The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 4.03 Dev Impact Fee Report c~rv ClEIRrt{ fBle # D~[][[lc~[l2] A G lE b\!l1Q) A 5nr A 'fEM lE b\!l1r CfiTV (C(QU b\!l (C ~ IL M IErE1r~ ~ G IQ)A TIE JBlwn ~Blrt1f ~ 5, 2IDH0l8 SUBJECT Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds DeposIts Pursuant to Government Code SectlOns 66002, 66006 and 66008 (AB 1600) Report Prepared by Paul S Rankm, Admlnlstratlve Services Dlr -/) ~JL ATTACHMENTS 1 Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds Deposits I 2 Resolution Makmg Fmdmgs Regardmg Unexpended /l . _V Developer Deposits For Public Improvements RECOMMENDA 'IKON <~ Accept the reports and ddopt the ResolutIOn .!FiN AN CIAL S T A TEMENT All Developer Deposl ts are antic I pated to be utIlIzed for the purpose for whIch they were ongmally collected DESCRIPTKON A City IS authonzed under State Law to reqUire development applicants to contnbute fees toward off-sIte public Improvements, which are needed as a result of the new development Annually the City IS reqUIred to dIsclose the status of funds held for thIS purpose The report m Attachment 1 provides mfonnatIOn related to the status of these funds from July 1,2006 through June 30, 2007 ReqUIrements of Law The law reqmres the CIty to review on an annual baSIS the status of development fees collected As reqUlred by Government Code SectIOn 66006(b )(2) the report IS to be mcluded on the Agenda at a publIc meetmg not less than 15 days after the mformatIOn was made avatlable Staff prevIOusly made avallable to the publIc a draft copy of thiS report on December 10, 2007 In the event thdt dllY fees remam unexpended for more than five years the City CouncIl must adopt a ResolutIOn makmg I"ertalll findmgs In the event that findmgs are not made to support the retention at the tunds, the unexpended fees must be returned to the current owner5 of the subject property MaJor Components of Report The 2006/2007 Annual Report of Developer Funds IS shown m Attachment 1 The law reqUIres disclosure of numerous detaIls WIth respect to actIVIty 111 these accounts ThIS Includes beg111l1lng and endmg balances, collectIOns for the year, expenditures for the year, mterest earned, and any refunds For the purpose of thiS report the CIty IS provldmg mformatlOn on the following funds ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ COpy TO Page 1 at 3 liTEM NO fl:3 G \Ab1600 Impact rees\FY 06 07\AGFNDA DOC o Eastern Dublm Traffic Impact Fees o Downtown Traffic Impact Fee o PublIc FacllItles Impact Fees o Park DedIcatIOn Fees o FIre Impact Fees o Tn Valley TransportatIOn Development Fees o Pass Through Fees (Freeway Interchange Fees / BART Garage) o DublIn - Contra Costa Traffic Impact MltlgatIon Fees Excluded from thIS report are two developer fee types that do not fit the defimtlon for the dIsclosure reqUIrements found In State Law CalIfornia Government Code sectIOn 66001 IS applIcable to funds collected for public Improvements The NOise mItlgatIon funds are collected to finance future nOise mItIgatIon on pnvate propertIes and would not meet the publIc Improvement entena The Non- ReSIdential Affordable Housmg Lmkage Fee and Housmg In-Lieu funds support a vanety of housmg programs that are not public Improvements The Public Art In-Lieu funds are collected under the City's general polIce power and are not deemed as ffiItIgatlon fees Details of actIVity for each of the fees are dIsplayed m the Annual Report (Attachment 1) The followmg IS a summary of the actiVIty for the year mcludmg the Begmmng and Endmg Balance Eastern Dublm Traffic Impact Fecs (Excludes BART Garage $ 9,596 166 $ 2,220,934 ($ 1,105,506) $ 10,711,594 Com anent - Pass Through Downtown Traffic Impact Fees & MItI atlOn Pro ects $ 2,085,566 $ 248,322 $ 2,238,316 Public FaCIlIty Fees $ 9,105,974 $ 5,945,434 $ 9,343,597 Park Dedlcatlon Fees $ 2,310,506 $ 0 $ 0 Fire Impact Fees - Advance Owed To General Fund $ 180,621 ($78,785 ) ($ 1,791,762) Tn-Valley Transportatlon Deve10 lTIent r ees $ 312,611) $ 242,632 None $ 69,979 Category 3 ReglOndl Traffic 1m aet Fees $ 1,258,317 $ 57,702 None $ 1,316,019 Pass Through Fees Freeway lnterchan e I BART Gara e $ 1,001,599 $ 357,229 $ 277,690 $ 1,081,138 Dublm - Contra Costa Traffic 1m act Mlhgdhon Fees $ 5,640,833 $ 810,263 ($3,296,600 $ 3,154,496 TOTAL $ 28,792,752 $ 10,063,137 ($12,872,470 $ 25,983,419 It IS Important to note that these fees are restncted and can only be used for the capital related purposes for which they have been collected Given the multI-year nature of the capital proJects to be financed It IS expected that funds will be accumulated and used based on the construction tllTImg Page 2 of3 funds Remamme: Unexpended More Than 5 Years After Beme: Collected One of the key provIsIOns of the legIslatIOn regulatmg development fees IS to regularly reVIew funds collected and held WIthout bemg expended for more than five years The ldw reqUIres the City to make certaIn findmgs m order to contmue to hold these funds The followmg Table summanzes the accounts WIth contnbutIons whIch have remamed unexpended for more than five years All of the proJects are IdentIfied m the adopted 2007/08 Update to the City of Dublm 2006-2011 CapItal Improvement Program SUMMARY O.!F ACCOUNTS WKTH FUNDS REMAINING UNEXPENDED FOR FiVE YEAR.S OR MORJE AlFTER THEY WERE COLLECTED Unexpended Kmpact lFee DepOSit Balances lProJed Name as of June 30,2007 Dougherty Road - North of Amador Valley Boulevard To CIty Limit $294,364 St Patrick Way - RegIOnal to Golden Gate $415,944 Dougherty Road Improvements - Houston Place North to Amador Valley Blvd $148,791 Bike Lane - Amador Valley Boulevard Stagecoach Road to Dougherty Road $ 51,507 DublIn Boulevard Improvements - SIerra Court to Dublm Court $500,848 Scarlett Dnve ExtensIOn Between Dublm Blvd and Dougherty Road $ 33,562 lProposed Resolution Makme: Necessary lFmdml!s In order to retdll1 funds longer than five years certaIn findmgs must be made by the CIty CounCIl Without thiS actIon the funds would need to be refunded All of these are IdentIfied proJects that WIll reqUire the fundmg m the future The CIty contmues to allocate mterest on the balances retamed Staff has IdentIfied the findmgs necessary as part of the attached ResolutIOn (Attachment 2) AdoptIOn of the ResolutIOn allows the CIty to contmue to retam the fees dIscussed earlier m the report, m order to fund the proJects for WhICh they were collected Staff would recommend that the City Council accept the attached Annual Report (Attachment I) and adopt the attached ResolutIon (Attachment 2) Page 3 of3 City of Dubltn Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds Deposits For the Year Ended June 30, 2007 CONTENTS SECTKON SectIOn 1 SectIOn 2 SectIOn 3 Section 4 SectIOn 5 SectIOn 6 KNFORMA TKON 'fable of Disclosure ReqUirements With Cross Reference To Government Code and locatIOn Kn City of Dubhn Report 1? AGJE(S) 1-2 Description Kmpact Fees Included In Report 3 Status of Funds o Knterfund Loans & Transfers o Specific Funds Held in JExcess of5 Years o Refnnds 4-6 2006/2007 Accountmg ofHmpact Fees o Eastern Dubhn 'fraffic Impact Fees o Pubhc .!Facility Impact Fees o Park DedicatIOn Fees o Fire Impact .!Fees o Downtown TKF 1 MItigatIOn (All Accounts) o Tn-Valley TransportatIOn Development Fee o Freeway Interchange Fees o BART Pdrkmg Garage Component TllF o Dubhn I Contra Costa MItigatIOn Fees 7 Detail By Account - Downtown Traffic MItigatIOn Contnbutions 8 Schedule of Fundmg For Pubhc Improvements And Percentage Funded By Developer .!Fees 9-11 Data AvaIlable To Pubhc December to, 2007 Presented City Council Meetmg January 15, 2008 Al"fACIHIMEN'f ]. Sec!mll1l. 1 l' ABlLE OF IMP ACT FEE llJB.SCJLOSIlJIRE REQUrrREMlEN'fS WITH ClROSS REFERENCES Government Code SectIOn Requirement 66006 (b) (A) 66006 (b) (B) 66006 (b) (C) 66006 (b) (D) 66006 (b)( E) 66006 (b) (F) 66006 (b) (0) 66006 (b) (H) Knformabon .!Found In City Report At ProvIde the followmg 1 A bnefdescnptIon of each of the CIty'S Impact fees SectIOn 2, Part A 2 The amount charged for the CIty'S Impact fees SectIon 2, Part B 3 The begmnmg and endmg balance for the CIty'S SectIon 4 and SectIOn 5 Impact fee accounts 4 The amount of fees collected and mterest earned SectIon 4 and SectIOn 5 5 An IdentIfication of each publIc Improvement on SectIons 4, 5 and 6 WhICh fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each Improvement, mcludmg the total percentage of the cost of the publIc Improvement that was funded wIth fees 6 An IdentIficatIOn of an approxImate date by WhICh SectIOn 3, Part B the constructIon ofthe public llnprovement WIll commence If the local agency detenmnes that suffiCient funds have bccn collected to complete findncmg on an mcomplete public Improvement, as IdentIfied m paragraph (2) of subdIVISIon (d) of Sectton 66001, and the publIc llnprovement remams mcomplete 7 A descnptIOn of cach mtcrfund transfer or lom1 SectIOn 3, Part A made [rom the account or fund, mc1udmg the public Improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees wlll be cxpended, and, In the case of an mterfund loan, the date on winch the loan WIll be repdld, and the rate of mterest that the account or fund Wlll receive on the loan 8 The amount of refunds made pursuant to SectIOn 3, Part C subdIVISion (e) of SectIOn 66001 and any allocatlOns pursuant to subdIVISIon (f) of SectIon 6600 I Page 1 (, \Ab 1600 Impact Fee<;\FY 06 07\OUTI INF DOC SectuHn 1 TAJBll..Ji: OJF IMPACT JFEE ][}D.SCLOSlU]RE REQUIREMENTS WIl'lHI CIR. OSS IR. IE FE IRIE N C JES Government Code Section 66001 (d) 66001 (d) (1) 66001 (d)(2) 66001 (d)(3) 66001 (d) (4) 66006 (b) (1) (F) ReqUirement 9 For the fifth year followmg the first depOSit mto the account or fund, and every five years thereafter, the City shall make all of the followmg findmgs With rcspect to those portIOns of the Impact fee remmmng unexpended, whether committed or uncommItted a IdentIfy the purpose to WhICh the fee IS to be used for b Demonstrate a reasonable relatlOnshIp between the fee and the purpose for WhICh It IS charged c IdentIfy all sources and amounts of fundmg antIcipated to complete financmg m mcomplete Improvements d DeSIgnate the approxlmate dates on which the fundmg referred to In Item c above IS expected to be depOSIted mto the appropnatc account or fund e When suffiCIent funds have been collected, the agency shallldentl fy, wlthm 180 ddYs of the determmatlon that suffiCient funds have been collected, an approximate date by WhICh the constructIOn of the public Improvements Will commence Page 2 G IAbl 600 Impact fees\FY 06 07\OUTLlNI: DOC InformatIOn Found In City !Report At SectIOn 3, Part B and attached ResolutIOn for Items a-e below SecboHll 2 DJESCllUP1I'liON OJ!.? liMP ACT FlElES A DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY'S IMPACT FEJES The CIty of Dub 1m has established the foIIowmg Impact Fees and Traffic MItIgatIon ContnbutIOns o Eastern DublIn Traffic Impact Fees o Downtown Traffic Impact Fee o PublIc FacIlItIes Impact Fees o Park DedIcatIOn Fees o Fire Impact Fees o Tn Valley Transportation Development Fees o Freeway Interchange Fees o DublIn - Contra Costa Traffic Impact MItIgatIOn Fees These Impact fees were establIshed to pay for the design, development and constructIOn of publIc Improvement proJects for streets, publIc facIhtIes, parks, fire capital expansIOn proJects and cornmumty amemtles B AMOUNTS CHARGED BY TIHlE CKTY }FOR JIMP ACT FEES AND PUBLIC JIMPROVEMENTS lFUNDED BY THESE }FEES The amounts charged for the Impact fees noted above are dependent upon the type and size of a partIcular development and were based upon related studies, conducted pnor to the adoptIon of the fees City Counctl has adopted and Imposed the subJect fees through the passage of the followmg resolutIons These fees are updated on an annual baSIS based upon various cost mdexes descnbed m further detaIl as part of the resolutIOns for these fees Kmpact lFee Resolution IOrdmaDce Eastern Dublm Traffic Impact Fees ResolutIon 225-99 (Includes BART Garage Pass-Through) Amended by ResolutIon 111-04 Downtown Traffic Impact Fee ResolutIon 210-04 PublIc FaCIlIty Impact Fees ResolutIon 60-99 Amended by ResolutIOn 214-02 Park DedIcatIOn Fees Chapter 928 Dub1m MumcIpal Code FIre Impact Fees ResolutIon 37-97 - Amended by ResolutIOns 208-00, 12-03 and 77-05 Tn Valley TransportatIOn Development Fees ResolutIon 89-98 Amended by ResolutIons 85-99 and 87-03 Pleasanton Interchange Fees ResolutIOn 11-96 Amended by ResolutIon 155-98 DublIn - Contra Costa Traffic Impact ResolutIOn 74-00 and Contra Costa County MitigatIOn Fees Ordmance No 2000-24 The studIes and supportmg documentation presented or adopted as part of the resolutIOns noted above, IdentIfy the publIc Improvements that those fees WIll be used to finance These studIes also show that there IS a reasonable relationshIp a) bctwcen the fces' use and the type of development proJect on whIch the fee IS Imposed and b ) between the need for the publIc faclhty and the type of development project on WhICh the fee IS Imposed Page 3 G \AblGOO ImpJct Fees\FY 06 07\;e~_2_De~~npllOnofFee> DOC SEC']['][ 0 N 3 S1' A 'flUS OF FUNDS A KNTERlFUND LOANS AND TRANSFERS OF IMPACf FEES No mterfund loans or transfers of Impact fees were granted to othcr funds dUrIng FIscal Year 2006-2007 The Fire Impact Pee Fund receIved an advancc 1 loan from the Genefal Fund m both 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 CollectIOns of Fife Impact Fees are bemg used to repay the advance Interest accrues at the rate equal to the CIty'S return on Its mvestment portfolIo lB ANAL YSKS OF .!FEES LEVKED AGAiNST DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN ACCORDANCE WITIHI SEC 66001 OF THE (CGC) AND UNSPENT AFfER 5 YEARS The purpose of the reVIew was to Identify momes that had been collected and held for a penod of more than five years and to make appropnate dIsclosures The CIty of Dublm has analyzed the balance of momes held m Its Impact fee funds and has determmed that thefe are SIX proJects mvolvlOg the use of Traffic MItIgatIon ContnbutIOns, which have contmued to be held for more than five years The ProJects are accounted for m the adopted City of Dublm FIve Year CapItallmprovement Program 2006 - 2011 (As updated for Fiscal Year 2007/08) In accordance WIth State Law the City CounCil has prevIOusly adopted ResolutIon #234-06 on December 19, 2006 declarIng the need to contmue to mamtam the funds In order to complete five proJects ThIS report adds an addItIonal project to the list Detmls related to the SIX proJects and funds held for more than five years arc Identified below DOUGHERTY RD NORTH OF AMADOR VALLEY lBLVD TO CKTY LKMiT (#Not Yet ASSigned) Amount Collected m PrcvIOus Fiscal Years SubJect to 5 Year LllmtatIOn Project Cost As IdentIfied rn CIP (#96850) 1 $294,364 $4,346,695 DescriptIOn ofProlect flus proJect Will WIden Dougherty Road to a SIX lane dlvlded highway, Includmg landscaped medIans wlthm thc proJcct limits In d preVIOUS phase a traffic SIgnal was added at WIllow Crcck Drive and funded from the Dougherty Valley Impact Fees Source ofFundmg The work IS antIclpatcd to be funded by Traffic Impact Fees, mcludmg contnbutIOns from thiS source dS well dS Edstem Dublm TIP and contnbutIons from the Dublm / Contra Costa County (Dougherty Valley) MItIgatIOn Fees ApprOXimate Pr01ect CompletIon Dates A precIsc complctton date for the proJect has not been establIshed It IS eurrently expected that It WIll be WIll be a date outSIde the current 5 Year CIP plaomng hOrizon 2 ST PATRICK WAY - REGIONAL STREET TO GOLDEN GATE DRIVE (#96870) Amount Collected 111 PreVIOUS FIscal Years Subject to 5 Year LImItatIOn $415,944 ProJcct Cost As Identified In CIP (#96870) $472,279 DescnptIOn of Prolect ThiS project WIll construct a 2-lane roadway between Golden Gate Dnve and RegIOnal Street, south of and parallel to Dublm Boulevard The need for a connector road fOf three long commerCIal cul-de-sacs was first IdentIfied m the CIty'S ongmal Downtown Study ThIS need IS becommg more apparent as thiS portIOn of the Central Busmess Dlstnct develops further and the BART parkmg lot IS constructed along Golden Gate Dnve Page 4 G IAb1600 Impad F~e~\FY 06 lJ7\5ec_3_Status of Funds DOC SEC'f][ON 3 S1r A 1rUS OF FUNDS The sectIOn of SaInt Patnck Way between Amador Plaza Road and Golden Gate Dn ve was constructed by the Alameda County TransportatIOn Authonty (ACT A) as part of the 1-580/1-680 Interchange Improvements For the purpose of thIs CapItal ProJect, only the portIon of Samt Patnck Way that IS antIcIpated to be bUIlt by the CIty IS Included m the cost estimate Source of Fundmg Downtown Traffic MitigatIOn ContnbutIons and Impact Fees, BART mitigatIon funds, and developer mItigatIon Improvements ApproXimate Project CompletIon Dates It IS estImated that the City WIll complete the acqUISItIon of nght-of-way III FIscal Year 2007-2008 The Developer Will then construct Improvements In 2008-2009 DOUGHlERTY ROAlD IMPROVEMlENTS - HOUSTON PLAClE NORTH TO AMAIDOR V ALL lEY BOULlEV ARID (#96850) Amount Collected In PrevIous Fiscal Years SubJect to 5 Year LImItatIon ProJect Cost As IdcntIfied In CIP # 96850 3 $148.791 $4,346.695 Descnpllon of Prolect ThIS project conSists of two phases and the first phase IS complete The second phase conSIsts of wldenmg the number of travel lanes from four to SIX lanes and mstalhng landscaped medIans Source of Fundll1g In additIOn to these funds, Eastern DublIn Traffic Impact Fee Funds, and Dougherty Valley (Contra Costa County Impact Fees) ApproXimate Project CompletIon Dates A precise completIon date for the proJect has not been establIshed It IS currently expected that It Will be WIll be a date outSIde the current 5 Year CIP plannll1g honzon BIKE LANE - AMADOR V ALLEY BOUUEV ARID STAGECOACH ROAD TO DOUGHERTY ROAD (#96070) Amount Collected In PreVIOUS FIscal Years Subject to 5 Year LImitatIon ProJect Cost As IdentIfied In CIP #96070 4 $51.507 $295,699 Descnptton of Prolect ThIS project would construct a Class 2 bIcycle lane along the north Side of Amador Valley Boulevard between Stagecodch ROdd and Dougherty Road to allow for the exclUSive use of bicycles and pedestnans ThiS BIke Lane Project on Amador Valley Boulevard Win connect the Iron Horse Trdll, the Alamo Creek Bike Path, dlld the Dougherty ROad Bike Pdth Source ofFundmg Measure B Bike and Pedestnan, and Traffic MItIgatIon ContnbutIons ApproXImate Project CompletlOn Dates It IS estImated that the proJect Will be completed m Fiscal Year 2008-2009 5 DUBLIN ]BLVD IMPROVEMENTS - SIIERRA COURT TO DUBLKN COURT (#96930) Amount Collected m PrevIOUS FIscal Years SubJect to 5 Year LImitatIon $500.848 Project Cost As IdentIfied In ClP #96930 $2.881.181 Page 5 G IAb1600 Impact Fees\FY 06 07\se<.._3_Stalus uf Funds DOC SJECTlfON .3 Sl'A'fQJS OJF JFUNIDS DescriptIon ofProlect ThIs proJect wIll widen Dublm Boulevard from SIerra Court to Dublm Court and underground eXlstmg overhead utIhtIes This proJect will mcrease the roadway capacIty from four to SIX lanes This IS the third phase of the Dublm Boulevard wldemng The wIdenmg ofthls segment of Dub 1m Boulevard WIll complete the Improvements on Dublin Boulevard from San Ramon Road to Dougherty Road Recent traffic studIes have shown that SIX lanes of traffic WIll be needed as DublIn contmues to expand to the east Source of Fundmg Traffic MItIgatIOn ContnbutIons, Category 2 Eastern Dublm TIF Fees ApprOXImate Project CompletIon Dates It IS estImated that the project deSIgn Will begm m 2010-2011 and completIon date for the proJect WIll be at a later date, outsIde the current 5 Year CIP plannmg hOrizon It IS possIble that phases based upon aVaIlable fundmg could begm at an earlier date SCARLETT DR & KRON HORSE TRAIL EXTENSION - DUBLIN RL VII) - DOUGHERTY RD (#96840) Amount Collected m PrevIous FIscal Years SubJect to 5 Year LimItatIon Project Cost As IdentIfied In CTP #96840 5 $33,562 $10,951,520 DeSCription of Prolect ThiS proJect will Widen Dublin Boulevard from SIerra Court to DublIn Court and underground eXlstmg overhead utIlItIes ThIS proJect WIll mcrease the roadway capaCity from four to SIX lanes ThIS IS the thIrd phase of the Dublm Boulevard wIdenmg The wldenmg of th IS segment of Dublin Boulevard WIll c.omplete the Improvements on Dubltn Boulevard from San Ramon Road to Dougherty Road Recent traffic studIes have shown that SIX lanes of traffic will be needed as Dublm contmues to expand to the east Source of Fundmg Traffic MItIgatIon ContnbutIons, Category 2 Eastern Dublin TIF Fees, Alameda County TransportatIOn Improvement Authonty Project Funds ApprOXimate Project Completion Dates A precise completion date for the project has not been estdbhshed It IS currently expected that It Will be Will be d ddte outSIde the current 5 Year CIP plannmg honzon C REFUNDS No refunds were made dunng fIscal Yedr 2006-2007 Page 6 G \Ab 1600 Impact ~eeslFY 06 07\sec_3_St:llUS of Funds DOC R o o N o .... C ::::I ..., '" o o N >- "5 .., b ;; tl ~ '<t Z o i= (J IU III >- ll! <l: ::!: ::!: :> 1Il l- ll! o a.. w ll! 11.I 11.I u.. I- U <( a.. ~ ....I <( l- ii: <( o z :J al :J Cl u.. o j: (3 Z o ::.:-i=1/) 0:<(11.I <(UW a..au.. 11.I Cl 1Il III 11.I UWWo :JEu.."" aJ...JI-"O ::)-Oc D..~~~ u..~ Z ~ :J III aJ w~ ::lUW..., C;:;:u..N Zu..l-tIJ o:<(u13 wll!<(m I-I-D..E 1Il ::i: 0 <( -.c W 65 Ul W 11.I0 WIL~ !!:t;-g u.. <l: ::::I D..lL ~ 6' ;;; "C <: ::::I lL <:: "C '" 1i>"C ~8 "C '" go:: u.. '" <:: Q 13 '" '" <: '" ~ m ill .... OJ Ii> "" OJ '" ~ <0 "" <0 o Ii> o .... "" N .,. m 10 '" .... OJ ll> o m .,. .... "" <0 to ... to OJ ll> OJ .,. '" e .... j:;: :a .!i ~ ~ u C III n; al '" CO o N '" o CO o o o <0 '<t "I "I '<t N N "" ll> m N .... .... N ;;; .... .... o 2i "" ;;:; '" .e .... j:;: "0 ..l!l u ~ "0 o '" IL o o o :;- N ..., 0 ~ ~ ..., .... "" .... ~ @.. !::::. o "" N <0 r:- ~ ~ 0' 0- '" '" "lOll> OJ '" .... 0 '" ~ ;D ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ o ~ ::. ~ <0 '<t o o .... l() '" m '" .,..- .... o ;:; .... US '" m o ~ '" UJ c: Ol en tJ5 ~ a c 'is Q 6' ~ 1jo; Q.'-=~ -c ~ -g e '" ~ :;: Q ~ to rotS 5 o 1:2 U; ~ c3~ I :: ~8 ~ ~ 00/5 6 to ~ .... - tIJ t :E ~ Vi' iO z ~ :2 ~ t5 l() a "'0= ~ 0: i.., 11. g_t: ~ (f.) '" Q is :5 ~ :g ffi ~;;~~ "" "" '" m m ~ 11. a.. :::l -g II) U5 o t:: <ll .c 0 <ll o a. u... .a (/) .c <: '" .2 iii <Ii Z LL ti '" Q. 5 N to l() co .... co ~ -0 <:: ::::I u.. '" ~ 2 ~12 "'(/) (') ~ ELi: e_ - 0 <:: <:: '" 0 .3fj 5~ '" '" <:: <ll 0 (j;U ~.2 ;;- .,..- '" o l() l() o .... ::. '" o Z ti <ll a It '" :::l _ Q m ~ ~ ;; o <0 '" U (') U (j; a.. '" "C <:: .2 <ll IY ~ <: <ll E <ll > o c. E " ~ '" ~ Ul ~~Il)~ ~i=S~ ~ffiiim l:;~D::~~ "'u..I-c:"l <-Z-'<t ::i:I-Oc..... ::i:ZU:!:1f) ::I3:z,g", UlgQlIl"g Z!;(=E 3:C).l!Io 0-<1>.0 0!::065 ::i '" '<t N '" .... ;; .... :; <l:l-lIl::!: I-Uwo IIl<(Wo ll.u..m ~8~~~ ....I <(U-o CDa:_l-o ::I I-u.. <(.... OZ~~t> Oa:I-<ll UI-:ig Ul "l~:g W NO", ~ OI5wo~m J:>-~~~g~ C)<Zll!"'OO ::I;;: <(<l: ""PlO OiiJJ:C)o~... O:W~I-og ~D::wD::'EO Vlu..!z~5~ ~ - 8-0 ll. <C~ o o o .... ;1; to m '" '" .,..- .... m .... U 0 ;:;: l() Mu..VlO <(Wo >a:wm ~I-u.~ C)....II-o w<(Uo I-Z<(M <(04.~ U-::i" C) - '!!, 11.I ..a a: 0 N N '<t m '" "I M o >-i=Z 0 W<(W d, ...J1-::iIl)N ...JD::ll.w""- <:{OOwo >~u:Ju..g D::z> u I-<:{ll.l <ll a:Cl E I- 0 Z 01- .... r:: o ... ... .... o 2i ~ u C '" <; aJ OJ c: 'iI c: w Page 7 M m ll> fZl '" co o N ... '" N N l() M .... M '" co Ol ~ ;:: '" '" If) ... o o .... ;;; <0 lO "l ... ;::- .... M .... .... N "" <0 <0 "I N ... '<t "" N ~ to e .- j:;: :a ..!!! iii > <( u c: to "'iii CD '<t "" N 'Xl .- <:> lO .... v o m N N .... lO M .... e o "" <c to e .- ;;: "C .2! u .!! '5 U .. LL 'Xl '<t o ;'! <0 Ol .... m <:> .... '" '" "l .... ;; .... .... ll> <:> o o .... e o .... <c '" ;b E ~ <ll .a ~ :0 i) m D- e- E w u .... ~ <:> ~ <c I- g ~ N <:: o '" ;;;, :;'l <ll ::::!. IY '" e .... ;;: ., .; .E 6' M N .... If) lO e N .... <:> <:> '" '" m "I C. M '" 0:) 0:) m .... <0 .... '" .... .... .... .... co !::::. 0 Z;; <:: '" Q 0 "'iii z '" (i) "g g ir e ~ -< a.. ~ ro ~ ::J .... s: Q ..a 8~~~~ E 2! (!) 0 0 w~g'ffi~ -;:;; E '" 0 U> ~ <ll {j <.9 E; (j; 0 g a.EQi.; E i:l n... CD 3. -2 Ol ., co c: w ~ :0 U:: ~ C. IY ll.l ,E '" <..) <:: U '" E > '" ~ .= '" '<t '" .... "" 0:) "" '" N .... '" Z o i= o ILl tn <:> U> '" m '<t ;1; '" ~ o 0/1 " ;;; ~ ..0 ::0 '" 1::: " -S '- o -" 'S ..D .... .8 " :0 2 ;:; >- '" i:i :> o E '" "0 " " .D E o " " .=:; " "" " '" -fi '0 " '" " o "'0 'E " ~ :> .0- '" " "" .... .... N .... 0:) .... o U> .... "" Z;; 1: o "'" " ~g 5'" NO ,,1- .=:;> '" - - " "0-" " ~ t: 0 o ~ ",-" i':' g ~ ~ ;:~ "I- .co>:: ;: -< Ecn ~ ::: ,,:0 .;, " "0 ~ E ..0 " ",,"'; ~ ~ " " 5b'5 " ..D OJ -5a .E '" " c; -g ~ E '" 00 ~ " " ;: E 'E " " " .5 .5 ~ ~ -g~ " " -<-" . I- j ,;: ::;: '" iil "' 8 "! S 1l ~ ,. ID m o " fr ~ ~I "'-' ~: 1': -" 2 i ~ ~ U il. E r::- o o N o M Q) l: :::l Il)-' ZCD 00 i=O ON W..... (I) >. ''5 r--, g E N 0 . ... :g~ 0(1) NZ 1-0 0:::_ 01- a..:J wa:I 0:::0:: WI- WZ Ll-O 1-0 Oz ~Q ~I- -e:( ...JC) e:(- I-!::: .o::~ <CO Oii: ~~ ...Jo::: all- :JZ es: Ll..0 01- ~~ 00 e LI- o ...J ~ W e Q) ...... Cll v21 .....Q)(f.I g~> d,~E NC- V::Q :J o al > <( C"'>EO .....Q)I- o..c- 9 O)D... O):Jc (l)NOo 1-",,"01;) Z :J ::J 0 o I o o <:( u U. LL e:( 0::: I- U !:!:: u w a.. (I) Cll 1-1'---0::;: 000::: Wo-..::.::: -'o~~ o ,-..... 0:::~~1O a..",,"~D... U5 "0 coO::: o >. al at::> OQ)<( d,..co N Ol_ """ 6 C o "0 C~ gal (/J C CD C OQ).o ox:J owe d,:t:: NQ)t:: """L:Q) Cll..c U :J if) 0 o o o CD 0) o I.!) co CD 0) o I.!) OJ CD 0) o I'-- OJ CD 0) o """ co CD 0) ~ I- o W .., o 0::: a.. a.. (3 I.!) M o I.!) o <.D """ I'-- M I.!) co o """ I'-- T- CD co N I.!) CD 0) co M M """ M co N M co I.!) co I'-- v 0) m I'-- co T- CD o - ..... -- r- CI) :0 C'lI jij ~ CI) u c ..!! C'lI m r- o -- o M -- CD . CD o -- ..... -- r- "C CI) - u J2 "'5 o l/l CI) CI) LL o I'-- T- T- N .- 0) N co 0) I'-- M o co (0 co I'-- ..... co """ o r-- N (0 N M """ I.D ..... r-- """ r- o -- o ("') -- <0 <0 o -- ..... -- r- - l/l CI) ... CI) - l: ...-... o 0) I.D 0) r0 o ..... ...-... ..... ..... v (0 ..... I.D ~ (f.I ~ :::l ~ '0 l: Q) a. x W r- o -- CD o o N UI UI CI) ...J I.!) o N (0 co v OJ N co (0 o N co ..... 0) OJ o N I.!) I'-- o """ T- o co I.!) ..... 0) 0) I.D o ..... CD """ I.D I'-- o ..... s -- ~ ..... o o CD CD o C> o "- ell a.. UI "C l: ::J ~ 0::: r- o -- o M -- CD CI) o l: C'lI 'jij to C'l c ii l: W u. !!:JB i=r-I-ffi l: """ C E :J: 9 ~ Q.l 00).8> -Nca c: """ :s:: ..... :J: a c- o DE e Q) C..c U)(j)CllU I-N...Jro ZOQ.lO :J9~~ o m al O"l UNalro 0""">U5 <C <( o !:!:: o W a.. (I) I- Or-- WN -,0 09 0:::0) a..~ Page 8 >. "'0 ...... >..c - Ol alo !: m - ..... .0 ..... :J Q) Oc/5 ...J e:( I- o l- e Z <C 0::: C) o r-- o (0 0) o M O"J (0 m ~ I- o W -, o 0::: a.. a.. o <'? 0) I.l) to I.!) I.l) OJ o N v O"J I.D M I'- I'-- ..... v ..... ..... co m """ (0 CD o N co I'-- N (0 CD o -- ..... -- r- Q) :0 ~ C'lI > <C CI) o s::: C'lI 'jij al V M N OJ ..... o I.D ..... v M N co ..... o I.l) ..... r- o -- o M -- CD . CD o -- ..... -- r- "C Q) - o ~ o u UI ell Q) Ll.. co """ o """ ..... co 0) v I.!) m 0) CD I'-- m I'-- m I'-- m N o CD N ..... I.!) co N r- o -- o !2 CD tD o -- ..... -- r- - UI ~ CI) - l: o <'? N I'-- I.!) I.D ~ ...-... m N C\/ ..... '-' l/l CI) ... ::J ~ "C l: ell a. x w r- o -- CD o o N UI UI CI) ...J I.D """ (0 ..... M OJ M N N C") I.l) I.!) o (0 I.D I'-- ..... C") O"J o CD m I'-- (0 (0 (0 """ O"J N o I.l) (0 g m - ..... o o CD CD U C) o ... CI) a.. UI "C C :::l .... CI) 0::: r- o -- o M -- co CI) U l: C'lI "'jij a:I tn l: '0 c: UJ ll.f) ~ o = ~ U W f(f/')) 1: o 0- W 0:: I"- '" 1 '" ;1 ~: <= o 13 w Vl 6 o CD :;; '" 0; -2 t> co 0- E -" rn '" E '" <: ~ L.i: ::E <l: '" o ;::. o o N o ~ "'C '" -;: 6: RESOLUTION NO -08 A RESOLUTKON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O.!F DUBLIN *~********************************************* MAKING FINDINGS REGARDKNG UNEXPENDED TRAFFIC MI'fIGATKON CONTR:nBUTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 Recital 1 The CIty has collected contnbutlons for compTetlon of off-Site pubhc traffic lmprovements needed as a result of new development, whIch will not be expended wlthm five years aftcr deposIt The Improvements are descnbed m thc FIscal Year 2007/08 Update to the 2006-2011 Capital Improvement Program and mc1ude the Improvements des"nbed below Unexpended Developer Project Name DepOSit Balances as of June 30, 2007 1 Dougherty Road - North of Amador Valley Boulevard To City LimIt $294,364 2 St Patnck Way - RegIOnal to Golden Gate $415,944 3 Dougherty Rd Impvts - Houston PI North to Amador Valley Blvd $148,791 4 Blkc Lane - Amador Valley Blvd Stagecoach Rd to Dougherty Rd $ 51,507 5 Dublm Blvd Improvements - SIerra Ct to Dublm Ct $500,848 6 Scarlett Drive ExtensIOn - Between Dublm Blvd & Dougherty Rd $ 33,562 2 The SIX Projects descnbed m the recital above are referred to as the "SIX Traffic Improvements" IFmdm2S The CIty Councd finds, on the baSIS of the foregomg ReCitals that A The contnbutlons which have been collected for the SIX Traffic Improvements will remam unexpended after Fiscal Year 2006-2007 B The contnbutlOns which have been collected for the SIX Traffic Improvements Will remam committed for constructlon of the Improvcments Identified 10 the adopted Capltdl Improvement Program, C The purpo,>e for which the contnbutlons WIll be used IS constructIOn of the SIX Traffic Improvements, a& descnbed above and m the 2006 - 2011 Capital Improvement Program (As Updated for FlsGal Year 2007/08) , D The contnbutIons were collected to make the 'lIX Traffic Improvement,>, which Improvements w1l1 mItigate traffic Impacts caused by the new development projects which paid the GOntnbutlOns, and E The contnbuhons which have been collected for the SIX Traffic Improvements are needed for con,>tnlctlOn of the SIX 1 ra ffi " Improvements PASS.cD, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED TIllS 15th day of January 2008 AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN Mayor ATTEST CIty Clerk G \Ab 1600 Impact] ees\1 Y 06 Q7\rc501ul1On07 doc A TT ACHMENT 2