HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.06 DBW WashInfrasSvcs CTTY CLERK
AGENDA STATEMENT
CI'TY COUNCTL MEETTNG DATE: 3uly 16, 2002
SUBJECT: Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement with Washington
Infrastructure Services (formerly MK Centennial) for the Widening
of Dublin Boulevard from Village Parkway to Sierra Court
(Modification to Scope of Work and Additional Compensation)
Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution amending agreement
2) Amended agreement dated July 18, 2000 (superseded
original agreement dated November 16, 1999), and
Amendment Noo 2 dated November 27, 2001
RECOMMENDATION: /3 ~ Adopt Resolution Approving Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement
with Washington Infrastructure Services, Inc., to expa¢, d the scope
of work as described in the letter dated June 26, 2002
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The Washington Infrastructure Services, Inc. (WIS), contract
with the City for the Dublin Boulevard Widening project was for
$411,000o The contract was later amended to expand WIS~s scope
of work and provide additional compensation of $139,164. Staff is
proposing to amend WISPs contract to provide construction support
services in an amount not to exceed'S30,000. Funds have been
budgeted to accOmmodate this amendment.
DESCRIPTION: After construction of the Dublin Boulevard Widening project
commenced, the Contractor requested additional information and design clarification. In order for the
design consultant of the project, WIS, to respond to these requests, it is necessary to expand the scope of
services from WIS's original contract to include construction support services. The consultant has
prepared a scope of work, and the compensation associated with the expanded scope of services is
proposed at an amount not to exceed $30,000.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving Amendment No. 3 to the
agreement with Washington Infrastructure Services, Inc., to expand the scope of work as described in the
letter dated June 26, 2002.
COPIES TO: James H. Lundell, WIS
ITEM NO. ~
g:\engr-contmct\Wash~.gstWash3AmendJuly 16-2002.doc ~
RESOLUTION NO. ~ 02
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT WITH
WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, INC. (FORMERLY MK CENTENNIAL),
FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE WIDENING OF
DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM VILLAGE PARKWAY TO SIERRA COURT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin approved an agreement for Preliminary
Engineering and Environmental Services with Washington Infrastructure Services, Inc., for the Dublin
Boulevard project from Village Parkway to Sierra Court, on November 16, 1999; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin amended the agreement on July 18, 2000, to extend the scope
of services to include the preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the said project with
an additional compensation in the mount of $267,000 for a total aggregate amount of $411,000; and
WHEREAS, the agreement was further amended on November 20, 2001, to expand the Scope of
Work to include additional right-of-way survey work, bike path wall and creek slope protection design,
additional landscaping and signal interconnect 'design, other miscellaneous work, and design services
during construction at a cost of $139,164; and
WHEREAS, it is proposed to amend the agreement to expand the Scope of Work to allow the
consultant to respond to requests from the contractor performing the construction of said project for
information and design clarification at a not-to-exceed amount of $30,000;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby
approve Amendment No. 3 to the agreement with Washington Infrastructure Services to expand the scope
of work, as described in Exhibit "A", which is attached to this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized to execute the amended agreement.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED thisl6th day of July, 2002.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A" OF RESOLUTION -02
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DUBLIN AND
WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, INC., FOR THE WIDENING
OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM VILLAGE PARKWAY TO SIERRA COURT
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin (hereinafter referred t° as "CITY") and Washington
Infrastructure Services, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"), entered into an agreement on
November 16, 1999, for Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Services for the Dublin Boulevard
Widening Project between Village Parkway and Sierra Court; and
WHEREAS~ the City amended the agreement on July 18, 2000, to extend the scope of
work to include the preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates; and
WHEREAS, the City further amended the agreement on November 20, 2001, to extend
the Scope of Work t° include additional design work; and
WHEREAS, the Scope of Work to be performed is proposed to be extended to allow the
consultant to respond to requests from the contractor performing the construction of the Dublin Boulevard
Widening for additional information and design clarification;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Scope of Work
The Scope of Work shall be modified as described in Consultant's Amended Scope of Services
dated June 26, 2002, for the Dublin Boulevard Widening Project between Village Parkway and Sierra
Court (attached).
Extension of Term
The total cost for work covered by this amendment shall not exceed $30,000.
CITY OF DUBLIN
Mayor
ATTEST:
City clerk
WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
James H. Lundell, Vice President
Date:
WashingtOn ......
June 26, 2002
File No. 2262.020
Mr. 'Ferd Del Rosario
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
RE: Dublin Blvd. Widening Project from Village Parkway to Sierra Court/Civic Plaza
Amendment No. 3 - Design Services During Construction
Dear Ferd:
In response ro your e-mail dated June 14, 2002, we are enclosing a rate schedule for staffwe
anticipate to work during the period beginning June 14, 2002 through the end of construction. In
addition, we have also included a brief scope of work for design services during construction. As
stated in the e-mail, the design services during construction (DSDC) will be billed on a time and
materials basis. We will need to include time and materials for our subconsultants, Chaudhary &
Associates and Haygood & Associates since these subconsultants are not included in your on-call
service contracts that you have for the other subconsultants used in design, Kleinfelder and Fehr
& Peers Associates. We will be an~ending their contracts accordingly based on receipt of an
executed contract from the City or an authorization letter.
At the City's request, we have responded to an RFI sent on June 14, 2002 and attended a
construction meeting on June20, 2002. These will be included in the invoice for the period
ending June 2002. In addition, the construction management fmu has sent a batch of RFI's for
our review on June 25, 2002 for review and response. This work will also be included in the
invoice for the period ending June 2002. We request the City send us an authorization letter that
approves the above work and authorization to proceed with DSDC pending an executed
amendment for design service during construction.
If you have any questions or require more information, please do not hesitate to call at (925) 824-
4414.
Sincerely,
Etty, ercufio~~~~)
Maniager
EM/nc
Encl.
cc: J. Lundetl, WIS
J. Baughman, WIS
J:\2262\Admin\CorrespondenceLLettersXLetter City DSDC 6 24 02.doc
Washington Group International. nc. · 2633 Camino Ramon · Suite 450 · San Ramon, CA USA 94583
Phone: (925) 244-1500 ° Fax: (925) 244-1520
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT June 26, 2002
Scope of Services Page l
EXHIBIT
A Professional Services Agreement Between
CITY OF DUBLIN
(CITY)
and
WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
(formerly MK Centennial)
(CONSULTANT)
for the
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
'AMENDMENT NO. 3
SCOPE OF SERVICES
INTRODUCTION
This scope of services covers design services during construction for the project. The design service
during construction schedule will anticipate beginning June 14, 2002 and continuing through construction.
Construction is anticipated to be complete by December 2003.
1. Design Services During Construction (I)SDC)
The CONSULTANT will provide 'design services during constructions that include response to request for
information (RFIs) and response to contract change orders (CCOs). These services will be provided on a
time a material basis during construction and are estimated at $30,000. These services do not include
inspection services, construction quality control services, utility coordination, as-builts drawings (record
drawings), record of survey or right-of-way record maps.
Design services during construction for subconsultants will be limited to services by Chaudhary and
Associates and Haygood and Associates. Their services will be provided on a time a material basis and are
included in the estimated $30,000. No other subconsultants are included in these design services during
construction, as the City will contract with the other subconsulants under separate contract.
J:~2262Xa~dmin\Contracts\amendment 3 DSDC scope.doc
2002 HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
Average Hourly
Classification Design Staff for 2002 Hourly Rate Average Hourly Overhead Rate Fee on Labor Rate Including OH Rate Including
DSDC by Individual Rate & Fee Overhead and
Profit
Etty Mercurio $53.60 1.69293 10% $158,78 '
Joe Baughman $55.28 1.69293 10% $163.75
Project Manager / $54.00 $161.00
Principal
Farhad Shahpar $40.98 1,69293 10% $121.39
Dave VVhitmore $43.90 1.69293 10% $130.04
Structural Aurelio Alegria $45.14 $43.00 1.69293 10% $133.71 $128.00 .
Engineer
Peter DeStefano $44.00 1.69293 10% $130.34
Erica Skyrman $40.85 1,69293 10% $121,01
Engineer II Ron Allen $34.49 1,69293 10% $102.17
Steve Jackson $35.71 $39.00 $115,00
1.69293 10% $105.78
Roadway
Engineer Chuck Morgansen $35.76 1,69293 10% $105.93
Miguel Lopez $27.11 1.69293 10% $80.31
Engineer I Karen Stewart $33.65 $32.00 1.69293 lO% $99.68 $95.00
Reggie Moore $40.00 1.69293 10% $118.49
Mark Matsumoto $30.62 1.69293 10% $90.70
CADD , Cathy Woods $29.49 $33.00 1.69293 10% $87,36 $98.00
Veenu Chand $32.49 1.69293 10% $96.24
Nancy Cook $19.86 1,69293 ' 10% $58.83
Clerical $20.00' $59,00
Notes:
1, These 2002 houdy rates are valid from June 4, 2002 through February 1, 2003. After February 1, 2003, the hourly rate will increase on the average 5%.
2. Actual rates for each individual will be used for billing and may exceed average hourly rates stated above.
u:\etty\fremont\Hrlyrate.xls Sheet1 Printed: 06/26/2002 4:50 PM
_~M~E~ED STAIND~
CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS ~ED AGREEMENT supercedes and replaces in its entirety an ex~sfing
a~eemen~, between smd parties, that was made on the t6m of November 1999. (City Council Resolu~on
THIS AIVIENDED AOREElv~NT is made at Dublin, California, as of 0'uly 18, 2000, by
and between the CITY OF DUBLIN, a m,m~cipal corporation ("City"), and MK Centenrdal
("Consultant"), who agree as follows:
1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement,
Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A Phase I and Phase II. Consultant shah
provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A Phases t and II.
2. PAYMENT. City shall pay Cqnsuimut for services rendered pursuant to this
A~ccment at thc t'ma. e and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B. Thc payments specified in Exhibit B shall
be the only payments fo b¢~d¢ to C....,,c3u. sultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
Consultant shall submit all billings for said services to City in the manner specified in Exhibit B; or, if no
manner be specified in Exhibit B, then according to the usual and customary procedures and practices
which Consultant uses for billing clients sknilar To City,
3. FACILITIES AND EOUIPMENT, Except as set forth in Exhibit C, Consultant shall, at
its sole cost and expense, famish ail facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing
services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall furnish to Consultant only the facilifics and equipment
listed in Exhibit C according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit C.
4. GENEKAL PROVISIONS. The general provisions set forth in Exhibit D are part of
this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and any .other terms or
conditions of this Agreement, the other term or condition shall control insofar as it is inconsistent w~th the
general provisions.
5; EXHIBITS. All exhibits referred tO herein are attached hereto and arc by this reference
incorporated herein.
6. SUBCONTRACTING. The Consultant shall perform thc work contemplated with
resources available vcithin its own organization and no posen of the work pertinent to this contract shall
be subcontracted without ~¢itten authorization by the City, except that.which is expressly identified in the
Consultant's proposal.
7. CHANGES. CiV'may from time to time require changes in the scope of the services by
Consultant to be performed under this Agreement.. Such changes, including any change in thc mount of
Consultant's'compensation which arc mutually agreed Upon by City and Consultant, shall bc effective as
amendments to this' Agreement only when in writing.
Agreement
Page ~ of 2
07/10/00
g. RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. Consultant shall assign a project manager(s) to the project
for the duration of the project. There shall be no change in the Project Manager or members of the project
team without prior written approval by the City. The Project Manager for Consultant shall bc Etty
Mercurio.
9. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be artministered by LEE S.
THOMPSON ("Administrator"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Administrator or
his or designee.
10. NOTICES. Any written notice to Consultant shall be sent to:
Err Koenig, Vice President
MI( Centennial
5000 Hopyard Road, Suite 100
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Any written notice to City shall be scm to:
Lee S. Thompson
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
P. O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
Executed as of the day first above stated:
CITY OF DUBLIN,
a municipal corporation
By
Attest: City Clerk ~ ~s~d~e~/
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Agreement
Page 2 of 2
07/10/00
EXtlIBrr A
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCt:I]EDI~E
PER ADMENDED PROPOSAL DATED-July 6, 2000 (Phase I) and June 28, 2000 (Phase ID
FROM MK Centennial (ATTACHED)
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 1
07/10/00
A Professional Services Agreement Between
CITY OF DUBLIN
(C TY)
and
MK CENTENNIAL
(CONSULTANT)
for the
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PHASE I
INDEX DESCRIi~TION PAGE
100 GENERAL ........ : .................................................. 3
I l 0 Location .............................................................. 3
120 Description ............................................................ 3
130 Length of Services ...................................................... 3
140 Project Scheduling ...................................................... 3
150 Project Progress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting ..................... 4
160 Desig-n Monitoring and Subconsultant Management ............................ 4
200 DESIGN REFERENCES ............................................... 4
210 Caltrans Publications .................................................... 4
220 AASHTO Publications .................................................. 4
230 Publications From Other Sources .......................................... 5
3(}0 DESIGN WORK PERFORM_ED BY CONSULTANT ....................... 5
310 Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties ................................ 5
320 Data Collection and Field Reviews .................... ' ..................... 5
330 Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys ................................ 5
340 Rigt/t-of-way Engineering ' 6
400 Environmental Document ................................................ 6
410 Environmental Pro.am Management ....................................... 6
420 Confirm Environmental Review Process'. .................................... 6
430 CEQA Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration .......................... 6
440 Traffic Data and Safe~ Analysis ........................................... 7
450 Location Hydraulic Study ................................................ 8
500 Preliminary Engineering ................................................. 8
510 Structure General Plan .................................................... 8
520 Project Submittals ...................................................... 8
540 Design Reviews ........................................................ 9
600 MATERIALS FURNISHED BY The CITY ................................ 9
610 Record Documents ....................................................... 9
620 Base and Miscellaneous Information ........................................ 9
I:~262~Ad rain\ContractskSCOPEX$ COP£ I a. WPD 1
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WlDENIN , ,¢OJECT ~ Ju~y 6, 2000
Scope of Services Page 2
700 CONTRACT AI)/VIINISTRATION ....................................... 9
710 The CITY ............................................................. 9
720 CONSULTANT ........................................................ 9
730 Project Control ........................................................ 10
740 Subcontract Services ................................................... 10
750 Quality Control ....................................................... 10
760 CONSULTANT Personnel .............................................. 10
770 Acceptability of the Work ............................................... 10
780 Design Documentation ................................................. 1 ]
J:~262kAdmin\Contracts~COPE~SCOPEla. WPD 2
DUBLIN BOULEVARD W~DENINC~' )JECT ( July 6, 2000
Scope of Services Page 3
100 GENERAL
110 'Location
The project is located in Dublin, California. The City of Dublin is proposing to widen
Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway and Sierra Lane from a four-lane facility to a
six-lane facility. The existing street has been improved to a six-lane facility from Village
Parkway westerly to San Ramon Road. Current City's Capital Improvement Project will
provide for Dublin Boulevard to be six lanes from Dougherty Road to Tassajara Road by
the end of next year's Construction Season. The proposed project will extend the six-lane
facility to just east of the Sierra Court intersection. The widening of Dublin Boulevard is to
both sides of the street to obtain additional roadway width. This will require both demolkion
and reconstruction of existing improvements on both sides of the street including widening
of an existing bridge and repair of the creek slopes below the bridge. During the
reconstruction, existing overhead utilkies will be placed underground.
120 Description
The CONSULTANT will prepare an Environmental Document, preliminary engineering
plans, surveys and right-of-way engineering maps. The design of the project elements
described herein, will be in accordance with the CITY, and Caltrans Standards in effect at
the time this agreement is executed. The documents will be produced in dual units
(metric/imperial).
The contract work will consist of the following basic features:
· Conduct an environmental field review
'· Prepare environmental technical studies
· Prepare an Environmental Document
· Attend project status meetings and City Council meetings
· Conduct field reviews, research and data collection
· Prepare topographic mapping and conduct supplemental surveys
· Prepare preliminary engineering plans in support of the environmental document
· Prepare right-of-way engineering maps
130 Len~h of Services
The project will be initiated with a notice to proceed from the CITY. The environmental
and preliminary engineering v~ork would then proceed without delay for 8 months. A four-
week review period is scheduled for each review of the draft and final environmental
document packages.
The CITY may wish to amend the scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT.
When this occurs the .CITY and the CONSULTANT will agee on a revised scope and any
adjustments to the project schedule and/or compensation due the CONSULTANT.
140 Project Scheduling
The project schedule will include all project activities and milestones. The schedule will
identify all milestones, tasks and sub tasks, review periods, and coordination activities
associated with engineering and design. Attachment A, "Design Schedule," shows the time
phased tasks to be performed for the required work.
j:~262h~.drnin\Contracts~COPE'~,S COPE t a. WPD 3
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENINg' .OJECT '( July 6, 2000
Scope of Services Page 4
150 Project Progress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting
Monthly progress reports will be submitted to the CITY with each invoice for payment for (
engineering services. The report will indicate the tasks that were completed during the
preceding period, work planned for the next period, identification of design issues or
problems being encountered, and a comparison of planned and actual progress. The updated
schedule will accompany this report. Monthly reports will be submitted throughout the
project duration assumed above. Reports will not be submitted for any period where no work
was performed.
The CONSULTANT Project Manager will meet with the appointed CITY representatives
,..... on a monthly basis to discuss the status of the project design work. These meetings will
focus on resolution of any design issues requiring the CITY involvement, the design
progress, potential problems, and to address any particular detail of the work previously
identified for resolution.
160 Design Monitoring and Subconsultant Management
The CONSULTANT Project Manager and each subconsultant principal will monitor the"
work underway to assure it complies with the criteria and standards established for the work,
and to ensure that the design work is being accomplished in the most efficient manner
possible.
The CONSULTANT will establish effective and efficient project procedures m direct and
monitor the subconsultants' work. Regular scheduled reviews o£the subconsultant design
will be performed to ensure compliance with the quality standards established, coordination
among team members, and that design-operations are being conducted in a timely and (
efficient manner.
200 DESIGN REFERENCES
210 Caltrans Publications
211 Standard Drawings
~ Bridge Standard Details (Current Edition - Metric)
Standard Plans (1999 Edition - Metric)
212 Specifications
Standard Specifications (1999 Edition ~ Metric).
2i3 Manuals
Highway Design Manual, 4th edition (English)
Bridge Design Specifications (Current Edition - Metric)
Bridge Design Practice (Current Edition)
Bridge Memo to Designers (Current Edition)
Bridge Design Aids (Current Edition)
Bridge Design Details (Current Edition)
220 AASHTO Publications
A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 1994 ("Green Book")
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, with interim revisions through 1997
Manual on Foundation Investigations, 1978 "~
.~:~.262iAdrainSContractskSCOPE~$COPE l a.WPD 4
DUBLIN'BOULEVARD V~DENING!' )JECT (" July 6, 2000
Scope of Services Pege 5
Guide for Desig-n ofPavement:~tructm'es,~1993
Guide for Specifications and Standards
Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaries and Traffic
Signals, Edition of 1985 and Interim Specifications through 1991
Roadside Design Guide, 1996
An Information Guide for Roadway Lighting, 1984
AASHTO Drainage Guidelines, 1992
230 Publications From Other Sources
City of Dublin Standard Plans
Alameda County Standards
Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation
Zone 7 Standards & Hydrology & Hydroceed Design Criteria
Dublin San Ramon Service District (DSRSD) Standards
300 DESIGN WORK PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
310 Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties
Design team members will attend the scheduled meetings. The coordination will be
conducted during design review submittals, monthly meetings, and at such other times as
specific issues need resolution. It will be necessary for the CONSULTANT to meet with
representatives of the local agencies and The CITY for the purpose of discussing design
details. The number of meetings budgeted for this work are as follows:
Description Number of Meetings
Monthly progress meetings 4
City Council Public Meetings., 2
Zone 7 Meeting 1
Underground Utility 2
Coordination Meeting
(Trench design by others)
The agency contacts anticipated are with Alameda County FC & WCD, Zone 7 and the
CITY.
320 Data Collection and Field Reviews
The CONSULTANT will meet with the CITY and the local agencies to collect available
information pertinent to the project. A review of available information and an on-site
investigation will be conducted to further define site conditions and determine the need for
additionaI investigation and data. The design team members and representatives of the CITY'
along with any interested parties will field review the work site two times.
330 Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys
The CONSULTANT will prepare topographic base mapping at t:500 with 0.5-meter
continuous intervals based on 1983 NAD (horizOntal control)and 1929 NGVD (vertical
control). Mapping standards will be checked by the CONSULTANT and will conform to
J:~262kAdmin\ContractsXS COPE~q COPE 1 a. WPD 5
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENIN~ .OJECT ( July 6, 2000
Scope of Services Page 6
the CITY's survey/mapping standards, as required for this project. The CONSULTANT will
conduct field surveys. Work will include conform areas, pavement spot elevations, storm
drainage inlets/outlets, selected utilkies and potholed utilities. Potholing is not included in
this scope of services.
340 Right-of-Way Engineering
The CONSULTANT will order title reports (15 total), prepare right-of-way plats and legal
descriptions, and conduct right-of-way surveys.
400 Environmental Document
The project will require environmental review under both the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), as well as, the National Environmental Policy Act (N-EPA). N-EPA
review is required because federal funds will be used to construct the project. When federal
funds from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are used for project construction,
Cattrans acts as the reviewing agency of all environmental documents on behalf of the
FHWA to ensure that the documents and process comply with NEPA. As a result, the
environmental review process outlined below assumes coordination with Caltrans
environmental staff throughout the project.
410 Environmental Program Management
The CONSULTANT will oversee and coordinate all aspects of the environmental process
as described below:
Technical Studies
Oversee the preparation of all technical studies
Coordinate with technical subconsultants as required
Coordinate with The CITY during'all phases of the* environmental process
Agency Coordination
Conduct early consultation to explain the project and identify any agency concerns.
Conduct consultation with agencies to facilitate processing of environmental
permits if required.
Coordination with Engineering Effort
Provide input to t~reliminary engineering based on the technical reports
~ Analyze design alternatives proposed in terms of environmental constraints and
potentia.1 impacts.
Agencies to be consulted will be the CITY, Alameda C(~unty FC & WCD, Zone 7, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and/or California Department of
Fish & Game.
420 Confirm Environmental Review Process
The CONSULTANT will conduct a field review.meeting with City Staff and Cattrans
Project Development and Environmental staff to review the' proposed improvements to
Dublin Boulevard, environmental technical studies that will need to be completed, and the
appropriate environmental document(s) for the project.
430 CEQA Initial Study/g/litigated Negative Declaration
The CONSULTANT will distribute and notice for a proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration/Initial Study including preparation ofaqNotice of Intent, mailing of notices to
local property owners, interested parties and agencies, and delivery of copies of the
Proposed Negative Declaration to the State Clearinghouse.
J:~2262~A. dml n\Contra~\$COPE~S COPE 1 a.~'D 6
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENINg' ~JECT I July 6, 2000
Scope of Services Page 7
The CONSULTANT will attend one Public Information meeting and City Council bemiring
and meet with City staff as needed throughout the process.
The CONSULTANT will file a Notice of Completion with the Alameda County Clerk, State
Clearinghouse and payment of California Department of Fish and Game Filing Fees.
Natural Environment Study
The CONSULTANT will prepare a Natural Environment Study pursuant to Caltrans
Environmental guidelines and comments from Caltrans Office of Local Assistance
environmental staff. It will include a wetland delineation and field verification With the US
Army Corps of Engineers.
Categorical Exclusion under N-EPA
This includes submittal of technical information to Caltrans in support of a determination
that the project qualifies for a Categorical Exclusion under N-EPA. The following technical
studies will be provided to Caltrans:
,- N~itural Environment Study
,- Location Hydraulic Study
Traffic memorandum
Sonoma State Cultural Resources Literature Search
,- Area of Potential Effect Map
Coordination with City and Cattrans as needed regarding Caltrans review of the above
technical information and processing of a Categorical Exclusion through the Federal
..... ' ..... Highway Administration.
440 Traffic Data and Safety Analysis
The CONSULTANT will prepare the transportation element for the environmental
document. The impact analys is will be completed with and without the Dub[in Boulevard
Widening project under both construction year ~ind cumulative year conditions for each
transportation mode including automobiles, bicycle, and pedestrian travel. The
CONSULTANT will collect 24-hour traffic count data on Dublin Boulevard at one location
within the project limits. The CONSUt~,.TANT will collect morning and evening peak period
traffic counts at the Dublin Boulevard/Sierra Cour~ and Dublin Boulevard/Clark Avenue
intersections. The CONSULTANT will also obtain available accident data from Alameda
County and the City within the project limits. The CONSULTANT will summarize the
setting information including peak hour capacity analyses of the study section of Dublin
Boulevard and the Sierra Court and Clark Avenue intersections.
Available morning and evening peak hour. traffic forecasts will be obtained for the study
segment of Dublin Boulevard and the Sierra Court and Clark Avenue intersections under
each scenario. Peak hour operations analyses will be conducted for each facility to establish
a baseline of traffic operations for the corridor. Impacts to bicycle and pedestrian travel wilI
be qualitatively evaluated based on a review of the project's consistency with established
policies and standards of adopted documents (i.e., General Plans, Specific Plans, design
standards, etc.). Mitigation measures will be identified for significant adverse impacts. The
CONSULTANT wilt prepare the administrative draft transportation section of the
environmental document. The CONSULTANT has budgeted a total of 8 hours to respond
J:~..2 6 2~.d minI. ContractskS COPE'G C OPE I a.W"PD 7
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDEN/Nd .OJECT { July 6, 2000
Scope of Services Page 8
to comments on the administrative draft and draft sections. The CONSULTANT anticipates
attendance at up to one meeting during this effort.
450 Location Hydraulic Study
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a location hydraulic study in accordance with Caltrans
procedures. The CONSULTANT will coordinate with Zone 7 to obtain relevant current
hydraulic information for the Alamo Canal. The CONSULTANT will prepare a backwater
analysis to supplement the location hydraulic study and will submit copies to Caltrans, the
City and Zone 7 for review.
500 Preliminary Engineering
The design objective is to provide plans and construction cost estimates in support of the
environmental document. CADD digital drawings wilI be prepared in Microstation format
and a format acceptable to the City. The documents will be produced in metric units and
. annotated Imperial units.
510 Structure General Plan
The CONSULTANT will prepare a structure general plan to show structural type and
preliminary cost estimates.
520 Project Submittals
The design objective is to provide an enVironmental document and obtain the environmental
clearance for the construction of the project. The following environmental documents, if
required, will be submitted to the CITY:
A maximum of six copies of each Environmental Technical Studies for the CITY
and Caltrans review:
Natural Environment Study
Location Hydraulic Study
Traffic memorandum
Sonoma State Cultural Resources Literature Search .
Area of Potential Effect Map
A maximum of six copies of each Environmental Technical Studies for the CITY,
Caltrans and FHWA files:
Natural Environment Study
Location Hydraulic Study
Traffic memorandum
Sonoma State Cultural Resources Literature Search
Area of Potential Effect Map
In conjunction with the environmental document, the CONSULTANT MI1 prepare
preliminary engineering documents for the project. CADD digital drawings will be prepared
in Microstation format, or a format acceptable to the CITY in accordance with the CITY
procedures. Drawings will be in metric, and annotated Imperial units as established by the
CITY. The CONSULTANT will submit a maximum of 10 copies of the preliminary
engineering plans consisting of:
Strip maps with right-of-way and geometries defined
Preliminary Bridge general plan
J:~2262%Admin\C ontracts%SCOPEKSCOPE ! a. WPD 8
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WTDENING(: JJECT { July 6, ~000
Scope of Services Page 9
540 Design Reviews
At milestone points, the CONSULTANT will submit materials to the CITY and
participating local agencies for review and comment. Review periods will be four weeks
for all milestones. Each reviewing agency will submit a single set of coordinated review
comments to the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will compile review comments
from the reviewing agencies and schedule a meeting with the CITY and the other reviewing
agencies to discuss any conflicting comments and to reach a consensus on resolution of any
conflicts. MinUtes of the resolution meeting will be distributed within five working days
of the meeting. The CONSULTANT will incorporate agreed 'upon resolutions into the
reviewed documents. Should future reviews generate comments which require changes to
previously agreed upon elements of the documents and such changes result in additional
work on the part of the CONSULTANT, such changes will be performed as Additional
Services.
600 MATERIALS FURNISHED BY The CITY
610 Record Documents
The CITY will provide the following items:
· Current standard Drawings, ManUals, Guides, and Procedures that pertain to the
project
· Available CITY "as-built" plans and specifications of existing condkions including
roadways, utilities, drainage improvements, and structures
· Available CITY right-of-way plans
· Surveying and mapping information including existing monument locations
· Sample plans and reports to be used as guidelines for format, organization and
content
· Access to all records available at the CITY
620 Base and Miscellaneous Information
..... · Entry permission on private parcels
700 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
710 The CITY
The CITY will:
· Conduct ongoing reviews of the CONSULTANT's progress in performing the work
and furnish technical comments in a timely manner on all submissions
· Review and approve the CONSULTANT's billings in a timely manner
· Review, evaluate and may approve CONSULTANT's requests for extension of time
and amendments to the agreement
· Attend all ~)ro~ess meetings with the CONSULTANT
· Attend meetings with the CONSULTANT and others as requested
· Conduct Public outreach and public relations tasks
720 CONSULTANT
The CONSULTANT will:
· Establish, furnish and maintain suitable office facilities to serve as the project office
for the duration of the project
· Maintain an adequate staff of qualified support personnel to perform the work
J:~'262ka-dmin\C°ntra¢~s~ COPE~COPE 1 a,WPD 9
DUB~IN BOULEVARD WIDEfi/IAI~' OJECT ( July 6, 2000
Scope of Services Page 10
necessary to complete the project
· Establish internal accounting methods and Procedures for documenting and '(
monitoring project costs acceptable to Cattrans Standards
· Establish and maintain contract administration procedures which will include
amendments, time extensions and subcontracts
· Maintain a project workbook with all the pertinent information relating to the
project to be given to the CITY at the close of the project
· Attend meetings with other agencies as requested by the CITY. However, if number
of meetings exceed those indicated in this scope of services, then those meetings
will be performed as Additional Services
The CONSULTANT is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the contract
documents and related design prepared under this project and prior to submittals will check
all material accordingly. The plans will be reviewed by the CITY for conformity With the
CITY.procedures and the terms of the contract.
730 Project Control
The CONSULTANT will provide and maintain a Management Information System to
-- monitor costs and manpower and to report progress with the following:
· Identify progress against the schedule for each major work item
· Forecast completion dates from current progress
· Advise the CITY of any work not in this scope or in any area'which is out of the
required sequence
· Provide updated estimates of time, manpower and dollars required for major work
elements (
740 Subcontract Services
Due to the nature and scope of the required services, the CONSULTANT Mil subcontract
portions of the work. The CONSULTANT will review and coordinate the work of all
subconsultants and they will abide by the terms and conditions of this scope as applicable
to them.
750 Quality Control
The CONSULTANT and subconsultants have total responsibility, for the accuracy and
completeness of the plans and related design prepared under this project and will check all
such material accordingly. The CONSULTANT will prepare and have a quality control plan
in effect during the'entire time work is being'performed under this contract. The quality
control plan will establish a process whereby plans, calculations, and documents that the
CONSULTANT submits for review will be clearly marked as fully checked prior to
submittals by a qualified individual other than the originator.
760 CONSULTANT Personnel
The CONSULTANT's work will be performed and/or directed by' the key personnel
identified in the CONSULTANT's proposal. Any changes in the indicated key personnel
will be subject to review and approval by The CITY.
770 Acceptability of the Work
The plans, designs, calculations, reports and other documents furnished under this scope of
work will conform to the CITY's standard of quality. The criteria for acceptance will be'a
J:k12-62ka, drnin\ContractskCkckckckckckckckck~COPEkgCOPE I a. WPD l 0
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING( .)JECT (' July 6, 2000
ScoPe of'Services Page I~
(, product of neat appearance, Well organized, accurate and complete, technically and
grammatically correct, checked and dated in accordance with the Quality Control Plan, and
having the originator and checker-identified. The minimum standards of appearance,
organization, and content of drawing will are similar to the type produced by the CITY.
780 Design Documentation
The CONSULTANT will submit all design notes, sketches, worksheets and computations
to document the design conclusions. The design notes and computations will be recorded
on 8 1/2 "x 11" computation sheets, appropriately titled, numbered, dated, indexed, and
signed by the designer and checker. The data will be bound in a hardback folder or a three-
ring binder for submittals to the CITY. Computer output forms and other oversized sheets
will be bound or placed in a binder. Design notes and computations will include, but not
necessarily be limited to, the following data:
· Design criteria used for the project
· Geometric design calculations for horizontal and vertical alignment
· Quantity calculations
· Documentation of decisions reached from meetings, telephone conversations or-~ite
visits
J:k2262'~Admin[Coatract ~SC OPEkS COP E I a. WPD 1 1
MKCENTENNIAL Dublin Boulevard Widening -Village Parkway to Sierra Court
~' Phase I and Phase 2
2000 2001 2002
Task Name Duration Stad Finish
Project Management 258 days 219100 2/2101
Project Schedule, QA Plan. Sub conlracts 51.6 wks 2/9/00 2/2/01
Kickoff Meeting Phase 1 0 days 21gl00 2}9 i
Ulllity Coordination Meetings 51.6 wks 2/9/00 2/2/01
Kickoff Meeting Phase 2 0 days 7117100 7117/00
PHASE 1 DESIGN 233 days 1112/00 1211100 ...... r ~ ........................... ~ ........... ~ ....... ~ .....
Conduct technical studies 4 wks 1/26/00 2122/00
.................... 'i~'~;'~6"~0~'6'~{'~; ........................................................................... 4wks 1/28/oo 2/22/00 i i .~ i ........ i .................... i ........ ! '"~"
.....
P.h',eRav, ewP.do, 4wks 2 100 3,21100' ' ! ......... ii! '" ......................................
- - i ~ I
Pub,c Hearing and CI~ adoption of ED 1 day 3/21/00 3/21/00
P~epareFina~EDands.hm, toCe,ransa.,C~ 2wks 3~2/08 ,14/00 i i [] i ......... i ............. ~ .......... i ...... ~ ........... ~ .............. ~ ..................................... ~ ......... ~ ................ i ......
~ ., . ~. .~ ............ ~.. .~ .......... ; ......... ~ ............ ; ............. ~ ............... '~ ........ ' ....... ~ ....... ; ............. ~ ...... ' '. . .
Review ED 2 wks 415/00 4/18/06 ...... . ........................... ~ ................................. } .........................................................
.............. ~}~ii' a'~p;o~'~5"i~"~A'~;;' a~'~;ai .... 1 wk 4/19/00 4/25/00
.................
Data Colleclion and Field Reviews l'wk 1126/00 2/1100 ..............................................
Design ~leda 13.4 wks 212100 514100 ................... i ....................... ~ ........... f ..................................
Prelimtna~ roadway design 12.4 wks ~9/00 . 5/4/00
Mapping, Su~eys and Right-of-Way Engineering 80 days ~/5/00 8/24/00
4 wks 515/00 6~1/~ ~ ............................... - .............................................. ~ ........ ~ .....................
SupplemenIal Su~ey~ 4 wks 612100 6129100 ........ [ .............. [ ............. i ............... ~ ........................................ i ..................... ~ ............. ~ ................................................................ ~ .......... ~ .......... I .........
Tl~e RepoNs 6 wks 6/~00 7113/00
~ ~ ~ i t ! ~ ~ , t i I ! I I
~ Su~eys 4 wks 0/29/00 ] ~ ~ , I , ~ ~ ~ ~ '
Plals and legals 6 wks 8~24~00
203 days 1211100 ' ' ' ~ ................. ~ .................... ~ ...................... ~ ................. ~ ............ ~ ...........
S wi~ stakeholders 40.6 wks 2/~/00 1211100 ~ ~ i ~ ........ ~ ......... ~ .............. I ....... ~ .......................... ~..
%
Project: DUBLIN 12.MPP
Date: 716/00 6:12 PM Task ~.~.~t~,,~.¢..~_~, I
p.~.,,~'~,,.!~.~, Cdlical Task [~~] Progress II Mileslone ~ Summa~ ~ ~
File: y:~e~scope~DUB.~j 2.MPP _~ ..... ~,
MK CENTENNIAL
Dublin Boulevard Widening - Village Parkway to Sierra Court
Phase 1 and Phase 2
.... ' 2000 .... . 2001 ..... 12002
ID Task Name Ouraton Stall Finish Jan I F~~v Dec ~ Jan I Feb ~Mar Al pr ~May I Jun I Jul I Au~an FebtM~
31 ~'HASE 2 DESIGN' 175 days 7117100 3/16/01 i i ~i i ~ it . -. ~. -~ -. ,. -. I,. ,. \ \ L~ .~. ! '
33 .............. 6'~i;~'lCal";;;<~i;r~io~ '~'~l~s ......... :~'~))~' ......... ~J;i:l)~)o ............. i ................................... ! .......... ~'l'"'~'"'""t'''''''~ ................. ~ ........ i''i ................ i ...................
34 Draft foundation rel;~'r~ ~4'~; ........... ~/~/~ .......... ~}:~'~')0~) .................................................. i ............ !'i'"'~'"'""i .............................. i' .................. !'' '''+ .......... ! .......... i ' ;" ; ....... :"
........................................................................................... ...... ................... ................. ............ ........... ! ...................... ~ ..................... i iI ~'~?~'~ i ! ! · ,
3~ 3oo,~ p~ans ~ ;;~ ~}'~'~/d6 ~}'~>~)~ ~ i j t'~"~ ............. i ............ i ............ ? ..................................................... ~ ............ ~ ....... i .......... , .........................
..................................... I[\~"~i [ ~ i j : ' ~ '
36 Construct o, Costs ...................................................................... ~"~ .................. ~'}~}~i~ .................. ~'7~ ...................................... i ............. ! ............................ ~I .............. :~ ................................................................... [ ............ ,' .......... ~ ...... ~ ...................... : ........ i ..... ; ....... '.. . i
....... - ........ i [J ' ' . '
37 QA/Q C ................................................... {' W~ .................... ~)~6 ...................... ~6~ .............................................. i ........................................ i"' '"'"'~ ............ i~'"'"'"i ............................................................................ ~ ....................... { ............................... i ................ i ...................... !
38 ............ S ~'" ":'"'""';mit 30 Yo ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... plans and estimate0 days 918/00 918/00 ~ ............. iI ...................................... , ~ ~ ....... .... [, ........................................................... '-~.' .ia ~ t ~' .............. i~ .......... I... i, ~' !, ............................................................ ~'!
....................... ' i i ~' ~:~ i , ~ .
I i i i I ~ i i , " ~ i i ' ~ ....
40
I I '~I ......... T ............ !' ........... ~ ............. r ............... :'"~ ............ f ......................... ~ ...... f ' "' ~ ......... i ............ i ............ ' ......... ~' ....................................................
4z ............. i~;'~[{';~'~iiGii;~;' ..................................................................................... ~"~'~; ........... lo/~oo 11/3/00 ! i ~ 'irmmm i I
44 ConstlucUon Costs ' , ~ , .................................................................................................................................................................. ; .......... ~ ....... ; ' ~ '
1
li/27100
i2/1100
............................................................................................................... ! ......... i ............. ~ ........... ~ ............ ~ ............. ! ................... !'""7'"'"! ............................. r '"" "'" ';I ............... ~ ..................... i ........ ~ ........... ~ ....... i .... : ........ i ..... ~ ....... :. .! ........ i ....
~ ....................... ~ ~"~;~' ..................... 'i~}~]6~' ............... ~"~}~ .............. ~ ........... , ............. , ............ -"' ........................ h ..................... ~ .......... ~ ............. ' ......................................~ ~ ........... ' ......... '~ .................. ? ....... " ...............................! .
0.days
t2/8100
" ~ ~ i I '. ', i ~ ............... : ...... · ............. i ' '~'
................. ! ......................... ..'"' ............. ! ............. ~ ........ i ............. ~ ........................................~'~ .....................................................
~8 C~TYra~, ....................................................... ';~';~S ............. ~'~}'ii'}~' ................ iT~]6~ .......... , , '. , ' .... ~ ..... ;"
50 Final plans 4 wks 1/~/0i 21~10i ~ ; , t ~ ~ , ................ ~ ........... ~ :
§t Construclion Cosla ~"~ ......... 2/5/01 2/9/01 -'i ""i .................. ~ ........ ~ ...................... ~ .......... ~ ........... i ............ i ...... ; ............ I ........ ~ ................................. ~ ' ' -
~3 OA~QC i~,~ ................... ~i'~ ................ ~ ........ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~. i i ~ ~ : , i~ ~ ~ ; ' :
54 Submit Ftnal PS&E '" · ....
~"'~i;;~;'~ ......... ~,~i ~:i .............. ~i~'~' ........... !~ ............ i~ ............................. ~ ~ i; [ ......... ~ ............. ~ ........... ~ ............ ! ............... i! ....................... i ~ ~ ii ....................... ~ ; ..................... ....... ! i i ~ '
~ '~'6~'~¥~u6~i~' : ....... z3o days ...... ~'~i~ ........ ~i~io~ ........ : .... ' ..................... :' ...............................................................................
.................................................... ~ .............. ~ .................................... ~.I ...... ~ ......... ~ ........ ~ .~: ..... i ....
i ~ i! " ~ ~ -
............................................... ~. .......... ~ .............. ~ ~ . ~. , . I . l_ .~_ . L~
~8 ..... ~';'~'~ ~Owks ........ ~r~'~'~" ..... 2~t~o~ I ~ r 1 ~" ~ ......... i .......... ~ .......... ~ ....... ~ .......... ! ........ -.. ...................... , ...... ~ .........
Project: DUBLIN 12.MPP _
File:Date:y:\ettytscope~DUBLIN 12.M pp7/6/00 8:12 PM Task t~i~l Cdlical Task L'~"~'~N~_~I Progress '1 r Milestone ~ Summary
Jublin Boulevard Widening Proj( ~--~ .~z~.-~"''~'z'~
COST PROPOSAL
MK CENTENNIAL
LABOR:
Classificatior~ Hours Rate Total
Proj Prin 8 $ 54.00 $ 432.00
Proj Mgr 164 $ 45.00 $ 7',380.00
Sr Eng 136 $ 34.00 $ 4,624.00
Engineer 100 $ 24.00 $ 2,400.00
CADD 56 $ 23.00 $ 1,288.00
Clerical 30 $ 1600 $ 480.00
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR 494 $ 16,604.00
OVERHEAD ~ 1.69293 $ 28~109.41
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 44,715.41
MKC DIRECT COSTS:
DIRECT COSTS:
Mailing, Telephone, Suppties,.Photos .... $ 500.00
Reproduction & Presentation Materials $ 305.00
CADD Computer $
Transportation $
SUBTOTAL MKC DIRECT COSTS $ 805.00
FEE ibased on 10% profit of labor) $ 4,471.34
I SUBTOTAL MKC $ 49,989.7S 135%
Page 1
y:\etty~dublin~,scope\Engcstl .)ds Labor + ODCs R evised: T/6/O0 8:10 PM
( 3ublin Boulevard Widening Proj( ~O
COST PROPOSAL
PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT
LABOR:
Classification Hours Rate Total
Principal- Env 28 $ 50.16 $ 1.404.48
Proj Mgr- Env 88 $ 29.57 $ 2,010.82
· Assocfate- Env 138 $ 18.59 $ 2,584.81
Clerical 48 $ 20.38 $ 978.28
DIRECT LABOR 282 $ 8,g58.20
OVERHEAD ~. 1.44 $ 10r019.80 .
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 15,978.00
DIRECT COSTS:
Printing, Mailing, Telephone & Supplies $ 3,000.00
Transportation $ 500.00
Graphic Support $ 1.500.00
Subconsultants $ 8,000.00
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ 13,000.00
FEE (based on 10% profit of ~abor) $ 1.697.80
I SUBTOTAL PAM $ 3%67~,80 122%
Page 2
y:\ett¢,dublin~scope\Engcstl .xts Labor + ODCs Revised: 7/6/00 8:10 PM
I" ublin Boulevard Widening Proj( ~/ ~
COST PROPOSAL
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 143,480.02 ~
Chaudhary & Associates
LABOR:
Hours Rate Total
Prin Mngr 20 $ 46.00 $ 960.00
Proj Surveyor 56 $ 37.00 $ 2, 072.00
Office Surveyor 8 $ 28.00 $ 224.00
2-man Field Crew 110 $ 53.97 $ 5,936.70 (assumes 5 field' days)
Eng / CADD 64 $ 25.00 $ 1-~ 800.00
D~RECT LABOR 258 $ 10,792.70
OVERHEAD ~ 1.8612 $ 20,087.37
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 30,880.07
DIRECT COSTS:
Mileage $ 500.00
Reproduction & Materials $ 500.00
Photogrametrist $ 3.700.00
Title Reports at cost (assumes 15 total @ 1000 per title report) $ 15,000.00
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ 19,700.00
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor) $ 3,088.01
J SUBTOTAL CHAUDHARY $ 53~688.08"t37%
Page 3
y~ettC, dublin~scope\Engcstl .xts Labor + ODCs Revised: 7/6/00 8:10 PM
( ~ublin Boulevard Widening Proje("~,, ~;~' COST PROPOSAl
FI=HR & PEERS ASSOCIATES
LABOR:
Houra Rate Tota]
Proj Prin 14 $ 54.81 $ 787.34
Sr Engineer 27 8 28.85 $ 778.95
Engineer 52 $ 21.64 $ 1 125.28
Technical 14 $ 19.00 $ 266.00
DIRECT LABOR 107 $ 2.937.57
OVERHEAD @ 1.4437 $ 4,240.97
SUBTOTAL LABOR - OVERHEAD $ 7,178.54
DIRECT COSTS:
Travel Miteage
Printing, Mailing, Telephone &Supplies $ 25000
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ 250.00
FEE fbased on 10% profit of labor) $ 717.85
[SUBTOTAL FBER & PEERS $ 8,146,39
Page 4
y:\etty\dubiin\scope\Engcstl .xls Labor + ODCs Rev~ed: 7/6/00 8:10 PM
COST PROPOSAL- LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 7/6100 8:10 PM
E~¢~P~R'~.¢!~ff4?~i~J~ ~ = ~ ~!~i: ~ ~!ii~:~:!~'.~:,;:~ ~4,:~, ~': ProJ Prln ProJ Mgr SrEng Engineer CADD Clerical MKC
~z~,~,:¢*~:~N~¢Des~t~`~¢~,.~.;~h~w~¢~Yi::.~;~:.;~:.~:~:~:z.~;,::~.~:~M~?,~:;;;~.. Hou~ Cost Hours Cost Hours Coat Hours Cost Hours Cosl Ho~rs Cost Ho~s Cost
Project Management & Administration
Adminls~atlon / Invoices (4) 2 ~' 108 12 540 8 128 22 776.00
Monthly Progress Repo~s / Schedule (4) 2 ' 108 16 720 8 128 26
Subconsultant Coordination 2 108 40 1.800 4 64 46 1,972,00
Kickoff meeting . 8 360 8 272 2 32 18 ~4.~
Meetings /Agency Coordination (4} 2 108 12 540 12 408 12 288 - 8 128 46 1.472.~
SUBTOTAL 8 . 432 88 3,960 20 680 12 288 0 30 480 158 5,840.~
Environmental
Confi~ En~mnmental ~cument 2 90 2 90,~
Techni~l Studies 8 360 24 816 32 ~.1~6.~
CEQA Initial Study / Nog Dec 8 :~360 24 816 32 1,176.~
SUBTOTAL 0 18 8t0 48 1,632 0 0 O 66 2,442.~
Right-of-Way Englneedng & Su~eys
~sling utili~ plans & ~ordination 8 380 8 272 8 t92 8 184 32 ~,008.~
Supplemental Su~eys 8 , 380 8 272 - 18 632.00
R~ and Mapping Control 8 360: 8 272 t6 632.~
SUBTOTAL 0 24 1,080 24 816 8 192 8 184 0 64 2.272
Prellmlnaw Engtneeflng
Data co{lecaon and field reviews 4 136 8 ~ 192 12 328.~
GeomeMc layout 2 90 20 680 40 ~0 32 736 94 2,466,~
S~cture General Plan 8 380 8 272 20 480 16 368 52 1,480.~
Response to ~mments 4 180 4 136 4 96 12 4i2.00
Q~QC 16 720 " 16 720.~
Es~mates ': 4 180 8 272 8 192 20 644.00
SUBTOTAL 0 34 1,530 44 1,496 80 1.920 ' 48 1.104 0 206 6.o50.o0
;:..~.,,..:..,, ,.:..,..:,.,...... ,..~..,=....¢ ¢..: ........................ , . _ .
,s,~.,.G~NB~TO~AE~,~. ~ ... ,*~,.~,,','~;~*,*~, ¢'~,:~z,;~.~a~g~,~ ,-~,~*~~ .~, . .~.~. 8 432 t64 7,380 136 4,624 100 2,400 56 t,288 30 480
.~.*,..,,::,..,,~**~,,,r,~..,~ ~? ~.,~.~:~,~, ~>:,..¢~ab~;~,~.~a~:~[~ ~[~,~.,.,,~ ~'"'1 494 16,604
COST PROPOSAL- LABOR OHLY DUblin Boulevar~dening Project Re~sed:...Z~00 e: m P~
Project Management & Administration.' I I I I
Adminls[ration I Invoices (4} 0 O.00
Monthly Progress Reports / Schedule (4) 0 0.00
Subconsullanl Coordination 0 0.00
~ Kick-off meeting 0 0.00
Meetings 1 Agency Coordinalion (4) ~ ' 0 0.00
SUBTOTAL ,' 0 - 0 - O - 0 - 0 0.00
Con~rmEnvlronmentalDocument ' '~ 4 201 ~ 4 118 ~ 8 ' 149 ~ - ~ 16 467.60
Technical Studies
8 40~ I 24 710 I 40 743 l 18 328 1 ' 88 2180.43
CEQA Inillal Sludy/Neg Dec , 16 803 I 40 1,183 ~ g0 '1,673 ~ 32 6,52 I 178 4310.~7
·
0
Preliminary Englneeflng
Data collection and §eld rev[ews 0 0.0~
Geometric layout 0 0.0(]
Struclure General Plan · · 0 0.0~
Response lo comments 0 0.01~
QA/QC 0 0,0~
EsllmaIes 0 o.oc
' SUBTOTAL 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - ~ O.OC
COST PR, OPOSAL - LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Re,~sed: Z/~/O0 8:m PM
ProjeCt Management ~'Ad~lnlst~at~on "' ' ' '
Adminis~Uon / Invoices (4) 0 0~
Monthly Progress Repo~s I s~edule (4) 0 0.~
Subconsul{ant Coordinaaon 0 0,00
Kick-off meeting 0 0.~
Meetings I Agency Coordinaaon (4) 0 0.00
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0
Environmental
Confi~ En~mnmental D~ment 0 0.00
Te~nical Studies 0 0.~
CEQA Initial Study I NeB Dec - : 0 0.~
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0
Right-of-Way Englneerlng & Su~eys
E~sfing utility plans & ~ordinafion
Supplemenlal Su~eys 2 96 4 148 ~ 54 2,~14 8 200 68 3,358,38
~ and Mapping ConSol 18 864 52 1,924 8 224 56 3,022 5~ 1,4~ 190 7,434.32
SUBTOTAL 20 g60 56 2.072 8 224 110 5,937 64 1,600 258 10,793
Preltmlna~ Engineering
Data colleclion and field renews - 0 0.~
Geomet~c layout 0 0.~
Slmcture Genera~ Plan 0 0.~
Response Io comments
Q~QC 0 0.~
Es~males
.* 0 0.~
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0
- - - : 0 .- - 0 .
COST PROPO. S_~L -_ LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard-~/idening. Project Revised: __?~/00 8:10 PM
Project Management & Administration ' '
AdminisEation I Invoi~s (4} 0 0.~
Monthly Progress Rep,s I S~edule (4) 0 0.~
Subc~nsullan Coor~nation 0 0.00
Kick-off meeting - 3 87 3 ~.55
Meetings /Agency Coordination (4) 0 0.00
SUBTOTAL '0 3 87 0 0 3 86.55
Environmental
Confi~ En~ronmental D~ument
Ta~nical Studies 7 384 12 346 32 ~92 ~ 8 152 59 1.574.35
CEQA Initial Sludy I Nag Dec 7 384 12 346 20 433 6
SUBTOTAL 14 7B7 24 692 52 1.125 14 2~ .1~l 2.851.02
~Ight-of-Way Engineering & Su~eys
Existing utility plans & ~ordinallon 0 0.~
Supplemental Su~eys 0 O.~
R~ end Mapping Control . 0 0.~
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 .0 0
Prellmlna~ Englneerlng
Data ~tiecOon and ~eld reviews 0 0.~
Geome~c layoul 0 0.00
Slmclure General Plan 0 0.~
Response to commenls 0 0.~ ~._~
Q~QC - 0
Estimates
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0
Page 8
COST PROPOSAL - LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 7/6/00 8:10 PM
:reject Management & Administration
Administration I Invoices (4) 22 $ 776.00
Mon~ly Progress Repo~s / Schedele (4) 26'
Subconsultant Coordination 46 $ 1,972.00
Kick-off meeting 21 $ 750.65
Meefings I Aggncy Coordination (4) 46 $ 1,472,00
;~ SUBTOTAL 161 $ 5,927
Environmental
Confirm Environmental Document ~8 $ 557.60
Technical Studies ~79 $ 4,930.78-
CEQA IniUal Study / Neg Dec 255 $ 6,762.84
SUBTOTAL 452 $
Rlght-o[-Way Englneeflng & Su~eys
Exisling ulilily plans & coordination 32 $ ~,008.00
SupptementaJ Suweys 84 $ 3,990,38
~ and Mapping Control 206 $ 8,068.32
SUBTOTAL 322 $ , ~3,064.70
Prelimlna~ Englneeflng
Data collection and field reviews 12 $ 328.00
Geome~c layout 94 $ 2,466.00
S~ctumGeneraIPian 52 $ 1,480.00
Respo~se to ~mments 12
Q~C 16 $ 720.00
Eslimates 20 $ 644.00
SUBTOTAL 206 $ 6,050
-~,,~;...~A~ .~ ,~ ':: ~ , ~, ,~: , :~?~ ~,~ ~;.:~-~:,?~ r~.,'.,:~:':::~:~:~ t,t41 . 37,292
A Professional Services Agreement Between
. CITY OF DUBLIN
(CITY)
and
MK CENTENNIAL
(CONSULTANT)
for the
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
SCOPE OF SERVICES _:
PHASE 2
INDEX DESCRIPTION PAGE
100 GENERAL ................................................................ .: ....................................................... 3
110 Location ...................................................................................................... i ........................ 3
120 Description .......................................................................................................................... 3
t 40 Design Contract ......................................................................................................... i ......... 3
150 Construction Cost ................................................................................................................ 4
160 Length of Services ............................................................................................................... 4
170 Project Scheduling .............................................................................................................. 4
180 Project Prog-ress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting ............................................. 4
190 Design Monitoring and Subconsultant Management .......................................................... 4
200. DESIGN REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 5
210 Caltrans Publications ........................................................................................................... 5
220 AASHTO Publications ........................................................................................................ 5
240 Publications From Other Sources ....................................................................................... 5
300 PHASE 1 DESIGN WORK PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT ................................ 5
310 Data Collection and Field Reviews ..................................................................................... 5
320 Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys .................................................................. 5
330 Public Outreach .................................................................. .'. ............................................... 6
340 Right-of-Way ...................................................................................................................... 6
400 PHASE 2 DESIGN WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT ........... ~ ....... 6
410 Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties .................................................................. 6
420 Permits ........................................... ; ..................................................................................... 6
430 Geotechnical ........................................................................................................................ 8
440 P.S. & E. Documents .......................................................................................................... 8
44I Lighting and Signal Design .................................................................................................. 9
442 Construction Staging ................................................ ~ ...... , ...... 2 ............................................ 9
443 Utility Plans ......................................................................................................................... 9
444 Drainage .............................................................................................................................. 9
445 Landscaping and Irrigation ............................................................................................... 10
450 Project Submittals ........................................ :..: ................................................................. 10
460 Design Reviews ................................................................................................................. !2
470 Quantities and Cost Estimates ........................................................................................... 12
'*%'CE I-PL I WOL I~CEID Alh/26*'%~D MII'ACONTRACTbn'pHAsE2%S COP E/'WPD I
Scope of Services Page 2
500 MATERIALS FURNISI~D BY The CITY ................................................................. 12 (
510 Recoi'd Documents ............................................................................................................ 12
520 Miscellaneous Information ............................................................................................... 12
600 CONTRACT AD1VIINISTRATION ............................................................................... 12
610 The CITY .......................................................................................................................... 12
620 CONSULTANT ................................................................................................................ 13
630 Project Control .................................................................................................................. 13
640 Subcontract Services ......................................................................................................... 13
650 Quality Control .................................................................................................................. 13
660 CONSULTANT Personnel ................................................................................................ 14
670 Acceptability of the Work ................................................................................................. 14
680 Design Documentation ...................................................................................................... 14
\[CEI_PLI'~V OL I \CE IDA'I~262xAD M II'~CONTI:I-ACT S~HASE'2~COPF-'2'Wla D 2
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WlDENIN~ OJECT ( June 28, 2000
Scope of Services Page 3
100 GENERAL
110 Location
The project is located in Dublin, California. The City of Dublin is proposing to widen
Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway and Sierra Court/Civic Plaza from a four-lane
to a six-lane facility. The existing street has been improved to a six-lane facility from
Village Parkway to San Kamon Koad. The proposed project will extend the six-lane facility
to just east of the Sierra Court intersection. The widening of Dublin Boulevard is to both
sides of the street to obtain additional roadway width. This will require both demolition and
reconstruction of existing improvements on both sides 0f the street including widening of
an existing bridge and repair of the creek slopes below the bridge. During the
reconstruction, existing overhead utilities will be placed underground.
120 Description
The CONSULTANT will prepare final plans, specification and estimates. The design of the
project elements described herein, will be in accordance with The CITY, and Caltrans
Standards in 'effect at the time this agreement is executed. The documents wilt be produced
in metric units.
The project will consist of the following basic features:
· Prepare environmental technical studies and environmental documents required for
environmental clearance
· Attend project status meetings and City Council meetings
· Prepare contract bid dOCuments (plans, specifications and estimates - PS&E)
140 Design Contract
The CONSULTANT services will be divided into three phases of work:
Phase I was completed under a separate consulting engineering services contract dated
November 16, 1999 with the City of Dublin and included:
· Environmental documents and clearance
· Topographic mapping, title reports, supplemental surveys and right-of-way maps
· Field reviews and data collection
· Preliminary engineering and design criteria
· Right-of-way maps, plats and legal descriptions including permanent and temporary
construction easements (TCE)
Phase 2 work will include the following scope of services:
Phase 2
· Final construction documents: plans, estimate and specifications (one construction
bid document) inclUding landscaping and irrigation plans and traffic handling and
stage construction plans
· Assist The CITY with utility relocation and right-of-way coordination
\\CEI_PL 1 \VOL I ~CEIDA'IX2262~DM13~CONTKACTS',PbLASE2\SCOPE2. WPD 3
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WiDENIN~ DJECT (' June 28, 2000
Scope of Services Page 4
Phase 2 (ContinuatiOn)...
· Assist the CITY with response to bidders' questions as they pertain to design only
· Construction support services during construction wi. Il be provided by CITY staff
150 Construction Cost
The CONSULTANT will prepare cost estimates of the probable construction costs using the
CITY'and Caltrans unit prices. The estimate will include construction costs for roadway,
structures and drainage facilities.
160 Length of Services
The project will be initiated with a notice'to proceed from the CITY. The engineering work.
would then proceed without delay for 8 months. Review periods at the milestones will be:
four weeks at the 30% submittal, four weeks at the 90% submittal, and four weeks at the
final submittal. A four-week review period is scheduled for each review of the draft and
final environmental document packages.
The CITY may wish to amend the scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT~
When this occurs the CITY and the CONSULTANT will agree on a revised scope and any
adjustments to the project schedule and/or compensation due the CONSULTANT.
170 Project Scheduling
The project schedule will include all project activities and milestones. The schedule will
identify all milestones, tasks and sub tasks, review periods, and coordination activities
associated with engineering and design. Attachment A, "Design Schedule," shows the time
phased tasks to be performed for the required work.
180 Project Progress Meetings and 'Monthly progress Reporting
Monthly progress reports will be submitted tO the CITY with' each invoice for payment for
engineering services. The report will indicate the tasks that were completed during the
preceding period, work Planned for the next period, identification of design issues or
problems being encountered, and a comparison of planned and actual progress. The updated
schedule will accompany this report. Monthly reports will be submitted throughout the
project duration assumed above. Reports will not be submitted for any period where no
work was performed.
The CONSULTANT Project Manager will meet with the appointed CITY representatives
on a monthly basis to discuss the status'of the project design work. These meetings will
focus on resolution of any design issues requiring the CITY involvement, the design
progress, potential Problems, and to address any particular detail of the work previously
identified for resolution.
190 Design Monitoring and Subconsultant Management '
The CONSULTANT Project Manager and each subconsultant principal will monitor the
work underway to assure it complies with the criteria and standards established for the work,
and to ensure that the design work is being accomplished in the most efficient manner
possible.
The CONSULTANT will establish effective and efficient project procedures to direct and
monitor the subconsultants' work. Regular scheduled reviews oft he subconsultant design
\\CEI_PL I\VOL I\CEt DATk2262~DMrN1CONTRACTSEP ftASE2~COPE2. WP D ~
DUBLIN BOULEVARD W1DENIN~~?~ OJECT ( June 28, 2000
Scope of Services Page 5
will be performed to ensure compliance with the quality standards established, coordination
among team members, and that design operations are being conducted'in a timely and
efficient manner.
200 DESIGN REFERENCES
210 Caltrans Publications
211 Standard Drawines
Bridge Standard Details (Current Edition - Metric)
Standard Plans (1999 Edition - Metric)
2 t 2 Specifications
Standard Specifications (1999 Edition - Metric)
213 Manuals
Highway Design Manual, 5th edition (Metric)
Bridge Design Specifications (Current Edition - Metric)
Bridge Design Practice (Current Edition)
Bridge Memo to Designers (Current Edition) '
Bridge Design Aids (Current Edition)
Bridge Design Details (Current Edition)
220 ~ AASHTO PubIications
A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 1994 ("Green Book")
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, with interim revisions through 1997
Manual on Foundation Investigations, t 978
Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, 1993
Guide for Specifications and Standards
Standard Specifications for Smactural Supports for Highway Sigus, Luminaries and Traffic
Signals, Edition of 1985 and Interim Specifications through 1991
Roadside Design Guide, 1996
An Information Guide for Koadway Lighting, 1984
AASHTO Drainage Guidelines, 1992
240 Publications From Other Sources
City of Dublin Standard Plans
300 pHASE 1 DESIGN WORK PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
310 Data Collection and Field Reviews
Under phase 1 contract, the CONSULTANT met with the CITY and the local agencies to
collect available information pertinent to the project. A review of available information and
an on-site investigation was conducted to further define site conditions and determine the
need for additional investigation and data.
320 Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys
Under phase 1 contract, the CONSULTANT prepared topographic base mapping at 1:500
with 0.5-meter continuous intervals based on 1983 NAD (horizontal control) and 1929
NGVD (vertical control). Mapping standards will be checked by the CONSULTANT and
\\C~'I_PL I \VOL I \CEI DA'D,2262~.DMIN~CONTRA CTS~PHAS E2~COPE2.W'PD 5
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING~ ~JECT ( June.28, 2000
Scope of Services Page 6
will conform to the CITY's survey/mapping standards, as required for this project. The
CONSULTANT will conduct field surveys. Work will include conform areas, pavement
spot elevations, storm drainage inlets/outlets, selected utilities and potholed utilities.
Potholing is not included in this scope of services.
330 Public Outreach
Public outreach activities are included in phase 1 contract. Public outreach activities are
assumed to be minimal during the design phase. We have assumed that the City may want
to have one to two follow-up meetings with local business owners to review the project
status. In addition, we have budgeted for mailings for these two meetings and the
preparation and distribution of one (post-card size) project update during the design phase.
If the City wishes to conduct additional outreach activities such as newsletters, or .more
community meetings, they would be billed on a time and materials basis.
340 Right-of-Way
As part of the phase 1 contract, the CONSULTANT will identify right-of-way necessary for
the project alternatives based on information derived from existing rip, bt-of-way information
provided by The CITY. The CONSULTANT will prepare right-of-way maps and conduct
right-of-way surveys. The CITY Will provide right-of-way costs to the CONSULTANT.
400 PHASE 2 DES.~GN WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
410 Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties
In phase 2, the Design team members will continue to attend scheduled meetings. The
coordination will be conducted during design review submittals, monthly meetings, and at
such other times as specific issues need resolution. It will be necessary for the
CONSULTANT to meet with representatives of the local agencies and The CITY for the
purpose of discussing design details. The number of meetings budgeted for this work are as
follows:
Description N. um156r of Meetings
Monthly progress 6
meetings and / or utility
coordination meetings
. The agency contacts anticipated are with Zone 7 and the CITY.
420 Permits
In phase 2, the CONSULTANT will oversee the application and approval of regulatory
permits for the project. These will include permits from the US Army Corps of Engineers,
401 Certification from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Streambed Alteration
Agreement from the California Deparhnent of Fish and Game, and possibly a Section 7
permit from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The CONSrjLT.ANT wiI1 utilize the
assistance of Barry Anderson and Monk & Associates in preparing applications and
consulting with the regu.latory agencies. Coordination with the City and Zone 7 will an
integral part of preparing the applications and consultation with the regulatory agencies
regarding any mitigat, ion requirements'within the Creek Channel.
\\CE [_P L l \VOL t \CE [ D AT~226 --:%aoD M r/~c ONTRACTSkPHASF-2~S COPE2.'*VP D 6
DUBLJN BOULEVARD WIDENING( %IECT ( June 28, 2000
Scope of Services ~, Page 7
Task 1 Obtaining a Corps Permit We are assuming that the project will be eligible for a
. Nationwide Permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. It is likely that two
permits may be required: Nationwide 14 for linear corridors, and Nationwide 33 for
temporary construction impacts. Although these general permits have already been issued
by the Corps, the applicant must provide the Corps with a Pre¢onstruction Notification (also
known as a PCN). We would prepare PCN and submit it to the Corps.
Task 20btainine a 401 Certification or Waiver In California the Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB) in each district administers Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
We believe the project will receive a Certification waiver. We wilt prepare the necessary
forms and submit them to the Board for their review. Also, note that as part of the
application package the Board requires adequate California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) documentation which we are assuming the Negative DeclaratiOn approved by the
City under the phase I contract will be adequate for RWQCB purposes.
Task 30btainine a i603 Streambe. d..Alteration Agreement The California Department of
Fish and Game (CDFG) issues Streambed Alteration Agreements for projects that affect the
bed or bank of creeks and streams in Catiforrt. ia. We will prepare the necessary forms and
submit them to the Departmen{ for their approval. The applicant or applicants consultant
Usually meets with the Department in the field to discuss the project and how impacts can
be eliminated or reduced. The Department has recently revised its policy on Streambed
Alteration Agreements and now requires that the project be in compliance with CEQA. We
are assuming that the Negative Declaration approved by the City will be adequate for CDFG
purposes. ' ....
Task 4 Assisting Wi'th the California Red-le~.,*ed Frog (CRLF) Permit Monk & Associates
has already prepa.red a CRLF site assessment and submitted it to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service for their approval. We do not know what type of permit or permit conditions the
Service will reqUire. For small impacts to frog habitat, the Service has a programmatic
Section 7 permit that they append to the Corps 404 Permit. Ideally, this is what would
happen here, and this is what we are providing a budget for.
Task 5 Mitigation Plan Because impacts to various resources are small, we are assuming
that th~ mitigation requirements wilt be to reconstruct the. bank to its previous extent and
hydroseeding bare soil. In this task we will discuss mitigation with the regulatory agencies
and prepare a brief (several pages) document describing the methods for restoration.
Assumptions Because we do not know the exact permits or requirements the agencies will
request, t have made some assumptions that limit .what we are prepared to do for the budget
proposed here.
CEQA documentation has been PrePared by the City. We assume it will be adequate for
both the Regional Board and the Department offish and Game. Preparation of new CEQA
documents is beyond the scope of this proposal. We assume the project Will be eligible fOr
a Corps Nationwide Permit. Preparing an application for an Individual Corps permit is
beyond the scope of this proposal. The Fish and Wildlife Service may require a full Section
7 consultation and associated mitigation and monitoring requirements. We assume the
project will receive a Programmatic Section 7, and a regular Section 7 (or Section 10) is
beyond the scope of this proposal. All permits require some sort of mitigation plan. We
assume that restoration to the original state of the channel will be all that is required, and
preparation of full mitigation and monitoring plans that the agencies could require is beyond
the scope of this proposal. We assume the Engineers will provide the necessary engineering
drawings that will be required for several of the permits described above.
\\CEI_PL I [VOL I \CEIDATk1262'~kDMINXCONTR. ACT$'~PHASE2\SCOPF.2.WPD 7
SCope of Services Page 8
430 Geotechnical ('~
In phase 2; the CONSULTANT will provide pavement section evaluation by first evaluating ,,,
the existing pavement conditions of the street and subgrade soils. We will first perform a
document search, followed by a brief pavement conditions survey of the surface of the
pavement following Pavement Management Standards (PMS). The' pavement Section will
be based on an R-value of 5 where new pavement section design and reconstruction is
needed. Pavement section options will be provided so that the most economic means of
paving the road may be selected.
To obtain subsurface information for the bridge and abutment design, we will drill a deep
.boring at each end of the 1964 bridge. Samples obtgined from the borings will be Used to
provide geotechnical parameters for the bridge in accordance with Caltrans design
requirements. The samples will also be used for evaluating the Alamo Creek bank
stabilization recommendations and the repair of the bicycle path under the bridge: .In
addition, these borings will be used for further information in the evaluation of the existing
roadway. We plan to' provide seismic design parameters for use in the upgrade of the
bridge. Our scope of work' includes r~searching available information regarding the
geology, tectonics, and seismicity of the project site, establishing ~e controlling seismic
gource, estimating peak bedrock acceleration using Caltrans Seismic Hazard Map (1996),
and recommending the appropriate acceleration response spectra (ARS) curve from the
Applied Technolo, gy Council publication ATC-32 for the design based on the subsurface
soil information from our field investigation,
The CONSULTANT will draw upon our extensive local experience with Alameda County ('
Zone 7 as well as that of our staff, in .addressing the Alamo Creek. channel stahilizatiam We ,.
will draw upon Zone 7's Channel Repair Standards as defined by A.lameda County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District's Resolution No. t 757. We will also consider the
concerns of the Army Corps of Erigin~ers and the Fish and Game Department in assessing
stabilization methods. We will include mitigation measures as outlined in the CEQA
Negative Declaration into the plans and specifications.
The CONSULTANT will also drill three to four shallow borings along the alignment of the
proposed joint utility trench. This is so that we can obtain engineering perimeters and
identify the subsurface c'onditions that will be encountered during excavation and
construction of the utility vaults, conduits, and trench sections and will also be used for
pavement evaluation. Based on our experience the surface soils in the area are generally
very expansive clays wkh deeper soils consisting of alluvial silty clays .with some sand
440 P.S. & E. Documents
The design objective is to provide plans, specifications and construction cost estimates for
the construction of the project. CADD digital drawings will be prepared in Microstation
format. The documents will be produced in metric units.
Specifications will be composed of supplements to the Caltrans Standard Specifications for
Construction, with general conditions and contract format, including Special provisions, as
directed by the CITY. These compositions will be carefully coordinated with the work
depictions shown on the plans and the bid items included in the construction cost estimate. ~
Construction cost estimates will be assimilated using Caltrans bid item designations,
%CEI_PL I\VOL I \CEIDATk2262~[DMIN~CONTILa, CTS~HASE?~'COP E2.WPD ~
DUBLflV BOULEVARD WIDENING( JJECT (' June 28, 2000
Scope of Services Page 9
( estimating a quantity and expanding it to a cost application of the expected unit price. This
estimate will be performed at each to the design submittal stages. The accuracy of the
estimate will increase throughout the design process.
441 Lighting and Signal Design
In phase 2, plans specifications & estimates (PS&E) documents will be prepared for the
following project elements:
· Traffic signal modifications at the Dublin Boulevard/Sierra Court and Dublin
Boulevard/Clark Avenue. intersections;
·Traffic signal interconnection along Dublin Boulevard between Village· Parkway
and Sierra Court; and
· Street lighting on Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway and Sierra Court.
Available record and/or construction drawings will be obtained for each project element.
Detailed field verification of as-built existing conditions will be performed. All work will
be conducted in accordance with the current-applicable City, County, and State standards.
Electrical load calculations will be prepared and submitted m facilitate verification of
service point locations with the utility company. Final design documents will be provided
based on comments.
submittal. Technical special provisions wilt be prepared and submitted at the 90% design
.' stage. A construction cost estimate will be prepared and submitted at the 30%, 90.%, and
final design stages.
(' 442 Construction Staging
..... ~''~ As part of the PS&E package in phase 2, the CONSULTANT will prepare construction
staging and traffic handling plans. The existing traffic capacity will. be maintained during
~' Construction. However, temporary, lane closures will be required. CONSULTANT will
identify lane closure hour constraints in the specifications.
443 Utility Plans - - '
In phase 2, the CONSULTANT will prepare utility maps that identify the existing utilities
based on existing as-built data obtained from the CITY and utilities. The CONSULTANT
shall coordinate with the utilities to identify, propose final locations, and prepare plans for
utilities which are affected by the project and not included in the utility under~ound district
work. Utility owners Will design the relocation of their own facilities as identified by the
CONSULTANT. Pot holing is not included in this scope of services. The CITY may wish
to amend t-he scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT for utility relocation
design. When this occurs The CITY and CONSULTANT will agree on a revised scope and
any adjustments to the project schedule and/or compensation due CONSULTANT.
444 Drainage
The CONSULTANT will review the affected sUb-basin drainage areas for the project and
determine the drainage impacts. The CONSULTANT will then report to the CITY their
findings of the drainage impacts. The CITY will review the CONSULTANT'S finding and
make a determination on how to proceed with the design of the project's drainage system.
The CITY has previously provided the CONSULTANT with record drawings of the exiSting
drainage system for the projects. The CITY has researched their existing files and has
determined that what was previously provided to the CONSULTANT is thc best information
\\CEI_PL I\VOL [ \CE I D AT~-262'~a~)M IN'CONTR~CTS~HA~E-'~SC OPF-2',W P D ~
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENINg'..OJECT i June 28, 2000
Scope of Services Page 10
available.
The CONSULTANT will prepare drainage plans as determined and as directed by the CITY.
It is assumed that no additional drainage design nor changes to the existing main line system
will be required. This does not preclude the necessity of amending the scope of work if this
assumption is found to be in error.
445 Landscaping and Irrigation
Landscaping and irrigation are included in phase 2 work. The landscape architectural
portion of'the work involves providing construction documents for planting and irrigation
for street trees within cut-outs in the city sidewalks and trees, shrubs and ground cover in
the new median. The contractor will be instructed to maintain the plants that are to remain
during construction.
For the property frontages that will be disrupted as a result of the road widening, the -
contractor will be responsible for repairing and reconnecting existing irrigation systems in
these areas using new equipment comparable to the existing systems, and installing the
equipment in such a manner as to provide full'irrigation coverage of the planting bead along
the road frontages. In addition to the irrigation along these frontages, the contractor will also
be responsible for installing ground cover to match existing materials (e.g. sod, ivy, mulch,
crushed rock, etc.) to restore the property to a neat and clean appearance. Any existing trees
and shrubs that are damaged as a result o£the construction that are outside of the edge of
pavement and are to remain will be replaced by the contractor with new plants of'the same
species. Direction for this work will be covered in the construction documents.
The landscape planning portion of the work will occur concurrently with the public outreach
effort. Concept plans will be prepared for presentation to staff at the 30% level of team
production. Planting plans will be completed by 90% and Will be reviewed by city staff.
Upon acceptance of planting plans, irrigation plans will be prepared and submitted at the
100% submittal. The final bid set will incorporate all comments made by the city staff.
450 Project Submittals
CONSULTANT will prepare PS&E documents for the project. CADD digital drawings will
be prepared in Microstation format in accordance with the CITY procedures. Final plans
wiI1 be submitted in an electronic format compatible to the CITY's electronic equipment
which is AUTOCAD version 14. Drawings will be in dual (Metric/Imperial) units as
"'established by the CITY. This Scope of Services provides for a design process that will
produce several documents that will serve as a record of the design development. Design
submittals will be made at the 30% and 90%. Final design documents will be provided
based on comments. An internal quality control review will be Conducted prior to each
Submittal. Technical special provisions and a construction cost estimate will also be
prepared and submitted at the 90% design stage.
5 copies Of each submittal at 30%, 90% and Final
One hard copy to each utility owner and electronic files
One print-ready original PS&E for advertisement
¥,CEI_PL IIVOL ~ \C E 1D AT~262'~,D MII~CONTP,-A CTS'd) HA SE2~S CO P E2.V'tPD 1 0
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENINC~- OJECT i' June 28, 2000
Scope of Services Page 11
The following documents, will be submitted to the CITY at project milestone points:
30% plans consistin_~'of:
Title Sheet
TypicaI Cross Sections
Key Map and Line Index
Layout
Utility Plan (existinl,~ only)
Signal and Lighting Plans
Define Right-of-Way
Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate
List of permits required and draft permit applications
Draft Foundation Report
Bridge General Plan
90% plans consisting of all plan sheets (revised) listed for the 30% submittal and:
Construction Details
Drainage Plans and Details
Utility Plans
Stage Construction and Traffic Handling Plans
Construction Area Signs
Pavement Delineation and Sign Plans
Signal and Lighting Details
Planting Plan, Details, Plant List
Irrigation Plan and Details
Foundation Report
Construction Cost Estimate
Perm it Applications Exhibits
Construction Schedule
Specifications
Final plans consisting of all plan sheets (revised). fullv completed, listed for the 90%
submittal and:
Construction Cost Estimate
Construction Support Services during construction will be Crovided bv the CITY as stated
in section t40 of this scope,
The CITY will provide the CONSULTANT with a marked up set of plans that reflect
changes that occurred during the construction phase of the project. The CONSULTANT
shall transfer the reflected changes to the original set of plans with appropriated annotation
that clearly indicates what change occurred during construction. The CONSULTANT shall
then label each sheet of the plans as RECORD DRAWINGS. The CONSULTANT shall
provide to the CITY a copy of the RECORD DRAWING plans in an electronic median
acceptable to the CITY, (AutoCADD Release 14).
\\CEI-P L I \ VOL 1 '~C E I D AT~'";"2' fi "~'A D M rt"~C O NTKA CTS"PHASE2kS C OPF'[ WPD 1 !
DUBUN BOULEVARD WIDENING( OJECT ( June 28, 2000
Scope of Services Page 12
460 Design Reviews
At milestone points, the CONSULTANT will submit materials to the CITY' and
participating local agencies for review and comment. Review periods will. be .four weeksfor
all milestones. Each reviewing agency will submit a single set of coordinated review
comments to the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will compile review comments
from the reviewing agencies and schedule a meeting with' The CITY and the other reviewing
agencies to discuss any conflicting comments and to reach a consensus on resolution o£any
conflicts. Minutes of the resolution meeting will be distributed within five working days
of the meeting. The CONSULTANT will incorporate agreed upon resolutions into the
reviewed documents. Should future reviews generate comments which require changes to
previously agreed upon elements of the documents and such changes result in additional
work on the part of the CONSULTANT, such changes will be performed as Additional
Services.
470 Quantifies and Cost Estimate
An itemized cost 6stimate will be prepared based upon the project's' required list of Standard
Items of Work. The quantity estimate will address general requirements, retaining walls,
electrical systems, drainage structures, and all construction work items as applicable. A
preliminarY. cost estimate will also be prepared that identifies' the various work items,
quantities, unit costs, and the project's cost, including allowances for mobilization and
contingencies. Quantities and estimates will be updated m respond to each respective
submittals's review comments.
500 MATERIALS FURNISHED BY The CITY
510 Record Documents
The CITY will provide the following items:
· Current standard Drawings, Manuals, Guides, and Procedures'Rat pertain to the
project
· Available CITY "as-built" plans and specifications of existing conditions including
roadways, utilities, drainage improvements, and structures
Available CITY right-of-way plans
· Surveying and mapping information including existing monument locations
· Sample plans 'and reports to be used as guidelines for format, organization and
' content
· Access to all records available at the CITY
520 · Miscellaneous Information
· Entry permits on private parcels
600 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
610 The CITY
The CITY wilt:
· Conduct ongoing reviews of the CONSULTANT's progress in performing the work
and furnish technical comments in a timely manner on all submissions
· Review and approve the CONSULTANT's billings in a timely manner
° Review, evaluate and may approve CONSULTANT's requests for extension of time
and amendments to the agreement
%CEi_PL I\¥OL I\CEIDAT%2262~d2)MIN%CONTR~CTSVaH^S E2~COPE2. WPD 1 2
DUBEN BOULEVARD WIDENINg' DJECT .{ June 28, 2000
Scope of Services Page 73
....... · Attend all progress meetings With the CONSULTANT
{ · Attend meetings with the CONSULTANT and others as requested
620 Consultant
CONSULTANT will:
·Establish, furnish and maintain suitable office facilities to serve asthe project office
for the duration of the project
· Maintain an adequate staff of qualified support personnel to perform the work
necessary to complete the project
· Establish internal accounting methods and procedures for documenting and
monitoring project costs consistent with the State auditor's requirements.
· Establish and maintain contract administration procedures which will include
amendments, time extensions and subcontracts
· Maintain a project workbook with all the pertinent information relating to the
project to be given to the CITY at the close of the project
· Attehd meetings with other agencies as requested by the CITY. However, if number
of meetings exceed tho~e indicated in this scope of services, then those meetings
wilt be performed as Additional Services
The CONSULTANT is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the contract
documents and related design prepared under this project and prior to submittals will check
ali material accordingly. The plans will be reviewed by the CITY for conformity with the
CITY procedures and the terms of the contract.
('- 630 Project Control
The CONSULTANT will provide and maintain a Management Information System to
monitor costs and manpower and to report progress with the following:
· Identify progress against the schedule for each major Work item
· Forecast completion dates from current progress
· Advise. the CITY of any work not in this scope or in any area which is oUt of the
required sequence
· Provide updated estimates of time, manpower and dollars required for major work
elements
640 Subcontract Services
Due to the nature and scope of the required services, the CONSULTANT will subcontract
portions of the work.. The subcontract firm will be approved by the CITY in writing prior
to initiation of any work bY the subconsultant firms. The CONSULTANT will review and
coordinate the work of all subconsultants and they wilt abide by the terms and conditions
.of this scope as applicable to them.
650 Quality Control
The CONSULTANT and subconsultants have total responsibility for the accuracy and
completeness of the plans and related design prepared under this project and will check all
such material accordingly. The CONSULTANT will have a quality control plan in effect
during the entire time work is being performed under this contract. The quality control plan
[,~ wilt establish a process whereby plans, calculations, and documents that the
coNSULTANT submits for review will be clearly marked as fully checked prior to
submittals by a qualified individual other than the originator.
\[CEI_PL I\VOL I \CEIDA'fX2262'u~DM[l~CON~A. CTS~PHASE2~COPE2.WPD 1 3
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDEhlIAI~ )JECT ( June 28, 2000
Scope of Services Page 14
660 CONSULTANT Personnel
The CONSULTA2xlT's Work will be performed and/or directed by.the key personnel
identified in the CONSULTANT's proposal. Any changes in the indicated key personnel
will be subject to review and approval by The CITY.
670 Acceptability of the Work
The plans, designs, calculations, reports and other documents furnished under this scope of
work will conform to the CITY's standard of quality. The criteria for acceptance will be a
product of neat appearance, well organized, accurate and complete, technically and
grammatically correct, checked and dated in accordance with the Quality Control Plan, and
having the originator and checker identified. The minimum standards of appearance,
organization, and content of drawing will are similar to the type produced by the CITY.
680 Design Documentation
The CONSULTANT will submit all design notes, sketches, reports, worksheets and
computations to document the design conclusions. The design notes and computations will
be recorded on 8 ½ "x 11" computation sheets, appropriately titled, numbered, dated,
indexed, and signed by the designer and checker. The data will be bound in a hardback
folder or a three-ring binder for submittals to the CITY. Computer output forms and other
oversized sheets will be bound or placed in a binder.
Design notes and computations will include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following
data:
o Design criteria used for the project
· Geometric design calculations for horizontal and verticaI alignment
Quantity calculations
· Documentation of decisions reached from meetings, telephone conversations or site
visits
o Bridge structural calculations
\~,CEI_?L 1 \VOL I \CEIDAT~262~DMINXCONTR~ CT-q'~PHASE2~COPE2.WPD 1 4
MK CENTENNIAL ·
Dublin 'Boulevard Widening - Village Parkway to Slerra Court
Phase 1 and Phase 2
' ' 2000 1200, ..... 12oo2 ....
Ouralon Sla. Fin,eh Jan Feb ~ar ^p~ May Ju. Ju Aug Sep Oct .o.~ C~e. lJ.n F..I~I'~.~IJ~, I*.oIs.Plo~,l.o~loe. lJ.. FeblMm
ID
Task Hame
1 N~tce To Proceed ' ' ~ days 2/9/00 219100 ~ ~. ~ ~ i ' ~1 ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ [ ~ ~ :' ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ '
2 Project Managemant 25~ days i 2/9/00 2/2101 ~
3 Pm]ed Schedule, QA Plan, Sub ~nlracts 51.6 wks 2~/00 2/2/01
12 Public Review Period 4 wks 2123/00 3/21/00 ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i
13 Pub c HeaHng and C ~ adopt on of ED I day 3/21~ 3~0 ...... ~ ....... {'"'";"~ ........................... [ ........... ~ ......... [ ........... [ .......................... ~ ............. ~ ................................ ~ ............. ~ ......................... i ...................................... ! ........ , ..... [ .... ; "i .........
14 Prepare Final ED and subm t o Ca bans and C ~ 2 wks 3/2~00 4/4/00 { ~ ~ ~
15 Revmw ED 2 wks 4/5/00 4/18/00 ~ i' ~ {
16 Transmt approved ED o FHWA for approva 1 wk 4/19~0 4~5/00 ~ ~ ~ [ ~ ~ '
Final approval 0 days 5/2/00 51~00 ~ { ~ ~,~ ~ i , ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ .
18 Prellmlna~ Engineering 76 days 1126/00 ~/10/00 ~ i j
22 Prelimlna~ roadway design 12,4 wks : ~9/00 5/4/00 ' · · ..... J i . ' ·
23 Mapping~ Su~eys and Right-of-Way Engineering. 80 days 5/5/00 8/24/00 ~ ~ ~
25 Supplemental Suweys ' 4 wks 8/~0 ' '8/2g~0 .... ~ .... ~ .......... ~ ; .......I~ ' ~' ' '
29 Publlc Outreach . 203 days 2/23/00 12/1/00 -'[ ....
30 ~eeUngs w~ stakeholders 40 6 wks ~3/00 12/1/00 i ·
Prajecl: DUBLt~12.MPP Tas~ C~li~l Tas~ Progress I Mile~lone
Date: 7/6/00 8:12 PM ·
_~tle: y:~etty~mpe~DU BLIN 12.MPP
MKCENTENNIAL Dublin Boulevard Widening -Village Parkway to Sierra Court
Phase 1 and Phase 2
..... 2000 .... 2OOl ' ........... ' ' ~o02
.!D TaskName Dura,on Stair Fln~s_h JanlFeb'lMarlAprlMaylJunl Jul JAug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr ~tayljUnl~lul IAu. lSa. IOctl'ovl0.clJa. FablUar
31 PHASE 2 DESIGN 175 days ?117/00 3116101
34 Dfa~ founda~on repod 4 wks 7/17/00 8/11/00
36 ConsWcflon Costs 1 wk : 8/28/00 9/1/00 = ~ . · ' ~ t ~ ~ . = ; ; . ; ; - .
38 Submit 30% plans and estimate 0 days 9/8100 9/8/00 :
39 CITY renew 4 wks 9/11100 10/6/00~ , ~ : ~.
41 Final foundation repo~ "2 wks 10/9/~ 101~0/00
,~ I t t
Project: DUBLIN12,MPP Task I.~~J~,~J Crill~l Task LXXXXN~XX] Progress Mileslone .~ Summa~ I I
Date: 7/6/00 8:12 P~
Boulevard Widening Proj~?t ~'~ ~ ~'/~
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
MK CENTENNIAL
LABOR:
Classification Hours Rate Total
Proj Prin 2 $ 54,00 $ 108.00
Proj Mgr 232 $ 45.00 $ 10,440.00
Sr Eng 450 $ 34.00 $ 15,300.00
Engineer 536 S 24.00 $ 12,864.00
CADD 424 $ 23.00 $ 9,752.00
Clerical 128 $ 16.00 $ 2~048.00
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR 1772 $ 50,512,00
OVERHEAD ~ t.69293 $ 85.513.25
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 136,025.28
MKC DIRECT COSTS:
DIRECT COSTS:
Mailing, Teiephone, Supplies. Photos .... $ 500.00
Reproduction & Presentation Materials $ 3,600.00
CADD Computer
Transportation
SUBTOTAL MKC DIRECT COSTS $ 4,100.00
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor) $ 13,601.50
l SUBTOTAL MKC $ 153,726.78
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~2262~admin~contracts~ohase2~ngcst-?--xis Labor + ODCs Page 1
~ublin Boulevard Widening Pr(~?'ct , ~-~- ~, '~- ~
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
~)'~AL"PROJECT COST $ ....... 267,519.98'~
PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT
LABOR:
Classification Hours Rate Total
Principal - Env 64 $ 50,16 $ 3,210.24
Principal - PI 0 $ 44,S8 $
Proj Mgr-Env 0 $ 29.57 $
Proj Mgr - PI 0 $ 39.07 $
Associate - Env 72 $ 18.59 $ 1,338.48
Associate - Pi 0 $ 23.23 $
Clerical 30 $ 20.38 $ 611.40
DIRECT LABOR 166 $ 5,160,1=2
OVERHEAD @ 1.6 $ 8.256.19
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 13,416.31
DIRECT COSTS:
Printing, Mailing, Telephone & Supplies $ 400.00
Transportation $ 250.00
..... Graphic Support $ -
Miscellaneous $ 200.00
Biology' Subconsultant $ 15.000.00
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ 15,850.00
FEE ~ased on 10% profit of labor) $ 1~341.63
I SUBTOTAL PAM $ 307607.94 t11%
Revised 8;43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~262~dmin~contracts~phase2~Engcst2,xJs Labor + ODCs Page 2
(~'lblin Boulevard Widening Proj~c"~.t ~" ~' ~-~
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
~T0.TAL PROJECT COS-E ..$ .... 2677519-98
Chaudhary & Associates
LABOR:-'
Hours Rate Total
Prin Mn.gr 0 $ 48.00 $
Proj Surveyor 0 $ 37.00
/ Office Surveyor 0 $ 28.00 $ -
2-man FieidCrew 0 $ 53.97 $
Eng / CADD 0 $ 25.00
DIRECT LABOR 0 $
OVERHEAD ~_. 1.8612 $
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 22.500.-00
DIRECT COSTS:
Mileage
Reproduction & Materials
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor) $ 2~250.00
I SUBTOTAL CHAUDHARY $ 24r750,00
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~262~admin~contracts~ohase2LEngcst2.xls Labor + ODCs Page 3
(~ 'blin Boulevard Widening Pro~- 't ~C~" c~" ~D
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
KLEINFELDER
LABOR:
Hours Rate Total
Prin Eng 8 $ 46.64 $ 373.12
Proj Mng / Eng 50 $ 33.65 $ 1,682.50
Snr StaffProf 42 $ 25,80 $ 1,083.60
· Professional 18 $ 17.88 $ 321.84
'Technician 7 $ 15,60 $ 109.20
Drafting f Admin 18 $ 18.03 $ 324.54
DIRECT LABOR 143 $ 3,894.80
OVERHEAD (~ 1.92 $ 7~478.02
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 11,372.82
DIRECT COSTS:
Drilling $ 2,958.00
Permits & backfill
. Laboratory testing $ 1,900.00
Analysis
Data research & materials
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ 4,858.00
FEE (based on 10% orofitoflabor) $ 1~137.28
' I SUBTOTAL KLEINFELDER $ 17t368.1,0..
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~262~admin~contract.s~ohase2~ngcsb?..xis Labor + ODCs Page 4
~,,,blin Boulevard Widening Proj~*.
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
~-~--~L PRoJ-E-_ECT CO~-'$ ~ 2~67,5!9.98~
FEHR & PEERS ASSOCIATES
LABOR:
Hours Rate Total
P¢oj Prin 24 $ 58.65 $ 1,407.60
Sr Eng'~neer 61 $ 33.17 $ 2,023.37
Engineer 80 $ 23.80 $ 1,904.00
Technical 88 $ 20.67 $ I~81.8.96
DIRECT LABOR 253 $ 7,153.93
OVERHEAD @ 1,4553 $ 10,482.65
SUBTOTAL.LABOR+OVERHEAD $ 17,636.58
DIRECT COSTS:
Travel Mileage $ 180.00
Printing, Mailing, Telephone & Supplies $ 815.00
SUBTOTAL DIRECTCOST~ $ 995.00
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor) $ 1 .,763.66
[ SUBTOTAL FEER & PEERS $ 20.395.24
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~2262~admin~contracts~ohase2',Engcst2.xts Labor + ODCs Page 5
~'~,blin Boulevard Widening Proi~-~'t o%2 ~ ~
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
~OTAL PROJECT COST $ 267,519.98 ~
HAYGOOD & ASSOCIATES
LABOR:
Hours Rate Total
Proj Prin / Proj Mgr 27.5 $ 45.00 $ 1~37.50
Landscape Assoc 211 $ 26,00 $ 5,486.00
Jr Landscape Arch 0 $ 15.00 $ .-
CADD Tech 0 $ 25.00 $
Field Tech 0 ' $ 17.00 $
Clerical 0 $ 14.00 $
DIRECT LABOR 238.5 $ 6,723.50
OVERHEAD @ 1.4466 $ 9,726.22
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 16.449~72
DIRECT COSTS:
irrigation Subconsultant $ 1,700.00
Horticulture Subconsultant
Reproductions $ 704.88
Delivery Charges $ 144.00
Film $
Mileage, tolls, parking $ 28.35
Per Diem Travel
Project Equipment $
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ 2,577.23
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor) $ 1,644.97
SUBTOTAL HAYGOOD $ 20t6~1.92
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~.282~admin~contracts~ohase2~Engcst2.xls Labor + ODCs Page 6
ONLY DubIiH Boulev.a~.d Widenilig Project Raised: I101008:43 PM
~:~:~!;~`~:"~;~j~i!~!~]~i~i`~j~;~;~]~;~;~i~i~i~;~`[~i~ii:~if~;:.~i~;:~; ProJ Prln ProJ Mgr Sr Eno Engineer CADD Clerical MKC
:~::~:.~;~%lre~.~:~~A~ ~.i~.,,.,~A:;~ ::~,~.~,~:~::~;.~: $' 45.00 $ 34.~ $ 24.00 $ 23.00 $ 16.00
' ~ ........ *~ '~ , ,' '. ~ ~ ~r~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~'= :: "~ Hours Cosl Hours Cosl Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cosl Hours Cosl Hour~ Cosl
Project Msnagement & Administration
Admlnisba~on I Invoices (B) 32 1,440 24 384 56 1,824.~
Mon~ty Progress Repo~s I S~edule (8) 32 1,440 24 384 ~ 1,824.~
Sub~nsultant Coordination 40 1,800 40 1,360 24 384 104 3.544.~
~ meeting (I) 4- 180 4 136 4 96 4 ~ 16 476.~
MeeUngs I Agen~ Coordina~on (4) 2 108 20 9~ 20 480 14 224 ~ t,~12.~ ~
SUBTOTAL! 2 108: 128 5,760 44 1,496 24 576 0 90 1,440 288 9,380.~
Pe~lls and Public Outreach
Public Oulrea~
Pe~lts (Co~s, Fish&Game. Water Qualily Zone 7) 20 900 32 1.088 52 t.g88.~
SUBTOTAL 0 .~ 20 900 32 1,088 0 0 0 52 t,g88.~
UtlII~, Right-of-Way Engineering & Su~eys :.
Ufllily plans & ~ordina~on (assumes Precslon
planning pm~des att pa~nen[ Info,eton for
mapping) 8 360 20 680 40 ~0 40 920 t08 2,920.~
SUBTOTAL 0 8 360 20 680 40 ~0 40 920 0 108 2,920
Englneeflng
Geote~nl~l exploraBon & analysis & repo~s ' 8 272 - 8 272.~
GeomeMc layout 4 180 24 5¢6 24 552 52 1,308.~
Cons~ction details 2 90 J 24 816 40 960 40 920 t~ 2.786.~
Bddge 20 900 120 4,080 160 3,840 160 3,680 4~ 12.~.~
Channel erosion ~n~ol design and plans 2 90 J 4 136 40 ~0 32 736 78 1,922.00
Bike pa~ ramp design and repair at bridge only 2 90 4 130 40 ~0 32 736 78
Drainage 2 90 10 340 40 980 24 552 76 1,942.~
Joinl Een~ plans (re~ew only) 2 90 8 272 8 192 2 32 20 580.~
Landscaping and I~gation plans 2 90 ~ 272 8 192 2 32 ' 20 586.~
LighOng and signals 2 90 8 272 8 192 2 32 20 5~.~
S~ge ~ns~caon and Eaffic handling 2 90 40 1,360 ~ - 40 920 82 2,370.~
Pavement dalinea on 2 90 4 1~ 40 960 32 736 78 1,922.~
Response to~mmenis 2 90 24 816 24 576 50 1,482.~ '~
Q~C t6 720 32 1,088 48 1.808.~
SPedfi~fl°ns 8 360 40 1,360 32 5t2 80 2,232.~
Cons~cfion ~st estimates 8 360 20 680 40 960 68 2.~.~
SUBTOTAL 0 76 3.420 354 12,O36 472 tl,328 304 0,832 30 508 1324 30,224.~
Construction Suppo~ So,Ices
RE file (n01 Included In ~is s~pe of se~l~s)
Cons~c~on bidding supp0~ (not Included in ~is s~pe gL se~i~s 0 · .
Post award asslstan~ (Dublin to pro,de ~nstm~lon support se~l 0 0~
~ 0 0.~
SUBTOTALJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:~,~ ~A~i~,~~,~.~,,,~.,~I= ~0, ~z 10,~0 450 15,~00 5~6 12,864 424 9,752 128 2,048 ~,772
y;lellyldublin~cope[Engc~.xls Labor Page 7
COST PROPOSAL - LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: ?/6/00 8:43 PM
ement & Administration
Admtnlsb'ation / Invoices (8) 0
Monthly Progress Reports / Schedule (8) O
Subconsultant CoordinaUon 0
Kick-off meeUng (1) 0
MeeUngs / Agency Coordinalion (4) 0
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O .dC
~ermlta and Public Outreach
Public Outreach 40 2,006 32 595 18 367' 90 2968.12
Permits (Corps, Fish&Game, Water Quality, Zone 7) 24 1,204 40 744 12 245 76 2192.00
SUBTOTAL 64 3,210 0 0 0 72 1,338 0 30 611 168 5180.12
Jtlllty, PJght-of-Way Englneertng & Surveys
UUlily plans & coordinaUon (assumes Procsion
planning provides all pertinent Infom~aUon for
mapping) 0 0.00
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O.00
Engineering
Geotechnlcal exploration & analysis & reports 0
GaomeLdc layout
ConslmcUon details O 0.00
Bddga 0 0.00
Channel erosion control design and plans 0 0.00
Blke path ramp design and repair at bfldge only 0
Drainage
Joint trench plans (review only) 0 0.00
O 0.0~
Landscaping and i~igation plans
Lighting and signals 0 0.0~
Stage construction and traffic handling 0 0.0~
Pavement deltheaUon 0 0.00
Response to commenls 0
QA/QC : 0 .00
Specifications. 0 0.00
Construction coal estimates 0 0.00
0 0.00
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0
3onstructlon Support Services
RE file (not lncJuded In tills scope of se~vices) . 0
Construction bidding support (nol Included in Ihis scop
Pest award assistance (Dublin to provide conslmction ., - 0 0.00
SUBTOT^L 0 0 0 0 O 0 O - O
~G ~ ~ ~ ~[{ ~~ ~ ~i~i~ ~i~i!i 64 3,2t0 ..... "' ....... 72 ' ........ 1,338' ...... ' ........ 3'0 ' ' 611 ', ";~'1~'6 '
COS [ PROPOSAL- LABOR OHLY
...... - ' Dublin Boulew~d Widening Project " ReV~..~ 1/6/00 8:43 PM
Project M~nagement & Admlnl~traiion -. ,,,, ,,-'
Admtnts~aUon I Invoices (8) . ' .... ~ - ' 0 O.~
Monlhly progress Repots I S~edule (8) ~ ' ' '- ' ~ - 0 0.~
Sub~nsullan~ Coordination '
Kick~ meeting {1) .... ] - 0 0.00
Meetings I Agency Coo~ination (4)
Permits and Public Outreach SUBTOTAL 0 - · 0 - 0 - 0 - ~ 0 - 0 -
Public Ou~oach .... ~ ' 0 0.~
' Pe~its (Co~s. Fish&Game. Waler Qualily, Zone 7)
' ' ' : ' I ' 0 0.~
SUBTOTAL
Utility, Right-of-Way Engineering & Su~eys
Utility plans & ~ordinaUon (assumes Precsion
. planning provides ail pe~nent info~aUon for
mapping) .... I ' 0 0.~
Engineering SUBTOTAL 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - ~ O' - 0 -
Geote~ni~l ~xploratlon & analysis & repeals · - - ' ' ~ - 0 0.~
Geometric layout ' ' ' ' [ - 0 0.~
Cons~c~on details .... ] * 0 0.~
Bridge .... ~ - 0 0.~
Channel erosion con~ol design and plans - - ' - J - 0 0.~
Bike palh ramp design and ¢epatr at bddge on~y .... ~ - 0 0.~
Drainage ....
Joint trench plans (re~ew only) ' ' ' - ~ . - 0 0.~
Lands~plng and I~gaQon plans .... ~ - 0 0.~
Lighting and signals
Stage ~ns~c[ion and ~affic handling ' * ' * ~ - 0 0.~
Pavement detineaUon : ' ' ' ' ~ - 0 0.~
Response to ~mments · . . . ·
Q~C ' ' - ' ~ - 0 '0.~
0 .... I ' O 0.~
Construction Suppo~ Se~lces SUBTOTAL - 0 - 0 - O * ] 0 - 0 .
. RE file (not included In ~ls scope of se~ces) ' ' ' ' ~ * 0 O.~
Cons~ction bidding suppo~ (not Included In this
' ' ' ' ' I ' 0 0.~
Post award assistance (Dublln to pro,de ~ns~c~on ~
SUBTOTAL ' - 0.~
y:~etly[dub~in~copo[Engcs~.xls Labor Page
COST PROPOSAL. LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Ra,~sad: 7/6/00 8:43 PM
~roJect Management & Administration
AdmlnlsEaUon / Invot~s (8) ' -
Mon~ly Progress Repods / S~edule (8) ...... I O ' O.~
Sub~nsultant CoordinaUon ...... I O · O,~
~ff mee~ng (1)
Mee~ngs/Agen~ Coordinaaon (4) ...... ~ 0 O.~
~e~lts and Public Outreach SUBTOTAL 0 - 0
Publi= Outrea~ ...... I 0 O.~
Pe~its (Co~s, Fish&Game. Water Quality, Zone 7) ...... I 0 O.~
~tlllty~ ~ght~f-Way Engineering & Su~eys SUBTOTAL 0 - 0 - 0 * 0 - 0 - 0 ' I 0 .
Utility plans & ~ordlnatlon (assumes Precston
I
planning provides all pennant intonation for
mapping) : - · . - - -. . ~ 0 0.~
SUBTOTAL 0 - 0
EnglneeHng
Geoledmi~l exploration &analysis & reports 8 373 50 1.683 42 1,084 18 322 7 109 18 325 ~ 143 3,894.80
Geome~clayout · ' ' - ' ' - - - ~ 0 . 0.~
Cons~cfion delails ...... ~ 0 0.~
BHdge
Channel erosion ~nEol design and plans ...... .~ 0 0.~
Bike pa~ romp design and repair at b~dge only ...... ~ 0 0.~
' Drainage ' ' ' ' '
Joint ~en~ plans (re~aw onty) ' '
Lands~ping and i~ga~on plans ' ' .... I 0 0.~
Llgh~ng and signals ' ' ' " ' ' ' / 0 O.~
S~ge ~ns~ion and traffic handling ' - ' ' ' - ~ 0 O.~
Pavemeni delineation ......
Response lo ~mments ' ' ' .... / 0 0.~
Q~QC ...... / O 0.~
Sped~ons ..... ' / 0 0.~
.Cons~c~on ~st esllmates ...... / 0 O.00
SUBTOTAL=
Cons~ctlon Suppo~ So,Ices ~ 8 373 50 1,683 42 1,084 j 18 322 7 109 18 325 143 3 894.80
RE ~le (not In~uded in ~ls s~pe of se~lces) ' : ' ' ' -
C~s~c~on bidding suppo, (not Included In ~ls scop~ ...... / 0 0.~
Post award assistan~ (Dublin to pro,de cons~c~on ~ ' ' ' ' - ' ' ' ' ' / ' 0 0.~
SUBTOTAL 0 - 0 - 0 ' -' 0 - 0
~ ._ ~'~
Dublin Boulpv_~a,.rd Widening Project B~4.~: 7/6/00 8:43 PM
Pro]ecl Management & Admlnlsl~ell~'"
Admtnislraliorl / Invoices (8) B6 $ 1,824.00
Monthly Progress Reports I Schedule (8) 56 $ 1,624.00
Subconsultant Coordination 1o4 $ 3,{N4.00
Kick-off meeling (1) lg $
Meetings/Agency Coordination (4) 60 $ t0093.70
SUBTOTAL 301 $ 9,'/61
Permits and Pub0c Outreach
PubticOutreach 90 $ 2,968 12
Perm s (Corps, F sh&Game. Water Guaffiy. Zone 7) 128 $ 4,180.00
SUBTOTAL 218 $ 7,148
Uflllty~ Right-or-Way Engineering & SurVeys ,
Utility plans & coordinalion (assumes Precslon
planning provides all pertinent informaL!on for
, mapping) t08 $ 2,920.00
SUBTOTAL 108 $ 2~920.00
Engineering
Geotechnicalexploration & analysis & reports 151 $ 4,t86.80
Geometric layoul 52 $ 1,308.00
Construction details 106 $ 2,786.00
Bridge 460 $ 12,500.00
Channel erosion control design and plans 78 $ t,922.00
Bike path ramp design and repair at bridge only 78 $ t,922.00
Drainage 76 $ t,942.00
Joint trench plans (review only) 20 $ 586.00
Landscaping and Inrigat!on plan~ 258.5 $ 7,309.50
Lighting and signals 216 S 8.932.B0
Stage construction and traffic handling 82 $ 2.370.00
Pavement delineation 78 $ 1,922.00
Response tocomments $0 $ 1,482.00
OMQC 48 S 1,808.00
Specifications 106 $ 3,068.90
Col~strucllon cost estimates 88 $ 2,599.02
SUBTOTAL 1945.8 $ 63,615
~onstructlon Snpport Services
RE file (not included tn this scope of se~/ices) ~ 0 $
ConslnJClion bidding supped (not included in this scope 0 $
Post award assistance (Dublin lo provide constmcUon s 0 $
SUBTOTALJ 0
y:~etty'~dublin',scope'~Engcst2.xts Labor Page
Printed: ?/6/00 8:44 PM
MKC Job NO. 2262 {. ('
SUMMARY
Dublin Boulevard Widening - Phase 1 and Phase 2 Fee Estimates
I Labor I ODCs I Fee I TOTAL
Phase 1 (with adjustments for revised scope)
MKC t$ 44,713.41 $ 805.00 $ 4,471.3415 49,989.75
PAMj $ 16,978.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 1,697.80t $ 31,675.80
Chaudhary $ 30,880.07 $ 19,700.00 $ 3,088.01 IS 53,668.08
Kleinfelder $ - $ - $ $ -
Fehr&Peers $ 7,178.54 $ 250.00 $ 717.85 $ 8,146.39
Haygood $ - $ - $ $
Subtotal Phase I $ 99,750.02 $ 33,755,00 $ 9,975.00 $ 143,48,0.02-:
Phase 2
MKC I$ 136,025.28 I$ .4,100.00 $ 13,601.50 IS ' 153,726.78
PAMt $ 13,416.31 IS 15,850.00 $ 1,34!.63 t~ 30,607.94
Chaudhary I $ 22,500.00t $ - $ 2,250.00 I$ 24,750.00
IKleinfeldert $ 11,372.82 I$ 4,858.00 $ 1,137.28 IS 17,368.10
;Fehr&Peers iS' 17,636.58 $ 995J00 i $ 1,763.6615- 20,395.24
Haygoodt $ 16,449.72 . $ 2,577.2315 1,644.97I $. 20,671.92
Subtotal Phas'~ 2 $ 217,400.71 $ 28,380.23 $ 21,739.04 $ 267. ,5.,19.98-
TOTAL = l$ 317,150.73 I $ 62,135.23 I $ 31,714.04 J $ 411,000.00
j:~262\admin\contracts\budget\Total Fixed Fee.xls Sheet1
COS [ PI~.OPO.S,',L - LAP, OR OHLY
.......... Dublin Boule?.(d Widening Project Ra,'---~: 7~8/00 8:43 PM
4~;~i~! ~! ~!~!~ i~ii:;!~:i~j~:4!i?~d~!'~.~ , ~:~i~F~ii~[:~:[:q~ii~ii~i~ii' :..:.=~'.=:~ =. ~ ::....;~ ;.... ~.: .... ':'.;.::.: ' . " · '.. ,'..:.: ........... · ....... ..~,&:.¥."": .... ' /: .. ::':'..':. : · ·
;:~:~;[~{i~,.;;~;~.?F;i~[~ :;~l~f~' ~][ [~jl~.:~[~[~'~ ~ j[ ~;',~:~,~'~'=[~[ ?' P~] pfln ;~.-::~ :: :~":~ ':S~ E~ d~er':~'. ¥2 :. L:::';"~ ~ ~'~: ::.'~ '~: -' I~ ~ '" .... ' .... ~h~ &Peem To a
'~?~X~,~j~,~:~:~;~r~;~ ~[~ ~r~;~l~- .;~::'.. :~ ~:::'~:= , :: .... ~:... :~.~'~;.~::",~.-~,.~:.~.~" ~-. ...... ~',~ ~.~, .~: ~;.~..~.~..: =: .r~ :~.~ ?': '..~= ~-. ~,:: .~..': ............ ,..:~:' ·
Project Management & Administration .....
Admlnls~a~on I Invol~s (8) 0 0.~
Mon~l~ Progress Repo~s / S~edule (8) O
8ub~nsultanl CoordinaBon 0 0.~
Ktck~ff mee~ng (l) 3 ~ 3 g~.5t
Mee~ngs/Agency Coordlna~on {4) 6 199 ~ 4 83 10 281.70
SUBTOTAL 0 9 299 0 ~ 83 13 38S.21
Pe~l~ and Public Outreach
Public Oulrea~
Pe~l~s (Co~s, Fish&Game, Water Quall~. Zone 7) 0 0.~
0
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0
Uflll~, Right-of-Way Englneedng & 8u~eys
U~lity plans & ~ordinafion (assumes Precsion
planning proqdes all pennant Info~a~on for
mapping) . - 0 0.~
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0
Engineering
Geotechnical exploralion & analysis & reports 0 0.~
Geome~c layout
Cons~clion delalls 0 0.~
0 0.00
B~dge 0 0.~
Channel erosion conbol design and plans 0
Bike pafl~ ramp design and repair at bridge only 0
Oralnage
Joint tren~ plans (reVieW only) 0 0.~
0 0.~
Lands~ping and IrHgatio~ plans ' * O 0,~
Ughting and slgna)s ~6 938 40 1.327 60 t,~28 ~ 1.654 1~ 5.346,~
Siege ~nsl~cUon and traffic handling
Pavement delineelio~ 0
Response to ~mments .
O~QC O 0.~
0 O.00
~peci~tlons 4 235 8 265 12 286 2 41 26 826.~
Construction cost eslimates 4 235 4 133 8 190 2 4 ~ 18 599.02
SUBTOTAL 24 1.40~ 52 ~,725 80 1.904 84 1.736 240 6.772.72
Conslmcllon Suppo~
RE file (not ln~uded In ~Is scope o~ se~l~s) 0 0,~ i
Cons~cfion bidding suppo~ (not Included in thls scop~ 0 0.00
Post award assistance (Oublln lo provide ~ns~c~on ~ 0
SUBTOTAL ~ - 0 . 0 - 0
: 24 %408 61 2,023 80
'.
v:~llv~ublin~scooe~Eno~12 xl~ 1 abor Page
COST PROPOSAL - LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 7/t~00 8:43 PM
ProJ Prtn I ProJ Mgr Landscape Assoc Jr Landscape Archl! CADD Tach' Field Tach Clerical HAYGOOD Total
~'~,¥~:s:t.~,~=~;;~![,!{~i~!~!~ ~::;[;3~,'i~;~i~.: j:~:~. ~ :'.~:':~. ~',~: :..~'~:.' "~:.~=:~:~.E~ b 0 r ,Rat o :~,I $ 45.00 ' $ 26.00 $ 15.00 $ 25.00 $ 17.00 $ $4.00
~N~p~{~3~-~-~.JjJ~j~J~.~`.-`.~.~i~`;:~:~J~J~!~~:~ :~Hours. ' ·Cost.: ~! .H~um'...',i..:=':!Cost. Hours Cost 'Hours 'Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours· Cool
Project Management & Administration ' ' '
Admlnlsffation I Invoices (8) 0 0.00
Monthly Progress Roporls / Schedule (8} 0 0.00
Subconsultaot Coordination 0 0.00
~J~-off meeting {1) 0
Meetings /Agency Coordination (4) 0
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
Permits and Public Outreach
Public Outreach 0 0.00
Permits (Corps, Fish&Game, Water Quality, Zone 7) 0 0.00
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Utlllty~ Right-or-Way Englneertng & Surveys
Utilily plans & coordination (assumes Proc. sion
planning provides ail pertinent Information for
mapping) 0 0.00
SUBTOTAL 0 ~' 0 0 0 0 0 0
Englneertng
Geotechnlcal exploration & analysis & I'eports 0 0.00
Gaomel~c layoul , - 0 0.00
Conslmctlon details 0 0.00
Bridge 0 0.00
Channel erosion control design and plans . - 0
Bike path ramp desigri and repatr at bridge only ' 0 0.00
Drainage 0 0.00
Joint lrench plans (review only) 0 0.00
Landscaping and irrigation plans 27,5 1,238 211 5,48§ 238.5 8,723.50
Lighting and signals 0
Siege construction and traffic handling -' ', 0 0,00
Pavement delineation
Response to comments 0 O.L
QA~C o o.ool
SpecJticetlons 0 0.0{3
Cons~'uction cost estimales 0
SUBTOTAL 27.5 1,238 21 $ 5,486 0 0 0 0 238.5 6,723,50
Construction Support Services
RE file (not Included in this scope of services) 0 0,00
Consth. lctlon bidding suppofl (not Included tn Ihls scop! ~ ~' - 0 0.00
Post award assistance (Dublin to provide oonslrucflon., 0 0.00
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0
{ PAYMENT SCHEDULE (
The method of payment for this contract will be based on actual costs plus fixed fee.
(' The City will reimburse the Consultant for actual costs (including labor costs, employee benefits',
travel, overhead and other direct costs) incurred by the Consultant in performance of the work,
exclusive of any fixed fee, not to exceed the mount of THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY NINE
THOUSAND TWO HLrNDRED EIGHTY FIVE DOLLARS AND NINTY SIX CENTS
($379,285.96). Actual costs shall be based on the estimated wage rates and other estimated costs set
forth in the Consultant' s cost proposal unless otherwise authorized by the City Council in writing.
In addition to the actual costs, the City will pay the Consultant a fixed fee as set forth
and attached hereto in Consultant's (MK Centennial) proposal dated July 6, 2000 in the amount of
THIRTY ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FOURTEEN AND FOUR ($31,714.04). The
fixed fee is nonadjustable for the term of the contract except in the event of a change in the scope of
Work and such adjustment is made by contract amendment. The fixed fee shall be billed monthly at
the ration that the Direct Labor Costs incurred during the billing period bears to the maximum total
estimated Direct Labor Cost for this Agreement, with any un-billed fixed fee being paid upon the
satisfactory completion of the scope of services hereunder.
The total amount payable b3; the City, including the fixed fee, shall not exceed
FOUR HUNDRED ELEVEN THOUSAND AND ZERO cENTS ($411,000.00).
Consultant shall submit invoices on a monthly basis based of the actual cost for
services performed in accordance with the cost qstimate included in the Consultant's (MK
· - Centennial) proposal dated July 6, 2000. The mo. nthly invoices shall also include a portion of the
fixed fee determined in accordance with the provisions of the second paragraph of this Exhibit B.
The total amount, actual cost plus fixed fee stated above, shall be the total which
( City shall pay for the services to be rendered by Consultant Pursuant to this Agreement. CiD' shall
" not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost 'whatsoever incurred by Consultant in rendering
services pursuant to this Agreement
City shalI makeno payment for any extra, further or additional service pursuant ..... to....
this Agreement unless such extra service and the price therefor is agreed to in writing executed by
the City Manager or other designated official of City authorized to obligate City thereto prior to the
time such extra service is rendered and in no event shall such change order exceed twenty-five
percent (25%) of the initial contract price.
The services robe provided under this Agreement may be terminated without cause
at any point in time in the sole and exclusive discretion of City. If the Agreement is terminated by
City, Consultant shall be entitled to r~ceive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory
work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. In
that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials shall, at the option of the City,
become City's sole and exclusive property. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims
for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate
logs and timesheets in order to verify costs incurred to date,
Exhibit B
Page 1 of 1
07/t 0/00
EXHIBIT C
City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference
space, as may be reasonably necessary for Contractor's use while consulting with City employees
and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quantity, and
time of furnishing said physical facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall
City be obligated to furnish any facility which may involve incurring any direct expense,
including, but not limiting the generality of this exclusion, long-distance telephone or other
communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities.
Exhibit C
Page 1 of 1
07/10/00
EXI-IIBIT D
( GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. At all times during the term oftkis Agreement, Consultant
shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right
to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's engineering services rendered
pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which
Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to tiffs Agreement.
2. LICENSES; PERMITS; ETC. Consultant represents and warrants to City that he has all
licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature, which are legally required
for Consultant to practice his profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that
Consultant shall, at his sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this
Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to
practice his profession.
3. TIME. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this
Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance, of Consultant's
obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
4. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise
(" from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors. The cost of such insurance shall be included in the
Consultant's bid.
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering
comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL
0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance
Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG
0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile
Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025.
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers Liability Insurance.
B. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no tess than:
(1) General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and propmx~y damage. If commercial General Liability
Exhibit D
Page 1 of 5
07/10/00
Insurance or .other fOrm with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general..
aggregate limit shall' apply separately to this project/location or the general. ~'
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (
(2)Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily
injury and property damage.
(3) Workers Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers Compensation limits
as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability
limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
C. Deductibles and self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must
be declared to and approved by' the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall
reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its
officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing
payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
D. Other Insurance Provisions. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the
following provisions:
(1) General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages,
(a). The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered ('
.... as insureds as~resp.ects:~ ;1/ability.arising out.of activities performed by or ~
on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant, premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitatio~ns on the scope of the protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(b) The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects
the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance
or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officerS, officials, employees
or volunteers shall be excess Of the Consultant's insurance and shall not
Contribute with it. '
(c) Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not
affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials;employees or
volunteers.
(d) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
Exhibit D
Page 2 of 5
07/10/00
(2) Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage.
'( The insurer shall agree to waive all' rights of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
.... performed by the Consultant for the City.
(3) Professional Liability.
Consultant shall carry professional liability insurance in an amount deemed by the
City to adequately protect the City against liability caused by negligent acts,
errors or omissions on the part of the Consultant in the course of performance of
the services specified in this Agreement.
(4) All Coverages.
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either'party, reduced in
coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified
mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
E. Acceptabilitv of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of
no less than A:VIII.
(. E~, Verification of CoveraCe. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and
~.. with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates
.:and endorsements for each insurance policy ~are to be signed by a person authorized by
that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right
to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any'time.
H. The Risk Manager of City may approve a variation of those insurance requirements upon
a determination that the coverages, scope, limits 'and forms of such insurance are either
not commercially available or that the City's interests are otherwise fully protected.
5. CONSULTANT NO AGENT. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no
authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent.
Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City
· to any obligation whatsoever.
6. ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITED. No party to this Agreement may assign any right or Obligation
pursuant to this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of an5, right or obligation
pursuant to this Agreement shall be void and of no effect.
Exhibit D
Page 3 of 5
07/10/00
7. PERSONSXlEL. ConSultant shall assign only competent persormel to perform services pursuant to
· this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this
Agreement, desires the removal of any such persons, Consultant shall, immediately upon
receiving notice from City of such desire of City, cause the removal of such person or persons.
8. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall perform ali services required pursuant to
this Agreement in themanner and according to the standards observed by a competent
practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged in the geographiCal area in which
Consultant practices his profession. All instruments of service of whatsoever nature which
Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Agreement shall be prepared in a substantial, first
class and wor .kmantike manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a
person practicing in Consultant's profession.
9. HOLD HARMLESS AND RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULTANTS. 'Consultant shall take all
responsibility for the work, shall bear all losses and damages directly or indirectly resulting to
him, to any subconsultant, to the City, to City officers and employees, or to parties designated by
the City, on account of the negligent performance, unforeseen difficulties, accidents, occurrences
or other causes predicated on active or passive negligence of the Consultant or of his
subconsultant. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials, directors, employees and agents from and against any or .all loss, liability, expense,
claim, costs (including costs of defense), suits, and damages of every kind, nature and description
directly or indirectly arising from the negligent performance of the work. This paragraph shall
not be construed to exempt the City, its employees and officers from its own fraud, willful injury ~,.
or violation of law whether willful or negligent. For purposes of Section 2782 of the Civil Code
the parties hereto recognize and agree that this Agreement is not a construction contract. By
· execution of this Agreement Consultant acknowledges and agrees that he has read and . .:
understands the provisions hereof and that this paragraph,is a material element of consideration.
Approval oft he insurance contracts does not relieve th~'Consultant or sub-consultants from
liability under this paragraph.
10. ' GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by
fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant shall comply with ail applicable
roles and regulations t° which City is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program.
This may included but not limited to:
a) Representatives of the City, State of California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) or the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) shall have access to review
alt'' relative documents to the project, including but not limited to accounting records,
design reports, design calculations, construction documents and other docUments as
outlined in paragraph 11 DOCUMENTS.
Exhibit D
Page 4 of 5
07/10/00
b) The Consultant agrees that the Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR,
Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31 et seq., shall be used to
determine the allowability of individual items of cost to be paid by City to Consultant.
c) The Consultant also agrees to comply with Federal procedures in accordance with 49
CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative
Agreements to State and Local Governments.
d) Any costs for which payment has been made to consultant that are determined by
subsequent audit to be unallowable under 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations
System, Chapter 1, Part 31 et seq., or 49 CFR, Part 18, uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments
shall be repaid by Consultant to City.
e) For the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code Section 10t 15,
et.seq] and Tkle 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21 Section 2500 et seq.,
when applicable, and other matters connected with the performance of the contract
pursuant to Governmental Code Section 8546.7, the Consultant, sub-consultants and the
City shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting record, and other evidence
pertaining to the performance of the contr.act, including but not limited to, the cost.s of
administering the contract. All parties shall make such materials available at their
respective offices at all reasonable times during the contract period and for three yea[.s
from the date of final payment under the contract. The City, State, the State Auditor,
(
FHWA, or any duly authorized representative of the Federal government having
jurisdiction under Federal laws or regulation (including the basis of Federal funding in
whole or in part) shall have access to any books, records, and documents of the
Consultant that are pertinent to the contract for audits, examinations, excerpts, and
transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested.
f) Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract shall contain all of the
provisions of this article, paragraph 10 GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS.
11. DOCUMENTS. All reports, data, maps, models, charts, designs, plans; studies, surveys,
photographs, memoranda or other written documents or materials prepared by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of City upon completion of the work to be
performed hereunder or upon termination of the Agreement. No such mater/als or properties
produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights, or
patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express
written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (as may be
limited by the provisions of the Califomia Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use,
copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics;forms or other
materials or properties produced under this Agreement.
Exhibit D
Page 5 of 5
07/10/00
( CITY OF DUBLIN (
BUDGET CHANGE FORM
.... CHANGE FoRM #
New Appropriations i'C!ty Council Approval Required): Budge~ Transfers:
From Unappropriated Reserves From Budgeted Contingent Reserve (1080-799.000)
(If Other than General Fund, Fund No - Within Same Department Activity
x From New Revenues (unspent FY 99'00 budgeted 'Between Departments (City Council Approval Required)
STIP funds) Other:
Name: Name: Dublin Boulevard Widening $50,000
Village Parkway to Sierra
Account #: Account #: 219-96920-740-078
Name: Name:
Account #: Account #:
Name: Name:
Account #: Account #:
Name.: Name:
Account #:' Account #:
Name: .Name:
Account #: Account #:
City Manager: .' Date: Signature
Signature
REASON FOR BUDGET CHANGE ENTRY:
$50,000 of STIP funds was previously allocated in FY 99-00. Moving these available grant funds to
FY 00-01 will Provide a total of $267,000 of STIP funds for the preparation of PS&E.
Mayor: Date: Signature
Posted By: Date: Signature
..
· EXHIBIT "A" OF RESOLUTION Iq~ -01
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
. BETWEEN CITY OF DUBLIN AND WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTUI~ SERVICES
' (formerly MK Centennial) FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
WttEREAS, the City of Dublin (hereinafter referred ~o as "CITY") and Washington
Infrastructure Services (formerly MK Centennial)-(hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"), entered
into an agreement on November 16,. 1999 for Preliminary Engineerh~g and Environmental Services for the
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project between Village Parkway and Sierra Court; and
WHEREAS, the City amended the agreement on July. 18, 2000 to extend the scope of
work to include the preparation of Plans, SpecificatiOns and Estimates; and
WHEREAS, the Scope of WOrk to be performed is proposed to be extended to include
additional right of way survey work, bike path wall and Creek slope protection design, additional
landscaping and signal interconnect design, other miscellaneous work, and design services during
construction;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
· Scope of Work
The Scope of Work shall be modified as described in Consultant's Amended Scope of Services -
Phase 2 dated November 13, 2001 for the Dublin Boulevard Widening Project between Village Parkway
and Sierra Court (attached).
Extension of Term
The total cost for time-and-materials Wo~{-k under this amendment shall not exceed an additional
$139,164.
CITY OF DUBLIN
~James H} Lundell, Vice President
Date:
EXHIBIT
A Professional Services Agreement Between
CITY OF DUBLIN
(CITY)
and
WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
(formerly MK Centennial)
(CONSULTANT)
for the
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
AMENDMENT NO. 2
SCOPE OF SERVICES
INDEX DESCRIPTION PAGE
INTROI)IJCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 2
1o Revised RYW ................................................................. : ................................................................... 2
2. Supplemental S.urveys ...................................................................................................................... 2
3.' Utility Design and Coordinatiorra .................................................................................. ~ ................. 2
4. Dublin San Ramon Service District (DSRSD) Coordinatign and Desigr~ ............ : .......................... 2
5. ' Zone 7 Coordination and Design of Erosion Protection and Ouffalls ................................ ~ ............. 3
6.:Specifications Special Provisions with City Boiler Plate ................................................................. 3
7. Left-turn Pocket Alternatives ..................................................... ;....: .................... : ........................... 3
8. Landscape Alternatives .................................................................................................................... 3
9. Landsc. aping and Irrigation ......................... . ...................... ~ ................................ ; .............................. 3
10.Civic Center Plaza Design ..................... : ............................................................................. · ........... '.3
11. Stage Construction Plans, Revised Structural Section and Overlay. ............................................ ,.4
12: Drainage as-built research, design and details ............................................................................... :.4
. I3.Additional Meetings: ...................... [ ............................................................................................. ~...4
14.New SIC and dual meter service pedesta~ ........ . ........ : ................... : ..................... .'. .......................... 4
15.Bike path retaining Wall. .......................................... : ........................................................................ 4
16.Design Services During Construction (DSDC) ............................................................................... 5
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT November~3, 2001
Amended Scope of services- Amendment No. 2 ' ' Page
INTRODUCTION
This SCope of services covers the out Of scope work for the design phase of the project.
An amended schedule that identifies milestones, tasks and sub tasks, review periods, and coordination
activities associated with engineering and design is included as AttachmentA, "Design Schedule."'It
shows the amended time phased tasks to be performed for the required work.
1. Revised R/W
The original scope was to prepare one Set of R/W docUments that included appraisal map~, legals
descriptions and plats. The CONSULTANT prepared three sets of R/W docUments as follows:
· R/W documents were prepared for the project based on the approved roadway geometries
developed during the environmental clearance phase of the project.
· After the first set of R/W documents were issued, the City requested that the roadway geometrics
be modified to eliminate and reduce required R/W acquisition on three parcels at the beginning of
the project. The CONSULTANT modified the roadway geometries and revised and reissued the
R/W appraisal maps to reflect the requested changes.
· ARer. the second set of R/W documents were issued, the City requested that Public service
easements be added on four properties for use by the underground utility project work.
2o Supplemental Surveys
The original scope of services had additional sUrVeys to supplement aerial topography. During the course
of design, additional surveys points have been identified to refine and verify design features within to
project such as utilities, bike path, canal and miscellaneous featureS. Surveys on existing drainage facilities
· and other appurtenances will be obtained. Only One additional field day of surveys will b.e required (with
two days office time for compilation of said surveys).
3. Utility Design and Coordination ·
· Pacific Bell has an existing conduit structure on the south side of the existing bridge. When the bridge is
widened, the conduit structure will be temporary relocated and new structure built with the widened
bridge; The City requested the CONSULTANT coordinate with Pacific Bell for relocation of their conduit
structure. The CONSULTANT coordinated with Pacific Bell to detail a conduit bracket and opening for
the existing facilities and a new bracket and utility opening for the new facilities. The CONSULTANT
will prepare a segregated construction cost for the CITY to bill Pacific Bell for these construction items.
In addition, the 'City requested the coNsULTANT design utility oPenings/attachments on the widened
bridge for several utilities from the underground utility district including.
4. Dublin San Ramon Service District (DSRSD) Coordination and Design
The City requested the CONSULTANT incorporate the sign relocation for DSRSD into the contract
documents for the project. In addition, the CONSULTANT will also incorporate the new reCYcled water
line design for DSRSD into the contract documents. DSRSD will provide the CONSULTANT with their
design plans 'and specification notes, and the CONSULTANT will attach the plans to the project plans and
special provisions and modify the engineer's estimate and boilerplate accordingly.
The City requested the CONSULTANT prepare an engineer's estimate with segregated costs for the two
additional packages to be added to the' project documents for the. utility underground district work and
DSRSD reclaimed waterline.
l:~2262~dmln~2ontracts\phase2~mend l~nendment scope.doc
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WTDENING PROJECT -. November ~3'~ 200~
Scope of Services Page
The cONsuLTANT will track these' deSign costs .separately.
5o Zone 7 Coordination and Design of Erosion Protection and Outfalls
A Zone 7 66-inch RCP within the Project limits. The pipe will remain 'in place during construction under
the new widened bridge. The CONSULTANT will straddle the existing pipe. The ouffall structure for the
existing 66-inch RCP will be reconstructed during construction.'
The existing Alamo Canal has signs of erosion and scour below the existing bridge Structure as well as
subsidence aiongthe banks adjacent the bike trail. TheCity requested the CONSULTANT include
scour/erosion protection and repair into the project design. The CONSULTANT will prepare plan, cross-
sections and specifications for work in the canal to be submitted to Zone 7 for concurrence, and to COrps
of Engineers and Fish and Game for permit application to construct.
Three existing outfalls within the canal are approximately 300 mm above bottom of the canal that are
aggravating.the erosion and scour within the canal° These ouffall structures will be evaluated during
construction to determine if replacement is required.
6. Specifications Special ProvisiOn with City. Boiler Plate '
The original scope of services was'to Provide Caltrans specifications supplemented with Caltrans special
provisions. The CitY requested the CONSULTANT replace the sections 1 through 9 with the CitY
boilerplate, and incorporate language for "Buy America" and DBE/WBE goals. In addition, the CitY
requested that CONSULTANT replace Caltrans landscaping, signal and lighting specifications with
specifications provided by the CitY.
In addition, the CONSULTANT. will add two sections to the SSPs: one for. the underground joint trench
and a second for the DSRSD reclaimed waterline (see item 4 above for work associated with DSRSD).
The CITY's consultant for the joint trench will provide special provisions in Microsoft WORD format to
be added as a separate section to the SSPs. These SSPs will be in Imperial units consistent with the joint
trench work whereas the remainder of the contract,documents will be in metric units.
7. Left-turn Pocket Alternatives
The City requested the CONSULTANT to evaluate several design alternatives for the left-turn pockets
alOng Dublin Blvd. The CONSuLTANT prepared exhibits for the various alternatives for review and
comment by the CitY.
8. Landscaping Alternatives
The original scope of services for landscape design was to only landscape the one new median in front of
DSRSD property. The CitY requested the CONSULTANT to prepare landscaping alternatives to show
three different landscaping alternatives for the entire project including preliminary cost estimates for the
alternatives. The alternatives also included evaluating special architectural features on the widened bridge
and t° evaluate whether a planter could be placed on the existing bridge (additional dead load evaluation).
9. Landscaping and Irrigation
Based on the alternatives, the City selected a preferred alternative that requires new landscaping and
irrigation in all medians within the project except for the median on the bridge structure. The
CONSULTANT will prepare complete landscaping and irrigation plans for full landscaping within the
project. The new landscaping will include new interlocking pavers in the median throughout the project.
10. Civic Center Plaza Design
,The project will impact the entrance to City Hall that has a special design of interlocking pavers with
J:~22~2~.dmin\Contraots\phasc2~atcnd l\amendment scope.doc
DUBliN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT Novernber f3, 200f
Amended Scope of Services -'Amendment NO. 2 Page 4
concrete bands. Based on a field review and a future widening project' the cONsULTANT will Prepare.
construction details for a modificatiOn to the entrance of Civic. Ctnter Plaza on the west side only that '
/ncludes a reconstruction of the median nose, a new concrete band and reconstruction of the existing
interlocking paver pattern. The east side of the entrance will not be disturbed.
· 11. Stage Construction Plans, Revised' Structural Section and Overlay
The original ~cope of services did not include staging Plans and coordination for the utility underground
.~strict work. The City requested the CONSULTANT to prepare construction staging plans that
incorporates the utility underground work. In addition, the City requested the project include a full
overlayo.The stage construction plans will need to incorporate stages for temporary strippingfor stage 1
through 3 and a final stage for overlay and final stripping~
The City requested the CONSULTANT include plans, details and specifications for a complete overlay of
the project. The CONSULTANT will add' construction details and revise the typical sections, stage
construction plans (see above), quantities and specifications°
The City requested the CONSULTANT to reVise the plans to show a full dePth AC pavement for the
project. The CONSULTANT will revise the typical sections, quantifies and specifications.
12o Drainage as-built research, design and detailS.
The original scope of service assUmed that existing as-builts and calculations would be available for the
project. The City did not have as-built information for the existing drainage systems within the project. As
a result, the City instructed the CONSULTANT to research as-builts at Alameda'County and Zone 7 for
as-built data. No data was found on these systems. Therefore, the CONSULTANT is required to perform a
field survey of the existing system, obtain additional surveys (see supplemental Surveys above), and
prepare drainage details' for a new drainage system in addition to extending the existing drainage systems.
13} AdditiOnal Meetings.
The original scope of services only had budget for a total of six meetings. Additional meetings are
required and the estimated number of additional meetings is as follows:
DescriPtion No. Meetings
Progress Meetings 4
Agency Meetings 4 ........
Zone 7
DSRSD
Utility Meetings 2
TOTAL 10
14~ New SIC and Dual Meter ServiCe Pedestal
TheCITY requested the installation of new signal interconnect cable (SIC) from Village Parkway to C1ark
Avenue. The project limits and design drawings curre6tly did not originally include Village Parkway to
Clark. Avenue. An additional sheet is required to add interconnect plans to show conduit, pull boxes~ and'
· connection point to the traffic controller at Village parkway.
15. Bike Path Retaining Wall
At a meeting among the CITY, Zone 7, Kleinfelder and'WIS, the CITY requested a retaining wail be .
added to the scope of services to repair the failing slope along the bike path under Dublin Blvd.
Approximately 40 meters (120 feet) of new wall wiI1 be added to the contract documents. The new Wall
J:~262ka. dmin\ContraCtS~hase2~Unend l~mendment seope.do~
DUBUN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT Nov~nber f3, 200f
Amended Scope of Services - Amendment No. 2 Page 5
height will be, approximately 1 to 1.2 meters (3 to 4 feet) of exposed face. Additional geotechnical analysis
willbe required for the pile support and be providedto the designers to complete a retaining wall design.
16. Design Services During Construction (DSDC)
The CONSULTANT will provide design services, during Construction that include response to bidder's*
questions, response to request for information (RFIs), and response to contract change orders (CCOs).
These services will be provided on a time a material basis during construction and are estimated at
$10,000~ These services exclude work by any subconsultants and do not include as-builts or a record of
~urvey.
3:~2262~_flmin\Contraets~phase2\amend l~nendment scope.doc
Dubiin Boulevard Widening ProjeCt COST PROPOSAL
AMENDMENT NO. 2
ORIGINAL CONTRACT ~MOUNT = ?~- t.~43~_72.2.2_~8
Amendm~t No. 2
WASHINGTON (~ CEN~N~L)
~D 208 $ ~,00 $ 6,240.~
DIRECT
~lng, Te~ne, Supp~s, Pho~ .... $ ~0.~
FEE $
PUBLIC A~AIRS ~GEMENT:
· UBTOTAL PAM $ $ 6~2~.74 $' 62,2~.74 ~ $ ~,2~.74
C~UD~RY & ASS~TES ......
Ordinal Budg~ ~a[ ~g~ I BudgM ·
SUB~TAL ~U~A~ $ $ 7S,418.~ $, 78,418,~ ~ $ 78,418.~
KLEINFELDER
~n Eng 0 $ 46.~ $
~ Mngr 17 $ ~ $ ' 572.05
DIRE~ ~R ~ j $ ~.45
S~T~ ~OR + 0~ ; $ 1,85Z59
DIRE~ ~8:
Midge $
. $U~TAL KLEINFE~ER$ .... 2~0~7.~ I $ 17,~.t0 ) $ 17,~.10 $ 19.405.g5
~HR & P~RS .
Houm Ra~ To~I
~gln~ 20 $ ~.80 $ 47~.~
DIRECT ~R ~ $ 824,~
SUBTOT~ ~ +~H~ $
~RE~ COST~
&UBTOT~ DIRECT ~S $ ~ R~l~t~ ~ To~ R~ed
Revised 11/13~'200t 1:~9 PM
J:~62~admln'contracts~hese2~ENGC~T2al.XL$ Labor +ODCs Page I of 6
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project COST PROPOSAL
AMENDMENT NO. 2
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT = i-'$ 143,722.28 ~ .
AMENDMENT NO, 1 =~ 267,277.72 I
.-
DESIGN AMENDMENT NO. 2 a ~ $ 139,164.30
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT = ~ $ SS0,164.30.
HAYGOOD & ASSOCIATES
LA~OR:
Hours Ra~e
~oj Pr~ IProj ~gr 25 $ 4~.00 $ ~,12~.00
Landscape Assoc t24 $ 26.0G $ 3,224,00
Jr Lands~apeAmh .O $ 15.00 $
3-~DD Tech 0 $ 25.~0 $
Field Tech 0 $ 18.75 $
~RECT LABOR . 149 $ 4,349.00
OVERHEAD.(~ 1.4486 $ 6,291.26
SUE;?O?AZ. LA,BOR + OVERHEAD $
~JBTOTAL L~BOR + OVERHEAD FOR CONSTRUCltON 8UPPORT ~ER~CE~ $
91RECT COST~
~rrlg~tion SubC°nsu~tan~ $ 3,END.00
Repl~uct]~s $ ~35.00
Delivery Charges $ 36.00
Mileage, tolls, pa~lnli $ 11
PmJec~ Equipment $ ,
I Reag~ ] To'~l Revise¢~
SUBTOTAL DIRECT CO~'I'$FEE $$ 4,38~.001.065.00 Orlgin,~l B.dget Oflgin~l Budge~ Bucl~et
e~uB'rOTAL HAY~OOD $ 16,09t.25 $ 20.671.92 ~ $ 20,671.92 $ 36.763.18
Revised 11113/200¢ I:09PM
J.~262~min~contra ct~ hase~ENGOST2a I .XL.S Labor + ODCs Page 2 of 6
COST PROPOSAL = L~U~OR ONLY . Dublin BoUlevard Widening Project
LABOR FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2
i proJMgr SrEng Eaglneer ' Cledeml WIS (MKC)
H0U~ ~t H~rs C~ ~ur~ Cost ] H~rs ~t ~ H~ Cost
2 Su~ Su~ 2 1~ 8 ~ 4 t20 t4 476.~
4 DSRSD CoOl.tim md ~sl~ 8 4~ ~ 1,~ 20 ~0 20 ~ 2 38
6 SSP; wIC~ ~ ~ 9 450 ~ 1,3~ 10 ~0 20 3~ 69 2,~.~
179 8,9~ 2~4 9,~ 2~ 9,~20 ~6 6,240 65.76 t,~9 ~1,75
CO,.%'T PRO~-~ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
LABOR FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2
I 1 Revtsed FL, W · ! -. 0 0.00
2 Supplemental Sun~eys I 0 0.00
3 UEility Design and ~on ~ . 0 0.~
4 DSRSD ~d~ ~d ~gn I 0 0.~ ~
/
o I ~z ~"1
0 ~ 4 ~ 21
Pege 4of6
y:~etty~ublln~c~e;NGCST2a I.XL~ Labor =~..,.,~. d.aa'a.'~w*~"a .~-~e mA
COST PROPOSAL- ~eOR C~L¥ Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Ra~ ~m~0o~ ~:o~ P~
LABOR FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2
I Revised PJW 0 O.O0
2 8~optemer~tal Surveys - 0 0.00
4 ~RSD ~na~ a~ Dad~ 0 0.~
5 Z~ 7 ~U~ end ~gn ~ E~ Pm~ - 0 0.~
6 ~wlQ~ B~er P~te 0 0.~
Pege 5 o~6 ~
y:.'ett,~dublin'~cope~ENGCST2at.XLS Labor e~,ax~ .;.~/s~r~r~s ~.na~ ~au
COST PROPOSAL - LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Re~= 11ti3/20011:09PM
LABOR FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2
~Pa wi Q~ B~ler Plate . 0
L~-~ ~ ~v~ 0 0.~
~ng N~s 8 ~0 24 624 32 9~.~
CMO ~er Pl~a 0 0.~
Bke pa~ ~nlng w&l - 0 0,~
Page6of6 ; '~