HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4.10 StreetLightPoleReplac
CITY CLERK
File # D[6]lQ]6]-ßJ5J
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 16, 2005
SUBJECT:
Award of Bid - Contract 05-09, Street Light Pole Replacement
Project, Phase 4
Report Prepared by: Melissa Morton, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
I)
2)
Resolution
Bid Results
J
Adopt the rcsolution awarding Contract 05-09, Street Light Pole
Replacement Project, Phase 4, to John Baker Construction
RECOMMENDATION:
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
The construction budget for this project is $201,235. The low bid of
$186,760 is within funds budgeted for construction. It is proposed
that $75,000 of the project cost be paid by Street Light Maintenance
Assessment District 83-1. The balance would be paid from the
City's General Fund.
DESCRIPTION: This is the fourth and final year of a four-year project to replace old
painted steel strect light poles in subdivisions that were constructed in thc 1960's. These ungalvanjzed
poles have deteriorated over time and many are corroded to thc point of needing replacement. The projcct
was originally conceived as a five- to six-year projcct; however, the work has been escalated due to the
potential risk caused by the dctcriorated poles. Approximately 234 poles have been replaccd in the first
threc phases of the project, and an additional 8 to 10 poles. have been replaced through the City's street
light maintenance contract with Alameda County. It is proposed to replace the remaining poles with the
2005-2006 project.
The 2005-2006 project is anticipated to replace approximately 112 poles in the area north of Amador
Valley Boulevard between 1-680 and San Ramon Road. The new poles would bc constructed of
galvanized steel, which has an estimated life span of 60 years or more. The galvanized poles would
rcduce ongoing maintenance costs (approximately $20,000 per ycar) by eliminating the need to paint the
poles every five years.
A total of four bids were received. The low biddcr is John Baker Construction, with a total bid of
$186,760. Staff has reviewed the low bidder's proposal and checked with references. Therefore, Staff
recommends that thc City Council adopt the resolution awarding Contract 05-09, Street Light Pole
Replacement Project, Phase 4, to John Baker Construction.
_____~~w_~_______________________~______~___________________w__
COPIES TO: Bidders
lÐ:b1
ITEMNO.~
g:lmiseprojlst lite pole OS.06lsgst award
l~d-
RESOLUTION NO. - 05
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
...,....1$ * ill"" *. f¡ III,... "",....
AWARDING CONTRACT 05-09
STREET LIGHT POLE REPLACEMENT, PHASE 4
TO JOHN BAKER CONSTRUCTION
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin did, on August 9, 2005, publicly open, examine, and declare all
sealed bids for doing the work described in the approved Plans, Specifications, and Modifications for
Contract 05.09, Street Light Pole Replacement, Phase 4, authorized by the City Council on July 19, 2005,
which Plans, Specifications, and Modifications are hereby expressly referred to for a description of said
work and for all particulars relative to the proceedings under the request for bids; and
WHEREAS, said bids were submitted to the Director of Public Works, who has recommended
that the bid hereinafter mentioned is the lowest and best bid for doing said work;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does
hereby award City of Dublin Contract 05-09, Street Light Pole Replacement, Phase 4, to the lowest
responsible bidder therefor, to wit John Baker Construction with a bid of One Hundred Eighty Six
Thousand, Seven Hundred and Sixty Dollars ($186,760), the particulars of which bid are on file in the
Office of the Director of Public Works.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized to execute the agreement.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of August, 2005.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINING:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
g:\trti3CþroJ13thtflpolMlre.JOãwtd
'6-110- 05
(-+.10
wxiu.hm
-,
88 0
I 0
;¡¡!og 0
~
.....~œ r-.
go,..:", '"
~
"'0 N
011 N -- ,-
- ----
- - --'- >- 0
:2 00
0,
- 'on
l!!t:ißN
111:2"''''
:::>~
_.no -- -
--r'- 00 8
00
0...1«>0 ~
w«U)g ...
..J ..... (0 & r-
U O"':¡n '"
...", ~
>- ~
W
..J 88
""' -,-- C
~"'<':ig
mzt:"It"
:;:::::>~
-
...
~
a..
...
:2
w
:::¡¡
w
o
S
a..
w
a::
~
o
a..
!i:
I:)
::¡
tu
w
~~
'",
1110
...
..Jt¡,
:::>:$
:a~
a::
c~1
_0
alO
--- -----
~o g
00 _
o:a!g~ ~"
w............ - (0
..JO",<,> '"
UJt-~ '!"'"
2
is
--, 2 88
::J...o",
O-MT""
a:::!5 r-_ N
~
""'
I' "'I'" 00
00
-100
Cl;m~"
a::I-Ñ...
wO",
~...~
all __, ___
2 00
:I: 00
°....60
"'-<'>0
2""",
:::>,.:
- .-
-
o
o
o
Ie
g
~
N'"
~..-
f:~
a
2
0
¡;::
a..",
-UJ
5..JCI)
:aOUJ 0
<L..J
c~:( W
s... ~
o..¡;¡;
UJ< °
oco.. I-
-- -, ~N
::IE J
~
I
. ",' )
$d Ø-6uÆfS
'J1I:?-
:z