HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.7 - 3268 Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 - Environmental
Page 1 of 3
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: June 16, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Fallon Sports Park Master Plan Update and CEQA Addendum
Prepared by: Rosemary Alex, Parks and Facilities Development
Coordinator
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider adopting an Addendum to the 2005 Mitigated Negative
Declaration and approving an update to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan to include a
cricket field, sand volleyball courts, and a lighted five-bay batting cage in Phase 3 of
park development.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving an Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Approving an Update to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
As approved in the updated 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program, the total budget
for Fallon Sports Park - Phase 3 is $10,598,000, funded by the Public Facility Fee Fund.
There is no impact to the General Fund.
DESCRIPTION:
The 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes Fallon Sports Park -
Phase 3 (CIP No. PK0119), which provides for the design and construction of the
remaining 14 acres of the 60-acre Fallon Sports Park, in accordance with the Fallon
Sports Master Plan
Fallon Sports Park Master Plan
On June 7, 2005, the City Council approved the Master Plan (Attachment 4) for a three -
phased development of the 60-acre Fallon Sports Park. The Master Plan was
subsequently amended on February 21, 2012 (Attachment 5) which included the
following revisions: 1) a 90-foot illuminated baseball diamond; 2) eliminating sand
volleyball courts; and 3) identifying the following amenities to be optional: baseball field
restroom, baseball field synthetic turf infield, changing natural turf to synthetic turf f or
Page 2 of 3
soccer fields, soccer field lighting, soccer field shade structure, soccer field wind breaks,
soccer field practice walls and a recreation building. On February 18, 2014 , the Master
Plan was revised a second time (Attachment 6) to include all the option al items
identified in the 2012 update except for the following: baseball field restroom, soccer
field practice walls, and the recreation building.
Phase 3 Conceptual Design
On December 17, 2019, the City Council approved the conceptual design for Fallo n
Sports Park Phase 3 that included two little league fields, four sand volleyball courts, a
cricket field, children’s play area, and a five-bay batting cage (Attachment 3).
The conceptual design differs from the 2014 Master Plan in the following ways:
1. Eliminated two softball fields and a walkway access connection to Fallon Road in
the northeast corner.
2. No further improvements to the BMX track.
3. Addition of one cricket field with three cricket pitches, a five-bay batting cage for
both baseball and cricket, and four sand volleyball courts.
In addition, the City Council directed Staff to complete an environmental review for
inclusion of lighting for the batting cage. The environmental review included evaluation
of the approved concept design, in which two previously planned softball fields were
replaced with the cricket field, batting cages, and volleyball courts.
Environmental Document Update
On June 7, 2005, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for
a three-phased development of Fallon Sports Park (Attachment 7). The Master Plan
and MND identified that lighting would only be located in Phase 1 of the park. On
February 18, 2014, the City Council approved an Addendum to the MND to include
lighting of two soccer fields and a 90 -foot baseball diamond in Phase 2 of the park
(Attachment 8).
During the public outreach process for Phase 3, sports interest groups requested that
the batting cages be illuminated to allow for extended batting practice time. Upon
approval of the Phase 3 concept plan, the City Council directed Staff to consider adding
lighting to the batting cages during project design. Staff engaged an environmental
consultant to review the Phase 3 concept plan, including the addition of lighting for the
batting cages. The environmental review of the cricket field, sand volleyball courts, and
batting cage with lights has shown that there would be no significant impacts beyond
those identified in the original 2005 Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Therefore, an Addendum (Attachment 2) to the Fallon Sports Park 2005 MND has been
prepared to document this conclusion and complete the required environmental review
for the current project. Finally, with approval of the Addendum to the MND, the Fallon
Sports Park Master Plan can be amended for: the removal of two softball fields and the
walkway access to Fallon; the addition of a cricket field with three pitches; the addition
of four volleyball courts; and the addition of an illuminated five-bay batting cage.
Page 3 of 3
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
A public notice has been mailed to all the property owners within a 300-foot radius of
Fallon Sports Park.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving an Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Approving an Update to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan
2. Exhibit A to Resolution - Addendum to 2005 Mitigated Negative Declaration
3. Exhibit B to Resolution - Master Plan Update
4. Fallon Sports Park Master Plan 2005
5. Fallon Sports Park Master Plan Update 02-21-2012
6. Fallon Sports Park Master Plan Update 02-18-2014
7. Fallon Sports Park Master Plan 2005 Mitigated Negative Declaration
8. Fallon Sports Park Mitigated Negative Declaration 2014 Addendum
9. CIP - PK0119 Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. - 20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * * * *
APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING
AN UPDATE TO THE FALLON SPORTS PARK MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, the project site is located in the eastern portion of the City of Dublin, for which the City
adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan to provide a planning framework for
land uses, including recreational facilities and community parks. In connection wi th this approval, the City
of Dublin certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section
15168 (SCH: 91103064, Resolution 51-93, and Addendum dated August 22, 1994; and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared to analyze the Fallon Sports
Park Master Plan in 2005. The 2005 Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved by City Council
Resolution No. 89-05 on June 7, 2005; and
WHEREAS, on January 8, 2019, the City Council directed Staff to update the Fallon Sports Park
Master Plan to include batting cages and a cricket field, and to look at the cost and location of adding
sand volleyball courts, in lieu of two softball fields; and
WHEREAS, on December 17, 2019 the City Council approved the Fallon Sports Park – Phase
3 Concept Plan to include four sand volleyball courts and to eliminate the group picnic area and stairway
access, and the City Council directed Staff to complete an environmental review in order to consider
the inclusion of lighting for the batting cages; and
WHEREAS, Staff prepared an initial study checklist pursuant to Public Resources Code Section
21166, and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164, subdivision (a), to evaluate whether the
proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would result in any new impacts or impacts
that would be more severe than were evaluated and disclosed in the 2005 Mitigated Negative
Declaration; and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, subdivision (a) provides that the lead agency or
a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) or MND if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions describe d in
CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR or MND have occurred
(CEQA Guidelines § 15164, subdivision (a)); and
WHEREAS, the analysis provided in the initial study checklist confirms that the proposed
changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not result in any new impacts or impacts that
would be more severe than were evaluated and disclosed in the 2005 Mitigated Negative Declaration;
and
WHEREAS, the Addendum, checklist, and attached documents constitute substantial evidence
supporting the conclusion that preparation of a subsequent MND is not required prior to construction of
Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 by responsible and trustee agencies and provides the required
documentation under CEQA.
ATTACHMENT 1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby
accept and approve the Addendum (attached as Exhibit A) as substantial evidence supporting the
conclusion that preparation of a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration is not required and
provides the required documentation under CEQA.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby approve
an update to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan (attached as Exhibit B).
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of June 2020, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 (Upper Terrace)
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND
May 28, 2020
Table of Contents
Introduction 1
Background 2
Project Description 3
Environmental Checklist 6
Explanation of Environmental Checklist Responses 8
Appendices
A Photometric Plan
List of Figures
Figure 1: Regional Location .......................................................................................................... 53
Figure 2: Project Location ............................................................................................................ 54
Figure 3: Phase 3 – Concept Plan .................................................................................................. 55
Note: All figures are included at the end of the document.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 1
Fallon Park Phase 3 (Upper Terrace)
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND
Introduction
This Addendum, checklist, and attached supporting documents have been prepared to
determine whether and to what extent the 2005 Fallon Sports Park Mitigated Negative
Declaration (MND)/Initial Study (2005 MND) prepared by the City of Dublin remains sufficient
to address potential impacts of the proposed new cricket field, batting cages, sand volleyball
courts, and walkway, or whether additional documentation is required under California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code [PRC], § 21000, et seq.). For the
purposes of this Addendum, Phase 3 (also known as the Upper Terrace) of the Fallon Sports
Park (Park) is the proposed project and project site.
Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and
15164, subdivision (a), the attached checklist has been prepared to evaluate the proposed
project. The attached checklist uses the standard environmental checklist categories provided
in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, subdivision (a) provides
that the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously
certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or MND if some changes or additions are necessary
but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation
of a subsequent EIR or MND have occurred (CEQA Guidelines § 15164, subd. (a)).
This Addendum, checklist, and attached documents constitute substantial evidence supporting
the conclusion that preparation of a subsequent MND is not required prior to approval of the
above-referenced permits by responsible and trustee agencies and provides the required
documentation under CEQA.
This Addendum addresses improvements and construction of the remaining 12.83 acres of
Phase 3 of the Fallon Sports Park. Proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan
include the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of
the originally proposed softball diamonds in the Upper Terrace area. All other existing and
proposed components of the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would remain unchanged.
Project Title
Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 (Upper Terrace)
Lead Agency Name and Address
City of Dublin
Community Development Department
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 2
Contact Person and Phone Number
Rosemary Alex
Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator
Phone: 925/833-6630
rosemary.alex@dublin.ca.gov
Background
Project Location and Context
The project site is in the City of Dublin, Alameda County, California (APN: 985-54-2) (Figure 1:
Regional Location). The 60.58-acre Fallon Sports Park is located at the northwest corner of
Fallon Road and Central Parkway in Eastern Dublin and currently consists of a variety of athletic
fields, courts, and activity areas accommodating baseball, softball, soccer, tennis, basketball,
and bocce ball, a jogging/walking loop, BMX course, and parking areas (Figure 2: Project
Location). The Fallon Sports Park area has been graded to create a lower and upper terrace.
Drainage improvements, entry roads, parking lots, and utilities have already been installed.
This existing development covers 47.75 acres and was completed in two phases. Phase I
developed 28 acres that opened in 2010, and included two Little League baseball diamonds,
two lighted softball diamonds, four lighted basketball courts, two lighted soccer fields, four
lighted tennis courts, a restroom/field office structure, two restroom/concession structures, a
parking lot, picnic areas, and vehicle and pedestrian entryways. Phase II (also known as the
Lower Terrace Phase) developed 19.75 acres that opened in 2018, and included a lighted
baseball diamond, four lighted bocce ball courts, two lighted, turf soccer fields, a playground,
parking lot, group picnic areas, and a vehicle entryway.
The original Fallon Sports Park Master Plan for the entire 60.58 acres was approved by the City
in June 2005. A Master Plan Update for Phase II was adopted in February 2012 which deleted
the original proposed sand volleyball courts, added a lighted baseball diamond as well as
lighting for the existing soccer field, and temporarily relocated an existing City preschool to the
project site. (The preschool was never relocated to the Fallon Sports Park.)
The Park is bound by single-family and medium-density residential development on all sides, in
addition to a fire station and open space to the north, undeveloped parkland to the south, and
a public elementary school to the west.
Prior Environmental Review Documents
The project has been included in two previous CEQA documents, as noted below:
Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (State
Clearinghouse # 1991103064).
A Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan
Amendment (Eastern Extended Planning Area) and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 3
(EDSP) was certified by the City Council in 1993 by Resolution No. 51-93. This document
and its related Addenda collectively are referred to as the Eastern Dublin EIR (EDEIR.) It
evaluated the following impacts:
Land Use; Population, Employment and Housing; Traffic and Circulation;
Community Services and Facilities; Sewer, Water and Storm Drainage; Soils,
Geology and Seismicity; Biological Resources; Visual Resources; Cultural
Resources; Noise; Air Quality; and Fiscal Considerations.
The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Resolution No. 53–93) for
the following impacts:
Cumulative loss of agriculture and open space land, cumulative traffic, extension
of certain community facilities (natural gas, electric and telephone service),
consumption of non - renewable natural resources, increases in energy uses
through increased water treatment and disposal and through operation of the
water distribution system, inducement of substantial growth and concentration
of population, earthquake ground shaking, loss or degradation of botanically
sensitive habitat, regional air quality, noise and alteration of visual character.
The EDEIR was challenged in court and was found to be legally adequate.
Fallon Sports Park Master Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration (2005 MND)
A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to analyze the Fallon Sports Park Master
Plan in 2005. The 2005 MND was approved by City Council Resolution No. 89-05 on June
7, 2005. The 2005 MND assumed development of the Park consistent with the 2005
Fallon Sports Park Master Plan. Several mitigation measures were included in the
adopted MND in the attachment to the Initial Study.
Project Description
The entire Fallon Sports Park is designated in the General Plan as Parks/Public Recreation, and
in the Zoning Ordinance as Planned Development. The proposed project includes developing
Phase 3 (Upper Terrace) of the Fallon Sports Park with the following components:
• Installation of a new cricket field with three pitches
• Installation of four sand volleyball courts approximately lining south end of BMX course
• Installation of lighted batting cages south of proposed sand volleyball courts
• Elimination of two softball diamonds originally proposed in the Master Plan, to be
replaced with the new cricket field, sand volleyball courts, and batting cages
The Master Plan already includes the following uses for the Upper Terrace Area. These uses
would also be constructed, and were previously evaluated and approved as part of the 2005
MND:
• Two Little League baseball diamonds adjacent to existing Little League diamonds
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 4
• Activity area (children’s play area and picnic plaza) between Little League diamonds and
proposed new improvements
• Walkway along cricket field and sand volleyball courts
Figure 3: Phase 3 – Concept Plan demonstrates locations of proposed improvements.
Field Lighting. The City of Dublin is proposing to install up to 20 lighting fixtures in the proposed
batting cages, to be located south of Fallon Road and the existing BMX course. A photometric
plan is included as Appendix A. Lights would only be used when the Park is open until 10 p.m.
each night; all lights would be turned off by 10:00 p.m.
New lights would be sited to minimize spillover of unwanted light and glare on adjacent
residential areas. Additionally, as described in the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan, all lighting
would be “cut-off” style, directing light down, not out.
Project Approvals
The City proposes to amend the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan to accommodate the proposed
revisions to Phase 3 Park improvements, as described in this Addendum.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 5
Lead Agency
City of Dublin
Community Development Department
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Contact Person and Phone Number
Rosemary Alex
Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator
Phone: 925/833-6630
rosemary.alex@dublin.ca.gov
Project Location
Fallon Sports Park, northwest corner of Fallon Road and Central Parkway in Eastern
Dublin
Project Sponsor
City of Dublin
General Plan Designation
Parks/Public Recreation
Zoning
Planned Development
Project Approvals
The City proposes to amend the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan to accommodate the
proposed project.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 6
Environmental Checklist
The purpose of the checklist is to evaluate the categories in terms of any changed condition (i.e.,
changed circumstances, Project changes, or new information of substantial importance) that may
result in an adverse change in the environmental result (e.g., a new significant impact or
substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant effect) (CEQA Guidelines
§ 15162).
The questions posed in the checklist come from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. A “no”
answer does not necessarily mean that there are no potential impacts relative to the
environmental category, but that there is no adverse change in the condition or status of the
impact since it was analyzed and addressed with mitigation measures in the 2005 MND. These
environmental categories might be answered with a “no” in the checklist, since the proposed
Project does not introduce adverse changes that would result in a modification to the conclusion
of the previously approved CEQA document.
This addendum addresses the conclusions of the 2005 MND.
Explanation of Checklist Evaluation Categories
(1) Conclusion in 2005MND and Related Documents
This column summarizes the conclusion of the 2005 MND relative to the environmental issue listed
under each topic.
(2) Do the Proposed Changes Involve New Significant Impacts?
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subdivision (a)(1), this column indicates whether the
changes represented by the revised Project will result in new significant environmental impacts not
previously identified or mitigated by the 2005 MND, or whether the changes will result in a
substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact.
(3) New Circumstances Involving New Significant Impacts?
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subdivision (a)(2), this column indicates whether there
have been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is
undertaken that will require major revisions to the 2005 MND due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects.
(4) New Information of Substantial Importance Requiring New Analysis or Verification?
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subdivision (a)(3)(A-D), this column indicates whether
new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known
with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the 2005 MND was adopted, shows any of the
following:
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 7
(A) The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or
negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the
previous 2005 MND;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be
feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the
Project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the
previous 2005 MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the Project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative.
If the additional analysis completed as part of this environmental review were to find that the
conclusions of the 2005 MND remain the same and no new significant impacts are identified, or
identified impacts are not found to be substantially more severe, or additional mitigation is not
necessary, then the question would be answered “no” and no additional environmental document
would be required under section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines.
(5) Mitigation Measures Implemented or Address Impacts
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subdivision (a)(3), this column indicates whether the
IS/MND provides mitigation measures to address effects in the related impact category. Any
previously adopted mitigation measures will be identified. The response will also address proposed
revisions to previously adopted mitigation measures. These mitigation measures will be
implemented with the construction of the Project, as applicable. If “NA” is indicated, the IS/MND
has concluded that the impact either does not occur with this Project or is not significant, and
therefore no additional mitigation measures are needed.
Discussion and Mitigation Sections
(1) Discussion
A discussion of the elements of the checklist is provided under each environmental category in
order to clarify the answers. The discussion provides information about the particular
environmental issue, how the Project relates to the issue, and the status of any mitigation that may
be required or that has already been implemented.
(2) Mitigation Measures
Applicable mitigation measures from the 2005 MND that apply to the Project are listed under each
environmental category.
(3) Conclusions
A discussion of the conclusion relating to the analysis is contained in each section.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 8
Explanation of Environmental Checklist Responses
Aesthetics
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse
effect on a scenic vista?
Less than
significant
No No No None
b) Substantially damage
scenic resources, including
but not limited to, trees,
rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a
state scenic highway?
Less than
significant
No No No None
c) Substantially degrade the
existing visual character or
quality of the site and its
surroundings?
Less than
significant
No No No None
d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare
which would adversely
affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
Less than
significant
with
mitigation
No No No 2005 MND
Mitigation
Measure 1
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a–c) Scenic vistas and resources, visual character
The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with visual quality and resources would be
less than significant because the implementation of Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not
significantly alter the appearance of the originally vacant site. Fallon Sports Park is not located
within a scenic route, and the proposed improvements would provide street frontage
landscaping that would improve the visual community landscape of the area.
The proposed Phase 3 portion of the Fallon Sports Park is currently vacant and has been rough
graded in connection with prior approvals and in anticipation of construction of a public park.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 9
The project would involve minor changes to the site plan proposed in the 2005 MND.
Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan include the installation of
cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of the two softball diamonds
originally proposed in Phase 3 of the Master Plan. These proposed changes to the Master Plan
would retain the athletic development originally proposed and would not significantly alter the
visual characteristics of the site as analyzed in the 2005 MND. Therefore, the project would not
result in any new or more severe impacts related to scenic vistas, scenic resources, or visual
characteristics than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare
The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with new light or glare because of nighttime
park lighting in proximity to residential neighborhoods would be less than significant with
mitigation. Mitigation Measure 1 required a photometric study for the Master Plan
demonstrating low lighting prior to electrical permits for lighting installation. This mitigation
measure applies to the proposed Phase 3 development.
Daytime glare is not expected to be generated by any components of the Phase 3 development.
The only proposed new lighting would be installed at the batting cages. Lighting was not
originally proposed for Phase 3 development and was not analyzed in the 2005 MND. However,
this lighting would be contained to a small area compared to field lighting for other parts of the
Park. The lighted batting cages would be located in the interior of the park, not adjacent to
neighboring residential uses. A photometric plan was prepared for the City by Associated
Lighting Representatives on February 21, 2020 and is included as Appendix A of this Addendum.
Proposed changes to the Master Plan include adding 20 light fixtures to the Phase 3
development area. The photometric study demonstrates that based on the location of the
proposed batting cages in the interior of the Park, the lighting would dissipate sufficiently at the
property line and not adversely affect any surrounding residences. Furthermore, the Park is
surrounded by local roadways, which provide an additional buffer, and all lighting would be
shut off at 10 p.m. Therefore, proposed changes to the Master Plan would not result in any light
trespass during nighttime hours or new or more severe impacts from light and glare than were
previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
Mitigation Measures
2005 MND MM 1 – A photometric study shall be provided with final construction drawings of
the project prior to the issuance of an electrical permit for installation of any lighting. "Spill
over" lighting shall be kept to a minimum to prevent disturbance and intrusion into residential
areas using lower lighting, with light standards for fields and courts designed to minimize the
light intrusion into residential areas. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce
the impact of nighttime lighting to a level of less-than-significant.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 10
Agricultural and Forestry Resources
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to
use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources
Agency, to non-agricultural use?
Less than
significant
No No No None
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
Less than
significant
No No No None
c) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their
location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland to non-
agricultural use?
Less than
significant
No No No None
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(farmland)
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact associated with the conversion of farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of
statewide importance.
The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND.
Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of
cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These
minor changes would not result in any new or additional impacts in relation to agricultural
resources. As such, the project would not result in a new or more severe impact to important
farmland than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 11
(b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a William Act contract
The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with existing zoning conflicts or Williamson
Act contracts would be less than significant because the Fallon Sports Park contains no
agricultural zoning or farmland and is zoned for use as a community park, consistent with the
General Plan and Specific Plan. According to the 2005 MND, no portion of the site is associated
with a Williamson Act Land Conservation Agreement.
The project would involve development of parkland with minor changes to the originally
proposed plan that was analyzed in the 2005 MND. These minor changes would be consistent
with existing zoning and would not conflict with agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract.
As such, the project would not result in any new or more severe impact to important farmland
than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(c) Conflict with existing zoning
The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with existing zoning conflicts would be less
than significant because the Park is zoned for use as a community park.
The project would fulfill the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan’s intended use of the land as a
community park and is consistent with the existing zoning. The minor changes that are
proposed would not necessitate a change of zoning or result in any new or more severe impacts
than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 12
Air Quality
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Conclusion in
IS/MND Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstan
ces
Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New Analysis
or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan? No impact No No No None
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation?
Less than
significant
with
mitigation.
No No No 2005 MND
Mitigation
Measure 2
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is non-attainment under an applicable
federal or state ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
Less than
significant
No No No None
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
Less than
significant
No No No None
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
Less than
significant
No No No None
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Consistent with air quality plans
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not conflict with the
Clean Air Plan adopted by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. The proposed amount
of nonresidential development has been included in the City of Dublin's planned growth as part
of the EDEIR since 1994 and would serve the existing community.
The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as analyzed in the 2005 MND.
Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of
cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These
minor changes would not alter the amount of nonresidential development as compared to the
previously proposed plan, and therefore would not result in any new or additional impacts. As
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 13
such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were previously
analyzed in the 2005 MND with respect to Clean Air Plan consistency.
(b) Violate any air quality standard
The 2005 MND concluded that, with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2, the Fallon Sports
Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact associated with air quality standard
violations. The 2005 MND required the incorporation of Mitigation Measure 2 into future
phases of project construction to reduce potential air quality impacts related to construction on
the 60.58 acres of park development to a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measure 2
requires dust control for the project’s construction and earthwork to conform to the
requirements of the stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) prepared by the City and to
established City standards. This mitigation measure includes additional requirements for dust
control, including daily watering of all active construction areas, covering all trucks hauling soil,
sand or other loose materials; daily watering or application of nontoxic soil stabilizer on all
unpaved access roads, parking area and staging areas; daily sweeping of all paved access roads,
parking areas, and staging areas with water sweepers; and hydroseeding or application of
nontoxic soil stabilizers to construction areas that have been graded.
The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND.
Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of
cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These
changes would involve a similar level of construction as the previously proposed plan, and
therefore would not result in any new or additional impacts. The proposed project would
implement Mitigation Measure 2 from the 2005 MND, updated to reflect current BAAQMD
guidance. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to air
quality standards violations than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(c) Cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutant
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact associated with cumulatively considerable net increases of criteria pollutants.
The implementation of the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not generate significant
amounts of additional traffic beyond that considered in previous environmental documents,
and vehicular traffic emissions and stationary source emissions would not exceed regional air
quality standards or thresholds.
The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND.
Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of
cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These
minor changes would not increase vehicle trips associated with the Fallon Sports Park Master
Plan as analyzed in the 2005 MND, and therefore would not result in any new or additional
criteria pollutant impacts. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts
related to criteria pollutants than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 14
(d–e) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations, or create objectionable odors
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have less than
significant impacts associated with the exposure of sensitive receptors to pollutant
concentrations and the creation of objectionable odors.
The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND.
Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of
cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These
minor changes would not result in an increase in pollutants or odors associated with the
construction and operation of the project, and therefore would not result in any new or
additional impacts. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts related
to pollutants or odors than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
Mitigation Measures
2005 MND MM 2 – Dust control for the construction and earthwork for the project shall
conform to the requirements of the SWPPP prepared by the City and established City
standards. All active construction areas shall be watered daily and more frequently, if
necessary. All trucks hauling soil, sand or other loose materials shall be covered. Water shall be
applied daily, or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking area, and
staging areas at construction sites. All paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at
construction sites shall be swept daily with water sweepers. Hydroseed or apply non-toxic soil
stabilizers to construction areas that have been graded.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 15
Biological Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly
or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-
status species in local or regional plans, policies,
or regulations, or by the California Department
of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
Less than
significant
No No No EDEIR
MM
3.7/1.0 –
5.0,
10.0,
14.0,
16.0,
17.0,
and 19.0
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies,
regulations, or by the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
Less than
significant
No No No None
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited
to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
Less than
significant
No No No None
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
Less than
significant
No No No None
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
No impact No No No None
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
No impact No No No None
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 16
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Substantial adverse effect on candidate, sensitive, or special-status species
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact regarding adverse effects on candidate, sensitive, or special-status species if
the mitigation measures defined in applicable CEQA documents (including the EDEIR), and all
applicable environmental permits, are implemented. Mitigation measures defined in the EDEIR
to reduce significant impacts on biological resources are included in IM 3.7A through S.
Mitigation measures that are applicable to the proposed project are listed below.
The proposed project involves only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005
MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution
of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds.
Additionally, the proposed project site is heavily degraded following implementation of
previous phases of the Fallon Sports Park. No candidate, sensitive, or special-status species or
signs thereof were detected during a field survey conducted on March 12, 2020, by FCS
biologist Bernhard Warzecha.
Therefore, the minor changes associated with the proposed project would not result in any new
or more severe impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special-status species than were previously
analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(b) Substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
communities
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact regarding adverse effects on riparian or other sensitive natural communities
if the mitigation measures defined in the EDEIR are implemented.
Based on the field survey conducted on March 12, 2020 by FCS biologist Bernhard Warzecha,
no riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities are present on the proposed project
footprint covered under this Addendum. Therefore, the project would not result in any adverse
effects to riparian or other sensitive natural communities and would therefore remain
consistent with the conclusions of the 2005 MND. The proposed project would not result in any
new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(c) Substantial adverse effect on wetlands
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact regarding adverse effects on federally protected wetlands.
Based on the field survey conducted on March 12, 2020 by FCS biologist Bernhard Warzecha,
no aquatic features, including wetlands, are present at the proposed project site covered under
this Addendum. Therefore, the project would not result in any adverse impacts to federally
protected wetlands and would therefore remain consistent with conclusions and findings of the
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 17
2005 MND. The proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impact than were
previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(d) Interfere or impede the movement of migratory fish or wildlife
The 2005 MND concluded that the impacts of the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would be less
than significant in relation to interference or impediments to movement of migratory fish or
wildlife.
The proposed project involves only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005
MND. Additionally, the proposed project site is heavily degraded following implementation of
previous phases of the Fallon Sports Park. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in
new or more severe impacts regarding adverse effects to movement of migratory fish or
wildlife than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(e) Conflict with local policies or ordinance include tree preservation
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not conflict with the
EDSP, General Plan, or other adopted policies and ordinances including tree preservation, and
that no heritage trees exist on-site.
Approval and construction of the proposed project would not affect any protected trees on-
site, since no mature trees currently exist where the cricket pitches, batting cages, or sand
volleyball courts would be constructed. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in
new or more severe impacts regarding conflicts with local policies or ordinance than were
previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(f) Conflict with adopted habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not conflict with the
provision of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or
other approved local, regional, or state Habitat Conservation Plan.
The project site lies within the Eastern Alameda County Conservation Strategy (EACCS) planning
area. The City of Dublin utilizes the EACCS as guidance for environmental permitting for public
projects. Private development projects are encouraged to use the EACCS as a resource as well.
The EACCS embodies a regional approach to permitting and mitigating wildlife habitat impacts
associated with land development, infrastructure, and other activities. The EACCS is neither a
Habitat Conservation Plan nor a Natural Community Conservation Plan, but is a document
intended to provide guidance during the project planning and permitting process to ensure that
impacts are offset in a biologically effective manner. Therefore, the proposed project would not
result in new or significantly more severe impacts with respect to this topic than were
previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
Mitigation Measures
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 18
EDEIR MM 3.7/1.0 – Direct disturbance or removal of trees or native vegetation cover should
be minimized and be restricted to those areas actually designated for the construction of
improvements.
EDEIR MM 3.7/2.0 – Vegetation enhancement/management plans should be prepared for all
open space areas (whether held publicly or privately) with the intent to enhance the biologic
potential of the area as wildlife habitat. The focus of such plans will be to reintroduce native
species in order to increase the vegetative cover and plant diversity.
EDEIR MM 3.7/3.0 – The City will require a detailed revegetation/restoration plan to be
developed for all disturbed areas that are to remain undeveloped. The plan will be developed
by a qualified revegetation specialist, and should incorporate stockpiling of native topsoils as
appropriate, for later reapplication to cut slopes, shoulders, and pads.
EDEIR MM 3.7/4.0 – Grazing management plans shall be developed by the City and
implemented soon after approval of the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan.
Management plans shall favor protection of riparian and wetland areas, increased plant
diversity, and the recovery of native plants, in particular, perennial grasses.
EDEIR MM 3.7/5.0 – All areas of disturbance should be revegetated as quickly as possible to
prevent erosion. Native trees (preferably those species already on site), shrubs, herbs, and
grasses should be used for revegetation of areas to remain as natural open space. The
introduction of non-native plant species should be avoided.
EDEIR MM 3.7/10.0 – Establish a stream corridor system (see Specific Plan: Figure 6.1) which
provides multi-purpose open space corridors capable of accommodating wildlife and pedestrian
circulation. In order to facilitate the use of these corridors by both humans and wildlife, human
activities (e.g., trails) should be limited to one side of the stream.
EDEIR MM 3.7/14.0 – The City should enact and enforce an erosion and sedimentation control
ordinance establishing performance standards to ensure maintenance of water quality and
protection of stream channels. The ordinance should regulate grading and development
activities adjacent to streams and wetland areas, and require revegetation of all ground
disturbance immediately after construction to reduce erosion potential. Until such an
ordinance is in place, the City shall require project applicants to provide a detailed erosion and
sedimentation control plan as part of the project submittal.
EDEIR MM 3.7/16.0 – Existing sensitive habitats shall be avoided and protected where feasible.
EDEIR MM 3.7/17.0 – Construction near drainages shall take place during the dry season.
EDEIR MM 3.7/19.0 – The use of rodenticides and herbicides within the Project area should be
restricted to avoid impacts on wildlife. The City shall require any poisoning programs to be done
in cooperation with and under supervision of the Alameda County Department of Agriculture.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 19
Cultural Resources
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant
to Section 15064.5?
No impact No No No MM
3.9/1.0–4.0
of the
EDEIR
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
No impact No No No MM
3.9/5.0 of
the EDEIR
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
No impact No No No None
d) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?
No impact No No No MM
3.9/5.0 of
the EDEIR
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Historical resources
The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with historical resources
because no resources were discovered on the Fallon Sports Park site in a site-specific survey.
Unrecorded cultural resources that could be encountered on the site would be addressed as
required by the mitigation measures contained in the EDEIR. These mitigation measures
(3.9/1.0–4.0) mandate a program of mechanical and/or hand subsurface testing for the
presence or absence of midden deposits, recordation of identified midden sites, collection
and/or testing of resources, and development of a site-specific protection program for
prehistoric sites.
The Phase 3 development area has remained relatively unchanged since the implementation of
Phase II and is still vacant. No new State or local historical resources have been designated on
or adjacent to the site. The proposed minor changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan
would not result in any new or more severe impacts related to historical resources than were
previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 20
(b, d) Archaeological resources, human remains
The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with archaeological resources
or human remains because no resources or remains were discovered on the Fallon Sports Park
site in a site-specific survey. It did, however, reference Mitigation Measure 3.9/5.0 of the EDEIR,
establishing protocols for inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources found during site
grading. The 2005 MND stipulated that these measures would continue to be followed during
ongoing development of Fallon Sports Park, and so are incorporated in this Addendum. In
addition, the cultural resource mitigation measures contained in the EDEIR would address
impacts to human remains.
The Phase 3 development area has remained relatively unchanged since the implementation of
Phase II and is still vacant. The proposed minor changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan
would not result in any new or more severe impacts related to archaeological resources and
disturbance of human remains than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(c) Paleontological/unique geological resources
The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with paleontological
resources because no resources were discovered on the Fallon Sports Park site in a site-specific
survey.
The Phase 3 development area has remained relatively unchanged since the implementation of
Phase II and is still vacant. The proposed minor changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan
would not result in new or more severe impacts related to paleontological resources than were
previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
Mitigation Measures
EDEIR MM 3.9/1.0 – All locations of prehistoric resources will need a program of mechanical
and/or hand subsurface testing to determine the presence or absence of midden deposits
associated with the surface indicators of aboriginal presence.
EDEIR MM 3.9/2.0 – All locations containing either midden components or concentrations of
cultural materials located on the surface will be recorded on State of California site survey
forms. The borders of any midden deposits or concentrations of cultural materials (other than
single isolated artifact discoveries) will be staked so that accurate location maps can be
produced by professional survey teams.
EDEIR MM 3.9/3.0 – If it can be demonstrated that these recorded and mapped locations will
be impacted in any manner by future construction or indirectly impacted as a result of
increased access to the areas, a plan of evaluative testing of each resource will have to be
devised in order to prepare responsive mitigation measures. Evaluative testing will consist of
the collection and analysis of any surface concentration of cultural materials, and the hand
excavation and analysis of the scientific content of any midden components discovered during
presence or absence testing.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 21
EDEIR MM 3.9/4.0 – The City shall retain the services of a qualified archaeologist to develop a
protection program for prehistoric sites which contain either a surface or subsurface deposit of
cultural materials or information which qualify under Appendix K of CEQA as "significant", and
which are located in areas of the Project site where development will significantly alter the
current condition of the prehistoric resource.
EDEIR MM 3.9/5.0 – The discovery of historic or prehistoric remains during grading and
construction will result in the cessation of such activities until the significance and extent of
those remains can be ascertained by a certified archaeologist.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 22
ENERGY
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
The topic of the project's energy use was not analyzed in the EDEIR or the 2005 MND. The
project’s impacts related to energy use are not required to be analyzed unless they constitute
new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known
at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete (Public Resources Code section 21166
and Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). The impact of energy use was known at the time of
the certification of the EDEIR and the 2005 MND. Under CEQA standards, it is not new
information that requires analysis in a supplemental EIR or negative declaration. Therefore, no
supplemental environmental analysis of the project's impacts on this issue is required under
CEQA.
(a–b) Wasteful consumption of energy resources, or conflict with local plans for renewable
energy
As discussed above, no additional environmental analysis is required under CEQA Section
21166.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 23
Geology and Soils
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
a) Indirectly or directly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial evidence of
a known fault?
Less than
significant
No No No None
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less than
significant
No No No None
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
Less than
significant
No No No None
iv) Landslides? Less than
significant
No No No None
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
Less than
significant
No No No None
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Less than
significant
No No No MM
3.6/14.0
through
16.0 of
the EDEIR
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?
Less than
significant
No No No MM
3.6/14.0
through
16.0 of
the EDEIR
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative waste
water disposal systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of waste water?
No impact No No No None
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 24
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Seismic hazards
The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with seismic hazards would be less than
significant because recommendations from previous area and site geotechnical evaluations
were incorporated into development plans for the Fallon Sports Park.
The location of the Phase 3 development would not change. Additionally, the proposed minor
changes to the Master Plan would not change existing circumstances related to seismic hazards
or result in any new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(b) Erosion/topsoil loss
The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with erosion or topsoil loss would be less
than significant because standard City Conditions of Approval would be followed and
incorporated into construction documents, including implementation of erosion control plans
and a SWPPP. These conditions would also apply to the Phase 3 development.
The proposed project is located within Fallon Sports Park, which had been analyzed for erosion
and topsoil loss impacts. The proposed minor changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan
would not result in any new or more severe impacts related to erosion and loss of topsoil than
were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(c–d) Soil stability, expansion
The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with soil stability and expansive soils would
be less than significant because Mitigation Measures 3.6/14.0 through 16.0 of the EDEIR were
adopted to reduce shrink-swell potential. These mitigation measures require appropriate
structural foundations, support for court and parking areas, and other methods to mediate
impacts. These mitigation measures would be carried forward as applicable.
The proposed project is located within Fallon Sports Park, which had been analyzed for unstable
or expansive soil impacts. The proposed minor changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan
would not result in any new or more severe impacts related to unstable or expansive soils than
were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(e) Soil capability to support alternative wastewater disposal
The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with supporting alternative
wastewater disposal because the restroom facilities at Fallon Sports Park would be connected
to the public sewer system.
Restroom facilities are not part of the proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan,
nor were they included in the originally proposed Phase 3 development. As such there would
be no new or more severe impacts related to soil capability to support alternative wastewater
disposal than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
Mitigation Measures
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 25
EDEIR MM 3.6/14.0 – The potential impact of expansive soils and rock with respect to Project
improvements can be significantly reduced, or in many cases prevented by the recognition and
characterization of site-specific conditions, and the formulation of appropriate design criteria
and mitigation measures during detailed design-level geotechnical investigation, conducted for
each specific proposed project.
EDEIR MM 3.6/15.0 – The potential for shrink and swell of expansive soils and rock can be
reduced by controlling moisture and by treatment through measures listed below. Subsurface
drainage alone is not generally effective against the effects of regional wet/drought cycles.
Required measures for a specific project should be based on the recommendation of the
project geotechnical consultant and approved by the City and include:
• Moisture conditioning prior to construction;
• Construction of surface and subsurface drainage to control infiltration after
construction;
• Lime treatment, which can be used to produce non-expansive fill; and
EDEIR MM 3.6/16.0 – The potential effects of expansive soil and rock can be reduced by
appropriate foundation and pavement design, including those design elements listed below.
Adjustable foundation systems are not generally effective against the effects of regional
wet/drought cycles and are considered undesirable because the systems require periodic
maintenance, and their use should be discouraged.
Appropriate design criteria should be developed by the project geotechnical consultant and
approved by the City.
• Founding structural foundations below the zone of seasonal moisture change;
• Use of structurally supported floors; and
• Removal and replacement with non-expansive fill beneath structure slabs and asphaltic
concrete.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 26
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Since the EDEIR and the 2005 MND were approved before greenhouse gas (GHG) emission
analysis became a CEQA requirement in 2006, the determination of whether GHG emissions
and climate change need to be analyzed for this proposed project is governed by the law on
supplemental or subsequent EIRs (Public Resources Code section 21166 and Guidelines,
Sections 15162 and 15163).
The topic of the project's contribution to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions was not analyzed in
the EDEIR or the 2005 MND. However, these impacts are not required to be analyzed unless
they constitute new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not
have been known at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete (Public Resources Code
section 21166 and Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). The impact of GHG emissions was
known at the time of the certification of the EDEIR and the 2005 MND. Under CEQA standards,
it is not considered new information that requires analysis in a supplemental EIR or negative
declaration. Therefore, no supplemental environmental analysis of the project's impacts on this
issue is required under CEQA.
(a–b) Generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, or conflict with GHG plans or regulations.
As discussed above, no additional environmental analysis is required under CEQA Section
21166.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 27
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
No impact No No No None
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
No impact No No No None
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within ¼ mile of an existing or proposed
school?
No impact No No No None
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list
of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
No impact No No No None
e) For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
No impact No No No
None
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
No impact No No No None
g) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No impact No No No None
h) Expose people or structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland
fires, including where wildlands are adjacent
No impact No No No None
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 28
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
to urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a–d) Exposure to hazardous materials, upset/accident, near school, hazardous materials list,
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have no impacts
associated with exposure to hazardous materials, upset/accident, hazards near schools, or
hazardous sites. The 2005 MND determined that no hazardous material has been transported
to or from the site or is anticipated to be done in the future, as the site was planned to be
developed into a public park. The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts.
The proposed project involves only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005
MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution
of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These
proposed changes would not involve additional exposure to hazardous materials, or any other
risks associated with upset or accident or exposure of hazards near schools. The proposed
project would not be located on a hazardous materials site. Although Kolb Elementary School is
located 500 feet west of the Park, given the nature of the proposed project, there would be no
risk of exposure of hazardous materials to the school.
There are no hazardous sites or other areas of concern listed on the State of California
Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor database.1 The nearest site of concern
listed on EnviroStor is a former cleanup program site located about 500 feet east of the Fallon
Sports Park at the Jordan Ranch at 4233 Fallon Street. The case was resolved and closed in
January 2016. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated
with hazards or hazardous materials than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(e–f) Proximity to a public or private airport
The 2005 MND concluded that the site is not located within an airport land use plan or within
the vicinity of a public airport. According to the 2005 MND, the Livermore Municipal Airport
and the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) confirmed that the Area F Planning Area in
1 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2020. EnviroStor. Website:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=4605+Lockhart+St%2C+Dublin%2C+CA+94568.
Accessed March 19, 2020.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 29
Eastern Dublin was outside the referral area for the airport, and the ALUC has no jurisdiction
over the land uses. The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts.
The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the
2005 MND. The proposed changes would not change the circumstances regarding proximity to
public or private airports or regarding airport planning areas. As such, the project would not
result in new or more severe impacts associated with hazards or hazardous materials than were
previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(g) Impair implementation of an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan
The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with emergency
evacuation plans. According to the 2005 MND, the site’s driveways with entry features from
Lockhart Street and Central Parkway provide adequate emergency access, and the emergency
access as shown on the Master Plan was approved by the Alameda County Fire Department.
The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the
2005 MND. The proposed changes would not involve any changes to emergency access, or to
an emergency response plan, or to an emergency evacuation plan. As such, the project would
not result in new or more severe impacts associated with an emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(h) Expose people or structures to wildland fires
The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts due to exposure of people or
structures to the risk of wildland fires. According to the 2005 MND, improvements to the Park
as well as urbanization in the surrounding areas would minimize the risks of wildfires in the
project area.
The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the
2005 MND. The proposed changes would not create any new risk of wildland fires or any
increased exposure to such risks. The site is located within a State Responsibility Area and is
currently located outside of the fire hazard severity zones as indicated on the applicable Fire
Hazard Severity Zone Map provided by CalFire.2 As such, the project would not result in new or
more severe impacts associated with wildland fires than were previously analyzed in the 2005
MND.
2 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2020. Fire Hazard Severity Zones Maps: Alameda County.
Website: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/divisions/wildfire-planning-engineering/wildland-hazards-building-codes/fire-
hazard-severity-zones-maps/. Accessed March 19, 2020.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 30
Hydrology and Water Quality
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
Less than
significant
No No No No
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that there would be a net
deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local ground water table level (for example,
the production rate of pre-existing nearby
wells would drop to a level which would not
support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
Less than
significant
No No No No
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site.
Less than
significant
No No No EDEIR
MM
3.5/49.0,
51.0, and
52.0
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off-site.
Less than
significant
No No No EDEIR
MM
3.5/49.0,
51.0, and
52.0
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
storm water drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted
runoff?
Less than
significant
No No No EDEIR
MM
3.5/49.0,
51.0, and
52.0
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water
quality?
Less than
significant
No No No EDEIR
MM
3.5/49.0,
51.0, and
52.0
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood-hazard
area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Less than
significant
No No No No
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 31
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or
other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood-hazard area
structures which would impede or redirect
flood flows?
Less than
significant
No No No None
i) Expose people or structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
Less than
significant
No No No None
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Less than
significant
No No No None
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Violate water quality or waste discharge requirements
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact regarding violations of water quality or waste discharge requirements.
The proposed project involves only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005
MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution
of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These
proposed changes would not violate water quality or waste discharge requirements. As such,
the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated with water quality or
waste discharge requirements than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(b) Substantially deplete or interfere with groundwater supplies
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact regarding groundwater supplies.
The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the
2005 MND. The proposed changes would not involve any additional demand to groundwater
supplies. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated with
groundwater supplies than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 32
(c–f) Substantially alter existing drainage patterns re: erosion/siltation, re: flooding, or
degrade water quality
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact regarding drainage patterns and water quality. According to the 2005 MND,
an intermittent creek flows along the western boundary of the site. According to the 2005
MND, the project utilized a United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 wetland fill
permit, a U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Opinion, a Regional Water Quality Control Board
Section 401 Water Quality Certification, and a California Department of Fish and Game 1602
Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, and all other required permits from the appropriate
State and federal agencies.
The 2005 MND stated that the Park’s existing drainage patterns would be changed as a result of
grading and contouring of the land. The 2005 MND noted that the creek would be improved
and enhanced, and swales would be constructed to filter and absorb stormwater and runoff at
the site.
Mitigation measures requiring drainage and runoff control and the use of biodegradable
pesticides and herbicide to reduce pollution were implemented. These include the following
mitigation measures from the EDEIR: 3.5/49.0, 51.0, and 52.0. The 2005 MND determined that
these mitigation measures would reduce impacts to water quality and drainage to a less than
significant impact.
The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the
2005 MND. The project would be required to implement the applicable mitigation measures
identified above. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts
associated with the alteration of drainage patterns, erosion, siltation, or degradation of water
supply than were previously analyzed and mitigated in the 2005 MND.
(e) Runoff exceed drainage capacity, or add pollution
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact regarding runoff, drainage capacity, and pollution. According to the 2005
MND, the grading plan that was prepared for the project conformed to the Alameda Flood
Control and Water Quality District, Zone 7 requirements. The grading plan also met the water
quality standards of the City of Dublin’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Permit and the Alameda County Urban Runoff Clean Water Program. The City of
Dublin’s Conditions of Approval included erosion control plans and preparation of a SWPPP. The
City Public Works Department’s hydrology and drainage studies determined that there is
sufficient capacity to accommodate the project’s stormwater and drainage facilities.
The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the
2005 MND. Existing drainage patterns may be slightly modified to accommodate the changes;
however, the changes would not be significant. The project would be required to implement
the mitigation measures as outlined above, which would reduce any changes to drainage
patterns to a less than significant impact. The proposed changes would not cause additional
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 33
pollution beyond what was analyzed in the 2005 MND. As such, the project would not result in
new or more severe impacts associated with runoff than were previously analyzed in the 2005
MND.
(f) Water Quality
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact on water quality. As discussed in Impact Question 9 (c–e), the project has
complied with all requirements related to water quality and has implemented mitigation
measures that were determined to reduce the project’s impacts on water quality to less than
significant.
The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the
2005 MND. The proposed changes would not include changes that would impact water quality
beyond what was analyzed in the 2005 MND. As such, the project would not result in new or
more severe impacts to water quality than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(g–h) Flood hazard
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact regarding flood hazards. According to the 2005 MND, the area is not located
within a 100-year flood zone as identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).3
The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the
2005 MND. The proposed changes would not involve any additional flood hazards beyond what
was analyzed in the 2005 MND. The proposed changes would not alter the location of the site,
which is currently designated an Area of Minimal Flood Hazard on the most recent FEMA flood
maps. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to flood
hazards than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than
significant impact regarding seiche, tsunami, or mudflows. According to the 2005 MND and
discussed in the previous impact question, the site is not located within a 100-year flood zone
as identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map published by FEMA. Additionally, the project site
is not located near major bodies of water and is therefore not at risk of tsunami or seiche.
The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the
2005 MND, which would not include any changes to the site’s location or boundaries. As such,
the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated with seiche, tsunamis, or
mudflows than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
3 Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2009. Flood Map Number 06001C0328G. August 3. Website:
https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?#searchresultsanchor. Accessed March 19, 2020.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 34
Mitigation Measures
EDEIR MM 3.5/49.0 – Plan facilities and select management practices in the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan area that protect and enhance water quality.
EDEIR MM 3.5/51.0 – Water Quality Investigation. Require a specific water quality investigation
be submitted with each development application to demonstrate existing water quality and
impacts that urban runoff would have. The water quality investigation should address the
quantity of runoff and the effects from discharged pollutants from surface runoff into creeks
and detention facilities.
EDEIR MM 3.5/52.0 – Develop community-based programs to educate local residents and
businesses on methods to reduce non-point sources of pollution. Coordinate such programs
with current Alameda County programs. Such programs should include:
• Increased availability of liquid recycling centers (i.e.: oil, greases, etc.), to reduce
potential/or dumping into storm drains.
• Programs that educate the public that catch basins and storm drains flow to creeks, to
potable groundwater basins, and to the San Francisco Bay, including a potential
program to paint labels at each catch basin and storm drain to alert people to these
facts.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 35
Land Use and Planning
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? No impact No No No None
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan,
policy, or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the project (including, but not
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
No impact No No No None
c) Conflict with any applicable Habitat
Conservation Plan or Natural Community
Conservation Plan?
No impact No No No None
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Physically divide an established community
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have no impacts
related to the physical division of an established community. As discussed in the 2005 MND, the
project does not divide an established community because the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan
designated the site to provide recreational facilities to new and existing developments in
Eastern Dublin for use by residents and the surrounding community. The Master Plan is
consistent with the EDSP and General Plan.
The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the
2005 MND. The proposed changes would not alter the location or boundaries of the Park.
Therefore, the impacts of the proposed changes are consistent with the 2005 MND. The site
would not physically divide an established community. As such, the project would not result in
new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(b) Conflict with general plan
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have no impacts
associated with conflicts with applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations. The Master
Plan is consistent with the EDSP/General Plan EIR. These plans designate the Master Plan area
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 36
as City Park and Park. Additionally, the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan is consistent with the
City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the
2005 MND. The proposed changes would not cause any inconsistencies with the EDSP, the
General Plan, the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan, the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan,
or any other land use or zoning designations. As such, the project would not result in new or
more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation
plan
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have no impacts
related to conflicts with a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan.
According to the 2005 MND, there are no applicable Habitat Conservation Plans or Natural
Community Conservation Plans for the project area.
The proposed changes would occur within the Fallon Sports Park and would not be inconsistent
with any applicable Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan. As
such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were previously
analyzed in the 2005 MND.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 37
Mineral Resources
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
No impact No No No None
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
No impact No No No None
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a–b) Loss of known mineral resource
The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with mineral resources
because State mineral resource maps do not indicate mineral resources on-site, and the EDEIR
does not indicate significant mineral deposits on-site.
The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the
2005 MND, which would not include any changes to the site’s location or boundaries. The
proposed minor changes to the Master Plan would not change existing circumstances related to
mineral resources or result in any new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in
the 2005 MND.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 38
Noise
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
12. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise
levels in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance or
applicable standards of other agencies?
Less than
significant
No No No MM
3.10/4.0-
5.0
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of
excessive ground borne vibration or ground
borne noise levels?
Less than
significant
No No No MM
3.10/4.0-
5.0
c) Substantial permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
Less than
significant
No No No MM
3.10/4.0-
5.0
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
Less than
significant
No No No MM
3.10/4.0-
5.0
e) For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?
No impact No No No MM
3.10/4.0-
5.0
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
No impact No No No MM
3.10/4.0-
5.0
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a–d) Exposure to or generation of noise exceeding standards, exposure to ground borne
vibration or ground borne noise, permanently increasing ambient noise levels, or substantial
temporary noise increase
The 2005 MND concluded that with implementation of mitigation measures defined in the
EDEIR and requirements in the City of Dublin’s standard conditions of approval, the Fallon
Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact associated with exposure to
or generation of noise levels in excess of standards, exposure of people to ground-borne
vibration, or permanent increases in ambient noise levels. These mitigation measures and
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 39
conditions of approval require preparation of a construction noise management plan to
minimize noise and adherence to construction hour limitations.
The project would involve minor changes to the Phase 3 development as analyzed in the 2005
MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution
of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These
minor changes would not result in any new or additional noise impacts. Implementation of
these changes are expected to result in similar levels of construction, trip generation, and
spectator attendance. These changes would not introduce any new noise sources not
previously analyzed. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts than
were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND for any impacts related to exposure to or generation
of noise in excess of standards, exposure to ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise, a
permanent increase in ambient noise levels, or a substantial temporary noise increase.
(e–f) Excessive noise level near a public or private airport
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not expose people in
the project area to excessive noise levels because the project is not located within an airport
land use plan or within two miles of a public airport, public use airport, or private airstrip.
The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND.
However, these minor changes would not alter the location of the project, and therefore would
not result in any new or additional noise impacts related to proximity to airports. As such, the
project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the
2005 MND.
Mitigation Measures
MM 3.10/4.0 – Developers shall submit to the City a Construction Noise Management Program
that identifies measures to be taken to minimize impacts on existing planning area residents.
The program will include a schedule for grading and other major noise-generating activities
that· will limit these activities to the shortest possible number of days. Hours of construction
activities shall be limited in keeping with Dublin ordinances. The Program for construction
vehicle access to the site shall minimize construction truck traffic through residential areas. If
construction traffic must travel through residential areas, then a mitigation plan should be
developed. The Program may include barriers, berms or restrictions on hours.
MM 3.10/5.0 – In order to minimize the impact of construction noise, all operations should
comply with local noise standards relating to construction activities. When construction occurs
near residential areas, then it should be limited to normal daytime hours to minimize the
impact. Stationary equipment should be adequately muffled and located as far away from
sensitive receptors as possible.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 40
Population and Housing
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion
in IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
No impact No No No None
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
No impact No No No None
c) Displace substantial numbers of people,
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
No impact No No No None
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Population growth
The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with population growth
because Fallon Sports Park was planned well in advance of actual development in the eastern
area of the City to serve projected residential units and those already planned and approved.
The proposed minor changes to the Master Plan would not be significantly different from the
originally proposed softball diamonds regarding inducing population growth or result in any
new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(b–c) Housing and resident displacement
The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with displacement of housing
or people because the site was planned for park uses and not residential uses, and there is also
no housing on-site.
The proposed minor changes to the Master Plan would not be significantly different from the
originally proposed softball diamonds and would not result in any new or more severe impacts
than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 41
Public Services
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,
the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? No impact No No No None
b) Police protection? No impact No No No None
c) Schools? No impact No No No None
d) Parks? No impact No No No None
e) Other public facilities? No impact No No No None
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a–e) Fire, police, schools, parks, and other public facilities
The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with public services because
development of the Fallon Sports Park would not create a need for new services or facilities.
Alameda County Fire Department and the City of Dublin Police Department had ensured that
the Fallon Sports Park met the applicable safety criteria for public use. The City would provide
maintenance of streets, roads, the Park itself, and other related governmental facilities.
The project would involve minor changes to the Phase 3 development as analyzed in the 2005
MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution
of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These
minor changes would not increase the demand of fire, police, parks, and other public facilities.
In addition, these proposed changes would not induce population growth and thus would not
impact nearby schools. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe
impacts related to public services than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 42
Recreation
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
15. RECREATION. Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational facilities
such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be accelerated?
No impact No No No None
b) Include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?
No impact No No No None
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Increase the use of existing recreation facilities causing deterioration
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have no impacts
associated with the use of existing recreational facilities. The 2005 MND determined that the
project would provide much-needed recreational facilities, which would increase recreational
resources for the community and thereby have a beneficial impact on the provision of park
facilities with no adverse impacts on existing recreational facilities. The 2005 MND concluded
that there would be no impacts.
The project would involve minor changes to the Phase 3 development as proposed in the 2005
MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution
of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These
minor changes would not result in any new or additional impacts regarding the use of existing
recreational facilities. As such, the project would not result in a new or more severe impacts
than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(b) Propose, require new facilities that cause physical effect
The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have no impacts
associated with the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment. The 2005 MND determined that a standard
requirement of 2.5 acres of community parkland is needed per 1,000 residents and that the
area needed approximately 10 acres to meet this standard. The Fallon Sports Park would add
60 acres, leading to beneficial impacts associated with parks and recreational facilities.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 43
The proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are minor, and the total acreage of
parkland would not change pursuant to the proposed changes. The project would fulfill the
Fallon Sports Park Master Plan’s intended use of the land as a community park. The proposed
changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not result in any new or additional impacts
regarding construction of new recreational facilities. As such, the project would not result in a
new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 44
Transportation/Traffic
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadways, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
Less than
significant
No No No None
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
Not
analyzed
No No No None
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
Less than
significant
No No No None
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? Less than
significant
No No No None
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Conflict with applicable transportation plans standards, including bicycle and pedestrian
facilities
The 2005 MND concluded the Fallon Sports Park would have less than significant impacts
regarding traffic. Several new traffic improvements and extensions of roadways were underway
at the time of the 2005 MND preparation and would provide adequate transportation facilities
and transit modes with sufficient capacity for the planned Fallon Sports Park. A traffic study was
prepared for the 2005 MND to analyze the two intersections on Lockhart Street, one at the
main entrance to the Park and the second across from the pedestrian bridge. Impacts related to
transportation were anticipated to be less than significant with the construction of a driveway
leading to the Lower Terrace area of the Park. A driveway was since constructed from Central
Parkway into the Lower Terrace, which satisfied the 2005 MND mitigation measure. No impacts
related to parking and pedestrian circulation were expected.
Future traffic as part of the Phase 3 development was analyzed in the 2005 MND. The proposed
project is generally consistent with the original Phase 3 development, with minor changes such
as constructing cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball
diamonds. Traffic as analyzed in the 2005 MND is not anticipated to change as a result of the
proposed changes. The proposed project also would not change parking or pedestrian
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 45
circulation. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts
related to transportation plans, ordinances, or policies than were previously analyzed in the
2005 MND.
(b) Conflict with CEQA Section 15064.3 (b)
The topic of the project's contribution to vehicle miles travelled (VMT) was not analyzed in the
EDEIR or 2005 MND. This impact is not required to be analyzed unless it constitutes new
information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at
the time the previous EIR was certified as complete (Public Resources Code section 21166 and
Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). The impact of increased traffic was analyzed using
other methods at the time of certification of the EDEIR and 2005 MND. Under CEQA standards,
it is not considered new information that requires analysis in a supplemental EIR or negative
declaration. Therefore, no supplemental environmental analysis of the project's impacts on this
issue is required under CEQA.
(c) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
The 2005 MND concluded that there were less than significant impacts associated with design
hazards with the implementation of the independent roadway improvements that would be
completed prior to the completion of Phase I of the Fallon Sports Park. In addition, a driveway
was constructed from Central Parkway into the Lower Terrace, which satisfied the 2005 MND
mitigation measure.
No changes to vehicular access are proposed as part of the changes to the Master Plan. As such
there would be no new or more severe impacts related to design hazards than were previously
analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(d) Result in inadequate emergency access
The 2005 MND concluded that there were less than significant impacts associated with
emergency access and that access roads would meet City of Dublin and Alameda County Fire
Department design standards.
Vehicular access to the Phase 3 development area is currently provided via one driveway on
Lockhart Street connecting to a parking lot and providing emergency access. The driveway and
parking lot were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. No changes to vehicular access are
proposed as part of the changes to the Master Plan, nor were they included in the originally
proposed Phase 3 development. As such, the proposed minor changes to the Master Plan
would not impact existing emergency access or result in any new or more severe impacts than
were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 46
Tribal Cultural Resources
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a, b) Listing in a Register of Historical Resources, or significant according to National Register
of Historic Places criteria
The topic of the Master Plan’s potential impacts to tribal cultural resources was not specifically
analyzed in the EDEIR or the 2005 MND. However, the EDEIR and the 2005 MND analyzed
prehistoric and historic resources and included mitigation measures related to historical and
archaeological resources and human remains. These measures are listed in the cultural
resources section of this Addendum. Additionally, Assembly Bill 52 does not require tribal
consultation for Addendums. Therefore, the proposed minor changes to the Master Plan would
not create significant impacts to tribal cultural resources.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 47
Utilities and Service Systems
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements
of the applicable Regional Water Quality
Control Board?
No impact No No No None
b) Require or result in the construction of new
water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction or which could cause significant
environmental effects?
No impact No No No None
c) Require or result in the construction of new
storm water drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental effects?
(V.4)
No impact No No No None
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project from existing entitlements
and resources, or are new or expanded
entitlements needed?
No impact No No No None
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
No impact No No No None
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the
project’s solid waste disposal needs?
No impact No No No None
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes
and regulations related to solid waste?
No impact No No No None
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 48
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Wastewater treatment requirements
The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with wastewater
treatment requirements. The 2005 MND determined that the project would not increase the
need for additional wastewater services because the project was taken into consideration in
the EDEIR.
The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND.
Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of
cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These
minor changes would not result in any new or additional impacts regarding wastewater
treatment requirements. As such, the project would not result in a new or more severe impacts
than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(b) Require construction of new facilities
The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with the construction of
new facilities. The 2005 MND determined that the project was taken into consideration when
the water and wastewater facilities were planned for the Eastern Dublin area and were
included in the EDEIR.
The minor changes to the plan as proposed in the 2005 MND would not require the
construction of new facilities. As such, the project would not result in a new or more severe
impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(c) Stormwater drainage
The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with stormwater
drainage. As discussed in the response to Impact Question 9(e), the grading plan that was
prepared for the project conformed to the Alameda Flood Control and Water Quality District,
Zone 7 requirements. The grading plan also met the water quality standards of the City of
Dublin’s NPDES Permit and the Alameda County Urban Runoff Clean Water Program. The City of
Dublin’s Conditions of Approval included erosion control plans and preparation of a SWPPP. The
City Public Works Department’s hydrology and drainage studies determined that there is
sufficient capacity to accommodate the project’s stormwater and drainage facilities.
The minor changes to the plan as proposed in the 2005 MND would not alter the stormwater
drainage for the site or require new facilities. As such, the project would not result in a new or
more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(d) Sufficient water supply
The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with water supply.
According to the 2005 MND, the construction of the proposed recreational facilities would not
increase the need for additional water services. The project was considered when the water
facilities were planned for the Eastern Dublin area and were analyzed in the EDEIR.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 49
The minor changes to the plan as proposed in the 2005 MND would not increase the demand
for water supply or require new facilities. As such, the project would not result in a new or
more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(e) Sufficient wastewater capacity
The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with wastewater capacity.
According to the 2005 MND, the construction of the proposed recreational facilities would not
increase the need for wastewater services. The project was considered when the wastewater
facilities were planned for the Eastern Dublin area and were analyzed in the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan/General Plan EIR.
The minor changes to the plan as proposed in the 2005 MND would not increase the demand
for wastewater services or require new facilities. As such, the project would not result in new or
more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND.
(f–g) Adequate landfill and compliance
The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with solid waste.
According to the 2005 MND, the project would be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs.
The minor changes to the plan as proposed in the 2005 MND would not increase the demand
for solid waste disposal services or require greater capacity or new facilities. As such, the
project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the
2005 MND.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 50
Wildfire
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a–d) Impair an emergency response plan, exposure to wildfire, require installation or
maintenance of infrastructure, exposure to flooding or landslides
The EDEIR and the 2005 MND were certified prior to the mandatory analysis of wildfire impacts.
However, wildfire risks were adequately discussed in impact question 8(h). The proposed minor
changes to the Master Plan would not create significant impacts related to wildfire.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 51
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Environmental Issue
Area
Conclusion in
IS/MND
Do the
Proposed
Changes
Involve New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstanc
es Involving
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification
?
Mitigation
Measures
18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project:
a) Have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish
or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Less than
significant
with
mitigation
No No No EDEIR
MM
3.7/1.0 –
5.0, 10.0,
14.0,
16.0,
17.0, and
19.0,
EDEIR
MM
3.9/1.0–
4.0
b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of the
past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.)
Less than
significant
with
mitigation
No No No 2005
MND MM
1 and 2
c) Have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
No impact No No No None
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Have the potential to degrade the quality of environment
Potential impacts related to biological resources, including a reduction of fish or wildlife
habitat, elimination of a plant or animal community, or elimination of an important example of
major periods of California history or prehistory, were analyzed in the EDEIR and the 2005
MND. The proposed project would represent a similar development type that was previously
analyzed. No new or more significant impacts are anticipated than previously analyzed.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 52
(b) Individually limited but cumulatively considerable impacts
Although incremental increases in certain areas can be expected as a result of construction,
including air emissions and light and glare, the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan is within an area
with an approved specific plan that permits urbanized development and community facilities.
Mitigation measures discussed in the 2005 MND and this Addendum would reduce any residual
impacts on the surrounding community to less than significant levels.
(c) Substantial adverse effects of human beings
As detailed in this Addendum and in the 2005 MND, impacts to the environment and human
beings are considered less than significant, and the proposed changes would not create new or
more severe environmental impacts.
City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3
Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 52
(b) Individually limited but cumulatively considerable impacts
Although incremental increases in certain areas can be expected as a result of construction,
including air emissions and light and glare, the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan is within an area
with an approved specific plan that permits urbanized development and community facilities.
Mitigation measures discussed in the 2005 MND and this Addendum would reduce any residual
impacts on the surrounding community to less than significant levels.
(c) Substantial adverse effects of human beings
As detailed in this Addendum and in the 2005 MND, impacts to the environment and human
beings are considered less than significant, and the proposed changes would not create new or
more severe environmental impacts.
!
·|}þ4 ·|}þ4
Alameda County
Santa Clara County
C o n tra C o s ta C o u n ty
A la m e d a C o u n ty
!"#$580
·|}þ92
·|}þ84
!"#$680
!"#$880
·|}þ24
!"#$680
·|}þ237
(/101
!"#$280
·|}þ238
Mount DiabloState Park
Brentwood
Ala
m
e
d
a
C
o
u
nty
S
a
n
M
ate
o
C
o
u
nty
Pittsburg
Martinez Antioch Oakley
PleasantHill
WalnutCreekLafayette
Orinda
Moraga
Danville
SanRamon
DublinCastroValleySanLeandro LivermoreSanLorenzoPleasanton
Hayward
UnionCity
FremontNewarkRedwoodCity
MenloPark
NorthFairOaks EastPaloAlto
Milpitas
Stanford MountainViewPaloAlto
Sunnyvale EastFoothills
San Joa quinRiverCarquinez S t ra i t Sherm anLake Bi g Bre a k
Br io n esReservoi r
Up p er S a nLeandroReservoir
Lak e C habot
Lak e D elValleSan AntonioReservoir
Ca l a vera sReservoir
CliftonCourtForebayLos Va q u ero sReservoir
Figure 1Regional Location Map
5 0 52.5
Miles
!
Text
Project Site
Source: Census 2000 Data, The CaSIL.
I
CITY OF DUBLINFALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE III (UPPER TERRACE)ADDENDUM
37660008 • 03/2020 | 1_regional.mxd
Project Site
37660008 • 03/2020 | 2_project_location.mxd
Figure 2Project Location
Source: Bing Aerial Imagery.
CITY OF DUBLINFALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE III (UPPER TERRACE)ADDENDUM
I 1,000 0 1,000500
Feet
Legend
Project Site - Phase III
Fallon Sports Park
I37660008 • 02/2020 | 3_phaseIII_concept_plan.cdr
Figure 3
Phase III - Concept Plan
CITY OF DUBLIN
FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE III (UPPER TERRACE)
ADDENDUM
Source: BFS Landscape Architects, 5/29/2020.
PATHWAY ACRICKET BATTING CAGE_WorkplanePATHWAY BPATHWAY BPATHWAY APATHWAY APATHWAY AMATCHLINEXAXBXBXBXBXBXBXBXBXAXA1XA1XA1XA1XA1XA1XAXAXA0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.010.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.010.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.010.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.02 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.01 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.01 0.02 0.03 0.09 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.08 0.15 0.22 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.03 0.03 0.030.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.14 0.27 0.35 0.36 0.32 0.26 0.20 0.14 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.030.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.24 0.40 0.49 0.49 0.43 0.35 0.26 0.16 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.030.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.07 0.22 0.41 0.61 0.69 0.66 0.55 0.43 0.30 0.18 0.12 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.030.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.07 0.15 0.38 0.67 0.90 0.97 0.87 0.70 0.52 0.34 0.21 0.15 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.030.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.09 0.28 0.60 1.00 1.28 1.33 1.15 0.88 0.60 0.36 0.26 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.17 0.23 0.26 0.29 0.33 0.36 0.36 0.33 0.29 0.26 0.22 0.17 0.12 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.22 0.27 0.30 0.34 0.38 0.38 0.35 0.31 0.28 0.24 0.18 0.13 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.17 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.030.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.15 0.45 0.89 1.42 1.73 1.74 1.46 1.06 0.68 0.44 0.31 0.26 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.22 0.30 0.39 0.46 0.54 0.60 0.60 0.53 0.45 0.38 0.29 0.21 0.15 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.20 0.29 0.38 0.46 0.55 0.62 0.64 0.58 0.49 0.41 0.32 0.23 0.16 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.11 0.16 0.21 0.26 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.22 0.17 0.14 0.11 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.030.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.29 0.67 1.29 1.92 2.29 2.21 1.78 1.23 0.76 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.34 0.30 0.24 0.21 0.21 0.24 0.28 0.42 0.55 0.70 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.82 0.69 0.54 0.40 0.27 0.24 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.19 0.24 0.29 0.39 0.55 0.71 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.90 0.75 0.59 0.45 0.29 0.25 0.18 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.18 0.27 0.34 0.40 0.41 0.40 0.36 0.31 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.06 0.04 0.040.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.16 0.48 1.00 1.80 2.52 2.93 2.77 2.13 1.36 0.80 0.56 0.52 0.54 0.54 0.51 0.48 0.43 0.41 0.48 0.67 0.90 1.10 1.32 1.57 1.72 1.72 1.53 1.31 1.08 0.87 0.64 0.47 0.40 0.35 0.34 0.36 0.42 0.51 0.66 0.93 1.18 1.42 1.65 1.85 1.89 1.73 1.48 1.25 1.01 0.74 0.52 0.39 0.29 0.22 0.17 0.14 0.15 0.19 0.30 0.42 0.50 0.57 0.58 0.56 0.50 0.43 0.35 0.28 0.20 0.13 0.07 0.05 0.040.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.10 0.28 0.73 1.41 2.42 3.22 3.70 3.43 2.53 1.46 0.84 0.67 0.69 0.75 0.79 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.86 1.05 1.36 1.78 2.27 2.67 3.03 3.28 3.28 2.99 2.62 2.22 1.74 1.33 1.02 0.79 0.65 0.60 0.65 0.79 1.02 1.36 1.78 2.27 2.69 3.07 3.38 3.40 3.19 2.81 2.42 1.92 1.46 1.06 0.76 0.53 0.38 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.39 0.52 0.64 0.73 0.79 0.79 0.76 0.67 0.58 0.49 0.37 0.26 0.15 0.08 0.05 0.040.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.16 0.51 1.05 1.99 3.19 4.144.754.29 2.82 1.46 0.88 0.85 0.93 1.02 1.10 1.12 1.15 1.20 1.31 1.48 1.80 2.29 2.89 3.40 3.81 3.98 3.98 3.77 3.35 2.83 2.24 1.76 1.41 1.16 0.98 0.92 0.98 1.15 1.39 1.73 2.19 2.78 3.34 3.75 4.01 4.00 3.88 3.47 2.98 2.35 1.81 1.39 1.05 0.77 0.56 0.43 0.40 0.47 0.62 0.77 0.90 0.98 1.04 1.05 1.02 0.90 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.16 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.050.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.28 0.74 1.51 2.65 4.125.456.08 5.01 2.83 1.38 1.02 1.07 1.22 1.34 1.40 1.46 1.53 1.63 1.73 1.78 1.95 2.31 2.93 3.41 3.82 3.93 3.93 3.77 3.37 2.87 2.28 1.87 1.61 1.42 1.25 1.17 1.24 1.41 1.60 1.84 2.22 2.77 3.31 3.69 3.89 3.89 3.81 3.42 2.97 2.34 1.87 1.53 1.25 0.96 0.71 0.59 0.62 0.74 0.89 1.05 1.15 1.23 1.30 1.39 1.34 1.17 0.97 0.77 0.56 0.35 0.18 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.050.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.17 0.50 1.05 2.02 3.41 5.08 6.71 7.15 5.28 2.52 1.28 1.18 1.29 1.51 1.67 1.68 1.74 1.84 1.98 2.09 2.15 2.10 2.24 2.61 3.06 3.34 3.44 3.43 3.31 3.01 2.56 2.15 1.93 1.80 1.60 1.39 1.30 1.38 1.58 1.78 1.90 2.09 2.47 2.91 3.23 3.35 3.37 3.28 3.03 2.59 2.16 1.83 1.67 1.39 1.07 0.84 0.76 0.85 1.03 1.18 1.35 1.44 1.49 1.58 1.74 1.65 1.44 1.17 0.92 0.65 0.41 0.20 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.060.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.10 0.30 0.73 1.44 2.56 3.95 5.65 7.28 7.024.471.92 1.30 1.29 1.46 1.71 1.96 1.94 2.01 2.12 2.26 2.32 2.22 2.10 2.09 2.26 2.49 2.64 2.69 2.69 2.63 2.45 2.17 1.91 1.71 1.64 1.56 1.40 1.32 1.38 1.53 1.61 1.68 1.85 2.10 2.36 2.54 2.60 2.61 2.57 2.43 2.16 1.87 1.63 1.46 1.33 1.13 0.99 0.98 1.13 1.31 1.50 1.66 1.78 1.83 1.91 2.02 1.91 1.71 1.41 1.06 0.75 0.44 0.20 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.060.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.16 0.48 1.00 1.86 2.89 4.065.446.39 5.49 2.93 1.46 1.21 1.31 1.57 1.84 2.14 2.24 2.34 2.42 2.43 2.39 2.26 2.11 2.05 2.00 2.01 2.03 2.03 2.03 2.02 1.95 1.80 1.64 1.51 1.44 1.37 1.29 1.25 1.27 1.35 1.41 1.48 1.59 1.74 1.88 1.95 1.96 1.96 1.95 1.90 1.78 1.59 1.42 1.28 1.18 1.11 1.12 1.29 1.40 1.63 1.84 2.05 2.21 2.29 2.33 2.30 2.26 2.06 1.67 1.25 0.84 0.49 0.25 0.14 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.070.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.11 0.30 0.68 1.31 2.13 2.99 3.88 4.72 4.65 3.23 1.59 1.04 0.99 1.21 1.63 2.04 2.37 2.63 2.76 2.77 2.68 2.52 2.33 2.18 2.01 1.83 1.69 1.60 1.54 1.53 1.56 1.52 1.47 1.38 1.30 1.23 1.19 1.13 1.10 1.13 1.16 1.21 1.27 1.34 1.42 1.47 1.50 1.48 1.49 1.50 1.47 1.42 1.33 1.22 1.15 1.15 1.22 1.37 1.52 1.76 1.93 2.21 2.54 2.79 2.92 2.92 2.84 2.77 2.43 1.91 1.42 1.01 0.59 0.29 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.080.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.16 0.43 0.88 1.50 2.18 2.81 3.27 3.40 2.84 1.65 0.88 0.75 0.73 0.93 1.54 2.25 2.76 3.17 3.32 3.22 2.96 2.64 2.41 2.17 1.98 1.76 1.51 1.34 1.22 1.17 1.17 1.16 1.13 1.10 1.04 1.01 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.90 0.92 0.98 1.01 1.07 1.09 1.11 1.12 1.10 1.13 1.11 1.10 1.09 1.06 1.03 1.07 1.19 1.40 1.64 1.85 2.05 2.33 2.67 3.11 3.49 3.62 3.60 3.45 3.20 2.66 2.18 1.72 1.19 0.68 0.30 0.16 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.080.01 0.02 0.04 0.10 0.25 0.56 0.99 1.51 1.99 2.31 2.41 2.20 1.51 0.80 0.56 0.52 0.52 0.69 1.24 2.17 3.05 3.59 3.78 3.70 3.29 2.86 2.45 2.18 1.93 1.66 1.40 1.14 0.93 0.83 0.80 0.81 0.79 0.77 0.75 0.71 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.65 0.67 0.69 0.71 0.74 0.74 0.76 0.73 0.70 0.74 0.73 0.75 0.76 0.79 0.90 1.09 1.36 1.62 1.89 2.15 2.44 2.78 3.23 3.73 4.08 4.13 3.99 3.84 3.41 2.90 2.56 2.05 1.37 0.73 0.35 0.17 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.090.01 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.30 0.60 0.98 1.35 1.62 1.72 1.61 1.26 0.75 0.44 0.38 0.40 0.45 0.55 0.83 1.69 2.84 3.70 4.13 4.02 3.67 3.11 2.60 2.20 1.85 1.59 1.28 1.00 0.76 0.59 0.48 0.46 0.47 0.45 0.46 0.44 0.43 0.43 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.41 0.42 0.40 0.38 0.36 0.39 0.39 0.41 0.52 0.65 0.90 1.21 1.55 1.89 2.17 2.47 2.82 3.26 3.80 4.234.454.48 4.09 3.78 3.60 3.48 3.11 2.37 1.52 0.81 0.34 0.18 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.100.01 0.02 0.06 0.16 0.35 0.60 0.85 1.07 1.21 1.19 1.01 0.71 0.41 0.29 0.29 0.33 0.39 0.50 0.68 1.09 2.14 3.41 4.07 4.12 3.89 3.38 2.75 2.25 1.83 1.54 1.25 0.99 0.74 0.53 0.37 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.25 0.22 0.24 0.25 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.19 0.24 0.30 0.48 0.73 1.09 1.44 1.80 2.14 2.42 2.74 3.13 3.63 4.144.554.59 4.27 3.76 3.79 4.34 4.29 3.59 2.66 1.61 0.82 0.37 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.120.01 0.03 0.08 0.20 0.37 0.53 0.68 0.79 0.83 0.77 0.58 0.40 0.25 0.20 0.22 0.26 0.32 0.42 0.58 0.86 1.42 2.64 3.62 4.06 3.92 3.46 2.85 2.28 1.88 1.59 1.34 1.11 0.89 0.68 0.50 0.38 0.30 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.19 0.28 0.47 0.74 1.06 1.40 1.77 2.10 2.38 2.64 2.96 3.33 3.81 4.18 4.42 4.30 3.70 3.20 4.35 5.51 5.17 4.03 2.85 1.65 0.82 0.37 0.20 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.130.01 0.02 0.04 0.10 0.21 0.33 0.44 0.52 0.57 0.56 0.47 0.32 0.22 0.16 0.14 0.16 0.19 0.25 0.33 0.48 0.71 1.04 1.60 2.68 3.40 3.57 3.31 2.77 2.26 1.90 1.65 1.46 1.31 1.10 0.92 0.79 0.63 0.51 0.42 0.34 0.25 0.19 0.18 0.14 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.25 0.38 0.56 0.83 1.07 1.41 1.76 2.12 2.42 2.65 2.87 3.16 3.46 3.69 3.97 3.93 3.44 2.70 3.01 5.29 6.77 6.05 4.52 3.01 1.67 0.83 0.35 0.20 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.140.01 0.02 0.06 0.11 0.19 0.26 0.33 0.38 0.39 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.19 0.26 0.37 0.55 0.77 1.01 1.48 2.36 2.93 2.86 2.46 2.14 1.92 1.72 1.59 1.45 1.33 1.18 1.06 0.95 0.84 0.74 0.64 0.53 0.41 0.36 0.26 0.23 0.19 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.25 0.34 0.51 0.70 0.90 1.14 1.46 1.77 2.11 2.46 2.74 2.96 3.19 3.40 3.34 3.38 3.39 3.05 2.37 2.12 3.04 6.01 7.73 6.82 4.86 3.08 1.67 0.82 0.31 0.20 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.170.01 0.03 0.06 0.10 0.15 0.19 0.23 0.26 0.27 0.23 0.15 0.12 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.20 0.27 0.39 0.53 0.67 0.83 1.29 1.97 2.22 2.08 1.88 1.88 1.83 1.65 1.53 1.47 1.39 1.31 1.24 1.19 1.09 1.00 0.89 0.76 0.68 0.60 0.49 0.45 0.37 0.35 0.32 0.36 0.49 0.65 0.81 1.02 1.26 1.51 1.79 2.11 2.49 2.85 3.09 3.24 3.28 3.20 3.03 2.89 2.53 2.00 1.60 1.76 2.79 5.86 7.66 6.78 4.85 3.06 1.65 0.82 0.32 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.191.05 1.12 1.18 1.24 1.31 1.37 1.41 1.420.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.13 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.45 0.54 0.65 1.05 1.46 1.62 1.58 1.59 1.61 1.58 1.56 1.57 1.55 1.51 1.50 1.49 1.45 1.37 1.27 1.18 1.03 0.96 0.86 0.76 0.71 0.65 0.65 0.69 0.80 0.95 1.13 1.35 1.59 1.87 2.18 2.57 2.98 3.35 3.53 3.51 3.27 2.97 2.65 2.22 1.63 1.18 1.17 1.35 2.26 4.83 6.53 5.94 4.46 2.97 1.64 0.82 0.35 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.211.03 1.10 1.18 1.27 1.36 1.44 1.53 1.62 1.72 1.80 1.84 1.85 1.80 1.71 1.52 1.320.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.18 0.24 0.31 0.36 0.38 0.49 0.76 1.06 1.20 1.28 1.34 1.40 1.52 1.67 1.71 1.70 1.75 1.82 1.84 1.77 1.65 1.57 1.43 1.34 1.23 1.13 1.05 1.01 0.99 1.04 1.13 1.24 1.41 1.64 1.92 2.28 2.68 3.14 3.59 3.90 3.94 3.79 3.29 2.75 2.14 1.49 0.98 0.75 0.80 0.98 1.69 3.57 5.08 4.94 3.89 2.77 1.60 0.80 0.36 0.21 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.231.14 1.24 1.33 1.44 1.56 1.67 1.77 1.87 1.99 2.12 2.23 2.30 2.33 2.35 2.37 2.30 2.11 1.81 1.45 1.050.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.17 0.21 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.36 0.59 0.79 0.93 1.07 1.22 1.42 1.67 1.90 1.91 2.04 2.20 2.32 2.29 2.16 2.00 1.86 1.73 1.59 1.46 1.35 1.31 1.28 1.33 1.39 1.49 1.62 1.86 2.19 2.65 3.20 3.69 4.05 4.29 4.16 3.75 3.08 2.22 1.42 0.79 0.57 0.52 0.57 0.70 1.21 2.56 3.76 3.96 3.39 2.54 1.54 0.79 0.37 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.261.23 1.35 1.47 1.59 1.72 1.85 1.99 2.11 2.24 2.38 2.52 2.65 2.76 2.83 2.88 2.90 2.98 3.00 2.87 2.53 1.97 1.37 1.09 0.920.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.20 0.30 0.48 0.63 0.79 1.00 1.25 1.52 1.78 2.06 2.34 2.67 2.92 2.96 2.83 2.63 2.42 2.19 1.94 1.73 1.59 1.54 1.53 1.54 1.58 1.65 1.76 1.98 2.35 2.91 3.51 4.02 4.24 4.25 3.92 3.15 2.22 1.35 0.76 0.47 0.39 0.39 0.42 0.52 0.91 1.82 2.72 3.10 2.90 2.26 1.46 0.79 0.35 0.21 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.281.26 1.44 1.60 1.76 1.90 2.06 2.21 2.34 2.48 2.61 2.76 2.95 3.11 3.24 3.34 3.38 3.42 3.49 3.62 3.71 3.67 3.37 2.65 1.85 1.41 1.11 0.95 0.870.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.26 0.38 0.54 0.75 1.02 1.34 1.70 2.10 2.60 3.15 3.47 3.61 3.54 3.35 3.05 2.63 2.24 1.95 1.76 1.70 1.65 1.62 1.67 1.78 1.90 2.06 2.39 2.94 3.49 3.85 3.97 3.65 3.00 1.98 1.19 0.76 0.52 0.40 0.33 0.31 0.33 0.38 0.65 1.30 1.98 2.39 2.38 1.97 1.34 0.74 0.38 0.21 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.28 0.311.36 1.62 1.83 2.04 2.24 2.41 2.59 2.75 2.90 3.04 3.18 3.38 3.58 3.77 3.91 3.93 3.95 3.98 4.05 4.22 4.43 4.43 4.21 3.43 2.52 1.87 1.36 1.16 1.05 0.96 0.880.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.22 0.32 0.48 0.71 1.05 1.50 2.06 2.67 3.29 3.75 4.03 3.95 3.87 3.50 3.05 2.49 2.11 1.92 1.86 1.72 1.61 1.64 1.77 1.86 1.95 2.21 2.65 3.08 3.13 2.90 2.34 1.63 1.12 0.81 0.59 0.44 0.35 0.29 0.26 0.26 0.33 0.51 0.94 1.47 1.82 1.90 1.66 1.21 0.72 0.36 0.23 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.27 0.30 0.34 0.381.37 1.70 2.02 2.26 2.50 2.73 2.94 3.15 3.37 3.54 3.71 3.92 4.13 4.344.544.61 4.584.54 4.574.64 4.79 4.96 4.99 4.87 4.23 3.35 2.46 1.69 1.44 1.29 1.19 1.09 0.980.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.11 0.16 0.23 0.37 0.59 0.96 1.50 2.18 2.83 3.44 3.88 3.98 3.97 3.60 3.16 2.53 2.11 1.88 1.75 1.58 1.45 1.43 1.48 1.55 1.66 1.89 2.12 2.18 1.90 1.47 1.17 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.43 0.34 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.22 0.28 0.42 0.71 1.11 1.40 1.51 1.37 1.05 0.68 0.38 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.24 0.26 0.29 0.32 0.37 0.421.28 1.71 2.14 2.50 2.75 2.99 3.23 3.47 3.74 4.02 4.28 4.51 4.81 5.09 5.33 5.46 5.44 5.35 5.28 5.28 5.33 5.41 5.43 5.34 5.25 4.86 4.19 3.13 2.13 1.82 1.67 1.52 1.36 1.19 1.060.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.20 0.30 0.45 0.69 1.14 1.66 2.32 2.97 3.31 3.30 3.16 2.85 2.36 1.93 1.63 1.46 1.32 1.21 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.26 1.33 1.26 1.09 0.87 0.77 0.73 0.66 0.54 0.42 0.32 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.23 0.35 0.56 0.87 1.09 1.19 1.13 0.92 0.61 0.37 0.24 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.28 0.31 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.531.14 1.57 2.11 2.68 3.06 3.30 3.51 3.73 3.98 4.29 4.66 5.06 5.50 5.91 6.25 6.55 6.63 6.52 6.38 6.31 6.23 6.22 6.08 5.99 5.77 5.62 5.42 4.94 3.82 2.80 2.51 2.23 1.96 1.78 1.60 1.35 1.10 0.900.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.20 0.30 0.44 0.63 0.86 1.15 1.47 1.75 1.90 2.02 1.99 1.79 1.52 1.30 1.11 0.99 0.90 0.84 0.82 0.80 0.77 0.66 0.57 0.45 0.49 0.50 0.47 0.42 0.36 0.29 0.23 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.20 0.30 0.47 0.72 0.89 0.98 0.97 0.83 0.58 0.35 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.24 0.27 0.30 0.34 0.38 0.43 0.50 0.59 0.70 0.85 1.27 1.87 2.61 3.28 3.67 3.88 4.04 4.23 4.50 4.84 5.31 5.87 6.53 7.16 7.63 7.95 8.02 7.94 7.81 7.68 7.53 7.30 7.12 7.04 6.89 6.69 6.56 6.00 5.10 4.16 3.53 3.08 2.84 2.53 2.12 1.69 1.32 1.06 0.890.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.17 0.25 0.34 0.45 0.59 0.75 0.89 0.92 0.89 0.87 0.87 0.89 0.83 0.78 0.71 0.64 0.59 0.54 0.50 0.45 0.37 0.31 0.26 0.29 0.33 0.33 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.19 0.28 0.43 0.66 0.81 0.89 0.89 0.79 0.58 0.35 0.24 0.23 0.24 0.26 0.29 0.32 0.36 0.41 0.47 0.54 0.64 0.78 0.96 1.35 2.13 3.08 3.88 4.32 4.52 4.63 4.81 5.12 5.52 6.12 6.84 7.68 8.45 9.02 9.36 9.50 9.52 9.44 9.30 9.09 8.93 9.02 9.15 9.11 8.97 9.01 8.51 7.35 6.07 5.07 4.49 4.02 3.45 2.76 2.12 1.64 1.31 1.07 0.890.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.10 0.15 0.19 0.25 0.30 0.39 0.49 0.57 0.58 0.55 0.52 0.44 0.34 0.37 0.32 0.35 0.35 0.32 0.29 0.27 0.22 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.27 0.42 0.64 0.80 0.89 0.90 0.79 0.58 0.35 0.25 0.23 0.25 0.28 0.31 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.51 0.59 0.69 0.84 1.09 1.45 2.34 3.45 4.38 4.82 5.04 5.21 5.46 5.87 6.45 7.20 8.08 8.96 9.74 10.28 10.66 10.95 11.19 11.31 11.30 11.48 12.04 12.40 12.37 12.37 12.36 12.44 11.79 9.74 7.87 6.71 6.02 5.31 4.40 3.47 2.67 2.02 1.58 1.27 1.04 0.840.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.16 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.30 0.24 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.18 0.28 0.44 0.67 0.84 0.93 0.92 0.81 0.59 0.37 0.27 0.26 0.27 0.30 0.34 0.38 0.43 0.49 0.56 0.65 0.76 0.91 1.19 1.68 2.51 3.74 4.83 5.14 5.40 5.69 6.13 6.73 7.54 8.47 9.45 10.38 11.17 11.77 12.30 12.87 13.48 14.00 14.64 15.88 17.02 16.94 16.52 16.42 16.26 16.01 14.63 11.76 9.56 8.05 7.05 6.21 5.17 4.08 3.10 2.37 1.85 1.49 1.19 0.96 0.750.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.16 0.19 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.21 0.17 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.18 0.30 0.49 0.77 0.97 1.07 1.04 0.88 0.62 0.39 0.29 0.27 0.29 0.32 0.36 0.41 0.47 0.54 0.62 0.72 0.86 1.02 1.26 1.85 2.77 3.98 4.95 5.35 5.68 6.25 6.93 7.76 8.77 9.88 11.04 12.24 13.26 14.14 14.85 15.85 17.01 18.07 19.03 20.39 21.79 21.59 21.10 20.77 19.84 19.54 17.68 13.71 10.93 9.04 7.78 6.84 5.76 4.53 3.44 2.64 2.07 1.65 1.33 1.08 0.840.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.20 0.35 0.61 0.96 1.22 1.32 1.24 1.00 0.66 0.43 0.30 0.28 0.31 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.51 0.60 0.69 0.81 0.96 1.15 1.40 1.85 2.94 4.26 5.11 5.75 6.43 7.38 8.50 9.73 11.20 12.67 13.95 15.33 16.75 17.74 18.52 19.64 21.07 22.18 23.03 24.96 26.86 25.85 24.56 23.37 22.04 22.05 20.68 16.25 12.81 10.24 8.44 7.30 6.13 4.85 3.72 2.88 2.27 1.82 1.46 1.19 0.94 0.740.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.16 0.24 0.43 0.79 1.25 1.58 1.67 1.50 1.13 0.74 0.44 0.30 0.31 0.33 0.37 0.42 0.49 0.56 0.66 0.78 0.92 1.10 1.32 1.61 2.03 2.88 4.35 5.62 6.84 7.99 9.50 11.06 12.93 15.20 17.51 18.78 19.50 20.51 22.06 23.60 25.04 26.10 27.02 27.71 29.32 30.22 27.0823.79 19.08 14.63 11.45 9.04 7.65 6.44 5.15 3.99 3.11 2.46 1.97 1.59 1.30 1.05 0.830.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.15 0.19 0.28 0.52 1.06 1.66 2.04 2.10 1.79 1.28 0.78 0.45 0.33 0.32 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.61 0.73 0.87 1.06 1.29 1.58 1.98 2.55 3.41 4.95 6.92 8.80 10.56 12.39 14.43 16.52 19.12 21.88 23.30 23.81 25.08 26.76 27.72 28.04 28.05 28.5826.42 21.55 16.26 12.83 9.74 7.97 6.72 5.47 4.27 3.34 2.64 2.12 1.71 1.40 1.14 0.91 0.720.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.15 0.19 0.23 0.33 0.69 1.48 2.25 2.66 2.58 2.09 1.39 0.81 0.45 0.31 0.33 0.37 0.42 0.48 0.56 0.66 0.79 0.96 1.18 1.48 1.87 2.40 3.16 4.35 6.17 8.68 11.43 13.79 15.67 17.97 20.41 22.87 25.81 28.18 28.80 28.99 28.9727.84 23.23 17.61 13.96 10.42 8.20 6.89 5.73 4.56 3.59 2.84 2.26 1.83 1.49 1.22 0.98 0.780.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.18 0.23 0.31 0.45 0.95 2.08 3.10 3.41 3.07 2.35 1.50 0.82 0.45 0.33 0.34 0.38 0.44 0.50 0.59 0.71 0.87 1.09 1.41 1.84 2.43 3.19 4.15 5.44 7.20 9.59 12.82 16.28 18.67 20.64 22.95 24.76 26.4923.83 18.60 14.57 11.12 8.39 6.98 5.90 4.83 3.85 3.05 2.42 1.94 1.57 1.27 1.03 0.83 0.670.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.16 0.21 0.29 0.41 0.61 1.30 2.94 4.27 4.29 3.52 2.58 1.55 0.84 0.41 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.52 0.61 0.74 0.93 1.20 1.60 2.19 3.00 4.01 5.19 6.53 8.05 10.07 13.15 17.74 21.03 22.0423.05 18.96 14.79 11.49 8.55 7.05 6.02 5.06 4.12 3.29 2.59 2.05 1.63 1.32 1.08 0.88 0.710.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.18 0.26 0.37 0.55 0.81 1.74 4.04 5.61 5.22 4.02 2.80 1.58 0.85 0.44 0.33 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.63 0.77 0.96 1.25 1.70 2.41 3.39 4.58 5.83 6.99 8.27 10.33 13.28 18.22 23.0321.12 19.03 15.29 11.80 8.77 7.14 6.09 5.20 4.34 3.52 2.75 2.14 1.70 1.37 1.13 0.93 0.76 0.600.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.21 0.29 0.44 0.67 1.02 2.23 5.23 6.95 6.19 4.53 2.92 1.62 0.86 0.42 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.54 0.66 0.81 1.03 1.34 1.83 2.58 3.60 4.79 6.05 7.17 8.41 10.54 13.63 18.26 23.9619.52 19.07 16.29 12.52 9.31 7.40 6.25 5.34 4.50 3.63 2.84 2.22 1.76 1.44 1.19 0.98 0.80 0.640.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.16 0.22 0.31 0.46 0.71 1.14 2.44 5.80 7.59 6.63 4.76 3.00 1.67 0.88 0.41 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.55 0.69 0.86 1.10 1.43 1.90 2.59 3.51 4.71 5.95 7.14 8.34 10.21 13.71 17.74 23.5719.25 17.34 13.51 9.99 7.74 6.46 5.53 4.63 3.69 2.87 2.25 1.81 1.49 1.24 1.02 0.83 0.670.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.15 0.21 0.30 0.44 0.67 1.03 2.27 5.31 7.04 6.26 4.56 2.93 1.63 0.86 0.42 0.33 0.35 0.38 0.45 0.55 0.70 0.89 1.14 1.48 1.93 2.53 3.34 4.39 5.63 6.90 8.09 9.85 13.20 16.73 22.20 26.9118.98 17.79 14.40 10.71 8.15 6.73 5.73 4.76 3.76 2.91 2.27 1.82 1.51 1.27 1.06 0.86 0.70 0.570.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.18 0.26 0.37 0.56 0.82 1.79 4.14 5.72 5.29 4.06 2.82 1.61 0.87 0.44 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.55 0.70 0.91 1.17 1.48 1.89 2.43 3.15 4.07 5.27 6.53 7.73 9.35 12.21 15.70 20.19 24.3118.88 18.22 15.14 11.76 8.78 7.08 5.98 4.91 3.83 2.94 2.28 1.83 1.53 1.29 1.10 0.88 0.72 0.590.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.21 0.30 0.42 0.62 1.34 3.02 4.38 4.37 3.57 2.61 1.57 0.85 0.43 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.54 0.69 0.89 1.16 1.45 1.84 2.33 2.97 3.82 4.92 6.15 7.25 8.66 11.23 14.47 17.97 21.5019.34 19.37 16.34 13.04 9.79 7.44 6.17 5.07 3.93 2.98 2.31 1.86 1.55 1.32 1.13 0.92 0.74 0.610.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.17 0.23 0.31 0.46 0.98 2.15 3.19 3.49 3.12 2.39 1.53 0.83 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.39 0.45 0.54 0.67 0.87 1.14 1.42 1.78 2.24 2.82 3.58 4.58 5.73 6.77 7.89 10.01 13.00 16.20 19.5021.32 18.24 14.39 10.84 8.00 6.33 5.19 4.02 3.03 2.34 1.89 1.57 1.35 1.15 0.96 0.77 0.630.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.18 0.23 0.34 0.71 1.52 2.32 2.72 2.63 2.13 1.42 0.82 0.44 0.32 0.34 0.39 0.45 0.54 0.67 0.86 1.11 1.38 1.71 2.12 2.66 3.38 4.30 5.33 6.31 7.29 8.84 11.61 15.10 18.37 19.2323.44 20.36 15.62 11.79 8.46 6.50 5.27 4.12 3.11 2.42 1.94 1.62 1.38 1.18 0.99 0.81 0.650.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.15 0.19 0.28 0.53 1.09 1.71 2.10 2.16 1.84 1.32 0.79 0.45 0.33 0.33 0.38 0.44 0.53 0.66 0.84 1.07 1.34 1.64 2.02 2.53 3.20 4.05 5.02 5.89 6.78 8.12 10.47 14.12 17.71 19.1424.59 21.69 16.66 12.80 8.89 6.60 5.35 4.24 3.25 2.53 2.02 1.67 1.42 1.21 1.01 0.83 0.68 0.540.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.15 0.23 0.44 0.81 1.29 1.63 1.73 1.56 1.19 0.77 0.44 0.31 0.32 0.36 0.43 0.51 0.64 0.81 1.03 1.28 1.56 1.92 2.40 3.05 3.84 4.70 5.54 6.41 7.60 9.69 13.00 16.83 18.9721.92 17.23 13.35 9.36 6.66 5.37 4.36 3.44 2.68 2.13 1.74 1.45 1.21 1.02 0.85 0.70 0.560.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.19 0.35 0.62 0.99 1.27 1.39 1.31 1.07 0.71 0.44 0.31 0.31 0.36 0.42 0.50 0.61 0.78 0.98 1.20 1.46 1.80 2.25 2.86 3.62 4.42 5.23 6.09 7.16 8.93 11.91 15.49 18.42 19.1520.97 17.12 13.14 9.66 6.68 5.35 4.43 3.62 2.88 2.28 1.82 1.47 1.20 1.01 0.86 0.71 0.570.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.29 0.49 0.78 1.00 1.13 1.12 0.98 0.70 0.44 0.32 0.31 0.34 0.40 0.48 0.59 0.74 0.92 1.12 1.36 1.66 2.08 2.63 3.31 4.09 4.93 5.82 6.82 8.29 11.14 14.48 18.28 20.6319.26 16.75 12.99 9.63 6.84 5.36 4.49 3.77 3.08 2.44 1.90 1.49 1.21 1.02 0.87 0.74 0.590.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.24 0.41 0.66 0.86 0.99 1.03 0.96 0.74 0.47 0.33 0.31 0.33 0.39 0.47 0.57 0.70 0.87 1.06 1.27 1.55 1.92 2.37 2.95 3.69 4.58 5.55 6.57 7.88 10.67 14.03 18.16 21.9717.44 16.79 13.66 9.99 7.12 5.47 4.56 3.89 3.23 2.56 1.97 1.54 1.24 1.05 0.89 0.75 0.610.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.21 0.35 0.58 0.78 0.93 1.01 0.99 0.81 0.54 0.36 0.32 0.32 0.38 0.45 0.54 0.66 0.82 1.00 1.21 1.46 1.75 2.12 2.62 3.30 4.16 5.18 6.21 7.46 9.95 13.67 17.65 22.2716.89 14.87 10.90 7.62 5.69 4.68 3.99 3.31 2.59 1.99 1.55 1.26 1.07 0.91 0.75 0.610.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.12 0.19 0.31 0.52 0.74 0.92 1.05 1.07 0.94 0.67 0.44 0.34 0.32 0.37 0.43 0.52 0.63 0.78 0.95 1.15 1.36 1.61 1.91 2.34 2.93 3.74 4.76 5.79 6.97 9.07 12.72 16.50 21.42 24.4216.27 15.33 11.66 8.22 6.06 4.87 4.12 3.38 2.61 1.97 1.54 1.25 1.07 0.91 0.76 0.610.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.16 0.28 0.46 0.72 0.97 1.17 1.26 1.15 0.86 0.56 0.36 0.33 0.36 0.42 0.50 0.60 0.73 0.89 1.08 1.28 1.49 1.75 2.09 2.59 3.30 4.26 5.31 6.42 8.21 11.31 15.01 19.43 22.5615.91 15.39 12.13 9.00 6.53 5.17 4.30 3.49 2.63 1.96 1.51 1.23 1.05 0.90 0.77 0.600.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.15 0.26 0.43 0.74 1.09 1.40 1.55 1.45 1.12 0.72 0.44 0.35 0.36 0.41 0.48 0.57 0.68 0.82 1.00 1.20 1.39 1.61 1.90 2.32 2.92 3.78 4.82 5.84 7.25 9.97 13.44 16.76 19.8716.00 15.86 12.81 10.25 7.48 5.51 4.54 3.62 2.67 1.96 1.50 1.21 1.02 0.88 0.760.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.22 0.43 0.77 1.25 1.68 1.92 1.82 1.43 0.90 0.54 0.36 0.36 0.40 0.47 0.54 0.64 0.76 0.92 1.13 1.30 1.50 1.76 2.13 2.65 3.39 4.35 5.31 6.34 8.47 11.64 14.42 17.5717.05 14.23 11.45 8.55 6.03 4.75 3.79 2.77 1.98 1.49 1.19 1.00 0.86 0.740.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.14 0.22 0.40 0.81 1.43 2.02 2.38 2.29 1.79 1.16 0.68 0.41 0.36 0.40 0.45 0.52 0.60 0.71 0.86 1.06 1.23 1.42 1.65 1.98 2.44 3.11 3.97 4.81 5.69 7.14 9.78 12.91 16.21 16.7918.74 15.86 12.22 9.26 6.51 4.93 3.91 2.90 2.07 1.52 1.18 0.97 0.84 0.730.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.21 0.39 0.85 1.66 2.48 2.96 2.85 2.27 1.47 0.84 0.45 0.37 0.39 0.43 0.49 0.56 0.66 0.80 0.98 1.16 1.35 1.56 1.86 2.29 2.90 3.66 4.41 5.16 6.34 8.53 11.92 15.51 16.4019.87 17.01 12.77 9.77 6.70 5.02 3.97 3.02 2.18 1.57 1.19 0.96 0.820.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.17 0.23 0.36 0.84 1.91 3.09 3.72 3.49 2.80 1.85 1.03 0.58 0.37 0.38 0.42 0.47 0.53 0.62 0.75 0.91 1.09 1.27 1.48 1.76 2.17 2.74 3.44 4.09 4.76 5.73 7.62 10.79 14.65 16.3819.35 17.26 13.04 9.76 6.73 4.93 3.88 3.04 2.26 1.64 1.23 0.96 0.800.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.14 0.19 0.27 0.41 0.81 2.10 3.87 4.77 4.35 3.46 2.31 1.31 0.75 0.41 0.37 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.58 0.71 0.85 1.00 1.17 1.36 1.64 2.04 2.60 3.24 3.86 4.48 5.31 6.89 9.59 13.04 15.6716.58 12.83 9.15 6.62 4.69 3.65 2.93 2.27 1.69 1.27 0.98 0.790.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.16 0.22 0.31 0.47 0.82 2.17 4.57 6.02 5.52 4.30 2.85 1.63 0.93 0.48 0.37 0.38 0.42 0.47 0.54 0.65 0.79 0.92 1.06 1.23 1.49 1.87 2.38 2.99 3.61 4.25 5.02 6.35 8.76 11.69 14.97 16.6914.22 14.86 12.30 8.67 6.21 4.37 3.32 2.69 2.16 1.70 1.30 1.000.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.17 0.24 0.35 0.55 0.88 2.05 4.94 7.05 6.77 5.12 3.46 2.03 1.12 0.61 0.37 0.36 0.39 0.44 0.50 0.60 0.73 0.86 0.98 1.14 1.37 1.69 2.11 2.66 3.33 4.04 4.81 5.97 8.50 11.35 14.54 17.6411.09 10.54 11.35 11.55 11.72 12.21 11.22 8.52 5.92 4.06 2.98 2.40 1.97 1.60 1.27 1.000.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.17 0.25 0.38 0.59 0.92 1.73 4.44 7.12 7.32 5.64 3.92 2.46 1.37 0.76 0.42 0.35 0.36 0.40 0.46 0.55 0.67 0.80 0.93 1.08 1.26 1.51 1.84 2.32 2.99 3.79 4.62 5.70 8.05 11.22 14.12 17.939.04 9.05 9.54 11.21 11.59 10.43 9.97 10.00 9.75 9.78 9.78 8.07 5.61 3.76 2.66 2.09 1.72 1.42 1.150.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.18 0.25 0.37 0.56 0.84 1.36 3.19 5.92 6.69 5.45 3.99 2.77 1.66 0.93 0.51 0.35 0.34 0.38 0.43 0.51 0.62 0.74 0.87 1.01 1.16 1.34 1.60 2.01 2.62 3.46 4.38 5.37 7.30 10.39 13.10 17.15 19.809.36 8.96 8.67 8.47 8.31 8.28 8.37 9.51 10.97 10.53 9.47 8.93 8.45 8.12 7.93 6.86 5.11 3.39 2.35 1.79 1.46 1.22 1.010.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.17 0.24 0.33 0.48 0.70 0.98 1.87 3.89 5.14 4.86 3.84 2.87 1.93 1.12 0.63 0.37 0.33 0.36 0.40 0.47 0.57 0.68 0.81 0.94 1.06 1.20 1.41 1.74 2.27 3.08 4.04 4.99 6.47 8.97 11.67 15.38 18.2910.64 11.94 10.48 8.76 8.30 7.96 7.70 7.59 7.54 7.51 7.88 8.80 9.05 8.50 7.87 7.32 6.76 6.18 5.49 4.48 3.22 2.05 1.52 1.22 1.020.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.20 0.27 0.38 0.52 0.68 1.04 2.26 3.55 3.84 3.47 2.81 2.04 1.29 0.76 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.37 0.43 0.51 0.61 0.73 0.86 0.96 1.08 1.25 1.52 1.98 2.71 3.64 4.53 5.62 7.52 10.00 12.99 15.83 15.03 12.88 11.99 10.52 10.57 11.50 9.87 8.12 7.64 7.33 7.10 6.97 6.94 6.81 6.75 6.87 6.76 6.53 6.12 5.76 5.30 4.75 4.41 3.91 3.26 2.07 1.28 1.03 0.850.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.17 0.21 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.62 1.24 2.19 2.75 2.82 2.54 2.01 1.41 0.89 0.53 0.36 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.46 0.54 0.65 0.78 0.88 0.99 1.13 1.36 1.75 2.38 3.21 3.98 4.79 6.15 8.19 10.59 13.25 12.96 11.26 10.39 9.84 10.17 10.76 9.00 7.52 7.01 6.83 6.63 6.51 6.40 6.25 5.99 5.65 5.24 4.92 4.60 4.38 4.16 3.94 3.88 3.69 3.13 2.11 1.25 0.860.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.20 0.25 0.31 0.39 0.69 1.29 1.85 2.11 2.08 1.82 1.40 0.97 0.63 0.42 0.34 0.33 0.36 0.42 0.48 0.58 0.72 0.80 0.90 1.02 1.21 1.56 2.11 2.79 3.41 4.02 4.95 6.56 8.66 10.92 10.87 9.66 9.14 9.07 9.27 8.94 7.63 6.70 6.43 6.31 6.18 6.05 5.91 5.70 5.38 4.91 4.45 4.10 3.85 3.71 3.67 3.69 3.77 3.70 2.89 1.91 1.21 0.780.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.19 0.22 0.26 0.42 0.76 1.19 1.51 1.62 1.54 1.30 1.00 0.69 0.49 0.37 0.33 0.34 0.38 0.44 0.53 0.64 0.74 0.82 0.92 1.10 1.39 1.84 2.39 2.88 3.30 3.95 5.23 7.05 8.94 9.03 8.28 8.08 7.89 7.54 6.86 6.15 5.84 5.78 5.74 5.67 5.60 5.45 5.20 4.84 4.39 4.02 3.71 3.54 3.46 3.51 3.62 3.68 3.60 2.71 1.71 1.030.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.19 0.27 0.47 0.75 1.05 1.22 1.22 1.14 0.97 0.77 0.57 0.42 0.35 0.33 0.36 0.41 0.49 0.58 0.67 0.74 0.84 0.99 1.25 1.62 2.04 2.39 2.70 3.13 4.06 5.54 7.01 7.37 6.85 6.64 6.25 5.70 5.22 4.95 4.94 5.05 5.15 5.19 5.18 5.07 4.81 4.44 4.05 3.75 3.49 3.37 3.32 3.36 3.45 3.43 3.18 2.51 1.600.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.20 0.30 0.46 0.71 0.89 0.97 0.99 0.94 0.85 0.71 0.55 0.40 0.34 0.34 0.37 0.45 0.53 0.60 0.67 0.76 0.90 1.12 1.42 1.72 1.96 2.17 2.47 3.07 4.17 5.20 5.57 5.29 5.08 4.72 4.39 4.17 4.16 4.26 4.40 4.57 4.71 4.77 4.70 4.46 4.16 3.81 3.55 3.33 3.21 3.15 3.15 3.17 3.06 2.73 2.15 1.440.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.21 0.32 0.48 0.66 0.80 0.88 0.92 0.91 0.84 0.69 0.51 0.40 0.34 0.35 0.41 0.48 0.55 0.61 0.69 0.81 1.01 1.22 1.42 1.58 1.72 1.91 2.27 3.23 4.09 4.27 4.12 4.03 3.85 3.73 3.63 3.68 3.80 3.92 4.11 4.28 4.34 4.23 4.08 3.86 3.58 3.35 3.15 3.01 2.90 2.82 2.76 2.63 2.31 1.760.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.23 0.34 0.50 0.66 0.80 0.90 0.98 0.98 0.90 0.70 0.51 0.37 0.34 0.38 0.44 0.50 0.56 0.63 0.74 0.88 1.02 1.15 1.26 1.35 1.47 1.72 2.66 3.55 3.81 3.76 3.70 3.59 3.47 3.43 3.42 3.49 3.61 3.73 3.86 3.86 3.73 3.59 3.41 3.23 3.05 2.87 2.72 2.59 2.45 2.31 2.14 1.830.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.17 0.25 0.38 0.54 0.71 0.89 1.06 1.19 1.17 0.98 0.72 0.47 0.38 0.37 0.41 0.46 0.52 0.58 0.66 0.75 0.84 0.93 1.00 1.06 1.14 1.34 2.15 3.00 3.54 3.78 3.68 3.55 3.39 3.28 3.24 3.25 3.33 3.40 3.39 3.32 3.22 3.07 2.90 2.77 2.64 2.49 2.35 2.22 2.06 1.89 1.710.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.13 0.18 0.29 0.42 0.64 0.91 1.20 1.45 1.52 1.35 1.01 0.65 0.43 0.37 0.39 0.43 0.48 0.53 0.58 0.63 0.69 0.75 0.79 0.83 0.89 1.03 1.60 2.27 3.03 3.58 3.55 3.44 3.26 3.11 3.03 3.02 3.04 3.02 2.93 2.81 2.66 2.52 2.40 2.29 2.17 2.04 1.92 1.81 1.66 1.500.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.14 0.22 0.36 0.56 0.92 1.34 1.72 1.92 1.80 1.39 0.93 0.56 0.40 0.38 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.50 0.53 0.57 0.60 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.82 1.14 1.59 2.36 3.04 3.21 3.15 2.97 2.84 2.76 2.70 2.65 2.57 2.47 2.32 2.17 2.03 1.93 1.84 1.73 1.63 1.53 1.430.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.18 0.28 0.50 0.90 1.46 2.02 2.40 2.35 1.92 1.30 0.80 0.46 0.37 0.38 0.40 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.47 0.49 0.51 0.54 0.57 0.66 0.82 1.10 1.73 2.29 2.57 2.66 2.59 2.46 2.38 2.33 2.22 2.12 2.00 1.88 1.74 1.63 1.54 1.45 1.35 1.260.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.24 0.41 0.84 1.54 2.35 2.94 3.00 2.56 1.80 1.09 0.66 0.40 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.46 0.52 0.61 0.78 1.23 1.63 1.92 2.07 2.10 2.03 1.96 1.90 1.79 1.69 1.58 1.48 1.38 1.30 1.21 1.13 1.060.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.20 0.35 0.70 1.55 2.69 3.59 3.77 3.30 2.50 1.56 0.93 0.50 0.36 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.39 0.43 0.47 0.57 0.86 1.11 1.35 1.55 1.60 1.59 1.54 1.49 1.41 1.31 1.23 1.15 1.08 1.01 0.940.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.20 0.30 0.59 1.40 2.94 4.42 4.84 4.29 3.38 2.20 1.29 0.77 0.39 0.32 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.35 0.38 0.44 0.61 0.76 0.91 1.08 1.16 1.20 1.19 1.130.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.22 0.31 0.51 1.15 2.84 5.08 6.22 5.68 4.40 3.01 1.80 1.04 0.57 0.33 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.30 0.31 0.35 0.45 0.540.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.23 0.33 0.52 0.93 2.35 5.20 7.19 6.96 5.43 3.81 2.46 1.44 0.81 0.43 0.28 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.28 0.34 0.400.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.23 0.34 0.55 0.87 1.68 4.11 6.84 7.42 5.97 4.30 3.03 1.94 1.13 0.64 0.35 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.27 0.31 0.340.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.16 0.23 0.34 0.53 0.79 1.24 2.48 4.91 6.17 5.68 4.39 3.28 2.37 1.52 0.90 0.51 0.30 0.22 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.23 0.25 0.270.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.15 0.22 0.31 0.45 0.65 0.91 1.32 2.62 4.12 4.56 4.03 3.29 2.55 1.79 1.15 0.69 0.39 0.23 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.220.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.20 0.26 0.36 0.49 0.65 0.78 1.21 2.20 3.01 3.11 2.87 2.44 1.89 1.34 0.88 0.54 0.33 0.22 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.190.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.10 0.12 0.17 0.21 0.27 0.34 0.42 0.49 0.61 1.06 1.71 2.10 2.18 2.05 1.76 1.39 1.01 0.67 0.43 0.27 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.160.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.32 0.36 0.52 0.88 1.27 1.51 1.57 1.48 1.27 1.03 0.80 0.56 0.38 0.23 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.1425.7026.6827.0228.7032.7431.9530.7030.4029.5728.5528.5229.5230.3830.6931.8632.8528.8827.0926.7625.7428.7128.7027.8327.4430.8730.2528.7129.0429.0428.3028.2829.0029.0528.7130.1831.0127.5227.8228.7628.7130.9730.2928.0225.7128.3527.8426.0426.7727.7228.2428.2827.7626.8126.0127.7328.4625.7427.8930.3130.9631.0131.1628.7324.9425.9724.7422.9524.1626.9630.1730.2427.1424.2222.9524.6526.0424.9028.6131.2031.0428.3228.8228.0726.1927.8425.9224.3225.4927.5429.5229.6027.6925.5824.3625.8427.8526.2327.9928.9028.3424.6124.3923.5823.7426.0023.8622.8123.3523.7223.9823.9623.7323.3622.8123.7926.0123.8023.5724.4424.6321.6221.4521.2622.4523.0620.5920.0620.6420.9921.1321.1321.0020.6520.0720.5423.0022.5421.2821.4821.6220.0720.3320.7821.8621.1919.5119.3519.6819.8219.7719.7719.8219.6919.3619.4921.1621.9020.8020.3520.1019.8520.2520.4620.2919.3918.7118.7018.8018.8218.6418.6318.8118.8018.7218.7119.3620.3020.4820.2719.8819.3519.7219.9719.9218.9018.0617.9417.9317.8817.7517.7517.8817.9417.9518.0518.8819.9119.9919.7519.3818.8318.9819.3420.4219.5917.4416.9917.0517.0817.0917.0917.0917.0517.0117.4219.5420.4719.3819.0018.8519.9319.3818.6819.4919.9217.2216.1416.2316.4216.5616.5616.4316.2516.1517.1719.9019.5618.7119.3819.9222.2721.0919.1018.0719.5917.0915.5215.5915.7916.0616.0715.8115.6015.5217.0119.6318.1319.0621.0822.2124.6822.6219.9017.1918.7516.9314.9014.9515.1715.4315.4315.1814.9614.8916.8418.8017.1619.8022.6224.6026.0323.2720.0816.6717.9716.5614.2814.3314.6214.8214.8314.6414.3314.2616.4718.0316.6719.9623.2525.9225.3822.6319.4216.0417.3415.9513.6813.7213.9614.2514.2513.9713.7213.6715.8617.4016.0419.3122.6125.2822.7420.6317.9415.3316.9915.1013.1113.1613.3313.5813.5813.3413.1613.0915.0017.0215.3317.8620.6222.6719.4918.1816.1815.3116.7814.1812.6112.6812.8312.9612.9612.8412.6912.6114.1016.8115.3416.1318.1919.4617.0716.2915.4516.0516.1713.3412.3112.2812.3012.3812.3812.3112.2912.3113.3016.1516.1415.4816.3517.1016.5116.3216.1416.5215.0812.8312.1712.0311.9511.8911.8911.9512.0312.1812.8215.0716.6016.2116.4016.6216.6316.7616.7116.2114.3512.4711.9811.8311.7411.5511.5411.7311.8312.0012.4814.3416.2816.8016.8416.7216.1215.8915.7415.9914.5512.3611.6811.5611.4711.4211.4211.4711.5611.6912.3414.5616.0515.7815.9516.2016.0715.2714.4315.0015.1212.3511.3011.2811.2911.3711.3711.3011.2911.3012.3015.0915.0614.4215.3016.1117.7316.3614.4513.6215.1312.5510.9911.0711.2111.3311.3311.2211.0810.9912.4615.1313.6314.4016.4217.7620.1918.0415.4712.8814.5912.7810.7510.7810.9611.2111.2110.9810.7810.7212.6614.6112.8915.3718.0620.1321.8819.1716.1412.8014.0812.8110.4510.4010.5610.8510.8610.5810.3910.4112.6514.1512.7615.9619.1421.7621.6418.9215.9412.5313.7712.5110.099.9610.0410.1510.1510.059.9510.0312.3313.8512.4415.7118.8521.4119.4217.4114.8612.1213.5711.859.619.419.329.319.319.329.399.5611.6813.6712.0414.6317.3119.16ASSOCIATED LIGHTING REPRESENTATIVES, INC7777 PARDEE LANEP.O. BOX 2265OAKLAND, CA 94621PHONE: (510) 638-3800 - FAX (510) 638-2908* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *ALL VALUES SHOWN ARE MAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES AT GRADEPHOTOMETRIC DATA USED AS INPUT FOR THESE CALCULATIONSIS BASED ON ESTABLISHED IES PROCEDURES AND PUBLISHEDLAMP, RATINGS. FIELD PERFORMANCE WILL DEPEND ON ACTUALLAMP, BALLAST, ELECTRICAL AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS.Calculations have been performed according to IES standards and good practice.Some differences between measured values and calculated results may occur due tomeasurement techniques and field conditions such as voltage and temperaturevariations. Input data used to generate the attached calculations such as roomdimensions, reflectances, furniture and architectural elements significantly affect thelighting calculations. If the real environment conditions do not match the input data,differences will occur between measured values and calculated values.REPORT FOR: AURUM CONSULTING ENGINEERSBY: APPLICATIONS ENGINEERING; GILBERTO J. RODRIGUEZSALES REPRESENTATIVE: ALR; JD STEPHENSAGI32 VERSION 19.11AGI (C) 1999-2020 LIGHTING ANALYSTS, INC.10268 W. CENTENNIAL ROAD, SUITE 202LITTLETON, CO 80127FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 34605 LOCKHART ST. DUBLIN CADRAWING NO. / INPUT FILEPROJECT DESCRIPTION17734JDS - E2.2N.DWG /.AGISCALE1" = 16'SHEET1 OF 2DATE02.21.2020REV0***LIGHTING LAYOUT RECOMMENDATION*****PARTIAL SITE*** TWIN ROTATED ASSEMBLIES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.** HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLE VALUES SHOWN AT 36" ABOVE FINISH GRADE.1.0FC0.5FCLuminaire ScheduleProject: FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 3 - PARTIAL SITESymbolQtyLabelArrangementLum. LumensLLFLDDLLDDescriptionFilenameLum. Watts6XASINGLE66520.8500.9000.944SIGNIFY GARDCO GL13-XXX-1-2-70LA-6435-NW-VOLT-XXX - 15' POLEGL13-2-70LA-6435-NW.IES706XA1SINGLE67500.8500.9000.944SIGNIFY GARDCO GL13-XXX-1-3-70LA-6435-NW-VOLT-XXX - 15' POLEGL13-3-70LA-6435-NW.IES70.18XB *TWIN274320.8500.9000.944VISIONAIRE BLX-II-4-T4-128LC-5-4K-VOLT-XX-XX-(TWIN) - 25' POLEBLX-II_4_T4_128LC_5_4K.IES211Calculation SummaryProject: FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 3 - PARTIAL SITELabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/Min# PtsCRICKET BATTING CAGE_Workplane **IlluminanceFc18.5632.859.311.993.53560PATHWAY AIlluminanceFc2.575.010.882.925.69238PATHWAY BIlluminanceFc3.027.730.634.7912.27263
CRICKET BATTING CAGE_WorkplanePATHWAY BPATHWAY BPATHWAY BMATCHLINEXBXBXBXBXBXBXBXBXA1XAXAXAXA1.611.641.771.861.952.212.653.083.132.902.341.631.120.810.590.440.350.290.260.260.330.510.941.471.821.901.661.210.720.360.230.190.190.200.220.240.270.300.340.381.371.702.022.262.502.732.943.153.373.543.713.924.134.344.544.614.584.544.574.644.794.964.994.874.233.352.461.691.441.291.191.090.981.451.431.481.551.661.892.122.181.901.471.171.000.800.600.430.340.280.250.230.220.280.420.711.111.401.511.371.050.680.380.210.190.200.210.240.260.290.320.370.421.281.712.142.502.752.993.233.473.744.024.284.514.815.095.335.465.445.355.285.285.335.415.435.345.254.864.193.132.131.821.671.521.361.191.061.211.161.161.191.261.331.261.090.870.770.730.660.540.420.320.250.220.200.190.190.230.350.560.871.091.191.130.920.610.370.240.200.210.230.250.280.310.350.400.460.531.141.572.112.683.063.303.513.733.984.294.665.065.505.916.256.556.636.526.386.316.236.226.085.995.775.625.424.943.822.802.512.231.961.781.601.351.100.900.900.840.820.800.770.660.570.450.490.500.470.420.360.290.230.190.170.160.150.170.200.300.470.720.890.980.970.830.580.350.240.220.220.240.270.300.340.380.430.500.590.700.851.271.872.613.283.673.884.044.234.504.845.315.876.537.167.637.958.027.947.817.687.537.307.127.046.896.696.566.005.104.163.533.082.842.532.121.691.321.060.890.590.540.500.450.370.310.260.290.330.330.300.270.240.200.180.160.140.130.130.140.190.280.430.660.810.890.890.790.580.350.240.230.240.260.290.320.360.410.470.540.640.780.961.352.133.083.884.324.524.634.815.125.526.126.847.688.459.029.369.509.529.449.309.098.939.029.159.118.979.018.517.356.075.074.494.023.452.762.121.641.311.070.890.320.290.270.220.180.180.180.200.230.230.200.180.170.150.140.130.120.120.120.130.180.270.420.640.800.890.900.790.580.350.250.230.250.280.310.350.390.450.510.590.690.841.091.452.343.454.384.825.045.215.465.876.457.208.088.969.7410.2810.6610.9511.1911.3111.3011.4812.0412.4012.3712.3712.3612.4411.799.747.876.716.025.314.403.472.672.021.581.271.040.840.160.160.130.110.110.110.120.140.160.160.140.130.130.120.110.110.110.110.110.130.180.280.440.670.840.930.920.810.590.370.270.260.270.300.340.380.430.490.560.650.760.911.191.682.513.744.835.145.405.696.136.737.548.479.4510.3811.1711.7712.3012.8713.4814.0014.6415.8817.0216.9416.5216.4216.2616.0114.6311.769.568.057.056.215.174.083.102.371.851.491.190.960.750.080.070.070.070.070.080.090.110.120.120.110.100.100.100.100.100.100.110.110.130.180.300.490.770.971.071.040.880.620.390.290.270.290.320.360.410.470.540.620.720.861.021.261.852.773.984.955.355.686.256.937.768.779.8811.0412.2413.2614.1414.8515.8517.0118.0719.0320.3921.7921.5921.1020.7719.8419.5417.6813.7110.939.047.786.845.764.533.442.642.071.651.331.080.840.050.050.050.050.060.060.070.080.090.090.090.080.090.090.090.090.100.110.120.140.200.350.610.961.221.321.241.000.660.430.300.280.310.350.390.450.510.600.690.810.961.151.401.852.944.265.115.756.437.388.509.7311.2012.6713.9515.3316.7517.7418.5219.6421.0722.1823.0324.9626.8625.8524.5623.3722.0422.0520.6816.2512.8110.248.447.306.134.853.722.882.271.821.461.190.940.740.040.040.040.040.050.050.060.070.070.070.070.070.080.080.080.090.100.110.130.160.240.430.791.251.581.671.501.130.740.440.300.310.330.370.420.490.560.660.780.921.101.321.612.032.884.355.626.847.999.5011.0612.9315.2017.5118.7819.5020.5122.0623.6025.0426.1027.0227.7129.3230.2227.0823.7919.0814.6311.459.047.656.445.153.993.112.461.971.591.301.050.830.040.040.040.040.040.040.050.050.060.060.060.060.070.070.080.090.110.130.150.190.280.521.061.662.042.101.791.280.780.450.330.320.350.400.460.530.610.730.871.061.291.581.982.553.414.956.928.8010.5612.3914.4316.5219.1221.8823.3023.8125.0826.7627.7228.0428.0528.5826.4221.5516.2612.839.747.976.725.474.273.342.642.121.711.401.140.910.720.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.050.060.060.070.070.080.100.120.150.190.230.330.691.482.252.662.582.091.390.810.450.310.330.370.420.480.560.660.790.961.181.481.872.403.164.356.178.6811.4313.7915.6717.9720.4122.8725.8128.1828.8028.9928.9727.8423.2317.6113.9610.428.206.895.734.563.592.842.261.831.491.220.980.780.030.030.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.050.060.060.070.090.110.140.180.230.310.450.952.083.103.413.072.351.500.820.450.330.340.380.440.500.590.710.871.091.411.842.433.194.155.447.209.5912.8216.2818.6720.6422.9524.7626.4923.8318.6014.5711.128.396.985.904.833.853.052.421.941.571.271.030.830.670.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.050.060.080.100.120.160.210.290.410.611.302.944.274.293.522.581.550.840.410.330.350.390.450.520.610.740.931.201.602.193.004.015.196.538.0510.0713.1517.7421.0322.0423.0518.9614.7911.498.557.056.025.064.123.292.592.051.631.321.080.880.710.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.070.080.100.140.180.260.370.550.811.744.045.615.224.022.801.580.850.440.330.350.400.460.530.630.770.961.251.702.413.394.585.836.998.2710.3313.2818.2223.0321.1219.0315.2911.808.777.146.095.204.343.522.752.141.701.371.130.930.760.600.020.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.070.090.110.150.210.290.440.671.022.235.236.956.194.532.921.620.860.420.330.350.390.450.540.660.811.031.341.832.583.604.796.057.178.4110.5413.6318.2623.9619.5219.0716.2912.529.317.406.255.344.503.632.842.221.761.441.190.980.800.640.030.030.030.040.040.050.070.090.110.160.220.310.460.711.142.445.807.596.634.763.001.670.880.410.330.350.390.450.550.690.861.101.431.902.593.514.715.957.148.3410.2113.7117.7423.5719.2517.3413.519.997.746.465.534.633.692.872.251.811.491.241.020.830.670.030.030.030.040.040.050.070.080.110.150.210.300.440.671.032.275.317.046.264.562.931.630.860.420.330.350.380.450.550.700.891.141.481.932.533.344.395.636.908.099.8513.2016.7322.2026.9118.9817.7914.4010.718.156.735.734.763.762.912.271.821.511.271.060.860.700.030.030.040.040.050.060.080.100.130.180.260.370.560.821.794.145.725.294.062.821.610.870.440.330.350.390.450.550.700.911.171.481.892.433.154.075.276.537.739.3512.2115.7020.1924.3118.8818.2215.1411.768.787.085.984.913.832.942.281.831.531.291.100.880.720.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.120.160.210.300.420.621.343.024.384.373.572.611.570.850.430.330.350.390.450.540.690.891.161.451.842.332.973.824.926.157.258.6611.2314.4717.9721.5019.3419.3716.3413.049.797.446.175.073.932.982.311.861.551.321.130.920.740.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.080.100.130.170.230.310.460.982.153.193.493.122.391.530.830.460.340.340.390.450.540.670.871.141.421.782.242.823.584.585.736.777.8910.0113.0016.2019.5021.3218.2414.3910.848.006.335.194.023.032.341.891.571.351.150.960.770.020.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.090.110.140.180.230.340.711.522.322.722.632.131.420.820.440.320.340.390.450.540.670.861.111.381.712.122.663.384.305.336.317.298.8411.6115.1018.3719.2323.4420.3615.6211.798.466.505.274.123.112.421.941.621.381.180.990.810.020.030.030.030.040.050.050.060.080.100.120.150.190.280.531.091.712.102.161.841.320.790.450.330.330.380.440.530.660.841.071.341.642.022.533.204.055.025.896.788.1210.4714.1217.7119.1424.5921.6916.6612.808.896.605.354.243.252.532.021.671.421.211.010.830.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.080.100.120.150.230.440.811.291.631.731.561.190.770.440.310.320.360.430.510.640.811.031.281.561.922.403.053.844.705.546.417.609.6913.0016.8318.9721.9217.2313.359.366.665.374.363.442.682.131.741.451.211.020.850.020.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.080.100.130.190.350.620.991.271.391.311.070.710.440.310.310.360.420.500.610.780.981.201.461.802.252.863.624.425.236.097.168.9311.9115.4918.4219.1520.9717.1213.149.666.685.354.433.622.882.281.821.471.201.010.860.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.060.070.090.120.160.290.490.781.001.131.120.980.700.440.320.310.340.400.480.590.740.921.121.361.662.082.633.314.094.935.826.828.2911.1414.4818.2820.6319.2616.7512.999.636.845.364.493.773.082.441.901.491.211.020.870.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.080.100.140.240.410.660.860.991.030.960.740.470.330.310.330.390.470.570.700.871.061.271.551.922.372.953.694.585.556.577.8810.6714.0318.1621.9717.4416.7913.669.997.125.474.563.893.232.561.971.541.241.050.890.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.090.130.210.350.580.780.931.010.990.810.540.360.320.320.380.450.540.660.821.001.211.461.752.122.623.304.165.186.217.469.9513.6717.6522.2716.8914.8710.907.625.694.683.993.312.591.991.551.261.070.910.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.080.120.190.310.520.740.921.051.070.940.670.440.340.320.370.430.520.630.780.951.151.361.611.912.342.933.744.765.796.979.0712.7216.5021.4224.4216.2715.3311.668.226.064.874.123.382.611.971.541.251.070.910.020.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.060.070.080.110.160.280.460.720.971.171.261.150.860.560.360.330.360.420.500.600.730.891.081.281.491.752.092.593.304.265.316.428.2111.3115.0119.4322.5615.9115.3912.139.006.535.174.303.492.631.961.511.231.050.900.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.080.110.150.260.430.741.091.401.551.451.120.720.440.350.360.410.480.570.680.821.001.201.391.611.902.322.923.784.825.847.259.9713.4416.7619.8716.0015.8612.8110.257.485.514.543.622.671.961.501.211.020.880.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.080.100.140.220.430.771.251.681.921.821.430.900.540.360.360.400.470.540.640.760.921.131.301.501.762.132.653.394.355.316.348.4711.6414.4217.5717.0514.2311.458.556.034.753.792.771.981.491.191.000.860.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.080.110.140.220.400.811.432.022.382.291.791.160.680.410.360.400.450.520.600.710.861.061.231.421.651.982.443.113.974.815.697.149.7812.9116.2116.7918.7415.8612.229.266.514.933.912.902.071.521.180.970.840.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.090.110.150.210.390.851.662.482.962.852.271.470.840.450.370.390.430.490.560.660.800.981.161.351.561.862.292.903.664.415.166.348.5311.9215.5116.4019.8717.0112.779.776.705.023.973.022.181.571.190.960.820.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.080.100.130.170.230.360.841.913.093.723.492.801.851.030.580.370.380.420.470.530.620.750.911.091.271.481.762.172.743.444.094.765.737.6210.7914.6516.3819.3517.2613.049.766.734.933.883.042.261.641.230.960.800.020.030.030.030.040.050.050.070.080.110.140.190.270.410.812.103.874.774.353.462.311.310.750.410.370.400.450.500.580.710.851.001.171.361.642.042.603.243.864.485.316.899.5913.0415.6716.5812.839.156.624.693.652.932.271.691.270.980.790.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.110.160.220.310.470.822.174.576.025.524.302.851.630.930.480.370.380.420.470.540.650.790.921.061.231.491.872.382.993.614.255.026.358.7611.6914.9716.6914.2214.8612.308.676.214.373.322.692.161.701.301.000.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.120.170.240.350.550.882.054.947.056.775.123.462.031.120.610.370.360.390.440.500.600.730.860.981.141.371.692.112.663.334.044.815.978.5011.3514.5417.6411.0910.5411.3511.5511.7212.2111.228.525.924.062.982.401.971.601.271.000.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.120.170.250.380.590.921.734.447.127.325.643.922.461.370.760.420.350.360.400.460.550.670.800.931.081.261.511.842.322.993.794.625.708.0511.2214.1217.939.049.059.5411.2111.5910.439.9710.009.759.789.788.075.613.762.662.091.721.421.150.020.030.030.040.040.060.070.090.130.180.250.370.560.841.363.195.926.695.453.992.771.660.930.510.350.340.380.430.510.620.740.871.011.161.341.602.012.623.464.385.377.3010.3913.1017.1519.809.368.968.678.478.318.288.379.5110.9710.539.478.938.458.127.936.865.113.392.351.791.461.221.010.030.030.040.040.050.070.090.120.170.240.330.480.700.981.873.895.144.863.842.871.931.120.630.370.330.360.400.470.570.680.810.941.061.201.411.742.273.084.044.996.478.9711.6715.3818.2910.6411.9410.488.768.307.967.707.597.547.517.888.809.058.507.877.326.766.185.494.483.222.051.521.221.020.030.030.030.040.050.070.090.110.150.200.270.380.520.681.042.263.553.843.472.812.041.290.760.460.340.340.370.430.510.610.730.860.961.081.251.521.982.713.644.535.627.5210.0012.9915.8315.0312.8811.9910.5210.5711.509.878.127.647.337.106.976.946.816.756.876.766.536.125.765.304.754.413.913.262.071.281.030.850.020.030.030.040.050.060.080.100.130.170.210.270.360.450.621.242.192.752.822.542.011.410.890.530.360.330.350.390.460.540.650.780.880.991.131.361.752.383.213.984.796.158.1910.5913.2512.9611.2610.399.8410.1710.769.007.527.016.836.636.516.406.255.995.655.244.924.604.384.163.943.883.693.132.111.250.860.030.030.040.040.050.070.080.100.130.160.200.250.310.390.691.291.852.112.081.821.400.970.630.420.340.330.360.420.480.580.720.800.901.021.211.562.112.793.414.024.956.568.6610.9210.879.669.149.079.278.947.636.706.436.316.186.055.915.705.384.914.454.103.853.713.673.693.773.702.891.911.210.780.020.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.100.130.160.190.220.260.420.761.191.511.621.541.301.000.690.490.370.330.340.380.440.530.640.740.820.921.101.391.842.392.883.303.955.237.058.949.038.288.087.897.546.866.155.845.785.745.675.605.455.204.844.394.023.713.543.463.513.623.683.602.711.711.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.080.100.120.140.160.190.270.470.751.051.221.221.140.970.770.570.420.350.330.360.410.490.580.670.740.840.991.251.622.042.392.703.134.065.547.017.376.856.646.255.705.224.954.945.055.155.195.185.074.814.444.053.753.493.373.323.363.453.433.182.511.600.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.080.100.110.120.140.200.300.460.710.890.970.990.940.850.710.550.400.340.340.370.450.530.600.670.760.901.121.421.721.962.172.473.074.175.205.575.295.084.724.394.174.164.264.404.574.714.774.704.464.163.813.553.333.213.153.153.173.062.732.151.440.020.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.080.090.100.110.150.210.320.480.660.800.880.920.910.840.690.510.400.340.350.410.480.550.610.690.811.011.221.421.581.721.912.273.234.094.274.124.033.853.733.633.683.803.924.114.284.344.234.083.863.583.353.153.012.902.822.762.632.311.760.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.070.080.090.110.150.230.340.500.660.800.900.980.980.900.700.510.370.340.380.440.500.560.630.740.881.021.151.261.351.471.722.663.553.813.763.703.593.473.433.423.493.613.733.863.863.733.593.413.233.052.872.722.592.452.312.141.830.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.060.070.080.090.110.170.250.380.540.710.891.061.191.170.980.720.470.380.370.410.460.520.580.660.750.840.931.001.061.141.342.153.003.543.783.683.553.393.283.243.253.333.403.393.323.223.072.902.772.642.492.352.222.061.891.710.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.060.070.080.090.130.180.290.420.640.911.201.451.521.351.010.650.430.370.390.430.480.530.580.630.690.750.790.830.891.031.602.273.033.583.553.443.263.113.033.023.043.022.932.812.662.522.402.292.172.041.921.811.661.500.020.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.060.060.070.080.110.140.220.360.560.921.341.721.921.801.390.930.560.400.380.400.440.470.500.530.570.600.630.660.700.821.141.592.363.043.213.152.972.842.762.702.652.572.472.322.172.031.931.841.731.631.531.430.020.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.060.070.080.100.130.180.280.500.901.462.022.402.351.921.300.800.460.370.380.400.410.430.450.470.490.510.540.570.660.821.101.732.292.572.662.592.462.382.332.222.122.001.881.741.631.541.451.351.260.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.060.060.070.090.110.150.240.410.841.542.352.943.002.561.801.090.660.400.360.360.370.380.390.400.410.430.450.460.520.610.781.231.631.922.072.102.031.961.901.791.691.581.481.381.301.211.131.060.020.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.060.070.090.110.140.200.350.701.552.693.593.773.302.501.560.930.500.360.330.330.330.340.340.350.360.370.390.430.470.570.861.111.351.551.601.591.541.491.411.311.231.151.081.010.940.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.090.110.150.200.300.591.402.944.424.844.293.382.201.290.770.390.320.300.300.300.300.300.310.320.330.350.380.440.610.760.911.081.161.201.191.130.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.090.120.160.220.310.511.152.845.086.225.684.403.011.801.040.570.330.280.270.270.260.270.270.270.280.300.310.350.450.540.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.090.120.160.230.330.520.932.355.207.196.965.433.812.461.440.810.430.280.250.240.230.230.240.240.240.250.260.280.340.400.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.090.120.160.230.340.550.871.684.116.847.425.974.303.031.941.130.640.350.240.220.210.210.210.210.210.220.230.240.270.310.340.030.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.110.160.230.340.530.791.242.484.916.175.684.393.282.371.520.900.510.300.220.190.180.180.180.190.190.190.200.230.250.270.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.070.080.110.150.220.310.450.650.911.322.624.124.564.033.292.551.791.150.690.390.230.190.170.160.160.160.170.170.180.190.210.220.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.080.100.140.200.260.360.490.650.781.212.203.013.112.872.441.891.340.880.540.330.220.170.150.150.150.150.150.160.170.180.190.190.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.100.120.170.210.270.340.420.490.611.061.712.102.182.051.761.391.010.670.430.270.180.150.140.130.130.140.140.140.150.160.160.020.030.030.040.040.050.060.080.100.130.160.200.240.280.320.360.520.881.271.511.571.481.271.030.800.560.380.230.160.140.130.120.120.130.130.130.130.140.140.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.100.120.140.170.200.210.230.290.430.710.971.121.141.080.980.860.730.550.340.200.150.120.120.110.120.120.120.120.120.120.120.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.110.120.140.150.160.180.250.410.560.750.860.910.920.900.840.720.520.320.210.130.120.110.110.110.110.110.100.100.110.020.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.070.080.100.110.110.120.120.160.240.330.480.640.760.850.920.950.910.760.520.320.160.120.110.110.110.100.100.090.090.090.090.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.070.080.090.090.090.110.140.220.320.460.630.790.941.081.161.070.820.510.270.140.110.110.100.100.090.080.080.080.080.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.060.070.070.070.070.080.100.150.220.330.500.720.991.261.461.451.210.790.440.200.130.110.100.100.090.080.080.080.070.070.020.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.050.060.060.060.070.080.100.150.240.390.651.031.441.781.891.691.200.720.360.160.120.110.100.090.080.070.070.070.070.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.050.050.060.070.080.120.160.310.561.021.592.132.422.271.771.080.610.270.140.110.100.090.080.070.060.060.060.060.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.040.050.050.050.060.070.100.140.230.470.941.702.493.012.972.451.650.940.480.200.130.110.090.080.070.060.060.060.050.020.030.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.060.070.090.120.190.360.801.722.873.733.793.272.411.440.800.370.160.110.090.080.070.060.060.050.050.050.020.020.030.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.060.070.090.130.180.280.631.543.144.624.954.373.372.161.260.650.270.130.100.080.070.060.060.050.050.040.040.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.100.130.190.280.511.192.975.246.405.834.493.031.841.010.520.210.110.080.070.060.050.050.040.040.040.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.100.140.200.310.490.912.355.177.217.065.513.912.551.510.820.400.170.090.070.060.050.050.040.040.040.030.020.020.020.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.100.140.200.310.510.821.563.836.527.205.894.323.092.071.220.660.300.130.080.060.050.040.040.040.030.030.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.040.050.070.090.130.200.300.480.731.142.114.245.635.444.363.302.431.620.950.490.220.090.060.040.040.040.030.030.030.020.020.020.030.030.030.040.050.070.090.130.180.270.400.580.811.112.063.414.063.753.172.531.861.230.720.370.160.080.050.040.030.030.030.030.030.020.020.020.030.030.040.050.060.080.120.170.230.320.430.560.670.901.672.432.692.582.261.821.330.860.480.230.110.060.040.030.030.030.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.060.070.100.140.180.230.290.350.410.460.721.241.671.811.761.561.250.900.570.310.140.060.040.030.030.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.050.060.080.110.130.160.190.230.260.270.320.540.901.151.251.191.020.800.580.370.200.090.040.030.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.050.070.080.100.110.130.150.170.170.190.280.460.640.790.820.760.650.510.380.240.130.060.030.030.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.100.110.110.120.160.230.340.460.530.540.490.420.330.230.150.080.050.030.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.050.050.060.070.070.080.080.080.090.110.190.240.330.370.360.310.250.190.140.090.050.030.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.050.050.050.060.070.100.140.190.240.240.210.180.140.110.080.050.030.020.020.020.010.020.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.040.040.040.050.050.080.100.140.150.140.120.100.070.050.040.030.030.020.020.010.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.050.060.070.090.090.080.060.050.040.030.030.020.020.020.010.010.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.040.040.050.060.050.040.030.030.020.020.020.020.010.010.010.010.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.030.020.020.020.020.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.020.020.020.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0125.7026.6827.0228.7032.7431.9530.7030.4029.5728.5528.5229.5230.3830.6931.8632.8528.8827.0926.7625.7428.7128.7027.8327.4430.8730.2528.7129.0429.0428.3028.2829.0029.0528.7130.1831.0127.5227.8228.7628.7130.9730.2928.0225.7128.3527.8426.0426.7727.7228.2428.2827.7626.8126.0127.7328.4625.7427.8930.3130.9631.0131.1628.7324.9425.9724.7422.9524.1626.9630.1730.2427.1424.2222.9524.6526.0424.9028.6131.2031.0428.3228.8228.0726.1927.8425.9224.3225.4927.5429.5229.6027.6925.5824.3625.8427.8526.2327.9928.9028.3424.6124.3923.5823.7426.0023.8622.8123.3523.7223.9823.9623.7323.3622.8123.7926.0123.8023.5724.4424.6321.6221.4521.2622.4523.0620.5920.0620.6420.9921.1321.1321.0020.6520.0720.5423.0022.5421.2821.4821.6220.0720.3320.7821.8621.1919.5119.3519.6819.8219.7719.7719.8219.6919.3619.4921.1621.9020.8020.3520.1019.8520.2520.4620.2919.3918.7118.7018.8018.8218.6418.6318.8118.8018.7218.7119.3620.3020.4820.2719.8819.3519.7219.9719.9218.9018.0617.9417.9317.8817.7517.7517.8817.9417.9518.0518.8819.9119.9919.7519.3818.8318.9819.3420.4219.5917.4416.9917.0517.0817.0917.0917.0917.0517.0117.4219.5420.4719.3819.0018.8519.9319.3818.6819.4919.9217.2216.1416.2316.4216.5616.5616.4316.2516.1517.1719.9019.5618.7119.3819.9222.2721.0919.1018.0719.5917.0915.5215.5915.7916.0616.0715.8115.6015.5217.0119.6318.1319.0621.0822.2124.6822.6219.9017.1918.7516.9314.9014.9515.1715.4315.4315.1814.9614.8916.8418.8017.1619.8022.6224.6026.0323.2720.0816.6717.9716.5614.2814.3314.6214.8214.8314.6414.3314.2616.4718.0316.6719.9623.2525.9225.3822.6319.4216.0417.3415.9513.6813.7213.9614.2514.2513.9713.7213.6715.8617.4016.0419.3122.6125.2822.7420.6317.9415.3316.9915.1013.1113.1613.3313.5813.5813.3413.1613.0915.0017.0215.3317.8620.6222.6719.4918.1816.1815.3116.7814.1812.6112.6812.8312.9612.9612.8412.6912.6114.1016.8115.3416.1318.1919.4617.0716.2915.4516.0516.1713.3412.3112.2812.3012.3812.3812.3112.2912.3113.3016.1516.1415.4816.3517.1016.5116.3216.1416.5215.0812.8312.1712.0311.9511.8911.8911.9512.0312.1812.8215.0716.6016.2116.4016.6216.6316.7616.7116.2114.3512.4711.9811.8311.7411.5511.5411.7311.8312.0012.4814.3416.2816.8016.8416.7216.1215.8915.7415.9914.5512.3611.6811.5611.4711.4211.4211.4711.5611.6912.3414.5616.0515.7815.9516.2016.0715.2714.4315.0015.1212.3511.3011.2811.2911.3711.3711.3011.2911.3012.3015.0915.0614.4215.3016.1117.7316.3614.4513.6215.1312.5510.9911.0711.2111.3311.3311.2211.0810.9912.4615.1313.6314.4016.4217.7620.1918.0415.4712.8814.5912.7810.7510.7810.9611.2111.2110.9810.7810.7212.6614.6112.8915.3718.0620.1321.8819.1716.1412.8014.0812.8110.4510.4010.5610.8510.8610.5810.3910.4112.6514.1512.7615.9619.1421.7621.6418.9215.9412.5313.7712.5110.099.9610.0410.1510.1510.059.9510.0312.3313.8512.4415.7118.8521.4119.4217.4114.8612.1213.5711.859.619.419.329.319.319.329.399.5611.6813.6712.0414.6317.3119.16CRICKET BATTING CAGE_WorkplaneXBXBXBXBXBXBXBXB6.566.005.104.169.029.159.118.979.018.517.356.0711.3111.3011.4812.0412.4012.3712.3712.3612.4411.799.747.8712.3012.8713.4814.0014.6415.8817.0216.9416.5216.4216.2616.0114.6311.769.5611.0412.2413.2614.1414.8515.8517.0118.0719.0320.3921.7921.5921.1020.7719.8419.5417.6813.7110.939.048.509.7311.2012.6713.9515.3316.7517.7418.5219.6421.0722.1823.0324.9626.8625.8524.5623.3722.0422.0520.6816.2512.8110.245.626.847.999.5011.0612.9315.2017.5118.7819.5020.5122.0623.6025.0426.1027.0227.7129.3230.2227.0823.7919.0814.6311.452.553.414.956.928.8010.5612.3914.4316.5219.1221.8823.3023.8125.0826.7627.7228.0428.0528.5826.4221.5516.2612.839.743.164.356.178.6811.4313.7915.6717.9720.4122.8725.8128.1828.8028.9928.9727.8423.2317.6113.9610.424.155.447.209.5912.8216.2818.6720.6422.9524.7626.4923.8318.6014.5711.126.538.0510.0713.1517.7421.0322.0423.0518.9614.7911.496.998.2710.3313.2818.2223.0321.1219.0315.2911.808.777.178.4110.5413.6318.2623.9619.5219.0716.2912.529.318.3410.2113.7117.7423.5719.2517.3413.519.998.099.8513.2016.7322.2026.9118.9817.7914.4010.717.739.3512.2115.7020.1924.3118.8818.2215.1411.768.787.258.6611.2314.4717.9721.5019.3419.3716.3413.049.797.8910.0113.0016.2019.5021.3218.2414.3910.847.298.8411.6115.1018.3719.2323.4420.3615.6211.796.788.1210.4714.1217.7119.1424.5921.6916.6612.808.896.417.609.6913.0016.8318.9721.9217.2313.359.367.168.9311.9115.4918.4219.1520.9717.1213.149.666.828.2911.1414.4818.2820.6319.2616.7512.999.636.846.577.8810.6714.0318.1621.9717.4416.7913.669.997.126.217.469.9513.6717.6522.2716.8914.8710.907.626.979.0712.7216.5021.4224.4216.2715.3311.668.226.428.2111.3115.0119.4322.5615.9115.3912.139.006.535.847.259.9713.4416.7619.8716.0015.8612.8110.257.486.348.4711.6414.4217.5717.0514.2311.458.555.697.149.7812.9116.2116.7918.7415.8612.229.265.166.348.5311.9215.5116.4019.8717.0112.779.776.704.765.737.6210.7914.6516.3819.3517.2613.049.766.735.316.899.5913.0415.6716.5812.839.156.625.026.358.7611.6914.9716.6914.2214.8612.308.676.214.815.978.5011.3514.5417.6411.0910.5411.3511.5511.7212.2111.228.525.924.064.625.708.0511.2214.1217.939.049.059.5411.2111.5910.439.9710.009.759.789.788.075.613.765.377.3010.3913.1017.1519.809.368.968.678.478.318.288.379.5110.9710.539.478.938.458.127.934.996.478.9711.6715.3818.2910.6411.9410.488.768.307.967.707.597.547.517.888.809.058.504.535.627.5210.0012.9915.8315.0312.8811.9910.5210.5711.509.878.127.647.337.106.976.946.813.984.796.158.1910.5913.2512.9611.2610.399.8410.1710.769.007.527.016.836.634.024.956.568.6610.9210.879.669.149.079.278.947.633.303.955.237.058.949.038.288.082.703.134.065.5425.7026.6827.0228.7032.7431.9530.7030.4029.5728.5528.5229.5230.3830.6931.8632.8528.8827.0926.7625.7428.7128.7027.8327.4430.8730.2528.7129.0429.0428.3028.2829.0029.0528.7130.1831.0127.5227.8228.7628.7130.9730.2928.0225.7128.3527.8426.0426.7727.7228.2428.2827.7626.8126.0127.7328.4625.7427.8930.3130.9631.0131.1628.7324.9425.9724.7422.9524.1626.9630.1730.2427.1424.2222.9524.6526.0424.9028.6131.2031.0428.3228.8228.0726.1927.8425.9224.3225.4927.5429.5229.6027.6925.5824.3625.8427.8526.2327.9928.9028.3424.6124.3923.5823.7426.0023.8622.8123.3523.7223.9823.9623.7323.3622.8123.7926.0123.8023.5724.4424.6321.6221.4521.2622.4523.0620.5920.0620.6420.9921.1321.1321.0020.6520.0720.5423.0022.5421.2821.4821.6220.0720.3320.7821.8621.1919.5119.3519.6819.8219.7719.7719.8219.6919.3619.4921.1621.9020.8020.3520.1019.8520.2520.4620.2919.3918.7118.7018.8018.8218.6418.6318.8118.8018.7218.7119.3620.3020.4820.2719.8819.3519.7219.9719.9218.9018.0617.9417.9317.8817.7517.7517.8817.9417.9518.0518.8819.9119.9919.7519.3818.8318.9819.3420.4219.5917.4416.9917.0517.0817.0917.0917.0917.0517.0117.4219.5420.4719.3819.0018.8519.9319.3818.6819.4919.9217.2216.1416.2316.4216.5616.5616.4316.2516.1517.1719.9019.5618.7119.3819.9222.2721.0919.1018.0719.5917.0915.5215.5915.7916.0616.0715.8115.6015.5217.0119.6318.1319.0621.0822.2124.6822.6219.9017.1918.7516.9314.9014.9515.1715.4315.4315.1814.9614.8916.8418.8017.1619.8022.6224.6026.0323.2720.0816.6717.9716.5614.2814.3314.6214.8214.8314.6414.3314.2616.4718.0316.6719.9623.2525.9225.3822.6319.4216.0417.3415.9513.6813.7213.9614.2514.2513.9713.7213.6715.8617.4016.0419.3122.6125.2822.7420.6317.9415.3316.9915.1013.1113.1613.3313.5813.5813.3413.1613.0915.0017.0215.3317.8620.6222.6719.4918.1816.1815.3116.7814.1812.6112.6812.8312.9612.9612.8412.6912.6114.1016.8115.3416.1318.1919.4617.0716.2915.4516.0516.1713.3412.3112.2812.3012.3812.3812.3112.2912.3113.3016.1516.1415.4816.3517.1016.5116.3216.1416.5215.0812.8312.1712.0311.9511.8911.8911.9512.0312.1812.8215.0716.6016.2116.4016.6216.6316.7616.7116.2114.3512.4711.9811.8311.7411.5511.5411.7311.8312.0012.4814.3416.2816.8016.8416.7216.1215.8915.7415.9914.5512.3611.6811.5611.4711.4211.4211.4711.5611.6912.3414.5616.0515.7815.9516.2016.0715.2714.4315.0015.1212.3511.3011.2811.2911.3711.3711.3011.2911.3012.3015.0915.0614.4215.3016.1117.7316.3614.4513.6215.1312.5510.9911.0711.2111.3311.3311.2211.0810.9912.4615.1313.6314.4016.4217.7620.1918.0415.4712.8814.5912.7810.7510.7810.9611.2111.2110.9810.7810.7212.6614.6112.8915.3718.0620.1321.8819.1716.1412.8014.0812.8110.4510.4010.5610.8510.8610.5810.3910.4112.6514.1512.7615.9619.1421.7621.6418.9215.9412.5313.7712.5110.099.9610.0410.1510.1510.059.9510.0312.3313.8512.4415.7118.8521.4119.4217.4114.8612.1213.5711.859.619.419.329.319.319.329.399.5611.6813.6712.0414.6317.3119.16ASSOCIATED LIGHTING REPRESENTATIVES, INC7777 PARDEE LANEP.O. BOX 2265OAKLAND, CA 94621PHONE: (510) 638-3800 - FAX (510) 638-2908* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *ALL VALUES SHOWN ARE MAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES AT GRADEPHOTOMETRIC DATA USED AS INPUT FOR THESE CALCULATIONSIS BASED ON ESTABLISHED IES PROCEDURES AND PUBLISHEDLAMP, RATINGS. FIELD PERFORMANCE WILL DEPEND ON ACTUALLAMP, BALLAST, ELECTRICAL AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS.Calculations have been performed according to IES standards and good practice.Some differences between measured values and calculated results may occur due tomeasurement techniques and field conditions such as voltage and temperaturevariations. Input data used to generate the attached calculations such as roomdimensions, reflectances, furniture and architectural elements significantly affect thelighting calculations. If the real environment conditions do not match the input data,differences will occur between measured values and calculated values.REPORT FOR: AURUM CONSULTING ENGINEERSBY: APPLICATIONS ENGINEERING; GILBERTO J. RODRIGUEZSALES REPRESENTATIVE: ALR; JD STEPHENSAGI32 VERSION 19.11AGI (C) 1999-2020 LIGHTING ANALYSTS, INC.10268 W. CENTENNIAL ROAD, SUITE 202LITTLETON, CO 80127FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 34605 LOCKHART ST. DUBLIN CADRAWING NO. / INPUT FILEPROJECT DESCRIPTION17734JDS - E2.2N.DWG /.AGISCALEAS NOTEDSHEET2 OF 2DATE02.21.2020REV0**PARTIAL SITE**1" = 16'1" = 8'1.0FC0.5FC***LIGHTING LAYOUT RECOMMENDATION**** TWIN ROTATED ASSEMBLIES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.** HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLE VALUES SHOWN AT 36" ABOVE FINISH GRADE.Luminaire ScheduleProject: FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 3 - PARTIAL SITESymbolQtyLabelArrangementLum. LumensLLFLDDLLDDescriptionFilenameLum. Watts6XASINGLE66520.8500.9000.944SIGNIFY GARDCO GL13-XXX-1-2-70LA-6435-NW-VOLT-XXX - 15' POLEGL13-2-70LA-6435-NW.IES706XA1SINGLE67500.8500.9000.944SIGNIFY GARDCO GL13-XXX-1-3-70LA-6435-NW-VOLT-XXX - 15' POLEGL13-3-70LA-6435-NW.IES70.18XB *TWIN274320.8500.9000.944VISIONAIRE BLX-II-4-T4-128LC-5-4K-VOLT-XX-XX-(TWIN) - 25' POLEBLX-II_4_T4_128LC_5_4K.IES211Calculation SummaryProject: FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 3 - PARTIAL SITELabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/Min# PtsCRICKET BATTING CAGE_Workplane **IlluminanceFc18.5632.859.311.993.53560PATHWAY AIlluminanceFc2.575.010.882.925.69238PATHWAY BIlluminanceFc3.027.730.634.7912.27263
Dublin, California
LITTLE
LEAGUE
LITTLE
LEAGUE
PLAY AREA
WITH ADJACENT
SEATING
SCORE KEEPING
BOOTHS
NEW WALKS
BATTING CAGES
WITH TURF
LAWN
SAND VOLLEYBALL
COURTS
CRICKET FIELD
CONCRETE TERRACE
SEATING
3–PITCHES
SIGHT SCREEN
SIGHT SCREEN
Fallon Sports Park - Phase 3 Concept Plan
BATTING CAGE
LIGHTING: 25' HIGH
POLE LIGHTS
5/29/2020
Tr
1i
i\
-tn2{<FALLON SPORTS PARK
A!'DUBtIN, C
:\
I
I
'{
I
IFORNIA
I
wr
; ' T.Tf,z:s*
I
(
I
I
I
I
I
il
tItf
1
fl
1
'Ifl
:ffi L -_,..__:r]:---
I
1
{o
I
ii."lf ir
'\'''
\
I
I
>
.I
,.'
l-,
I
./q
I
I'ttlf "' .s ''U: tl
4
l.
il.
ilt.
tv.
V.
vt.
vil.
vilt
lx.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
MASTER PLAN PROGRAM
SITE CONTEXT AND ANALYSIS
PROC ESS
MASTER PLAN DESIGN COMPONENTS
PHASING
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
APPENDICES
a. Task Force Meeting Agenda
b. Task Force Meeting Minutes
c. Task Force Design Concepts
d. Task Force Meeting Handouts
e. lrrigation and Recycled Water
Demand Analysis
f. Cost Estimate
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES
SAN FRANCISCO, CATIFORNIA
rNc
.},(,
7
t
B tI
t
t I lt ,,.'9
L.-
\.
\
E I
il'ts
I
./I
\
{
d
,J
-
{r.:.l. t
\
\-z.\.
,{-
.i
UBL!|l,r CAtIFORNI
SECTION I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ln 2004 the City of Dublin included funding for development of the
Master Plan for the 60-acre Fallon Sports Park. This Master Plan
Report outlines the desires, intentions, and objectives of the City of
Dublin for the development of Fallon Sports Park. The basis for the
programming of the 60-acre sports park is the "City of Dublin: Parks
and Recreation Master Plan, lr/arch 2004 Update" (PRITIP) which
was developed to assure the future development of parks throughout
the City. The PRMP identified this 60-acre parcel on Fallon Road
in eastern Dublin as a "park facility developed to accommodate the
majority of competition ball fields in the City".r As part of the master
plan process the Fallon Sports Park project was initiated in March
of 2004 and the City Council appointed a 22-person Task Force, to
represent the interests of particular groups, users, and residents.
The program for the Fallon Sports Park as contained in the Parks
and Recreation Master Plan includes the following amenities:
baseball fields, soccer fields, softball fields, tennis courts, basketball
courts, Blt/X track, children's play area, jogging or walking loop, fam-
ily and group picnic areas, shade structures, restrooms, concession/
scoreboard areas, lighting for sporls fields and parking lots. Through
input received from the Fallon Sports Park Task Force additional
amenities have been identified including bocce ballcourts, cricket
fields, and water play areas. The Sports Park will also create link-
ages to adjacent open space, establish a focal element for the Dublin
Community, and provide competition sports fields for tournament
play. Throughout the design process the Task Force has taken part
to help assure the Master Plan's acceptance by City residents and its
relevance with current trends and future demands.
MASTER PLANNING DESIGN PROGESS
The Design Team worked closely with the Task Force members to
incorporate their participation in the design process. The meetings
allowed the participants to guide the design and have a primary role
in the decision-making process. The Task Force members were
included in a series of six meetings which were held to solicit input
into the process. They included an lntroductory hleeting - outlining
the parameters of the program and the physical make up of the site;
a Srte Vrsff - where the task force members actually hiked the site
and gained a sense of the scale of the projecl; Design Arleeting #1
- where the task force prepared a series of potential layouts for the
park; Desrgrn Arleeting #2 - took the potential layouts and refined them
to six viable plans and the task force narrowed these down to three
options to be refined further; Design fu|eeting #3 - the three refined
plans were presented and a preferred alternative was selected; De-
sign Meeting tt4 - lhe preferred alternative and phasing plans were
presented to the Task Force for approval and recommendation to the
Parks and Community Services Commission; and Design Mleeting
#5 - discussed the comments and recommended changes from the
Parks Commission and asked for direction from the Task Force.
1. "City of Dublin: Parks and Recreation l\4aster Plan, March 2004 Update,'' (Nrarch 2004): 50.
Task Force lntroduction Meeting (0U2U2004).
Design Meeting #1 Design Meeting #2
Existing aeial photo
Sile views Site yiews of hillside and
distance
I
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, I ALTON SPORTS PARK
SAN FRANCISCO, CAI.IFORNIA
NC F
DUBTIN, CAI-IFOR,NIA
t-l
I 3iae
-#.#
L-\".d
\..d
-1i
t
r''I
SECTION I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ln June of 2004 the Parks & Community Services Commission
was presented the three master plan alternatives and the preferred
scheme of the Task Force. The Commission selected Scheme B
as the preferred design with the recommendation that the design be
referred back to the Task Force to reevaluate the space requirements
of the two 90' baseball diamonds and to consider removal of the
baseball diamonds to allow for program flexibility in the future.
Staff returned to the Task Force and looked at options for the base-
ball field area which included a revised Master plan with updated
engineering information. The updated engineering information
adjusted the grades leaving space for only one 90' baseball field and
reconfigured the parking to allow for access per Traffic Engineer-
ing requirements. The Task Force was in favor of retaining one 90,
baseballfield in the plan. This is supported by the standards for
baseball fields in the Parks and Recreation Master plan which shows
the need for two additional 90' baseball fields within the City. As
the Parks and Recreation Master Plan designated both 90'baseball
fields for the Fallon Sports Park, it would be necessary to identify
another location for the remaining g0' baseball field in order to meet
the standards for City build-out.
The Final Draft Master Plan was presented to the Parks and Com-
munity Services Commission at the June 2005 meeting. The Com-
mission received the presentation and public comment, including
comments from Task Force members. The Commission deliberated
on elements of the plan and commented on the baseball field and
the option of removing it from the plan. The discussion included
the overall programming requirements of the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan and limitations for future locations should the field be
removed. Further, the JVaster Plan is meant as a template and simi-
lar to other master planned parks it is flexible given future recreation
needs. Upon completion of deliberations the Commission voted
unanimously to recommend approval of the Master Plan, as present-
ed to the City Council.
The Final Draft Fallon Sports Park Master Plan was presented to
the City Council. The City Council was in favor of the majority of the
design elements in the overall Master Plan. The City Council dis-
cussed the need for flexibility for future recreation needs and chose
to eliminate the remaining 9O-foot baseballfield and leave the space
open as a future study area.
The Final Master Plan and cost estimates have been revised to re-
flect these changes. The Master Plan follows the Executive Summa-
ry and the cost estimates are included in the Appendix of this report.
DESIGN ELEMENTS
Based on input received from the Task Force and Parks and Com-
munity Services Commission meetings, a final list of park elements
was developed to incorporate into the park. These elements are
listed on the following page:
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC
Master plan with baseball fteld
Master plan with future study area
fucce
Basketball
FAttON SPORTS PARK
Scheme B
Little League
/'
fllr,l.5-
SAN FRANCISCO, CAI.ITORNIA
Baseball
DUluN, CAr.ttoRNtA
t-2
n
)u
aa ta aa
f
SECTION I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Sport Facilities. 4-60'Little League fields. 4 softballfields (2lighted). 4 soccer fields (2 lighted)
2 natural turf fields with a cricket field overlay
2 natural turf fields with synthetic turf option. 4 tennis courts (lighted). 4 basketballcourts (lighted). 4 bocce courts (lighted). 2 additional courts optional (lighted). 4 sand volleyballcourts. BMX course
Other Park Facilities. Activity hubs/staff offices (200-300 sf). Restrooms. Concessions. Picnic plazas. Play areas. Art and water features (optional). Loop jogging trail (one mile). Family picnic areas with barbecues. On-site parking for 459 cars (259 upper terrace parking
spaces, and 200 lower terrace parking spaces). Lockable bicycle parking distributed throughout the park. Shade structures
Sport Field Lighting. 2 softball fields. 2 soccer fields. 4 tennis courts. 4 basketballcourts. 4 bocce courts. 2 additional bocce courts optional
Other Lighted Facilities. Vehicular entry lighting. Parking lot lighting. Pathway lighting. Security lighting. Arrival/Drop-offlighting. Activity hub lighting. Pedestrian bridge lighting
SITE CHARACTER!STICS
The site has an overall elevation change of approximately
100 feet, from the Fallon Road/Gleason Drive intersection
(+/490 feet) to the Lockhart StreeVCentral Parkway inter-
section (+/-ggO feet). This 10O-foot drop occurs over a length
of 2,500 feet, creating an overall 4% slope across the site; it
should be noted that much of the site exceeds 5%, which is
considered to be the maximum slope for park usability. The
site is bordered to the north and northwest by housing devel-
Nafural turf soccer field soccer field
Restroom / cn,ncessrbn
Sport field lighting
area Water and aft features
Pedestrian circulation Sile Wslf (05n1/04)
CARDUCCI & ASSOCI ATES, INC tON SPORTS PAR,K
--a
{-
SAN FRANCISCO, CAI.IFORNIA
FAL
DUBL!N, CATIFORNIA
l-3
L
il-Iil--
I
C. t'
I
)
E
SECTION I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
opments and a golf course. To the south and east, additional housing
and a school site are planned for future development. On the west-
ern edge of the park and parallel to Lockhart Street is a continuous
7O-foot-wide stream corridor that is being developed for environmen-
tal mitigation purposes. This stream corridor defines this western and
northwestern edge of the park and will be reinforced with a series
of riparian zone plantings. City of Dublin Fire Station #18 is located
along Fallon Road approximately 20 to 30 feet higher than the park's
existing finish grade and is supported by a large retaining wall. The
overall site topography consists of rolling hills with two small val-
leys that create drainage channels across the site from its northern
to southwestern boundary. The grass-covered, treeless rolling hills
create attractive views to the east and to the south. The prevailing
western winds often dominate the park environment. The existing
soil is classified as being predominately of the Tassajara formation
characterized by a high-clay content and poor drainage.
GRADING CONCEPT
ln order to create usable, level surfaces for the facilities, and to
accept .5 million to 1 million cubic yards of fill from adjacent devel-
opments, two main terraces (upper and lower) have been created.
These terraces create a dramatic grade change of 30 feet between
each level and significant embankments at the northwest and south-
west corners of the park. These terraces provide many opportunities
for views and topographic interest throughout the park. The terracing
also allows for two main vehicular entries, one off of Lockhart Street
at the upper level on the western edge of the park, and the second
off of Central Parkway on the southern edge of the lower level.
SITE DRAINAGE
All site drainage will connect to the perimeter storm drainage system
running along Fallon Road and Central Parkway. Each field, hub,
and parking lot will serve as its own watershed and will connect to
the perimeter storm drainage system. Further, each terrace will be a
closed drainage system that directs all water into the storm drainage
system. No park drainage will enter the stream corridor, which will be
controlled and maintained by the Home Owners'Association from the
adjacent residential development. The stream corridor is only meant
to accept drainage from northerly developments and is intended to
be a wildlife corridor as it runs along the sports park.
PARK FEATURES
The park is designed to include memorable identification features
and signage clearly directing visitors to specific facilities. Fallon
Sports Park will be an identifiable and memorable park through the
use of a ranch theme. This theme is exemplified by the split-rail-style
fencing running the perimeter of the park and large, traditional "ranch
gates" at the two main entrances. Other park elements such as play
areas, trellis, and restrooms will incorporate colors and elements that
reinforce the ranch theme.
Site Charactenstrbs
"l
R@d
Grading Plan (Red lines indicate contour lines)
cARDUccI & -ASsocIAIEs, INC , P. i FAttON SPOR.TS PAR.K
sAN FRANcrsco, cAuFoRNrA DUltlN, CALIFOINIA
I l-4
:tq Foit*
Rad
1
,
l.J
Pork Site
SECTION I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
{
Activity hubs, located at the end of the entry drives and at the heart
of each terrace, will create a sense of place and arrival. ln addition,
a series of sport and activity hubs will organize uses throughout the
park. The circulation system will provide accessible paths throughout
the park connecting the park facilities and providing neighborhood
access. These neighborhood connections will link the park to the
surrounding areas so that residents can easily walk to the park. The
multiuse trail, located within the stream corridor, links the park to the
Tassajara bike trail via the continuation of the stream corridor north
along Fallon Road and south along the proposed extension of Lock-
hart Street across Central Parkway.
Sports facilities will be lighted to allow for tournament play and safety
at night. Park hours will be dawn to dusk and lighted facilities will be
open and lighted until 10 p.m.
PHASING
The park will be divided into Phase 1, and Subsequent Phases to
be subdivided in the future. Phase 1 will follow the development of
Lockhart Street giving the park vehicular access for the upper ter-
race where a variety of facilities will be constructed. The Subsequent
Phases will be subdivided in the future and will provide uses that
remain current with budgeting, community use demands, and sur-
rounding road development.
J\
i. ..;'\
I
.l
HAII 8',
SITEET
70'wrDE STtEAXcottt00t
Slream aridor at upper terrace entry
I O' ? IH
Existing stream conidor along Fallon Road
Dublin Ranch entry Existing ranch fencing
Fencing at Fire Statbn #18
t0,3:l
SLO?E
3rl
sto?E
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC ttON SPORTS PAR,K
SAN FRANCISCO, CAI.IFORNIA
FA
DUBtIN, CATIFORNIA
l-5
I--
i
J
8'
v
!
SECTION II. INTRODUCTION
The Master Plan is intended to guide the park development by defining
the goals and establishing the design elements to be used at the Fallon
Sports Park. The park is a 60-acre parcel located in the fast-growing
eastern portion of Dublin. lt was identified in the PRMP to contain the
majority of competition sports fields; the PRMP lays the framework
for all future park development in Dublin and has identified the need
for 299.5 acres of land for public park use at build-out of the City. ln
addition, the City of Dublin will protect existing open space and provide
linkages through trails, streets, and bikeways to connect these parks
and open space resources. Fallon Sports Park has been identified as
the site to provide the core of competition sports fields to serve the
communitywide recreation needs in the City of Dublin.
Master Plan Goals
Seven major goals were established to lead the Master Plan. These
goals are as follows:
1. Create a focal and destination point in the City of Dublin, and
create a regional attraction that welcomes users from surrounding
communities.
2. Create a premier sports park with a wide range of fields and courts
to be used for competitive and tournament play.
3. Provide lighted facilities for extended use and tournament play.
Position lighted facilities in the center of the park to reduce glare
impact on surrounding neighborhoods.
4. Develop the park adjacent to the 7O-foot-wide (4-acre) stream
corridor so that the park and the stream corridor complement each
other and provide a large open space resource.
5. Provide a park like experience and recreational opportunities for
non-sport users, such as picnic, play, walking trails, relaxation,
etc. Promote nature appreciation through native plantings, stream
corridor interaction, distant views, and open space connections.
6. Provide linkages to the regional bike system, other parks within the
City, neighborhoods, and the adjacent private open space.
7. Create a clear traffic pattern with descriptive signage to allow
visiting teams and out-of-town users ease in finding the site. ln
addition, provide clear descriptive signage giving directions to
speciflc facilities on site.
2. "City of Oublin: Parks and Recreation Master Plan, March 2oo4 Update," ltr,larctr 2004): 23.
ld v\q.EHra aswk
IJUDIIJI KaIICI] . rw.qu urrJrla.Fa 'i;--
AkrPhndcomm0i rrrlM
r. rkb'
Duilin Ranch futurc development location map
(Cowtesy d MacKay & Somps)
Site location map
D
,!-.. !
I
I
II
I
1
I :l
I
I
i
--
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES FALTON SPORT S PARK
;\itE;\ il
r\it-B*\ C
o
rU{Br\il
@
SAN FRANCISCO, CAI.IFORNIA
tNc
DU!TIN, CATIFOTNIA
lt- l
SECTION III. MASTER PLAN PROGRAM
The City appointed a 22-person Task Force, representing the interests
of particular groups, users, and residents, to help guide and give input
for the Master Plan design process. Through the Master planning
process the original list of proposed park elements and components,
as specified in the PRMP, has been adjusted. The following list of site
elements and components will be integrated into the park.
SPORT FACILITIES. 4-60'Little League fields. 4 softballfields (2lighted). 4 soccer fields (2 lighted)
2 natural turf fields with a cricket field overlay
2 natural turf fields with synthetic turf option. 1-90'baseballfield (lighted). 4 tennis courts (lighted). 4 basketball courts (lighted). 4 bocce courts (lighted)
2 additional bocce courts optional (lighted). 4 sand volleyballcourts. BN/X course
OTHER PARK FAC!LITIES. Activity hubs. Restrooms. Concessions. Picnic plazas. Play areas. Art and water features (optional). Loop jogging trail (one mile). Family picnic areas with barbecue. On-site parking for 459 cars (259 upper terrace parking spaces,
200 lower terrace parking spaces). Lockable bicycle parking distributed throughout the park. Shade structures
SPORT FIELD LIGHTING. 1 baseballfield. 2 softball fields. 2 soccer fields. 4 tennis courts. 4 basketballcourts. 4 bocce courts
2 additional bocce courts optional
OTHER LIGHTED FACILITIES. Vehicular entry lighting. Parking lot lighting. Pathway lighting. Security lighting. Arrival/Drop-offlighting. Activity hub lighting. Pedestrian bridge lighting
Task Force Meeting (06/18n4)
Liftle League
BMX course
\
Crickel field
ba*bafrfield
FAttON
SAN f RANCISCO, CAI.IFORNIA
)CARDUCCI &SSOCIATES c K
DUBLIN, CATIFORNIA
lll- l
l
tr
q
E
o
)-I
-,-
--
SECTION IV. SITE CONTEXT AND ANALYSIS
This 60-acre parcel is located approximately lz mile north of l-580
along the western edge of Fallon Road. Fallon Road, Gleason Drive,
Lockhart Street, and Central Parkway will define the park boundary.
Currently, residential developments and a golf course exist to the north
and there are proposed residential developments to the west and to
the south of the park. ln addition, an elementary school is slated for
development across from the park along Lockhart Street on the western
edge of the site.
The site's major landmark is City of Dublin Fire Station #18, which is
positioned along the park's border on Fallon Road with a 20- to 30-
foot-tall retaining wall on its eastern edge. Otherwise, the topography
embodies the classical Northern Californian rolling hills. Natural
waterways and drainage channels cross the site from the northeast
to southwest. The site has significant grade changes with a 100-foot
vertical drop over a 2,500-foot horizontal distance from the most
northerly point at the Fallon Road/Gleason Drive intersection to the
most southerly point at the Lockhart StreeUCentral Parkrruay intersection.
This grade change results in an overall slope of 4o/o. The existing soil
is classified as being predominately of the Tassajara formation, which
is characterized by a high clay content and poor drainage.
The stream corridor is being constructed by the developer of the adjacent
housing project as part of the mitigation of environmental impacts from
the surrounding developments. The existing stream corridor will enter
the park site atthe Gleason Drive/Fallon Road intersection and continue
along the western border of the site parallel to Lockhart Street. There
are strict design guidelines for the stream corridor. lt will be 70 feet
wide and will incorporate a multi-use trail along its western edge. The
streambed will have a 1S-foot-wide flat bottom and 3H:1V (Horizontal:
Vertical) maximum-sloped sides. lt will be planted with a mixture of
native grasses, trees and shrubs. No park drainage will enterthis stream
corridor along the western edge of Fallon Sports Park.
It
T
@
LEGEND
N tl,6dimoenslyResi.dstid
MH tlecliLnn HW Oen:fiy Residf,nlial
ES EbrentarySdwl
MS Middbsch@l
L LN Derelty Resldentid
OS qpenspac€
NP NeightothoEdPe,,
NS NogtrbodioodSqmm
/rc fis'gtborrroodCanedoa
R&4 Rtrd ResUsr,ab, Agtidllwel
P/SP PublicsentPtbllc
GC GenedCoaw*il
CO CmffirciCo,frc€
Existing Fire Station #18
Dublin Ranch future de-
velopment location map
(Couftesy of MacKay &
Somps)
--t-
FALLON SPORTS PARK
GTE E
a
a
East view of lhe hills
CARDU cct & Assoc|ATEs, INC
SAN FRANCISCO, CATIFORNIA DUBtIN, CATIFORNIA
lv- I
.:,1'-=-I
South.view-of the
SECTION IV. SITE CONTEXT AND ANALYSIS
I
I
I
I
I
\
\J
I
I
/i\r
u'{il
I
I
h)
w,
w
HYDROLOGY
?-- S1rVAl-E
- - - RIDGE
Wind Speeds (Colms: 7.5%)
TOPOGRAPHY
N slorrssroRGREArER
, (4 rra: 1q SPOT ELEVAnONS
ln7.7r PRoPosEo RoAD spor
ELEVATIONS
GEOLOGY
o
ARTIFICIAL FItT
TA\DSUDE DEBRS
COLLUVIUM
ALLUVIUM
TASSAJARA FORMATION
BORING LOCATION
N
EQUINOXT
DAY = NlGl{I
N
AlARCH
EQUINOX:
DAY = NIGHT
N
SEPTEA,IBER
,'-f\otcwlE
S
.IUNE
HIGHEST SUN ALTITUDE
SOLSTICE:
LONGEST DAYS
N
SOLSTICE:
SHORTEST OAYS
N
E
EW
iq rarm
505.r.a r,5?.9 J.o4.9 .9 AO 12 (,ry!t
C.lr! 0.+1.1 a.a-1.4 0..'1.1 0.+!,{ C5-1.. (il,A.!
DECEMEER
LOWESI SUN ALTIIUDE
JN FEB A{A? APf, &AY JLN JT' ^UG SEP O.I I{OVOTYTAI WIND/SUN
-),
pREvAluNG wrND
TEilFEUTURf
MNGE
Rcro,. Hish
Hich
Raaerc Lox
80
,lEnthtMecn -
Avs. lr*tfih Ex i sting site con d itio n s
10
"F
ffi -lfiH
tl,-f-|.l'
-n:+ffi
Iit i,I,1
sl a?t
SAN FRANCISCO, CATIFORNIA
rNCCARDUCASSOCIATES FALTON S ORTS PAR
DUBLIN, CATIFORNIA
lY -2
t't
F?'Va
1 ...:' .//WMl.*i!a
t>{i.t4
fv' j
q
5
f'
E
l
l
SECTION V. PROCESS
The Design Team worked closelywith the Task Force members to garner
extensive input into the design process. This lrlaster Planning resulted
in an accurate assessment of the community's needs and a prioritization
of facilities that offer the highest value to the entire community while
appealing to all ages of Dublin residents.
TASK FORCE MEETINGS
During the course of the project, seven Task Force meetings were held,
including informal introductions, site visits, and formal design meetings.
The Task Force meetings are summarized as follows:
lntroductory Task Force Meeting
Prior to beginning substantive work on the park, an initial informal
introductory meeting with City Staff and Task Force members was
held to discuss project scope, schedule, site characteristics, design
elements, budgetary goals, master planning process, and meetings.
The Task Force members were also asked about their interests, needs,
concerns, ideas, and suggestions.
lnformalTask Force Site Visit
A site visit with the City Staff and the Task Force was conducted to
assess the site characteristics, discuss site opportunities, constraints,
views, natural systems, and contextual setting.
Task Force Meeting #1
A design charrette was held to give the Task Force members an
opportunity to offer input and ideas into the park design. They were
given grading plans and site element templates and created their own
layouts for the park design. The Task Force members created seven
conceptual options and then chose three preferred schemes.
Task Force Meeting #2
The Task Force responded to three refined Master Plan alternatives
and chose their preferred plan. This plan was a combination of options
from all three preferred schemes and incorporated add itional comments
from the meeting.
Task Force Meeting #3
The preferred Master Plan was presented and approved by the Task
Force. The plan was then brought before the Parks and Community
Services Commission.
lntroductory Meeting
lnformal Site Meeting
rt
Task Force Meeting #1
Task Force Meeting #2
P ref ene d sch e m e se I e ction
a
I
rI.(:ab
. SCNEMC PI'FEru
'i"ffi[',''.J,
a-
,,'+*I
rl.i
CARDUCCI &.AS CIA,TES. INC FATLO N SPO RTS PAR,K
3ettt i
Scheme I
DUBtIN, CATIFOR.NIASAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
v-l
?
lJ.u
,,*
f
I
T rT
Lj \
r
SECTION V. PROCESS
Task Force Meeting #4
This meeting further refined elements such as sports field lighting and
a parking concept. ln addition, a final phasing plan was selected.
Task Force Meeting #5
The Master Plan and Phasing Plan were presented to the Task Force
for review and comment. Budgetary constraints were also discussed.
Parks and Community Services Commission Meeting #1
After the third Task Force lt/eeting the three master plan alternatives
and preferred Master Plan were presented to the Parks and Community
Services Commission. The Commission voiced concern with some
of the items of the preferred plan, primarily that the site might not
comfortably accommodate all of the elements and that not enough
parking had been provided. They recommended that one 90'baseball
field be dropped from the Jvlaster Plan to provide a better fit with the
site and allow for additional parking.
Parks and Community Services Gommission Meeting #2
The Master Plan, Lighting Plan, Phasing Plan and cost estimates were
presented to the Parks and Community Services Commission for review
and comment.
Gity Council Meeting
The lvlaster Plan, Lighting Plan, Phasing Plan, and cost estimates were
presented to the City Council for review and comment.
Throughout the Master Plan Process, Task Force members gave input
and direction into the sports park development, allowing the design to
meet the interests of the community.
Task Force Meeting 1t3
t"
r-at,.-''-' isairl
1(..
(-)
Lt
Task Force Meeting ll4
t
I
-.r!_
.i;
Task Force Meeting #4
FALTON SPORTS PARKCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC
SAN FRANCISCO, CATIFORNIA
CARDU
DUBLIN, CAI.ITORNIA
Y-2
I
t
I
I
t
/
tL
SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS
ln order to serve the needs and vision of the growing community and
the vision of the City of Dublin, Fallon Sports Park will be the premier
sports facility for all Dublin residents. The park will feature two terraces,
with pedestrian and vehicular entries on each. The entries will have
strong axial connections to the internal Park Activity hubs, which will
provide a sense of place and arrival. The following section describes
the specifics of the site and design elements.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE
The site will be graded into two main terraces to fit the sports fields within
the 100-foot overall elevation change from the Gleason Drive/Fallon
Road intersection (+/-490 feet) to the Lockhart StreeUCentral Parkway
intersection (+/-390 feet). This 100-foot drop occurs over a 2,500-foot
horizontal distance creating a 4% slope across the site. ln addition,
the terraces will be graded to allow vehicular entrances on both the
upper and lower terraces. The grading will conform to all proposed
edge conditions and will create "level" surfaces for the proposed field
layouts. Approximately .5 million to 1 million cubic yards of import fill
from adjacent developments will be used to create these terraces and
will provide the majority of imported fill needed.
A geotechnical report, created by Kleinfelder, lnc., states that slopes
should be no steeper than 2H:1V (Horizontal: Vertical), and where
feasible, slopes should be no steeperthan 3H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical).3
ln order to capitalize on the import fill and respond to the overall 1O0-foot
elevation change on site, two main terraces with a 25- to 30-foot grade
change will create level surfaces for sport fields, accessible pathways,
and proper drainage.
A48-inch storm main drainage system will run the perimeter of the site
along Fallon Road and Central Parkway. This storm drainage system
will handle drainage from adjacent developments, roadways, and
accommodate all of the park drainage.
Existing site aeial photograph
Site character
E
ru
3
.9o!
oo
o
.sE
o
=upper
I terrace
Upper temce
vehicular eny
Drive
Upper lenace
I
Upper lowr tem@
Lowr temce
Paftway
3.'Geotechnicl Grading and Drainage Recommendations Proposed Fallon Sports ParkDublin, Calilomia,'
(September 29, 20041: 12.
Central Lower terrace
CARDUCCI & ASSO CIATES, INC LtON SPORTS PARK
SAN TRANCISCO, CAI.IFORNIA
FA
vl- l
I
DUBLIN, CAI,IFORNIA
q
tflL
!
Upper ternce
tenace
cgnidor
section below
: F,
tE
\
"a
J
I
!
SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS
The existing drainage swales and
channels that run across the site
from the northerly to the southerly
border will be put into subsurface
drains. Due to the highly expansive
nature of the clay soils, the natural
turf fields will require additional
subsurface drainage systems.
This subsurface drainage will also
connect to the perimeter storm
drainage lines.
The overall drainage concept
creates individual watersheds that
connect to the perimeter storm
drainage system. Specifically,
each field, hub, and parking lot will
serve as its own watershed and
will connect to the perimeter storm
drainage system. Further, each
terrace will be a closed drainage
system that directs allwater into the
storm drainage system. No water
from the terraces will drain over the
embankments below the terraces.
The upper terrace parking lot will
either have a fossil filter system
or a small bioswale and biobasin
to filter and drain the parking lot
water before it reaches the storm
drainage system. ln addition, the
lower terrace will have a bioswale
that will filter water from the parking
lot along Central Parkway.
The park drainage will not drain into
the stream corridor, as on-site water
used for irrigation will be recycled
water and recycled water is not
compatible with the stream corridor
habitat mitigation.
FALTON SPORTS PARK GRADING PtAN
I\)\\.<tti \-
:{
\,Yd..\
(
r\
h:
foflon
;Rood
.a t, atrrr*rp?.
- @6aa|a
--rr'.ilr*(a|u5'i@tr
ril'*.d@n @/u
lt
I
q,lsEAl.&nA
, tt,
SPORTS FIELDS
As noted in the PRMP, Fallon
Sports Park is intended to be "a park
facility developed to accommodate
the majority of competition ball fields in the City"a that could be utilized
for tournament play. The PRMP specifies two 90' baseball fields for the
sports park, but one field was omitted due to site spatial and grading
constraints. Through meetings with the Task Force and the Parks and
Community Services Commission, a final list of park components was
created.
o to tao
4. "City of Dublin: Parks and Recreation Master Plan, March 2004 Update,'(March 2004): 50
CARDUCCI & ASSdCIATES, INC FALLON SPORTS PARK
/-\
rs{rro
ll
lrl
It
ll
'lri
I
"l.5Ilro
{}-)
t
'tt
, t
.mt
i&EiE 3
+
SAN FRANCISCO, CATIFORNIA DUtUN, CAUTOtNtA
vl-2
,ra,, a
SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS
The list of sport fields and uses is
as follows:
4-60' Little League fields
4 softballfields (2 lighted)
4 soccer fields (2 lighted)
2 natural turf fields with
a cricket field overlay
2 natural turf fields with a
synthetic turf option*
1 -90' baseball (lighted)
4 tennis courts (lighted)
4 basketball courts (lighted)
4 bocce courts (lighted)
2 additional bocce courts
optional (lighted)
4 sand volleyball courts
All baseball and softball fields will
have perimeter warning tracks and
will be fully fenced allowing them to
accommodate premier tournament
play.
"See Appendix lX - Section f. for
further discussion on synthetic
fields.
PARK IDENTITY FEATURES
Fallon Sports Park was designed to
be a memorable park utilizing a ranch
theme. This theme is exemplified by
the ranch-style fencing running the
perimeter of the park and the large,
traditional "ranch-gate" entryways
at the two main entrances. ln
addition, on the four surrounding
intersections, thematic signage
will identify the park. lt is important
that the park create a memorable
arrival experience, as it will be
used by residents from Dublin and
surrounding communities.
PARK ENTRIES
The entries to the park, celebrated
by the large entryways, will welcome
visitors into an exciting sports
destination. The entryways distinguish the park from other facilities in
the City of Dublin, as a "focal element for (the) Dublin Community."s
The upper terrace will have a vehicular "bridge" crossing the stream
corridor and the lower terrace vehicular entry will be on grade. There
will be a pedestrian bridge on the southern portion of Lockhart Street
providing access from the proposed school and on-street parking. AII
entries will provide visitors with a sense of place and arrival as they
enter the park.
5. "City of Dublin: Parks and Recreation Master Plan, March 2004 Update,' (lvlarch 2004): 50.
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC
.,.'11, i.r':,.t,\\.' 1,
FAttON SPORTS PARK
SAN FRANCISCO, CAIITORNIA DUBtIN, CATIFORNIA
vl-3
tON SPOR.T
ri:t-
I
[,
I
l,l
-l
I
)
o to tao ,/o
-+ ()r
SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS
The October 23, 2003 TJKM Traffic Study proposed one four-way
intersection on Lockhart Street at the entrance to the park.6 The
current plan shows two intersections on Lockhart Street: one at the
park entrance, which will remain a four-way intersection with one lane
in and two lanes out, and one three-way intersection across from the
pedestrian bridge. Both these intersections will connect with streets
from the adjacent neighborhoods. At the time of the report no study
had been completed on the lower terrace entry off Central Parkway.
Although a preferred entry location for the park site is shown, further
study of this entrance is needed as a housing development is planned
directly across from the park on Central Parkway. lt is expected that the
lower terrace vehicular entry will also have one lane in and two lanes
out, but a new traffic study or intersection requirement confirmation is
needed.
AUTOMOBILE PARK!NG
The entries lead the visitors to tree-shaded parking areas located in
the heart of the park, close to the facilities. As indicated in the PRMP,
it was projected that the park would need roughly 500 parking spaces
to serve its proposed facilities. Through the Master Planning process,
and due to tight spatial and grading restrictions, a total of 459 parking
spaces are located within the park. These spaces will be divided into
two main lots with one off of each entry. An additional 84 on-street
parking spaces will be directly related to the park on Lockhart Street and
Central Parkway, as well as possible overflow parking at the proposed
school across Lockhart Street.
This provides for a total of 459 on-site parking spaces and 84 on-street
parking spaces, adding up to 543 total parking spaces related to the
park (See parking analysis table).
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
A system of pathways provides access to all areas and activities.
The pathway system provides neighborhood connections to promote
community use and access from all sides of the park. These
neighborhood connections allow community residents to go forwalks in
the park on a loop pathway system. All pathways on site are accessible
and connect to perimeter sidewalks.
Pedestrian circulation pathways take advantage of the unique site
characteristics such as views from the upper terrace, axial views from
the main entry points, and interaction with the stream corridoredges.
ln particular, the pathways provide connections between facilities and
will clearly direct and guide the visitors throughout the 60-acre park.
There is an internal pathway system that connects the facilities and
a p'erimeter loop system for exercise and walking. These pathways
connect to the local neighborhood, the Dublin community, and the
regional Tassajara bike trail.
6. "Traffic lmpact Study for Proposed Lockhart Street in Eastem Dublin," (October 23,2003):4'
Lower tenace entry and parking
FACILITY / USE
UPPER TERRACE
Facilitv,l SDaces
LOWER TERRACE
Facility / SDases
Baseball Field
Little League Field
Softball Field
S@cer Field
Basketball Court
Tennis Court
Picnic Area
Play Area
Bocce Court
Volleyball court
BMX Couse
4120
4110
1 129
1t5
1115
't 124
4t100
1 141
115
4t15
4l't5
Subtotal 259 oarkinq spaces 200 oarkino soaces
459 Parking Spaces
Lockhart Street
Central Parkway
fotal On-street Parkinq 23
44
17
6l
Subtotal w/ On.street 282 Parkinq Spaces 261 Parkinq SDaces
Total 543 Parking Spaces
Pa*ing analysis table
ItrE!
t(Gmol
Upper tenace entry and pafting
I !."
1i-
FALLON SP ORTS PARKCARDUCCr& ASSOCIATES, INC
DUBLIN, CATIFORNIA
V I.4
SAN FRANCISCO, CAIIFORNIA
4i90
4i90
1n-citr Perkind Total
SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS
NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS
It is essential to link the park to the surrounding neighborhoods and
to the Dublin community through pathways and bike trail connections.
There will be Class 2 Bike Lanes along Fallon Road, Gleason Drive,
and Central Parkway and a multiuse trail along the stream corridor
on Lockhart Street that connects Fallon Sports Park to the Dublin
community.
BICYCLE PARKING
To encourage bicycling to and from the park, the Master Plan includes
lockable bicycle parking distributed throughout the park at locations
convenient to the park facilities and activity areas.
SEATING AND PICNIC AREAS
The Master Plan provides opportunities for sitting, viewing, picnicking,
and barbecuing at various locations throughout the park. Although the
park will be a premier sports park, it also provides activities for non-sport
users. A series of small picnic areas are dispersed throughout the site
along the pathway system.
At each of the two picnic plazas, there is group picnic seating for
100 people with an expansion area for 200. Each terrace will have
approximately equal picnicking capacities, as there is an even
distribution of tables at each terrace. The Little League and softball
plazas are located within the sport hubs, each with a large picnic plaza to
allow for tournament or end-of-season celebrations. ln addition, smaller
picnic plazas and picnic areas are dispersed throughout the park.
HUBS
Separate hubs or concentrated use groupings are the concepts behind
organizing and defining spaces and activities throughout the park. The
activity hubs, defined with special paving and planting, will create a
sense of place for the arrival on each terrace. ln addition, the sport hubs
will group each sport type and related facilities to create gathering and
viewing places for the user. Each hub includes some enclosed dry and
lockable storage for use by leagues and similar organizations.
ACTIVITY HUBS
These activity hubs will be composed of the following activities
Upper Terrace Activity Hub. Restroom/staff offices (200-300 sf). Picnic plaza (covered with overhead arbor). Play area. Shade trees. Water or art feature (optional)
Lower Terrace Activity Hub. Restroom. Adventure play area. Shade trees. Water or art feature (optional)
Lower tenace group picnic area
FAttON SPOR,TS PARK
Pedestrian circulation diagram
N e igh borh ood con n e ction
Pedestrian path
Contour
rtAIA
coNcEst roN
sorr0ail
Upper tenace group picnic area
I
I
last!at
lLlGHrtt
CARDUC ct & AssoclATEs, INC (
i
t m
DUBUN, CALlfonNlASAN FRANCISCO, CAIIFORNIA
v t-5
t t-
t
SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS
SPORT HUBS
There will be a softball hub, a Little League hub, and a soccer hub,
a smalltennis center, and baseball, basketball, volleyball, and bocce
ball area. These areas are composed of the following activities:
Softball Hub. 4 softball fields (2 lighted). Restroom/concession. Picnic plaza. Shade trees
Little League Hub. 4-60'Little League fields. Restroom/concession. Picnic plaza. Shade trees
Baseba!!Area. 1-90'baseballfield (lighted). Terraced seating. Picnic area. Shade trees
Soccer Area. 4 soccer fields (2 lighted)
2 natural turf fields with a cricket field overlay
2 natural turf fields with a synthetic turf option. Viewing areas. Picnic areas. Shade trees
Tennis Center. 4 tennis courts (lighted). Restroom and smalltennis center. Viewing area
BasketballArea. 4 basketball courts (lighted). Seating areas
VolleyballArea. 4 sand volleyball courts. Picnic area
Bocce Ball Center. 4 bocce courts (lighted)
2 additional bocce courts optional (lighted). Shaded seating area. Picnic area
Upper tenace softball hub with restroom/ concessrbn
Lower tenace baseball with terraced seating
seafing
li
tlg,
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, IN c LtON SPORTS PARK
SAN FR,ANCISCO, CAI.IFORNIA
FA
DUBI-IN, CALIFORNIA
vl-6
t
rl
rY
I
l'
,.t
I
Y4,
It
Z
rt
il! {
o
I-'
i
SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS
LIGHTING
Lighting requirements in the park
differ between sports, vehicular
and pedestrian. The vehicular and
pedestrian lighting will identify the
entries and provide orientation for
parkvisitors. ln orderto minimize any
potential impacts to the surrounding
developments, the sports lighting
will be concentrated at the center
of the park and across from the
proposed school site. All lighting
will be designed with "cut-offl'style
lights, which direct illumination
down and not out.
Lighting Criteria:. Light required areas only. Light only paths that connect
lighted facilities to parking lots. Light pathways to minimum
requirements to discourage
nighttime use. Light parking lots for nighttime
safety. Light entries to distinguish park
from street and to welcome
USETS. Park hours will be dawn to dusk
and until 10 p.m. for lighted
facilities. Provide specific lighting types
for specified facilities (as noted
in the Lighting Table)
Sport Field Lighting. 1 baseballfield. 2 softball fields. 2 soccer fields. 4 tennis courts. 4 basketball courts. 2 bocce courts (2 additional
courts optional)
Mounting Height and Foot Gandle
Table
As seen in the tt/ounting Height and Foot Candle Table, sports lighting
depends on the desired level of play. Competition play demands
greater illumination while lighting for recreation purposes reduces the
illumination and the cost. To be a premier sports park, the competition
level lighting should be provided.
LI TIN DI RAM
FAttON SPORTS PARKCARDUCCI & ASSOCIAT
FALLON SP o
DUBtIN, CATIFORNIASAN f RANCISCO, CATIFORNIA
ES. rNC
v t-7
aQ. .. .:l t *re
-
F"ir--J
ot
Fi:' 1
+a /t c
o "9
q
U
PARKW A.l
\\1s
c 0 80 16()!0(}
SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS
PLANTING
Due to the varying terrain and park uses, different plant
materials will be used to define park elements; the
planting will reinforce the use and reflectthe landforms.
ln addition the park will be irrigated with recycled water
that will limit some types of planting. The Master Plan
identifies seven tree types for Fallon Sports Park:
Street Trees (perimeter street trees consistent
with the Planning Department requirements and
the overall planned development)
Entry Trees (formal trees identifying the entries)
Accent Trees (attractive, seasonal, colorful trees
reinforcing areas of interest)
Deciduous Shade Trees (lining parking lots and
pathways at sport hubs)
Evergreen Screen Trees (as backdrops to
baseball, Little League, and softballfields)
Native Riparian Edge Trees (to relate to stream
corridor and provide wildlife habitat)
Native Oak and Sycamore Groves (on slopes to
provide shade, add interest, and frame views)
!RRIGATION
The irrigation system should be designed for water conservation, flow
management, energy efficiency and interface with any future Central
lrrigation System. The irrigation system will use recycled water in
accordance with the Dublin San Ramon Services District standards.
Where the facilities such as softball, Little League, baseball, soccer,
picnic, and play areas will have users in potential contact with the
water, any irrigation will need to be done after 10 p.m. and before dawn.
Nonrecycled water will be used specifically for washing down areas,
field hoses, watering of synthetic fields for cooling, water features,
etc. The recycled water is not to be used in areas where there will be
human contact. lt is also mandatory that recycled water does not drain
into the stream corridor and instead drains into the perimeter storm
drainage system. The recycled water system will run during non-use
times between the hours of 10 p.m. and dawn. Refer to irrigation and
recycled water demand analysis and DSRSD water flow and pressure
information in Appendix lX-Section e.
Mounting height and foot candle table
I fI
Accent trees at entry
activity hub
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC FAttON SPORTS PAR,K
FACILITY / USE MOUNTING HEIGHT
MAINTAINED FOOT CANDLES
' Commlition/Recreation
2 Softball Fields
lnfield
Ouffield
I Baseball Field
lnfield
Outfield
2 Soccer Fields
4 Tennis Courts
4 Basketball Courts
4 Bo@ Courts
Sport Hubs
Activity Hubs
Vehicular Entdes
Arival/Drop-ofi
Pedestrian Bridge
Parking Lighting
Path Lighting
Security Lighting
Perimeter Sidewalks
60'
80L sideline / 70L outfield
80'
90L sldellne / 80L oumold
70'
30'
30'
30'
1{
11
20,
20'
30'
20'
11'.
Detemlned by pollce dept.
Llt by public street
50r30
30t20
50/30
30/20
30/20
30t20
30/20
10/5
1
1
1
1
1
0.5 at perimeiet and 1 fc average
0.5
Determined by police dept.
SAN fRANCISCO, CATIFORNIA DUBI. IN, CATITORNIA
vl-8
N
a
aru
I
i
I t,
,
I
JrE..r=
>,1
. ,..'f'',
Lit bv oublic street
a
SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS
\..'.ffi1 l+l-i,l ,t:
FAttON SPOR,TS PAR,K SCHEMATIC
I tEGEND
-
aKYCGOW ItI
-
lllrc^Idw Et
.At
l o+
(
ao ta0 ,ao
-lrJr o
BmdcolMd
BMdCOrcil
tuG^nqcmrut
I
i1 \r.J o*,
\.
I :;
!l
:l
I
j
:l'
I
1
\
n
I
b
I
SSOCIATES, INC SPORTS PARKCARDUCCI & A
DUBLIN, CATIFORNIASAN FRANCISCO, CAI.IFORNIA
FATTON
v t-9
UT!LITIES
Stub-ins from perimeter street
utilities should be provided at
each vehicularentry (one on each
terrace). The stub-ins should
provide the park with the following
utilities:. Electricity. Telephone. Sanitary sewer. Recycled water. lrrigation water. Domestic water. Fire water (centrally locate
one fire hydrant for each
terrace - final location to
be approved by the Fire
Department). Storm drainage system (stub-
ins from Fallon Road and
Central Parkway)
of DUTUN I
I
:.r.-
it
I
It\
H
!ON PTAN
c
c
I
I
c
c
c I
I
l!
I
I
i
c
SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS
t:
+-
=-E
+.
t
EiiFlr;t'!
/i'
'..ltf,IIEI3B\Dr -IE+, i r-i: 'rll
'lFATLON RANCH PARK
. . \\
\,
SCHEMATIC
\
TEGEND
I ?oTAttt yAIar.lq.b.ot kl*rElAirlatY !tw!tfrlE wAItt
EY
CONNECTION
TItE iYDIANI
a rEsrloor ol corcErsroN
..?
t:
\,o
I
lrl .c]
lE r,lEl ,J
ii
rl
t ',i
\>..-r't ..:r/ -r,
--h,II]
t.
\
-:l
I
-l
I
rl
o to lao 2ao
-i# ()
)
FALLON SPORTS PARKCARDUCCI &ASSOCIATES, INC
SAN FRANCISCO, CAIIFORNIA DUBtIN, CATIFORNIA
vl-l0
& EWER
r"l I ')!
.'
.,/
I
l
j
I
l -..-t.,.
I
SECTION V!. DESIGN COMPONENTS
(El 2.'
It
\
l-,t
E -.::
w-'-
\i
'l
,l
t1
.t:,
rQ,t
r r- l.E
-t:l,l- , E
iI
!''
I
1,.
I
I
I
\
-\
\.. B[ffiW!-+ i: .-iil It
FATTON SPORTS PARK
\.
,\i-", \
HEMATICs
\.
- TECEND
-
nlI&srcI&NSEI
&.&d.J o pd cl d.
rF!fuDhwmlout$m&'ftda *Ft-Fd
a urc$aff
BrcSru{
II U&lNrNalrclmAXU*'0')
o
\
,l
i'
o
l
I
ilt
-t.F {}tao 7ao
59
CARDUCCI & AS OCIATES FATTON S ORTS PARK
UBtIN, CATITORNIASAN FRANCISCO, CATIFORNIA
lNc
vl-lI
INAGE
I
I
_ttl_l
lit
\
i \
I
I
I
I
,
I
\
SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS
l,t\\
IEG EN D
?OMtr CONNSIq
l1
I
I
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC FALLON SPORTS PARK
sAN FRANCISCO, cAtlFoRNlA DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA
l_-:l
I
-'\-- -
vr-12
c (. .
c
l1
T
I
(,it
'i
IE HONE PtA
FATLO sPo
c
i;
i
I
ll'r-:'._1
ill
o aa rao ,ao /\
-f.F 'aD
I
SECTION VII. PHASING
PHAS!NG
Fallon Sports Park phasing will
provide a variety of facilities that
serve a wide range of users.
ln addition, proposed road
construction dates may also
influence park development.
Therefore, the park will be
developed in phases that include
Phase 1, and Subsequent Phases
that will be subdivided, if needed,
as the project evolves.
Phase 1
Phase 1 developments will
provide a variety of activities and
uses while developing the core
of the upper terrace to create
a cohesive and self-contained
park. A significant portion of
the upper terrace facilities are
shown in Phase 1 because it is
projected that Lockhart Street
will be completed first, allowing
for vehicular access. ln addition,
all lighted fields or courts, except
the baseball field, are to be
constructed in Phase 1. Phase 1
will also include the two lighted
soccer fields, with a synthetic
turf option.
A list of Phase 1 facilities
follows:. Upper terrace park
identifi cation featu res. Upper terrace parking lot. Pedestrian bridge. 2-60'Little League fields with
hub. 2 lighted softball fields with
hub. 4 lighted basketball courts. 4 lighted tennis courts. 2 lighted soccer fields. Loop walking trail (connects
upper and lower terrace)
I ro.'(\t ',, fl\,!f i.;l li
FALLOh.I RANCH SPORTS PARK PHAS!NG D!AGRAM
+.i r \l \'
?HAilNC CONCE'IMruMM[AV [frqf&m5sou$s
rurD ffil@ irErE a0 c@r3 rnt rc MCEUilU'YMOT ErcIAIY CNIT'CrcN ECEST ffi 'Mmuslffifr&ffi
roAo ANo sIlEAll colrtDol
D EYETO ?M ENT -1nuwu1ffiw!.coMffiotcxul st, coMm 2@5/26sw cdlrcr.cilffi{dGW rGffiNllNquqNc snilc*md ffi ilntrlfM t@- NOtnilHMqto&,5r. rca, N
.: \
:
-i
-
-!
a
a
tta
N -corm 2@/2@5.msocffi;Mru2q/2WGNrut&av-com &/2o7
\i .,-i(-
PH t
PPER, TER
P HAS
tr.-t.-.t!-!
IHASE I
o too 200 loo
-'llr'{)
rc lm tffi nsswem nrz^ m{c,NrttE^vc*tsNrcreHEMAED6WMMUTA
rcNrc, aD tEsn@N/coresoNru.WTEENSCSIEruargBN(ruc@nsm rffi NATUUgCEt fffiw ffiruElomul
7-a lmEtrcNKSPTlmIrcLOOWUtrcrulmmrc?axtffiuIilauEsIitlttu@E.EreAGUOIrcNrc I
tI
ACE
,.i 3"
*'i
SUISEAUENI ?HASES
lmflof rnorEMrc[mEtil€l
UMlM.mXUl
lrudrc Iffi traz^ uYM,aot6n6usl
.coMruEUElAmLffaErc
MErc
. P^IKNG NO mvn X6ltl@m, mE nlz^ uY {tA N ffreUsl
. rc MIU Uf gct ftbt wn ctEG ftruY.OMffilNUlft$.UHEODcGc@rB
rc^DorulJmEccmslotrcul.mNrcuIruCOUiR
. AIIND WA]A ENES.WDToCONXtOOS
(
o
aa
a
aot*
t..
.rcUrutffirus.rcmnG.WCrc
.€qW@CGmS
.mrlfffiffitltm{csffiff
fMNt@t
lt I
,
erl
row
ItIIIItII
I
I
I
,t,
}}o,a
Phasing plan
FATTON SPORTS PARKCARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES
SAN FRANCISCO, CAI.IFORNIA
rNc
DUIUN, CAUFOtNtA
vil- r
ctTY of
t
l' r '\..
I(
o L
,
PlrasE r
,.,'I
rlpl I
:,IIiIII
SECTION VII. PHASING
Subsequent Phases. The order of the remaining phases will be determined in the future
and will provide uses current with budgeting, community use
demands, and surrounding road completion.. Subsequent phases will be developed to allow for efficient staging
and access.. Subsequent phases will be designed so as not to impact prior
phase improvements.
Tentative Schedule for Road Completion Dates:. Gleason Road - Completed. Lockhart Street- Complete 2005/2006. Stream Corridor - Will be constructed along with Lockhart Street
(including stream corridor on Gleason Drive). Fallon Road - Northern half of road, storm drainage, southern half
of mass grading, plus two lanes - Complete 200412005. Widen and complete Fallon Road - Complete 200612007. Central Parkway - Complete 200612007
CALIFORN IA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
The Dublin Ranch Specific Plan Environmental lmpact Report (ElR)
included Fallon Sports Park. The EIR did not identify specific park uses,
which will require the City to file a Mitigated Negative Declaration of
lmpact (Neg. Dec.). Staff has prepared the Neg. Dec. in conjunction with
this li/aster Plan report to allow for all future design and construction
to move forward without further environmental review The exception
would be if any of the uses addressed in the Master Plan are changed
or added to, as this may require the environmental review to be
reopened.
Task Force Meeting- 0A06/04)
c IDU CCI & ASS OCilAI
SP PA
ORNIA
SAN TRANCIS co,CATITORNIA
ES INC
AL
DUBLIN, C
Yll-2
caaaF*rr
(
L-a.
A L
--I
v
'fatr'\ \ '\ f\ \'i!'/ iil 'l;
SPORTS PARK PHASING DIAGRAMFAttON RANCH
\
PHASING CONCEPT
FOTI.OW ROAD DEVEI.OPMENT
PROVIDE A VARIETY Of FACII.ITIES AND USES
EUII.D I.IGHTED FIEI.DS AND COURTS fIRSI IO INCREASE
USAIIUTY
PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCNON ACCESS OFF fAI.tON
ROAD fOT SUBSEOUENI PHASE DEVEI.OPMENT
ROAD AND STREAM COR,RIDOR
D EV E tO PM E NT . (FrscAr.YEARI
GIEAsON DRIVE . COMPI,EIEO
LOCKHARI tANE - COMptEIE 200512006
SINEAM CORRIDOR. CONSTRUCT AIONG wlIH TOCKHATT
LANE {lNCl.UDtNG SnEAM CORRTDOR ON ctEASON OflVE}
TAIION ROAO. NORTHERN HAU OF ROAD, 5'' ICP, AND
SOUTHERN HAIf MA5S GRADING, PIUS 2 TANES
- coMPtErE 2OOal2O05
-wrDEN AND COMPTETE FAIION ROAD 2@6/2007
CENTRA| PARKWAY. COMPIEIE 2006/2007
PHASE I
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
IUIO UIIE EAGUE FIEI.DSwlIH ASSOCIATED PtAZA, PICNIC.
AND RESnOO^VCONCESSTON
N\O IIGHTED SOfIIAU FI€I,DS wlIH ASSOCIATED PIAZA,
PrcNrC. AND RESInOOM/CONCESS|ON
FOUR TIGHIED IENNIS COURTS
FOUR I.IGHTED IASXEIBAI,I. COURTS
TWO I.IGHTED NATURAL TURf SOCCER FIEI.DS WiITI SYNIHEnC
ruRF (omoNAtl
ARI AND WAIER TEAruRES
UPPET IERIACE PARKING IOT
UPPER IERTACE I.OOP WATXING TRAII.
UPPET IERRACE PARK IDENTIFrcANON FEATUTES
IIAX COURSE
. ROUGH GRADING IN PHASE I
SUBSEAUENT PHASES
(ORDER OF DEVEIOPMENT TO BE DEIERMINEDI
UPPEN IETTACT
. ACnv[Y HUi
(tNctuDtNG ncNtc PtAzA, PIAY AREA, ANO RESTROOMSI
.IWO UmE IEAGUE tlELDs
. tWO SOFTBAlI FlEl-DS
.8MX COURSE
. NEI@IBORHOOD CONNECTIONS
. PROVIDE IEMPoTARY coNsTRt clloN AccEss off of
TATION ROAD
TOWEETETTACI
. PARKING A}{D ACIIVITY HUB
(tNctuDtNG, PtcNtc ?tAzA, PIAY At€A, AND R8STiOOMS),/
. IWO NATURA. ruRf SOCCER flEtDS wlIH CIICKEI OVERIAY,/
.ONE UGHIEO SASETAU.FIELD r'
. FOT,T UGHIED IOCCE COURTS ,,
TWO ADDTnONAT UGHTED IOCCE COUITS (OmONAr,l
. fOUl SAND VO|IEYBAII COURTS ,/
. All AND WAIER FEAruRES /
a
lo
tt
a)
,i
,'lJII
a
w AY
. NEIGHSORHooD coNNEcTloNS
. PARK IOENTIIICATION FEATURES
. COMPTEIE UPPER AND IOWER IERRACE
o too 200 300
\
1\\
-f
I
o
CITY OF LtN !,-rl jt ;
(.i4ftr I soo^nl ria
' ouaolor rrlor/qN ri
'lt
I
_lq
:
-'l) I
:t \\i \l|(l .
d I l
\(\
I
\
.iI
)-,j\
PHAS E
{,
"4 D,It o ry
e
\o
--1.7
VI
q{
av
IJ
o
P'HASE r
I
'I
a
ACE
I
t
PPER TERRAC
PHASE
SECTION VIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CITY COUNCIL
Janet Lockhart - Mayor
George Zika - Vice Mayor
Claudia tt/cCormick - Councilmember
Tony Oravetz - Councilmember
Kasie Hildenbrand - Councilmember
Tim Sbranti - Councilmember (Former)
PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
Sue Flores - Chairperson
Steve Jones - Vice Chairperson
Burr Cain - Commissioner
Richard Guarienti - Commissioner
Angela Muetterties - Commissioner
Kasie Hildenbrand - Commissioner (Former)
Erik Smith - Student Representative
ClTY STAFF
Diane Lowart - Parks and Community Services Director
Herma Lichtenstein - Parks and Facilities Development [Manager
Rosmary Alex - Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator
Rich Jochner - Recreation Supervisor
Paul Kruger - City Civil Engineer Consultant
lvlelissa lr/orton - Director of Public Works
TASK FORCE
Anthony Casadonte
lgnatus Chinn
Roy Chowduri
Greg Duncan
Alan Elias
David Galli
Richard Guarienti
Michele Haubert
Diane Hudson
Jim North
Arlene Elizabeth Raffo
Kimberly Roth
Ellen Silky
Anupam Singh
Karen Y. Wang
Eric Weinhagen
Dave Chadbourne
Jeff Lawrence
Shane Huntoon
Connie Mack
Paul Silvas
Brandon Chapin
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES
r
_-
I
*riaIfr
,.i
AUtORNt
I
Ii
I
I
SAN FRANCISCO, CATIFORNIA
tNc o P
vlrr-l
7
I
I
(\,
t.'lr ,t-'
t\i\'
I i
SECTION VIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
MASTER PLAN CONSULTANTS
Carducci & Associates, lnc. (Landscape Architects)
Bill Fee - Principal
Vince Lattanzio - Principal
Yi Jin Kim - Associate
Jim Bensman - Associate
Tony Esterbrooks - Associate
Dave Andrews - Associate
Zeiger Engineers (Electrical Engineers)
Ron Zeiger
Bohley Consulting, !nc. (Civil Engineers)
Pete Bohley
DEVELOPER REPRESENTATIVES
MacKay & Somps
Dave Chadbourne
Jeff Lawrence
Matt Jenson
CIATE
SAN FRANCISCO, CAI.IFORNIA
r
A o
t i\
\
t
R
1\](\
l, :ilr',i. '
B
l
Ilrr
,
..n.
I
{
I
I
T
,
S
DUBUNi ATIFORN
o
vil l-2
)
ar""rq
{
.-w4!*
ill
fr
3
n
:-\.-_-
,qt
-i'\I
U
c
'rru
-:l
I.
(7-'\' r rlii tiI ,'r
IL' x ,'
h,:t.;t:,1.E.-*4
)
t7
IiI
q
(
!
FI
I
I
I
I
i
:I.W
SECTION IX. APPENDICES
A. TASK FORCE MEETING AGENDAS
. TNTRODUCTORy MEETTNG (04_28_04)
. DEStcN MEETTNG 1 (05-26-04)
. DESIGN MEETTNG 2 (06-16-04)
. DEStcN MEETTNG 3 (09-08-04)
. DEStcN MEETTNG 4 (10-06-04)
. DEStcN lvtEETtNG 5 (11-03-04)
ARD OCIATES
SAN FRANCISCO, CATIFORNIA
tNc
f
I ,'
\tl\(,
l, llt','1.'
B
tiit'
}r"ir;
x;lrl't
t.
_{
-
I
{
tII
I
.i
\.i-.'iXr. -- :t
P
DUBUNI I.!FORNI
lXo-I
CAR
ARC
April28,2004
Meeting Agenda
Fallon Sport Park
Introductory Task Force Meeting
7:00 PM
Dublin Citv Hall - Council Chambers
100 Civic Plaza.94568
Welcome and Project Overview - Diane Lowart, City of Dublin,
Director of Parks and Community Services Department
II Introductions - Vince Lattanzio, Carducci Landscape Architects
Task Force Members Input
A. Interests
B. Needs
C. Concerns
D. Ideas
E. Suggestions
Review of Project Program - Bill Fee, Carducci Landscape Architects
. F. Distribution of program, site plan and program templates
Review of Site Conditions - Yi Jin Kim, Carducci Landscape Architects
A. Context, traffrc patterns, neighborhood, physical constraints, grading, drainage, natural syste:
opportunities, views, etc.
Review of Task Force Planning Process - Vince Lattanzio
A. Discussion of meeting schedule
Discussion of Next Steps - Vince Lattanzio
A Next meetings:
Site Walk, 5ll/04,10:00 AM at corner of Fallon Road and Bent Tree
Design Meeting # l: 5126104,7:00 PM at Dublin City Hall, Regional MeetingRmm
VII.
- CARDUCCT & ASSOCTATES,INC. 555 BEACH STREET .SAN FRANCISCO, CAg4l33 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ..IRRIGATION DE,SIGN . PLANNING ' URBAN DESIGN
I.
m
IV
V.
VI.
CAR
!,AN
AGENDA
Fallon Ranch Sports Park
Task Force Meeting #1
7 PM Dublin City Hall - Regional Room
N{ay 26,2004
L Summarize Introductory Meeting and Site Walk
Design Workshop - Vince Lattanzio, Carducci Landscape Architects
A. Distribution of Grading Plan (basic template) and new sports field templates
B. Group Formation (3 Groups)
C. Design Charrette (3 Groups)
III Design Workshop Review
A. Review of group design concepts
Next Steps
Meeting Schedule
Final presentation to Council for adoption of Master Plan - December 7,2004
- CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES,INC.555 BEACH STREET . SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE . IRRIGATION DESIGN . PLANNING ' URBAN DESIGN
II.
IV
V.
Meeting Date & Time Place Meeting Purpose
Introductory Meeting April28, 2004,7:00 PM,City Hall Council Chambers Introductory Meeting
Site Visit Meeting May 1,2004, 10:00 AM Intersection of Bent Tree &
Fallon Rd
Site Familiarity
Design Meeting #1 May26,2004 7:00 PM,City Hall - Regional Room Design Charrette
Design Meeting#2 June 16,2004,7:00PM Library Community Room Review 3 Alternative Plans
Design Meeting #3 Sept 8, 2004,7:00PM City Hall - Regional Room Review Preferred Plan
Design Meeting fi4 Oct 6,2004,7:00 PM City Hall - Regional Room Presentation Confirmation &
Phasing
Design Meeting #5 Nov 3,2004,7:00 PM City Hall - Regional Room Review Final Plan & Phasing
CAR
l,lN
AGENDA
Fallon Ranch Sports Park
Task Force Meeting #2
Dublin Library Community Room
7 PM, June 16,2004
I. SummarizeLast Meeting
Present 3 Alternative Plans to Task Force Members
Review & Comment of 3 Altemative Plans by Task Force Members
A. Review of each plan by Task Force Members
B. Record Comments
C. Task Force Members vote for preferences
IV. Summarize Comments & Preferences
V. Next Steps
VI. Meeting Schedule
Meeting Date & Time Place Meeting Purpose
Introductory Meeting April28, 2004,7:00 PM,City Hall Council Chambers Introductory Meeting
Site Visit Meeting May 1,2004, 10:00 AM Intersection of Bent Tree &
Fallon Rd
Site Familiarity
Design Meeting #1 May 26,2004, 7:00 PM City Hall - Regional Room Design Chanette
Design Meeting #2 June 16, 2004, 7:00 PM Library Community Room Review 3 Alternative Plans
Design Meeting #3 Sept 8, 2004,7:00PM City Hall - Regional Room Review Preferred Plan
Design Meeting #4 Oct 6, 2004, 7:00 PM City Hall- Regional Room Presentation Confirmation &
Phasing
Design Meeting #5 Nov 3,2004, 7:00 PM City Hall- Regional Room Review Final Plan & Phasing
Final presentation to Council for adoption of Master Plan - December 7 ,2004
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET . SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674.0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE . IRRIGATION DESIGN ' PLANNING ' URBAN DESIGN
il.
m.
m.
ry.
V.
VI.
cAR
PA
Af,CII
AGENDA
Fallon Ranch Sports Park
Task Force Meeting #3
City Hall - Regional Room
7 PM, September 8,2004
I.Summarize Progress since Last Meeting
A. Grading
B. Parks & Community Services Commission input
II. Present Preferred Plan & Supporting Documents to Task Force Members
Review & Comment of Preferred Plan & Supporting Documents by Task Force Members
A. Record Comments
Summarize Comments
Next Steps
Meeting Schedule
Final presentation to Council for adoption of Master Plan - December 7,2004
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET . SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674.0990 FAX (415) 6'14-0999
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE . IRRIGATION DESIGN . PLANNING ' URBAN DESIGN
Meeting Date & Time Place Meeting Purpose
Introductory Meeting April28, 2004,7:00 PM,City Hall Council Chambers Introductory Meeting
Site Visit Meeting May 1,2004, 10:00 AM Intersection of Bent Tree &
Fallon Rd
Site Familiarity
Design Meeting #1 May 26,2004, 7:00 PM City Hall - Regional Room Design Charrette
Design Meeting#Z June 16, 2004, 7:00 PM Library Community Room Review 3 Altemative Plans
Design Meeting #3 Sept 8,2004, 7:00 PM City Hall- Regional Room Review Preferred Plan
Design Meeting fl4 Oct 6, 2004, 7:00 PM City Hall - Regional Room Presentation Confirmation &
Phasing
Design Meeting #5 Nov 3, 2004,7:00PM City Hall - Regional Room Review Final Plan & Phasing
cAR
AGENDA
Fallon Ranch Sports Park
Task tr'orce Meeting #4
City Hall - Regional Room
7 PM, October 612004
Summarize Progress since Last Meeting
A. Incorporate revisions based on TF comments
B. Coordinate with MacKay & Somps Engineers
il.Presentation to Task Force Members
A. Plan Revisions
B. Phasing Options
Review & Comment of Phasing Options by Task Force Members
A. Record Comments
Summarize Comments
Next Steps
Meeting Schedule
Meeting Date & Time Place Meeting Purpose
Introductory Meeting April28, 2004,7:00 PM,City Hall Council Chambers Introductory Meeting
Site Visit Meeting May 1,2004, 10:00 AM Intersection of Bent Tree &
Fallon Rd
Site Familiarity
Design Meeting #1 May 26,2004,7:00 PM City Hall - Regional Room Design Charrette
Design Meeting #2 June 16, 2004, 7:00 PM Library Community Room Review 3 Alternative Plans
Design Meeting #3 Sept 8, 2004, 7:00 PM City Hall - Regional Room Review Preferred Plan
Design Meeting *i4 Oct 6, 2004, 7:00 PM City Hall - Regional Room Presentation Confirmation &
Phasing
Design Meeting #5 Nov 3,2004,7:00 PM City Hall - Regional Room Review Final Plan & Phasing
Final presentation to Council for adoption o f Master Plan - December 7,2004
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET . SAN FRANCISCO, CA94I33 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674'0999
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ' IRRIGATION DESIGN ' PLANNING ' URBAN DESIGN
I.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
CAR
ARCTI
AGENDA
Fallon Ranch Sports Park
Task Force Meeting #5
7 PM Dublin City Hall - Council Chambers
November 3,2004
il.
Summarize Introductory Meeting and Site Walk
Design Workshop - Vince Lattanzio, Carducci Landscape Architects
A. Distribution of Grading Plan (basic template) and new sports field templates
B. Group Formation (3 Groups)
C. Design Charrette (3 Groups)
Design Workshop Review
A. Review of group design concepts
Next Steps
Meeting Schedule
- CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES,INC. 555 BEACH STREET . SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE . IRRIGATION DESIGN ' PLANNING ' URBAN DESIGN
I
m.
IV.
V.
Meeting Date & Time Place Meeting Purpose
Parks Commission November 22,2004 Adoption of Master Plan
City Council December 7,2004 Adoption of Master Plan
SECTION IX. APPENDICES
b. TASK FORCE MEETING TVIINUTES
. TNTRODUCTORy MEETTNG (04-28_04)
. stTE vtstT MEETTNG (05-1-04)
. DESTGN MEETTNG 1 (05-26_04)
. DEStcN MEETTNG 2 (06-16_04)
. DEStcN MEETTNG 3 (09-08-04)
. DEStcN MEETTNG 4 (10-06-04)
. DEStcN TUEETtNG 5 (11-03_04)
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES
ll :tttr,.+.'
,1,
j
I
{
I
J
i{
I
l'
'u
B,
E
SAN FRANCISCO, CATIFORNIA
rNc
I
a
BU AtIF
CAR
LAN
Date:
To:
Job Name
Job #
Re
By
MEETING NOTES
04-28-04
Herma Lichtenstein
Fallon Ranch Sports Park
DUB03-02
lnformal Task Force Meeting
Jin Kim
On Wednesday, April 28,2004 an informal meeting was held with the Task Force to review the project and get
initial input from the Task Force members. Refer to attached Agenda.
Attendees
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES,INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (4I5) 6]4-0999
www.carducciassociates.com jin@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING O URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
Name Affiliation
X Diane Lowart (DL)City of Dublin
X Herma Lichtenstein (HL)City of Dublin
X Rich Jochner (RJ)City of Dublin
X Anthonv Casadonte (AC)Dublin Ranch HOA (President)
lsnatus Chinn (lC)Summer Glen HOA
Roy Chowdhuri (RC)
Greq Duncan (GD)Summer Glen HOA
X Alan Elias (AE)Dublin Ranch
X David Galli (DG)Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League
X Michele Haubert (MH)Dublin Ranch
X Diane Hudson (DH)Bocce, Dublin Little League
X Jim North (JN)Dublin Little League
X Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR)Summer Glen HOA (CFO)
X Kimberly Roth (KR)Dublin Green
X Ellen Silky (ES)Dublin Ranch, Dublin Little League
X Anupam Sinsh (AS)Northern California Cricket Association l!!qe President)
Karen Y. Wang (KW)Greenbriar
Eric Weinhagen (EW)Dublin Ranch
X Mary Senior Center
X Dave Chadbourne (DC)Devel &
Jeff Lawrence (JL)Devel raddock &an
X Shane Huntoon (SH)Special lnterest Group (BMX)
X Richard Guarienti (RG)Parks and Commun Services Commission
X Connie Mack (CM)e and CulturalArts CommissionH
X Paul Silvas (PS)Senior Center committee
Brandon Chapin (BC)Youth Advi Committee
X Vince Lattanzio (VL)Carducci Architects
X Bill Fee (BF)Carducci Landsca Architects
X Jin Kim (EM)Carducci Landsca Architects
Fallon Sports Park
The following were initial comments from individual members:
Mary: Dublin Senior Center
Paul Silvas: Dublin Senior Center
Get input
4:00 sun, keep sun out of 3'd base persons eyes
Wind
Sahde
Arlene Elizabeth Raffo: Summer Glen HOA
Sports input
Shane Huntoon: non-residenU BMX group advocate
Wants to introduce BMX to Dublin. lt is a sport for everyone 3-60 yrs old.
Kimberly Roth
Real estate value
Toll Brothers, Orchard HOA representative
David Galli: Soccer advocate
Soccer 1500 kids
30% annual increase in annual participation
Diane Hudson:
Bocce, everyone can play, low impact, provide 2 courts
Anupam Singh: Sybase employee, VP of Northern Cricket Association, Cricket advocate
Cricket ground here in Dublin
32 teams
Anthony Casadonte: Dublin Ranch HOA
Balanced interest of community
Richard Guarienti: Parks and Community Services Commissioner
Represent Western Dublin
Was an EGP Master Plan Task Force Member
Dogs? Trails walking
Balance
Here for input and to integrate
Here for input and to listen
Alan Elias: Dublin Ranch, writes for the Valley Times
Has 3 kids, likes baseball and organized sports
Like to see Dublin get ahead of the curve to meet recreation needs
Rich Jochner: Recreation Supervisor
Dave Chadbourne: MacKay & SomPs
Lin Family representative and worked on planning for Lin family for 12yrs
No precohceived ideas, relate park to context, circulation, lighting, earthwork
Michele Hauber: a parent
Shade, restrooms, cover
Jim North: Dublin Little League Baseball Board Member, Little League Baseball advocate
Balance of faci lities, appropriate adjacencies
Ellen Silky: Dublin Little League, a parent
Shade, parking, restrooms
Connie Mack: Heritage and CulturalArts Commissioner
Open Comments and euestions During Review of Program, Site Gonditions and the Planning Process:
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674'0999
www'carducciassociates'com jin@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
Why move Fallon Road?
Need to meet requirements for safe road geometric standards of City
Good to have activity for seniors, walking
Plants: lnclude opportunity to make park a demonstration garden and would like nametags of planting for
educational value. Use of native plants a good idea.
lnfrastructure: does this include drainage? Need better drainage than at other parks.
Will there be a master plan review of the citywide plan to look at the allocation of the facilities?
Yes, at the next meeting.
What parks are now are on hills in Dublin?
Dolan, Ted Fairfield
Trees: take 25 years to grow, wind blows them sideways; why not plant mature trees? Need to have shade
Process timeline: What is the process and timeline?
It will be similar to Emerald Glen Park, 1O-year development process to be completed in phases
Type ofgrass: Have soccer grass, baseball grass
Do not overlay baseball and soccer fields
Have permanent fences for baseball
4 adult softball and 2 adult baseball fields will generate revenue
How is this project funded?
Developer fees
Annual review of revenues
Build in phases as the money comes in, as population & needs grows, as tax revenue grow, etc.
Consider Synthetic Turf here to minimize maintenance and maximize year-round use.
What is time frame for phase 1?
Unknown at this time
Have Snack bar/ concession stand
Coordinate with EGP develoPment
Sept 8 meeting may be conflict with Labor Day holiday?
Can be rescheduled if necessary
Can we look at ideas and drawings together?
Yes
Develop 2 or 3 options for the task force to review
Yes
Lighting concerns: Lack of light or too much light.
From Dublin Ranch the Pleasanton Sports Park is visible and dominates the valley at night
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES,INC.555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com jin@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
Usability concerns: lf its dark people cannot use the facilities. People have jobs and can't play until the evening
when it is dark. They come home and evenings are the only time for them to use. 7 to 7:30pm is a common
time for recreation and it is usually dark therefore you need lighting for sports. But not too much light
Understand surrounding development and the effect sports lights will have
Too much light can be detrimental to property values
Try to minimize impacts
How do we get in touch with you guys?
Send all pictures and emails to Herma (the gate keeper)
What is BIVX?
BlVlX, all unique in response to site, 80' by 200'area
Shane will provide info on BIMX course design (see original flip chart notes page 8)
ls roller hockey a consideration?
New Pleasanton park: At Val Vista east of 680 @ Stone ridge is a good model to look at.
Think out of the box for the stream corridor
Consider waterfalls
Responsible dog owners
Provide dog area and maybe dog waste bag dispenser posts throughout the park
Drinking fountains throughout the project for convenient use near sports facilities
1st phase should provide adequate parking and restroom facilities for visitors
Consider family restrooms
Place restrooms convenient to small children's play areas
For Saturday meet at 10 am at the site
There is a park in Colorado on a hillside
End of Meeting Notes
Attendees are to notify Garducci & Associates, lnc., in writing, of discrepancies in these minutes.
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (4I5) 674-0999
www-carducciassociates.com jin@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING T URBAN DESIGN E IRRIGATION DESIGN
MEETING NOTES
05-01-04
Herma Lichtenstein
Fallon Ranch Sports Park
DUB03-02
lnformalTask Force Site Visit
Jin Kim
CAR
LAN
ARCH
Date:
To:
Job Name
Job #
Re
By
On Saturday, May 1, 2004 an informal meeting was held with the Task Force to review the project and get initial
input from the Task Force members. Refer to attached Agenda.
Attendees
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com jin@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
Name Affiliation
Diane Lowart (DL)City of Dublin
X Herma Lichtenstein (HL)CiW of Dublin
Rich Jochner (RJ)City of Dublin
Anthony Casadonte (AC)Dublin Ranch HOA (President)
lgnatus Chinn (lC)Summer Glen HOA
Roy Chowdhuri (RC)
Greq Duncan (GD)Summer Glen HOA
X Alan Elias (AE)Dublin Ranch
David Galli (DG)Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League
Michele Haubert (MH)Dublin Ranch
Diane Hudson (DH)Bocce, Dublin Little League
Jim North (JN)Dublin Little League
Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR)Summer Glen HOA CFO
Kimberly Roth (KR)Dublin Green
Ellen Silky (ES)Dublin Ranch Dublin Little ue
Anupam Sinqh (AS)Northern California Cricket Association President
Karen Y. Wang (KW)Greenbriar
Eric Weinhagen (EW)Dublin Ranch
Mary Senior Center
Dave Chadbourne (DC)ac & Som
Jeff Lawrence (JL)Develo ock &
Shane Huntoon (SH)lnterest Grou
X Richard Guarienti (RG)Parks and Commun Services Commission
X Connie tMack (CM)He e and CulturalArts Commission
X Paul Silvas (PS)Senior Center Advi committee
Brandon Chapin (BC)Youth Advi Committee
X Vince Lattanzio (VL)Carducci Landsca Architects
X Bill Fee (BF)Carducci Landsca Architects
X Jin Kim (EM)Carducci Landsca Architects
I nnan\
Fallon Sports Park
The following were comments from the members:
VL: lntroduction to fassajara formation, which is the soil that will be imported to the site. The overview of the
soil condition of the site and his recommendations. We might need to take the top (e) layer of the site soil aside
then fill with import soil (Tassajara formation) then relay (e) soil on top.
54" RCP
the third knoll will get cut back quite a bit due to fallon rd
Water feature near Gleason
End of Meeting Notes
Attendees are to notify Carducci & Associates, lnc., in writing, of discrepancies in these minutes.
CARDUCCT & ASSOCTATES, TNC.555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com jin@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
cAR
LAN
MEETING NOTES
06-07-04
Herma Lichtenstein
Fallon Ranch Sports Park
DUB03-02
Task Force t\4eeting #1
David Andrews
ARCH
Date:
To:
Job Name
Job #
Re
By
On Wednesday, May 26,2004 a meeting with the Task Force was held at the City Hall Regional Room to
provide the members with an opportunity to participate in a design charette that lead to the creation of three
preferred design schemes. Refer to attached Agenda.
Attendees
Name Affiliation
X Diane Lowart (DL)City of Dublin
X Herma Lichtenstein (HL)City of Dublin
X Rich Jochner (RJ)City of Dublin
Anthonv Casadonte (AC)Dublin Ranch HOA (President)
lqnatus Chinn (lC)Summer Glen HOA
Roy Chowdhuri (RC)
Greg Duncan (GD)Summer Glen HOA
X Alan Elias (AE)Dublin Ranch
X David Galli (DG)Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League
Michele Haubert (MH)Dublin Ranch
X Diane Hudson (DH)Bocce, Dublin Little League
X Jim North (JN)Dublin Little League
Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR)Summer Glen HOA (CFO)
Kimberly Roth (KR)Dublin Green
Ellen Silkv (ES)Dublin Ranch, Dublin Little League
X Anupam Sinqh (AS)Northern California Cricket Association (Vice President)
X Karen Y. Wang (KW)Greenbriar
Eric Weinhagen (EW)Dublin Ranch
X Dave Chadbourne (DQ)Developer (Mac Kay & Somps)
Jeff Lawrence (JL)Developer (Braddock & Logan)
X Shane Huntoon (SH)Special lnterest Group (BMX)
Richard Guarienti (RG)Parks and Community Services Commission
X Connie tMack (CM)Heri and Cultural Arts Commission
X Paul Silvas (PS)Senior Center Advi committee
X Brandon Chapin (BC)Committee
X Danny Wanq
X Kasie Hildenbrand PCSC
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 614.0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com david@carducciassociates.com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING O URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
Youth Advisory
X Vince Lattanzio (VL)Carducci Landscape Architects
X Bill Fee (BF)Qqrdgccj Landscape Architects
X Jin Kim (JK)Carducci Landscape Architects
X David Andrews (DA)Carducci Landscape Architects
X Chunqpo Fanq (CF)Card ucci Landscape Architects
Fallon Sports Park
The following is a review of the meeting content:
VL: Description of the park and the site constraints as well as the review of the Program Elements.
The Task Force was then divided into three groups where base maps and cutouts of the prograrn elements were
provided for the members to design the layout of the park. Carducci Associates lead the groups and assisted the
members in creating seven design schemes for the park.
The designs were posted on the wall and the schemes were reviewed to identify what issues were most
important to the members.
A rating system was used to identify the members' design scheme preferences. Members were asked to place
colored stickers on the drawings to identify their preferred scheme; the sticker identification is as follows:
Red-3 points, Green- 2 points, Blue-1 point. The following Table displays the points given to each scheme.
Fallon Sports Park - May 26,2004
Preference Matrix for Design Charette Schemes
SCHEME
A B c D E F G
RED
(multiply x 3)5 1 2 2 2 0 0
GREEN
(multiply x 2)2 6 1 1 0 1 1
BLUE
(multiply x 1)0 3 2 1 3 3 0
TOTAL
(weighted value)19 18 10 I I 5 2
All schemes are listed in order of preference as chosen by the Task Force members.
Schemes A and B were the favorites while Schemes C, D, and E closely followed. Because there is no clear
third preference, we will develop a composite of Schemes C, D, and E identifying the best components and
layouts of each.
Attachment:
Seven Design Schemes
End of Meeting Notes
Attendees are to notify Carducci & Associates, lnc., in writing, of discrepancies in these minutes
CARDUCCI & ASSOCTATES, rNC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCTSCO, CA 94r33 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com david@carducciassociates.com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING . URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
CATD
LAND
MEETING NOTES
06-16-04
Herma Lichtenstein
Fallon Ranch Sports Park
DUB03-02
Task Force Meeting #2
Tony Esterbrooks
ARCH
Date:
To:
Job Name
Job #
Re
By
On Wednesday, June 16,2Q04 a meeting with the Task Force was held at the City Hall Library Community
Room to review three design schemes while receiving input from the Task Force Committee. See attached
meeting agenda.
Attendees
Name Affiliation
Diane Lowart (DL)City of Dublin
Herma Lichtenstein (HL)City of Dublin
X Rich Jochner (RJ)City of Dublin
Anthony Casadonte (AC)Dublin Ranch HOA (President)
lgnatus Chinn (lC)Summer Glen HOA
Rov Chowdhuri (RC)
Greq Duncan (GD)Summer Glen HOA
Alan Elias (AE)Dublin Ranch
David Galli (DG)Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League
X Michele Haubert (MH)Dublin Ranch
Diane Hudson (DH)Bocce, Dublin Little League
X Jim North (JN)Dublin Little League
Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR)Summer Glen HOA (CFO)
X Kimberlv Roth (KR)Dublin Green
X Ellen Silky (ES)Dublin Ranch, Dublin Little League
X Anupam Singh (AS)Northern California Cricket Association (Vi ce President)
X Karen Y. Wans (KW)Greenbriar
X Eric Weinhasen (EW)Dublin Ranch
X Dave Chadbourne (DC)Mac &So
Jeff Lawrence (JL)Braddock &r
X Shane Huntoon (SH)Special lnterest Group (BIUX)
X Richard Guarienti (RG)Parks and Community Services Commission
X Connie Mack (CM)and Cultural Arts Commission
X Paul Silvas (PS)Senior Center committee
Brandon Chapin (BC)Youth Advisory Committee
Danny Wang
Kasie Hildenbrand PCSC
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES,INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674'0999
www.carducciassociates.com tony@carducciassociates.com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
Fallon Sports Park
The following is a review of the meeting content:
Comments on Scheme A:
BMX Course Comments:
1. Possibility of axis terminating at the BMX course
2. Parking, restroom, and playground at BMX
3. A portion of BMX should have a lower level of difficulty for younger kids
4. Location of BMX near fire station
5. Would be nice to have a level viewing area at the starting point
Lighting lssues:
1. Prefer that lighting is further away from residential areas
2. Consider lighting at BIMX course
3. Concerns with the light at baseball fields
4. Light the central parking areas
5. Turn sports fields at 45 degree angle for better lighting
Playgounds:
1. Would like to have two large playgrounds, one in the upper terrace, one at lower terrace
2. Incorporate a gated play area for younger children
3. Have playgrounds located further away from bocce
Sports Fields:
1. Association between bocce and tennis is preferred
2. Keep picnic and viewing areas associated with bocce courts.
3. Consider possibility of having a sand volleyball court
4. Prefer to have the cricket overlay located in the synthetic turf area. Locate the overlay away from
parking for safety reasons
5. lncorporate synthetic turf into softball fields
Misc. Design lssues:
1. lntegrate walking/exercise into the park
2. A shorter walkway circulation route is preferred.
3. A portion of the park could be reserved for a picnic/trellis area
Comments on Scheme B:
BIMX Course Comments:
1. Prefer to have BIVX course located at lower terrace where it will become less visible
2. Do not like location of BMX. Would prefer to have it near the fire station
Lighting lssues:
l.Light sports field away from housing
Sports Fields:
1. Take out one baseball field and replace with fifth soccer field
2. Locate sand volleyball and bocce courts near soccer fields for possible expansion
3. Prefer to have a larger single level soccer for flexibility
4. Sand volleYball over turf
5. Flexible ballfields between 80 and 90 feet
6. Possibility of replacing softballwith roller hockey
7. Move basketball away from Little League fields
8. Prefer to have broken, terraced soccer fields to help reduce wind
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94T33 (415) 674'0990 FAX (415) 6"74-0999
www.carducciassociates.com tony@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
X Vince Lattanzio (VL)Carducci Landscape Architects
X Bill Fee (BF)Carducci Landscape Architects
X Jin Kim (JK)Carducci Landscape Architects
9. Possibility of having neither hockey or tennis courts
Misc. Design lssues:
1. Locate parking near Little League, softball, and baseball fields
2. Concession and play areas located centrally to baseball complexes
3. Water fountains near fleld areas and restrooms4. Prefer more organic layout to orthogonal layout
5. Spread parking out away from street
6. Place the restrooms adjacent to play areas
7. Place drop-off areas in parking lots near sports fields
Comments on Scheme C:
BMX Course Comments:
1. Prefer this BMX location over scheme A or B
2. BMX needs 20 parking spots close by (50'to 60' away)
3. Locating BMX at fire station will help block wind4. Provide temporary parking at BttIX for two vehicles
Restroom lssues:
1. How many restrooms and where should they be located?
2. Consider unisex restrooms
Sports Fields:
1. Practice areas for cricket should be like a pitch layout
2. Softball outfield fence is too close
3. Two task force members prefer to have four soccer fields versus three, while one member prefers
three instead of four
4. Variety of adult sports is good to have
5. Could be difficult to schedule Little League and adult baseball leagues
6. Prefer grouped sports activity to mixed sports activity
7. Prefer sand volleyball courts
8. ldea of having hockey overlay tennis courts is not possible
9. Like artificial turf-ls cheaper in long run
Misc. Design lssues:
1. Cluster layout could be good and bad. Look and pro's and con's
2. Like this playground layout. Prefer to have main playground at the upper level and smaller play area
at lower level. Group play areas according to age.
3. Love the surrounding water
4. Look at ft/emorial Park in San Ramon
Gonclusions:
The task force members preferred Scheme B over Scheme A or C
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com tony@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
End of Meeting Notes
Attendees are to notify Carducci & Associates, lnc., in writing, of discrepancies in these minutes.
1
MEETING NOTES
ARCI
Date:
To:
Job Name
Job #
Re
By
09-10-04
Herma Lichtenstein
Fallon Ranch Sports Park
DU803-02
Task Force Meeting #3
Dave Andrews
On Wednesday, September 8,2004 a third public meeting was held with the Task Force to review the preferred
scheme and get input from the Task Force and approval to continue with proposed plan. Refer to the attached
Agenda.
Attendees
Name Affiliation
X Diane Lowart (DL)Citv of Dublin
X Herma Lichtenstein (HL)City of Dublin
X Rich Jochner (RJ)City of Dublin
X-ALT Anthony Casadonte (MC)-X- MARY-ALT.Dublin Ranch HOA (President)
lgnatus Chinn (lC)Summer Glen HOA
Roy Chowdhuri (RC)
Greq Duncan (GD)Summer Glen HOA
X Alan Elias (AE)Dublin Ranch
David Galli (DG)Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer Lea
X [Vichele Haubert (MH)Dublin Ranch
Diane Hudson (DH)Bocce, Dublin Little League
Jim North (JN)Dublin Little Leaque
Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR)Summer Glen HOA (CFO)
Kimberly Roth (KR)Dublin Green
X Ellen Silky (ES)Dublin Ranch Dublin Little Lea e
X Anupam Singh (AS)Northern California Cricket Association P
Karen Y. Wang (KW)Greenbriar
Eric Weinhagen (EW)Dublin Ranch
lr/ary Senior Center
X Dave Chadbourne (DC)Develo & Som
Jeff Lawrence (JL)Develo raddock &
X Shane Huntoon (SH)Special lnterest Group (BMX)
X Richard Guarienti RG Parks and Commun Services Commission
X Connie tVack (CM)Herita and Cultural Arts Commission
X-ALT Paul Silvas .X. MARY SUE.ALT.Senior Center Advi committee
X Brandon Chapin (BC)Youth Advi Committee
X Vince Lattanzio Carducci Landsca Architects
X Bill Fee (BF)Carducci Landsca Architects
X Jin Kim (JK)Carducci Land Architects
X Dave Andrews (DA)Carducci Land Architects
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 614-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com david@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
2
TURF
Fallon Sports Park
The following were initial comments from individual Task Force members in attendance:
o Synthetic turf is a great idea, promotes water conservation, no irrigation needed.. Bring synthetic turf samples next time
DRAINAGE
o Stream corridor is not used for site drainage.. Be careful when draining the terraces - do not drain upper terraces to lower terraces, specifically the
soccer fields as there are clay soils which will create subsurface sheet drainage possibly to lower
terraced fields. Ted Fairfield Park drainage is terrible.. Field drainage options:
- Sand channel
- Sand field
- Synthetic turf. Each field to be a separate watershed. Drainage to be accepted and directed to major storm drainage system at Fallon Road and Central
Parkway
BMX. Need electricity to BMX course, but not necessarily for lighting, as lighting is not required. 1 inch water
hook-ups (aCVs) needed at the inside of each turn. Drainage should occur at the inside of each turn.
Linear drains (French drains) could also line the track in between the straight-aways (said either could be
done). ls the BMX a fully open area or is it fenced? - will be fenced all around, minimum 4' high chain link fence
. Need sedimentation and erosion control at BIVX
LIGHTING
. Light only major connector paths consistent with other city parks
. Keep lighting at perimeter entries and parking lots, but keep to minimum where possible (ie. parking lots)
-do not light in park
. Provide lighting for nighttime events (therefore might need some path lights from/to specific areas that
would be used at night
r Operation times for park lighting
- Games start as late as 7:45 or 8:30
- Possibly have field lights go off at 10:00pm
- Existing city park rules have operation times dawn to dusk
- Existing city park rules have field lights turn off at 10:00pm
- Keep in mind that sports are seasonal
. KeeP lighting in center of Park
- Concerned with light glare
- Use glare reduction systems if possible
. Light the parking lots and especially the pedestrian bridge
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 614-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com david@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN C IRRIGATION DESIGN
3
NEIGHBORHOOD CON NECTIONSo Would like to see access points from all around (likes what is shown on plans), but would specifically like
connection of open spaces at southern edge (across Central Parkway). Possibly make a second pedestrian bridge connection at Gleason/Lockhart intersection. Provide pedestrian street crossings by fire station and at all neighborhood connection points
WATER/ART FEATURESr Are there any water features anywhere?o Would like to see art features and water features throughout the park
- Water features possibly at entry
- Possibly misting water features at the trellis and picnic areas as comfort optionso Would like to see water features and restrooms at picnic areas. Have "special" things/places/objects outside of sport field items to promote attraction to other parts/facets
of park and to create non-sporting areas of interest. ls it possible to take advantage of slopes for water elements, surrounding sporting areas?
FENCINGo Are the fields fenced?
- fences needed for tournaments
- softball and baseball needs fences for big games or tournaments or teams
- fences are needed to attract teams and tournaments, they will not come without the fences
PARK DEVELOPMENT. The city has new standards for soil amendment
o What is the financial reality of Fallon, especially, in terms of Emerald Glen Park, if the money is not
available yet for Emerald Glen Park what is supposed to help pay for its construction costs
- developers pay through impact fees
- neighborhood park fees
- community park fees
- the city has taken everything into account, and the park will happen
- problems at EGP are becauie they need more manpower, not because the funds are not available
- each phase takes at least 3 years to plan, design, and build
. The City sees Fallon as a premier sports park
. See ground-breaking to potentially be in 2-3 years after first phase funding is approved by the council
o Private development west of Fallon Park is working from west to east
- tr/ight be able to make interim intersection of Fallon and Central if new Fallon alignment is not
constructed yet
- pedestrian bridge axis/location is adjustable dependent upon elementary school and intersection
locations
. Stream corridor to continue on south side of Central Parkway (tt4acKay & Somps to provide plans)
o At Lockhart 12' or 16' walkway adjacent to corridor? Sidewalk becomes corridor walkway
ADDITIONAL ITETMS. ls it possible to have shade structures in play area itself?
r Would like pathways to be large enough to allow for bikes. Strollers, and people to move easily
. provide shade trees/areas by soccer fields and other fields for viewing
. Use embankments for seating opportunities
. provide equipment sheds for each sport where possible (maybe the 8' x 20" containers)
. Can we make the soccer goals permanent?
- This might be a conflict with the cricket fields
r Walking/runiing path could have a softer surface for jogging, possibly DG, resin paving, or dirt
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 614-0990 FAX (415) 614-0999
www.carducciassociates.com david@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
4. Provide areas for celebratory gathering (BBQ, parties, sports team awards, jamborees, team/league
award ceremonies, parades, etc). Bike racks throughout (allow for bike racks at major hubs and at Little League, softball, baseball, and
soccer hubs). Provide for separate toddler (2-5yrs) playground areas as well as older kid (school age) playgrounds
- Try to fence in toddler areas or at least have them secured for safety
- Have places for parents to sit within or around these toddler playground areas (shaded)
- Adult areas within play areas
- No rocks/granite or dangerous objects in play areas
- Provide form of immediate shade while large/planted trees are growing in (plant larger trees). Recommend to use sand opposed to wood fiber or rubber because it is a bit too hard sometimes. Make sure there are BBQ pits at picnic areaso Provide stainvays between landings of sloped walks at Gleason Drive and Fallon Road. For east vs. west town league games, would want to have 2 batting cages for Little League. Are the Little League batting cages owned by LL or by city?
- They are not a commercial ventureo Cricket needs batting cages too (net cages that are removable and will be installed and removed each
time), but would like sleeves for its placement and possibly have electrical connections for bowling
machine which they will provide
PHASING
Lin Family responsibility for Fallon Road
[\4ass grading and stream bed corridor may happen in 2 years time
Stream corridor might get built first due to permit obligations, so would make sense to build Lockhart or
part of Lockhart along with it
a
a
a
Possible phasinq considerations per Carducci & Associates:
. Roadso Utilities into hubs. Perimeter trees and stream corridor planting
. fvlass grading. Soccer fields. Parking as needed (build-out sooner than later)
o Restrooms along with needs. Meet community needs. Soccer growing at30% Per Year. Coordinate with developers concerning their responsibilities to build roads as soon as possible
o Consider perimeter roads paths and access as 1't Phase and develop from perimeter into park area
Phasinq requests per Task Force
. picnic areas, small areas, walks, for immediately surrounding residents
. Build pathways in first Phase. North side, then work southward
. Perimeter work
. BMX in first stages as it is new to area
. It should be a community park first, then can grow to complete its sport park needs
. lnfrastructure first
. Litfle League first as it is on the north side where the roads are already built, plus there is no Little
League at Emerald Glen Park so have the need to build them first
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 614-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com david@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
5
Possibly have the section of Lockhart from Gleason to upper entry be built, as to provide access to
upper terrace and Little League fields
Because Central Parkway might happen first, then maybe use lower parking with sloped walks or roads
leading up to upper terrace (Little League Fields), then fill in as if in north/south halves(build eastern half
first)
Just make it usable whatever parts are possible
End of Meeting Notes
Attendees are to notify Carducci & Associates, lnc., in writing, of discrepancies in these rninutes.
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 614-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com david@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
a
a
a
1
MEETING NOTES
cAx
Date:
To:
Job Name
Job #
Re
By
10-8-04
Herma Lichtenstein
Fallon Ranch Sports Park
DU803-02
Task Force Meeting #4
Tonv Esterbrooks
On Wednesday, October 6, 2004 a fourth public meeting was held with the Task Force to review the preferred
scheme and get input from the Task Force and approval to continue with the proposed plan. Refer to the
attached Agenda.
Attendees
Name Affiliation
X Diane Lowart (DL)City of Dublin
X Herma Lichtenstein (HL)Citv of Dublin
X Rich Jochner (RJ)City of Dublin
Anthony Casadonte (MC)Dublin Ranch HOA (President)
lgnatus Chinn (lC)Summer Glen HOA
Rov Chowdhuri (RC)
Greq Duncan (GD)Summer Glen HOA
X Alan Elias (AE)Dublin Ranch
David Galli (DG)Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League
Michele Haubert (tMH)Dublin Ranch
X Diane Hudson (DH)Bocce, Dublin Little League
Jim North (JN)Dublin Little Leaque
Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR)Summer Glen HOA (CFO)
X Kimberlv Roth (KR)Dublin Green
X Ellen Silky (ES)Dublin Ranch, Dublin Little League
X Anupam Sinsh (AS)Northern California Cricket Association (Vice President)
Karen Y. Wanq (KW)Greenbriar
Eric Weinhasen (EW)Dublin Ranch
[Varv Senior Center
X Dave Chadbourne (DC)Developer (Mac Kay & Somps)
Jeff Lawrence (JL)Developer (Braddock & Logan)
X Shane Huntoon (SH)Special Interest Group lPtvlX)
X Richard Guarienti (RG)Parks and Community Services Commission
x Connie t\4ack (CM)and Cultural Arts Commission
Paul Silvas (PS)Senior Center Ad committee
X Brandon Chapin (BC)Youth Advisory Committee
X Vince Lattanzio (VL)Carducci Landscape Architects
X Bill Fee (BF)Carducci Land Architects
X Jin Kim (JK)Carducci Architects
X Tony Esterbrooks(TE)Carducci Landscape Architects
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES,INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 614-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com tony@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
2Fallon Sports Park
The following were comments from individualTask Force members in attendance:
DRAINAGE
. Ensure that drainage is effective on ball fields. Subsurface drainage will be used that ties into a main storm drain lineo Concern with Ted Fairfield Park and the fact that it does not drain well. Task force does not want this
situation at Fallon Sports Park. Synthetic turf is a permeable surface and will work well with drainage plan
BtMX
. A rough grade for the BMX course can be used initially
LIG ING
Most of the lighted sports fields lighting would be constructed during Phase 1. There is concern that
adjacent future neighbors would be upset with construction of sports lighting after the purchase their
property. lt is better for lights to already be present before new developments are finished near lighted
sports fields
a
NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIONS. Toll Brothers will start development on the west side of the site. They will be responsible for the curb
and stream corridor along Lockhart linking Lockhart Lane from curb to stream corridor
PLAY AREA
The consideration of a tot lot near the Little League and softball hubs may be dangerous due to balls
flying into the play areas
a
ADDITIONAL ITEMS. lncorporation of a space or opportunity for on-site staff to manage park facilities. Due to large size of
park, it may be important for someone to be present to monitor the park. Need to understand that the park stays on track as a sports park before considering other items
PHASING
. Phase 1 to include 2 Little League fields and 2 lighted softball fields. Two lighted and synthetic turf
Soccer fields should be included in Phase 1 due to a high demand as well
r Most lighted fields should be built first
o lnclude the priority of demand/need for Phase 1. For example phasing must meet demands for Dublin
and East Dublin Little League. There is currently high demand for Little League and that demand will
most likely continue to grow. Little league can use softball fields as a temporary solution
. BMX course can be a rough graded area included in Phase 1
. The time frames for each should be determined by next meeting. Mostly depends on the funding
available, but are probably look at 2-3 years for each phase
. Come to final conclusions on Phase 1 without having to be locked into Phases 2 and 3, leave the rest
open for future phases
. Phasing for alternative 1 looks good
End of Meeting Notes
Attendees are to notify Garducci & Associates, lnc., in writing, of discrepancies in these rninutes.
CARDUCCT & ASSOCTATES, rNC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (4r5) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com tony@carducciassociates.com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
1
MEETING NOTES
AACH
Date:
To:
Job Name
Job #
Re
By
1 1-03-04
Herma Lichtenstein
Fallon Ranch Sports Park
DUB03-02
Task Force Meeting #5
Dave Andrews
On Wedn esday, November 11,2004, a fifth public meeting was held with the Task Force to review the final plan
Phasing Plan and provide an opportunity for them to select their preferred design components that they would
like to see in the park if there are budget restrictions that may call for their deletion.
Attendees
Name Affiliation
X Diane Lowart (DL)City of Dublin
X Herma Lichtenstein (HL)City of Dublin
Rich Jochner (RJ)City of Dublin
Anthony Casadonte (MC)Dublin Ranch HOA (President)
lqnatus Chinn (lC)Summer Glen HOA
Roy Chowdhuri (RC)
Greg Duncan (GD)Summer Glen HOA
X Alan Elias (AE)Dublin Ranch
David Galli (DG)Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League
Michele Haubert (MH)Dublin Ranch
X Diane Hudson (DH)Bocce, Dublin Little Leaque
Jim North (JN)Dublin Little Leaque
Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR)Summer Glen HOA (CFO)
X Kimberly Roth (KR)Dublin Green
X Ellen Silky (ES)Dublin Ranch, Dublin Little League
X Anupam Singh (AS)Northern California Cricket Association (Vice President)
Karen Y. Wanq (KW)Greenbriar
Eric Weinhagen (EW)Dublin Ranch
Mary Senior Center
X Dave Chadbourne (DC)Developer (Mac Kay & Somps)
Jeff Lawrence (JL)Developer (Braddock & Logan)
X Shane Huntoon (SH)
X Richard Guarienti (RG)Parks and Community Services Commission
X Connie t\tlack (Ct\4)Heritaqe and Cultural Arts Commission
Paul Silvas (PS)Senior Center Advisory committee
Brandon Chapin (BC)Youth Advisory Committee
X Vince Lattanzio (VL)Carducci Landscape Architects
X Bill Fee (BF)Carducci Landscape Architects
X Jin Kim (JK)Carducci Landscape Architects
X Dave Andrews (DA)Carducci Landscape Architects
CARDUCS & ASSOCIATES,INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 6'74-0999
tony@ carducciassociates. comwww.carducciassociates.com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING O URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
Special lnterest Group (BtVX)
2
Trellis Expansion refers to the expansion at the soccer area, the bocce area, and the volleyball area
Little League and softballwill have shade structures
What are the parameters to make something cost effective (i.e. scale of item's price)?. More an issue of what the needs and wants are.. For example - synthetic soccer fields may be one of the most expensive items, but the budget will be
adjusted if people really want it
Why is synthetic important or wanted?. Can play in rain...the field does not get damaged as natural turf does and is ready to use immediately
The City will find a way to make budget happen if people want it
SH - Water Features are very important (particularly for summer)
Some items could be added later but some can't be. But could add bocce or par course latero But special paving it would be best to add now. Could add trellis later. Water feature might be able to be piped and added later, but still may not be best ideao Synthetic turf needs to be done now...not later
Other par courses have been taken out...people not really using. How big would this be...would it be strung out along the trail or concentrated. Long courses typically don't get used as much...concentrated equipment seem to be bettero This one would be concentrated
CARDUCCT & ASSOCTATES,INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (4t5) 614-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com tony@carducciassociates.com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
SECTION IX. APPENDICES
C. TASK FORCE DESIGN CONCEPTS
ccr & Assocl
:t
-.']
I
i
SAN FRANCISCO, CATIFORNIA
\-r a
t 1 ltl ,r'. 'ra
rf-..l-l . r
.-il': -\\
\
;tIt
.i
"
'^"t*ot
\
UBtI cAr-ORNI
lXc-l
/
BLUE
TOTAI.
(weighted)
$ uraera
e,
az.
at)
*t)
ffi
ffi
oo
o
-
o
SCHEME A
-.rr)
a-
l-..fP
BtUE
RED
TOTAT
(rveighred)
3
t8
Sa,.u
TENN(9
W€tWd-
wx
ffis-wffi
&
ffi
o
&
&
ffi
SCHE'I'IE B
RED
BtUE
IOTAL
(weighred)
2
ro
L'
@
o4ffio 'ffi
SCHEME C
I
l(l
o
RED
GREEN
2
t
BLUE
TOIAL
(weighted)
offi$ffi
SCHEME D
t
GREEN
BLUE
o
3
2RED
@
(weighted)
o
&
o
,\lJ4
ffi
;.i;$irw
1
,ffi
SCHEME E
I
RED
GREEN
TOTAT
o
3
5
t
BtUE
(weighted)
-r7
$
=,ooN-o
€
--,i{l
.ffi
@&
SCHEINE F
RED
GREEN
BLUE
TOTAT
(weighted)
ow &SCHEME G
d. TASK
SECTION IX. APPENDICES
FORCE MEETING HANDOUTS
coNTEXT (TNTRODUCTORY MEETTNG)
srTE ANALYStS (tNTRODUCTORy MEETTNG)
IIVIAGERY 1&2 (MEETING 1)
MASTER PLAN (MEETING 5)
IMAGERY PLAN (tvlEETtNG 5)
LTGHTTNG DTAGRAM (rvlEETrNG 5)
GRADTNG PLAN(MEETTNG s)
srrE SECTToNS (MEETTNG 4)
PHASTNG PLAN (MEETTNG 5)
ARDUCCI & A TES
SAN FRANCISCO, CATIFORNIA
tNc
(4
#\\b(\l!
t
, lll'rl.':ra
tI
tar({'Ar
:
FOR,N
I
(
t
.^- a
ryr'1;,.
,-
I
{
i
It
a
T
a:i
.-_n\.
:l' ' "'\'\
DUBTI
lxd-r
VICINITY AND EXISTING CONDITION
mEiSiI
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION AAAP
FALLON SPORTS PARK SITE ANALYSIS,.aq,R\.i'Jl\v^iul!.:,\.2^\./rl'r\H#Dublin, Colilornio
H
.fu.
l
i
I
:-
Et
tI
ir
W
Pork Site
ar.o t -.,,
Streom
(ror w''d5l
{.aACr
t\i\
'.i
,: {E} Follon
Rod
(E)
TOPOGRAPHY
ffi lortssxororernn
r16.r.r F sPoTafv^TtoNs
@ aroFo*oroaostot
ETATloI{S
GEOLOGY
ITTICAL FIII
LAIOSUO€ D€16
cou.ww
AIIJVIUM
TASSUTi FOIMAIE|
o 60R|NG rocATroN
g e!4
'd..r.e
!@
-
@
L.!r*.aqAn<<
60' Pio.
SITE PLAN
i
l
DlMuNq
HYDROLOGY
r-- SlV U
--- IEE
WIND/SUN
-.-j)
pcrvruro vaNo
E-Oaq
ffi
EQUINO}L
DAY . NIGIII
N
SOI.STICE:
tolr6Es' 0AY3
N
*l-i\s
JUNE
HIG}I€sI $JN AIIITI,OI
URCH
/,
a EOUnOft
OAY - l{lGlfl
N
SOISIKE:
S}IORIESI o^YS
N
DECEilt T
rowEsr sl.r [rmro€
Wnd Sts.dr {Colmt: 7.5fl
cd.r o5 a r.tr., rJU 5rr.l aO12 t,
Gbr ol a :1r.. o.lr.r o! r ,r-r.. ld6
| .^.
ll@s
ADJACENT LAND USE AND VIEWS
SOUTH VIEW OT ItlE MOUNTAINS
)**ltru
$msEx
FALLON SPORTS PARK
Dublin, Colilornio
JI
I
I
\
il
il
J I
I
I
filidq ffi F
kl
-l--=
-l#
flfrr[
I-il
9-.1
T
.t+
!+
{6^68}OW#?
SITE ANALYSIS il
ff:
I
{i
GY'fli \
EAST VIEW OF THE HIII.S
I I
I DUBI. IN FIRE STATION
SITE
IMAGERY
PEDESTRIAN PATH
I
PAVILION
WATER BRIDGE
STREAM CORRIDOR
IAAAGERYFALLON SPORTSfABK
Dublin, Coli{omio
EAST VIEW OF THE HIttS OF THE [1 OUNT.A,I Ii5
ry
SO UT H VI,EW
*ffi ffi::l;l
h
L 1'n
u I
RANCH
H
7 s -l
n€
r
I
*
E
fl',
e
rf ra
BASEBALL
TERRACE
SEATING
CIRCULATION
SOFTBALL
LITTLE LEAGUE
SOCCER
BMX
II
VOLLEYBALL
f,ffi
BASKETBALL
FALLON S
BOCCE
PLAY AREA
IAAAGERY
w4
I.,#
sffi7-
,@ Dublin, Colifornio
RTS PARK ffi'::[:ll:_:lt-
"ll r-
f
r .
;l
-
NATURAL
SYNTHETIC
*
I
a
)
t
t {
a
t{
t
p
\)
\
flta
)r^rhl tlstNTHaTtc
t\,I !
lStNTHaTtC
i1 Vr'l
FAttON SPORTS PARK
lli -_-lll l[,,,.,,-,,
MASTE
i.i \1' ' ':; 1t1
PLAN
T
',l
l.
!
,\
""A \,r'
!1.I
9
Y
o*f
t,
o
vi
,rrrr, "ro,!f..oaN3rrr raroaN7l^L
I
o!"rr' rrsroEI,,^L
,rttEr
t
t'
<-dNNt.rr
0 80 160 210
,I
\i
oExrrTY rtIlDrNrAr
-lf,
(}
I
I
I
,
I ',I
T]
l
-t(\
.t
FATTON SPORTS PARK IMAGERY
TERRACED SEATING
iI
ooD
ECTION
IASEIAII. FIEID
\
INTERACTIVE
WATER FEAIURE
\
HN
PI.AY EAUIPMENI
CITY OT DUBTIN
{
\
.-
fr
rl
1 !['K
. ..1
.t
t rf
H|tt
ZZI
t
\",
-l
t
ar
I
+€F
TERTACE
o1I\
I
I
a-
A AI?H ITH EAI EI
L \
'*{u
t
at.
\
L
?lcNlc tr'I
I
Ilr
I
oL
!,lI:T I
-t
ilcNrc
ART
-- rt
=!*
FATTON SPORTS PARK TIGHTING DIAGRAM
{LroHra0,
Ir6Hrlol tn6nr.0l
rE(tra
<axEt
I16ifto)
aocc!t
IIYNftaia a
!rchrrDl
tsrNrHllrc a
TENNII
CITY OF DUBTIN i.r! cc(r r sro(rlri 0<
| /ta .ra ,r7t . at, ara t* |outc!c, rD/o./0r
t1
A
)
a
Iilr\
\
Ui
uJ
d
Y
!f)
ra!at ltrlaaa tNlaY/. rrEiDrioci) j
lrrrrlr 'l I
t i,o."tr"ooo
ti",lfiti'
A-
q
tv
()I
I
I
A16roi
il:;;f/ I
4
d
PARKW
I
IU6XitOl
-:aZ
I
\
\
C e,o 80 160 2lo o
FALTON SPORTS PARKRANCH SITE"PERIMETER SECTIONS
/8'-1
o o CENTRAI.
PA R KWAY
l8'.d'
BtoswAtE
3: I 5l,OPEl
RIPARIAN
PTANTING
PARKING TOT
PTAZA/FtELDS
KEY MAP
1/8"-1
l-:'.
--j l
I
LOCKHART
LA NE
I O'
ATH
i2'wrDE
MULTI.USE PAIH
7O'WIDE STREAM
CORRIDOR
1/8"-1',
I,OCKHART
tAN E
6 I O' PATH
12'WtDE
MUtTI.USE PATH 70'WIDE STREAM
COR RI DOR
1i-] *(
lr
<.-
(. ..-'r
.ll -.'r
"t /a"-1
!1
ZO'WIDE STREAM
CORRIDOR
3:l SLOPE/RIPARIAN
PLANTING
10'3:l TITTTE TEAGUE
STOPE
3:l
SI.OPE
15',3:1
sr.oPE
3rl
SLOPE
153r'l
SLOPE SLOPE
GTEASON
DRIVE
8',t2
PATH SLOPE FIETDS
@ ffi
F:!F^
d
o
1
.J
('\
)
6',
L)\./
,)
l5'
i
FALLON sEcTtoNs
,. ,1
i,tt-'
2-.\
":/i
utPEtranAcE ler, ,a5
-----rffiE&18.r
,DS
LEAGUE
CONCESSION
coNcEsstoN/
R EsTR O OIA
IITTLE TEAGUE ?INES
SOfIBAtL FIETDS
STREAM CORRIDOR
8'TX IR,ACK
FA LLO N
R,OA D
GLEASON DRIYE
rALtO N
ROAD
CENT*,AL
PA R T VfAY
--:=
L
-J-
C E NTNAI
PARKWA
'-t0'
DR.oP-orF/ [AWN
PANKlNG
PtAY
AREA
RE5T.
ROOH
SAN D
vottEY-
BAtL
CITY OF DUSTIN
"r^
TRET.LlS BOCCE TRErrlS BOCCE rRErLrS TRELI.IS 3: I SI,OFE
WALT REST.
nooM
CIIY OF DUBTIN
FALLON SPOR S,PARK GRADING PtAN
Y.V ->/',
/
I
,
llon
frr
fo
+
,B*d
I
s
tt"
rtll
!rl lll
I
trrrl l '
uMtf oF €Rsrio
(a ca{qR,
-----<' FtNtg{ canraR 6', rxiRvAli
FlNrgtr co[tano ${IERVAL)
r rN|g{ lfOT EwAi1ON
PAI|,{AY
; l:'l Rolv EAsElGllr AeEA LocAnotl
I EAgEt'tNrREo.EgrAREALo/-Aaor
, !f ,
,
/l
:-
. w
I
t(
I
tffiffi1ffi ,o
'/ \\:-//
\.J
'/
::"
I
'l
65 lr0 +
T
I
,t
=
6s tr r0
I
IU
@
!^4
al ,, tr rrarirlrr,
0 a0 160
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\,
aBsro a rl36rE Nc
ra! [Gi:l@ ar. rrd u nsrrc u a.rtrr.rr ataar.ot arr at. o.a
ocaltar ro a/0.
e
)-'
-i
(
,
,,-.-
I
--
ll .rt
FATTON RANCH SPORTS PARK PHASING DIAGRAM
N
\\ \'\'
PHASING CONCEPT
TOU.OW ROAD DEVEI.OPMENT
PRcllr'IDE A VARIEIY OT fACII-ITIES AND USES
8UII.D TIGHTEO fIEI.DS AND COURTS fIRSI TO INCREASE
usAlLlIY
PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONSIIUCNON ACCESS Off fAIION
ROAD FOR SUBSEOUENT P}IASE DEVEI.OPMENT
ROAD AND STREAM CORRIDOI
D EV E tO P M E NT . (FrscAr.YEAnl
GI.EASON DRIVE . COMPIEIED
tocxHART tANE. COMPIETE 2005/2006
SNEA,M CORRIDOR. CONSIRUCT AI.ONG WIIH I"OCKHART
I.ANE ONCIUDING SIREAM CORRIDOR ON GI,EASON DRI\
FAI.I,ON ROAD. NORTHERN HATf Of ROAD, 54' RCP, AND
SOUTHERN HAlf MASS GTADING, PI.US 2 IANES
. coMPtEIE 2OOal2005
.wtDEN AND COMptETE FAU"ON ROAD 200,6/2007
CENTRA| PARKWAY. COMptEIE 200612007
PHASE I
PEDESIf,IAN BRIDGE
TWO I.ITNE EAGUE FIETDS WTH ASSOCIATED PTAZA, PICNIC,
AND RESIROOM/CONCESSTON
TWO TIGHTED SOFIIAU TIEIDS wlIH ASSOCIATED PIAZA,
PlcNrc, AND RESTnOOM/CONCESSTON
FOUR TIGHIED IENNIS COURTS
FOIJR I.IGHTED IASKEIBAI COURIS
IWO I.IGHTED NATURAT TURF SOCCER FIEI-DS WITH SYNTHEN(
ruRF (oPTtoNArl
ART AND WATET TEATURES
UPPER IERRACE PARKING IOT
UPPER IERRACE IOOP WALXING IRAII
UPPET IERRACE PARK IDENTIFICATION FEATURES
aMx couRst
. ROUGH GIADING IN PHASE I
SUBSEQUENT PHASES
(ORDER OF DEVEI.OPMENt IO BE DETERMINEDI
UPPET IETNA€I
. ACnVIIY HUB
(rNcLuDlNG PlcNtc PtAzA, PtAY AREA, AND RESInOOMSI
. TWO l.lTrG TEAGUE tlEtDS
. TWO SOFIBATI tlELDS
. BMX COURSE
. NEIGHIORHOOD CONNECIIONS
. PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCIION ACCESS OfF OF
fAI.I.ON ROAD
lowElrERn cE
. PARKING AI.ID ACIIVITY HU8
[NCtUD|NG, nCNtC PIAZA, PIAY AREA, AND RESInOOMS
. TWO IIATU&A| TURF SOCCER flEIDS Wlfi CRICKEI OVERT/
. ONE IIGHTED lAsElALL tlELD
. FOUI I.IGHIED BOCCE COURIS
TWO ADDTTTONAI UGHIED BOCCE COUTTS (OPflONAI
. FOUI SAND vOl.l,EYBAtl COURTS
. AlI AND WATER fEATRES
. NEGHSORHOOD CONNECNONS
. PATK IDENN'ICATION FEAruRES
. COMPTETE UPPER AND TOWER TERRACE
o too 2oo 300
I
I
R TER,R,AC
PHAS E
\:
r:ATUla a
aoxxacTron
I,l-\
(
I
a
,{
tl
a,
*a
P AR rwA Y i^..
c
rLF o
CITY OF N \\,ax0!6 asso(l^frt,r(trt*.cnnrrEral{rtooi llrrr^x<rtco c...lI
utol.or D/0rl0.I
f-- -l -i--
,i\
E
lr
lli
t\
II
L.I
\.o
1t {o
,
o 4o
ASE I
q{
i.,,\i VI-!,
uttat tatlaca txtat
.I'i
tttltl i
?**r-rjlt
E
t.tr
1
SECTION !X. APPENDICES
E. IRRIGATION AND RECYCLED WATER DEMAND
ANALYSIS
DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DIS-
TRICT WATER FLOW AND PRESSURE
INFORMATION
CARDUCCI &
I
I
i
I
I
SAN FRANCISCO, CAI.IFORNIA
J,
::-+.k i,,=-:-
-)t?
l.
t,-/
t
B (r
J'
1
ra
!
i.
"l
'i
-
I
{
i
T
t
'i
!atiwAl
,.t; l,i\\.
''. -..,L-
P
DUBI. I CAtiFORNI
lXe-l
Analysis of the lrrigation Water Requirements
Fallon Sports Park
CAR
I-AN
The following is an analysis of the irrigation water requirements for the Fallon Sports Park.
The analysis is based on the following data:
Approximate park area: 62.44 acres
Approximate turf area: 40.00 acres
Approximate unplanted area: 22.44 acres
1 cubic feet of water = 7 .48052 gallons
Irrigation water will be recycled water.
Recycled water static pressure is approximately 130 psi at the corner of Fallon Road and Gleason Drive and 74 psi at the
corner of Central Parkway and Lockhart Street according to the memos dated 3-22-OS from Rudy Portugal of the Dublin
San Ramon Services District.
This analysis ignores the use of synthetic turf for two soccer fields (3.67 acres). Synthetic turf would save water
consumption and optimize maintenance resources and reduce impacts of overuse of the other turf fields.
Park Acres Street Frontage
Acres
Turf Acres
Phase 1 26.42 0 17.00
Upper Terrace Phase
1 4.4 1 0.68 11.00
Lower Terrace
Phase 1.18 12.00
Total 60.58 1.86 40.00
The maximum evaporation rate would be approximately 0.25 inches per day or 7 .75 inches per month (July). The plant
factor for turf would be 80% of the maximum evaporation rate. The irrigation efficiency would be B0%.
The watering window would be 10 PM to 6 AM or B hours.
I;HH[:I[:B?ti:H:331?T5l% 80 prant factor divided by 0 80 irrisation efficiency x27,1?4sailons per acre inch =
271,154 gallons per day.
8-hour window requirements:
271,154 gallons per day divided by 480 minutes = 565 GPM or approximately 600 GPI\/
provide two irrigation water connections, two at the upper terrace to make use of the static water pressure for recycled
water of approximately 130 Psi.
Phase 1 and Upper Terrace Turf summer irrigation requirements:
2g.00 acres x O.2S inches per day x 0.80 plant factor divided by 0.80 irrigation efficiency x 27 ,154 gallons per acre inch =
'190,078 gallons per day.
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES,INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 614'0990 FAX (4I5) 674-0999
www.carducciassociates.com bill@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
19.75
8-hour window requ irements:
190,078 gallons per day divided by 480 minutes = 396 GPIVI or approximately 400 GPM
Lower Terrace Turf summer irrigation requirements:
12.00 acres x 0.25 inches per day x 0.80 plant factor divided by 0.80 irrigation efficiency x 27 ,154 gallons per acre inch =
81,462 gallons per day.
B-hour window requirements:
81,462 gallons per day divided by 480 minutes = 170 GPM or approximately 200 GPM
CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674'0999
www.carducciassociates.com bill@carducciassociates'com
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE o PLANNING o URBAN DESIGN O IRRIGATION DESIGN
a.n
p.nURGENT
Need By:
Request Taken By:
Dublin San Ramon Services District
7051 Dublin Blvd., Dublin, CA 94568
Telephone: (925) 828-0515
FAX: (925) 829-1T80
RCP
Initials
FACSIMILE INFORMATION TRANSMITTAL
WATER FLOW AND PRESSURE INFORMATION REQUEST
No. of Pages (incl. transmittal page): I Date of Request:
Date of Response:
3-22-05
To: Name Herma Lichtenstein
Company City of Dublin Response Rudy Portugal
Phone 833-6645 by:Assistant Engineer
FAx 833-6651
Location
(Address &
Cross Streets):
925-875-2251
Fallon Sports Park - Fallon Road & Gleason Drive - Potable Water Pressure Zone 2
Recycled Water Pressure Zone 2
In response to your request, we ran our hydraulic model to determine water pressures at the above
noted location. The results are as follows:
Potable Water:
Static Pressure
Residual Pressure
Recycled Water:
Static Pressure
Residual Pressure
90 psi
psi at a flow of
psi
psi at a flow of
1500 gpm
gpm
87
130
Actual water pressures may vary depending on delivery pressures from water wholesaler (Zone 7),
system demands, and the dYnamic status of facilities. This information does not relieve Requestor
of to due Actual field test is recommended.
Should you have additional questions, please contact us at the above number-
A dditio n al n otes/com m ents :
HTUSERS\BIAGTANSOWS\I-irenoW Requst Fom.doc
3-23-05
a.m,
p.m.
URGENT
Need By:Request Taken By:
Dublin San Ramon Services District
7051 Dublin Blvd., Dublin, CA 94568
Telephone: (925) 828-0515
FAX: (925) 829-1180
RCP
InitialsDate
FAC SIMILE INFORMATIOI\ TRAI{SMITTAL
WATER FLOW AND PRESSURE INFORMATION REQUEST
No. of Pages (incl. transmittal page): I Date of Request:
Date of Response:
3-22-05
Herma Lichtenstein 3-23-05
City of Dublin Response Rudy Portugal
833-664s by Assistant Engineer
833-66s 1 925-875-2251
Fallon Sports Park - Central Pkwy & Lockhart St - Potable Water Pressure Zone 2
Recycled Water Pressure Zone I
To: Name
Company
Phone
FAX
Location
(Address &
Cross Streets):
In response to your request, we ran our hydraulic model to determine water pressures at the above
noted location. The results are as follows:
Potable Water:
Static Pressure
Residual Pressure
Recvcled Water:
Static Pressure
Residual Pressure
13s psr
psi at a flow of
psl
psi at a flow of
1500 gpm
gpm
t28
74
Actual water pressures may vary depending on delivery pressures from water wholesaler (Zone 7),
system demands, and the dynamic status of facilities. This information does not relieve Requestor
of to due Actual field test is recommended.
Should you have additional questions, please contact us at the above number.
Additio n al n otes/c o mm ents :
H:\USERSBhGTAN$ORMS$ireoow Rquest Fom.doc
SECTION IX. APPENDICES
f. COST ESTITUATE
ASSOCIA
SAN FRANCISCO, CAI.IFORNIA
(r{\
E
tI
ra
I
I
\
t_
{
j
f
;
;I
fr
I
rt : rix\ .r, ._.':\
DUBUf.+' CAUFORNI..Y
txf-l
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS . Fallon Sports Park Cost Estimate Summary
Item
Cost Estimate Summary
Phase 1 $9,531,468
Upper Terrace Phase $4,970,293
Lower Terrace Phase $5,636,530
Total Park Construction Costs $20,138,291
1
OPINION OF PROBABLE GOSTS - Fallon Sports Park PHASE 1
Item Qty Unit Cost T"t"il
Phase 1 Construction (26.42 acres)
1. Little League Field (2)
Backstop
Grading
lnfleld Mix & Warning Track
Lawn & lrrigation
Score Keeper's Booth
Scoreboard
Dugouts
Bullpens
Foul poles
Bleachers
Trench Drain
Perimeter Fencing & Mowband
Subsurface Drainage
2. Softball (2)
Backstop
Grading
lnfield Mix & Warning Track
Lawn & Irrigation
Score Keeper's Booth
Scoreboard
Dugouts
Bullpens
Foul poles
Bleachers
Trench Drain
Perimeter Fencing & Mowband
Subsurface Drainage
Softball Field Lighting
3. Basketball Court
Fencing
AC Paving w/ Color Course
Backboard / HooPs
Basketball Court Llghts
4. Soccer Field( Natural Turf) (80,000 SF)
Grading, Lawn & lrrigation
Sand Drainage
Goals
Soccer Field Lighting
5. Tennis
Tennis Center
Striping
AC Paving w/ Color Course
Fencing
Nets
Tennis Court Lighting
2
91,000
26,000
65,000
2
2
4
4
4
4
350
1,300
2,200
2
174,000
46,000
128,000
2
2
4
4
4
4
350
2,000
2,200
1
4
$100,000
$91,000
$52,000
$130,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$12,000
$16,000
$17,500
$52,000
$66,000
$100,000
$174,000
$92,000
$256,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$12,000
$16,000
$17,500
$80,000
$66,000
$200,000
$200,000
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
LF
LF
LF
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
LF
LF
LF
LS
EA
LS
EA
LS
EA
1
2
1
4
$s0,000.00
$1.00
$2.00
$2.00
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$3,000.00
$4,000.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$50,000.00
$1.00
$2.00
$2.00
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$3,000.00
$4,000.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$200,000.00
$50,000.00
$46,000.00
$320,000.00
$332,400.00
$60,000.00
$46,000
$640,000
$332,400
$240,000
1 LS $90,000.00 $e0,000
1
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS - Fallon Sports Park PHASE 1
00,000
7. Restroom / Concession Structure -Prefabricated
8. Shade Structure
9. Conc Curb at Parking Lot
'10. Parking Lot (259 cars)
Striping & Signage
Wheel Stops
Accessible Parking
Grading
11. Conc Paving
12. Conc Paving
13. Upper Entry Drive
Asphalt Paving
Concrete Paving
14. Upper Terrace Entry Feature
15. Signage / ldentity Feature
16. Conc Steps & Handrails
17. Upper Terrace Culvert Entry
Gateway / Railing
AC Paving
18. LowerPedestrian Entry
Pedestrian Brid ge-Prefabricated
Special Conc Paving
Conc Paving
Pilasters
19. Conc Paving for paths due to slopes
20. BBQ Grills--Small
21 . Picnic Table--Square (Upper Terrace)
22. Seatwalls
23. Bench
24. Bike Rack
25. Storage Container
26. Drinking Fountain
27. Fire Hydrant
28. Drain lnlet
29. Storm Drainage
30. Sanitary Sewer
31. Electrical Service
32. Underground Electrical Work
33. Pathway Lights
34. Concession/ Restroom Building (Electrical/ Lights)
35. Restroom Building (Electricau Lights)
36. Parking Area Lights
37. Potable Water Service (1 Connection)
38. Potable Water SYstem
39. Fire Service (1 Connection)
40. Recycled Water Service (1 Connection)
41. Telephone Service
2EA
2EA
2,625 LF
94,835 SF
15,288 SF
119,707 SF
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$20.00
$4.50
$400,000
$50,000
$52,500
$426,758
$99,372
$658,389
$21,740
$45,078
$50,000
$100,000
$59,625
$150,000
$200,000
4,831
$6.50
$5.50
$4.50
$6.50
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$75.00
$150,000.00
1 LS $200,000.00
SF
SF
LS
EA
SF
LS
6,935
1
2
795
1
3,200 sF
4EA
8EA
75 CY
50 EA
6EA
3EA
6EA
1EA
24 EA
1LS
1LS
1LS
1LS
1LS
1LS
1LS
1LS
1LS
1LS
1LS,I LS
1LS
$6.50
$300.00
$1,500.00
$1,000.00
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$4,000.00
$s,000.00
$10,000.00
$1,500.00
$300,000.00
$50,000.00
$67,500.00
$200,000.00
$65,000.00
$22,580.00
$6,000.00
$54,400.00
$20,000.00
$28,000.00
$15,000.00
$20,000.00
$10,000.00
$20,800
$1,200
$12,000
$75,000
$75,000
$9,000
$12,000
$30,000
$10,000
$36,000
$300,000
$50,000
$67,500
$200,000
$65,000
$22,580
$6,000
$54,400
$20,000
$28,000
$15,000
$20,000
$10,000
2
OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS - Fallon Sports Park PHASE 1
Item Unit
1LS
375,332 SF
1,049 EA
1LS
1LS
375,332 SF
Cost
1.00
$50,000.00
$1.00
$2s0.00
$10,000.00
$46,000.00
$0.15
Total
$375,332
$50,000
$37s,3s2
$262,250
$10,000
$46,000
$56,300
42. Lawn (Excludes Fields)
43. lrrigation Controllers
44. lrrigation
45. 24" Box tree
46. SWPPP/Erosion Control
47. Basketball Court Lights
48. Maintenance (90 days)
Subtotal
Bonding & lnsurance (2%)
Mobilization & General Conditions (5%)
Continqency (10%
$8,146,554
$162,931
$407,328
$814,6s5
Phase 1 Park Construction Cosfs TOTAL
Phase 1 Cost Per Acre
$9,531,468
$360,767
Phase 1 Optional ltems Not lncluded in Estimate
1. Soccer Field (Change to Synthetic Tufi (80,000 SF)
(Refer to enclosed Operating Cost Analysis)
2 EA $750,000.00
Subtotal
Bonding & lnsurance (2%o)
Mobilization & General Conditions (5%)
Contingency (10%)
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$30,000
$75,000
$150,000
Total Phase 1 Optional ltems Not lncluded in Estimate $1,755,000
Notes:
1) This Estimate excludes utility provider connection fees, Construction Contingency, changes due to unforeseen
conditions, work related to hazardous materials, Design Fees, Engineering, Inspection, Testing, and Etc.
2) Unit Costs for elements include a 17o/o mark up for general contractor overhead and profit.
3) All costs shown are 2004/05 costs,
4) Public Art to be determined per phase in conjunction with Council and Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission.
5) ln Providing the Estimate, the Client understands that the Landscape Architect has no control over costs or the price
of labor equipment or materials, or over the Contractor's method of prlcing, and that the budget analysis provided herein
are to be made on the basis of the Landscape Architect's qualifications and experience. The Landscape Architect
makes no warranty, expressed or implied as to the accuracy qualifications and experience. The Landscape Architect
makes no warranty, expressed or implied as to the accuracy of such opinions as compared to bid or actual costs.
3
Fallon Sports Park Future Phase - Upper Terrace
n Cost
$50,000.00
$1.00
$2.00
$2.00
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$3,000.00
$4,000.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$50,000.00
$1.00
$2.00
$2.00
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$3,000.00
$4,000.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$200,000.00
$100,000
$91,000
$52,000
$130,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$12,000
$16,000
$17,500
$52,000
$66,000
$100,000
$174,000
$92,000
$256,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$12,000
$16,000
$17,500
$80,000
$66,000
$200,000
$100,000
$100,000
$25,000
$38,000
$4,100
$106,990
$480,348
$121,950
$45,500
$127,500
$6,000
$1,500
$e00
$10,000
Upper Terrace Phase - Park Construction (14.41 acres)
1. Little League Field (2)
Backstop
Grading
lnfield Mix & Warning Track
Lawn & lrrigation
Score Keeper's Booth
Scoreboard
Dugouts
Bullpens
Foul poles
Bleachers
Trench Drain
Perimeter Fencing & Mowband
Subsurface Drainage
2. Softball (2)
Backstop
Grading
Infield Mix & Warning Track
Lawn & lrrigation
Score Keepe/s Booth
Scoreboard
Dugouts
Bullpens
Foul poles
Bleachers
Trench Drain
Perimeter Fencing & Mowband
Subsurface Drainage
3. BMX Course (62,858 SF)
Earthwork
Starting Pavilion
Bleachers
Conc Paving
Drainage
Fencing
Soil Amendments
4. Upper Adventure Playground (2,260 SF)
5. Restroom Structure (2 Fixtures) -Prefabricated
6. Shade Structure
7. Seatwalls
8. Conc Curb
9. Conc Paving (Special Paving Optional)
10. Conc Paving
11. Conc StePs & Handrails
12. Conc Paving for paths due to slopes
13. Trellis-Picnic PlaY Area
14. Tree Wells
15. BBQ Grills--Large
16. BBO Grills--Small
17. Picnic Table--Rectangular (Upper Terrace)
2EA
91,000 EA
26,000 EA
65,000 EA
2EA
2EA
4EA
4EA
4EA
4EA
350 LF
1,300 LF
2,200 LF
2EA
174,000 EA
46,000 EA
128,000 EA
2EA
2EA
4EA
4EA
4EA
4EA
350 LF
2,000 LF
2,200 LF
1LS
1LS
1EA
1EA
38 CY
205 LF
16,460 SF
87,336 SF
1,626 SF
7,000 sF
1,275 SF
30 EA
1EA
3EA
4EA
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
$25,000.00
$1,000.00
$20.00
$6.50
$5.50
$75.00
$6.50
$100.00
$200.00
$1,500.00
$300.00
$2,500.00
1
Fallon Sports Park Future Phase - Upper Terrace
Item
18. Picnic Ta
19. Bench
20. Bike Rack
21. Storage Container
22. Drinking Fountain
23. Drain lnlet
24. Storm Drainage
25. Sanitary Sewer
26. Underground Electrical Work
27. Pathway Lights
28. Potable Water System
29. Lawn (Excludes Sport Fields)
30. lrrigation Controllers
31. lrrigation
32. 24" Box tree
33. 15 Gallon tree (Slope Planting
34. SWPPP/Erosion Control
35. Maintenance (90 days)
Unit
00
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$4,000.00
$5,000.00
$1,500.00
$150,000.00
$25,000.00
$41,000.00
$35,500.00
$25,000.00
$1.00
$25,000.00
$1.00
$250.00
$100.00
$7,000.00
$0.15
Subtotal
Bonding & lnsurance (2%)
Mobilization & General Conditions (5%)
Contingency (10%)
Total
18,000
$19,500
$4,500
$8,000
$1s,000
$18,000
$150,000
$25,000
$41,000
$35,500
$2s,000
$275,039
$25,000
$275,039
$78,750
$30,000
$7,000
$41,256
r Terrace)12 EA
13 EA
3EA
2EA
3EA
12 EA
1LS
1LS
1LS
1LS
1LS
275,039 SF
1LS
275,039 SF
315 EA
3OO EA
1LS
275,039 SF
$4,129,372
$82,587
$206,469
$412,937
Upper Terrace Phase - Park Construction Costs
Upper Terrace Phase - Street lmprovements (0.68 Acres)
Construction
1. 24" Box tree
2. Concrete Paving
3. Lawn
4. lrrigation
5. [\tlaintenance (90 days)
Subtotal
Upper Terrace Phase Gost Per Acre
37 EA
11,736 SF
16,960 SF
16,960 SF
16,960 SF
Subtotal
Bonding & lnsurance (2%)
Mobilization & General Conditions (5%)
$4,831,36s
$335,279
$9,250
$64,548
$16,960
$25,44o
$2,544
$250.00
$5.50
$1.00
$1.50
$0.15
$118,742
$2,375
$5,e37
$11,8741
D. Upper Terrace Fallon Rd. Street lmprovement Construction Costs Subtotal
tJpper Terrace Phase Park & Sfreef lmprovements Construcfion Cosfs Total
Itpper Terrace Phase Park & Street lmprovements Cosfs Acre
38,928
$4,970,293
$329,377
2
Fallon Sports Park Future Phase - Upper Terrace
Item Qty Unit Cost r"E
Upper Terrace Optional ltems Not lncluded in Estimate
1. Par Course - UpperTerrace
2. Upper Water Feature
3. Add Special Conc Paving
4. Trellis--Picnic Play Area
5. BBQ Grills--Large
6. Concrete Fence along Fallon Road
7. Picnic Table--Square (Upper Terrace)
Total Terrace
Subtotal
Bonding & lnsurance (2%)
hrlobilization & General Conditions (5%)
Contingency (10%)
Items Not lncluded in Estimate
1EA
lLS
16,460 SF
3,825 SF
3EA
1,467 LF
12 EA
$30,000.00
$50,000.00
$3.50
$100.00
$1,500.00
$28.00
$1,500.00
$30,000
$50,000
$57,610
$382,500
$4,500
$41,076
$18,000
583,686
$11,674
$29,184
$5436e
$682,913
Notes:
1) This Estimate excludes utility provider connection fees, Construction Contingency, changes due to unforeseen
conditions, work related to hazardous materials, Design Fees, Engineering, lnspection, Testing, and Etc.
2) Unit Costs for elements include a 17oh mark up for general contractor overhead and profit.
3) All costs shown are 2004/05 costs.
4) Public Art to be determined per phase in conjunction with Council and Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission.
5) In Providing the Estimate, the Client understands that the Landscape Architect has no control over costs or the price
of labor equipment or materials, or over the Contractor's method of pricing, and that the budget analysis provided herein
are to be made on the basis of the Landscape Architect's qualifications and experience. The Landscape Architect
makes no warranty, expressed or implied as to the accuracy qualifications and experience. The Landscape Architect
makes no warranty, expressed or implied as to the accuracy of such opinions as compared to bid or actual costs.
J
Fallon Sports Park Future Phase - Lower Terrace
Item
94,082 EA
94,082 EA
1LS
2,200 LF
4EA
1LS
4EA
1EA
1LS
2EA
1EA
77 CY
3,423 LF
67,941 SF
24,690 SF
138,930 SF
510 SF
5,000 sF
Cost
$1.00
$2.00
$50,000.00
$30.00
$20,000.00
$28,000.00
$35,000.00
Total
$94,082
$188,164
$50,000
$66,000
$80,000
$28,000
$140,000
$700,000
$160,485
$764,1 15
$38,2s0
$32,500
Lower Terrace Phase - Park Construction Costs (-19.75 acres)
1. Future Study Area (1)
Grading
Lawn & lrrigation
Drainage
Subsurface Drainage
2. Bocce Court
Bocce Court Lights
3. Volleyball Court
Sand
Subdrainage
Fine Grading
Conc Border w/ Resilient Paving
Nets
4. Soccer Field (Natural Turf) (80,000 SF)
Lawn & lrrigation
Sand Drainage
Goals
6. Cricket Overlay
7. Lower Adventure Playground (1 1,175 SF)
8. Restroom Structure (2 Fixtures) -Prefabricated
9. Shade Structure
10. Seatwalls
11. Conc Curb at Parking Lot
12. Parking Lot (200 cars)
Striping & Signage
Wheel Stops
Accessible Parking
Grading
13. Conc Paving (Special Conc Paving Optional)
14. Conc Paving
15. Conc Steps & Handrails
16. Conc Paving for paths due to slopes
17. Lower Entry Drive
Asphalt Paving (Special Conc Paving Optional)
Concrete Paving
18. Lower Terrace Entry Feature
19. Signage / ldentity Feature
21. Trellis-Lower Entry Plaza
22. Tree Wells
23. BBQ Grills--Large
24. BBO Grills--Small
25. Picnic Table--Rectangular (Lower Terrace)
26. Picnic Table--Square (Lower Terrace)
27. Bench
28. Bike Rack
29. Drinking Fountain
30. Fire HYdrant
31. Drain lnlet
32. Storm Drainage
33. Sanitary Sewer
34. Storage Container
35. Bioswale
36. Underground Electrical Work
37. PathwaY Lights
38. Parking Area Lights
39. Potable Water Service (1 Connection)
40. Potable Water SYstem
$5,000.00
$150,000.00
$100,000.00
$25,000.00
$1,000.00
$20.00
$4.50
$5,000
$150,000
$200,000
$25,000
$77,000
$68,460
$305,73s
2 EA $350,000.00
6,808 SF
4,812 SF
1LS
2 EA.
1,275 SF
79 EA
1EA
3EA
4EA
20 EA
38 EA
3EA
3EA
1EA
12 EA
1LS
1LS
5EA
660 LF
1LS
1LS
1LS
1LS
1LS
$6.50
$5.50
$75.00
$6.50
$4.50
$6.50
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$100.00
$200.00
$1,500.00
$300.00
$2,500.00
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$5,000.00
$10,000.00
$1,500.00
$150,000.00
$25,000.00
$4,000.00
$40.00
$41,000.00
$35,500.00
$40,000.00
$20,000.00
$25,000.00
$30,636
$31,278
$50,000
$100,000
$127,500
$15,800
$1,500
$900
$10,000
$30,000
$57,000
$4,500
$15,000
$10,000
$18,000
$150,000
$25,000
$20,000
$26,400
$41,000
$35,500
$40,000
$20,000
$25,000
1
Fallon Sports Park Future Phase - Lower Terrace
1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000
42. Recycled Water Service (1 Connection) 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000
43. Lawn (Excludes Sport Fields) 220,229 SF $1.00 $220,229
44. lrrigation Controllers 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000
45. lrrigation 220,229 SF $1.00 $220,229
46. 24" Box tree 645 EA $250.00 $161,250
47. 15 Gallon tree (Slope Planting) 300 EA $100.00 $30,000
48. SWPPP/Erosion Control 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
49. Maintenance (90 days)220,229 SF $0.15 $33,034
Subtotal
Bonding & lnsurance (2%)
Mobilization & General Conditions (5%)
Contingency (10%)
$4,817,547
$96,351
$240,877
$481,755
Lower Terrace Phase - Park Construction Costs Subtotal
Lower Terrace Phase Cost Per Acre
Lower Terrace Phase - Street lmprovements Fatlon & Central (-.1 .18 Acres)
Construction
1. 24" Box tree 115 EA
2. Concrete Paving 17,152 SF
3. Lawn 33,160 SF
4. lrrigation 33,160 SF
5. SWPPP/Erosion Control 1 LS
6. Maintenance (90 days) 33,160 SF
$250.00
$5.50
$1.00
$1.50
$7,500.00
$0.15
Subtotal
Bonding & lnsurance (2%)
Mobilization & General Conditions (5%)
$5,636,530
$285,394
$28,7s0
$94,336
$33,160
$49,740
$7,500
$4.974
$218,460
$4,369
$10,923
0%
Lower Terrace Phase - Street lmprovements Fallon & Central Subtotal
Lower Terrace Phase - Park & Street lmprovements Construcfion Cosfs TOTAL
Lower Terrace Park & Street lmprovements Construction Gosts /Acre
$21
$5,892,128
281,516
,
Total
1. Add Bocce
2. Par Course - Lower Tenace
3. Add Special Conc Paving
4. Lower Water Feature
5. Lower Entry Drive
Special Conc Paving
6. Trellis-Lower Entry Plaza
7. Trellis-- Volleyball Area
8. Trellis--Natural Soccer Field Area
9. Trellis-Bocce Area
10. BBQ Grills--Large
1 1. Picnic Table--Rectangular (Lower Terrace)
12. Picnic Table--Square (Lower Terrace)
13. Concrete Fence at Fallon Road
14. Concrete Fence at Central Parkway
Total
$1 527
Terrace Items Not lncluded in Estimate
2EA
1EA
24,690 SF
,tS
$40,000
$30,000
$86,415
$100,000
$20,000.00
$30,000.00
$3.50
$100,000.00
$2s,828
$300,000
$s30,000
$520,000
$210,000
$4,500
$20,000
$48,000
$26,124
$36,400
$1,775,267
$35,505
$88,763
Subtotal
Bonding & lnsurance (2%)
Irlobilization & General Conditions (5%)
Contingency (10%d
Items Not lncluded in Estimate
6,808
3,000
3,304
5,200
2JA0
3
I
32
9s3
1,300
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
EA
EA
EA
LF
LF
$3.50
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$1,500.00
$2,500.00
$1,500.00
$28.00
$28.00
Fallon Sports Park
Item
Future Phase - Lower Terrace
Notes:
1) This Estimate excludes utility provider connection fees, Construction Contingency, changes due to unforeseen
conditions, work related to hazardous materials, Design Fees, Engineering, lnspection, Testing, and Etc.
2) Unit Costs for elements include a 17o/o mark up for general contractor overhead and profit.
3) All costs shown are 2004/05 costs.
4) Public Art to be determined per phase in conjunction with Council and Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission.
5) ln Providing the Estimate, the Client understands that the Landscape Architect has no control over costs or the price
of labor equipment or materials, or over the Contractor's method of pricing, and that the budget analysis provided herein
are to be made on the basis of the Landscape Architect's qualifications and experience. The Landscape Architect
makes no warranty, expressed or implied as to the accuracy qualifications and experience. The Landscape Architect
makes no warranty, expressed or implied as to the accuracy of such opinions as compared to bid or actual costs.
J
1o-Year Cost comparison between a NATURAL GRASS field and a SYNTHETIC TURF field.
Natural Grass (sand drainage)
lnitial Capital Cost
Excavate existing site, install drainage &
irrigation systems, install & grow grass
(seed/sod)
Provide equipment to maintain grass
Contractor to maintain field during growing
SUATOIAIS
Future Capital Costs
Field replacement of irrigation &
turf, etc. (1 0 years)
Periodic equipment replacement
SUBTOTALS
't0 yr. Annualized Operation Cost
Water and PG & E
(Approxiamtely $3,2001 acrelyearl
Labor to apply materials, mowing,
aerating, divot replacement, area sod
replacement (Approxiamtely $1 1,ooo/acre/year)
SUBTOTALS
TOTALS*
of costs for 1 0 with an
Local
Area
Cost
f- $rropoo'l
l----Tru,ooo1
foot field
Syntetic Turf
lnitial Capital Gost
Excavation, drainage, installation of
FieldIufi (2-112" Pro Series)
Operating equipment required-roller
brush, sweeper and cart
SUBTOTALS
Future Capital Costs
Field replacement is done determining
the useful seruice life interval (10 years)
Operating maintenance equipment
replacement
SUBTOIALS
10 yr Annualized Operation Cost
Water and PG & E
Labor to sweep fleld
(Approxiamtely $5,000/year or $100 per week)
suaroTALs
TOTALS'
Area
Cost
$10,000
s760.000
l--- $s-iool
f $4.oool
tThese totals do not reflect any income garnered from field rental fees, nor the income lost in rental fees when natural grass
fields are closed due to inclement weather, maintenance or time down for repairs; such revenue losses do not occur with a
FieldTurf field.
|--- $2o.oool
|-sr4opool
T-J- $ro,ooo'l
f-- $$r--ir6o,oool
l--- $?5o.oool
l---- $4osnool
l-- $s4,ood
fJ-r-r1r-oool
10-Year Cost comparison between a NATURAL GRASS field and a SYNTHETIC TURF field
Both Fields have sports lighting and are available till 10:00 pm each day
Natural grass fields are closed in the winter due to rain
EItrItrTE]EEre@
80 weekend days x 1 0 hours per day 800 1 00 weekend days x 'l 0 hours per day 1 000
120 Sorino & Fall weekdavs x 6 hours per dav 720 120 Sprinq & Fall weekdays x 6 hours per day 720
60 Summerweekdays x 10 hours perday 600 60 Summer weekdays x 10 hours per day 600
60 Winter weekdavs x 6 hours per dav 360
TOTALS 2120
Annually
2680
Annually
21200
Over't0 Years
26800
Over 10 Years
Athletic Surface Costs Over 10-Year Periot
Revenue Data:
City of Roseville
$135for1-112hours,$325for4hours,$750forfull day(uptol0hours). Useoflightsisanadditional chargeof$15perhour,min1-1/2hours'
City of Petaluma
The City of Petaluma has told us that their field is rented 360 out of 365
days per year. Their rental rate is $75lhour without lights and $95/hour
with lights for "out of towners," $4s/hour without lights and $65/hour with
lights to "in-towners" and the local Petaluma soccer club, which may be the
majority of their use.
City of Folsom
The City of Folsom rents their field as well, and it is constantly in use,
with rates of $60/hour without lights and $75lhour with lights for "out of
towners," $48/hour without lights and $60/hour with lights to "in-towners."
Marin Academy
The Marin Academy rents out their field to youth groups and the last rental
rate I heard was $1 0O/hour per third of the field, adding up to $300/per
hour. And I understand they have had waiting lists to rent field time in
the winter.
Expense Natural Grass Synthetic Turf
lnstallation Costs $370,000 $760,000
Replacement Cost $260,000 $405,000
IVaintenance $284,000 $54,000
Total Cost Over 10 Years $914,000 $1 ,219,000
Hours Supportec 21,204 26,800
Cost Per Hour $43 $4s
I
Fallon Sports Park Electrical Work
City of Dublin Est.
Description QnW Unit Unit Cost Total Cost
Electrica! Service and Equipment:
480 Volt Electrical Service Enclosure and Controls 1 ls 34000.00 34000.00
Transformer pad 1 ea 2000.00 2000.00
Switchboard pad 1 ea 2500.00 2500.00
Access control system and enclosure 1 ea 8000.00 8000.00
Site telephone service 1 IS 3000.00 3000.00
Scoreboard connections and grounding 1 ls 14000.00 14000.00
Scorekeepers booths - light, switch and receptacle 5 ea 800.00 4000.00
$67,500
Underground Electrical Work
Underground trenching, backfill and compaction 7500 tf 5.00 37500.00
Concrete sports field pull boxes and ground rods 42 ea 500.00 21000.00
Concrete pull boxes and ground rods 40 ea 300.00 12000.00
Waterproof receptacles outlets 16 ea 500.00 8000.00
I rrigation controller connections 1 ls 1000.00 1000.00
I rrigation booster pump connections 1 ls 9000.00 9000.00
Conduit:
2" PVC sch 40 14000 rf 3.00 42000.00
3" PVC schd 40 't600 tf 5.00 8000.00
4' PVC schd 40 2800 tf 6.00 16800.00
5' PVC schd 40 300 tf 15.00 4500.00
PVC elbows large radius 1 ls 1000.00 1000.00
Special conduit elbows at sports light poles 60 ea 400.00 24000.00
Conductors:
No.12 AWG CU THWN
No.8 AWG CU THWN
12 CLF 56.00 672.00
135 CLF 85.00 11475.00
No. 6 AWG CU THWN 300 CLF 103.00 30900.00
No.4 AWG CU THWN 300 CLF 112.OO 33600.00
No. 4/0 AWG CU THWN 50 CLF 150.00 7500.00
terminations and 1 ls 6000.00 6000.00
Grou cond and connections 1 ls 7000.00 7000.00
$281,947
Note: u ll boxes, and wi tol is covered round Electrical Worl
Little Softball ht Poles: 50/30 fc illumination
wheel dual use with I hts banked on both sides of to two fie
Pole fu 8 luminaires and bases/concrete 4 21000 84000.00
Pole B/ 16lum and bases/concrete 4 ea 28000.00 1 12000.00
on 8 ea 900.00 7200.00
N tests and of ballfield hts 1 ls 2000.00 2000.00
Softball Poles: 50/30 illumination
wheel des dual use with banked on both sides of to ht two acent fields
tu8 and bases/concrete 4 ea 2't000.00
B/ 16 luminai and bases/concrete 4 ea 28000.00 1 12000.00
Pole C/ l2luminaires,and bases/concrete I ea 24000.00 192000.00
on I ea 900.00 7200.00
tests and re-aimi of ballfield 1 ls 2000.00 2000.00
$397,200
Baseball Poles: 50/30 fc illumination
Pole fu 4 luminai and bases/concrete 2 ea 13000.00 26000.00
Pole B/ 8 luminai and bases/concrete 10 ea 19000.00 190000.00
Pole C/ 9 lumi and bases/concrete 2 ea 22000.00 44000.00
N httime tests and of ballfield 1 ls 2000.00 2000.00
$262,000
Field Poles: 30 fc illumination
s1/'t0 and bases/concrete 4 ea 23000.00 92000.00
Pole s2t 20 and bases/concrete 2 ea 31000.00 62000.00
Pole s3t 12 and 4 ea 24000.00
ea
ooles
84000.0(
9601
Pote Type 54/ 24 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 2 ea 36000.00 72000.00
Security lights on poles 12 ea 700.00 8400.00
Nighttime tests and re-aiming of ballfield lights 1 ls 2000.00 2000.00
$332,400
Pathway Lights
20' pole, luminaire and footing 34 ea 3000.00 102000.00
Parking Area Lights
25' pole, single luminaire and footing 14 ea 3400.00 47600.00
25'pole, twin luminaire and footing 12 ea 3900.00 46800.00
Tennis Court Light Poles: 50' pole heiqht - 50 fc illumination
Pole Type T1l 4 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 4 ea 1 3000.00 52000.00
Pole Type T2i 8 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 2 ea 17000.00 34000.00
$86,000
Basketball Court Light Poles: 30' pole height - 20 fc illumination
Pole Type B't/ 2 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 4 ea 7000.00 28000.00
Pole Tvpe B2l 4 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 2 ea 9000.00 18000.00
$46,000
Bocce Court Light Poles: 30' pole height - 20 fc illumination
Pole Type B 1/ 2 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete A ea 7000.00 28000.00
Vollevball Court Liqht Poles: 30' pole height - 20 fc illumination
Pole Tvpe V1/ 2 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 4 ea 7000.00 28000.00
Concession/Restroom Building
lnterior lights 16 ea 300.00 4800.00
Exterior lights 8 ea 400.00 3200.00
Receptacles 14 ea 150.00 2100.00
Switches 7 ea 140.00 980.00
25 kva transformer 480v-2401120v 1 ea 3000.00 3000.00
Telephone Service, conduit, box, terminal board & outlet 1 ea 3000.00 3000.00
Panelboard 1 ea 2000.00 2000.00
A/C unit connection 1 ea '1000.00 1000.00
Water heater, hand dryer connections 5 ea 500.00 2500.00
$22,580
Restroom Building - small, prefabricated
Panel feeders, connections and grounding 4 ea 1500.00 6000.00
Total subcontractor cost 1953227.00
� I
I IL w
FALLON SPORTS PARK , ,AS19 TER P_4Aly
rA.�7F'•�RNS'
FEATURE &
�+ P
NEIGH OR O II
T-
EEY .. �` `'�`'� � ,�, f a'�1' \ ��.° 'Y ��`��g[q}B •�R--�jllk
// T7
t S
o
D`_c
s
f 1
1 a I R
Q
r �
4CONNECTION D.
Y
LITTLE
LEAGUE „r. .,VERLO.OIt.
A 10 /J [ J IAK
R
O
nE
C� PTO
Pri
D S ° LEAGUE / ADv N RE, y, s +I �
R
kCR
yF l LE E O E)
1. ER cN
PLAZA c
1 �
'1; '9.MX@E -
_ IEE"
LEAGUELITTLE
I E
A�h o R7 ESTROOM'/ V K
Fo ,,
FUTURE fDNCEs ION
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL �'+ �.LITTLE
LE
TG
i t
EVERGREEN
1 SOFTBALL M UTAREA T
7'
A
BASKETBALLIE CE 1t
¢IGe D) i
ALLEN T } - _ �7
VEHICULAR G T EES -
So
S�H:�LL
(HIGH
UPPER TERRACE ENTRY
bG RRHO'O-D �NNECTHQN
EIGND ART OPQ NAZANIcPLTE
CON ECH
O
,I{
a 4-
5
r y _lk
�
r.
r ti
4 r
LLB
�rREEIl
f EEs,:
' y ✓.a �pT4. SOFTBALL
SCHOOL R + $
is ♦yr�, e
d as x D raaos as x EVERGRESCREEEN
D raaos `
HGHTED SOCCER LIGHTED SOCCER `
1
1. THL
STREETs, THL B*#T)B.NOPETONuYNET
SLOE TI-
NG)6Z)! I ,
�� x AL
TERR
NEIGN
O HOOD
♦I �bT ',� GR fir. „ 5 Do N _ PLAz CONNECTION
� `, r LIIPD+YE ti :WAHPI TER. [ESSION .T ., B
LOWERf' y]�'� f TDRE 1.
PEDESTRIAN'
j�F' • IPljl' + ARi� '
ENTRY
WGEs.. _PR. ' REEST +
H HY D ' ''
.CON ON '+ . J 'tY--.. ;+ 4- a� }-- RE
`m tl
�' FUTURE STUDY AREA 6ZA s 6 s _-�REEs Z.
iI Y. E 1
:RY Ti SOCCER SOCCER R _
PP jIC
�1y4J Y A �TRF -
KR: E'*w .ew STREET f� —
i 1 j c.R cKETPARK IDENTITY
� .
oV ERLAY
lll��4gC
; P =a ii aWORM
1r -
DENSITY BCONNE TON
TAELSLI�
Ap �1 NNECTI
VO LL BY BA LL ,.s� 1`S-
FUTUR
MULTI
`yy+FAMILY HOMES
9� 'PLANT
ENTR
T BEE 3 REET
TREESIL
R v
OPEN SPACE AREA �.
PARK IDENTITY
FEATURE 3
NEIGHBORHOOD
C.NNE
A
FUTURE MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
CONNECTION
iOFUTURE
HEIGHBCRHOO.D ,
SQUARE
CON N —1 ONPft
xaoxi 000 ^.;r T�,b'ninex
.. - svz sorTea��c�exreoi %+ " sorTea�� .a 1
F A L L 0 N S P O R T S P A R K R E V I S E D M A S T E R P L A N/ L O W E R T E R R A C E
IC I
DUBLIN I.1 0Eacx Ix I I T .T I I a.91n'JIM
>':>>�
j1 1'TINNO��xTroi .. r�',€w,aESTwonM � ,, � •,. o ,
- r SETT Eg
4 6 . �sTw
E.
Y�
Txoo,
M
a�u.,o.awo„�xTEn,ocIEw a�x„o.awo„�xTEo,oaEw
r,
uT,eTCToxn � uruTxeTCToxn -I -
t
As
4 Icy[
LOWER TERRACE
• ENTRY ROAD AND PARKING (145 CARS)
• PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
• UTILITIES
• LANDSCAPING (EROSION CONTROL)
• 2 NATURAL TURF SOCCER FIELDS (80X120AND 65X110)
LIGHTED 90' BASEBALL DIAMOND (NATURAL GRASS ONLYI
• RESTROOMICONCESS I ON BUILDING
• ADVENTURE PLAYGROUND
• BASEBALL FIELD TERRACED SEATING
SCORE KEEPER'S BOOTH
• B ASE B AL L .SCOREBOARD
• BOCCE COURT
• BOCCE COURT LIGHTS
• GROUP PICNIC (100 PEOPLEI
• PARK IDENTITY AND DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
• SITE FURNISHINGS
OPTIONAL PARK AMENITIES
• 2 SYNTHETIC TURF SOCCER FIELDS (2-65X110) OR 2
SYNTHETIC TURF SOCCER FIELDS (80X120 AND 65X110)
• BASEBALL FIELD RESTROOM
• BASE B ALL Sy
NTHETIC TURF INFIELD
•. RECREATION BUILDING
• SOCCER FIELD LIGHTING
• SOCCER FIELD SHADE STRUCTURES
• SOCCER FIELD WIND BREAKS
• SOCCER PRACTICE WALLS
- E k t Nf ,xaox, 000 ` i`` sorraa��(�sxreol N�AsoFrea�� R �l'^. '
Tl
� Y1
eP F A L L 0 N S P O R T S P A R K 1 S T P H A S E 0 P T 1 0 N S L 0 W E R T E R R A C E
DUBLIN "I —1H ITREE. ITH F 99
' T 211,1 wsxTeoi 4 xnr y -tl r
I
of
—Taa
<<n sx Teo, a w
i Y
I— 1ILIMI-11
NTxETIIx„T "x. soTTt�
� ,,.T—, 1111THIT11 TlwT,
HI L
u`
i
w � a 414
411
�o aE
n—.:: 11
Yl
TUTae,o. "ee,o
41—
\ �t
I � I
I
r
T Es
I.
s,oTTEw
� ,�wF
�T
I a
1E Gxso
w o00
V II 0. WARa�o11 A Ea
.I411
�'�� 1ST PHASE LOWER TERRACE
y e
�pa 1i[5'k j+„_F �, ENTRY ROAD AND PARKING (145 CARS)
I 4 — '^�— jj • PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
1 U1ILITIES
LANDSCAPING (EROSION CONTROL)
2 NATURAL TURF SOCCER FIELDS (BOX120 AND 65X110)
90' BASEBALL DIAMOND (NATURAL GRASS ONLY)
qppq�� • RE STROOM/CONCESSION BUILDING
4 6 ru.uae o>ex s>ace , p MINIMAL SITE FURNISHINGS
ii
+ _
,
. -ETTwF
qq ryy I 90 t9N i o e MlbIUl x Gx iv k-l—IAL
� N �
N O O
O — N
� N •
O co
� W
d d' N
bW
UJ
� z o
o o a W
W
-
__
o J
Wes' CW
a
U
. +I�HauJtn U lklll►� -
e
11 -4�-- 1b llq�
Fallon Sports Park
Mitigated Negative Declaration /
Initial ;Study
File No.:
PA 05-0 1
Lead Agency;
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
April 26, 2005
ATTACHMENT 3
CITY OF DUBLIN
100 Civic Pizza, Dublin, C:alifcrriia 94568 Website: http://vvww,ci,dubliri.c`,a.us
(Prepared pursuant to City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines)
Mitigated Negative Declaration For: PA 05-021 Fallon Sports Park Master Plan — Park Development flan
Description of Project: The project consists of the construction of recreational features and facilities on
the Fallon Sports Park property located In the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area.
The park development encompasses approximately 60 acres of property, and
improvements to the land consist of baseball, softball and soccer fields; tennis and
bocce courts; group picnic areas and play areas, pathways, and associated
parking lots to serve the park. The park development will serve as a major sports
field recreational facility for the City and is consistent with the parks and
Recreation Master Plan adopted by the City in 2004, the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan/General Plan EIR, and the City of Dublin General Plan.
Project Location: Generally located southwest of the Intersection of Fallon Road and Gleason Drive
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area
Name of Proponents: City of Dublin
Parks & Community Services
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94556
Public Hearings: A public hearing will be held before the City Council on the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Project
on Tuesday, May 17, 2005, at 7:00 P.M. in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin.
I hereby find that the above project will not have a significant effect on the environment with the mitigation measures
incorporated in the project. A copy of the Initial Study ("Environmental Information ForMn and "Environmental Checklist Form")
documenting the reasons to support the above finding is available for review at the City of Dublin Community Development
Department, Planning Division, at 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin. lI
Dated: April 26, 2005
Date Published: April 27, 2005
Date Posted; April 27, 2005
Date Notice Mailed: April 26, 2005
Considered by: City Council
on:
Action on Mitigated Negative Declaration:
Approved __ __ Disapproved
Notice of Determination filed:
Resolution No.
Harbin, Senior Planner
Council 833-6659 RVRWMAW!WgIRP6omic Development 833.6650
Finance 833.Ge;40 • Public Works/Fnginearing 833.6630 . Parks & Community Services 833-6645 • police 833-6670
Planninq/Code Enforcement 833.6610 • Building Inspection 833-6620 • Fire prevention Bureau 833-6606
Printed on Recycled Paver
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction.. ............................................ ....................................... 3
Project Description and Context.............................................................. .. 4
Exhibits......................... . ................... , , ,........................................... 8
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ..... ..................................... • . • .....14
Determination................. ........................................... . ......................14
Evaluation of Environmental impacts ........ . .................... . .................. . ...15
Attachment to Initial Study ............... . ..................... . ................... . .......... 26
Discussion of Checklist .............. . . . ........................................................ 2
I. Aesthetics.......................................................... ..............26
H. Agricultural Resources ................... , , .................... , ............... 27
III. Air Quality ... . . .......................................... . . . ................ . . 28
IV. Biological Resources ...........................................................33
V. Cultural. Resources................................................................34
VI. Geology and Soils.. ............................................................... 34
VIL Hazards and Hazardous Materials .............. . .............................. 36
VIII. Hydrology and Water ........... ................................................. 37
IX. Land Use Planning ................................ . . . ................. . ....... 38
X. Mineral Resources .................................................... .......... 39
XI. Noise ......................................... . ................... . .............. 39
XII. Population and Housing .................... . ................... , .............. 40
)III. Public Services.................................................................41
XIV. Recreation..........................................................................41
XV. Transportation/Traffic................................................. . ..... 41
XVI. Utilities and Service Systems ........................................ • ....... 43
XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance.... ...... . ..................... . ........ 44
Background Information ..... . ............................................. . . . .................. 45
References................. . ........................ . .. . .................. . ................. . ... 45
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Page 2
April 26, 2005
114
INTRODUCTION
This Initial Study and associated Mitigated Negative Declaration have been prepared in accordance with
the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the 2005 CEQA Guidelines
adopted by the City of Dublin. The Initial Study assesses the potential environmental impacts of
implementing the proposed project described below. The Initial Study consists of a completed
environmental checklist, and a brief explanation of the environmental topics addressed in the checklist,
1. Project Title:
2. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Dublin
Fallon Sports Park, PA 05-021
City of Dublin
Community Development
101 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Janet Harbin, Senior Planner
Community Development Department
(925) 833-6610
4. Project Location: Southwest of the intersection of Gleason Drive/Fallon Road
APN: 985-0027-008
5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Dublin
Parks & Community Services Dept.
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Contact Person: Herma Lichtenstein, Parks and Facilities
Development Manager
6. General/Specific Plan Designation: Parks/Public Recreation, Open Space (Stream Corridor) &
City Park
7. Zoning: PD -- Community Park
9. Public agency required approvals: Building and Grading Permits (City of Dublin)
Utility, Sewer and Water Service Permits (DSRSD)
Encroachment Permits (City of Dublin)
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Page 3
April 26, 2005
Nip
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND CONTEXT
The development of Fallon Sports Park and conceptual plan for the Park was approved by the Dublin
City Council, with funding provided through the Capital Improvement Program CIP Budget for fiscal
year 2001 to 2002. The basis for creation of the Park was the City's Parks and Recreation Master Plan
updated in 2004, which also outlined the specific program elements to be included in Fallon. Sports
Park. As there was a need for a large competition ball field park to serve the growing community in the
eastern portion of Dublin, and also the rest of the Dublin community, the Master Plan directed such
facilities to be located on the subject 60-acre parcel (see Exhibit A). The City Council appointed a 22-
member task force to study these program elements and design options beginning in March 2004.
Working with City staff, a design consultant, Carducci & Associates, and other members of the
community, various design options and associated park elements and features were refined for the
inclusion in the final Fallon Sports Park Master Plan, presented to the City Council in December 2004.
The Master Plan for the Park includes such recreational facilities to serve the community as sports
fields, play areas, plazas, restrooms and concession buildings, trails and associated parking areas, with
linkages to large open space areas. It is anticipated that the Park will be built in three phases as shown
in the diagram in Exhibit E.
Location, Fallon Sports Park is located near major transportation corridors such as Fallon Road,
Gleason Drive, Central Parkway and Lockhart Street within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and
General Plan Amendment planning area of the City, ensuring convenient access for all members of the
Dublin community (see Exhibit B). Its location in east Dublin is in an area experiencing a great deal of
growth at this time based on the implementation of the Specific Plan adopted in 1994. The existing
land use development pattern and projected land uses in the east will likely double the size and
population of the City within the next 20 years.
.Recreational Features and Facilities: The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan directs the growth of
infrastructure, community centers and parks such as the Fallon Sports Park and other park sites to meet
the future demands of the Dublin community under the projected land uses in Specific Plan. The
Specific Plan provided the necessary land use framework for development of the 60-acre parr site by
establishing the goals and priorities for development of parklands and recreational spaces in the eastern
portion of the City, in a portion of an area known as Dublin Ranch, Area F. With consideration to the
land use established by the Specific Plan for the property, and based on the various elements and
features identified in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan with input from the Task Force and Parks
and Community Services Commission meetings, the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan has been designed
to include the following recreational features and facilities as shown in Exhibit C:
S qrt Facilities:
a. 4-60' Little League Fields;
City of Dublin Page 4
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
III
b. 4 Softball Fields (2 lighted);
c. 4 Soccer Fields (2 lighted),
2 natural turf fields with cricket field overlay
2 natural turf fields with synthetic turf option;
d. 1-90' Baseball Field (lighted);
e. 4 Bocce Courts (Iighted),
2 additional courts optional (lighted);
f. 4 Basketball Courts (lighted);
g. 4 Sand Volleyball Courts; and.,
h. BMX Course.
Other Park Facilities:
i. Activity Hubs
j. Picnic Plazas and Family Picnic Areas (with barbeques);
k. Play Areas;
1. Orr -Site Parking and street frontage improvements;
m. Loop Jogging Trail;
n. Connecting Trails to adjacent open space;
o. Art and Water Features (optional);
p. Lockable Bicycle Parking throughout Park;
q. Restrooms & Concessions; and,
r. Shade Structures.
OTHER RELATED ACTIONS
The Fallon Sports Park is the eastern portion of Area F, in the original 186-acre Jordon property
presently being developed for residential use. Grading activities have commenced on the future park
site in conjunction with the development of Area F in Dublin Ranch in the Eastern Dublin Specific Man
area, along with preliminary infrastructure improvements. These activities were analyzed and
evaluated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (March 2000) adopted by the Dublin City Council for
Area F (PA 98-068, Reso. No. 34-00), and also in the Addendum (PA 01-037) adopted by the City
Council (Reso. No. 43-04) in March 2004 for the Area F North Project. Subsequently, a preliminary
grading plan (see Exhibit D) for the park land area was prepared as part of the Area F overall grading
plans.
On the western edge of the park property, running parallel to Lockhart Street and its intersection with
Gleason Drive, is a continuous 70-foot wide open channel stream corridor being enhanced for
environmental mitigation purposes related to development of Area F. The park site topography consists
of rolling hills and two small valleys, with an overall 4 to slope over the entire property. Construction
of site improvements requires grading with related cut and fill to balance the soil on the property,
thereby facilitating the improvements and recreational uses planned. Stormwater drainage on the site
City of Dublin Fags 5
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA O5-021 April 26, 2005
h
will be provided through a series of swales and filtration methods, to eventually channel stormwater to
connections with the existing on -site facilities.
Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD), in accordance with DSRSD's Eastern Dublin Facilities
Master Plan, will provide water, sewer and recycled water services. Sewer service for the project will
be accommodated through a connection to the existing sewer system owned and maintained by the
Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD). Recycled water from DSRSD will be used for irrigation
purposes, reducing the need for potable water. Additionally, irrigation and drainage requirements are
provided and planned for all on -site improvements.
PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS
Approval of the General Plan / Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments, Planned Development
Rezoning / Development Plans, future Tentative Map and amendment to the Development Agreement
for Area F of Dublin Ranch are within the Dublin General Plan's Eastern Extended Planning Area and
the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area, which was the subject of an Environmental Impact Report,
certified by the City of Dublin in 1993 (Addenda to the EIR were also approved, elated May 4, 1993
and August 22, 1994). The General Plan/Specific Play EIR is a program EIR, which anticipated
several subsequent actions related to Future development in Eastern Dublin. The EIR did identify some
impacts from implementation of the General Plan/Specific Plan that were not able to be mitigated.
Upon certification of the EIR, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for several
impacts, some of which relate to this project. The City also adopted a mitigation -monitoring program,
which included measures intended to reduce impacts from the development of Eastern Dublin area.
These mitigation measures apply to project approvals and actions at various stages in the development
process, and will be applied to this project as applicable. The timing of the mitigation measures was
indicated in the City's EIR mitigation monitoring matrix (City Council Resolution No.53-93) and was
to be incorporated into the timing of the development of Area F.
Through the Initial Study process discussed above, several issues presented themselves requiring
additional analysis, and, ultimately, mitigation measures which resulted in an additional Mitigated
Negative Declaration to be prepared for Area F. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was published
for review on November 9, 1999, for the mandatory 30-day review period. Based on discussions with
the project applicants, measures to mitigate loss of on -site breeding and movement (estivation) habitat
for both species within Planning Area F, including the portion of the corridor on the Fallon Sport Park
site, were refined and included in the original Initial Study/Mitigated. Negative Declaration. Mitigation
for the impacts consists of permanently creating suitable red -legged frog and California tiger
salamander habitat and preserving a minimum 63-acre site in the northern drainage area of the Dublin
Rauch property. Other mitigations have also been included. The amended mitigation measures reduced
impacts to biological resources to a less -than -significant level (document is incorporated by reference).
City of Dublin Page 6
initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
The park site has been the subject of subsequent environmental reviews as applications for various
phases of the Dublin Ranch development were submitted to and approved by the City. The park site
was once included within Areas B and E of Dublin Ranch (known as the "Area F/B/E Project"), and
the City approved a Negative Declaration for that project on November 18, 1997 through Resolution
140-97. The Negative Declaration evaluated an area of approximately 453 acres, consisting of Dublin
Ranch Areas B through E, and proposed for a variety of residential and non-residential uses, as well as
a community park site of approximately 42 acres, The portions of Areas B and E analyzed at that time
included residential uses and the conununity park site configured to be approximately 65 acres. For the
portions of the project within Area F, the City approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration on February
15, 2000 through Resolution 34-00.
Following the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration in 2000, the City prepared an Initial
Study dated February 9, 2004, for the Area F area to determine whether supplemental environmental
impacts would occur as a result of this project beyond or different from those already addressed in the
Program EIR and the previous Negative Declaration and Mitigated Negative Declaration, incorporated
by refernnce. The Initial Study reviewed the proposed reconfiguration of uses, including the use of 60
acres for a community park, and recent environmental studies prepared for the Area F project. These
studies included a TJKM traffic report containing projected traffic volumes based on the various land
uses proposed with the project. Since the prior reviews, the applicant also has obtained permits from
state and federal agencies for alteration of wetlands and has implemented related offsite mitigation, as
anticipated in the prior reviews and further described in the Initial Study for the project, and
incorporated here by reference.
The Initial Study determined that the Area F project would cause no environmental impacts beyond
those previously identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR, the subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration,
and Negative Declaration based on the project description and the minor nature of the changes
proposed by the project, evaluation of the prior reviews, and evaluation of recent reports. Linder these
circumstances, a CEQA Addendum was prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164, and
adopted by the City Council on March 16, 2004.
Additionally, the proposed Fallon Sports Park was included in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan
2004 Update (PA 04-035) and the acreage used in determining City community park acreage along with
the type of facilities to be included in the park, for which the City Council adopted a Negative
Declaration on March 16, 2004 (Reno. No. 48-04). An Initial Study was prepared for the Master Plan
2004 Update in accordance with City environmental guidelines and CEQA Guidelines. The Initial
Study concluded that implementation of the specific changes to park lands and open space in the Parks
and Recreation Master Plan 2004 Update would not pose any significant environmental impacts and a
Negative Declaration was prepared. A copy of City Council Resolution No. 48-04 and associated
information is included as incorporated in this document by reference.
As the various sports fields, courts and other facilities pertinent to the development and successful
future of the Master Plan for Fallon Sports Park were not analyzed in depth in previous environmental
documents noted here, but only as a general land use category of community parr, this Mitigated
City of Dublin Page 7
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
i ID
documents noted here, but ❑nly as a general land use category of cormnunity park, this Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Initial Study analyzes the development and design of the specific types of
activity and passive areas to be developed within the boundaries of Fallon Sports Park.
City of Dublin Page S
Initial Study & Mitigated Ncgative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
ASSESSOR'S MAP 98
27
30
II
Rp 4 31 i
t f
r � i
AmF t
i DES IMAM)
RFWAI VQ GR
AREA roe • 4
y ((NOT A PARTI
F1a0,14 AG•e
.g (Id4.4C A0•aI
- errs
4� I
�b
c�wAk
—75
Code Area Nos, z6-024 26-025 64-005 64-004
29 RANCHO SANTA RITA (John Younix) PAT.8K.•A-fra.le1. t
i
2E (ow TR. 59�5 a41/aG
28
S2 32 'l,a' r I III I + IV
0
I75,37 AC.*
f
� 0 IlS.14 AC•t
133.0. AC.A _
b119L ltJ '�
ly
l
xrarN/I��,O�
an �M�+��M4.WfMWIMIINmrrvr A
INTERSTATE
941
I I Y6
N++
946
+Ixa
248
II$¢
946 y
112$ 904
tlja .ey DETAIL 'Sr
¢CALEi 1"-240' 1
- 1 946
446/ 112a
446
� ( 1 1 � Q
qp N
G �
IY 1•is Aii-t
94a
4a I
EXHIBIT A — Assessor Parcel Map
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
9d5�
2
SEE
.II
904/1
{i
DETAP- -A-
SCALb I'•RD6'
Aly
�
1
r
SIC ••
■ ORpAK
�I8
.............
«w
NTErRSTATE
-------
-
5B6
Page 9
April 26, 2005
`l-Lr
EXHMIT B - Vicinity Map
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negativc Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
1:17V k2LABLIN
MI I. I',.III
II", 1 1!.41
jj
. ALK,
V.
a."WS—
%
T�n .. d
MIT I.
ZIA Q
fL AI L." 1116.,'r
j
I
4V
Ak
x�,
IT,
J.
:J:
4.
4's
J
ON
WW11
A Me T A W .74
- i
Y4
77,M)7W
4:1
1 ps
L.1
15
HIS
!114=1
T .0. ..'PT
1, IT,
lowy. a Ono
o M! j In III SIL
M-
1 . .... .. j
W
X, ji 4 �VO
r' 3 �,, FALLON SPORTS PARK GRADING PLAN
! ✓ � ' �ji ,�' {*�r � J` J +.f �J {�',, / I` / ��" V��' � k .•Y'J I ��'�•' y 1���J --1 i�/
IN
♦. .. I i Y {� -`1 iyl
-
y
� rf.F' .g� r '' _ Y`t M!t �rro•„ ' ,w' �1r'� r /� �� / �`Jj/ / i
^.a' �; ,4 pl I} `� y,r�., � r �,�.rC `�•✓_ R+�, lr 1 fir. r
f A
/u
on
w�
_.ti,, k4 � • r ,pn�«
i' 4 1��11, 1','l4yL,,� ICI"rill 1 , / / `IS 'r➢, A L 'I ramrt
•
LI
Lq
� ;f�� ar' I� I 65Xtto � 651¢�10 I /- _ ��•��
I ! L.1..I
I
T' r
1r
i
i I I
►rl in � i`1;1k � �,��4 y ' # i f�' 4yr„ =r',' � w 1 � �
r y
It / ! I i ^\� ;<•,-F' i 4'r%F' �'F•I rr /ii' let 61;;ltXwef t•� \ �* PUSH [CHTOUR Ill rrrftvn l w
�l1 +d11111 Raysem-,MAI-,.Y,-k',M 6 M9 Is4 } 1
I ; i'i 1� C,uAi?I' lEO�9r /RCA LOCAfbN l�t
EXHIBIT D - Preliminary Grading Puri
City of Dublin Page 12
Initial Study & Mitigated N'89ative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
A, Pt4lASING DIAGRAM
44
Pq Lq f!*.
PROVIDIPAI, .ARI .
lmO,Y.P F!I�F.
N Aqr, 33 OFf
PFIABE DEYEIApmE
eR A'D AND 5 T !" RE K .'' .0 RIVO I Am C
0P-IFISCALMEA . ',WLEN T
Ek
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors cllecked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "potentially significant impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
-
Aesthetics
-
Agricultural Resources
-
Air Quality
Biological Resources
-
Cultural Resources
-
Geology/Soils
-
Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
-
HydrologylWater Quality
-
Land Use/ Planning
Mineral Resources
-
Noise
-
Population/Housing
-
Public Services
-
Recreation
-
Transportation/
Circulation
-
Utilities/Service Systems
-
Mandatory Findings of
S ia ificance
D>TERMINATION (TO RE COMPLETED SY LEAD AGENCY):
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE, DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find thatthaugh theraposeclro ec# caul. have'a sgtu idant effect on the environmetxt;'tlleret11 `
riot tie a significant efie�ct tia'tfits. ease because revisions in thervject k�aye been made;by or agreed taiby
t'beioect propont IT ATE A AZID hIRGA'NE I LAk e prep
EC UN will; b ared
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in
an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed,
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the 2roposed project, nothing further is required.
Date: Ayril 26, 2005
: Janet Harbin, Senior Planner For: City of Dublin
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Page 14
April 26, 2005
o'j
Environmental Impacts (Note. Source of determination listed in parenthesis. See listing of sources used to
determine each potential impact at the end of the checklist.)
Now,, A full discussion of each item is found following the
checklist.
I, Aesthetics. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse impact on a scenic vista?
(Source. 1-8)
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but
not limited to trees, rock outcroppin gs, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway? (Source: I -
7)
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings? (Source: 1 -
7)
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area? (Source: 1-5,7)
II. Agricultural Resources. Would the project:
a) Overt Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or
Farmland of Statewide Importance, as showing on
the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, ton non-agricultural use?
(Source: 2-5,7,S)
b) Conflict with existing toning for agriculture use, or a
Williamson Act contract? (Source: 6,7,8)
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result
in conversion of famlar d to a non -agricultural use?
(Source: 2-5,7,8,11,12)
111. Air Quality (Where available, the significance criteria
established by the applicable air quality management
district may be relied on to make the following
determinations). Would the project;
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan? (Source: 4,5,7,11,12)
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation? (Source: 5.7,11-13)
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigatcd Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
PotentidI6
.'Less thttre:-
1, ss tha►i�
N 1 ct t"
Stgrijicmir
sigrufacrtrit
slgnZcunt
Impost
Wthrpact
..
lkrrti sari
X
X
X
X
X
X
aY
�
X
X
Page 15
April 26, 2005
Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the
checklist.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non -attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors? (Source: 5,7,11-13)
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? (Source: 5,7,11-13)
c) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people? (Source: 0,54,11-13)
W. Biological Resources. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly
through habitat modif ications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
(Source: 1-3,5,7,9,11-13,15-20)
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies or
regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and Came or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
(Source: 1-3,5,7,9,11-13,15-20)
c) Have a substantial adverse impact on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including but not limited to
marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption or other
means? (Source: 1-3,5,7,9,11-13,15-20)
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species
or with established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites? (Source: 3,5,7,9,11-13,15-
20)
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as tree
protection ordinances? (Source, 3,5,7,9,11-13,15-
20 )
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
l� � Leis t ... Less thari� No ampaCt
si rat cruet s
S.lf ..., g,� g.f .
{ nr ��ret se ni cunt
�Xrri�act ; � With � �, Impact;
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 16
April 26, 2005
Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the
checklist.
f) Conflict with the provision of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan or other approved local, regional
or state habitat conservation plan? (Source* 3-5,
7,9,11-13)
V. Cultural Resources. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse impact in the
significance of a historical resource as defined in
Sec. 15064.57 (Source: 1,2,4,5,9,11-14)
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archeological resource pursuant to
Sec. 15064.5 (Source: 1,2,4,5,9,11-14)
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or unique geologic feature?
(Source: 1,2,4,5,9,11-14)
d) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of a formal cemetery? (Source: 1,2,
4,5,9,11-14)
VI. Geology and Soils. Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury,
or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist or based on other
known evidence of a known fault (Source: 1-9,11-
13)
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking (Source: 1-9,11-13)
iii,) Seismic -related ground failure, including
liquefaction? (Source: 1-9,11-13)
iv) Landslides? (Source: 1-9,11-13)
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil? (Source: 1-9,11-13)
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a result
of the project and potentially result in on - and off -
site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or similar hazards (Source: 1-9,11-13)
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Potertd4oy
.Less than
,Less -that
Igo a ol,.:
ttt cantst
Sig f
t cant
st ni c
...,.
Intpaei'`:
Iyttla !
..,Imp�ct;fl
X
X
X
X
X
rN
X
X
X
X
X
Page 17
April 26, 2005
Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the
checklist.
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
13-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1.994),
creating substantial risks to life or property?
(Source. 1-9,11-13)
e) Have soils capable of adequately supporting the use
of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste? (Source: 1-3,6-9,11,12,13 )
V11. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Would the
project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use or
disposal of hazardous materials? (Source.1-3,6,
7,10)
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous into the environment? (Source: 1-3,6,7,
10-13)
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school? (Sourc e: 1-
3,6,7,1043)
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to
Government Code Sec. 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment? (Source: 1-7,10-13)
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such plan has not been adopted., would
the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area? (Source: 1-
7,10-13)
f) For a project within the vicinity of private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project area.?
(Source: 1,2,4,6,7,11-13)
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with the adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan? (Source: 1,2,6,7,10-13)
City of Dublin
initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Potenti�llx cut- ess than- No ampact
5! txt ccrr sa
'gna,�aciuit `sl�7tajieatat
Im�'1 � Wz#h I �Pnpaet :.
.. �att,�aaYon
►.i
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 18
April 26, 2005
Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the
checklist.
b) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlarids are adjacent to urbanized
areas or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands? (Source: 1-7,11-13)
VIQ. Hydrology and Water Quality. Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements? (Source: 1 -7,11-13,18,19)
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table
level (e.g. the production rate of existing nearby
wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted? (Source; 1.-7,11-13, 18)
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including through the aeration of
the course of a stream or river, in a manner which
would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or
off -site? (Source: 1-7,11-13, 18)
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or areas, including through the alteration of
a nurse or stream or river, or substantially increase
the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or off -site?
(Source: 1-7,11-13, 18,20)
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff? (Source: 1-
7,11-13, 18)
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
(Source: 1-7,11-13,18,19)
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map?
(Source: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,11-13)
h) Dace within a 100-year flood hazard area structures
which impede or redirect flood flows? (Soutce:l-
7,11-13, 18)
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
1N
Pvtentidldy tta►i- mess than- Naito
.S .1� lgnajicciiat s„ ni c
. , 7tttpact' With ;7rrapiict: , .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 19
April 26, 2005
X
Note: A jiall discussion of each item is found following the
checklist.
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury, and death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
(Source: 1-7,11-13,18)
J) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow? (Source:
14,9,11-13,18)
IX. Land Use and planning. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
(Source: 1-7,11-13)
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including but not limitedto the general
plan, specific plan, or zoning ordinance) adopted for
the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect? (Source: 1-8,11-13,16-20)
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan
or natural community conservation plan? (Source:
1-8,11-13)
X. htineral Resources. Would the projecl:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that 'would be of value to the region and
the residents of the state? (Source: 1,2,6,7,11-13)
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general Plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
(Source: 1,2,6,7,11-13)
XL Noise. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels
in excess of standards established in the general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of otber
agencies? (Source: 1-8,11-13)
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundbornea noise levels?
(Source: 1-8,11-13)
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above existing levels
without the project? (Source: 1-8,11-13)
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise: levels in the project vicinity above
levels without the project? (Source: 1-8, 11-13)
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports PaTk PA 05-021
j
p Y
ot�ritl�l!
Sz �dr�t
$�, ft,
..Ir�paci'.
Less rht� .
r�-
s;gt2ijtc nt
with
�4att' atinn
Liss thuit�
.: .
sa •g�tufxCcrJ2t
'1ct.
o t77R�L�Et
X
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 20
April 26, 2005
Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the
checklist.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not beets adapted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing or working
n the project area to excessive noise levels? (Source:
1-8,11-13)
t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive poise levels?
(Source:
X11. Population and Housing . 'Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
directly or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or ether infrastructure)? (Source:
1-4,7,8,10)
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere? (Source:l-4,7,8,10)
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the replacement of housing elsewhere? (Source: 1-
4,7,8,10)
X111. Public Services.
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities,
the construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public
services:
Fire protection? (Sources: 1,3,5,7,11-13)
Police protection? (Sources: 1,3,5,7,11-13)
Schools? (Sources: 1;3,5,7,11-13)
Parks? (Sources: 1,3,5,7,11-13)
Other public facilities? (Sources: 1-5,7,11-
13,18,21)
Potentially
Less'tltan.
Lest %n-
No ura r
Signif cant
;sfgnicant
tttti►at
Impiut
Wilk
Tnxpltet
'ltircti�tatic►n
, . .
City of Dublin Page 21
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
X
►4
94
X
F
X
M
Me; A full discussion of each item is found fWlawing the
checklist.
XIV. Recreation
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood or regional facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the facility
would occur or be accelerated (Sources. 1,3-5,7,11-
13)
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
.require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities that might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment? (Sources: 1,2,4,5,7,11-13)
XV. Transportation and Traffic, Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of
the street system (i.e. result iti a substantial increase
in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads or congestion at
intersections)? (Sources: 1,3,4,7,11-13,21)
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the County
Congestion Management .Agency for designated
roads or highways? (Sources. 1,3,4,6,7,11 13,21)
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
(S=ces. 1,3,4,6,7,11-13,21)
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses, such as farm equipment?
(Sources: 1,2,4,7-10)
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
(Sources; 1-4,7-11)
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
(Sources: 1-5,8)
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs
supporting alternative transportation (such as bus
turnouts and bicycle facilities)? (Sources: 1,3-8,21)
XVI. Utilities and Service Systems, Would the ,project
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
(Sources: 1,4-6,9,11-13,19)
Y
n- No impact
PDterurall Z�ess-thart Zess Chi
signtcdnt s;gttifiodltd signrfi ec�nt
:I�rtpa�'1'`; With ; I7rnpact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
City of Dublin Page 22
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
Note: A full discussion of each item is found fallowing the
checklist.
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities of expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could.
cause significant environmental effects?
(Sources: 1,2-7,11-13,18-20)
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects? (Sources: 1-7,11-
13,18-20)
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing water entitlements and
;resources, or are new or expanded entitlements
needed? (Sources; 1-7,11-13,18-20)
e) Result iii a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that
it has adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in addition to the provider's
existing cornmrtments? (Sources: 1-7,11-13,18-20)
fj Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs? (Sources: 1-7,11-13,18-20)
g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste? (Sources: 1-7,11-
13,18-20)
XV1. Mandatory Madings of Significance.
a) Roes the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number of or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the eff ects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects and the
effects of probable future projects).
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Potendaly Less�rhan- I:esS than= No impuet...
Significant stgttt,�Zcctnt significant
Zm actt%F ''; : ;'Impact ,
`ll�iti�c7lton I;. ,
Page 23
April 26, 2005
M
X
X
R.
X
X
Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the
checklist.
c) noes the project have environmental effects that will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
eithet directly or indirectly?
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
.Potentially. :Iess than: L1 -than- Nn itnpr�ct
agntt sigrttficail sagnjicant
: II igct `With
pia aticit�
X
Page
April 26, 2005
13-7
Sources used to determine potential environmental-,im�acts=
1.. project location & Preliminary Grading Plan, prepared by MacKay & Somps, March 10, 2005
2. Field/Site Review of project area
3. Master Plan for Fallon Sports Park, prepared by Carducci & Associates, November 30, 200-1
4. Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2002)
5, Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update (2004)
6. City of Dublin. General Plan ( updated 2002)
7. Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amend ment Environmental Impact Report and Addendum
(1994)*
8. City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance
9. Geomchnical Investigation for Lin Property, prepared by Bergolar Geotechnical Consultants, November
1999
10. Environmental Assessmentavestigation for Hazardous Materials, Phase I &_II, prepared by Kleinfelder
Engineering, November 2004
11. Individual Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring PTograrn - Area B-E (1997)
12. Individual Mitigated Negative Declaration for Dublin Ranch Area F (2000)
13. Initial Study and Addendum for Dublin Ranch Area B/F/E-, PA 0 1 -037 (2004)
14. Cultural Resource Survey, Dublin Ranch, Holman & ,Associates (June 1999)
15. Special ,,Status Strecies Survey, Pao Yeh Lin Property , H.T. Harvey Associates (October 1999)
16. U.S Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Fill Permit , dated May 23, 2003
17. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Opinion, dated July 1, 2002
18, Drainage and Hydrology Study for Dublin Ranch, MacKay & Somps (November 2003)
19. regional Water Quality Control Board Water Quality Certification Order , dated April 22, 2003
20, California Departamerit of Fish & Game 1603 lake and Streambed Alteration Agreerneat, dated June 5,
2003
21. Project Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by TJKM Associates (October 1999 w/2003 update)
22. Discussion with City Staff or affected Special Districts
*Portions of the environmental setting, project impacts and mitigation measures for this Initial Study refer to
environmental information contained in the 1994 Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment
Environmental Impact Report. (SChi 91103064). Phis document is referred to in the Initial Study as the 'Final
Eastern Dublin EIR. " Copies of this document, and all other documents referenced here, are available for public
review at the City of Dublin Planning Department, 100 Civic .Plaza, Dublin, CA, d uring normal business hours.
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Page 25
April 26, 2005
ATTACHMENT TO INITIAL ,STUDY: DISCUSSION OF CHECKLIST
Proiect Impacts and Mitigation Measures
I. Aesthetics
a-c) Significant impact on scenic vista, damage to scenic resource, degrade visual character of' the site
or create light or glare?
Less -than -significant The project site is vacant and consists of gently rolling hills and 'valleys.
Historically, grazing and cultivation of agricultural crops took place on the subject 60-acre parcel.
The visual image of the land is formed by patterns of the soil that have been furrowed. The
improvements proposed with the development of the sports fields and the other recreational
amenities will, naturally, alter the appearance of the undisturbed farmland, but not to a potential
significant level. The park use will continue to be an open space type use and be enhanced with
landscaping and provide trail links to other open space acres, The development of the property as
a park will provide scenic and landscaped views from Central Parkway to Lockhart Street and the
trail along the creek corridor adjacent to the street and Gleason Drive. The parking lot areas
accessed from Lockhart Street and Central Parkway will be screened with improved landscaped
areas and vegetation, as will the tennis courts and bail fields. From the residential areas west of the
creek alignment and Lockhart Street, and those to the southwest and northeast of Fallon Road, the
most prominent visual features will be the enhanced creek corridor along the park's western edge
and the landscaping surrounding the park. The active recreational features and areas will be
several hundred feet and across roadways fforn the homes.
Views of the site are limited to the immediate area and from the I-580 freeway. Although, the
proposed park is located one mile north of 1-580 freeway, which is a designated scenic highway,
the park is not within a scenic route. Visual impacts were addressed in the Eastern Dublin EIR
(Impact IM 3.8/C. Obscuring of Distinctive Native Features) and it was determined that no
measures would reduce the impacts to a less -than -significant degree. Other mitigation measures
(3.8/4.0 through 4.5, 5.0 and 5,1) have been included in the Eastern Dublin EIR to reduce the
impacts of hillside development. The EIR concluded this impact would be a potentially
significant irreversible change and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the
City Council. The parcel of land where the park development is proposed is slightly hilly with an
overall 4% slope and is at a lower elevation than much of the surrounding land. Specifically, the
construction of park features and landscaping will benefit the existing visual character of the park.
These improvements wouldprovide street frontage landscaping, ranging from lawn areas to annual
grasses, garden areas and trees, and improve the visual. community landscape of the area.
As visual quality was discussed in the earlier analyses of the community park site and addressed in
the Final Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR, any development of urban uses in Eastern Dublin
would inalterably change the character of the area. The development of a community park at this
location was addresser) by the previous documentation related to Area F, cited as references, and
City of Dublin
initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Paris PA 05-021
Page 26
April 26, 2005
I BO
found to have a less -than -significant effect on visual quality in the area, basedon the resulting
visual benefits to the community provided by the newly landscaped areas and the presence of the
open space and recreational use. No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan EIR (EDSP EZR) and the subsequent documents related to Area F of Dublin Ranch
will occur as a result of the proposed project.
Additionally, measures to maintain the visual quality of the area, especially from views along
scenic corridors in Eastern Dublin. Mitigation measures. 3.8/1.0 through 3.8/8.1 of the EDSP EIR
require that grading be done sensitively to reduce visual impacts. These mitigation measures have
been incorporated into the project.
d) Les. -than -significant with Mitigation. The Master Plan for Fallon Sports Parr contains
information on the lighting needs for the uses at the park. The park will generally be open from
dusk to dawn; however, the various sports Melds, courts and associated parking lots will be lighted.
The project may create additional light and glaze for surrounding single-family residential
neighborhoods. Low-level lighting will be used along walkways and trail. Sensor lighting lamps
with low wattage are proposed for the parking area. New street lights and other security lighting
combined with the night lighting for the courts and fields at the park could create a "spill over"
effect oflight in the residential areas closest to the site, and may operate as late as 10:00 PM, The
following mitigation measure will be added to the project to ensure that the lighting is adequate for
the use and unobtrusive to surrounding residences:
Mitigation Measure X: A photometric study shall be provided with final construction
drawings of the project prior to the issuance of an electrical permit for installation of
any lighting. "Spill over" lighting shall be kept to a minimum to prevent disturbance
and intrusion into residential areas through the use of lower lighting, with light
standards for fields and courts designed to minimize the light intrusion into residential
areas. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce the impact of nighttime
lighting to a level of less -than -significant
II. Agricultural Resources
a-c) Convert Prime Farmland, conflict with agricultural zoning or convert prime farmland to a non-
agricultural use?
Less-than-signifkan4 Historically, grazing and cultivation of agricultural crops tools place on
the subject 60-acre parcel when it was part of the greater Dublin Ranch area. Surrounding areas
near the park have been planned for conversion from agricultural use to urban and residential uses
since 1994. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, the Master Platt for
Fallon Sports Park, the Negative Declaration prepared for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan,
and other environmental analysis of Dublin Ranch and Area F in 1997, 2000 and 2004 have
concluded that the area will be urbanized during the next five years.
The park land contains no current agricultural zoning or farmland, and is zoned for use as a
community park, consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan designation of Parks/Public
Recreation & City Parr. Approval and construction of the proposed project would allow further
City of Dublin Page 27
Initial Study &]Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
development of land for a much needed sports field park to provide recreational activity areas for
surrounding residents and the community. Discontinuation of agricultural use or loss of farmland
of local importance were considered less -than -significant impacts in the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR. and previous environmental analyses for Dublin Rauch Area
F. Therefore, less -than -significant impacts are anticipated with regard to prime farmland or loss of
agricultural production for the sports park property.
Based on information contained in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment
BIR, no portion of the site is nor has been encumbered with a Williamson Act Land Conservation
Agreement. Similarly, No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan/General Plan Amendment FIR are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project.
M. Air Quality
Environmental 5ettiag
The project is within the Amador Valley, a part of the Livermore sub -regional air basin distinct
from the larger San Francisco Bay Area Basin. The Livermore sub -area basin is surrounded on all
sides by high hills or mountains. Significant breaks in the hills surrounding the air basin are Niles
Canyon and the San Rat -non Valley, which extends northward into Contra Costa County.
According to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR and other environmental studies, the terrain of
the Arnador Valley influences both the climate and air pollution potential of the sub -regional air
basin. As an inland, protected valley, the area has generally lighter winds and a higher frequency
of calm conditions when compared to the greater Bay Area.
The occurrence of episodes of high atmospheric stability, known as inversion conditions, severely
limits the ability of the atmosphere to disperse pollutants vertically. Inversions can be found
during all seasons in the Bay Area, but are particularly prevalent in the summer months when they
are present about 90% of the time in both morning and afternoon.
Additionally, during the winter, the sheltering effect of terrain and its inland location results in
frequent surface -based inversions. Under these conditions pollutants such as carbon monoxide
from automobiles and particulate matter generated by fireplaces and agricultural burning can
become concentrated.
According to the Bay Area Quality Management District, air pollution potential is high in the
Livermore-Amador Valley, especially for ozone in the summer and fall. High temperatures
increase the potential for ozone, and the valley not only traps locally generated pollutants but can
be the receptor of ozone and ozone precursors froin upwind portions of the greater Bay Area.
Transport of pollutants also occurs between the Livermore Valley and the San Joaquin Valley to
the east.
Ambient air quality standards
Both the I.T.S. Environmental Protection. Agency and the California Air Resources Board have
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated ].Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Page 28
April 26, 2005
141
established ambient air quality standards for common pollutants. These ambient air quality
standards are levels that avoid specific adverse health effects associated with each pollutant. The
ambient air quality standards cover what are called "criteria" pollutants because the health and
other effects of each pollutant are described in criteria documents. The federal and California
ambient air. quality standards are summarized in Table 1 for important pollutants. The federal and
state ambient standards were developed independently with differing purposes and methods,
although both federal and state standards are intended to avoid health -related effects. As a result,
the federal and state standards differ in some cases. In general, the California state standards are
more stringent. This is particularly true for ozone and PM10.
Table 1. Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards
Pollutant
Averaging Time
Federal
State
Primary
Standard
Standard
Ozone
1-Hour
0.12 PPM
0.09 PPM
S-Hour
Carbon Monoxide
8-Hour
9 PPM
9.0 PPM
1-Hour
35 PPM
20 PPM
Nitrogen Dioxide
Annual Average
0.05 PPM
--
1-Hour
-,
0.25 PPM
Sulfur Dioxide
Annual Average
0.03 PFM
-
24-Hour
0.14 PPM
0.25 PPM
1-Hour
PM10
Annual Average
50 ug/m3
30 uWm3
24-How'
150 ug/m3
50 ug/m3
PM2,5
Annual
15 ug/m3
-T
24-Hour
65 ug/m3
--
PPM = Parts per Million
-g/m3 = Microgmus per Cubic Meter
Source: Bay Area Air Quality Management Distract
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1997 adopted new national air quality standards for
ground -level ozone and for fine Particulate Matter, The existing 1-hour ozone standard of 0.12
PPM will be phased out and replaced by an S-hour standard of 0.08 PPM. New -national standards
were retained, but the method and form for determining compliance with the standards were
revised.
Implementation of the new ozone and Particulate Matter standards has been complicated by a
lawsuit. On May 14, 199 the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a
decision ruled that the Clean Air Act as applied in setting the public standards for ozone and
particulate matter, was unconstitutional as an improper delegation of legislative authority to the
Environmental Protection Agency. The decision has been appealed, but the legal status of the new
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Page 29
April 26, 2005
I q-�,
standards will probably remain uncertain for some time.
Ambient air quality
The project is within the nine -county Bay Area Basin. The Bay Area Quality Management
District (BAAQMD) operates a network of air quality monitoring sites in the region, including one
in central Livermore on Old First Street. Table 2 shows a summary of air quality data for this
monitoring site for the period 1995-1999. Data are shown for ozone, carbon monoxide, PM10 and
nitrogen dioxide. The numbers of days exceeding each standard are shown for each year.
Table 2. Air Quality Data for Livermore,1995-1999
Pollutant
Standard
Days Exceeding Standard
In:
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
Ozone
Federal 1-Hour
7
8
0
6
2
Ozone
State 1-Hour
20
22
3
21.
14
Ozone
Federal 8-Hour
11
10
0
10
5
Carbon
Monoxide
State/Federal
8 Hour
0
0
0
0
0
PM10
State
24-Hour
6
6
12
12
18
PM10
Federal
24-Hour
0
0
0
0
Nitrogen
Dioxide
State 1-Hour
0
0
0
0
Source: Air Sources Board Aerometric Data Analysis and Management System (ADAM)
Table 2 shows that concentrations of carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide at the Livermore
monitoring site meet state/federal standards. Ozone concentrations exceed both the state and
federal standards, and exhibit wide variations from year-to-year related to -meteorological
conditions. Years where the summer months tend to be warmer than average tend to have higher
average ozone concentrations while years with cooler than average temperatures tend to have
lower average ozone concentrations. Levels of PM10 at Livermore meet the federal ambient
standards but exceed the more stringent state standard.
Attainment status
The Federal Clean Air Act and the California Clean Air Act of 1988 require that the State Air
Resources Board, based on air quality monitoring data, designate air basins within the state where
the federal or state ambient air quality standards are not met as "nonattainment areas." Because of
the differences between the federal and state standards, the designation of nonattainment areas is
different under the federal and state legislation.
The Bay Area is currently a nonattainment area for the federal 1-hour ozone standard. Under the
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Page 30
April 26, 2005
California Clean Air Act the Bay Area is a nonattainment area for ozone and PM10.
To meet federal Clean Air Act requirements, the District has adopted an Ozone Attainment
Demonstration Plan. In addition, to meet California Clean Air Act requirements, the District has
adopted and updated a Clean Air Plan addressing the California ozone standard. The control
strategies contained into these plans include new limits on emissions from industry, prohibitions
on sources of hydrocarbons, and buyback programs for older vehicles and educational programs.
The California Legislature, when it passed the California Clean Air Act in 1988, recognized the
relative intractability of the PM10 problem with respect to the state ambient standard and excluded
it from basic planning requirements of the Act. The Act did require the Glean Air Resources
Board to prepare a report to the Legislature regarding the prospect of achieving the State ambient
air quality standard for PM 10. This report recommended a menu of actions, but did not
recommend imposing a planning process similar to that for ozone or other pollutants for
achievement of the standard within a certain period of time.
Sensitive receptors
The Bay Area Air Quality Management District defines sensitive receptors as facilities where
sensitive receptor population groups (children, the elderly, the acutely ill and the chronically ill)
are likely to be located. These land uses include residences, schools, playgrounds, child-care
centers, hospitals and medical clinics. This project would involve construction and development
of new park and recreational Facilities where children would play and gather for recreation.
a) Would the project conflict or obstruct implementation of an air quality plan?
No impact, The proposed project would not conflict with the local Clean Air Plan adopted by the
Bay Area Air Quality Management District, since the proposed amount of non-residential
development has been included in Dublin's planned growth as part of the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan/General Plan EIR since 1994, and would serve the existing community, Therefore, such
impacts would be less -than -significant.
b) Would the project violate any air quality standards?
Less- than -significant with Mitigation. Short-term construction impacts related to implementation
of the project, including grading and excavation, could result in exceeding air quality standards
established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Adherence to Mitigation Measures
nos. 3.11/1.0, 3.11/3.0, 3.11/4.0 and 3.11/12.0 of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan
Amendment EIR has been included in the plans for the preliminary and subsequent grading of the
property to reduce short-term air quality impacts to a less -than -significant level. These measures
minimize the creation of fugitive dust during grading and construction activities with frequent
watering of those areas, and also mandate that construction equipment be kept in proper running
order at all times during construction. Additionally, certain mitigation measures for the control of
fugitive dust are incorporated into the preliminary grading plans to be implemented as part of the
responsibility of the contractor, and monitored by the Inspector for the project. These measures
should be incorporated into the construction plans for the park project. The Eastern Dublin Specific
City of Dublin
Initial Study & NUtigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Page 31
April 26, 2005
144
Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR concludes that potential air quality impacts related to
construction equipment could not be mitigated to a less -than -significant impact, and a Statement of
Overriding Considerations was adopted for this impact. However, potential air quality impacts
related to construction on the 60-acres of park development will be mitigated to a less -than -
significant impact with the following measures related to air duality impacts incorporated into the
future phases of project construction.
Mitigation Measure 2: Dust control for the construction and earthwork for the project.
shall conform to the requirements of the SWPPP prepared by the City and established City
standards. All active construction areas shall be watered daily and more frequently, if
necessary. All trucks hauling soil, sand or other loose materials shall be covered. Water
shall be applied daily, or apply non -toxic soil. stabilizers on all unpaved access roads,
parking area, and staging areas at construction sites. All paved access roads, parking areas
and staging areas at construction sites shall be swept daily with water sweepers. Hydroseed
or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers to construction areas that have been graded.
c) Would the project result in cumulatively considerable airpollutants?
Less -than -significant: The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General plan Amendment EIR identifies
Mobile Source Emissions and Stationary Source Emissions as significant irreversible impacts. A
Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted with certification of the EIR in 1994 and
with subsequent environmental documents related to development of the Dublin Ranch Area F.
Generally, such impacts are based on vehicular emission from future traffic within the sub -region
as well as stationary sources. Similarly, potential air quality impacts related to vehicular traffic
emissions on roadways of Reactive Organic Gasses and Nitrogen Oxide, both precursor indicators
of smog, and stationary source emissions would not exceed regional air quality standards or
thresholds. This project will not generate significant amounts of additional traffic beyond that
considered in previous environmental documents, as it serves the existing community with a
planned transportation network and roadways engineered to support the development. Therefore,
vehicular emissions are estimated to be minimal and impacts would be less -than -significant.
d, e) Expose sensitive receptors to significant pollutant concentrations or create objectionable odors?
Less -than -significant: Proposed uses in the park will include softball, baseball and soccer fields;
tennis and bocce courts; play areas, parking and street frontage improvements with landscaping;
an enhanced stream/creekbed corridor; and, connecting trails. Air quality impacts associated
with the proposed project are expected to be less- than -significant, as no significant pollutant
concentration or creation of objectionable odors are anticipated from the park use and the
improvements proposed for project. The only source of pollutants would be vehicles using the
roadways adjacent to the park. These items were previously addressed in the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan/Gmeral Plan Amendment EIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, the
Mitigated Declaration in 2000 and the Addendum (2004) for Area F of Dublin Ranch. No further
impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment
EIR are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project.
City of Dublixi
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon. Sports Park PA 05-021
Page 32
April 26, 2005
I4
TV. Biological Resources
a-d) Have a substantial.adverse impact on special -status species, riparian features, movement offish
or wildlife species, or conflict with California Fish & Game or UI S, Wildl(fe Service policies or
regulations?
Less -than -significant. Impacts from the project upon biological resources were thoroughly
addressed in the earlier analysis of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment
EIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, the Mitigated Declaration in 2000 and the
Addendum (2004) for Area F of Dublin Ranch, and mitigation measures are currently being
undertaken by the Developer of Dublin Ranch Area F (Toll Brothers) to enhance the stream/creek
corridor along Lockhart Street and a portion of Gleason Drive, with some filling of wetlands and
relocation of species such as tiger salamander and red. -legged frog pursuant to USAGE (United
States Army Corps of Engineers) and DFG (California Department of Fish and Game) permits
(copies of permits are contained in Appendices Q. Biological analyzes and wetland delineations
were conducted for the Eastern Dublin Specific P1an/Gencral Plan Amendment EIR, the Negative
Declaration in 1997 for Areas 13-E, as well as the Mitigated Declaration (2000) and the Addendum
(2004) for Area F of Dublin Ranch, prior to the development of the preliminary grading plan and
issuance of the USAGE and DFG permits, describing both habitat and species present on the
project site.
Walking trails and other pathways proposed within the park boundaries, as well as proposed
structures, are located on the site plan for Fallon Sports Park in accordance with setbacks and
buffers approved by the USAGE and DFG permits. A number of mitigation measures are included
in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR to reduce significant impacts on
biological resources, IM 3.7A through S, which still apply to the project site and reduce all such
impacts to a less -than -significant level. Additionally, the Mitigated Declaration in 2000 for Area F
contained two Supplemental Mitigation Measures 2 and 3 to protect special -species and wetlands
in this planning area. There would be a less -thane -significant impact on biological resources with
the measures and the mitigation measures allowed under agency permits, currently underway at
the project site.
e, f) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such a.s tree
protection ordinances.
No impact The Fallon Sports Park project's preliminary plan has been designed to be consistent
with all Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, General Plan and other adopted policies and mitigation
measures related to preservation and protection of biological resources. Mitigation measures are
currently underway in accordance with USAGE and DFG permits. Few trees are located on the
Sports Park site due to the past agricultural cultivation of the land, and a substantial amount of
landscaping and plantings will be installed on the site to enhance the appeal of the area and
upgrade the present vegetation along the creek. Additionally, landscaping and vegetation will be
installed around manmade structures and improvements proposed for the site. No known Heritage
trees exist on the site.
Additionally, the proposed project is not located within the boundaries of any Habitat
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigathd Negative Declaration
Fallon Sport4 Park FA 05-021
Page 33
April26, 2005
16+0
IV, Biological Resources
a-d) Have a substantial adverse impact on special -status species, riparian features, Movement offish
or wildlife species, or conflict with California Fish & Game or U.S. Mildlife Service policies or
regulations?
Lees-than-signheart. Impacts from the project upon biological resources were thoroughly
addressed in the earlier analysis of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment
EIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, the Mitigated Declaration in 2000 and the
Addendum (2004) for Area F of Dublin Ranch, and mitigation measures are currently being
undertaken by the Developer of Dublin Ranch Area F (Toll Brothers) to enhance the stream/creek
corridor along Lockhart Street and a portion of Gleason Drive, with some filling of wetlands and
-relocation of species such as tiger salamander and red -legged frog pursuant to USAGE (United
States Army Corps of Engineers) and DFG (California Department of Fish and Game) permits
(copies of permits are contained in the 2004 Addendum and incorporated here by reference).
Biological analyzes and wetland delineations were conducted for the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, as well as
the Mitigated Declaration (2000) and the Addendum (2004) for Area F of Dublin Ranch, prior to
the development of the preliminary grading plan and issuance of the USAGE and DFG permits,
describing both habitat and species present on the project site.
Walking trails and other pathways proposed within the park boundaries, as well as proposed
structures, are located on the site plan for Fallon Sports Park in accordance with setbacks and
buffer's approved by the USAGE and DFG permits. A number of mitigation measures are included
in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plat- Amendment EIR to reduce significant impacts on
biological resources, 1M 3.7A through S, which still apply to the project site and reduce all such
impacts to a less -than -significant level. Additionally, the Mitigated Declaration in 2000 for Area F
contained two Supplemental Mitigation Measures 2 and 3 to protect spacial -species and wetlands
in this planning area. There would be a less -than -significant impact on biological resources with
the measures and the mitigation measures allowed under agency permits, currently underway at
the project site.
e, f) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree
protection ordinances.
No impact: The Fallon Sports Park project's preliminary plan has been designed to be consistent
with all Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, General Plan and other adopted policies and mitigation
measures related to preservation and protection of biological resources. Mitigation measures are
currently underway in accordance with USAGE and DFG permits, Few trees are located on the
Sports Park site due to the past agricultural cultivation of the land, and a substantial amount of
landscaping and plantings will be installed on the site to enhance the appeal of the area and
upgrade the present vegetation along the creek. Additionally, landscaping and vegetation will be
installed around manmade structures and improvements proposed for the site. No known Heritage
trees exist on the site.
Additionally, the proposed project is not located within the boundaries of any Habitat
City of Dublin Page 33
initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-02 ] April 26, 2005
IL41
Conservation Plan. No biological resource impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plant/General Plan Amendment EIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, as
well as the Mitigated Declaration (2000) and the Addendum (2004) for Area F of Dublin Ranch,
are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. In accordance with the approval
conditions of the USAGE wetland fill permit dated May 23, 2003; U.S.Fish &Wildlife Service
Biological Opinion dated July 1, 2002; RWQCB 'Water Quality Certification Order dated April 22,
2003; and, DFG 1603 lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement dated June 5, 2003, mitigation
measures applicable to the park site addressing impacts on candidate, sensitive or special status
species have already been implemented, and the Developer has obtained all necessary permits
from the appropriate State and Federal agencies. Based on implementation of these measures,
species impacts are no longer considered to be applicable to this project,
V. Cultural Resources
a-d) Cause substantial adverse change to significant historic, archeological or paleontological
resources or human remains?
No impact. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Platt Amendment Elk identified a number
of potentially significant impacts associated with development in East Dublin, including disruption
or destruction of prehistoric resources, and disruption to historic resources.
In May 1999, Holman and Associates performed an additional survey of the properties in Area F
of Dublin Ranch, and no potentially significant prehistoric archaeological materials or indicators
were found on the proposed park site. Although there are no historic structures/resources or known
archeological or paleontological resources on this site, Mitigation Measure 3.9/5.0 contained in the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR establishes procedures in the event
archeological resources are encountered during grading for development of the park. These
measures have been incorporated into the grading project currently underway, and will be
followed in the event that subsurface deposits are discovered during the continuing development
of the Fallon Sports Park. No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, as well as
the Mitigated Declaration (2000) and the Addendum (2004) for Area F are expected to occur as a
result of the proposed project. Therefore, No impacts are anticipated related to cultural resources
because of implementation of the Park development.
VI. Geology and Soils
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse impacts, including lass, injury or
death related to ground rupture, seismic ground shaking, groundfiailure, landslide,, substantial
erosion, unstable soils, or liquefaction?
,I ess-than-significant. Preliminary geotechnical reports were prepared for Area F in Eastern
Dublin, including the subject Project site, as part of the environmental review for the properties
with both the Negative Declaration in 1997 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration in 2000. A
follow-up geotechnical survey for the Fallon Sports Park site was prepared by Berlogar
Geotechnical Consultants prior to the development of the preliminary grading plan prepared by
MacKay & Somps in 2004 for the site. The recommendations of the geotechnical report have
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Page 34
April 26, 2005
14%
been incorporated into the preliminary plans for development of the site.
The site is subject to groundshaking caused by a number of regional faults such as the Calaveras,
Greenville, Hayward and San Andreas Faults. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan
Amendment EIR identifies several potential impacts to soils and geology, including earthquake
and ground shaking, ground rupture, seismic ground shaking, impacts to groundwater resources,
shrink -swell potential due to expansive soils, slope stability, erosion and sedimentation, in many
locations in the Specific Plan planning area and established mitigation ieasures to be incorporated
into projects in the area. As the site is not within a Special Study Zone for faults as identified by
the State of California under the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zayre legislation, the potential for
ground rupture is expected to be minimal. However, under moderate to severe seismic events
which are probable in the Bay Area over the next 30 years, buildings, utilities and other
improvements constructed at the Project site could be subject to damage caused by groundshaking.
Mitigation Measures 3.611.0 through 8.0 contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR were adopted to
ensure that new structures built within Area F will comply with generally recognized seismic
safety standards to reduce groundshaking impacts to a level of less -than-significant. The
mitigation measures referred to also are consistent with the recommendations of the last
geotechnical study for the site.
b) Is the site subject to substantial erosion and/or loss of topsoil?
Less-than-signiflcant! The Eastern Dublin EIR notes that the impact of constructing all the land
uses identified in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan would be an increase of erosion
and sedimentation caused by grading activities. Consistent with adopted Mitigation Measures
3.6/27.0 of the EIR, the Conditions of Approval require preparation and implementation of
interim erosion plans as part of grading plans and permitting. These requirements will be
reflected in the plans prepared by MacKay & Somps in conjunction with City Public Works
Department Staff. As noted in the 2000 Mitigated Declaration for Area F and the 2004
Addendum for Areas B-E, standard City of Dublin development Conditions of Approval require
erosion control plans and preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention flan to minimize the
impacts of erosion and loss of soil. Project construction documents will reflect these conditions,
and also ensure that all improvements to the park will comply with generally recognized seismic
safety standards so that ground shaking or ground failure impacts would be reduced to a level of
less -than -significant. Additionally, less -than -significant impacts are anticipated in the park phase
related to soil or geotechnical hazards as the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer have
been incorporated into the Project.
c-d) Is the site located on soil that is unstable or expansive, or result in potential lateral spreading,
liquefaction, landslide or collapse?
Less -than -significant; The Project site is located on the T'assajara Formation and contains areas
of colluvium soil, and a small amount of landslide debris near the intersection of Lockhart Street
and Central Parkway. The soil has a high shrink -swell potential, and Mitigation Measures
3.6/14.Othrough 16.0 of the Eastern Dublin EIR were adopted to reduce potential shrink -swell
impacts to a level of less -than -significant by requiring appropriate structural foundations,
underlying support for court and parking areas, and other related techniques to overcome the
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Page 35
April 26, 2005
1417
adverse effects. No additional mitigation measures are required. Additionally, less -than -
significant impacts are anticipated in the development of the park related to soil or geotechnieal
hazards as the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer have also been incorporated into
the Project.
e) Does the site have soils capable of supporting on -site septic tanks if sewer,e are not available?
No impact. The park property is in the process of being connected to the sewer system with
service provided by the Dublin San Ramon Services District. Therefore, there will be No
impact related to septic tanks or systems.
VIl. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
a-d) Create a significant hazard through transport of hazardous materials or release or emission of
hazardous materials, andlor listed as a hazardous materials site?
No impact. The proposed use of the site would include construction of recreational facilities for
the Fallon Sports Park, and street frontage improvements along Central Parkway, Fallon Road and
Lockhart Street. Recreational improvements on this site were discussed in the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, and have always been planned for this property. No
hazardous material has been transported to or from the site, nor is anticipated to be done in the
future as the site will be a public park.
Phase I and 11 hazardous materials studies were completed for the site by Berlogar Geotechnical
Consultants in 1996 and. 1997, which found no hazardous materials on the site. The site has not
been listed as containing a historical hazardous site, hazardous material generator or transporter
location, nor is it known to contain underground storage tanks according to the site assessments.
Additionally, there is no change in the conclusion in the previous environmental documents for
the site that only minor and .less -than -significant quantities of potentially hazardous materials
would be associated with the park use. Materials would include normal and customary
substances such as lawn chemicals, household solvents and similar items in minimal quantities.
Therefore, the project would not involve the use or transportation of hazardous material, and
there would be No impact with regard to the release of hazardous materials.
e, f) Is the site located within an airport laud use plan of a public airport or private airstrip?
No impact. The site is not located within an airport land use plan or within the vicinity of a
public airport. The Livermore Municipal Airport and the ALUC confirmed in 1999 that the
Area F Planning Area in Eastern Dublin was outside the referral area for the airport, and the
ALUC has no jurisdiction over the land uses. Therefore, No impacts are anticipated regarding
airport noise and crash hazard zones.
g,h) Interference with an emergency evacuation plan, expose people and structures to a significant
risk involving wildland fires, and are nearby residences intermixed with wildlands?
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Page 36
April 26, 2005
No impact. Since the project would convert undeveloped laud to a paved parking lot, and
recreational facilities with associated structures, the proposed driveways with entry features
from Lockhart Street and Central Parkway will provide adequate emergency access. Adequate
emergency access as shown on the Master Plan for the park has been approved by the Alameda
County Fire Department which provides services to Dublin. Additionally, a Fire Station is
located adjacent to the park with access from Fallon Road. Due to the provision of adequate
access to and from the site, there would be No impact with regard to any emergency evacuation.
plans.
Additionally, the project site is presently vacant grassland, but in the future, based on plans
approved by the City and ensuing construction, the adjacent lands will soon be an urbanized
area. The park will be improved with irrigation from new water lines and services that will be
regularly maintained, as will the surrounding future developed area. Therefore, the risk of
wildland fire is anticipated to be minimal, and No impact is expected relative to wildfires in the
project area..
VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality
a-i) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, depute groundwater
resources, alter drainage patterns, effect surface or subsurface water quality, result in placing
housing in a flood plain?
Less -than -significant. Portions of the Project site are characterized by slopes above 5%, An
intermittent creek flows along the west boundary of the site and proceeds to the east slightly
across the northwest corner of the property neat` the intersection of Lockhart Street and Fallon
Road. Improvements and preliminary grading is currently in process at the site as part of the
larger Area F project. In accordance with the approval conditions of the USACE wetland fill
permit dated May 23, 2003; U.S.Fish &Wildlife Service Biological Opinion dated July 1, 2002;
RWQCB Water Quality Certification Cyder dated April 22, 2003; and, DFG 1603 Lake and
Streamhed Alteration Agreement dated June 5, 2003, mitigation measures applicable to
addressing impacts on creek on the park site and water quality provisions have already been
implemented, and the Developer of Area F has obtained all necessary permits from the
appropriate State and Federal agencies. Additionally, the project preliminary grading plan
conforms to Alameda County Flood Control and Water Quality District, Zone 7 requirements
and meets the water quality standards of the City of Dublin's NPDES permit and the Alameda
County Urban Runoff Clean Water Program. The contractor selected by the City to develop
parr project will be responsible for obtaining all permits necessary from Zane 7 prior to
construction, and follow all provisions of the City's SWPPP and the Water Quality Control
Board requirements. These requirements will he reflected by the plans prepared by MacKay &
Somps in conjunction with City Public Works Department Staff. As noted in the 2000
Mitigated Declaration for Area F and the 2004 Addendum for Areas B-E, standard City of
Dublin development Conditions of Approval require erosion control plans and preparation of a
Stormwawr Pollution Prevention Plan. No additional water quality impacts are anticipated.
City of Dublin Page 37
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Paris PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
Although the Eastern Dublin EIR acknowledges that grading and recontouring of the land for.
the park will change existing natural drainage patterns, the existing creek on the site will be
improved and enhanced, and swales will be constructed to filter and absorb stormwater and run-
off at the site. Diagrams of the utility systems, including pipes, culverts, drainage and
stormwater systems are included in the Master Plan for the Fallon Sports Park, and are
currently being installed at the site with the appropriate permits under the development plan for
Area F, Adherence to mitigation measures nos, 3.5/20.0, 3.5/44.0, 3.5/47.0 through 3.5/55.0
of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Playa Amendment EIR requiring proper drainage
and run-off control, and the use of biodegradable pesticides and herbicides, will reduce surface
water quality pollution and provide the proper drainage facilities for the site, thereby reducing
the impacts on water quality and drainage to a level of less-than-signifzcame, Additionally, the
City Public Works Department has performed extensive hydrology and drainage studies to
insure that all stormwater and drainage facilities constructed for the park contain sufficient
capacity to service the projected development of the Master Plan for the Parr.
The site is not located within a 100-year flood plain as identified on the applicable Flood
Insurance Rate Map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Construction of the Fallon Sports Park recreational facilities will be consistent with all the
previous actions and environmental documentation approved by the City of Dublin for east
Dublin. No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan
Amendment EIR are expected to occur.
IX. Land Use and Planning
a) Physically divide an established community?
No impact. The project is consistent with the General Plan and planned recreational and open
space uses in the Eastern. Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR and in the plans
for Area F. As this property has always been planned to be an open space type use, it is a
consolidated open area consisting of 60 acres on the eastern edge of Area F, adjacent to Fallon
Road. Residential development exists across Fallon Road, and is currently being constructed by
Toll Brothers adjacent to the future extension of Lockhart Street. To the east of the park site,
additional urbanization, predominately residential, is anticipated to occur in the fixture in the
East Dublin property Owners development. No residential subdivision or community is divided
by the park as all the uses have been master planned in an orderly fashion. Therefore, there
would be no disruption of any established community because the proposed facilities for Fallon
Sports Park are designed to serve new and existing development in east Dublin, providing
recreational facilities within walking distant to residents and community access routes.
Therefore, the park development will result in no negative or adverse impact on land use or the
community.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or. regulation?
City of Dublin Page 38
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
1
No impact. The Fallon Sports Park Phase project is consistent with the goals and policies
contained in both the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan, which indicate that these
facilities are needed to serve the growing population in east Dublin and the other growing areas
of the community. The Specific Plan and General Plan land use maps include the designation
for this park site as a City Park and Park, and refer to the Dublin Parks and Recreation Master
Plan, recently updated in 2004, for a description of the land use activities and types of facilities
to be provided in the park. Additionally, the Master Plan for the Fallon Sports Park is a
comprehensive plan for the development of the recreational facilities to serve the activity needs
of the surrounding community, and proposes ballfields and sports courts consistent with the
projected uses in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The park site is also located near a
planned school site, and will be used by schools as needed for recreational activities and events.
The City presently does not have a recreational facility of this size that will serve the organized
sports popular in a growing community. Therefore, the park development is consistent with all
land use plans, policies and regulations of the City, and will result in no negative or adverse
impact on land use.
c) Conflict with a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plats?
No impact. No such plan has been adopted within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. There
would, therefore, be No impact to a habitat conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan for the existing site.
X. Mineral Resources
a, b) -Result in the lass of availability of regionally or locally significant mineral resources?
No impact. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR does not indicate
that significant deposits of minerals exist on the site. Additionally, the site is not shown as a
location for mineral or aggregate resources on State Mineral Resource maps. No impacts related
to the loss of mineral resources would occur as a result of the project.
X1. Noise
a-d) Would the project expose persons or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established
by the General Plan or other applicable standard, expose people to groundborne vibration, or
result in permanent increases in ambient noise levels?
Less -than -significant. Major sources of noise on and adjacent to the Project site include distant
noise generated by vehicles traveling through the Eastern Dublin planning area on I-580, traffic
sources on Tassajara Road and from aircraft flyovers. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plat/General
Plan Amendment EIR addressed potential noise impacts of adopting and implementing the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan, which included the development of Area F and the Fallon
Sports Park. Short-term noise -related impacts were identified in the EIR which included exposure
of residents to increased levels of noise from construction of proposed residential, park and
improvernent development in east Dublin.
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Spouts Park PA 05-021
39
April 26, 2005
Mitigation measure nos. 3.10/4.0 and 3.10/5.0 contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR require
individual project builders to prepare construction noise management plans to minimize noise as
well as adhere to construction hour limitations. City of Dublin standard Conditions of Approval
required by the Public Works Department for all projects constructed in the City also include
preparation of a construction noise management plan and construction hour limitations. Including
these measures in all construction phases for the project will mitigate or minimize construction
noise impacts to a level of less -than -significant. I4owever, short-term construction related noise
could be expected which would be considered significant depending on the specific type of
equipment used in the grading process for the parking lot and various sports courts and paved
areas. The City has adopted common practices for all construction and grading operations, and
which are included in the construction documents for the Project, to limit the hours of construction
to 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, including the idling of equipment, unless the
Director of Public Works approves alternative hours. Additionally, all equipment used on the
construction site is to be in good, well -maintained condition, and mufflers, to minimizenoise
generation that could affect the residents in the area of the park. Therefore, noise -related impacts
of the project will be reduced to a less -than -significant impact.
e, f) No impact The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a
public airport, public use airport, or a private airstrip. Therefore, the project will not expose
people in the project area to excessive noise levels.
X11. Population and Housing
a) ,induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly?
No impact. Implementation of planned recreational facilities will not induce additional growth in
Eastern Dublin that has not been projected for in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan
Amendment EIR, and subsequent environmental documents. The proposed recreational facility
and community park were planned well in advance of actual development in the eastern area of the
City to serve projected residential units and those already planned and approved. Therefore, no
population growth impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
b, c) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing units or people?
No impact. The project site is designated as a park on the Dublin General Plan, and a City Park in
the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan for residents in the
immediate and surrounding areas of Dublin, The site is currently being developed as parkland
with preliminary grading underway with appropriate permits as part of the approved and permitted
development of Area F. The property has never been designated for housing nor previously
developed for such use. Displacement of housing units or people, therefore, would not occur.
Additionally, the site was vacant and undeveloped prior to construction of other development in
the area.
EDSP Mitigation measures 3.4/20.0 through 3.4/35.0 are designed to ensure that adequate parks
and recreational facilities are provided in the community near residential development to serve the
growing population of Dublin. This project is planned to serve the residential growth and residents
City of Dublin Page 40
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
�-t
in the immediate area based on the park standards in the Parks and Recreation Master plan.
Therefore, No impacts related to displacement of housing units or people are anticipated.
XYII. Public Services
a-c) Potential impacts related to: fire protection, police protection, schools, maintenance, or solid
waste generation?
No impact. Construction and operation of the proposed recreational facilities will not create a
need for new public services or facilities. The Alameda County Fire Department and the Dublin
Police Department have reviewed the project to ensure that the facility meets their criteria for
public use. An additional fire station has been built in the east Dublin area adjacent to the Park site
to serve the planning area. Additionally, the park plan has been designed in conjunction with
security criteria provided by the Police Department. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, as a basis
for the provision of the Fallon Sports Park at this location, included sufficient fire safety resources
to serve the projected growth and facilities in the area. The City of Dublin will provide
maintenance of streets, roads, the park and other related governmental facilities. Solid Waste
service will be provided by the Livermore Dublin Disposal Company. As these services will
already be extended to the Area F planning area; no significant impacts related to public services is
anticipated.
XIV. Recreation
a, b) Would the project increase use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or require the
construction of new recreational facilities?
No impact. The proposed project does not include residential development, so there would be
no increase in the need for or impact on recreational facilities. The project would add a much
needed recreational facility with various types of active recreational uses to the east Dublin area,
thereby increasing the City's recreational resources and facilities to serve the community. No
adverse impact related to recreational facilities will result, but rather, the park development will
provide more recreational activities and facilities and opportunities for the neighborhoods being
developed in east Dublin and for the public's use, Based on the criteria of the updated Parks and
Recreation Master Plan (2004), a standard requirement of 3.5 acres of community parkland is
needed per 1,000 residents. Area F is anticipated to have a population of 2,725 residents in the
planning area at build -out. Approximately 10 acres of community parkland would be needed
for Area F, and the Fallon Sports Park at 60 acres well exceeds the community parkland
requirement for the planning area. Therefore, the Project will have a beneficial impact on the
provision of parr facilities, and not have an adverse impact on park or recreational facilities.
XV. Transportation/Traffic
a-g) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial to existing traffic load and street capacity,
exceed LOS standards for CMA roadways, change of stir traffic patterns, increase traffic safety
hazard, provide for inadequate emergency vehicle access, inadequate parking, provide hazard
City of Dublin Page 41
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
ism
or barrier to alternative transportation modes?
Less -than -significant. To implement the transportation and circulation aspects of the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan based on future land use projections with existing, the City
has undertaken a comprehensive program of transportation improvements in the community.
The purpose of this program is to accommodate anticipated traffic from the Eastern Dublin
area. Overall, the program includes upgrades to the I-580 freeway intersections, construction of
new roads and improvements to existing roads. These improvements are required to be
installed by the developer of a specific project which will be generating additional traffic in the
area, or through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Improvements are primarily funded
from fees collected from new development in eastern Dublin.
Traffic Impacts & Improvements: An extensive traffic analysis was prepared for the original
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan EIR approved in 1994 to establish this program.
That analysis identified 16 potentially significant and potentially cumulatively significant
impacts related to the development of the Specific Plan. Although many of these impacts could
be reduced to a level of less -than -significance, a Statement of Overriding Consideration was
adopted for impacts to mainline I-580 and I-680 freeways, cumulative freeway impacts; Santa
Rita & I-580 eastbound freeway ramps due to existing level of traffic; and, cumulative impacts
on Dublin Boulevard. Additionally, the 1997 Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning
Areas B-E, in which the Fallon Sports Park property was included for community parr use, did
not identify new or supplemental impacts or mitigation measures in addition to those already
identified in the early environmental document. The 2000 Mitigated Negative Declaration
identified a number of supplemental mitigation measures to be implemented with the Dublin
Ranch Area A project as a result of changes to the Land Use Plan of the Specific Plan, but not
as a result of proposed community park use.
Less -than -significant impacts are anticipated with regard to traffic and parking for the proposed
recreational improvements at the Fallon Sports Park site. Several new traffic improvements and
extensions of roadways are underway at the present time to facilitate the overall development
scheme for Area F. The existing and proposed roadway improvements in Area F have been
designed, sized and approved to provide adequate transportation facilities and transit modes with
sufficient capacity for the park use. The following extensions and improvements will be
completed prior to the completion of Phase 1 of the Fallon Sports Park (see Exhibit E for
phasing);
• Lockhart Street is proposed for extension with the development underway for
Area F, and is projected to be completed in 2005;
• Central parkway is proposed for extension in fiscal year 2005-2006;
• Fallon Road will be improved in fiscal year 2005-2006;
• A traffic signal will be installed at the Gleason Drive/Fallon Road intersection in
fiscal year 2005-2006; and,
• A second traffic signal may be installed at the main entry to the Park on Lockhart
Street if CalTraus warrants are met.
City of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021
Page ,42
April 26, 2005
An October 23, 2003 Traffic Study prepared by TJ M for the design of Lockhart Street
proposed on four-way intersection on Lockhart Street at the entrance to the park. The current
plan for the Park shows two intersections on .Lockhart Street: one at the main entrance to the
Park and the second across from the pedestrian bridge. Both these intersections will connect
with streets from the adjacent neighborhoods. At the present time, there has been no study of
the entry location off Central Parkway. Although this is the preferred location of the Central
Parkway entrance, further study of this entrance is needed to determine the optimum location as
future multi -family development is planned across from the Park on Central Parkway. A
mitigation measure is proposed as follows:
1ll&xigutinn Measure ; Future study of specific location of the entrance to the Park from
Central Parkway shall he completed prior to development of the Lower Terrace Phase of
the Project, with consideration given to the potential multi -residential land use across
Central Parkway from the Parr.
Impacts related to transportation are anticipated to be reduced to a less -than -significant level
with the mitigation measure above and those included in the mitigation for the development of
Area F, in process at this time.
Parking Analysis/Study_ No impact. Additionally, a parking study was prepared for the Master
Plan for the sports park by Carducci &. Associates which analyzed the parking needs for the
various recreational activities and sports fields planned for the Park. The parking study
anticipated the parking needs for each type of recreational facility, activity, court, or field
proposed for the Park, and determined that approximately 500 parking spaces would be needed
to serve park users. The Park is also designed with pedestrian connections to the various
surrounding neighborhoods and the school site across Lockhart Street. Due to spatial and
grading constraints, and the location of environmentally sensitive areas adjacent to the creek, a
total of 459 spaces are proposed for location within the boundaries of the park, and divided
between the two proposed parking lots accessed by Lockhart Street and Central Parkway (see
Master Plan Exhibit B). An additional 84 on -street parking spaces will also be available for a
total of 524 parking spaces. Overflow parking on late afternoons, evenings and weekends will
be able to park in the lots of the school on Lockhart Street. Therefore, no adverse impacts
relative to parking areas are anticipated.
Pedestrian_ Circulation &Pathways: No impact. A system of pathways will provide access for
pedestrians to all areas of the Park. The pathway system also provides neighborhood
connections to promote community use of the facility from all sides of the Park. All pathways
on the site are accessible and connect to perimeter sidewalks along the Park boundaries, and to
the Tassajara bike trail. A pedestrian bridge on the southern portion of Lockhart Street will
provide access from the proposed school and on -street parking. As this system of pathways and
walkways will provide complete access to all areas of the Park and surrounding neighborhoods
and trails, there are no adverse impacts related to pedestrian and bike access.
Uity of Dublin
Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Paris PA 05-021
Page 43
April 26, 2005
I t5l
XVI. Utilities and Service Systems
a-g) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB, require new or expanded water or
wastewater treatment facilities, require new storm drain facilities, require additional water
supplies, require new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities, or require new solid waste
facilities?
No impact. Since the subject site is within an area where the extension of urban services is
underway, and in adjacent areas already available, the construction of the proposed recreation
facilities will not increase the need for additional water or wastewater services. Some service
connections are anticipated prior to opening the facilities for public use. The project was taken
into consideration when the water and wastewater facilities where planned for the,east Dublin
area, and considered in the previous environmental documents prepared for Area F. Therefore,
there will be no need for additional mitigation measures than those already established by the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR.
XV. Mandatory Findings of Significance
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or prehistory?
No impact. The preceding analysis indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant
adverse impact on overall environmental quality, including biological resources or cultural
resources, with the implementation of mitigation measures included in the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, as discussed in this document.
%) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable " means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects
and the effects of probable future projects),
No impact. Although incremental increases in certain areas can be expected as a result of
constructing this project, including air emissions, light and glare, the project site lies within an
area with an approved specific plan which permits urbanized development and community
facilities. Mitigation measures are included in an approved EIR that would reduce any residual
impacts on the surrounding residential community to less -than -significant levels.
c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
No impact, No such impacts have been discovered in the course of preparing this Initial Study.
City of ]>Ublin Page 44
initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
INITIAL STUDY PREPARER
Janet Harbin, Senior Planner
City of Dublin Community Development Department
AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED
The following agencies and organizations were contacted in the course of this Initial Study:
City of Dublin Community Development Department
City of Dublin Parks and Community Services Department
City of Dublin Public Works Department
City of Dublin Police Department
Alameda County Fire Department, Dublin Division
REFERENCES
City of Dublin General Plan, updated November 2002.
City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. 2000.
Construction Project Plans for Fallon ,Sports Park, prepared by MacKay & Somps, dated
November 10, 2004.
Geotechnical Investigation for Fallon Park, prepared by Kleinfelder Engineering, November 22,
2004.
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan with u dates
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment Environmental Irr1 act Report, Wallace
Roberts and Todd, 1994, and subsequent Negative Declarations & Mitigated Negative
Declarations.
Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 1994, with update in 2004.
Final Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Wallace Roberts and Todd, 1998.
Master Plan for Fallon Sports Park, prepared by Carducci &.Associates, November 30, 2004
City of Dublin Page 45
initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005
FALLON SPORTS PAR
DEVELOPMENT &
MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
PA 05-021
FETTERS OF COMMENT RECEIVED
WITH RESPONSES
A) ,Alameda County Flood Control & Water
Conservation District - Zone 7
$) City of Livermore
I sm #� I I 4�
Al"FACHMENT 4
CITY OF DL BLIN
100 Chic Plaza, DUblin, California 9,1566 Website: http;llwww.c:i.dublin.c.a.us
May 26, 2005
Jim Horen, Principal Engineer
Advance Planning Section
Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Zone 7
100 North Canyons Parkway
Livermore, CA. 94551
RE: Comments on Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park (PA 05-021)
Dear Mr. Horen:
The City appreciates your Comments of May 13, 2005 on the Fallon Sports Park (PA 05-021) project
proposed in eastern Dublin. The Master Plan for the Fallon Sports Park was approved in November 2004,
and implemented the park established by the East Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment
adopted in 1994. Since the original conception of the plan for the Park, the City Council. has also adopted
a new barks and Recreation Master Plan (2004), which addressed the features and locations of the
proposed facilities for the Sports Park.
Regarding your first comment relative to the fees that the Applicant will be required to pay for Zone Ts
review of the project, the City of Dublin collects the Zone 7 fees at the Building Permit stage, and then
forwards the funds to Zone 7. In this case, because the sportsfield park project is a City sponsored project
on land dedicated to the City through. the agreement related to Dublin Ranch Area F, the City intends to
pay any and all required fees to the various peniiitting agencies prior to development and improvement of
the Fallon Sports Park. Payment of these fees Was included as a mitigation measure in the Eastern Dublin
General Plan/Specific Plan E1R and the Mitigation Monitoring Program applicable to this Project.
In response to DSRSD's second comment, the project does not propose to improve or enhance the stream
corridor as it is not within the boundaries of the park area, The improvement and enhancement of the
corridor is underway as part of the development of Area I~ of Dublin Ranch and was analyzed in previous
environmental documents for that project (1997 Negative Declaration, 2000 Mitigated Negative
Declaration, and 2004 Addendum), as stated in the Fallon Sports Park Development Initial Study on page
33 and 34. DSRSD reviewed the environmental documents and improvement plans, including the
hydrology study, in their review of the Dublin Ranch Area F and Dublin Ranch Area F North Projects
prior to issuance of grading permits for that project. This information is on file with the District.
All appropriate permits from USACE, CDF&G and RWQCB were obtained prior to the commencement
of the grading and improvement activities for the Area F projects, as detailed on page 33 of the Fallon
Sports Parr Development Initial Study. Any site -specific mitigation measures relative to Fallon Sports
Park such as landscaping around manmade structures, parking areas, and sportsfields and courts are
contained in the Initial Study for PA 05-021. Other potential impacts of the project will be reduced to a
Area Cade (925) - City Manager 833-6650 - City Council 833-6654 - Personnel 833-6605 - Economic Development 833-6650
Finance 83.'i-664❑ • PubflC Works/£rvneering 833-6630 - Perks e. Cornmuiflly Servious 833-6845 • Police 833-6670
Planning/Code Enforcement 833-6610 - BuiUng Inspection 833.6620 - Fire Prevention Bureau 833.6606
Prinfed on Recycled Paper
Letter to Zane 7 — Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 2
Fallon Sports Park Development PA 05-021
level of insignificance with the mitigation measures contained in the Initial Study and Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the Fallon Sports Park project will not result in significant effects on the
environment.
Should you have any further comments or questions, please contact me at (925) 833-6610.
Sin ely,
anet Harbin
Senior Planner
Cc: Mayor & City Councilrnem.bers
Rich Ambrose, City Manager
Diane Lowart, Parks and Community Services Dir.
Herma Lichtenstein, Park and Facilities Dev. Mngr.
Paul Kruger, Consulting Engineer
1P
ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
100 NORTH CANYONS PARKWAY, LIVERMORE, CA 94551 * . PHONE (925) 454-9000
May 13, 2005
Ms. Janet Harbin, Senior Planner
City of Dublin Planning Department
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Re. Initial study/mitigated Negative Declaration for Fallon Sports Park
Dear Ms. Harbin,:
,Zone 7 has reviewed the referenced CEQA document and we have several comments, which are made
in the content of Zone 7's mission to provide drinking water, non -potable water for agriculture and
irrigated turf, flood protection, and groundwater and stream management in the Livermore-Amador
Valley. Our comments are as follows;
• Mitigation for the creation of new impervious surface areas within the Livermore-Amador
Valley is addressed through the collection of Special Drainage Area (SDA) 7-1 Drainage Fees.
These fees are collected for Zone 7 by the appropriate local governing agency upon approval
of the vesting tentative or ,final map for now streets/developments and/or upon approval of any
new building/grading/use permit required of any public agency/cornmer6al/residential/
industrial/agricultural user. Collection of the drainage fees is dependent upon whether post -
project impervious surface area, conditions are greater than pre -project conditions and/or
whether fees have previously been paid for that particular site. The current fee is S0.662 per
square feet of new impervious surface area.
• The project proposes to enhance an existing stream corridor located along the western edge of
the project site for environmental mitigation purposes in the development of "Area F." The
Hydrology and Water Quality section of the Initial Study, page 37, states that the "project
preliminary grading plan conforms to Alameda County Flood Control and Water Quality
District, Zone 7 requirements and ...." Please be advised that this creek is not currently
designated as a Special Drainage Area 7-1 Authorized Project Line, nor is it currently
owned/maintained by Zone 7. The jurisdiction of this creek does not belong to Zone 7.
Therefore, at this time, there are not any Zone 7 permits and/or other Zone 7 requirements
placed on this .project. Also, note that Zone 7 is part of Alameda County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District and is not a Water Quality District. For our future use, we would
very much appreciate it if you could provide us information on where this creek drains to and
provide a copy of the hydrology study,
'AY i 6 n
�ANMIKL�
Ms. Janet Harbin
City of Dublin Planning Department
May 13, 2005
Page 2
'We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this document. If you have any questions, please feel
free to contact Jack Fong at (925) 454-5035 or myself at (925) 454-5019 at your earliest convenience.
Sincer 1.y, .
I X,
im Boren
Principal Engineer
Advance Planning Section
JH:JF:arr
cc: Joe Seto, Zone 7
Jack pang, Zone 7
Mary Lim, Zane 7
P; 'vt dvpdaro i�xlacklCFsA-F�dlon5potsPark doe
ILO
CITY OF DUBLIN
100 Givic Plaza, Dublin, California 9,1568 VV00sitc" httF)://www.ci.dublin.ca.uB
May 26, 2005
Jennifer Craven
Associate Planner
City of Livermore
1052 S. Livermore Ave.
Livermore, CA 94550
RE: Comments on InitialStudy/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fallon Sports Park (PA 05-021)
Dear Ms. Craven:
The City appreciates your cox=ents elated May 12, 2005 on the Fallon Sports Park (PA 05-021) project
proposed in eastern Dublin. As stated in the initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project,
the Master Plan for the Fallon Sports Park was approved in November 2004, to implement the park
established by the East Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment adopted in 1994. Since the
original conception of the plan for the Park, the City Council has also adopted a new Parks and Recreation
Master Plan (2004), which addressed the features and locations of the proposed facilities for the Sports
Park.
Below are the City of Dublin's responses to your comments. The numbered paragraphs below correspond
to the comment sections in your letter:
1) Rcgarding your first comment related to the connection between the description of a
"community park" and a "sports park," and whether a "sports park" is indeed a "community
park," the Parks & Recreation Master Plan was done in concert with the East Dublin Specific
Plan and General Plan Amendment and the associated Environinental Impact Deport adopted
in 1994 and subsequent Suppleineiatal E1R's and Addendums. The Community Park that is
referred to in the East Dublin Specific flan and General Plan Amendment adopted in 1994 is
referred to in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan as a Sports Park. There is a prototype in
the Parks and Recreation Master Plan which identifies the types of facilities that were to be in
the park. The Fallon Sports Park Master Plan used this prototype as a basis for the plan
adopted in November 2004. Furthermore, the Fallon Sports Park at approximately 60 acres
exceeds the minimum acreage required for a community park in the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan.
2) Comment noted. On page 27 of the initial Study for the development of the Fallon Sports
Park, it is stated that:
Low-level lighting will be used along walkways and trail. Sewer lighting lamps with low
wattage are proposed for the parking area. New street lights and other security lighting
combined with the night lighting for the courts crud, fields at the park could create a "spill
Area Code (925) • City Manager 833-6650 • City Coumil 833-6650 - Personnel 833.6605 - Economic Development 833-6650
Fingnoo 833-6640 - Public Works/Engineering 8336630 - Parks & Community Services 833-6646 - Polioo 833-6670
Pianning/Code Entorcemont 833-6610 - Building Inspection 833-6G20 • Fire Prevention Bureau 833-6606
Printed on Rec'yf, gPd Paper
Letter to City of Livermore -- Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 2 h,0
Fallon Sports Park Development PA 05-021
over" effect of light in the residential areas closest to the site, and may operate as late as
10: 00 PM. The following mitigation measure will be added to the project to ensure that the
lighting is adequate for the use and unobtrusive to surrounding residences:
Mitigation Measure 1. A photometric study shall be provided with final
construction drawings of the project prior to the issuance of an electrical permit for
installation of any lighting. "Spill over" lighting shall be kept to a minimum to prevent
disturbance and intrusion into residential areas through the use of lower lighting, with
light standards forfields and courts designed to minimize the light intrusion into
residential areas. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce the impact of
nighttime lighting to a level of less -than -significant.
This mitigation measure is included as a mitigation measure in the Eastern Dublin General
Plan/Specific Plan EIR and the Mitigation Monitoring Program applicable to this Project (see
attached Exhibit). The assumption used in the environmental document regarding the effects
of the park lighting on aircraft flying approximately 700 feet or higher above the ground is
that if "spill over" lighting is kept to a minimum so it does not intrude on the nearby
residences, based on the photometric study, and is directed toward the playing fields and
courts, itwould not have adverse effects on aircraft above the park. There is absolutely no
reason to direct lighting for the park toward aircraft in the sky. However, the study will
include verification that this assumption is indeed correct.
3) It is acknowledged that aircraft fsorn the Livermore Airport regularly flies over a portion of
Eastern Dublin where the Fallon Sports Park is located. This was discussed in regard to the
expansion of the Livermore Airport and the use of larger, heavier aircraft related to the
expanded airport in the correspondence from the City of Dublin to the Livermore Airport
District and the City of Livermore earlier this year and in 2004. It was not identified as a
significant hazard related to the present airport use type. The Livermore Airport Master Plan
Advisory Committee's Negative Declaration document for the airport expansion stated that
overflights contribute little to alubient noise levels in Livermore where they originate, and did
not evaluate the noise resulthig from the larger aircraft to be used at the expanded facility.
The previous Dublin environmental documents which evaluated the enviromnental and noise
impacts of development of a park on the subject property, the Eastern Dublin General
Plaza/Specific Plan EIR and the associated Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted in 1994,
the Negative Declaration for Areas B and E of Dublin Ranch approved on November 18, 1997,
the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Area F of Dublin Ranch approved on February 15,
2000, and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Area F in 2004, were incorporated by
reference in the Initial Study for the Fallon Sports Park development (page 7 of the Initial
Study). The Initial Study for the 2004 Mitigated Negative Declaration for Area F of Dublin
Ranch in 2004 reviewed the proposed reconfiguration of uses, including the use of 60 acres for
a community park. Included in the Initial Study was a detailed analysis of the existing noise
sources in the vicinity of the project site, and identification of areas subject to unacceptable
noise levels exceeding 60 decibels. The major sources of noise identified in the documents
were the traffic on 1-580, some local streets in Area F of Dublin Ranch, and aircraft flyovers.
Mitigation Measures for noise (Mitigation Measures 3.10/1.0 and 3.10/3.0-5.0), which was
determined to be a less -than -significant impact in the area with mitigation, were addressed by
Letter to City of Livermore — Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 3 1 LP to
Fallon Sports Park Development PA 05-021
these documents and are included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program in the attached
Exhibit matrix. Relative to the park use, short-term constructions noise was an issue of concern
and Mitigation Measures incorporated into the park project will reduce the level of short-term
construction noise to a less -than -sign f cant level. The proposed park area was not identified
as a location subject to excessive long -terra noise exceeding 60 decibels, unlike some
residential subdivisions which are surrounded by sound walls due to traffic noise. Therefore,
no further mitigation for noise impacts, including those resulting from aircraft: ilyovers, is
necessary.
Please refer to Response under Comment 2, above, related to hazards resulting from park
lighting on aircraft.
4) Comment acknowledged regarding distances from the Project site to the Livermore Airport.
Please refer to Response under Comment 3, above, regarding noise impacts. Based on the
environmental documents prepared by Dublin for the project site, and those prepared to the
Livermore Airport Expansion project, there is no need to disclose noise hazards to potential
park users.
Should you have any further comments or questions, please contact me at (925) 833-6610.
Sincerely,
anet Harbin
senior Planner
Cc: Mayor & City Councilmembers
Rich Ambrose, City Manager
Diane Lowart, Parks and Community Services Dir.
Hernia Lichtenstein, Park and Facilities Dev. Mngr.
Paul Kruger, Consulting Engineer
ADM I N I44TRATIO N'
ELVILD1NC
105Z S, I-ivenmore Avcl,ue
I,.ivtmiore. CA 94550.4899
Ph; (925) 960-4000
Fax: (925) 960.4056
TDD (91 5) 960-4104
vrww.gi.Iivarmore Ua,us
MAV OR i CCIUNCIL
Ph; 960-4010 - Fax 966-4025
CCTV MANAGER
Ph: 960,404() . Fax: 960-4045
CITY ATTORNEY
Ph: 960-4150 - Fax; 960-4190
TIISK ftAANAGEMENT
Ph: 960-4170 - Fax: 960.4196
CITY CI ,ICRK
Ph: 960-4zW o Fax: 960-4i05
COMMUNITY
DMILLOPMENT
Ph: �)0-4400 - Fax: 960,4450
6iaildmg DIMsGrn
Ph: 960-4410. Fax: 960- 419
,EnKinaering Division
Ph: 960-4500 - Ft,X: 960-4505
Housing & Human Services
Division
?h: 960-4590 - Fax, 960.4149
Planning lyi„4rrrrn
Ph; 960.4450. Fax: 960-4459
ECONON41(7
PEWTi)PMENT
1'h: 06(1-4140. Fmk; 960-4149
I-1NANC.'E DEPARTMEN I
Ph; 960-,;100 - Fax: 960-4309
FIRE, pltl'AW1'NI16NT
4550 Fan Avenue
Ph; 454-2361 . Fax: 454-2367
LIBRARY
1000 s. Livgmore Avenue
Ph: 373-5500 - Fax: 373-5iO3
IiUMAN RE,5OIIRCES
Ph: 960-4100. I-axt %04I05
POLICE DEPARTMENT
I 1 .I0 '�. Liv.rmS,re AV nuc
PSI: 371-4900- Fax: 37t-4M
Tbi) :571-4982
PUBLIC SERVICES
3500 Rohe.rteon Park Rd
Ph: 96U-8000 - Fax; 960-800$
4irperl j3ivi, —
636 -I'errnmal Cireie
Ph: 373-5260. Fax: 373-5042
Grr(f CRiIPBe Dilvvinn
909 (:.IkLhhnuae Diivc.
Ph: 373-5239 . Fax: 373-5,703
Mai tenance DiviRinn
.35M Ro6crosan I'nrk Rd.
Ph: 960-802C * Fax: 960-8025
WiiAr ,Reronrces Div&mn
101 W. Jack I.-ondon Blvd.
Ph; 960-5I00 . Fax: 960-9I0S
AF-CEIVE
MAY 1 6 M
DUBUtl PLA"'KGOTY DF LI vmmoR '
CouatD
tiSitl.ee
1849"
May 12, 2005
Janet Harbin, Senior Planner
City of Dublin
100 Civic plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
RE: Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for proposed City of Dublin Fallon
Sports 1arlc Development (PA 05-021)
Dear Ms. Harbin:
Thank for you providing the City of Livermore the opportunity to review and comment on
the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration USWND) for the proposed Fallon Sports
Park. Livermore's concerns with the environmental analysis and proposed sports park
generally focus on the location of the sports park, and the subsequent interplay of sports
park operations with aircraft operations, as described below.
Pro'ect Descri tion an — From the project
description, it appears that this enviromn.enta1 analysis is being tiered from the 1993 EIR
prepared for the East Dublin General flan Amend-ment/Specific Plan, as well as a number
of subsequent tiered TS/MN'D's for the Bast Dublin planning area. It is not clear,
however, that the previous environmental doculnents planned for and analyzed th.e
proposed sports park, because the references in the prior analysers were far a "COMI-11tMity"
park, and not a "sports" parr (see paragraph 1 and 2, page 7 of IS/MND). If the proposed
sports park is indeed the previously analyzed conununity parr, please provide additional
discussion indicating how the connection from "community" park to "sports" park was
determined appropriate to enable CEQA tiering (e.g., the description, intended uses, and
acreage range standards for community parks are consistent with and appropriate for the
proposed sports park).
Aesthetics — Section I, Aesthetics, response "d," indicates that lighting sources utilized at
the sports park will create new light and glare impacts for the surrounding single-family
residential areas. 'Phis response, however, neglects to aokiiowledge that the project site is
located under the FAA established traffic pattern for aircraft utilizing the primary runway
(25R-7L) at the Livermore Airport, and that any new lighting source added to the project
site could potentially create lighting and glare impacts for pilots. Tljis impact could
create a new hazard for pilots, arid, as such, it is discussed further under the following
Hazards comment section.
I toys
Hazards — Section VII, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, response "e, f ' indicates that there are
no anticipated impacts related to aircraft noise and crash zone hazards. The project site;
however, is located under the FAA established traffic pattern for the primary runway (25R-7L)
at the Livermore Airport, indicating that the site will be frequently over -flown by aircraft.
Secondly, this hazards response indicates that in 1999, the ALUC had no jurisdiction over land
uses within the project site, Since that time, however, the ALUC airport influence area boundary
has expanded, and now encompasses the southern half of the project site, indicating that the
ALUC now has jurisdiction over land uses within the project. Finally, Livermore requests that
additional mitigation be incorporated into the IS/MND that will ensure that all lighting sources
utilized at the sports park are designed to direct light downward so as .to prevent upward spill-
over or create glare into the FAA designated aircraft traffic pattern. Livermore requests that this
IS/MND response be amended to disclose the potential of these aircraft related conflicts, and to
add additional mitigation to control lighting source impacts from the project on pilots.
Noise — Section XI, Noise, response "e, f' Indicates that the project is not located within two -
miles of a public airport, finding that project would not expose people in the project area to
excessive noise levels. This response is incorrect because the western boundary of the
Livermore Airport is located (.83)-mile from the project site, and the western end of the primary
runaway is located 1,52-miles from the project site, Additionally, as discussed under the hazards
conunent, the project site is located under the FAA designated aircraft traffic pattern for the
primary runway, and, as such, will be frequently over -flown by aircraft, therefore exposing
sports parks users to some amount of aircraft noise. During consideration of the draft Airport
Master Plan Update in 2004, Livermore received. 21 letters from Dublin residents indicating that
aircraft operations were problematic for d)eir business and residential activities, as well as two
letters from the City of Dublin echoing these same concerns (attached). Livermore requests that
this response be amended to disclose the potential for sports park users to be exposed to aircraft
noise.
Once again, Livermore appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on this project.
Livenmore requests that Dublin respond to our concemg with this project, and indicate how these
concerns will be incorporated into the project's design, use, and operation. Please contact n1e, or
Principal Planner Susan. Frost, at 925-960-4450, if you have any questions,
Sincerely,
CA4���
Jtifer Craver►
Associate Plan-ner
cc: Marc Roberts, Co=unity Development Director
Eric Brown, Planning Manager
Leander H.auri, Airport Manager
Susan Frost, Principal Planner
CITY of DUI LIN
100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California 9455$
January 6, 2005
Leander Hauri, Airport Manager
Livermore Municipal Airport
636 Terminal Circle
Livermore, CA 94551-9609
Website: httP://www,ol,dublin.ca•us
RECEIVED
JAN i p 2006
LIVERMORE AIRPORT
Re: Livermore Airport Master plan Advisory Comrrrittee Item for January 31, 2005
Doss Mr. Hauri:
I have appreciated the opportunity to participate in the Livermore Airport Master Plan Advisory
Committee; (Advisory Committee), as the City of Dublin City Council RepTesentative. -•'The Advisory
Committee has developed recommendations for the Draft Livermore Airport 2004 Master Plan Update
(2004 Update) and the projeet's Initial tudy/hEtigated Negative Declaration (Negative -.Declaration),
prepared in vonforrnanee with State of California law. I aria writing to express my concern that mazy of
the important issues raised by myself and by earlier correspondence from the City of Dublin have not
been addressed by the Advisory Committee's recoil=mdatioris. r
I believe that the following issues should be addressed in the revisions to the Airport Master Plan and in
future envirmmental documentation, which should be in the form of an Enviromp nt , . pact deport
(EIR) consistent with the CahfoTnia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and pm -visions:
Project Site
The Negative Declaratioa does not discuss existing or approved noise sensitive uses within the City
of Dublin that are located in close proximity to the Aiipott. This information should be used in, the
documenis, snob as in the Airspace Plana. The Eastc-rin Dublin Spcci5c Plan and Gei]eral Y'hm
Amndrnent and the: subsequent iinpletncnting approvah have been corisistent with AJ,UC policies
regarding the Airport and specifically recognized the existiig Airporrt Protection .Area. likewise,
existing and approved dc'vvlop:irrent within the City of Dublin should be recognized.. in the Airport
Master Plain and the resulting effects should be addressed.
Aircraft MIT,
The changes in aircraft mix that will result from the proposed changes to hangar space, runway design
(length anal pavement strength), and .Airport Business Plan will create noise impacts that have not
been adequately addressed in the previous' Negative Declaration. The changes to hangars will
,accorxuxaodate larger and noisier aircraft and these additional impacts should be studied and mitigated
in the environmental documentation under. CEQA•. Cinder a "Reduced Project" scmari.o, typically
found in the Alterx>atives section of an MR, the LiveTmo1,e Municipal Airport would have an
opportunity to review the Airport's goals and impacts without the changes brought about by the
proposed new hangars, new runway design, and new leaseholds.
■ Flight Patterns A roach Patterns
Insufficient information is provided in the 2004 Update on the ay rnaeh,i�nd takeoff patterns and
fli ,t_aths, I am concemcd that the flight paths and flight patterns resulting tram changes it thi
Livermore Municipal Airport will permit the flight of larger and noisier aircraft above the eastern
Dublin community.
Area Code (925) • CRy Manager 833-6650 - City Council 833-6650 • Personnel 833-6606 • Economic Development 833-6650
Finance 833-8640 - Public WorksiEngineertng 833-6630 • Parks & Comrnunity Servioss 833-6645 - Po Ice 833-6570
Planning/Code Enforcement 83s-6010 - Building Inspection 833-6620• Fire Prevention Bureau 833-6eoe
printed on Pacycled Paper
Noise
The Livermore General Plan EIR stated that over flights contribute little to ambient noise levels in
Livermore, however, the General Plaza EIR did not assume a shift in aircraft mix resulting fxom the
proposed changes to the Airport as a result of the 2004 Update project or assume that planes operate
as low as 700 feet above existuag and planned residential uses in the eastern Dublin'area. At this
distance, over flights do have the potential to increase noise impacts to residences located vvithin
these flight paths, Additionally, the General Plata EIR and Mitigated Negative Declaration do not
inglude any discussion of single poise ev_entR from aircraft flyovers to sensitive rcceptczs located in
Dublin. Further analysis and disolosure of existing and potential impacts are needed to .provide full
disclosure of the potential adverse impacts of the 2004 Update project.
■ A' art usincss Plan
The Airport Business Plan attached to the Master Flan Update recommends that a buffer.be, created .S
to I mile beyond the Airport Protection Area due to perceived conflicts with residential, uses,, These
conflicts should be fully disclosed and identified in greater detail to adequately address the pmajeet
impacts.
Qoerationa�l Limits
Without operatimal lzinits and noise buffering, as required for new uses in the Livermore General
Plan (Volley N-1. IP4), the im-aacts of the airport have not been adequately predicted ;or contr Iled.
Far example, the proposed rtuaway lights would incrtwe nighttime aitcra$ Operations, unless,
operationbl cmirols such as restrictions on flight tunes during the night and restrictions on the
number' of aircraft :operations were implemehted. Although the airport is not a new use, tlm proposed
changes in operations activity would change the FAA classification of the airport, resulting in -
us new
typ6 of airport use and increased intensity at the site.
For ',casts
Lastly, the Master Plan 2004 Update's stated intent is to accommodate the forecasts ,for growth in
aircraft operations. It'is essential that the operations forecast tiled in the 2004 update (370,000
operations annually by the year 2020) be accornpanied by supporting data such as ttae source a of the
forecast's conohl slota5. I believe that the 2004 Update has not established the basis for, or need for,
the r.ivermorc A.ipolt's expallaion.
I urgc the Liver naorc City Council to work with its neighboring canummities to resolve I' c$ important
issues for the mutual benefit of the Livcrtriore Municipal ,Airport at)d all of the businesses and residcnta in
the Tri-Valley Region.
Sincerely,
ear c FF,�
City of D lirr Vicayor
cc: Members of the Dublin City Council
Richard C. Ambrose, City Manager
Eddie Peabody, Jr., Community Development Director
file
QTY oF DUBLI
1Go Civic Plaza, Dublin, California 94568
April 7, 2004
Ms, Jvnnifer Craven, Associate. Planner
City. of Livermore Planning Division
1052 S. Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550-4899
Wobsite: http://www,ci,dublin.ca.LJS
F—IVD
APR - $ ZU04
PLANNING DIVISION
Fie-_ Review of the Livermore Municipal Airport 2004 Master Plan Update and initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Dear Ms. Craven'
The City bf Dublin appreciates the opportunity to provide oorx�rnent5 on the Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ;for the City of Livermore Municipal Airport 2004 Master
Plan Update (hereafter "Master Plan" &TO "Mitigated Negative Declaration")
The City zecagnizes the importance the Livermore Airport provides to the local coz-imunity,
however as an adjacent, jurisdiction, the City of Dublin is concerned about the potentially
significant impacts of the proposed project from associated noise impacts from the Airport.
Specifically, the City is concemed that the expanded airport operation will result in additional
noise impacts to the existing and planned residential uses located. within Eastern Dublin. In the
past, the City has receivcd complaints from Eastern Dublin. ,residents regarding flight activities
f` om existing operation of thx - L. vc;rmoxe Airport. Dublin is concerned that the scope and
content of; the Mitigated Negative Declaration is not adequate.
The City's co3i. nmcnts arf, suimnarized below:
fmti L Sire
The Mitigated Negative Declaration does not mention uses within, the City of Dublin as a.diacent
to the project site. The Mitigated Negative Declaration does not discuss existing or approved
noise sensitive uses within the City of Dublin that are located in close proximity to the Akport.
The City of Dublin is located less than '/2 mile away from the 7L425R Runway and the General
Plain shows residential land uses that are located lcss than 1 mile from the existing runway.
Additionally, existing single-family residential land uses are located approximately L 8 miles
away from the existing Runway.
Additionally, the Master Plan should recognize existing development approval within adjacelit
cities. The Eastern Dublin Specific Flan and General flan Amendment and the subsequent
implementing approvals (i.e, prezoning and annexation) were consistent with the ALUC policies
regarding the Airport and specifically recognized the existing Airport Protection Ayea
surrounding the Airport. Likewise the Master Plan should recognize existing and approved
development within the City of Dublin.
Area Code (925) - City Manager 833-C)650 • City Councii 833-6650 • Personnel 833-5605 • Economic Deveiopment 833-6650
Finance 833-0640 • Pub{io WorkslEngine9fing 833-603P ' Parks & Community Services 533.6645 • Police 833-5670
Planning/Code Bntorcernent 3$3-6610 • $Uhding Inspection 833-6620 • Fire Prev®ntion BWragu 833-6606
prrrlted on Recycled Paper
The Map contained in the Master Platt, labeled Airspace Plana, is inadequate in that it utilizes an
out of date US S base map and does not show current or approved land uses qr nearby
jurisdictional lines. The City would be happy to share the most current data in our GIS library to
facilitate the preparation of a new map.
froiecl Description
The project description states the plan does not encourage increased operations, however
changes to airport including runway lengthening and strengthening, new taxiway, and additional
hanger space will result in increased utilization of the Airport. The Project Description section
on page 7 includes the statement that "implementation of the plan does not encourage inoreased
operations." This statement is contradicted by a statement iri the Master Plan, found on page 2-9,
which reads:
"The availability of reasonably priced bougar units will largely govem the amount of increase in
single -engine aircraft based at the airport. Hangar availability will also shape the growth in other
aircraft types. ...Growth in multi -engine aircraft (i.e. both piston and jet) will also be affected by
the ability of comnxercial Ie-aseholds."
According to the Master Plan the aircraft mix is projected to change significantly in the future.
The proposed modifications to the Airport will facilitate these changes to the aircraft mix, which
will in tarn result in a higher percentage of larger and noisier aircraft utilizing the Airport. The
table below is from the Master Plan, which demonstrates that the largest percentage increase in
aircraft type occurs in the twin -engine and small business jet aircraft. These planes tend to
produce the highest levels of noise. Without the proposed changes to the Airport, the increased
utilization of these types of aircraft could not be accommodated. The change in aircraft mix
would result is additional noise impacts, Which were not addressed or studied, zior mitigation
measures ide.n.tified.
Aircraft type
Single Engine Fixed
Single Engine Variable
Twin -Engine Piston
Twin -Engine Turbo Prop
Small Fan Jet
Med Fan Jet
Aviation Activity 2001
149,980
55,000
45, 000
3,800
1,100
Boo
Large Fanjet 100
Vo increase 2020 v. 2001
14.3% .
63.6%
77.8%
110.5%
809.1 %
$37.5%
900.0%
Small Turbojet 200 '
Large Turbo Fan 26 _ -
Heiico tern 1,500 2.000 33.3%
total 257,500 370,000 43. 7%
Protected Activity_ L02d
171,500
9o,000
80,000
8,000
10,000
7,500
1,000
sOurcG:Uvr3rmoro Mur7icipal Airport MaMf;r Plan Update March P004
Flight Patterns andZyj2roach Patterm
Insufficient infomation is provided in
patterns and flight paths. The City is
the Master Plan Update on the
one-Prnerl that the flight paths
regularly place larger and noisier aircraft above
Area.
approach and take -off
and flight patterns will
sensitive receptors within the Eastern Dublin
Noise
The Mitigated Negative Declaration does not contain an adequate discussion or analysis on
potential noise impacts. Aircraft noise around airports consists of a series of single -events from
individual aircraft flyovers. The methodology utilized in the Mitigated Negative Declaration
was an average of noise levels (CNEL). This methodology does not quantify the maximum
instMtaneous noise levels (Lmax) from individual aircraft flybys, therefore, the utilization of
CNEL alone can make it difficult for the public -and decision makers to fully evaluate noise
effects,
The Livermore General Plan EIR stated that over flights contribute little to ambient noise levels
in Livermore. However, according to information from the Airport Manager, aircraft operate as
low as 700 feet above existing and planned residential uses within Eastern Dublin. At this
distance, over flights do have the potential to increase noise impacts to residences located within
flight paths. Additionally, the General Plan EIR and Mitigated Negative Declaration do not
include any discussiou of single noise events frorA aircraft flyovers to sensitive receptors located
in Dublin.
The General flan EIR projected axi additional 113,000-flight increase from 2000. to 2020,
However, the General Plan EIR did not assume a shift in aircraft mix resulting from the proposed
changes to the Airport. As a result of this shift, larger airdafts would be introduced and
additional potential noise impacts would result that were not studied Md mitigation measures
were not identified in either the Livermore General Plan, EIR or the Mitigated Negative
Declaration. Therefore the sole reliance upon Mitigation Measure Noise GP-2 to fully mitigate
noisz impacts is inappropriate given the proknuamatic-nature of the Livermore General Plan EIR
and the proposed changes to the .Airport as a result of the Master Plan update.
The Airport Business ,Pleat
The AR -port Busianess flan attached to the Master Plain Update suggests that a buffer be created .5
to 1 mile bayond the Airport Protection Area due to conflicts with residential uses, Please clarity
if it is intended to extend this buffer beyond jurisdictional lines, into nearby cities.
Operational L units
The Di7aft City of Uvorrnore General Plan contains Policy (N-I-LP4) that the City shall require
operational limitations and feasible noise buffering for new uses that generate significant noise
impacts near sensitive uses. Although the, airport is trot a new use, changes in operations activity
would change the FAA classification of the airport, the Airport Deference Code, The City of
Dublin is coTkoerned that without specific operational limitations, the impacts of the airport
expansion cannot be adequately predicted or controlled.
Thank you again for the opportunity to provide these comments. The City of Dublia looks
forward to working with Livermore representatives to craft appropriate .mitigation measures that
ensure the impacts from the proposed expansion of the Airport are fully mitigated. The City
respectfully requests that this Mitigated Negative Declaration not be adopted until sucks time that
adequate mitigation measures can be identified that fully mitigates the impacts resulting from the
Master Plan implementatiotx.
The City believes that cooperation between Livermore and Dublin on this issue can result in a
solution that is beneficial to the citizens ❑f both communities.
Should you need clarification on any of the comments provided in this letter, phase feel free to
contact Ms. Jeri Ram, Dublin Planning Manager, at 925-833-6610.
Sincerely,
A r
Eddie Peabody Jr, AZCP
Community Developmx -nt Director
cc: Mayor and City Council
•Richard Ambrose City Manager
Jeri Ram, Plaming Manager
} Melissa Morton, Public Works Director
ROE
LDBER
DE R Consultants in Acoustics
31 March 2004 '
Pierce Macdonald
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Subject: initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
Livermore Municipal Airport Master Plan
RCD Projeut ##: 04-012-1
Dear Pierce:
We have completed our review of the noise impacts that were identified in the initial
study/mitigated negative declaraflan (I IMND) for the Livermore Municipal Airport. In
summary, we found three areas that need additional analysis to allow a reader to
acquire a complete understanding of the project's impacts. They are:
1. Increase. in ambient noise due toproiect — The I.S/MND does not provide an
analysis of the change in aircraft noise levels that would occur as a result of the
project implementation.
2. Single event noise levels — The ISUND does not discuss single event noise levels
from individual plane flyovers. The California Division of Aeronautics and a recent
court derision both identify the need to discuss singly event noise and potential
effects.
3. Outdoor noise levels in excess of City standards The IS/MND states that existing
.residences east of the airport will be exposed to a potentially significant impact
since outdoor noise levels will be in excess of a CNEL of 60 dBA, the City's
normally acceptable noise level. Air-conditioning is proposed to mitigate the
impact by allowing windows to remain closed. Is the impact mitigated if outdoor
levels remain over 60 dBA?
Discussion
The IS/MND identifies impacts that are associated with the impiernentation of the
master plan. Impacts associated with the plan are primarily based on the findings of
the E1R on the Livermore General Plan Update. The noise related sections of the
following documents were consulted during our review:
1100 Larkspur Landing Circle #254 1 Larkspur CA 94939 1 Tel 415 464 0150 1 Fax 415 464 0165
Pierce Macdonald
31 March 20b4 I (
Page 2.
Livermore Municipal Airport Master Plan Update, Public Review Draft, March
2004
• Initial Sturdy and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Livermore Municipal
Airport Draft Master Plait, February 2004
• City of Livermore General Plan 2003 — 2026
• The Draft/Final EIR on the City of Livermore General Plan
(except Appendix F — Noise)
• Noise Impact Analysis, Livermore Airport, Livermore California, Prepared by
LSA Associates, June 2002
1. No "INCRF-ASE IN NOISE" DiscussION
Page 51 of the 1S/MND, section Xi(c) addresses increase in ambient noise levels.
The IS/MND states that the implementation of the Airport Master Plan Update would
not lead to any greater or different noise impacts related to substantial permanent
increases in ambient noise levels than those identified in the 2003 EIR for the General
Man Update and refers the reader to pages 165 to 174 in Volume II of the 2003 EIR,
' According to the 2003 FIR, a project would have significant noise impact if the project
would increase noise levels by over 4 dBA above existing levels without the project.
The ihccreasa in noise from the airport, however, is not assessed with respect to -this .
standard. Instead it is assessed only with respect to the City of Livermore's standard
for outdoor noise, a CNEL of 60 d13A- This approach ignores the guidance of the
State of California's Airport Land Use Planning Handbook' which states that, "...
consideratlon needs to be glven to 170tjust the absolute level of noise, but also tho
amount of noise increase resulting from the project."
Examination of the existing and future airport noise contours indicates that areas near
the airport would experience increases in aircraft noise of up to 5 dBA, An analysis of
noise increases should be conducted for the noise sensitive areas in the airport
vicinity including those in the City of Dublin.
2, No SINGLE EVENT NoisE LEvFL ❑IscUSSION
Aircraft noise around airports consists of a series of singie events from individual
aircraft flyovers. Federal and State regulations require that the noise exposure from
airports be quantified in terms of cumulative (or average) noise level descriptors such
as CNEL or Ldn. These descriptors, however, do not quantify the maximum
Instantaneous noise levels from individual aircraft flybys and, therefore, can
make it difficult for the public and decision makers to fully evaluate noise effects,
1 "California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook," State of California Lepartment of Transportation Division of
Aeronautics, January 2002, prepared by Shutt Moen Associates, page 7-40.
Pierce Macdonald
31 March 2004
Page 3
Litigation over an EIR on the Airport Development Plan at the Oakland International
Airport resulted in a recent court decision that required a supplemental E ..Ili
addressing single event noise levels. Similarly, the State of California recognizes the
limitation of the CNEL metric and suggests the use of other noise metrics such as Lmax
as is evidenced by'the following excerpt from the State's Airport Land Use Planning
Handbook.
"A final consideration with respect to reviews of airport development
proposals is that the issue involves not only a matter of policy (how much
noise is acceptable?), but also, as previously noted, communication of the
information in a form that the general public can comprehend,
Consequently environmental impact documents prepared for airport -
related projects may need to make use of supplemental noise metrics to
explain the impacts even though the determination of significance relies
upon criteria related to cumulative noise metrics."2
The inclusion of information regarding single event noise and flight tracks would help
the public understand the effects of the project and allow adjacent communities to
adopt appropriate land uses and planning policies. Disclosure of flight tracks and a
discussion of single event noise levels and their effects could reduce the potential for
future noise complaints.
3. MITIGATION OF OuTDoorz NOISE
The IWMND refers to page 173 of the 2003 EIR which has the sole impact statement
regarding aircraft noise (NOISE GP-2).3 It identifies that homes, east of the airport,
will be exposed to a CNEL greater than 60 dBA, a significant irnpact. The adopted
mitigation measure requires that the City purchase and installing air conditioning units
for the affected residences so that their windows can be closed when it would
otherwise be too hot to do so.
Although the Elie states that this mitigation measure will reduce the ihnpact to a less
than significant level, the air conditioning will not improve the noise environment in thQ
backyards of the homes. The backyards would still have a CNEL which is greater
than the "normal]'y acceptable" noise level of 60 dBA for residential land use (General
Plan Table 9-7). The Negative Declaration should explain how, the installation of air
conditioning will fully mitigate the significant noise impact.
2 Same as foatnota 1.
3 Livermore Draft General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report Public Review Draft,
Volume 11, June 2003, page 174
Uall
'; Sports
INITIAL STUDYI
CFQA ADDENDUM
Lead Agency:
City of Dublin
Prepared By:
Jerry Haag, Urban Planner
February 7,2014
Table of Contents
Introduction...................................................................................................................2
Applicant............................................................. ...........................................................
2
Project Location and Context......................................................................................3
Prior Environmental Documents................................................................................3
ProjectDescription........................................................................................................5
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected.............................................................15
Determination............................................ ....................................................................15
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ..............................
Attachment to Initial Study.........................................................................................30
1. Aesthetics...............................................................................................30
2. Agricultural and Forestry Resources .... .............................................
32
3. Air Quality.............................................................................................33
4. Biological Resources.............................................................................35
5. Cultural Resources................................................................................37
6. Geology and Soils................................................................................39
7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials....................................................41
& Hydrology and Water Quality ..........................
....42
9. Land Use and Planning........................................................................44
10. Mineral Resources.................................................................................46
11. Noise.......................................................................................................46
12. Population and Housing ................................................. ...........47
13. Public Services.......................................................................................49
14. Recreation ...................... ........................................ ............ .....................
49
15. Transportation/Traffic.........................................................................51
16- Utilities and Service Systems...............................................................52
17. Mandatory Findings of Significance..................................................54
InitialStudy Preparers.................................................................................................57
Agencies and Organizations Consulted....................................................................57
References..............................................................................................................
.......57
City of Dublin
Environmental Checklist/
Initial Study
Introduction
This Initial Study has been prepared in accord with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and assesses the potential environmental impacts
of approving and implementing Phase II (the Lower Terrace) of the Fallon Sports Park
located in Eastern Dublin.
The Initial Study consists of a completed environmental checklist and a brief
explanation of the environmental topics addressed in the checklist. Because the
proposed project is generally based on the land use designations, circulation patterns
etc. assigned to the project by the City of Dublin General Plan, the Initial Study relies on
a Program EIR certified by the City in 1993 for the Eastern Dublin General Plan
Amendment and Specific Plan (the "Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and
Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 91103064). That
EIR, also known in this Initial Study as the "Eastern Dublin EIR," evaluated the
following impacts: Land Use, Population, Employment and Housing, Traffic and
Circulation, Community Services and Facilities, Sewer, Water and Storm Drainage,
Soils, Geology and Seismicity, Biological Resources, Visual Resources, Cultural
Resources, Noise, Air Quality and Fiscal Considerations.
In 2005, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-05 that approved a
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan. This will be
referred to as the "2005 MND." The 2005 MND analyzed the environmental impacts of
approving a Master Plan for the development of the Fallon Sports Park, located on the
northwest corner of Fallon Road and Central Parkway and constructing recreational
improvements envisioned in the Master Plan.
The subject of this Initial Study is a proposed change to the Master Plan to install night
lighting on one sports field located on the northeast corner of Central Parkway and
Lockhart Street that was not previously considered for night lighting and to relocate an
existing City preschool center from Emerald Glen Park to Fallon Sports Park .for
approximately five years.
Applicant:
City of Dublin
Parks and Community Services Department
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin CA
City of Dublin Page 2
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
Attn: Rosemary Alex
Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator
(925) 833-6646
Project Location and Context
Fallon Sports Park consists of approximately 60 acres of land devoted to a range of
active sports recreational uses, including baseball and softball diamonds, soccer fields,
basketball and tennis courts. Other uses include group picnic areas, play areas, sports
paths, restrooms and vehicle parking lots. Phase I improvements, encompassing
approximately 27 acres of land, was completed in 2010 and is open for public use. Two
additional phases, generally located in the north, east and south, remain to be
constructed. This Initial Study addresses improvements in Phase II, also known as the
"Lower Terrace."
A Master Plan For the entire 60-acre Fallon Sports Park was approved by the City of
Dublin in June 2006.
The park is located on the northwest corner of Fallon Road and Central Parkway in the
Eastern Extended Planning area of the City of Dublin as identified in the Dublin
General Plan. It is generally located along the west side of Fallon Road, north of Central
Parkway and approximately one-half mile north of the I-580 freeway.
Exhibit I shows the regional location of the City of Dublin. Exhibit 2 shows the location
of Fallon Sports Park in relation to surrounding features in Eastern Dublin.. Exhibit 3
depicts the Lower Terrace area, the focus of this Initial Study, as well as the location of
proposed site improvements (discussed below),
Existing land uses adjacent to the project site includes residential development and a
fire station north of the park, residential development and undeveloped land to the
east, residential development to the west and undeveloped land to the south.
Prior Environmental Review Documents
The project has been included in two previous CEQA documents, as noted below:
Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (State
Clearinghouse #91103064). A Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern
Dublin General Plan Amendment (Eastern Extended Planning Area) and the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) was certified by the City Council in 1993 by Resolution
No. 51-93. This document and its related Addenda collectively are referred to as the
"Eastern Dublin EIR" or "EDEIR." It evaluated the Following impacts:
Land Use; Population, Employment and Housing; Traffic and Circulation;
Community Services and Facilities; Sewer, Water and Storm Drainage; Soils,
Geology and Seismicity; Biological Resources; Visual Resources; Cultural
Resources; Noise; Air Quality; and Fiscal Considerations.
City of Dublin Page 3
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Resolution No. 53-93)
for the following impacts:
Cumulative loss of agriculture and open space laud, cumulative traffic,
extension of certain community facilities (natural gas, electric and telephone
service), Consumption of non-renewable natural resources, increases in energy
uses through increased water treatment and disposal and through operation of
the water distribution system, inducement of substantial growth and
concentration of population, earthquake ground shaking, loss or degradation
of botanically sensitive habitat, regional air quality, noise and alteration of
visual character.
The Eastern Dublin EIR was challenged in court and was found to be legally
adequate.
Fallon Sports Park Master Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration (2005 MND)
A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to analyze the Fallon Sports Park
Master Plan in 2005. The MND was approved by City Council Resolution No. 89-05
on May 15, 2005. The MND assumed development of the park Consistent with the
Fallon Sports Park Master Plan. A number of mitigation measures were included in
the adopted MND in the attachment to the Initial Study.
City of Dublin Page 4
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
Project Description
The proposed project includes approving and developing the Lower Terrace of the
Park. Overall improvements envisioned for this phase include but are not limited to:
■ Constructing an on -site entry road at the existing curb cut along the north side of
Central Parkway;
■ Building an approximately 145-space vehicle parking lot.
■ Constructing a combination restroom and concession building.
+ Extending existing on -site pedestrian pathways from the existing park.
• Constructing a 90' lighted baseball field.
■ Construction of a 2,000 square foot building for public use, including but not
limited to community meetings, rentals, etc.)
* Constructing two synthetic turf lighted soccer fields plus a warm up area.
• Extending utility lines.
+ Temporarily relocating a City preschool center for a five-year period.
■ Related improvements, such as site grading and water quality features, to
facilitate the above improvements.
Details regarding the proposed field lighting and temporary preschool center relocation
are discussed below.
Field Lighting. The City of Dublin is proposing to install up to S lighting fixtures (still
correct number?) adjacent to existing lighted soccer fields similar to existing lights that
were constructed as part of the initial phase of the park. The planned athletic fields are
located on the southwest con-ier of Fallon Sports Park. The approximate locations of the
light fixtures are shown on Exhibit 4a. An alternative location is shown on Exhibit 4b.
Exhibit 5 shows the design of a typical lighting fixture_ Lighting standards (poles) are
proposed to be up to 80 feet tall to illuminate soccer and rugby fields. All light fixtures
would be 1500-watt metal halide lamps. Lights would only be used when the field is in
use up until 10 pm each night and all lights would be turned off at 10:10 p.m.
New lights would be sited so as to minimize spill over of unwanted light and glare on
adjacent residential areas to the south and west of the park. To achieve this, lights are
proposed to be installed using the following criteria to limit spill over of light from the
site.
Lights near Lockhart Street shall have a maximum vertical illumination of 0.20
foot-candles at a distance of 260 horizontal distance from the west side of the
proposed soccer field. A foot-candle is a unit of illumination equivalent to the
light produced from 1 candle at a distance of 1 foot. Prior to using the lights, a
photometric analysis will be completed by the City's lighting consultant to
confirm this standard is achieved.
■ Lights near Central Parkway would be limited to a maximum vertical
illumination of 0.40 foot-candles at a distance of 260 horizontal feet from the
south side of the baseball field. A photometric analysis will also be completed by
the City to ensure this lighting standard is achieved.
City of Dublin Page 5
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
Preschool Relocation. The City proposes to relocate Emerald Glen preschool from its
current location in Emerald Glen Park to a portion of the existing (Phase 1) Fallon Sports
Park while Emerald Glen Aquatic facility is under construction for up to a 5-year
period. Exhibit 6 shows the approximate location of the proposed preschool, which
would be immediately north of the existing parking lot in the approximate north central
of the park.
The preschool enrolls a maximum of 50 students per session with two sessions operated
per day. The morning session would begin at approximately 8:45 to 9:15 a.m. and end at
11:00 to 11.45 a.m. The afternoon session would extend from approximately 12.45 to
1:45 p.m. to 3:15 to 3:45 p.m.
Each session would have a maximum staff of six staff people at the school would arrive
approximately 15 minutes before the start of the session and depart approximately 15
minutes following the close of the session.
Proposed preschool facilities include installing modular classrooms totaling 2,300
square feet on a portion of the existing park as described above. Water, wastewater,
electrical and other utilities would be extended to the buildings. School staff and
visitors would use the existing parking lot,
Requested City approvals. The City is proposing to amend the Fallon Sports Park
Master Plan to accommodate the proposed project.
City of Dublin page 6
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
f
El Schranrr vacn a G�nCUrd BfacJr PraRgnd '-
n❑r[11
Richmond
SAN
FRANCISCO
Berna�,yr f ;
FrafOh[ ,
Harlew
roa Part _
T❑ck,r Vallry .
Amar❑n Ivt
nrr.na
an
Fran in-
h
.al4 t o.
' ter
i _�•
�.�. MtIIL1fa
'Peek;; �".:"'_ blfatwr❑trph
San Mh s
Mrrnm{a7 York ...
el
1
(L
Ifelf
A{o❑n Rnr .k '
Eukergh Murray
Y
�T�
.. y+'+'1 nrrnrs Rrg,Anar:,: •i T ns�rl'nd
- .qy� Prrarrre - ,
b
Plea Hill An - $unKr Park _
�j W+ki y❑n hiriones Sda+ y2 Claylvn Afhfrlie CvrrrWrF
`- Irryr P rk Regioaef Yrvk a r4 �' &lntwprvd
rMtrcz vnllfi' Cari3 cr. nlrr 9albKr[y Apple
I[.nomgtm Walnut Firl1 Part
er cherry • . �ryr'M*
rant' I{as Lafayette Saranap Cac[k-.
Uri nda Rork Park M. Oiabia
y Berkeley'' wn,� Srnrlrmk h" al �a,� F
In `� Ala ❑ 1iDW1d Vork-y
I FIF.. cnnrvn k+orege �6ry ,.. Prr¢rnr -
RrQmenl mvr9AR IerPrery'
:oavu•n .L a Dam €e 0xhherk Req,wrM Park [ v
'. �. L,k, Pr'k
OAKLAND'
_ lirdwDnE ia�•w` Tana 06
• runralr �Ir,�,
SAN RAMON
. s Ala` a .San f{errtvn
... R,�`• Eact Saln Sli SITE ,
r811Leand rrc'p. ❑ i. LOCATION
ari Le�
DUBLIN
M alley �°""i06'n w .
sen nro. Frrirvirw . 1.Ikrn.r �� LIVERMORE
a7.; 3c . Hayward `'N
-- w• Rkis❑Ariobr PLEASANTON
f�fffspn ie,l. Rd
` � Cartsmlrn,A-AmL _
a4 v�h. g:V��'i�l" Perk
tl V Via' //::�
it n�; � � .�•r�'F P rk ivn CilY � � 7yrwl �
OA
F
Y- FREMONT
4wark ro�
_ Eae3woo 1 �.:
kwth-- y� MA awn
faw U,lrx Eaef. `� rrnclyvy
{rrz<reld la� 7 z MILES
prr
1{ars. elpwty `rtds;Helwa may,
a � Mfa Park {9
$, ereddur r�at - 7re Eeni f � f
CITY OF DUBLIN Exhibit 1
FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE 11 REGIONAL CONTEXT
INITIAL STUDY
0 0.5
Miles
STREAM CORRIDOR
SITE LOCATION
SCHOOL
q) FIRE STATION
RURAL RESIDENTIAL/
AGRICULTURE
LOW -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
F-IMED-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
MEDIF€IGH-DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL
A
`.HIGH -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
.OPEN SPACE
x
.PUBLIC J SEMI-PUBLIC
MGENERAL COMMERCIAL
.GENERAL COMMERCIAL I
CAMPUS OFFICE
CAMPUS OFFICE
®INDUSTRIAL PART(
u MIXED USE 2 / CAMPUS
OFFICE
Ej PARK
HIGHWAY 580
EXIT 48 AT FALLON ROAD
CITY OF DUE3LiN
Exhibit 2
FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE If SITE CONTEXT
INJTIAL STUDY
EXISTING SYNTHETIC
TURF SQCCfR FIELDS
- -J
-
1� 90' BASEBALL DIAMOND (NATURAL GRASS ONLY)
Q BOX 120 YARD LIGHTED SYNTHETIC TURF
SOCCER FIELD
65X100 YARD LIGHTED SYNTHETIC TURF SOCCER
FIELD
® RESTROOM I CONCESSION BUILDING
i RECREATION BUILDING
CITY OF DUBLIN
FALLON SPORTS PARK PRASE it
INITIAL STUDY
EXISTING LIGHTED
r
SOFTBALL FIELD
.14
250' t
— --- APPROXIMATE LIMIT OF WORK
7D LIGHTED BOCCE COURTS (4)
ADVENTURE PLAY AREA
[9 GROUP PICNIC AREA
16 ENTRY ROAD AND PARKING (--145 CARS)
Exhibit 3
PROPOSED LOWER TERRACE
IMPROVEMENTS
EXISTING LIGHTED
'LIGHTED ~� I ��,k SOFTBALL FIELD
EXISTING
r f
!1 SYNTHETIC TURF
r SO FIE
I'Ll1 CCR . LDS
�r
Q SPORTS POLE LIGHT APPROXIMATE LOCATION
LIGHTED BOCCE BALL COURTS
CITY OF DUBLIN
FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE II
INITIAL STUDY
250' f
N
Exhibit 4
LOCATION OF
FIELD LIGHTING
POLETOP LUI
ASSEMBLY
WIRE HARNESS
i*6X POW
ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS —
ENCLOSURE
_gwsm
-a pACM46
_fttmc
—PPiyIR LANOM wcs
—ow Mmdw PER cowl
PER lfW[ IRE r A"7EI1
GALVANIZED STEEL POLE I{
� I}
1,3 PUSL ROX IN
r
t t_T
i i
07 14' LONG PRECAST CONCRETE. BASE I
CENTRIFUGALLY SPUN. PRESTRESSED i
SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS PROVOED BY
MANUFACTURER FOR DESIGN OF
CONCRETE WE
i
I
i
a
i
EXTENDED GLARE
CONTROL VWRS
BP15-s
ADJACENT PAVEMENT
PULL BOX CONCRETE PAD
�3 REBAR
'' CAISSON
RECASI
30' i8. - 'f , CL COONCRETTE BASE
LIGHT FIXTURE F3 4.
27 1/2. I ON POLES 53 & 54
TOP VIEW
CL -
15.75'
LIGHT POLE BASE
PULL BOX OWBAND
�3 REBAR I GROUND LEVEL 291-E"
CONCRETE _i
ATTACHMENT 9 M
BACKFILL
• JACKING EAR
-DETAIL •A�
GROUND LEVEL
SSD FOR BASE AND
REINFORCEMENT DETAILS
30' DiA MIN. 3000 PSI
CONCRETE BACKF}LL. S51)
ELEVATKIN NEW
DETAIL 'A'
SCALE: NTS
NOTE: DIMENSIONS SHOWN
ARE MINIMUM REQUIRED
1O•-0' I
2'-p'
CUSTOMER
�CpNTFUCTOR SUPPLIES:
GRL' �J
-OUNDI G ROD AND CONNECTION +
TO SYSTEM GROUNDING LUG
-CONCRETE BACKFILL I '
-UNDERGROUND WIRING N
-SWVIDE ENTRANCE
PRECAST BASE 51DE VIEW
KNUCKLE
' C F3 ON POLES S1 & S2
HL
BRACKET
WIRE ACCESS HUB
HAMDHOLE WITH GROUNDING
LUG ACCESS
INTEGRATED POLE GROUNDING
FITTINGS
LIFTING BAR HOLE
ABOVE GROUND ACCESS HOLE
UNDERGROUND ACCESS HOLE
INTEGRATED
GROUNDING
ELECTRODE
CITY OF DUBLIN Exhibit 5
FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE II TYPICAL LIGHT FIXTURE
INITIAL STUDY . __ _i
3 0v
a,
�_ rn U
wz
a� X
s
��F
8
�21ME
WFA
rr
R�:�• jti�xl�/1 P
6�
zF
r W
1-0,
z
z �
wiz
n a W
Y �
aU
a =
LLJ
a
z
0
® c3
LU
N J
0 J
a 0
ui 0
CC _
cn
LU
cc
Ll]
a
2
a
cc
Q
CL
2 G]
r
M cc
= a r
❑ {A ❑
LL Z N
00
J Q
H r
U LL
1. Project description: Approval of Phase fX improvements to the existing
Fallon Sports Park, would include lighted baseball
field, two lighted soccer fields, a temporarily
relocated preschool, a 2,000 square foot building and
other park and recreation improvements.
2. Lead agency: City of Dublin
Community Parks & Community Services
Department
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin CA 94568
3. Contact persons: Rosemary Alex
Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator
(925) 833 6646
4. Project location: Fallon Sports Park, northwest corner of Fallon Road
and Central Parkway in Eastern Dublin
5. Project sponsor: City of Dublin
6. General Plan designation: Communi ty Park
7. Zoning: PD-Planned Development
S. Other public agency required approvals:
Amendment to City of Dublin Parks and Recreation Master Plan
(probable)
City of Dublin Page 14
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The enviroiunental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "potentially significant impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages_
_
Aesthetics
_
Agricultural
-
Air Quality
Resources
-
Biological
_
Cultural Resources
-
Geology Soils
Resources
_
Hazards and
-
Hydrology/ Water
_
Land Use/
Hazardous
Quality
Planning
Materials
_
Mineral Resources
--
Noise
--
Population./
Housing
--
Public Services
_
Recreation
-
Transportation/
Circulation
--
Utilities/Service
-
Mandatory
Systems
Findings of
Significance
Determination (to be completed by Lead Agency):
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the
environment and the previous Negative Declaration certified for this project by the
City of Dublin adequately addresses potential impacts.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Negative
Declaration will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project may have a significant effect on the
environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by
mitigation measures based on earlier analysis as described on the attached sheets, if the
effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." A
Environmental Impact Report is required, but must only analyze the effects that
remain to be addressed.
X I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be any new or substantially more severe significant effect in
this case because all potentially significant effects: a) have been analyzed adequately in
an earlier EIR and MND pursuant to applicable standards; and (b) have been avoided
or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR and MND, including revisions or mitigation
City of Dublin
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II
Page 15
February 2014
measures that are imposed on the proposed Project, except for those impacts which
were identified as significant and unavoidable and for which a Statement of Overriding
Considerations was previously adopted by the City. An Addendum to the Eastern
Dublin Environmental Impact Report and the 2005 Fallon Sports Park Mitigated
Negative Declaration will be prepared.
Signature: ! Bate:
Printed Name: &qV`"I For:
City of Dublin Page 16
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
1.) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "no impact" answers that are
adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the
parenthesis following each question. A "no impact" answer is adequately
supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does
not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault
rupture zone). A "no impact" answer should be explained where it is based on
project -specific factors as well as general factors (e.g. the project will not expose
sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as
well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and
construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur,
then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially
significant, less -than -significant with mitigation, or less -than -significant.
"Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that
an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant
Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less -than -Significant With Mitigation Incorporated"
applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from
"Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less -than -Significant Impact." The lead
agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce
the effect to a less -than -significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17,
"Earlier Analysis," as described in (5) below, may be crass -referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other
CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or
negative declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). The checklist will include a response
"no new impact" in these circumstances_ In this case, a brief discussion should
identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for
review.
b) impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above
checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such
effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less -Than -Significant with
Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures
which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the
extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project.
City of Dublin Page 17
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
6) Lead Agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to
information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances,
etc.). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where
appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is
substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached and other
sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is a suggested form and lead agencies are free to use different formats;
however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist
that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each agency should identify the significance criteria or
threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question and the mitigation measures
identified, if any, to reduce the impact to a less than significant level.
City of Dublin Page lg
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
Environmental Impacts (Note: Source of determination listed in parenthesis. See listing of
sources used to determine each potential impact at the end of the checklist)
Note: A full discussion of each item is found
following the checklist.
1. Aesthetics. World the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista? (Source: 2,3,5)
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including
but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
(Source: 2,3,4)
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character
or quality of the site and its surroundings?
(Source: 2, 5)
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare
which would adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area? (Source: 2, 4, 6)
2. Agricultural Resources
Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or
Farmland of Statewide importance, as shown on
the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to a non-
agricultural use? (Source: 2, 3, 5)
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use,
or a Williamson Act contract? (Source: 1,2,3)
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could
result in conversion of farmland to a non-
agricultural use? (Source: 2,3,5)
3. Air- Quality (Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management district may be relied on to make
the following determinations). Would the
project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan? (Source: 24)
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air
quality violation? (Source: 2,4)
City of Dublin
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 19
February 2014
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is non-attaimnent under an applicable
federal or state ambient air qua] ity standard
(including releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? (2,
4,6)
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? (Source: 4, 5)
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people? (Source: S, 6)
4. Biological Resources. Would the project
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional plans, policies
or regulations, or by the California Department
of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?(Source: 2,3 ,4)
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies or
regulations or by the California Department of
Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service? (Source: 2,3,4)
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (including but not liar ted to
marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption or
other means?
(Source: Source: 2,3,4)
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites? (Source: 2, 3,4)
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as tree
protection ordinances? (Source: 1, 2, 4)
City of Dublin
Initial Study/Fallon Sports ParkJPhase 11
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less "Chan
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 20
February 2014
f) Conflict with the provision of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan or other approved local,
regional or state habitat conservation plan?
(Source: 1,2)
5. Cultural Resources. Would the project
a) Cause a substantial adverse impact in the
significance of a historical resource as defined in
Sec. 15064.5? (Source: 2,4,5)
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archeological resource
pursuant to Sec. 15064.5 (Source: 2,4,5)
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource, site or unique geologic
feature? (Source: 2,3,5)
d) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of a formal cemetery? (4)
G. Geology and Soils. Would the project
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated
on the most recent Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault (Source: 2,
4)
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking (2, 5)
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including
liquefaction? (2, 4)
iv) Landslides? (2, 4)
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil? (Source: 2,4,5 )
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project and potentially result in on -
or off -site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or similar hazards
(Source: 2, 4)
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial risks to life or property?
(Source: 2,4)
City of Dublin
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitt ation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 21
February 2014
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of wastewater? (Source: 2,4)
7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Would the
project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use or
disposal of hazardous materials
(Source: 2, 4, 5)
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment? (Source: 2, 4, 5)
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
materials or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of
an existing or proposed school? (Source: 2, 3, 4)
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Sec. 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment? (Source: 6)
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted
within two miles of a public airport of public use
airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area? (Source: 2, 3)
f) For a project within the vicinity of private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project area?
(Source: 2, 4)
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with the adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
(Source: 2,6)
City of Dublin
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase lI
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Lcss Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X -
X
X
Page 22
February 2014
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands? (Source: 2, 4,5)
8. Hydrology and Water Quality. Would the project.
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements? (Source: 2,4)
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater
table level (e.g. the production rate of existing
nearby wells would drop to a level which would
not support existing land uses or planned uses
for which permits have been granted? (2,4)
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including through the alteration
of the course of a stream or river, in a manner
which would result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off -site? (Source: 2, 4, 5)
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or areas, including through the alteration
of the course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a mariner which would result in
flooding on- or off -site? (Source: 2, 4, 5)
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
(Source: 2, 4, 5)
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
(Source: 2,4)
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area
as snapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary
or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood
delineation map? (Source: 4, 6)
City of Dublin
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less 'Phan
Significant
With
Mitileation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 23
February 2014
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area
structures which would impede or redirect flood
flows? (Source: 4,6)
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury, and death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam? (4)
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or rnudf€ow? (5)
9. Land Use and Planning. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
(Source: 1)
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy,
or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over
the project (including but not limited to the
general plan, specific plan, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the Purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect? (Source: 1,
2,3,6)
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation
plan or natural community conservation plant?
(1,2,3,6)
10. Mineral Resources. Would the project
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state? (Source: 1,
2,4)
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general Plan, specific plan
or other land use plan? (Source: 1, 2, 4)
l I. Noise. World the proposal result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise
levels in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies? (2, 4)
b) Exposure of persons or to generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise
levels? (Source: 2,4)
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above existing
levels without the project? (2, 4, 5)
City of Dublin
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
i
Page 24
February 2014
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project? (2,4, 5)
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project expose people residing
or working n the project area to excessive noise
levels'? (2, 4, 5)
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels? (Source: 2, 4, 5)
12. Population and Housing. World" the project
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,
either directly or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)? (Source: 2, 4, 5)
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere? (4, 5)
c) Displace substantial numbers of people,
necessitating the construction of replacement of
housing elsewhere? (Source: 4, )
13. Public Services. Would the proposal:
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental
facilities, need for new or physically altered
government facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service rations,
response times or other performance objectives
for any of the public services? (Sources: 2, G)
Fire protecti on
Police protection
Schools
Parks
Other public facilities
Solid Waste
City of Dublin
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
impact
N0 New
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 25
February 2014
14. Recreation:
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or recreational
facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated (Source: 2, 4, 5)
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the con stniction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
(Source: 2, 4, 5)
15, Transportation and Traffic. Would the pro jeer:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity
of the street system (i.e, result in a substantial
increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the
volume to capacity ratio on roads or congestion
at intersections)? (2, 4, 5)
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a
level of service standard established by the
County Congestion Management Agency for
designated roads or highways? (4,5)
c} Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
(4,5)
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design
feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses, such as farm
equipment? (5)
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (5)
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (5)
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs
supporting alternative transportation (such as bus
turnouts and bicycle facilities)
(1,2,4)
City of Dublin
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11
PotentiallyFSignificani
Significant
ImpactImpact
Less than
Significant
No New
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 26
February 2014
16. Utilities and Service Systems. Would the project
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control
Board? (4, 5)
b) Require or result in the construction of new water
or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion
of existing facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental effects?
(4,5)
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects? (4,5)
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project from existing water entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements
needed? (5)
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to serve
the project's projected demand in addition to the
providers existing commitments? (5)
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid
waste disposal needs? (5)
g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste? (5)
71.7. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, substantially reduce
the number of or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
City of Dub{in
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
I
X
I
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 27
February 2014
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects and the effects of probable
future projects).
c) Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
X
X
Sources used to determine ootential environmental imi)acts
1. Eastern General Plan AmendinentlSpecific Plan
2. Eastern Dublin General Plan AtnendinentlSpeeific Plan EIR
3 2005 Fallon Sports Park Mitigated Negative Declaration
4. Discussion with City staff or service provider
5. Site Visit
G. Other Source
XVIL Earlier Analyses
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for
review.
Portions of the environmental setting, project impacts and mitigation measures for this
Initial Study refer to environmental information contained in. the 1993 Eastern Dublin
General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State
Clearinghouse No_ 91103064), hereinafter referred to as the Eastern Dublin EIR or
EDEIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR is a Program EIR which was prepared for the Eastern
Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan of which this Project is a part. It
was certified by the Dublin City Council on May 10, 1993. Following certification of the
EIR, the Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for impacts
including but not limited to: cumulative traffic, extension of certain community facilities
(natural gas, electric and telephone service), regional air quality, noise and visual.
The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a large number of mitigation measures which apply to
this project and which would be applied to any development within the project area.
Specific mitigation measures identified in the certified Eastern Dublin EIR for potential
impacts are referenced in the text of this Initial Study.
City of Dublin Page 28
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
This Initial Study also relies on the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted in
2Da5, previously cited, that analyzed the impacts of approving the Fallon Sports Park
Master Plan and constructing the park.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and 15163, this Initial Study is intended to
identify the potential for any new or substantially increased significant impacts on or of
the project which were not evaluated in the Eastern Dublin EIR or the 2035 MND for the
park and which would require additional environmental review.
City of Dublin Page 29
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
Attachment to Initial Study
Discussion of Checklist
1. Aesthetics
Previous CEOA documents
Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures
to reduce anticipated visual resource impacts from the General Plan and EDSP project.
These include:
Mitigation Measure 3.8/ 1.0 reduced project impacts related to standardized tract
development (IM 3.8 / B) to a less -than -significant level. This mitigation requires
future developers to establish visually distinct communities which preserves the
character of the natural landscape by protecting key visual elements and
maintaining views from major travel corridors.
Mitigation Measure 3.8 f 2.0 reduced the impact of converting the rural and open
space character of the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan area (IM
3.8/B) but not to a less -than -significant level. The mitigation measure requires
implementation of the land use plan that emphasizes retention of predominant
natural features. Even with adherence to this measure, IM 3.8/B would remain
significant and unavoidable on both a project and cumulative level.
Mitigation Measure 3.8/3.0 would reduce the impact of obscuring distinctive
natural features of the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan area (IM
3.8 f Q but not to a less -than -significant level. The mitigation measure requires
implementation of the land use plan that emphasizes retention of predominant
naturalfeatures.
Mitigation Measures 3.8/4.0-4.5 reduced the impact of altering the visual quality
of hillsides (IM 3.8/D) to a less -than -significant level. These mitigation measures
require implemtation of appropriate Eastern Dublin Specific Plan policies
including but not limited to use of sensitive grading design to miniinize grading,
use of existing topographic features, limiting use of flat pads for construction,
using building designs that conform to natural land forms, recontouring hillside
to resemble existing topography and minimizing the height of cut and fill slopes.
Mitigation Measures 3.8 / 5.0-5.2 reduced the impact of altering the visual quality
of ridges (IM 3.8 / E) to a less -than. -significant level. These mitigation measures
limit development on main ridges that border the Specific Plan area to the north
and east but are allowed on foreground hills, and would limit development in
locations where scenic views would be obscured or would extend above a
ridgetop.
City of Dublin Page 30
initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase fl February 2014
■ Mitigation Measure 3.8 j 6.0 reduced the impact of altering the visual quality of
watercourses (IM 3.8/ G) to a less -than -significant level. This mitigation measure
protects Tassajara Creek and other stream courses from unnecessary alteration or
disturbance, and adjoining development should be sited to maintain visual
access to stream corridors.
• Mitigation Measures 3.817.0 and 7/ 1 reduced impacts on scenic vistas (lM 3.811)
to a less -than -significant level. These mitigation measures require protection of
designated open space areas and directs the City to conduct a visual survey of
the EDSP area to identify and map viewsheds.
2005 MND
Mitigation Measure 1 required a photometric study with final construction
drawings prior to the issuance of an electrical permit for the installation of
any lighting. Lighting "spill -over" shall be kept to a minimum to disturbance
and intrusion into residential areas through the use of lower lighting, with
light standards for fields and courts designed to minimize light intrusion into
residential areas.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to applicable mitigation measures
identified above.
Project Impacts
a) Have a saubstantial adverse iinpact on a scenic vista? No New Impact, The Lower
Terrace area is located on a downslope area generally facing Central Parkway.
Although planned for a major park, the site is vacant and does not contain any
existing scenic vistas or public gathering places. Proposed development of an
additional phase of the Fallon Sports Park under the auspices of the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan and Fallon Sports Park Master Plan was analyzed in the
2005 MND. The proposed day care facility would be located within a developed
portion of the existing park and there would be limited visibility of school
buildings from surrounding streets. No new or more severe impacts are
anticipated for the added field lighting and temporary preschool with respect to
substantial adverse impacts on a scenic vista.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including state scenic highway? No New
Impact. The project site has been rough graded in connection with prior
approvals and in anticipation of construction of a public park. The site is located
approximately one-half mile north of the 1-580 freeway, a designated scenic
highway. No major stands of trees or other similar scenic resources are present
on the site that would be significantly impacted. The site for the proposed day
care facility has already been graded as part of Phase I improvements for the
park. No new or more severe impacts are anticipated with respect to this topic
than have been previously analyzed.
c) Substantially degrade existing visual character or the quality of the site? No New
Impact. The proposed project includes the consideration developing an
City of Dublin Page 31
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
additional, second phase of the Fallon Sports Park. Aesthetic impacts would
include disturbance of existing vegetation and grading of undeveloped land to
create generally flat pads for sports fields, parking areas, walkways and other
recreational improvements. This second phase of park development was
considered and analyzed in the 2005 MND and no new or more severe impacts
are anticipated with approval of the second phase of park development.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area? No New Impact. The proposed project would include
the installation of sports field lighting as described in the Project Description
section of this Initial Study. To ensure that there would be rnh-dirial and less -
than. -significant "spill over" of unwanted light and glare off of the park site, the
City will require that field lighting plans and specification conform to a
maximum maintained vertical illuminance level for spill light that does not
exceed 0.8 foot-candles (FC) (initial 1.1 FQ when measured 150 feet from edge of
the soccer field. Measurements are to be taken facing the lights and at heights
that may be of most concern (i.e. 5 feet, 10 feet and 15 feet above grade). The
lighting designer shall prepare initial vertical illuminance calculations on the line
to establish compliance with 0.8 FC level and indicate maintenance factor used to
convert initial values to maintained values. At 200 feet from edge of soccer field
spill light design specifications shall not exceed 0.1 FC measured at finished
grade level.
2. Agricultural and Forestry Resources
Previous CE A documents
Eastern .Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR identified several potential impacts related
to agricultural resources. Impact IM 3.1/C stated that discontinuation of agricultural
uses would be an insignficant impact due to on -going urbanization trends in Dublin
and the Tri-Valley area. Impact 3.1 /D identified a loss of Iands of Farmlands of Local
Importance with approval and implementation of the General Plan and Specific Plan.
This was also noted as an insignificant impact. Impact 3.1 / F stated that buildout of
Specific Plan land uses would have a significant and unavoidable impact on cumulative
loss of agricultural and open space lands. Finally, Impact IM 3.1 / E noted indirect
impacts related to non -renewal of Williamson Act contracts. This impact was also
identified as an insignificant impact.
2005 MND. No impact to agricultural or forestry resources were identified in this
document.
Project Impacts
a-d) Convert prime farmland to a non-agricultural use or involve other changes which could
result in conversion of farinland to a non-agricultural use, conflict with existing zoning
for agricultural use or a Willia)nson Act contract, result in the loss of forest land use
conversion of forest Iand to ca non forest use or involve of other changes that could result
in the conversion of forest land to a non forest use? No New Impact. No significant
City of Dublin Page 32
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
impacts were identified with respect to agricultural resources in previous CEQA
documents listed above. No new conditions have been identified in this Initial
Study with respect to conversion of prime farmland or forest land to a non--
agricultural or non -forest use and no new or more severe impacts would result
than were analyzed in previous CEQA documents for this site. The site is not
zoned for agricultural use nor is there a Williamson Act contract in effect on the
property. No new or more severe impacts are therefore anticipated than were
previously analyzed n the 2005 MND.
3. Air Quality
Previous CEQA documents
Eastern Dublin £IR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures
to reduce anticipated air quality impacts from the General Plan and EDSP project. These
include:
Mitigation Measures 3.11/2.0-4.0 reduced project and cumulative impacts related
to vehicle emission from construction equipment (IM 3.11/B) but not to a less -
than -significant level. These mitigations require emission control from on -site
equipment, completion of a construction impact reduction plan and others. Even
with adherence to these mitigations, this impact would remain significant and
unavoidable.
Mitigation Measures 3.11 / 5.0-11.0 reduced mobile source emission from RGG
and Nax (IM 3.11 C) but not to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation measures
require coordination of growth with transportation plans and other measures.
Many of which are at a policy (not a project) level. Even with adherence to
adopted mitigations, IM 3.11 / C would remain significant and unavoidable.
Mitigation Measures 3.11 / 12.0-13.0 reduced project and cumulative impacts
related to stationary source emissions (IM 3.11/E) but not to a less -than -
significant level. The two adopted mitigations require reduction of stationary
source emissions to the extent feasible by use of energy conservation techniques
and recycling of solid waste material. Even with adherence to the two measures,
stationary source emissions would remain significant and unavoidable.
2005 MND. This document did not identify and significant air quality impacts or
mitigation measures.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to applicable mitigation measures
related to air quality.
Project Im,�acts
a) Would the project conflict or obstruct implementation of an air quality plan? No New
Impact. Approval and construction of the Phase ll portion of the Fallon Sports
Park would be consistent with growth projections included in the Dublin General
City of Dublin Page 33
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
Plan, which is used as the basis of the Regional Clean Air Plan, No new or more
severe impacts would occur result with respect to this topic than was previously
analyzed.
b) Would the project violate any air quality standards? No New Impact. Grading and
construction activities associated with Phase II would generate fugitive dust into
the environmental, potentially exceeding Bay Area Air Quality Management
District air quality standards. Adherence to Mitigation Measure 2 contained in the
2005 MND and other applicable Eastern Dublin EIR air quality mitigation
measures will reduce this impact to a less -than -significant level by requiring a
number of dust control measures, including frequent watering of graded areas,
covering of haul trucks, stabilizing graded areas with non -toxic soil stabilizers,
sweeping of paved areas and hydroseeding or stabilizing graded areas. Therefore,
no new or more severe impacts would result than have been previously analyzed
in other CEQA documents.
c) Would the project result in cumulatively considerable air pollutants? No New Impact.
The Eastern Dublin EIR found that Mobile Source and Stationary Source air
emissions as significant and irreversible impacts. Accordingly, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations was approved when the EDSP was approved and the
EDSP EIR certified in 1994. The proposed park expansion is not anticipated to
generate additional vehicle trips beyond those analyzed in the EDSP EIR and the
2005 MND. Therefore, new or more severe impacts would occur and no additional
analysis is required for this topic.
d) Expose sensitive receptors to significant pollutant concentrations No New Impact. The
same level of park use is anticipated than was anticipated in the 2005 MND in
terms of sensitive receptors. Adherence to mitigation measures contained in the
2005 MND and Eastern Dublin EIR reduced impacts to sensitive receptors to a
less -than -significant level. No new or more severe impacts have been identified in
this Initial Study than were previously analyzed.
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? No New Impact.
Since the proposed project does not include manufacturing or similarusesuses, no
significant amounts of objectionable odors would be created. The Eastern Dublin
EIR identified this impact as a potentially significant cumulative impact which
could not be mitigated to achieve the eight -fold reduction in stationary source
emissions needed to meet the less -than -significant threshold and, pursuant to
CEQA, the City of Dublin adopted a Statemment of Overriding Consideration for
this impact. No new impacts are identified in this Initial Study beyond those
identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR and other CEQA documents.
City of Dublin Page 34
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
4. Biological Resources
Previous CEOA documents
Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures
to reduce anticipated impacts to biological resources from the General Plan and EDSP
project. These include:
• Mitigation Measures 3.7/ 1.0-4.0 reduced impacts related to direct habitat loss
(IM 3.7/A) to a less -than -significant level. These mitigations require
minimization of direct habitat loss due to development, preparation of
vegetation management and enhancement plans and development of a grazing
management plan by the City of Dublin.
• Mitigation Measure 3.7/5.0 reduced impacts related to indirect loss of vegetation
removal (IM 3.7/S) to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure 3.7/5.0
requires revegetation of graded or disturbed areas as quickly as possible.
Mitigation Measures 3.7/6.0-17.0 reduced impacts related to loss or degradation
of botanically sensitive habitats (IM 3.7/ Q to a less -than --significant level. These
measures require a wide range of steps to be taken by future developers to
minimize impacts to sensitive habitat areas, including preserving natural stream
corridors, incorporating natural greenbelts and open space into development
projects, preparation of individual wetland delineations, preparation of
individual erosion and sedimentation plans and similar actions.
• Mitigation Measures 3.7/ 18.0-19.0 reduced impacts related to the San Joaquin kit
fox (IM 3.7/1)) to a less -than -significant level. These measures require
Consultation with appropriate regulatory agencies regarding the possibility of lit
fox on project sites and restrictions on use of pesticides and herbicides.
• Mitigation Measures 3.7/20.0-22.0 reduced impacts related to the tri-colored
blackbird (IM 3.7/I) to a less -than -significant level. These measures require
preconstruction surveys for this species and protection of impacted habitat areas.
These measures also apply to burrowing owl and badger species.
• Mitigation Measures 3.7/23.0-24.0 reduced impacts related to destruction of
Golden Eagle nesting sites (IM 3.7/r) to a less -than -significant level. These
measures require preconstruction surveys for this species and protection of
impacted habitat areas.
• Mitigation Measure 3.7/ 25.0 reduced impacts related to loss of Golden Eagle
foraging habitat (IM 3.7/K) to a less -than -significant level. This measure requires
the identification of a Golden Eagle protection zone within the Eastern Dublin
planning area.
City of Dublin Page 35
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
■ Mitigation Measure 3.7j26.0 reduced impacts related to Golden Eagle and other
raptor electrocution (IM 3.71 L) to a less -than -significant level. This measure
requires undergrounding of electrical transmission facilities.
■ Mitigation Measure 3.7 J 27.0 reduced impacts related to American badger (IM
3.7/N) to a less -than -significant level. This measure mandates a minimum buffer
of 300 feet around burrowing owl nesting sites and American badger breeding
sites during the breeding season.
■ Mitigation Measure 3.7J 28.0 reduced impacts related to special status
invertebrates (IM 3.7JS) to a less -than --significant level. This measure requires
follow-on special surveys for these species during appropriate times of the year.
The Eastern Dublin EIR also addresses potential impacts and mitigation measures
regarding bald eagle, peregrine falcons, red -legged frog, California tiger salamander,
western pond turtle the prairie falcon, northern harrier, black -shouldered kite, sharp -
shinned hawk, Cooper's hawk, short -eared owl and California horned lizard.
2005 MND. No significant biological resource impacts were identified in this document.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to applicable biological resource
mitigation pleasures contained in the previous CEQA documents prepared for the site.
Project Im12acts
a) Have a substantial adverse impact on a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species? No
New Impact. The Eastern Dublin EIR, contains numerous mitigation measures
to reduce impacts to candidate, sensitive and special -status species to a less -
than significant level. These are listed above. As noted above, the project site
was analyzed in multiple previous CEQA documents and the site has been
previously disturbed as part of a rough grading plan. Proposed construction of
the Phase 11 portion of Fallon Sports Park will be required to comply with
applicable mitigation measures to protect candidate, sensitive and special -
status plant and wildlife species. Therefore, no new or more severe impacts
with respect to candidate, sensitive or special -status species would occur than
have been analyzed in previous CEQA documents.
The proposed project would continue to contribute to cumulative loss or
degradation of botanically sensitive habitat, wluch was identified as a
significant and unavoidable impact (IM 3.7/C) in the Eastern Dublin EIR.
b, c) Have a substantial adverse impact on riparian habitat or federally protected wetlands?
No New Impact. Although no wetlands and waters of the United States have
been identified on the project site, mitigation measures are included in the
Eastern Dublin EIR to reduce such impacts to a less -than -significant level. No
new or more severe impacts would occur than have been previously analyzed
with respect to this topic.
City of Dublin Paga 36
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
d) Interfere with movement of native fish or wildlife species? No New Impact. Mitigation
measures contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR contain mitigation measures that
reduced this impact to a less -than -significant level. No new or more severe
impacts would occur than have been previously analyzed with respect to
potential interference with fish or wildlife movement.
e, f) Conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources or any adopted
Habitat Conservation PIans or Natural Community Conservation Plans? No New
Impact. Approval and construction of the proposed project would not affect any
trees on the site, since no mature trees are found there.
The project site lies within the Eastern Alameda County Conservation Strategy
(EACCS) planning area. The City of Dublin utilizes the Conservation Strategy as
guidance for environmental permitting for public projects, and private
development projects are encouraged to use the EACCS as a resource as well.
The Conservation Strategy embodies a regional approach to permitting and
mitigation for wildlife habitat impacts associated with land development,
infrastructure, and other activities. The Conservation Strategy is neither a
Habitat Conservation Plan nor a Natural Community Conservation Plan, but is a
document intended to provide guidance during the project planning and
permitting process to ensure that impacts are offset in a biologically effective
manner. There would therefore be no new or significantly more severe impacts
with respect to this topic than previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR.
5. Cultural Resources
Previous CEOA documents
Eastern Dublin EIR. he Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures
to reduce anticipated impacts to cultural resources from the General Plan and EDSP
project. These include:
Mitigation Measures 3.9/1.0-4.0 reduced impacts related to disruption or
destruction of identified prehistoric resources (IM 3.9/A) to a less -than -
significant level. These mitigations mandate a program of mechanical and/or
hand subsurface testing for the presence or absence of midden deposits,
recordation of identified midden sites, collection and/or testing of resources and
development of a site -specific protection program for prehistoric sites.
Mitigation Measures 3.9/ 5.0-5.0 reduced impacts related to the disruption or
destruction of unrecorded prehistoric resources (IM 3.913) to a less -than -
significant level.
Mitigation Measures 3.9 / 7.0-12.0 reduced impacts related to disruption or
destruction of identified historic resources to a less -than -significant level. These
measures would include preparing site -specific archival research for individual
resources, encourage adaptive reuse of historic resources, recordation of historic
City of ❑ubNn Page 37
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
sites on local state and federal registers, as appropriate and development of
preservation programs for significant resources.
2005 MAID. No significant impacts or mitigation measures were included in the 2005
MND.
The proposed project will be required to comply with the above cultural resource
mitigation measures.
Project Impacts
a) Cause substantial adverse change to significant historic resources? No New Impact. No
historic resources have been identified in the project area in either the Eastern
Dublin EIR or the 2005 MND. Urwecorded cultural resources that could be
encountered on the site will be addressed as required by mitigation measures
contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR. No new or more severe supplemental
impacts have therefore been identified for the proposed project than were
disclosed in previous CEQA documents.
b, c) Cause a substantial adverse impact or destruction to archeological or paleontological
resources? No New Impact. The Eastern Dublin EIR identifies a remote but
potentially significant possibility that construction activities, including site
grading, trenching and excavation, may uncover significant archeological and/or
paleontological resources on development sites. The Eastern Dublin EIR
categorized these resources as pre -historic cultural resources. The Eastern Dublin
EIR assumed that all pre -historic sites would be disturbed or altered in some
manner. This potential impact was identified and addressed in the Eastern
Dublin EIR (Impact 3.9 / A) and mitigation measures 3.911.0 through 3.9 J 4.0
(page 3.9-6 — 3.9-7) that require subsurface testing for archeological resources;
recordation and mapping of such resources; and development of a protection
program for resources which qualify as "significant" under Section 15064.5 of the
CEQA Guidelines. Mitigation Measures 3.9 / 5.0 and 3.9 J 6.0, described above,
also were adopted to address the potential disruption of any previously
unidentified pre -historic resources and would apply to the project as may be
appropriate.
The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan also contains policies (Policies 6-24 and 6-25)
requiring research of archaeological resources prior to construction and
determination of the significance and extent of any resources uncovered during
grading and construction.
Therefore, no new or more significant impacts with respect to cultural resources
have been identified that have been previously analyzed in other CEQA
documents for the project area and no additional analysis is required.
d) Disturb any human reniains, including those interred outside of a formal cemetery? No
New Impact. Existing cultural resource mitigation measures contained in the
Eastern Dublin EIR and the 2005 MND reduced impacts to human remains to a
City of Dublin Page 38
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
less -than -significant level. No new or more severe impacts with respect to
cultural impacts are anticipated beyond those previously analyzed.
6. Geology and Soils
Previous CEQA documents
Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures
to reduce anticipated impacts related to Soils, Geology and Seismicity from the General
Plan and EDSP project. These include:
• Mitigation Measure 3.6 / 1.0 reduced impacts related to primary effects of
earthquake ground shaking (IM 3.6 / B) but not to a less -than --significant level.
This mitigation measure requires that future structure and infrastructure
facilities be designed to applicable local and state building codes.
Mitigation Measures 3.9/ 2.0-6.0 reduced impacts related to the secondary effects
of earthquake ground shaking (IM 3.9/C) to a less -than -significant level.
Mitigation measures mandate building setbacks from landslides, stabilization of
unstable land forms, removal and reconstruction of unstable soils, use of
engineered retaining structures, use of appropriately designed and engineered
fill, and design of structures to account of potential soil failure.
Mitigation Measures 3.6/ 9.0-10.0 reduced impacts related to substantial
alteration to landforms to a less -than significant level (IM 3.6/1)). Mitigations
require minimal grading plans with minimal cuts and fills and careful siting of
homes and improvements to avoid excessive grading.
■ Mitigation Measures 3.6/ 14.0-16.0 reduced impacts related to expansive soils (IM
3.6/ H) to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation measures require forrnulation
of site -specific designs to overcome expansive soils, reducing the amount of
moisture in the soil and by appropriate foundation and pavement design.
Mitigation Measures 3.6/ 17.0-19.0 reduced impacts related to natural slope
stability GM 3.6/I) to a less -than --significant level. Mitigation measures mandate
formulation of use of site -specific designs based on follow-on geotechnical
reviews of individual developments, limiting the location of improvements on
downslopes of unstable soils, removal / reconstruction of potentially unstable
slope areas and installation of surface and subsurface slope drainage
improvements.
• Mitigation Measures 3.6/20.0-26.0 reduced impacts related to cut and fill slope
stability (IM 3.6 / J) to a less -than -significant level. These measures include
developing grading plans for hillside areas that minimize grading and associate
cuts and fills, ensuring that grading plans comply with appropriate building
codes, utilizing keys and benches as part of grading to ensure slope stability and
City of Dublin Page 39
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II February 2014
minimizing use of unreinforced fill slopes, appropriate compaction of fill areas
and on -going maintenance of slope drainage areas.
• Mitigation Measure 3.6/27.0 reduced the impact related to short-term
construction -related erosion and sedimentation (IM 3.6/K) to a less -than -
significant level. This measure includes limiting timing of construction to avoid
the rainy season and implementing a number of other specific erosion control
measures.
■ Mitigation Measure 3.6/28.0 reduced the impact related to long-term erosion and
sedimentation (IM 3.6/L) to a less -than -significant level. This measure includes
installation of erosion control facilities into individual development projects,
including sediment catch basins, creek bank stabilization, revegetation of graded
areas and similar measures.
2005 MND. No supplemental impacts or mitigation measures were identified in this
MND.
The proposed project will be required to comply with applicable soil, geologic and
seismic mitigation measures.
Protect Impacts
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse iinpacts, including Ions,
injury or death related to ground rupture, seismic ground shaking, ground failure, or
landslides? No New Impact. The Eastern Dublin EIR identified that the primary
and secondary effects of ground -shaking (Impacts 3.6 / B and 3.6 / C) could be
potentially significant impacts. With implementation of Mitigation Measure
3.6 / 1.0 the primary effects of ground -shaking are reduced but not to a less -than -
significant level by using modern seismic design for resistance to lateral forces in
construction, which would reduce the potential for structure failure, major
structural damage and loss of life.
Mitigation Measures 3.6 / 2.0 through 3.6 / 7.0 contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR
will be implemented to reduce the secondary effects of ground -shaking on
proposed project improvements but not to a less -than -significant level. Impact
3.6 / B found that impacts related to seismic action in the Eastern Dublin area
could damage structures and infrastructure and would be significant and
unavoidable. This finding also applies to the proposed Fallon Sports Park Phase
II as well.
Adherence to Mitigation Measures 20 through 23 by the City will ensure that
infrastructure facilities built on the project site will comply with generally
recognized seismic safety standards so that effects due to ground shaking and
ground failure will be less -than -significant Overall, no new or more severe
impacts would occur with respect to ground rupture, ground shaking, ground
failure or landslides than have been previously analyzed.
City of Dublin Page 40
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase It February 2014
bj Is the site subject to substantial erosion andlor the Ioss of topsoil? No New Impact.
Construction of the roposed project improvements on the Fallon Sports Park
site would modify Te existing ground surface and alter patterns of surface
runoff and infiltration and could result in a short-term increase in erosion and
sedimentation caused by grading activities. Long-term impacts could result from
modification of the ground -surface and removal of existing vegetation (Eastern
Dublin EIR Impact 3.6 / Q. With implementation of Mitigation Measures 3.6 / 27.0
and 28.0 contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR and re -stated above, both of these
impacts would be less -than -significant.
The Eastern. Dublin Specific Plan also contains a policy (Policy 6-43), which
requires that new development be designed to provide effective control of soil
erosion as a result of construction activities. This policy will be applied to the
proposed project.
Overall, with adherence to previous mitigation measures, there would be no new
or more severe impacts than have been previously analyzed in other CEQA
documents for this site.
c,d) Is the site located on soil that is unstable or expansive or result in potential lateral
spreading, liquefaction, landslide or collapse? No New Impact. The 2005 MND notes
that the project site is located on the Tassajara Geologic Formation and contains
colluvium soils with a high shrink -swell potential. With adherence to Eastern
Dublin EIR mitigation measures, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan policies that
require appropriate building foundations, underlying supports for sports fields
and other related techiuques, no new or more severe impacts have been
identified related to lateral spreading, liquefaction and other soil hazards than
have been analyzed in previous CEQA documents.
e) Have soils incapable of supporting on -site septic tanks if sewers are riot available? No
New Impact. Proposed restroom facilities on the site would be connected to
sanitary sewers provided by DSRSD, so there would be no new or more severe
impacts with regard to septic systems.
7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Environmental Setting
Since certification of the Eastern Dublin EIR in 1993 and follow-on CEQA documents,
the issue of contribution of greenhouse gasses to climate change has become a more
prominent issue of concern as evidenced by passage of AB 32 in 2006. On March 18,
2010, amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines took effect which set forth
requirements for the analysis of greenhouse gasses. The topic of the project's
contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change was not analyzed in the
Eastern Dublin EIR or the 2005 MND. Since the Eastern Dublin EIR and the 2005 MND
have been approved, the determination of whether greenhouse gasses and climate
change needs to be analyzed for this proposed project is governed by the law on
supplemental or subsequent EIRs (Public Resources Code section 21166 and
City of Dublin Page 41
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). Greenhouse gas and climate change is not
required to be analyzed under those standards unless it constitutes "new information of
substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the
time the previous EIR was certified as complete (CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15162 (a) (3).)
Greenhouse gas and climate change impacts is not new information that was not known
or could not have been known at the time the Eastern Dublin EIR was certified and the
2005 MND was adopted. The issue of climate change and greenhouse gasses was
widely known prior to the certification of these EIRs. The United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change was established in 1992. The regulation of greenhouse
gas emissions to reduce climate change impacts was extensively debated and analyzed
throughout the early 1990s. The studies and analyses of this issue resulted in the
adoption of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997. In the early and mid 2000s, GHGs and climate
change were extensively discussed and analyzed in California. In 2000, SB 1771
established the California Climate Action Registry for the recordation of greenhouse gas
emissions to provide information about potential environmental impacts. In 2005, the
Governor issued Executive Oder # S-03-05 establishing greenhouse gas emission
reduction targets in California. AB 32 was adopted in 2006. Therefore, the impact of
greenhouse gases on climate change was known at the time of the certification of the
Eastern Dublin EIR in May 1993 or the 2005 MND. Under CEQA standards, it is not
new information that requires analysis in a supplemental EIR or negative declaration.
No supplemental environmental analysis of the projects impacts on this issue is
required under CEQA.
Project Impacts
a,b Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that array have a significant
iinpact on the environment or conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? As discussed above, no additional
environmental analysis is required under CEQA Section 21166.
S. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Previous CEQA documents
2005 MND. No significant impacts were identified with respect to hazards or hazardous
materials in the 2005 MND.
The topic of hazards and hazardous materials was not analyzed in the Eastern Dublin
EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environinent through the routine transport,
use or disposal of hazardous materials? No New Impact. There would be no impact
with regard to transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials, since the
proposed project involves construction of an additional phase of a recreational
park adjacent to existing phases of the park. There would be no use, storage or
transport of significant quantities of hazardous materials associated with the
City of Dublin Page 42
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
proposed park. No new or more severe impacts would therefore occur on the site
than have been previously analyzed.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment? No New impact. Based on the discussion in subsection "a," above, no
new impacts are anticipated with respect to the release of hazardous materials
than were analyzed in the 2005 MND.
c) Emif hazardous materials or handle hazardous materials or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No
Impact. Approval and implementation of the proposed project would have no
impact with regard to this topic, since no schools exist or are planned near the
project area. No new or more severe impact with respect to emission or handing of
hazardous materials within one -quarter of an existing or planned school.
d) Is the site Iisted as a hazardous materials site? No New Impact. No properties
comprising the project area are listed on the State of California Department of
Toxic Substances Control as an identified hazardous site as of October 28, 2013.
There is therefore no new or more severe impacts impact with respect to this topic
than have been previously analyzed.
e,f) Is the site located within an airport land use plait of o public airport or private airstrip? No
New Impact. The project site is not located near a public or private airport, airfield
or airstrip. No new or more severe impacts are anticipated regarding airport safety
issues than were discussed in the 2005 MND.
g) Interference with an emergency evacuation plan? No New Impact. The proposed park
expansion would be located on land owned by the City of Dublin, purchased for
park purposes. No emergency evacuation plan would be affected since no
roadways would be blocked. No new or more severe impacts would result than
have been previously analyzed.
h) Expose people and structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving
wildland fires or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No New Impact. The
project area is located in a partially undeveloped area with residential
development approved to the north and east (Moller Ranch and Mission Peak) and
west (Dublin Ranch West). However, significant natural areas remain to the west
(Tassajara Creek and adjacent open space easement area) and south (Moller
Creek), Adherence to mitigation measures contained in previous CEQA
documents will reduce impacts to wildland fire risk to a less -than -significant level.
City of Dublin Page 43
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
3. Hydrology and Water Qualify
Previous CEQA documents
Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures
to reduce anticipated impacts related to hydrology and storm drainage from the
General Plan and EDSP project. These include:
■ Mitigation Measures 3.5 j 44.0-48 reduced impacts related potential flooding (IM
3.51 Y) to a less -than -significant level. These mitigation measures require new
storm drainage facilities as part of new development, requires developers to
prepare storm drain plans for individual development projects and requires new
flood control facilities to alleviate downstream flooding potential.
Mitigation Measures 3.5 j 51.0 and 52.0 reduced impacts related to non --point
source pollution (IM 3.51 AA) to a less -than -significant level. These mitigation
measures mandate that specific water quality investigations be submitted as part
of development projects and that the City should develop community -based
programs to educate residents and businesses to reduce non -point source
pollution.
2005 A4ND. No significant hydrology or water quality issues or mitigation measures
were identified in this document.
The proposed project shall adhere to all of the applicable above previous mitigation
measures.
Pro ect Impacts
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requireMents? No New Impact.
Approval and construction of the proposed development project would add
impervious surfaces, including but not limited to a paved parking lot, building
areas and pedestrian walkways, to the essentially undeveloped site that would
increase the amount of stormwater runoff and potentially degrade water quality.
Mitigation Measure 3.5151.0 contained in the EDSP EIR requires each project
developer to prepare and submit a water quality investigation. Adherence to the
existing EDSP EIR mitigation measures will ensure that no new or more sigrficant
impacts with respect to water quality violations or wastewater discharges would
result than have been previously analyzed.
b) Substantially deplete groundwater recharge areas or lowering of zoater table? No New
Impact. No new or more significant impacts are anticipated with regard to
depletion of groundwater resources than have been analyzed in previous CEQA
documents. Although a new parking area would be constructed on the site as well
as paved pathways and a number of small buildings, much of the site would
remain as open play fields or landscaped areas that would allow recharge of the
underground aquifer. Based on discussions with City staff, recycled water from
DSRSD would be used for irrigation and a synthetic surface would be used for
City of Dublin Page 44
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
playfields, significantly reducing potable water use (source: A. Alex, Dublin Parks
and Community Services Department, 10/ 29/ 13). No new or more significant
impacts would therefore result than previously analyzed.
c} Substantially alter drainage patterns, including streambed courses such that substantial
siltation or erosion would occur? No New Impact. Limited new impervious surfaces
would be added to the park expansion project site to accommodate a parking lot, r,
driveways, pathways, sinall buildings and similar surfaces. Existing drainage
patterns may be slightly modified based on proposed development. However
adherence to Mitigation Measure 46.0 contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR would
reduce changed drainage patterns to a less -than --significant level. No new or more
severe impacts would result with respect to changed drainage patterns than have
been previously analyzed.
d) Substantially alter drainage patterns or result in flooding, either on or off the project site?
No New Impact. No impacts or significant changes to drainage patterns are
anticipated as part of the project. Based on the 2005 MND, the project site outside
of a FEMA 100--year flood hazard area. No new or more significant impacts are
anticipated than have been previously analyzed.
e) Create stormwater runoff that would exceed the capacity of drainage systems or add
substantial amounts of polluted runoff? No New Impact. Adherence to Eastern Dublin
EIR Mitigation Measures 3.5 / 44.0-48.0 will reduce drainage and pollution impacts
to a less -than -significant level. These mitigation measures require new storm
drainage facilities as part of new development and requires developers to prepare
storm drain plans for individual development projects. No new or more significant
impacts have been identified in this Initial Study regarding increases in
stormwater runoff than have been previously analyzed.
f) Substantially degrade water quality? No New Impact. This is a potentially significant
issue and has been addressed above in items "a" and "e."
g} Place housing within a 106-year flood hvzard area as mapped by a Flood Insurance Rate
Map? No New Impact. No portions of the project site are located within a 100-year
flood plain, as documented in the 2005 MND. No new or more significant impacts
are anticipated than have been previously analyzed.
It, 0 PIcace within a 100-year flood hazard boundary structures that impeded or redirect flood
flow, including dam failures? No New Impact. Refer to item "g," above.
j} ResuIt in inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudf2ows? No New Impact. The project site
is located well inland from San Francisco Bay or other major bodies of water to be
impacted by a tsunami or seiche. No new or more significant impacts would
therefore result than have been previously analyzed.
City of Dublin Page 45
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
10. Land Use and Planning
Project Impacts
a) Plzysically divide an established community? No New Impact. The project site is
located immediately south of the first phase of Fallon Sports Park, which has been
developed as a recreation park. The project site is included as Phase II of the Fallon
Sports Park Master Plan, which depicts future recreational uses on the site, as
currently proposed. Therefore, no existing, established community would be
physically divided. No new or more significant impacts have been identified in
this Initial Study than have been previously analyzed.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation? No New Impact. No
changes are proposed to any regulation regulating environmental protection. No
new or more significant impacts are anticipated with regard to land use
regulations than have been previously analyzed in previous CEQA documents.
c) Conflict with a habitat conservation plan or natural corninunity conservation plan? No
New impact. The project site lies within the Eastern Alameda County
Conservation Strategy (EACCS) planning area. The City of Dublin utilizes the
Conservation Strategy as guidance for environmental permitting for public
projects, and private development projects are encouraged to use the EACCS as a
resource as well. The Conservation Strategy embodies a regional approach to
permitting and mitigation for wildlife habitat impacts associated with land
development, infrastructure, and other activities. The Conservation Strategy is
neither a Habitat Conservation Plan nor a Natural Community Conservation Plan,
but is a document intended to provide guidance during the project planning and
permitting process to ensure that impacts are offset in a biologically effective
manner. There would therefore be no new or significantly more severe impacts
than previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR and other CEQA documents
prepared for this site.
11. Mineral Resources
Project Impacts
a, b) result in the loss of availability of regionally or Iocally significant rnineral resources? No
New Impact. Neither the Eastern Dublin EIR nor the 2005 MND indicates that
significant deposits of minerals exist in the project area, so no new or more severe
impacts would occur than have been previously analyzed.
City of Dublin Page 46
initial Study/Fafion Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
12. Noise
Previous CEOA documents
Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR notes that major noise sources within
Eastern Dublin include traffic noise from arterial roadways, helicopter overflights from
Camp Parks RFTA, west of Tassajara Road, noise generated by development of land
uses under the Specific Plan and General Plan and construction noise. No specific
significant future noise sources are identified on the project site.
The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures to reduce anticipated
noise impacts frown the General Plan and EDSP project. These include:
■ Mitigation Measures 3.10/ I.0 reduced impacts related to exposure of proposed
housing to future roadway noise (IM 3.10 / A) to a less -than -significant level.
This mitigation measure require that all future development projects within a
future CNEL 60 noise contour have an acoustic analysis prepared to ensure that
future dwelling units meet City noise exposure levels.
■ Mitigation Measures 3.10/4.0 and 5.0 reduced impacts related to construction
noise (IM 10 / E) to a less -than -significant level. These mitigation measures
require developers to submit construction noise management plans and to limit
hours of construction operations.
2005 M.ND. No significant noise impacts or mitigation measures were identified in the
2005 MND.
The proposed project will be required to comply with applicable noise mitigation
measures identified above.
Project Impacts
a) Would the project expose persons or generation of noise revels in excess of standards
established by the General Plan or other applicable standard? No New Impact. The 2005
MND found that exposure of persons to excessive noise levels in above City
exposure levels to be less -than -significant. Major source of noise on the Phase II
site include distant noise generated by vehicles traveling the 1-580 freeway to the
south, traffic noise from Fallon Road and Central Parkway and occasional aircraft
flyovers. Table I., belwv, shows the current exterior noise exposure levels included
in the Noise Element of the General Plan_
City of Dublin Page 47
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
Table 1. City of Dublin Land Use/Noise Compatibility Standards (decibels)
Land Use
l Normally
Acceptable
Conditionally
Acceptable
Normally Clearly
Unacceptable Unacceptable
Residential
60 or less
60-70
70-75 75+
Lodging Facilities
60 or less
61-80
71-80 Over 80
Schools, churches,
nursing homes
60 or less
61-70
71-80
Over 80
Neighborhood
arks
60 or less
61-65
66-70
Over 70
Office/Retail
70 or less
71-75
76-80
Over 80
Industrial
70 or less
71-75
Over 75
--
Source: Dublin General Plan Noise Element, Table 9-1, 2013
Noise impacts to the proposed relocated day care facility would be less -than -
significant by the requirement for the school to meet interior and exterior noise
exposure levels as set forth in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Noise
impacts for proposed sports fields would be minimized by having future
playfields elevated above Central Parkway and out of the "line of sight" of noise
transmissions. No new or more significant noise impacts have been identified than
have previously analyzed.
b) Exposure of people to excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? No
New Impact. The proposed project would not include construction or operational
elements that would result in significant groundborne vibration levels to nearby
residents (source: R. Alex, Dublin Parks and Community Services Department,
10130113). No new impacts would result with respect to vibration or groundborne
vibration than was analyzed in previous CEQA documents on the project site.
c) Substantial increases in permanent in ambient noise levels? No New Impact. h-icreased
levels of permanent noise on the project that would occur based on project
construction would be reduced to a less -than significant level through adherence
to applicable mitigation measures contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR and the
Dublin Noise Ordinance. No new or more significant impacts have been identified
in this Initial Study than have been previously analyzed.
d) Substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise Ievels in the project vicinity
above levels without the project? No New Impact. Increased levels of short-term
construction noise generated on the project site would be reduced to a less -than -
significant level through adherence to applicable mitigation measures contained in
the Eastern Dublin EIR and the Dublin Noise Ordinance. These measures require
project developers to limit hours of construction activity and to prepare
construction noise management plans. No new or more significant impacts have
been identified in this Initial Study than have been previously analyzed.
e, f) For a project located within an airport land use plan, would the project expose people to
excessive noise levels? No New Impact. No portions of the site are located within the
City of Dublin Page 48
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
airport referral area for Livermore Municipal Airport. No new or more significant
impacts are therefore anticipated in terms of this topic than was previously
analyzed in previous CEQA documents.
13. Population and Housing
Project Impacts
a) fndl[ce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly? No New
Impact. Approval of the proposed project would not induce substantial additional
population growth in the Eastern Dublin area, since development of the Fallon
Sports Park has been envisioned in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and Dublin
General Plan. In addition, the proposed project would not contain any residences.
No new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed are therefore
anticipated with respect to this topic.
b,c) Would the project displace substantial nranibers of existing housing units or people? No
New Impact. The proposed expansion area is vacant and no impact would result
with respect to displacement of housing units or people. No new or more severe
impacts than were previously analyzed are therefore anticipated with respect
housing displacement.
14. Public Services
Previous CEQA documents
Eastern Dublin EfR. Applicable mitigation measures contained in Eastern Dublin FIR
addressing fire and police protection include:
• Mitigation Measure 3.4/7.0: Establish appropriate funding mechanisms to cover up-
front costs of capital fire improvements.
• Mitigation Measure 3.4/ 9.0: Incorporate Fire Department recommendations on
project design relating to access, water pressure, fire safety and prevention into the
requirements of development approval.
• Mitigation Measure 3.4/ 10.0: Ensure, as a requirement of project approval, that an
assessment district, homeowners association or other mechanism is in place that will
provide regular long-term maintenance of the urban/ open space interface.
• Mitigation Measure 3.4 / 12.0: The City shall work with the Fire Department and
qualified biologists to prepare a wildfire management plan for the project area.
Mitigation Measure 3.4/1.0: Provide additional personnel and facilities and revise
beats as necessary in order to establish and maintain City standards for police
protection service in Eastern Dublin.
City of Dublin Page 49
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
Mitigation Measure 3.4/3.0-5.0: Incorporate into the requirements of project
approval Police Department recommendations on project design that affect traffic
safety and crime prevention.
2005 MND. No significant public utility impacts or mitigation measures were identified
in the 2005 MND.
The project will be required to comply with the above mitigation measures.
Prpject Impacts
a) Fire protection? No New Impact. Approval and implementation of the proposed
project would increase the number of fire and emergency medical calls for service
that would need to be responded to by the Alameda County Fire Department, the
City of Dublin's contract fire department, as a result of increased recreational use
of Phase II of Fallon Sports Park. Consistent with Eastern Dublin EIR Mitigation
Measure 3.4 / 9.0, proposed development of the park will be reviewed by the Fire
Department to meet Fire Department requirements including but not limited to
maintaining minimum water pressure and fire flow, providing adequate site
access, using fire retardant building materials and similar features. Proposed
development on the site will also be conditioned to be consistent with the City's
adopted Wildfire Management Plan (Eastern Dublin EIR Mitigation Measure
3.4/ 12.0).
Based on discussions with Alameda County Fire Departi- ent staff, there would be
no new or substantially more severe significant impacts with respect to fire service
beyond that analyzed in previous CEQA documents (source: Bonnie Terra,
Alameda County Fire Department, 10/ 28 / 13) and no new or expanded fire
stations would be needed to provide fire and emergency service For the proposed
project.
bj Police protection? No New Impact. Similar to fire protection, there would be no new
impact with regard to police protection, based on mitigation measures included in
the Eastern Dublin EIR. These Mitigation Measures include incorporating Police
Department safety and security requirements into the proposed project, including
but not limited to adequate locking devices, security lighting and ensuring
adequate surveillance for structures and parking areas (EDSP EIR Mitigation
Measures 3.4 j 3.0-5.0),
Based on discussions with Dublin Police Services Department staff, there would be
no new or substantially more severe impacts with respect to police service
associated with the proposed project beyond that analyzed in previous CEQA
documents (source: Captain Tom McCarthy, Dublin Police Services, 10 / 28/ 13).
c) Scliools? No New Impact. No new impacts to school service are anticipated should
the proposed project be approved since no residents that would generate school
aged children would be built.. There would be no new or substantially more
severe significant impacts with respect to this impact than has been previously
analyzed in previous CEQA documents.
City of Dublin Page 54
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
d) Other governmental service, including maintenance of public facilities? No New Impact.
Maintenance of public facilities would continue to be provided by the City of
Dublin with no new impacts in regard to this topic. New public facilities will be
required to be designed to meet City of Dublin standards. There would therefore
be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts with respect to this
impact than has been previously analyzed in previous CEQA documents.
15. Recreation
Previous CEQA documents
Eastern Dublin EIR. Applicable mitigation measures contained in Eastern Dublin EIR
addressing fire and police protection include:
■ Mitigation Measure 3.4 / 29.0: Ensure, as apart of the approval process, that each
new development provide its fair share of planned open space, parklands and trail
corridors.
• Mitigation Measure 3.4131.0: Calculate and assess in -lieu park fees based on the
City's parkland dedication ordinance. Credit towards parkland dedication
requirements will only be given for level or gently sloping areas suitable for active
recreation use.
■ Mitigation Measure 3.4/36.0: Require developer to dedicate public access easements
along ridgetops and stream corridors to accommodate the development of trails and
staging areas.
No mitigation measures were included in the 2005 MND.
Project Impacts
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks? No New
Impact. Approval and construction of the proposed project would increase the use
of City or regional recreational facilities, since the underlying project includes
construction of new park and recreation facilities as part of the Fallon Sports Park.
The intent of the project is to expand park and recreation opportunities in the
Eastern Dublin planning area as directed by the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. There
would therefore be no new or more severe impacts with respect to recreation than
were previously analyzed.
b) .hoes the project include recreational facilities or require the construction of recreational
facilities? See item "a," above.
City of Dublin Page 51
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
16. Transportation/Traffic
Previous CEQA documents
Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures
to reduce anticipated traffic impacts from the General Plan and EDSP project. These
measures generally include construction of new roadways, widening of existing
roadways and improvements to local freeway facilities to accommodate anticipated
increases in the number of vehicles associated with the build out of the Eastern Dublin
area.
With the exceptions noted below, the EIR found that all traffic and transportation
impacts could be reduced to less -than -significant levels with adherence to mitigation
measures identified in the EIR. A number of impacts could not be reduced to a level of
insignificance even with mitigations. These include: impacts to the I-580 freeway
between 1-680 and Hacienda Drive (IM 3.3/B), impacts to the I-580 Freeway between
Tassajara Road and Airway Boulevard (IM 3.3IC), cumulative freeway impacts (IM
3.3/E) impacts to Santa Rita Road and T-580 Eastbound ramps (IM 3.3/1), and
cumulative impacts to Tassajara Road (IM 3.3/N).
2005 MND. One Mitigation Measure dealing with traffic and transportation was
included in the 2005 MND. Mitigation Measure 3 required that a future study be
completed at the entrance of proposed Phase II of the Park from Central Parkway prior
to the development of this area, with consideration given to the potential for multi-
family housing on the south side of Central Parkway from Fallon Sports Park.
The proposed project will be required to comply with all of the above transportation
and circulation mitigation measures.
Project Impacts
a,b) Conflict with applicable plans related to the effectiveness of the circulation system,
including all modes of travel, including intersections, streets, highways and other
components or conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including
level of service standards, travel demand measures and other applicable standards? No
New Impact. The Eastern Dublin EIR considered the development of Fallon Sports
Park and, following approval of the Specific Plan and EIR, approved development
impact fees for Eastern Dublin that provided funding for local and community
parks and transportation improvements in Eastern Dublin. Many of the proposed
goad and pedestrian improvements have been installed by either the City or by
local developers.
Future traffic that would be generated by construction of the Lower Terrace of the
Fallon Sports Park have been analyzed in previous CEQA documents for Eastern
Dublin and for the original Park Master Plan. Proposed uses within the park
expansion are generally consistent with those included in the 2005 Park Master
Plan. The proposed relocation of the day care facility to the Phase I of the Park was
not considered in previous documents; however, based on the information about
City of Dublin Page 52
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase H February 2014
hours of operation included in the Project Description section of this Initial Study,
the proposed day care would operate between the hours of late morning and early
afternoon on weekdays. Traffic generated by the proposed day care operation
would therefore be outside of a.m. and p.m peak hours, so this traffic would not
contribute vehicles to nearby major intersections or to nearby freeways. Also, it is
assumed that many of the trips to and from the relocated preschool facility are
currently in operation, although the routes of the new trips would be somewhat
different from current traffic patterns.
A driveway has been constructed from Central Parkway into the Lower Terrace
portion of the park. Since the improvement plans that depicted the location of he
driveway have been approved by the Dublin Public Works Department,
Mitigation Measure 3 contained in the 2005 MND has been satisfied.
Therefore, no new or more severe impacts would result with respect to
intersections, streets highways, routes of regional significance or other components
of the local and regional circulation system than have been previously analyzed.
c) Change in air traffic patterns? No New Impact. The proposed project includes park
and recreational uses and would have no impact on air traffic patterns. No new or
more severe impacts would result with respect to this topic than was previously
analyzed in other CEQA documents.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible use? No New
Impact. The primary on -site circulation feature on the Phase U park site would be a
parking lot for approximately 145 vehicles. Adherence to Mitigation Measure 2
contained in the 2005 MND requires a study for the location of the drive entrance
to the park site. This analysis will also determine if adequate driver site lines
would be provided and that other safety standards Auld be met. No new or more
severe impacts with respect to design hazards would be created than previously
analyzed.
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? No New Impact. A single drive access to
Central Parkway would be provided to serve the Lower Terrace portion of the
park that would meet City of Dublin and Alameda County Fire Department
design standards to ensure that adequate emergency access would be provided.
No new or more severe impacts would result with respect to this topic.
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs regarding public transit, pedestrian
facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? No New
Impact. No conflicts to plans, policies or programs that promote public transit,
pedestrian use or similar features were identified in the 2005 MND as part of
previous CEQA review of the overall park development. No new or more impacts
have been identified in this Initial Study that has been previously analyzed in
other CEQA documents.
City of Dublin Page 53
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
lb. Utilities and Service Systems
Environmental Setting
The project area is served by the following service providers:
• Water supply and distribution: Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD).
• Sewage collection and treatment, recycled water: DSRSD.
■ Storm drainage: City of Dublin and Zone 7.
■ Solid waste service: Amador Valley Industries
■ Electrical and natural gas power: Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
• Communications: AT &T
Previous CEOA documents
Eastern Dublin EIR. In terms of water resources, the Eastern Dublin EIR identified
overdraft of groundwater resources (Impact 3.5 / P) as a potentially significant impact
Adherence to Mitigation Measures 3.5/24.0 and 25.0 would reduce this impact to a level
of insignificant. These measures require the City of Dublin to coordinate with DSRSD to
develop recycled water resources and otherwise carefully use water resources and that
all new development in the Eastern Dublin project area to connect to the DSRSD water
system. Impact 3.5 / Q identified an increase in water demand as a potentially significant
impact, but this impact could be mitigated to an insignificant level based on
implementation of Mitigation Measures 3.5/26.0-31.0. These mitigation measures
require implementation of water conservation measures in individual development
projects and construction of new system -wide water improvements which are funded
by development impact fees. Another related impact identified in the Eastern Dublin
EIR is the need for additional water treatment plant capacity (Impact 3.5/R). This
impact was identified as being reduced to a level of insignificance through the
implementation of Mitigation Measures 3.5 / 32.0-31 .0, which requires improvement to
the Zone 7 water system, to be funded by individual development impact fees.
Impact 3.5/S (lack of a water distribution system) was identified as a potentially
significant impact in the Eastern Dublin EIR, but this impact has been reduced to an
insignificant level through adherence to Mitigation Measures3.5 / 4.34.0-38.0. These
mitigations require upgrades to the project area water system and provision of a "will
serve" letter prior to issuance of a grading permit. Impact 3.5/T identified a potentially
significant impact related to inducement of substantial growth and concentration of
population in the project area_ The Eastern Dublin found that this was a significant and
unavoidable impact.
Regarding sewer service, the Eastern Dublin EIR identified Impact 3.5 / B (lack of a
wastewater collection system) as a potentially significant impact that could be mitigated
City of Dublin Page 54
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
through adherence to Mitigation Measures 3.5/1.0-5.0. These measures require DSRSD
to prepare an area -wide wastewater collection system master plan, requires all new
development to be connected to DSRSD's public sewer system, discourages on -site
wastewater treatment, requires a "will -serve" letter from DSRSD and requires that all
sewer facilities be constructed to DSRSD engineering standards. Impact 3.5 noted an
impact with regard to extension of a sewer trunk line with capacity to serve new
development, but could be reduced to an insignificant level since the proposed Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan sewer system has been sized to accommodate increased sewer
demand from the proposed Specific Plan project. Impact 3.5/G found that lack of
wastewater disposal capacity as a significant impact. An upgraded wastewater disposal
facility is presently being constructed by the Livermore Amador Valley Water
Management Agency. Impact 3.5/ E identified lack of wastewater treatment plant
capacity as a potentially significant impact, which could be reduced to an insigzvficant
level through adherence to Mitigation Measure.
No significant impacts or mitigation measures pertaining to utilities or service systems
were identified in the 2005 MND.
Project Impacts
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB? No New Impact. The
current project would contain the same type of development as analyzed in the
Eastern Dublin EIR and he 2005 MND. based on recent discussions with DSRSD
staff (noted below) regarding this project, the proposed project would not exceed
wastewater requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).
No new or more significant impacts with respect to wastewater treatment
requirements have been identified in this Initial Study than have been analyzed in
previous CEQA documents.
b) Require new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities?
No New Impact. Water, recycled water and wastewater extensions to existing
mains in Central Parkway and other local roads would need to be extended to
provide recycled water for field irrigation and potable water for restrooms,
drinking fountains and similar uses. Sewer laterals would also need to be extended
to the site to serve proposed restrooms and concession uses. According to a
representative of DSRSD, District wastewater collection, treatment and disposal
facilities and proposed recycled and domestic water for the proposed project
would not result in a new or more significant impact than was analyzed in
previous CEQA documents (source: Stan Kolo;zdie, DSRSD 11 / 11 / 13)
c) Require new storm drainage facilities? No New Impact. The proposed expansion of
Fallon Sports Park would require new and or upgraded drainage facilities to
support proposed new uses. Consistent with Eastern Dublin EIR Mitigation
Measures, the project developer (City of Dublin) will be required to install new or
upgraded on and off -site (if required) storm drain systems that comply with City
of Dublin and Zone 7 standards. No storm drainage impacts were identified in
other previous CEQA documents. No new or more significant impacts are
anticipated with respect to storm drain facilities that have been analyzed in
previous CEQA documents.
City of Dublin Page 55
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
dj Are sufficient water supplies available? No New Impact. Based on the information
provided by DSRSD staff, the District has planned for future urban uses on this
site and included such development in the District's Urban Water Management
Plan (source: Stan Kolozdie, DSRSD,11111113). No new or more significant are
anticipated with respect to water supplies than have been previously analyzed.
e) Adequate wastewater capacity to serve the proposed project? See response to "a," above.
e, f) Solid waste disposal? No New Impact. The project site is within the franchise area of
Amador Valley Industries that provides residential and commercial solid waste
pick-up and recycling services. Fallon Sports Park is currently receiving solid
waste services from Amador Valley Industries. The topic of solid waste disposal
was not identified as a potentially significant impact in previous CEQA documents
and no new or more significant impacts have been identified in this Initial Study
than have been previously analyzed.
g) Corrzply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No
New Impact. The existing service provider will ensure adherence to federal, state
and local solid waste regulations. No new or more severe impacts are anticipated
impacts than have been previously analyzed.
17. Mandatory Findings of Significance
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the gr.rrrlity of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number of or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? No. Potential
impacts related to biological resources, including a reduction in habitat area of fish
or wildlife species, elimination of a plant or animal community, or elimination of
an important example of major periods of California history or prehistory was
analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR and the 2005 MN. The proposed project would
represent a similar development type that was previously analyzed and no new or
more significant impacts are anticipated than previously analyzed.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects). No.
Cumulative impacts of the proposed Fallon Sports Park project have been
analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR.
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly? No. No such impacts have been
discovered in the course of preparing this Initial Study.
City of Dubiin Page 56
initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
Initial Study Preparers
Jerry Haag, Urban Planner, project manager
Agencies and Organizations Consulted
The following agencies and organizations were contacted in the course of this Initial
Study:
City of Dublin
Paul McCreary, Director of Parks and Community Services
Rosemary Alex, Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator
Bonnie Terra, Alameda County Fire Department
Chief Tom McCarthy, Dublin Police Services
Kathleen Faubion, AICP, Assistant City Attorney
California Department of Toxic Substances Control {DTSQ
Website
DSRSD
Stan Kolozdie
References
Dublin General Plan, City of Dublin, Updated through 7J2111
Eastern Dublin General Plan Wallace Roberts & Todd, 1993
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General PlanEnvironmental Impact Report,
Wallace Roberts & Todd, 1994
Fallon Sports Park Master Plan, Carducci & Associates,, 2006
Livermore Municipal Airport, Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, ESA
Associates, August 2012
Parks and Recreation Master Plan City of Dublin, 2006 update
City of Dublin Page 57
Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014
���� �f f �
CEQA ADDENDUM FOR THE FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE II PROJECT
February 7, 2014
On May 10, 1993, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 51-93, certifying an
Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific
Plan ("Eastern Dublin EIR, SCH #91103064). The certified EIR consisted of a Draft EIR and
Responses to Comments bound volumes, as well as an Addendum to the Eastern Dublin EIR
dated May 4, 1993, assessing a reduced development project alternative. The City Council
adopted Resolution No. 53-93 approving a General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan for the
reduced area alternative on May 10, 1993. On August 22, 1994, the City Council adopted a
second Addendum updating wastewater disposal plans for Eastern Dublin. The Eastern
Dublin EIR evaluated the potential environmental effects of urbanizing Eastern Dublin over a
20 to 30 year period. Since certification of the EIR, many implementing projects have been
proposed, relying to various degrees on the certified EIR.
In 2005, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-05 that approved a
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan. The 2005 MN❑
analyzed the environmental impacts of approving a Master Plan for the development of
the Fallon Sports Park, located on the northwest corder of Fallon Road and Central
Parkway and constructing recreational improvements envisioned in the Master Plan.
This Addendum has been prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 for the
Project, as described below.
Project Description
The current application includes approving and developing the Lower Terrace of the
Park, also identified as Phase It. Overall improvements envisioned for this phase include
but are not limited to:
• Constructing an on -site entry road at the existing curb cut along the north side of
Central Parkway;
■ Building an approximately 145-space vehicle parking lot.
• Constructing a combination restroom and concession building.
■ Extending existing on -site pedestrian pathways from the existing park.
• Constructing a 90' lighted baseball field.
• Construction of a 2,000 square foot building for public use, including but not
limited to community meetings, rentals, etc.)
• Constructing two synthetic turf lighted soccer fields plus a warm up area.
• Extending utility lines.
• Temporarily relocating a City pre-school facility for a five-year period.
■ Related improvements, such as site grading and water quality features, to facilitate the
above improvements.
Prior CEQA Analyses and Determinations
As summarized above and discussed in more detail in the attached Initial Study, the site has
been planned for a community park since the Eastern Dublin approvals in 1993 and has been
the subject of a Mitigated Negative Declaration in 2005. The Eastern Dublin FIR identified
numerous environmental impacts, and numerous mitigations were adopted upon approval of
the Easter Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan. For identified impacts that
could not be mitigated to insignificance, the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding
Considerations. Similarly, the 2005 MND identified environmental impacts and mitigation
measures. All previously adopted mitigation measures for development of Eastern Dublin
identified in the Eastern Dublin FIR and the 2005 MND that are applicable to the Project and
Project site continue to apply to the currently proposed Project as further discussed in the
attached Initial Study.
Current CEQA Analysis and Determination that an Addendum is Appropriate for this
Project.
Updated Initial Study. The City of Dublin has determined that an Addendum is the appropriate
CEQA review for the Project, which proposes minor changes to the approved Fallon Sports Park
Master Plan. If approved, the proposed project would allow lighted soccer fields and a
temporarily relocated City pre-school facility within the park.
The City prepared an updated Initial Study dated February 7, 2014, incorporated herein by
reference, to assess whether any further environmental review is required for this Project
Through this Initial Study, the City has determined that no subsequent FIR, or Negative
Declaration is required for the plan and zoning amendments or the refined development
details.
No Subsequent Review is Required per CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. CEQA Guidelines
Section 15162 identifies the conditions requiring subsequent environmental review, After a
review of these conditions, the City has determined that no subsequent EIR or negative
declaration is required for this Project. This is based on the following analysis:
a) Are there substantial changes to the Project involving new or more severe significant
impacts? There are no substantial changes to the Project analyzed in the Eastern
Dublin FIR and the 2005 MND. The Project is similar to land uses for the project site
analyzed in previous CEQA documents. As demonstrated in the Initial Study, the
proposed changes within park would not be a substantial change to either the 1993
Eastern Dublin EIR analysis or the 2005 MND and will not result in additional
significant impacts, and no additional or different mitigation measures are required.
b) Are there substantial changes in the conditions which the Project is undertaken involving
new or more severe significant impacts? There are no substantial changes in the conditions
assumed in the Eastern Dublin EIR or the 2005 MND. This is documented in the attached
Initial Study prepared for this Project dated February 7, 2014.
Page 2
c) Is there new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known at the time of the previous EIR that shows the Project will have a
significant effect not addressed in the previous EIR; or previous effects are more severe;
or, previously infeasible mitigation measures are now feasible but the applicant declined
to adopt them; or mitigation measures considerably different from those in the previous
EIR would substantially reduce significant effects but the applicant declines to adopt
them? As documented in the attached Initial Study, there is no new information showing a
new or more severe significant effect beyond those identified in the prior CEQA
documents. Similarly, the Initial Study documents that no new or different mitigation
measures are required for the Project. All previously adopted mitigations continue to apply
to the Project. The previously approved CEQA documents adequately describe the
impacts and mitigations associated with the proposed development on portions of the
Fallon Sports Park site.
d) If no subsequent EIR-level review is required, should a subsequent negative declaration
be prepared? No subsequent negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration is
required because there are no impacts, significant or otherwise, of the Project beyond
those identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR and previous CEQA documents for the site, as
documented in the attached initial Study.
Conclusion. This Addendum is adopted pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 based
on the attached Initial Study dated February 7, 2414. The Addendum and Initial Study review
the proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan as discussed above. Through the
adoption of this Addendum and related Initial Study, the City determines that the above minor
changes in land uses do not require a subsequent EIR or negative declaration under CEQA
Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163. The City further determines
that the Eastern Dublin EIR and the 2005 MND adequately address the potential
environmental impacts of the Master Plan change as documented in the attached Initial Study.
As provided in Section 15164 of the Guidelines, the Addendum need not be circulated for
public review, but shall be considered with the prior environmental documents before making
a decision on this project.
The Initial Study, Eastern Dublin EIR, the 2005 MND, and all resolutions cited above are
incorporated herein by reference and are available for public review during normal business
hours in the Community Development Department, Dublin City Hall, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin
CA during normal business hours.
Page 3
Parks City of Dublin Capital Improvement Program 2020-2025 Page 46
Number – PK0119 FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 3 Program – PARKS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Fallon Sports Park is a 60-acre community park bordered by Fallon Road, Central Parkway, Lockhart Street and Gleason Drive. Phases 1 and 2 of the park have been
completed and Phase 3 represents the final phase of park development.
The Phase 3 project provides for the design and construction of the remaining 14 acres of Fallon Sports Park, referred to as the Upper Terrace. On December 17,
2019, City Council approved the concept design that includes a cricket field, sand volleyball courts and multi-sport batting cages. Construction is anticipated to start
in 2021.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT: $260,000
MANAGING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
2020-2025 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ESTIMATED COSTS
PRIOR
YEARS
2019-2020
BUDGET 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025
FUTURE
YEARS TOTALS
9100 - Salaries & Benefits $19,909 $44,519 $105,590 $170,018
9200 - Contract Services $55,696 $1,938,416 $1,994,112
9400 - Improvements $980,924 $7,252,846 $8,233,770
9500 - Miscellaneous $26 $200,074 $200,100
TOTAL $75,631 $3,163,933 $7,358,436 $10,598,000
FUNDING SOURCE
PRIOR
YEARS
2019-2020
BUDGET 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025
FUTURE
YEARS TOTALS
4100 - Public Facility Fees $75,631 $3,163,933 $7,358,436 $10,598,000
TOTAL $75,631 $3,163,933 $7,358,436 $10,598,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT $260,000 $260,000 $260,000