Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-28-1991 Adopted CC MinutesREGULA~ MEETING - January 28, 1991 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin was held on Monday, January 28, 1991, in the Council Chambers of the Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m., by Mayor Snyder. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers Burton, Howard, Jeffery, Moffatt and Mayor Snyder. ABSENT: None. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Mayor led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. PROCLAMATION - CARL SPRINGER (610-50) Mayor Snyder presented a proclamation and pen to Carl Springer honoring him for his service on the Planning Commission during 1990. INTRODUCTION OF NEW PLANNING COMMISSIONER (420-40) Cm. Howard introduced her appointment to the Planning Commission, Lee North, who has lived in the community for over 24 years. He has worked for AT&T for over 38 years and will be retiring in July. He also served as an officer in the military reserves. Mr. North was formerly on the Senior Center Advisory Committee. Request for City Recognition - Ilene Misheloff (580-90) Sandie Hart addressed the Council and advised that she whole heartily supported the yellow ribbon campaign in support of our troops which the Council would be considering later in the meeting. Two years ago, yellow ribbons were displayed in the community as a symbol that one of our own had been kidnapped. Ms. Hart advised that there will be a candlelight walk on Wednesday night along the route where Ilene Misheloff was last seen. The walk will end at St. Raymond's Church where there will be a service. She urged the City Councilmembers to participate and indicated that she would further like to see something permanent placed in the community as a reminder that we haven't forgotten the Misheloff family and are awaiting Ilene's return. She suggested a plaque with yellow ribbons or perhaPs planting a tree with a plaque. Ms. Hart requested that this item be placed on a future agenda for consideration. * * * * CM- VOL 10 - 21 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 CONSENT CALENDAR On motion of Cm. Moffatt, seconded by Cm. JefferY, and by unanimous vote, the Council took the following actions: Approved Minutes of Joint City Council/Planning Commission East Dublin Study Session of December 18, 1990, and Regular Meeting of January 14, 1991; Authorized Staff to submit application materials for funding (60' baseball field @ the Sports Grounds) through the Lucky Stores/Oakland A's Youth Baseball Fields Program (260-30); Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 8 - 91 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT (600-40) WITH DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR DUBLIN HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL FIELD & GIRLS ATHLETIC FIELD RENOVATION Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 9 - 91 ESTABLISHING A NO PARKING ZONE ON DUBLIN BOULEVARD WEST OF CIVIC PLAZA (590-20) Authorized the Planning Director to attend the American Planning Association National Planning Conference March 23-27, 1991, in New Orleans, LA (710-20); Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 10 - 91 ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 5074 IMAGES, AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS (600-60) and authorized Staff to accept a maintenance bond at a future date; Accepted the Finance Report (330-50) for Period Ending December 31, 1990; Approved Warrant Register in the amount of $494,375.72. fl · · · PUBLIC HEARING SPEED LIMIT ON DUBLIN BOULEVARD (590-20) Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing. Public Works Director Thompson advised that this is the second reading of a proposed Ordinance which would establish a speed limit of 35 mph on Dublin Boulevard from Donlon Way through the Silvergate Drive intersection, and 40 mph on Dublin Boulevard from the westerly side of CM - VOL 10 - 22 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 the Silvergate Drive intersection to the westerly City Limit. This will enable the City to use radar for enforcement. Proposed signing would include a 25 mph curve warning sign on the sweeping curve from Dublin Boulevard onto Silvergate Drive, as has been discussed previously, and standard 40 mph speed limit signs west of Silvergate Drive. No comments were made by members of the public on this issue. Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous vote, the Council waived the reading and adopted ORDINANCE NO. 2 - 91 ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON DUBLIN BOULEVARD PUBLIC HEARING PASSENGER LOADING ZONE ON AMARILLO ROAD @ NIELSEN SCHOOL (590-50) Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing. Public Works Director Thompson advised that on December 10, 1990, the Council adopted a ResolutiOn which establishes short no-pa~king zones adjacent to the school driveways for visibility and establishes an on- street handicapped parking space in front of the school. The Council also introduced an Ordinance which would establish a passenger loading zone along the frontage of the school. In January, Staff learned that Nielsen School plans to begin a daycare program in the near future, and that parents dropping off children at the daycare center would be required to escort the children to the door of the facility. Vehicle Code regulations pertaining to passenger loading zones do not permit a driver to leave the vehicle. Staff contacted Diane Griffiths, Principal, who felt that the majority of parents using the daycare center would drop off children between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. and pick them up between 5:00 and 6:00 p.m., and that the parents would be able to use the parking lot at those times of day. Ms. Griffiths suggested that the time specified on the passenger loading zone signing be 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., on school days only. Mr. Thompson explained that the existing passenger loading zone north of the driveway specifies an 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. time frame. In order to avoid confusion and enforcement problems, Staff recommended that both the new and existing passenger loading zones reflect the same times. Cm. Moffatt questioned the time that the kids get out of school. CM - VOL 10 - 23 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 Mr. Thompson advised that the times are staggered, but they are all out by 3:30 p.m. Beth Adolph stated the parents are willing to accept this ordinance, but indicated they would like to have it considered on a trial basis. She thanked the City Council for the addition of the crossing guard. Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing. On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous vote, the Council waived the reading and INTRODUCED an Ordinance establishing passenger loading zones on Amarillo Road. PUBLIC HEARING ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE @ 7416 BRIGHTON DRIVE (640-70) Mayor Snyder opened the public hearing. Building Official Taugher who was sworn in, entered testimony and advised that there are 5 buildings on the old Murray School District offices site next to Kolb Park. The owner is Brighton Meadows 89, a California Limited Partnership. A Tentative Map for Tract 5616, a 17 lot subdivision has been approved. Mr. Taugher advised that in the past year, the City has had many complaints regarding the condition of the buildings. In response to written requests, the owners have attempted to secure the buildings to prevent unauthorized entry, but these attempts have proven inadequate. Mr. Taugher stated it is his opinion that the buildings have been damaged so as to become an attractive nuisance to children, a harbor for vagrants and criminals, and to enable persons to resort thereto for the purpose of committing unlawful acts as set forth in Section 7.28.050 K of the Dublin Municipal Code. The buildings are also a fire hazard as set forth in Section 7.28.050 O. Mr. Taugher recommended that the nuisance be demolished and that the buildings and trash be removed from the property. He recommended that the demolition and removal begin in 30 days and be completed in 45 days. If the owner fails to comply with the abatement order, the Building Official shall be authorized to cause the abatement to be completed and costs recovered from the property owner. Mr. Taugher advised that he met a representative of the owner by accident on the property. Slides taken during an inspection made on January 9, 1991 were shown. Cm. Burton stated the buildings appear to be relocatable and questioned why the owner had not done something with the buildings. CM - VOL 10 - 24 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 Cm. Jeffery stated she thought that when they were moved there, they were told that this was the last time they could be moved. Mr. Taugher stated that it appears that the owner has procrastinated, perhaps because of economic conditions. No members of the public entered testimony related to this issue. Mayor Snyder closed the public hearing. Cm. Moffatt asked.if the owner of the property was present. Mr. Taugher responded that he was not. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote, the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 11 - 91 ORDERING ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE AT 7416 BRIGHTON DRIVE COMMUNITY PROFILE BROCHURE (150-30) Senior Planner Carrington presented a draft of the proposed Community Profile Brochure which was designed to.provide potential businesses and new residents with a brief and attractive information brochure emphasizing the benefits of locating in the City of Dublin. The draft text is oriented to a variety of target markets with an emphasis on small businesses and households. Mr. Carrington explained that costs for 5,000 copies would be approximately $4,400. These would be distributed over a 2-year period by both the City and the Chamber of Commerce. Cm. Jeffery complimented Staff on the brochure which gets together exactly what we need. Under History & Size, Cm. Jeffery suggested that the population statement be made first and then work in the rest of the information. Under Civic Center, she felt that we should remove mention of the architectural firm and use the space to discuss fine arts, meeting rooms, etc. Under Climate, she felt that people want to know what you mean by mild summer daytime temperatures. We should put, temperatures generally range from x degrees to x degrees. Under Parks and Recreation, there should be a statement that we have quite a few organized youth groups. On the map, we should include Pleasanton and San Ramon, because of Dublin being situated between 2 major business parks. This will ultimately bring in business to us. Cm. Burton stated he felt Staff had done a good job. Under the Welcome to Dublin section, instead of saying we have an excellent education system, we should indicated that we have our own Dublin Unified School District. Under Education and Library, it was pointed CM - VOL 10 - 25 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 out that we indicate the high school has received academic excellence. Also, the map does not indicate where BART will be and Cm. Burton felt this will be a significant item in the cOming years. Under Education, Cm. Howard stated she would like to say that Dublin High School is a California Distinguished Award winning school. Mr. Ambrose pointed out that this is already in the text. Cm. Moffatt felt the brochure looked good. Under Location/Transporta- tion/Access, he felt it should be Pointed out that there is a local transportation system within Dublin. He also felt that BART should be included on the map. Mayor Snyder asked what the cutoff date was for publication. Mr. Carrington responded that there really is no cutoff time. Once we submit it for typesetting, however, the more changes we made, the more the costs we will incur. He had hoped to finalize another proof within the next couple of weeks, with printing in late February. Cm. Burton questioned how this brochure will be used. Mr. Carrington stated that they will be mailed by. the Chamber of Commerce on request, the City will distribute it at various forums, the City Manager's Office will be mailing some, and businesses that are interested in locating here could request them. Cm. Burton stated the quantity of 5,000 didn't seem like!<many. Cm. Jeffery stated Lafayette uses 5,000 per year, and felt that this should be considered a 1-year project. Cm. Burton felt that if you plan for general use, this quantity won't last long. Mr. Ambrose advised that the City would plan to update it next year. Mr. Carrington advised that Staff will come back with a revised brochure at the next Council meeting. ANNUAL ST. PATRICK'S DAY CELEBRATION (950-40) Recreation Supervisor O'Shea advised that the'Eighth Annual St. Patrick's Day Celebration is scheduled for Saturday, March 16, 1991. The Dublin-San Ramon Lions Club plan to sponsor a parade; the City's Recreation Department will sponsor a community celebration; and the Dublin Sister City Association will sponsor a dinner/dance. The proposed parade r6ute is the same as has been successfully utilized for the past 3 years. CM - VOL 10 - 26 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 The celebration will begin immediately following the parade and typically runs from 10:30 a.m.. to 4:00 p.m. In past years, the celebration has been held at Shannon Park and Community Center, the Civic Center, Dublin High School and Dublin Place Shopping Center. On December 10, 1990, the Council considered a proposal from the Chamber of Commerce to expand the scope of the St. Patrick's Day celebration to involve more of the business community. One suggested method to increase business participation was to have the celebration at the Dublin Place Shopping Center and invite businesses to sponsor booths. It was determined, however, that there was not sufficient time to coordinate an expanded event for the 1991 celebration. Ms. O'Shea advised that the Dublin Place Shopping Center is interested in having the celebration there, and the Chamber has asked that the Council give consideration to this location. The 1990 celebration was held at the Civic Center and was well received by both participants and those in attendance. The Sister City Association will host a traditional corned beef and cabbage dinner followed by a dance at the Shannon Community Center. Additionally, the Citizen and Organization of the Year will be formally recognized at the dinner/dance. Ms. O'Shea advised that preliminary cost estimates for the celebration total $8,230. Cm. Moffatt questioned if any of the Dublin Place merchants group were present, since the Chamber of Commerce has asked that the Council give consideration to holding the event at this shopping center. JoEllen McKinsey indicated that they have discussed doing this but felt there was a lack of time for planning. She was not aware of any contact with the merchants. Don Johnson stated he was not aware of any problems. The Chamber of Commerce would like to have it held in the downtown area, since you have a captive audience after the Parade. He felt there would be greater participation and the groups involved would have greater benefit. The Dublin Place Shopping Center would be an ideal location. It would also be easy to expand on this location in the future. He indicated he was referring to the area between Target and Montgomery Wards. Cm. Moffatt expressed concern that Target and Wards might come out and say we are taking away parking space. Cm. Jeffery advised that Nancy Feeley contacted whoever is in charge of this area and they said yes they would like to have the event in this area. Ms. McKinsey stated the businesses themselves have indicated they would like to do something. ', OM - VOL 10 - 27 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 Cm. Burton stated he would like to go with the shopping center location, but questions couldn't be answered. He felt that Staff and the shopping center should have something in writing. On motion of Cm. Burton,· seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote, the Council approved the parade route and authorized issuance of the parade permit. Cm. Burton suggested continuing the portion related to location. Written information should be submitted for Council approval. Cm. Jeffery stated she felt it would be benefiCial to businesses to have the celebration downtown and suggested that the Council approve this conditioned upon receipt of something in writing. The Dublin Place Shopping Center location would be subject to approval of the stores, the landlord, property owners and anchor tenants. Mr. Ambrose advised that there have been problems in the past with stores complaining about the parade route. Cm. Moffatt asked what percentage of approval of business areas would be required. Cm. Jeffery stated there is an organization called the Dublin Place Shopping Center. We should get the approval of that organization. Nancy Feeley has already talked to them and they indicated they would like to have the event there. cm. Moffatt asked if the businesses have any say. On motion of Cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous vote, the Council gave Staff direction to get written permission of the Dublin Place land owner and association to hold the function in that place and if we don't get permission, then proceed with the Civic Center location. Cm. Moffatt advised that he was still concerned about businesses. the majority don't want it, then we are not helping them. If Cm. Burton asked if there was some kind of a contract we would need in order to hold the function on their property. City Attorney Silver advised that Staff will look into this. Mr. Ambrose stated he would make sure the City is adequately protected. CM - VOL 10 - 28 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 CITY SUPPORT OF TROOPS STATIONED IN MIDDLE EAST (520-30) Assistant to the City Manager Texeira advised that the City has received a number of telephone calls from concerned residents related to a City-sponsored "Yellow Ribbon Campaign" and a City-sponsored blood drive. Ms. Texeira advised that the City maintenance crew could arrange to install yellow ribbons along City medians and sidewalks. The City would allow private parties and/or volunteer groups to install yellow ribbons on private property (with the permission of the property owner). A local florist has offered to donate yellow ribbon and thus, costs associated with placement would be approximately $420. With regard to a City-sponsored blood drive, Ms. Texeira advised that Staff contacted the Blood Bank of Alameda Contra Costa Medical Association (ACCMA), which Offers blood center donations in Oakland, Newark and Pleasant Hill. According to a representative of ACCMA, 2 upcoming BlOod Mobile Drives are scheduled in the Tri-Valley area. A driVe is scheduled in Dublin on February 2nd, and a drive is scheduled in Pleasanton on February 14th. Cm. Howard asked if City Staff will put the ribbons up. Mayor Snyder stated that the Staff Report indicated that the City would install them in the public right-of-way. Mr. Ambrose advised that we don't want private people running across the street installing them. Cm. Howard asked if the City could get banners. Mayor Snyder indicated that the Public Works Staff investigated the possibility of putting banners up where we display the St. Patrick's banners and holiday banners. One of the manufacturers we use will have a new style of banner available later this week similar to a flag. The actual product would be available in 3-4 weeks. The cost to purchaSe and install these banners at all 24 available locations would be about $8,000. This is obviously an important time in all our lives. The banners could be used on the 4th of July as well as other times in the community. Cm. Moffatt asked if, rather than having 24, would it be appropriate to place them at the entrances to the City or the entrance of the business area. Perhaps we could get by with about 6 instead of 24. Cm. Burton stated that obviously all the other cities in the valley have gotten into the yellow ribbons and why not use the red, white and blue instead in Dublin. He felt it was important to go on record as supporting our servicemen and yellow ribbons are an accepted means of doing this. He was not sure how long the ribbons would last, however. CM - VOL 10 - 29 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 Cm. Howard felt that banners would not be wasted as we could use them at other times of the year. We could place them at the main intersections only. Mayor Snyder questioned the locations of the brackets which would hold the banners. Mr. Thompson advised that they are on Dublin Boulevard, San Ramon Road, Amador Valley Boulevard and Village Parkway; mostly in the downtown commercial area. Cm. Jeffery pointed out that the purpose is to show support and the yellow ribbons do this. If you take it into red, white and blue flags, you are changing the statement somewhat. Mayor Snyder agreed that you start to get into personal philosophy and situations of what means what. Cm. Moffatt stated everyone is in agreement with supporting the policies of the United States. The majority of people are interested in having some type of visual means of depicting this support on behalf of the City. On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous vote, the Council agreed to sponsor a City "Yellow Ribbon Campaign" with associated costs of $420. Cm. Burton stated he would like to justify doing a little more since this is a short term use. George Zika stated obviously the war will be over shortly. If we use the yellow ribbons and decorate our City entrance signs, it will be appropriate. Lyn Dinelli stated she supports the yellow ribbon drive and thought this represents bringing POW's home. She felt that a compromise could be reached on the flags. They could be used for other occasions. We spend money on other things and it isn't that much money to express our opinions during this important time. There is'a lot of community spirit and it makes us all feel like a family. Karen Seals stated she definitely supports the yellow ribbon campaign. Youth in the community would love to show their support by putting these up. They would like to decorate the trees in the City's parks. She has a brother in Saudi Arabia. If you drive the streets of Dublin, you can't go a block without seeing a flag. The majority of Dublin people are in support of our troops. She would like to see flags around town, if just to show Camp Parks how much we support them. Ms. Texeira pointed out that the cost to purchase additional yellow ribbon was not included in the Staff Report. CM - VOL 10 - 30 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 City Attorney Silver advised that the item listed on the agenda for discussion is very specific and related only to the placement of yellow ribbons with no mention of flags or banners. Therefore, it was not appropriate for the Council to discuss the flag situation, unless the Council determined that it should be added to the agenda. It could, however, be added to a future agenda. Cm. Jeffery felt that banners will probably be several weeks in production anyway. Cm. Burton felt the City should check for other sources. Mr. Ambrose pointed out that another issue would be the purchasing ordinance. Depending on the proposal, certain findings have to be made in order to waive the terms of the purchasing ordinance. Any actual purchase approval should be made at a subsequent meeting, properly noticed. Cm. Moffatt requested that the Council agree to put this on the next meeting agenda. He also would like to see a resolution presented to Major Cook at Camp Parks, so that individuals going through on their way to the Mid-East can see that the City of Dublin is in support of their endeavors. A sample resolution was distributed which was prepared by the City of Vista. Cm. Burton indicated he picked this up at the League of CA Cities conference and felt that it is important to go on record in support. Cm. Howard stated she is sending a letter to the troops from the City Council and asked each Councilmember who wanted to be a part of this to sign the letter. Mayor Snyder stated that it would be appropriate to have the letter distributed by Staff. Cm. Moffatt asked if we had a list of the individuals serving that live in Dublin. Mayor Snyder stated the Herald is accumulating names, at this time and this seems to be as good a method as any to consolidate the list. He was not aware of any better list available at this time. By consensus, the Council requested that flags, banners and a Resolution be agendiZed for discussion at the February 11, 1991, Council meeting. With regard to the blood drive, Mayor Snyder stated the Council encouraged people to participate in one of the upcoming blood drives. Emotions are running high and it is difficult to deal with the whole issue; however, with healthy discussion, we can come to a resolution. Several people have called and requested that the City be involved. The actiOn tonight is to show support for the troops rather than a particular philosophy. * * * · CM - VOL 10 - 31 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 BAY VISION 2020 REVIEW DRAFT REPORT (420-50) City Manager Ambrose advised that the Bay Vision Commission was formed in 1989 for the purpose of examining ways in which the Bay Area is growing in population and changing in character, and to prepare a general vision for the Bay Area in the year 2020, with recommended measures to achieve that vision. Mr. Ambrose pointed out that it was Staff's understanding that the formation of this Commission was NOT initially proposed to the cities and counties in the 9 Bay Area County area to sanction its formation or work program. The Bay Vision 2020 commission has requested that interested parties review the draft report and comment during the months of January and February, 1991. Staff understands that the Commission intends to prepare a final report which will be sent to the Governor and the State Legislature for further action. Mr. Ambrose discussed the general principles espoused by the Commission which indicates growth needs to be managed and development should be encouraged in some areas and discouraged in others. The Commission supports increasing population and development density to emphasize and support public transit. The Commission supports: 1) the establishment of State growth management policies and the development of State financing mechanisms for schools, transportation systems, and other infrastructure; 2) a new regional government responsible for growth management, which would initially consist of Bay Area Air Quality Management District, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and the Association of Bay Area Governments; and 3) requiring local government planningiand decision making to be in conformity with State and regional growth management plans and policies. Mr. Ambrose discussed the findings and conclusions of the Commission and identified goals to maintain the well-being of the Bay Area. These included discussion related to: the Land Urban Areas and Open Space; the Air; Water Management; Housing; Transportation; our Cities and their Residents; the Economy; and Governing the Region. The Commission recommends the creation of a new 9-County Regional Commission which would combine the functions of the Bay Area Quality Management District, the MTC and ABAG. The Commission suggests that other agencies, such as the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Bay ConServation Development Commission, and other single-purpose agencies operating on issues of regional concern (such as waste management), could be added at a later date. Mr. Ambrose pointed out that the report discusses the responsibilities which the Commission would have during the initial planning period. These include administration of the air quality laws, transportation programs, regional "fair housing" programs and other legally mandated responsibilities of ABAG, and preparation of a regional plan which would set standards for meeting regional needs. CM - VOL 10 - 32 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 Once completed, all local agencies and governmental units would be required to bring their general plans into conformity with the regional plan. The Commission recommends that for the initial 4-year period, the governing board be appointed and that each of t.he 9 counties represented have at least 1 representative, and that larger areas should have representation based on population. Half of the members of the governing board should represent local government, and half should be chosen from the public at large. The Commission suggests that these board members be paid for their work. Alternatives for appointments contained in the report were discussed. Mr. Ambrose reviewed and discussed Dublin's analysis of the report and advised that Staff took issue with several of the findings. In summary, he was not convinced that we have had the input necessary. The ABAG Executive Board is pushing this. The ABAG General Assembly will consider this at their March 15th meeting. Copies of Willie Brown's AB 3 were distributed. This bill is a follow up to last years bill related to regional government. Mayor Snyder referred to correspondence dated January 22nd to the Chairperson of Bay Vision 2020 Commission related to the various votes identified. Major cities such as.San Francisco, Oaklan~!~.and San Jose automatically have 2 votes each, as well as the County BOards of Supervisors. Small cities are represented in the smaller votes. He felt it was unfair to conceptually adOpt this play without feedback from the cities. He felt that 90% of the elected officials in the Bay Area have no knowledge of what this plan can do. It is important to take a stand and let them understand our feelings. Cm. Burton questioned if we reject it, what will be the most effective way for us to approach this. Instead of making suggestions, perhaps we should just say it's off the wall. He understands that we have regional problems, but cities have really been blitzed with this. He was concerned with what this power grab really is. Mayor Snyder stated we have to comment on individual sections and the plan as a whole both through ABAG and Bay Vision 2020. Cm. Jeffery felt the Council should encompass all of Staff's comments. She felt that because Sacramento has some monumental problems to deal with this year, this issue will be too hot to handle. The plan definitely needs input from all levels of government. We should very strongly advise them that we don't want them to plan our area, but we will welcome their suggestions and input. Cm. Moffatt felt that any suggestions sent, we should provide a carbon copy to our State Legislators in Sacramento. Mayor Snyder stated the whole goal of this is to take the place of AB 3 which was formerly AB 4242. It will keep coming back and he stated he would rather see something adopted which we have a chance to CM - VOL 20 - 33 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 plan ourselves. legislation. If this report is done, it will become the basis for Cm. Jeffery expressed concern that if money is funnelled through this group, we will never see it. Mr. AmbroSe advised that if they develop a General Regional Plan and your plan is not in conformance, you won't get any funding. There is no other layer of government that would have such power and yet is unaccountable to the people. Mayor Snyder requested that each Councilmember provide comments to Staff prior to Tuesday, February 5th in order that Staff can then prepare a draft response which can be agendized at the February llth City Council meeting. He stated he hopes that every city in the Bay Area will respond with a lot of comments. This has very very serious implications for our community. REQUEST TO CONSIDER FORMATION OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (110-20) City Manager Ambrose advised that Councilmember Burton has requested that the City Council consider sponsorship of a Business Development Commission designed to develop positive programs to enhance existing retail businesses and to attract new businesses. Staff presented a brief summary of actions taken by the City to date to enhance and improve the City's business sector. These included many capital improvement projects to beautify the downtown, improve circulation, and City and street identification. A Community Profile Brochure will be printed in the near future. The City contributes funding to the Chamber map which is also used for promotional purposes. Staff has been developing information and will be presenting a report to the Council in March addressing the feasibility of developing a local Economic Development Program. The City currently participates in the Alameda Countywide Economic Development Program. In addition, a number of tasks have been completed which were identified in the Downtown Specific Plan which was adopted in 1987. In summary, Mr. Ambrose advised that since the basic purpose of Cm. Burton's proposal to enhance and promote our existing business community and attract new business is somewhat similar to the Downtown Specific Plan's objectives, the Council may wish to consider forming a task force to develop recommendations for the City Council regarding how these objectives might best be accomplished and to consider whether the strategies within the Downtown Specific Plan are still viable. Cm. Burton stated he felt it important to recognize retail businesses which are making a good part of our lifestyle possible. We should be doing something to give them a more positive influence. He is not proposing an economic development committee, but rather a retail committee. The objective is to put retail people on a commission. He discussed the possible composition of a commission and indicated that VOL 10 - 34 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 they would not be a Planning Commission, but rather could bring forth ideas. We should have an idea by budget time of how much this would cost and it could be included in the budget. If you have people on a commission, they feel it is an important function. The City's business people feel we could use something like this. It could be a sounding board for the City Council and a resource for City Staff. Cm. Moffatt stated he felt this was a great idea in concept and if you look at some of the objectives, they are positive and would be great for the City. However, he did foresee some problems. As an example, he asked how many businesses are members of the Chamber of Commerce and questioned what would happen to those that are not members. He also questioned what residents will get out of this expenditure of City money. Cm. Burton responded that hopefully, they will get a better area for shopping. Cm. Moffatt stated he felt a task force or committee would be better. He pointed out that the Brown Act would need to be considered in addition to the various forms which must be completed by a commission. Mayor Snyder suggested that he and Cm. Burton, 2 members of the Chamber of Commerce and 2 business people sit down and talk about some of these things. Cm. Burton indicated this was fine. Cm- Jeffery stated she would go along with this, but did~ not agree with a commission concept at this time. Mayor Snyder stated we don't want to lose site of the Downtown Specific Plan objectives. Mr. Ambrose advised that a committee on which Mayor Snyder and Cm. Burton sit will be subject to the Brown Act and agendas will need to be published. On motion of cm. Burton, seconded by Cm. Howard, and by unanimous vote, the Council agreed to form a group to discuss this which will consist of Mayor Snyder, Cm. Burton, 2 members of the Chamber of Commerce and 2non-Chamber member business people. OTHER BUSINESS San Ramon Liaison Meeting (610-80) Mr. Ambrose advised that the City of San Ramon had called and advised that they needed to reschedule the liaison meeting which was scheduled for February 11, 1991. CM - VOL 10 - 35 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 Budget (state & County) 330-80 Mr. Ambrose advised that the Alameda County Administrator recently sent a letter to the President of the City Management Association advising that the Board of Supervisors approved implementation of the Property Tax Administration and Jail Booking Fees. The City's share of the Property Tax Administration Fees will be handled as a tax transfer to the County and will be reflected in each cities' property tax apportionment for FY 90-91. Billing for Jail Booking Fees is targeted for no later than March 1st. Mayor Snyder asked if we will get an accounting. Mr. Ambrose advised that some cities have indicated they may sue. The County has indicated they will do whatever they have to do to balance their budget. Some cities may refuse to pay. Cm. Jeffery asked what the penalty would be if we withhold the fees prior to July 1st. She felt they were playing unfairly. Mayor Snyder indicated they already have the money; we can't withhold it; at least not the property tax money. City Attorney Silver advised that the County can offset money they owe us with money we owe them. If we dispute this, we must'~respond by certified mail. The process for disputing was discussed. Mr. Ambrose pointed out that the County could also consider stopping providing services to us such as Police Services, AnimaI~i~Control Services, etc. Cm. Moffatt questioned SB 90 which allows the City to charge back for state mandated programs. Ms. Silver advised that this is now in the Constitution. We could make a claim and if we did this, it would be a test claim. It has to be a state mandated program as interpreted by the courts. Booking fees is not specifically state mandated. There is discretion by the County as to whether or not to charge for this. DRFA Meeting (540-60) Mr. Ambrose advised that a DRFA meeting will not be held on February 4th which he thought had been tentatively scheduled. Following discussion, the Councilmembers who sit on the DRFA Board suggested possible meeting dates of February llth at 6:00 p.m., or February 12th at 7:30 a.m. CM - VOL 10 - 36 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 Upcoming Meeting Schedule (610-10) Mr. Ambrose reminded the Council of upcoming meetings: East Dublin Study Session, Thursday, February 14th at 7:30 p.m., Goals & Objectives Study Session, Wednesday, February 27th at 7:00 p.m., and West Dublin Study Session, Thursday, February 28th at 7:30 p.m. Citizen/Organization of the Year (610-50) Cm. Moffatt advised that the citizen and organization of the year presentations will be made at the dinner held by the Sister City Association on March 16, 1991. Since we need judges, Cm. Moffatt suggested persuading the Chamber of Commerce to nominate one judge, the School District to nominate one and the Senior Citizen Committee to nominate one. Mayor Snyder suggested that we go outside the community for judges. Cm. Jeffery suggested that Cm. Moffatt contact Pleasanton Councilmember Karen Mohr regarding suggestions on how to. handle this. Federal Correctional Institute (580-70) Cm. Moffatt advised that he and Cm. Burton recently toured the Federal Correctional Institute. This facility now contains all females. They are developing a work camp. It is a security level one facility with no bars. Cm. Burton advised that Cm. Moffatt has taken over as Chair of the FCI committee. League Conference (140-20) Cm. Burton stated he recently enjoyed attending a League of California cities Conference for new Councilmembers in San Jose. He advised that most attendees at the conference were newly elected and that most were women. CM - VOL 10 - 37 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991 CLOSED SESSION (640-30) At 9:55 p.m., the Council recessed to a closed executive session to discuss Pending Litigation, City of Dublin vs. Alameda County, Superior Court No. V-002172-8 in accordance with Government Code Section 54956.9(a). ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. -- (,c~t~-cIerk CM - VOL 10 - 38 Regular Meeting January 28, 1991