HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.4 Iron Horse TrailCITY' CLERK
AGENDA STATEHENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 5t :!.999
SUBJECT:
Iron Horse Trail Project - Phase 2 Northern City Limit
Extending South (Report Prepared by Lee S. Thompson)
ATTACHMENTS:
RECOMMEI~-DATION: [~
1) Sururnary of Revised Project Financing Based On Bid
2) Project Bid Results
3) Budget Change Form
4) Location Map (Phase 2 Iron Horse Trail -Alamo Canal Bike Path)
5) Iron Horse Trail Status Map
6) Status of Furore Segments of Trail Development
I) Approve budget change including an additional General Fund
Appropriation of $122,493. from Unappropriated General Fund
Reserves. 2) Authorize Staff to prepare an agreement w/th the City
of Pleasanton to account for pa)muent of costs associated with the
Dublin portion of the project.
FLN.4~NCL4.L STATEMENT: This project is being constructed jointly with the City of P/easanton
and a porti6n of the project to be constructed is in each City. The Construction Contract will be
administered by the City of Pleasanton. The bids received for the s%m-nent located in Dublin exceeded the
amount in the adopted 1998/99 Budget In addition, the City of Pleasanton will be administering certain
funds ori~'finally anticipated to be accounted for by the City of Dublin. An additional appropriation of
$122,493 is required. (See detail in Attachment 1)
DESCRIPTION: The Cities of Dublin and Pleasanton had originally applied for and received a
Federal ISTBA ~m-ant to construct a bike/pedestrian trail begirm/ng at Dublin's northerly boundary along
the old Southern Pacific Raikoad rigjat of way, and extending southeasterly along the railroad right of way
to a point south of Amador Valley Blvd. The trail would then turn southwesterly along the Alamo Canal
passing west, of the Civic Center, then under 1-580 and down into Pleasanton to the Arroyo Mocho
channel. This trail is planned to be constructed on Zone 7's Flood Control charmel bank under license
· agreements with Dublin and Pleasanton. Dublin will, in turn, enter into an agreement with the East Bay
Re~onal Park District to maintain the trail.
The project was split into two phases. Phase 1 has previously been cons~-ucted and it consisted of the
installation of bridge structures in both cities. The City of Pleasanton was the lead agency and the
recipient of the grant mon/es for this phase. Therefore all costs associated with th/s phase of the project
were accounted for by the City of Pleasanton. The phasing of the project was necessary, as Zone 7 needed
to repak several channel bank failures, before the trail could be built The structures were completed last
fiscal year as Phase 1 construction. The Phase 1 work completed in Dublin included: 1) an underpass at
DubLin Boulevard; 2) a bridge over the Alamo Creek channel behind Park Sierra / Shea Homes
.apartments; and 3) a bridge to Dublin High School.
COPIES TO: CiTM of Pleasanton;, Zone 7 Flood Control;
EBRPD; Celia Chung, CMA
ITEM NO.
SCOPE OF PHASE 2 PROJECT
In Fiscal Year 1997/98 the City of Dublin proceeded with the design of Phase 2 of the project. This phase
involves the design and construction of the asphalt pathways and drainage improvements. The actual
contract bidding and award of the construction contract will once again be handled by the City of
pleasanton.- Bids were received on November 12, 1998 by the City of Pteasanton and the contractors
. proxdded ~: breakdoam of the portions of the project located in each of the two cities. (Bids are attached as
Attachment 2) The contrhct will be awarded by Pleasanton on January 19, 1999. Construction .is
expected to be~n in February, weather permitting, and be completed near the first of June 1999.
Dublin will be responsible for covering its proportionate share of project costs associated with
improvements constructed only in the City of Dublin, and not covered by grant funds or public agency
contributions. The City has accounted for this as Project # 9605 in the adopted Capital Improvement
Program. As identified in the adopted C~, it was anticipated that the project would extend south of
.~nador Valley Boulevard. Based upon available funds, Public Works Staff requested that the bid
documents reduce the scope of the recently bid Dublin se_anent, to terminate at :~nador Valley
Boulevard. It is expected that in the upcoming Fiscal Year that additional ~ant funds should be available
to continue with the se_anent south of Amador Valley Boulevard. Even with the reduction in scope the
project costs exceed the amount budgeted.
.~N.~LYSIS OF BIDS / DIFFERENCES FROM CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET _
As shown in Attachment 1 the estimated project cost presented in the adopted CI~ for this project was
$235,278. This includes project expenditures in both Fiscal Year 1997/98 and 1998/99 associated with
Phase 2. Based upon the low bid received the project costs will be $330,678. (This includes a 5%
construction contingency and a contract modification to reduce the consWaction cost.) In addition to the
project cost increase, the funding sources available to consmlct the project have changed, which will also
need to be addressed in an adopted Budget change. The following tables summarize the revenues
originally programmed to complete phase 2'of the project compared to those which will actually be
available.
Fund
PROJECT REVEN-tJES ESTIMATED IN DUBLIN CIP
1997-98 1998-99
Totals
001 G~'~ral -Conm"oution From Other Agenci=s $ 125,000 $ 125,000
210 F~fl-~ral ISTEA Transportation Grant 36,948 $ 36,948
211 TDA Bicycle Path Grmat $ 21,867 51,463 $ 73,33¢
REVISED ACTUAL CITY OF DUBLIN PROJECT REVEhT. IES
Fund
1997-98 1998-99 Tm
001 G.-n.~ral -Conm'bution From Oth~ Agen:ies $ 0 $ 0
210 Fed.'ral ISTEA. Tran~oration Grant $
211 TDA Bicycle Path Grant $ 20,843 $ 20,842
As previously noted, the City of Pleasanton will be serving as the lead agency for the receipt and
expenditure of the grant funds to be expended in Fiscal Year 1998/99. The adopted City of Dublin Budget
for Fiscal Year 1998/99 included a General Fund Revenue of $125,000, as a contribution from East Bay
Re~onal Park District and Zone 7. This payment will now be made by the agencies directly to the City of
Pleasanton, and applied towards Dublin's proportionate share of the project cost. As sho~m on
Attachment 1 Grant Funds and Agency contributions are applied against Dublin's share of the project
cost, wkich results in a net mount funded by the City of Dublin of $143,336. Please will administer both
the revenue and expenditure of these funds. Of the total amount atlributable to Dublin, $20,843 will be
IDA Grant Funds and the remainder will b~ General Funds. The net amount financed by the City of
Dublin also reflects an increase in the amount of funds made available fi.om Zone 7.
The financing
l)
of th/s project was impacted by the follo~Sng conditions:
The costs encountered with Phase lofthe project, was more than was or/g'inally estimated.
This resulted in less grant monies being available for application towards phase 2 expenses.
Recent public projects have experienced h/_~_her bids due to the level of construction
actixdty already underway in the re, on.
The available TDA Grant Funds were less than stated in the C~, as the total allocation of
TDA monies to the City of Dublin were split bera,een two projects: Mape Memorial Park
Pedestrian Bridge and the Iron Horse Trail.
A_DDITIONA_L .a2PROPRL~.TION REQUIRED
Attachment 3 is a Budget Change Form recorm'nended by Staff for adoption, wh/ch details the budgetary
changes required. This includes the decrease of revenues and expenditures in the following funds: ISTEA
T~n~portation Grant; TDA Bicycle Grant; and General Fund. The decrease in the General Fund reflects
the fact that the City of Pleasanton will administer contributions received fi-om outside agencies. In
addition the City Council is requested to approve an additional appropriation from the General Fund
Reserves of $122,493. This will be necessm-y, to finance the City of Dublin share of the project in
1998/99. This appropriation includes an operating transfer required to account for Fiscal Year 1997/98
expenditures in the TDA Fund, which were not covered by grant revenues.
STATUS / ESTIMATED TIMING OF REMAINING TR_4IL CONSTRUCTION
The Iron Horse Trail consists of several segments as it is cm-rently incorporated in the City of Dublin
Capital Improvement Plan. In addit/on, the City has identified the Alamo Canal Bike Path. This trail
follows Alamo Canal fi.om I - 580 (adjacent to Civic Center) to South of Amador Valley Boulevard,
where it intersects the Iron Horse Trail (See Attachments 4 & 5). It is anticipated that the in/rial portion of
the Iron Horse Trail south of Amador Valley Boulevard will be combined with the Alamo Canal Bike
Path Project for construction in a future year. Staff will need to evaluate project funding sources, along
with oth= identified needs in preparing the update to the current CIP. For the Council's information,
Attachment 6 contains a surm-nary of the status of the various segments of the Iron Horse Trail Project.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff reconn~ends that the City Council receive the report; authorize the Mayor to execute the Budget
Change and Additional Appropriation fi-om Reserves; and direct Staff to prepare an agreement with the
City of Pleasantun to account for payment of costs associated w/th the Dublin portion of the project. It is
expected that the agreement will be consistent with the financing information contained in th/s report.
ATTACt-LMENT 1
Summary of Revised Project # 9605 Project Financing (Ail Years)
Iron Horse Trail Segment: Based On November i998 Bid
PROJECT NU.'MBER
9605
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Iron Horse Trail - South of Amador
Valle)' Boulevard to Northerly Ci.ty Limit
1998-2003 City of Dublin CIP
ESTI3£4,TED COSTS
Desi~n,,,J I~pecfion
Improx ~m~nts
:onslrucfion Contingency
fiscellzneous
$ 48,150
!86,311
817
Costs Based on Nos'. 1998
CONSTRUCTION BID
Pleasauton WilI Administer Grant Funds and Related Share of Expenses.
The Following Funds ~rill Be Applied To Dublin Phase of Project:
'fDA GR_MNT Funds Not Used On Phase 1
ISTEA G1L&NT FU.-NrDS Not Used On Phase 1
TOTAL G1L4~NT FU~-DS Al)MINISTERED BY PLEAS.4~N'TON
5,487
37,342
AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE A/)M2L-NISTERED BY PLEA. SA.NTON
(Note: The 1998/99 City of Dublin Budget had antizipated $125,000 in conffibutions, which matched
the e~imated City of Dublin budgeted General Fund expenses for this project the revenue/expense
for this project. Without this revenue an appropriation from reserves wi]I be required-see Budget Change.)
Contribution From Zone 7 As A.nficipated When CIP Budget Was Prepared
Additional Conn'ibufion From Zone 7 Funds After Bids Reoeieved
Conn-ibution Prom East Bay Re~onal Park District
TOTAL AGENCY FU~-DS NOW ADMINISTERED BY PLEASA.NTON
75,000
25,000
50.000
150,000
Net .4anount Of Total Project Cost To Be Paid By CiD' of Dublin
Following Application of Pleasanton Administered Funds
143,336
CiD, of Dublin 1997/98 TDA Grant Used For Project Design/Administration $
20,843
NET .4~MOUNT TO BE FI2N.&NCED BY CITY GENERAJ- FU2ND 1998/99 $ 122,493
ARROYO TRAILS PROJECT (BIKEWAY), PHASE 2
PROJECT NO. 935028
FEDERAL-AID PROJECT: STPLE 5101 (034)
BID OPENING DATE: November 12, 1998 (2:00 P.M.) in P[easanton
CiTY OF PLEASANTON
BID SUMMARY
No. Item Quantity Unit
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Unit Cost Line Total
MCH General Engineering_
Unit Cost Line Total
1 LS $10.0OO.0O $10,00O.00 $13,900.00 $13,900.00
510 TONS S20.DO $10,200.00 $23.50 $11.985.00
460 TONS $45.00 $20,700.00 $48.00 $22.080.00
S8.00 $19,840.00 $3.00 S7,440.09
Roadway Excavation and Grading
2 --- Ag~gregate Base-Class I[
3 Asphalt Concrete
4 $" AC. Berm z,48C~ LF
Regrade Earth Ditch 2,330 LF S2.00 $4,660.00 $1.00 $2,330.0u
Raise Ivlanhole to Grade 4 EACH S500.00 $2,000.00 $450.00 $1,800.0:~
Signs 5 EACH $150.00 $900.00 $175.00 $1.050.00
S~ripi--ng-Detail 1 2,750 LF $0.15 $412.50 S0.30 $$25.0u
SUBTOTAL
S58,712.50 $51,410.00
~IT~'OFDUBLIN ~'~
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Unit Cost Line Total
MCH G~n~, al _noln.~rlng
Unit Cost Line Total
No. Item Quantity Unit
1 Mobilization 1 LS $5,000.00
2 Clearing/Demolition 1 LS S5,000.00
$5,000.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.u0
$5,000.00 $10,500.00 $10,500.03
1 LS $25.000.00 $25.000.00 $34,000.00 $34.DO0.DD
3 Grading/Subgrade Preparation
4 15" Reinforced Concrete Pipe 153 LF S75.00
5 Shoring S5,000.00
Type A Storm Drain Inlet
$11,475.00 $52.00 $7.955.0u
1 LS S5,000.00 $2,000.00 $2.O00.OD
1 -.~ACH .~4.000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.0{:) $4,000.0..~L
4 EACH $1,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,500.00 $5,000
7 Field Inlet
8 Lateral Pipe Connection to 42" RCP
1 EACH $1,000.00 $%000.00 $1,200.00 $1
9
Lateral Pipe Connection to 35" CMP 2 EACH Sl,000.00 $2,000.00 $900.00 $1,800.00
10 Impervious Membrane 28,000 SF $1.25 $35,000.00. $0.54 $15,120.00
11 Concrete Curb and Gutter 55 LF $20.00 $1,100.00 $58.00 $3,190.00
12 Concrete Driveway 225 SF $5.00 $1,125.00 $11.00 $2,475.00
13 Concrete Sidewalk 55 SF $4.00 $220.00 $9.00 $495.00
14 Apg_ rr~gate Base 2,000 TONS $20.00 $40,000.00 $24.00 S48,000.00
15 Asphalt Concrete 1,900 TONS $50.00' $114,000.00. $.44.09 $83,600.00
16 Asphalt Concrete Lined Ditch 4,632 LF $10.00 ,?46,'320.00 $7.00 $32,424.00
17 Trail Entry Structure 1 EACH: $5,000.00i $5,000.00~ $5,000.00 $5,000.00
18 4' Vinyl-Clad Chain Link Fence 96 LF $25.00: $2,400.00 $23.00 $2,208.00
19 Stop Bar and Leaend 1 LS $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00
20 Hydroseedin~/F-rosion Control 1 LS $7,500.00: $7,500.00 $7.500.00 $7,500.00
21 90 Day Erosion Control Maintenance 1 LS SS,OD0.00: $6,000.00 $5.800.00 $5,800.00
$277.568.00
SUBTOTAL $323,640.00
Remove and Replace Unsuitable Subgrade 50 CY S2O.00' $1,000.00 $75.00 $3,750.00
Altemata
Bid Item A
TOTAL
CITY OF PL=_ASANTON
BID SUMMARY
Carone & Sons, Inc. GradeTech, Inc.
No. Item Unit Cost Line Total Unit Cost Line Total
Re dg_.wick Construction
Unit Cost Line Total
$14.000.00
Roadway Excavation and Grading
Ag_gr__egate Base-Class II
$22.000.00 S22.000.00 $29,000.00
2 $37.00 $T8~870~00 S15.00 $7.650.00 S39.00
S237020700-
Asphalt Concrete S44.00 S-2~,240.00 S40.00 $18,400.00 ' S52.00
5" A.C. Berm $2.50 $~-,200.00 $2.70 $5.695.00 S300
Re~rade Earth Ditch $1.40 -$%262.00 $1.00 S2.330.00 Sl .35 S3,145.53-
Raise Manhole to Grade $700.00 -$~78-50-.03 S300.O0 $1.200.00 $200.O0
Sic:ns $3go.oo ' $2,340.09 S200.00 $1.200.00 $350,00 S2~1~00~0 o-
Striping-Detail 1 $2.00 $5,500.02 $0.70 S1,925.00 SO.TO $1,025702-
SUBTOTAL S73.212.03 S51.401.0D S$8.=_0.o0
Carone & Sons, Inc.
Nc. l~em
Mobilization
2 Ciearino/De~ molition
3 Grading/Subarade Preparation
4 15" Reinforced Concrete Pipe
Shorin~ S330.00
Type A Storm Drain inlet $1.520.00
Field Inlet Sl.330.00
$-300.00
9
10
Lateral Pipe Connection to 42" RCP
Lateral Ripe Connection to 35" CMP
Imoervious Membrane
$0.53
11 Concrete Curb and Gutter $,49.00
12 Concrete Driveway $13.25
13 Concrete Sidewalk $18.00
14 .Ag~gr_~eg at e Base S27.00
15 Asphalt Concrete S42.75
15 Asphalt Concrete Lined Ditch $F.50
17 Trail Entry Structure
18 4' VinyPClad Chain Link Fence
19 Stop Bar and Legend $830.00
20 H),droseeding/Erosion Control S6,130.00
21 gO Day Erosion Control Maintenance $3,100.00;
Unit Cost Line Total Unit Cost Line To;al Unit Cost Line Total
29.500.00 S9,500.03 S25,000.00 S25.000.00 $14.500.00
$9.050.00 -~i-.~5~-dO S47,000.00 $47.ODO.DO $28,0D0.00
$43,150.00 ~43,150.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 $45,009.00 $45,0-~3703-
$72.00 $11,016.00 $100.00 $15,300.00 $7500 $1-~7Z,475~03-
$~2-0 .~3'0 $100.00 $100.00 $1,500.00
$q~,520.00 S2.000.00 $2,000.00 $3,590.00 $ 3~50 O~O~
$5,320.00 S2.000.00 $8,000.00 $1,700.00 $5.800.00
$1,150.0~ $3DO.0D $300.00; $2,000.00 S-2~ddOTdO-
51.200.00 $300.O0 $500.00: Sl.0OO.O0
$16,240.00 $0.30 $8,400.00 $0.45
$2,695.00 $20.00 $%100.00 $30.00 $~-50-. C~0-
-S2,981.25 $6.00 $1,350.00 ~ $8.00
$990.00 $5.00 S275.00' $7.00
$54,000.00 $13.00 $26,000.00 S20.00
S~1,2.25.00 $35.00 $65,500.00 $42.00
$34,740.00 $7.00 $32,424.00 $7.00
$3,275.00 $3,275.00: S4,0O0.00~ $4,000.001 $3,500.00 $~7,500.00-
$31.50 $3,024.00 $22.00, $2,112.00: S21.00 $~'016.0b-
$830.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00
$5.130.00 $6,000.00 ss,goO.DO: $5,500.00 $~,50D.DO
$3,1~0.00 $5.000.00 $5,000.00: $500.00
SUBTOTAL $292,366.25 $306,951.00' $295,450.00
.Alternate Remove and Replace Unsuitable S50.00 $2,500.03 $50.00 S2,500.00 $95.00 $-4,750.00
Bid Item A Subgrade
TOTAL I $355.578.251 I S358.3~2.001 J ..~83.o70.~0J
2
Ct'FY OF PLEASANTON
BID SUMMARY
RGW Construction McGuire and Hector Carone & Company, Inc.
No. Item Unit Cost Line Total Unit Cost Line Total Unit Cost Line Total
1 Roadway Excavation and Grading $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $17,000.00 $1~70-0-0'70-0 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
2 Aggre__gaie Base-Class II $28.00 $14,280.00- $47.00 ~-2-3'7970.-0-0 $30.00 $15,300.00
3 Asphalt Cpncrete $39.00 $17,940.00 $50.00 $~-3 ,-0~-0-~'00, $75.00 $34,500.00
4 6" A.C. Berm $1.25 $3,100.00 $3.00 $~7,~'0~'00 $3.75 $9,300.00
5 Regrade Earth Ditch $1.50 $3,725.00 $1.50 ~-3'7zi~5'7(f~ $3.25 $7,572.59
5 Raise Manhole to Grade $325.00 $1,300.00 $400.00 $%-,SU070-0F $500.00
7 Signs $350.00 $2,100.00 $100.00 $-6-0-0~ ~-0 $500.00 $3.000.00
$ Striping-Detail 1 $2.00 $5.500.00 $0.60 $%-, 6-5-0~'~0 $1.00 $2,750.00
SUBTOTAL $72.948.00 $75,755.00 $99,422.50
RGW Construction McGuire and Hector Carone & Campa~y_,_l:'?:.
No. Item Unit Cost Line Total Unit Cost Line Total Unit Cast Line Total
I Mobilization $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $3.000.00 ~-3~0-0'70-[~ $24,582.50 $24,552.53
2 Clearing/Demolition $63,829.00 $63,529.00 $18,126.00 $¥83~2-87d0515,000.00 $15.000.03
3 Grading/Subgrade Preparation $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $70,000.00 $70~-0~)-0.~0 $25.0D0.00 $25,000.00
4 15" Reinforced Concrete Pipe $59.00 $10,557.00 $150.00 $22,9~0.00, $50.00 $7,650.00
5 Shoring $1,0O0.DD $1,000.00 $500.00 S'5-0-0~'0~0 $2.500.00 $2,500.03
5 Type A Storm Drain Inlet $3,094.00 $3,664.00 $5,0O0.DO $1~,[~00.00 '-$-5~'000'00 i $2,500.0052'500'00 $10,000"--'$2'500'03
7 Field Inlet $2.000.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00
8 Lateral Pipe Connection to 42" PCP $2,850.00. $2,850.00 $2,000.00
9 Lateral Pipe Connection to 35" CMP $3,150.00 $6,300.00 $1,000.00
$~'7¢0~)~-(~0 i $1,500.00 $1,500.,
$~,-00~70~) i $1.500.00 $3,000.00
ST~,~(~0.00, $0.50. $14,000.00
$1-~00.00 ~ $100.00 $5,500.u0
$'T7,3~'7.00 ~
$275.00:
10 Impervious Membrane $0.86 $24,080.00 $0.40
11 Concrete Curb and Gutter $43.00, $2,365.00 $20.00
12 Concrete Ddveway $15.00! $3,375.00 $5.00 $15.25 $3,431.25
13 Concrete Sidewalk $35.00 $1,925.00 $5.00 $12.25 $573.75
14 Ag_ rg..r_egate Base $20.00 $40,000.00 $25.00 $-5~7000.00 $25.00 $50,000.00
15 Asphalt Concrete $34.00 $64,600.00 $50.00 $-9~7,0-0-0~'00, $55.00 $104,500.00
15 Asphalt Concrete Lined Ditch ' $3.25 $15,054.00 $7.00, ~32,424.00 $15.00 $89,480.00
17 Trail Entry Structure $5,900.00' $5,900.00 $3,500.00: $'27500.001 $1.250.00 $1,250.00
18 4' Vinyl-Clad Chain Link Fence $20.00 $1,920.00 $20.00 ~ $1,920.0~) i $35.00 $3,360.00
19 Stop Bar and Legend $750.00 $750.00 $300.00 $~00.00! $600.00 $$00.00
20 Hydreseedingl Erosion Control $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $3,000.00 ~310D0.0B ', $3,000.00,
21 90 Day Erosion Control Maintenance $5,100.00 $5,100.O0 $200.00 $~-0"0'Z~0 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
SUBTOTAL $322,769.00 $333,845.00, $350,527.50
Alternate Remeve and Replace Unsuitable $26.00 $1,300.00 $30.00
Bid Item A Subgrade
TOTAL
3
CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CI~-~NGE FORM
X From Unappropriated Reserx,es
From New Revenues
[~DF~.. ~BIJDGE,~C~O Lrh -'~8~AM O Uq~-f~ ~:IN CREASE BUD G E'B~A.C CO UN 1~-~,,~!
Accoum #: 210-1000-555-01 ] S 51.453.00
I~M A CCO~ g
Salaries (2II-9605-70]-00~) ' $ 5,000.00
P~tin~ (211-~605-7]~0~0) 400.00
Noti::~ (211-P605-72~-000) 300.00
Can~zt Tes~g Svcs (211-9605-74~077) 3,000.00
Con. ct Svc Design (211-9605-74~078)
Con~:l Svc S~ey (2 H -9605-7~0g0) g,400.00
~mprm'emznm (211-9605-750-050) 2~,363.00
TOTAL DECEASE ~A E~ENSES S 51,~63.00
City Manager: Date:
Signature
REASON FOR BUDGET CH.~NGE EN~KY: The decreases in Revenues and Expmditures reflect changes in
the way the project will be administered. The adopted City of Dublin Budget was based upon the receipt of
these revenues in Fiscal Year 1998/99 and the City would also incur the associated expenses. Instead, the City
of PIe~santon will be directly receiving the revenues and will ~so incur the related expenses.
An additional appropriation fi.om Genemi Fund Reserves is requh'ed, based upon the actual bid and tine CiD' of
Dublin share of the project v,'b~ch is not covered by Grant Funds administered by the City of Pleasanton. h~
addition, an operating trar~f~ of $2,531 to the TDA Fund will be required to reconcile a reduced grime amount
available for expenditures incun'ed in Fiscal Year 1997/98.
Mayor:
Signature
Date:
Posted By: Date:
FUTURE ALAMO CANAL BIKE PATH PROJECT
LOCATION MAP
iR~N HORSE TP, AIL PROJECT (CURREN"T')
FUTURE ALAMO CANAL BIKE PATH PROJECT
ATTACHMEHT~; -
-. ,-, , CURRENT ~, ~
IRON HORSE TRAIL pROJECT
.... ] ./~ UNFUN.-'ED PORTION
(TENTATIVELY PROGRAMMED FOR ~'~
1999-20D0 FISCAL YEA-~)
TMAT ;",'AS PP,.="VIDUSLY
PARk SIERRA PROJECT
i; OCATION MAP_.'
~DN H:::)R~E ~IL p'p.~jEC-.T
'
::' :':'"".'-2~' · ·
I,,tILITAP, Y RES=- P'VATION
UZ.
OF JUSTF" .
k
C-LEAN Al~
TP, A.=FI C '~IGNAL
(70 SE INSTA~ ~-LED BY PARK S!EEP, A PRDJEC~
(TO SE FUNOED ~.Y
-/ /IMPAOTFE=S) ~ --
U.S. NAT. AERONAUTICB
¢ SPACE ADI,4.
.&'Fi', ACHMEN'F
ATTACHMENT 6
Status of Future Segments of Trail Development
This Anachment provides informatibn regarding the current funding identified and stares of. bike path
projects in the City of Dublin.
LOCATION I STATUS FUNDING
IRON HORSE TRAIL
1) North City Limit to Amador
Valley Blvd. (on Zone 7 land)
2) .-Mmador Valley Blvd. (AVB)
pedesMan siL&nal and mail fi-om
AVB to northerly Park Sierra
(on Zone 7 land)
3) Bridge at nomherly Park Sierra
(on Zone 7 la=ad)
Pleasanton administering award
January 19:1999. Construction to
be from February to June 1999
i Semment was not included with
Phase 2 Due to funding. Staff
recommends considering
feasibility to construct in Fiscal
Year 1999/2000 with Alamo
Canal Bike Path project
Completed 1997-98
ISTEA, TDA _.grants, A23434
~ant, EBRPD, Zone 7, General
Fund
It is anticipated that the Ciw will
receive TDA / Clean .45r Grant
Funds in Fiscal Year 1999/2000.
ISTEA, 'iDA
4) Parallel to Park Sierra
development to Dougherry Road
(on Alameda Count7 land)
5) Traffic Sisal at Dougheny
Road (in City R_ig. ht of Wa)0
6) Dougherty Road to
I580/B.~,T Station (in County
land)
Built bv Ciw ori~nall¥
Cons2'uction damage to be
r~aired/overlald in Spring 1999
To be cons~-acted by Park Sierra
Developer in Spring of 1999
Grant just awarded. Joint City,
EBRPD and .Alameda Co.
project; County to administer
Design: 1999-2000
Construction: 2000-2001
TDA (ori~nal) ~
Park Sierra Developer (repair)
Traffic Impact Fees
(construction b7 Park Sierra)
Clean .4.ir Grant
7) Traffic sig:aal at Dublin To be consla-ucted with Dublin East Dublin Traffic Impact Fees
Blvd./Scarlett Dr. (in City Rig_hr Blvd. widening - Doug.berry Rd.
of Way) to Scarlett Drive.
Desigm 1998-1999
Construction: 1999-2000
I .-XL.~iO CA-NAL BIKE PATH
1) As identified in the 1998-2003 Bridge and Dublin Blvd. , Cun-ent CI:P projected General
Underpass work completed ~ ith Fund costs of $174,000. (.~T~i2
C~': from 1-580 to south of Phase 1 of Iron Horse project, does not include any adjustment
to incoporate #2 above)
.-Mnador Valley Boulevard (on
Zone 7 rig. bt-of-way)