HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8.3 ADA LegislativeChanges
CITY CLERK
File # D(;;1~[Q]-[5]~
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 2005
SUBJECT:
Considcration of Support for Legislative Changes that would Amend
the Americans with Disabilities Act to Require Notice Prior to Filing
a Lawsuit
Report Prepared by Joni Pattillo, Assistant City
ATTACHMENT:
1) Letter from City of Morro Bay
rJ./ 2) Proposed Resolution
'i; Council to consider the adoption of the attached resolution or supply
Staffwith additional direction on this matter.
RECOMMENDATION:
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None
DESCRIPTION:
The federal government enacted the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) to prevent
discrimination to individuals with disabilities_ ADA guarantecs cqual opportunity for individuals with
disabilities in public accommodations, employment, transportation, state and local government services,
and telecommunications. The City of Dublin subsequent to the enactment of ADA also adopted the ADA
Transition Plan in 1993; the plan articulated various strategies in ordcr to provide equal access to thc
disabled when providing municipal services.
The City of Morro Bay based on the direction of the City Council for the City or Morro Bay is requesting
the City of Dublin's support for legislation that would amend ADA and California State Access laws to
require notice prior to filing a lawsuit. The City of Morro Bay is locatcd on the Pacific Coast of
California about half way between San Francisco and Los Angeles ncar Hearst Castle and the Big Sur
Coast. The City is a pleasant tourist destination with shops, restaurants and hotels along thc coastline and
within several blocks of thc primary streets. The City of Morro Bay has grown very little in the past 20
years, and as of 2000, there are 10,350 people residing in the City. All the shops and rcstaurants are
10cal1y owned and operated and arc considered "Mom & Pop" shops.
In 2002, litigation was Illed against thc City of Morro Bay for aJ1eged violations of the ADA and Statc
Access laws. The City of Morro Bay settled a portion of the lawsuit by agreeing to spend $75,000 on
ADA improvements ovcr the next five years. The City of Morro Bay has been unable to settlc the portion
of the lawsuit dealing with attorneys' fèes as plaintiffs attorneys demanded approximately $200,000. The
Court recently reduced the amount of the attorneys' fees to $54,000; however, plaintifl"s attorncy is
appcaling thc dccision.
_________________M~~__________________________________-___________.__.~_______________________~_.____________
COPIES TO:
H/c<-forlll'/agdastmt.doc
1002-
ITEM NO. _8.3
In 2004, litigation was filed against 16 loeally owned and operated restaurants in Morro Bay for alleged
violations of ADA. All the lawsuits are identical and have bccn filcd by the same plaintiff and attorney.
These lawsuits have had a tremendous impact on the Community. Two of the restaurants have had to
closc thcir doors, as they did not have the financial ability to fight the allegations. It appears tl1at the spirit
of ADA is being abuscd by a growing number of attorneys. Without giving small business owners an
opportunity to remedy the alleged violations, thcse attorneys are filing lawsuits for minor technical access
violations. Fearing the timc, hassle and expense of lawsuits, small businesscs arc being forced into cash
scttlements- most of which goes to the attorneys.
In order to help rectify this problem, legislation has been introduced by California State Assemblyman
Tim Lcslie (AB 2594) and by U.S. Congressman Mark Foley (H.R. 728) that would amend ADA to
require, as a precondition to commencing a civil action with respect to a place of puhlic accommodation
or commercial facility, tbat an opportunitybc provided to correct alleged violations.
Recommendation
Council to considcr the adoption of the attached resolution or supply Staff with additional direction on
this matter.
2l1b1.-
\ObG
City of Morro Bay
Morro Bay, CA 93442 . 805-772-6200
VET
RECEI ..
1.1'
"
01';:'.
C\TY Of UU\::'IìJI'
December 21, 2004
Richard C. Ambrose
Dublin City Manager
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568-2658
£Þ
cK,Lté)
e- ~--,~ .
Re: Requestfor support/or legislation that would amend the Americans with lJisabWties Act
to require notice prior to filing a lawsuit.
Dear City Manager:
This correspondence is being sent to you at the direction of the City Council for the City of
Morro Bay to solicit your support for legislation that would amend the Americans with
Disabilities Act and California Statc Access laws to rcquire notice prior to filing a lawsuit.
As you may know, the City of Morro Bay is located on the Pacific Coast of California about half
way between San Francisco and Los Angeles near Hearst Castle and the Big Sur Coast. The City
of Morro Bay is a working fishing village and the local fishing industry is one of the most
important along the California Coast. The City is a pleasant tourist destination with shops,
restaurants and hotels along the coastline and within several blocks of the primary streets. The
Embarcadero, which runs along the waterfront, includes art galleries, tourist gift shops, surf and
sport shops and dozcns of rcstaurants. Thc City of Morro Bay has grown very little in the past 20
years, and as of 2000, there are 10,350 people residing in the City. There are absolutely no
national chains in the City of Morro Bay except grocery stores and fast food chains. All of the
shops and restaurants are 10cally owned and operated and are considered "Mom & Pop" shops.
In 2002, litigation was filed against the City for alleged violations of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) and State Access laws. The City quickly settled a portion of the lawsuit
by agreeing to spend $75,000 on ADA improvements over the next five years. The City was
unahle to settle the portion of the lawsuit dealing with attorneys' fees as plaintiff s attorneys
demanded approximatcly $200,000. The Court rccently reduccd the amount of the attorneys'
fccs to $54,000; however, plaintiffs attorney is appealing the decision.
In 2004, litigation was filed against 16 locally owned and operated restaurants in Morro Bay for
alleged violations of ADA. All of the lawsuits are identical and have been filed by the same
plaintiff and attorney. These lawsuits have had a trCll1cndous impact on the Community. Two of
AOMINISTRATION
595 Harbor Srrect
CITY ATIORNEY
955 Shasta Avenue
FINANCE DEPARTMr...."T"T'" ..TnT; nr.nARTf\rfr.NT
595 Harbor Street 1"1 ß ~DG 'a~
A TT ACHMENT 1
PUBLIC SERVICE
955 Sha~ta AvcßUI
HARBOR DEPARTMENT
1275 En'lharc:a.dt:ro Road
POLICE DEPARTMENT
870 Mono Bay Boulevard
Request for Support - ADA
December 21, 2004
7..lfb -5
the rcstaurants have had to close their doors as they did not have the financial ability to fight the
allegations.
The 14-ycar-old Americans with Disabilities Act is a good law. Unfortunately, the intent and
spirit of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 is being abused by a growing number of
attorneys. Without giving small business owners an opportunity to remedy the alleged violations,
these attorneys are filing lawsuits for minor technical access violations. Fearing the time, hassle
and expense of lawsuits, small businesses are being forced into cash settlements - most of which
goes to the attorneys. By creating a multitude of cases, these attorneys are generating substantial
amounts of income for themsclves at the expcnsc of small businesses.
To help rectify this problem, Congressman Mark Foley (R-FL) introduced the ADA Notification
Act (H. R. 728), which amends the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 to deny jurisdiction
to a court in a civil action for remedies unless the complainant has implemented specified
notification procedures that include opportunity for correction of the alleged violation.
At the State level, Assemblyman Tim Lcslic (Tahoc City) has introduced similar legislation. AB
2594 Public accommodations: persons with disabilities would allow a person who hires an ADA
specialist to review the design and construction of the person's premises to havc a Certificate of
ADA Compliance. Holders of such a certificate would be entitled to notice and the opportunity
to correct future ADA violations before a civil lawsuit could be filed.
Congressman Foley's and Assemblyman Leslie's legislation would curtail the abusive practice
of certain attorneys filing lawsuits for easily correctable ADA infractions and would enable
small businesses to work with the disabled community to correct minor violations and improve
accessibility for the disabled. In effect, passagc of this Icgislation would tip the balance back to
accessibility and back to the disabled and away from the lawyers.
Recently our City Council passed the enclosed resolution and directed Staff to notify other
jurisdictions and solicit support in our endeavor to seek an amendment to the Americans with
Disabilities Act to require notice prior to filing a lawsuit.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
7?00J.~
Rohert Schult;<
City Attorney
· .
" '
~$
RESOLUTION NO. 68-e4
RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MORRO BAY SUPPORTING LEGISLATION
AMENDING THE AMERICANS Wlm DISABILITIES ACT
TO REQUIRE NOTICE PRIOR TO FILING LEGAL ACIlON
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morre Bay, California
WHEREAS, the Americans with Disabilities Act gives civil rights protection to individuals with disabilitie¡¡
similar to those provided to individuals on the bllllis of mee, color, sex, national origin, age, and religion; and
WHEREAS, the Americans with Disabilities Act guarantees tJqual opportwúty for individuals with disabilities
in public acqómmodations, employment, transportation, state and local government services, and
telecommunications; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay supporbJ the goals of this- bmrltnArk civll rights läw and the original intent
of the Americans with Disabilities Act because it provides equal access opportwúties for all Americans; and
WHEREAS, since the enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act, many abuses have been perpetrated
against property owners by a few unscrupulous attorneys seeking to wage economic retribution upon property
owners using the guise of a well-intentioned civil rights law, Unfortunately, it is not the goal of these few
attorneys to intprove accessibility for the disabled, but to exact financial punishment through lawSuits; and
WHEREAS, legislation has been introduced by California State Assemblyman Tint Leslie <AB 2594) and by
U.S, Congressman Mark Foley (H.R 728) that would amend the Americans with Disabilities Act to reqnire, as
a precondition to conunencing a civil action with respect to a place of public accommodation or commercial
facility, that an opportwúty be provided to correct alleged violations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY that
this Council. supports the adoption of legislation that would require notice prior to filing legal action for
violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act since it would curtail the abusive practice of certain attorneys
by providing a due process provision for property owners so that they may be in.full compliance with the Act.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon passage, the City Clerk shall deliver this Resolution to the League
of California Cities, Central Coast Cities, the Governor's office, and to the California and Federal Legislative
Delegation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro Bay at a regular meeting thereof held on
the 21" day of September, 2004 on the following vote: .
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Elliott, Peirce. Peters, Winholtz, Yates
None
None
ATTEST:
~ç
RESOLUTION NO. - 05
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*********
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
SUPPORTING LEGISLATION AMENDING THE AMERICANS WITH
DISABILITIES ACT TO REQUIRE NOTICE PRIOR TO FILING LEGAL ACTION
WHEREAS, the Amcricans with Disabilities Act gives civil rights protection to individuals with
disabilities similar to those provided to individuals on the basis ofrace, color, sex, national origin,
agc, and religion; and
WHEREAS, the Americans with Disabilitics Act guarantees equal opportunity for individuals with
disahilities in public accommodations, employment, transportation, state and local government
services, and telecommunications; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin supports the goals of this landmark civil rights law and the
original intent of thc Amcricans with Disabilities Act because it provides equal access
opportunities for all Americans; and
WHEREAS, since the enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act, many abuses have been
perpetrated against property owners by a few unscrupulous attorneys seeking to wage economic
rctribution upon property owners using the guise of a well-intentioned civil rights law.
Unfortunately, it is not the goal ofthcsc few attorneys to improve accessibility for the disabled, but
to exact financial punishment through lawsuits; and
WHEREAS, legislation has been introduced by Calirornia State Assemblyman Tim Leslie (AB
2594) and by U.S. Congressman Mark Foley (H.R. 728) that would amend the Americans with
Disabilities Act to require, as a precondition to commencing a civil action with respect to a place
of public accommodation or commercial facility, that an opportunity be provided to corrcct alleged
violations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Dublin that this Council
supports the adoption of legislation that would require notice prior to filing legal action for
violations of thc Americans with Disabilities Act sincc it would curtail the abusivc practice of
certain attorneys by providing a duc process provision for property owners so that they may bc in
full compliance with the Act.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon passage, the City Clerk shall deliver this Resolution to
the League of California Cities, the Governor's office, and to thc California and Fedcral
Legislative De1egation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day ofJanuary, 2005.
AYES:
ATTACHMENT 2
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
r;i~6
City Clerk
Mayor