Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.1 TriVlyXingsRevSitePln " << CITY CLERK File # D[?l][Z][(i]-~~ . AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 26,1996 SUBJECT: Tri Valley Crossings (Santa Rita Commercial Center) Revised Site Plan REPORT PREPARED BY: Jeri Ram, Associate Planner oj- ~_..~_ - '. -_ -~"j I 'I ..:~..: "1'\!~11' .. . Resolution of the City Council ReVising the Site Plan for PA 96R026 Santa Rita Commercial Center EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibit 1: Exhibit 2: Proposed Site Plan dated 2/7/96 Attaclunent 1: Approved Site Plan for the Santa Rita Commercial Center Attachment 2: Resolution 105-95, Approving P A 95-026, Santa Rita Commercial Center Site Development Review for an 800,000 Square Foot Shopping Center Att.achment 3: Developer's Diversified Written Statement . Attachment 4: Resolution 6-95, Approving and Establishing Findings and General Provisions for a PD, Planned Development Rezoning Concerning 94-001 Santa Rita Commercial Center Attachment 5: Project Architect's Written Statement RECOMMENDATION: 1Arr/ Adopt a Resolution (Exhibit 1) revising the Site Plan for Santa Rita Commercial Center (Attachment 1). FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The fiscal impacts of this project were addressed as part of a fiscal analysis performed for the approved project. The City Council reviewed the fiscal analysis as part of the PD Rezone and Development Agreement applications in January of 1995. In summary, the fiscal analysis concluded that this project is consistent with the fiscal policies in relation to provision of infrastructure and public services of the City's General Plan and the EDSP and General Plan Amendment. . COPIES TO: Developers Diversified Alameda County P A File Project Planner Senior Planner ITEM NO. &1..- . 'j DESCRIPTION: O;n January 23, 1995, the City Council approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project. On January 31, 1995, the City Council approved the P .D. Rezone and Development Agreement. On May 17, 1995, the Planning Director approved a tentative parcel map. On August 22, 1995, the City Council approved the Site Development Review for the project. A copy of the resolution approving the Site Development Review is attached (Attachment 2). In late 1995, Homart Community Centers, the original applicant, was acquired by Developers Diversified of Ohio. Shortly after the acquisition, staff began working with Developers Diversified on the project. Developers Diversified placed a new management team in charg~ of the project, however, retained the same architect that was used by Homart. =, ~=:=----:--; =: :~.";' -'; " . In telephone conversations with Staff and in the Written Statement attached tothis Report (~ttachment 3), Developers Diversified has indicated that the Center, in its present configuration, is difficult to lease long term. Therefore, they are requesting that the City Council approve a revised Site Plan that will accommodate their tenant mix. Developers Diversified is not requesting any other change from the original project approval. While the orientation of the buildings on the site plan are proposed to be modified, there are no other changes proposed to be made to the Center that would affect the original analysis. The changes will not generate additional traffic, change the ingress and egress points to the Center, nor are there changes proposed to the overall design theme. Consistency with Approved Mitigated Negative Declaration: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH 94113020) has been approved for the Santa Rita Commercial Center Project which, together with the Program EIR for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment, adequately describes this project for the purposes of CEQA. Since the Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted, the City has identified no changes in the Santa Rita Commercial Center Project or in the circumstances under which the Santa Rita Commercial Center Project is to be undertaken or any other new information which requires revisions to the Mitigated Negative Declaration or to the Program EIR. ANAL YSIS: Consistency with Approved Site Development Review: Resolution 105-95, approving the Site Development Review application for the project contained a Condition of Approval that staff could approve modifications to the location and size of buildings on the site plan (Attachment 2, Condition 2). However, the Staff. Report that was presented to the City Council stated that staff did not anticipate changes to the orientation of the Center: "It is not anticipated that the overall design, square footage, or orientation or general location of the buildings of the Center would be changed; however, some of the buildings may be changed with others. . ." [Emphasis added] Staff is therefore requesting that the City Council review Developers Diversified Proposed Site Plan and determine whether it is consistent with their original approval. This project has been noticed to the public for review in accordance with requirements of the Municipal Code. Therefore, should the City' Council desire to modify existing conditions of approval of the original Resolution approving the Site . . . '. .,.<.iii Development Review (Attachment 2), add conditio~otreq)Jire modifidatio,{~!fto the'sit~pl~ this can. be 'j\ accomplished by the CitY Council atthis meeting,.. ." '.~' . ...:. . . . I ..' '" . '~'\1; <~ .' ,. Easte,." Dublin Specific P1ttn Design'Gllidelin.~: . . . .," " . ~ , . .1,' . -'". ,\' f 'c> I. . .',; Th~tproject is located in the Hacienda GatewaY~ofib~(~Du,b~:S~ific't~(EDSP). TheEDSPcontains advisoxy ~gnguide1inesfor prqj~ withhliliis.:c~~'tlie~?roPo$~stte Plan v:atil:s from.the Approved Site Plan in tbeoriei11ati<m ofthC .Center~:the~ oftl)e woject(traffic generation, access points and design.them~ofthe Center) have:not ~~: 1'1:lerefQt4,sinoe the remainder of the project is unchanged, S~sanl1ysis oftl\ePl'QPosedSUPl~'conc=trates on those designsuid~inesinthe ED~~ that ~tO'building.OJi~on. ..J1tose'~~..re~tifit4 below: . . <' \, ., . :' . , ' ! <' . i " ., ,,' " . ~, . \ ',. ., ., jl r, "~' \," 1. 1. Visibility of. parktng areas from City .~;. ' . 2. . Orientation to,major arterials and notfMeW#;~. " .. .' 3, ". Community image, '>, ..... . . Visibility of Parking Areat from City StJ'eet;$::.' .1ib.Gui~.$ugpstftJl.t .buildiDgs be sited to block views ofp.rldng areas from _jor'~ '.' , '. . '~ '. J','. .\ :; '".i' . ' .,' . " < I. ' I,i. _ The chart .below illtlStpteS that the diff~te$b4tween~,AItP~;~it. p.,. ~.the PJDposed Site Plan aIongDublin Boulevanl' While~, AppI:~$itePhqll>l~:J11.o~views of the parmI areas along Dublin BcolleVard.with. .~,btU1~;eJevations.tQ.e~bop~sed$ite Plan wouldprovidevi~ jntothe Cmtca',including~...~ftomn~ Boulevard,' Although tbePtop~ed Site Plan is 21 ~tD:1oreope.t.tbJin'~-e:ApP~'(.fIJnl~'~.landscaping along DUblin Boulevard wouldso~ the view oftl1eptrkirJg~, . Based'upanStaff' sanalysis, the:Ptoposed ..;Plan.isC9bSistent!With.tbe~:OftbeBDSP JadtheApprovjd"Ske Plan, . DUBLIN BOUV;NP?0BIB1'ffA'll_i;' '. '1: '. .' '. .' ..... ,. ,.;;,: . . ......'.\. .,. '.' APPROVED '. ..' .2,12 . . ,". ..'. . ..:,i....~S' . .,'c':;,'.," :....... .....:. ;.' . ..--R~~sID- . ". .1,733-.., ....~..~..~.~ ~t.i:;'~":_" . 2.'Orient:BuUdiags',toMajOl" ~ 8mf.~;tI;lff'r:~qt' ~iDsp~i.Is:2lS follows: , " ~ . , I _ -t"., ,. . '. -, - .. ' .. '. ."Orient build'to '. arterial streets wi1hin:.r:~iriubJmtb ~. ',.i.:. .: :.... '. " mgs major . .. ,_ ~~~. ". . . .... .~'!"~" ..' gateway experience~.. Do not site buildings'~B4~to the~,:.,R.OW, . . Where; the are oriented~........~l towards .' "~;'~~.ttaf6c' tUtnthcir bat.kS. . .. . Y Jf4~~Y pusmg~Wtj11.~!<J.1 .... .. , ,. .... <JJl community streetS'.~'bloQk'vl~ frMn'tbe'~t()~:hin~tp,;i;:I~{~SP' '" ,.' -, ", \<..'.,; ',')>0" .: , . A... 'oneIlt tq'~or Arterial,! " ",do",-,"" i.'" . " , . ; .\ . ,. ' " '., . .,,, "The,ApprovedSit8 Plaa orients the Center~;~!~YiWi'1he~ex~()11!-OD'" Dublb1;Jioulevard. "ThePropo.ed:Site'PhnthaS~i~~aJonapubUlt,~evdl(.~ ., ., '1"" \ '\, ," ,. " ." ,-" . towardsthe.1reeway;however, large ~betWeen~'W()1I14:~.;av1. mtOthe .Cen_wh.re.tbe.futema1elements oftbeCenter 'jy'Ou1(b&e~bielOitldr:.~:alpng'Dublin . BOuleVar4.Based upOn ,$tiffs ~ysis,the Pro~'.(;P~~;~"with.ihein1ent of '+1-"BD' SP' ";~~-4-~:.~ft't"d._..a,.SiteP'';'- .. '. ,'. - ",,<,~,,"._> ,..'} . i-: '. .. ~~. ..... w~,~r~"~ PUI. " ,. _ '". J :,',:~~ . '..: .' "", ,,". ' . . . . B. B]Ockai~ of views of hills from the freeway: i The major view point that can be seen along 1-580 adjacent the Center are the visually sensitive ridgelands. The Prop()sed Site PlaD, as well as the Approved Site Plan were designed to allow . , for a vi:wc~rridor at the eastern portion of~e ~ter, ~here the ridgelan~ b7coine more visible."..(....~.. The major difference betWeen the two plans m this area 1S the. amount of budding frontage along I- I 580. As the chatt below illustrates, the Proposed Site Plan has 26 percent more builc:lin$ frontage along I-S80 than the Approved Site Plan. However, the Proposed Site Plan continues to leave a view corridor where tbevisuaIly sensitive ridge1ands can be viewed. . "-Jr" Apditionally, the"ScenicCorridot Policies and St.attdards Document (Document)," scheduled for review by the City Council At'tonilht's,meeting, contains specific policies that may be'used to evaluate projects in eastern Dublin. The project, while adjacent to a designated scenic corridor, is not located in tu1 area where it would.block more $an 50 percent of the view of a scenic vieWpoint (the visually sensitive ridgelands). The Proposed Site Plan is, therefore, consistent with the policies and standards contained in the "Scenic Corridor Policies and Standards Document" and the BDSP. FREEWAY ORIENTATION .''?Dnilllo '~1'lli~n'C ';"'i.'~~l(.."': ....~,. ~.4~~ ~ "! ";"...J~~1l~~D4~r~>. 2350 feet 2350 feet ~> . 3. .' MaiataiD an AttractiveCoMDl1mjty Image from the Freeway: l\e'Proposed She 1'&n plocks 26pel'CeDt more of the freeway view of the Center than the Approvecl....PJaa~ However. the Proposed'Site Plan adds 2 1/2 acres oflandscapingbetweeJ1 the ~. and the uuyority ,oftbebuildin&s~ The Applicant will present a perspective at the m~gto iUustratehow the Center will look from the freeway. In: conclusion, st8ffbelievesthatwbile the orientation of the Center is slightly modified, policies' of the EDSP have been. ~Od. . Staff teCOD1mCnds that the City Council approve the Proposed Site Plan. ......::.. ,..." . ....,.., '.'1".' '..... , G:\9S-O%6\c2sQ ..;:.::-.,:: . ..,,; i\ . ... ,~:."'"''' '., ,~ " .' " .:'7 -~, .: -, -' ..-.....-"" RESOLUTION NO. - 96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ********* REVISING THE SITE PLAN FOR PA 95-026, SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER WHEREAS, the City Council approved an application for Site Development Review for the Santa Rita Commercial Center on August 22, 1995; and WHEREAS, part of that approval included a site plan for an 800,000:t. commercial center, hereinafter referred to as the "Approved Site Plan"; and WHEREAS, the rights to develop the Center were sold by the original Applicant to Developer's Diversified; and WHEREAS, Developers Diversified submitted an application (PA 96-013) to modify the Site Develqpment Review Approval for P A 95-026 with a new Proposed Site Plan for the Center; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed said Proposed Site Plan using their independent judgment, including a staff report and testimony from staff and the developer at a City Council Meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby, determine that the Proposed Site Plan, prepared by Musil Perkowitz Ruth, inc., dated February 7, 1996, and stamped "Received February 8, 1996" shall replace the Approved Site Plan. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of March, 1996. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk (g:paK\ 1995\026\ccres2) EXHIBIT J- _~ ,- -'C"-' -. . .....--- ... ----- .....------- m.....~"-. --'-i'~" .,-- - + -~-:J. -.- '-- i \/)i i:~ -, I 0 ~ '~I' ~! :~ .~ ~ U; U "li' ~ c~:3 ,I I\! ~ ,,'. 1.4 If)1 ' _:J tP'>. _\.. ;~ .... I ....:--__ ~ j '"'" C, " _- -__ I I Z~. ,.: ~ · l~J)~~l; :~ :'" ~b!~i . ffi~ I:: bw h ..4 3~ "lid.N.71---=::2 _ i ~ :. ~.; ~ ~a! , ~" .,. -:. ..., ~",-,'o'l! d _I .;,-, .... _~ <n , ~~. ,.1'\ Z -.l't"""'J ~", . c) .. ~..,~ ....E::l::l - 0 Ir..../~--:..--"'-~ ----.-- ':'- ~: ~"~~g, -~tn ',a: '! / "'0"""''''',,,,,'',,'''',,.,,,';;;"---'''---__ ~h' c;-r ~ ~ N. . ~~.::,~ -_ - =-;-.. - - --s:. ':::-=i- ~ ,',~ II ,'lkr:t _ _ - ~/;;;~?-=~ I - ~]9 - - -I ~=-_t.:: ," a: , ~ _ F:.-- -,~,_ ~ - -fi.!:t:lii, 'II tW"" :: "-o.;;j h '-- W I 1',,-_ OJ lJ i fTTttftHJ.iJl. r---- ' I 00::::: iT ~ 'IUTti III ~,!I' ..:=. " t' "u" 'I;i, I I" ,~I 00::::: , i f I 'iJ, /.. '" · 0"-- 1 I ..:=. I " UIi"iT7ii~~!J/III!'" 51 ""'>- I I 0 ) n'II,,. 11I11i",., II'!:. If 0' I IiI () : / J urttfIf!,"1 III , ' "II 5/ ,,-' li ~ f- ~ J r:I n rJ l' ~~;;:~/,'fiD (C? ~I ~.. ,'. ....' -- --L-Il:~:'lf/~11 ~l _ ~_",,:::,,~~ I!I'~ ~ ~I ~i :; _~_ o. . ~,', nmilll I/<:::::O"yj' ~ ~ lW ~ tlf ~ __.~ ~ 1Ft: ,il I Iii ''',11111, ~ ~ -::: ~ ~ ~ :::;:!! ~ '1:: ~ " , ~,,' I :::t:=- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :: / I L -Or/lIllI,. I.... III.." ~ ~ .:::~. c--.: ~ ~ $~ ~ ~ IS I r-- ''''' /IIITt-fi/l ~ ~ --- ~ ~ ~ :: I " ~ (~' '111 'H/..LI/II . . "1,V..or ~ ~ :=:::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ::::::.: :: . I L. ~." ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3;c'" ~ I 1,'1 R I - I,'if) :::t:: ~ ~ ;:;:;:;: ~ -~ :::::: ~ WF:: :: i r~ / ... I ,v ~ ~ ~ ~ :::::: ~ ~ ~ :::: '" . I :--.: :.--.:: :--..;: ~ :c-.:: ::-:: :--.: :::r-::. :: :: ;: 'I ~ (~ I , ';:J .;'1 I I '~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ :: :: I" r" II'" J . ""d II c:::::; C:5;::::::;:::: ~ ~~~ ::.:: ~\!' , I' . ~ II' '-J D D ~ = I:: ~j" I ' i / I l<~ . ." II fltffff!/./..:1 I ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' J- UJJ' \ !A'" I I, , '/j'/IIU - ::;:!l. H sa ! g~l" =:(1 ~ v ~'IIIJP.I.LJI''!l~ GJ ~ ;; ::::t:: ::: - = 8 g ~< I~~" "","[1. Y, ~ _ _e::;i 'I' "IIf7TfU~jl tl ~ =+= ==- :::E ~ ::E ~ I:Z;~' N .......... -_-- ~ :i r::,::E: -<Ii ~ -.- ~:.! · H;s I I'" ",,'it- --_ II.. =113::: =i= ::::;:;: -..- -.- -~ 108' I I ,_ _ - _ _ _ _ -.;r... 1"111"11""1" ~ ~~::.t= = :; _ * ~ ~ 1== a.~ . 'I- ~. 1J{J:rt<) ~ -=:t- . =;30- P~~ir I ,I'm /5 11'.. I ~....: G,ITlHfII~~IIIII'''IIIIIIIIII''IIIIIIIIIIU r--.... -"",,--" ~ = I~:..J:I ca . ~ ....J ~ I)' ~ ~, 'C ~ ..cJ!'II" '" 1 ~~ IF . ...." I;;:: I ~: -p .." =t; ~ ~ I: ' ~ 0 @ ,'~!f I' ,.._It;-. UJoilllllilg~===I, I Il:l I~ "'~ ~! ~ ~ a:, I I:::E: ~ :;:UI-.-J! ,~~% ~. .0<' I ~\! Ii:: -..- = ~... '~%o '-'-','I '" ~ ClI I' n 11111111 h ;: . ~_'------':~L IIi ~ U :'11111 'j 11111 :: ~ ~ '" Ui ::I ~ l1T111TJ1Tl;l"ll I I oF''';: c = r 6 >-u '::z:: "i!~ I.... ~ .: ;:> ~ = ~ Ii! ~tf" I I- ~I- ~E.!l.IIIIIII1I" '''lOIn ~ ~I !J'::: ~ :: III ~ , .., 1Q::j1f " I..... 11-'"'- UlTlTTTTTTlIIII II II nTl .. rrru,' i ' ~ ::E - :,.... I , I .C'~~ _,I '" ~<1" II~..I UITTTTTTTT 11111111Ik"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIU ~RIIIIIIIIII"IIIII ~:: - .,,:to;.. ~I :: ~I .... i nlllllll III1I1II1II1'"lllIllIlllIllI!.!fl J 6 0 iE ~ c;::. = ~ = c::J~,1 ~ I ",~ r! '.. "'I . UIII'lllllllllllllilllTll'III"lldl?!r.'1 ~ ~ ~ =t= ~ ~ ~ Il::= ~ ~ g~ I 5 "II i<'," ~ ~ __ r:: - -..- = -..- F - - - -.- I , 'k :.;...;... , . _LI"'I"I':II'" ':" ."" ""'I'II'~ :=:=::: = = = - F = = ::::::: = ...... Yj'B ::' I U ,,,,,,,I,,,,"i,,,:..I",I'II!,;:,/! 5 = -.- = :: ~ = = == === II ,~ -~ " :.~- DIIIIIIIIIIII"IIIIIIIIIIIII'II"lllitn /::J ~::E :: ~ ~ =:;::: I " I!~I :: ~I~' ~ ;i ~ ~lil"I/IIIIII'I/I)~~IIIII,'I~FiL"~iIU ~ ~ ~ -..- ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ ~ I'~' :" 11111 I 'I~I a lfaillirTifTll mrrmTfTU :::E ::::t:: == :::1= = ~ E :3r...~ , ~ :: ',. 1'1 :: 'i= I ',l-~_... i ~1I111111"""'"II1I1I1I1"I'lI ~ ~ * ~ :;,:t= :: ~ ~::E , ::t= ~, ; , a.. , ,. I I .... 11rl'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi ImTT"1 .?J c::;:J ~ 15 QSl c::;:J <=l:' . 'I <( I I l;l ~ [I II :j)"""" :;E : : I ~ ..: ! -9JtttttL1" 'I III I! ... n 1111111111111111 !il rr----r ~ I ."'1 - -Ii I' - -... E I' , ~ I ,! _ ii.~; III JJ;;fmTTT III U 1111 i 111111111111 rrru-- ~""i I I - : I ~ ~. >- II I(~~ · nlllW'III~11 I1nl!III1I~1111 I I I " ~i I- " ~\;- . _ , ~ulTImmTlT"" l1~ihWo~11 0; il ~= .' II: :, iiI z I~=-__ ~ ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~"~ ~IIJ;'I'I'! ~i ~!III:N ::Ii N'~II' :. ~~ ~ ';/ I d' llf ~r ~ '... ~ i , , ,,',.'... -:0"--'- GIIIIIIITTlmlll~ ~ 1 ~./~ o+t+ttHtH+#ft{) l:~,,!, ,-__~... _ ,__'t--: ; " l~"''''' """'~""'~ll'l .: n.!ilillllWill.!J1.L;t..n \= rllll1lllllllll 11:" -. ::' '''''5!M\I/D, 'lh ' ~ Nl! ", UTTTTTTTiilHTTTTTTTD I Ullllllllllllil'U I ...; ~ II~ ' I, }:: :e~ . .J:J!01i"!IIII1I1I1I111 _ I ~ I . ~ j!;" U ' I , ,I ! .... i lJOoIlIll 11111111 II fTTTl: I Ii 1 IE; ! ' ~ ~ II,.. n , L~ : I ' I " ~ ..... _ nl'lllIllll 1IIIIIIln ~ I I ~!'" ',' ~$,I .-: Uli1il:rl i"IIIIU :1:1 III l'fI-O .:: I .. =''''~''b ~ $ ~ 't I ," , "'I~ _..... I.. -<<:... ,1ij - . " 7;- {,. S ~ i I ~~ : : ; ; III1 I:: rtW r /;, , I 0 I I I I f1-O ~ ;. . -...; "-.~ -;::> B' ',' , ' , , , " .., I linl! ~'-'I' h'l~' I :; l0" t,: :"-~': -..' ~O &4/jJ DttH-Htt+tttttH~O :~ ii /!~ ",.,~ 1'1 " tL- ..., ',_ _~: n"III1'!"I..,,...., ''\ IIIIIIIIII! 1111111 !l -: '",,,,. ",~ , 'I " I JIIIIIIIIIIIII'~C::V'III"""::l~~ JIIIII]IIII1I1I1I_ -' ~"""---f-l=: ~' " I :; cl =~ nllllll~lIl1: ;II'n O+HtHtW.n ~I nllllllll~lIlllllll~r"'I ~ I! ;:;""k' ~ ~'-(;;; - ~ ( III " IT~M 1.~UI""Y.!;llllnl U I, ,[I 1/11 ;; UT1TITl1111TTTT ;;; , ~rI -, ~ ,,'J ~ ~ l 'I 2 .. a:'!; III.L~, ""..I~ l:~ ~ 1/111 1I1111~!lr'"\ ~ ~-""- .' f. /;1; I, ". ~ ,___ 11111111 ~1I1'IIU ~ [JI'" 1/ I ~ - -.,. i ~ ot~ ~ 1=,.." =i;:'" l~' '1/(, . \ I I I " n"ln rilllollll;B Jltl II I I~ II) .I E ru1;J~ ~ ,(/)l ';; ';;~'~~ ~ \\\ II " ~ L TIt;. e a.J = ~~Urlrlirl!U = I a: ~'";;S' \\ I " J~! ;I~'i\ IL I L -.i _ i ~1I11111!l (" -" - A, ;~~ i~ ) I" l( ~..._"_'~ _ ~":~/ .c-[~~>~ ".! _' ~r "'~~"~:'v1 :iJ. ~ ::: -i... - - h - - - - - - h - - - , : ~:"::~:" - ~: =-- ..L...'i \! f'/AJ>;)-,"-<.....L .......u : :,: : : _ - - - ::::::::: . ........- ~/:: - ",~.rh~ ~ -,: ~~ - . - ,':.: : 1 ,- - : : : : : : : :: :: -:: --:: -' ,-.- ~~ ~ .,0;: . ~~ ih ~~ ~;~. Imil W...... ~ , -- -- I II ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I!! 111 ~ I!!l!! ~f 50 00: 1Il~ 0- 15S/ 0:0 CL.O< ~ ~~ _ .7....___~..... ---. \ I . I . . l I:=:: .. Z . ':u. - , ~ U ....,:. : iiUt(:1 :! ~.... ~I;:; I I ; N;','~,;,~ -i .~ . I i z 323: ~ '\. '" :... :. ~ 'A' ce::) 03~.r~ 0.. c.. a. ~cI! Z :JW all- aCi5 C"~ - : 'j W',. ~ C!J"" <( ""'~'.~ d ~ i$ ~ ~ '(0 m~., ~~.~ ~~ :I:W ad-l g-l ~< ~~ ~a: zl- . ~ ..... ~ ~ .... m :g ,opt itl~Si' " E ~~~ o ~~I :c w~~ ~O~ 8~~ d1Z~ cnw~ ~o...... tJ/YlU ....",,"". v~ I '''- >' ~.' .. . ; $?-" ...: , :. ~~ - "en :::J . 5, ~~u .~. ,.~.,.'. ~ '~-.~~'. ~ .~,~. i;" ,. :';\. ..... ~~~?~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . a -, 'I:. "::!. -'~ -, ....; 1 ; :"1 ~ . - -".,...1 . . .I. ~ .; -; ."';:X :;; -~ ~ ~ "ii . . \- . III ~- g- " ,~; - o ~~;I . ~~~ -=l rI... i ~ . . u: I -- JI ~ 11~ . \\~ I I~~~~ ~ I · ~ ~ ~/ \. il~ ;1\ ~- -~!~ r- , ~. ....... ...- Z'.~ i I m i <C; ll; ll; · ~ ~ ! ~~ . I: 8 ~ g (I) en F ~t;~ . ~. ~~~!~~ tD~~ 1 ~-:~ . . . << . ~ ~. ~ ..- .. . ~~~I~, i~hin l5 C!J ~ ~ ~~ .~~ l' ~\ '...~ ~~oaw~, 115",~..!I .; .c( 9C:Wa::~ ""8 '.II! .:c' .-,., Ul 0.. c: . ... ~ 't: - <'.'-; '-J ~~~~~i~ ~~~ !Cf)": ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~~ f~ii ': ..! . j _ '0"." _ ..~ \ ....~:!;.. _ill - I '-1 . I ,',' :', .~, ';.'-' Jj -'I <1: If- <<) II- jJ~~ 8(1)1t;~ ~'i:t::cn(l) ~ CO...... tt. :t: ~ ~ (o)a;I~~~ ..... (\II w ro c( :J: @.. LI~~ ~tl1it;t; C'If(l.l/j;~~ ~~t':I'~ . III . . . '?' w ro <It ~ l!l. >- a: <( ~ ~ ::> en ~~ tD~ $i" , l};~ ~; ;; N~ ~;; ...~':.__..........-..:.....~.:- " . (/) ~ z ~(/) ....J(/) . m 0 I- i3 a::: frl ~o (3 13 a: :t >- c... O/l LLJ :;i ~:J< (3 ~ <( <..'J ffiu.>z ~ 0 I - ::: 0a:S o L.L!L...=> () z.... c T I I I ," ," .', 1/ ... v.l "t:) i ~ M GJ g .m Q) '-::J i" ~c....c., i .. O.-lS ~l. v.l Q,! fi . " -....... .1)1 I- , I- ~ Q) 8 in ~ " z >!;o ~..:. " w o Q] u~ , ::::i " " () , " , " , " , SMOlSlIlil.'.C r c..J . H: ~ c .~ ~.., ~ .. s ~ . -.. ] ~ : ..c:::. t . , +--oJ ..!, ::::::J :: r <,.. :: '3: Wc) ::?E~ W~ ::r: =-= e U ~ j,f , n 11III:: ~ g ",,-=: <t ~~ , " , 0 << I fj' c... I .' <( I t:! ::i: I ... !jj >- I- ~ Z (3 '> I ~ j L~ . 00IIIllHlllHiil ..J ~ " , fiZ ~ ;l%li~ Ii 0 !IS5~ ill 0ffllilll!IIltl ~ .. . . . . . I~ WIllffIlll7 i 1~0 : N .Ii l?i~ UJ cn~.~~ ~j Z Cf) i~i <( ~1!101o IU :c: ~ -::g'" Iii i <( Q.. !;j:9~ d!i ~ I" ~....J .- : ~i h UJ I I en ~;f~'f ~ia.. I I II <( I I' :c g~~l!5~ Ii Q.. I ,I .~~';'.j 3i~1 ' I II EXHIBIT Z. R E eEl V! Dl II >- ~III ~h~ I " a:: <( 1'" ' .' ~ rt: tJ - 8 1S95 ifii! ~~ .~; ~ !l ~! ~ iI S - ~~m~j.'CI) DUBUN f'LArJNiNG ~ L (/) J RESOLUTION NO.1 05 - 95 ." .' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUI\CIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN lie lie lie lie lie, lie lie lie ... APPROVING PA 95026, SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR A 800,0001: SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER 'WHEREAS, Homan Community Centers has requested approval of Site Development Review for an 800,OOOi square foot shopping center; and WHEREAS, the Planned Development that was approved for this site requires that the application for Site Development Review be approved by the City Council at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, the Site Development Review for the site is a component of the Santa Rita Commercial Center Project. That project is within the scope of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment, for which a Program EIR was certified (SCH 91103064), A :Mitigated 'Negative Declaration (SCH 94113020) has been approved for the Santa Rita Commercial Center Project. That Mitigated Negative Declaration together with the Program EIR adequately describes the total project for the purposes ofCEQ.~ and .::'; . ~RE.~S, there have not been .any identified ~hanges in th~ Santa Rita C?~ercial Center ,~,':.ProJect or In the CIrcumstances under which the Santa Rita CommercIal Center Project IS to be undertaken ...." or any new information which requires revisions to the Mitigated Negative Declaration or to the Program EIR; and ,^1HEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on said application on August 22, 1995; and -wHEREAS, proper notice of said public meeting and a ten day public review period was given in all respects as required by law; and -wHEREAS, the staff report was submitted recommending the City Council approve the Site Development Review application subject to Conditions of Approval prepared by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and use their independent judgment and considered all said reports, recommendations and testimony herein above set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL \lED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby find that: A The approval of this application (pA 95-026) is consistent with the intent/purpose of Section 8-95.0 (Site Development Review) if the Zoning Ordinance. . B. The approval of this application, as conditioned, complies with the policies of the General Plan, with the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and with ~rleCUllrl1Tfor"2 PA 94-001 which would allow a shopping center at t'''l~tf'ft nllltn I c. The approval of this application, as conditioned, is consistent with the design review requirements in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance, . D, The approval of this application, as conditioned, is in conformance with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Santa Rita Commercial Center Project Mitigated Negative Declaration. E. The approval of this application, as conditioned, is in confonnance with regional transportation and growth management plans. F. The approval ofthis application, as conditioned, is in the best interests of the public health, safety and general welfare as the development is consistent with all laws and ordinances and implements the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. G. The proposed site development, including site layout, vehicular access, circulation and parking, setbacks, height, walls, public safety and similar elements, as conditioned, has been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development. H. Architectural considerations, including the character, scale and quality of the design, the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings, signs, building materials and colors, screening of exterior appurtenances, exterior lighting and similar elements have been incorporated into the project and as conditions of approval in order to insure compatibility of this development with the development's design concept or theme and the character of adjacent buildings and uses, ." '. 1. Landscape considerations, including the locations, type, size, color, te>.'ture and coverage of plant materials, provisions and similar elements have been considered to insure visual relief and an attractive environment for the public. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby conditionally approve P A 95-026, Santa Rita Commercial Center Site Development Review application, as generally depicted by materials labeled Exhibits through D of the Staff Report, as well as the color elevations, displays, perspectives and material board, stamped approved and on file with the Dublin Planning Department, subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Unless stated otherwise. all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits or establishment of use. and shall be subiect to Planning Department review and approval. The followim! codes reoresent those denartments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance of the conditions of approval. fPL 1 Plannin2. fBl Building. fPOl Police. [pWl Public Works. r ADMl Administration/City Attorney. [FINl Finance. rFJ Doughertv Reeional Fire Authority. IDSR) Dublin San Ramon Services District. rCOl Alameda County Department of Environmental Health. rZ71 Zone Seven. .' , ' 2 GE1'.TERAL .:"'PlanninQ: e' . ": 4. 1. This Site Development Review approval for P A95-026 is to set forth the overall design concepts and layout of the Santa Rita Commercial Center. The approval of the overall design concept and layout is based on: A. The plans prepared by Musil Perkowitz Ruth, inc. dated April 11, 1995 consisting of a site plan and perspective/elevations and color displays of same and revisions thereto dated August 7, 1995 relating to parapet designs; B. Color Perspectives prepared by Musil Perkowitz Ruth, Inc., dated August 3, 1995, consisting of three sheets; C. Color and Material Board prepared by Musil Perkowitz Ruth, inc. dated July 28, 1995; D. Eleyation of movie theatre area, in watercolor, prepared by Musil Perkowitz Ruth, Inc.; and E. Freestanding Signs Design Plans prepared by Musil Perkowitz Ruth, inc., dated August 7, 1995, and colored elevations of same dated August 9, 1995; F. Landscape Plan prepared by David Gates & Associates stamped as received by the Planning Department on July 6, 1995; G. Landscape Elements colored display prepared by Gates & Associates stamped as received by the Planning Department on August 8, 1995; H. The Chart entitled "Design Concepts by User Area" prepared by City Staff dated August 10, 1995. [PL] \ I 2. Modifications to location and size of buildings on the site plan may be approved by the Planning Director. Modifications that increase the quality of materials may be approved by the Planning Director. Modifications to overall design concepts and/or reduction in quality of materials may be made by the City Council. [PL] 3. The Applicant is responsible for those Conditions of Approval of Resolution No. 6-95 for P A 94001, the Santa Rita Commercial Center Planned Development Rezone; those obligations of the Development Agreement Between the City of Dublin and Bomart Development Co. and Surplus Property Authority of the County of Alameda for the Tri- Valley Crossings Project/Santa Rita Commercial Center, adopted by Ordinance No. 3-95 for which the Applicant is responsible; the Conditions of Approval of Resolution No. 3-95 (of the Planning Director) for PA 95-013 approving Tentative Parcel Map 6879, and any amendments thereto relating to zoning regulations, subdivision, and improvement of the property. [PL] ~ The Applicant is responsible for complying with all applicable mitigation measures of the Santa Rita Commercial Center Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan approved by the City Council on January 23, 1995, relating to the subdivision and associated improvements ofthe project site. [PL] 3 5. Prior to issuance ofa building permit to construct the 800,000 square foot Center, Items A through F shall be submitted in a form satisfactory to the Planning Director. For Items C through F, the .',. relationship to existing or approved improvements shall be illustrated on the plans: A. A written statement, summarizing the proposed construction plan; B. A title report; C. A supplemental site plan (fully dimensioned. showing all proposed improvements, structures, mechanical equipment. bus stop structures. circulation. parking, loading spaces, summary of development calculations, including site area. gross and net floor area of all buildings, number of parking stalls required and proposed, lot coverage allowed and proposed, property lines, any easements); D. A supplemental pedestrian circulation plan showing circulation through the Center, including parking areas to buildings and bus stops to buildings, outdoor furniture. special paving. directional signage, etc,; E. Site lighting plan showing pedestrian. building and parking lot lighting fix"tures and locations; and F. Supplemental landscape plans, including plant palette, quantities. spacing and container sizes, growth rate, locations of proposed plants, benns, concrete curbs, paths, fencing and miscellaneous structures (including above grade utility structures), and landscape/site/parking ratios. [PL] e', 6. All requests to phase the development (Phase 1 or Phase 2 or portions of Phase 1 or Phase 2 of the development). shall be approved by the Planning Director following review by. and input from, City departments and agencies that participate in the project review committee. Approval of the phasing request may be conditioned by the Planning Director. The Applicant may appeal the Planning Director's decision to the City Council. Each of the items below shall be included with any request to phase the project (unless waived by the Planning Director). For Items C through F. the relationship to existing or approved improvements shall be illustrated on the plans. Any request shall contain the following: A. A written statement. summarizing the proposed phasing plan; B. A title report; C. A final integrated site plan (fully dimensioned, showing all proposed improvements, structures, mechanical equipment. bus stop structures. circulation, parking. loading spaces, summary of development calculations, including site area. gross and net floor area of all buildings. number of parking stalls required and proposed. lot coverage allowed and proposed, property lines. any easements); .::: . ".". . -.". D. A final pedestrian circulation plan showing circulation through the Center, including parking areas to buildings and bus stops to buildings. outdoor fufl"jture, special paving, directional signage, etc.; 4 .. .... 12. .13. E. Site lighting plan showing pedestrian, building and parking lot lighting fi).1:ures and locations; and F. Final landscape plans, including plant palette, quantities, spacing and container sizes, growth rate, locations of proposed plants, berms, concrete curbs, paths, fencing and miscellaneous structures (including above grade utility structures), and landscape/site/parking ratios. [PL] 7. Landscaping for the area adjacent 1-580 shall be revised by planting ground cover, shrubs and trees instead of hydro seeding. The plant materials shall be ofa size, quality and quantity comparable to the rest of the Center's landscaping. These revisions shall be shown on final landscape plan for the project. [PL] 8. Site Development Review approval for independent Pads may be given by the Planning Director pursuant to the procedures set forth under Section 8-95 of the Zoning Code, ifin his review, he makes findings that 1) the design concepts of the proposed site are complementary to the design concepts and theme of the Center and therefore the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and 2) the proposed materials are comparable to or superior in quality to those utilized by the C~nter. [PL] 9. ltil elevations of buildings on Pads PI through P5 visible from the public rights of way shall provide an enhanced level of design. Site design for independent Pads P2 through P5 shall be sensitive to the Hacienda Drive frontage by providing the same detailed level of design on the elevation fronting Hacienda Drive as the frontage that is chosen for the main entrance to the business. Site design for Pad Number 1 shall be sensitive to the Dublin Boulevard frontage by providing the same detailed level of design on the elevation fronting Dublin Boulevard as the frontage that is chosen as the main entrance to the business. [PL] 10. The frontages along Dublin Boulevard and along 1-580 westbound offramp shall be further enhanced. The enhancements shall provide more architectural and sculptural treatment to create a more attractive streetscape and to be more in scale with people traveling along the streets and future residents across Dublin Boulevard. Methods to accomplish this may include breaking up large, regular wall surfaces into smaller, more interesting and varied areas; modifying the wall planes with wall inserts and projections; varying the spatial volumes, entry areas, roof elements and building materials; and, incorporating a variety of street furniture, lighting fb..1:ures, landscape materials and paving textures into the design. 11. The maximum number and height of freestanding signs for this Center are as follows: A Three 75 foot high signs adjacent 1-580, as shown on the Site Plan; B. Four 45 foot high signs along Hacienda Drive and Dublin Boulevard; and C. Fourteen 8 foot high signs along Hacienda Drive and Dublin Boulevard. Prior to approving building permits for any signage for the Center, a Master Sign Program shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator. Applicant shall pay all outstanding City processing fees pursuant to that Processing Fee Agreement executed by Homart Development Co. not later than the time of issuance of any building pennit for the Center. 5 14. Approval of the Site Development Review shall be valid for two years, until August 22, 1997, for those structures for which a valid building permit has been issued and construction has begun. If construction on a particular structure has not commenced by that time, the Site Development Review approval for that particular structure shall be null and void. The approval period for the Site Development Review may be e>..1ended six (6) additional months (Applicant must submit a written request for the extension prior to August 22, 1997) by the Planning Director upon the determination that the Conditions of Approval remain adequate to assure that the above-stated findings of approval will continue to be met. [PL] .' 14A. If this project is developed in phases pursuant to Condition No, 6, and upon compliance with Condition No. 14 as to the initial phase, this approval shall remain valid for all phases of construction so long as construction on any subsequent phase commences within 30 months after the first building permit is issued on the previous phase. If there is more than a 30 month lag between phases, the approval period for the Site Development Review shall expire. In no event shall this Site Development Review approval be extended beyond the term of the Development Agreement Between the City of Dublin and Bomart Development Co. and the Surplus Property Authority of the County of Alameda for the Tri- Valley Crossings Project/Santa Rita Commercial Center. [PL] 15. This approval shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8-90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance, Any violation ofthe terms Of conditions ofthis resolution shall be subject to citation. [PL] PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of August, 1995. .-' AllES: Councilmembers Barnes, Bur~on, Rovard, Moffatt, and Mayor Houston NOES: None .ABSENT: None &J ' i I ~- ..- I.' j A ',' () - JI!/&V(( \,j Mayor ABSTAJ]\/: None ATTEST: ~r9(b UC?--t-.f-...., City er~. ;;-- ~199 5\026ia:resl) K=Ill.;U.9Slf'CSCI-10S.doc --- .':- 6 Mar-11-96 03:34P DORC e:. e',:,' .. . 1. TENANT ROSTER TE~ANT Sport Mart JC Penney Furniture Premium Pct Lil'"}'hings Beverages 'Il More Major Consumer Elect. M<l;ior Book Store Major Movie Theater Major Horne Goods 2. SITE CHANGE P.OZ Wrinen Statcmcnl Santa Rita Commercial Center Dublin, CA AGRREMENT Letter ofIntent Letter of Intent Letter of Intent Letter ofT ntent Letter of Intent Lener of Intent Letter ofTntent Letter of Intent Lcttcr of Intent The layout presented is based on 30 years of development experiencc that the applicant brings to the project. DDRC, as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), develops properties with the intention of owning and operating them long-term. Being that DDRC holds their properties long term. they must be able to market the properties long term. The previously submitted layout would he ver)' difficult, if !lot impossible, to lease long term. 'Ine application as submitted reflects a layout based on DDRC's development experience and the requirements of the tenants (i.e.: the major consumer electronics tenant mUSl always be located on the end of the center). AIT ACHMENT J a~CidV !.'t:.l ~ f~ -O.I~" ~~~~ . DUBLIN PU'.:' 1 " - ~ ....'}!. D\..l~~l RESOLUTION NO. .6 - 95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil., OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING FINDINGS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR A PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING CONCERNING PA 94-001 SANTA RlTA COMMERCIAL CENTER .'-,. , ' \VHEREAS, Homart Development Co., a Delaware Corporation, and the Surplus Property Authority of the County of Alameda (Applicants), are requesting a Planned Development Rezoning to establish General Provisions and Development Regulations for a 75:!: acre portion of APN 946-15-1-4 (por); and WHEREAS, Homart Development Co., a Delaware Corporation, and the Surplus Property Authority of the County of Alameda (Applicants), have submitted a Land Use and Development Plan as required by Section 8.31-13 of the Zoning Ordinance which meets the requirements of said section; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold public hearings on said application on December 19, 1994; January 3, 1995; and January 17, 1995 and did adopt Resolution No. 95-01, recommending that the City Council certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopt the M.itigation Monitoring Program; Resolution No. 95 -02, recommending that the City Council approve the' Planned Development Rezoning request; Resolution No. 95 -03 recommending that the City Council approve the Development Agreement; and recommending further that the City Council support, in concept, the preparation of a Greenway Study along Tassajara Creek and further recommending that the City Council support continuing to work with the East Bay Regional Park District on trails consistent with the City's Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and . . : . WHEREAS, proper notice of said public bearing was given in all respects as required by law; and . . \VHEREAS, the application has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and a :Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH 94113020) has been prepared; and \VHEREAS, with the inclusion of mitigation measures and conditions of approval, it has been determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the envirorunent; and '-"HEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that City Council approve the application subject to conditions prepared by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and use their independent judgment and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby find that: 1. The Planned Development Rezone will be appropriate for the subject property in terms of providing a range of permitted and conditionally pennitted uses which will be compatible with existing vacant and proposed commercial, office and residential uses in the immediate vicinity, and which enhances development of the Specific Plan area; and The Planned Development Rezoning will not have a substantial adverse affect on health or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or public improvement as all applicable regulations will be met; and The Planned Development Rezoning will not overburden public services as the Dublin San Ramo. Sennces Di~ct has stated that public semces &e aATTACHMENT L( . 2. .., .). .... . ::lplanning'~=,'\9400I>s I 1. A5 demonstrated in the matrix attached and made a part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Planned Development Rezoning will be consistent with the Dublin General Plan and the . Eastern Dublin Specific Plan including all the policies therein; and 5. The Planned Development Rezoning will provide efficient use of the land that includes preservation of significant open areas and natural and topographic landscape features along Tassajara Creek with minimum alteration of natural land forms; and .,. 4. 6. The Planned Development Rezoning will provide an envirorunent that will encourage the use of common open areas for neighborhood or community activities and other amenities through conditions of approval; and 7. The Planned Development Rezoning will create an attractive, efficient and safe environment through conditions of approval; and 8. The Planned Development Rezoning will benefit the public necessity, convenience and general welfare and is in conformance with Sections 8-31.0 to 8-31.19 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance; and 9. The Planned Development Rezoning will be compatible with and enhance the general development of the area because it will be developed pursuant to conditions of approval and site development review; and 10. The Planned Development Rezoning will create attractive, efficient and safe development because it will be developed pursuant to conditions of approval and site development review. e,,::, DE IT FURTHER RESOLVED TIlA T THE Dublin City Council does hereby approve PA 94-001, _' _, ' Santa Rita Commercial Center Planned Development, subject to the following General Provisions and -';:".:Development Standards which constitute regulations for the use, improvement and maintenance ofthe 75: acre parcel 946-15-1- 4 (por). GE1\1ER.J\L PROVISIONS AND DEVELOPMENT ST ANDA.RDS 1. Intent: This approval is for Planned Development Rezone PA 94-001, Santa Rita Commercial Center. This Planned Development District is established to provide for and regulate the development ofthe Santa Rita Commercial Center. Development shall be generally consistent with the Land Use Development Plan which consists of the following submittals: A. Planned Development Rezone Application dated September 6, 1994; and B. The "Conceptual Site Plan" dated September 23, 1994 which supersedes the document entitled "Conceptual Site Plan" in the September 6, 1994 application. 2. The following principal uses are permitted in the PD District A. Retail commercial establishments, including, but not limited to, the following: .:' dpllMing\i..,"\P400!I$! 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. General Merchandise Store DiscountlWarehouse Retail Store Clothing/Fashion Store Shoe Store Home Furnishing Store Office Supply Store Home ApplianceI.Electronics Store Home Improvement Store Music Store 2 10. Hobby/Special Interest Store 11. Gifts/Specialty Store 12. Jewelry and Cosmetic Store 13. Drug Store 14. Auto Parts Store 15. Toy Store 16. Book Store 17. Pet Supplies Store (including in-store veterinary clinic) ] 8. Sporting Goods Store 19. Grocery/Food Store 20. Automobile Service .-- and similar uses that sell goods based on price and quality. B. Eating, drinking and entertainment establishments, including, but not limited to, the following: ... -'. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. II. 12. 1. 2. Restaurant Wine or liquor bar with on-sale liquor license Micro-brewery Nightclub Indoor movie theater Delicatessen Specialty Food Bakery Ice Cream Shop Sandwich Shop Video Arcade/Rentals Drive-through Facilities, including restaurants ..:: C. Office and sezvice establishments including, but not limited to: 1. Bank/Savings and Loan 2. Real EstatelTitle Office 3. Travel Agent 4. Legal 5. Accounting 6. Medical and Dental 7. Optometrist 8. Architect 9. Employment Agency 10. Hair/Beauty Salon 11. Cleaner and Dryer 12. Shoe Repair 13. Key Shop 14. Tailor 15. Athletic Club 16. Formal WearIRental 17. Other Administrative and Professional Office ] 8. Technology Access Center 19. Tele-Commuting Center The fall owing are conditi onal oses in the PD District aod shall be permitted only if approved by .. the Planning Commission: 3. 1. Community;' religious and charitable institutional facilities c:\plaImiD&Ij<:n"\9400 I...] 3 .> .". . "." . . " .' " e:: 2. Public Facilities and uses Veterinary Office Recycling Center In-patient and out-patient health facilities as licensed by the State Department of Health Services Gas Station Outdoor food vendors Automobile sales HotellMotel .... J. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 4. Any structure, circulation, parking, landscaping and signage shall be subject to Site Development Review (pursuant to Section 8-95 of the Zoning Ordinance) unless zoning approval is granted upon the determination that the construction constitutes a minor project and that the Building Permit plans are in accord with the intent and objectives ofthe Site Development Review procedures. 5. Setbacks and Yards A. Minimum Setbacks: The minimum perimeter setbacks for buildings, accessory structures, parking areas, driveways and loading .areas shall be as follows: 1. Along Interstate 580: 20 feet from right-of-way. 2. AJong Dublin Boulevard: 20 feet from right-of-way. 3. Along Tassajara Creek: A minimum 100 foot setback from the top of bank will be maintained along Tassajara Creek. The setback zones shall be fully landscaped with both hardscape (private sidewalks and other hard surfaced areas) and softscape (trees, shrubs, ground cover, etc.). B. Exceptions to the above setback requirements are the following: 1. Architectural projections (such as eaves, columns, balconies, arcades, awnings, steps and decks) which may encroach up to a maximum of 10 feet into a required setback, with a minimum setback of 10 feet from a street right-of-way. 2. Freestanding signage: As permitted in the Master Sign Program. C. Minimum Yards: The required setback between all buildings within the project for all yards is 0 feet. 6. Building and other structures will be limited to a maximum height of75 feet in this District. 7. The overall maximum floor area ratio for this district will be .25 pennitting a total of approximately 800, ADO::!: square feet of Gross Leasable Area (GLA) on 75 acres. 8. Parking and loading: A Parkins! and Loadinli2: Spaces. There shall be provided and maintained in accordance with these standards, off-street automobile parking and loading spaces for every building and use. No building or structure shall be erected or use established and no existing building shall be structurally altered, unless there is already in existence, or unless provision therefore is made, concurrently with such erection or structural alteration or new use, the number of parking spaces and loading spaces necessary to meet the minimum requirements hereinafter set forth. c:~~~\9400I~1 4 e:'9l0l'lllina\jeri'\94001n) B. Continuim~ Character of Obli \Zation. The maintenance of the parking and loading spaces required shall be a continuing obligation of the owner of the real property upon which the:, building or structure is located as long as the building or structure exists and the use ' requiring such space continues. It shall be unlawful for an owner of a building or structure affected by these requirements to discontinue, change or dispense with or to cause the discontinuance, sale or transfer of such building or structure, without establishing alternative spaces which conform to those requirements; or for any person, firm, or corporation to use such building or structure without providing such required parking or loading spaces, in compliance with these standards. Parking Spaces: Accessibilitv. These standards are intended to provide off-street spaces for the parking of the automobiles of tenants of the premises and for clients, customers, employees, and callers. They are required to be kept accessible for the purposes continuously. and the use of any such required space or spaces other than these specified, shall constitute discontinuance thereof in violation of Section 8-63.1. C. Parking Spaces: Size and Location. A standard parking stall shall be a minimum of nine (9) feet wide by nineteen (19) feet in length. Compact stalls shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet wide by a minimum of seventeen (17) feet in length. Compact parking spaces may comprise up to 25% of the required parking spaces. Where parking spaces abut sidewalks or landscape areas the length of a parking stall may be reduced by two feet. Minor adjustments to parking space size and location may be made through the Site Development Review process. Loading Spaces: Size and Location. Required loading space for buildings with an aggregate floor area less than forty-thousand (40,000) s.f. shall be not less than ten (10) feet in width and twenty (20) feet in length. Required loading spaces at buildings with an.: aggregate floor area over forty-thousand (40,000) s.f. shall be not less than ten (10) feet i ,.,:' width and sixty (60) feet in length. Every required loading space shall be clear to a height of not less than fourteen (14) feet. Every required loading space shall be on the same lot as the structure it serves or on an abutting lot and shall be continuously accessible from the street. No loading space shall occupy any part of a required parking space, or any required street side yard of a comer lot. F. Parkin'?, and Loading Spaces: Approval of Plan. A site plan showing the location of the existing and proposed building or buildings and other improvements, the location of all required parking and loading spaces, and all provisions for maneuvering space and access thereto from a public right-of-way including proposed curb cuts, shall be submitted and approved as being convenient and functional prior to the issuance of Building Pennit. No approval of occupancy shall be issued upon completion of a building or structural alteration of a building or for any land use when no buildings are erected or altered, unless and until all such spaces as required and as shown upon approved plans and made a part of the Building Permit are in place and ready for use. D. E. G. Parking and Loading Spaces: Maintenance. All parking and loading spaces, access driveways, and maneuvering areas required shall be graded and well drained and shall be maintained with all weather dust-free surfacing. Lighting of parking and loading spaces shall be so arranged as to be directed downward and away from any residential area. H. Collective Action Permitted. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the joint use of parking or loading space for two (2) or more buildings or uses if the total of such spaces provided i~ not less than th~ sum of the requirements for the individual uses computed . separately In accordance WIth these standards. ' ,,-', 1. Number of Spaces Reouired. The number of parking and/or loading spaces required shall be calculated based on gross floor area for retail and office uses, and customer service 5 .... . . e:, e, 1. area for restaurant uses. When the calculation results in a fractional number, any fraction up to and including one-half (1;2) shall be disregarded and any fraction over one-half ('I:) shall be adjusted to the next higher whole number. Parking Spaces Required: The number of parking spaces required shall be not less than specified in the following table: USE Parking Required Retail Restaurant Theater Office 4.5/1 000 sq. ft. 7/1000 sq. ft. 1/5 seats 4/1000 sq. ft. Excep.tion: Whcre an attested copy ofa contract between the parties concerned is filed with the Application for Building Permit, which contract sets forth a valid agreement for joint use of parking spaces for the life of the buildings or uses concerned and a parking study has been approved by the Zoning Administrator demonstrating that a lesser number of parking spaces would be appropriate for the proposed use, through shared use of parking, then the number of required parking spaces shall be reduced in accordance with the number indicated in the approved parking study. K. Loadim! Spaces Required: Every allowable use which has an aggregate gross floor area of fifteen-thousand (15,000) square feet or more, shall provide loading spaces in accordance with the following: Aggregate Gross floor Area (sq. ft) Number of Loa dine Soaces required 15,000 - 40,000 over 40,000 R 100,000 over 100,000 - 160,000 over 160,000 1 2 3 3 plus I for each full 80,000 square feet in excess of160,000 L. Minimum Aislc Widths: Parking aisles with two-way traffic shall have a minimum width of twenty-two (22) feet for parking angles of 0,30,45 and 60 degrees. Parking aisles with two-way traffic shall have a minimum width of twenty-five (25 ) feet for 90 degree parking angle. Parking aisles with one-way traffic shall have minimum widths as follows: a) 15 feet for parking angles of 0, 30, and 45 degrees. b) 18 feet for a parking angle of60 degrees. c) 25 feet for a parking angle of90 degrees. Minor adjustments to aisle width standards may be made through the Site Development Review process. Bicvcle Facilities: Bicycle parking facilities shall be provided, at the minimum, at a ratio of one space per 150 required automobile spaces. These facilities, which would provide for convenient parking and locking of bicycles shall be located adjacent to the fronts of buildings and dispersed throughout the shopping center. 9. The Master Sign Program will be submitted for review with the Site Development Review package. M. .:~\ien\9400lnl 6 10. A minimum ratio of twenty percent (20%)ofthe gross land area will be provided in open space, e', which shall include landscape, entry, plaza and sidewalk areas. The minimum ratio ofJandscape ,: to gross land area shall be as follows: Perimeter site areas: Parking areas: Ten (10%) percent Five (5%) percent BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does hereby approve P A 94-001 Planned Development Rezoning subject to the following conditions: C01'\TJ)ITIONS OF AFPROV AL: Unless stated otherwise. all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to final occupancy of any building. and shall be subiect to Planning Department review and approval. The followinl! codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance of the conditions of approval. rPLl Planning. rB) Building. rpO) Police. rpWl Public Works. [ADMl Administration/City Attornev. rFINl Finance. rFl Dougherty Regional Fire Authority. IDSR 1 Dublin San Ramon Services District. rCO) Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (Zone 7). 11. Developer shall work with LA VT A to establish the need, routes and bus schedule for this project prior to Site Development Review (SDR). [PW] . 12. Developer shall design bus turnouts, transit shelters and pedestrian paths (sidewalks) to match proposed LA VTA routes and stops and to the City of Dublin's requirements and standards prior to issuance of the building permit. Construction shall be undertaken as part of the street improvement work. [PW] 13. Alameda County shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Dublin that, in addition to e: other provisions, provides that when the property to the east of the Santa Rita Commercial Center project develops, all the action measures of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin FElR pertaining to Tassajara Creek adjacent to this project will be activated and completed or guaranteed for completion. [PL] 14. Prior to obtaining building permits, the applicant must receive Site Development Review (SDR) approval from the City of Dublin City Council for P A 94-001. Said application for SDR approval shall include a visual survey to insure scenic vistas as identified in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and FEIR are not blocked. [PL] 15. Bomart Development Co., Alameda County and the City of Dublin shall enter into a development agreement which shall contain provisions for sequencing of infrastructure, any financing plans, payment of traffic, noise and public facilities impact fees and other provisions deemed appropriate by the parties. [PL] , 16. Bicycle parking facilities shall be provided at the Santa Rita Commercial Center in accordance with the Planned Development Rezone general provisions and development standards filed with the Planning Department. [PL] 17. The location and siting of project specific wastewater, storm drain and potable water system infrastructure shall be consistent with the resource management policies of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. [PL, PW] 18. Any proposed modifications or alterations to Tassajara Creek shall be approved by the City of Dublin ane', any required permitting agencies and shall be consistent with the policies of East em Dublin Specific Plan . ,': and FEIR.. [PW, PL] C:WIIlll1ift&\jcn"\94001 IS I 7 .-:19. .,::_,26. 'C",:27. - -- 28. 29 30. 31. ..32. 20. Developer shall pay a Traffic Impact Fee (TlF) based on the adopted Eastern Dublin TIF. The TIF must be paid prior to issuance of any building permit. [B, PW] Developer shall participate in the BAAQMD's Traffic Systems Management Program and provide a funding mechanism to LA VT A for free bus passes for employees prior to occupancy of any buildings. [PW] 21. Prior to any combustible construction, fire facilities shall be in place to serve the project to the satisfaction of the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority. [DS~ F, B] Prior to receiving a building permit, applicant shall pay school fees to the satisfaction of the Dublin Unified School District. [B] 22. 23. The refuse collection areas within the project shall be reviewed by the garbage service provider to ensure that adequate space is provided to accommodate collection and sorting of petrucible solid waste as well as source-separated recyclable materials generated by the commercial businesses within the Homart project. Prior to issuance of building permit, applicants shall provide written documentation that adequate electric, gas, telephone and landfill capacity is available. [P\V] . Developer shall submit plans for the water and sewer systemS" to service this development acceptable to DSRSD, pay fees required by DSRSD and receive DSRSD's approval prior to issuance of any building permit. Developer shall construct these facilities prior to occupancy. [B, PW] Developer shall provide ,a "will serve" letter from DSRSD prior to issuance of the grading pennit which states that the Homart project can be served by DSRSD for water and sewer prior to occupancy. [B, PW] Developer shall provide a recycled water system for the landscaping per City of Dublin, Zone 7 and DSRSD requirements. The landscaping areas must meet City of Dublin- Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance requirements. [PW] Developer shall provide Public Utility Easements per requirements of the City of Dublin and/or public utility companies as necessary to serve this area with utility services. [PW] 24. 25. Developer shall participate, along with other Eastern Dublin developers who shall benefit, in financing construction of needed new chlorination-fluoridation stations at the proposed Zone 7 turnouts in the Eastern Dublin area. The details of this requirement are to be developed as part of the DSRSD reviews and approvals. [pVl] Developer shall meet City of Dublin requirements for Dublin's Urban Runoff Program and shall apply for and obtain a pennit from the Regional Water Quality Board. All grading shall be perfonned during the non-rainy season (April 15th to October 1st), or provide erosion control measures as part of the project to keep mud and silt out of the stonn drain system. [PW] A preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the City that is prepared within 60 days prior to any habitat modification to verify the presence of sensitive species, especially the San Joaquin Kit Fox, nesting raptors, the red-legged frog, the Western Pond Turtle, the California Tiger Salamander, the Tri- Colored Blackbird, and other species of special concern. Said survey shall be prepared by a biologist and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. [PL] Prior to issuance by the City of any building permit, all utility connection fees, plan checking fees, inspection fees, permit fees and fees associated with a wastewater discharge permit shall be paid to DSRSD in accordance with the rates and schedules established in the DSRSD Code. [pW, B] c:\plaMing\j.,ri\94001 rs I 8 38. .. .. -., . -' ~ . . . 33. AJI businesses will be required to secure a City of Dublin business license prior to opening for business.- and provide the number, type and salary level of employees (on a form established by the City) for eac ' business in order to implement the housing and employment monitoring system. 34. The Developer shall contact the Alameda County Agricultural Department and develop and distribute a handout to tenants regarding the safe use of rodenticides and herbicides within the project area. This handout is to be developed, delivered to the City of Dublin for review, and approved by the City prior to the occupancy of any buildings. Except as specifically modified by the provisions of this Planned Development (P A 94-001) this project shall be subject to the regulations of the C-2, General Commercial, District. All items listed in the matrix attached and made a part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration that have not been made conditions of approval of this PD Rezone, will be required as conditions of approval on the discretionary action so indicated on the matrix. 35. 36. 37. Prior to the occupancy of any portion of phase 1, the storm drainage systems to the site as well as on site drainage systems to the areas to be occupied shall be complete to the satisfaction and requirements of the Dublin Public Works Department and shall be in conformity with the Master Drainage Plan. Notwithstanding S~ctions 8-95.0 et.seq. of the City's Zoning Code and Section 8-95.060 in particular, the City Council shall be the approving body for the Site Development Review application for the Santa Rita Commercial Center Project (P A 94-001). The City Council shall consider the Site Development Review application at a public meeting and shall make the findings pursuant to Section 8-95.070. Notwithstanding Section 8-95.090 of the Zoning Code, the decision of the City Council on the Site Development Review application shall be effective immediately. Any waiver of Site Development .' " Review shall be consistent with Section 8-95.100. Notwithstanding Section 8-95.110, any revision or modification ofthe.Plan approved shall be heard and decided by the Planning Director. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 31st day ofJanuary, 1995. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilrrembers Barnes, Burton, Howard, M::>ffatt & Mayor Houston None None )jQir1Jb~ ATffiST: r~ c- .'ity fFlerk I .f cP- (1994\PA94-001~) ,.' .:.~ '. . ~,"~~cn\9400IDI o .. PROJECT STATEMENT Santa Rita Commercial Center Site Development Review modification February 6,1996 MPR file # 96-199 Request modification to the approved site development review, PA #95-026, for the Santa Rita Commercial Center. The project consists of 630,000 SF major inline retail, a 75,000 SF multiplex Theatre with approx. 4200 seats, and 5 outparcel pad sites totaling 5.96 acres. The outparcel pad tenants are not determined at this time but will likely consist of a mix of restaurant, drive-thru and service related uses. calculating these pad sites at a maximum FAR of .25 results in an estimated building area of 64,900 SF for the 5 designated outparcels. Please note that building areas and seating counts are estimates and subject to change based on tinal tenant demising; however, the FAR will not exceed .25 for the project The project maintains consistency with approved Planned Development Standards and is in fact similar in many respects to the plan approved at City Council on August 22, 1995. A few of these similarities are as follows: 1) .- 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) Access points to Dublin Blvd. and Hacienda Drive are unchanged. FAR of .25 maximum, the current proposed building area is actually less then the approved plan (769,900 SF vs. 800,000 SF). Proposed uses are similar. Conceptual building designs are unchanged. (note: some adaptation will occur to frt new footprint configurations.) Color and Material pallet is unchanged. Landscape treatments and design theme are similar. Parking lot design and on-site vehicular circulation are similar. Pedestrian Links and pathways have been integrated into the new plan consistent with original design intent. Freestanding sign designs and locations are unchanged. SpeCific project development standards have been respected, no changes requested. . The proposed plan modification consists primarily of a shift in orientation to the group of buildings located at the southwest comer of the site and a reduction of the building mass backing up to Dublin Blvd. Additionally more emphasis has been placed on the major eastlwest drive aisle which bisects the project. A throated drive has been designed to facilitate access throughout the project and create a strong visual statement. A TTACiiAitHT S Musil Perkowitz Ruth, inc, i Reorientation of the Major tenants along the 1-580 frontage will result in the following effects: 1) Rear building treatments will need to be enhanced similar to previous approved treatments for buildings fronting on Dublin Blvd. 2) The building configuration allows for a large variable width landscape buffer to be developed along the 1.580 frontage. 3) Views into the project looking north from the Hacienda Blvd. freeway overpass are significantly more open then on the Approved Plan due to the setback of the major tenant buildings from Hacienda Drive. The buildings to be located in the outparcels along the street frontage will be of reduced scale and 4 sided architecture. subject to further staff review and approval. 4) An indirect impact is the ability to reduce building massing along the Dublin Blvd frontage allowing better views into the project and creating a nicer. more open. appearance along this primary arterial roadway. Overall we feel the revised plan is consistent with the design intent of the original SDR approval. Attached is a project statistical summary which details proposed building area, FAR, Parking stalls provided and parking stalls required. : M usii Perkowitz Ruth, inc, . " . .' ':! e,: j ,. .. 0 w 6 W CI) > ~ " w co ~ r-- a:: a:: oi W 0 t;.. > 0 t= -H U <C --- LLLL#~~ 0:: cf!. C/) en ~ _L..J LL~ OeDe;::;:: w (9 enN -' z o~ ...J~S;!:!.enC/) -'w ...J ~-' 0 0..... ~ ~~~ I"- I"- 1--' <C If)~ ...J CD ""- 1"-0NCOl"- .... ...... O<<:l:.I"-~N..eD_ r--I- 5 0 mLO ~If) eD . ....C'> t")~C'> .....-8 ~ .... I"-M a: II II u..u.. Z W ww 5 r->- 6 ~8 0 zo:: ~ w i]j~ z We:( co " -.i@ <C en ~ t):2: ~ a:: e>u.. <C W u..W w -1== > -H 0 w8 c::: LLLLU~~ <C --- <:J ~~ ::.e 0 _rn enen:;l!:...l....J g~ C) LL~ t)..J Ngg~~~ Z N eneD Na:: 0 ot:! 0::< wt")o~enen N'::> :::! W g~ en ,..: t:O:!:: 0 I"- W=~ tJ) ..~ W~ :2COCOCOLOCD W~I- :;) <C -co ONI"-l()N ~t-W m :I: COI"- " :EI- a...: N ..: .....- :J:ww co . n.a::a:: 10 a.. NN :E!':2 N O~ 11. 0 01- U iiJ 0: <(I) W <- ~ " !!Z -' u.: r-I- 0:0 ~ W -' ;[ a:: ~ _0 W ~ I- 0 O::UJ > IJJ W W -H 0 :J: 0 ::!: --- eta LLLLO~~ 0 Cb ~ If) :;) 0 Cl)cn~....J....J W II tJ) u..~ 1-0:: .....oo.-.:~;:: x If) If) tJ) ~ eno zo.. uJ ;: g -=- en en I- ::jlf)~ <C w o~ a:: ~-' I- 0..... c( ~ ,..:,..::!: r- 0 0 t--'(I) tJ) If)~lt) <: ~ CD ""- CO.....NMCO u.. -l() U) :I: M_ oo:t I"'-; I"-: ~ z ~l;;;:: 0 .....(3) co . D..N oo:tNN 0 ~8@ w a.. vM ~ 0 II II u: U) :;) ::>.. u..~w -' ...J 0" If)~~ W () 0 -'z 0 ~ ~- ~~u) a:: i=oo ()~ ~ --r-- e.. tJ) ~ww cO ii'5to-~ ~ ...J 0 00::: w..... -.i e> ~ a::...J ::> W US~ <.9>=> -0 @~;:;) 0 U ::>u.. <: 00 Ow ~81f) 0 n:::: .. wZ W:J: ~ ctrn us~g[~ a::t- ~.8 :5: IT:: 0:::. l:i Clz I- N. <(<.9 n:o:::J<.9rJ -z '<t ari 1-0 (!)o N ~o ~~ ' (I) :J-l i <zmZZ :::t::n. a:: a:: W 0-1 z...l o5-X:S2 a::::> '-':JW n _m z::::!fin:o:: ~o W=~I- ::> :I: 0 0(5 ;b n.w If)~t-~ ..... ....11.. :::!z ~ ~::J::i<< WU) ~I-If)W 0 :J:< :J:wW:J: z -fI) ffi~ . .. to a.. 0- t-m o...a::a::t- ;- 3:ct m ..