Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.5 MAD 99-1 Levy Assessment ':' CITY CLERK File # 5GQ - zn • AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 3, 1999 SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Formation of Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District 99-1 (Dublin Ranch) and Levy of Assessments Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution Ordering Improvements and Formation of the District, Approving the Final Engineer's Report, and Confirming the Assessment and Diagram 2) Engineer's Report and Diagram RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open Public Hearing 2) Receive Staff presentation and public testimony 3) Question Staff and the public 4) Close Public Hearing and deliberate 5) Adopt resolution FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 is $19,590, or $23.12 per single family lot. The proposed assessment for the ultimate improvements for Phase I of Dublin Ranch is $28,450, or $33.59 per single family lot(subject to inflationary and utility rate increases). Please • see Preliminary Engineer's Report (Attachment 2) for further information regarding calculation of the proposed assessment. DESCRIPTION: On June 1, 1999, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to form Street Light Maintenance Assessment District 99-1 (Dublin Ranch). This is the second of two public hearings regarding this proposed assessment district. Background: At the March 16, 1999, meeting, the City Council received a petition requesting formation of Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District 99-1 (Dublin Ranch). This assessment district would fund the electric energy, maintenance, and repair costs associated with the decorative street lighting that is to be installed in the Dublin Ranch development. The City Council previously reviewed the decorative light that was proposed for the Dublin Ranch development, including estimated costs for energy and maintenance. The energy and maintenance costs for these lights are anticipated to be proportionally higher than the energy and maintenance costs for the standard"cobra head" street lights in the rest of the City. The assessment per single family lot for the Citywide Street Lighting Maintenance District has been $13.26 for the past several years and is anticipated to remain the same for 1999-2000. Therefore, Staff has recommended that a separate street lighting maintenance district be established for Dublin Ranch. COPIES TO: Property Owners ITEM NO. 6,7 g:\assessdist\99-1\agstlevyl Formation of Assessment District: The formation of an assessment district under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires the following actions: 1) Adoption of a resolution initiating proceedings. The City Council adopted Resolution 37-99 at the March 16, 1999 meeting. 2) Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Report. The City Council adopted Resolution 98-99 at the June 1, 1999, meeting. 3) Adoption of a Resolution of Intention The City Council adopted Resolution 99-99 at the June 1, 1999, meeting. 4) Adoption of a Resolution Ordering the Improvements and Formation of the District, Approving the Final Engineer's Report, and Confirming the Assessment and Diagram. This resolution can be adopted following 45 days'notice to the property owners and a public meeting and public hearing. The public meeting was held on July 20rh; the public hearing is this current(August 3rd) item. Engineer's Report and Calculation of Proposed Assessment: The Preliminary Engineer's Report (Attachment 2) identifies both a proposed assessment for the upcoming fiscal year and an anticipated ultimate assessment when Phase I of Dublin Ranch has been constructed. Under the provisions of this report, the ultimate assessment may be increased in accordance with actual increases in energy cost and according to the Consumer Price Index for all other costs. The assessment for 1999-2000 per single family home or townhouse lot is proposed to be $23.12. The ultimate assessment at Phase I buildout is anticipated to be $33.59 per single family home or townhouse lot, subject to energy and inflationary increases as noted above. At the time that the City Council originally reviewed the proposed decorative light, the per-lot estimated assessment was in the range of$20.00. The factors which have changed in the interim are as follows: 1) The initial estimate was based on the use of High Pressure Sodium(HPS) lighting, as there was not an existing rate for Metal Halide. The developers prefer the Metal Halide lighting, and a rate has now been obtained through PG&E which is approximately 60 per light per month higher than the rate for BPS. In addition, the rated life of a Metal Halide bulb is only about 60% as long as the rated life of a High Pressure Sodium bulb, causing a higher maintenance cost. The effect of the use of Metal Halide on the assessment per lot is about $2.13 higher than High Pressure Sodium for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, and about$3.10 higher for the ultimate improvement. 2) The total number of lights in Dublin Ranch Phase I was greatly underestimated in the original report. The developers had estimated that the total number of lights in Phase I would be about 260. Now that the subdivisions are being laid out, it appears that the total number of lights in Phase I will be 349. It is expected that the remainder of the Dublin Ranch Development (the Lin property) will be annexed to this District at a later date. At that time, the method of spread to be applied to commercial and multiple residential properties will be determined. PauP.7 Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, deliberate, and adopt the Resolution Ordering Improvements and Formation of the District, Approving the Final Engineer's Report, and Confirming the Assessment and Diagram. • • Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. - 99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RESOLUTION CONFIRMING REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, AND LEVYING FIRST ANNUAL ASSESSMENT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH) The City Council of the City of Dublin resolves: This City Council has taken a series of actions preliminary to ordering the improvement in Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 99-1 (Dublin Ranch) and now makes the following findings and orders: 1. The City Council adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the improvement described therein under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and directed the City Engineer, as Engineer of Work for the assessment district, to prepare the report required by Section 22565, and following, of the Streets and Highways Code. The improvement is generally described as follows: The maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of all public street lighting facilities located within the public streets and within public easements within private streets within the District Boundaries, as shown on the approved improvement plans for the following Tracts: Final Maps 6925 and 6956 through 6964, including, but not limited to, the lighting poles, fixtures, conduits, conductors, service boxes, controllers, and appurtenances, and the furnishing of power, together with all incidental expenses for the - maintenance, operation, and repair of the street lighting system. 2. The Engineer of Work filed the report as directed, and the City Council adopted its Resolution of Intention calling a hearing on the report as required by Section 22587 of the Streets and Highways Code. Notice of the hearing was given by publication and by mailing to affected property owners, all according to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Affidavits of publication and mailing were filed with the City Clerk. 3. At the time and place for which notice was given, the City Council conducted a public hearing and gave every interested person an opportunity to object to the proposed improvement, the extent of the assessment district, or the proposed assessment. 4. The City Council finds that written protests against the proposed improvement have not been made by owners representing more than one half of the area of the land to be assessed for the improvement. 1 , T A:.,n H M E N C •� 5. The documents and events described in Paragraphs 1 to 4, inclusive, are stated herein tabular form, with their dates and, where appropriate, their numbers. All documents are now on file with the City Clerk. Document or Event Date Number a. Resolution Initiating Proceedings 3/16/99 37-99 b. Filing of Engineer's Report 5/26/99 N/A c. Resolution Preliminarily Approving Engineer's Report 6/1/99 98-99 c. Resolution of Intention- 6/1/99 99-99 d. Certificate of Mailing Notice 6/16/99 N/A . e. Affidavit of Publication of Notice 6/19 &26/99 N/A 7/20& f. Public hearings to be conducted 8/3/99 TBD 6. The City Council approves the Engineer's Report-and each component part of it, including - each exhibit incorporated by reference in the report. 7. The City Council finds that the Engineer of Work, in the Engineer's Report has fairly and properly apportioned the cost of the improvement to each parcel of land in the assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each parcel, respectively, from the improvement. The City Council hereby confirms and levies each individual assessment as stated in the Engineer's Report. 8. The City Council orders the improvement described in Paragraph 1 and as detailed in the Engineer's Report. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of August, 1999. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 2 <-iof DU�� G� - f�` 19 � _ —Oils 82 ///( "<:>j- e`ILIFolz ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA) (PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972) THE UNDERSIGNED RESPECTFULLY SUBMITS THE ENCLOSED REPORT AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL DATED: , /x 2/ / c`t " ENGINEER OF WORK, BY: Ni. --c. 0 / \------/ -!'JTTAC - ME -- V 42— ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA) Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 LEE THOMPSON, City Engineer of the City of Dublin and Engineer of Work for Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 99-1 (Dublin Ranch Area), City of Dublin, Alameda County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). The total assessment district area is 225.5 acres as shown in Part A (the Assessment Diagram and Boundaries Map) of this report. The "ultimate improvements" consist of: The maintenance, operation, repair and replacement of all public street lighting facilities located within the public streets and within public easements within private streets within the District Boundaries, as shown on the approved improvement plans for the following Tracts: Final Maps 6925 and 6956 through 6964, including, but not limited to, the lighting poles, fixtures, conduits, conductors, service boxes, controllers, and appurtenances, and the furnishing of power, together with all incidental expenses for the maintenance, operation, and repair of the street lighting system. This report consists of five parts as follows: Part A- An Assessment Diagram and Boundaries Map showing all of the real property within the Assessment District. Part B - An estimate of the annual maintenance costs for the planned "ultimate improvements" to be maintained. Part C - An Assessment Roll detailing the estimated cost of the maintenance on each residential parcel within the Assessment District. Part D - A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel. Part E - A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this Assessment District, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk. This District is being established to pay for maintenance, operation, and repair of the proposed street light fixtures, which differ from the City Standard. A special light fixture has been proposed to create a community element which is a benefit to the future homeowners within the proposed District boundary. Respectfully submitted, t (S. Thomps6n, ngineer bf Work PART A ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND BOUNDARIES MAP STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA) SEE REDUCED COPY ON FOLLOWING PAGE .if N8e35•44'w 1955.00'BN01'. N1725'52'11'66.00'BNOT. . �"�. N_:D620'E 31.1r MY. • f w I y �, R S "°` E7 PIrtLNRA TR E°P>] 7...i .:. . :ir rirtii LEWIS R•235' 1 IiR. E9E2I K."� Q� 15=•••35.11- ( ..R a 1+145.96'BRD7. •• S L c I E NORTH .. i......., � ry 1 S1 e=25'1755 N L•121.63'BATE. • t.21 49'40'w 595.60'81 1. • o_ CITTDF jI:: PlF ASANIDN • r 8.315'b.31'4617 1-174.67 BNDT. I R.210 b•8652'ST L•315.43'BATE. N1J".T47 tR 4.4-S..3 .•.''' R.355'b.34•4319 L.221.16 BATE. A7S05'0-'L '7.�in_o•, "Iaro.I„ NiS:J'OSW:06.17 BATE. .5:.26 HATE. _ .-' - ;••,,.1.,j ,A"iv R.235'bo_54'57 L•22t.1e BAT! . ..� .° .I, �,Ana. A^�74.1FF ,'nI QL.im"'�'" , . 1„I.I..1.1n1N1v•'1N IJOSDE'D,'L 64.65'BATE. 785.02'B.'.7(. --.A--.. '' • : .. .. ' a ° °∎+ I I Illt;:,,,2,24.9 . �./ =775 , 4 A , ° �s 4 y�> %%.I,I�I'-.I se , ..OI� ai a. I 1 r VI b=17151( •L•3175 BATE.�\• �� N i �� ' v p1: .FS--T.rRI O� O©�„ (VID it , , tF1 n 15.1715'1! -- f r`y:1- '1'' . II.. 69581 QO ■ ° s 8.19.54' L•2E50'BATY •.1•. tat��OIL �4 O b=16:.36 BAY. ITN. E9E5 1+ • ° 0 1 A��24,5E .22_ e o0 00 .) j 4 E9:ST HATE. O 0 a ITR 6901 AT.••463rE I�Ti 1 t'N I"'I“1'1'NOOOOO - • Q �D� O 19:27 BIO'E. t 1• °7- - 0 ' 1 ; ..I.I I N n ® ��_ O ..u "®___�Iool .1.2<•1FF v��OO OO® 155.D7 Mt I ,°-',<F , •P f-^ \NR:46'05 S1J0'RV:. NAIR TR E°� O D•:_iS:S uu. - NrJ:•JEexI- .1D. ..tea..e ii O n O- j. .1.-- I , "MS LAM, N3S54•35E(R) 190.00'BATE. L=30.49 war. =� V_iw ti c �o 6 09'42.7 NS?53'07'M'IS55J0'BOY. R=10.5 J/�-p m L•11817 KATY. 6•:_.3'22- J „,..._,.....:,....2......,...„...---1.. :' ."k‘'''''.--7 T - N:5'26'40'w 22E29'BOY. �NH_'S3'25 E 270.00'BOY. 1=29.07'BATE. .+N N8..43'&w NSS33.17w 16E21'EOM �. r, 264.U'BAT.".-NO:'1J97E �yt 1,o+ NUMBER NUMBER OF LIGHTS .67871'BATE.-' _ �••• R.730' 6.�Dp3y TRACT I I OF UNITS PHASE 1 I BUILDOUT � Z-sue y -• =, 1.281.04'BNDL 6925 0 ES fa, 68E41 '''.•••2 a- ••• •• 56r0621'w , 05 I _ �N" "'� E957 69 17 17 ti„ Ilex :^= 75.12'BAT[. � ^`l' w=P.m..°,° on 6058 85 28 31 A„:05'4.7E I.I,®'"' - o$ - 6960 113 39 39 2923:BOY.--; ." .„.,•+ =' -e R.616 6962 711 40 40 I ....,.,^.•••;.. `15.0:'30'77 }+••,_••...y.�..,.,N L=21.41'BOY.. 6963 45 20 2D :s1J_-7,:E / 6954 123 31 31 527-61'EA:.. 6956 (F1JTUR`) 92 31 6959 (FUTURE)E) 91 36 6961 (FUME) 117 37 TOTALS. 647 24D 349 FT3x P 7:_DYF Dr'BC COUNTY AN ART ENT WAS LEVa BY DE A.!•J^9.G"TI=I`I.'T D' OTT COMM.OF TFE Ott DF A_AV A,SMATO G CALIFORNU, DUBJN.CALIFORNIA.DR 1016. 510-DAY PLECE9,AND PAR TLS R"ON T LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 OF SHOW ON 1N5 CAMAY ON THE (DUBLIN RANCH AREA) DAY OF BY ITS R.ESDLUBON ND. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 - ,,;.JA:. Jl:.a^.✓r TRACT 6956 THROUGH TRACT 69E3 A;.A1..-9.=JIM',CAJFORNIA . CITY OF DUBLIN FI- l IN 2 pm= y TIE CLERK .Ott CERN Cp.1p,�Y, G�,FDRNLI 0=TF C:T•CF:LEA CALIFORNIA, Ott CF OLPJH T!"2-_DAY Cr COUNTY C:ALFDRNA `CK�Y a 50 fPS SIAr o-CALIF DRNIA R LfaYilriti \�//l MI cm.EN:MEER.N:..LANO N°;+.:f'.T SURVEn.:O S•.E M.O..OR.PLIw..r0.D.NW 1924 SL`-0697 Ott 1TRK MAY 26, 1999 Ott ff DFJN CIKH:^.•5 A;.AJIZDA STATC 5✓:FDPJ7A 9 46. PART B AN ESTIMATE OF THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST OF THE ULTIMATE STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA) Fiscal Year 1999-2000 street lights to be installed=240 Total street lights estimated to be installed= 349 (ultimate improvements) Fiscal Year 1999-2000 ENERGY COST $2.305 per light per month x 12 mo.x 240 lights $6,640.00 STANDARD MAINTENANCE (BULB CHANGES) $18.40 material cost, plus$29.00 labor cost per bulb change=$47.40 $3,790.00 x 240 lights+3 year interval OTHER MAINTENANCE (Starter, ballast, photocell) Estimated 6 occurrences per year x$58.09 cost $350.00 ACCIDENTS AND OTHER MAJOR REPAIRS Estimated 2 per year @$2,000 each. $4,000.00 RESERVE FOR POLE PAINTING $115 each x 240 lights=10 year interval $2,760.00 ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS Engineer's Report$600 Annual Administrative Cost$400 $1,130.00 CAL-SLA Dues and Conference$130 Subtotal $18,670.00 COUNTY COST OF COLLECTION AND DELINQUENCY Cost of collection @ 1.7% $920.00 Estimated delinquency @ 3% TOTAL FY 1999-2000 ASSESSMENT $19,590.00 Ultimate Improvements ENERGY COST $2.305 per light per month x 12 mo.x 349 lights $9,655.00 STANDARD MAINTENANCE-(BULB CHANGES) $18.40 material cost, plus$29.00 labor cost per bulb change=$47.40 $5,515.00 x 349 lights_3 year interval OTHER MAINTENANCE Estimated 9 occurrences per year x$58.09 cost $525.00 ACCIDENTS AND OTHER MAJOR REPAIRS Estimated 3 per year @$2,000 each. $6,000.00 RESERVE FOR POLE PAINTING $115 each x 349:fights=10 year interval $4,015.00 ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS Engineer's Report$700 Annual Administrative Cost$570 $1 400.00 CAL-SLA Dues and Conference$130 Subtotal $27,110.00 COUNTY COST OF COLLECTION AND DELINQUENCY Cost of collection @ 1.7% $1.340.00 Estimated delinquency @ 3% TOTAL ULTIMATE ASSESSMENT $28,450.00 Subject to annual inflationary increases as noted below. $ pia-- Part B continued In addition to the increase in the annual maintenance cost as a result of additional lights (i.e., from 240 lights to the ultimate improvements consisting of 349 lights), the annual maintenance cost shall be increased annually beginning July 1, 2000, by the percentage increase in the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Consumer Price Index("Index") (applies to all costs except electricity), plus any actual increase in the cost of electricity. If the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Consumer Price Index is unavailable or deemed by the City Council to be inappropriate, a comparable consumer price index, as approved by the City Council, shall be used to replace the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Price Index. Example: Assume an increase in the index of 1% and a utility increase of 5%. ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENT COST $27,110 LESS ENERGY COST (SUBJECT TO RATE INCREASE ONLY) $(9,655) ASSESSMENT SUBJECT TO INDEX INCREASE $17,455 INDEX INCREASE (ASSUMED 1%) 17,455x.01 =175 $175 ENERGY COST $9,655 5% UTILITY RATE INCREASE 9,655x.05=483 $483 NEW TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST $27,768 • i• PART C • • ASSESSMENT ROLL STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 Assessment No. Name of Property Number Annual Assessment Owner of Lots Fiscal Year 1999-2000 Ultimate Improvements Per Lot Total Per Lot Total* Lots 1-69 MSSH Mayfield LLC Tract 6957 69 $23.12 $1,595.28 $33.59 $2,317.70 Lots 1-86 MSSH Mayfield LLC Tract 6958 86 $23.12 $1,988.32 $33.59 $2,888.74 Lots 1-45 Standard Pacific Tract 6963 Corp. 45 $23.12 $1,040.40 $33.59 $1,511.56 Lots 1-113 Centex Homes Tract 6960 113 $23.12 $2,612.56 $33.59 $3,795.68 Lots 114-116 of First American Title Tract 6960 Corp. 300 $23.12 $6,936.00 $33.59 $10,077.00 Future Tracts 6956, 6959, 6961 Lots 1-111 Standard Pacific Tract 6962 Corp. 111 $23.12 $2,566.32 $33.59 $3,728.50 Lots 1-123 Standard Pacific Tract 6964 Corp. 123 $23.12 $2,843.76 $33.59 $4,131.58 TOTAL: 847 $19,582.64 $28,450.76 *Subject to increases in index and actual utility cost. PART D METHOD OF SPREAD OF ASSESSMENTS STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA) The maintenance of the street lighting within the boundaries of the Assessment District benefits each residential lot in the District in the same manner and to the same extent. Therefore, the Assessment has been equally apportioned over the proposed 847 planned single-family residential lots contained within the District. The per lot assessment will be $23.12 per lot for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, increasing to $33.59 (subject to inflation and utility rate increases) at buildout for all residential lots within the boundaries of the District on a per lot basis. All non- residential lots within the District have been excepted and will have a zero assessment since they receive no special benefit with regard to the special light-fixture proposed. The following Lots 114, 115, and 116 of Tract 6960 will be subdivided at a later date. The projected lot counts are: Tract 6960 Lot 114 - 92 lots (future Tract 6956) Lot 115 - 91 lots (future Tract 6959) Lot 116 - 117 lots (future Tract 6961) Until they are subdivided, the assessment for these lots shall be equal to the per-lot assessment each year times the number of proposed lots within.each Tract listed above. With the recording of the future Tract maps, the new assessments will be reapportioned to each of the individual residential lots. ' As more street lights are installed each year, until all 349 are installed, the assessment each year will be based on the estimated cost of maintenance (using the numbers in Part B, adjusted for inflation as noted in Part B), divided by the number of lights to be installed that year, provided in no event will the per lot assessment be more than $33.59 (as adjusted for inflation). It should be noted that future annexations to this District may affect the spread of assessments. PART E PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA) Assessment No. Name of Property Owner Lots 1-69 MSSH Mayfield, LLC Tract 6957 25 Metro Drive Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95110 Lots 1-86 MSSH Mayfield, LLC Tract 6958 25 Metro Drive Suite 300 San Jose, CA 95110 Lots 1-45 Standard Pacific Tract 6963 3825 Hopyard Road Suite 195 Pleasanton CA 94588 Lots 1-113 Centex Homes Tract 6960 1855 Gateway Blvd. Suite 650 Concord CA 94520 Lots 114-116 of Tract 6960 First American Title Co. Future Tracts (Under Holding Agreement) 6956, 6959, and 6961 6681 Owens Drive Pleasanton CA 94588 Lots 1-111 Standard Pacific Tract 6962 3825 Hopyard Road Suite 195 Pleasanton CA 94588 Lots 1-123 Standard Pacific Tract 6964 3825 Hopyard Road Suite 195 Pleasanton CA 94588 The above property owners and the City of Pleasanton and Dublin San Ramon Services District own additional non-residential properties such as community-owned open space parcels, proposed public facilities, and community owned recreation parcels, within the proposed Assessment District No. 99-1 boundaries, but they will have a zero assessment. • J 2 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (DUBLIN RANCH AREA) CERTIFICATES I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in Part B, with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on May 26, 1999. 1 •U. i I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the'oregoing Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment and diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. 98-99, duly adopted by said Council on June 1, 1999 . V I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that e foregoing Engineer's' Report, together with the Assessment and diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. -99, duly adopted by said -- Council on August 3, 1999. I, the City Clerk of the City.of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment and diagram thereto attached, was filed in the office of the County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California, on *' , 1999. • •