Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 6.3 Esprit At Dublin Rch
G~~~ OF DUB~ti 19~ ~ ,82 STAFF REPORT CITY C L E R K `~~C~~~~ DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL File # ?[~]Q©-03 OO- ~ DATE: October 19, 2010 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Joni Pattillo, City Manager SUBJECT: Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station) - Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan and an Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project. PA 09-002 Prepared By: Kristi Bascom, Project Planner J~j EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This public hearing item was continued from the October 5, 2010 City Council meeting to October 19, 2010. D.R. Horton, Inc. is proposing to construct amulti-family residential townhouse community with 105 units on ± 4.1 net acres of land within the Dublin Transit Center project on Site E-1. A Planned Development Rezone will allow the development of either the 105-unit Esprit at Dublin Station Project (proposed) or the 300-unit Metropolitan at Dublin Station project (previously- approved). The proposed amendment to the existing Development Agreement for the project site relates to the allowed density of uses (to permit the 105-unit project), an extension of the existing Agreement term by seven years, an amendment to the affordable housing obligations for the property, and a provision on a public art fee. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: (1) Receive Staff presentation; (2) Open the public hearing; (3) Take testimony from the Applicant and the public; (4) Close the public hearing and deliberate; and (5) Take the following actions: a) Waive the reading and introduce an Ordinance approving a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan for the Esprit at Dublin Station project; and b) Waive the reading and introduce an Ordinance approving Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at blin S tion). ubmitted By Re a ed By: Community Development Director Assistant City Manager Page 1 of 8 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION: Figure 1: Vicinity Map Background: The 4.13-acre site, referred ~ a~ to as site "E-1" in the Transit k ~ s ~ ~ Center Stage 1 Development ` ~ ~ ~ Plan, is located within the ~ ~ j FroJect ~ - .Site Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ~ , ~ - area. The site has a General - } j Plan land use designation of , ' „~R,,~~ " g~;; Campus Office and is in a ~ ~ ~ . ~ . gip. Planned Development Zoning ~ ` District. The site is currently ~ ~ s ~ 2~ a ~ _ E. ~a ~ vacant and is surrounded by ~ ~ ~':w~"~..,~e~. ~ the Avalon Dublin Station ~ ~ ~ `R~ ~ ~ ~ residential project to the ~ " ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ west, vacant land to the e i ~ ~ ~ ~ south and the east, and ~ r Camp Parks to the north ~ - ~ Tt S S s Dublin acros Boulevard, as ~~=TMti--:!~ ~ x a,~ . ~h ~ ~ , W shown on the Figure 1 to the ~ ~ ~ - " right. The site is rectangular and flat, and is located less than a quarter mile from the East Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station. Entitlement History: In December 2002, the City Council approved a General Plan/Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment (Resolution 216-02); approved a Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning (Ordinance 21-02); and approved Tentative Parcel Map 7892 (Resolution 02-40), for the Dublin Transit Center. The 91-acre Transit Center site is located generally between the Iron Horse Trail to the west, Dublin Boulevard to the north, Arnold Road to the East, and the BART station to the south. A Master Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center was adopted in May 2003 (Ordinance 5-03) and together with the approved General Plan/Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map, established the land use approvals for the future development of the site. The Master Development Agreement was then amended to set forth affordable housing obligations in the project area (Ordinance 25-05). The Transit Center Stage 1 Development Plan (Ordinance 21-02) designates the land use of Site E-1 as Campus Office, with up to 300,000 sq. ft. of office and 15,000 sq. ft. of ancillary retail. The Transit Center Plan also further defined this parcel as a flex parcel that could be developed with up to 300 residential units. The 105-unit Esprit project is permitted by the Stage 1 Development Plan. Page 2 of 8 The following entitlements have been granted for residential projects in the Transit Center: Date Develo er Project Name Site # of units Janua 2004 D.R. Horton Elan B-1 257 January 2004 Avalon Bay Avalon Dublin Station 305 (with 15,000 square feet of round-floor retail A ril 2004 EAH, Inc. Camellia Place A-2 112 Total 674 units All three of the above projects have been completed and are occupied except for the ground floor retail at Avalon at Dublin Station. In March of 2006, D.R. Horton received approval of a 300-unit condominium project (Metropolitan at Dublin Station) with approximately 15,000 square feet of ground floor retail on the E-1 project site. The approvals included a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 2 Development Plan, Vesting Tentative Map, Site Development Review, and Development Agreement. The Development Agreement vested the project approvals for five (5) years, which are set to expire in March 2011. Project Proposal: The Esprit at Dublin Station project includes 105 residential condominium units at a density of 25.4 units per acre. Thirteen individual buildings will be constructed on the property along with a private drive (Esprit Way) that will bisect the property and provide internal vehicular access to the units. Residential parking is provided in private garages and guest parking is provided on site as well as on the adjoining streets. Pedestrian portals occur at the ground level of most buildings and allow for pedestrian connections from Martinelli Way through to 7,300 square foot space adjacent to Dublin Boulevard that includes a grass and garden area. The Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 24, 2010 (Attachment 1) contains more detail about the proposed project. The Planning Commission Meeting Minutes are included as Attachment 2 and the project plans are included as Attachment 3 to this Staff Report. At this time, the Applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Development Rezone with an amendment to the Stage 1 Development Plan and a Stage 2 Development Plan and an Amendment to the Development Agreement for the project site to permit the 105-unit Esprit at Dublin Station project to be built. This project proposal is unusual in the fact that the accompanying Stage 1 Development Plan amendment for the Esprit at Dublin Station project will permit the construction of either the 300- unit Metropolitan at Dublin Station project (approved March 2006) or the 105-unit Esprit at Dublin Station project (current proposal). Both of the projects will have entitlements for the same piece of property and it will be up to the Applicant or a future developer to determine which project will eventually be constructed. If the Esprit at Dublin Station project is approved, the project site will have the following entitlements: 1. Planned Development Zoning with a related Stage 1 Development Plan that permits either project to move forward; 2. Two approved Stage 2 Development Plans (one of which will ultimately be utilized depending on which project is constructed and the other nullified); Page 3 of 8 3. Two Site Development Review approvals (one of which will ultimately enable the issuance of building permits and the other nullified); and 4. Two approved Vesting Tentative Maps (one of which will be turned into a Final Map depending on which project is constructed and the other nullified). On August 24, 2010, the Planning Commission granted Site Development Review approval and approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 for the 105-unit Esprit at Dublin Station project. The analysis below describes the Stage 1 Development Plan amendment, Stage 2 Development Plan, and the Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Esprit at Dublin Station proposal only. The approved Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review approval, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 for the Metropolitan at Dublin Station project are not proposed to change in any way. ANALYSIS: Staff's analysis is broken up into several sections that describe each component of the project proposal Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment: The Applicant is proposing several amendments to the Stage 1 Development Plan for the Transit Center to accommodate the Esprit project. The amendments are focused on allowing the dual entitlements, as described in a previous section, as well as reducing minimum building setback along one frontage and reducing the required sidewalk width along two other frontages. Since there is no longer retail proposed for the project site, the wider sidewalks that are typical for commercial areas are no longer necessary, and the two feet of extra space along the project frontage can be incorporated into creating a comfortable townhome development. The specific Stage 1 Planned Development Amendments are proposed as follows: 1. Allowing Dual Entitlements. Additional language added which will serve to permit the development of either the approved 300-unit Metropolitan project or the proposed 105-unit Esprit project. Under the heading "Campus Office Uses", an additional paragraph is proposed at the end of the section. The additional paragraph is proposed as follows: "In order to permit development on Site E-1 that responds to residential market conditions, it is permissible for the site to have dual entitlements and for two separate and distinct projects to receive approvals for the same site. Should this situation occur, both projects would need to be consistent with this Stage 1 Development Plan and the Development Agreement prepared for the project(s) would need to address the potential for either project. Once a Developer commences with development of one of the projects on Site E-1, the rights relating to the other project not developed shall be terminated. The term "commences with development" shall mean the issuance of any building permit." 2. Reducing the minimum building setback on Martinelli Way. The building setback along Martinelli Way is proposed to change from 16 feet to variable. The text on Page 2.28 and Street Section E-E on Page 2.29 will need to be modified to note the reduced setback. Page 4 of 8 3. Reducing the sidewalk width on Iron Horse Parkway and Campus Drive. The project street frontage along Iron Horse Parkway is proposed to change from a 18 foot wide sidewalk with 5 foot tree grate to a 16 foot sidewalk with a 5 foot tree grate. The text on Page 2.22 and Street Section A-A on Page 2.25 will need to be modified to reflect the reduced 16 foot width. The project street frontage along Campus Drive is proposed to change from a 12 foot sidewalk with a 6 foot tree grate to a 10 foot sidewalk with a 5 foot tree grate. The text on Page 2.30 and Street Section G-G on Page 2.32 will need to be modified to reflect the reduced 10 foot width. Please refer to page 4 of Attachment 4 for the text of the proposed Stage 1 Development Plan amendment. Stage 2 Development Plan: A Stage 2 Development Plan is proposed in accordance with Section 8.32.040 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. The Stage 2 Development Plan would allow for up to 105 residential condominium units at a density of 25.4 units per acre. The residential units will be divided into thirteen three-story buildings with tuck-under garage parking. The Stage 2 Development Plan details the permitted and conditional uses; site development standards, architectural and landscape standards and guidelines; data on site area, proposed densities and maximum number of dwelling units; a phasing plan and street sections. Page 5 of Attachment 1 describes the Stage 2 Development Plan in greater detail. The Proposed Project is compatible with the Transit Center land use goals to provide a range of housing opportunities within the 91-acre Transit Center area. Permitting residential development on the site maximizes transit opportunities presented by the adjacent Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station; conforms with the development standards adopted for the Stage 1 Development Plan (as amended); and contributes to a vibrant, pedestrian friendly environment within less than one-quarter of a mile from the existing BART Station. The Ordinance approving a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan is included as Attachment 4 to this Staff Report. Development Agreement Projects within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) require a Development Agreement between the City and the Developer. California Government Code 65864 et seq. and Chapter 8.56 of the Dublin Municipal Code authorize the City to enter into an agreement for the development of real property with any person having a legal or equitable interest in such property in order to obtain certain commitments and establish certain development rights for the property. The Development Agreement must be approved prior to recordation of the final Tract Map and issuance of building permits for the development of the property. The Applicant and the City are a party to an existing development agreement for the property, which was approved by the City Council on March 9, 2006. The existing Development Agreement expires on March 9, 2011. At this time, the Applicant is requesting approval of Amendment 1 to the existing Development Agreement, which has been negotiated with City Staff. The proposed "Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing, Inc. for the Dublin Transit Center E-1 Project" modifies the approved Development Agreement as follows: Page 5 of 8 Section 1 of Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement allows for the construction of either the originally-approved 300-unit Metropolitan project ("Project") or the 105-unit Esprit project ("Alternate Project"). Section 2 of Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement extends the term of the Development Agreement and changes the expiration date from March 9, 2011 to March 9, 2018. Exhibit B of the Development Agreement is amended in its entirety, and the modifications from the original Exhibit B include changes to the affordable housing fee payments and obligations for the Property and include a provision on payment of the public art fee. In exchange for the City's agreement to extend the term of the Development Agreement, the developer has agreed to payments of the affordable housing fee in a schedule that is desirable to the City. Instead of paying the affordable housing fees at the time of receiving building permits, the Applicant will begin payment of the fees within a year of approval of the Amendment to the Development Agreement, regardless of the status of building permits for the project. In addition, the Agreement provides that the developer shall pay a single public art fee in the amount of $50,000 prior to the issuance of the first building permit. In all other respects, the Amendment to the Development Agreement as amended is based on the standard Development Agreement adopted by the City Council for projects located within the EDSP and is consistent with the preceding Development Agreements that affect the project site. The Ordinance approving Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 is included as Attachment 5 to this Staff Report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission reviewed the project at public hearings on August 24, 2010 (Rezoning, Site Development Review, and Tentative Tract Map) and September 14, 2010 (Development Agreement Amendment). The Planning Commission Staff Reports and draft minutes for both meetings are included as Attachments 1, 2, 6, and 7 to this Staff Report. At both meetings, the Commission discussed the merits of the Proposed Project, heard testimony from the Applicant, and approved the following resolutions: • Planning Commission Resolution 10-36, recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan for the Esprit at Dublin Station project (Attachment 8); • Planning Commission Resolution 10-37, approving Site Development Review for Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station) (Attachment 9); • Planning Commission Resolution 10-38 approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 for Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station) (Attachment 10); and • Planning Commission Resolution 10-39, recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station) (Attachment 11). Page 6 of 8 NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: In accordance with State law, a public notice was mailed to all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property to notify property owners and occupants of the proposed project and of the October 5, 2010 Public Hearing. The public notice was also published in the Valley Times and posted at several locations throughout the City. A copy of this Staff Report was provided to the Applicant. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Council finds that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code section 65457 because it is a residential project that is consistent with a specific plan for which an EIR has been certified. The Project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Dublin Transit Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395) which was certified by City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. The City Council finds that no further environmental review under CEQA is required for the proposed Project because there is no substantial evidence in the record as a whole that any of the standards under CEQA section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR are met. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 24, 2010 (without attachments) 2) Minutes from the August 24, 2010 Planning Commission meeting 3) Project Plans 4) Ordinance approving a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan for the Esprit at Dublin Station project 5) Ordinance approving Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station) with the Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement included as Exhibit A 6) Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 14, 2010 (without attachments) 7) Draft Minutes from the September 14, 2010 Planning Commission meeting 8) Planning Commission Resolution 10-36, recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan for the Esprit at Dublin Station project 9) Planning Commission Resolution 10-37, approving Site Development Review for Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station) (without attachments) 10) Planning Commission Resolution 10-38 approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 for Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station) (without attachments) Page 7 of 8 11) Planning Commission Resolution 10-39, recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station) Page 8 of 8 G~~.l OF DU~l~~ / V~'p I C~ STAFF REPORT ~J ~9`~~~/2 PLANNING COMMISSION /l O~LIF04'-~~~ DATE: August 24, 2010 TO: Planning Commission SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING - PA 09-002 Esprit at Dublin Station, Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667. (Legislative Act). Report prepared by Krisfi Bascom, Principal Planner EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Esprit at Dublin Station project site is 4.13 acres located at the southeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and Iron Horse Parkway within the 91-acre Transit Center. The proposed Project includes a request for approval of a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan that would permit the development of 105 townhome-style residential units. The Applicant is also requesting Site Development Review for the site layout and building architecture. Lastly, the Applicant is seeking approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667, which would permit the division of the site into two master lots, each of which would be further subdivided for condominium purposes and for the construction of associated improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1) Receive Staff presentation; 2) Open the Public Hearing; 3) Take testimony from the Applicant and the public; 4) Close the public hearing and deliberate; and 5) Adopt the following Resolutions: a) Recommending that the City Council adapt an Ordinance approving a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station), with the draft City Council Ordinance included as Exhibit A; b) Resolution approving Site Development Review for Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station), with the Project Plans included as Exhibit A; and c) Resolution approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 for Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station), with Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 included as Exhibit A. rl ~/~-~Y~ Submitted By iewed By Principal Planner Planning Manager COPIES TO: Applicant File Page 1 of 11 G:wA#120091PA 09-002 Site E-11PC 08 24 20101PCSR Esprit.doc C©.,~ Ip-~~~-lo ATTACHMENT 1 DESCRIPTION: Figure 7: Vicinify Map Background: The 4.13-acre site, referred to ' ' ' as site "E-1" in the Transit 4 ~ ~ r, ~ . Center Stage 1 Development Plan is located within the _ Pr°jecf ~ ~ Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ~ ~ site; z.. w ~w , , ~~w - area. The site has a General , , Plan land use designation of L x ~ . ~ , ~ , Campus Office and is in a _ ~ ~ ~ , ' - Planned Development Zoning ' ~ ~ ' ~ District. The site is currently ' ~ ~ ~ ~ t vacant and is surrounded by - the Avalon at Dublin Station ~ 'i~ ~ - , residential project to the east, rt' vacant land to the south and ;.~..3 _ - 'i,. the west, and Camp Parks to ~ - w the north across Dublin ~ - - Boulevard, as shown on the ' Figure 1 to the right. t _ _ ,,..~.r _ ~~k,.u,~....,.~-s, The site is rectangular and flat, and is located less than a quarter mile from the East Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station. Entitlement History: In December 2002, the City Council approved a General Plan/Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment (Resolution 216-02); approved a Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning {Ordinance 21-02}; and, approved Tentative Parcel Map 7892 (Resolution 02-40}, for the Dublin Transit Center. The 91-acre Transit Center site is located generally between the Iron Horse Trail to the west, Dublin Boulevard to the north, Arnold Road to the East, and the BART station to the south. A Master Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center was adopted in May 2003 (Ordinance 5-03} and together with the approved General Plan/Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map, established the land use approvals for the future development of the site. The Master Development Agreement was then amended to set forth affordable housing obligations in the project area (Ordinance 25-05). The Master Development Agreement provides that the Dublin Transit Center project area includes the development of 1,800 residential units on Sites A, B and C; 2-million square feet of campus office on Sites D and E; and 70,000 square feet of ancillary retail uses to be dispersed among Sites B through E. Open space wil! be provided by a 12.20 gross acre park, located on Site F and a 1-acre Village Green located between Sites B and C. The Transit Center project area also includes 8.65 gross acres of public/semi-public uses including the BART station and related parking and a Pacific Gas ~ Electric (PG & E) substation. The Stage 1 Development Plan (Ordinance 21-02) breaks up Site E into E-1 and E-2. The Development Plan provides that Site E-1 could contain up to 300,000 square feet of campus office uses. !n the alternative, up to 300 residential units could be approved on this site. Implementation of this "flex zoning" increases the residential unit count of the Transit Center by 2of11 300 units to a total of 1,800 residential units and decreases the amount of campus office efy ~ 300,000 square feet to a total of 1.7 million square feet of campus office. The following entitlements have been granted far residential projects in the Transit Center: Date Develo er Project Name Site # of units Janus 2004 D.R. Horton Elan B-1 257 January 2004 Avalon Bay Avalon at Dublin Station 305 (with 15,000 square feet of round-floor retail April 2004 EAH, Inc. Camellia Place A-2 112 All three of the above projects have been completed and are in various stages of occupancy. In March of 2006, D.R. Horton received approval of a 300-unit condominium project (Metropolitan at Dublin Station) with approximately 15,000 square feet of ground floor retail on the E-1 project site. The approvals included a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 2 Development Plan, Vesting Tentative Map, Site Development Review, and Development Agreement. The Development Agreement vested the project approvals for five (5) years, which are set to expire in March 2011. Project Proposal: At this time, the Applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Development Rezone with an amendment to the Stage 1 Development Plan and a Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 for a new project on the E-1 project site, the 105-unit Esprit at Dublin Station. This ~+roject proposal is unusual in the fact that the accompanying Stage 1 Development Plan amendment will permit the construction of either the 300-unit Metropolitan at Dublin Station project (approved March 2006) or the 105-unit Esprit at Dublin Station project (current proposal). Both of the projects will have entitlements for the same piece of property and it will be up to the Applicant or a future developer to determine which project will eventually be constructed. If the Esprit at Dublin Station project is approved, the project site will have the following entitlements: 1. Planned Development Zoning with a related Stage 1 Development Plan that permits either project to move forward; 2. Two approved Stage 2 Development Plans (one of which will ultimately be utilized depending on which project is constructed and the other nullified); 3. Two Site Development Review approvals (one of which will ultimately enable the issuance of building permits and the other nullified); and 4. Two approved Vesting Tentative Maps (one of which will be turned into a Final Map depending on which project is constructed and the other nullified). At a future meeting, the Planning Commission will review proposed amendments to the Metropolitan Development Agreement that will allow the development of either of the projects. The analysis below describes the Stage 1 Development Plan amendment, Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review application, and the Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 for the Esprit at Dublin Station proposal only. The approved Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review approval, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 for the Metropolitan at Dublin Station project are not proposed to change in any way. 3 of 11 ANALYSIS: j~ I~~~ Staff's analysis is broken up into several sections that describe each component of the proposed Esprit at Dublin Station project. Stage 7 Development Plan Amendment: The Planned Development Rezone and related Stage 1 Development Plan, adopted by the City Council for the Dublin Transit Center in December 2002, established the permitted, conditionally permitted, and accessory land uses; site areas and proposed densities; maximum number of residential units and non-residential square footage; and a Master Landscaping Plan. The Transit Center Stage 1 Development Plan designates the land use of Site E-1 as Campus Office, with up to 300,000 sq. ft. of office and 15,000 sq. ft. of ancillary retail. The Transit Center Plan also further defined this parcel as a flex parcel that could be developed with up to 300 residential units. The 105-unit Esprit project is permitted by the Stage 1 Development Plan. The Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning limits properties with a residential land use to a building height of five stories along Dublin Boulevard (the proposed project is three stories with tuck-under parking). For comparison, Campus Office buildings are permitted to be a maximum of 8 stories in height adjacent to Dublin Boulevard, so this project is of a lower density and intensity than surrounding properties. The Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning requires 1.5 parking spaces per residential unit, regardless of the size of the units. The Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning allows street parking to be counted in the number of parking spaces provided. There are 207 on-site and 33 on-street parking spaces proposed for the site (2.3 spaces per unit), which is more than the minimum requirement of the Stage 1 Development Plan. Unlike the previously-approved Metropolitan project, the Esprit project does not have a retail component. Because the Esprit project is a townhome-style project, which has a more single- family feel than stacked condominiums, providing retail spaces along the Iron Horse Parkway frontage did not seem compatible with the type of development. The Transit Center Stage 1 Development Plan notes that retail along Iron Horse Parkway is encouraged, but not required. The existing retail spaces at the Transit Center are unoccupied and the need for additional retail at this time is unwarranted. The Applicant is proposing severs! amendments to the Stage 1 Development Plan for the Transit Center to accommodate the Esprit project. The amendments are focused on allowing the dual entitlements, as described in a previous section, as well as reducing minimum building setback along one frontage and reducing the required sidewalk width along two other frontages. Since there is no longer retail proposed for the project site, the wider sidewalks that are typical for commercial areas are no longer necessary, and the two feet of extra space along the project frontage can be incorporated into creating a comfortable townhome development. The specific Stage 1 Planned Development Amendments are proposed as follows: 1. Allowing Dual Entitlements. Additional language added which will serve to permit the development of either the approved 300-unit Metropolitan project or the proposed 105-unit Esprit project. Under the heading "Campus Office Uses", an additional paragraph is proposed at the end of the section. The additional paragraph is proposed as follows: "!n order to permit development on Site E-7 that responds to residential market conditions, it is permissible 4of11 i lG P for the site to have dual entitlements and for two separate and distinct projects to receiv~ approvals for the same site. Should this situation occur, both projects would need to be consistent with this Stage 1 Development Plan and the Development Agreement prepared for the project(s) would need to address the potential for either project. Once a Developer commences with development of one of the projects on Site E-7, the rights relating to the other project not developed shall be terminated. The term "commences with development" shall mean the issuance of any grading or building permit." 2. Reducing the minimum building setback on Martinelli Way. The building setback along Martinelli Way is proposed to change from 16' to variable. The text on Page 2.28 and Street Section E-E on Page 2.29 will need to be modified to note the reduced setback. 3. Reducing the sidewalk width on Iron Horse Parkway and Campus Drive. The project street frontage along Iron Horse Parkway is proposed to change from a 18' wide sidewalk with 5' tree grate to a 16' sidewalk with a 5' tree grate. The text on Page 2.22 and Street Section A-A on Page 2.25 will need to be modified to reflect the reduced 16' width. The project street frontage along Campus Drive is proposed to change from a 12' sidewalk with a 6' tree grate to a 10' sidewalk with a 5' tree grate. The text on Page 2.30 and Street Section G-G on Page 2.32 will need to be modified to reflect-the reduced 10' width. Please refer to page 4 of Exhibit A to Attachment 1 for the proposed Stage 1 Development Plan amendment. Stage 2 Development Plan: A Stage 2 Development Plan is proposed in accordance with Section 8.32.040 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. The Stage 2 Development Plan would allow for up to 105 residential condominium units at a density of 25.4 units per acre. The residential units will be divided into thirteen three-story buildings with tuck-under garage parking. The Stage 2 Development Plan details the permitted and conditional uses; site development standards, architectural and landscape standards and guidelines; data on site area, proposed densities and maximum number of dwelling units; a phasing plan and street sections. Page 5 of Exhibit A to Attachment 1 describes the Stage 2 Development Plan in greater detail. The Proposed Project is compatible with the Transit Center land use goals to provide a range of housing opportunities with the 91-acre Transit Center area. Permitting residential development on the site maximizes transit opportunities presented by the adjacent Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station; conforms with the development standards adopted for the Stage 1 Development Plan {as amended); and, contributes to a vibrant, pedestrian friendly environment within less than one-quarter of a mile from the existing BART Station. The Resolution recommending approval of the Stage 1 Development Plan amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan is included as Attachment 1 to this staff report. Site Development Review: The following information is a summary of the key components of the project associated with the Site Development Review. Staffs discussion is broken down into several categories. Site Plan. Access, and Circulation: The Project is bound by Dublin Boulevard to the north, Martinelli Way to the south, Iron Horse Parkway to the west and Campus Drive to the east. Thirteen individual buildings comprising the 5of11 ~e 105 townhouse units will be constructed on the property along with a private drive (Esprit Way~~~ I` that will bisect the property and provide internal vehicular access to the units. Residential parking is provided in private garages and guest parking is provided on site as well as on the adjoining streets. Pedestrian portals occur at the ground level of most buildings and allow for pedestrian connections from Martinelli Way through to the recreation facilities that are adjacent to Dublin Boulevard. Located at the north end of the site, a 7,300 square foot area includes a pool, spa, restroom and shower facility and outdoor lounging area. Sheet SP-1 of the Project Plan Set {Exhibit A to Attachment 2) illustrates the overall site layout. Floor/Unit Plans: All of the residential buildings are three stories and comprised of five different unit plans, as shown in the following table: Unit Type Sg. Ft. No. of Units Plan 1 - 2 Bedroom 1,174 5 Plan 2 - 2 Bedroom 1,208 19 Plan 3 - 2 Bedroom 1,440 23 Plan 4 - 3 Bedroom 1,547 13 Plan 5 - 3 Bedroom 1,610 45 Total Number of Units 105 Access to each unit can be obtained from either the attached garage or from the front door that faces either a public or private street or an interior paseo. Sheets A-20 through A-24 of the Project Plan Set (Exhibit A to Attachment 2) illustrates the floor plan for each of the unit types. Parking: Resident parking is hidden from view from the surrounding streets and located off of private drive aisles accessed from Esprit Way. Each unit has attached private garage spaces and guest parking is located throughout the site with connections to front doors through landscaped paseos and pedestrian portals. The parking provisions for the proposed project are as follows: Parkin Standard Re uired er Sta e 1 PD Pro osed Project Minimum arkin re uired 1.5 s aces er unit 2.3 s aces er unit Total number of spaces 158 spaces (includes 134 240 spaces (includes 195 resident spaces and 24 guest resident spaces and 45 guest spaces -can be both on-site spaces) and street arkin On site spaces - 207 spaces (187 garage, 20 uncovered on-site Street parkin - 33 s aces Sheet SP-2 of the Project Plan Set (Exhibit A to Attachment 2) illustrates the location of the parking spaces throughout the project site and project frontage. Architecture: The architectural concept for the project was to create a design that, when integrated with other projects in the Dublin Transit Center, would create an "Urban Village," that would encourage pedestrian movement and activity throughout the Transit Center. To achieve this, considerable attention was focused at the base of the building. Residential stoops have been located along 6of11 Iron Horse Parkway, Campus Drive, and Martinelli to activate the streets. Each stoop directl~i ties to the sidewalk and has a porch located 3 to 4 feet above street level. All of the units are three-story town-homes and are joined together to form large buildings around the site perimeter. This concept creates a strong street presence that contributes to the project's urban character. Wood rafter tails, stacked stone, and trellis elements accent a mostly stucco body and concrete roof tiles provide some weight to the building and help emphasize the pedestrian portals that run through the buildings. Sheet A-3 of the Project Plan Set (Exhibit A to Attachment 2} illustrates the building elevations from each of the public street frontages and the Project Renderings (Attachment 3} give a perspective of the project from Dublin Boulevard. Pedestrian portals occur at the ground level of most building types and allow for pedestrian connections from Martinelli Way through to the recreation facilities adjacent to Dublin Boulevard. Connections are also formed from Iron Horse Parkway and Campus Drive to the site's interior. The pedestrian portals are provided to create both a visual link to the interior of the project, as well as to encourage pedestrian movement throughout the Transit Center. Since Dublin Boulevard is a major thoroughfare, pedestrian connection to the street is minimized. There are no units fronting this street. Instead, buildings and asix-foot screen wall designed to compliment the architecture form this edge along with layered landscape elements. The architectural design of the base of the building was also developed to encourage a pedestrian scale. In addition to the stoop units and entry portals, the building was designed with a series of arched openings at the base of the building to create a strong rhythm at the pedestrian level. The pedestrian level is further complimented with ornamental railings and decorative light fixtures to create human scale at the buildings' base. Sheets A-4, A-7, A10, A- 13, A-16, and A-18 of the Project Plan Set (Exhibit A to Attachment 2) illustrates the building elevations for each of the proposed buildings on site. The proposed architecture is compatible with the approved buildings in the Transit Center and buildings in the area. Architectural detailing on the buildings are reflective of styles that are prevalent in the City of Dublin. The massing and form of the buildings are also compatible with the surrounding buildings. The proposed colors and materials include stucco siding with a stacked stone accent walls, the roofs, wrought iron stair and porch railings, and decorative metal grills over the pedestrian portals. The proposed stone and earth tones are compatible with the design of this project as well as the adjacent buildings. Sheet A-26 of the Project Plan Set (Exhibit A to Attachment 2) illustrates the paint colors and roof the colors proposed for use on the buildings. Landscaping: Consistent with the Transit Center Stage 1 Development Plan, the streetscape design for the community incorporates generous sidewalk widths, enhanced paving, pedestrian scale lighting fixtures and street tree canopies to provide apedestrian-oriented perimeter. Tree placement and paving styles along Iron Horse Parkway mirror the existing streetscape across the street and the balance of the project perimeter repeat these elements to maintain continuity. The planting design at the building edge includes foreground planting at the residential stoop entries and accent planting at building entries and focal points. Tree standards have been proposed to provide a vertical layering of plant material to soften the public/private interface along the streetscape. The internal landscape continues to emphasize a pedestrian oriented design. Pedestrian breezeways within the architecture allow for a continuous central promenade from the sidewalk 7of11 at Martinelli Way to the recreation area along Dublin Boulevard. Paseos located along th ~ central promenade provide connectivity and a common landscape area with bench seating and flowering accent trees. The planting design includes foundation plantings to soften the building edges, areas of turf, and a hierarchy of trees to create apedestrian-scale landscape. The proposed plant palette consists of plants with a wide variety of textures, foliage colors, and flowers for visual interest throughout the year. This palette also emphasizes plants that are water-conserving and low maintenance. Sheets L-1 through L-4 of the Project Plan Set (Exhibit A to Attachment 2) illustrates the landscape plans and details for the project site. Sound Attenuation: A mitigation measure contained in the Environmental Impact Report for the Dublin Transit Center requires site specific acoustic reports to be prepared by qualified acoustical consultants. Proposed Site Development Review Condition of Approval No. 20 requires an acoustic report to be submitted prior to issuance of a Building Permit (Attachment 2). The report must include detailed identification of noise exposure levels on the individual project site and a listing of specific measures to reduce both interior and exterior noise levels to normally acceptable levels including but not limited to glazing and ventilation systems, construction of noise barriers and use of buildings to shield noise. Affordability: The Master Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center (as amended by Ordinance 25-05) provides that a minimum of 15% of the total units constructed on the Dublin Transit Center property shall be inclusionary units. However, this requirement shall not apply if the developer pays the City's affordable housing in-lieu fee for 15% of the total units constructed prior to issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit within Site E-1. Proposed Site Development Review Condition of Approval No. 19, which requires compliance with the existing Development Agreement or any subsequent Development Agreements, is included in Attachment 2. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 76fi7: The Applicant is requesting to subdivide the 4.13-acre parcel into two master lots that will be further subdivided to create 105 townhouse-style condominiums. .The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map conforms to the City of Dublin General Plan, Eastern Dublin Specific Pian, and Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Development Plan (as amended), and the Stage 2 Development Plan, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval. The Resolution approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 is included as Attachment 4 to this staff report. CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN, SPECIFIC PLAN & ZONING ORDINANCE The proposed Esprit at Dublin Station project includes a proposal for a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan to allow the development of up to 105 attached townhouse-style residential units on the project site. The proposed Planned Development Rezoning, as defined by Section 8.32.030 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance, establishes the land use pattern for the Esprit at Dublin Station site, which is consistent with both the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use designations of Campus Office. The project is consistent with the Community Design and Sustainability Element of the General Plan in that the project ensures quality and compatible design of the built form, which is one of the main goals of the Element. Specifically, the project is in compliance with the following policies: 8of11 Policy 10.5.3(D): Provide landscaping and articulated design to soften the visual appearance of existing and new walls and fences that are adjacent to regional corridors, wherever feasible. Policy 10.7.2.3(A): Achieve neighborhood identities by applying streetscape and landscape design, entry treatments, signage, and architectural detailing standards Policy 10.7.3.6(A): Encourage compact development that integrates a variety of housing types and densities, commercial and industrial uses, community facilities, civic, and educational uses with an emphasis on pedestrian-friendly design REVIEW BY APPLICABLE DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES: The Building Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Public Works Department, Dublin Police Services and Dublin San Ramon Services District have reviewed the project. Conditions of Approval have been included in both the Site Development Review Resolution (Attachment 2) and the Vesting Tentative Tract 'Map Resolution (Attachment 4) to ensure successful implementation of the project. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: In accordance with State law, a public notice was mailed to all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property to notify property owners and occupants of the proposed project and of the August 24, 2010 Public Hearing. The public notice was also published in the Valley Times and posted at several locations throughout the City. One letter from the Alameda County Community Development Agency Surplus Property Authority was received prior to publishing the staff report (See Attachment 5). The letter contained a comment regarding including retail square footage in the project, and the reason for not doing so was discussed on page 4 of this staff report (Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment section}. Based on the letter, Condition of Approval No. 47 was added to the approval Resolution for the Vesting Tentative Tract Map (Attachment 4) to address the need to notify buyers of the future buildout conditions at the Transit Center. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council finds that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code section 65457 because it is a residential project that is consistent with a specific plan for which an EIR has been certified. The Project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Dublin Transit Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395) which was certified by City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. The City Council finds that no further environmental review under CEQA is required for the proposed Project because there is no substantial evidence in the record as a whole that any of the standards under CEQA section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR are met. CONCLUSION: This application has been reviewed by applicable City departments and agencies and their comments have been incorporated into the Projec# and the proposed Conditions of Approval. The Proposed Project is consistent with the Dublin General Plan, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, 9 of 11 and the Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning (as amended) for the Dublin Transit Center and is compatible with the surrounding properties as well as the project site. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan for the Esprit at Dublin Station project, with the draft City Council Ordinance included as Exhibit A. 2) Resolution approving Site Development Review for Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 {Esprit at Dublin Station), with the Project Plans included as Exhibit A. 3) Project Renderings dated August 12, 2010. 4) Resolution approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 for Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station), with the Vesting Tentative Tract Map included as Exhibit A. 5) August 17, 2010 letter from Alameda County Community Development Agency Surplus Property Authority. 10 of 11 II~IaI GENERAL INFORMATION: PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: Dean Mills D.R. Horton, Inc. 6658 Owens Drive Pleasanton, CA 94588 LOCATION: Southeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and Iron Horse Parkway {APN 986-0034-011-00) ZONING: PD, Planned Development GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Campus Office SPECIFIC PLAN/ LAND USE DESIGNATION: Campus Office (Flex Parcel) SURROUNDING USES: LOCATION ZONING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CURRENT USE OF PROPERTY North None Public Lands Camp Parks (U.S. Army) South PD Campus Office Vacant West PD High Density Residential High Density Residential East PD Campus Office Vacant 11 of 11 ~a~ t I'lc~nnzng Commission Minutes Tuesday, August 24, 2010 CALL TO ORDER/IZOLL CALL A regular meeting of the City of Dublin Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, August 24, 2010, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Plaza. Chair King called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Chair King; Vice Chair Brown; Commissioners Schaub, Swalwell, and Wehrenberg; Jeff Baker, Planning Manager; Kristi Bascom, Principal Planner; Mike Porto, Consulting Planner; Mamie Waffle, Senior Planner; and Taryn Gavagan, Recording Secretary. Absent: None ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA -NONE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS - On a motion by Cm. Swalwell, seconded by Cm. Schaub the minutes of the August 10, 2010 meeting were approved. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -NONE CONSENT CALENDAR -NONE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS -NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS - 8.1 PLPA 2010-00020 Samran Large Family Day Care Conditional Use Permit. Mamie Waffle, Senior Planner presented the project as outlined in the Staff Report. Commissioner Wehrenberg asked if the City has received any complaints regarding the daycare thus far. Ms. Waffle replied no. Commissioner Wehrenberg asked if the traffic study was conducted only one day and found no major issues. Ms. Waffle replied yes. Cm. Schaub asked if there is parking on the Applicant's side of the street. Ms. Waffle replied no. r Chair King ope ed the public hearing. Ranjit Samra ,Applicant, stated that she brought letters from surrounding neighbors who were in support of'her business and is confident that her business will not interrupt any neighbors. 89 ATTACHMENT 2 ~ae~ OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR CORTONA AT POSITANO, FOR 68 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON APPROXIMATELY 15.8 ACRES WITHIN TRACT 8037 PLPA-2010-00041 8.3 PA 09-002 Esprit at Dublin Station, Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667. Kristi Bascom, Principal Planner presented the project as outlined in the Staff Report. Cm. Schaub asked for clarification regarding the surrounding properties and future plans for them. Ms. Bascom stated that all three surrounding sites are currently designated Campus Office; however, the City has not received any applications for any sites yet. Cm. Schaub asked for the status of the project that would take the place of the existing BART parking lot. Ms. Bascom and Mr. Baker stated that the project proposed for that site would come before the Commission at a future date. Cm. Schaub asked when the Development Agreement (DA) for the site expires. Ms. Bascom answered 2011. She stated that the Applicant is currently in the process of amending their current DA to extend the life of the Agreement. Cm. Schaub asked if Esprit Way is a public road. Ms. Bascom replied that Esprit Way is a private road but not gated. She clarified that all roads within the project are private streets although not gated and therefore accessible by the public. Cm. Schaub asked if there are guest parking spaces located inside the project. Ms. Bascom replied yes; there are 12 spaces on-site and 33 off-site, which are located on Campus Drive and Ironhorse Parkway. Cm. Schaub asked what the guest parking space requirements were for this particular project. Ms. Bascom answered 15% of the total. Mr. Baker clarified that the parking for this project is consistent with the other parking requirements for previously approved projects in the Transit Center. Cm. Wehrenberg asked if parking is approved on Dublin Blvd. Ms. Bascom replied no, there is no parking allowed on Dublin Blvd. or Martinelli Way. Cm. Schaub asked how wide the sidewalks will be on Dublin Blvd. Ms. Bascom replied 14 feet wide, including the parkway strip. ~ ;,~tr~ 93 Ms. Bascom stated that Pat Cashman of Alameda County Surplus Property Authority submitted comments addressing concerns regarding future developments adjacent to the Esprit project, ensuring that future residents of this project know what could possibly be built next to them. Ms. Bascom stated that in response to Mr. Cashman s comments, Condition of Approval #47 was added to the Resolution which requires the Developer to have future residents sign a disclosure saying they understand that they could be living next to a future office building. She further stated that there is Condition of Approval #48 was also added which states the City provide a map of the Transit Center to be posted in the Esprit sales office. Ms. Bascom clarified that the map would show the location of the Esprit development as well as the adjacent properties. Cm. Wehrenberg asked why the DA amendment could not be included with the current presentation. Ms. Bascom answered that DR Horton is requesting other amendments that will be reviewed by City Council. Mr. Baker clarified that the typical DA has a life of 5 years and it is typical that extensions would be addressed in the DA as opposed to the Conditions of Approval. Chair King opened the public hearing. Dean Mills, DR Horton, stated that DR Horton is excited to be moving forward with the Esprit project. Cm. Schaub stated that similar projects have had parking problems because residents use their garages for storage and not for parking. He stated that this causes guest parking spaces to be completely occupied by residents and not guests. He further stated that a Condition stating that residents must park in their garage is strongly suggested. Cm. Schaub suggested signage on Campus Way stating that parking is designated for non-residents. Mr. Mills stated that the project does propose more guest parking than required. He clarified that the one-car garage spaces do actually allow for 2-car tandem parking, however only one space was counted to ensure they met the parking requirements without it. Mr. Mills stated that the future CC&Rs for the property will not allow for residents' garages to be used as storage and the Homeowner's Association would have the power to note a violation for residents who do use their garage as storage. Mr. Mills stated that the Elan and Avalon at Dublin Station projects have signage on the surrounding streets stating that only 2-hour parking is allowed from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., and then allowing for overnight parking after 6 p.m. He clarified that the Esprit development would require the same signage. Chair King asked if the CC&Rs will include giving individual HOA members the right to enforce the CC&Rs. Mr. Mills stated that he would not be opposed to giving members the right to enforce the CC&Rs as long as there was no legal issue. f ~ 94 Mr. Bak S~ ~ ~ ~ er stated that the Planning Commission could request Staff to add a Condition regarding enforcement subject to the legality of it. Cm. Schaub asked what the project proposed for waste management. Mr. Mills stated that DR Horton spoke to the garbage hauler a year and half ago but needs to follow-up on the conversation regarding how garbage hauling would be handled for the project. Mr. Mills stated that Plans 1, 2 and 3 do provide room for trash and recycle bins in the garage. He stated that Plans 4 & 5 will have the wall pulled back a foot and a half to make space for a trash and recycle bin. Mr. Mills stated that a third bin for yard waste was not considered as there should be no yard waste. He clarified that there would be landscape company to come in and take care of the landscaping for the project. Chair King asked if there is space for storage considering that residents would be unable to use their garages for storage space. Mr. Mills stated that the goal is to provide as much storage as possible; however, there is not a lot of room for outside storage. Cm. Swalwell asked Mr. Mills if he anticipates that most of the future residents will be the type of individuals or families to require a lot of storage space. Mr. Mills stated that they do anticipate most of their future residents to be individuals who commute for work, younger and newer families, or younger first-time buyers. He stated that they don't anticipate future residents having several vehicles or a large need for additional storage. Cm. Schaub asked the height of the ceiling in the garage. Mr. Mills answered a little over 9 feet. Cm. Wehrenberg stated that it may be a good idea to suggest or offer above-ground shelving in the garage for residents. Hearing no further comments, Chair King closed the public hearing. Cm. Swalwell stated that he agrees with Cm. Schaub's suggestion of adding Conditions regarding parking and space for trash and recycle bins. Cm. Schaub stated that he likes and supports the project. He stated that he likes the fact that the project consists of townhomes as opposed to condominiums. He further stated that he appreciates softening the look of Dublin Blvd. and thinks it a good addition to the Transit Center. Vice-Chair Brown, and Cm. Swalwell and Wehrenberg stated that they support the project and agree with Cm. Schaub's additional Conditions of Approval suggestions. Ms. Bascom reiterated the Commission's suggestions for additional Conditions of Approval (COA) for the Vesting Tentative Map Resolution: 95 COA # ~ ~ ~ • 49. The Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) developed for the project shall include a requirement that the enclosed garage spaces are used for resident parking. • COA #50: Within the limits of the law, the CC&Rs developed for the project shall include a provision that the CC&Rs can be enforced by any resident as well as by the Homeowner's Association. Ms. Bascom reiterated the Commission s suggestions for an additional Condition of Approval (COA) for the Site Development Review Resolution: • COA #100: The garage area of Floor Plans 4 and 5 shall be reconfigured to accommodate space for two garbage/recycling containers. On a motion by Cm. Schaub and seconded by Cm. Wehrenberg, on a vote of 5-0, the Planning Commission approved the following Resolutions, with additional Conditions of Approval as stated: RESOLUTION NO. 10 - 36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE WITH A RELATED STAGE 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AND STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DUBLIN TRANSIT CENTER SITE E-1 (ESPRIT AT DUBLIN STATION) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD AND IRON HORSE PARKWAY (APN 986-0034-011-00) PA 09-002 RESOLUTION NO. 10 - 37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR DUBLIN TRANSIT CENTER SITE E-1 (ESPRIT AT DUBLIN STATION) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD AND IRON HORSE PARKWAY (APN 986-0034-011-00) PA 09-002 RESOLUTION NO. 10 - 38 96 ~1~. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 7667 FOR DUBLIN TRANSIT CENTER SITE E-1 (ESPRIT AT DUBLIN STATION) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD AND IRON HORSE PARKWAY (APN 986-0034-011-00) PA 09-002 NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS -NONE OTHER BUSINESS -NONE 10.1 Brief INFORMATION ONLY reports from the Planning Commission and/or Staff, including Committee Reports and Reports by the Planning Commission related to meetings attended at City Expense (AB 1234). ADTOURNMENT -The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Respectf 1 su muted, ~ ` Mogan King ~ Chair Planning Commis ,ion ATTEST: i Jeff Ba er Planning Manager G: ~ MINUTES ~ 2010 ~ PLANNING COMMISSION ~ Ptarrning Coimrcission_20100824-1631 _01 c643a9c4c57500.doc r, ~ t c?9a 2d5i ' 97 I SDR SUBMITTAL I - - I ~ Project Index r~' ~ ~ ~ ~ A-1 Title Sheet C-01 Configuration and Easements I ~ ' ~ ~ ` ' s ,4 ~ ~ A-2 Data Sheet C-02 Gradin Plan 9 I h ~ SP-1 Conceptual Site Plan C-03 Utility and Drainage Plan 1:~ I C-04 Site Dimension Plan t ..c o ~ SP-2 Parkin ~ r; . ~ ! . _ g Ian _ pica) Se tions ~ P C 05 Ty ~ w ° - ° ; ~ r~~ ~ C-06 Erosion Control Plan and Notes ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~f ~ ar~. ~ A-3 Martinelli, Iron Horse, and Campus C-07 Fire Exhibits 1 Street Scenes I A-4 14-Plex Elevations L-1 Preliminary Landscape Site Plan I Partial Elevation N.T.s. A-5 14-Plex Floor Plans L-2 Landscape Enlargements ` A-6 14-Plex Floor & Roof Plans L-3 Landscape Enlargements I A-7 12-Plex Elevations L-4 Landscape Imagery A-8 12-Plex Floor Plans I A-9 12-Plex Floor & Roof Plans I A-10 11-Plex Elevations A-11 11-Plex Floor Plans I A-12 11-Plex Floor & Roof Plans I A-13 7-Plex Elevations I A-14 7-Plex Floor Plans ~ A-15 7-Plex Floor & Roof Plans A-16 4-Plex Elevations ( A-17 4-Plex Floor & Roof Plans i I A-18 3-Plex Elevations ~ A-19 3-Plex Floor & Roof Plans ~ A-20 Plan 1 ~ A-21 Plan 2 ~ ~ A-22 Plan 3 iRECEI~/ED A-23 Plan 4 ~ A-24 Plan 5 .JUN 2 8 2010 I r A-25 Building Sections DUBLIN PLANNING A-26 ColorlMaterial Board Title Sheet A-1 I D.R. Horton DUblln, California Architecture+planning 263 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t Dublin Station 1 925 225 7400 Main 510.272.2910 ktgy.com j KTGY #20080583 June 22, 2010 .ATTACH:4IENT 3 ~ Jai b I DDtO~A~GW~NtH ~o N°" Project Site 2007 CBC Code Analysis CRY OF ~ ..a0E0A I SAN RAMON ~ ~ P??"",, 20D7 CBC with Supplements / TASSAJAAA N I CREEK ~ ® 1.Occupancy: R•2 Condominiums CAMP PARKS PARK ® zl TRACT MAP ~ 2.FIreSprinklers: NFPA13 LOCATION z 4 ~ " A. Increases allowed: I ~ ~ ~ ® O ~ ~ I ® I © 19 gg$ ® i. Sec 504.2 Story and Height Increase I ° 9 GLEASON BLVD. ~ a ~ ~ „ ~ 4 ii Sec 5062 Allowable area increase for frontage ' ~ Cyr 0 ~ ii. Sec 506.3 Allowable area increase for Spinklers (Not allowed) i 2 0 g 9 ;rL', DeMAAC ca>APUS ~ 11 z s~ DueLIN BLw, eLw ~ w F e 0 ~ ~ 3. ConsWction Type: Type V-B (Nan-Rated Construction) ~K~ 0 0° I O O CItt OF IRON HOR a WBLI BLVD. ® ® A.Abwabe Stones: 3slofies II I ¢ DusuN560 ~ 00 1e Table5038504.2 per Sec 504.2 with Sprinklers ~py~ y,y B. Allowable Area: R-2, Type V-B=7,000 s,f.=At I PLEASnNroN BART ~f E~~S~p~. Table 503 8 Sec 506 Section 5042 Story increase with sprinklers sTAnoN cP oe R~ Section 506.2 Frontage increase for area (not used) I DRIVE VICINITY MAP Section 506.4 Area determination for Multi-sto Increase Q$a STONE RIDGE a - ry b 4 ° w rc R-2 Aa = {At +(Atzls) + (At x If)} a LANDOWNERS ADJACENT Aa=pooo.poooxD)+poooxo)) = 7,000 allowable floor area ° I P~~trse`'v0 TO THE PROJECT& ACCESSORSNo. I,DODx2=14,OODs.Lallowablebuildingarea U=3,000 Section 406.1 I I. n7ANECecaxnsuAPws e. AW.IE°ACWMYSUAPLLl4 n. w1sTErwPwlFlcxouslNOlNC. 4.Aaxessibil R+cPEanAmNOwn PxaPFRnAUrxoam IAPxsae°ml°nl ry LOCATION MAP IAPN98fiB5WBBrf 14P„mfiBB7197„ Section 11D2A.3 MulS-story Dwellings ' le. aiw,~oA000NnsuxrnusPBaPeAnAUnIOMn NOT TD6CALE z. FAH IxG l°. uAUEwcaNrv suBPLUS IAPa ses °°a0ola°fl Total units on site includes all building types: IwnBraooN OOeI PxaERttAUnwan 19. nuwEwcouxn sLRPLUSVSoPEmvAUtxoxm 105 dux 10% = 11 du shall comply with 1102A.3 3. ASHi°NAi BUBLINSTAnON LLC (APN Mfi NH °7°I (MN900W31 B,P1 1 (RAN 798 BOJIOMI 11. Cfl1'OF WBDN m. NAM~ACWNIYSUBPLUSR70PERn AUiHORIn - - 4. NESSFAMILYPAR7NEA5 LP IAPx 9fie[V91BN) LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS APx 9ll eRe°1910) 71. EV.N~WBLIN HOA 21. AIAMEIIACWNtt9UAHLS PBOffRn ANHdiln PROPOSED EXI6TIN"G 5 ~~NRInB~,~E I~N~~~~ PROJECT TEAM: BUILDING SUMMARY: ' PROPERTYIRNV LINE AC ACRE, ASPHALT CONCRETE _ _ - _ _ - M AREADRAIN µPx eat os5°°sa) f3. AvuoNSnv cawurmes m. PIAMEM Cahn suaxus PNaPEanwilaRln CONrouRUNE BtPNaesaaa0lB) wxsefiamecla 14-PlezBld _105 APN ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER s. clnaF OUSUN 1 ) g' BFP BACKfLOW PREVEMOR IAOrlalos5opm) N. AvwoNB.v coUxunnss zJ. wMEnA COUNrrsIHPLUSaROPERnAUrxoBm OWNER: "i R~ns_t, ~.xl., lb.l) uL.e.q Tmel T~ ' EASEMENT LINE BOB BOTTOM OF BO% (APN eee aaaasnl IAPxOesam7 DoT Fdm Flan gos.6.fU ~ar 9ea zeza ref last gem e4pq r. swcHEZ°AVIO31 wwMO D.R. HORTON seam Fmr mae e3r7 nee 10025 SUBOIVI610N BOUNDARY LINE - - BW BACK OFWALK is AvwoxsavcoNxurBnFS gPN9etmsceza) za. siwKBAIOCEexvEMEKAloFL50E7Aa0muc ' 17 SD Ce 04TCH BASIN Iwn9eea07ectal E6300WENS DRIVE trail FUor 2180 - g21q m3B 984Y , STORMORAIN MAIN IraNSa6am7 oo5) -(Ep25D - CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE 8. BPCOBR-0-0im B eee PLEASANTON,CA94566 real esi7 fBm aBm mm efu iM7 7LB1 aw 00 CLFANOUT IPPN 911050024 M) 75. UNITED eTAlE30FAMEWG SANRARYSEWER MWN B'6S) (E)A•SS ON OOWIJ NPN9BSarxole) I~geg°°°, pp„sl (925)737-108(1 _ 12•Ple%Bldg. I WATER MAIN ~8'W_~ _ (E~B•W _ (E) EXISTING ATTN: DEAN MILLS Al AZ M R U' OVERHEAD ELEDTRID DH ,E,DH EG EE"X STING GRADE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: FI~FbPr ~3`" 7,; 5~' ' GAS LINE --q'G (E~'G - EVAE EMERGENCYVEHICLEACCESa EASEMENT Second Fbor 2eBB - mR 276q 95N - RECIAIMEOWATERLINE FOR FlAE DEPARTMENT A65EMBLY 986.OW1-013-02 ENGINEER: ~M"IFS 6577 Ten B15B 1108 ~ tBfl I~S~ ysBs I ^RW - (E~B'RW FF FINISH FLOOR FlAE SERVICE 2'FS- (EJ?'FS FG FINISH GRADE PROPOSED AREAS: BKF ENGINEERS JOINT UTILITY TRENCH J, FH FIRE HYDRANT 25SSHORELINEDRIVE,SUITE200 ' FL FLOWLINE LOT 1: PROPOSED 54CONOOMINIUMUNITS REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065 11-PexBldg. ELECTRIC UNE FS FIRESERVICE a p2 R p• E PARKING AND COMMON AREAS 650 482.6300 R ns f u n t c cAS z x Ac I ) ~ ~ n a.t a n,.l. ix~ Toml f DRAINAGE INLET ~ T~. GB GARDE BREAK ( ) Flml Floor 792 2383 993 2Bt0 1JSe 5193 CURB INLET ~ GFF GAMGE FlNIGHFLOOR LOT 2: PROPOSED 5I CONDOMINIUM UNITS ATTN: ROLANO HAGA seroM Floor mt8 g2B0 7148 rn9d Fkor 2856 4106 ~ M61 GR GRATE PARKING AND COMMON AREAS ialal mB8 7767 03% mfl 1°175 M17 AREA OAAIN a HP HIGH POINT (1.79 AC) I POW'ERPOLE INV INVERT ARC_HITEC_ T_: 7-Pte%Bld JT JolNrunuTYTRENCH PROPERTY ADDRESS: 9' I MANHOLE ~ 0 LF LINEAR FEET - A' A2 R U' KTGY GROUP, INC. R n.a,t a naf. not SANTARY SEWERCLFN40UT c58C0 LP LOW POINT PAACELI0F PM 7B82,LOCATEO BETNEEN MARTINELU WAY I60lRH),DUBLIN R1_1 Ujns] Total i?W 17922FITCH FlmtFlon 302 03] ssa z39B a9s aim MAx MAXIMUM BLVD WORTH), IRON HORSE PARKWAYIYYE6T)BCAMPUSDRNE(FAST1. semMFkor t2Ba ~ 3960 arze sTORM DRAIN CLEANOUT o6DC0 IRNNE, CA 92614 I MH MANHOLE Trim Fbx 1218 3ml g50p M°" MD"DMENT EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: (949)85,-2133 TWI nM WATER METER ~wM Cwnl N NORTH I I FIRE HYOMNT ~FH o~pp N0. NUMBER VACANT HIGH DENSITY RE6IDENTIAL ATTN:CHRIS TEIRER 4~lex Bldg. O.R. OFFICIAL RECORD WATERVALVE w X Af R U' PGBE PACIFIC GASBELECTRIC glnefl ~ Tmal Taml pERP°E~N~o~~~oft~„E~~ FDA PM PAA~E M~"E EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: LANDSCAPE: ~F~nr x;83 '~9 PR PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) PO HIGH DENSITY RFSIOENTIAI RIPLEY DESIGN oylFbor ~7 115i WI 1150 II, I STREETLIGHT(SINGLE ARM) ~ ~ PSE PUBUC SERVICE EASEMENT HIGH DENSITY RE6IDENTBLL 1615 BONANZA STREET, SURE 314 I STREEFLIGHT(OOUBLE ARM) • >r x x PUE PUBOC UTILITY EASEMENT WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 Prc PoLYUImcHLORIDE 3-Ple%Bldg. I PEDE6TAIAN6TREETLIGHT ~ R RADIUS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: i925)93a-'377 A, R 9' ACP REINFORCED CONCAETEPIPE R(ns.l.l U n.e.L TMaI Tdal SPOT EtFlATION x tot x fm s SLOPE, SOUTH PARCEL I, (A.P.N.9B6-0001-01b02, PoRTIONIAS SHOWNON 71iAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, ATTN; ANNIKA CARPENTER Flm Fbor 3JS 15n 345 149 SD Si017M DRAIN 'PARCELANP 7892, FILEDAPRIL 14,2005, IN BOOK 2800E PAACFI MAPS, PAGES Sle5, Sx°m Fkm ~ ~ FENCE (XIIGATE (G) -xX- ~ ' S& SANRARY6EWER IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER AIAMEDA COUNTY. ToMI~ /ml IBm tl01 17m SSE SANRARYSEWER EASEMENT SWE SIDEWAU(EASEMENT 'FlrewMpmrldedanpfomaHWnmu. 3000 a.l.br U.aaopury TG TDPDFDURB UTILITIES: WI4 WATERMETEA WATER SUPPLY-DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT W WATER,MIEBT - Data Sheet A-2 SANITARY SEWER -DUBLIN SAN AAMON SERVICES DISTRICT STORM DRAIN ~ CITY OF DUBLIN D.R. Horton DUblin, California Architecture+planning 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ~ ~ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t D u h I 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main I~ S t a t ~ O ktgy.com KTGY #20080583 June 22, 200 ~ ' ~a ~--u--'-~------'-~--u-------~---u--~' ~---~-------u--~--~--u-------~-~- - ~J I+BZ , ~d Project Summary Dc~ 13+OD 14+00 15+DO 16+00 17+00 18+DO 19+OD 2 DD Site Area: 179,950 SF IRON HORSE PAR WAY (4.13Acres) ,Dwelling Units: 105 Homes ' - - ~ ~ Density: 25.5 DUTAC - I 1 ---------¦¦¦~'¦1¦¦¦~¦¦¦ r A=Accessible Plan ~ ~ ~ ! i ~ I I I ~ I I I ~ 1'' ~I ~ ¦ ¦ ¦=Accessible Path of Travel (105 x 10%=Req., 11 provided) 1 I I es fis ea fi3 fiP fi, fifi ss se sr se ss 1 u 53 3: 5, m a9 4fi a 4e 43 „ a3 ?~''L I ~ =Pedestrian Connections Through Bldg. I + I I P2 PS P5 PS PS P3 P3 PS PS P5 P5 P4 1 P4 PS P5 PS P5 P P3 P5 PS P5 P5 P2 I II l i l I I I I I I I Site Summary ~ I ~ i i ~ a ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i II I I r ~ ~ I I Description Area % I 'i I I _ _ _ _ , ` 1 _ , _ _ , , _ I I Building Footprint Area: 81,639 SF (1.87 Acres) 45 I ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ I~ it HardscapelParkingRrea: 58,212 SF (1.34 Acres) 32 I ~ ~ 1 m ao ~ a, 3e ~ ~ 39 ~ ~ I Landscape Area: 40,099 SF (0.92 Acres) 23 j ii ~ I P2 P2 y P2 P2 1 P2 P2 ~ P2 P2 P5 P3 I I Total Site Area: 179,950 SF (4.13 Acres) 100 ~ 1 i i ~ ~ i ~ ~,i iii ~ ~ ~ 1 _ 1 II I 1 fiB 79 8Z 93 ~1. ZT 30 ~ 4, I 11 1 ~ P5 PS _ I I _ P5 P5 _ ~ _ PS ~ PS _ ~ I _ P5 ~ ~ I Plan $Ummary 1 ' 1 1 ¦ 7B ~ 92 ~e 3, w , ~ ~1 ~ Plan Type Description Area No. 1 ~ P9 P3 P3 P9 Pa Pa Pa C Plan 1 2 BR 12.5 BA 1174 SF 5 5 I t~l I ; 1 3 I ~ r ` ' I l+ ~ PIan2 2BR12.5BA 1208 SF 19 18 J 11 i I ~ 1 I ro n 1 Sa - s, ~ ~ I 3s 32 1 39 - 1 Z Plan 3 2 BR 12.5 BA 1440 SF 23 22 Ij i ~ i P3 P3 ~ P3 P3 P3 P3 1 P9 I ~ i^ pl Plan 4 3 BR 13.0 BA 1547 SF 13 12 ~ ~ fZr1 ~ i, rs Ij 85 ~ 99 t ~ ~ y „ „ - I i - ~ ~ 4 II C Plan 5 3 BR / 3.0 BA 1610 SF 45 43 II o r 1 P5 P5 1' ; 65 4 95 1 ~ ~ 1 1 _ _ ~I m Total Units 105 100 i=i ~ I 1 rc 1 n is I P5 PS 1 P5 G ~ J Z3 u I 1 1 P4 P4 P4 P4 ~ ~ III i ~ ' ~ ~ Pa Pa ~I', Pa III ~ *Refer to Civil Sheets C-04 for Dimensions and Setbacks ~ ` x ti ~ t ¦ ~ g, I ~ I I I ~ a, I v ',1 1 1 73 74 87 08 g~ 1 tI 35 78 P5 P5 P$ ~1 ~ II ' I I lil 1 ~ P2 _ P2 P2 P2 ~i ~ 1 P2 P2 ~ ~ P2 I 1 i ~ 1 _ l I 1 - ~ ~ ~~i I I ~ Iii i ~ ~ ~ i~~'', 1 1 ~ ~ I I 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 i II i ~ f+~, I f I ~iIN 1 103 104 103 10Y ,01 100 99 99 97 98 95 21 30 19 ,fi fl ,fi 15 1/ 13 13 11 10 9 9 1~~' I P7 P7 P1 P1 P1 P3 P3 PS P5 P4 P4 Pa PS P5 P5 PS P P3 PS P5 P5 PS P5 P4 P2 3 ~I' I I / 'o I 1 I I I ~ I ~ 1 I ~j 1 1 1 I I I _ _ I - - -38+00 I 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 a5+00 111 CA P S DRIVE ~ 1 w I l o l 1 11 n1 1 ,I 1 i i~, 1 I Conceptual Site Plan'- ~ SP-1 0 15 30 60 ' I Sc91e D.R. Horton Dublin, California a Architecture+Planning 283 4th Street Third Floar 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ ~ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t Dublin Station 510.272.2910 • 925 225 7400 Main ktgy.com KTGY #20080583 June 22, 2010 ~ alb ~a~ i ' J}.+~--u--~- --u--u-- I --+~--u--u-- -u-- _ PARKING SUMMARY ~~J - Otil?~ Dwelling Parking Spaces I t3+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 2 00 Required Dwelling Prkg. Spaces: 158 (1.5 SP1DU) Provided Dwelling Prkg, Spaces: Side-by-side Garage Spaces: 164 i } On-Site 0 en Dwellin S aces: ' v - -,c- - - - - - - - - -y4- - - TOotal Prov Bede Spacges:p 195 (1.9 SPIDU) 11 ~ _ ~ I Guest Parking Spaces ~ i ~ ~ ~ } 1 I RegUlred GUBSt $paC@S: 24 (15%Req. Dwelling Prkg. Spaces) ~ ^;~'~?-E- ~ Provided Guest Spaces; I I- i I i I 1 On-Site Open Guest Spaces: 12 ~ • ~ ~ - I 1 Public Street Frontage Spaces: 33 1 5 26° Re . Dw lin Prk . S aces) I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Total Provided. 4 (i q ale s p 1 I I ~ I 1 I I _ _ _ _ - - 1 1 ~ i _ _ J/,~ ~ - I` i Typical Stall Diminsion: Refer to Civil Sheet C-04 1 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ I i 1 R~ Prov, ~ 1 1 ~ I i Dwelling Parking Spaces 1.5 SPIDU Req 158 195 ~ j - I I - - ` - ' - I I - Guest Parking Spaces 15%Req. 24 45 ' 1 1 1 _ ~ ` Dwelling Spaces I 1 r ; ~ !I~ 's~ ~ e Total Parking Spaces 182 240 ~ I I C11 117 [i 3 ~ ~ r fi r~ l i 1 ~ ~ I I 1 1 1 ~ l 1~ 1 ii i ( 11$11 ; ~i ~ 11 ~egend I I 1 1~ ~ ! +:n I 1 1 ? - I I Side-by-side Garage Spaces 1 1 ~ I 1 1 I { 1 1 j 1 ~ ~I i ~ 1 One Car Garage Spaces 1 1 ~ 1 1 - - - - - t Stora e - - 1 1 1 _ ` 1 g ' ~ 1 1 1 ; , , j ~ On-Site Open Dwelling Spaces 1 1 ~ 1 I ~ \V I ~ ~ I 1 ~ i . On-Site Open Guest Spaces ~ - i1 ~ j ~ 1 .Public Street Frontage Spaces ~ ~ I __Y / ~ - - -IS~oO ~ Is+oo 20+00 2t+oo 22+00 2~+ao 24+ao ~+oo ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I I 1 i t 1 I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' i i 1 ~ S P'2 ~ Parking Plan \ , Scale: N.T.S. ~ D.R. Horton Dublin, California Architecture+Planning ' 283 4th Street Third Floor 8630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ ~ Oakland, California 94607 ' Pleasanton, California 94588 k ESPRIT a t D u b I i n Station ~ 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ktgy.com ' KTGY #20080583 ~ ~Unt? Z~~~ ~~i~~ - .N w ~ _ ~ ~ 09'x' i~ 1 t1'1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~il +r d~ ~ f r;'i.:, ~ ~'(~i,f i~~ ~ r ~t ~ ~ rrr~ f 'rt r"rr rr ~ 1 ~ e ~ _ ~ " ' T i i ~ I _ - r' t i ..r ~ ~ ~ e ri « e ~ t ,i$ r~ rig a i e e o:. a ' p Campus Drive Street Scene ,F ~ - i0.. 4 i ~i - ~ Martinelli Way Street Scene ' 7 ~ ~ 99q qqq ~ -i~ ~ ~ B!H' IM~p Rr ITI~ uTw P R : F1'f 4e ' 119b TIw~ PAR 121 i r ~ 111 ~ ~ t;:. ~ , ~ - ~ L~ ~ ~i^, ~ id Imo:. f" ~ i,P.u• ~r ~f~' t"'" f I ~ r'_ « i ~y _ , 1 . . i Apt ~ 7 ~ r - 1 Iron Horse Parkway Street Scene Street Scenes A-3 D.R. Horton Dublin, California nroni~ewre«via~m~y 6630 Owens Drive P834ih 6treN ThiN RpOf PieasaNOn. Daiiternla 94666 ESPRIT a t Dublin Station °~~i~~~~=s~'~` m~~~' 925 225 7400 Main kr9Y COm ~rcva2ooeo663 June 22, 2010 -~4'-0'No openings Roof '>4'-0'No openings ROOF ~ 2 Hr. - Z He - FieWall Fire Wall I 1 1 I 1 r i~ m d m-~.~ ~m v. v eo n. mm ~ ev and a mom... m d n bm- 0 e n m e I. _ _ , - - p pp pp pp ~ pp p pp pp V Y M ~ R ~ - Y M- R ~ M~ K M ~ a. r ~ I r ~ I 4 i m 2Hc 2Hc Fire ~ Front Elevation RreWall S-Tile Roof Stucco Finished Mechanical Screen ~ ~ Rafter Tail o Stucco Finish Stucco Finish ~ -~I tai Isl I Recessed Window Q Left Side Elevation Ri ht Side Elevation 9 4'-0' No openings Roof 4'-0" No openings Roof YHc PHr. Fire Well Fire Well 1 1 ~ ~ , Q ~ m m 0 o o ~ Imo o~0 0 0- o ~ o o moo ~ o ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0-0 0 ~ I~ o moo ~o ~ o ~ olio o~l~ o00 ~o o ~ Imo, o ~o o ~ ~ ~ 1 Hr. 1 Hr. F've Wall Fire Wall ~ ~-P~eIA Rear Elevation W y 0 N H C ~ C 0 0 m lL lL ~ O F W ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ evations A-4 m LL~~N~ 0 5 10 15 U) ~ ~ U) ~ ~ Scale I I Architecture+Plannin D.R. Horton Dublin, California s 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ ~ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t Dublin Station ~ 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ktgy.com KTGY #20080583 June 22, 2010 I m a << 0 0 m 2Hr. ~ 2Hr d ~ Rre Wall Flre Wall N I I I o--o o--o I I I I I ~ a - -oo oa- as oo -oo - ca- -a~ - oa- as - - o- - L0 C od ~ l - oa o 00 o as a o0 00 0 04 a oo - - J - ~ ~o o ~,o o~ ~o o~ ~o o~ ~o o~ ~o P4 P5 P5 P5 P5 ' ' I I I P5 ~ P5 P5 P5 P5 P4 ~ P2 P3 P3 - - III~II°II ii 0 onto ~lliii Blew ~ I I , iI 1 1 1 1 1 1 ILJI O - O O 0? O o - o ~ 0 O O O ? 2Hr. i 2Hc a ` ~ Fire Wall I 304'4' Fire Wall f Second Floor m a c c ~ Line of Units Above u 2Hr. 2Hr ~ N FlreWall ~ Fire WaX - - 0 0 0 0 _ - ~ - - _ - - ~ A i ' I I - P2 - I . . P3 I'I ~ III P3 ' . - ~ - e - ~ - - P4 P5 I P5 P5 ~ P5 ~ P5 ~ P5 P5 P5 P5 P4 ~ ~l~~ol Portal Mrr 7 1 r ~ j~ 1 ~ i I n i 2Hr. i 3Hc i Fire Wall ~ 3044' Flre Well First Floor 14-Plex Floor Plans A-5 0 5 10 15 Scale I I D.R. Horton Dublin, C8lifornia Architecture+Planning 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ ~ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t D u b l ~ n S t a t ~ o n 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ktgy.com -I<TCY #2oa8o583 _ June 22, 2010 Roof Mounted Mechanlwl m < Equip6ment e ~ 0 c ~ m ro W _ I r--- Z-----L ~ ~ 1------.._l ~ -J L- ~ I ~ I I I ~ I I - i ~ I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I i 0 i i 0 i i 0 0` i i O i i ~ 1 1 ~i ~ I ~ i i i i 1 1 1 / i i i/ / ~ i t 1 1 ii ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ p o i ~ ~ i i ~ it 0 i ~ ! i V - i i it I i~ I ~ ~ I I ~ I I ~ I II ~ ~ I I I I I ~ ~ i Roof Plan Slope 3:12 m a ~ ° zHr. 0 o z w. u ~ Fie Wall ~ m Fie Wall N N nn nn nn nn _ n nn nn nn nn nn O t5 0 O t5 t5 0 O ~5 C~ ~ O 0 ~5 ~5 O O ~5 t5 O O ~5 ~ 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 ,~O 00, i 00 i I ° ilnui i ° 00 00 1 0 G~ ~ ~ c:] _ _ ~ P4 P5 P5 P5 ~ P5 ° ° P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 - P4 - ~ P2 D _ ~ ~ - ~ ~ m ~ ~~oo o P3 P3 ° @ o0 0 0 00 0 mn~ ~ ~Rm ~n~~ ~m~ u.uamiwm~oiiwuiAU~inm isuiaoiiuoinmuNliuiiuuu uuiuofmuupuuuniwielmuuuBl f of uu ul m of iN of iu Mi nn ui aA m i uu nu m of in ul a iui uu a of is uu~ uu iu n uu iui uu uu o ini II m uu uq it uq_up_gl_ip_gi maiudui_gl_uu p_uA_ui~ i I uryu_uu_m_ui_iu_u9usduu um m wu m_gip uiiu_in_il_mi_ib uu uu a uu n m uu iul i a d. P He ~ 2 Hr. ~ ' Fire Well ,~~,p FieWal Third Floor 14-Plex Floor & Roof PIanS A-6 0 5 10 15 Scale I I ~ D.R. Horton ~ Dublin, California s Architecture+Planning 6630 Owens Drive 283 4th Street Third Floor Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ~ ~ 510.272.2910 ~ r ESPRIT at Dublin Station 925 225 7400 Main ~ ktgy.com ~ KTGY #20080583 ~Un@ ~Z, Z~~ ~ ? I 2Hr. - 4'-0"No openings ROOF 2Hr, ->4'-0'NOapenings Roof ~ I~~ nMkv, Fre Wal Fire Wall i L 1. ~'M m Y m 1 ~ o I~ _ I m m a ew n m u. 6 ~ t. ~1 ~ ~ , , - C d d? _ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ d m~ ra. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 d i a r i . ; Frer~l~ 1 Front Elevation FrorWall 1 Front Elevation Dublin Blvd. and Iron Horse Prkwy. Enhanced Comer Stucco Finish 1 IIII IIII I / ~ a,oma Trellis Stucco Finished Trim ~ ~ - ~ ~ Decorative Light ' i Fixture Fiberglass Columns 1234 Address Tile ~ i ~ f Stucco Finish I ~ ~ ~ ~ a Entry Door wl - i Window Inset ~ Decorative Metal Railing ~ I ~C it fly i U U Jr ,U ii Stucw Finished Trim Stucco Finish - - _ - - Stucco Finiehed Left Side Elevation Right Side Elevation Right Side Elevation Stucco Finished Trim Dublin Blvd. and Iron Horse Prkwy. Enhanced Corner P Hr, - 4'-0" No apenngs Roof p Hr ~4'-0" No openings RoM Fire Wall Fire Wal D a U o m o m m~ ~ ~ m r ~ r ' - - i ~ l~°o loo ' loo 0 0 - ' ~o l~l~l~ o l~ l~ ~ - l~ oo loo loo 0 0 moo- o l~l~l~ 0 0 0~~~ 0 0 000 o moo- o00 0 0 0 ~~o _ F2rWzll 1 Rear Elevation F~'waw 1 ~ 2-Flex L rp ~ 0 N ~ LL d LLpp N LLpp ° p ~ N ~ ~ ` _m ° ~ Elevations A-7 d N R_F- R Nm ~ ~ mW~ U> N H N m W 0 5 10 15 ~ U, Scale~~i Architecture+Plan nin D.R. Horton Dublin, Califoi"nia 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t Dublin Station ~ 510.272.2910 I 925 225 7400 Main ktgy.com I~KTGY#20080583 41UneZZ,2~~~ } `~~;I f~~ 2Hr. a 2Hr. i Fie Wal , Fire Wall I I i I o 0 0--0 0--0 o I i o - 00~ 0 ~ r" 00 0- r 00 I 1 0 I l0 ~0 ~ r 00 r00 ~ r GO ~ 0 o I ~ I I o?~ ~ 0 00~ I l o o l I b I 0 00 oa - l- 1 I I I III II 1 O O ~ ~ 0 O ~ ~ O 1111111 I I O ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I P4 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P2 P3 1 ~ P3 ~ 0 en to I Below 0 n~i - Im~ ~ ~ --.1 I III VIII ~ VIII 1111111 VIII 1111111 I II o o o _ l~ o_ o ° ? ° - ° 2Hc 2 Hr. ~ FIre WaU ~ 281'U Flre Wall Second Floor Line of Units Above 2Hc ~ ~ 2Hc --i r I - ~ - _ i r i ~ _ D O ? Fire Wall - ~ - _ - - - ~ _ I ~ I I I I I I i I~ I I l i i v_ I V ~ I ~ I~ ~ I 111 ~ I i ~ i i I!I i II n P2 - - ~ a V - ~ - - P4 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 P5 ? II Portal I ~ III 11 11111 ~I ~ , 1 I ~ - v 1.. 1 ,III I ? ,~w 0 0 J I o I L_PJ- IIH II J IIIII II11 II ill II VIII VIII I YII I VIII I II r~ _ D _ ~ III. I I ~ - JJIJ - ° ° ? ? 2Hc 2Hc ~ Fire Wall ffi1'p Fire Wail ~ First Floor 12-Plex Floor Plans A-8 0 5 10 15 Scale I D.R. Horton Dublin, California r Architecture+Planning 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton California 94588 925 225 7400 Main ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ 510.272.2910 ktgy.com KTGY #20080583 ~Une 22, 2010 ~ ~ I -Roof Mounted Mechanical Equiptment - _ - - - - - 1 - _J L- _ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~i 1 l i i 1 1 i ~ ~ 1' i 1 l i 1 1 i'i p o i i ~ 1 1 ~ i ~ ~ ~ i i ~ i ~ it ~ it ~ i it ~ it ~ it i iii ~ U ~ i ~ ~ ~ li i ~ i i I ~I' ~i 1 Roof Plan Slope 3:12 2 Hr. i Fia Wall , nn nn n nn nn nn nn nn n Q O t5 u ~ O t5 ~5 O O t5 ~ ~ ~5 O O ~5 ~5 ' O © ? S', - C] - C] 0 0 C] - - c;] ~ ? I 00 00 0 0 00 0.11- - 00 00 1 I 0~0 lullln - 0~0 I 00 I 0 Q~ 0 ~ _ = I P2 P4 P5 P5 P5 - P5 01 1 ° P5 - - P5 P5 P5 ~ I 0 ? o0 o P3 P3 ~~~m . III NI IIII 11 III III III VIII--1Ik II III ql ~ in II II III IIII~III II III Ip II RII IIII III I ~ al uu uu o m lu lu n1 m ul n lu RIB i n n III uu ul of II al II a uu uu wu gl~III uu n m_lu I~Idu ul_uh u_iu_ulu I I uil ~I_Im_ul iu ul a of II n uu uli uu_HU I I - rug-m~~w~~-a.°u-n-aw'~ I _ i ~ _ _ _ _ - - N~ -~-"w-,~-~w°rw-~ir~~.`aq i 2nc Fire Wall ~5gg ' f Third Floor 12-Plex Floor & Roof Plans A-9 0 5 10 15 Scale I I D.R. Horton Dublin, California Architecture+Planning 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t Dublin Station 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ktgy.com KTGY #20080583 ~Unl? lrlrr/ ~4'-O'NOOpenhgs Roof ~ ~t ~p~~ 2 He rvusi^'n~r•.~ vv~.v. 11 'T"i'"`v` FR WeI -^nMn•~^n~^nn-o-~zvv~.wv~nm. .nv+n v~rv~r:7~. n~K',y '''",w~ ~=~n^."'' nrnvv.-i~.v~•.~.v:v~"r.M:rn-. ivv-nv;~r.~:'~ m e ( a I m ® i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i m Fhe Wall zHr' Front Elevation ,ti=~3'-0" No openings in wall for roof overhangs Trellis Punch Opening to Entry Patio y i ~ - ? J i Recessed Opening r~~ I ~ Brackets ~i Stucco Finish Stucco Finish Recessed Window 1 Left Side Elevation Right Side Elevation L= >4'-0' No openings Roof P Hr.-`lam"-~ Flre Wall fr ti rrVn . rn ^IV4'. . ' C C C C C C 'CC CC C C C C C CC C C C CCC C CC CCC CCC C CC CCC -''CC CCC 'CCC CCC CCC Rear Elevation FlrenYJal~ 11-Flex N y ~ a ~ ~-j0'-0' No openings in wall c y p p C ~ H `"111 for roof overhangs ¦ ~ N° ~ ~ ~ Elevations A-10 ~ A m ~ ~ 0 5 10 15 ~ ~ ~ ~ to Scale I I D.R. Horton Dublin, California Architecture+Planning 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ~ 283 4th Street Third Floor Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t D u b I i n Station 5010I272.2910ornia 94607 925 225 7400 Main ~ ktgy.com KTGY #20080583 June 22, 2010 ~ _ s¦./ I~ I 3'~g' No openings in wall 2 Hr >for roof Overhangs Fire Wall , ® ~ ® oo , I o o~ ~ oo _ roa ao ~ I 00 0 ~ LJ ~ LJ ~ ~ ` ~ o ~I I I I o,l I - I loo I - _ ~ o~, ~o o~ on P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 p5 P5 P4 P4 d ? ? ? ? ? P3 P3 - oeeiow° 2Hr. Fire Wall O f] ~>3'-q'No openings in wall for roof Overhangs ~ sas`r Second Floor 3'-7 Noopeningsinwall ~-Line of Units Above 2 Hr. for roof overhangs Free Wal , - _ - O - I O O _ O - - ~ I _ ~ / - _ Ir _ - ~ _ I I I , _ I I~ P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 I _ . _ - I ~ ~ ~ ~ P3 I P3 I . D ? P5 ~ _ ~ P5 P4 = P4 - FoAai o ~ ? I I I 2Nc d ? loo ? Fire Wall - Ill 0 0 0 _ o ~ 71 _ =in - - ~3'-0'No openingsln Oval ror roof ovaHmngs / 23fi' 2' First Floor 11-Plex Floor Plans A-11 D 5 fo fs Srale D R Horton Dublin, California Architecture+planning 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive a ESPRIT a t D u b I i n Station Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 a 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ~ ktgy.com l KTGY #20080583 June 22, 2010 s ~I ~aC ~1 Roof Mounted Mechanical Equiptment ~ _ 1------~ -J L- ~ I ~ I - ~ - I i ~ i 1 1~ o~ 1 1~ ~ i i 0 0~ i i~ C ~ i i I~ i 1 1 i, ' i 1 l ~r ~ C, i i _ i i ~ i ~ I I ~I Roof Plan Slope 3:12 3'-g' No openings in wall 2 Hr. 'far roof overhangs Fire Wall , ' nn- nn nn. nn _nn_ nn nn nn nn O ~5 LS O O ~5 t5 O O t5 ~ C" t5 O O t5 t5 O ~5 O - r- II Ir_ - - ~ 0 0 I - ~ - - - _ _ ~ 0~0 ~i r 00 - 0 - I~ = P1 P1 - - P1 P1 I - = P1 ° o - - - - - - ° - ~ ° P5 P5 P4 P4 I ~ ~ o - a _ a a z„, P3 P3 Fire Wall I ~ I _ ~ 3'-0"Noopenings in wall fir root owxhengs ~ P75A Third Floor 11-Plex Floor & Roof Plans A-12 0 5 10 15 Scale D.R. Horton ~ Dublin, California Architecture+Planning 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton California 94588 ESPRIT at Dublin Station 510.272.2910 ~ 925 225 7400 Main # ktgy.com I KTGY #20080583 June 22, 2~~ ~ _ - ~ 4'-0' No openings in Roof ~ ~t~ ~f ~ a~~ Fire Wall r~~jl i I i 1 m Fire`Wzl~ - Front Elevation Decorative Metal Grill Decorative Li ht ~ i - Punched Opening to g i ~ I Pedestrian Portal Below Fixture 123 Address Tile Recessed Opening Entry Door I ® 'w~ Stucw Finish ~S Stucco Finish ~ ~ ~ z~€ Stucco Finished Trim Stucco Finished Trim _ - Left Side Elevation Right Side Elevation st°ccoFinishedTrim Pedestrian Portal ~4'-0" No openings n Raof 2 Hr. Fire Well ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ i 0 0 o °o °a ~o o°a o ooh Rear Elevation nre Wald z"` 7-Plex L L ~ N F C O ~ N O 0 d O m W LL m LL ~ N~ Elevations A-13 ¢~E tnHWN mm 0 5 1D 15 f U Scale I I~- D R. Horton Dublin, California Architecture+Planning c 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ESPRIT a t Dublin Station ~ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ktgy.com , I'I KTCY #2ooso5s3 June 22, 2010 i a~ rHr. FreWall ~ ~ Q Q 0 ~ ® _ OD ~ I I ~ r ~ G] a 00 0o I w 0o II o0 00 ~ ~ 1 I I V i ~ I - - I _ ~ ~S ~ _ O O ~ I~I~I] I ~ p P2 P4 P5 P5 P2 4 l~ P3 P3 ~ o en to ~ ~ ~eioW ~ - ~ 0 Fire Wall - ~ 15r8 f Second Floor ~ Line of Units Above I 1 Hr Fire Wall - l ~ I~ l 1 V I J II il P2 ~ P2 i ® ~ ~ i ~ p i P _ - 3 P 3 - - ? - P4 P5 P5 ? I ' i', Portai ~ I'I ` I I ~i ~I ~ I~~ I ~ II l o o i-~ o II, lil Fire Wall ~ ~srs f First Floor 7-Plex Floor Plans A-14 0 5 10 15 Scale iI~ D.R. Horton DUblln, California x Architecture+Planning 6630 Owens Drive k 283 4th Street Third Floor ESPRIT a t Dublin Station Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ~ 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main x ktgy,com KTGY #20080583 ,lUne 22, 2O1 O oof Mounted Mechanical Equiptment _ ~ - -J I III ~ ~ ~ ~ i 1' ' i ~ i it ~ i i i i ~ `0 i~ iii ii i 0 0~ I 1 1 i i i~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ---1- ~ ~ -z= i ~ li Roof Plan Slope 3:12 2 Hr. 1 Fia Wall 0 GI O n r O ~ ~ O n ? - ~5 ~ LS - 0 0 - t5 ~ ? Q i- O O I - _ O O = C~ uui i ~ N P2 = - - - I P2 P4 P5 o - o P5 = I ~ - ~ - ~ 'I P3 P3 i - 1Hc._--_~ Fire Wall { 116-10' Third Floor l-Plex Floor & Roof PIanS A-7 ~ 0 5 10 15 Scale D.R. Horton ~ Dublin, California Arcnitecture+Planning ' 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ~ ESPRIT a t Dublin S t a t i o n Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ~ 1 925 225 7400 Main ~ 510.272.2910 kt .com 9Y ~ KTGY #20080583 June 22, Z~~~ 1~~1 m ~ a ~ a m~ Front Elevation - - - - - _ l~l~ir Stucco Finished Trim - - Recessed Window J, ~ ~ I - - Slone Finish _ ® _ ~ i ~ Metal Rail ~ _ y ~ ~ ~ Stucco Finish ~I~u`'U- - ~ I _ ~ - ~~~~-Y - - J~ Left Side Elevation Right Side Elevation ~ ~ D O m ~ m- ~ co ~ °o CO _ L t 4-Plex N N N OO N ~ N mLL ~LL ~o ~ ` ~ ` ° ° ~ Elevations A-~ ~ o ~ Ern ~ W° 0 5 10 15 tp W F to ~ ~ Scale I ~ c~ ~-I D.R. Horton DUblln, California Architecture+planning 6630 Owens Drive t 283 4th Street Third Floor Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t Dublin S t a t' o n Oakland, California 94607 925 225 7400 Main 510.272.2910 KTGY #20080583 - ~Une TT, Z0~ 0 ~ ktgy.com ~~~~1 Roof Mounted Mechanical I Equiptment I I 1 ~ as oa o0 00 I I I ~ I I I J I ? ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~o off, ~o ~ i ~ ~ P5 P5 P5 - P2 i i i ~ ~ i ° o d o - o o - - Roof Plan Second Floor Slope 3:12 o - _ 1~-~~ -i ~ - ~ 00 0 Qo - P2 00 0 ~0 _ w P5 P5 P5 - - P5 P5 = P5 ~ I?~ I , 0 00 0 I I I ? _ I , - ~ ee`r ~ , so'-r f Third Floor First Floor 4-Plex Floor & Roof Plans A-1l 0 5 10 15 Scale I I D.R. Horton Dublin, California Architecture+Pianning 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ Pleasanton, California 94588 Oakland, California 94607 E PRIT at Dublin tat~on 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ktgy.com KTGY #20080583 - ~Une 22, 2~1U 3~ ~a Front Elevation Stucco Finish „ Stucco Finish Recessed Window D 1` I - il~ - n, Stucco Finished Tnm Metal Rail y ~ti~ 1~ U I~ ~ - rJ - n~ i Metal Sectional r.~, . - Garage Door Stucco finish Stucco Finish Left Side Elevation Right Side Elevation 0 ® m~ l~ l~ l~ l~ l~ 3-Plex L ~ Rear Elevation o o ~ • m~ ~ moo Elevations A-18 ~ ~ E m ~ ~ D 5 10 15 W H m m N Scale I I Architecture+Plannin D.R. Horton Dublin, California 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t D u b I i n S t a t ~ o n 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ktgy.com ° KTGY #20080583 dune TT, 2U1~ ~a~ -Roof Mounted Mechanical Equiptment Oa ~ oa o0 ~ I I ~ I ~ a o0 i i 0 _ it / / I ~ it it o~ _ 0 ~ ~ 1 1 P2 P5 I I' I ~ ~ ~ ~ i P3 ~~ll,, ~ q LJ 0 ~ q o ~ ~ o ? - r i 6/ 0 ~ Roof Plan Second Floor Slope 3:12 - ~ - - - ~ 0 M ~f ~ ~ O I I ~ ~ - - I I V _ ° 4 - o - aC~ ~ P2 _ ~ =I - n _ ~ ~ P3 P2 - ~ - P5 ~ ~ R , ~ - - L~ ~ ~ P5 i I P3 0 - o D Third Floor First Floor 3-Plex Floor & Roof Plans A-1 ~ 0 5 10 15 Scale I I ~.R. Horton ? ~Ublln, ~811fornl8 ~ Architecture+Planning 6630 Owens Drive ~ ~ 283 4th Street Third Floor Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton California 94588 51 .27 0 2.2910 ESPRIT at Dublin Station 925 225 7400 Main ~ ktgy.com KTGY #2oo8o5s3 _ June 22, 2010 f ~ I~~I za,a 20 ~ za ~a _ CC ~~t Pwdr . Masser ~ Bath. o,o Kltcherl © ~ ~ o'o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~11IC Naste~ ~ Di~~ng Bedroom i~~ ~o° x ~o~ o" ~ rake 11'-0° x "4' 0" ! 2 ' x 22' U ~ ~ 1 i h 2 _ f UO - J~ - F~Cdr00'T' - 1C 0" x 10' 6" IVIO _ - ~~I ~ ~q ~ ~ q up ~nt~ ~ Third Level Second Level Ground Level 2 Bedrooms 12.5 Baths 1174 N.S.F. Plan tJne A-20 o z 4 8 Scale ' D.R. Horton - Dublin California Architecture+Planning 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT ~ ~ D U ~ I I ~ Station 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ktgy.com KTGY #20080583 ~ _ ~Une 22, 2010 s ~ ~ z,~ o~~ z. o~~ - ~ ~Wd~ --I ~C_ ~ - - aster Batn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~itcrer qo ~ i do _ ~ MGs:er - ~ Becroom ~ ~ Ir '2~ 4° X ~2~ o° ~ ni~g I I - WIC ~1~=io~~ X 10~-0, ~ _ _ ~ rage 2 ~ ~Xz2 i n u ,v th 2 U Bedroom 2 r} f1- _ Dn_ ~ ~ p 10' 0" x 1a 6" ~ Vlrl 13' "xf'10" o ~ 0 - l~f --Ion ~p ~ ~p''~, ~ , 1~ ~ , - ~ - ? II ~ II up up I~ I, II I ~ I I I 0 II I L_~ _ - Third Level Second Level Ground Level 2 Bedrooms 12.5 Baths 1208 N.S.F. Plan Two A-21 0 2 4 8 Scale I I D.R. Horton ~ Dublin, CBIIfOrnlB Architecture+Planning 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Dnve ¦ ¦ Oakland, California 94607 ~ Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t Dublin Station • ' 510.272.2910 t 925 225 7400 Main ~ ktgy.com KTGY #20080583 ~ June 22, 2010 i-/ ~a~ 2Y-2,: z, r _ ~ - z, z„ ~o } ~ o a ~ i D ~ ~ ~ ii Kl,chen ~_T~ i ath 2 00 ~ ~ der ~ ~ o~o ~ ~ 10' a' X 1o'-z" Bedroor' i 2 ~ ~ ~ 13'-10" x 13' 6" w - a I I PWd` ~ ~ I ~ i m i ~~undr nen Eoat ~ ~ ~ ~ i Cinng ~ 99'x 3'0" Up~ i''~ 1-( ~ ~ ~ Garage ~ p w '0' 0'' x 40' 2" r -a ~ Master ~n ~ ° ~ 0 ~alh Dn', ~ II ~ WIC,' ~ _ ~ ~ 'i- 15' 2" x 13 9' I~ NIc.St2r UO 3edroom 15~ X r z'~ - r ~r ~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ _ O _ O _ ~ Third Level Second Level Ground Level 2 Bedrooms 12.5 Baths + Den 1440 N.S.F. Plan Three A-22 0 2 4 fi S~~B i ~ D.R. Horton Architecture+Plannin Dublin, California s 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ ~ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a~ D u b I I n S t a t I o n 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ~ ktgy.com ~ ; ~ KTGY #20080583 _ dune ZZ, 2010 ~a - - Z,.6~~ - Batr 2 Bedroom 2 ~ _ CD II ~ i ~ ~o~ s~ x 13' 4' ~ Be roo I ~ 0 t Stu I O o,o II II 10' o^ x 10' o' II ~ ~ ob K:che~ ' ~ ~ ~ U a ~ ~ I~ rage I I 2'~~~x21• aster _ I3atr - aun~'~ I ~--=1--C Balh ~I WIC :1 ~ ~ ~ , ~ Di~irq I,,~ I rsxoo~ I - v Li Masser Bccroom o 13' 2" x 12' 9" Dn ~p ~'1 ~ I _ - - ~ I ~IVing I I~ I ~ z X 10 powder 'I~ - V rlex_Space I, ~ C~a (s 1 o x 1z a p ' J ~ry LIB C ~-I Third Level Second Level Ground Level 3 Bedrooms 13 Baths 1547 N.S.F. Plan Four A_-23 0 2 4 6 Sple I j D Horton Dublin, California Architecture+Planning 283 4th Street Third Floor j 6630 Owens Drive ~ ¦ ¦ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t D u b I i n Station ~ 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ~ ktgy.com KTGY #20080583 ~llne 22, 2~~~ ~ `~3 ~ I~ ~1 z s~~ z.6~. z,~s~ o Bath 2 Bedroom 2 ° ~ ~ j 10 6 x 13' 4° I~~ BeW00 ~ Oft Stu ~ i op i i '0' 0~' x ~0'-0' i A / ono K:che~ I I = - I` ~ ~ -race ~I i z ~X2., aster Bath a~c~,~ ~ ~ ash 3 WIC ~ Dicing Mader Bedroom r- 13'2'x16'0" ~p ~ Dn 1 = I ~ivin - - p 13' 2' x 13' 0" ~ 'I I w- _ - - =1ex Soace i a ~ 13.2, X .2~ 8.. { ' p i~rl - T ~;r I ~ D - D 0 1 ' Deck ~ ~ w: COI - i0 0 ? ~ ~ ~ Third Level Second Level Ground Level 3 Bedrooms / 3 Baths 1610 N.S.F. Plan Five A-24 0 2 4 6 Sple I ' ~i D.R. Horton ~ Dublin, California Architecture+Planning Y 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ Pleasanton, California 94588 ~ Oakland, California 94807 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ~ ESPRIT a t Dublin Station a ~ ktgy.com KTGY#20080583 June 22, 2U1U ~ rz Rooftop AIC Condensers 1 i - ll r 1' Bath Bedroom Master8edroom Bath Bath r Stair I_ L Bath Closet' Bedroom Deck LivinglDining Kitchen Entry Stair Garage Entry Flec Space Garage Section A-A Section B-B Building Sections A-2~ 0 5 10 15 Scale D.R. Horton Dublin, C8iIf01'nl8 Architecture+Planning 4 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Drive ESPRIT a t D u b I i n Station Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ~ 510.272.2910 925 225 7400 Main ktgy.com „4~ KrcY #2oaso583 June 22, 2010 i ~b fog-' I Accent 1 - Accent 2 - Front Doors! Front doors! Accent 3 - Trim and Stucco 1 Stucco 2 Garage Doors Garage Doors Railings Fascia Roof Tile U SW 7101 SW 6106 SW 6117 SW 6082 SW 2803 SW 6083 Capistrano Futon Kilim Beige Smokey Topaz Cobble Brown Rookwood Sable Weathered Terracotta Terra Cotta Flashed 3520 'CRRC rated Accent 1 - Accent 2 - Front Doors! Front Doors/ Accent 3 - Trim and Stucco 1 Stucco 2 Garage Doors Garage Doors Railings Fascia Roof Tile N N U SW 6105 SW 6079 SW 2851 SW 7054 SW 0032 SW 7055 Capistrano Divine White Diverse Beige Sage Green Suitable Brown Needlepoint Enduring Canyon Brown Light Navy Bronze 3581 "CRRC rated Color and Materials Board A - 2 6 D.R. Horton Dublin, California Architecture+Planning 283 4th Street Third Floor 6630 Owens Dfive ¦ ¦ Oakland, California 94607 Pleasanton, California 94588 ~ ESPRIT a t Dublin Station 5t0.272.29to 925 225 7400 Main ktgy.com KTGY#20080583 June 22, 2010 b N984S00 - E 4273295 Z~ - - N 917)286 ~ ~ dal pUBLIN BOULEVARD sa~~•'"~° 'I" E ~ N 989252 ~ ' ~ N 9841.41 ~ ~ _ - - E 43202.88 - ~ - E 42697.02 _ d pg ! ~ N 1 ~ > Pb4W91 -0~.31'39'Ld6/.66'~ m•r9 ~ 8-011==~51• j,~4R.31 ~ ~ R=192RGU 1d P9E! 9E =p~22~ L=31zi' N sn9.n , ~ ~ ~ I =1ns~21' E 42180.22 N 4554'47 - ' ~ ~ r4dE N 40!101' E 364E ~ ~ I ~ E ~ ~ _ _ - - - - ,d ro sE~r-Aa''woaEn ~ 1 I ~ I - - - - - -2ax5.99' ' / / I ~~d~ I I I L=54.71' _LI I I =172'35' ~ _ - _ ~ I _ I I Ijl~ ~jll ~ ~-~E,~ I r- ~ I I 96' dII ~IIII I ~ I ~ I ,rcEnoll aF 1d I I LOT 1 (I I I LEffN~ I J I ~(E~ Ig t~~M~ ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ (N)S[IE WhIH EASEMENT (511Ej ? Imo/ Ylp l10 611! AC Fti7t CpOpN~Y pUpOffS V r~,yl{ I ~ I I I PARCEL 2 PORTION OF R0N HORg I ~ ~I~I I - - - - - I I I I I > PARCEL MAP 7892 PAKKIYAY TO BE VACAIEO ? I ~ I ~CJ ~ 1r ~ I 0 (N]EIIERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ? I i I ,d ~ I L I~ EA9QIFNT I (EpL~ W ~ ~ I I ~ ~ II I ( ml ~ I ~ABINIONm4 SiE TO BE ? RW.M)%L WWW I U I I 71n ° ~ IIVE1000E53 E6®0Nr _ I I r~>I~~2roFEdr= I I_ I I ~ _ _ Lori I ~ , I Lor z SPRIT WAY (PRIVATfE I ~ 254 PM 2B 25 I I I ~ 2C54 PMP s525 ~ } of I ~ I I a I I 4601E y, °E1~ ~ I I ~ I~ IIII ---1,da ~I, ~76~-I ~ ~ ~ I= III 9d EYIE ~ I VIII j I ~ ~}UI _1639E ~~II ~ ~ III ' "I ~ III LOT 2 ~~I ~ _ = _ I I ~ -I 16 ~1nR cao ~N~wNP~s I I iv _ _ - - - - -F~kN~YA~ I I ~ s II II 51 lNrs tdtc III 9_ W ~ I - ~ I III I I ~ II III ~I - ~ ~ II~ ~ ~ _ ~ ,-o-- 6 R=51.09' ~ ~ s I L=31.14' I - I 15' RRE 4~L 18445, _ _ 2F34s9'9Y I ~ I N 7HI'4T E - L=27b7 L f I - - - - - - - d=6385'30' ~yS X75,46 N 919394 ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - ~ - ~I~1lR.w ~r'p'S176- V"' E 43096.63 ~ ~ a ~ / ~ 6~~ 141E LOT 3 I ~ 9 .9~ ~ / ~ TRACT MAP 1525 ~ ~ - = N ~ ar~ N BB~B$S E~,~.W ~'~'}"p'(~ ~ / , - ~ / ~ 254 PM 26 ~ 94-- 2B6u ~A~~ E 439w9o - ~ ~ / #AREAS INCLUDE ADDI110NAL 0.111 AC ALONG IRON ~ ~ ~ AB15550 - _ _ - _ _ - 1- _ ~ ~ _ _ - L _ ~ = E 42nR ~ HORSE PKWf FRONTAGE. W/ (N) PL Al1GNMENT ~ h _ ?dBCELJ- - - - - PM 7093 (E1~ - - - - - ~ I PARCEL J - _ - , / I I PARCEL MAP 7892 I I N SGOR+IPHIC SCAOIE 5G ,OG CONFIGURATION AND EASEMENTS C-01 D.R. Horton Dublin, California BKF ENGINEERS 6630 Owens Drive ¦ } ¦ n 255 SHORELINE DR. SUITE 200 Pleasanton, CA 94588 ESPRIT a t Dublin S t a ~ i o n REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065 925 225 7400 Main (650) 482-6300 (PHONE) KTGY #20080583 June 22, 2~1~ (659) 482-6399 (FAX) EAG¦EERSISURVEYOR9I PLANNER9 lay NN ~ ~ goo N ~ ~ 1 i ' I ~f~ AAC i ' ~ /i - - PPY T G3~1- - - ~ ~ / 1 e n s s e \ l 1 it ` 1 m ~ m IRON HORSE PARKWAY , o ~ 1~ I \ n e~ a a ~ ~ ~ o~ ~>rm ~ w~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ >o ~o ~ nsx D.SS a a5f 0.5A ~ I V F - - - IA1 ~--T--- r_- --i-~a n ~a 6s ~ 1 I \ - ~ - - f - - ~ a ''I i I ~m ~ t>z ~ ~ ~ ~ - 51 ss a ~ ~ e~ I ~ asx ESPRIT CIRCLE Gs ~ ~ ~ 87971 Tc 3BSZO ~ ~sT ~ I H ~ PRIYATE ~ ur.n- fl 371.17 a I 3,9z+ ~ a>&m ~ Fc a>szl A°~ ~ ~ ]w.o7 I I I v e ~ I ~ % ~5 $~s. a " ~ ~ a a ~p 1 III I ~ e ~ I ~ ~ ^I l ~ ~ III ~ ~ $ ~ 6iF J8,00 ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ffF JJi.~O (iF ~ II ~ I ~ I I ~ v r -f- - m II I ~ i ~ ~ a>•~aoao ~aaao , LJ a~ ~ c I II a ~ ~ 1sr e a i s~ e~ ~ 6~ I IN III \ \ AA ~y .l PteA1R7B92 I I ~ ~ nl a~~p~ ~ ~5~~ I ~~a~ ~ ~~8 I I I .c - I I 6 ~ Tc 779A7 nn u9.1a ~ a'~ a Tc 31aA2 # as ~q Tc uL71 RIT CIR aTS ~ I \ e 4 ~ ~ ~ Fc aTa Tc 379sa l~ ~ Tc alss2~ (PRIYATE) 1 7 P I \ II ms ^ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 9 9 ~ ~ ~ III - . e a.Tx ~ ~ aTx ~ i ~ 5~ y~ ~ 6 k ~ a I e e~ e ~ ~ CA DRIVE a ~ \ an an I - ~ v1 - \ I I I II PM 7892 J m I \ III I NO7hHE INFORNAlION REGARDING TfR PROPOSED NIPAOVAIEN75 5 BASED ON THE FOLLONING PR0..EC75: I II 1 A AVALON AT DUBLPI 7RAN9T CENTER, LOT 2 PAflA MAP 7525 PREPARED BY BKF ENgNEERS DATED 9/R B. IRON HORSE PARKWAY AND MARDNEW WAY OFFSiE IL~ROVEMENiS \ 1 I µ PEA STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS ASSOgA1FD XITN PARCEL YAP 7992 PREPARED BY BKF ENgNFFR$ D \ I I C. DUBLIN BLVD,, ARNgD R0~4 HAgENDA DPoVE STREET WPROVFNEN75 PRFPMED BY BKF ENgNEIIi$ \ 11 I I RECORD DRAWINGS DATE 2/2/08. I I I I1 1 2. CON NGOPHASE OFAND LOT 215~T0 BE~IBSETp1FNTLYOCONSIRUCIEDCNO I \ PHASE 2 ~ i I 3. SFE SHEET C-01 FOR E%ISDNG AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS i*~ E--- ADA UNIT ACCESS ~I°~~ GRADING PLAN 40 0 40 80 C 02 D.R. Horton Dublin, California BKF ENGINEERS 6630 Owens Drive ¦ } ¦ „ 255 SHORELINE DR. SUITE 200 Pleasanton, CA 94588 ESPRIT a t D u b I i n ~ IF ~ 0 1 1 REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065 925 225 7400 Main (650) 482-6300 (PHONE) (659) 482-6399 (FAX) EXGINEFRSI SUNNEYORS IRLANNERG KTGY #20080583 June 22, 2~1U ~g~ I~j ~ ~ ~ p ~ < + )1' lEliA ~ 1 I LOT 2 T1R6~N ((4`LL 11 ~1 1 1 1 I I m - 1 m - wu m AR~~~LZ 8 2 PP 893 ~ ~mv~w $p a~ ~ ~ ~:°i e,~ _ / (E)60'SD ~ ~ ~ v ~ 1 (EI5rA RCR ~ ~~~SO z gg 1 1 ,.«m (gym Y~ (fJAD'SD 1 1 8u ~g (E)aw m IRON HORSE P KWAY ~ 1 m~ ~o (EI SS- ~ \ m ro I ff I m uNi [ I \ w ~ r. z r, r. ~ ~ 1nc ~ ~ m / ~2zy TY IID BE NSEWEDI ~ II ~ r~ a~ ~ ~ r ky~~`FE~~B AMf 91E p~C1 411479 1 I I - ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ Qi ~ ' ~ sAl[CI CCM>FCT Tp JT I I 1 I ~ I I~ \ r I ,r ,r ~ II \ ^m q~l~l I \ H ff~~ I ~ ~ Itl i n~ I~Q I I ~ < ~ ~ F ~ I~ ~ I I - - ~ a \ I ~ ~ ~ I~ 3 I I \ ~ ~ 9 5~ r ~ 9 a T.r ~ I ~ ~~pp z P L 9 I a ~ A v v n G I I 'a PN~Bi2 I I I b° ~ < o nS I ~ ~ m o p p~' ~ r c~ r r r m ~ r ~ ~ ~ y I ~ I I \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; I \ ~ 4 I N n \ f y ~ ~ I b y y ~ .5' 1I s I \ I I ~ 554 25• g n ~ I \ I II I? ~ I 1r r ~ r I I I I A ~ I \ C~ 11 ~ J 9 8a < E g~ ~ ~ o I m9 I I ~ ~ Z 2 nNE ~ I I - ~ R. ~ g ~ y-' J I (E)B'RN I (E~'S5 - (E)1A'SO I 1 ~J12.~ CAMPUS DRNE I \ T ~ ~ U I\ -m8 1~ < < c" i-or~ o=ff „ ~ -r- I \ PPN 782 =~y I ~ ~ ~ ~ m~ 3 ~ ~ Q 3 I ~ \ ~ AA ~ ~ ~ ~ I '~o I 1 PP~T49Z ~ m c~ ~ ~ ~ \ A v ` y 1 I ~ Nplf< I s9~~ _ 1 I i. FDA DarrfcnaY 1NpUDES DDUALE DEFECTOR I ~ CHECK VAVE AND FRE DEPARTYENi Cd1NECRIX9 \ I AS SHpMI PER pTY OF WBWI STANDARD DETNLS ( I 2 SEE C-0I FCR EASEilEN15 NDT SHDYM I I 1 ON-SRE R1pM DAAIN 5131E11 IS N BE PAVATelY ONffD AND YANTAA&D. ~1~~ A~'~'°~ AD RD UTILITY AND DRAINAGE PLAN C-03 D.IZ. Horton Dublin, California BKF ENGINEERS 6630 Owens Drive ESPRIT a t D u b I i n Station 255 SHORELINE DR. SUITE 200 Pleasanton, CA 94588 REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065 925 225 7400 Main (650) 482-6300 (PHONE) KTGY #20080583 June 12, 2U1~ (659) 482.6399 (FAX) EADAIEEA9I SURYEYAASIPLANAERS i~~ ~ ,111 mn~ ° z~;s ~ ~ 1 . ~ ~ ~ OV-N R~ ~R ~ 1 ~ZU 1 I ~ ~ ~DUiN 1 1 ~o o~ 1 1 VEO,, I V~ Z m~ to 1 1 u7 I N W fpN I ~ 1 I ~ / - 0 1 1 n n n~ a o` 1\ ~ m • 11 L N IRON HORSE PARKWAY m o N ~ I I A OOH a - N ~ 1 - - - - - - - ~~--L+.-~~ o ~ ~ ~ u~--.+-~ 'O° 1 I \ SITE PARKING COUNT TABLE ~ y 24.0 ~ _ I I OFT51E PMKRIG 11 I im B E I IRON HORSE PKWY. (SEE NOrE 1) i6 ° SM T w TM.6 CNIPUS OR. (SEE ND1E 1) 15 °m I DUEUN BLM. 0 I I ~ ~ I ~ p ~ ~ o fS N ~ ~ ~ IN ~ ~ A ~ ~ N d ° AESPRIT CRCLE ~ I~ ~G',rw. N I uMrrrEww wr. o I ~ ~ _ ~ ' 4 0~ o a o U N ^r a o (PRNATE) ~ ° 1 I oFF5ltE roru 55 I ~ N I~ I ~ y ~ ~ ° I~ I ~ ~z III II ON9IE PARKING ~n 41I~ I dN z I II II ~ ° I I N ~ N r®~~ d I N~ 4 N ~ EDr ~ ~3 /I I I! V 4 A ~2.D 9D I EDr Z 1 + TM-s ~'a + ~---r~-.._nL.yy 1 ~ I oNStErorA1 20 c z II ; +L ~ ~ ~D~ 2p.o ~ I+ ° ~ S II 1. SHORT-TERN PAANINC (2 HDJR UE11~ 7N1-6PN~ NON-FPo) ~ ~ I p 30.0 24.0 16 ~ 44,p _ a ~ I I ~ ALONG CAEIPUS DRIVE kD IRON HORSE PARKWAY. ~ ~ ~ ~ -I Ei 0 3 i r i Ea sa i m N-6 c~ H Y., n g ~ I 2 ONSHE PARKING SHALL BE DE5GNAIFD FOA GUESTS AND ~ O ~ I ~ NOT ASSIGNED FIXi RESIDENT PMKING. m r r p6,p O rRAFTIC 9CNAL5 SHAl1 BE INTERCONNECIFD 1M1H O1HER MJ.ACENT N W m I II r 4 24A ~ N n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ E 3 I ~ I I 9GNAlS N11HIN 1HE E}75?NC ptt 1NAFFlC SI(N/L S151F11 BY HMO WRE. I r + + 1e ~ I y 1 ~ 20.0 ~ "i 4 ~ 20.o TN-s _"I o I ~ 1~ 5zD ~ ~ G~ T I I I I I~ 4 TN-8 iN-g 31.8 'o 9~N ~~~~;V a ~ _ tAl 6 ~ ~m z I ® u I e ~ IN ~ ~ IN rrr ~-p ~ A ~1 D I ~11N~1 N I A ~y} ~ ~ ESPRIT GRCLE p , ',8 o N ~ A o to-6 I °NI~ °~`L•-A N IPRNAT© ~IY ~ N J C ~II ~II ~ N v ~ 11 4 I ~ 1 ~ N ~ 24.0 z ~ I° / ° ~ I ~ a n N m N P' wm I N Q I ° m l _ _ f _ _ ~ ~ g ~ RC r ° CARPUS DRIVE N S o I 2 N N ~ - ~ ° . o P' o o ° I - - - 1 ~-~IR 1- I f ~ n~ZN~ ^'D~ 1 II A V ~D vmNFn zpIG~ 11 I 1 ~cii'" ZD I BQIE,Y n N=cmio~ Ia,GyJy~v n ImDr ADZ~~ 1 dg~ 1 1 1 ~ ~r NA ~yo=o I I K I I NN I I omm 1, II II I iii , ~ , 11. , ~I°~ 4p gp SITE DIMENSION PLAN C-04 U.R. Horton Dublin, California BKF ENGINEERS 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ 255 SHORELINE DR. SUITE 200 Pleasanton, CA 94588 ESPRIT a t D u b I i n Station REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065 - 925 225 7400 Main (650) 482-630D (PHONE) KTGY #20080583 June 22, 2~1~ (659) 482399 (FAX) EX6NEER6ISOnvEY0A5I PlAlIMERS ~~t i~ LDr I TY 7661 PL o7xm4 ESPPoT AT WBIJN BOULEVARD llE PL IRON HORSE PAANWAY WBIN STATION I _ fib 96' RPW lOf 2 PY 7395 ~ ¦ LOT 2 lY 7687 ~ I (E)FC OLBIIN STATION i ESPRB AT ' AVALON AT l~O fiD' FC TO FG 16' h ~ OU[BN STA1pN SPR01 ~ I E 1 18 5Y 1 i PSE d SYE DWI( 8 SEE l6 I¦t I ' 8 (EJ1RA~~~(E)1RAVFIWAY~(E)1RAIflWAY ~ 10.5' i9.2' ~ I SOYM LS 5 ~ 1~ i 17 i 17 B' (E)PAAKINC p' (E~AIB6NC TREE WAUOYAY i (E~EEi (E)TRANELWAY i (E)1AA142WAY i (E)1RAIELWAY (EJIEEBAN ~ ~ / / '6 2 ~ (E~ (EkkG J fE)cec J W1~ER ~a aiRS ~ ~ curs E}]BANC N AEYAN IWR01fNEN18 ~ m II,~RONENENIS EASING ID REYIJN PEA 1N7667 PER 1Y7687 ONS1E PLANS ON9TE PWIS IRON HORSE PARKWAY SECTION ~ NDrE n DUBLIN BOULEVARD BECTON - SCA1E I'=1U - SCNE I'=10' R YARTINEW WAY 0. LOT 2 1N 7661 100'f ROW VARIES ESPRIT WAY (PRIVATE) ESPRIT AT I PARCEL 3 lYJfifi7 LOT 2 ~ 1N7687 LOT 1 OU%1N STAl10Nl 14' 47- •PY 1892 322' i SiRUCNrE 10 S7RUCNRE 27' (E)NF19AN 77 FAff OF 527 FACE OF YIN OED' I 8.5' 5 (E)TRAIELWAY I VNtlES (E)1RA'AWAY (~7RA14LWAY~ j 20' 6.7 SIRUCNAE 7D SIRUCNRE SIRUCIIEB: I S7AUCNRE 10 SIAUCNAE ~~N~ BEYOND EEYg10 WAUCWAY 1RFF ~ PLAN ~ 6' 1RAVr1WAY LS I 14,B 17 1Y 139' ~ ~ ~ rY ~ I PST $ B' 1AA1flWAY B' I~WAUCWAY 1RAKLWAY -I`IAAYflWAY WNl(WAY~ ~ ~ 7REE ¦11 ORWf ORWY I CiKiB I NHEAE OCCURS (E)NEOIAN CUB 4"W 8'F'6 ~ POPOJr POPOUT ro plg4g7 8~ ~.w INPNOVEYENTS pI511NC TO REMAIN 3' i5' 6' S' N.$~'~ERE (p)~ ~ YALIEY GUI1Bt O~~ PEA rN7s67 ON91E PUNS OCCURS MARTINELLI WAY SECTION ~ ffE PIAN Fp9 ~ ~ °ETNL 15y--...aa5'»~ - scuE: P=1U unuTY sPAasc 1 SECTON 1 a SECTION ~ s SECTION 8 LOT 2 7Y 7fi67 CAYPUS DPoVE - SCAIE 1'=10' SCPlf 1~=1p SCIIE 1'=10' ESPRIT AT 0. PL OUBJN STATION I~ I IU ~ ~ ~ W ~ "'PY 78922 ESPRIT WAY (PRIVATE) (N)PL ESPRIT WAY (PRIVATE) J2.Y 7867 LOT 2 1Y7667 LOT 1 N7661 LOi 2 VARIES I ~ 26'26' 12'----I SIRUCNAE TO STRUCNFE I 1117667 LOT 1 I 17 12' I7 I µ'S~ i 58' I 5 J A' ArAVflWAY-~(~NRN IANE 7RAYELWAY 8 i7 2D' I SIRUCNIB: TO SIRUCNRE SIRUCNFE i0 SIRUCNRE PAPoGNC ~ PIRNNG 1.5' I ~ L$ ~1RAYELWAY 8' B' 4.5' ~ BENpI I YA1CN (E) ~ D~ ID' 12' 1Y SDMK LS ~ a.9' 4.5' B' 12' 12' 8 a5' a1' POPO1IT LS 7RA1flNAY 1RANIWAY 02 TREF NEIi .7 x CRADE WPL -CIlA9 ~ W ,S 5p~ PMNINC TIUOfl,NAY TAA1£LWAY PA180NC SOW( LS t~ MIIERE OCCURS CyG EC 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e'ss ro ~ 'iL ~ NPROWrNENTS AW'ADVLNENIS PEA tY7sfi7 m' x ~ (a) Q ~ ~ ~ 1~ cac ~ cup PER nN1fi61 oFTg1E PLANS TG REYNN ~ocaWS ro) a>Re o 1x'sD ON91E PLANS CAMPUS DRIVE SECTION 3'6 i6' 3' T - SCALE I'=10' -51' 11' 11' 7.7 9.3' 128' 18' n SECTION 2 n SECTION 5 1 BECTON 7 tot 1 Tu 7fifi7 _ ESPRIT AT PL DUBLIN BOULEVARD IWIEa I'-10' - SCAIE 1'=10' - SCA1E 1'=10' WBUN STATION I 88' FAIT ff ~ I ~ ~ 3DY ~ SIAUCNAE TO 51AUCNRE 1 I Tt 4' CHWY POPWi 1g 6' ~ J4' Iii PSE 8 SNE SIAUCNRE 10 SIRUCNAE 5 8' I 8' 12' RICHi 5' , 12' , 1q' i 12' 8' i ~ 1AANFLWAY a ARKINC LS SOWKI ~ NRN LANE (~BINE~ (E)~A~ ' (E)1RAVELWAY ~ (E)7RAVflWAY (EWfDIAN ~ I STALL ~ ~ d DRWY 2U D7W i UNE I I ~ 1RAVFIWAY ~W~ 1 E1fTB0 CL E ~ AAES POPCNIT CUABJ C~ ~ ROADWAY ~ (E)CM ro ~ CURB a'W (P)te ro) ~ O~ ~ DEfNS 9E ~ CUId7 Ral01fl ' YABE1' COTIBR [frAIL V~ p ~ IYPAOVEYENTS IIpR01E11EN15 IXB11NG lO rmAWN PER IY78fi1 p8q ry7fi57 0 ONSDE PUNS OFF91E PLANS 3' i9' A' 7 A.7 J.6' 13'----I-~- SEE NOTE 1 SEE N01E 1 DUBLIN BOULEVARD SECTION 3 SECTION 3 yqg~ scuE 1'=1D' scuE 1'=10' 1. IYPROWIEENIS PEA fu 7e67 aETSTE FUNS ARE 1NOSE Pufiuc IYPAavaYNfs To BESECTION BB CONSRNCIID W1H 1HE RECpIONG ~ 1Y 7667. IYPROW]ENTS PFA AI 7667 ONSIE SCAIE 1'=10' PLANS ARE 1HE PII&1C ANO PPoYAIE IYPROVEIB'N1S 1D BE CONSIRUCIFD WA1 7HE OE1f10PMENB CN LO7S 1 AND 2 2. (P) PRIVATE U11JIY, (D) ~ uTEl7Y _ TYPICAL SECTIONS C-05 D.R. Horton Dublin, California BKF ENGINEERS 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ 255 SHORELINE DR. SUITE 200 ' Pleasanton, CA 94588 ESPRIT a t D u b I i n Station REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065 j, 925 225 7400 Main (650) 482-6300 (PHONE) ~ (659)482-6399 (FAX) EMG¦EERSI~YRVEMOABIPUMWEWs KTGY #20080583 June 22, 2010 EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. 1HIS PLAN NAY NOT COVFA NL THE S1UAnONS 1HAT A1ASE DURING C4NS1RUCnON DUE TO UNANngPAlm FlE1D CONDInONS IN GENERAL nlE CONTRACTOR IS R6PONSBLE FOR KEEPING SEDIMENT STORK RUN OFF FROM LEAWNG 1HE SITE. FlBER RIXLS SAND SACS, AND SILT FENCES SHALL BE USED BY THE CONIRACTCR ON AN AS 1EmE0 BARS 10 INHNR SILT FRpI LEANNG nlE 9TE AND ENTERING 1HE STIXRM OANN SY'1EY. NL IXISnNG, TEMPORARY, OR PEIRNANENi CATCH BASINS SMALL Uff ONE OF 1HE SEDIMENT / - - AAAFNERS SHOWN. . ~v! ADO ~ _ - - _ _ - 2 1HE CONTRACigt SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AVY AND NL DANAG6 1D PUBUC P _ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ ANO/OR PRIVATELY OW1E0 AND NAMAINED ROADS CAUSED BY THE CgV1RAC70R'S _ _ ~ CRApNC ACTINnES, AND 91NL BE RE~GISIBIE FOR nE gFANUP OF M'Y MATERIAL ~ s - ~ \ SFWIED CN ANY PUBUC ROAD ON niE HAUL RWTE ADJACENT PUBUC ROADS SHALL - ~ \ll I BE CLEANED AT THE END OF GCH YpPofING DAY. i~~~-~- ~ - 3. EROSION WIIIROL FAgU116 SHALL BE NNNTAINm ONLY UNRL MRIL I5. THE NAME OF I I I THE PERSON AESPONSIELE FOR THE DAILY NANTENANCE tlF 1H6E FAgUn6 RHAIl BE ON ' I ~ I RECORD WTH 7HE CRY ff WBl1N OEPARTNENT OF PUBUC WORNR N.ONG WITH A PHONE I NUMBER WHERE THEY CAN BE REACNEO 24 HIXRS A DAY. 1H6E FACi1116 SHALL CONTROL ANO CONTNN FR090N-CAUSED SILT DEPOSD5 ANO PAOWDE FOR 1HE SAFE DISCHARGE OF SILT-FltEE SiORN WATER INTO EgSRNG ANO PROPOSED STCRN DRNN ~ LLIIRAWCIpN I FAgUn6. DESIGN OF 1HESE FAOUDES NUSf BE APPROVED AAC UPDATED EApI YEAR ~r a ~ ~ I I I PPoOR TO SEPTEMBER 30 RY 1HE ENGNEER ° I I I .r I I I I 4. 7HE CONTRACTOR IS RESPpNSIBIE FOR ENSURING 1HAT ALL SUB-CONINACiOR$ AND SUPRIERS ARE AWARE OF ALL S7giM WATER WNJTY MEASURES AND INPLQAE14f BJgI l r'' ~ - i I I i I MEASURES FNLUAE TO COMPLY WTH THE APPROVED CONSTMICnON NWL RESULT IN 1HE ISSUANCE OF COAFECnON NOnCES, gTARONS AND/OR A PRO.ECT S1DP ORDER. I I I I I 5. EROSION AND SEgIENi CQTIROL MEASJAES SHALL BE OPERABLE YEAR NRWND OR UNDL VEGEFAngH N ESTABUSIED ON SLOPED SURFACES. I I I I I A. E?POgD EARTHEN AAEAR TO BE STAHIUZEO RHNL AE SEEDED ANO I.IULCHm INMEgA1ELY I I I I I AFTER EACH AREA HAS BFE1H (RADEO. gED MI%NRE MAY LE EITHER HYOROSEEDEO OR I I EROSION CONTROL LEGEND HAND SEEDED, INaupNC A TAd(IFlER, PER THE MANUFACTURES RECGUUENDAnaN. CQTIAACICHE SHALL BE RESPoNSB.E FOR INInA1 WATERING OF AREAS TO ESABIIRH GROWTH I I I I NTD STAEIUZE THE SLOPES 6 THE 1HE GRADED AREAS WTH YEC{fADgl, ND i0 RE-SEm I I ANY AFd:AS IN Wllgl VEC£TAINIX DOES NOT INlna TAME HIXD. y. I I I ~ INLET SmINFNT BARRIER I ~ I Mg 7. WANG 1HE RNNY REASON, ALL PAGED AREAS AAE i0 BE KEPT gEAA OF ENiTH NAIEAIAI I ~ I I ap I AND DEARIS 1HE SITE IR TO BE MNNTNNED 50 AS TO IMINI2E SEDIMENT RUNOFF TO ANY ~ I I ~ I TEMPORMY GRAVEL STOAN DRNN RYSIETL ~ I I I ~ I I CONS1AUCnON ENTRANCE 8. IT IS 7HE RESPIATSNAJtt OF 1HE CONTAACTgt TO INSPECT ALL EAOSIgJ CW1R0. FAdURES ~ t AND REPNR ANY DANAGID FAgU116 BY THE ENO W niE WOPof OAY DURING THE RNNY I REASON. ~ I I I S I FlBER ROLL ~ •UJ ; 9. BORROW AND 1ENPORMY STOgfPI1fS SHAll BE FRO7ECIED W1H PPPROPAIATE EROSXIN I I I I CONTROL MEASIR6 (TARPS, FlBFR RODS, SLT FENCER ECL) TO ENSURE 9LT 006 NOT IEA1E 1HE SITE OR ENIFA THE STURN ptNN SYSTEM. AEFEA TO EROSION CONTROL AND I I I SEDIMENT CONTROL FlHD MANUN, DRD EDInOIJ, PREPARED RY 1HE CALIFORNIA AEgONAL WATER p1NJtt CONTROL BOAAO, SAN FRANpSCO BAY PECION. 1 I a I 10. ALL TRUCK nAES SHAll BE gEANm PRNIR TO E>anNC THE SITE I I I 11. NE DIRT PILE hN0 HNIL 1RUCN5 SHALL BE COVERED, 1 I I I I 12 1HE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT EROSION AND SEDNFNT CONTROL PRACRC£S DETNI;D I N 7HE EROSgX CONIRCL AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Flf1D NANUN. ORD E111nON I I IJ. WRING PEPoWS WIEN STgiNS ARE FORECAST - a. EXCAVATED Sq6 RHWLD NOi BE PUCEO IN STREETS OR ON PAGED AREAS I I I I N µ11E AY.AiEO Sq6 SHWLO BE RENOGfO FROM 7HE SiE BY 1HE END OF o I I I c. WHERE STOCKPl1NG IS NECESSARY, USE A fARPAUUN OR SURROUND THE c I STOq(PIIID MATERIAL Wnl STRAW BALER, SET FENCE, OR O7HEA RUNOFF I I I I CONTROLS. 0 0 i I I d. USE INLET CONTR06 (ES Fl1EA NAT) PoA STORM AWNS NNACENT TO I I - T1E STOCKPIIID SqL I I I - ~ a. 1HPORg1GHlNTSW2P N1 PAVED AREAR IXPOSEO TO SOIL E%GVAnON ANO ~ I I ~ / - / J ' 14. DURING PERKIDS WIEN STORKS AAE NOT FOAECASi - I I ca~rlsoNA q~ ~ / - / a, PREVENT S7OCKPILID MATERIAL FROM ENTERING THE RTORN DRAIN SYSTEM. I I I I - / , ~ ~ ~ ' 6. THORWLHY REMOTE LOOSE SqL NA SWEEPING Fd10WNC AElIOVN. dF DIRT. I I INIEf ga~AxT I I ~ ~ , I I , DRAINAGE INLET SEDIMENT BARRIERS 1. DANNAGE NLET gDIMETEf BARPoERS 41NL BE INSTALLED AS SOON AS THE S1DRM _ _ ~ ; ~ I / / / _ ~ . OANNAGE SYS1E11 IS NSTNIFA i ~ I _ 2 PRIOR TO PAWNG, FlBER RIXLS SHALL BE NSTNIFD ARWNO EACH DROP INLET PEA I I ~ f ~ OETNL E1A AF1FA PANNG IS COYPLLTE AAWNO EAtlI DROP INLET, WOCK ANO GAAGfl ` ~ ~ ~ i.~ i j - ~ SEDNENi BARPoERS 91N1 BE NSTALIID AROUND THE piW INLE75 PFR OETNL E1B ` ~ L-~--= - ~ ~ " / / ~ ~ UNTIL ALL E~OSED EARTHEN NiEAS NAI4 BEEN STABIUIfD AND 1HE PMKINC LOT - / - fACIUTY IS OPERAnONAL _ i v~Q_ LL4WAY ifARTRiE i CONTRACTOR SHALL SIENOL NL ORNNACE INIE75 WTH NPIXS STATFIIENT OF 'NO WMPING - FLOWS TO RAY.' CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 1HE Cltt OF WALIN ENGINEERING DIWRION 10 1 / ~ ~ - / - - COOPo11NAlE 7F1W'UTF, COLgt, AND WPUCAnON PROCEWRE I I I I I I ~ II II 1 I , 5~'I°~ BD ,GD ERASION CONTRQL PLAN C-06 D.R. Horton Dublin, California BKF ENGINEERS 6630 Owens Drive ESPRIT a t D u b I i n Station 255 SHORELINE DR. SUITE 200 Pleasanton, CA 94588 REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065 925 225 7400 Main (650) 482-6300 (PHONE) (659) 482-6399 (FAX) EAGNEEAS ISURVEYARS IPUNMEAS KTGY#20080583 June 22, 2~t~ 5~~, FlRE 1RU(N +0 0 4o eo I~QN P~`~, YE}IICIE ENVELOPE ~ IRON HORSE PKWi ~~~d' ~ NQ ~~~~1~ 79' 68' 211' n~ r3 ~ 1 hl ~1 fie, ~ I J t" I 57.9~Il,'' _ _ ~f~_R=42' 2';~,r~fE`';mE20.0 ~-67.R ~ 210' ~ R=42~ ' ~ R=42' ;.B ~ ~ ~ ' ~ na ~ 7 273' 161.9 24.D t_161.8 E 247 I ~ E E E ~a 4 R=42' R=47 - I_ I58 103 125.0 I Ea ;',E 20.0 R=42'~y r ~ 962 -?I PH ~ f noeEi 114 ~ ~ 90' - BO' 58' ~$cn~ sf SPRIT .4 1s1' PREY,AT~; 2os' 7s' : `~:r FRE TRUCK ~ SB CAEIPUS OR 9a, ~ B k:'~ ~'~"N;e~uF O FIRE ACCESS EXHIBIT = C +o a ao Ro ~ 42' 135' 281 iJe', _ r.4 _ 3a2' ~ ~ ~ 1`~~`? FIRE HYDRANT NUMBER ~ F I R E TRUCK 9o"TM oFF-sirE ON-SITE TEMPLATE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A B C ~ 2ss' C 1 211 - - - - - 262 388 382 - fps w 2 144 - - - - - 286 - - ~ ~ 3 273 - - - - 278 - - _ u~ 54' z ~ 4 287 - - - 241 289 293 ~ I 5 213 - - - - 176 ~.~,~-u,~, ~ ~J 1m' ¢ 0 6 132 - - 356 29fi ~ 14s' } 7 302 - 370 - _1 ~ ~ ~ J1 i5 w ~ A 290 - ame 4oe~ ~ 42 Z B 300 75 ~51, 13g C ~TyiO~F DUBLIN FIRE TRUCK ~7 `E~ 5g FIRE HYDRANT SPACING CHART 't ~g M1ART6~ELli SAY 0 FIRE HYDRANT SPACING EXHIBIT FIRE EXHIBITS ~',•07 D.R. Horton Dublin, California BKF ENGINEERS 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ¦ 255 SHORELINE DR. SUITE 200 ' Pleasanton, CA 94588 ESPRIT a t D u b I i n Station REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065 925 225 7400 Main (650) 482-6300 (PHONE) KTGY #20080583 June 22, 2Uf 0 (659) 482-6399 (FAX) ERG¦EERS ISURVEYRRS IPUNYERS 53~~~ I~j PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME 81IE IOCATgN SIZE BOTIWLAL NAME COMMON NICE 8OE BOTANN:LL NAME COMMON NAME 81ZE iRF13 BHMRB ACCQR BHALBB/PQENNWB VINEA AZALEA 'SOUTHERN INDICA' SUN AZALEA 5 GALLON AGAPANTHUS AFltIDANUS LILY-0F-THE-NILE I GALLON ARBUNS MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE DUBLIN BLVD./MARTINELLI WY. 24' BO% MALFADYEN4 UNGUIa-CATI YELLOW TRUMPET VINE 5 GALLGN CAMELLN SASANQUA CAMELLIA 5 GALLON BEARERIS T, 'CAIMSUN PYCM1" UWAAF JAPANESE BARBERRY I GALLON SULANUM JASMINUIDES POTATO VINE 5 GALIUN PYRUS C. 'ARISTOCRAT' ARISTOCRAT PEAR IRON HORSE PKWYICAMPUS DA. 24' BU% ESGALLUhIA 'CUMPANTA' ESCALLONIA 6 GALLON CAAFX TUMICOL4 BEAALEY SEDGE I GALLON AOSA 'CECIL BRUENNER' CECIL BAUENNER ROSE 5 GALLGN EUONYMUS J. 'MICRUPHYL@' BONLEAF EUUNYMUS 5 GALLON UIUSMA P. 'SUNSET GOLU' UWAAF BREATH Of HEAVEN I GALLON GREVILLEA 'NOELLI' WOOLLY GAEVILLfA 5 GALLGN ERGERQN AARVINSRIANUS SANTA BARRAAA UAISY I GALLON PLATANU$ ACEAFOLIA PLANE TREE DUBLIN BLVU.IMARTINELLI WY. 24' BOR LAVATERA ASSURGENTIFLURA TREE MALLOW 5 GALLON HEMEAOCALLIS HYBRIDS OAYLILY I GALLON PlAUS KAWAKAMII EVERGREEN PEAR E GALLON LIGUSTAUM J. TEXANUM PRfVET 5 GALLGN JUNCUS EFfUSUS RUSH I GALLON TRACHELUSPERMUM JASMINUIUES STAB JASMINE 15 GALLON LAUAUS N.'SARATUGA' SAAAiOGA LAUREL )NTEAIOA STREETS/CAMPUS UAIVE 24' l3fi' BO% LUAUPETALUM C. 'RUBRA' CHINESE FRINGE FLOWER 5 6ALLUN LIRIGPE 'SILVERY BUNPAOOF' VARIEGATED LILY TURF I U4LLON BROINlDCOVERB MYRNS C.'COMPACTA' UWARF MYRTLE 5 GALLUN MURAEA BICOLOR FORTNIGHT LILY I GALLON RUAUS P.'EMERALD CAAPEP BRAMBLE FLATTED TRISTANIOPS16 LAUAINA WATER GUM PASE05 29'/ 36' BOA NANDINA DUMESTIU4 'CQMPACTA' HEAVENLY BAMBOO 5 GALLON MORAEA IAIDIUIDES FORTNIGHT LILY I GALLUN SCAEVOLA 'MAUVE CLUSTERS' FAN FLOWER FLATTEU PH011Nt4 FRASERI REO-TIP PNUTINIA 5 GALLUN AOBA 'FLOWER CARPET' CARPET RUSE I GALLON LAGESTAGEMIA INUICA CRAPE MYRTLE PASE06 24"/ 36' BOX PHORMIUM iENAA 'MAOIRI MAIDEN' NEW ZEAIANU FLAN 5 GALLUN AOSMARINUS OFFICINAl1S ROSEMARY I GALLON PIITOSPUAUM TENUIFULIA TAWHIWHI 5 GALLON iRACNELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDEB STAR JASMINE I GALLON MALUG 'NOPA' NUPA CRABAPPLE PASE05 24"/ 36' BU% PITTOSPOAUM TUBIRA M1VHEELER' UWAAF70AIRA 5 GALLON PUDOCARPUS GRACILIOR FERN PINE 5 GALLGN PAUNUSBAIGHT 8 TIGHT' BRIGHT 8 TIGHT LAUREL 5 GALLON NOTES: PNUTINIA STANUARU PHOTINW STANDARDS 24' BOA I. ALL TREES SHALL AE PLANTED ANU STAKED PEA CITY STANDARDS. NERIUM OLEANDER OLEANDER STANDARDS 24' BOA AHAPHIULEPIS INUICA 'BALLERINA DWAAf INDIA IIAWTHUAN 5 6ALLUN 2. ALL PERMING AREAS SHALL BE AUTOMATICALLY IRRIGATED PEA 418URNUM iINUS 'SPRING BOUQUET' LAURUSTINUS 5 GALLON CITY STANDARDS. AYLOSMA C. 'COMPACTA' SHINY COMPACT %YLOSMA 5 GALLON J. ALL PLANTING AREAS 6HALL BE MULCHED TO A M]NIMNI DEPTH OF 2' 4. 3U% TREES SHALL BE 36' BDA. PAVING PATTERN - CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVING- IRON HORSE PARKWAY PAVER FIELDS $ BANDS COLORED GONRETE W/ SCORE PATTERN I ~ ~ M50 ~ PAVER BANDS . ® ~ ~ L - _ ~ I ~ TREE WEL W/ GRATE AT TREE WELLS ~ I ARKET STR IRONSMTIH r BET' BY ij~~~ CONCRETE PAVERS I I I E i I I I PUBLIC ART SPACE W/ BENCHES & BOLLARD LIGHTING- SEE SIDEWALK W/ SHEET L3 COLORED CONCRETE - ~ T ~ T ~ - I r~ i ~ B I ~ ~ ® I ®rr _ ® e s ~ 6' MASONRY SCREEN WALL _ _ I . TO MATCH ARGHITEGTURE I, i ~ ~ ~ STREET TREE-PLATANUS I ' AGERFOLIA OFFSET FOR T. EXIST N I G STORM DRA N I INE L TYPIGA GANG L - - - - - k 3 - - I I 'II MAILBOX LOCATION l . ®I G 4 LOCATIONS TOTA ~ i I I. f. ~ L I I t - P ~ - . z , i ~ sue' ~ ~ NEIGHBORHOOD GOMMONS- ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ° SEE SHEET L-2 ~-t r. ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ W FOR ENLARGEMENT ~ III - - ~ I- - ~ - - ~ I< A JT I 1 m III r 1 - r 7 ~ _ y~~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ TYPICAL PASEO- I~ a ~d { ' ~ SEE SHEET L-2 I 11 FOR ENLARGEMENT r. i, ; I - i CONCRETE PAVERS B e a ~I L err rP r ~T a 6' MASONRY SCREEN WALL AT ENTRIES L< r - - I ' - TO MATCH ARGHITEGTURE ~ . 2 A II ~'A~ CONCRETE PAVERS _ I I i I PAVING PATTERN - CONCRETE _ r PAVER FIELDS ~ BANDS SIDEWALK W/ - _ ~ , COLORED CONCRETE I I ~ I - i . - - - I I ~-Z 3: CAMPUS DRIVE GRAPHIC SCALE o ao eD so ~ wee . ao Lc PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN `M~~ L-1 D.R. Horton DUblln, California Ripley Design Group, Inc. R 1 P L E Y h 1815 Bonanza Street 6630 Owens Drive ESPRIT a t D U IJ I I n Station Suite 314 Pleasanton, California 94588 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 925.225.7400 Main P 925-938-7377 KTGY #20080583 June 22, 2U10 F 925-938-7436 i I`~~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ 0`` - ! 1- 6' MASONRY SCREEN . - _ _ • - . WALL TO MATCH - - - - - - - - - _ - - . ~ ~ ~ , ~ ARGHITEGTURE , I - . I.i I,_ r- ~ - ~F-- - ~ \ IT ~'=~1 `H ~ • ~ TYPICAL 4' WALK o I i ~ , n - ? 3' MASONRY WALL W/ ? _ - 0 3' DECORATIVE STEEL r ~ o ~ ~ FENCING ° - TYPICAL BENCH _ ~ l , ~ MASONRY - o SEE SHEET L-3 0 PEDESTRIAN ~ ~ GATEWAY J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + ` PLAZA W/ SCORED ~r_ ~ ~ - 1 0 TYPICAL BENCH ~ T 1 ~ ~.Y ~-Y~ ~ CONCRETE PAVING ~ ~ TURF ' ~ SEE SHEET L-3 ~ ~ ` r ~ SHADE TREE z ~ AREA . •ii I ~ ~1 ~ ~ o . I` i~ . ` . ~ , 6' MASONRY WALL W/ ° ? ? o ; a i TRELLIS . - _ ~I' ~ - - . . • MASONRY - o ° i PEDESTRIAN - t' GATEWAY 3' MA50NRY WALL ~ ~ ~ W/ 3' DECORATNE ~ ~ i STEEL FENCING • ' j i ' ' I rvl, ~ i I I ~ ~ ~ J - ~~~I - ai O I • • 1` _ ~ _ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6' MASONRY SCREEN ~DH ~ rDA i WALL TO MATCH ~ ~ - s : ~ . - ARGHITEGTURE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMONS TYPICAL PASEO _ z' GRAPHIC SCALE u 10 20 30 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS ,IN~~, L-2 ~ti s ~o « D.R. Horton Dublin, California Riptey design croup, Inc. R 1 P L E Y 6630 Owens Drive 1615 Bonanza Street Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t D U IJ I I n Station Suite 314 925.225.7400 Main Walnut Creek, CA 94596 P 925-938-7377 KTGY #20080583 ~Un@ 22, ZO1O F 925-938-7436 I IRON HORSE PARKWAY ~ r' • FAGS OF BUILDING 7 T:~{ TYPIGAL n ~ r "rte ~ ' STREET TREE _ CONCRETE PAVER BANDS 8 FIELDS ~ ~ 1 ' ~ TYPIGAL BOLLARD ~ ' ' ' ' i 1 ' ° SEE SHEET L-4 W TYPIGAL ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ UNDERSTORY ,-n ~ • w ~ TREE ° TYPIGAL BENGH ~~I' ~ ~ SEE SHEET L-4 m P~' 1.i~r~ ~y,- Y LANDSCAPE TREE STANDARDS- ~~F '1 ~ ~ BUFFER PLANTINGS PHOTINIA FRASERI ~ ~I ~ m s - ~ - - : , ' ; • LOW FLOWERING ACCENT SHRUBS I rn ~ ~ 6' STUCCO SGREI=N WALL u-,~, ~:+1~ II ~ °e ~ ' TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE °'-°"MI" 6`°" 6'-°" DusuNBwD. i VINE PLANTINGS AT WALL }ANDSLAPE AREAI 510E/Y4LK PARKWAY SECTION'A' AT DUBLIN BLVD. CORNER PLAZA DETAIL SCALE 4"=1'-0" n ~ TYPIGAL STREET TREE ~y ~ ~ I I TYPIGAL SHADE TREE ` >>r ~ 1 6' STUCCO WALL W/ V1NE TRELLIS vtl BENGH SEATING WITH LANDSCAPE BUFFER LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTINGS PLANTINGS %qS ~ MM `i q' } :.y~.L, ~ ~ M, p, 1 I NEIGHBORHOOD COMMONS LANDSGA~ 5`0' °''O' DUBLIN BLVD. ~Z' WIDTH VARIES 51DEW<1.K PARKlYAY GRAPHIC SCALE SECTION'B' AT DUBLIN BLVD. a ~o zo 30 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTS SCALE4"=I'-o" Ia~, L-3 D.R. Horton Dublin, CBIIfOfnlB Ripley Design Group, Inc. R I P L E Y 6630 Owens Drive ¦ ~ 1615 Bonanza Street Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t D U Ii/ I I n S t a t i o n Suite 314 925.225.7400 Main Walnut Creek, CA 94596 P 925.938-7377 KTGY #20080583 ,JUn@ 2Y, ZO1O F 925-938-7436 5b~ I ~ ._.t., T ~ ~ . ; w ~ _ _ "Market Street" - - Tree Grate ~ ~ "Petoskey" Bench "Petoskey" Trash Receptacle By Ironsmith "Annapolis" Bollard By Landscape Forms By Landscape Forms B Landsca a Forms Y p LANDSCAPE IMAGERY L-4 D.R. Horton Dublin, California Ripley Design Group, inc. 6630 Owens Drive 1615 Bonanza Street I Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t Dublin Station Suite 314 925.225.7400 Main Walnut Creek, CA 94596 P 925.938.7377 ®00~ KTGY #20080583 June 12, 201U F 925-938.7436 1 ~nrt . ~s a.~ w~ o ~ S^ ~ Y - ~ ~ ~ WOOD TRELLIS MATERIAL EXAMPLE: PAINT COLOR: PAINTED WOOD SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 6083 "SABLE" LANDSCAPE IMAGERY L-5 D.R. Horton Dublln, California Ripley Design Group, Ina 6630 Owens Drive 1615 Bonanza Street Pleasanton, California 94588 ESPRIT a t Dublin Station Suite 314 925.225.7400 Main Walnut Creek, CA 94596 KTGY #20080583 P 925-938-7377 June 22,2010 F s25-s36aa3s ~ ~ ~g ORDINANCE NO. XX - 10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE WITH A RELATED STAGE 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AND STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE ESPRIT AT DUBLIN STATION PROJECT APN 986-0034-011-00 PA 09-002 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. RECITALS A. The Esprit at Dublin Station project site is 4.13 acres bounded by Dublin Boulevard and Martinelli Way between Iron Horse Parkway and Campus Drive. City Council Ordinance No. 21- 02 rezoned the approximately 91 acre area known as the Dublin Transit Center ("the Transit Center") to a Planned Development Zoning District and adopted a Stage 1 Development Plan for the entirety of the site. The 4.13 acre Esprit at Dublin Station project site is within the 91- acre Transit Center, and is referred to as site E-1 in the Stage 1 Development Plan. B. In 2006, the Applicant received entitlements fora 300-unit residential project on the site with up to 15,000 square feet of commercial space. The project approvals included the Metropolitan at Dublin Station Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 2 Development Plan (City Council Ordinance 04-06), a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 7667 (Planning Commission Resolution 05-68), Site Development Review (City Council Resolution 06-06) and a Development Agreement (City Council Ordinance 05-06). C. The Applicant is seeking approval for an Alternate Project that could be constructed in place of the Metropolitan at Dublin Station project should market conditions warrant. The Esprit at Dublin Station Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan, as proposed, would permit the future development of up to 105 residential units on the project site. The Stage 2 Development Plan establishes the permitted, conditionally permitted, and accessory uses, site plan, site area and maximum proposed densities, maximum numbers of residential units by type, development regulations, architectural standards, and preliminary landscape plan for the 105-unit development. D. The Planning Commission recommended adoption of the Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan through Resolution 10-36 following a properly noticed public hearing on August 24, 2010. E. The City Council considered the Planning Commission recommendation at a properly noticed public hearing on October 19, 2010 at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard. The City Council considered the prior environmental documents, and all above referenced reports, recommendations and testimony to evaluate the Project, including the Planned Development zoning. ATTACHMENT 4 Section 2. FINDINGS A. Pursuant to Section 8.32.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows: 1. The Esprit at Dublin Station Planned Development Zoning, including the Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan, meets the purpose and intent of Chapter 8.32 in that the development plan contains a desirable use of land that complements surrounding land uses, in particular that it provides a new type of residential unit to the Transit Center areas while continuing the concentration of high-density residential development envisioned in the Transit Center Stage 1 Development Plan. 2. The Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan will be harmonious and compatible with existing and potential development in the surrounding area in that the Project will implement the high-density scale of development envisioned at the Transit Center in the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The Project is generally similar to the character and density of existing development in the surrounding area and will create a good transition between the higher density residential units built in the Transit Center and potential future residential development across Dublin Boulevard at Camp Parks. It will provide attractive and interesting buildings and will provide pedestrian and bicycle connectivity between the BART station and Dublin Boulevard. B. Pursuant to Section 8.120.050.A and B of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows: 1. The Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 7 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan will be harmonious and compatible with existing and potential development in the surrounding area in that 1) the proposed development is consistent with the approved development for this property as approved under the Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning (as amended); 2) the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding area which is comprised of residential and commercial development; 3) the residential development will be compatible with the approved adjacent Avalon Bay development because the development consists of high-density townhouse units; 4) as designed, the architecture of the building including roof forms, colors and materials is compatible with the roof forms, colors and materials of the existing and approved buildings in the vicinity; 5) as shown on the Landscape Plans, the proposed landscaping is compatible with the existing and approved landscaping in the area including landscaping along Dublin Boulevard and street trees which conform to the requirements of the Dublin Transit Center Plan. 2. The Project site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the zoning district being proposed in that 1) the Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning identified this property as having the potential to be developed with office, housing and/or retail and the proposed project will have high-density residential units which will conform to the approved land use for the property; 2) the proposed development will result in a density of 25.4 dwelling units per acre which is compatible with the High-Density Residential land use designations in the surrounding neighborhood; 3) the proposed 2 f~~ density and height of the buildings (three stories) will be compatible with the height of buildings in the surrounding area and will be compatible with the site which is located near the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station and a higher density is warranted to encourage use of the station and to take advantage of the close proximity to the public transit center; and 4) the proposed lot coverage of 47% is compatible with the approved and future Dublin Transit Center developments. 3. The Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 7 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity or be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare because 1) the proposed project will result in ahigh-density residential project that is compatible with existing and future development in the area as identified in the Dublin Transit Center Plan; 2) the site layout and design of the proposed buildings (project site) is compatible with the site layout and design of buildings in the neighborhood; and 3) as conditioned, the buildings will be operated in such a manner as to reduce impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. 4. The Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan is consistent with the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan in that 1) the proposed 105 townhouse units are compatible with the approved uses for the site; 2) the overall design of the project is consistent with the design requirements discussed in the Dublin Transit Center Plan; 3) the proposed project is consistent with the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan because the Plan states that the Transit Center area should have a mix of uses and should have a pedestrian friendly environment which the proposed project achieves through the design of the residential project, site layout, and landscaping which together promote the use of the street and create a more pedestrian friendly environment; 4) the Proposed Project provides a new housing type that is not yet present in the Transit Center area to serve the needs of residents and employees in the neighborhood; 5) the proposed development is compatible with the General Plan Land Use designation of Campus Office that allows for the flexible use of the property as high density residential; 6) the proposed project is compatible with the General Plan Implementing Policy 2.1.1.6 which encourages high density residential projects where higher density is compatible with the surrounding uses and the density of the project is compatible with surrounding developments and a higher density in this case is warranted due to the location of the BART station which is less than one quarter of a mile from the property; and 7) the proposed project meets the intent of the Dublin General Plan that discourages projects that do not relate well to the surrounding developments and the proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood which includes office, high density residential and retail uses including mixed-use developments which are located across the street from and adjacent to (future) the property. C. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council finds that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code section 65457 because it is a residential project that is consistent with a specific plan for which an EIR has been certified. The Project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Dublin Transit Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395) which was certified by City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. The City 3 W~~(~ Council finds that no further environmental review under CEQA is required for the proposed Project because there is no substantial evidence in the record as a whole that any of the standards under CEQA section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR are met. D. All of the above referenced resolutions and ordinances are incorporated herein by reference and available for review at City Hall during normal business hours. Section 3. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Pursuant to Chapter 8.32, Title 8 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code, the Dublin Zoning Map is amended to rezone the following property ("the Property") to a PD-Planned Development district: 4.13 acres at the southwest corner of Dublin Boulevard and Iron Horse Parkway (APN 986-0034-011-00). A map of the rezoning area is shown below: crtroP ~c f SAN RAMON TASSh4ViA CREEK CJWP PARKS ~ PARK Project Site ~ a~w. o c ~ ~ ~ a ~ '~Q ~ c~ oualw elw. a~.w w 5 GrvoF ~ weu eaw. ss wanNEw un o~ ( wAr PLEASANTON BAgT % STATION STONE A~ p ORIVE R Q ~ ~kS o E ~`y5 ~~Np. P~ LOCATION MAP Section 4. STAGE 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT The Stage 1 Development Plan is amended in the following locations: Page 1.12: Add a paragraph under the heading "Campus Office Uses": "In order to permit development on Site E-1 that responds to residential market conditions, it is permissible for the site to have dual entitlements and for two separate and distinct projects to receive approvals for the same site. Should this situation occur, both projects would need to be consistent with this Stage 1 Development Plan and the Development Agreement prepared for the project(s) would need to address the potential for either project. Once a Developer commences with development of one of the projects on Site 4 E-1, the rights relating to the other project not developed shall be terminated. The term "commences with development" shall mean the issuance of any building permit." Pages 2.22 and 2.25: The project street frontage along Iron Horse Parkway is proposed to change from a 18' wide sidewalk with 5' tree grate to a 16' sidewalk with a 5' tree grate. The text on Page 2.22 and Street Section A-A on Page 2.25 will need to strike the reference to 18' and replace with 16'. Pages 2.28 and 2.29: The building setback along Martinelli Way is proposed to change from 16' to variable. The text on Page 2.28 and Street Section E-E on Page 2.29 will need to strike the reference to 16' and replace with "variable". Pages 2.30 and 2.32: The project street frontage along Campus Drive is proposed to change from a 12' sidewalk with a 6' tree grate to a 10' sidewalk with a 5' tree grate. The text on Page 2.30 and Street Section G-G on Page 2.32 will need to strike the reference to 12' and replace with 10' and strike the reference to 6' and replace with 5'. Section 5. STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN The regulations for the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the subject property are set forth in the following Stage 2 Development Plan, which is hereby approved. The Stage 2 Development Plan permits the development of up to 105 townhomes pursuant to an approved Site Development Review. Any amendments to the approved Stage 2 Development Plan shall be in accordance with Section 8.32.080 of the Dublin Municipal Code. The Stage 2 Development Plan consists of the items and plans identified below. 1. Statement of compatibility with Stage 1 Development Plan The project proposal includes an amendment to the existing Stage 1 Development Plan that was approved by the City Council in December 2002 via Ordinance 21-02. The 105-unit Esprit at Dublin Station project is consistent with the allowed land uses as well as the design requirements discussed in the Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Development Plan. Once the amendment is approved through the adoption of this ordinance, the Stage 2 Development Plan will be compatible with the Stage 1 Development Plan (as amended). 2. Statement of uses. The Permitted, Conditionally Permitted, Accessory, and Temporarily Permitted land uses allowed under the Esprit at Dublin Station Planned Development zoning district include, but are not limited to, the following: Permitted Uses: Accessory uses (As permitted by Ordinance 21-02, the Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning Development Plan (PA 00-013) and with Chapter 8.40 (Accessory Structures and Uses Regulations) of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance) Community Care Facility/Small Home Occupations (per Chapter 8.64 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance) Multi-Family Dwelling Private Recreation Facility. (for homeowner's association and/or tenant's use) Small Family Daycare Home 5 ~~,~~y Temporary Uses: Temporary Construction Trailer in accordance with Chapter 8.108 (Temporary Uses Permit of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Tract and Sales Office/Model Home Complex in accordance with Chapter 8.108 (Temporary Uses Permit of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance 3. Stage 2 Site Plan The Stage 2 Development Plan is shown below and is also included as Sheet SP-1 in the Project Plan Set, dated received June 28, 2010, on file at the Community Development Department. The site plan illustrates potential building envelopes. -a--~--- -------T - ~sz 1 o:, '~3~f:f te.(~; IS+t;C 16+Or, I'-CO 1fl,CC 1G-CC :'~!OC~ IRON HORSE P AY r~ ~ 'ice Q - I~~ ~ 11 1 r ~ a1 ~ ~ I ~ I I I - t I f ~r~~ I I - I~' I ~•.~1 ~ I I r M M a n Y w a n y~ Y ~ t I -1 ~ % % % Ps % P a { % % % % P4 N N r°s Pa n n ~ % ro M P4 PD Y3 I I c ~,l _ I. I I I I I I ,f. f S ~ I I I ~ l~ 1 } ~ i I w !11 va % n % v~e I % ~ n , ~ ~ v~ r- . i I ~ x I Y I-, 1. ' I11 I I q I 84 _ P°D Ps _ 3s' P's ~ r"4 M ~ ' 1 , R 2,~ Z d ' 7 % % ~ , % ruo ~ - i Z x.; p - - I~'~~ _ r- O I ^#I r\1~f % PS D - % P! V _ P! II PD f_. ~ C I + ~ II i Y~ ~ ~ I x r r I I I ~ ~11 > ~~i n ~`i M d - Pa is ~ - r, w w ~ y~.~~ ~ 2 < I I .1 1 I ~i 1 1~ I I . n 'll I n n w i I '1 I ~ t Itl I ~ C • I pl 11 I ~ r { '-.I 1 ~ % P1 P1 % P1 % '';'~P~D P4 % W W W P4 PD P4 P4 ~ j V7 P4 PS Pf PS PS P1 % i~ I ~ ~ FIB 11~ ~7 ~'~':.3.'y`......1...+~~.- . 11 .>r, n,°-* ` _ i -is+:xl I la.oo ^,+nn 2~~.oa ~z+na z3+oo ~ ~ za, no 2a+oo i , F i + v~ I i1\ I` I. I 4. Site area, proposed densities. Land Use Designation Site Net Number of Units Net Density Acres Campus Office 4.13 105 25.4 du (flex parcel) 6 5. Development Regulations. The Development Regulations for the future development of the Esprit at Dublin Ranch project are included below. Develo ment Standard Lot Area: +4.13 acres (net) Setbacks: 8-20+ feet varies alon Dublin Boulevard varies feet along Iron Horse Parkway varies feet alon Martinelli Wa varies feet alon Campus Drive Sidewalk width 16 feet alon Iron Horse Parkwa 10 feet alon Campus Drive 14 feet alon Martinelli Wa 17 feet along Dublin Blvd Hei ht Limits: 3 stories and 40 feet Re uired Parkin Parkin required 158 spaces Guest Parking (included 24 spaces in total required Lot Covera e: 47% Unit Summary: Unit Type Sq. Ft. No. of Units Plan 1 - 2 Bedroom 1,174 5 Plan 2 - 2 Bedroom 1,208 19 Plan 3 - 2 Bedroom 1,440 23 Plan 4 - 3 Bedroom 1,547 13 Plan 5 - 3 Bedroom 1,610 45 Total Number of Units 105 6. Architectural Standards. The architectural concept for the project was to create a design that, when integrated with other projects in the Dublin Transit Center, would create an "Urban Village," that would encourage pedestrian movement and activity throughout the Transit Center. To achieve this, considerable attention was focused at the base of the building. Residential stoops have been located along Iron Horse Parkway, Campus Drive, and Martinelli to activate the streets. Each stoop directly ties to the sidewalk and has a porch located 3 to 4 feet above street level. All of the units are three-story town-homes and are joined together to form large buildings around the site perimeter. This concept creates a strong street presence that contributes to the project's urban character. Wood rafter tails, stacked stone, and trellis elements accent a mostly stucco body and concrete roof tiles provide some weight to the building and help emphasize the pedestrian portals that run through the buildings. Pedestrian portals occur at the ground level of most building types and allow for pedestrian connections from Martinelli Way through to the recreation facilities adjacent to Dublin Boulevard. 7 Connections are also formed from Iron Horse Parkway and Campus Drive to the site's interior. The pedestrian portals are provided to create both a visual link to the interior of the project, as well as to encourage pedestrian movement throughout the Transit Center. Since Dublin Boulevard is a major thoroughfare, pedestrian connection to the street is minimized. There are no units fronting this street. Instead, buildings and asix-foot screen wall designed to compliment the architecture form this edge layered by landscaping. The architectural design of the base of the building was also developed to encourage a pedestrian scale. In addition to the stoop units and entry portals, the building was designed with a series of arched openings at the base of the building to create a strong rhythm at the pedestrian level. The pedestrian level is further complimented with ornamental railings and decorative light fixtures to create human scale at the buildings' base. The proposed architecture is compatible with the approved buildings in the Transit Center and buildings in the area. Architectural detailing on the building is reflective of styles that are prevalent in the City of Dublin. The massing and form of the buildings are also compatible with the surrounding buildings. The proposed colors and materials include stucco siding with a stacked stone accent walls, the roofs, wrought iron stair and porch railings, and decorative metal grills over the pedestrian portals. The proposed stone and earth tones are compatible with the design.of this project as well as the adjacent buildings. 7. Preliminary Landscaping Plan The Preliminary Landscape Plan is shown below and is also included as Sheet L-1 in the Project Plan Set, dated received June 28, 2010, on file at the Community Development Department. ~~~.K~<. m ~ F ~ } ~ ~ I ( . s x LL ~ ~---,~~E ~;~~r ~ r - - - - x- --t f . y} ~ • ~t v . ~ . ....'c'lx~ _e:..~..C 8 8. Other information Inclusionary Zoning regulations: The Inclusionary Zoning requirements for this Project shall be as set forth in the Development Agreement as amended. Section 6. Pursuant to the Dublin Zoning Ordinance, section 8.32.060.C, the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the Project area shall be governed by the provisions of the closest comparable zoning district (R-M Multi Family Residential Zoning District) except as provided in the Stage 2 Development Plan. Section 7. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause the Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this day of 2010 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk G:\PA#\2009\PA 09-002 Site E-1\CC 10 05 10\CC Att 1 - PD Stage 2 Ord.DOC 9 ORDINANCE NO. XX - 10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING AMENDMENT 1 TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR DUBLIN TRANSIT CENTER SITE E-1 (ESPRIT AT DUBLIN STATION) PA 09-002 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. RECITALS A. The proposed Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 ("Project") is located within the boundaries of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ("Specific Plan") in an area, which is designated on the General Plan Land Use Element Map, and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Land Use Map for a combination of High Density Residential, Campus Office and Public/Semi Public land uses. B. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code Section 65457 which exempts residential projects that are consistent with a specific plan from further environmental review. Additionally, the Project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Dublin Transit Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395) which was certified by City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002 (Transit Center EIR). Furthermore, there are no supplemental impacts that would require preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. C. A Development Agreement between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing (doing business as D. R. Horton) was approved in March 2006 (Ordinance 5-06). Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement has been presented to the City Council. The Amendment is attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit A. D. A public hearing on the proposed Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement was held before the Planning Commission on September 14, 2010, for which public notice was given as provided by law. D. The Planning Commission has made its recommendation to the City Council for approval of Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement (Resolution 10-39, incorporated herein by reference). F. A public hearing on the proposed Development Agreement was held before the City Council on October 19, 2010, for which public notice was given as provided by law. G. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission who considered the item at its September 14, 2010 meeting, including the Planning Commission's reasons for its recommendation, the Agenda Statement, all comments received in writing, and all testimony received at the public hearing. ATTACHMENT 5 I Section 2. FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS Therefore, on the basis of: (a) the foregoing Recitals which are incorporated herein; (b) the City of Dublin's General Plan; (c) the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment; (d) the Specific Plan; (e) the Transit Center EIR; and (f) the Staff Report, and on the basis of the specific conclusions set forth below, the City Council finds and determines that: 1. The Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan in that: a) the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan land use designation for the subject site is proposed to be Planned Development and that the proposed Site E-1 residential development is consistent with that designation; b) the project is consistent with the fiscal policies in relation to provision of infrastructure and public services of the City's Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan; c) the Agreement sets forth the rules the Developer and City will be governed by during the development process which is required by the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and the Mitigation Monitoring Program of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. 2. The Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use districts in which the real property is located in that the project approvals include amended Planned Development Rezone, Site Development Review and Vesting Tentative Maps. 3. The Agreement is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice in that the Developer's project will implement land use guidelines set forth in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan and the Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Development Plan. 4. The Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare in that the development will proceed in accordance with the Agreement and any Conditions of Approval for the Project. 5. The Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of the property or the preservation of property values in that the development will be consistent with the City of Dublin Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan. 6. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council finds that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code section 65457 because it implements a residential project that is consistent with a specific plan for which an EIR has been certified. The Project is within the scope of the certified Transit Center EIR. The City Council finds that no further environmental review under CEQA is required for the proposed Project because there is no substantial evidence in the record as a whole that any of the standards under CEQA section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR are met Section 3. APPROVAL The City Council hereby approves the Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement (Exhibit A to the Ordinance) and authorizes the Mayor to execute it. Section 4. RECORDATION Within ten (10) days after the Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement is fully executed by all parties, the City Clerk shall submit the Agreement to the County Recorder for recordation. Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause the Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this day of 2010 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk G:IPA#120091PA 09-002 Site E-11CC 10 05 101CC Att 1 -DA Ord.DOC ~~~~~a ..i~. ~o r~~ RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF DUBLIN When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Fee Waived per GC 27383 Space above this line for Recorder's use AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING, INC. FOR THE DUBLIN TRANSIT CENTER E-1 PROJECT EXHIBIT A TO ATTACHMENT 5 ~6 THIS Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement Between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing ("Amendment") is made and entered in the City of Dublin on this _ day of , 2010, by and between the City of Dublin, a Municipal Corporation (hereafter "City"), and Western Pacific Housing, Inc, a Delaware corporation, doing business as D.R. Horton (hereafter "Developer"), pursuant to the authority of 65864 et seq. of the California Government Code and Dublin Municipal Code, Chapter 8.56. City and Developer are from time-to-time individually referred to in this Agreement as a "Party" and are collectively referred to as "Parties". RECITALS 1. California Government Code 65864 et seq. and Chapter 8.56 of the Dublin Municipal Code (hereafter "Chapter 8.56") authorize the City to enter into an agreement for the development of real property with any person having a legal or equitable interest in such property in order to establish certain development rights in such property. 2. Developer desires to develop and holds legal interest in certain real property consisting of approximately 4.1 acres of land, located in the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California, which is more particularly described in Exhibit 1 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and which real property is hereafter called the "Property". The Property is generally known as the "Transit Center Site E-1"and is part of the Transit Center Property located adjacent to the Dublin BART station. 3. Pursuant to that authority, City and Developer entered into that certain "Development Agreement Between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing, Inc for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project", dated February 7, 2006 and recorded in the Official Records of Alameda County ("Official Records") on March 10, 2006, as document number 2006-090936 ("the Agreement"). 4. Developer previously proposed the development of the Property with 300 residential units and approximately 15,000 square feet of ground floor retail. The City approved various land use approvals in connection with the development of the Property, and the Agreement referred to the proposal and the associated development approvals as, respectively, "the Project" and "the Project Approvals." The "Project Approvals" included, without limitation, a Stage 2 Development Plan (Ord. No. 4-06), Site Development Review (City Council Resolution No. 6-06) and a vesting tentative parcel map (Planning Commission Resolution No. 05-68). The Project Approvals remain in effect. 5. Developer now proposes the development of the Property with 105 residential units as an alternative approval ("the Alternate Project"). The Developer has applied for, and the City has approved or is processing, various land use approvals in connection with the development of the Alternate Project, Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement Between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project Page 2 of 5 ~ including, without limitation, a Planned Development Rezoning (Ord. No. Stage 1 and 2 Development Plan Amendments (Ord. No. Site Development Review (City Council Resolution No. and a Vesting Tentative Tract Map (Planning Commission Resolution No. All such approvals collectively, together with any approvals or permits now or hereinafter issued with respect to the Alternate Project as referred to as the "Alternate Project Approvals". Under the proposed entitlements, the Developer will have the option of proceeding with development under either the Project Approvals or Alternate Project Approvals. 6. Section 9.3 of the Agreement requires that the Agreement be amended where the density or intensity of uses or term of the Agreement are amended. Developer requests amendments to the Agreement regarding the density of uses under the Alternate Project Approvals, an extension of the existing term by seven years, an amendment to the affordable housing obligations for the Property, and a provision on a public art fee. The Parties agree that these revisions require an amendment to the Agreement. 7. The City Council has found that, among other things, the Agreement, as amended, is consistent with its General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and has been reviewed and evaluated in accordance with Chapter 8.56. 8. City and Developer have reached agreement and desire to express herein an Amendment to the Agreement that will facilitate development of the Project subject to conditions set forth herein; and 9. On , 2010, the City Council of the City of Dublin adopted Ordinance No. approving this Amendment. The ordinance took effect on , 2010 ("the Amendment Effective Date"). NOW, THEREFORE, with reference to the foregoing recitals and in consideration of the mutual promises, obligations and covenants herein contained, City and Developer agree as follows: AGREEMENT Section 1. The terms of the Agreement are amended as follows so that all terms applicable to the Project and Project Approvals, as defined in the Agreement, shall apply to the Alternate Project and Alternate Project Approvals as defined in this Amendment. All references to "Project" in Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 14.2, and 20 of the Agreement are amended to read "Project or Alternate Project". All references to "Project Approvals" in Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 14.2, and 20 of the Agreement are amended to read "Project Approvals or Alternate Project Approvals". Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Agreement and Amendment shall not create any right for Developer to proceed with development of both the Project and Alternate Project on the Property. Once the Developer Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement Between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project Page 3 of 5 1 ~~1 commences with development of either the Project or Alternate Project, the rights under the Agreement relating to the other project not developed shall be terminated. For the purposes of this Agreement, "commences with development" means the issuance of any building permit. Section 2. Section 4.2 of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows: "4.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Approval Date and shall terminate twelve (12) years thereafter on March 9, 2018, unless said term is otherwise terminated or modified by circumstances set forth in this Agreement." Section 3. Section 10 of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows: "10 Term of Proiect Approvals and Alternate Proiect Approvals. The term of the Project Approvals and Alternate Project Approvals are extended for the term of the Agreement subject to the provisions of Section 4.2 of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, once the Developer commences with development of either the Project or Alternate Project, the extension of the term of the project approvals under the Agreement for the other project not developed shall be terminated. For the purposes of this Agreement, "commences with development" means the issuance of any building permit. Section 4. Amendment to Exhibit 8. Exhibit B to the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with Exhibit 2 to this Amendment. Section 5. Counterparts. This Amendment is executed in two (2) duplicate originals, each of which is deemed to be an original. Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement Between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project Page 4 of 5 ~~U~ 1~~~ Section 6. Recordation. City shall record a copy of this Amendment within ten (10) days following execution by all parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF DUBLIN: By: Date: Tim Sbranti, Mayor ATTEST: By: Date: Caroline Soto, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John Bakker, City Attorney WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING INC. a Delaware Corporation By: Date: 9~~~0 Dean K. Mills, Assistant Vice President (NOTARIZATION ATTACHED) Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement Between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project Page 5 of 5 r/~~~) f CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Q IVFWL q On ~ ~ ~ Z~ I Q before me, ~ SOYI y . M~tZ, N ~~U Y\/ ~ U b D ,e Here Insert Name and Title of the Office ' personally appeared ~.~-~~1 ~ • M 1 ~ ~ 5 Name(s) of Signer(s) e who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the ALISON V. METZ instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of Commission ~ 1837808 which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. i Notary Public - CalHornia z Contra Costa County 3 I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws Comm. Tres Feb 22 2013 of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ? Individual ? Individual ? Corporate Officer -Title(s): ? Corporate Officer -Title(s): ? Partner - ? Limited ? General _ ? Partner - ? Limited ? General _ ? Attorney in Fact • • - ? Attorney in Fact • • • • ? Trustee Top of thumb here ? Trustee Top of thumb here ? Guardian or Conservator ? Guardian or Conservator ? Other: ? Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: ©2007 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402 • www.NationalNotaryorg Item #5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827 Exhibit 1 Legal Description of Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Property Real property in the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Parcel 1, as shown on Parcel Map 7892, filed April 14 2005, in book 280 of Parcel Maps, Pages 83 85 in the Office of the Recorder of Alameda County, Assessor's Parcel Number 986-0034-011-00. ia~ Exhibit 2 Amended Exhibit B to the Agreement EXHIBIT B Additional Conditions The following Additional Conditions are hereby imposed pursuant to Paragraph 5.3 of the Agreement. Subparagraph 5.3.1 - Subseauent Discretionary Approvals None. Subparagraph 5.3.2 -Mitigation Conditions Subsection a. Infrastructure Sequencing Program The Infrastructure Sequencing Program for the Project is set forth below. (i) Roads: The project-specific roadway improvements (and offers of dedication) identified in for the Project in Resolution No. 10-_ of the City of Dublin Planning Commission approving Site Development Review and Vesting Tentative Tract Map or for the Alternate Project in Resolution No. 10-_ of the City of Dublin Planning Commission approving Site Development Review and Vesting Tentative Tract Map (hereafter "SDR and VTM Resolution") shall be completed by Developer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer at the times and in the manner specified in the applicable SDR and VTM Resolution unless otherwise provided below. All such roadway improvements shall be constructed to the satisfaction and requirements of City's City Engineer. (ii) Sewer: All sanitary sewer improvements to serve the project site (or any recorded phase of the Project or Alternate Project) shall be completed in accordance with DSRSD requirements. (iii) Water: An all weather roadway and an approved hydrant and water supply system shall be available and in service at the site in accordance with the tentative map conditions of approval to the satisfaction and requirements of the City's fire department. All potable water system components to serve the project site shall be completed in accordance with the DSRSD requirements. Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement Page 1 of 7 Between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project -EXHIBIT B 1 ~ } Recycled water lines shall be installed in accordance with the tentative map conditions of approval. (iv) Storm Drainage: The storm drainage systems off-site, as well as on-site drainage systems for the areas to be occupied, shall be improved consistent with the tentative map conditions of approval and to the satisfaction and requirements of the Dublin Public Works Department applying the City's and Zone 7 (Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Zone 7) standards and policies which are in force and effect at the time of issuance of the permit for the proposed improvements. Pursuant to Alameda County's National Pollution Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES) No. CAS0029831 with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, or pursuant to subsequent permits adopted by the Board, all grading, construction and development activities within the City of Dublin must comply with the provisions of the Clean Water Act. Proper erosion control measures must be installed at development sites within the City during construction, and all activities shall adhere to Best Management Practices. (v) Other Utilities (e.q. gas, electricity, cable televisions telephone): Construction shall be completed by phase prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for any building within that specific phase of occupancy for the Project or Alternate Project. Subsection b. Miscellaneous (i) Completion Mav Be Deferred. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City's Public Works Director may, in his or her sole discretion and upon receipt of documentation in a form satisfactory to the Public Works Director that assures completion, allow Developer to defer completion of discrete portions of any public improvements for the Project or Alternate Project if the Public Works Director determines that to do so would not jeopardize the public health, safety or welfare. Subparagraph 5.3.3 -Phasing. Timing This Agreement contains no requirements that Developer must initiate or complete development of the Project or Alternate Project within any period of time set by the City. It is the intention of this provision that Developer be able to develop the Property in accordance with its own time schedules and the Project Approvals or Alternate Project Approvals. Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement Page 2 of 7 Between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project -EXHIBIT B Subparagraph 5.3.4 -Financing Plan Developer will install all improvements necessary for the Project or Alternate Project at its own cost (subject to credits for any improvements which qualify for credits as provided in Subparagraph 5.3.6 below). Other infrastructure necessary to provide sewer, potable water, and recycled water services to the Project or Alternate Project will be made available by the Dublin San Ramon Services District. If so required by Dublin San Ramon Services District, Developer will enter into an "Area Wide Facilities Agreement" with the Dublin San Ramon Services District to pay for the cost of extending such services to the Project or Alternate Project. Such services shall be provided as set forth in Subparagraph 5.3.2(a)(ii) and (iii) above. Subparagraph 5.3.5 -Fees, Dedications Except as otherwise provided in this Subparagraph 5.3.5 or this Development Agreement, Developer shall pay any fees required by Subsections a-g at the time such fees are due under the resolutions and/or ordinances establishing and/or amending such fees. Subsection a. Traffic Impact Fees. Developer shall pay the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee ("TIF") established by Resolution No. 40-10, including any amendments to such fee that may be in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. Developer will pay such fees no later than the time of issuance of building permits and in the amount of the impact fee in effect at time of building permit issuance. Subsection b. Traffic Impact Fee to Reimburse Pleasanton for Freeway Interchanges. Developer shall pay the Eastern Dublin I-580 Interchange Fee in the amounts and at the times set forth in Resolution No. 155-98 and by any resolution which revises such Fee that may be in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. Developer will pay such fees no later than the time of issuance of building permits. Subsection c. Public Facilities Fees. Developer shall pay a Public Facilities Fee established by City of Dublin Resolution No. 214-02, including any amendments to such fee that may be in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. Developer will pay such fees no later than the time of issuance of building permits. Subsection d. Noise Mitigation Fee. Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement Page 3 of 7 Between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project -EXHIBIT B ~aG Developer shall pay a Noise Mitigation Fee established by City of Dublin Resolution No. 33-96, including any amendments to such fee that may be in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. Developer will pay such fees no later than the time of issuance of building permits. Subsection e. School Impact Fees. School impact fees shall be paid by Developer in accordance with Government Code section 53080 and the agreement between Developer or its predecessor in interest and the Dublin Unified School District regarding payment of school mitigation fees. Subsection f. Fire Facilities Fees. Developer shall pay a fire facilities fee established by City of Dublin Resolution No. 12-03 including any amendments to such fee that may be in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. Developer will pay such fees no later than the time of issuance of building permits. Subsection q. Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee. Developer shall pay the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee in the amount and at the times set forth in City of Dublin Resolution No. 89-98 or any resolution which revises such fee. Developer will pay such fees no later than the time of issuance of building permits and in the amount of the impact fee in effect at time of building permit issuance. Subparagraph 5.3.6 -Reimbursement Subsection a. Traffic Impact Fee Improvements -Credit The City shall provide a credit against Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees to Developer for those improvements described in the resolution establishing the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee if such improvements are constructed by the Developer in their ultimate location. All aspects of the credit shall be governed by the TIF Guidelines. Subsection b. Traffic Impact Fee Right-of-Way Dedications - Credit The City shall provide a credit against Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees to Developer for any TIF area right-of-way to be dedicated by Developer to the City which is required for improvements which are described in the resolution establishing the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee. All aspects of the credits shall be governed by the TIF Guidelines. Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement Page 4 of 7 Between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project -EXHIBIT B ~,1~~1 Subparagraph 5.3.7 -Miscellaneous Subsection a. Affordable Housina Requirements. This subsection shall govern the affordable housing requirement for the Property. As between the parties, it replaces in its entirety the affordable housing requirements applicable to the Property (Transit Center Site E-1) set forth in Section 12 of the First Amendment to Master Development Agreement Between City of Dublin and Surplus Property Authority of Alameda County for the Dublin Transit Center Project, dated October 4, 2005. This subsection does not revise any of the requirements for affordable housing applicable to the Dublin Transit Center Project, other than Site E-1, set forth in Section 12 in the First Amendment to Master Development Agreement Between City of Dublin and Surplus Property Authority of Alameda County for the Dublin Transit Center Project, dated October 4, 2005. The affordable housing requirement for the Project and Alternate Project shall be met by the payment of an in-lieu fee rather than construction of units on-site. The affordable housing requirement shall be fifteen percent (15%) of the total residential units constructed on the Property. The in-lieu fee shall be calculated as follows: the amount of the City's per-unit fee in lieu of construction of inclusionary units that is in effect on the Effective Date of the Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement ("Amendment Effective Date") (which equals One Hundred Two Thousand One Hundred and Fifty-One Dollars ($102,151.00)) multiplied by a number equal to fifteen (15%) of the total residential units to be constructed on the Property ("Total Affordable Housing Fee"). For the Alternate Project (105 residential units), the Total Affordable Housing Fee shall equal One Million Six Hundred Thirty-four Thousand Four Hundred and Sixteen Dollars ($1,634,416). The Developer shall pay the Total Affordable Housing Fee in accordance with the following schedule: Due Date Amount First Payment 1 Year after Amendment $300,000. Effective Date Second 2 years after $400,000. Payment Amendment Effective Date Third Payment 3 years after $400,000. Amendment Effective Date Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement Page 5 of 7 Between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project -EXHIBIT B Fourth Payment 4 years after $534,416. Amendment Effective Date Tota I $1,634,416. For the Project (300 residential units), the Total Affordable Housing Fee shall equal Four Million Five Hundred Ninety-six Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety-five Dollars ($4,596,795). The Developer shall pay the Total Affordable Housing Fee in accordance with the following schedule: Due Date Amount First Payment 1 Year after Amendment $830,000. Effective Date Second 2 years after $1,100,000. Payment Amendment Effective Date Third Payment 3 years after $1,100,000. Amendment Effective Date Fourth Payment 4 years after $1,566,795. Amendment Effective Date Total $4,596,795. If the Developer has not submitted plans for the development of the Project or Alternate Project before the Due Date for any of the required Payments specified above, the amount of the Payment shall be based on the payment schedule for the Alternate Project. If Developer makes any payment of the Total Affordable Housing Fee based on the Alternate Project and the Developer submits plans for the Project, then Developer shall pay the Total Affordable Housing Fee for the Project in accordance with the Payment schedule for the Project, provided however that any Payments already made for the Alternate Project shall be credited to Payments for the Project. Any Payments for the Project that had a Due Date prior to the date of submission of plans for the Project shall be paid at the time of submission of Project plans. Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement Page 6 of 7 Between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project -EXHIBIT B ~ . A 1~ This affordable housing requirement constitutes an "alternative method of compliance" under the City's Inclusionary Zoning Regulations (Chapter 8.68 of the Dublin Municipal Code and Section 8.68.040E). Through its approval of this subsection, the City Council hereby finds that the "alternative method of compliance" meets the purposes of the City Inclusionary Zoning Regulations and will promote the City's affordability and Housing Element goals, and hereby waives the specific requirements of the City Inclusionary Zoning Regulations for the Project or Alternate Project. If the City's Inclusionary Zoning Regulations are repealed or suspended in the future, then Developer is not obligated to make any payment of the portion of the applicable Total Affordable Housing Fee that is due after the effective date of the repeal or suspension of the Regulations. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement, if any payment by Developer required under this subsection is not received in full by the City by the due date for such payment, the approval of Developer's "alternative method of compliance" shall become ineffective. Accordingly, in such event, the City will withhold further issuance of building permits and other approvals until such time as Developer has entered into a binding agreement specifying how it will comply with the City Inclusionary Zoning Regulations. The affordable housing requirements shall survive termination of the Agreement. Subsection b. Public Art Fee Requirement. For the Project or the Alternate Project, the Developer shall pay a single public art fee in the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) prior to issuance of the first building permit ("Public Art Fee"). The Public Art Fee shall be used for public art purposes as determined in the sole discretion of the City. The payment of the Public Art Fee shall constitute full compliance with Condition of Approval 41 of the Site Development Review for the Project and shall constitute full compliance with all Public Art Fee conditions or requirements that may be applied to the Alternative Project. 1486357.10 Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement Page 7 of 7 Between the Ciry of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 Project -EXHIBIT B G~~~ OF~~Dp~I f~ f ~1 ~i~? STAFF REPORT ~ v I 1\`~~~~% PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: September 14, 2010 TO: Planning Commission SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING - PA 09-002 Esprit at Dublin Station, Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center E-1 Project. (Legislative Act) Report prepared by Kristi Bascom, Principal Planner EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Esprit at Dublin Station project site is 4.13 acres located at the southeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and Iron Horse Parkway within the 91-acre Transit Center. The Applicant has received approval from the Planning Commission to construct a multi-family residential townhouse community with 105 units on the site, and an amendment to the existing Development Agreement for the project site has been requested. The proposed amendment relates to the density of uses (to allow the 105-unit project), an extension of the existing Agreement term by seven years, an amendment to the affordable housing obligations for the property, and a provision on a public art fee. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1) Receive Staff presentation; 2) Open the public hearing; 3) Take testimony from the Applicant and the public; 4) Close the public hearing and deliberate; and 5) Adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station). ~ Submitted By v wed By Principal Planner Planning Manager I ~ .w.._.....~... COPIES TO: Applicant File ~ Page 1 of 5 G:1PA#120091PA 09-002 Site E-11PC 09 14 20901PCSR Esprit DA.doc Attachment 6 DESCRIPTION: ) Figure 1: Vic?n?ty Map Background: The 4.13-acre site, referred to ' ' ~ ' ' ' as site °E-1" in the Transit q r' ~ Center Stage 1 Development ~ ~ _ Plan is located within the _,;w ~ Proiecf I , " ~ Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ~ <.r " (EDSP) area. The site has a ~ w ~ ¢~r. General Plan land use ~ - . ¦ ~ ~ designation of Campus Office - and is in a Planned Development Zoning District. The site is currently vacant and is surrounded by the ~ i Avalon at Dublin Station residential project to the west, ~ ~ , t°~~' vacant land to the south and the east, and Camp Parks to the north across Dublin _ ~ Boulevard, as shown on the rt . . Figure 1 to the right. The site is rectangular and flat, and is located less than a quarter mile from the East Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station. Entitlement History: The 91-acre Transit Center site is located generally between the Iron Horse Trail to the west, Dublin Boulevard to the north, Arnold Road to the East, and the BART station to the south. In December 2002, the City Council approved a General Plan/Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment (Resolution 216-02); approved a Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning (Ordinance 21-02); and approved Tentative Parcel Map 7892 (Resolution 02-40) for the Dublin Transit Center. A Master Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center was adopted in May 2003 (City Council Ordinance 5-03) and together with the approved General Plan/Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map, established the land use approvals for the future development of the site. The Master Development Agreement was then amended to set forth affordable housing obligations in the project area (City Council Ordinance 25-05). In March of 2006, D.R. Horton received approval of a 300-unit condominium project (Metropolitan at Dublin Station) with approximately 15,000 square feet of ground floor retail on the E-1 project site. The approvals included a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 2 Development Plan, Vesting Tentative Map, Site Development Review, and Development Agreement. The approved Development Agreement for Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 vested the project approvals for five (5) years, which will expire in March 2011 (City Council Ordinance 5-06 is included as Attachment 1). In 2009, the Applicant submitted plans for a new project on the subject site. On August 24, 2010, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan that 2 of 5 would permit the development of 105 townhome-style residential units (Planning Commis~ori" Resolution 10-36}. The Planning Commission also .approved a Resolution granting a Site Development Review approval for the site layout and building architecture (Planning Commission Resolution 10-37) and a Resolution approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 (Planning Commission Resolution 10-38). This project site is unusual in the fact that the Applicant has been granted dual entitlements for the property, which will permit the construction of either the 300-unit Metropolitan at Dublin Station project (approved by the City Council in March 2006) or the 105-unit Esprit at Dublin Station project (approved by the Planning Commission in August 2010). Both of the projects will have entitlements for the same piece of property and it will be up to the Applicant or a future developer to determine which project will eventually be constructed. Project Proposal:. Projects within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) require a Development Agreement between the Ciry and the Developer. California Government Code 65864 et seq. and Chapter 8.56 of the Dublin Municipal Code authorize the City to enter into an agreement for the development of real property with any person having a legal or equitable interest in such property in order to obtain certain commitments and establish certain development rights for the property. The Development Agreement must be approved prior to recordation of the final Tract Map and issuance of building permits for the development of the property. The Applicant and the City are a party to an existing development agreement for the property, which was approved by the City Council on March 9, 2006. The existing Development Agreement expires on March 9, 2011. At this time, the Applicant is requesting approval of Amendment 1 to the existing Development Agreement, which has been negotiated with City Staff. The proposed "Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement between the City of Dublin and Western Pacific Housing, inc. for the Dublin Transit Center E-1 Project" (Exhibit A-1 to Attachment 2) modifies the approved Development Agreement as follows: Section 1 of Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement allows for the construction of either the originally-approved 300-unit Metropolitan project ("Project") or the 105-unit Esprit project ("Alternate Project"). Section 2 of Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement extends the term of the Development Agreement and changes the expiration date from March 9, 2011 to March 9, 2018. Exhibit B of the Development Agreement is amended in its entirety, and the modifications from the original Exhibit B include changes to the affordable housing fee payments and obligations for the Property and include a provision on payment of the public art fee. In exchange for the City's agreement to extend the term of the Development Agreement, the developer has agreed to payments of the affordable housing fee in a schedule that is desirable to the City. In addition, the agreement provides that the developer will make payments to the City in satisfaction of its Public Art requirement under Chapter 8.58 of the Zoning Ordinance. In all other respects, the Amendment to the Development Agreement as amended is based on the standard Development Agreement adopted by the City Council for projects located within the EDSP and is consistent with the preceding Development Agreements that affect the project site. 3 of 5 A Planning Commission Resolution recommending the City Council adopt an Ordi a~c~J I a~ approving the Development Agreement is included as Attachment 2, with the draft Ordinance attached as Exhibit A. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: In accordance with State law, a public notice was mailed to all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property to notify property owners and occupants of the proposed project and of the September 14, 2010 Public Hearing. The public notice was also published in the Valley Times and posted at several locations throughout the City. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code section 65457 because it is a residential project that is consistent with a specific plan for which an EIR has been certified. The Project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Dublin Transit Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395) which was certified by City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. The City Council finds that no further environmental review under CEQA is required for the proposed Project because there is no substantial evidence in the record as a whole that any of the standards under CEQA section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR are met. ' CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, SPECIFIC PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE:: The Proposed Project is consistent with the Dublin General Plan, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and the Planned Development Zoning for the Dublin Transit Center and is compatible with the surrounding properties as well as the project site. ATTACHMENTS: 1) City Council Ordinance 5-06 2) Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station), with the draft Ordinance included as Exhibit A and the Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement included as Exhibit A-1. 4 of 5 GENERAL INFORMATION: ~ ~ ~ PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: Dean Mills D.R. Horton, Inc. 6658 Owens Drive Pleasanton, CA 94588 LOCATION: Southeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and Iron Horse Parkway (APN 986-0034-011-00) ZONING: PD, Planned Development GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Campus Office SPECIFIC PLAN/ LAND USE DESIGNATION: Campus Office (Flex Parcel) SURROUNDING USES: LOCATION ZONING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CURRENT USE OF PROPERTY North None Public Lands Camp Parks (U.S. Army) South PD Campus Office Vacant West PD High Density Residential High Density Residential East PD Campus Office Vacant 5 of 5 DRAFT ~~~.a~ . Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, September 14, 2010 CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the City of Dublin Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, September 14, 2010, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Plaza. Chair King called the meeting to order at 6:59:31 PM Present: Chair King; Commissioners Swalwell and Wehrenberg; Jeff Baker, Planning Manager; Kristi Bascom, Principal Planner; Mike Porto, Consulting Planner; and Debra LeClair, Recording Secretary. Absent: Cm. Brown and Cm. Schaub ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA -NONE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS - On a motion by Cm. Swalwell, seconded by Cm. Wehrenberg the minutes of the August 24, 2010 meeting were approved. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -NONE CONSENT CALENDAR -NONE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS -NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS - 8.1 PA 09-002 Esprit at Dublin Station, Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center E-1 Project. Kristi Bascom, Principal Planner presented the project as outlined in the Staff Report. Chair King opened the public hearing; with no one to speak he closed the public hearing. Cm. Swalwell was in support of the project and had no questions. Cm. Wehrenberg was in support of the project and had no questions. Chair King was. in support of the project and had no questions. On a motion by Cm. Wehrenberg and seconded by Cm. Swalwell, on a vote of 3-0-2, with Cm. Brown and Schaub being absent, the Planning Commission approved: RESOLUTION NO. 10 - 39 . , 98 ATTACHMENT 7 DRAFT ~ i ~ D~~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AMENDMENT 1 TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DUBLIN TRANSIT CENTER SITE E-1 (ESPRIT AT DUBLIN STATION) APN 986-0034-011-00 PA 09-002 8.2 PLPA-2010-00043 Livorno Site Development Review for portion of the Positano project which includes 69 single-family detached residential nits on approximately 16.7 acres within Tract 8036. Mike Porto, Consulting Planner presented the project a outlined in the Staff Report. Chair King opened the public hearing. Scott Montgomery, K. Hovnanian Homes, ~plicant spoke in favor of the project. Mr. Montgomery mentioned Patrick Edinger, Ar itect; Mark McClellan, McKay and Somps; and Carrie Gooding, Community Manager area , o present to answer questions. i Cm. Wehrenberg had no questions but; complemented Mr. Porto and the Applicant on the architecture, style and attention to detai ~ of the project. Chair King asked the Applicant h w the project will address 4-sided architecture in the construction of the homes. / Mr. Montgomery answered that 11 sides of the homes that are visible from the common areas will be built per the approved p ans. Chair King asked if there wi be view issues with the homes that are on the high point of the slope in the development. Mr. Montgomery stated t ere is a requirement in the design guidelines that there will be open- view fencing for lots th are a number of feet above the pads below. He stated there will be open-view fencing on t eir lots and on the lots shared with the D. R. Horton project. Mr. Porto pointed ou on Page L-2 of the plans where the open-view fencing lots will be located. He continued the ster Stage 1 Development Plan for Positano determined which lots would have view-fencing He stated the D. R. Horton, Cortona lots will have views above the K. Hovnanian, Livor o lots. Chair King aske if there would be a Homeowners Association. Mr. Montgomery answered yes. 99 ~a`I RESOLUTION NO. 10 - 36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE WITH A RELATED STAGE 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AND STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DUBLIN TRANSIT CENTER SITE E-1 (ESPRIT AT DUBLIN STATION) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD AND IRON HORSE PARKWAY (APN 986-0034-011-00) PA 09-002 WHEREAS, the Applicant, D.R. Horton, Inc., has requested approval of Site Development Review for PA 09-002, Dublin Transit Center Site E-1, for the construction of a 105-unit townhouse community on approximately ±4.13 acres of land, located on a portion of Site E of the Dublin Transit Center, within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, at the southeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and Iron Horse Parkway; and WHEREAS, the project includes applications for a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review, and a Vesting Tentative Tract Map. The applications are collectively known as the "Project"; and WHEREAS, the Project site is rectangular-shaped, flat, and currently vacant; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 216-02 in December 2002 approving a General Plan/Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment; Ordinance 21-02 approving a Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning; and, Resolution 02-40 approving Tentative Parcel Map 7892, for the Dublin Transit Center. The 91-acre Transit Center site is located generally between the Iron Horse Trail to the wesfi, Dublin Boulevard to the north, Arnold Road to the East, and the BART station to the south; and WHEREAS, a Master Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center was adopted by Ordinance 5-03 in May 2003. The Master Development Agreement was then later amended by Ordinance 25-05, which set forth affordable housing obligations in the project area; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State guidelines and City environmental regulations require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Staff has recommended that the project be found exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code section 65457 for residential projects that are consistent with a specific plan. The Project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Dublin Transit Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395) which was certified by City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. This eTTAf NMFNT R y ~ l , recommendation is based on a determination that there are no supplemental impacts that would require preparation of a Supplemental EIR; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated August 24, 20.10 and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project, including the proposed Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan, for the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on the Project, including the proposed Planned Development zoning, on August 24, 2010 at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the CEQA exemption, prior related environmental documents, and all above-referenced reports, recommendations, and testimony to evaluate the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission, for the reasons set forth in the findings in the attached draft ordinance, recommends that the City Council approve the ordinance attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, which ordinance adopts a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan for the Esprit at Dublin Station project. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of August, 2010 by the following vote: AYES: King, Brown, Swalwell, Wehrenberg, Schaub NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PI nin mm' sion C it ATT T: Planni Ma ager G:IPA#120091PA 09-002 Site E-1lPC 08 24 20101PC Att 1 - Reso PD Stage 2.DOC 2 RESOLUTION NO. 10-37 ' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR DUBLIN TRANSIT CENTER SITE E-1 (ESPRIT AT DUBLIN STATION) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD AND IRON HORSE PARKWAY (APN 986-0034-011-00) PA 09-002 WHEREAS, the Applicant, D.R. Horton, Inc., has requested approval of Site Development Review for PA 09-002, Dublin Transit Center Site E-1, for the construction of a 105-unit townhouse community on approximately ±4.13 acres of land, located on a portion of Site E of the Dublin Transit Center, within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, at the southeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and Iron Horse Parkway; and WHEREAS, the project includes applications for a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review, and a Vesting Tentative. Tract, Map. The applications are collectively known as the "Project"; and WHEREAS, the Site Development Review application contains information relating to the construction of a 105-unit townhouse community, parking, common areas and related improvements, which is available and on file in the Planning Division; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted project plans for the requested entitlement prepared by KTGY Architecture and Planning, received by the Planning Division on June 28, 2010; and WHEREAS, a Master Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center project was adopted by Ordinance 5-03 and amended by Ordinance 25-05; and WHEREAS, the amended Master Development Agreement requires that the Applicant/Developer pay an affordable housing in-lieu fee of 15% of the total constructed units (105); and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with State guidelines and City environmental regulations require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Staff has recommended that the project be found exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code section 65457 for residential projects that are consistent with a specific plan. The Project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Dublin Transit Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395) which was certified by City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. This recommendation is based on a determination that there are no supplemental impacts that would require preparation of a Supplemental EIR; and ATTACHMENT 9 IJ~ i~~.~ WHEREAS, .the Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing on said project application on August 24, 2010; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said Public Hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted to the Planning Commission recommending project approval; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and use their independent judgment and considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission of the City of Dublin does hereby make the following findings and determinations regarding the proposed Site Development Review: A. The Proposed Project, as conditioned, is consistent with the purposes of this Chapter, with the General Plan and with any applicable Specific Plans and design guidelines, and the zoning requirements of the Stage 1 Development Plan for the Dublin Transit Center in which the project is located because: 1) the proposed 105 townhouse units are compatible with the approved uses for the site; 2) the overall design of the project is consistent with the design requirements discussed in the Dublin Transit Center Plan; 3) the proposed project is consistent with the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan because the Plan states that the Transit Center area should have a mix of uses and should have a pedestrian friendly environment that the proposed project achieves by providing a different housing type than currently exists in the Transit Center and through the design of the building, site layout and landscaping which together promote the use of the street and create a more pedestrian friendly environment; 4) the proposed development is compatible with the General Plan Land Use designation of Campus Office which allows for high density residential in the Transit Center; 5) the proposed project is compatible with the General Plan Implementing Policy 2.1.1.B which encourages high density residential projects where higher density is compatible with the surrounding uses and the density of the project is compatible with surrounding developments and a higher density in this case is warranted due to the location of the BART station which is less than one quarter of a mile from the property; and 6) the proposed project meets the intent of the Dublin General Plan which discourages projects which do not relate well to the surrounding developments and the proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood which includes office, high density residential and retail uses including mixed-use developments which are located across the street from and adjacent to (future) the property. 8. The Proposed Project, as conditioned, is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance because: 1) the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area because the development is designed to take advantage of the close proximity to the Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station and because the project has been designed to be compatible with the surrounding approved and existing developments and to create a pedestrian friendly environment as required by Section 8.104.020.A of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance; 2) the proposed project will conform to the height, density, design, and landscape requirements of the Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning (as 2 amended) as required by Section 8.104.020.B of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance; and` 3) the project will be an attractive addition to the City and the Dublin Transit Center and therefore will meet the requirements of Sections 8.104.020.D and E. C. The design of the Proposed Project is appropriate to the City, the vicinity, surrounding properties, and the lot in which the Project is proposed because: 1) as designed, the architecture of the building including roof forms, colors and materials is compatible with the roof forms, colors and materials of the existing and approved buildings in the vicinity; 2) as shown on the Landscape Plans, the proposed landscaping is compatible with the existing and approved landscaping in the area including landscaping along Dublin Boulevard and street trees which conform to the requirements of the Dublin Transit Center Plan; 3) the overall design of the project is consistent with the design requirements discussed in the Dublin Transit Center Plan; 4) the design of the building which includes Mediterranean and modern design features will be compatible with developments in the neighborhood which have a Mediterranean or modern design or a mix of the two elements; 5) the architecture of the building includes tower elements, stucco and stone materials, earth tone colors, window design, and roof pitch that are compatible with common architectural elements found in the area; and 6) the project includes many pedestrian friendly elements which include attractive paving, wide sidewalks, street trees, awnings and units with street access which is compatible with the proposed design of the area, as discussed in the Dublin Transit Center Plan, and is compatible with the design of the approved developments in the area. D. The subject site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the Proposed Project because: 1) the Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning identified this property as having the potential to be developed with office, housing and/or retail and the proposed project will have residential units which will conform to the approved land use for the property; 2) the proposed development will result in a density of 25.4 dwelling units per acre which is compatible with the High Density Residential land use category and the land use designations of the surrounding neighborhood; and 3) the proposed density and height of the buildings (three stories) will be compatible with the height of buildings in the surrounding area and will be compatible with the site which is located near the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station and a higher density is warranted to encourage use of the station and to take advantage of the close proximity to the public transit center. E. There are no impacts to slopes or topographic features because the existing site is relatively flat. F. Architectural considerations including the character scale and quality of the design site layout the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings screening of unsightly uses lighting building materials and colors and similar elements result in a project that is harmonious with its surroundings and compatible with other development in the vicinity because: 1) the proposed project contains residential units in a density that is compatible with developments in the area; 2) the proposed density of 25.4 units per acre is compatible with the density of approved developments in the area and the overall anticipated density of the Dublin Transit Center once all of the properties identified in the Dublin Transit Center Plan have been developed; 3) the perceived massing and overall density of the site is reduced by pedestrian elements, attractive landscaping, tower elements, windows, varying roof forms and varying building wall set backs to the ground floor; 4) the proposed design of the building includes architectural elements which are 3 1~~~~ commonly found on Mediterranean and modern style buildings which are prevalent in the City of Dublin and in the vicinity; 5) the project will include balconies, porches, stoops, on-street parking, and architectural features to make the area a more pedestrian friendly neighborhood and to encourage the use of the sidewalk and surrounding streets; 6) the design of the buildings are well designed in and of itself and provide an attractive addition to the neighborhood; 7) the proposed buildings include architectural features which are common in the area and include materials, colors, window design, roof pitch, roof design and massing that are compatible with the surroundings; 8) the proposed earth tone color palette is compatible with colors found in the neighborhood; and 9) the proposed building has a mix of stone and stucco materials which relate well to the design of the building and are compatible with the building materials commonly found in the City as well as in the Transit Center and surrounding area. G. Landscape considerations including the location type size color texture and coverage of plant materials and similar elements have been incorporated into the project to ensure visual relief adequate screening and an attractive environment for the public because: 1) a double row of street trees will be provided on all four streets which surround the subject property as required by the Dublin Transit Center Plan; 2) the street tree species will conform to the approved species as stated in the Dublin Transit Center Plan; 3) an opportunity for public art has been provided at the corner of Dublin Boulevard and Iron Horse Parkway to provide an attractive pedestrian element and an attractive focal point from the street; 4) a mix of attractive plantings is located throughout the site including the interior paseos to reduce the amount of paving on-site; 5) a good mix of tall trees, tall shrubs, groundcover and colorful plants has been provided along Dublin Boulevard to provide an attractive view for motorists and pedestrians in the area. H. The site has been adequately designed to ensure proper circulation for bicyclists pedestrians and automobiles because: 1) the project has been conditioned to comply with all Building Division, Fire Department, Public Works Department, Planning Division and Dublin San Ramon Services District requirements; and 2) as conditioned, the residential uses will be operated in such a manner as to reduce impacts on the surrounding neighborhood, streets and pedestrian areas. I. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning Commission finds that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code section 65457 because it is a residential project that is consistent with a specific plan for which an EIR has been certified. The Project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Dublin Transit Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395) which was certified by City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. The Planning Commission finds that no further environmental review under CEQA is required for the proposed Project because there is no substantial evidence in the record as a whole that any of the standards under CEQA section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR are met BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve said application, PA 09-002, Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (Esprit at Dublin Station) Site Development Review to construct a 105-unit townhouse community located at the southeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and Iron Horse Parkway, as generally depicted in the written 4 statement and project plans prepared by KTGY Architects and Planners and the Landscape Plans prepared by the Ripley Design Group, received by the Planning Division on June 28, 2010, labeled Exhibit A and attached to this Resolution, stamped approved, and on file with the Community Development Department, subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits or establishment of use, and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance of the conditions of approval: [PL] Planning, [B] Building, [PO] Police, [PW] Public Works, [ADM] Administration/City Attorney, [FIN] Finance, [PCS] Parks and Community Services, [F] Alameda County Fire Department, [DSR] Dublin San Ramon Services District, [LDD), Livermore Dublin Disposal, [CO] Alameda County Department of Environmental Health, [Zone 7], Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Zone 7, [LAVTA], Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority, [CHS], California Department of Health Services. CONDITION TEXT RESPON. 'WHEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to GENERAL -SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1. Approval. This Site Development Review PL On-going Planning approval for the Esprit residential development, PA 09-002 establishes the detailed design concepts and regulations for the project. Development pursuant to this Site Development Review generally shall conform to the project plans submitted by KTGY Group Inc.,, received June 28, 2010, on file in the Community Development Department, and other plans, text, and diagrams relating to this Site Development Review, unless modified by the Conditions of A royal contained herein. 2. Permit Expiration. Approval of this Site PL Two years DMC Development Review shall be valid for two (2) After 8.96.020. years from the effective date and for any Effective D extension of the term for this approval Date established in the Development Agreement for the Project. This approval shall be null and void in the event the approved use fails to be established within two (2) years or before the expiration of any extension of the term for this approval established in the Development Agreement for the Project whichever is later. Commencement of the use means the establishment of use pursuant to the Permit approval or, demonstrating substantial progress toward commencin such use. If there is a 5 J of CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: dispute as to whether the Permit has expired, the City may hold a noticed public hearing to determine the matter. Such a determination may be processed concurrently with revocation proceedings in appropriate circumstances. If a Permit expires, a new application must be made and processed according to the requirements of this Ordinance. 3. Time Extension. The original approving PL One Year DMC decision-maker may, upon the Applicant's written Following 8.96.020. request for an extension of approval prior to Expiration E expiration, upon the determination that afl Date Conditions of Approval remain adequate and all applicable findings of approval will continue to be met, grant an extension of the approval for a period not to exceed six (6) months. All time extension requests shall be noticed and a public hearing shall be held before the original hearing bod . 4. Compliance. The Applicant/Property Owner shall PL On-going DMC operate this use in compliance with the 8.96.020. Conditions of Approval of this Site Development F Review, the approved plans and the regulations established in the Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or conditions specified may be subject to enforcement action. 5. Effective Date. This approval shall not become PL City Council Planning effective until the Planned Development Rezone, related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment, Stage 2 Development Plan and Amended Development Agreement are approved by the City Council. If the above approvals are not granted, this Site Development Review approval shall become null and void. 6. Revocation of Permit. The Site Development PL On- DMC Review approval shall be revocable for cause in going 8.96.020. accordance with Section 8.96.020.1 of the Dublin 1 Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or conditions of this permit shall be subject to citation. 7. Requirements and Standard Conditions. The Various Building Standard Applicant/ Developer shall comply with applicable Permit City of Dublin Fire Prevention Bureau, Dublin Issuance Public Works Department, Dublin Building Department, Dublin Police Services, Alameda Count Flood Control District Zone 7, Livermore 6 I~~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: Amador Valley Transit Authority, Alameda County Public and Environmental Health, Dublin San Ramon Services District and the California Department of Health Services requirements and standard conditions. Prior to issuance of building permits or the installation of any improvements related to this project, the Developer shall supply written statements from each such agency or department to the Planning Department, indicating that all applicable conditions required have been or will be met. 8. Required Permits. Developer shall obtain all PW Building Standard permits required by other agencies including, but Permit not limited to Alameda County Flood Control and Issuance Water Conservation District Zone 7, California Department of Fish and Game, Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Caltrans and provide copies of the permits to the Public Works De artment. 9. Fees. Applicant/Developer shall pay all Various Building Various applicable fees in effect at the time of building Permit permit issuance, including, but not limited to, Issuance Planning fees, Building fees, Traffic Impact Fees, TVTC fees, Dublin San Ramon Services District fees, Public Facilities fees, Dublin Unified School District School Impact fees, Fire Facilities Impact fees, Alameda County Flood and Water Conservation District (Zone 7) Drainage and Water Connection fees; or any other fee that may be ado ted and a licable. 10. Indemnification. The Developer shall defend, ADM On- Administr indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Dublin going ation/City and its agents, officers, and employees from any Attorney claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Dublin or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Dublin or its advisory agency, appeal board, Planning Commission, City Council, Community Development Director, Zoning Administrator, or any other department, committee, or agency of the City to the extent such actions are brought within the time period required by Government Code Section 66499.37 or other applicable law; provided, however, that The Developer's duty to so defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall be sub'ect to the Cit 's 7 l of CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN. SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: promptly notifying The Developer of any said claim, action, or proceeding and the City's full cooperation in the defense of such actions or roceedin s. 11. Clarification of Conditions. In the event that PW On-going Public there needs to be clarification to the Conditions of Works Approval, the Director of Community Development and the City Engineer have the authority to clarify the intent of these Conditions of Approval to the Developer without going to a public hearing. The Director of Community Development and the City Engineer also have the authority to make minor modifications to these conditions without going to a public hearing in order for the Developer to fulfill needed improvements or mitigations resulting from im acts to this ro'ect. 12. Clean-up. The Applicant/Developer shall be PL On- Planning responsible for clean-up and disposal of project going related trash to maintain a safe, clean, and litter- free site. 13. Modifications. Modifications or changes to this PL On- DMC Site Development Review approval may be going 8.104.10 considered by the Community Development 0 Director if the modifications or changes proposed comply with Section 8.104.100 of the Zoning Ordinance. 14. Lighting. Lighting is required over exterior PL, PW Building Municipal entrances/doors including the service areas. Permit Code Exterior lighting used after daylight hours shall be Issuance adequate to provide for security needs, A lighting plan shall be submitted for approval. The lighting plan shall provide a photometric readout with foot-candles plotted on the site. .Pedestrian pathways, including the first floor portals shall maintain a minimum lighting level of 0.6 foot candles. 15. Soft Building Materials. Soft Foam or efis type PL Building Planning material may be installed no closer then 6 feet Permit from the earth or paved areas. Issuance/ On- oin PROJECT SPECIFIC 16. Equipment Screening. All electrical, fire risers PL Building Planning and/or mechanical equipment shall be screened Permit from public view. Any roof-mounted equipment Issuance - shall be com letel screened from view b 8 t off, CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: materials architecturally compatible with the Through building and to the satisfaction of the Community Completion/ Development Director. The Building Permit plans On-going shall show the location of all equipment and screening for review and approval by the Director of Communit Develo ment. 17. Colors. The exterior paint colors of the buildings PL Occupancy Planning are subject to City review and approval. The Applicant shall paint a portion of the building the proposed colors for review and approval by the Director of Community Development prior to painting the buildings, whose approval shall not be unreasonabl withheld. 18. Master Sign Program. A Master Sign Program PL Installation of Planning shall be applied for and approved for all Project Signs related signage including, but not limited to, community identification signage, address signage, directional signage, parking signage, speed limit signage, retail tenant signage, and other si na e deemed necessa b the Cit . 19. Development Agreement. The Developer shall PL Building Planning meet all applicable sections of the Master Permit Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Issuance Center adopted as Ordinance No. 5-03 unless directed otherwise by a subsequent Development A reement s ecific to this ro'ect. 20. Sound Attenuation. The Applicant/Developer PL Building Planning shall submit a site specific acoustic report to be Permit prepared by qualified acoustical consultants. The Issuance acoustic report shall include detailed identification of noise exposure levels on the individual project site and a listing of specific measures to reduce both interior and exterior noise levels to normally acceptable levels including but not limited to glazing and ventilation systems, construction of noise barriers and use of buildings to shield noise. 21. Mitigation Monitoring Program. The Applicant/ PL On-going Planning Developer shall comply with the Dublin Transit Center EIR Mitigation Monitoring Program including all mitigation measures, action programs, and implementation measures on file with the Communit Development De artment. LANDSCAPING 22. Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans. Final PL Building DMC Landsca e and Irri ation Plans, re ared and Permit 8.72.030 9 ~o~ ~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON. 'WHEN SO CE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: stamped by a State licensed landscape architect Issuance or registered engineer, shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. Plans shall be generally consistent with the Preliminary Landscape Plans prepared by. Ripley Design Group received by the Planning Division on June 28, 2010, except as modified by the Conditions listed below or as required by the Community Development Director and the Transit Center Stage 1 Planned Development Plan to address s ecific site constraints or conditions. 23. Plant Species. Plant species shall be selected PL Building Planning according to use, sun/shade location and space Permit available. The landscape plan should include Issuance plant species that are not salt sensitive. Street trees shall be high branching and produce minimal litter. 24. Slopes. The landscape plan shall address PL Building Planning slopes within the property, including erosion, Permit maintenance and irrigation issues. All slopes Issuance shall have cone-foot level area at top and bottom of the slo e for maintenance. 25. Landscaping at Street/Drive Aisle PL Building Planning Intersections. Landscaping shall not obstruct Permit the sight distance of motorists, pedestrians or Issuance bicyclists. Except for trees, landscaping (and/or landscape structures such as walls) at drive aisle intersections shall not be taller than 30 inches above the curb. Landscaping shall be kept at a minimum height and fullness giving patrol officers and the general public surveillance capabilities of the area. 26. Lighting. The Applicant/Developer shall prepare PL, PW, PO Building Planning a photometric plan to the reasonable satisfaction Permit of the City Engineer, Director of Community Issuance Development, the City's Consulting Landscape Architect and Dublin Police Services. The photometric plan shall show lighting levels which takes into consideration poles, low walls and other obstructions. Exterior lighting shall be provided within the parking lot and on the building, and shall be of a design and placement so as not to cause glare onto adjoining properties, businesses or to vehicular traffic. Li htin used after da li ht hours shall be 10 1 a a I~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN S CE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: adequate to provide for security needs. The plan shall shows measurements for the parking structure, connecting paths, outdoor parking area and outside of residential areas. Lighting inside of the parking structure shall be of a level which is high enough to promote safety within the structure, at no point should the lighting level be below 1 foot candle. The parking lot lights shall also be designed to eliminate any pockets of high and low illuminated areas. Prior to Occupancy, the Applicant shall request an inspection of the lighting levels in the structure to determine if lighting is sufficient. If additional lights are required to be installed to meet the 1.5 foot- candle requirement, the Applicant shall do so rior to Occu anc . 27. Standard Plant Material, Irrigation and PL Building DMC Maintenance Agreement. The Permit 8.72.050. Applicant/Developer shall complete and submit to Issuance B the Dublin Planning .Department the Standard Plant Material, Irrigation and Maintenance A reement. 28. Landscaping. Applicant/Developer shall PL, PW Building Planning/ construct all landscaping within the site and along Permit Public the project frontage. Issuance Works 29. Plant Standards. All trees that are on the PL Occupancy Planning exterior building perimeter shall be 24" box minimum, with at least 30% at 36" box or greater. All shrubs shall be 5 allon minimum. 30. Backflow Prevention Devices. The Landscape PL, PW, F Building Planning Plan shall show the location of all backflow Permit prevention devises. The location and screening of Issuance the backflow prevention devices shall be reviewed and a roved b Cit staff. 31. Root Barriers and Tree Staking. The landscape PL, PW Building Planning plans shall provide details showing root barriers Permit and tree staking will be installed which meet Issuance current Cit s ecifications. 32. Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The PL Building DMC Applicant/ Developer shall submit written Permit 8.88 documentation to the Public Works Department Issuance (in the form of a Landscape Documentation Package and other required documents) that the development conforms to the City's Water Efficient Landsca in Ordinance. 11 D a t CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: 33. Shrubs. All shrubs shall be continuously PL On-going maintained including pruning and regular watering. If at any time the shrubs in the parking lot or throughout the project site are damaged, missing, dead or dying, these shrubs shall be immediately replaced with the same species to the reasonable satisfaction of the Community Develo ment Director. 34. Trees. The property owner shall continually PL On-going Planning maintain all trees shown on the approved Landscape Plans including replacing dead or dying trees with the same species, pruning and regular watering of the trees. Within five years and every five years thereafter, all trees which are to be installed in conjunction with this phase of the project shall show normal growth to the reasonable satisfaction of the Community Development Director. If the trees have not shown normal growth, the property owner shall replace the trees to the reasonable satisfaction of the Communit Develo ment Director. BUILDING - GENERAL CONDITLONS 35. Building Codes and Ordinances. All project B Through Building construction shall conform to all building codes Completion and ordinances in effect at the time of building ermit. 36. Retaining Walls. All retaining walls over 30 B Through Building inches in height and in a walkway shall be Completion provided with guardrails. All retaining walls over 24 inches with a surcharge or 36 inches without a surcharge shall obtain permits and inspections from the Buildin Division. 37. Phased Occupancy Plan. If occupancy is B Occupancy of Building requested to occur in phases, then all physical any Affected improvements within each phase shall be Building completed prior to occupancy of any buildings within that phase except for items specifically excluded in an approved Phased Occupancy Plan, or minor handwork items, approved by the Department of Community Development. The Phased Occupancy Plan shall be submitted to the Directors of Community Development and Public Works for review and approval a minimum of 45 days prior to the request for occupancy of any building covered by said Phased Occupancy Plan. An hasin shall rovide for ade uate 12 l ~ ~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: vehicular access to all parcels in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. No individual building shall be occupied until the adjoining area is finished, safe, accessible, provided with all reasonable expected services and amenities, and separated from remaining additional construction activity. Subject to approval of the Director of Community Development, the completion of landscaping may be deferred due to inclement weather with the posting of a bond for the value of the deferred landsca in and associated im rovements. 38. Building Permits. To apply for building permits, B Issuance of Building Applicant/Developer shall submit Seven (7) sets Building of construction plans to the Building Division for Permits plan check. Each set of plans shall have attached an annotated copy of these Conditions of Approval. The notations shall clearly indicate how all Conditions of Approval will or have been complied with. Construction plans will not be accepted without the annotated resolutions attached to each set of plans. Applicant/Developer will be responsible for obtaining the approvals of all participation non- City agencies prior to the issuance of building ermits. 39. Construction Drawings. Construction plans B Issuance of Building shall be fully dimensioned (including building Building elevations) accurately drawn (depicting all Permits existing and proposed conditions on site), and prepared and signed by a California licensed Architect or Engineer. All structural calculations shall be prepared and signed by a California licensed Architect or Engineer. The site plan, landscape plan and details shall be consistent with each other. 40. Mechanical Equipment. Air conditioning units B, PL Occupancy Building and ventilation ducts shall be screened from public view with materials compatible to the main building. Units shall be permanently installed on concrete pads or other non-movable materials approved by the Building Official and Director of Community Development. Air conditioning units shall be located in accordance with the PD text. 41. Addressin B Various Building 13 ~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN SO CE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: a) Provide a site plan with the City of Dublin's address grid overlaid on the plans (1 to 30 scale). Highlight all exterior door openings on plans (front, rear, garage, etc.). (Prior to release of addresses) b) Provide plan for display of addresses. The Building Official and Director of Community Development shall approve plan prior to issuance of the first building permit. (Prior to permitting) c) Addresses will be required on the front of the dwellings. Addresses are also required near the garage door opening if the opening is not on the same side of the dwelling as the front door. (Prior to permitting) d) Town homes /Condos are required to have address ranges posted on street side of the buildings. (Occupancy of any Unit) e) Address signage shall be provided as per the Dublin Residential Security Code. (Occupancy of any Unit) f) Exterior address numbers shall be backlight and be posted in such a way that they may be seen from the street. (Prior to permit issuance, and through completion) 42. Engineer Observation. The Engineer of record B Prior to Building shall be retained to provide observation services Frame for all components of the lateral and vertical Inspection design of the building, including nailing, hold- downs, straps, shear, roof diaphragm and structural frame of building. A written report shall be submitted to the City Inspector prior to schedulin the final frame ins ection. 43. Foundation. Geotechnical Engineer for the soils B Building Building report shall review and approve the foundation Permit design. A letter shall be submitted to the Building Issuance Division on the a royal. 44. Green Building Guidelines. The Green Building B Through Building checklist shall be included in the master plans. Completion The checklist shall detail what Green Points are being obtained and where the information is found within the master plans. (Prior to first permit). Prior to each unit final, the project shall submit a completed checklist with appropriate verification that all Green Points re uired b 7.94 14 I ~ CONDITION TEXT REP SON. WHEN SOU CE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: of the Dublin Municipal Code have been incor orated. 45. Cool Roofs. Flat roof areas shall have their B Through Building roofing material coated with light colored gravel or Completion painted with light colored or reflective material desi ned for Cool Roofs. 46. Electronic File. The applicant/developer shall B Prior to First Building submit all building drawings and specifications for and Final this project in an electronic format to the Inspection satisfaction of the Building Official prior to the issuance of building permits. Additionally, all revisions made to the building plans during the project shall be incorporated into an "As Built" electronic file and submitted prior to the issuance of the final occu anc . 47. Copies of Approved Plans. Applicant shall B 30 days After Building provide City with 4 reduced (1/2 size) copies of Permit and the approved plan. Each Revision Issuance 48. Construction Trailer. Due to size and nature of B When Building the development, the applicant/developer in Needed conjunction with the applicant/developer of the adjacent project on Site B, shall provide a construction trailer will all hook ups for use by City Inspection personnel during the time of construction as determined necessary by the Building Official. In the event that the City has their own construction trailer, the applicant/developer shall provide a site with appropriate hook ups in close proximity to the project site to accommodate this trailer. The applicant/developer shall cause the trailer to be moved from its current location at the time necessary as determined by the Building Official at the a licant/develo er's ex ense. FIRE - GENERAL CONDITIONS 49. Fire Code. The Developer shall comply with all F During Fire applicable Fire and Building Codes. Construction POLFCE - GENERAL CONDITIONS 50. Security Requirements. The PO Issuance of Police Applicant/Developer shall comply with all Building applicable City of Dublin Residential Security Permits requirements. On- oin 15 l ~ lack CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: PUBLIC WORKS -PROJECT SPECIFIC 51. Tentative Map Conditions of Approval: All PW On-going Public applicable Conditions of Approval for Tentative Works Map for Tract 7667 shall apply to this Site Develo ment Review. 52. Grading /Sitework Permit: Developer shall PW Through Public obtain aGrading /Sitework Permit from the Completion Works Public Works Department for all grading and private site improvements. The Developer shall provide security to guarantee drainage and private street improvements in an amount a roved b the Cit En ineer. 53. Onsite Parking Spaces: All 20 of the on site PW On-going Public parking spaces shown on the Tentative Map and Works SDR exhibits shall be available for guest and resident parking; none of these parking spaces shall be assi ned for residents onl . 54. Curb Returns: The curb returns at the Esprit PW Issuance of Public Way intersections with the private streets shall Grading/ Works have a 15-foot radius and the curb returns for the Sitework east-west streets shall have a minimum 7-foot Permit radius. 55. Crosswalks: One crosswalk with ramps shall be PW Issuance of Public added across Esprit Way at each of the Grading/ Works intersections with the private north-south streets. Sitework Permit 56. Decorative Pavements: The decorative PW Issuance of Public pavements in the private streets shall be paver Grading/ Works blocks or stamped concrete; stamped asphalt Sitework avement will not be allowed. Permit 57. Street Names. The two north-south private PW Issuance of Public streets cannot have the same street name. Grading/ Works Sitework Permit 58. Grading Plan. The Grading Plan shall be in PW Issuance of Public conformance with the recommendations of the Grading/ Works Geotechnical Report, the approved Tentative Sitework Map and Site Development Review, and the City Permit desi n standards & ordinances. 59. Erosion Control Plan. A detailed Erosion PW Issuance of Public Control Plan shall be included with the Grading Grading/ Works Plan approval. The plan shall include detailed Sitework design, location, and maintenance criteria of all Permit erosion and sedimentation control measures. 60. Tiebacks or Structural Fabric. Tiebacks or PW Issuance of Public 16 lily I ~ ~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON: WHEN SO RCE AGENCY" REQ'D Prior to: structural fabric for retaining walls shall not cross Grading/ Works property lines unless specifically approved by the Sitework Cit En ineer. Permit 61. Improvements. The public improvements shall PW During Public be constructed generally as shown on the Construction Works Tentative Map and/or Site Development Review. However, the approval of the Tentative Map and Site Development Review is not an approval of the specific design of the drainage, sanitary sewer, water, traffic circulation, and street im rovements. 62. Standard Plans. All public improvements shall PW During Public conform to the City of Dublin Standard Plans and Construction Works design requirements and as approved by the City En ineer. 63. Traffic Signs. The Developer shall install all PW Occupancy Public traffic signs and pavement marking as required Works b the Cit En ineer. 64. Light Standards. Street light standards and PW Occupancy Public luminaries shall be designed and installed per Works a royal of the Cit En ineer. 65. Bus Stops and Shelters. The Developer shall PW Occupancy Public construct bus stops and shelters at the locations Works designated and approved by the LAVTA and the City Engineer. The Developer shall pay the cost of rocurin and installin these im rovements. 66. Water and Sewer Facilities. Developer shall PW Occupancy Public construct all potable and recycled water and Works sanitary sewer facilities required to serve the project in accordance with DSRSD master plans, standards, s ecifications and re uirements. 67. Fire Hydrants. Fire hydrant locations shall be PW Issuance of Public approved by the Alameda County Fire Grading/ Works Department. A raised reflector blue traffic marker Sitework shall be installed in the street opposite each Permit h drant. 68. Street Name Signs. The Developer shall furnish PW Occupancy Public and install street name signs for the project to the Works satisfaction of the Cit En ineer. 69. Utilities. Developer shall construct gas, electric, PW Issuance of Public cable TV and communication improvements Grading/ Works within the fronting streets and as necessary to Sitework serve the project and the future adjacent parcels Permit as approved by the City Engineer and the various Public Utilit a encies. 70. Under round. All electrical, as, tele hone, and PL, PW Issuance of Public 17 ll~ I~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHfN SO RC AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: Cable TV utilities, shall be underground in Grading/ Works accordance with the City policies and ordinances. Sitework All utilities shall be located and provided within Permit public utility easements and .sized to meet utility com an standards. 71. Utility Vaults. All utility vaults, boxes and PL, PW Issuance of Public structures, unless specifically approved otherwise Grading/ Works by the City Engineer, shall be underground and Sitework placed in landscape areas and screened from Permit public view. Prior to Joint Trench Plan approval, landscape drawings shall be submitted to the City showing the location of all utility vaults, boxes and structures and adjacent landscape features and plantings. The Joint Trench Plans shall be signed by the City Engineer prior to construction of the 'oint trench im rovements. PUBLIC WORKS -..STANDARD CONDITIONS 72. Notice of Intent. Prior to any clearing or grading, PW Issuance of Public the Developer shall provide the City evidence that Grading/ Works a Notice of Intent (NOI) has been sent to the Sitework California State Water Resources Control Board Permit per the requirements of the NPDES. A copy of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be provided to the Public Works Department and be kept at the construction site. 73. Maintenance. Developer shall enter into an PW Issuance of Public agreement with the City of Dublin that guarantees Grading/ Works the perpetual maintenance obligation for all Sitework private storm water treatment measures installed Permit as part of the project. Said agreement is required pursuant to Provision C.3.e.ii of RWQCB Order R2-2003-0021 for the issuance of the Alameda Countywide NPDES municipal storm water permit. Said permit requires the City to provide verification and assurance that all treatment devices will be ro erl o erated and maintained. CONSTRUCTION 74. Archeological Materials. If archaeological PL, PW During Public materials are encountered during construction, Construction Works construction within 100 feet of these materials and Grading shall be halted until a professional Archaeologist Activities who is certified by the Society of California Archaeology (SCA) or the Society of Professional Archaeology (SOPA) has had an opportunity to evaluate the si nificance of the find and su est 18 11 ~ ~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON. _ WHEN SOUR E AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: a ro riate miti ation measures. 75. Construction Hours. Construction activities, PW During Public including the maintenance and warming of Construction Works equipment, shall be limited to Monday through and Grading Friday, and non-City holidays, between the hours Activities of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. except as otherwise a roved b the Cit En ineer. 76. Construction Noise Management Plan. PW During Public Developer shall prepare a construction noise Construction Works management plan that identifies measures to be and Grading taken to minimize construction noise on Activities surrounding developed properties. Specific noise management measures shall be included in the ro'ect tans ands ecifications. 77. Construction Traffic. Developer shall prepare a PW During Public plan for construction traffic interface with public Construction Works traffic on any existing public street. Construction and Grading traffic and parking may be subject to specific Activities re uirements b the Cit En ineer. 78. Pest Control. The Developer shall be PW During Public responsible for controlling any rodent, mosquito, Construction Works or other pest problem due to construction and Grading activities. Activities 79. Dust Control. The Developer shall be PW During Public responsible for measures to control dust as Construction Works conditions warrant or as directed by the City and Grading En ineer. Activities 80. Construction Security. During the construction PO During Public phase the site shall the following: Construction Works • The construction site shall be fenced and and Grading locked at all times when workers are not Activities present. • A temporary address sign shall be posted, and shall be of a sufficient size, a minimum of at least 36" x 36" with a white background and stenciled black numbers and letters so that the sign can be seen during night time hours with existing street lighting or additional lighting as needed. The address sign shall be posted on all approaches to the site. • The developer shall file a Dublin Police Emergency Contact Business Card prior to any phase of construction that will provide 24 hour phone contact numbers of persons responsible for the construction site. • Good securit ractices shall be followed with 19 ~~~i~~- CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN SOUR E AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: respect to storage of building materials and the stora e of tools at the construction site. 81. SWPPP. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention PW During Public Program (SWPPP) for the operation and Construction Works maintenance of the project shall identify the Best and Grading Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to the Activities project construction activities. The SWPPP shall include the erosion control measures in accordance with the regulations outlined in the most current version of the ABAG Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook or State Construction Best Management Practices Handbook. 82. Temporary Construction Fencing. Temporary Various During Public Construction fencing shall be installed along the Construction Works perimeter of all work under construction to and Grading separate the construction operation from the Activities public. All construction activities shall be confined to within the fenced area. Construction materials and/or equipment shall not be operated or stored outside of the fenced area or within the public right-of-way unless approved in advance b the Cit En ineer/Public Works Director. 83. Fire Access. Access roads, turnarounds, Various During Public pullouts, and fire operation areas are Fire Lanes Construction Works and shall be maintained clear and free of and Grading obstructions, includin the arkin of vehicles. Activities 84. Entrances. Entrances to job sites shall not be Various During Public blocked, including after hours, other than by Construction Works approved gates/barriers that provide for and Grading emer enc access. Activities 85. Site Utilities. Site utilities that would require the Various During Public access road to be dug up or made impassible Construction Works shall be installed prior to combustible construction and Grading commencing. Activities Entrance flare, angle of departure, width, turning radii, grades, turnaround, vertical clearances, road surface, bridges/crossings, gates/key-switch, & within re uired 150-ft. distance to Fire Lane DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT `DSRSD -STANDARD CONDITIONS 86. Prior to issuance of any building permit, complete DSR Issuance of Dublin improvement plans shall be submitted to DSRSD Building San that conform to the requirements of the Dublin Permits Ramon San Ramon Services District Code, the DSRSD Services "Standard Procedures, S ecifications and District 20 ~ 6~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON, WHEN SOURCE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: Drawings for Design and Installation of Water and Wastewater Facilities", all applicable DSRSD Master Plans and all DSRSD olicies. 87. If Applicant is required to upsize any mains shall DSR Improvement Dublin be sized to provide sufficient capacity to Plans San accommodate the development project's Ramon demand. Layout and sizing of mains shall be in Services conformance with DSRSD utilit master tannin District 88. Sewers shall be designed to operate by gravity DSR Improvement Dublin flow to DSRSD's existing sanitary sewer system. Plans San Pumping of sewage is discouraged and may only Ramon be allowed under extreme circumstances Services following a case by case review with DSRSD District staff. Any pumping station will require specific review and approval by DSRSD of preliminary design reports, design criteria, and final plans and specifications. The DSRSD reserves the right to require payment of present worth 20 year maintenance costs as well as other conditions within a separate agreement with the applicant for an ro'ect that re wires a um in station. 89. Domestic and fire protection waterline systems DSR Improvement Dublin for Tracts or Commercial Developments shall be Plans San designed to be looped or interconnected to avoid Ramon dead end sections in accordance with Services requirements of the DSRSD Standard District S ecifications and sound en ineerin ractice. 90. DSRSD policy requires public water and sewer DSR Improvement Dublin lines to be located in public streets rather than in Plans San off-street locations to the fullest extent possible. Ramon If unavoidable, then public sewer or water Services easements must be established over the District alignment of each public sewer or water line in an off-street or private street location to provide access for future maintenance and/or re lacement. 91. Prior to approval by the City of a grading permit DSR Improvement Dublin or a site development permit, the locations and Plans San widths of all proposed easement dedications for Ramon water and sewer lines shall be submitted to and Services a roved b DSRSD. District 92. All easement dedications for DSRSD facilities DSR Improvement Dublin shall be by separate instrument irrevocably Plans San offered to DSRSD or by offer of dedication on the Ramon Final Map. Services District 21 11 ~ I~~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN SOUR E AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: 93. Prior to approval by the City for Recordation, the DSR Recordation Dublin Final Map shall be submitted to and approved by of Final Map San DSRSD for easement locations, widths, and Ramon restrictions. Services District 94. Prior to issuance by the City of any Building DSR Issuance of Dublin Permit or Construction Permit by the Dublin San Building San Ramon Services District, whichever comes first, Permits Ramon all utility connection fees including DSRSD and Services Zone 7, plan checking fees, inspection fees, District connection fees, and fees associated with a wastewater discharge permit shall be paid to DSRSD in accordance with the rates and schedules established in the DSRSD Code. 95. Prior to issuance by the City of any Building DSR Issuance of Dublin Permit or Construction Permit by the Dublin San Building San Ramon Services District, whichever comes first, Permits Ramon all improvement plans for DSRSD facilities shall Services be signed by the District Engineer. Each drawing District of improvement plans shall contain a signature block for the District Engineer indicating approval of the sanitary sewer or water facilities shown. Prior to approval by the District Engineer, the applicant shall pay all required DSRSD fees, and provide an engineer's estimate of construction costs for the sewer and water systems, a performance bond, a one-year maintenance bond, and a comprehensive general liability insurance policy in the amounts and forms that are acceptable to DSRSD. The applicant shall allow at least 15 working days for final improvement drawing review by DSRSD before si nature b the District En ineer. 96. No sewer line or waterline construction shall be DSR Improvement Dublin permitted unless the proper utility construction Plans San permit has been issued by DSRSD. A Ramon construction permit will only be issued after all of Services the items in Condition No. 9 have been satisfied. District 97. The applicant shall hold DSRSD, its Board of DSR Issuance of Dublin Directors, commissions, employees, and agents Building San of DSRSD harmless and indemnify and defend Permits Ramon the same from any litigation, claims, or fines Services resulting from the construction and completion of District the ro'ect. 98. Improvement plans shall include recycled water DSR Improvement Dublin im rovements as re uired b DSRSD. Services Plans San 22 i~~ ~ CONDITION TEXT RESPON. WHEN SOU CE AGENCY REQ'D Prior to: for landscape irrigation shall connect to recycled Ramon water mains. Applicant must obtain a copy of the Services DSRSD Recycled Water Use Guidelines and District conform to the re uirements therein. PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES 99' Public Art Project. The developer shall comply PL, PCD Building DA with the City's Public Art Ordinance/requirements Permit in accordance with the terms of the Development Issuance Agreement approved for the project. MISCELLANEOUS 100. Trash Collection. The garage area of Floor PL Building PC Plans 4 and 5 shall be reconfigured to Permit accommodate space for two garbage/recycling Issuance containers. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of August, 2010 by the following vote: AYES: King, Brown, Schaub, Swalwell, Wehrenberg NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I; ` i Planni g C mmission air ATTEST: C Plannin Ma ger G:\PA#\2009\PA 09-002 Site E-1\PC 08 24 2010\PC Att 4 - PC approve SDR.DOC 23 RESOLUTION NO. 10 - 38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 7667 FOR DUBLIN TRANSIT CENTER SITE E-1 (ESPRIT AT DUBLIN STATION) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD AND IRON HORSE PARKWAY (APN 986-0034-011-00) PA 09-002 WHEREAS, the Applicant, D.R. Horton, Inc., has requested approval of Site Development Review for PA 09-002, Dublin Transit Center Site E-1, for the construction of a 105-unit townhouse community on approximately ±4.13 acres of land, located on a portion of Site E of the Dublin Transit Center, within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, at the southeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and Iron Horse Parkway; and WHEREAS, the project includes applications for a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review, and a Vesting Tentative Tract Map. The applications are collectively known as the "Project"; and WHEREAS, the tentative map proposes to subdivide the property into two parcels which will be further divided for condominium purposes; and WHEREAS, the State of California Subdivision Map Act and the adopted City of Dublin Subdivision Regulations require that no real property may be divided into five or more parcels for purpose of sale, lease or financing, unless a Tentative Subdivision Map is acted upon, and a Final Map is approved consistent with the Subdivision Map Act and City of Dublin Subdivision Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Applicant/Developer has submitted a complete application for a Vesting Tentative Tract Map dated received March 5, 2010, on file in the Community Development Department, Planning Division; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State guidelines and City environmental regulations require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Staff has recommended that the project be found exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code section 65457 for residential projects that are consistent with a specific plan. The Project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Dublin Transit Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395) which was certified by City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. This recommendation is based on a determination that there are no supplemental impacts that would require preparation of a Supplemental EIR; and Attachment 1.0 ~I g a l 1 WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated August 24, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project, including the Vesting Tentative Tract Map for the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on the Project, including the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map, on August 24, 2010 at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted to the Planning Commission recommending approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 subject to the conditions prepared by Staff; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the CEQA exemption and prior related environmental documents, and all above-referenced reports, recommendations, and testimony to evaluate the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution, and that the Planning Commission does hereby find: 1. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 is consistent with the intent of applicable subdivision regulations and related ordinances. 2. The design or improvements of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 is consistent with the City's General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan policies as they apply to the subject property in that it is a subdivision for implementation of a residential community in an area designated for high-density, transit-oriented, residential development. 3. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 is consistent with the Planned Development Zoning District Stage 1 Development Plan (as .amended) approved as PA 00-013 for this project and is therefore consistent with the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. 4. The site is located adjacent to major roads on ±4.1 gross acres of relatively flat topography and is, therefore, physically suitable for the type and density of development. 5. With the incorporation of mitigation measures from the Final Program EIR and subsequent addenda, the design of the subdivision will not cause environmental damage or substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat or cause public health concerns. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, or access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. The City Engineer has reviewed the map and title report and has not found any conflicting easements of this nature. 7. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning Commission finds that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code section 65457 because it is a residential project that is consistent with a specific plan for which an 2 l ~ ~ EIR has been certified. The Project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Dublin Transit Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395) which was certified by City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. The Planning Commission finds that no further environmental review under CEQA is required for the proposed Project because there is no substantial evidence in the record as a whole that any of the standards under CEQA section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR are met. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves PA 09-002, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667, to subdivide ± 4.13 acres into two lots to be further subdivided for condominium purposes. This approval shall conform generally to: the Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 prepared by BKF Engineers, dated received March 5, 2010 by the Planning Department, and consisting of seven (7) sheets, attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution, except as specifically modified by the Conditions of Approval contained below. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the approval of the Final Parcel Map, and shall be subject to City Engineer and the Director of Community Development review and approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance of the conditions of approval: [PL] Planning, [B] Building, [PO] Police, [PW] Public Works, [ADM] Administration/City Attorney, [PCS] Parks and Community Services, [F] City of Dublin Fire, and [DSR] Dublin San Ramon Services District. NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. SOURCE AGENCY GENERAL CONDITIONS - Vestin Tentative Tract Ma 1. Compliance. The Developer shall comply with the PW Public Works Subdivision Map Act, the City of Dublin Subdivision, Zoning, and Grading Ordinances, the City of Dublin Public Works Standards and Policies, and all building and fire codes and ordinances. All public improvements constructed by Developer and to be dedicated to the City are hereby identified as "public works" under Labor Code section 1771. Accordingly, Developer, in constructing such improvements, shall comply with the Prevailing Wage Law (Labor Code. Sects. 1720 and followin 2. Effective Date/Validity. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7667 PL Ongoing approval shall not be effective until the related PD-Planned Development rezoning including Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review, and amended Development Agreement are approved by the City Council.. If the above approvals are not granted, this Vesting Tentative Tract Map a royal shall become null and void. 3. Fees. The Develo er shall a all a licable fees in effect at PW Zone 7 and 3 i~~ NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. SOURCE AGENCY the time of building permit issuance including, but not limited Public to, Planning fees, Building fees, Dublin San Ramon Services Facilities In- District fees, Public Facilities fees, Dublin Unified School Lieu Fees District School Impact fees, Public Works Traffic Impact fees, Due Prior to Alameda County Fire Services fees; Noise Mitigation fees, Filing a Final Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu fees; Alameda County Flood Map; Other and Water Conservation District (Zone 7) Drainage and Fees Water Connection fees; and any other fees unless otherwise Required with directed in the Development Agreement. Issuance of Building Permits 4. Indemnification. The Developer shall defend, indemnify, PW Public Works and hold harmless the City of Dublin and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Dublin or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Dublin or its advisory agency, appeal board, Planning Commission, City Council, Community Development Director, Zoning Administrator, or any other department, committee, or agency of the City related to this project to the extent such actions are brought within the time period required by Government Code Section 66499.37 or other applicable law; provided, however, that The Developer's duty to so defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall be subject to the City's promptly notifying The Developer of any said claim, action, or proceeding and the City's full cooperation in the defense of such actions or roceedin s. 5. Clarifications and Changes to the Conditions. In the event PW Public Works that there needs to be clarification to these Conditions of Approval, the City Engineer has the authority to clarify the intent of these Conditions of Approval to the Developer without going to a public hearing. The City Engineer also has the authority to make minor modifications to these conditions without going to a public hearing in order for the Developer to fulfill needed improvements or mitigations resulting from im acts of this ro'ect. 6. Tract Improvement Agreement. The Developer shall enter PW Public Works into a Tract Improvement Agreement with the City for all ublic im rovements re wired for the Tract. 7. Security. The Developer shall provide performance (100%), PW Public Works and labor & material (100%) securities to guarantee the tract improvements, approved by the City Engineer, prior to execution of the Tract Improvement Agreement and approval of the Final Map. (Note: Upon acceptance of the improvements, the performance security may be replaced with cone-year warranty bond that is 25% of the value of the erformance securit . 4 I NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. SOUR E AGENCY 8. Encroachment Permit. Developer shall obtain an PW Public Works Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for all construction activity within the public right-of-way of any street where the City has accepted the improvements. The encroachment permit may require surety for slurry seal and restriping. At the discretion of the City Engineer an encroachment for work specifically included in an Im rovement A reement ma not be re uired. 9. Permits. Developer shall obtain all permits required by other PW Public Works agencies including, but not limited to Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 7, California Department of Fish and Game, Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Caltrans and provide co ies of the ermits to the Public Works De artment. 10. Submittals. The Developer will be responsible for submittals PW Public Works and reviews to obtain the approvals of all participating non- City agencies. The Alameda County Fire Department and the Dublin San Ramon Services District shall approve and sign the Im rovement Plans. 11. Electronic Copy. Developer shall provide the Public Works PW Public Works Department a digital vectorized file of the "master" files for the project when the Final Map has been approved. Digital raster copies are not acceptable. The digital vectorized files shall be in AutoCAD 14 or higher drawing format. Drawing units shall be decimal with the precision of the Final Map. All objects and entities in layers shall be colored by layer and named in English. All submitted drawings shall use the Global Coordinate System of USA, California, NAD 83 California State Plane, Zone III, and U.S. foot. 12. Final Map. The Final Map shall be substantially in PW Public Works accordance with the Tentative Map approved with this a lication, unless otherwise modified b these conditions. 13. Dedications. All rights-of-way and easement dedications PW Public Works required by the Tentative Map shall be shown on the Final Ma . 14. Abandonment. The Developer shall obtain abandonment PW Public Works from all applicable public agencies of existing easements and ri ht of wa s that will no Ion er be used. 15. Grading Plan. The Grading Plan shall be in conformance PW Public Works with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report, the approved Tentative Map and Site Development Review, and the Cit desi n standards & ordinances. 16. Erosion Control Plan. A detailed Erosion Control Plan shall PW Public Works be included with the Grading Plan approval. The plan shall include detailed design, location, and maintenance criteria of all erosion and sedimentation control measures. 17. Tiebacks. Tiebacks or structural fabric for retainin walls PW Public Works 5 I~~ 1 NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. SOURCE AGENCY shall not cross property lines unless specifically approved by the Cit En ineer. 18. Notice of Intent. Prior to any clearing or grading, the PW Public Works Developer shall provide the City evidence that a Notice of Intent (NOI) has been sent to the California State Water Resources Control Board per the requirements of the NPDES. A copy of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be provided to the Public Works De artment and be ke tat the construction site. 19. SWPPP. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan PW Public Works (SWPPP) shall identify the Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to the project construction activities. The SWPPP shall include the erosion control measures in accordance with the regulations outlined in the most current version of the ABAG Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook or State Construction Best Management Practices Handbook. The Developer is responsible for ensuring that all contractors implement all storm water pollution prevention measures in the SWPPP. 20. Maintenance Agreement. The Homeowners' Association PW Public Works shall enter into an agreement with the City of Dublin that guarantees the perpetual maintenance obligation for all private storm water treatment measures installed as part of the project. Said agreement is required pursuant to Provision C.3.e.ii of RWQCB Order R2-2003-0021 for the issuance of the Alameda Countywide NPDES municipal storm water permit. Said permit requires the City to provide verification and assurance that all treatment devices will be properly o erated and maintained. CONSTRUCTION 21. Erosion Control Plan. The Erosion Control Plan shall be PW Public Works implemented between October 15th and April 15th unless otherwise allowed in writing by the City Engineer. The Developer will be responsible for maintaining erosion and sediment control measures for one year following the City's acce tance of the subdivision im rovements. 22. Archeological Materials. If archaeological materials are PW Public Works encountered during construction, construction within 100 feet of these materials shall be halted until a professional Archaeologist who is certified by the Society of California Archaeology (SCA) or the Society of Professional Archaeology (SOPA) has had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation measures. 23. Construction Hours. Construction activities, including the PW Public Works maintenance and warming of equipment, shall be limited to Monda throu h Frida ,and non-Cit holida s, between the 6 ~ NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. SOURCE AGENCY hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. except as otherwise a roved b the Cit En ineer. 24. Construction Noise Management Plan. Developer shall PW Public Works prepare a construction noise management plan that identifies measures to be taken to minimize construction noise on surrounding developed properties. Specific noise management measures shall be included in the project plans ands ecifications. 25. Construction Traffic. Developer shall prepare a plan for PW Public Works construction traffic interface with public traffic on any existing public street. Construction traffic and parking may be subject to s ecific re uirements b the Cit En ineer. 26. Rodents. The Developer shall be responsible for controlling PW Public Works any rodent, mosquito, or other pest problem due to construction activities. 27. Dust Control. The Developer shall be responsible for PW Public Works measures to control dust as conditions warrant or as directed b the Cit En ineer. "'PROJECT SPECIFIC 28. Public Facilities Fee. The developer shall pay a Public PW DA Facilities Fee in accordance with the terms of the project Development Agreement. The in-lieu land dedication portion of the fee will be due prior to the recording of the Final Map for Tract 7667. 29. Streetscape Design Standards. The streetscape design for PW Public Works Martinelli Drive, Iron Horse Parkway, Dublin Boulevard and Campus Drive shall be in accordance with the Streetscape Master Plan adopted as Ordinance No. 21-02 for the Dublin Transit Center Project, PA 00-013. In keeping with the streetscape design used for residential frontage throughout the Dublin Transit Center, the Campus Drive frontage shall contain landsca a islands in the arkin area. 30. Sidewalks: All public sidewalks shall have a 2% cross slope. PW Public Works The 2% cross slope shall be maintained for a minimum distance of one foot behind the sidewalks where there is landscaping, stairs, or pathway along the back of the sidewalk. Sidewalks shall be designed to maintain a 2% cross slope across all driveway entrances. The SE small plaza at the corner of Iron Horse Parkway and Dublin Blvd. may be graded to be less than 2% cross slope for an accessible plaza condition, however, all other sidewalk will meet 2% cross slo ere uirements. 31. Parking Restrictions. Developer shall designate no parking PW Public Works areas along Dublin Boulevard and Martinelli Drive and designate parking on Iron Horse Parkway and Campus Drive for 2-hour limit, 7 AM to 6 PM, Monda - Frida . 32. Laadin Areas. The Develo er shall make rovision for PW Public Works 7 NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. SOURCE AGENCY loadin areas to the satisfaction of the Cit En ineer. 33. Dublin Boulevard Frontage: The Developer shall install a PW Public Works landscape six-foot wide planter and asix-foot wide walk the full len th of the ro'ect fronta e alon Dublin Boulevard 34. Iron Horse Parkway: The Developer shall construct the PW Public Works project frontage improvements along the east frontage of Iron Horse Parkwa as enerall shown on the Tentative Ma . 35. Martinelli Way: The Developer shall construct the project PW Public Works frontage improvements along the north frontage of Martinelli Wa as enerall shown on the Tentative Ma . 36. Campus Drive: The Developer shall construct the PW Public Works improvements for the full width of Campus Drive, as shown on the Tentative Map, between Martinelli Way and Dublin Boulevard. Improvements to include frontage landscaping and sidewalk onl on the west side. 37. Dublin Boulevard Right Turn Lane: The Developer shall PW Public Works widen Dublin Boulevard to provide a right turn lane at Cam us Drive to the satisfaction of the Cit En ineer. 38. Traffic Signal: The Developer shall install the traffic signal PW Public Works at the Martinelli Way /Campus Drive intersection. The traffic signals shall be interconnected with other adjacent signals within the existin Cit traffic si nal s stem b hard wire. 39. Traffic Signing and Striping: The Developer shall install all PW Public Works traffic signs and pavement marking for the above roadway improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Campus Drive Parkway shall maintain one lane southbound and one lane northbound with a turn lane in the middle. 40. Martinelli Way Walkway: The Developer shall construct a PW Public Works temporary 5-foot wide, AC walkway along the south side of Martinelli Wa between Cam us Drive and Arnold Drive. 41. Phasing: All public improvements required by the PW Public Works Conditions of Approval for Tract 7667 must be constructed with the recording of the final map except that the adjacent public sidewalk and landscaping may be phased with the onsite im rovements on Lot 1 and Lot 2. 42. Water Quality Treatment: The CDS unit shown on the PW Public Works Tentative Map in Campus Drive north of Martinelli Way shall be installed in Campus Drive south of Martinelli Way. With the CDS unit south of Martinelli Way the bioretention filtration units (Filterra Units) shown onsite on the Tentative Map are not required to meet water quality treatment but may be installed in addition to the CDS at the Developer's option. The CDS unit in Campus Drive south of Martinelli Way will be within City right-of-way and treat drainage from the public streets and therefore will be owned and maintained by the Cit . 43. Construction Traffic and Parkin All construction related PW Public Works 8 ~~~~~~r1~~~- ~ NO. CONDITION TEXT RESP. SOURCE AGENCY parking shall be off street in an area provided by the Developer. Construction traffic and parking shall be provided in a manner approved by the City Engineer to minimize im act on Bart atrons. 44. Street Names. Any street names assigned to private streets PW Public Works shall be approved pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 7.08. The approved street names shall be indicated on the Final Ma . 45. Public Art Easement. The Final Map shall show that a PL, PCS Chapter 8.58 Public Art Easement will be provided on the corner of Iron of the Horse Parkway and Dublin Boulevard (as shown on the Municipal ro'ect Site Plan . Code 46. Public Art. The Project shall comply with the Public Art PL, PCS Amended requirement in the Amended Development Agreement Development a roved b the Cit Council for the Project Agreement 47. Future Transit Center Development Disclosure. The PL Planning Applicant/Developer shall create astand-alone disclosure for all buyers noting that future development immediately adjacent to the Project Site is expected to be high-density commercial development in accordance with the Dublin Transit Center Sta e 1 Develo ment Plan. 48. Transit Center Map. Prior to opening a sales center and/or PL Planning model home for the project, the Applicant/Developer shall post a map of the Transit Center in the sales center/model home that shows the maximum possible height of surroundin buildin s. The ma will be rovided b the Cit . 49. Garage Utilization. The Covenants, Codes, and PL PC Restrictions (CC&Rs) developed for the project shall include a requirement that the enclosed garage spaces are used for resident arkin . 50. CC&R Enforcement. Within the limits of the law, the PL PC CC&Rs developed for the project shall include a provision that the CC&Rs can be enforced by any resident as well as b the Homeowner's Association. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of August, 2010 by the following vote: AYES: King, Brown, Schaub, Swalwell, Wehrenberg NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 9 ~ ~ Pla Wing ommi sion Ch r ATTEST: Planning M nag G:\PA#\2009\PA 09-002 Site E-1\PC 08 24 2010\PC Att 4 - Reso TMAP.DOC l~ l~~f ~l c~ I~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. 10 - 39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AMENDMENT 1 TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DUBLIN TRANSIT CENTER SITE E-1 (ESPRIT AT DUBLIN STATION) APN 986-0034-011-00 PA 09-002 WHEREAS, a request has been made by Western Pacific Housing (doing business as D. R. Horton) ("Applicant") for approval of Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement for the property known as Dublin Transit Center Site E-1, an area of approximately 4.13 acres located the southeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and Iron Horse Parkway (PA 09-002); and WHEREAS, Development Agreements are required as an implementing measure of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, a Master Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center was adopted by Ordinance 5-03 in May 2003. The Master Development Agreement was then later amended by Ordinance 25-05, which set forth affordable housing obligations in the project area; and WHEREAS, the Applicant is party to the original Transit Center Site E-1 Development Agreement, which was adopted by Ordinance 5-06 in March 2006; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State Guidelines and City Environmental Regulations require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Staff has recommended that the project be found exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code section 65457 for residential projects that are consistent with a specific plan. The Project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Dublin Transit Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395) which was certified by City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. This recommendation is based on a determination that there are no supplemental impacts that would require preparation of a Supplemental EIR; and WHEREAS, the Applicant requests to amend the March 2006 Development Agreement for Dublin Transit Center Site E-1; and WHEREAS, the text of Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement is attached to this resolution as Exhibit A-1 to the accompanying City Council Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on the application on September 14, 2010; and 1 Attachment 11 ~f WHEREAS, proper notice of the public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the CEQA exemption, prior related environmental documents, and all above-referenced reports, recommendations, and testimony to evaluate the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Dublin Planning Commission does hereby make the following findings and determinations regarding Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1: 1. The Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan in that: a) the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan land use designation for the subject site is proposed to be Planned Development and that the proposed Site E-1 residential development is consistent with that designation; b) the project is consistent with the fiscal policies in relation to provision of infrastructure and public services of the City's Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan; c) the Agreement sets forth the rules the Developer and City will be governed by during the development process which is required by the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and the Mitigation Monitoring Program of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. 2. The Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use districts in which the real property is located in that the project approvals include amended Planned Development Rezone, Site Development Review and Vesting Tentative Maps. 3. The Agreement is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice in that the Developer's project will implement land use guidelines set forth in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan and the Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Development Plan. 4. The Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare in that the development will proceed in accordance with the Agreement and any Conditions of Approval for the Project. 5. The Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of the property or the preservation of property values in that the development will be consistent with the City of Dublin Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission, for the reasons set forth in the findings in the attached draft Ordinance, recommends that the City Council approve the Ordinance attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, which Ordinance adopts Amendment 1 to the Development Agreement for the Dublin Transit Center Site E-1 (PA 09-002). Page 2 of 3 1~~~1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of September, 2010. AYES: King, Swalwell, Wehrenberg NOES: ABSENT: Brown, Schaub ABSTAIN: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Manager G:IPA#120091PA 09-002 Site E-11PC 09 14 20101PC Att 2 - Reso DA.DOC Page 3 of 3