Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7.2 DublinSwimCtrPlan CITY CLERK File # Dm1[Q]-(3j~ . AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 5,1998 SUBJECT: Dublin Swim Center Master Plan Study Report by: Diane Lowart, Parks & Community Services Director EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Pool Study RECOMMENDATION: 1. Accept Dublin Swim Center Master Plan Study 2. Direct Staff to evaluate the availability offunding for the /7 II d proposed improvements in the 1998-2003 CIP 'Il/V..... . 3. Authorize Staff to secure architectural services for the ^' preparation of construction documents for the Dublin Swim '" · Center Deck Replacement only. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: . The total costs associated with the improvements identified in the Dublin Swim Center Master Plan range from $660,430 to $726,344. Funds are currently not available to complete the improvements as proposed. . The estimated cost of replacing the deck only ranges from $349,762 to $415,676. There is an available balance of$11,580 for this project in the FY 1997-98 budget. A budget change will be necessary to proceed with the preparation of construction documents. The budget change will accompany the architectural services agreement which will be brought before the City Council at a subsequent meeting. . DESCRIPTION: At the November 4, 1997 meeting of the Dublin City Council, the Council approved an agreement with Water Technology, Inc. (WTI) for consultant services to perform an evaluation of the Dublin Swim Center. In addition to the evaluation, WTI was to provide suggested upgrades to the facility that would: 1) e},.'tend the life of the facility; 2) improve usability of the facility; and 3) provide additional features to the facility. Water Technology, Inc. has completed their work and their fmdings and recommendations are detailed in the attached Pool Study. The study is divided into four sections: Section 1, Introduction & Scope; Section 2, Observations; Section 3, Recommended Upgrades; and Section 4, Estimate of Probable Construction Cost. Staff has prepared a summary of the Pool Study for the City Council which is discussed on the following pages. . --------------------------------------------------------------~---- COPIES TO: Water Technology, Inc. ITEM NO. r.~ C:\capJjcts\dscdeck\cc55mp.doc EVALUATION OF FACILITY The Site , The site is well located and is well maintained. The general feel inside the grounds is comfortable and inviting. The pool appears to be very actively used by the public, however, age has left portions of the facility in need of a facelift. . Pool Tank The pool tank in general appears to be in excellent condition. The interior fiberglass coating is in good condition with the exception of areas where bubbling has occurred. The bubbling and de-lamination in localized areas is not uncommon in fiberglass coatings. The resolution is to repair localized areas as necessary on an as needed basis. Gutter System. Pool Inlets. Hydrostatic Relief Valves The gutter system is in serviceable condition and should require no major repair other than nonnal maintenance. The pool inlets are intact and also require only normal maintenance. The hydrostatic relief valves should be replaced every two to three years or whenever the pool is drained. Deck Equipment The diving towers are in marginal condition. The 1m (one meter) diving board should be replaced and the 3m (three meter) diving tower should be removed for safety reasons. Starting blocks should be omitted, again for safety reasons, except for two 18" high units at the 5' -0" depth. The stainless steel grab rails are in good condition. The in-wall steps and in-wall lane anchors are in good condition and should be checked on a routine basis and repaired as necessary. Deck Areas Due to the excessive cracking on the deck, there appears to be a sub-surface drainage problem that should be corrected. It is recommended that the deck be removed in it's entirety and an investigation of the sub- surface condition to provide under-deck drainage. New coping and tile should be provided for if the decke is removed. Also, while the deck is removed, consideration should be made to review the pool lighting connections and underground conduit. The current lifeguard stands are in need of repair and, in one case replacement. It is recommended that the existing stands be removed and replaced with moveable stainless steel stands. Piping- and Recirculation These systems are very important to the operation of the pool. Pressure testing on the piping was not a part of the study, however, piping in expansive soils and of pools of this age can become a leakage problem. If the deck is removed, it is recommended that a complete pressure test of the piping system be completed. Pool Filtration The pool filtration system and the pump system are in good condition. A fiberglass coating should be applied to the interior of the filter tank and, at that time, a cursory check of all anchors and support brackets in the tank should be inspected. Pool Heating- System The existing pool heating system is inefficient and, due to age, is in need of ongoing repairs. Removal and installation of a new, hi-efficiency natural gas heating system is recommended. The solar heating system is serviceable and should be inspected and panels replaced on an as needed basis. Chemical Control System . The present system (Chemtrol) is relatively new and is good condition. The disinfection system is currently a calcium hypochlorite system - Olin Pulsar. Consideration should be given to converting to a -2- liquid cWorine system as it is probable that significant chemical cost savings could be achieved for a . minor' investment. . Buildings The buildings (with the exception of the storage space) are in excellent condition. Recommendations for minor improvements would be to install new toilet partitions and new counters. The storage space is in need of refurbishment and should be expanded to provide storage for pool equipment as well as proper and safe storage of pool supplies and chemicals. Finally, painting of the exterior building and replacement of the fencing adjacent to the building and around the perimeter of the site would complete the "facelift" of the pool facility. RECOMMENDED UPGRADES TO THE FACILITY Based upon their evaluation of the Dublin Swim Center, WTI has prepared a number of recommendations which are discussed in detail below. . Replace Pool Deck This project would provide for the demolition and replacement of the current deck including the replacement of pool piping and pool lighting upgrade. As noted previously, since the deck is going to be removed, the pool piping should be pressure tested and the conduit to the pool lights checked, both of which will be exposed by the deck removal. If it is determined that the piping and pool lighting are not in need of replacement, then the project cost will be reduced. The estimated cost for replacement of the deck, pool piping and pool lighting upgrade is $349, 762. It is also recommended to increase the pool deck to include a new picnic area and increased deck space to accommodate bleachers and provide more on-deck storage space. The City recently received funds from the Alameda County Recycling Board (Measure D) in order to purchase new park furniture made from recycled products. This money will be used to install new picnic tables, park benches, as well as trash and recycling receptacles at the Dublin Swim Center. Although the picnic tables could be installed on the grass, it would be preferable to expand the deck to create a picnic area for the tables. The additional cost to increase the size of the pool deck is $65,914. Thus, the estimated cost for the project ranges from $349,762 to $415,676. The current available budget for this project in the 1996- 2001 Capital Improvement Program is $158,420. This results in a budget shortfall for the project rangingfrom $191,342 to $257,256. ' Replace Perimeter Fencing and Paint Exterior This project would provide for the replacement of the perimeter fencing, storage area fencing, and new paint for the remainder of the exterior of the facility. The fencing that borders Village Parkway is approximately 40% chain link and 60% wood fencing. Because most of the wood fencing is unserviceable, all of the fencing along Village Parkway would be replaced with wrought iron fencing. Additionally the fence line would be moved closer to Village Parkway which would provide additional space within the facility and provide greater visibility from the street to help prevent vandalism. The aging chain link fencing along the back side of the facility would also be replaced with a taller chain link fence to match the fence bordering the north side of the facility and to reduce the number of "fence jumpers". This project is currently included in the 1996-2001 Capital Improvements Program with a budget of $56,800 (FY 1998-99). . Replacement of Pool Heater The current pool heater is the original boiler and is over 24 years old. Due to the age of the heater it has become less efficient and is a constant repair problem. The City has spent over $5,900 over the past three -3- . . . years repairing the heater. This project provides for the replacement of the existing boiler with four Hi- Effkiency Heaters. These heaters are 97% efficient. It is estimated that the current boiler is only 60% efficient. By installing these heaters it is estimated that the City will save over $6,000 annually in gas and repair costs. Another advantage to installing four smaller heaters, rather than one large boiler, is that if one heater goes out the other three can continue to heat the pool. The estimated cost of the heaters is $40,000 if they are installed as part of the renovation to the mechanical building and storage area (see next project). If they are installed as a separate project, the cost increases to $55,000. This is due to the modifications that are necessary to the building to remove the current boiler and install the new heaters. This project is currently included in the 1996-2001 Capital Improvements Program with a budget of $42,250 (FY 2000-01). Improvements to Mechanical Building and Storage Area This project would provide for the installation of new roofing over the storage area and mechanical building. The current "roof' over the filter pit and storage area consists of chain link fencing and tarps. As this is the area where pool chemicals and pool equipment is stored, installation of a new roof would provide protection from the elements and the sun. UV rays put extra wear on the equipment and reduce the effectiveness of the chemicals. The new roof will provide proper and safe storage of pool supplies and chemicals, as well as improve the aesthetics of the facility. It should be noted that the roof on the mechanical building will need to be replaced when the new heaters are installed. The current boiler has two large ventilation stacks going through the roof. The new heaters will have small 4" PVC vents that can be built into the new roof. At the same time that the roof is installed, it is reconunended that the storage area be expanded which could be accomplished by extending the front of the facility out by ten feet. This would result in an additional 850 sq. ft of much needed storage space in the filter pit area. The estimated costfor improvements to the mechanical building and storage area is $147,468. Resurface Walls io Filter Pit The surface walls in the filter pit are crumbling and it is recommended that the plaster be replaced with a new fiberglass coating. This will extend the life of the gunite in the pit and reduce the risk of a water leak. The estimated cost for this project is $6,400. Iostallation of Drop Slides The installation of two drop slides would provide a replacement attraction for the 3-meter diving board and enhance the revenue at the Swim Center. In the past five years two public pools in the Tri- Valley area have installed slides at their pools. Throughout the Bay Area many other municipal pools have also installed slides. All the agencies that have installed slides experienced an increase in attendance (18%- 48%). Attendance at the Dublin Swim Center declined by 19% in the past year. The drop slides would be a unique attraction in the Tri-Valley, and have a positive impact on the revenue generated at the pool. It is estimated that a 25% increase in attendance would generate an additional $8,000 in revenue annually. The estimated cost for installation of two drop slides is $60,000. CONCLUSION The Dublin Swim Center is in relatively good condition for a facility that is 24 years old. The consultant has made recommendations for several structural and aesthetic improvements needed at the Swim Center. The recommendations thorougWy address the known repair items, and any possible repairs that may be hidden under the pool deck. They also address the improvements and recreational attractions that are desirable and could result in increased attendance and enhanced revenue. The reconunended ~4- improvements could be completed as one project or broken into smaller phases. As noted by the consultant there is a potential for significant cost savings by completing the project in one phase.. With the exception of the pool deck replacement, Staff would recommend that no action be taken at this time on the proposed improvements to the Dublin Swim Center. Instead, Staff would recommend that 1lA improvements be evaluated as part of the 1998-2003 Capital Improvement Program which is now bein~ developed by Staff and will be presented to the City Council in June, 1998. Replacement of the pool deck is a high priority as the deteriorating condition of the deck is creating a safety hazard at the Swim Center. Further, there is a limited "window of opportunity" with which to complete the deck project without disrupting the operation of the pool. The current timeline for the deck replacement project is as follows: June/July August September Development of construction documents Bidding of project Bid award/Project begins If the project is deferred until after the adoption of new Capital Improvement Program, the project will either need to be delayed for an additional year or will most likely have an impact on use of the pool by the Dublin High School Swim Team next year. There is an available balance of $11,580 for the Dublin Swim Center Deck Replacement project in the Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget. These funds were intended to be used for design of the deck project. Staff would recommend that an architect be retained to fmalize the design of the deck improvements and to prepare construction documents. However, it is anticipated that a budget change will be necessary in order to enter into an agreement for architectural services. The budget change will be brought before the City Council along with the consultant services agreement. By proceeding with design and constructiOIA documents now, this will provide the option of moving forward with the deck replacement in Fiscal YeJl' 1998-99 if it is determined that funds are available. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action: 1) accept the Dublin Swim Center Master Plan Study; 2) direct Staff to evaluate the availability of funding for the proposed improvements in the 1998-2003 CIP; and 3) authorize Staff to secure architectural services for the preparation of construction documents for the Dublin Swim Center Deck replacement only. . -5- .- .' POOL STUDY Dublin Swim Center Dublin, California WTt PROJECT #97049.0 April 6, 1 998 Vvater Technology, Inc. _ P.O. Box 614 1 00 Park Avenue Beaver Dam, WI 53916 W20} 887-7375 (920) 887-7999 FAX -y~'" !.$~'J1'*;J<Jff" A'-' ~ r"l" '-'''''I\. .. INDEX SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION & SCOPE. SECTION 2 OBSERVATIONS SECTION 3 RECOMMENDED UPGRADES TO THE EXISTING FACILITY APPENDIX ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST CONCEPTUAL SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN . . . . . . INTRODUCTION Water Technology Inc. has been hired by the City of Dublin to perform an evaluation of the existing Dublin Swim Center. In addition to this evaluation, WTI will provide suggested upgrades to the facility that will: . Extend The Life Of The Facility . Improve Usability . Provide Additional Features The evaluation of the existing faci!!ty ::;hall include the following: 1) . EXISTING POOL EVALUATION . Investigate the condition of the existing pools to include: Pool tank condition of the fiberglass shell, specifically determine the cause of the bubbling of the fiberglass expansion seams hydrostatic relief valves inlets gutters diving boards starting block anchors lane hooks ladders Deck areas drainage problems cracking and rust problems tiles coping signage anchors lifeguard stands 2 storage space lighting electrical source Piping and recirculation system Examine the condition of the mechanical and electrical systems with regard to present adequacy and future use. This will include: Filtration system Pool heating natural gas heater solar heating system condition and efficiency replacement schedule Chemical feed and control systems Circulation system turnover rate surface collection system pipes flow meters pump and pump efficiency Power requirements and lighting Provide a cursory examination of the condition of all buildings including: Interior/exterior walls Roof Floors Locker rooms/office space Storage space . Examine the existing pools and changing facilities with regard to compliance with ADA guidelines, state of California health code requirements, and general safety standards. . . . . .. 3 . . . OBSERVATIONS On December 10, 1997 & March 10, 1998, representatives of WTI and the City of Dublin met on the site to review the existing facility. A physical review was performed and information was gathered from Paul McCreary, Recreation Coordinator, as to the proposed future use of the Dublin Swim Center. THE SITE The pool is located in an urban residential setting adjacent to the Dublin High School. The park is a small development site with vegetation and mature trees. It appears to be very actively used by the public. The overall maintenance appears excellent. Circulation for the park facility for both vehicles and pedestrians is good. The general feel inside the park is very comfortable and inviting. The location of the pool within this facility is desirable due to the fact that it provides is in a central location, which has proven to be very well accepted by the public. The interior pool area is pleasant. It contains green space, berms, and mature vegetation which is exceptional. These are very desirable features and are being included in today's new facility designs. Maintenance appears to be excellent. Age, however, has left portions of the facility in need of a facelift. POOL TANK The pool tank in general appears to be in excellent condition and quite serviceable. The interior fiberglass coating is in good condition with the exception of areas where bubbling has occurred. The bubbling and or de-Iamitation in localized areas is not uncommon in fiberglass coatings. The cause is generally a combination of surface adherence or moisture content in the concrete material. 4 The resolution is to repair localized areas as necessary along with the expansion seams on an as needed basis. If the fiberglass becomes de-laminated over 50% of the pool, for example, then more drastic action is required. This facility, however, is not in that condition at present time. . GUTTER SYSTEM, POOL INLETS, HYDROSTATIC RELIEF VALVES The gutter system is also in serviceable condition and should require no major repair other than normal maintenance. Pool inlets are intact and also require only normal maintenance. The hydrostatic relief valves are always an issue on pools and in many cases, they leak and can become a nuisance. Whenever pools are constructed in areas of high ground water, they should be retained in the pool. WTI recommends replacement of the hydrostatic relief valve every two to three years or whenever pool draining occurs. DECK EQUIPMENT . The diving towers are in marginal condition. A 1 m diving board has been purchased and will be installed as part of the deck replacement project. As for the 3m tower, we recommend removal for safety reasons and the consideration of drop slides as an activity into the deep area. Starting Blocks should be omitted except for two 18" high units at the 5'-0" depth for practice use only. The stainless steel grab rails are in good condition. The in-wall steps should be checked on a routine basis to avoid any sharp or loose areas. In-wall lane anchors can be troublesome over a period of time. Our recommendation is to inspect the anchors and fiberglass for problems. Defective anchors should be replaced and repairs made to the fiberglass as necessary. . 5 . DECK AREAS On review of the deck areas, there definitely appears to be a sub-surface drainage problem which would account for the excessive cracking (there will always be some cracking), rust, and staining. WTI i8commends complete removal of the deck and an investigation of the sub-surface condition to provide under-deck drainage. New coping and tile should be provided for the pool if the deck is removed. A review of the proper depth markings would take place at this time. While the deck is removed, consideration should be made to review of the pool lighting connections and underground conduit. A further consideration should be made to the necessity of in-pool lighting. The current lifeguard stand are in need of repair and, in one case, replacement. The . existing stands will be adequate for this coming season, however, we alternatively recommend removal of the existing stands and the use of moveable, stainless steel stands. PIPING AND RECIRCULATION The piping and recirculation systems are obviously very important to the operation of a pool.' WTI has not performed any pressure tests on the piping nor is it part of the scope of this study. However, piping in expansive soils and of pools of this age can become a leakage problem. It is the recommendation of WTI that if the deck is removed, a complete pressure test of the piping system be completed. Money has been allocated in the budget, if required. for complete piping replacement. If the deck is removed, it would provide ideal time to do this replacement. . 6 POOL FILTRATION . The pool filtration system is in good condition and can be seNiceable for years to come. The pump system is also in good condition and appears to be in fine working order. This portion of the system does not require major refurbishment other than normal yearly maintenance. It is also our understanding that a flowmeter has been purchased and installed. For the interior of the filter tank, we have recommend a fiberglass coating be applied. At the time the coating is done, and the pool is empty, provide a cursory check of all anchors and support brackets in the tank. POOL HEATING SYSTEM The existing pool heating system is non-functional. We recommend the removal and installation of a new, hi-efficiency natural gas heating system which would also eliminate the large vent pipes on the existing heater. Present gas seNice is adequate. The solar heating system is certainly seNiceable; on systems of this type, panels are . replaced on an as needed basis. In some cases, the entire back support system are replaced on a cyclic basis. At a minimum, we would recommend painting the support structure and the wood deck. If an entire panel bank is replaced, it would be the time to evaluate the condition of the wood deck. CHEMICAL CONTROL SYSTEM The chemical control system (Chemtrol) is relatively new and is in good condition. The disinfection system is currently a calcium hypochlorite system- Olin Pulsar. By converting to a liquid chlorine system, it is probable that significant chemical cost savings can be achieved for a minor investment. An acid system is used for pH control. In the proposed new storage space we recommend the separation of the chlorine and the pH control systems. .. 7 . . . BUILDINGS The buildings (with the exception of the storage space) are in excellent condition. The roof structures appears to have many good years of life remaining. In the change rooms and locker areas, there is adequate room and the spaces are pleasant. It is our recommendation that the new partitions be installed to make the bathrooms accessible under ADA guidelines. Existing Fixture Inventory Toilets Urinals Lavatories Showers Men 3 2 3 6 Women 5 3 5 Fixture Requirement Comparison Per Proposed Code Section 9021 Note: All changes to the pool and facility are maintenance items. It has traditionally been shown that work of this nature has allowed facilities to be grandfathered into the existing code in terms of fixture requirements. The following tabl.e list how many fixtures are required per existing state health codes as compared to existing fixture counts. EXISTING FACILITY FIXTURE REQUIRMENTS Existing Existing Add!. Code Req'd 14 3 6 1 1. Showers 2. Toilets (women) (men) 3. Urinals (men) 4. Lavatories 11 5 3 2 5 5 2 3 6 9 3 This table assumes % men and % women in the calculations for toilets and urinals 8 . The office space is adequate for this type and size of facility. The entry area is functional, however, we may recommend the installation of new counters at some point in time. The storage space is the area that requires the most work and is an area that if refurbished, will provide good service and supply for years to come. We recommend the storage space be expanded with a roof system for security and weather protection. It will also provide proper and safe storage of pool supplies and chemicals. In general, the facility does well in ADA compliance. In the pool area we recommend the installation of a pool lift such as a Spectrum Swim Lift to comply with ADA requirements. In the building, there are four or five doorways that require widening to 36" in order to meet with ADA requirements. For compliance with California health code, the facility overall is in good condition. Areas not in compliance have been addressed in the above report. This information is based upon the information supplied by the owner and from site visits. No allowance for compliance with these codes is made for information not available at the time of this report. . RECOMMENDED UPGRADES TO THE FACILITY . The Priority Recommendation To The Facility In Terms Of Extending Life, Safety, And Improving Service To The Users In Increasing Visual Appeal Are As Follows: · Replace Pool Deck (With New Drainage) . Increase Deck In Critical Areas · Re-grade As Necessary · Improve Storage Areas .. 9 . . . . Expand New Concession And Party Area . Add 1-2 Drop Slides . New Perimeter Fencing (C.I.P.) . Paint Main Building (C.I.P.) . Modify Top Of Change Facility Building To Architecturally Improve Appearance. 10 DUBLIN SWIM CENTER Dublin, California Estimate of Probable Construction Cost: Total Project PRELIMINARY DRAFT March 20, 1998 I. General Conditions of Construction Temporary Facilities / Trash Utility Usage Permits & Fees Layout & Testing II. Site Work Development Demolition Existing Deck (sq. ft.) Pool Mechanical Building Excavation and Grading Site Grading I Shaping Site Drainage (allowance) Features Landscaping Seed Sod Plantings I Mulch Trees Low Retaining Walls Decks / Patios / Concrete Features Deck Concessions Patio Fencing Perimeter (separate CIP) Barriers Rope and Bollard Furnishings Lounge Chairs (separate) Tables (grant funding) Benches (grant funding) Shade Allowance III. Architectural Elements Pool Mechanical Sui/ding Renovation Roofs and Walls Electrical (panel upgrade & support) Plumbing (hose bibs, vacuum breaker) IV. Aquatic Elements Pool Renovation Piping Replacement (contingent) Pool Heaters Pool Lighting Upgrade V. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION Subtotal . Quantity Units Cost Extended SubTotal Total $6,300 1 $4,000 . 1 $300 . _" $0 . 1 $2,000 .'. 0' $181,604 $76,685 11,537 sq. ft. $5_ 1 $8,000 ., . . 1 $3,000 1 $8,000 $104,919 650 sq.yd $2 475 sq.yd $5 1 $2,500 . 1 $750 120 face s $20 17,019 sq. ft. $4 942 sq. ft. $4 250 /in. ft. $35_ .... $85,000 1 $60,000 ~ 1 $15,000 1 $10,000 $110,000 1 $60,000 . 5 $8,000 1 $10,000 $539,140 PB8 II . . . . Contingency - 15% General Contractor Mark-Up Bond Cost Development Risk Items (contingency) Poor site soils under deck (remove & replace) VI. ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING FEES I GEOTECHNICAL VII. TOTAL ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST VIII. OWNER PURCHASED EQUIPMENT Drop Slides $60,000 $599,140 2 Slides $30,000 "6.OIODO~ $60,000 IX. TOTAL ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST WITH OWNER PURCHASES /{)... $659,140 - - --"" ~ ~--~-------------~-------------~ -_............~------- -->, ...::::::.....- --- 1--- I I I .1 '1 .1 :1 'I f I 1 . I ! \ j 1 f I I I ! I I I 1 I I 1 I I I "I .1 I .1 I 1 :1 -I I I "' I I 1 I I I "" '-1 .:- . " -: t:::110"rINb I -fJ:N.:..~ I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I -I 1 CON C E P 1 DUBLIN SW'ri."" DUBUN, CAUFORNlA NO SCALI! -...- _ L "" tl.-', . I I i i I i I .1 I I I I I i I I I I i I j I i ! i I I I . .1 D+~ I ~ I , sg - DUBLIN SWIM CENTER Dublin, California Estimate of Probable Construction Cost: Phase I and II . PRELIMINARY DRAFT March 20, 1998 Phase I Phase II Option A Option B Option A I. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION $4,200 $4,200 $3,300 Temporary Facilities / Trash $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 Utility Usage $200 $200 $100 Permits & Fees $0 $0 $0 Layout & Testing $2,000 $2,000 $1 ,200 II. SITE WORK $127,135 $173,459 $1,600 Development Demolition Existing Deck (sq. ft.) $57,685 $57,865 Pool Mechanical Building Excavation and Grading Site Grading I Shaping $2,500 $3,000 Site Drainage (allowance) $8,000 $8,000 Features Landscaping Seed $975 $975 $600 Sod $2,375 $2,375 $1,000 . Plantings I Mulch $2,500 Trees $750 Low Retaining Walls $2,400 Decks / Patios / Concrete Features Deck $55,600 $68,076 Concessions Patio $3,768 Fencing Perimeter (separate CIP) Barriers Rope and Bollard $8,750 Furnishings Lounge Chairs (separate) Tables (grant funding) Benches (grant funding) Shade Allowance $15,000 III. ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS $85,000 Pool Mechanical Building Renovation $60,000 Roofs and Walls Electrical (panel upgrade & support) $15,000 Plumbing (hose bibs, vacuum breaker) $10,000 IV. AQUATIC ELEMENTS $70,000 $70,000 $40,000 Pool Renovation . Piping Rep43cement (contingent) $60,000 $60,000 Pool Heaters $40,000 Pool Lighting Upgrade $10,000 $10,000 v. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION $316,722 $376,480 $167,571 Subtotal $201,335 $247,659 $129,900 /1 Contingency ~ 15% $30,200 $37,149 "$19,485 General Contractor Mark~Up $30,160 $35,719 $15,588 Bond Cost $5,027 $5,953 $2,598 Development Risk Items (contingency) $50,000 $50,000 . Poor site soils under deck (remove & replace) VI. ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING FEES I GEOTECHNICA $33,000 $38,000 $28,000 VII. TOTAL ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST $349,722 $414,480 $195,571 VIII. OWNER PURCHASED EQUIPMENT Drop Slides $60,000 $60,000 IX. TOTAL PROBABLE COST WITH OWNER PURCHASES $409,722 $474,480 $195,571 . . 15 I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I __________________________~--~----------~-----------------~-.--~-~- 1 _______ \- ... ~-- ~. . . " " " .......: . ': " "~',' .~.;.. ;:.". ".:. . I~ . {\ -:L - u\ ~~ -;.;.. \.\ \11. 11- ! . . :. . \.9 - z C) - en ~_ W W"- Clft- Z ...IW c(U :)E i-~ C. ~ II( w i u Z f Z :; g Om z ::>>i U Cl & . I.... .