HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-23-1991 Adopted CC MinutesREGULAR MEETZNG - September 23~ 1991
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin was held
on Monday, September 23, 1991, in the Council Chambers of the Dublin
Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m., by Mayor
Snyder.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT'.
ABSENT:
Councilmembers Howard, Jeffery, and Mayor Snyder
Councilmember Moffatt arrived at the meeting at 7:40 p.m.
Councilmember Burton
* * *
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (610-20)
Life Scout Jordan Kahn from Troop 905 led the Council, Staff and those
present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag.
Jordan explained that he is a Patrol Leader who enjoys going on hikes
and campouts, which they do every month, plus he enjoys helping
younger Scouts advance and get their ranks.
PRESENTATION OF OCTOBER CUSTOMER SERVICE AWARD (150-90)
Assistant City Manager presented the October Customer Service Award to
Officer Gary Berge who has worked for the Dublin Police Services for
nearly 3 years. Officer Berge has received several letters of
commendation from Dublin residents and from Sheriff Plummer and was
recentlY recognized for his services assisting a mentally distressed
resident out of her home and also for assisting an assault victim. He
consistently goes the extra mile in order to better serve the public.
INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEE (700-10)
Assistant City Manager Rankin introduced Bo Barker, who was recently
hired to fill the Management Assistant position in the City Manager's
office.
Bo came to DUblin from the City of Manhattan Beach where he worked for
2 years, primarily in personnel, but with a lot of generalist duties.
He also worked for 9 months as an Intern in the City of Walnut, which
is a cOntract City very similar to Dublin, and was also an Intern with
the Butte County Economic Development Corporation.
The Council welcomed Bo aboard.
* * * *
CM - VOL 10 - 354
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991
CONSENT CALENDAR
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Howard, and by unanimous
vote (Cm. Burton absent), the Council took the following actions:
Approved Minutes of Regular Meeting of September 9, 1991;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 93 - 91
AWARDING CONTRACT 91-06 ($61,890)
ANNUAL STRIPING & MARKING CONTRACT TO CHRISP COMPANY (600-30)
and authorized the Mayor to execute the agreement;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 91
ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR THE REPAIR OF
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS DEEMED TO BE PEDESTRIAN HAZARDS (600-30)
and authorized Staff to advertise for bids;
Authorized Cm. Jeffery to attend the National League of Cities FAIR
Steering Committee meeting in Washington, D.C., on October 4-6, 1991
at an approximate cost of $800 (140-30);
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 91
DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
PROVIDING FINANCING FOR CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS (340-20)
Approved Warrant Register in the amount of $545,119.75 (300-40).
Cm. Moffatt requested that the Bissell & Karn agreement be pulled from
the Consent Calendar for discussion. It was his understanding that
there were 3 oPtions presented and the Council should discuss the
options.
Mr. Rankin advised that Staff's recommendation was that Option 3 be
selected.
Mr. Thompson advised that if you do both projects separately, you have
to do several things more than once. Staff felt there was a good cost
savings to do the design of both projects at once. The actual
construction would be done in 2 phases under 2 separate project
contract.
Cm. Moffatt indicated that he did not Understand this and thanked
Staff for explaining it.
**********************************************************************
CM - VOL 10 - 355
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote (Cm. Burton absent), the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 96 - 91
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BISSELL & KARN, INC.,
FOR DESIGN OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN
HANSEN DRIVE AND SILVERGATE DRIVE (600-30)
and authorized the transfer of $28,850 from unallocated reserves to
this project.
OAKLAND SCAVENGER COMPANY 199Z RATE ADJUSTMENT REQUEST (810-30)
Assistant City Manager Rankin advised that OSC has submitted a request
to the City for review of a 1992 rate application. The City jointly
reviews applications with other agencies serviced by OSC. Due to a
proposed change in the methodology, the actual amount of the increase
cannot be determined until further analysis by the Joint Refuse Rate
Review Committee.
Mr. Rankin advised that the report presented is primarily for
informational purposes. The JRRRC will primarily base their review
upon projections of revenue and expenditures for each jurisdiction.
In prior years, the total company operations were evaluated on a
whole.
Mr. Rankin advised that David MacDonald and Dan Borges were present to
answer any questions the Council may have.
Cm. Moffatt questioned the rates indicated in the letter from OSC to
the JRRRC. He questioned if we were looking at about a 10%-13%
increase every year for the next 3 years, or if this was cumulative.
Mr. Rankin advised that it is premature to assume that these figures
have any relevancy at this time. Costs will be reviewed on a
jurisdictional basis. Also, we don't know what impact the Measure D
decision will have.
Mr. MacDonald stated he felt that Staff had made a fair presentation
of where they are right now.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous
vote (Cm. Burton absent), the Council directed Staff to forward the
request to the Joint Refuse Rate Review Committee for further
analysis.
CM - VOL 10 - 356
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991
PUBLIC HEARIN~ - CHEVRON
CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT/SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (410-30)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Associate Planner Cirelli advised that PA 90-066 involves a request
for CUP and SDR approval to construct and operate a new 24-hour
service station, drive through car wash facility and food mart at 5933
Dougherty Road. They also request wall signage and one combined
service station display and price sign structure.
The Applicant requested a continuance in March, 1991, in order to
resolve land use dedication issues. As a Condition of Approval for
the project, the Applicant will be required to dedicate to the City
right-of-way required for the ultimate improvements along Dougherty
Road and Dublin Boulevard Extension on the project site. The amount
of land required to be dedicated is 4,840 square feet. The Applicant
has revised the site plan depicting the project site and related
improvements before and after construction of the Dougherty Road
widening and Dublin BOulevard Extension right-of-ways.
Ms. Cirelli advised that the project would result in the installation
of 12 self-service gasoline fueling positions. The food mart facility
proposed to be 953 square feet in size, would accommodate the service
station cashier and the sale of convenience items. The approximate
1,224 square foot car wash facility would be a fully automated
recycling type and would include restrooms. The Combined service
station display and price sign structure is 8 feet high with a sign
area of 58.6 square feet double faced. Wall signage is proposed to
identify the car wash, Chevron service station and food mart
facilities.
Ms. Cirelli discussed proposed parking, landscaping and signage and
the architectural design of the buildings and structures.
TJKM has concluded that the project will generate additional vehicular
traffic at the Dublin Boulevard and Dougherty Road intersection and
that payment of a traffic impact fee is warranted for the project. In
lieu of requiring the Applicant to pay a traffic impact fee,
conditions were included in the drafted Resolutions requiring the
Applicant to mitigate traffic impacts associated with the project by:
1) dedicating to the City the right-of-way required for the ultimate
improvements along Dougherty Road and proposed Dublin Boulevard
Extension; 2) constructing ultimate frontage improvements along the
Dougherty Road side of the project as shown on the Dougherty Road Plan
Line; 3) designing the project site work to match the ultimate
improvements for the Dublin Boulevard Extension project; 4)
contributing funds for the ultimate construction of Dublin Boulevard
Extension within the Applicant's property and any resulting
modifications to the future Dublin Boulevard/Dougherty Road
intersection; and 5) providing for the possibility of a joint access
driveway between the project site and the adjacent eastern property
once Dublin Boulevard Extension has been constructed.
CM - VOL 10 - 357
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991
Ms. Cirelli advised that these requirements are included as conditions
of approval on the draft Site Development Review Resolution. .The
Applicant requested clarification of Condition #50 regarding the joint
access driveway. Staff recommended replacing the last sentence in
Condition #50, page 8 with: "The Applicant shall comply with said
Public Works requirements within 60 days after the City has acquired
the adjacent eastern property and constructed Dublin Boulevard
extension."
Cm. Howard asked if the color picture was before or after the
dedication of the land right-of-way.
Charles Lowry, Project Engineer stated that the picture is after
dedication of the right-of-way. He indicated that he was comfortable
with the information presented by Staff.
Mayor Snyder referred to signage and indicated that in the past, the
City Council has had competitors come and ask for modifications to the
Sign Ordinance to allow a fourth line on the sign.
Mr. Lowry stated they do not anticipate the need for a fourth product;
generally this is for diesel.
Cm. Jeffery questioned the development of new fuels and asked if this
is something that could be incorporated in the design.
Mr. Lowry advised that while they are currently investigating
alternate fuel sources, more information is needed before they
actually handle alternative fuels.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous
vote (Cm. Burton absent), the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 97 - 91
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PA 90-066
CHEVRON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A GASOLINE SERVICE STATION,
FOOD MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY AT 5933 DOUGHERTY ROAD
and
RESOLUTION NO. 98 - 91
APPROVING PA 90-066 CHEVRON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW
THE OPERATION OF A SERVICE STATION, FOOD MART AND CAR WASH FACILITY
AT 5933 DOUGHERTY ROAD
and with changed noted to Condition #50, adopted
CM - VOL 10 - 358
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991
RESOLUTION NO. 99 - 91
APPROVING PA 90-066 CHEVRON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION TO
CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A SERVICE STATION
WITH 12 SELF-SERVICE FUELING POSITIONS, 953 SQUARE FOOT FOODM~RT,
APPROXII~%TELY 1,224 SQUARE FOOT Ci~R WASH FACILITY ~ND WALL SIGNAGE
AND TO PEI~IT ONE COMBINED SERVICE STATION DISPLAY AND
PRICE SIGN STRUCTURE AT 5933 DOUGHERTY ROAD
PUBLIC HEARING - RENTAL AVAILABILITY ORDINANCE (430-20)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Senior Planner Carrington advised that this Ordinance, which was
introduced at the September 9th City Council meeting, would allow fees
to be paid in-lieu of a requirement that a percentage of units in
large multi-family projects be rented for a specified time period.
The amount of the in-lieu fee would be based on the amount necessary
to subsidize the rental of a 3-bedroom market rate aPartment for 5
years for a family of 5 earning 80% of the Alameda County median
income, where no more than 30% of income is spent on rent.
On September 9th, the Council expressed concern that the requirement
of payment of the in-lieu rental fee prior to issuance of project
building permits was too early and directed Staff to change the
Ordinance to require payment of the in-lieu rental prior to final
inspection of the first dwelling unit of a project. Section 8 12.060
which addresses the relation of the Rental Availability Ordinance to
the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance was changed to delete "Chapter 8.08
of Title 8 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code" because the
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance has not been adopted.
Mr. Carrington advised that 2 changes needed to be made to Page 2 of
the Resolution. A paragraph should be inserted, "WHEREAS, this
Resolution shall be effective 30 days following its adoption." Also,
the third paragraph from the top should read, "WHEREAS, the City
Council did nold public hearings on said fee on September 9, and
September 23, 1991."
Cm. Moffatt asked if this would go into effect even if there is less
than a 3.5% rental vacancy.
Mr. Carrington advised that this is not related to the vacancy rate.
The in-lieu rental fee could be increased by the rental rate increase.
There is no provision for tying these to the vacancy rate. The fees
would be used toward the provision of rental housing.
Cm. Moffatt felt Dublin could end up with no rental inventory.
Mr. Carrington stated he did not feel'this could happen because this
whole policy is based on providing rental units. We recognize the
need, and that is why this Ordinance is being considered.
CM - VOL 10 - 359
Regular Meeting
September 23, 1991
No comments were made by members of the public relative to this issue.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote (Cm. Burton absent), the Council waived the reading and adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 14 - 91
ADDING CHAPTER 8.12 TO TITLE 8 OF THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE
ENACTING A RENTAL AVAILABILITY ORDINANCE
and with changes discussed, adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 100 - 91
APPROVING THE IN-LIEU RENTAL FEE
· · ·
PUBLIC HEARING JL CONSTRUCTION
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING-DUBLIN MEADOWS APPEAL (450-30)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Senior Planner Carrington advised that this planned development
rezoning would amend Dublin Meadows' conditions of approval to allow
payment of a fee in-lieu of maintaining 10% (21) of the multi-family
units as rental units for 5 years. An Ordinance was introduced on
September 9th which would amend the Zoning Ordinance to permit the PD
Rezoning. If elected by JL Construction, the in-lieu rental fee would
be $10,808 per rental unit in accordance with the Rental Availability
Ordinance. The in-lieu rental fee would be paid no later than 30 days
from the date of adoption of the PD Rezoning Ordinance for those units
which have already received final inspections and prior to final
inspection for those units which have not received final inspection.
No comments were made by members of the public relative to this issue.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded bY Cm. Howard, and by unanimous
vote (Cm. Burton absent), the Council waived the reading and adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 15 - 91
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING PA 91-001 TO AMEND CONDITION #54 OF
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 32-89 TO ALLOW OPTION OF PAYING
IN-LIEU RENTAL FEE RATHER THAN PROVIDING RENTAL UNITS FOR
JL CONSTRUCTION - DUBLIN MEADOWS
, · · ·
**********************************************************************
CM - VOL 10 - 360
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991
PUBLIC HEARING - 20 MINUTE PARKING ZONE
NORTH SIDE OF PENN DRIVE @ WELLS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL (570-20)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Public Works Director Thompson advised that in August, Staff received
a letter from Chuck Scanlon, Maintenance Superintendent of the Dublin
Unified School District, requesting that a passenger lOading zone be
installed along the frontage of Wells School between the westernmost
driveway and an existing Wheels bus stop. Additional requests
included some small no parking zones adjacent to driveways for
visibility purposes.
After reviewing the situation, Mr. Thompson advised that Staff
proposes to establish a 20-minute parking zone which would be
effective Monday through Friday from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. This
would allow the residents in the neighborhood to park for an unlimited
amount of time during non-school hours. The School District also
requested that the passenger loading zone be established across the
frontage of the school parking lot, but Staff did not recommend making
any changes in this area in order to allow for long-term parking lot
overflow.
Cm. Moffatt questioned if this emergency action required a 4/5 vote.
City Attorney Silver advised that there must be a statement of grounds
for an Ordinance to be adopted on an urgency basis. Four votes would
be required.
Cm. Howard asked if it was necessary to have the whole section marked
"E" painted white.
Mr. Thompson stated the 400' probably could be shortened, but it does
abut a bus stop at the end. Currently, some of the teachers park in
this area.
Cm. Howard asked if the School District said anything about the fact
that they are going to allow cars to go into the entrance and then out
again, or if they are going to block this off during school hours.
Mehran Sepehri indicated they said they would like this because it is
the safest way to drop off the kids, however, they don't want to lose
any parking spaces. The day they went out to review this, the parking
was filled and teachers were parking in Section E. Five or 6 teachers
were parking in the street.
No comments were made by members of the public relative to this issue.
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
Cm. Moffatt asked if the bus stop area was close enough that the kids
wouldn't get wet during the rainy season.
CM - VOL 10 - 361
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991
Mr. Sepehri advised that there were no changes recommended to the
location of the bus stop. The bus stop location shown is existing
already.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Howard, and by unanimous
vote (Cm. Burton absent), the Council waived the reading and on an
urgency basis, adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 16 - 91
ESTABLISHING A 20-MINUTE PARKING ZONE
ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF PENN DRIVE
PUBLIC HEARING - DENSITY BONUS ORDINANCE (430-20)
Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing.
Senior Planner Carrington advised that this Ordinance, which was
introduced at the September 9th Council meeting, would allow density
bonuses and other incentives to developers providing housing for very
low and lower income households and for senior citizens as required by
State Law.
On September 9th, the Council expressed concerns related to 2 major
issues:' 1) Concessions and incentives where the City may approve a
reduction of interior amenities for restricted units; and the waiver
or modification of Development and Zoning Standards to allow the
reduction or elimination of design requirements exceeding state
building code standards; and 2) The ability of the owner of a
restricted unit to recover the value of improvements made to the
dwelling at the time of sale.
Mr. Carrington discussed concessions and incentives, waivers and
modifications and recovery of the value of improvements and the
various alternatives and gave a brief analysis of each for Council
consideration.
Mr. Carrington advised that Section $.16.050(c)(3) would allow the
City to approve a reduction in interior amenities for restricted units
as necessary to retain project affordability. Such a reduction of
interior amenities could shift the burden of provision of the
amenities from the housing developer to the lower income families
which would eventually purchase them and could cause social problems
due to contrasts with adjacent units with full amenities.
Similarly, Section 8.16.060(a)(3) would allow the reduction or
elimination of any design requirements exceeding state building code
standards.
Cm. Jeffery felt that Alternate C of the Staff Report appeared to be a
good compromise which would encourage upgrades to a certain extent.
CM - VOL 10 - 362
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991
She questioned the amount of fluctuation in the different income
levels.
Mr. Carrington advised that there is not a whole lot. The median
income will rise over a period of time and household size might
change. There are a lot of factors that could go into this. Sales
price is based on the lesser of the 3 ways of looking at an increase.
Mr. Carrington stated that in order to maintain the availability of
the restricted units, the proposed ordinance provides that the City
would impose resale conditions.
The density bonus concept contains opposing goals. On one hand, a
goal of the concept is to provide restricted units at the lowest price
for the longest time possible. On the other hand, the concept allows
the owner of a restricted unit to recover the value of substantial
structural or permanent fixed improvements and enjoy appreciation of
their property due to their efforts.
Cm. Moffatt expressed concern that if a family comes in and can fit
the program to get into the low cost house and then 6 months down road
their income substantially increases, there is no way the family can
be restricted from using the unit.
Mr. Carrington advised that this is correct.
Cm. Moffatt stated if they utilize the house and disaster falls on the
people and they cannot afford to maintain the house, will the City
come in and help them out or will it just deteriorate.
Mr. Carrington advised that the Ordinance makes no provision for
assistance in maintaining the unit. They have to take out a loan and
buy the unit just like anyone else. There are programs available
through Alameda County for grants for some minor home repairs if they
have problems maintaining the unit.
Cm. Moffatt asked what happens if they let a unit get into disrepair.
Mr. Carrington advised that it is conceivable that they could let this
happen, but if they want to get the largest amount of money when
selling their unit, they would most likely maintain it. Plus, there
is also the Property Maintenance Ordinance that could be used, if
necessary.
Mayor Snyder stated maintenance or the lack of it drives the market
across the whole community.
Eddie Jo Mack, 7000 Ann Arbor Way suggested that the Council has no
way of making people maintain their property and this is true in most
neighborhoods. She urged the Council to waive the reading and
reintroduce the Ordinance keeping the amenities.
Mr. Carrington reiterated that Staff was recommending that 2 sections
be deleted.
CM - VOL ~0 - 363
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991
Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing.
Cm. Moffatt stated he was concerned about fluctuating values and
incomes of people. He asked if any other Ordinances address this
issue. Hesees problems whereby some enterprising developers might
put the unit into such a state that the units can be sold at a lower
price and then fix them up and sell them for a mUch higher price.
Some streetwise people like speculators could come in and develop this
sort of a situation. He wants to protect the low cost housing folks.
He would like to see Staff come back with some Ordinances that would
take a look at this and modify it. He would like to see another
Ordinance that would take this situation into consideration.
Mr. Rankin advised that this might be part of a planned development
and typically these would have CC&R's and concerns about individual
maintenance situations are usually the responsibility of a homeowners
association. They would be paying dues which would typically cover
maintenance.
Cm. Moffatt stated he had similar concerns like in Berkeley with
rental rates being so low there is no way you can get people out of
the units.
Mayor Snyder stated they weren't discussing rentals, but rather people
have a right to own property.
Cm. Moffatt questioned what would prevent someone from renting out
their unit.
Mr. Carrington stated the potential for a unit to become run down is
always there, but sellers would not realize as much prOfit if this
occurs. City inspections could occur and the City coUld pursue this
type of an option, however, it adds quite a bit of responsibility onto
the City. If work were necessary, it could be deducted from the sales
price.
Ms. Silver advised that the Ordinance currently provides that units
cannot be rented except in cases of illness or incapacity and the City
may approve rental of the unit to the same household type.
Mr. Carrington also advised that there is a violation section in the
Ordinance, and violations constitute a misdemeanor.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Howard, and by unanimous
vote (Cm. Burton absent), the Council waived the reading and
reintroduced the Ordinance with deletions 8.16.050(c) and (a), and
addition of Alternate C 8.16.100(c) to allow home improvements to be
added to sales price, within parameters.
CM - VOL 10 - 364
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991
1991-92 VECTOR CONTROL SERVICES (560-50)
Assistant to the City Manager Texeira advised that since March, 1988,
the City has contracted with Alameda County for vector control
services. Prior to that time, services were provided on an as needed
basis by the local County Health Inspector.
Currently, the City contracts directly with the County in lieU of
participating in the Countywide Vector Control Services District and
funds these services through the General Fund. As a result, Dublin
property owners receive the same level of service as residents served
by the District, but do not pay the assessment as part of their
property tax bill as do other Service Area participants.
During the 1991-92 Budget deliberations, the Council expressed
interest in annexing to the Countywide Service Area. If the City
annexes, costs associated with Vector Control Services would transfer
from the City of Dublin to Dublin property owners. Payment would be
calculated on the property owner's tax bill, and the annual cost to
the property owner would be approximately $4.00 per year.
Ms. Texeira advised that City Staff has worked with Alameda County
Staff to pursue joining the District. County Staff developed a
timetable for implementation of annexation of the City of Dublin to
the Vector Control Services DiStrict.
Mayor Snyder indicated he was not at the budget session when this
action was first proposed and asked about the philosophY that brought
this action forward. There is obviously some financial benefit to the
City.
Cm. Moffatt felt that as the City grows, vector problems get larger
and since they charge for service, the City could save money. We
should consider using Vector Control Services on a long term basis.
We need the services to maintain health and welfare. This is a
natural move to make rather than reviewing it on a year to year basis.
Mr. Rankin explained that the City initially contracted on an as-
needed basis. He discussed problems associated with this type of an
arrangement. We have since moved to the same level of service as the
district provides to other agencies. There is a commitment on the
part of Vector Control to assure that the money collected will be
spent within the community. The map displayed includes everything
that is part of the City and also provides for areas that will be
annexed in the future.
Mayor Snyder pointed out that the schedule as submitted by the County
will need to be altered because LAFCO's next meeting won't be until
December 5th.
On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote (Cm. Burton absent), the Council adopted
CM - VOL 10 - 365
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991
RESOLUTION NO. 101 - 91
REQUESTING THaT THE TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
BE ~REXED TO AL~EDA COUNTY SERVICE AREA 1984-1
(VECTOR CONTROL)
and approved the Plan for Providing Services.
OTHER BUSINESS
East Bay Division Breakfast (140-25)
Cm. Moffatt reminded everyone that the East Bay Division of the League
of CA Cities will be hosting a breakfast meeting at the League
Conference on October 14th at 8:00 a.m. Tickets are going fast and he
urged everyone to attend.
CITYLINK Program (League of CA Cities) 180-10
Cm. Moffatt stated that since Dublin is a young and progressive City
that likes to be on the cutting edge, he would recommend that we take
the opportunity to join other cities in the CITYLINK Program through
the League of CA Cities. He felt we could benefit tremendously
through participation in this program.
Cm. Jeffery asked if he wanted to put the request into the budget
process for next year.
Mr. Rankin advised that Staff could check with some of the current
users and provide additional information.
Mayor Snyder clarified that after the League of CA Cities Conference,
it may be appropriate for Staff to prepare a report to the Council
related to the CITYLINK Program for consideration.
Voter Registration Outreach (630-70)
Mayor Snyder stated the Council had received a letter from Del Miles
related to a joint endeavor by the Alameda County Registrar's Office
and the local League of Women Voters to register voters. There will
be an appreciation gathering to recognize local businesses who are
displaying and providing voter registration forms in their places of
business on Thursday, September 26th at 11:00 a.m., in front of
Orchard Supply Hardware.
CM - VOL 10 - 366
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991
CLOSED SESSION
At 9:00 p.m., the Council recessed to a closed executive session to
discuss: 1) Personnel, (700-20) Government Code Section 54957.6; 2)
Potential Litigation, (640-30) GCS 54956.9(c); 3) Potential
Litigation, GCS 54956.9(c); and 4) Pending Litigation, Measure D, GCS
54956.9 (a)
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the
meeting was adjourned at 10:49 p.m.
ATTEST-.
**********************************************************************
CM - VOL 10 - 367
Regular Meeting September 23, 1991