HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.03 DevImpFeeAnnualRpt CITY CLERK
File # r-~--~[~-~-'-~[~-~
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 6, 2004
SUBJECT:
Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds Deposits:
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 66002, 66006 and 66008
(AB 1600)
Report Prepared by: Carole A Perry, Administrative Services
Director and Fred W. Marsh, Finance Manager
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds Deposits
2. Resolution Making Findings Regarding Unexpended
Developer Deposits For Public Improvements
·
RECOMMENDATION: Accept the reports and adopt the Resolution
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: All Developer Deposits are anticipated to be utilized for the purpose
for which they were originallY collected.
DESCRIPTION: A City is authorized under State Law to require development applicants to
contribute fees toward off-site improvements, which are needed as a result of the new development. The
report in Attachment 1 provides information related to the status of these funds from July 1, 2002 through
June 30, 2003.
Requirements of Law
The law requires the City to review on an annual basis the status of development mitigation fees collected.
Staff previously made available to the public a draft copy of this report on December 19, 2003. In the
event that any fees remain unexpended for more than five years, the City Council must adopt a Resolution
making certain findings. In the event that findings are not made to support the retention of the funds, the
unexpended fees must be returned to the current owners of the subject property.
Major Components of Report
Fund balance reserve accounts have been established for each of the City's Impact Fees and Downtown
Traffic Mitigation Contributions. The information presented in the attachments to this report identify the
status of developer contributions. The ending impact fee balances shown in this report match the amounts
that will be shown on the City Financial Records and reported in the City's Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2002-2003.
Section #1 of Attachment 1 contains an outline of the various disclosure requirements relating to impact
fees and shows which attachments contain the required information.
Section #2 of Attachment 1 identifies those contributions which'have remained unexpended for more than
five years, discussed and summarized by project on the following page:
GSAb1600 - Impact FeesLFY 02-03LAGENDA.DOC
COPIES TO:
ITEM NO.
Project Name
Dougherty Road - North of
Amador Valley Boulevard
St. Patrick Way - Regional to Golden Gate
Dougherty Road Improvements - Houston
Place to 1-580
Bike Lane Amador Valley Boulevard
StageCoach Road to Dougherty Road
Dublin Boulevard Improvements - Sierra
Court to Dublin Court
Unexpended Developer
Deposit Balances
as of June 30, 2003
$156,043
$75,578
$67,267
$17,775
$54,156
Scarlett Drive Iron Horse Trail Extension $22,983
Section #3 of Attachment 1 contains a breakdown of the accounts as of June 30, 2003. In Fiscal Year
2002-2003, interest was allocated to the impact fee funds based upon the average month end cash balances
in each fund.
Section #4 of Attachment 1 was prepared in order to meet the disclosure requirements under section
66006 of the California Government Code. This section of the law requires that the report shows the
percentage of the costs of each public improvement that will be funded by impact fees as compared to
other funding sources.
Proposed Resolution Making Necessary Findings ·
In order to retain funds longer than five years certain findings must be made by the City Council. Staff
has identified the findings necessary as part of the attached Resolution (Attachment 2). Adoption of the
Resolution allows the City to continue to retain the fees discussed earlier in the report, in order to fund the
projects for which they were collected.
Staff would recommend that the City Council accept the attached reports and adopt the attached
Resolution (Attachment 2).
City of Dublin
Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds Deposits
For the Year Ended June 30, 2003
ATTACHMENT 1
IMPACT FEE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
Government Code
Section Requirement
Provide the following:
66006 (b) (A) 1. A brief description of each of the City's impact fees.
66006 (b) (B) 2. The amount charged for the City's impact fees.
66006 (b) (C)
3. The beginning and ending balance for the City's
impact fee accounts.
66006 (b) (D) 4. The amount of fees collected and interest earned.
66006 (b) (E) 5.
An identification of each public improvement on
which fees were expended and the amount of the
expenditures on each improvement, including the
total percentage of the cost of the public
improvement that was funded with fees.
66006 (b) (G) 6.
A description of each interfund transfer or loan
made from the account or fund, including the public
improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees
will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund
loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and
the rate of interest that the account or fund will
receive on the loan.
66006 (b) (H) 7.
The amount of refunds made pursuant to
subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocations
pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.
o
At the time the local agency imposes a fee for
public improvements on a specific development
project, it shall identify the public improvement that
the fee will be used to finance~
A determination that there is a reasonable
relationship between the fees' use and the type of
development project on which the fee is imposed.
10. A determination that there is a reasonable
relationship between the need for the public faciliiy
and the type of project on which the fee is imposed.
See Disclosure At
Section 2, Part A
Section 2, Part B
Section 3
Section 3
Sections 3 and 4
Section 2, Part C
Section 3
Section 2, Part B
Section 2, Part B
Section 2, Part B
G:~bl600 - Impact Fees~FV 02-03\OUTLINE.DOC ATTACHMENT 1, SECTION 1
IMPACT FEE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
Government Code
Section Requirement
See Disclosure At
66001 (d) (1)
66001 (d) (2) b.
66001 (d) (3)
11. For the fifth year following the first deposit into the
account or fund, and every five years thereafter, the
City shall make all of the following findings with
respect to those portions of the impact fee
remaining unexpended, whether committed or
uncommitted.
a. Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be used
for.
Co
66001 (d) (4) d.
Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between
the fee and the purpose for which it is to be
charged.
66006 (b) (1) (F) e.
Identify all sources and amounts of fimding'
anticipated to complete financing in incomplete
improvements.
Designate the approximate dates on which the
funding referred to in item c above is expected to
be deposited into the appropriate account or fired.
When sufficient funds have been collected, the
agency shall identify, within 180 days of the
determination that sufficient funds have been
collected, an approximate date by which the
construction of the public improvements will
commence.
Section 2, Part D and
attached Resolution for
items a-e below.
GSAbl600 - Impact Fees~FY 02-03\OUTLINE. DOC ATTACHMENT 1, SECTION 1
DISCLOSURES RELATING TO THE CITY'S IMPACT FEES
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY'S IMPACT FEES
The City of Dublin has established the following Impact Fees and Traffic Mitigation Contributions:
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees
Downtown Traffic Mitigation Contributions
Public Facilities Impact Fees
Park Dedication Fees
Fire Impact Fees
Th Valley Transportation Development Fees
Freeway Interchange Fees
Noise Mitigation Fees
Dublin Contra Costa Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees.
These impact fees were established to pay for the design, development and construction of projects for
streets, public facilities, parks, fire capital expansion projects and noise mitigation. '
Be
AMOUNTS CHARGED BY THE CITY FOR IMPACT FEES AND PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FUNDED BY THESE FEES
The amounts charged for the impact fees noted above are dependent upon the type and size of a particular
development and were based upon related studies, conducted prior to the adoption of the fees. City
Council has adopted and imposed the subject fees through the passage of the following resolutions:
Impact Fee
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees
Resolution / Ordinance
Resolution 225-99
Public Facility Impact Fees
Resolution 60-99
Amended by Resolution 214-02
Park Dedication Fees
Chapter 9.28 Dublin Municipal Code
Fire Impact Fees
Resolution 37-97
Amended by Resolutions 208-00 and 12-03
Tri Valley Transportation Development Fees
Resolution 89-98
Amended by Resolutions 85-99 and 87-03
Pleasanton Interchange Fees
Noise Mitigation Fees
Resolution' 11-96
Amended by Resolution 155-98
Resolution 33-96
Dublin - Contra Costa Traffic Impact
Mitigation Fees.
Resolution 74-00 and Contra Costa County
Ordinance No. 2000-24
GSAb1600- Impact Fees~FY 02-03\disclosures on impact fees. DOC ATTACHMENT 1 SECTION 2
The studies adopted as part of the resOlutions noted above identify the public improvements that those
fees will be used to finance. These studies also show that there is a reasonable relationship a.) between
the fees' use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed and b.) between the need
for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
C. INTERFUND LOANS AND TRANSFERS OF IMPACT FEES
No interfund loans or transfers of impact fees are outstanding and none were made during Fiscal Year
2002-2003.
ANALYSIS OF FEES LEVIED AGAINST DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 66001 OF THE (CGC) AND UNSPENT AFTER 5 YEARS
The purpose of the review was to identify monies that had been collected and held for a period of more
than five years and to make appropriate disclosures. The City of Dublin has analyzed the balance of
monies held in its impact fee funds and has determined that there are six projects involving the use of
Downtown Traffic Mitigation Contributions which continue to hold funds for more than five years. The
Projects are accounted for in the adopted City of Dublin Five Year Capital Improvement Program 2002 -
2007 revised for Fiscal Year 2003-2004. In accordance with State Law the City Council has previqusly
adopted Resolution #230-02 on 12/17/02 declaring the need to continue t° maintain these funds in order
to complete the intended projects.
Details related to the six projects and fimds held for more than five years are identified below:
DOUGHERTY RD NORTH OF AMADOR VALLEY BLVD. TO NORTH OF HOUSTON
PLACE 96850
Amount Collected in Previous Fiscal Years Subject to 5 Year Limitation:
Project Cost As Identified In CIP:
$156,043
$4,921,869
Description of Project
This project consists of two phases. The first phase widened the travel lanes by removing existing dirt
medians on Dougherty Road and replacing them with new pavement. This completed the ultimate
pavement improvements for southbound traffic for this segment of Dougherty Road. A second phase of
this project will widen Dougherty Road from four to six lanes and will include landscaped medians from
Amador Valley Boulevard to north of Houston Place.
The first phase of this project allowed the two southbound lanes to move away from the westerly curb,
thus improving intersection sight distance and providing an area along the curb for bus stops, emergency
parking and on-street bicyclists. The City also overlaid this segment of Dougherty Road, including a
portion of Dougherty Road north of Amador Valley Boulevard.
Source of Funding
Federal ISTEA Grant, Local Measure B monies, State Gas Taxes, State SB 300 Grant, and Downtown
Traffic Mitigation Contributions.
Approximate Project Completion Dates
It is estimated that the project will be completed in Fiscal Year 2006-2007.
based upon available fimding could begin at an earlier date.
It is possible that phases
o
ST. PATRICK WAY - REGIONAL STREET TO GOLDEN GATE DRIVE 96870
Amount Collected in Previous Fiscal Years Subject to 5 Year Limitation:
$75,578
Project Cost As Identified in CIP:
$5,015,820
Description of Proiect
This project will construct 'a 2-lane roadway between Golden Gate Drive and Regional Street, south of and
parallel to Dublin Boulevard. The need for a connector road for three long commercial cul-de-sacs was
first identified in the City's original Downtown Study. This need is becoming more apparent as this
portion of the Central Business District develops further and the proposed BART parking lot is
constructed along Golden Gate Drive.
Source of Funding
Downtown Traffic Mitigation Contributions, BART mitigation funds, and developer mitigation'
improvements
Approximate Project Completion Dates
It is estimated that the timing of the receipt of all necessary contributions will be beyond Fiscal Year
2006-2007. It is possible that phases based upon available funding could begin at an earlier date.
3. DOUGHERTY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - HOUSTON PLACE TO 1-580 96852
Amount Collected in Previous Fiscal Years Subject to 5 Year Limitation:
$67,267
Project Cost As Identified In CIP:
$7,225,808
Description of Project
This project provides for acquisition of right-of-way and widening of Dougherty Road between 1-580 and
Houston Place, and required improvements at the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and Dougherty Road.
To accommodate the necessary left-tm, fight-tm and through lanes, the following improvements are
proposed:
1) Widen northbound Dougherty Road between 1-580 and Dublin Boulevard.
2) Widen southbound Dougherty Road between the 1-580 westbound onramp and Dublin Boulevard.
3) Widen southbound Dougherty Road between Dublin Boulevard and Sierra Lane.
4) Widen westbound Dublin Boulevard between Dougherty Road and approximately 500 feet east of
Dougherty Road.
5) Widen westbound Dublin Boulevard between Dublin Court and Dougherty Road.
6) Widen eastbound Dublin Boulevard between Dublin Court and Dougherty Road.
Recent traffic studies have indicated the need to widen Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard to improve
the level of service at the intersection of the two roadways, which is necessary to accommodate planned
gro,wth in the DUblin General plan and the proposed Transit Village at the eastern Dublin BART Station.
Source of Funding
Downtown Traffic Mitigation Contributions, Category 2 Eastern Dublin TIF Fees
Approximate Project Completion Dates
It is estimated that the project will be completed in Fiscal Year 2005-2006.
based upon available funding could begin at an earlier date.
It is possible that phases
4. BIKE LANE - AMADOR VALLEY BOULEVARD STAGECOACH
DOUGHERTY ROAD 96070
ROAD TO
/
Amount Collected in Previous Fiscal Years Subject to 5 Year Limitation:
Project Cost As Identified In CIP:
$17,775
$248,800
Description of Project
This project would construct a Class 2 bicycle lane along the north side of Amador Valley Boulevard
between Stagecoach Road and Dougherty Road to allow for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians.
This Bike Lane Project will connect the Iron Horse Trail, the proposed Alamo Creek Bike Path, and the
Dougherty Road Bike Path.
Source of Funding
Measure B Bike and Pedestrian, Downtown Traffic Mitigation Contributions
ApProximate Project Completion Dates
It is estimated that the project will be completed in Fiscal Year 2006-2007.
based upon available funding could begin at an earlier date.
It is possible that phases
5. DUBLIN BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS - SIERRA COURT TO DUBLIN COURT
96930
Amount Collected in Fiscal Year 1997 Subject to 5 Year Limitation:
$54,156
Project Cost As Identified In CIP:
$1,940,253
Description of Project
This project will widen and overlay Dublin Boulevard from Sierra Court to Dublin Court. This project
will increase the roadway capacity from four to six lanes and add bicycle lanes. This is the third phase of
the Dublin Boulevard widening. The widening of this segment of Dublin Boulevard will complete the
improvements on Dublin Boulevard from San Ramon Road to Dougherty Road. Recent traffic studies
have shown that six lanes of traffic will be needed as Dublin continues to expand to the east.
Source of Funding
Downtown Traffic Mitigation Contributions, Category 2 Eastern Dublin TIF Fees
Approximate Project Completion Dates
It is estimated that the project will be completed in Fiscal Year 2005-2006.
based upon available funding could begin at an earlier date.
It is possible that phases
6. SCARLETT DRIVE IRON HORSE EXTENSION 96840
Amotmt Collected in Previous Fiscal Years Subject to 5 Year Limitation:
Project Cost As Identified In CIP:
Description of Proiect
This project would provide an extension of Scarlett Drive, as well as
$22,983
$6,147,328
relocating a portion of the Iron
Horse Trail. The roadway element is a connection between Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard
(parallel to the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way). The extension of Scarlett Drive, which is
included in the Dublin General Plan, will relieve traffic congestion at the Dougherty Road/Dublin
Boulevard intersection, especially for BART Station-bound traffic.
Source of Funding t~t~-
Local Measure B monies, Downtown Traffic Mitigation Contributions, Category 2 Eastern Dublin TIF
Fees
Approximate Proi ect Completion Dates
It is estimated that the project will be completed in Fiscal Year 2006-2007.
based upon available funding could begin at an earlier date.
It is possible that phases
E. REFUNDS
No refunds have been made pursuant to Section 66001(e), nor have allocations been made pursuant to
section 66001(t'). See Attachment 1, Section 3 for additional details.
I'--
0
UJ
[....,.
0 o
o o
RESOLUTION NO. -04
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF .DUBLIN
MAKING FINDINGS REGARDING UNEXPENDED
DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC MITIGATION CONTRIBUTIONS
" FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003
Recital
The City has collected contributions for off-site traffic improvements needed as a result of new
development, which will not be expended within five years after deposit~ The improvements are
described in the 2002-2007 Capital Improvement Program and include the improvements described
below:
Project Name
Dougherty Road - North of
Amador Valley Boulevard
St. Patrick Way - Regional to Golden Gate
Dougherty Road Improvements - Houston
Place to 1-580
Bike Lane - Amador Valley Boulevard
Stagecoach Road to Dougherty Road
Dublin Boulevard Improvements - Sierra
Court to Dublin Court
Unexpended Developer
Deposit Balances
as of June 30, 2003
$156,043
$75,578
$67,267
$17,775
$54,156
Scarlett Drive' Iron Horse Trail Extension $22,983
2. The Six projects described in the recital above are referred to as the "Six Traffic Improvements."
Findings
The Council finds, on the basis of the foregoing Recitals, that:
mo
The contributions which have been collected for the Six Traffic Improvements will remain unexpended
in Fiscal Year 2002-2003;
The contributions which have been collected for the Six Traffic Improvements will remain committed
for construction of the improvements identified in the adopted Capital Improvement Program;
Co
The purpose for which the contributions will be used is construction of the Six Traffic Improvements, as
described above and in the 2002 - 2007 Capital Improvement Program;
Do
The contributions were collected to make the Six Traffic Improvements, which improvements will
mitigate traffic impacts caused by the new development projects which paid the contributions; and
The contributions which have been collected for the Six Traffic Improvements are needed for
construction of the Six Traffic Improvements.
ATTACHMENT 2
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of January 2004
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
G:~bl600 - Impact FeesXFY 02-03Xresolutio?.doc
ATTACHMENT 2