The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReso 46-05 EmeraldGlenPHIII RESOLUTION NO. 46 - 05 A RESOLUTION OF THE COY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * ~ . . . * A * * ft . * * * ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR PA 05-009, EMERALD GLEN PARK, PHASE ill WHEREAS, the project site is located in the eastern portion of the City of Dublin for which the City adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan to provide a comprehensive planning framework for future development ofland uses, including recreational facilities, for the area. In connection with this approval, the City certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (ElR) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15168 (SCH:91 103064, Resolution 51-93, and Addendum dated August 22, 1994, hereafter ("Eastern Dublin ETR or "Program EIR") which is available for review in the Planning Department and is incorporated herein by reference. The Program EIR was integral to the plal1IÙng process and examined the direct and indirect effects, cumulative impacts, policy alternatives, and areawide mitigation measures for development within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area; and WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ElR identified potentially sigIÚficant environmental impacts and related mitigation measures, which the City adopted together with mitigation findings and a Mitigation Monitoring Program (Resolution 53-93), which mitigation measures and mOIÚtoring program continue to apply to implementing projects within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed construction drawings for the third phase of Emerald Glen Park, in accordance with the Emerald Glen Park Master Plan, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR and the City's General Plan and pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65450 et seq.; and WHEREAS, the potential environmental effects of the proposed project have been previously addressed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EJR (SCH No. 91-103064), Additionally, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan in March 2004 which included the analysis of the significant environmental impacts of all parks currently proposed for development in the City of Dublin, including Phase HI of Emerald Glen Park; and, the Project is consistent with the permitted land uses and goals of the City's Emerald Glen Park Master Plan to provide recreational facilities to the public; and WHEREAS, the City prepared an Initial Study for P A 05-009 to evaluate the environmental impacts of constructing the third phase of Emerald Glen Park as described in the Emerald Glen Park Master Plan, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, and determined that the proposed project and the alternate physical elements would not result in any significant adverse impacts with the recommended mitigation measures incorporated into the project. Based on the IIÚtial Study, the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR, and the Emerald Glen Park Master Plan, it has been determined by the City Council that the impacts of the Project have been adequately identified and mitigated, and there have been no substantial changes or new infonnation identified that would be outside the scope of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR or the Mitigated Negative DeclarationlTnitial Study for the Project; and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, attached as Exhibit A, and Mitigation Monitoring Program, attached as Exhibit B, for P A 05-009 have been prepared for the Project with the finding that with the implementation of mitigation measures, and those incorporated into the Project, the potential site- specific impacts of the project would be reduced to a less-than-significant level; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed 20-day public review period was held for the Mitigated Negative Declaration, which began on February 22, 2005 and ended on March 14, 2005; and WHEREAS, a letter of comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration was received during the public review period from the California Department ofFish and Game summarizing the Department's policies, regulations, and guidelines related to assessment of wildlife and vegetation, Streambed Alteration Agreements, and de miIÚmiS detenninations related to changes to fish and wildlife; and WHEREAS, the improvements proposed in Phase TJT of the development of Emerald Glen Park have been designed to avoid impacts to Tassajara Creek, maintaining an adequate buffer of 100-feet from the top of the creek bank to any structure in accordance with the Eastern Dublin Comprehensive Stream Restoration Program adopted by the City in 1996. All structures proposed in this phase are located mllside the required IOO-foot buffer area near the creek by the adopted Eastern Dublin Comprehensive Stream Restoration Program; and WHEREAS, based on the record as a whole, there is no evidence that Phase IT! will have an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the related habitat. There are no special-status species of wildlife or vegetation in this area. A follow-up biological survey will be conducted prior to construction of trails and structures in this phase of park improvements to confirm that no species has recently located in the area proposed for construction. Additionally, a Streambed Alteration Agreement is not required for this project as all construction and project-related work will be outside the Tassajara Creek corridor. On the basis of substantial evidence in the record, the City has rebutted the presumption of adverse effect on fish and wildlife contained in 14 California Code Regulations Section 753.5(d); and WHEREAS, a Staff report was submitted recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration, as contained in Exhibit A, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, as contained in Exhibit B, tor Phase m of Emerald Glen Park; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a properly noticed public hearing on the project on March 15, 2005, at which time in their independent judgment reviewed and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all reports, recommendations and testimony before them. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the above recitals are incorporated in this resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council does hereby find that: A. The proposed Project is within the scope of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Program EIR, the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and the Emerald Glen Park Master Plan, and all associated environmental documentation. Site-specific environmental effects have been analyzed in an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (pA 05-009) which determined the project will not have a sigIÚficant effect on the environment with the implementation of mitigation measures identified in the program EIR, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and incorporated into the Project. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City that the project as mitigated will have a sigIÚficant effect on the environment. B. The Program EIR and Mitigated Negative Declaration P A 05-009 adequately describe the impacts ofthe project. As further discussed in the Initial Study, there have been no substantial changes in the project or new information which necessitate supplementing the program EJR pursuant to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 in that: 1. The proposed project complies with the land uses, densities and development policies of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan, and the Dublin General Plan. 2. There are no substantially changed circumstances that involve new or substantially more severe significant impacts. C. The mitigation measures identified in the Program ElR and the site-specific mitigation measures contained in the Mitigated Negative DeclarationllIÚtial Study for P A 05-009 are included in the Project description D. The Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with State and local environmental laws and guidelines. E. The Mitigated Negative Declaration is complete and adequate for the proposed project, and reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis as to the environmental effects of the proposed project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Exhibit A) and Mitigation Monitoring Program (Exhibit B) for P A 05- 009, Emerald Glen Park Phase TH, including the Initial Study incorporated herein by reference. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this 15th day of March 2005, by the following votes: AYES: Councilmembers Hildenbrand, McCormick, Oravetz and Mayor Lockhart NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Zika ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: cJ, . EGParkNegDcc (Item 6.4) (i:\PA#\2005\05-oO')\CC R~MND.doc ,. "". ',." ""'. ,~ ....>;;.~ ,~,J" ·,4)..,j:·¡.... ,..~.z>' ~"""":"." ". ·~t\ ,,.¡iQ1 ~1\~ (.-., ['_ :'~I~Jö21)TY ()F . )US! IN ,~:, P,!~ . j))/-._~__._____~._~_____ ~ ¡' , ~,;:, ""~ ì()() <;¡'vIC P~a¿a, [Jw.:;lin, Cal1hxn¡¡:1 ~}4;)m:) :::/::,/i .?:\,~,:.~:;;:~.: .-.' MITIGATE.l:LNEGATIVE DEÇìLARATION February 22, 2005 .._,.~~~~",""' "ø,~..~_~".~____~~~'~~_~~,,~. ,,,,,.,,",..,.'~."''>IWoI,,.''',' '.'. """.. Wobni"te: http://www.ci.dublin.Ga.U8 (Prepared pursuant to City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines and the Califomia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines) Mitigated Negative Declaration For: PA 05-009 Emerald Glen Park Phase 111- Park Development Plan Description of Project: The project consists of the construction of the third phase of development of recreational features in the Emerald Glen Park located in the Eastem Dublin Specific Plan area. This phase of park development encompasses approximately 14 acres of City-owned property, and improvements to the land consist of soccer fields, bocce courts, a group picnic area and arbor, play areas, open meadow, a mini-arboretum, pathways, and a parking lot to serve this phase of the park. The park development phase is consistent with the Master Plan for Emerald Glen Part<: and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan adopted by the City in 2004. Project Location: 4201 Central Parkway, Dublin, CA 94568 Name of Proponents: City of Dublin Parks & Community Services 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Public Hearings: A public hearing will be held before the City Council on the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Project on Tuesday, March 15,2005, at 7:00 P.M. in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin. I hereby find that the above project will not have a significant effect on the environment with the mitigation measures incorporated in the project. A copy of the Initial Study ("Environmentallnformation Form" and "Environmental Checklist Form") documenting the reasons to support the above finding is available for review at the City of Dublin Community Development Department, Planning Division, at 100 Civic Plaza, Dubiin. Dated: February 22, 2005 - ( / Date PUblished: February 22, 2005 Date Posted: February 22, 2005 Date Notice Mailed: February 22, 2005 Conside ed ..b-y,' City Council on: c3 !:> " j/ Action on M I ad Negative Declaration: Approved _ Disapproved ".- Notice of DetermllJatlon filed: ~ Resolution No.l.fr, - ðS ¡-r- ., Area Code (9:75) . City Managor 833-13650 . City Counr~il f~:,~3..(5650 . Per50nnel 833-66ú5 . Economic Develöpf'Jiant 833-6650 Finance 833.6640 . f,]ublic WorkBfEnuinf'8ring ¡3:)3-6630 . Park!;; &. (;t)fI1munity Services 833-6645 . POljf.;A 033-6670 Planning/Code Enforcement ß33,661 0 . !3U1(~ing If')!;pectirm 833-6620 . Fire PfE:!vf;!,~(lol1 Bureau 833-6606 r'rintf:!ä Ofl fMcyclúcl Paper ASSESSOR'S .~ '"", '" .~. .~jj ~"'~ _ClOO " , ~,,(bO 'N-"'" " , .nNI'1 '0_0 ~-" ," no " , ~~~ ~~.!. OaD ~ 1 I I I I I j iz ,§1 1~ "" r I ,I ~~ f .j II , ~ \ ~.~1\'.'~\·~ r~¡\..~·· ,'./ ~ / \ '!:,t. ,,\£-___- /" . ~~ ~ M m.'B '·~I ~________________.\".----- J ~ 'l1li" _~_..- ~ CE:NIR.AL. --- ...,-..... 1 "I\"~'o \~( /#-Jù,""" ". '\ "'L -- C ~ If !J-~,:.~ C ____.----- ~ ":. " 20 'Y' - ~~,.., ___ \ "'~':'r.\ ~J -:. ß€.:O-~--- \ ~ANGOR COO~' r \' ".'.!I~. /' l~ ~ f~_ ~ _'t I ............ ~\ '" I ------ ~---.......... '-------. " " " " " " " " " " .' ,. I " , ~ \ "\. A.C.f.C.,1. , ' , , , , g.O' AC.;¡ /" " >' " I" 1/ .'1/ !:n~,~¡l·· I' " i " " " " " , ~~.,., S*~. ¡ ~c ",,' ~:{; I I I ! I ~ , ~ MAP 986 Code Area Nos. 26-012 'B' P.M.7257 ".1" '01 'c, P.M.7357 ,..17 ([J {f¡ , 26-013 , 25-0 P.M.7355 "5f" P. M. 7589 2B2I" P. M. 8187 "'/Iû- 15 12 12 CD \.\~. ~ 6 i I \ \ \ \ \ 5 " 'liIU' , 16 -,~ III ø <,-,;",,' // þ,A.CF,C. \".~!II , f,\ ,¡IIIIIII , \....:J If (.' ,~~~i)~;:"~'~;';"'"'''''' , III .... "I: l I:'o....\'-¢ I II! ~'¡ ""1" IC / N8I.¡Ij'.\!I"W ~ / GL.EASON I" 18 SAN ~ 8 u ~ . 19 M.i.G~LLAN -- IIICIt:Ní~ 18 .. - DRIVE 4:8(," ''UfS'7C Hi'MI'~'W t.. ~.~.I \,B~ l1li,. ~ 0)0 I\o.iII ¡j¡ 1.I'm·t ~ I'I!'>OT,~ 'G,~ /I !~'21' ·"v.liIr l ~., ...~/.!'P. ~M#'~!'r , , D (~'TII)'.IIi. AL,AMEDA COUNTY OFF!~~ OF ASSBSSOR FOR ASSESSMENT USE! ONLY NOl ¡¡OIl REPRODUCTJON OR 5,'..LE , tiT! ø .26. I \ AG.:t fl.1.6/¡ \ ~ ":.Yg~", \ ) t,,,,,"'" "" ~_~- "'~KWAY ,I ~~ f,jJ¡\, -~a~ ~,p'{ If }3'~., PAACEL , -", ® - " ~ COMMON A~[A 8.ZB ""C.:t ~ POR.I ,",," f>OR.1 @ CITY \2i1:.07 Þ-C..:I:.} 18.17 A(;.:t n . þ !IN!T I ® I \ L..--¥-, __________WAy _.........-- - ,+------+-.., ~ : UNIT "----, .3 :---~~): rt.'"ii--- ~ :5 , ;' UN 'M [~~1 EXHIBIT A - Assessor Parcel Map Page 6 City afDublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase ill P A 05-009 Febl11ar)' 22, 2005 Ir~ll ! LJI(Hæ~iendQ II r ìr If!1 " ! 'f I n I 0 I 'J .\ ~ I èT j I :J , - I çT' \)1 ~'r ,3 ~ < ~. () Q.. : ÇJ I ~ ( L ! ) ÇJ (' L£: ~! I , I ~ 11[ 11- j l l 5 ~ DriV~ ¡C0 ~ ÇJ (j) () :J. )1 l,J -; < ~ . .""'\'., _.~ ~:. ."""'f iL II ,I T0550Joro Rood I I ~' EXHIBIT B - Vicinity Map , Page 7 City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emcrald Glen Park, Phase ill P A 05-009 February 22, 2005 ; " ¡ j ~ , 'Ì ~,: "': i ti tf [ ~ " , r , " ¡ J i ! . ~ H, 0' ,i,~ ., !9~ i~ ;¡ ?, ~. z ~ - q " " ~ < '" > '. F ". "i " !:~ ~~ -, ~¡;. V. ,',I ~ . ., .¡ -, i :1· ·v .~ ~ f ~- H ?;, - . 1.' ~,. [ "íl1h~;'Ij.\I<"ij f((1!HI 8;'1'1'11' Ir ~,.¡¡....~ Jr¡¡¡d.*,~ fi~l.t.jIo EXHIBIT C - Emerald Glen Park Master Plan City of Dublin Initial Stu.dy & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Page 8 February 22, 2005 " o . " . ~ ¡ õ , n T ~ » '0 i 'Ì o W , "'" '" w -i -'- cr. ~ » '" ï , ; m ;;J --c¡ r :t> Z :< t IIÏ:: III !I¡...¡.·.·II..I...I.;...~. ·1' II" h' ·1 '. ·1"" , .' ~'. , >j A·itJt. ". !.! :trnIlJI!I"I" jI!I¡¡¡~~~¡ . "W¡lllh,¡¡ml , "I·!!tl:I~', i " -'......... -"'.." EXIllBIT D - Emerald Glen Park, Phase ill City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Nogative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase IIIP A 05.009 Page 9 Febmary 22, 2005 fA- os-- ð0'7 Emerald Glen Park: Phase III Initial Study File No.: P A 05-009 Lead Agency: City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 February 22, 2005 City ofDuhtin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Pagel February 22, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction............... .............. ..................... ........................................... ............................ 3 Project Description and Context ......................................................................................... 4 Exhibits.......................... ............................. ........................... ......... ..... ..................... .......... 6 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected..................................................................... 10 Determination............. .... ........... ......... .... ...... .... ....... ... .... ... .......... ........... ... ........ ........ ........ 12 EvaJuation of Environmental Impacts............................................................................... 13 Attachment to Initial Study ............................................................................................... 21 Discussion of CheckJist........ ........ ............. ............. ....... ............ ............... ........... ...... ........ 21 1. Aesthetics................................ ............................... ..............................................21 IT. Agricultural Resources ...... ............. ..................................... .... ............. ................22 TIT. Air Quality................. ................................... ........................................................22 IV. Biological Resources ......... ... ............................................... ................. ..... ...........27 V. Cultural Resources................................................................·.......·····..········..···...· 28 VI. Geology and Soils ................................................................................................29 VIT. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ........................................................................30 VITJ. Hydrology and Water ........................................................................................... 30 IX. Land Use Planning ...............................................................................................3I X. Mineral Resources.. ....... .............................. ............. ....................... .......... ........... 31 XI. Noise ...................... ...................... ............... ................................... ........... ........... 32 XU. Population and Housing .......................................................................................33 XllI. Public Services ....................... ...... ................... ........................................... .......... 33 XIV. Recreation...............................................................................··········..··..····..·····... 33 XV. TransportationlTraffic .......................................................................................... 33 XVI. Utilities and Service Systems ...............................................................................34 XVIJ. Mandatory Findings of Significance ....................................................................34 Background Infonnation ........................................................................................... ........ 36 References........................................................................................................................ . 36 City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigatod Negative Declaration Emeraid Glen Park, Phase IiI P A 05·009 Page 2 February 22, 2005 INTRODUCTION This Initial Study has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the 2005 CEQA Guidelines adopted by the City of Dublin. The Initial Study assesses the potential environmental impacts of implementing the proposed project described below. Tbe Initial Study consists of a completed environmental checklist, and a brief explanation of the environmental topics addressed in the cbecklist. 1. Project Title: 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: 4. Project Location: 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: 6. GeneraliSpecific Plan Designation: 7. Zoning: 8. Public agency required approvals: Emerald Glen Park Phase III, PA 05-009 City of Dublin Community Development 101 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Janet Harbin, Senior Planner Community Development Department (925) 833-6610 4201 Central Parkway APN: 986-0017-006-02 City of Dublin Parks & Community Services Dept. 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Contact Person: Rosemary Alex Development Coordinator, Parks and Facilities Parks/Public Recreation & City Park PD - Park Building and Grading Pennits (City of Dublin) Utility, Sewer and Water Service Pennits (DSRSD) Encroachment Pennits (City of Dublin) City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Page 3 February 22,2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND CONTEXT The development of Emerald Glen Park and conceptual plan for the Park was approved in June 1998 by the Dublin City Council. The basis for creation of the Park was the City's Parks and Recreation Master Plan which also defined specific program elements to be included in Emcrald Glcn Park, as there was a need for a large community park to serve the growing community in the eastern portion of Dublin. The City Council appointed a task force to study these program elements and design options from 1997 to 1998. Working with City staff and other members of the community, the various design options and associated prob'Tam elements were refined for the final Emerald Glen Park Master Plan presented to the City Council in June 1998. The Master Plan for the Park included such facilities to serve the community as sports fields and courts, play areas, plazas, picnic areas, restrooms and concession buildings, an aquatic center, trails and associated parking areas. Since the original conception of the plan for the Park, the City Council has adopted a new Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2004), which further refined the features and locations of the proposed facilities for five (5) distinctive phases of development in Emerald Glen Park, and particularly those to be constructed in Phase III of the Park. Emerald Glen Park is located near major transportation corridors such as Tassajara Road, Gleason Drive, Central Parkway and Interstate 580 within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment planning area of the City, ensuring convenient access for all members of the Dublin community. Its location in east Dublin is central to an area experiencing a great deal of growth at this time based on the implementation of the Specific Plan adopted in 1994. The existing land use development pattern and projected land uses in the east will likely double the size and population of the City within the next 20 years. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan directs the growth of infrastructure, community centers and parks such as Emerald Glen Park and other park sites to meet the future demands of the Dublin community under the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan provided the necessary land use framework for development of the 48.2- acre park site by establishing the goals, priorities and design parameters for development of each phase of the park. Phase I of Emerald Glen Park, which has been completed, encompasses 26.1 acres and includes the following recreational facilities: a. A playground with water features; b. A skateboard park; c. 2 ~ 60 foot ball fields; d. 1 - 90 foot baseball field; e. 2 regulation size soccer fields; f. 2 lighted basketball courts; g. 4 lighted tennis courts; h. A plaza and promenade; I. Restroom/Concession Building; J. Children's play area; k. Small picnic areas with tables and benches; and, 1. Parking and street frontage improvements. City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Dcclaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Page 4 February 22, 2005 The Phase II design improvements for the Emcrald Glen Park are currently under construction and include thc following fcatures: a. Water feature and arbor; b. Corporation/maintenance yard; c. Temporary parking; d. Street ftontage improvements; and, e. Activity center. The Phase III design improvements, the subject of this environmental analysis and evaluation, will provide the following recreational featurcs: a. 2 soccer fields with cricket overlay; b. Bocce courts; c. Group picnic area with arbor; d. Play areas; e. Mini-arboretum for native plants and vegetation; f. Open meadow; g. Parking and street ftontage improvements; and, h. Connecting trails. OTHER ACTIONS Grading activities would occur on the site to accommodate the proposed improvements to the park. Construction of Phase III improvements requires grading in the southwest portion oftha park where necessary to correct drainage problems. Soil removed from this area will be used to build low mounds surrounding lawn areas and a play hill near the play area feature. A preliminary grading plan has been submitted as part of this proj ect. Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) in accordance with DSRSD's Eastern Dublin Facilities Master Plan will provide water, sewer and recycled water services. Sewer service for the project will be accommodated through a connection to the existing sewer system owned and maintained by the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD). Recycled water from DSRSD will be used for irrigation purposes, reducing the need for potable water. Additionally, irrigation and drainage requirements are provided and planned for all on-site improvements. City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Page 5 February 22, 2005 ASSESSOR'S ~ '"", ,- - ~' ,;¡1j~ .''-'11)'" '000 " , "¡nmo ,N_m " , ·-N"1 _O·_Q .e. ....,.,., 00_ ¿:r~ -NN " , OOD <;ll;N I)~IVE --) ¡ ( I I I ¡ 2 ( :s! j~ i ,:QI 'w "L I I J \ 1 \ J 10 \,I~·'.I) T 6 \ \ \ \ \ MAP 986 Code Are. Nos. 26-012 (B~ P ..M. 7257 2.341B5 (0) '01 P.M.7357 ,.." , 26-013 , <5-0 P. M. 7355 245135 eE, P. M. 7589 '0>'" ø L 'F) P.M.8187 2T4110- / ~5 2^_O(l15 ~ c. c ;"*;/",, .:"\~~'- .-. 18 ' I ]C~ /" A.C.F.C. ~(flll ~" ~v.....------.......,. I 19 <"I~ 5 /" A v,,, ~" -- - ; --. .....4.:tV CD ¡1¡¡lf/11111 '1:.,. IV~ ~ SAN VICIE:NTE c;. TERRACl. [' '.85 AC.> ",,"... -------r:-J~ till III '~(\ ~ ~t-I¡!lll ~ I:) ~I ~,I!I ~ U I~ . t..c,?~II! tJ¡5f t:J ........r-¡II ~ ð _ MAGELLAN . ¡III ~J:, 18 I ... III -y/"t. ________ IIII r ~~~\ 7ri1 ~ q.J¡. (. III "I 4 NJ<II'~·.~- ;- / GLEASON " e ..",i~n: ' ." ~~:¡¡:., D 7-174:86 11!.~'· ,r ~ ,11 'I! 110M!· \.Q..oo, ".". ,. ~ /If1~. \1 N"r ~ 1-13'.!Õ' E l .'f1~9! ,I' 16'~I'E I' '.,.v,~ / IKq, { -f'~ / ~'¡¿'~I'r ( ~ 1 19 VICIEM"I:~ -'- ------- DRivE - - N!:~n:~·1 ~.. ~·'!IJ·JI). 12 ......----..................-.... ALAMEDA COUNTY OFFICE OF ASSESSOR FOR ASSESSMrJNl USE JNL Y NOT FOR RBP'IIODUC11ON OR L.LE , CiTy ø 12 f'C~.1 8c''rY (22.Cl AC.,t'j 18.17 AC..l 25, II AC.:!: ~~ \~~\ 4, "~~./'/' /.~ '~, . \ % J ¡ 8.Ç~AG.¡:/ " " " ø " ¡III / " " i i , ¡ ~~rT") '"if.:;:) :B%k J , I ¡ ~.t~"'<· ~ >þ.'!.1,1þ'~';' t ,.."It ~ ... "",!t\ 1 .~V:< ':[I..r}. \ V~ I'Q~i,--~t~-,_. ~_.-"- ~ N ~iI' '011' w _____- \ CENTRAL - /~~ ) ; .0' : l~ (-- ---/~~ ::: !lrJ.<~./j.,. 20 -,\ --------" -------~ I \ "o.øf.\ ~___; ~';:C~- ~., ~BANGQR COUR1_\ ~.- ,,__)-, ;:. ~.J.¡'M$J!D ~ ~ ~ .....\~ ~ ___ ~ __---- wAY ...,,~ ~ --_.....------- --' ~ ,--------.. ~ . 1-'01'\. I CITYe 3_90 AI;,j: i~ ~ ........---..... ":i\I.~I:,~:~\·,¡ \_,,1 ---1:!!:,L..-------+- "'JI.-----'--- --1-~ PARKWAY ,,¡,ß"--- ~. ;;--'ö\~ ~ ________..... F N~I~'N. ./~ ..____--- \ \·'f¡P4~' r fARc¡:':L I ,/ -1------ \ 1 ", G ..----"""/ '8- / ~ Ij. CQw.AON AREA ---- /--- \ _____________ /fi I t I!II: 8.28 AC..!. ____---Ø- ----~/ I , UNIT I , e~ @ 22 1 I, ~ , ;< i,lNIT 2 0) :\.::- 1---" ,.___,"UNI"f " ¡(7~) _._,._t·__, i .: ." EXHmIT A Assessor Parcel Map Pagc 6 City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emcrald Glcn Park, Phasc III P A 05-009 February 22, 2005 JI~I~(f(HoGiendo , II· ~ Drivt . I ~ - I . í 111~11 Q) I 21 ~ ~ - ( ~ cr ::> a _ n- 1/ ::>' j I 3 (j) I () => 1\)1 OJ - -u G '\.? < Ie) Ç,ì a J fr- , < I V L 0) ID i u:::: ~ I .. ;r;! C!<¿~$k, ~ , .""', j~ -\ '"'- Ii I 'L' II I ' II III II i ~I Tossajara Road EXHIBIT B - Vicinity Map City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Page 7 February 22, 2005 @\:: '; ,I ¡: I; f¡ " o ~ ~ ,. i. . ,. i!' ., ~ , " t . t . , ~ 0 ~ m ~' .. ',' .~.:f ~, ,~ . ~" ~ ¡ ,~ ~ .. :' " " '" "\ Q , ~ ; ~ ~' , o I )- >:J -1 m ;;;;¡ "" . ~ \;¡ ~! .. " .':", . f ~~ f~ ~' i.-o ~~ ~ ~ ~. 0: ~ .. ¡ e , ¡ ". -1 I J:\ "j>'. :~j ~.' . " ,~ :~ ~'j"1 -';:t ,,' ~ , :) , ):> ..r- -1 m '" "'" r- ):> Z " . 1¡1~'~;;:¡J.~n! I~~,¡I.!¡ 11:"'1\"1. ,,; ~~'IIIIIc","') ~t:tð,'p:"", !i"!loI!~ EXHIBIT C - Emerald Glen Park Master Plan Page 8 City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negativo Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 February 22, 2005 ij¡:' . [1..I.í..!'I..'1I 'At III' 'I¡'""'¡ .! '. /...·'I<'·! ".!.III'I!I¡ltilllll¡¡ ..11[,,' ,',I¡I~, I",¡ ¡ IU''I fl'¡!llh,!Ifi!¡ ~~l'hU fl~l! II','. . ì I,i'i'l ~ ,),,~',,;, . ,,: \.;-;;,,'" Ii,., , i7~,;!:,ft :': - ~. .:. ¡. I',:" .. .,,1 :',:: ,:' ,\,\~:;:a.. ~'.<" ','."':''', ... .............¡¡,..."................ I !i'~<~ ¢'O;.:I.'~J~., i'l~P .ª' , ..!!.,..¡lo'·. '~ . .. "1 ·1 ¡ '." ...,:,tJ :\.~:.r fl c: ¡¡¡III ':'"l;,t'1~.::,.~.. ExmBIT D - Emerald Glen Park, Phase In City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negativt Dtclaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase ill P A 05-009 Pagt 9 February 22, 2005 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "potentially significant impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agricultural Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology/Soils Hazards and Hazardous Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/ Plarming Materials Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/ Circulation Utilities/Service Systems Mandawry Findings of Si IÚficance DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY LEAD AGENCY): On the basis of this initial evaluation: I I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant etfect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. """ "" "", ",,"/":"," ,,:::·:":'.c":''':'''''' :':""::,::~,:':":,':' :' ::, ",' "" " :,', \':' ,..,:." :,:'" ' '''':::'::'.: :::"",,:, ",,,,:..,, ,:-: ' , "" '," :" "" "",.., Tfin:dthatalthouBh!b:eproposedproJect~o~ldhayea.significant.l¡ffec¡9n the environment, there will . notbeasignitkanteffectinthisease becaus~~e¥is¡öns~thepf'!ject:haveb~nmade by or agreedtoby thep.ro.· ~.e.·..ct proponent AMITIGATED NEGATIVEDECLAR:Â'TJON will be prep. are. d. ',,'..' ,'" " . ',.".' ''','',''''', ",.'," ",.""",'..",,',,",.',' '",;;i:'.·,,':,\,·,'·":""\"""'.'· '"',',,,',:' ,..,.:.."..","..:..".,:, I find that the proposed project MA Y have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environmen t, but at least one effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMP A CTREPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adeq uately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARA TTON pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signatur/L/ Printe N e: Janet Harbin. Senior Planner Date: Februarv 22.2005 ~ For: City of Dublin Page 10 City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 February 22,2005 Environmental Impacts (Not",: Source of determination listed in parenthesis. See listing of sources used to detennine each potential impact at the end of the checklist.) Note: A full discussion of each item is jound jollowing the checklist. 1. Aesthetics. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact on a scenic vista? (Source: 1,2,3,4.5.6.7) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees. rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Source: I, 2.3,4,5.6,7) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Source: 1. 2.3,5,6,7) d) Create a new source of substamiallight or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Source: 1,2,3,5,7) II. Agricultural Resources. Would the project: a) Conven Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as showing on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to a non -agricultural use? (Source: 2,3,4,5,7,8) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Source: 3,4,5,7,8) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or narure, could result in conversion of fannland to a non -agriculrural use? (Source: 2,3,4,5,7,8) III. AIr Quality (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicabie air quality management district may be relied on to make the following determinations). Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Source: 1,2,4,5.7.8) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Source: 1,2,5,7) City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emorald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Potelltially .····Lëss"lil<w~ Sign!jiÙiià<' ";¡g~¡¡¡<;¡¡íiÔ ·l"q,.;diTWitië <MliiaïiOii x LèS~~thiJlI; .~i~@caÎ!t "Jmp"ct,. : x x x x x x x x Pago II February 22, 2005 Note: A full discussion of each item is found folluwing the checklist. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net Increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal at state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? (Source: 1,2.5.7.9) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Source: 1,2,5,7,9) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Source: 1,2,3,6.7,9) IV. BiOlogical Resources. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive. or special status species in local or regional plans, policies err reguJations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U. S. Fish and Wl1dlife Service? (Source: 1,2,8,9,13) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies or reguiations or by the California Department of Fis h and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Source: 1.2.4,5,7,13) c) Have a substantial adverse impact on federally protected wetlands as def1ned by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal. etc.) through direct removal, fùling, hydrological Interruption or other means? (Source: 1,2,4.5,7.13) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wl1dlife corridors, or impede the use of native wl1d1ife nursery sites? (Source: 1,2,4,5,7.13) c) Conflict with any local policies err ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree protection ordinances? (Source: 1,2,4,5.7,13) t) Conflict with the provision of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? (Source: 1,2.4,5,7,13) City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Pot~lIIfa1lÿ . Sign(fican, Impact·. Less-ihan, si8~ijicant ...WitH....··..... Mlfi ~iidlï x x x x .... ussCt/ltm- ';ig,¡ifi~i:Ûtt . ... ¡,i,pizÜ' . x x x Page 12 February 22, 2005 . Nolmpact. x x Note: A full discussion of each item ¡sfoundfollowing the checklist. V. Cultural Resources. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse impact in the signil1cance of a historical resource as defined in Sec. 15064.5? (Source: 1,2,5,8,9) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeoiogical resource pursuant to Sec. 15064.5 (Source: 1,2,5,8,9) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic feature? (Source: 1.2,5.8,9) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of a formal cemetery? (Source: 1.2. 5,8.9) VI. Geology and Soils. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk ofloss, injury, or death invoiving: i) Rupture of a known earthq1.lake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist or based on other known evidence of a known fault (Source: t .2. 3, 5,6,7,8,12) ii) Strong seismic b'found shaking (Source: 1,2,3,5,6.7,8,12) iii) Seismic-related groWld failure. including liquefaction? (Source: 1.2,3.5.6,7,8,12) iv) Landslides? (Source: 1,2,3,5,6.7.8,12) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (Source: 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,12) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the projee[ and potentially res1.llt in on· and off- site landsllde, lateral spreading, subsidence, llquefaction or similar hazards (Source: 1,2,3.5,6.7,8.12) d) Be located on expansive soil. as defined in Table 13-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial riBks to life or property? (Source: 1,2,3,6,7,12) City ofD1.Iblin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phas" 1Il P A 05-009 PoteniitJ.lly ... Sigllijica~t .. ll1iþi2á Less"lhánC. No Impact ... significant I,i¡pgú x x x x x x x x x x x Page 13 F"bruary 22, 2005 Note: A full discussion oJ each item is found following the checklist. e) Have soils capable or adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste? (SOllrCC: 1,2,3,6,7,12) Poterúi~llY Sig~ijicant Impad Less-thane ..si8.lIifk(}.nt . With. ..' ::MiHtltión:' VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materiab¡. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the pllblic or the environment through the rou6ne transport, use or disposal of hazardous material$ (Source: 1,2,6,7.9) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environmem through reasonably fore$eeab Ie upset and accidem conditioru; involving the relea¡;e of hazardollB into the environment? (Source: 1,2.6,7.9) c) Emit hazardou$ emis$ions or handle hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed schoo I? (Source: 1,2,6,7,9) d) Be located on a $ite which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a signit1cant hazard to the poblic or the environment? (Source: 1,2,5,6.7,9) e) For a project located within an airport land IIBe plan or, where such plan has not been adopted. would the project re$lIlt in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Souree: 1.2,4,6.7,8,9) f) For a project within the vicinity of private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (SOllrce: 1,2,4,6,7,8,9) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with the adopted emergency resporu;e plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Source: 1,2,5,6,7,8,10) h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildland$'! (Source: 1.2,5.6,7,8,10) VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality. Would the project: City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park. Phase III P A 05-009 Lesi,thaii- : Sig7llflcajlt. : ··t¡,;p¡.:ct· x No Impact x x x x x x x x Page 14 February 22, 2005 Note: Afull discussion of each item is found following the checklist. a) Violate any water quality standardB or waste discharge requirements? (Source: 1,2,5, 6,7,8) b) Substantially depiete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a towering of the local groundwater table level (e. g. the production rate of existing nearby wells would drop to a level whieh would not support existing iand uses or planned useS for which permits have been granted? (Source: 1,2.4.5.6.7.8) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the aeration of the course of a stream or river, in a man:ncr which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site? (Source: 1,2,3,4.5,7,8) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site Or areas, including through the alteratio n of a course or stream Or river. or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off·site? (Source: 1,2,3,4,5.6.7.9) e) Create or contribute runoff water whicb would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (Source: 1,2, 3,4.5.6.7.9) t) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? (Source: 1.2, 3.4,5,6,7,9) g) Place housing within a lOO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? (Source: 1,2,3,4.5,6,7,9) h) Place within a lOO-year flood hazard area structures which impede or redirect flood flows? (Source: 1,2. 3,4,5,6,7,9) i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, and death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (Source: 1,2. 3,4,5,6,7,9) j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow? (Source: 1,2,3,4,5,6.7.9) IX. Land Use and Planning. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Source: 1,2,4,5,6,7) City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emeraid Oie!! Park, Phase III PA 05-009 Pot~ntialtx Sig1ÍiJJàll1t '¡m¡Jdct ÜSNhan- significant' With..... ..... MÛi'Jion' LesNhan, .···kiniji~ar¡t · 'Iì11¡jiJÇt x x x x x x x x x x Page IS February 22, 2005 Note: A full discussion of each item is found following rhe checklist. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (includillg but not limited to the general plan, speciflc plan, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoidillg or mitigating an environmental effect? (Source, 1.2,4,7,8) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or narural community conservation plan? (Source, 1,2,4,7,8) X. Mineral Resonrces. Would the project: a) Result ill the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Source, 1,2,4,7,8) b) Result in. the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general Plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Source, 1,2,4,7.8) XI. Noise. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of stanililrds established in the general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Source, 1,2,4,7,8) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundbome noise levels? (Source: 1,2,4,7,8) c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above existing levels without the project? (Source: 1,2,4,7,8) d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels without the project? (Source: 1,2,4,7,8) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two mile, of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working n the project area to excessive noise level,? (Source: 1,2,4,7,8) poriititirÛ/y ... Slgnifican( . . Impact·.···· Lesscthanc . . sfgiíífiCanl ·.:Wiïh··.i Mlii dtidn Less-thq/l-. jig/lifit.2Í!r. Inipai;;i . No Impact x x x x J) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Source: 1,2,4,7,8) City ofDublill Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glon Park, Phase III P A 05-009 x x x x Pago 16 February 22, 2005 x x Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the checklist. XII. Population and Housing. Would tM project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other intra.strucmre)? (Source: 1,2,3,4,7,8,10) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessltating the construction 01" replacemeat bousiag elsewhere? (Source: 1 ,2,3,4,7,8,10) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the rep1acemeat of housing elscwhcrc? (Source: 1,2,3,4,7,8,10) XIII. Public Services. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govermneaW facilities, the construction of which could cause significant envìronmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other perfonnance objectives for any of the public servIces: Fire protection? (Sources: 1,2,4,7,8) Police protection? (Sources: 1,2,4,7,8) Schools? (Sources: 1,2,4,7,8) Parks? (Sources: 1,2,4,7,8) Other public racilities? (Sources: 1,2,4,7,8) XIV. Recreation. a) Would the project increa.se the use of existing neighborhood or regional facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated (Sources: 1,2,4,7,8,10) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the envirorunent? (Sources: 1.2,4,7,8,10) XV. Transportation and Traffic. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (Le. result in a substantial increa.se in either the number or vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads or congestion at intersections)? (Sources: 1,2,4,7,8,9,10) City of Dublin Initial Stw:ly & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Potentially Signifiái,d " 'I11IJ1'aÚ Less-than- '" ., signiffcant ' With . Midi/tioÍ" 'Less'tlí.aii,' ' signijfâ1Ìii,' , Impair , : ':' '::. ~:: 111,""'''',''11'''1'11' .' ,~'\'''#~~" ¡>: " NO. Impact X X X ; ~¡ X x X X X X X X Page 17 February 22, 2005 x Note: A full di$cussion oj each item is jOUJId jollowing the checklÍ$/. b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways? (Sources: 1,2,4,7,8,9,10) c) Result in a change in air traffic panems, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Sources: 1,2,4,7,8,9,10,11) d) Substantially increase hazard, due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses, such as farm equipment'! (Sources: 1,2,4,7,8,9,10) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Sources: 1,2,4,7,8,9,10,11) I) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Sources: 1,2,4,7,8,9,10,11) g) Conflict with adopœd policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (such as bus turnouts and bicycle facilities)? (Sources: 1,2,4,7,S,9,10,1I ) XVI. Utilities and Service Systems. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (Sources: 1,4,5,6,9) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. the construction of which could Cause significant environmental effects? (Source,: 1,4,5,6,9) c) Require or re,ult in the construction of new ,torm water drainage facilities or expansion of exi,ting facilities, the con'truction of which could cau,e significant environmental effects? (Sources: 1,4.5.6,9) d) Have ,ufficient water supplies available to serve the project from exIsting water entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (Sources: 1,4,5,6,9) 0) Result in a determination by the wastewater rreatment provider which ,erves or may ,erve the project that it has adequate capacity to Serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (Sources: 1,4,5,6,9) , Patenlially Sigi,¡jicåii( Irrij,dci · .. No Impact. x x x x x X City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 X X x X X Page 18 February 22, 2005 Note: A full discussion of each ilem is found following Ihe <'hecklisl. Porenriolly Sig"iflctJJÚ Im¡iåêl··.· ...... LeSS"lhan, . sigi'lifiConl .. ·.....WZth··..·...·..·· Ùtfidiifu> Less:llzan. ··significont ····Impáil No ImjJocr f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (Sources: 1,4,5,6,9) g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulatiom related to solid waste? (Sources: 1,4,5,6,9) XVI. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self -sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the nwnber of or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively comideuble? CCwnulalively considerable" meanS that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects). c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X X ,:!.( X X X Source." u.,·ed to determine ootential environmental imoaets: 1. Determination based on location ofprojcct & Project Construction Documents and Program. 2. Determination based on Staff review of the project 3. Determination based on field review ofprojecUsite 4. Determination based on the Emerald Glen Park Master Plan (1998) 5. Determination based on Injtial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (1994) 6. Determination based on Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Dcclaration for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2002) 7. Determination based on the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2004) 8. Determination based on the City of Dublin General Plan (updated 2002) 9. Detennination based on Eastem Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Report and Addendum (1994)* 10. Detennination based on City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance I I. Determination based on Communitv Center and Recreation & Aquatic Center Parkin¡¡ Studv, prepared for the project phase and the future development of Phase 4 & 5, by Carducci & Associates, Inc. in May 2004 12. Determination based on Geotechnica1lnvesti¡¡ation for Phase ill afEmerald Glen Park. prepared by City of Dublin pag.19 Initial Study & Mitigat.d Negative Declaration Ern«ald Glen Park, Phase III PA 05-009 February 22,2005 Kleinfelder Engineering, November 22, 2004 13. Determination based on Eastern Dublin Comprehensive Stream Restoration ProJ!rntD.. prepared by Sycamore Associates and adopted by the City in 1996. ·Portions of the environmental setting, project impacts and mitigation measures for this Initial Study refer to environmental information contained in the 1994 Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Report. (SCH 91103064). This document is referred to in the JIÚtial Study as the "Final Eastern Dublin EIR." Copies of this document arC available for public review at the City of Dublin Planning Department, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, CA, during normal business hours. City of Dublin Iaitial Study & Mitigated Negative Doolatation Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05·009 Page 20 February 22, 2005 ATTACHMENT TO INITIAL STUDY: DISCUSSION OF CHECKLIST Proiect Impacts and Mitigation Measures I. Aesthetics a-c) Significant impact on scenic vista, damage to .~cenic resource, degrade visual character of the site or create light or glare? No Impact. The project site is within an existing City park and consists of the development of Phase III of Emerald Glen Park. The improvements proposed within the phase consist of two soccer fields with cricket overlay; Bocce courts; group picnic area and arbor; play areas; a mini- arboretum for native plants and vegetation; open grassy meadow areas, parking and street frontage improvements; and, connecting trails. The 14 acres in this phase of the park proj ect are currently undeveloped and contain little groundcover. The development would provide more scenic and landscaped views from Central Parkway and the creek trail along Tassajara Creek adjacent to the westside of the park. The parking lot near Central Parkway will also be screened with improved landscaped areas and vegetation. From the residential area west of the creek alignment, the most prominent visual features will be the mini-arboretum, the group picnic area, and the small restroom structure. However these features will be several hundred feet from the homes, and a frontage road, and landscaped trail and creek areas will be located between these features and the residential units. Development of the proposed improvements would not substantially change the visual character of the site. Because of the location of the improvements, and the relatively flat topography of the site, as well as the presence of surrounding development, views of the site are limited to the immediate area. Although, Emerald Glen Park is located one mile north ofI-580 freeway, which is a designated scenic highway, the park is not within a scenic route. Therefore, the proposed improvements to Emerald Glen Park will not create any visual impacts that have not been avoided or mitigated to a Less-than-significant degree during construction of previous phases of park development. Specifically, the construction of park features and landscaping will benefit the existing visual character of the park. These improvements would provide street frontage landscaping, ranging from lawn areas to annual grasses, garden areas and trees, and improve the visual community landscape of the area. Visual quality was discussed in the earlier analysis of the Emerald Glen Park Master Plan and addressed in the Final Eastem Dublin Specific Plan EIR. Both documents determined that development of Eastern Dublin would inalterably change the character of the area. The development of a community park at this location was addressed by the previous documentation and found to have a Less-than-significant or no significant effect on visual quality in the area, based on the resulting visual benefits to the community provided by the newly landscaped areas and the presence of the open space and recreational use, A statement of overriding considerations was previously adopted with the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR. No impacts not previously City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitig.tod Neg.tive Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase IJI P A 05-009 Page 21 February 22, 2005 analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ErR (EDSP ErR) will occur as a result of the proposed project. Additionally, the project contains measures to maintain the visual quality of the area, especially :from views along scenic corridors in Eastern Dublin. Mitigation measures. 3.8/1.0 through 3.8/8.lofthe EDSP ErR require that grading be done sensitively to reduce visual impacts. Tbese mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project. d) Less-than-significant with Mitigation. The project is not anticipated to create additional light and glare as the majority of lighting at the park will be low level lighting along walkways and trail. The proposed project would not introduce additional nighttime lighting on the site. Sensor lighting lamps with low wattage are proposed for the parking area and the sport courts will be closed at dusk, eliminating the need for nighttime lighting. However, the following mitigation measure will be added to the project to ensure that the lighting is adequate for the use and unobtrusive: Mitif!ation Measure 1: A photometric study shall be provided with final construction drawings of the project prior to the issuance of an electrical permit. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce the impact of nighttime lighting to a level of less- than-significant II. Agricultural Resources a-c) Convert Prime Farmland, conflict with agricultural zoning or convert prime farmland to a non- agricultural use? No Impact. Surrounding areas near the park have been converted :from agricultural to urban uses. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, Emerald Glen Park Master Plan, and other environmental analysis of the area conclude that the area is urbanized. Additionally, one phase of the park is completed and the second phase is underway. The remainder parkland contains no agricultural zoning or farmland, and is zoned for community park use, consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan designation ofParks/Public Recreation & City Park. Approval and construction of the proposed project would allow further development of an existing park. No impacts are therefore anticipated with regard to prime farmland or loss of agricultural production. Based on information contained in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment ErR, no portion of the site is nor has been encumbered with a Williamson Act Land Conservation Agreement. Similarly, no impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment ErR are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. III. Air Quality Environmental Setting The project is within the Amador Valley, a part of the Livermore sub-regional air basin distinct ftom the larger San Francisco Bay Area Basin. Tbe Livermore sub-area basin is surrounded on all sides by high hills or mountains. Signifìcant breaks in the hills surtounding the air basin are Niles Canyon and the San Ramon Valley, which extends northward into Contra Costa County. City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Ph.se III P A 05-009 Page 22 February 22, 2005 According to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ErR and other environmental studies, the terrain of the Amador Valley influences both the climate and air pollution potential of the sub-regional air basin. As an inland, protected valley, the area has generally lighter winds and a higher frequency of calm conditions when compared to the greater Bay Area. The occurrence of episodes of high atmospheric stability, known as inversion conditions, severely limits the ability of the atmosphere to disperse pollutants vertically. Inversions can be found during all seasons in the Bay Area, but are particularly prevalent in the summer months when they are present about 90% of the time in both morning and afternoon. Additionally, during the winter, the sheltering effect of terrain and its inland location results in &equent surface-based inversions. Under these conditions pollutants such as carbon monoxide &om automobiles and particulate matter generated by fireplaces and agricultural burning can become concentrated. According to the Bay Area Quality Management District, air pollution potential is high in the Livermore-Amador Valley, especially for ozone in the summer and fall. High temperatures increase the potential for ozone, and the valley not olÙY traps locally generated pollutants but can be the receptor of ozone and ozone precursors &um upwind portions of the greater Bay Area. Transport of pollutants also occurs between the Livennore Valley and the San Joaquin Valley to the east. Ambient air quality standards Both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board have established ambient air quality standards for common pollutants. Tbese ambient air quality standards are levels that avoid specific adverse health effects associated with each pollutant. The ambient air quality standards cover what are called "criteria" pollutants because the health and other effects of each pollutant are described in criteria documents. Tbe federal and California ambient air quality standards are summarized in Table I for important pollutants. The federal and state ambient standards were developed independently with differing purposes and methods, although both federal and state standards are intended to avoid health-related effects. As a result, the federal and state standards differ in some cases. In general, the California state standards are more stringent. This is particularly true for ozone and PMIO. Table 1. Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards Pollutant Averaging Time Federal Primary Standard 0.12 PPM State Standard Ozone I-Hour 8-Hour 8-Hour 0.09 PPM Carbon Monoxide 9PPM 9.0 PPM City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Gl= Park, Phase In P A 05-009 Page 23 February 22, 2005 I-Hour 35 PPM 20 PPM Nitrogen Dioxide Annual A veragc 0.05 PPM -" I-Hour -- 0.25 PPM Sulfur Dioxide Annual Average 0.03 PPM - 24-Hour 0.14 PPM 0.25 PPM I-Hour PMIO Annual Average 50 uglm3 30 uglm3 24-Hour 150 ug/m3 50 ug/m3 PM2.5 Annual 15 ug/m3 -- 24-Hour 65 ugim3 -- PPM = Parts per Million -gim3 ~ Micrograms per Cubic Meter Source: Bay Area Air Quaiity Management District The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1997 adopted new national air quality standards for ground-level ozone and for fine Particulate Mattcr. The existing I-hour ozone standard of 0.12 PPM will be phased out and replaced by an 8-hour standard of 0.08 PPM. New national standards were retained, but thc method and form for determining compliance with the standards were revised. Implementation of the new ozone and Particulate Matter standards has been complicated by a lawsuit. On May 14, 1999 the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision ruled that the Clean Air Act as applied in setting the public standards for ozone and particulate matter, was unconstitutional as an improper delegation oflegislative authority to the Environmental Protection Agency. The decision has been appealed, but the legal status of the new standards will probably remain uncertain for some time. Ambient air quality The project is within the nine-county Bay Area Basin. The Bay Area Quality Management District (BAAQMD) operates a network of air quality monitoring sites in the region, including one in central Livennore on Old First Street. Table 2 shows a summary of air quality data for this monitoring site for the period 1995-1999. Data are shown for ozone, carbon monoxide, PMIO and nitrogen dioxide. The numbers of days exceeding each standard are shown for each year. Table 2. Air Quality Data for Livermore, 1995-1999 Pollutant Standard Days Exceeding Standard In: 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Ozone Federal I-Hour 7 8 0 6 2 Ozone State I-Hour 20 22 3 21 14 Ozone Federal 8-Hour II 10 0 10 5 Carbon State/Federal 0 0 0 0 0 City of Dublin Page 24 Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Pha,e III P A 05-009 February 22, 2005 Monoxide 8 Hour PMI0 State 6 6 12 12 18 24·Hour PMlO Federal 0 0 0 0 24-Hour Nitrogen State I·Hour 0 0 0 0 Dioxide Source: Air Sources Board Aerometric Data Analysis and Management System (ADAM) Table 2 shows that concentrations of carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide at the Livermore monitoring site meet state/federal standards. Ozone concentrations exceed both the state and federal standards, and exhibit wide variations from year-to-year related to meteorological conditions. Years where the summer months tend to be warmer than average tend to have higher average ozone concentrations while years with cooler than average temperatures tend to have lower average ozone concentrations. Levels of PMI 0 at Livermore mcet the federal ambient standards but exceed the more stringent state standard. Attainment status The federal Clean Air Act and the California Clean Air Act of 1988 require that the State Air Resources Board, based on air quality monitoring data, designate air basins within the state where the federal or state ambient air quality standards are not met as "nonattainment areas." Because of the differences between the federal and state standards, the designation of nonattainment areas is different under the federal and state legislation. The Bay Area is currently a nonattainment area for the tederal I-hour ozone standard. Under the California Clean Air Act the Bay Area is a nonattainment area for ozone and PMI O. To meet tederal Clean Air Act requirements, the District has adopted an Ozone Attainment Demonstration Plan. In addition, to meet California Clean Air Act requirements, the District has adopted and updated a Clean Air Plan addressing the California ozone standard. The control strategies contained into these plans include new limits on emissions from industry, prohibitions on sources of hydrocarbons, and buyback programs for older vehicles and educational programs. The California Legislature, when it passed the California Clean Air Act in 1988, recognized the relative intractability of the PM] 0 problem with respect to the state ambient standard and excluded it from basic planning requirements of the Aet. The Act did require the Clean Air Resources Board to prepare a report to the Legislature regarding the prospect of achieving the State ambient air quality standard for PM10. This report recommended a menu of actions, but did not recommend imposing a planning process similar to that for ozone or other pollutants for achievement of the standard within a certain period of time. City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III PA 05-009 Pag. 25 February 22, 2005 Sensitive receptors The Bay Area Air Quality Management District defines sensitive receptors as facilities where sensitive receptor population groups (children, the elderly, the acutely ill and the chronically ill) are likely to be located. These land uses include residences, schools, playgrounds, child-care centers, hospitals and medical clinics. This project would involve construction and development of a phase of a new park and recreational facilities where children would play and gather for recreation. a) Would the project conflict or obstruct implementation of an air quality plan? No Impact. The proposed project would not cont1ict with the local Clean Air Plan adopted by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, since the proposed amount of non-residential development has been included in Dublin's planned growth as part of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan EIR and would serve the existing community. Therefore, such impacts would be less-than-significant. b) Would the project violate any air quality standard$? Less- than-significant with Mitigation. Short-term construction impacts related to implementation of the project, including grading and excavation, could result in exceeding air quality standards established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Adherence to Mitigation Measures nos. 3.11/1.0, 3.11/3.0, 3.11/4.0 and 3.11/12.0 of the EastemDublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR will reduce short-term air quality impacts to a less-than-significant level. These measures minimize the creation of fugitive dust during grading and construction activities with frequent watering of those areas, and also mandate that construction equipment be kept in proper running order at all times during construction. Additionally, certain mitigation measures for the control of fugitive dust are incorporated into the Project construction plans to be implemented as part of the responsibility of the contractor, and monitored by the Inspector for the Project. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR concludes that potential air quality impacts related to construction equipment could not be mitigated to a less-than-significant impact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this impact. However, potential air quality impacts rclated to construction on the 14 acres of park land in this phase of park development will be mitigated to a less-than-significant impact with the following measures related to air quality impacts incorporated into this project phase. Mitif!ation Measure 2: Dust Control shall conform to the requirements of the SWPPP prepared by the City. All active construction areas shall be watered daily and more frequently if necessary. All trucks hauling soil, sand or other loose materials shall be covered. Water shall be applied daily, or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking area, and staging areas at construction sites. All paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites shall be swept daily with water sweepers. Hydroseed or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers to construction areas that have been graded. c) Would the project re$ult in cumulatively considerable air pollutants? City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, pha,,¡e III P A 05-009 Page 26 February 22, 2005 Less-than-significant. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR identifics Mobile Source Emissions and Stationary Source Emissions as significant irreversible impacts. Generally such impacts are based on vehicular emission from future traffic within the sub-region as well as stationary sources. Similarly, potential air quality impacts related to vehicular traffic emissions on roadways of Reactive Organic Gasses and Nitrogen Oxide, both precursor indicators of smog, and stationary source emissions would not exceed regional air quality standards or thresholds. This project will not generate significant amounts of traffic as it serves the existing community with an adequate transportation network and roadway. Therefore, vehicular emissions are estimated to be minimal and impacts would be less-than-significant. d,e) Expose sensitive receptors to significant pollutant concentrations or create objectionable odors? Less"than-.~ignificant. Proposed uses in the third phase of park development will include two soccer fields with cricket overlay; Bocce courts; group picnic area and arbor; play areas; a mini-arboretum for native plants and vegetation; open grassy meadow areas, parking and street frontage improvements; and, connecting trails. Air quality impacts associated with the proposed project are expected to be less- than-significant as no significant pollutant concentration or creation of objectionable odors are anticipated from the park use and the improvements proposed for Phase III. The only source of pollutants would be vehicles using the roadways adjacent to the park. These items were previously addressed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR. No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. IV. Biological Resources a-d) Have a substantial adverse impact on special-status species, riparian features, movement of fish or wildlife species, or conflict with California Fish & Game or U.s. Wildlife Service policies or regulations? Less-than-significant with Mitigation. Impacts from the project upon biological resources were thoroughly addressed in the earlier analysis of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR. No sensitive or special-status species, or riparian features exist in this portion of the property which lies adjacent tot Tassajara Creek. Walking trails and other walkways proposed in Phase IIJ are approximately 50 to 60 feet from the Tassajara Creek corridor which lies adjacent to the westerly side of the park and Phase HI. The Eastern Duhlin Comprehensive Stream Restoration Program adopted by the City in 1996 allow such walkways and trails to be constructed within the 100-foot buffer area from the top ofthe creek bank normally restricted from development. The restroom structure proposed to be built in this phase of the park development is the nearest feature to the creek to be constructed in this phase. The structure has been designed and located outside the 100- foot buffer area required for construction near the creek, as is the arbor and paving in the group picnic area. Although at the present time there are no special-status species of wildlife or vegetation in this area, a follow-up biological survey in this area will be conducted prior to construction of trails and structures near the creek corridor to verify that no species has located in the area proposed for construction. There would be a less-than-significant impact on biological resources with this additional mitigation measure as no sensitive or special-status City of Dublin Pago 27 Initial Smdy & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emeraid Gte" Park, Phase !II P A 05-009 February 22, 2005 species and riparian features will be disturbed or destroyed on the project site. MitiE!ation Measure 3: A biological survey shall be conducted prior grading and construction of walkways and trails near the Tassajara Creek corridor to verify that no special species is located in the area proposed for construction in Phase III of the project. e, f) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological reSOllrces, such as tree protection ordinances. No Impact. The project phase has been designed to be consistent with all Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, General Plan and other adopted policies related to preservation and protection of biological resources. Somc trees are in the phase area, and an existing grove of evergreen trees will bc preserved as part of the project. Additional trees will be planted in the subject area in conjunction with other landscaping and vegetation. The trees proposed for removal are relatively small in size, except for a few large species within the parking lot area and the entrance to this portion of park from Central Parkway, directly across from Killian Road. No known Heritage trees are proposed for removal from the site. The City's Landscape Architect will make the final detennination on the trees to be removed. The majority of the trees will remain on the site and be protected from construction activities by protective fencing. The construction plans for the improvements in Phase III state that any tree in construction areas shall bc fenced and no construction or placement of equipment is to occur within the dripline of the tree to prevent damage. A qualified arborist will be on-site to supervise the construction to ensure that trees are not damaged or removed by accident. Additionally, the proposed project is not located within the boundaries of any Habitat Conservation Plan. No biological resource impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment ErR are expected to occur as a result ofthe proposed project. V. Cultural Resources a-d) Cause substantial adverse change to significant historic. archeological or paleontological resources or human remains? No Impact. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment ElR identified a number of potentially significant impacts associated with development in East Dublin, including disruption or destruction of prehistoric resources, and disruption to historic resources. Although there are no historic structures/resources or known archeological or paleontological resources on this site, mitigation measure no.3.9/5.0 contained in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment ErR establishes procedures in the event archeological resources are encollntered during grading for subsequent phases of development in the park. These measures have been incorporated into the project by reference, and will be followed in the event that subsurface deposits are discovered during development of Phase III of the Park. No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment ErR are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated related to cultural resources because of implementation of this phase of park development. City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Page 28 February 22, 2005 VI. Geology and Soils a-e) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse impacts, including loss, injury or death related to ground rupture, seismic ground shaking, ground failure, landslide, substantial erosion, unstable soils, or liquefaction? Less-than-~·ignificant. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment ETR identifies several potential impacts to soils and geology, including earthquake and ground shaking, ground rupture, seismic ground shaking, impacts to groundwater resources, shrink-swell potential due to cxpansive soils, slope stability, erosion and sedimentation, in many locations in the Specific Plan planning area. A Geotechoical Investigation has beeo prepared for Phase III of the park development by Kleinfelder Engineering and suggests certain measures be implemented to stabilize the soil on-site and coru;truct the improvements to withstand groundshaking in the event of an earthquake. The subject area aod park site contains fairly stable and well-consolidated clayey soils for the most part, however, several inches of topsoil is loose and fairly unconsolidated. This soil will be replaced as part of the Project prior to any groundcover or improvements being installed, Thc topography is relatively flat with a few slightly elevated arcas. Additionally, in the Phase III area, some stockpiling of soil, concrete rubble and trash accumulation has occurred in the southwcsterly portion of the project area. This material and soil will be removed prior to development of the soccer courts and the proposed detention basin near the mini-arboretum in the southwest comer of the area. Only the soil that is of a good stable quality found in these stockpiles will be reused to consolidate and compact the final soil on the site. A geotechnical engineer will be on site during all earthwork in accordance with the construction program. As the improvements in this phase consist oflow-Iying courts, trails, paving, and small single-story structures such as the restroom and arbor, the potential for death or injury of persons using the park during an earthquake is not anticipated. Since the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones, the potential for ground rupture is anticipated to be minimal. Adherence to Mitigation Measure 3.6/1.0 contained in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR and in the Project construction documents will ensure that all improvements to the park will comply with generally recognized seismic safety standards so that ground shaking or ground failure impacts would be reduced to a level of less-than-significant. Additionally, less-than-significant impacts are anticipated in the park phase related to soil or geotechnical hazards as the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer have been incorporated into the Project. VIT. Hazards and Hazardous Materials a-d) Create a significant hazard through transport of hazardous materials or release or emission of hazardous materials, and/or listed as a hazardous materials site? No Impact. The proposed use of the site would include construction of recreational facilities for Emerald Glen Park and street frontage improvements along Central Parkway. Recreational City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase lJl P A 05-009 Page 29 February 22, 2005 improvements on this site were discussed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment ErR, and have always been planned for this property, No hazardous material has been transported to or from the site, nor is anticipated to be done in the future as the site will be a public park. Therefore, the project would not involve the use or transportation of hazardous material. Additionally, there would be no impact with regard to the release of hazardous materials. e,t) Is the site located within an airport land use plan ofa public airport or private airstrip? No Impact. The site is not located within an airport land use plan or within the vicinity of a public airport; therefore no impacts are anticipated regarding airport noise and crash hazard zones. g,h) interference with an emergency evacuation plan, expose people and structures to a significant risk involving wildland fires, and are nearby residences intermtxed with wildlands? No ImpQct. Since the project would convert undeveloped land to a paved parking lot, and recreational facilities with few structures, the two proposed driveways from Central Parkway to Phase HI improvements will provide adequate emergency access, Due to the provision of cxisting and planned adequate access, there would be no impact with regard to any emergency evacuation plans. Additionally, the project site is adjacent to an urbanized area and within close proximity to vacant grassland that is planned for urbanization, The park will be improved with irrigation that will be regularly maintained. Therefore, the risk of wildland fire would in this phase of the park is not anticipated. No impact is expected relative to wildfires in the project area. VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality a-i) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, deplete groundwater resources, alter drainage patterns, effect surface Dr subsUljàce water quality, result in placing housing in aj/ood plain? No Impact. The project conforms to Alameda County Flood Control and Water Quality District, Zone 7 requirements and will meet the water quality standards of the City of Dublin's NPDES permit and the Alameda County Urban Runoff Clean Water Program. The contractor selected by the City wiIl be responsible for obtaining all pennits necessary from Zone 7 prior to construction, and follow all provisions of the City's SWPPP and the Water Quality Control Board requirements. Adherence to mitigation measures nos, 3.5/20.0, 3.5/44,0, 3.5/47.0, and 3.5/55.0 of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment ErR requiring proper drainage and run-off control, and the use of biodegradable pesticides and herbicides, will reduce surface water quality pollution to a level of less- than-significance. Additionally, the City Public Works Department has perfonned hydrology and drainage studies to insure that all stonnwater and drainage facilities constructed for the park contain sufficient capacity to service the projected development of all phases of the park plan. As a result of the studies, drainage detention basins wilI be located in various phases of the proj ect, including in the southwesterly comer of the site in this phase. Construction ofErnerald Glen Park Phase III recreational facilities wiIl be consistent with all the previous actions and environmental documentation approved by the City of Dublin for east City of Dublin Initial Stndy & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Page 30 February 22, 2005 Dublin. No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR are expected to occur. IX. Land Use and Planning a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The project is consistent with the General Plan and planned recreational uses in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment ElR. It is Phase IJJ of a large park project that is located on one large property. Residential development exists across Central Parkway and also in the adjacent Sumrnerglen development to the west across Tassajara Creek. Future development will occur across Tassajara Road from the park. No residential subdivision or community is divided by the park. Therefore, there would be no disruption of any established community because the proposed facilities for Emerald Glen Park are designed to serve new and existing development in east Dublin, providing recreational facilities within walking distant to residents. Thcrefore, this phase of park development will result in no negative or adverse impact on land use or the community. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation? No impact. The Emerald Glen Park Phase HI project is consistent with the goals and policies contained in both the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan, which indicate that these facilities are needed to serve the growing population in east Dublin. The Specific Plan and General Plan land use maps include the designation for this park site, and refer to the Dublin Parks and Recreation Master Plan, recently updated in 2004, for a description of the land use activities and types offacilities to be provided in the park. The facilities proposed for development in Phase III of the park are consistent with those projected uses in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Therefore, this phase of park development is consistent with all land use plans, policies and regulations of the City, and will result in no negative or adverse impact on land use. c) Conflict with a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No impact. No such plan has been adopted within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. There would, therefore, be no impact to a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan for the existing site. X. Mineral Resources a, b) Result in the loss of availability of regionally or locally significant mineral resources? No impact. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR does not indicate that significant deposits of rIÚnerals exist on the site. Additionally, the site is not shown as a location for mineral or aggregate resources on State Mineral Resource maps. No impacts related to the loss of mineral rcsources would occur as a result of the project. XI. Noise City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase !II PA 05-009 Page 31 February 22,2005 a-d) Would the project expo$e persom or generation of noise levels in excess of standards estabU$hed by the General Plan or other applicable standard, expose people to groundbome vibration, or result in permanent increases in ambient noise levels? Less-than-signijicant. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR addressed potential noise impacts of adopting and implementing the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan, which includcd the development of Emerald Glen Park. Noise related impacts were identified in the ETR which included exposure ofresidents to inereased levels of noise from construction of development in east Dublin. Mitigation measure nos. 3,10/2,0 and 3.10/5.0 will mitigate or minimize construction noise impacts to a level ofless-than-significant. However, short-term construction related noisc could be expected which would be considered significant depending on the specific type of equipment used in the grading process for the parking lot and various sports courts and paved areas. The City has adopted common practiccs for all construction and grading operations, and which are included in the construction documents for the Project, to limit the hours of construction to 7:30 a,m. to 5 p,m" Monday through Friday, including the idling of equipment, unless the Director of Public Works approves alternative hours. Additionally, all equipment used on the construction site is to be in good, well-maintained condition, and mufflers, to minimize noise generation that could affcct thc residents in the area of the park. Therefore, noise~related impacts of the project will bc reduced to a less-than-significant impact. c, f) No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport, public use airport, or a private airstrip. Thercfore, the project will not expose people in the project area to excessive noise levels. XII. Population and Housing a) InduCl! substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly? No Impact. Implementation ofplanncd recreational facilities will not induce additional growth in east Dublin that has not been projected for in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR. These proposed rccreational facilities were planned well in advance to serve residential units that have already been approved, and in some cases, already built. Therefore, no population growth impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. b,c) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing units or people? No Impact, The project site is designated as a community park on the Dublin General Plan and in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan for residents in the immediate and surrounding areas of Dublin. The site is currently being developed as parkland with Phase I having been completed and Phase II well underway. The property has never been designated for housing nor previously developed for such use. Displacement of housing units or people, therefore, would not occur. Additionally, the site was vacant and undeveloped prior to construction of other development in the area. EDSP Mitigation measures 3.4/20.0 through 3.4/35.0 are designed to ensure that adequate parks City of Dublin Jnitial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase ¡¡¡ P A 05-009 rage 32 February 22, 2005 and recreational facilities are provided in the community near residential development to serve the growing population of Dublin. This project is planned to serve the residential growth and residents in the immediate area based on the park standards in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Therefore, no impacts related to displacement of housing units or people are anticipated. XIII. Public Services a-e) Potential impacts related to: fire protection, police protection, schools, maintenance. or solid waste generation? No Impact. Construction and operation of the proposed rccreational facilities will not create a need for new public services or facilities. The Alameda County Fire Department and the Dublin Police Department have reviewed thc project to ensure that the facility meets their criteria for public use. An additional fire station has been built in the east Dublin area to serve the planning area, including the area where the park is located. Additionally, the park plan has been designed in conjunction with security criteria provided by the Police Department. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, as a basis for the provision of the Emerald Glen Park at this location, included sufficient fire safety resources to serve the projected growth and facilities in the area. Therefore, no impact related to public services is anticipated. XIV. Recreation a, b) Would the project increase use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or require the construction of new recreational facilities? No impact. The proposed project does not include residential development, so there would be no increase in the need for or impact on recrcational facilities. The project would add a much needed recreational facility with various types of active recreational uses to the east Dublin area, thcreby increasing the City's recreational resources and facilities to serve the community. No adverse impact related to recreational facilities will result, but rather, the park development will provide more recreational activities and facilities for the public's use. XV. TransportationlTraffie a-g) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial to existing traffic load and street capacity, exceed LOS standards for CMA roadways, change afair traffic patterns. increase traffic safety hazard, provide for inadequate emergency vehicle acceó's, inadequate parking, provide hazard or barrier to alternative transportation modes? No impact. No impacts are anticipated with regard to traffic or parking for the proposed recreational improvements. Existing and proposed roadway improvements have been designed and sized to provide adequate transportation facilities and transit modes with sufficient capacity for the use. Additionally, two fully improved accessways from Central Parkway serve this phase of the park development, and provide adequate access tor emergency vehicles. No adverse impacts related to transportation are anticipated. Additionally, a parking study was prepared for the project phase and the future development of City of Dublin Pago 33 Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 February 22, 2005 Phase 4 & 5 by Carducci & Associates, Inc. in May 2004 which analyzed the parking needs for the phase. The parking study anticipated the parking needs for each type of recreational facility in Phase III of the Plan and determined that 240 parking spaces would be needed to serve the phasc. The parking lot area has been designed to accommodate the 240 parking spaces, and Phase 4 & 5 will be accommodated by another parking area when it is constructed. Therefore, no adverse impacts relative to parking areas are anticipated. XVI. Utilities and Se¡-yice Systems a-g) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the R WQCB, require new or expanded water or wastewater treatment facilities, require neW storm drain facilities, require additional water supplies, require new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities, or require new :solid waste faci/itie:s ? No Impact. Since the subject site is currently vacant and within an area where urban services are available, the construction of the proposed recreation facilities will not increase the need for additional water services. Some service connections are anticipated prior to opeIÚng the facilities for public use. The project was taken into consideration when the wastewater tacilities where planned for the east Dublin area. Therefore, there would be no need for additional mitigation measures than those already found in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR. XV, Mandatory Findings of Significance a) Doe:s the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of afish or wildlife species, cau-ve afish or wi/dlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehi:story? No Impact. The preceding analysis indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse impact on overall environmental quality, including biological resources or cultural resources, with the implementation of mitigation measures included in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited. but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of pa:st projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probablefùture projects). No Impact. Although incremental increases in certain areas can be expected as a result of constructing this project, including air emissions, light and glare, the project site lies within an area with an approved specific plan which pewits urbanized development and community facilities. Mitigation measures are included in an approved EIR that would reduce any impacts to less-than-significant levels. c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human City of Dublin Page 34 Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 February 22, 2005 being~·. either directly or indirectly? No impact. No such impacts have been discovered in the course of preparing this Initial Study. City ofDubHn Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Page 35 February 22, 2005 BACKGROUND INFORMATION INTTJAL STUDY PREPARER Janet Harbin, Senior Planner, City of Dublin Community Devclopment Department AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSUL TED The following agencies and organizations were contacted in the course of this Initial Study: City of Dublin Community DeveJopment Department City of Dublin Parks and Community Services Department City of Dublin Public Works Department REFERENCES City of Dublin General Plan., updated November 2002. City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. 2000. City of Dublin. Department of Public Works: Notice to Contractors. Special Provisions. Proposal and Contract for Contract No. 05-02. Emerald Glen Park Phase III. (Bid Documents). Community Center and Recreation & Aouatic Center Parking Studv, Emerald Glen Park, prepared by Carducci & Associates, Inc., May 18,2004 Construction Proiect Plans for Emerald Glen Park Phase HI, preparcd by Carducci & Associates, dated December 10, 2004. Geotechnical Investigation for Phase III ofEmeraJd Glen Park, prepared by Kleinfelder Engineering, November 22, 2004 Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General P1an Amendment Environmental Impact Report.. Wallace Roberts and Todd, 1994. Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 1994, with update in 2004 Final Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.. Wallace Roberts and Todd, 1998. City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Emerald Glen Park, Phase III P A 05-009 Page 36 February 22, 2005 . '" = '" '" = ~ '" ... .8 00 -¡:¡ '" ~~ ::¡~ f ~ '~ ~~ ,Q. Q.I ~ ~ ~ 3 G ~ ~ ~z:E ~ i 2! E!';~ I"I~!!I g:§ ~ J:o;i '" " !:> «:~,::¡ "''''- ~Š ! "bb ~ ~" =~~ ~ e g o ¡¡'" ¡¡::]~ "!] ~ !! ~ o,¡:¡~ ¡."':E -01" z ... " o~':¡: :E " :\, z~'" ~~~ «: " ø~ I=i ~ ; 1"1 -š ~ .¡: ... .f e- ~ ~ .;: ~ <: 8<: 8 $' J! 1) $ > , ~ t 1!:¡1] ~. g, - a ~H jn êH ~ ¡¡o 0 " .s ~~ .~ ["" :ä o ~ ~ ¡¡ ¡¡ § . ;~ ~ :E'" êHª uQ U [ ~ ~ g š J J J sl ~ 18 '[ .- J! .¡¡ h ~ ,¡¡~ ..; ]~ 'æ "~ .., p .~ j" J!I ." . ~ þ " u . '-I '~.;'I'~ ~ !t.p J.h~ ~.",.¡3 ~ L;iõj 8"ji =.. § a . ~ ~ ~~ "'I .~tl. ~ i~ hq é ¡¡l]j.§ :,,: i:- ~ ~ § fi '§.:'/.¡¡ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g. '~." ~.~ e ~ :!~ d ~~ ~ ~ § ~ .~ '" 'õ.:!j i§ '" ~;!J~ æ:;: ~ 'Ii: -Ij' " ~ -II ¡j B ~ t~ ðH ],9 5¡¡-LHH ~8~~,Q",=,p..,~ ><: >< >< x >< ~ n h ~~d ~ ~ h ~nhh ~ ] .¡¡ t ~~ 1 .¡¡ " ~ ~ ~ 18 .~ c::; g 8 ~ Is 2~ i HJ j~ ~ ¡¡,~~Jj ~ ~ e ~ !t.J3 Po. .... ~ a ; ~ -Ij .š,;§U ~ r~ln t ]L~~ ~ H~i~ i 5!]~~~ :J" gJ ~'gJ :J" t ~ ~~O~~ J I } "j ~ .§ . ~ 1 ~ j {j ¡ .§> < i . " .IJ." . II) ~ ~ -; ~ JJ ËI.¡¡' ¡; - K 1;1. .~ §" n ! .h a~ '" <:1 ;", ~ ~þ U t r~ U '" Jj~ ",a ~ 0: 0: :<: ff: [:;ì ~ ~ ~ æ " " ~ $ '" ~ " o 0' " ~ 00 ~ ~ ::g it '" 00 ., .. . .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u u s š I éJ ~ u 8 .. " ~ " §.¡3 :n 11.;2 So ~ r~ : L ~ h! U ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ]!~ ~ ; Õ ~,<E -¡j g ~d ] ~~l! ~ ".Q °1 '"'" g 1°] ~ ~ ~.~š \b IJ ,.!w 11 ~p. '" ~ õ ~ . '" !i1 'Ii j '"~ ~.¡¡ .~ .~~ ~~;;. a -¡¡';;;~il-= ¡¡·~I ~ Hê h~'~ ...... u¡i¡()..ooo~a ~ ~ 0,2 '@ro 0'" .Jj!i1 d 81i ~"' ~ Jjg. ~] § ~1 '§.,. ci'i o '" ,b æ 0 ~ ~ u '" ~ ~ .¡¡" 1i ~'p tæ1~ !h~ ~~jg q¡~" s.:!å :!å Ut13~ H"j" !! § .." ~ ~ n ~ti~~" .~'" P-< !!1¡¡ § :nH·~HU fa,.:.o:J ã I..) v:. 8 ..... ~æ ~"PS1: o}:. ¡ § hj H n ~H]¡\¡ ¡L~],~ r¡~lUl1H 1i"g.~1i0,¡;¡o .~ ]h i;.¡3~ ~hHhu [:;ì [:;ì [:;ì [:;ì '" " ~ ~ '" ~ " 00 00 00 " " ~ ~ ~ ~ "' ~ 00 "' ><i ~ ~ o ~ .¡¡ ~ 1 . ~ .; ~ ~ ~ g. "1: § 3 ~ .J3 g .~ L 0: " ,; O! ~ ~ .,. '" ~:g <> T-E-~ .... ~ ~=- ~-j ~" f;o;1 s ~ f 1 ~ '" ) <E J ~ '" ~ ." ~ :£ ] w I~ ~ '" ~;g; ~ o .a 0 ~ ~ ~.r. ~ 11 Q ~ .£ :E;: " u _ u < o o " . '" '" '" ~ :; .., '" ¡; '" ;J '" $~ h iff '" ~~ ~ ~ ~ ¡¡ i; ¡¡ - " ~ c.;¡ .." 't:!~~ ;Jz", ~ '2 g ew':C c.¡ ~:! ",. -= ¡¡ "'''''s "'o(~ :£;¡"S. -<Ii_~ 0..0.. .. " .2$ ::!JUt ¡:;¡¡goi: ()~~ os", ~'8:,j c.;¡~1! ~ s .. -<Ii " " ~ o..!!!! ,.0..:;: Z'¡CI ot;ê ~ iI ~ z¡;Þ;e ~,§:;: ".g ~~ §Ë "" ;¡ c.¡ ~ ,!! s ~ ã! ë- ~ ~ .:;: g g ~ N @ N ~ ê ~ ~ s 0 ". 1 .~ J .~ 8 8 8 .: J 8' ~ 0 0 ~ § " § iø ~ ~ 0 ~~ ¡¡ ~ I ." ." ~ ~ ~ I;(t;lj .¡¡h ·n ~ ~ "'!J r" "' -Ii " " '" .g .~ . ¡:'.s ~.j¡~~ g ~ 0.'" .g ~ ~ fJ '" 1 1 Jj ~ o' 0 l'§j ~u <'I'" ~ ~.!!"¡Î I ì11~ jË ~ ~ ~ " 8~ ;¡j .~i I-s i3 õ,,':¡ :¡; ~-li H nb ]~ '" '" '" " . . -" "'.8 õ, o bl)~ E ;>-'å'l:: . 1 1 1 .. -!i§ f<28J: ~" ~ P. .!1~ i;'l! f P. U~ ~OO~~ ",n ~ n ~ 00. ~ ~ l! § il ID,~o~ . .~ ~ 1;1' ~.s] "-11 '" g;:;lš ~·r'" ~ .~ ~!: ~1 u .¡¡ .¡¡ . "'~r~ ~j 8 eq¡ 'E .§,s,; u 'õ 11 ~ -.' no ~ .D.!!¡ 0 ~ [ß tl[~ ."", u " ~t:I g i:> ".~ ~ ~ 0. .t' .¡j ~jr "'~- '" u · ~~ . d ~ g. 'õ . .¡¡ .¡¡ 'E ü. ·n E ;¡¡ ,s 0 11 ]' s ~'" o.'"~~ 0. ~~ -~- s] .S . o '= ~ Q~] - lias · 'g " lis;£ . .S íj; ." ~~ 1 ~]H !:-"ò "òã "'.Ii ~ 'g H~~fJ~ ~ !lII'~ 'Eflõ h $i ~b 0 8 ~ ~H. ~ia is ~ OJ..> :; ~ ""' ¡; ~ ~ "i ~ ~ Hi ~ U 'r ~." ~'ií~i ?:" ~ ~- '" 0 . ,., .- ~~ '" 'C ~ ~~[d~ ~ ~.~ öi " ;<' Í'H~ "" 0 U co"" '" 1/.1 Q, a ::I ~ C:., ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~~ ~§ ~§~ ~~ ~§ " " I!! I!! h h h h h~ ~ h @ @ ~ !:f"ö ¡:;. 1 H 1 "ò .S · 'E ¡; § ~~ ¡¡, ~ ¡j ] 0 ~ g ." - §." 1~~ ~ Jj~ ¡ · . ~ ., L~ " I\~ H It ." .- 8 .~ "ò 1 ¡¡ H§ 11'" ,!¡l ~ - ~ 0. ;; " "'" H § . Jj"'l .~.~ ~ t~ "" :a ~ ~ ~ ¡] · '" ~ .¡j .~ ¡¡ "'." ~ 8 §¡þ -!i- ".EI.l!! jH j " 0. j ~ 'iJE 6'" . 11} j 'õ1!~ '; -'" <Ji:. 1: ¡jf~ ~." ~. ¡¡51 t ~ ~ .Jj "",s " ~ III -'" ~] ,., s f~ u g 1 'I ~ ~ ~]1 g 8 .~ ~ "1 1~ ¡j, 6.g ~1 ¡¡ ~'õ.g H1 1] ¡¡ . ~ .:~ ~~ E ~0:¡J tJ " . 8 " ." §'" ~'" . 5 ~ § ., ~ ¡¡'¡¡o ~'] ~i 1 '" ~~ .¡j~ "::J ,¡¡ 0 g.11 [ ro ]- u '" m i ~ ] " ~ " is .~ :t!~.* !f" [8 t~~ ." ~ 'õ'¡¡ H.Jj . - ~ ·-1 .q §~ ¡¡ q ï~ · . ~.~ '"" ~ $ "ß: "~ iH H fJ.§.Jj ~'iJ ] ¡j " - ~~€ L· ¡¡ . h - . U .~~ ;¡jj" oN ~ p.,~ -. p ~~ ,,~ ~ "','§ ] ~'" u ~~ !j í2 iii, o.ª ~ ~ =-- ¡:¡:,¡;:: '1.1: . ~ :iJ ~:e ~~ ~ . ~ 5 t['~ c;;¡. H g<:§ .~ :íJ5\] iJ . ,¡¡.~ . "a ~I Ii ,g ~ .. ~ ia " . a ~ HH .o~! Ju '~ ]Sj o' ."!'" ~ 8 ,t ;<1 U ~~ öiª ..,9 ::! ~ ~ ..¡ ..¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. '" ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" " " 0 0 '" ,,¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ,.; ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" "' '" ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ m ,.; <'¡ "- 0, g :; 00 g ~ 00 " 00 s ::: ::: 0, '" 0, ¡:Q~ g ,J, Eo-< N. .,...~ gj'¡:Q:;; .. ,... ~ ~:E ~ Iõ ~ ~ '" 5 a ] e "' <E § ." ~ . "" ¡, . :>: < '" 8 ï " .~ ~ "' . s i ~ ~ -&g ~ 4-< b3 ~ ~ " . '" '" :-" "( ~ û ] '" IJ .... ... " - '" ~ ~~ '" .. ,,:¡:: f ~ ~] :;~ ø.. " ~ ~:ði = .. " '" '" ~¡j '"Z~ E... " " ¡:¡ .. a-;~ '" ~~ . -= " ~"'å 'i'0;!~ :¡¡ " S' ~..!!'" ø..ø..", ... " a <oS!6 ~ ~l£ c.Þ 5 § Oe" I>i:.¡¡" =-c~ ~QlÌiii ~~~ ¡¡¡" '" o.s¡j ~ø..:; -" f .. 0,,'''' ~ ~ :. Z~:¡:: ;;= Su¡... f-o-§ ~~ - s ~i '" " 09 ~ .::: ... ,! E- " ~ .-: ~ ! ,J. <:> ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g I ~J 8 J J J 8 8 ~J J ~ ~ ~,~ ¡; i ~ HJ .8 ~ ~ ~.š 15 ;>-. ¡¡. g ~lJ.1f f<~ i!. I ~ ¡~]~ ~]~ 1 g ø ø . E .~ ~ 1! '" i:jj;''' :¡;¡:¡j ~ I I ~I~: !~~ I !!! ~. ~ ~ilê ~!I i ¡¡ ¡¡ ~ . ~ 8 ~ :> -,; ~ J :;¡ ~ N '[ '[[ 8 ] ! ~!§ I H i~ ! ~ ~ i .~ ~ .If ~ ~ ~ If ] hr~ ~ ~ 's ~.'; = ] "~.~ ~"$..8 . ~ ~ ] ~ ~ j ~ n 1 H i ~1> n ~] ~ l l[ ~ ~ -" ]e"j :;: . '" go - :~ 18 $ . . ] Hl~~HHhÆU ~ ~ ~ ; ! ,~ .~ .~ ~ ~ ~ '"' ><i ~~~~Q.~ ~9",9~5 >-L<~µ..~¡¡;aJ ~~~~~~ ¡:§1;IJ~rn¡-'oo '" .¡¡ i:J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j i ¡¡ .9 .~ !! .~ ~ ~ ¡ M ~ .¡¡ £ ¡¡ ~ I "e' :: ¡ I t .~ ø ~ ~ .~ . f I ~ 'iI . ~ N . ~ ". 1:1 /;1J)"I;; ~ .s ~ ~ ~ Ii ~.. § '¡¡8'~ ~l J.¡..¡ä:~~~þ.., .. .. ~ '" '" '" ~ ~ -=0: 0 ó <1 <'i ~ If¡ ,;;; '" ¡ri ¡.-: M '" @~ d'" o ~ u l~ ~~ "'-" .~ 4:: 500 H ~ - ll~ ~ bI:'l:! ¡j IS 1~] ~ c ~.~ ~ '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' '"' ><i ><i '"' ~g~5~9~9~gg 9 9 ~g ~~ ~,,~,,~,,~,,~"" " " ~" ~~ ~g~~~~~~~g~~~g~~~g ~g " ¡¡ JI .¡¡ .¡¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ î~ ~ ~ .~~J ~~. $ I~ c~~ ~ ~Ue £. O..¡j a ¡¡j .g.~ !¡.!:! -6 '1iI.~ g,u ~~. ~~B ~~ £ a BI - I- t~H 9_ d~ ~H' tªlo~ ~:¡¡l H ¡'=ß~ c~è ~§ &J ~]u¡ õ~ J!J~I~e1 1£.ê~)1 ~~ ~u¡q~ ~r;r' r;r'....So~;o::!¡;¡ "E~ i£1~"H ~t~8 ~~¡¡i r~ $ :e:E ~.gf ~ ~ ~ ~ ::S'~ ê ~ ~ ~ ~ £I. ] ~,aê -B a ~ ~ :; ~ '" ~ ~o ê ~ ~ .¡¡n ;s ¡¡ .~" ¡¡ ~ .~ ~ .8 ] d" ~"' [~ ¿¡a~~ aij~ 8"'",,,, ". j ~ ~ ~ ~.g ~ ~ ij '" 1 ~ '~I u U ~~~õil~~~~~~·~l£~~ ~~ ¡¡q'¡¡~jE~ """1¡¡o:g¡,.\;!O ~š j.~81~ ~~~g~~~j~J šl ~~'¡¡I~ '1iIa'1il~'¡¡~~.~j.1 l)!í·i~!í~!í'3lU~·S' ~!1 ,h!§",¡o!ðIL ~l", l~~.§'â ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ .. ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ JJ ~ ] ~ § 'õ .~ 0 > := p, .8 ~~1 ~ ~~ u £ >ô' .S . J!"' . * . ~ ¡¡: ef:Q II) ~ ~ ¡;j~ .~ o A·ë c¡ .,a a JJq ~ ~~- ::;: §H 'Š lU~i ~ $ ~~ g JIH.¡¡ .HJ,8 ø~ ~ ~O p:::. ~ ~ p::: ~ !? 00000 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffl M ~ ~ ó $ ..; ó vi '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '"' '" '" '" '" ~ ='" g ME-< '"'. It'""'''' o':§i ¡;j::;: f;o;1 .. .. ~ '"' 9 " h s ~ f "'. Æ ] '" ] Jj JJ ø .'" ~ '" ~ > ." ;h :1: < 'E 8 " ' .,r¡ ~ ] i í ;5 h i <+-< ¡)'j' ~ o ] ~ G ð];¡; ~ 0- '" 9 '" '" õ: '" ] C/1 õI ;0 - '6 :=- ~= ~ '" -", f!! I - ~~ o..~~ .. '" ~ ~ eel !3 G ~; ~ ~ ] Z :E ~;li;:;iì~,;~ ~ 1 g a -.¡: .;¡ ~:! ~~ ~ :5:'<I~ '" .. S' õ:¡i;~ ~ " ã ~~= -";' ,II!:; ~ =' ;:¡r;~ D ¡¡.. °S,g ~ã..';j ~~è ~ = ; ê£~ ! ~õI" ot:§ ;;;: ¡¡ ~ ,>,e,:¡:e ,~ ::I ~~.., <= e,:¡¡::¡ - E ~i ~ ~ .;; a .g ~ '" ~ ~ :: N ~ 00 ~ <- ~ v ~ ~ " ~ ü ü [j ~ '> s s s .~ J ~ ~ ~ [ 21 II J ~ ,. .. .. ~ g k k k ~. 'õ] u 8 ~ ~ . " :¡¡ v J u 04" ª-¡j I 1 ~J 'å .~ lJ "," !J. H j v· ~] Q '" ~ -<e_ .¡¡¡ ~ 0. ~~ 0 IJ¡ g! 0 ~ "" '" g 'C '" . 11 ~h ~ . v ~ t .S 1 .; ~ j~ ] f.š -ii .".¡;. o._~ ~~ Š ð C1II;f; 0' . ,[~ "'¡¡- ~ iH .. <e IJ:" ~ ft~ " 0 ..g ¡" ¡" £õ [us ~ u !J: ~1 u " ~ ~~j "5 .~ U <e .. h 1j 8 ¡¡ ;¡ 0 0 '" 0 I I 0,," d i [~j "'.~ i~ '" õ 1IoRo. ~ Ii . " ß"~ S ~ ii :" .š ]~ ",o' v ~ n ä "" ij È' ] i~ f,.g ). ~ä 8 ~;g:-t: ~<3 ] ~ .Þ @~ 'ª ~ ~ H] ] Q' .... hi ,g:i! ,;¡ ~ ~.Þ' ,g~ :;~ ~~i O<e " ~~1 r .~ ;~ c.Jg =~ ~l ~1 .. ~ 1<. . . ~ :: i ~ 'Sj. t ~] ,~ ""'d or::: ~H ~d <: '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~g ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ "" h h h h h ~~ ~" ~U~ Nr ::J N ~ '" ::J o v ~.š ... · 1 ~ " f1J ~ ~i t v .ii1 ~ g iJ J¡", l¡ u ~~ '" v d .¡j t :tffi, ~ '" · .g H: ~ ~~ i ~ ~ '", '" ;¡" 1 n · iJ P .. § ~ ,~ '. 11 r· ~$ .Jj J! ¡j'ã 'g. -¡¡ 'E.~ " iJ 1s J¡" P ,3 ~ ]'~ 8 ~- ~ '" ~ o ~ t .¡& g "" j~ -'ij " = ~j cE ~ .51 . ~ rd .§¡; g '6 ~.!!.,d¡; .. ~ 11 ~ I~ t ,s ~ £~'jSC 2 ~ 8" li .-¡¡ . 0 ~ 8 ~ i ". Ii S ~<3 .~ :s ~~ H !s&u ~i ,g . ~ 1 ~ Ii n . ." = Æ'~ ê ~ ~~ - J!) H " ':0 " ~ Ii " . ; I DO 0. ~.1J ~ ¡¡ 8";¡J '"d.E ~ ~ :¡ . ¡¡ ~~ ¡¡¡> "" ~ ij ~ "Ii ~ ".J! "-j j i§ I ~ ~ ~i o v 'PJ'i '" 0 H~h~ "6 i~ ~ § " " 1Jš <e _ <3 ii, B ..g i~ - . § 0 ~;1 Hi I 0 00 Ii ~ u j ,- 13' ~.~ .§ e ~ .g - ¡¡; " <e '" 0 .] h~h ¡¡ " 0 r'" .. ~. .j¡ .- . ucE .p 0 §<3 :6.~ ..8 ", ~ o 0. ii, " . o'u ~ ~ 0 "" j ~ ~ "'. J¡d 'E ¡¡ , ~,~ ¡¡ .g. 0 ~ 8. ~ ..t~ ~~i ~¡¡ J¡iJ ä .~"a ';:: §r d ~~_vl v " "~. E ['õ j ; 11 g g ª H .~ :a: ..8~ü h ,.- ~H 0' g o'- H 0. . ':¡' u ,:¡~ h¡jL¡¡ .:is-B .q.§ ~ ~ ~ ~ :;: :;: ~ :;: " :;: '" '" ~ " " " " :3 " " " Ë~ " ~ ~ ,; ~ ~ :¡: ~ ~ £i ¡::: ."::9 '" '" '" '" .; .i '" '" '" 11: .... " 8 N <> '" v ~ <> " i1 i1 i1 ;:) ~ " " "ir~".y:,:i'; ~_"', ' 'II,'. "'''',', D '¡'I:;:, , ','., ~;~~'"",I~II::" " ,',~::"',:;I..i,::: ".." :::'. :,: ': '~:' ':1, ';I,:",;;~~;~'I~IJ}:ilr!'I: ~:~" :¡!~!!~:::' ~';: ,I,:"ij';"'ir'l : :,:,~,'}~" """,':' ~i~"'t~III::i ", .",;,,:,. ''',' ' ~I~:I:L,:~I,) "'.',;"," \' CC¡:9 '=' t"'''· ... '" e!!~;; ..~~ ¡:.j s o ] .. ~ 0. Ji " '" ] .:s = o 'g ~ ~ " . jj l ~ 1 ~ ." I' S! '" II ~ . .b >. 0\ ç. 8 'h; ~ ~ '" . o iiI ~ "" ~ ;1$ -<: ~ Õ +=:1 P. 8 . ;0-, '" .e In " '= ~~ ~ .. .. ... ~~ ~~ o..,,~ = ;0- ~ !,I ~ a G ~ñ ~z:E t"Ø IS a.!!" ¡:.¡~<! 0\'= 5 s~~ ,;,...- o ~ ~ :;¡¡;I::' " " Š ..!¡!SI' :E ~ ~ ~~£ ç,:Iijg OEl" <>:"''' =-=< rJ f" ¡;¡ ~ ~ O-:iJ ~~~ o~-:= :E = !\, Z~"" ~ S.5I,., E-<'" '" = rJA .. E ~i ¡:.¡ ~ ~ .¡: '" t ~ ~ '"' is ,;, o :; ~ :¡ ~ .. ~ S ¡;; i£ ~ ~ !> !> ... "" J J ~ Hi~ ~ j E J J i /j g -ci ¡; Õ .~ .~ " ] " .¡¡ t .~ .~ ~ ... ~ ! ~ ] ª' 11 n II . [ j ~ ~ '" ¡;. :;;: . :;;: .S ¡,,-¡¡ ~ .~ .@ .. " . o > ~i ~ '" -1J .. ;:-1J ..; ] '" ~ " ; H J H " '!: ,<0 - .., g g g 11 Š11 " ." U ..,'" t ; g i [ "[ .J:i '" ] . M" 0 § · ~ H 8~ · .~ 6 U .¡¡ u 0 ;,l):!::< F '" '" ~ " ." g ·ê 0 .È' o¡j o¡j "oS " . .~ ._ 0 ',$ 1 U ~ .!I H ~.¡¡ 1 n a g 8';;1 It " " t - . f, ~ h U g . '" H g J ·3] ~ .s: ~" H 11 ." .~ ~ ~ '8; .. 1~ '6 ~ ." 08' ~ g ",'8 ;¡8 '" u " u.. u ~ u 08 >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< ~~ .. ~ ð ~ ~ 0 ~ Q "''' ~ ¡;: ~@ u ~ 5 h 5 ~~~ ~~5~ N"'O ~n ~~~ " " ",,'" ~ " 0 ·Ë g] ~ h ~ .9 " i~" ~ .¡¡ i:§ I .S ,S 0 ]~ ~ ~ 'p '0 I 0 19~ \j .1i ~s ~ . .@. " ld "'. 3g -~ î "-~ "[ \! ~ . ~1] ¢ .¡J :E ~ ~ § L g '0:, Ð "- "'.g 8 ~ .~ H ,J " .. i i§ .E ;." ;¡., ,~ ~ }s"E U$ · '8 ]] I~ " . " "", ~ g " 811 .¡¡ ~ '" 0 8]] .. .Jj~ .. ß~ h ¡¡ß 0 0 ¡¡ " . 0 H ." ,~.~] ~ " 0.0 e- .S ~ I u §." " ·s :¡¡ ] ~ 0. ¡¡~ U'l jj g g . .~ -H~ .S ~ 11 .S o'E .~ ~ U 8'111 $.9 g. l.. J ßf-I"š ".g !J ~'" ~ i~~ ~.~ l~ u ~ 11 :~ l:I "" '" $.Jj ,8 ~~ E S '........ -~ ~j ~ ~p Hi o ~ ." q i¡ 11& g;;: ..~ h " " " ]~ $ õ-1J 80 H ; >.~ g H ~- " - j E] ¡¡ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ rl H -$ oJj " ]'11 ~~ g ~ '" 1 .~ '8' ~H H ~ ~ ~ .~ j ~¡¡ ~ ~d~ ¡".~ .. ~ ~ 16 ,; ,<,[ h· Ö ~ .Q <tI _ oS H IH " g" ar~ ,~ a,¡ ~ E h o ~ .. ~ .. l~ ]" ~ .. ! " .~ !i ..... ~ 0 ! ~ . u ~ . ltS !Ii go ~ " s ':¡š ~.g .E ,.., " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.., .. .. .. ;':~ 0 0 o 0 o 0 :;¡ 0 ~ ~ ""'<'E:9 ....; ::i'$;g ~ ~ ~f"~<§= -" §~ 'õ~ - -<; - "'0 '" '" '" M~p.., or<i r";~p.., ...; '^ " ~ Œ :;; '" '" 00 '" ~ '" ..... ..... ..... '" '" '" '" " " '" , : ~ I :'" I:"" ' ": . ' , ~:,:,~"I,;~I!tIII~ 'i" , i ;: "II :,!'II ; ~ \ " ' : : qr,:q:,"~::,9 "I:::, '1,~',r:1 ~i~'." . ',"""':.:, :,:,;:,::¡¡~II.' ¡,,:.,:,~,'j':J'~,il:',: ::,1 ß1,9'-)!j'J1"·:,, ~::,~l"i!ji.,~,) '.','....'..".'...' "!.'..'.'.'.."."'.'.".'.'.'.'..' :I !"":I;:W\I'::" !i:.,,',.".','.;.~".'.~I.,I.,." ~~'~'I'~:I(J""I '11:'::1...1·1' =~ 8 4>"''''. ....~ ";9- l~1 f;I;< s £ 1 ~ ] Jj .s g ." J . > ! " " 8 13 " " '" ¡ :E ;;: " .¡¡ ij ~ .g ic. ~ co "'~ ~ o íd:2 b- ';:I .0( ~ û :¡¡..