HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.1 - 3501 Public Health Departments
Page 1 of 5
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 1, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Informational Report: Local Public Health Departments
Prepared by: John Stefanski, Assistant to the City Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will receive an informational report on city-run Public Health
Departments and the process to form a local Public Health Department.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
Under Item 9 of its October 6, 2020 meeting, the City Council made a request for
information on public health departments and the process to form such a department
locally or regionally with other Tri-Valley cities.
Legal Background
County Health Officers, whether at the city or county level, are responsible enforcing
and observing:
1. Orders and ordinances of the governing body of the city pertaining to the public
health;
2. Orders, quarantines, and other regulations concerning the public health as
prescribed by the department; and
3. Statutes relating to public health.
Cities have a duty to appoint a health officer unless they consent to the county for
certain enforcement responsibilities. The City of Dublin, as part of its articles of
incorporation in 1982, consented for its health services function to remain with Alameda
County (Dublin Ordinance No. 13).
Page 2 of 5
The process of establishing a local Public Health Department in California requires a
city, by resolution and ordinance, to terminate service by the County Health Officer by
March 1 of each year. The city would have then until July 1 to establish and staff its
newly assumed public health duties. While these legal processes are straightforward,
the practical realities of establishing a new public health bureaucracy present several
challenges, presented throughout this report.
Overview of City Public Health Departments
Of the 482 cities in California, only four maintain their own public health departments.
The overwhelming majority of cities consent to enforcement by their county health
officer. This section details those four agencies – Berkeley (population 121,643), Long
Beach (population 467,354), Pasadena (population 141,246), and Vernon (population
112) – and their individual public health departments.
In the late 1800s it was more common for incorporated cities to maintain some form of
their own public health department, largely to address the more common infectious
diseases and public health issues of that era. Berkeley, Long Beach, and Pasadena, all
incorporated during this time, were no different in this respect. However, as the science
around infectious diseases evolved, so did the structure of local public health
administration, reflecting the understanding that jurisdictional boundaries do not contain
infectious diseases. Thus, the functions of individual public health departments
eventually consolidated to the county level to provide greater coordination, efficiency,
and effectiveness at addressing cross-jurisdictional public health problems. However,
Berkeley, Long Beach, and Pasadena wished to maintain their local control over public
health to better ensure the department was responsive to the individual needs of their
community. Information regarding the establishment of Vernon’s public health
department was not readily available.
The scope of public health functions at the local level is varied amongst the four cities.
They can be narrowly tailored for the specific needs of a community such as in Vernon,
an almost entirely industrial city in which its Public Health Department is largely
responsible for environmental and occupational health programs which support the
variety of industrial activities taking place. Public health functions can also be broad,
from the operation of public health clinics and community health programs to vector
control and food facility inspections, like in Long Beach, which maintains the largest
municipal public health department in the State of California.
Below is a brief overview of the public health functions administered by each of the four
cities mentioned above.
Berkeley
Berkeley’s Public Health Division is a part of the City’s Health, Housing, and Community
Services Department. The Division has a total budget of $10.5 million and
approximately 58 employees. The Public Health Division has three sections:
1. Family Health
a. This section is responsible for Childhood Health, Nursing Field Services,
and Communicable Disease Control (HIV/STD/TB).
2. Clinical Services
Page 3 of 5
a. This section oversees the City’s various clinical and school-based sites
which provide clinical services and health education programming. The
section also is responsible for the administration of the Women, Infants,
and Children (WIC) and Vital Statistics and Epidemiology programs.
3. Health Promotion
a. This section is responsible for health education and promotion programs
including nutrition, lead prevention, hypertension, and heart health
programs. This section also oversees public health emergency
preparedness, pandemic flu, immunizations, and tobacco prevention
programs.
The broader Health, Housing, and Community Development Department also contains
the Environmental Health and Mental Health divisions which work closely with the
Public Health division.
Long Beach
The Long Beach Health and Human Services Department has a total budget of $157M
and 439 employees, with $27.5M specifically budgeted for public health purposes. The
department has five department bureaus:
1. Community Health
a. This bureau oversees Nutrition Services (WIC program), Homeless
Services, Health Promotions (tobacco education and fitness programs),
and family planning and wellness programs.
2. Environmental Health
a. This bureau is responsible for the testing and inspection of food facilities,
hazardous materials (HAZMAT), tobacco retailers, and pool and beach
water. The bureau also oversees vector control, noise control, and air
quality resource education.
3. Housing Authority
a. This bureau supports economically disadvantaged populations, including
targeted groups such as the homeless, those living with disabilities,
HIV+/AIDS, and Veterans, with rental housing assistance and other
support services.
4. Physician Services
a. This bureau oversees five public health clinics as well as a public health
laboratory.
5. Policy, Planning and Prevention
a. This bureau is responsible for Nursing Services, Public Health Emergency
Management, Epidemiology and Communicable Disease Control, and
Strategic Planning.
Pasadena
The Pasadena Public Health Department has a total budget of $15.5 million and
approximately 99 employees. There are five divisions in the department:
1. Community Health Services
a. This division oversees health programs targeted towards infants, children,
and families. Examples of programs in this division include Immunization
Clinics, Communicable Disease Prevention, Child Health and Disability
Page 4 of 5
Prevention, and Tuberculosis Clinics.
2. Environmental Health
a. This division oversees Food Protection, Vector Control, Tobacco Retail
Enforcement, Animal Care and Control, and several general
environmental health programs.
3. Health Administration
a. This division oversees Medi-Cal administrative activities as well as general
budget and administrative functions.
4. Prevention and Policy Programs
a. This division administers the WIC, Obesity Reduction, and Tobacco
Control programs.
5. Social and Mental Health Services
a. This division is responsible for mental health services, substance abuse
treatment and prevention, HIV and STD services, and other special
community initiatives which address homelessness and violence
prevention.
Vernon
The City of Vernon’s Public Health Department is substantially different from the other
three departments discussed in this report. This is due in part to the City being
composed of almost entirely industrial uses with a very small population for an
incorporated city. Given this dynamic, the City’s Health and Environmental Control
Department focuses on HAZMAT, food safety inspections, storm water, solid waste
management, garment manufacturing, animal and vector control, and general
environmental health.
The City has not posted its Fiscal Year 2020-21 budget, but according to the Fiscal
Year 2019-20 Budget, the Health and Environmental Control Department had a total
budget of $1.4M and four employees.
Conclusion
While the process for establishing a public health department is routine in concept, in
practice the formation of such an agency is rife with complications and significant
upfront and ongoing investments in capital assets and personnel.
There are several considerations worth noting, which are not answerable within the
research done for this report. In the case of Dublin, there would be considerable work
identifying how and which public health functions would be transferred to a newly
formed department from Alameda County. As this report details, there is no
standardized approach to public health at the City level. It is unclear whether the County
would allow the City to assume certain parts of public health responsibilities while
allowing the City to contract for others; or, whether the County would obligate the City to
assume other public health related functions beyond the scope of what may be desired
locally.
The funding of the public health department is another unknown. Using the four city-run
public health departments as a baseline, it is reasonable to expect the annual
operational costs of a local public health department would be in the millions to tens of
millions of dollars. However, California has a decentralized structure for funding and
implementation of public health. Each local public health department is independent and
Page 5 of 5
must secure its own funding from state and federal grants, supplemented with local
revenue. In most cases, this funding is contingent upon the programs and services the
department provides or is tied to specific services/programs (e.g. WIC). It is unclear,
however, if those funding sources would negate the need for a General Fund subsidy.
Public health departments require teams of individuals with degrees of expertise and
advanced skills as well as specialized facilities, equipment, and materials, which
present additional human resource, procurement, and real estate complications in
establishing a new department. For reference, the City of Dublin’s contract for Police
Services includes an 18-month period of transition if the City decided to establish its
own police department; in that instance, the City already owns much of the asset
inventory needed for a police department. For establishing a new public health
department, the timeline would potentially be longer, as the City would be starting the
process with much less.
In the end, these complications impact the overall value proposition of forming a
municipal public health department in the City of Dublin or with regional partners. While
the City would gain more local control over public health affairs, the costs of doing so
and the efficiencies at which such services are provided may not ultimately produce the
value desired or needed by residents. Staff believes that the current arrangement with
the County providing public health services is the best option for the City given the
County’s existing infrastructure, operational economies of scale, and access to
expertise and technology.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.