Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 7.2 Passatempo Park - Sorrento Eastor 19 82 /ii � 111 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL June 19, 2012 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Joni Pattillo City Manager""' CITY CLERK File #290 -30 Conceptual Park Design for Passatempo Park Prepared by Rosemary Alex, Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 2010 -2015 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes funding for the design and construction of Passatempo Park. As part of the design process, Staff is seeking City Council approval on the preferred Conceptual Park Design for the 5.1 acre park located in the Sorrento East Development. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Engineers estimate for the Park, as designed, is $1,749,590 which is within the available budget of $1,803,464 and is funded through Public Facility Fees. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the presentation from Staff and the Consultant, approve the preferred Conceptual Park Design, and authorize the Consultant to proceed with preparation of construction documents. Submitted B Reviewed By Director of Parkland Assistant City Manager Community Services DESCRIPTION: In 2007, preliminary design work on the neighborhood park in the Sorrento East Development was initiated and the Italian word for Pastime, "Passatempo ", was selected for the park name by the City Council. Shortly thereafter, design work was suspended due to the slowdown in housing starts surrounding the proposed park site. The Sorrento East Development is bounded by Gleason Drive to the north, Central Parkway on the south, and is to the immediate west of Kolb Elementary School and Fallon Sports Park (Attachment 1). The original land plan for the development has changed since 2007 resulting in Page 1 of 3 ITEM NO. 7.2 a slight reconfiguration to the park site that required a redesign of the initial concepts. As part of the 2010 -2015 Capital Improvement Program the City Council authorized the re- initiation of design of Passatempo Park and, on March 6, 2012, the City Council approved a new Agreement with Callander Associates Landscape Architecture (Callander Associates) to provide design services. The first of three public meetings for the park design was conducted on April 26, 2012 in one of the model homes adjacent to the future park site. Fifteen community members were in attendance. Callander Associates presented three design alternatives as shown in Attachment 1. The consultants received input and questionnaire responses from the attendees. Following the meeting, Staff posted the three alternatives, along with the questionnaire, at the sales offices of the three home builders. After posting over the weekend, two additional survey questionnaires were completed for a total of 16. Based on first public meeting input and all completed questionnaires, Option C Natural Systems was the overall preferred design. As part of the process, participants were asked to show their preference on a number of the park elements the top five preferences are as follows: #1 Shade Trees #1 Shade Structure #3 Play Areas #4 Passive Seating #5 Sensory Garden A second workshop was held in conjunction with the Parks and Community Services Commission Meeting on May 21, 2012. In preparation for this meeting, the Consultant incorporated the results of the first public meeting and questionnaire into the Design Development Plan for the Natural Systems open as shown in Attachment 2. After receiving public comment, the Parks and Community Services Commission unanimously recommended approval to the City Council of the Design Development Plan for the Natural Systems Option and recommended the City modify the play area to incorporate elements similar to what was shown in Option A — Planetary Theme. Preferred Conceptual Park Design The Preferred Conceptual Park Design (Attachment 3) is a result of comments from both public meetings and the site surveys. As shown in Attachment 3, the preferred conceptual design incorporates the oval circulation shape along with elements from all three concepts. The designers approached the concept of Natural Systems on a broader scale and included a sensory garden, a stream bed, and elements from astronomy and geology in the play area. The primary refinements occurred in the plaza, play area and the stream bed, which was relocated to better align with existing grades. The plaza acts as the `headwaters' and the stream (blue resilient surfacing) runs through a portion of the play area with boulders transitioning into the seasonal bio- swale. In addressing the comments from the Parks and Community Services Commission, the play area surfacing has been revised and includes primary elements from the solar system and a sundial has been incorporated into plaza. The sensory garden from Option B has been incorporated into the north side of the plaza and the vineyards along eastern property line have been expanded. Shade trees and the shade structure have been included in the plaza area to provide shade at picnic areas as well as higher use areas. Page 2 of 3 Upon City Council approval of the preferred Conceptual Park Design, the Consultant will initiate the development of construction documents. The remaining schedule for the project is as follows: • Construction Documents July 2012 — December 2012 • Bidding and Award January 2013 — February 2013 • Construction and Plant Establishment March 2013 — Winter 2014 NOTICING REQUIREMENTS /PUBLIC OUTREACH: Residents within the geographic neighborhood around the park site were notified via mail for both public meetings. In addition, people that had signed contracts for future home purchases were notified of the public meetings. A copy of this Staff Report was provided to the Parks and Community Services Commission as well as those in attendance at the public meetings. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Context; Option A — Planetary; Option B — Sensory; and Option C - Natural Systems 2. Design Development Plan presented to the Parks and Community Services Commission 3. Preferred Conceptual Design Page 3 of 3 W 0 r_ �O N 7a Y O 0 Z a ° �p O p w ¢ a � a z ~ w o Q w 0= 2E I 2E N Z o LA m g > a ° LL m Ob NOIIVJ NOS.,no 15 NOIJVN9 r a 4A e Q 0 w Y �O Z 7a 2i O OF Z Q �p O p w ¢ N w 2E 0 w - 0 Z D z LU G U Q 4—J X C--,e O� V� ^O /1 9 NNg •�� O v 0 `� J R ' .z fit. i� f a a N Z 5W G U Q Q O z z o < z < I z z z N z J U Q Y ^ jj i V 133!115 NOSdW OHl33l - � a-J O z a--+ w Z O ¢ J r w V ~ Z N a J R V Qo J F ¢ Q Z a Z z J o� _z Z F o Q O O m O F ¢ a 0 �2E a w Q A h k� Y` k } i O Q a I Z U,3 < z 0 z } p 2 Q k Q ¢ n a Q F N Q F Q D i � J m � rc a w Q M Z W 75 2 U Q Q L O V O -J 0— O I'1 W 4-J i7-) L }+ O 0-0- Vary � o O N °° VaQV O F ID OZ ¢ = l7 w m Z ¢ ¢ J O } J ¢ F w ^ u w w } w J a ¢ w w w w w F Z Z 0 Q Z w OV OV Uv Z ^ I Z U,3 < z 0 z } p 2 Q k Q ¢ n a Q F N Q F Q D i � J m � rc a w Q M Z W 75 2 U Q Q L O V O -J 0— O I'1 W 4-J i7-) L }+ O 0-0- Vary � o O N °° VaQV s -- n 0 w O ¢ El 6-7 ¢ ¢ G - o-� ' ill Ln E 4J a--+ Ln � z y 4-j V) 2Dr 4-J 0 0-o Q V vN Off_ 11 Va e$a�+•' AL P Ln E 4J a--+ Ln � z y 4-j V) 2Dr 4-J 0 0-o Q V vN Off_ 11 Va 1 1 w I f ■ Iii � � ��• •„ `�. '�g� ISM SO V� � CL ^ W o L Q � 0 5 N N a } Q 0 2 W K J Q a M - .! 1 r II , ` 3F v� i} a ��• tic- � } �i s,7 l i R b Z ¢ mow`^ m Z w w H Q H Q Q N H Q J Q Zw ¢ J w H 7Sz V [C 1' Q �Q W w K vl vlal7 m H V1m d Z V1 V a0 Q z 5W 2 U Q Q z Z w w ~ < Q 0 0 w C) vl < O z a G J z 0 o r Z v7i > ¢ � ! } K z J 0 W = ~ _ w u uV w Z 4 y. w . i R b Z ¢ mow`^ m Z w w H Q H Q Q N H Q J Q Zw ¢ J w H 7Sz V [C 1' Q �Q W w K vl vlal7 m H V1m d Z V1 V a0 Q z 5W 2 U Q Q