The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6.1 - Revising the Traffic Impact Fee within the Eastern Dublin Area, Renaming the Program to the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, and Updating the Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative GuidelinesSTAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL Page 1 of 6 Agenda Item 6.1 DATE:December 21, 2021 TO:Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM:Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT:Revising the Traffic Impact Fee within the Eastern Dublin Area, Renaming the Program to the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, and Updating the Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative GuidelinesPrepared by: Pratyush Bhatia, Transportation and Operations Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:The City Council will consider revising the Traffic Impact Fee for future development within the eastern Dublin area and renaming the program to the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee(EDTIF). The EDTIF was last revised in 2010 and needs to be updated based on a revised list of capital improvement projects and costs, land use growth projections in the geographic area covered by the fee, and revised trip generation rates. In addition, the City Council will consider an update to the Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines to conform to the proposed EDTIF revisions and other minor clarifications. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Conduct a public hearing, deliberate, and adopt the Resolution Revising the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee for Future Development within the Eastern Dublin Area, Renaming the Program as the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, and Updating the Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines. FINANCIAL IMPACT:Fees collected are used to finance public infrastructure and improvements needed to mitigate the traffic-related impacts caused by development in eastern Dublin. The total estimated cost of the needed improvements is $206.5 million, and the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee has been calculated to collect $126 million based on projected new land uses in the eastern Dublin area. Grants and other funding sources will be sought, as needed, to meet the full funding needs of the projects. DESCRIPTION:Background 418 Page 2 of 6 On January 9, 1995, the City Council adopted the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (EDTIF) program (Resolution No. 1-95) with the purpose of generating funds to allow the City to implement certain important transportation investments planned in the eastern Dublin area, which generally covers the area from Dougherty Road to the easterly city limits.The program has been updated five times, most recently by City Council Resolution No. 40-10 on March 16, 2010. The funds generated by the program have been used to construct several improvements to transportation infrastructure in the affected area. Staff now recommends anupdate to the program to account for changes pursuant to the City’s most recent General Plan, the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, the 2014 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and Complete Streets Policy, and more current information about proposed developments in the eastern Dublin area. The 2021 EDTIF Update (Exhibit B to the Resolution) also recommends that the fee program should be renamed to better reflect the program’s scope and intent. If approved, it will now be known as the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee (also abbreviated as EDTIF). The update process, as documented in the EDTIF Update, included updating the list of capital improvement projects to be included in the EDTIF program, the growth projections in the geographic area covered by the EDTIF, and the fee calculations. The report also describes the approach to establishing the fee nexus, or the relationship between the impacts of new development and the fees that could justifiably be charged to construct transportation improvements that mitigate the impacts of new development.Proposed EDTIF ProjectsThe projects on the updated EDTIF list are primarily intended to improve the operations of the roadway system in the eastern Dublin area for users of all modes of travel and have been identified to implement the City’s General Plan, the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The projects involve elements such as adding travel lanes and turn lanes, adding or upgrading sidewalks, adding or modifying traffic signals, and extending or improving multi-use trails. The 2021 EDTIF Update provides the complete EDTIF project list. The previous EDTIF program classified the capital improvement projects included in the program as either Section I or Section II improvements and established a fee for each category. Section I improvements were those located inside the EDTIF area, while Section II improvements were located outside the area. This distinction is now being eliminated because the travel model is now used to allow the fee to be calculated based directly on the amount of eastern Dublin usage of each facility, regardless of the facility’s location. This change has implications for existing fee credits, which were issued as either Section I or Section II fee credits. To reflect this change, the Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines (Exhibit E to the Resolution) have been modified to eliminate the provision stating that Section I and Section II fee credits can only be used to offset fees in those same categories.Project Cost EstimatesFor the purposes of an impact fee, it is essential to have an estimate of the cost to implement each of the capital improvement projects on the list. Cost estimates were developed specifically for use in this study by Staff and its engineering consultant, Pakpour Consulting Group. The 2021 EDTIF Update provides the cost estimates for each project; the total cost of all projects included on the 419 Page 3 of 6 list is $206.5 million.Growth ProjectionsAn important element in quantifying the nexus relationship is to determine the amount of new development anticipated in the fee program area during the planning horizon of the study. The projected numbers of new residents and new jobs in the eastern Dublin area was taken from the City’s recently updated citywide travel demand model, which has a base year of 2020 and a horizon year of 2040. It is estimated that the number of jobs in the eastern Dublin area could increase by about 20,000 and the number of new housing units could increase by approximately 1,700 by the year 2040. Trip GenerationOnce the growth assumptions were established, the trip generation associated with those new land uses was analyzed. For the update of the EDTIF, evening (PM) peak hour trips are the focus. This is a change from the current application of the fee program, which uses daily trips as the basis for the fee calculations. It is standard practice to design transportation facilities to accommodate usage during the peak periods, and the PM peak is the period during which all of the land uses in the EDTIF area will be active, so it is the period that will best capture the full range of travel effects caused by the anticipated future development. The 2021 EDTIF Update documents the PM peak hour trips associated with new development in the eastern Dublin area; the total number of anticipated new PM peak hour trips is 12,136.EDTIF Project ResponsibilityAs described earlier, the City of Dublin travel model has recently been updated and reflects the City’s General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. That model was used to generate estimates of travel patterns and volumes in the future. A common modeling technique called a “select zone analysis” was applied to identify the amount of future traffic volume on each roadway link generated by land uses in the EDTIF area. On each model link that represents the location of an EDTIF project, the future traffic volume attributable to the EDTIF area was compared to the overall future traffic volume, thereby calculating the share of the usage of that link that can be attributed to the land uses in the EDTIF area. These usage percentages were used in the nexuscalculations. As described in the 2021 EDTIF Update, the EDTIF program is estimated to capture about 61% of the total project costs, or about $126 million, while other funding sources would be needed to cover the remainder. This means that about 61% of the usage of these facilities comes from residents and employees in the EDTIF area, while the remainder comes from travelers who use the facilities, but do not live or work in the EDTIF area. Fee CalculationBased on the elements described above, a new set of EDTIF fees was calculated. Starting from the amount of project costs eligible to be included in the EDTIF program (approximately $126 million), the analysts subtracted the current fund balance of approximately $13.6 million and added in the value of outstanding fee credits of approximately $54 million. The result was then divided by the number of new PM peak hour vehicle trips (12,136 trips) estimated to be generated by new development in the EDTIF area, and the result is a new fee per PM peak hour 420 Page 4 of 6 trip of $13,751. The updated EDTIF fees per unit of development (e.g., per dwelling unit for residential uses or per square foot for commercial uses) are similar to or lower than the existing EDTIF fees. Table 1 below shows the updated fees in comparison to the current fees by land use category. TABLE 1: EDTIF FEE AMOUNTS FOR TYPICAL LAND USE CATEGORIES Category Unit1 Updated EDTIF Fees Current EDTIF Fees Adjusted PM Peak Hour Trip Rate Fee per New PM Peak Hour Trip Updated Fee per Unit Daily Trip Rate Fee per New Daily Trip Current Fee per Unit Single-Family/Medium Density Residential (up to 14 units/acre) DU 0.99 $13,751 $13,613 10 $1,143 $12,619 Medium/High Density Residential (14.1 – 25 units per acre) DU 0.56 $13,751 $7,701 7 $1,143 $8,838 High Density Residential (more than 25 units per acre)DU 0.44 $13,751 $6,050 6 $1,143 $7,572 Hotel Room 0.60 $13,751 $8,251 10 $1,143 $11,430 General Office KSF 1.15 $13,751 $15,814 20 $1,143 $22,860 Restaurant (sit-down, high turnover)KSF 6.35 $13,751 $87,325 104 $1,143 $118,872 Community Shopping Center KSF 2.48 $13,751 $34,054 46 $1,143 $52,578 1. DU = Dwelling Unit; KSF = Thousand Square Feet.Fee ComponentsThere are three different transportation fee components charged within the eastern Dublin area. The basic EDTIF fee is the primary fee and is charged to new development of all types located in the eastern Dublin area to address the wide range of transportation improvements needed to support future development. In addition, there is a Freeway Interchange Fee to reimburse the City of Pleasanton for improvements previously constructed at the Hacienda Drive and TassajaraRoad interchanges along I-580. This fee was set in 1996 and has been indexed annually for inflation, a process that will continue unchanged under the updated EDTIF program. Finally, there is a BART Garage Fee that is charged to residential development outside the Dublin Transit Center to reimburse Alameda County for previous investments in the parking garage at the East Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. This fee has been re-calculated based on the balance remaining to be paid to Alameda County and the new residential growth projections in the area subject to the fee. To allocate the fees equitably among different development types, the fee amounts charged to each land use category should reflect the relative effects of each category on the transportation system. This is consistent with the approach used in the current fee program, which specifies different fee rates for different land use types. Table 2 below shows the three proposed/updated fee components by land use category. 421 Page 5 of 6 TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF UPDATED FEES Category Unit Updated EDTIF Fee Updated Freeway Interchange Fee Updated BART Garage Fee Single-Family/Medium Density Residential (up to 14 units/acre) DU $13,613 $362 $887 Medium/High Density Residential (14.1 – 25 units per acre) DU $7,701 $253 $502 High Density Residential (more than 25 units per acre) DU $6,050 $217 $394 Hotel Room $8,251 $362 $0 General Office KSF $15,814 $723 $0 Restaurant (sit-down, high turnover)KSF $87,325 $4,808 $0 Community Shopping Center KSF $34,054 $1,663 $0 Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative GuidelinesAdoption of the updated EDTIF results in the need to update the Consolidated Impact FeeAdministrative Guidelines (Exhibit E to the Resolution). The updated Guidelines incorporate various impact fee resolutions already adopted by the City Council, minor changes to the text to clarify the impact fee calculation process, and modifications reflecting the consolidation of the Section I and Section II EDTIF fees. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:A notice was placed in the East Bay Times on December 10, 2021 and December 16, 2021 notifying the community of the City Council’s consideration of the proposed fee revisions, EDTIFupdates, proposed revisions to the Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines, and that all the relevant materials are on file with the City Clerk for public review for a 10-day period prior to the City Council’s consideration of the fee increase. In addition, a letter was mailed out on December 6 to the City’s Interested Parties list which contained approximately 100 individuals and/or groups. The City Council Agenda was posted. ATTACHMENTS:1) Resolution Revising the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee for Future Development within the Eastern Dublin Area, Renaming the Program as the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, and Updating the Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines. 422 Page 6 of 6 2) Exhibit A to the Resolution - Boundary Map of the EDTIF Area3) Exhibit B to the Resolution - Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update4) Exhibit C to the Resolution - Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Schedule5) Exhibit D to the Resolution - Area of Benefit Fee6) Exhibit E to the Resolution - Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines 423 1 RESOLUTION NO. XX- 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN REVISING THE EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE EASTERN DUBLIN AREA, RENAMING THE PROGRAM AS THE EASTERN DUBLIN TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE, AND UPDATING THE CONSOLIDATED IMPACT FEE ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES SECTION I – RECITALS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin has adopted Chapter 7.82 of the Dublin Municipal Code which creates and establishes the authority for imposing and charging transportation impact fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”), and corresponding Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment (“GPA”) in 1993; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan has been the subject of various amendments, and all references herein to the “SP” are to the Specific Plan as amended to date; and WHEREAS, the GPA outlined future land uses for lands within the City's eastern sphere of influence, including approximately 13,906 dwelling units and 9.737 million square feet of commercial, office, and industrial development; and WHEREAS, the SP provides more specific detailed goals, policies, and action programs for the lands covered by it; and WHEREAS, the GPA and SP areas (“Eastern Dublin”) are included on the Land Use and Boundary Map of the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Area, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) was prepared for the GPA and SP (SCH No. 91103604) and certified by the Council on May 10, 1993, by Resolution No. 51-93, and two Addenda dated May 4, 1993, and August 22, 1994 (“Addenda”), were prepared and considered by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the GPA and SP provided for, and the EIR and Addenda analyzed, future buildout of Eastern Dublin and identified freeway, freeway interchange and road improvements, as well as transit improvements, pedestrian trails and bicycle paths necessary to implement the SP; and Attachment 1 424 2 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a “Mitigation Monitoring Program: Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment” by Resolution No. 53-93 which requires development within Eastern Dublin to pay its proportionate share of certain transportation improvements necessary to mitigate impacts caused by development within Eastern Dublin; and WHEREAS, a Program EIR (“the Transit Center EIR”) was prepared for the Dublin Transit Center project, and certified by the Council by Resolution 215-02; and WHEREAS, the Dublin Transit Center project area was added to the SP area and the Transit Center EIR identified new improvements beyond those identified in the EIR; and WHEREAS, supplemental CEQA documents, including supplemental environmental impact reports, mitigated negative declarations, negative declarations and addenda have been prepared for Eastern Dublin development since the EIR was certified in 1993 (collectively, the “CEQA Documents”); and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Dublin Crossing Specific Plan in 2013 which identified new improvements beyond those identified in the EIR; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Dublin Crossing Specific Plan (SCH No. 2012062009) and certified by the City Council on November 5, 2013, by Resolution No. 186-13 and an Addendum was prepared and considered by the City Council by Resolution No. 100-15 (collectively, the “Dublin Crossing Environmental Reports”); and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan for the City of Dublin; and WHEREAS, the City conducted the appropriate level of environmental review for the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and adopted a Negative Declaration (“ND”) on October 7, 2014, by Resolution No. 169-14; and WHEREAS, the GPA, SP, the Dublin Crossing Specific Plan and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (collectively, the “Plans”) provide specific detailed goals, policies, and action programs for land and transportation for the Eastern Dublin area, and show future uses for the Eastern Dublin area; and WHEREAS, the EIR, Addenda, Transit Center EIR, Dublin Crossing Environmental Reports, CEQA Documents, and ND (collectively, the “Environmental Documents”) considered and describe certain transportation improvements necessary for implementation of the Plans; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Documents describe the impacts of contemplated future development on existing public facilities in the areas of Eastern Dublin through 425 3 the year 2040, and contain analyses of the need for new public facilities and improvements to mitigate future development within such areas of Eastern Dublin; and WHEREAS, the EIR requires, and applicable Environmental Documents assumed, that certain traffic and transportation improvements would be made and that development within Eastern Dublin would pay its proportionate share of such improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1-95 on January 9, 1995, establishing an “Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee” for development within Eastern Dublin; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1-95 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared for the City of Dublin by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., in a document dated November 1994 and entitled “Traffic Impact Fee-Eastern Dublin” (hereinafter “Study”), which was attached as Exhibit B to Resolution No. 1-95; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1-95 further relies upon a second report which was prepared for the City of Dublin by Santina and Thompson in a document dated December 30, 1994, entitled, “Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Study/Roadway Costs, Initial Level” (hereinafter “Cost Report”), which was attached as Exhibit C to Resolution No. 1-95; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 41-96 on April 9, 1996, revising the fee established under Resolution No. 1-95; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 41-96 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared for the City by TJKM (“1996 Study Update”) and cost estimates prepared by Santina and Thompson (“1996 Cost Estimate Update”); and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 225-99 on December 7, 1999, revising the fee established under Resolution No. 41-96; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 225-99 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared by the Public Works Department (“1999 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update”, hereinafter “1999 Study Update”); and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 111-04 on June 15, 2004, revising the fee established under Resolution No. 225-99; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 111-04 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared by the Public Works Department (“2004 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update”, hereinafter “2004 Study Update”); and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 41-09 on April 7, 2009, revising the fee established under Resolution No. 111-04; and 426 4 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 41-09 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared by the Public Works Department (“2009 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update”, hereinafter “2009 Study Update”); and WHEREAS, testimony was received during the April 7, 2009 public hearing, requesting that the City Council incorporate into the EDTIF a provision for reducing fees within the Eastern Dublin Transit Center (Transit Center), as allowed under State Government Code Section 66005.1, on the basis that transit-oriented developments generate less traffic than conventional development due to proximity of public transit; and WHEREAS, the City Council directed Staff at the April 7, 2009 public hearing to prepare a work plan to develop a fee reduction study for the Transit Center, to determine if further revision to the EDTIF is appropriate to reflect lower trip generation rates for development within the Transit Center (“2009 Fee Reduction Study”); and WHEREAS,the City Council adopted Resolution No. 65-09 on May 19, 2009, approving the work plan and directing Staff to proceed with the 2009 Fee Reduction Study; and WHEREAS, the City's Public Works Department prepared a revised report, incorporating the recommendations of the 2009 Fee Reduction Study, dated February 22, 2010, entitled, “2010 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update” (hereinafter “2010 Study Update”); and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 40-10 on March 16, 2010, revising the fee established under Resolution No. 41-09; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 40-10 relies upon and incorporates the 2010 Study Update; and WHEREAS, Section 8 of Resolution No. 40-10 provides that the City will periodically review the fee and make revisions as appropriate; and WHEREAS,in December 2021, a report was prepared by Fehr and Peers Transportation Consultant titled, “Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update” (hereafter “2021 Study Update”) which assessed updating the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee (hereinafter “Fee”), and is attached hereto as Exhibit B;and WHEREAS, the 2021 Study Update includes and incorporates Tables 1 through 8 and Appendices A through E; and WHEREAS, the 2021 Study Update sets forth the relationship between future development in Eastern Dublin, the needed improvements and facilities, the estimated 427 5 cost of those improvements and facilities, and demonstrates overall the appropriateness of modifying the Fee in certain respects; and WHEREAS, the 2021 Study Update, which includes updated cost estimates, together with a copy of the Staff Report, proposed Resolution and all referenced documents were available for public inspection and review for 10 days prior to this public hearing; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Fee is referenced in numerous documents, including the Master Fee Schedule, and the Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines (hereinafter “Administrative Guidelines”); and WHEREAS, the City wishes to update the Fee to better implement the goals contained in the Plans, including updating the fee methodology and the fee amount; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to update the Administrative Guidelines to better implement the goals contained in the Plans, including clarifying the exceptions applicable to the various fees and the procedures surrounding fee credits; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to re-title the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee as the “Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee” to more accurately reflect the Fee’s scope and intent, including its multi-modal focus, as well as correspondingly update all references to the Fee in the Plans and other related documents. SECTION II – FINDINGS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby finds as follows: A.The purpose of Fee is to finance public improvements and facilities needed to mitigate the transportation-related impacts caused by future development in Eastern Dublin. The public improvements and facilities are listed in Table 1 of the 2021 Study Update and are hereafter defined and referred to as “Improvements.” The Improvements are needed to accommodate new development projected in Eastern Dublin and development in Eastern Dublin will pay its fair and proportional share of such Improvements with the implementation of this Fee. B.The Fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance the Improvements. C.After considering the Study, the Cost Report, the 1996 Study Update, the 1996 Cost Estimate Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Update Study, the 2009 Study Update, the 2010 Study Update, the 2021 Study Update, Resolution No. 1-95, Resolution 41-96, Resolution 225-99, Resolution 111-04, Resolution 41-09, Resolution 40-10, the Staff Report, the Plans, all EIRs and 428 6 Environmental Documents, all correspondence received and the testimony received at the noticed public hearing held on December 21, 2021 (the “Record”), the City Council reapproves and readopts the Study, as revised by the 1996 Study Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Update Study, the 2009 Study Update, the 2010 Study Update and the 2021 Study Update, and the Cost Estimate Report, as revised by the 1996 Cost Estimate, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study Update, the 2009 Study Update, the 2010 Study Update, and the 2021 Study Update, and incorporates each herein, and further finds that future development in Eastern Dublin will generate the need for the Improvements and the Improvements are consistent with the Plans. D.The adoption of the Fee is within the scope of the Environmental Documents. E.The Improvements were all identified in the Environmental Documents as necessary to accommodate traffic from and/or to, to mitigate impacts of development in Eastern Dublin. The impacts of such development, including the Improvements, were adequately analyzed at a Program level in the Environmental Documents. There are no changes proposed to the Improvements identified in the Environmental Documents, or to the surrounding circumstances, as a result of this Fee, and no other new information of substantial importance so as to require revisions to the Environmental Documents. No specific development is authorized by the adoption of this Fee. The adoption of the Fee is not a project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378 and 15061(b)(3), as it can be seen with certainty that there is no potential for the Fee to have any significant effect on the environment. Specific Improvements will be required to undergo the applicable environmental review when sufficient physical details are available to permit meaningful CEQA review. F.The record establishes: 1.That there continues to be a reasonable relationship between the need for the Improvements and the impacts of the types of development for which the corresponding Fee is charged in that new development in Eastern Dublin, both residential and non-residential, will generate increased vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic which contributes to the need for the Improvements; and 2.That there continues to be a reasonable relationship between the Fee’s use (to pay for the construction and costs of the Improvements) and the type of development for which the Fee is charged in that all development in Eastern Dublin, both residential and non-residential, generates or contributes to the need for the Improvements; and 3.That there continues to be a reasonable relationship between the amount of the Fee and the cost of the Improvements or portion thereof attributable to development in Eastern Dublin in that the Fee is calculated based on the total number of net new PM peak hour trips projected to be generated by specific types of land uses, the total cost to construct the Improvements, and the percentage by which development within Eastern Dublin contributes to the need for the Improvements; and 429 7 4.That the cost estimates set forth in the Study, as revised by the 1996 Study Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study Update, the 2009 Study Update, the 2010 Study Update, and the 2021 Study Update, and the Cost Estimate Report, as revised by the 1996 Cost Estimate, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study Update, the 2009 Study Update, the 2010 Study Update, and the 2021 Study Update are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Improvements, and the Fees expected to be generated by future development will not exceed the projected costs of constructing the Improvements; and 5.That the method of allocation of the Fee to a particular development, set forth in the Study, as revised in the 1996 Study Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study Update, the 2009 Study Update, the 2010 Study Update, and the 2021 Study Update bears a fair and reasonable relationship to each development’s burden on, and benefit from, the Improvements to be funded by the Fee, in that the Fee is calculated based on the total number of net new PM peak hour trips each particular development will generate. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin DOES RESOLVE as follows: SECTION III - RESOLUTION 1. Definitions a.“Development” shall mean the construction, alteration or addition of any building or structure within Eastern Dublin. b.“Eastern Dublin” shall mean all territory depicted within the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Area on the Land Use and Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit A. c.“Improvements” shall include those public improvements and facilities as listed in Table 1 of the 2021 Study Update. “Improvements” shall also include comparable alternative improvements and facilities should later changes in projections of development in the region necessitate construction of such alternative improvements and facilities; provided that the City Council later determines (1) that there is a reasonable relationship between development within Eastern Dublin and the need for the alternative improvements and facilities, (2)that the alternative improvements and facilities are comparable to the improvements and facilities in the 2021 Study Update and (3) that the revenue from the Fee will be used only to pay Eastern Dublin development’s fair and proportionate share of the alternative improvements and facilities. d.“Single Family Dwelling Unit” shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for up to 6 units per acre. 430 8 e.“Medium Density Dwelling Unit” shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for over 6 to 14 units per acre. f.“Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit” shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for over 14 to 25 units per acre. g.“High Density Dwelling Unit” shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for over 25 units per acre. h.“Accessory Dwelling Unit” shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin that is issued a building permit as an accessory dwelling unit pursuant to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.80 (Accessory Dwelling Regulations) of the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. i.Definitions of various non-residential land uses for the purpose of calculating the Fee shall be as per the current General Plan or the Specific Plan, as applicable. 2. Impact Fee Retitled The Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee shall henceforth be known as the “Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee.” All references to the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee in the Plans and other official City documents are deemed to be references to the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, unless the context otherwise requires, and all future documents will refer to the Fee by its new title. 3. Transportation Impact Fee Imposed a. A Transportation Impact Fee (“Fee”) shall be charged and paid for each residential unit within Eastern Dublin no later than the date of final inspection for the unit, provided that the Fee shall be payable by the date that the building permit is issued for any such unit from and after the date the City Council approves a Capital Improvement Program for the Improvements. b. A Fee shall be charged and paid for non-residential buildings or structures within Eastern Dublin at the time of issuance of the building permit for such building or structure, except where the building or structure will require a later stage of discretionary approval by the City before it can be occupied, in which case, with the approval of the Public Works Director, the Fee for that 431 9 building or structure may be deferred for payment to the date the City makes the last discretionary approval which is required prior to occupancy. c. The Fee includes the Freeway Interchange Fee and the Residential BART Garage Fee. The calculations of each fee component are described in the 2021 Study Update. The Residential BART Garage Fee (formerly known as Section II Residential BART Parking Fee) and Freeway Interchange Fee are separate fees but both, together with the Transportation Impact Fee, are collectively referred to as the “Fee.” 4. Amount of Fee a. The amount of the Fee shall be as set forth in the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated by reference. b. For any non-residential buildings or structures not reflected in Exhibit C, the Fee per unit shall be calculated as follows. i. The Fee per unit shall be calculated by multiplying $13,751 (the Maximum Fee amount) by the PM Peak Hour Trip rate for that specific land use category, as set forth in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The Public Works Director shall determine the applicable land use category. ii. A pass-by percentage reduction may be applicable per the guidance presented in ITE Trip Generation publications. The Public Works Director shall have sole discretion in determining whether to approve any pass-by percentage reduction. 5. Minimum Cash Payment The minimum cash payment for the Fee shall be 11% of the total Fee due. Developers may utilize credits for the remainder of the Fee, if authorized by the Administrative Guidelines. 6. Exemptions from Fee In addition to exemptions authorized by the Administrative Guidelines, the following types of development will be exempt from the Fee: a.Non-Residential Replacement or Reconstruction: Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing non-residential structure that has been destroyed or demolished is exempt from payment of the Fee, provided that the use of the new or reconstructed building would not increase the trips over 432 10 those from the existing non-residential structure, calculated as provided in Exhibit C. b. Non-Residential Replacement or Reconstruction (Partial Exemption): Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing non-residential structure that has been destroyed or demolished is entitled to a partial exemption from the Fee if the use of the new or reconstructed building would increase the trips over those from the existing non-residential structure calculated as provided in Exhibit C.The partial exemption from the Fee shall be equal to the square footage of the existing non-residential structure that was destroyed or demolished multiplied by the number of trips shown on Exhibit C for its previous use, which total is then subtracted as a “Partial Fee Exemption” from the fees owed based on the use and square footage of the new or reconstructed building as provided in Exhibit C.The new development shall not accrue any credit or reimbursement rights in the event that the fee for the new or reconstructed building is less than the “Partial Fee Exemption” as calculated above. c. Non-Residential Additions More Than 500 Square Feet (Partial Exemption: Any addition of 500 square feet or more to an existing non-residential building or structure is entitled to a partial exemption from payment of the Fee. The partial exemption from the Fee shall be equal to the square footage of the existing non-residential building or structure calculated as provided in Exhibit C. 7. Use of Revenues a. The revenues raised by payment of the Fee shall continue to be placed in the Traffic Impact Fee Fund, which will henceforth be known as the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Fund (“Fund”). The revenues (and interest) shall be used for the following purposes: i. To pay for design, engineering, right-of-way acquisition and constructions of the Improvements and reasonable costs of outside consultant studies related thereto; ii. To reimburse the City for Improvements constructed by the City with funds from other sources including funds from other public entities, unless the City funds were obtained from grants or gifts intended by the grantor to be used for traffic improvements; iii. To reimburse developers and/or public agencies who have constructed Improvements; and iv. To pay for and/or reimburse costs of program development and ongoing administration of the Fee program. 433 11 b. Fees in these Fund accounts shall be expended only for the Improvements and only for the purpose for which the Fee was collected. 8. Standards The standards upon which the needs for the Improvements are based are the standards of the City of Dublin, including the standards contained in the Plans, and the Environmental Documents. 9. No Existing Deficiencies The City Council determines that there are no existing deficiencies within Eastern Dublin and that the need for the Improvements in the 2021 Study Update is generated entirely by new development within Eastern Dublin, and, therefore, the 2021 Study Update has determined the proportionate share of the cost of the Improvements for which development within Eastern Dublin is responsible. 10.Periodic Review a. During each fiscal year, the City Manager shall continue to prepare a report for the City Council, pursuant to Government Code Section 66006. b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66002, the City Council shall also review, as part of any adopted Capital Improvement Program each year, the approximate location, size, time of availability and estimates of cost for all Improvements to be financed with the Fee. The estimated costs shall be adjusted in accordance with appropriate indices of inflation. The City Council shall make findings identifying the purpose to which the existing Fee balances are to be put and demonstrating a reasonable relationship between the Fee and the purpose for which it is charged. 11.Subsequent Analysis of the Fee The Fee established herein is adopted and implemented by the City Council in reliance on the Record identified above. The City will continue to conduct further study and analysis to determine whether the Fee should be revised. When additional information is available, the City Council shall review the Fee to determine that the amounts are reasonably related to the impacts of development within Eastern Dublin. The City Council may revise the Fee to incorporate the findings and conclusions of further studies and any standards in the Plans, as well as increases due to construction costs and land values. The City will evaluate land values through an appraisal approximately every three (3) years, as determined by the Public Works Director. 12.Automatic Increases in Fee The purpose of this section is to provide for an automatic annual adjustment to the Fee in years when the City Council does not revise the Fee pursuant to Section 11 434 12 above. The City Manager shall adjust the Fee automatically, effective July 1, 2022, and each July 1 thereafter, as follows: a. The costs of construction of the Improvements (which account for 80% of the improvement cost) shall be increased/decreased each July 1st by the annual percentage increase/decrease in the Engineering News Record's Construction Cost Index for the San Francisco Bay Area for the preceding month of December over the same Construction Cost Index for the month of December of the prior year. The City Manager may round the Fee adjustment to whole dollars. b. The Land Cost per acre for the Improvements shall be increased/decreased annually by the percentage increase/decrease between the land cost per acre in the most recent land appraisal (prepared for the City for purposes of adjusting the Fee) over the land cost per acre in the immediately preceding appraisal (prepared for the City for purposes of adjusting the Fee and using the same methodology), calculated as an annual increase/decrease. For example, if the appraised land value in Year One is $10/acre and in Year Two is $11/acre, that is an annual increase of 10% which will result in a yearly increase of 10%, until the Fee is revised by the Council pursuant to Section 11 above. The City Manager may round the Fee adjustment to whole dollars. The “land” comprises 20% of the improvement costs financed by the fees. 13.Area of Benefit Fee A portion of the Fee shall also be deemed to be an Area of Benefit Fee adopted pursuant to Dublin Municipal Code Section 9.16.090. This is the portion of the Fee designated for the construction of those Improvements that are major thoroughfares and bridges. These Improvements and the estimated cost of such improvements are listed on Exhibit D attached hereto. The “Area of Benefit” is Eastern Dublin as defined herein. The fee shall be apportioned over the Area of Benefit in the same manner set forth in Section 4 of this Resolution and in the Study, 1996 Study Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study Update, and the 2009 Study Update, with the amount to be assessed for residential and non-residential as shown on Exhibit D. The Area of Benefit Fee shall be deposited into the Fund into separate accounts established for each of the improvements identified in Exhibit D. 14.Administrative Guidelines The City Council hereby adopts the revised Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines attached hereto as Exhibit E. 15.Effective Date 435 13 This Resolution shall become effective immediately. The alterations to the Fee provided in this Resolution shall be effective 60 days from the effective date of the Resolution and shall supersede the Fee established by Resolution No. 40-10. The Area of Benefit Fee established in Section 13 of this Resolution shall be effective only if the Fee provided in Sections 3 and 4 hereof is declared invalid for any reason. 16.Severability Each component of the Fee, including the Freeway Interchange Fee and the Residential BART Garage Fee, and each and every improvement financed by the Fee or any of the component fees, and all portions of this Resolution are severable. Should any individual component fee of the Fee or other provision of this Resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall be and continue to be fully effective, and the Fee shall be fully effective except as to that portion that has been judged to be invalid. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21 st day of December 2021 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ City Clerk 5027752.2 436 Attachment 2 – Exhibit A to the Resolution Boundary Map of the EDTIF Area 437 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update: Final Report Prepared for: City of Dublin December 2021 WC16-3332 Attachment 3-Exhibit B to the Resolution 438 439 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 2. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ............................................................................................. 2 Project Identification .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Cost Estimates ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 3. GROWTH PROJECTIONS ................................................................................................................ 6 Land Use Growth.................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Trip Generation ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6 4. NEXUS ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 9 Existing Deficiencies ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 EDTIF Project Cost Responsibility ............................................................................................................................... 11 Fee Calculations ................................................................................................................................................................. 14 EDTIF Fee Calculations ........................................................................................................................................... 15 Freeway Interchange Fee Calculations ............................................................................................................. 18 Residential BART Garage Fee Calculations ..................................................................................................... 18 5. SUMMARY OF REQUIRED PROGRAM ELEMENTS ...................................................................... 20 Appendices Appendix A: Current EDTIF Projects Appendix B: Detailed Information on Updated EDTIF Projects Appendix C: Growth Projections Appendix D: Level of Service Criteria Appendix E: EDTIF Fee Amounts by Land Use Category 440 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 List of Figures Figure 1 EDTIF Project Locations ............................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Tables Table 1: Updated EDTIF Projects and Estimated Cost ............................................................................................................ 4 Table 2: East Dublin Trip Generation (New Future Development) .................................................................................. 8 Table 3: Existing Levels Of Service ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Table 4: Updated EDTIF Projects and Total Amount Per Project .................................................................................. 12 Table 5: EDTIF Calculation .............................................................................................................................................................. 16 Table 6: Fee Amounts For Typical Land Use Categories .................................................................................................... 17 Table 7: Summary of Fee Calculations ...................................................................................................................................... 19 441 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 1 1. INTRODUCTION On January 9, 1995, the Dublin City Council adopted (by Resolution #1-95) an Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee program, intended to generate funds to allow the City of Dublin to implement a number of important transportation investments planned in the eastern Dublin area, which generally covers the area from Dougherty Road to the easterly city limits (see Figure 1 for the boundaries of the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee program). The program has been updated several times, most recently by Council Resolution #40-10 on March 16, 2010. The funds generated have been used to construct several improvements to transportation infrastructure in the affected area. The City now wishes to update the program to account for changes pursuant to the City’s most recent General Plan, the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, adoption of the 2014 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and Complete Streets Policy, and more current information about proposed developments in the eastern Dublin area. The City also determined the fee program should be renamed to better reflect the program’s scope and intent; it will now be known as the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee (EDTIF). This report includes updating the list of capital improvement projects, the growth projections in the geographic area covered by the EDTIF, and the fee calculations. This report describes each of these steps and the approach to establishing the “nexus” or relationship between the impacts of new development in the EDTIF area and the fees that could justifiably be charged to construct transportation improvements to serve new development. Impact fees are established under a state law known as AB 1600, the Mitigation Fee Act. Fees charged pursuant to this legislation are used to build capital facilities needed to serve the demands generated by new development. Fees are not used to correct existing deficiencies, but rather are intended to address future needs. There must be a demonstrated relationship, or “nexus,” between the amount of the fee, the cost of the facilities, and the types of development on which the fee is imposed. This report presents the information needed to demonstrate those relationships and is commonly called a nexus study. 442 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 2 2. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PROJECT IDENTIFICATION City staff provided an updated list of capital improvement projects in the area covered by the EDTIF program. Most of these projects are continuations of capital improvements that have already been part of the EDTIF program; in some cases, the components of a project have been updated to reflect the most recent information about development patterns in the area as well as the policy direction set in the City’s General Plan and other planning documents. Overall, the purpose of the projects remains the same as when the EDTIF was first adopted. These projects are intended to accommodate travelers more efficiently through adding travel lanes and turn lanes, as well as adding or upgrading sidewalks, and adding or modifying traffic signals. For reference, the projects that have historically been included in the current EDTIF program are shown in Appendix A, along with the current status of each project and whether it is being carried forward into the updated EDTIF. Table 1 displays the updated EDTIF project list, and the project locations are shown in Figure 1. COST ESTIMATES For the purposes of the EDTIF, it is necessary to have an estimate of the cost to implement each of the capital improvement projects on the EDTIF project list. Cost estimates were developed for the EDTIF projects by the City. For the three interchange projects, the cost estimates were taken from a prior EDTIF analysis in 2010 and were escalated to 2021 dollars using cost escalation factors approved by the City. Consideration was given to whether right-of-way would need to be acquired as part of each project. Consistent with the practice typically used in the EDTIF, in cases where there is a fronting developer who would be required to dedicate right-of-way, no acquisition cost was included in the cost estimate. The estimated cost of each project is shown on Table 1. More detailed information about the capital improvement projects is provided in Appendix B, including a conceptual layout of each project and documentation of the cost estimates described above. Please note that the conceptual layouts shown in the appendix are for illustrative purposes; details of each project may change as more refined design work is completed. 443 # " " # " # " "k §¨¦580 §¨¦680 F allo n R d G l e a s o n D r Fallon RdS carlett Dr Dublin BlvdDougherty RdVillage PkwyOwens Dr Central PkwyAmador Valley BlvdHacienda DrRosewood DrH opyar d RdArnold RdTassajara RdDublin Blvd C:\GIS\MXD\figX_EastDublinImpactFee_100521.mxdEast Dublin Transpor tation Impact Fee Project LocationsFigure 1 5 Project Location s 5 E B C G Dublin Transit Center Area !!!!!East Dublin TIF AreaD A G IF Tassajara Rd Tassajara Rd / I-580 Interchange Fallon Rd Scarlett DrH F Dublin Blvd Hacienda Dr / I-580 Interchange Interchange Improvements I Fallon Rd / 580 Interchange H C Central Pkwy D A Project Improvements New Signal Roadway Improvements B Gleason DrE J J Hacienda Dr K K Iron Horse Trail CrossingNew Bike / Ped Bridgek L Class I Trail L Altamirano Class I Trail 444 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 4 TABLE 1: UPDATED EDTIF PROJECTS AND ESTIMATED COST Number Project Location Description Estimated Cost A Dublin Boulevard Roadway improvements, including frontage improvements, signal modifications, widening and roadway extension, from Sierra Court to Dougherty Road and from Iron Horse Parkway to Airway Boulevard (Segments: 6, 8A, 9, 10, 11) $112,433,000 B Hacienda/I-580 Interchange Reconstruct overcrossing with additional NB lane; widen EB off-ramp with third left-turn lane; modify WB loop on-ramp; and widen WB off-ramp with third left-turn lane $14,445,000 C Central Parkway Sidewalks, curb ramps, new signal (at Park Place), turn lanes, from Arnold Road to Hacienda Drive (Segments: 16A, 17, 18) $2,820,000 D Gleason Drive New signal and turn lanes at Gleason Drive and Arnold Road; new sidewalks and striping from Tassajara Road to Fallon Road (Segments: 19, 20) $1,234,000 E Tassajara Road Widening, turn lanes, sidewalks, curb ramps, new signals from I-580 to County line (Segments: 22, 22A, 23, 24) $32,399,000 F Tassajara/I-580 Interchange Widen eastbound off-ramp approach at Tassajara Road to provide fifth lane $4,308,000 G Fallon Road Widening, turn lanes, sidewalks, new signals between I-580 and Gleason Drive (Segments: 26A, 27) $8,166,000 H Scarlett Drive New 4 lane roadway with median from Houston Drive to Dublin Boulevard, and raised medians, curb ramps and new traffic signals from Dougherty Road to Houston Place (Segment: 21) $9,049,000 I Fallon/I-580 Interchange Reconstruct overcrossing with four lanes in each direction; reconstruct SB to EB loop on-ramp; widen EB off-ramp with two exit lanes with two left turn and two right tum lanes; widen EB on-ramp; widen WB off- ramp with two left turn and two right turn lanes; and widen WB on-ramp. $4,307,000 J Hacienda Drive New turn lanes, restriping between Dublin Boulevard and Gleason Drive (Segment: 14) $3,279,000 K Iron Horse Trail Crossing New bike/pedestrian bridge for Iron Horse Trail across Dublin Boulevard $11,600,000 445 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 5 L Altamirano Avenue Class I Trail New Class I trail along Altamirano Avenue, north of I-580 between Iron Horse Trail and Hacienda Drive $1,552,000 M Ongoing Traffic Signal Upgrades Signal timing modifications and signal systems upgrades associated with accommodating traffic from new development ($100,000 per year for 5 years) $500,000 N Future Nexus Report Update Update EDTIF nexus study to reflect updated growth projections, project definitions, and costs $150,000 O Update Eastern Dublin Travel Demand Model Update City of Dublin travel demand model for changing growth projections and to keep it up-to-date for applications in future East Dublin planning studies $300,000 Total Estimated Cost $206,542,000 Notes: See Appendix B for further description of the segments shown for most projects. 446 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 6 3. GROWTH PROJECTIONS LAND USE GROWTH An important step in quantifying the nexus relationship is to determine the amount of new development anticipated in the planning horizon of the study, which is the year 2040. The City has recently completed an update of the City’s travel demand model, including updates of the current and future land use throughout the City. The base year of the model is now 2020 and the horizon year is 2040, and the model’s land use inputs reflect the City’s General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. See Appendix C for a map showing the Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) from the City model that represent the EDTIF area, as well as a table showing the amount of existing and expected future development in the area. As shown in the appendix materials, a substantial amount of new development is anticipated; the number of jobs in this area could increase by about 20,000 (more than double when compared to current conditions), and the number of housing units could increase by approximately 1,700 (a 15% increase from base year to future year). It is also important to note that, as shown in Figure C-1 in Appendix C, the boundary of the EDTIF area is undergoing a minor change. As had been intended when the Boulevard project (then Dublin Crossing) was approved in 2013, the small parcel in the northwest quadrant of the Dublin Boulevard/Arnold Road intersection is now a part of the Boulevard development and will no longer be part of the EDTIF area. TRIP GENERATION Once the land use assumptions were established, the trip generation associated with those land uses was calculated. As a first step, the employment numbers applied in the City of Dublin travel model were converted into building square footages, since the fees for non-residential uses will typically be applied on the basis of building area. Consideration was also given to whether it might be appropriate to apply any trip reduction factors to account for mixed-use development, particularly in areas that are well-served by high-frequency transit. The EDTIF area does contain the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station, which is located at the western edge of the EDTIF area. The Dublin Transit Center development is the only portion of the new development anticipated in the EDTIF area that will be within easy walking distance of the BART station. To estimate the vehicular trip generation of the new development for all areas except the Dublin Transit Center, the average rates presented in the ITE Trip Generation manual (10th Edition) were applied to the relevant land use categories. For the Dublin Transit Center, Fehr and Peers’ MXD+ tool was applied to estimate the trip generation. This tool was selected because the traditional ITE Trip Generation 447 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 7 methodologies are primarily based on data collected at single-use, freestanding sites located in suburban areas with very little accessibility by transit, bicycling, or walking. These defining characteristics limit the data’s applicability to mixed-use or multi-use development projects in more pedestrian-friendly and transit- accessible places, such as the Dublin Transit Center. The development of the MXD+ technique began in response to the limitations in the ITE Trip Generation methodology. With the goal of providing a straightforward and empirically validated method of estimating vehicle trip generation at mixed-use developments, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sponsored a national study of the trip generation characteristics of mixed-use sites. Travel survey data was gathered from 239 mixed-use developments (called MXDs) in six major metropolitan regions and correlated with the characteristics of the sites and their surroundings. The findings indicated that the amount of traffic generated by each site is affected by a wide variety of factors including the mix of jobs and residents at the site, the overall size and density of the development, the availability of convenient internal connections for walking or driving between nearby uses, the availability of transit service to the site, and the surrounding trip destinations within the immediate area. None of these factors is explicitly accounted for in the traditional application of the ITE Trip Generation manual method. As part of the study, these characteristics were related statistically to trip behavior observed at the development sites using statistical techniques. These statistical relationships produced equations, known as the EPA MXD model, that predict how the trip generation from a particular mixed-use site would be reduced as compared to the traditional ITE methods. Applying these vehicle trip reduction percentages to the “raw trips” predicted by the ITE methods produces an estimate for the number of vehicle trips traveling in or out of a site. Table 2 shows the results of the trip generation estimation for the new development in the EDTIF area, including the trip reduction estimated for the Dublin Transit Center (DTC) as a result of the application of the MXD+ tool. 448 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 8 TABLE 2: EAST DUBLIN TRIP GENERATION (NEW FUTURE DEVELOPMENT) ITE Land Use Quantity Daily Total AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Single-Family Housing (including Townhomes) 1,452 Dwelling Units 13,707 269 806 1,074 906 531 1,437 Apartments 283 Dwelling Units 2,072 30 100 130 84 74 158 Shopping Center (Adj Streets, 7-9A, 4-6P) 1822.5 KSF leasable area 44,720 690 423 1,114 2,166 2,347 4,513 General Office Building (Pk Hr, AM & PM) 5144.3 KSF gross floor area 50,106 5,132 835 5,967 947 4,969 5,916 Manufacturing (Adj Streets, 7-9A, 4-6P) 897.3 KSF Gross Floor Area 3,527 428 128 556 186 415 601 114,130 6,549 2,293 8,842 4,289 8,336 12,625 Less Trip Reduction for DTC Area -3,010 -568 -489 Total Net New Vehicle Trips 111,120 8,274 12,136 Notes: KSF = Thousand Square Feet. Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021. Note that PM peak hour trips are the focus of this EDTIF study. This is a change from the current application of the fee program, which uses daily trips as the basis for the fee calculations. Most transportation facilities are designed to accommodate usage during peak periods, and the PM peak is the time period during which all of the land uses in the EDTIF area will be active, so it is the time period that will best capture the full range of travel effects caused by the anticipated future development. For the purposes of the EDTIF program, which focuses on the impacts of new development, the most important piece of information is the estimated growth in trips between existing and future conditions. As shown in Table 2, the total number of net new PM peak hour trips will be used to calculate the EDTIF fee per new peak hour trip. 449 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 9 4. NEXUS ANALYSIS EXISTING DEFICIENCIES An important part of a nexus analysis is to establish whether the transportation facilities that will be addressed by the projects in the fee program are currently deficient. If there are existing deficiencies at any of those locations, then an adjustment should be made in the fee calculations to ensure new development pays its fair share and is not being charged to correct an existing problem. The most recent study that comprehensively addresses the Eastern Dublin area is the transportation impact analysis conducted for the Dublin Kaiser Medical Center. The Dublin Kaiser study collected traffic count data and analyzed 22 intersections throughout the Eastern Dublin area located on or near one of the capital improvement projects proposed as part of the EDTIF. The City of Dublin uses vehicle Level of Service (LOS) as a performance measure, with a standard of LOS D or better at all intersections outside of the downtown area. Table 3 summarizes the current operations at the 22 intersections analyzed in the Dublin Kaiser study. (For reference, the Level of Service criteria for signalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual is included in Appendix D.) As shown, all of the intersections are reported as operating at LOS D or better in both the AM and PM peak hours; this level of operation meets the City’s standards, thus indicating these locations are not currently deficient. Because there are no existing deficiencies, it is reasonable to carry forward all of the cost of the future improvements into the next stage of the fee calculations. TABLE 3: EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE Intersection Traffic Control Peak Hour Existing Conditions (sec/veh)1 LOS2,3 1. Dublin Blvd/Scarlett Dr Signalized AM 7.0 A PM 10.0 A 2. Central Pkwy/Arnold Rd Signalized AM 7.3 A PM 6.3 A 3. Dublin Blvd/Arnold Rd Signalized AM 20.4 C PM 28.1 C 4. Dublin Blvd/Hacienda Dr Signalized AM 39.6 D PM 39.6 D 5. I-580 WB Ramps/Hacienda Dr Signalized AM 6.4 A 450 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 10 TABLE 3: EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE Intersection Traffic Control Peak Hour Existing Conditions (sec/veh)1 LOS2,3 PM 6.4 A 6. I-580 EB Ramps/Hacienda Dr Signalized AM 11.2 B PM 11.2 B 7. Fallon Rd/Tassajara Rd Signalized AM 20.2 C PM 20.2 C 8. Gleason Dr/Tassajara Rd Signalized AM 28.4 C PM 23.2 C 9. Central Pkwy/Tassajara Rd Signalized AM 28.1 C PM 28.1 C 10. Dublin Blvd/Tassajara Rd Signalized AM 39.2 D PM 39.2 D 11. I-580 WB Ramps/Tassajara Rd Signalized AM 6.5 A PM 6.5 A 12. I-580 EB Ramps/Tassajara Rd Signalized AM 29.9 C PM 29.9 C 13. Dublin Blvd/Brannigan St Signalized AM 14.4 B PM 14.4 B 14. Dublin Blvd/Carnmore Pl Signalized AM 4.3 A PM 4.3 A 15. Dublin Blvd/Keegan St Signalized AM 10.6 B PM 10.6 B 16. Dublin Blvd/Lockhart St Signalized AM 8.6 A PM 8.6 A 17. Dublin Blvd/Fallon Gateway Signalized AM 4.3 A PM 4.3 A 18. Central Pkwy/Fallon Rd Signalized AM 13.0 B PM 13.0 B 19. Dublin Blvd/Fallon Rd Signalized AM 18.5 B 451 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 11 TABLE 3: EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE Intersection Traffic Control Peak Hour Existing Conditions (sec/veh)1 LOS2,3 PM 18.5 B 20. Fallon Gateway/Fallon Rd Signalized AM 5.3 A PM 5.3 A 21. I-580 WB Ramps/Fallon Rd/El Charro Rd Signalized AM 8.6 A PM 8.6 A 22. I-580 EB Ramps/Fallon Rd/El Charro Rd Signalized AM 8.2 A PM 8.2 A Source: Fehr & Peers, 2017 Notes: 1 Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. 2 LOS calculations performed using the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method. 3 Unacceptable seconds of delay per vehicle and LOS highlighted in bold. EDTIF PROJECT COST RESPONSIBILITY As described earlier, the land use projections for the year 2040 were used in the Dublin travel demand model (Model)and the Model was applied to generate estimates of travel patterns and volumes in the future. A common modeling technique called a select zone analysis was applied within the Model to identify the amount of future traffic volume on each roadway link that is generated by land uses in the EDTIF area. On each Model link that represents the location of an EDTIF project, the future traffic volume attributable to the EDTIF area was compared to the overall future traffic volume, thereby calculating the share of the usage of that link that can be attributed to the land uses in the EDTIF area. These usage percentages are shown in Table 4. One project (Project L, the Altamirano Avenue Class I Trail) involves an extension of an off-street trail, which is a type of project that cannot be reflected in the Model so the usage percentage must be calculated differently. This project will serve bicycle and pedestrian travel as an extension of current bicycle/pedestrian facilities and will provide non-vehicular travel options both to existing and new residents and workers. The percentage of the project cost to be included in the EDTIF program has thus been calculated as the proportion of future population and employment added by the new development that will be subject to the fee. As calculated from the data presented in Table C-1 in Appendix C, the sum of the additional households plus employment expected in the EDTIF area (1,735 households plus 20,423 jobs) will constitute 452 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 12 about 47% of the total future households plus employment in the Eastern Dublin area, so the usage percentage for this project has been set at 47%. The percentages described above were applied to the cost of each EDTIF infrastructure project, and the resulting amount represents the portion of the cost of each project that will be included in the EDTIF program. As shown in Table 4, the EDTIF program would capture about 61% of the total project costs, while other funding sources (such as grants, County Measure BB funds, or other sources) would be needed to cover the remainder. This means that about 61% of the usage of these facilities comes from current and future residents and employees in the EDTIF area, while the remainder comes from travelers who use these facilities, but do not live or work in the EDTIF area. It should be noted that the previous EDTIF classified the capital improvement projects as Section I or Section II improvements and established a fee for each category. Section I improvements were those located inside the EDTIF area, while Section II improvements were located outside the area. Because of the application of the select zone modeling technique described above and its ability to capture Eastern Dublin’s share of usage on any facility regardless of the facility’s location, it is no longer necessary to make that distinction. The Model results show the percentage of usage on each facility coming from the land uses in the EDTIF area, thereby allowing for the fee to be calculated based directly on the amount of EDTIF usage of each facility, regardless of the facility’s location. The distinction is being eliminated. This change has implications for existing fee credits, which were issued as either Section I or Section II fee credits. Simultaneously with the EDTIF update, the City intends to update its Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines to eliminate the provision stating that Section I and Section II fee credits can only be used to offset fees in those same categories. TABLE 4: UPDATED EDTIF PROJECTS AND TOTAL AMOUNT PER PROJECT Project Project Location Description Estimated Cost % from EDTIF Area EDTIF Amount A Dublin Boulevard Roadway improvements, including frontage improvements, signal modifications, widening and roadway extension, from Sierra Court to Dougherty Road and from Iron Horse Parkway to Airway Boulevard (Segments: 6, 8A, 9, 10, 11) $112,433,000 61% $68,076,800 453 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 13 TABLE 4: UPDATED EDTIF PROJECTS AND TOTAL AMOUNT PER PROJECT Project Project Location Description Estimated Cost % from EDTIF Area EDTIF Amount B Hacienda/I-580 Interchange Reconstruct overcrossing with additional NB lane; widen EB off-ramp with third left-turn lane; modify WB loop on-ramp; and widen WB off-ramp with third left-turn lane $14,445,000 56% $8,080,100 C Central Parkway Sidewalks, curb ramps, new signal (at Sybase Drive), turn lanes, from Arnold Road to Hacienda Drive (Segments: 16A, 17, 18) $2,820,000 90% $2,543,600 D Gleason Drive New signal and turn lanes at Gleason and Arnold; new sidewalks and striping from Tassajara to Fallon (Segments: 19, 20) $1,234,000 90% $1,113,000 E Tassajara Road Widening, turn lanes, sidewalks, curb ramps, new signals from I-580 to County line (Segments: 22, 22A, 23, 24) $32,399,000 85% $27,569,800 F Tassajara/I-580 Interchange Widen eastbound off-ramp approach at Tassajara Road to provide fifth lane $4,308,000 70% $3,031,500 G Fallon Road Widening, turn lanes, sidewalks, new signals between I-580 and Gleason Drive (Segments: 26A, 27) $8,166,000 69% $5,632,500 H Scarlett Drive New 4 lane roadway with median from Houston Dr to Dublin Blvd, and raised medians, curb ramps and new traffic signals from Dougherty to Houston (Segment: 21) $9,049,000 39% $3,570,300 I Fallon/I-580 Interchange Reconstruct overcrossing with four lanes in each direction; reconstruct SB to EB loop on-ramp; widen EB off-ramp with two exit lanes with two left turn and two right tum lanes; widen EB on-ramp; widen WB off-ramp with two left turn and two right turn lanes; and widen WB on-ramp. $4,307,000 40% $1,730,700 J Hacienda Drive New turn lanes, restriping between Dublin Blvd and Gleason Drive (Segment: 14) $3,279,000 92% $3,001,400 454 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 14 TABLE 4: UPDATED EDTIF PROJECTS AND TOTAL AMOUNT PER PROJECT Project Project Location Description Estimated Cost % from EDTIF Area EDTIF Amount K Iron Horse Trail Crossing New bike/pedestrian bridge for Iron Horse Trail across Dublin Boulevard; (the EDTIF amount is the local match amount likely necessary to obtain outside funding) $11,600,000 4% $500,000 L Altamirano Avenue Class I Trail New Class I trail along Altamirano Avenue, north of I-580 between Iron Horse Trail and Hacienda Drive $1,552,000 47% $729,400 M Ongoing Traffic Signal Upgrades Signal timing modifications and signal systems upgrades associated with accommodating traffic from new development ($100,000 per year for 5 years) $500,000 100% $500,000 N Future Nexus Report Update Update EDTIF nexus study to reflect updated growth projections, project definitions and costs $150,000 100% $150,000 O Update Eastern Dublin Travel Demand Model Update City of Dublin travel demand model to keep it up-to-date for applications in future East Dublin planning studies $300,000 100% $300,000 Totals $206,542,000 61% $126,529,100 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021. FEE CALCULATIONS There are three different transportation fee components charged within the Eastern Dublin area. The basic EDTIF fee is the primary fee program and is charged to new development of all types located in the Eastern Dublin area to address the wide range of transportation improvements needed to support future development in the area as described above. In addition, there is a Freeway Interchange Fee that is focused on reimbursing the City of Pleasanton for improvements previously constructed at two interchanges along I-580, and there is a BART Garage Fee that is charged only in a portion of the Eastern Dublin area for the purpose of reimbursing Alameda County for previous investments in the parking garage at the East Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. The calculations of each fee component are described below. 455 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 15 EDTIF FEE CALCULATIONS The calculation of the basic EDTIF fee was completed based on the figures described above. Starting from the approximately $126 million of project costs eligible to be included in the EDTIF program, we add the outstanding fee credits currently carried by the EDTIF program and subtract the current (as of June 30, 2021) EDTIF fund balance, and the result is divided by the number of net new PM peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be generated by new development in the EDTIF area. Table 5 shows the results of the calculation. 456 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 16 TABLE 5: EDTIF CALCULATION Calculation Value Total Eligible Project Cost in EDTIF Program $126,529,100 Plus Outstanding EDTIF Fee Credits (as of 6/30/21) $53,929,941 Less Current EDTIF Fund Balance (as of 6/30/21) ($13,577,379) Total EDTIF Amount $166,881,662 Divided by Number of New PM Peak Hour Trips 12,136 Maximum Fee per New PM Peak Hour Trip $13,751 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021. It is important to note that the fee calculation shown in Table 5 is intended to represent the maximum fee that could be charged to support the list of projects shown above. The fees would be charged to new development of all types located in the geographic area covered by the EDTIF. In order to allocate the fees equitably among different development types, the fee amounts charged to each land use category should reflect the relative effects of each category on the transportation system. This is consistent with the approach used in the current fee program, which specifies different fee rates for different land use types. Using the maximum fee per new PM peak hour trip calculated in Table 5 above as a basis, the number of PM peak hour trips associated with a representative sample of land use categories has been estimated and the associated fee amount calculated. Table 6 shows the results of those calculations for several typical land use categories, along with an informational comparison of the updated fees to the fee rates currently charged through the existing EDTIF program. It should be remembered that the existing EDTIF program assesses a project’s fees based on its daily trips whereas the updated EDTIF is going to assess fees based on PM peak hour trips. Updated EDTIF fee calculations for a wider range of land use categories are shown in Appendix E. 457 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 17 TABLE 6: FEE AMOUNTS FOR TYPICAL LAND USE CATEGORIES Category Unit1 Updated EDTIF Fees Current EDTIF Fees Adjusted PM Peak Hour Trip Rate2 Fee per New PM Peak Hour Trip Fee per Unit Daily Trip Rate3 Fee per New Daily Trip4 Fee per Unit Single-Family/Medium Density Residential (up to 14 units/acre) DU 0.99 $13,751 $13,613 10 $1,143 $12,619 Medium/High Density Residential (14.1 – 25 units per acre) DU 0.56 $13,751 $7,701 7 $1,143 $8,838 High Density Residential (more than 25 units per acre) DU 0.44 $13,751 $6,050 6 $1,143 $7,572 Hotel Room 0.60 $13,751 $8,251 10 $1,143 $11,430 General Office KSF 1.15 $13,751 $15,814 20 $1,143 $22,860 Restaurant (sit-down, high turnover) KSF 6.35 $13,751 $87,325 104 $1,143 $118,872 Community Shopping Center KSF 2.48 $13,751 $34,054 46 $1,143 $52,578 1. DU = Dwelling Unit; KSF = Thousand Square Feet. 2. Adjusted PM peak hour trip rates were taken from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, and a pass-by percentage of 35% has been applied to the uses that are considered retail (i.e., the restaurant and shopping center). 3. Daily trip rates for the current EDTIF were taken from the East Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Schedule, Effective May 3, 2009, Exhibit C of Resolution No. 41-09 revising the EDTIF. 4. The current fee per new daily trip is taken from the fee schedule adopted by the City Council effective July 1, 2021. 458 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 18 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE FEE CALCULATIONS The Freeway Interchange Fee is applied to new development within the Eastern Dublin area as a mechanism for reimbursing the City of Pleasanton for the costs of making improvements to the interchanges on Interstate 580 at Hacienda Drive and at Tassajara Road/Santa Rita Road that benefit development in both Pleasanton and Eastern Dublin. Pleasanton already constructed improvements at those two interchanges at the time the Freeway Interchange Fee was created; the fee is a mechanism to allow development in East Dublin to pay a proportional share of those costs. The Freeway Interchange Fee was set at $21.46 per daily trip per Resolution No. 11-96, Exhibit C. The agreement between Dublin and Pleasanton regarding transfer of fee revenues provided that the fee would be automatically escalated each year, beginning with a base year of 1998 (the year of the revenue transfer agreement between the two cities). The escalation index selected at that time was the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) interest rate, and that rate has been applied consistently by the City’s Finance Department ever since. As of September 1, 2021, the current Freeway Interchange Fee per new daily trip is $36.15 per daily trip. Note that this fee continues to be assessed per daily trip, whereas the updated EDTIF is going to be assessed per PM peak hour trip for reasons described previously. As of the end of FY21, the current balance remaining to be collected and transferred to Pleasanton is $2,711,538. The Freeway Interchange Fee will continue to be collected until the outstanding balance is paid off. RESIDENTIAL BART GARAGE FEE CALCULATIONS The Residential BART Garage Fee is a contribution toward additional parking spaces constructed at the East Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station by the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority (ACSPA) and BART. Per the terms of the agreement between Dublin and the ACSPA, the ACSPA is to receive a cumulative total of $6 million in fees; as of the end of FY21, there was a remaining balance of $1.127 million yet to be collected. The fees are collected only on residential development located outside the Dublin Transit Center area. The Residential BART Garage Fee component is calculated as follows: • Estimate the portion of future residential development in the EDTIF area that is outside the Transit Center and thus would be subject to the fee. This has been calculated as 1,735 total new dwelling units in the overall EDTIF area minus 464 units anticipated within the Transit Center area, for a remainder of 1,271 new dwelling units that will be subject to the Residential BART Garage Fee. • Divide the remaining $1.127 million due to the ACSPA by the 1,271 new residential units subject to the fee, for a resulting fee of $887 per dwelling unit. 459 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 19 A summary of the three fee components is shown in Table 7. TABLE 7: SUMMARY OF UPDATED FEES Category Unit1 Updated EDTIF Fee Updated Freeway Interchange Fee Updated BART Garage Fee2 Single-Family/Medium Density Residential (up to 14 units/acre) DU $13,613 $362 $887 Medium/High Density Residential (14.1 – 25 units per acre) DU $7,701 $253 $502 High Density Residential (more than 25 units per acre) DU $6,050 $217 $394 Hotel Room $8,251 $362 $0 General Office KSF $15,814 $723 $0 Restaurant (sit-down, high turnover) KSF $87,325 $4,808 $0 Community Shopping Center KSF $34,054 $1,663 $0 1. DU = Dwelling Unit; KSF = Thousand Square Feet. 2. BART Garage Fee is charged only on residential development located outside DTC area. 460 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 20 5. SUMMARY OF REQUIRED PROGRAM ELEMENTS This report has provided a detailed discussion of the elements of the updated Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee program and explained the analytical techniques used to develop this nexus study. The report addresses all of the fee program elements required by AB 1600, as summarized below. 1. Identifying the purpose of the fee The Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee (EDTIF) program has been in place for more than 20 years. Consistent with the provisions of the City’s General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, the purpose of the EDTIF program is to support public improvements and facilities needed to mitigate the traffic-related impacts of new development in eastern Dublin. 2. Identifying how the fee will be used and the facilities to be funded through the fee The fee will be used to help fund capital improvement projects that will accommodate future transportation needs in eastern Dublin. Table 1 identifies the projects to be funded through the fee. 3. Determining a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development on which the fee is imposed As described in this report, different types of development generate traffic with different characteristics. The fee amounts presented in Table 6 account for these different characteristics by applying different per- unit fee factors to each type of development. These considerations account for the differential impacts on the local transportation system generated by different development types. 4. Determining a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development on which the fee is imposed The need for the facilities listed in Table 1 has been established through the prior EDTIF nexus studies, as well as through planning studies sponsored by the City over the last several years, as described in Section 2 of this report. Table 4 shows that there are no existing deficiencies on the facilities included in this EDTIF program, indicating that the need for improvements is not caused by existing development. 5. Determining a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility (or portion of facility) attributable to new development Section 4 of this report describes the calculations applied to determine the cost of the public facility that is attributable to new development; this process accounts for the effects of existing deficiencies (of which 461 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report December 2021 21 there are none in this program) and the effects of traffic generated from outside the EDTIF area. Thus, a reasonable effort has been made to quantitatively establish the relationship between the fees charged in the EDTIF program and the costs of public improvements attributable to new development within the EDTIF area. 462 APPENDIX A: CURRENT EDTIF PROJECTS 463 TABLE A-1:STATUS OF EAST DUBLIN TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROJECTS SINCE ADOPTION OF EDTIF Segment #Project Description from old EDTIF Current Status Include in Updated EDTIF? Updated EDTIF Project Designation SECTION I IMPROVEMENTS * Section I/II distinction no longer necessary 8 Dublin Boulevard Extension - Southern Pacific R/W to East BART Access Project is complete No 8A Dublin Boulevard Extension - East BART Access to Hacienda Drive Planned Yes Project A 9 Dublin Boulevard - Hacienda to Tassajara Road Planned Yes Project A 10 Dublin Boulevard - Tassajara Road to Fallon Road Under construction Yes Project A 11 Dublin Boulevard Extension - Fallon Road to Airway Planned Yes Project A 13 Hacienda - I-580 to Dublin Boulevard Extension (not including interchange)Project is complete No 14 Hacienda - Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Drive Updated to maintain 4 lane segment; some widening needed to provide 4 lanes.Yes Project J 15 Hacienda Road - Freeway Interchange improvements Planned Yes Project B 16 Arnold Road - Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Project is complete No 16A Central Parkway - Arnold to Hacienda Planned Yes Project C 17 Central Parkway - Hacienda to Tassajara Planned Yes Project C 18 Central Parkway - Tassajara Road to Keegan Street Planned Yes Project C 18A Central Parkway - Keegan Street to Fallon Project is complete No 19 Gleason - Arnold Road to Hacienda: signal and frontage improvements Planned Yes Project D 19A Gleason - Hacienda to Tassajara Project is complete No 20 Gleason - Tassajara to Fallon Planned Yes Project D 22 Tassajara Road - 5,000 feet north of Gleason to Contra Costa County Line: turn lanes Planned Yes Project E 22A Tassajara Road - Gleason Road to 5,000 feet north of Gleason Road: 6 lanes Partially complete Yes Project E 23 Tassajara Road - Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Road: 6 lanes Planned Yes Project E 24 Tassajara Road - Dublin Boulevard Extension to I-580: 6 lanes Planned Yes Project E 25 Tassajara Road - Freeway Interchange improvements Planned Yes Project F 26 Fallon Road - Tassajara to Gleason Project is complete No 26A Fallon Road - Gleason to Dublin Boulevard: three SB lanes, medians between Dublin and Central Planned Yes Project G 27 Fallon Road - Dublin Boulevard to North of I-580: 8 lanes Planned Yes Project G SECTION II IMPROVEMENTS * Section I/II distinction no longer necessary 1 Dougherty Road - City Limits to Amador Valley Widening Project is complete No 2 Dougherty Road - Amador Valley Boulevard to Houston Place Project is complete No 3 Dougherty Road - Houston Place to Dublin Boulevard Project is complete No 4 Dougherty Road - Dublin Boulevard to North of I-580 Off Ramp Project is complete No 5 Dublin Boulevard - East of Village Parkway to Sierra Court Widening Project is complete No 6 Dublin Boulevard - Sierra Court to Dougherty Road Widening Partially complete Yes Project A 7 Dublin Boulevard - Dougherty to Southern Pacific Right-of-Way Project is complete No 12 Freeway Interchange - Dublin Boulevard Extension with I-580 (Airway Blvd)Project is complete No 21 Scarlett Drive - Extend from Dougherty Road to Dublin Boulevard Under construction Yes Project H 28 Fallon and I-580 Freeway Interchange with Signals Planned Yes Project I SECTION I RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS * Section I/II distinction no longer necessary 29 Tassajara Creek Bike Path Some segments completed, EBRPD working on remaining section No 30 Park and Ride Lots Project is complete No 31 Iron Horse Trail Bridge Crossing at Dublin Blvd New Project Yes Project K 32 Altamirano Class I Trail New Project Yes Project L OTHER COSTS INCLUDED IN 2010 TIF UPDATE Brighton Drive and Amador Valley Boulevard, install traffic signal Project is complete No Village Parkway and Amador Valley Boulevard, lengthen southbound left-turn lane Based on recent traffic volume review, project is no longer needed No Other miscellaneous costs, such as traffic signal upgrades, update of nexus study, and travel model update, have been reviewed and updated and are now shown in Table 1 of updated EDTIF Report Costs have been updated Yes * Section I and Section II are now combined into one single fee schedule. See the EDTIF Nexus Report for more details. 464 APPENDIX B: DETAILED INFORMATION ON UPDATED EDTIF PROJECTS 465 PROJECT A: DUBLIN BOULEVARD 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 6 Segment 6 Dublin Blvd from Sierra Court to Dougherty Road Date: 8/1/2017 By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $226,000.00 $226,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $181,000.00 $181,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $46,000.00 $46,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $46,000.00 $46,000 $499,000 5 New Sign and Post 5 EA $700.00 $3,500 6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 5 EA $900.00 $4,500 $8,000 7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 3,600 LF $1.00 $3,600 8 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)1,750 LF $1.50 $2,625 9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 100 LF $4.80 $480 10 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)150 SF $12.00 $1,800 11 Remove Traffic Legend 100 SF $3.00 $300 12 Remove Traffic Stripe 3,500 LF $3.00 $10,500 $19,305 13 Sawcutting 2,100 LF $5.00 $10,500 14 Pavement Section 6,400 SF $23.00 $147,200 15 Roadway Right of Way Acquisition 2,100 SF $55.00 $115,500 16 Concrete Curb & Gutter 1,200 LF $90.00 $108,000 17 Curb Ramp 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000 $399,200 18 Remove AC Pavement 2,100 SF $5.00 $10,500 19 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter 1,200 LF $20.00 $24,000 20 Remove Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Ramp 15,300 SF $16.00 $244,800 $279,300 21 Concrete Sidewalk 8,700 SF $20.00 $174,000 22 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 8,400 SF $55.00 $462,000 $636,000 23 Signal Modifications at Dublin Blvd./Sierra Ct. 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000 24 Signal Modifications at Dublin Blvd./Dublin Ct. 1 LS $271,000.00 $271,000 $421,000 $2,261,805 $452,361 $339,271 $339,271 $20,000 $3,412,708 $207,833.89 $3,620,541.39 Paving/Curb Subtotal - Paving Curb Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Subtotal - Frontage Improvements Signing Subtotal - Signing Striping Subtotal - Striping Electrical Subtotal - Electrical SUBTOTAL Demolition & Removals Subtotal - Demolition & Removals Frontage Improvements ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) Contingency (20%) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee CIVIL ESTIMATE (2019 DOLLARS) 482 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 8A Segment 8A Dublin Blvd from Iron Horse Parkway to Hacienda Drive Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $44,000.00 $44,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $36,000.00 $36,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $9,000.00 $9,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $9,000.00 $9,000 $98,000 5 New Sign and Post 2 EA $700.00 $1,400 6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 1 EA $900.00 $900 $2,300 7 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 0 LF $4.80 $0 8 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)0 SF $12.00 $0 $0 9 Sawcutting 450 LF $5.00 $2,250 10 Pavement Section 5,000 SF $23.00 $115,000 11 Concrete Curb 450 LF $85.00 $38,250 12 Bus Pullout 1 EA $35,000.00 $35,000 13 Bus Shelter 1 EA $20,000.00 $20,000 $210,500 14 Clear and Grub 1,000 SF $1.00 $1,000 $1,000 15 Landscaping 0 SF $10.00 $0 16 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $20.00 $0 17 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0 $0 18 Signal Modifications at Dublin/Arnold 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000 19 Street lighting 5 EA $6,000.00 $30,000 $130,000 $441,800 $88,360 $66,270 $66,270 $30,000 $692,700 $42,185.43 $734,885.43 Signing Contingency (20%) Subtotal - Frontage Improvements Frontage Improvements Demolition & Removals Subtotal - Demolition & Removals Subtotal - Electrical SUBTOTAL Subtotal - Paving Curb Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Electrical Subtotal - Signing Striping Subtotal - Striping Paving/Curb Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee CIVIL ESTIMATE 483 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 9 Segment 9 Dublin Blvd from Hacienda Drive to Tassajara Road Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $149,000.00 $149,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $120,000.00 $120,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000 $329,000 5 New Sign and Post 4 EA $700.00 $2,800 $2,800 6 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 1,000 LF $1.00 $1,000 7 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)360 LF $1.50 $540 8 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 560 LF $10.00 $5,600 9 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)105 SF $12.00 $1,260 10 Remove Traffic Stripe 550 LF $3.00 $1,650 11 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 280 LF $4.80 $1,344 $10,050 12 Sawcutting 1,000 LF $5.00 $5,000 13 Pavement Section 5,000 SF $23.00 $115,000 14 Concrete Curb 200 LF $85.00 $17,000 15 Roadway Right of Way Acquisition 3,000 SF $55.00 $165,000 16 Concrete Curb & Gutter 750 LF $90.00 $67,500 17 Bus Pullout 1 EA $35,000.00 $35,000 18 Modify Bus Stop 1 EA $10,000.00 $10,000 19 Slurry Seal 76,000 SF $2.00 $152,000 20 Curb Ramp 6 EA $9,000.00 $54,000 $620,500 21 Deepened Curb and Gutter 110 LF $150.00 $16,500 22 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 50 LF $30.00 $1,500 23 Biotreatment Soil 10 CY $150.00 $1,500 24 Permeable Rock 10 CY $100.00 $1,000 $20,500 21 Remove AC Pavement 900 SF $5.00 $4,500 22 Remove Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Ramp 6,700 SF $16.00 $107,200 23 Remove Tree 2 EA $2,500.00 $5,000 $116,700 24 Concrete Sidewalk 6,000 SF $20.00 $120,000 25 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 3,000 SF $55.00 $165,000 26 Landscaping 4,500 SF $10.00 $45,000 $285,000 26 Signal Modifications at Dublin/Hacienda 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000 $100,000 $1,484,550 $296,910 $222,683 $222,683 $15,000 $2,241,825 $136,527.14 $2,378,352.14 Subtotal - Green Infrastructure Subtotal - Signing Striping Subtotal - Striping Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Signing Subtotal - Frontage Improvements Electrical Subtotal - Electrical Paving/Curb Subtotal - Paving Curb SUBTOTAL Demolition & Removals Subtotal - Demolition & Removals Frontage Improvements Stormwater Improvements Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Contingency (20%) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee CIVIL ESTIMATE 484 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 10 Segment 10 Dublin Blvd from Tassajara Road to Fallon Road Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG); Updated 1/6/2020 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $130,000.00 $130,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $104,000.00 $104,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $26,000.00 $26,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $26,000.00 $26,000 $286,000 5 New Sign and Post 5 EA $700.00 $3,500 6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 2 EA $900.00 $1,800 $5,300 7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 500 LF $1.00 $500 8 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)500 LF $1.50 $750 9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 200 LF $4.80 $960 10 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 200 LF $10.00 $2,000 11 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)200 SF $12.00 $2,400 12 Remove Traffic Legend 280 SF $3.00 $840 13 Remove Traffic Stripe 500 LF $3.00 $1,500 $8,950 14 Sawcutting 400 LF $5.00 $2,000 15 Pavement Section 21,000 SF $23.00 $483,000 16 Curb Ramp 12 EA $9,000.00 $108,000 17 Concrete Curb 0 LF $85.00 $0 18 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000 19 Bus Shelter 2 EA $20,000.00 $40,000 $703,000 20 Excavation 1,260 CY $75.00 $94,500 21 Clear and Grub 2,000 SF $1.00 $2,000 $96,500 22 Deepened Curb and Gutter 450 LF $150.00 $67,500 23 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 210 LF $30.00 $6,300 24 Biotreatment Soil 35 CY $150.00 $5,250 25 Permeable Rock 24 CY $100.00 $2,400 $81,450 26 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/Dublin 1 LS $80,000.00 $80,000 27 Signal Modifications at Dublin/Brannigan 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 28 Signal Modifications at Dublin/Keegan 0 LS $90,000.00 $0 29 Signal Modifications at Dublin/Lockhart 0 LS $150,000.00 $0 30 Street lighting 0 EA $6,000.00 $0 $130,000 $1,311,200 $262,240 $196,680 $196,680 $65,000 $2,031,800 $123,736.62 $2,155,536.62 Paving/Curb Subtotal - Paving Curb Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Subtotal - Green Infrastructure Signing Subtotal - Signing Striping Subtotal - Striping Electrical Subtotal - Electrical SUBTOTAL Demolition & Removals Subtotal - Demolition & Removals Stormwater Improvements Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Contingency (20%) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee CIVIL ESTIMATE 485 Segment 11 $5,943,840.00 $103,543,840.00 Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) 486 PROJECT B: HACIENDA/I-580 INTERCHANGE 487 Project B: I-580/Hacienda Drive Interchange Description: Preliminary Cost Estimate Date: Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) Description Cost Estimate, 2018 EDTIF Report* 2017-2021 Construction Cost Escalation (3% Annualized) Updated Cost Estimate Reconstruct overcrossing with additional NB lane; widen EB off-ramp with third left-turn lane; modify WB loop on-ramp; widen WB off-ramp with third left-turn lane 12,834,416.00$ 1,610,832.28$ 14,445,248.28$ *Cost estimate represented 2017 dollars 28 488 PROJECT C: CENTRAL PARKWAY 489 490 491 492 493 494 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 16A Segment 16A Central Parkway between Arnold Road and Hacienda Drive Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $120,000.00 $120,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $96,000.00 $96,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $24,000.00 $24,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $24,000.00 $24,000 $264,000 5 New Sign and Post 4 EA $700.00 $2,800 6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 5 EA $900.00 $4,500 $7,300 7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 1,650 LF $1.00 $1,650 8 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)1,900 LF $1.50 $2,850 9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 510 LF $4.80 $2,448 10 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 100 LF $10.00 $1,000 11 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)420 SF $12.00 $5,040 12 Remove Traffic Legend 100 SF $3.00 $300 13 Remove Traffic Stripe 560 LF $3.00 $1,680 $14,968 14 Sawcutting 2,000 LF $5.00 $10,000 15 Pavement Section 15,500 SF $23.00 $356,500 16 Concrete Curb 1,250 LF $85.00 $106,250 17 Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $90.00 $0 18 Curb Ramp 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000 $490,750 19 Deepened Curb and Gutter 200 LF $150.00 $30,000 20 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 100 LF $30.00 $3,000 21 Biotreatment Soil 20 CY $150.00 $3,000 22 Permeable Rock 15 CY $100.00 $1,500 $37,500 19 Remove AC Pavement 4,300 SF $5.00 $21,500 20 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter 1,250 LF $20.00 $25,000 21 Clear and Grub 14,000 SF $1.00 $14,000 $60,500 22 Landscaping 0 SF $10.00 $0 23 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $20.00 $0 24 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0 $0 25 New Traffic Sginal at Central/Sybase 1 EA $300,000.00 $300,000 26 Street lighting 5 EA $6,000.00 $30,000 $330,000 $1,205,018 $241,004 $180,753 $180,753 $25,000 $1,832,527 $111,600.89 $1,944,127.89 Subtotal - Green Infrastructure Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Signing Subtotal - Signing Striping Subtotal - Striping ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Contingency (20%) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee Paving/Curb Subtotal - Paving Curb Stormwater Improvements Subtotal - Frontage Improvements Electrical CIVIL ESTIMATE SUBTOTAL Demolition & Removals Subtotal - Demolition & Removals Frontage Improvements Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) Subtotal - Electrical 495 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 17 Segment 17 Central Parkway between Hacienda Drive and Tassajara Road Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000 $11,000 5 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 30 LF $10.00 $300 6 Remove Traffic Stripe 30 LF $3.00 $90 $390 7 Concrete Curb & Gutter 60 LF $90.00 $5,400 8 Curb Ramp 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000 $23,400 9 Concrete Sidewalk 500 SF $20.00 $10,000 10 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 500 SF $0.00 $0 $10,000 $44,790 $8,958 $6,719 $6,719 $5,000 $72,185 $4,396.07 $76,581.07 CIVIL ESTIMATE Subtotal - Paving Curb SUBTOTAL Contingency (20%) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee Subtotal - Frontage Improvements Frontage Improvements Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Subtotal - Striping Paving/Curb Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Striping 496 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 18 Segment 18 Central Parkway between Tassajara Road and Keegan Street Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG); Updated 1/9/2020 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $51,000.00 $51,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $41,000.00 $41,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $11,000.00 $11,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $11,000.00 $11,000 $114,000 5 2" AC Overlay 66,000 SF $4.00 $264,000 6 Curb Ramp 6 EA $9,000.00 $54,000 7 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000 $388,000 8 Landscaping 0 SF $10.00 $0 9 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $20.00 $0 10 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0 $0 $502,000 $100,400 $75,300 $75,300 $0 $753,000 $45,857.70 $798,857.70 Contingency (20%) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee CIVIL ESTIMATE Subtotal - Frontage Improvements SUBTOTAL Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Frontage Improvements Paving/Curb Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Subtotal - Paving Curb 497 PROJECT D: GLEASON DRIVE 498 499 500 501 502 503 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 19 Segment 19 Gleason Drive between Arnold Road and Hacienda Drive Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $47,000.00 $47,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $38,000.00 $38,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 $105,000 5 New Sign and Post 2 EA $700.00 $1,400 6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 3 EA $900.00 $2,700 $4,100 7 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)500 LF $1.50 $750 8 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 200 LF $10.00 $2,000 9 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)140 SF $12.00 $1,680 $4,430 10 Sawcutting 0 LF $5.00 $0 11 Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $90.00 $0 12 Curb Ramp 4 EA $9,000.00 $36,000 $36,000 13 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $20.00 $0 14 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0 $0 15 Street lighting 3 EA $6,000.00 $18,000 16 New Traffic Signal 1 EA $300,000.00 $300,000 $318,000 $467,530 $93,506 $70,130 $70,130 $5,000 $706,295 $43,013.37 $749,308.37 Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Signing Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Subtotal - Signing Striping Subtotal - Striping Paving/Curb Subtotal - Paving Curb Frontage Improvements Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee CIVIL ESTIMATE Subtotal - Frontage Improvements Electrical Subtotal - Electrical SUBTOTAL Contingency (20%) 504 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 20 Segment 20 Gleason Drive between Tassajara Road and Fallon Road Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG); Updated 1/13/2020 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $31,000.00 $31,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $7,000.00 $7,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $7,000.00 $7,000 $70,000 5 New Sign and Post 0 EA $700.00 $0 $0 6 2" AC Overlay 35,000 SF $4.00 $140,000 7 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000 8 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 0 LF $4.80 $0 9 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 250 LF $10.00 $2,500 10 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)230 SF $12.00 $2,760 11 Remove Traffic Legend 150 SF $3.00 $450 12 Remove Traffic Stripe 200 LF $3.00 $600 $216,310 13 Sawcutting 0 LF $5.00 $0 14 Pavement Section 0 SF $23.00 $0 15 Roadway Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $46.00 $0 16 Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $90.00 $0 17 Curb Ramp 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000 $18,000 18 Landscaping 0 SF $10.00 $0 19 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $20.00 $0 20 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0 $0 21 Signal Modification at Gleason/Tassajara 0 EA $80,000.00 $0 $0 $304,310 $60,862 $45,647 $45,647 $0 $456,465 $27,798.72 $484,263.72 Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Signing Subtotal - Frontage Improvements Electrical Subtotal - Electrical SUBTOTAL Subtotal - Signing Striping Subtotal - Striping Paving/Curb Subtotal - Paving Curb Frontage Improvements Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Contingency (20%) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee CIVIL ESTIMATE 505 PROJECT E: TASSAJARA ROAD 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 2/13/2019 Tassajara Road Improvements (Segment 22- City Portion) Fallon Road to City/County Limits Description Budget Construction Engineers Estimate 6,054,752.50$ Contingency 15% 908,212.88$ Construction CCO Authority 10% 696,296.54$ Cost Rise Projected in Mid‐2022 (6.7%)* 513,170.55$ Total Construction 8,172,432.46$ Right‐of‐way Road R/W 0.65 acre $540K/acre 351,000.00$ R/W Engineering & Legal 20%of R/W 70,200.00$ Mitigation Land bank (Ave. Ratio 2.75 @35,000/ac) 1,241,346.59$ Creek Setback Mitigation 100,000.00$ Cost Rise Projected in Mid‐2022 (6.7%)* 118,090.62$ Total Right‐of‐way 1,880,637.21$ Project Soft Costs Environmental Study/CEQA 3% of Const. 229,778$ Cost Rise Projected in Mid‐2021 (5.1%)* 11,719$ Environmental Study/CEQA Total 241,497$ Detail Design 12% of Const. 919,111$ Cost Rise Projected in Mid‐2021 (5.1%)* 46,875$ Detail Design Total 965,986$ Total Project Soft Costs 1,207,483$ CM/Testing/Inspect/Permits CM/RE/Inspection 13% of Const. 995,704$ Design Construction Support 2% of Const. 153,185$ Cost Rise Projected in Mid‐2022 (6.7%)* 76,976$ Total CM/Testing/Inspect/Permits 1,225,865$ Fees Impervious Area Development Fee 113,300$ Total Project Estimate 12,599,717$ 516 10/1/2021 Tassajara Road Improvements (Segment 1) North Dublin Ranch Road to Quarry Lane School Road Description Budget Construction Engineers Estimate 7,140,839.72$ Mobilization 15%714,083.97$ Contingency 15%1,178,238.55$ Cost Rise Projected in Mid-2021 (3%)*270,994.87$ Total Construction 9,304,157.11$ Construction CCO Authority 10% 930,415.71$ Total Construction Budget 10,234,572.82$ Total Construction Budget (Round) 10,235,000$ CM/Testing/Inspect CM/RE/Inspection 10% of Const.930,416$ Design Construction Support 2% of Const. 186,083$ Cost Rise Projected in Mid-2022 (3% per year)**66,990$ Total CM/Testing/Inspect 1,183,489$ Total CM/Testing/Inspect (Round)1,183,000$ 11,418,000$ Right‐of‐way Road R/W 0.346 acre ***1,074,616.49$ Road R/W 0.100 acre ****62,116.56$ R/W Engineering & Legal 40%of R/W Mitigation Land bank (Ave. Ratio 2.75 @35,000/ac) Cost Rise Projected in Mid-2021 (3% per year) Total Right‐of‐way 1,136,733.05$ Total Right‐of‐way (Round) 1,137,000.00$ 12,555,000$ Design 970,232$ 13,525,232$ Other Costs, Expenses and Contingencies PW Staff Time 87,746$ City Attorney 10,000$ Total Staff Costs 97,746$ Env application 2,500$ 517 Advertising 2,000$ Printing 5,000$ Total Expenses 9,500$ Fees Impervious Area Development Fee 16,566$ PG&E Electrical Service 100,000$ DSRSD Irrigation Service 50,000$ DSRSD SS Limited Construction Permit 5,000$ Total Fees 171,566.00 278,812$ 13,804,044$ Project Contingency 690,202$ 5.00% 14,494,246$ 14,494,000$ * Percentage of cost rise based on Construction Cost Indices and Forecast for 2020 & 2021. ** Assumed CPI increase of 3% per year. ***City valuations determined from the City of Dublin Appraisal Consulting Assignment Report, dated Septem **** Rural Segment $540k per acre 518 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 22A Segment 22A-South Tassajara Road - From Gleason Drive to North Dublin Ranch Drive Date: 1/9/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%) 1 LS $240,000.00 $240,000 2 Traffic Control (8%) 1 LS $192,000.00 $192,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $48,000.00 $48,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $48,000.00 $48,000 $528,000 5 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 5,500 LF $1.00 $5,500 6 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)1,090 LF $1.50 $1,635 7 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 680 LF $4.80 $3,264 8 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 800 LF $10.00 $8,000 9 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)350 SF $12.00 $4,200 10 Remove Traffic Legend 130 SF $3.00 $390 11 Remove Traffic Stripe 420 LF $3.00 $1,260 $24,249 12 Sawcutting 3,700 LF $5.00 $18,500 13 Pavement Section 35,000 SF $23.00 $805,000 14 Concrete Curb 3,500 LF $85.00 $297,500 15 Curb Ramp 4 EA $9,000.00 $36,000 $1,157,000 16 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter 3,200 LF $20.00 $64,000 17 Remove Tree 11 EA $2,500.00 $27,500 18 Clear and Grub 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000 19 Excavation 1,500 CY $75.00 $112,500 $239,000 20 Deepened Curb and Gutter 70 LF $150.00 $10,500 21 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 30 LF $30.00 $900 22 Biotreatment Soil 5 CY $150.00 $750 23 Permeable Rock 3 CY $100.00 $300 $12,450 24 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/Gleason 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000 25 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/S. Dublin Ranch 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000 26 Conversion of copper connection to fiber optic connection 2,500 LF $50.00 $125,000 $425,000 $2,385,699 $477,140 $357,855 $357,855 $20,000 $3,598,549 $219,151.60 $3,817,700.10 Contingency (20%) Stormwater Improvements Subtotal - Green Infrstructure Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Demolition & Removals Electrical Subtotal - Electrical SUBTOTAL Subtotal - Demolition & Removals Striping Subtotal - Striping Paving/Curb Subtotal - Paving Curb Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee CIVIL ESTIMATE 20 519 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 23 Segment 23 Tassajara Road - Between Dublin Blvd and Gleason Drive Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG); Updated 1/9/2020 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $74,000.00 $74,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $60,000.00 $60,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000 $164,000 5 New Sign and Post 2 EA $700.00 $1,400 6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 2 EA $900.00 $1,800 $3,200 7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 1,000 LF $1.00 $1,000 8 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000 9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 250 LF $4.80 $1,200 10 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 30 LF $10.00 $300 11 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)100 SF $12.00 $1,200 12 Remove Traffic Legend 100 SF $3.00 $300 13 Remove Traffic Stripe 250 LF $3.00 $750 $74,750 14 Sawcutting 1,000 LF $5.00 $5,000 15 Pavement Section 13,000 SF $23.00 $299,000 16 Roadway Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $46.00 $0 17 Concrete Curb 820 LF $85.00 $69,700 18 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000 19 Curb Ramp 4 EA $9,000.00 $36,000 $479,700 20 Remove AC Pavement 1,000 SF $5.00 $5,000 21 Remove Concrete Curb 1,000 LF $20.00 $20,000 22 Excavation 220 CY $75.00 $16,500 $41,500 23 Deepened Curb and Gutter 270 LF $150.00 $40,500 24 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 130 LF $30.00 $3,900 25 Biotreatment Soil 22 CY $150.00 $3,250 26 Permeable Rock 14 CY $100.00 $1,444 $49,094 27 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/Central 0 LS $50,000.00 $0 28 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/The Shops 0 LS $160,000.00 $0 29 1-A Pole 0 LS $30,000.00 $0 30 Street lighting 0 EA $6,000.00 $0 $0 $812,244 $162,449 $121,837 $121,837 $15,000 $1,233,367 $75,112.03 $1,308,478.70 Contingency (20%) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee CIVIL ESTIMATE Subtotal - Frontage Improvements Electrical Subtotal - Electrical SUBTOTAL Stormwater Improvements Subtotal - Signing Striping Subtotal - Striping Paving/Curb Subtotal - Paving Curb Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Signing Demolition & Removals Subtotal - Demolition & Removals 21 520 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 24 Segment 24 Tassajara Road - Between I-580 Interchange and Dublin Blvd Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000 $11,000 5 New Sign and Post 1 EA $700.00 $700 6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 1 EA $900.00 $900 $1,600 7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 0 LF $1.00 $0 8 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)0 LF $1.50 $0 9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 0 LF $4.80 $0 10 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 0 LF $10.00 $0 11 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)0 SF $12.00 $0 12 Remove Traffic Legend 0 SF $3.00 $0 13 Remove Traffic Stripe 0 LF $3.00 $0 $0 14 Sawcutting 0 LF $5.00 $0 15 Pavement Section 0 SF $23.00 $0 16 Roadway Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $46.00 $0 17 Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $90.00 $0 18 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000 $70,000 19 Remove AC Pavement 0 SF $5.00 $0 $0 20 Landscaping 0 SF $10.00 $0 21 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $20.00 $0 22 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0 $0 23 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/Dublin 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000 24 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/Dublin Corporate Way 0 LS $75,000.00 $0 25 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/I-580 Westbound off-ramp 0 LS $150,000.00 $0 26 Street lighting 0 EA $6,000.00 $0 $30,000 $112,600 $22,520 $16,890 $16,890 $0 $168,900 $10,286.01 $179,186.01 Contingency (20%) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee CIVIL ESTIMATE Subtotal - Frontage Improvements Electrical Subtotal - Electrical SUBTOTAL Frontage Improvements Subtotal - Signing Striping Subtotal - Striping Paving/Curb Subtotal - Paving Curb Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Signing Demolition & Removals Subtotal - Demolition & Removals 22 521 PROJECT F: TASSAJARA/I-580 INTERCHANGE 522 Project F: I-580/Tassajara Road Interchange Description: Preliminary Cost Estimate Date: Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) Description Cost Estimate, 2018 EDTIF Report* 2017-2021 Construction Cost Escalation (3% Annualized) Updated Cost Estimate Widen eastbound off-ramp approach at Tassajara Road to provide fifth lane 3,827,397.00$ 480,372.04$ 4,307,769.04$ *Cost estimate represented 2017 dollars 29 523 PROJECT G: FALLON ROAD 524 525 526 527 528 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 26A Segment 26A Fallon Road between Gleason Drive and Dublin Blvd Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $330,000.00 $330,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $264,000.00 $264,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $66,000.00 $66,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $66,000.00 $66,000 $726,000 5 New Sign and Post 4 EA $700.00 $2,800 6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 1 EA $900.00 $900 $3,700 7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 5,300 LF $1.00 $5,300 8 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)3,300 LF $1.50 $4,950 9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 800 LF $4.80 $3,840 10 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 1,000 LF $10.00 $10,000 11 Detail 22 - Double Yellow Center Line 400 LF $2.00 $800 12 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)890 SF $12.00 $10,680 13 Remove Traffic Legend 180 SF $3.00 $540 14 Remove Traffic Stripe 5,500 LF $3.00 $16,500 $52,610 15 Sawcutting 4,000 LF $5.00 $20,000 16 Pavement Section 32,600 SF $23.00 $749,800 17 Bus Pullout 1 EA $35,000.00 $35,000 18 Concrete Curb 2,450 LF $85.00 $208,250 19 Concrete Curb & Gutter 1,200 LF $90.00 $108,000 20 Narrow Raised Median (< 2') 200 LF $12.00 $2,400 21 Curb Ramp 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000 $1,141,450 22 Excavation 1,250 CY $75.00 $93,750 $93,750 23 Landscaping 32,300 SF $10.00 $323,000 24 Concrete Sidewalk 6,750 SF $20.00 $135,000 25 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 4,500 SF $55.00 $247,500 $705,500 26 Deepened Curb and Gutter 800 LF $150.00 $120,000 27 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 400 LF $30.00 $12,000 28 Biotreatment Soil 70 CY $150.00 $10,500 29 Permeable Rock 45 CY $100.00 $4,500 $147,000 26 Partial Signal Modifications at North Leg of Dublin/Fallon 1 LS $120,000.00 $120,000 27 Signal Modification at Central/Fallon 1 LS $200,000.00 $200,000 28 Street lighting 17 EA $6,000.00 $102,000 $422,000 $3,292,010 $658,402 $493,802 $493,802 $10,000 $4,948,015 Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Signing Subtotal - Signing Striping Subtotal - Striping Paving/Curb Subtotal - Paving Curb Demolition & Removals Subtotal - Demolition & Removals Frontage Improvements Subtotal - Frontage Improvements Electrical Subtotal - Electrical SUBTOTAL Stormwater Improvements Subtotal - Green Infrastructure Contingency (20%) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee CIVIL ESTIMATE 23 529 $301,334.11 $5,249,349.11 Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) 24 530 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 27 Segment 27 Fallon Road between Dublin Boulevard and North of I-580 Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $175,000.00 $175,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $140,000.00 $140,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000 $385,000 5 New Sign and Post 8 EA $700.00 $5,600 6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 6 EA $900.00 $5,400 $11,000 7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 7,250 LF $1.00 $7,250 8 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)3,000 LF $1.50 $4,500 9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 1,500 LF $4.80 $7,200 10 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 1,200 LF $10.00 $12,000 11 Detail 22 - Double Yellow Center Line 600 LF $2.00 $1,200 12 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)1,360 SF $12.00 $16,320 13 Remove Traffic Legend 1,500 SF $3.00 $4,500 14 Remove Traffic Stripe 2,000 LF $3.00 $6,000 $58,970 15 Sawcutting 4,500 LF $5.00 $22,500 16 Pavement Section 23,000 SF $23.00 $529,000 17 Roadway Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $46.00 $0 18 Concrete Curb 2,300 LF $85.00 $195,500 19 Bus Pullout 1 EA $35,000.00 $35,000 20 Narrow Raised Median (< 2') 600 LF $7.50 $4,500 21 Curb Ramp 5 EA $9,000.00 $45,000 $831,500 22 Remove AC Pavement 22,250 SF $5.00 $111,250 $111,250 23 Deepened Curb and Gutter 470 LF $150.00 $70,500 24 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 230 LF $30.00 $6,900 25 Biotreatment Soil 40 CY $150.00 $6,000 26 Permeable Rock 30 CY $100.00 $3,000 $86,400 27 Partial Signal Modifications at South Leg of Dublin/Fallon 1 EA $100,000.00 $100,000 28 New Traffic Signal at Fallon/Fallon Gateway 0 EA $300,000.00 $0 29 Signal Modification at Fallon/I-580 SB Exit Ramp 1 EA $120,000.00 $120,000 30 Street lighting 12 EA $6,000.00 $72,000 $292,000 $1,776,120 $355,224 $266,418 $266,418 $85,000 $2,749,180 $167,425.06 $2,916,605.06 SUBTOTAL Demolition & Removals Subtotal - Demolition & Removals Stormwater Improvements Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Signing Subtotal - Green Infrastructure Electrical Subtotal - Electrical Subtotal - Signing Striping Subtotal - Striping Paving/Curb Subtotal - Paving Curb Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) Contingency (20%) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee CIVIL ESTIMATE 25 531 PROJECT H: SCARLETT DRIVE 532 533 534 Segment 21 535 536 $519,477.00 $9,049,477.00 Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) 537 538 539 PROJECT I: FALLON/I-580 INTERCHANGE 540 Project I: I-580/Fallon Road Interchange Description: Preliminary Cost Estimate Date: Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) Description Cost Estimate, 2018 EDTIF Report* 2017-2021 Construction Cost Escalation (3% Annualized) Updated Cost Estimate Reconstruct overcrossing with four lanes in each direction; reconstruct SB to EB loop on-ramp; widen EB off-ramp with two exit lanes with two left-turn and two right-turn lanes; widen EB on-ramp; widen WB off- ramp with two left-turn and two right-turn lanes; and widen WB on-ramp (remaining Dublin Phase 2 Contributions)3,826,360.00$ 480,241.89$ 4,306,601.89$ *Cost estimate represented 2017 dollars 30 541 PROJECT J: HACIENDA DRIVE 542 543 544 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 14 Segment 14 Hacienda Drive between Dublin Boulevard and Gleason Drive Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total 1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $200,000.00 $200,000 2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $160,000.00 $160,000 3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000 4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000 $440,000 5 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 2,300 LF $1.00 $2,300 6 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)1,200 LF $1.50 $1,800 7 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 550 LF $4.80 $2,640 8 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 350 LF $10.00 $3,500 9 Detail 22 - Double Yellow Center Line 50 LF $2.00 $100 10 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)510 SF $12.00 $6,120 11 Remove Traffic Legend 200 SF $3.00 $600 12 Remove Traffic Stripe 2,900 LF $3.00 $8,700 $25,760 13 Sawcutting 2,750 LF $5.00 $13,750 14 Pavement Section 28,300 SF $23.00 $650,900 15 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000 16 Concrete Curb 1,600 LF $85.00 $136,000 17 Concrete Curb & Gutter 1,000 LF $90.00 $90,000 18 Curb Ramp 20 EA $9,000.00 $180,000 $1,140,650 19 Deepened Curb and Gutter 350 LF $150.00 $52,500 20 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 170 LF $30.00 $5,100 21 Biotreatment Soil 30 CY $150.00 $4,500 22 Permeable Rock 20 CY $100.00 $2,000 $64,100 23 Remove AC Pavement 5,700 SF $5.00 $28,500 24 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter 1,000 LF $20.00 $20,000 25 Remove Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Ramp 8,000 SF $16.00 $128,000 26 Clear and Grub 21,400 SF $1.00 $21,400 $197,900 27 Concrete Sidewalk 1,000 SF $20.00 $20,000 28 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0 $20,000 29 Signal Modifications at Hacienda/Central 1 EA $40,000.00 $40,000 30 Signal Modifications at Hacienda/Dublin 1 EA $40,000.00 $40,000 31 Street lighting 12 EA $6,000.00 $72,000 $152,000 $2,040,410 $408,082 $306,062 $306,062 $30,000 $3,090,615 $188,218.45 $3,278,833.45 Paving/Curb Demolition & Removals Subtotal - Electrical Electrical Subtotal - Paving Curb Frontage Improvements Subtotal - Frontage Improvements Stormwater Improvements Subtotal - Green Infrastructure SUBTOTAL $1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee Description: CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE General Subtotal - General Subtotal - Striping Striping Subtotal - Demolition & Removals Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021) ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS) CIVIL ESTIMATE Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing) Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental) Contingency (20%) 545 PROJECT K: IRON HORSE TRAIL CROSSING 546 Project K Project K: Iron Horse Trail Overcrossing Description: Preliminary Cost Estimate Date: Updated 9/29/21 (Per City provided estimate) Description Cost Estimate Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossing across Dublin Blvd along the Iron Horse Trail 11,604,439.00$ 547 PROJECT L: ALTAMIRANO CLASS I TRAIL 548 Project L: Segment 32 - Altamirano Avenue Class I Trail Description: Preliminary Cost Estimate Date: Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG) Description Cost Estimate, 2018 EDTIF Report* 2017-2021 Construction Cost Escalation (3% Annualized) Updated Cost Estimate Class I Trail; 1,400' Long, 14 feet wide 1,379,000.00$ 173,076.65$ 1,552,076.65$ *Cost estimate represented 2017 dollars 27 549 APPENDIX C: GROWTH PROJECTIONS 550 TASSAJARA RDFALLON RDCENTRAL PKWY DUBLIN BLVDHACIENDA DRDOUGHERTY RDAMADOR VALLEY BLVD1014 985 992 2136 1029 2137 1030 1028 2138 979978 1001 975 2139 966 994 1002 2124 995 1048 1050 1035 2135 1031 1123 2123 2122 2145 1034 1033 1388 1015 973 1213 1049 1046 1013 1155 967 982 1216 12171121 991 996 1032 990 1027 1010 993 1036 1016 980 1038 1024 965 984983 1043986 989 1195 1022969 1025 1125 968 1018 1042 1045 1193 1019 2125 1118 10201005 997 1012 1021 1037 1117 1009 1101 1023 1007 971 988976 11001157 1044 987 1194 977 1041 1097 1099 1102 1026 1017 999 1051 1000 1388 1047 1040 981 1052 1011 1211 1192 1198 1156 2141 1008 1004 1006 1093 1039 1106 1003 974 998 11241172 1395 1196 11191098 960 1214 970 N NOT TO SCALE Eastern Dublin TAZs Legend TAZ Boundaries Eastern Dublin §¨¦580 0211016 021 992 998 1004 Figure C-1: Eastern Dublin TAZs *The area shaded in yellow is being removed from the East Dublin TIF area 551 TABLE C-1: EAST DUBLIN GROWTH BY LAND USE CATEGORY Land Use Category Base Year (2020) Future Year (2040) Growth (Base Year to 2040) Households Single Family Dwelling Units 9,375 10,827 1,452 Multi-Family Dwelling Units 2,531 2,814 283 Total Households 11,906 13,641 1,735 Employment Retail Jobs 3,204 6,849 3,645 Office Jobs 9,747 25,179 15,432 Manufacturing Jobs 440 1,786 1,346 Total Employment 13,391 33,814 20,423 552 APPENDIX D: LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA 553 TABLE D-1: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS CRITERIA Level of Service Description Delay in Seconds A Progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. < 10.0 B Progression is good, cycle lengths are short, or both. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. > 10.0 to 20.0 C Higher congestion may result from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping. > 20.0 to 35.0 D The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. > 35.0 to 55.0 E This level is considered by many agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. > 55.0 to 80.0 F This level is considered unacceptable with oversaturation, which is when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. This level may also occur at high V/C ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be contributing factors to such delay levels. > 80.0 Source: 2010 Highway Capacity Manual. 554 APPENDIX E: EDTIF FEE AMOUNTS BY LAND USE CATEGORY 555 EDTIF Fee Calculations by Land Use Category Category Unit PM Pk Hr Trip Rate Pass-by Adjustment Adjusted PM Pk Hr Trip Rate Fee per PM Pk Hr Trip Fee per Unit RESIDENTIAL: Single-Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre)DU 0.99 0 0.99 $13,751 $13,613 Medium-Density Residential (6-14 units/acre)DU 0.99 0 0.99 $13,751 $13,613 Medium/High Density Residential (14-25 units/acre)DU 0.56 0 0.56 $13,751 $7,701 High Density Residential (greater than 25 units/acre)DU 0.44 0 0.44 $13,751 $6,050 HOTEL:Room 0.60 0 0.60 $13,751 $8,251 OFFICE: General Office KSF 1.15 0 1.15 $13,751 $15,814 RECREATION: Recreation Community Center KSF 2.31 0 2.31 $13,751 $31,765 Health Club KSF 3.45 0 3.45 $13,751 $47,441 Bowling Center KSF 1.16 0 1.16 $13,751 $15,951 Golf Course Acre 0.28 0 0.28 $13,751 $3,850 Tennis Courts Court 4.21 0 4.21 $13,751 $57,892 Movie Theater (multi-plex)Screen 13.64 -35%8.87 $13,751 $121,916 Theater, Live Seat 0.02 0 0.02 $13,751 $275 EDUCATION: Private School (K-8)Student 0.26 0 0.26 $13,751 $3,575 HOSPITAL: General Hospital Bed 1.42 0 1.42 $13,751 $19,526 Convalescent/Nursing Bed 0.22 0 0.22 $13,751 $3,025 CHURCH:KSF 0.49 0 0.49 $13,751 $6,738 INDUSTRIAL: Light Industrial KSF 0.63 0 0.63 $13,751 $8,663 RESTAURANT: Quality (leisure)KSF 7.80 -35%5.07 $13,751 $69,717 Sit-down, high-turnover KSF 9.77 -35%6.35 $13,751 $87,325 Fast food, no drive-through KSF 28.34 -35%18.42 $13,751 $253,306 Fast food, with drive-through KSF 32.67 -35%21.24 $13,751 $292,009 Coffee shop, with drive-through KSF 43.38 -35%28.20 $13,751 $387,736 AUTOMOTIVE: Gas station Pump 13.87 -35%9.02 $13,751 $123,972 Auto sales/parts KSF 2.26 -35%1.47 $13,751 $20,200 Auto repair center KSF 3.11 0 3.11 $13,751 $42,765 FINANCIAL: Bank/savings and loan KSF 12.13 0 12.13 $13,751 $166,799 RETAIL: Community shopping center KSF 3.81 -35%2.48 $13,751 $34,054 Supermarket KSF 9.24 -35%6.01 $13,751 $82,588 Convenience market KSF 49.11 -35%31.92 $13,751 $438,951 Discount store KSF 4.18 -35%2.72 $13,751 $37,361 Pharmacy with Drive-Through KSF 10.29 -35%6.69 $13,751 $91,973 Notes: Trip rates are drawn from ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Residential categories are as set forth in the resolution. Fees for all non-residential categories, including those not listed here, shall be categorized based on the definitions set forth in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Updated EDTIF Calculations 556 EDTIF Fee Calculations by Land Use Category Category Unit PM Pk Hr Trip Rate Pass-by Adjustment Adjusted PM Pk Hr Trip Rate Fee per PM Pk Hr Trip Fee per Unit RESIDENTIAL: Single-Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre)DU 0.99 0 0.99 $13,751 $13,613 Medium-Density Residential (6-14 units/acre)DU 0.99 0 0.99 $13,751 $13,613 Medium/High Density Residential (14-25 units/acre)DU 0.56 0 0.56 $13,751 $7,701 High Density Residential (greater than 25 units/acre)DU 0.44 0 0.44 $13,751 $6,050 HOTEL:Room 0.60 0 0.60 $13,751 $8,251 OFFICE: General Office KSF 1.15 0 1.15 $13,751 $15,814 RECREATION: Recreation Community Center KSF 2.31 0 2.31 $13,751 $31,765 Health Club KSF 3.45 0 3.45 $13,751 $47,441 Bowling Center KSF 1.16 0 1.16 $13,751 $15,951 Golf Course Acre 0.28 0 0.28 $13,751 $3,850 Tennis Courts Court 4.21 0 4.21 $13,751 $57,892 Movie Theater (multi-plex)Screen 13.64 -35%8.87 $13,751 $121,916 Theater, Live Seat 0.02 0 0.02 $13,751 $275 EDUCATION: Private School (K-8)Student 0.26 0 0.26 $13,751 $3,575 HOSPITAL: General Hospital Bed 1.42 0 1.42 $13,751 $19,526 Convalescent/Nursing Bed 0.22 0 0.22 $13,751 $3,025 CHURCH:KSF 0.49 0 0.49 $13,751 $6,738 INDUSTRIAL: Light Industrial KSF 0.63 0 0.63 $13,751 $8,663 RESTAURANT: Quality (leisure)KSF 7.80 -35%5.07 $13,751 $69,717 Sit-down, high-turnover KSF 9.77 -35%6.35 $13,751 $87,325 Fast food, no drive-through KSF 28.34 -35%18.42 $13,751 $253,306 Fast food, with drive-through KSF 32.67 -35%21.24 $13,751 $292,009 Coffee shop, with drive-through KSF 43.38 -35%28.20 $13,751 $387,736 AUTOMOTIVE: Gas station Pump 13.87 -35%9.02 $13,751 $123,972 Auto sales/parts KSF 2.26 -35%1.47 $13,751 $20,200 Auto repair center KSF 3.11 0 3.11 $13,751 $42,765 FINANCIAL: Bank/savings and loan KSF 12.13 0 12.13 $13,751 $166,799 RETAIL: Community shopping center KSF 3.81 -35%2.48 $13,751 $34,054 Supermarket KSF 9.24 -35%6.01 $13,751 $82,588 Convenience market KSF 49.11 -35%31.92 $13,751 $438,951 Discount store KSF 4.18 -35%2.72 $13,751 $37,361 Pharmacy with Drive-Through KSF 10.29 -35%6.69 $13,751 $91,973 Notes: Trip rates are drawn from ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Residential categories are as set forth in the resolution. Fees for all non-residential categories, including those not listed here, shall be categorized based on the definitions set forth in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Updated EDTIF Calculations Attachment 3-Exhibit C to the Resolution 557 Attachment 5-Exhibit D to the Resolution Dublin Boulevard Hacienda Drive Central Parkway Gleason Drive Tassajara Road Fallon Road Street Alignment Study AREA OF BENEFIT MAJOR THOROUGHFARES AND BRIDGES WITHIN EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Extend and widen to 6 lanes from the Southern Pacific Right-of-Way to Airway Boulevard (from the EIR future *Cost of Roadway *Cost of Bridge Improvements Improvements road improvement assumptions on pages 1 and 2 of the $ 27,780,432.39 $ 5,070,000.00 OKS revised report form December 15, 1992 and mitigation measure 3.3/10). Widen and extend as 4 lanes from Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Drive and to 6 lanes from 1-580 to Dublin Boulevard (from the EIR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of the OKS revised report). Construct four-lane road from Dublin Boulevard west of $ 942,195.00 $ Hacienda Drive to Fallon Road (from the EIR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of the OKS revised report). $ 4,453,310.63 $ 1,040,000.00 Construct new 4-lane road from west of Hacienda Drive to Fallon road (from the EIR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of the OKS revised report). (The project does not require extension of Gleason Drive to $ Doolan Road due to no development proposed in the future study area.) Widen to 4 lanes over a 6-lane right-of-way from Dublin Boulevard to the Contra Costa County Line, and to 6 292,110.00 $ lanes over an 8-lane right-of-way from Dublin Boulevard to 1-580 from the EIR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of the OKS revised report and $ 33,065,738.01 $ 5,293,600.00 mitigation measure 3.3/14.0 Extend to Tassajara Road, widen to 4 lanes over a 6- lane right-of-way from 1-580 to Tassajara road (from the EIR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of the OKS revised report). $ 9,247,554.20 A study is required to specify the exact street alignments $ in the Eastern Dublin area. Right-of-Way Contingency Funds are required to acquire land in the event that right- Total of-way must be obtained through condemnation and $ value of land is greater than the appraised value. $ 75,781,340.23 $ 11,403,600.00 The Area of Benefit Fee for roadway improvements based on 63,213 related trips for residential and 231,976 trips for non residential is $2,570/unit for Low Density (1-6 units per acre) and Medium Density Residential (7-14 units per acre), $1,799 for Medium/High Density Residential (15-25 units per acre), and $1,542 for High Density Residential (more than 25 units per acre); and $1,157 for High Density Residential (more than 25 units per acre) within the Transit Center; and $257/trip for non residential. The Area of Benefit Fee for bridge improvements for Low and Medium Density Residential is $390/unit, for Medium/High Density Residential is $273/unit, and for High Density Residential is $234/unit, and for High Density Residential (within the Transit Center) is $176/ unit; and non-residential is $39/trip. The eastern Dublin Specific Plan area has 3,916 Low Density units; 4,863 Medium Density units; 2,680 Medium/High Density units;and 3,952 High Density units. *These cost estimates do not include credits due for construction of portions of these major thoroughfares and bridges. In the event that the Area of Benefit Fee becomes effective, the appropriate credit amounts will be calculated and the Area of Benefit Fee will be adjusted accordingly.558 Attachment 6-Exhibit E to the Resolution b Document Description Amendment Control Project Name Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update Related Documents City of Dublin General Plan (Amended November -2014), Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (Amended -October 2014), City of Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (Updated October – 2014) Document Name Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines File Path G:\TRANSPORTATION\TIF\Eastern Dublin\2021\12062021_materials_F&P Date Document Approved December 21, 2021 City Council Resolution Amendment Date Description of Change 122-13 07/16/2013 Adoption of Consolidated Impact Fee Guidelines, Superseding previously adopted individual fee program guidelines 117-14 07/15/2014 Extension of Credit Life and Right-to-Reimbursement 111-15 06/16/2015 Extension of Credit for Perpetuity, Right-to-Reimbursement, and Park Credit Conversion 147-16 09/06/2016 Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update 109-17 08/05/2017 Fire Facilities Fee Credit and Right-to-Reimbursement ____-21 12/21/2021 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee 559 Attachment 6-Exhibit E to the Resolution Table of Contents I.Introduction/Overview.....................................................................................................................1 II.Authority of City Manager to Interpret Situations Not Covered.....................................................1 III.Fee Administration...........................................................................................................................2 A.Responsible Departments......................................................................................................2 B.Effective Fees........................................................................................................................2 C.Basis for Calculating Fees for Projects not Covered in Fee Resolutions..............................2 IV.Payment Records.............................................................................................................................4 V.Other Miscellaneous Administrative Guidelines.............................................................................4 A.Refunds.................................................................................................................................4 B.Annual Review of Fee Collection.........................................................................................4 C.Funds and Accounting ..........................................................................................................5 D.Exemptions ...........................................................................................................................5 E.Administrative Fees..............................................................................................................6 VI.Developer Fee Credits......................................................................................................................7 A.General..................................................................................................................................7 B.Fee Credit/Reimbursement Agreement Required.................................................................7 C.Calculating the Fee Credits...................................................................................................9 D.Use of Fee Credits.................................................................................................................9 E.Use of Fee Credits requires Completion of Facility or Performance Bonds.......................10 F.Transferring of Credits........................................................................................................10 G.Options At or Prior to Expiration of Credit Life.................................................................10 H.Reimbursement Rights (Excluding EDTIF Section II Residential BART Garage Fees)....11 I.Process for Reimbursement of Reimbursement Rights.......................................................11 J.Procedures for Construction of Designated Facilities by Developers.................................12 K.Guidelines for Issuing Trip Credits for Transportation Impact Fees..................................13 L.Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee-Section II Residential BART Garage.............14 Appendix A: Illustrative Examples 560 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 1 CITY OF DUBLIN CONSOLIDATED IMPACT FEE ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES I. Introduction/Overview These guidelines apply to the Western Dublin Transportation (formerly known as the Downtown Traffic) Impact Fees (adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin through Resolution 210- 04 and as subsequently amended), the Eastern Dublin Transportation (formerly known as the Eastern Dublin Traffic) Impact Fees (adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin through Resolution 1-95 and as subsequently amended), the Public Facilities Fees (adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin through Resolution 32-96 and as subsequently amended), the Fire Facilities Fees (adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin through Resolution 37-97 and as subsequently amended), the Noise Mitigation Fee (adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin through Resolution 33-96 and as subsequently amended), and the Non-residential Development Affordable Housing Impact Fee (adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin through Resolution 70-05 and as subsequently amended) which fees are, unless otherwise provided, hereinafter referred to as the "Fee" or "Fees." Except as otherwise provided herein, terms used in these guidelines shall be defined in the same manner as such terms are defined in the Resolution. The application of these guidelines will, at times, refer to various reference documents adopted by the City of Dublin. These documents include the City's General Plan, Specific Plans, and the most recent Impact Fee Studies. Such reference documents are subject to change and may affect the application of these guidelines. II. Authority of City Manager to Interpret Situations Not Covered Should situations arise not covered by these guidelines, the City Manager will have the authority to determine how the resolutions, ordinances, guidelines and agreements will be administered. Such interpretations by the City Manager will be in writing, and the City Manager’s determination will be final and not appealable. 561 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 2 III. Fee Administration A. Responsible Departments The Administrative Services Department serves as the lead department to gather and coordinate the information necessary to calculate the Fee. The Community Development Department is responsible for determining the intended land use. The Public Works Department is responsible for determining the number of vehicle trips assigned to the project. B. Effective Fees The Fee will be collected at the filing of final map and/or at the issuance of building permit for the development project, unless otherwise provided in the applicable Fee Resolution, or developer enters into a fee deferral agreement with the City. This section shall be applicable whether the fees are paid in cash or a credit is used. C. Basis for Calculating Fees for Projects not Covered in Fee Resolutions The Fees for projects will be calculated as provided for in the Fee Resolutions. However, in certain circumstances, the applicable resolutions may not appropriately reflect or apply to a particular project. Examples of this situation could include, but not be limited to mixed use projects or projects that involve land uses that are not included in the Resolution. In those situations, the guidelines presented in this section will be applied. For non-residential development projects in which the land use is not included in the definitions contained in the applicable Fee Resolution, the Community Development Director will determine which of the defined categories is appropriate, maintaining as much consistency as possible with the definition of such terms. For mixed-use development projects in all fee programs other than the Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, the Community Development Director will determine the projected percentage of each of the uses at the time the Final Map, other appropriate entitlement, or building permit is approved. The Fee will be calculated on a pro-rata basis for each different use. If the project contains both residential and non-residential portions, the Fee will be based upon the residential per dwelling unit fee schedule for the residential portion and the non-residential per square foot schedule for the non-residential portion. (Note that the Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee directly addresses the effects of mixed-use development.) 562 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 3 If the use(s) are unknown at the time of obtaining a building permit and the building permit does not include adequate interior details to determine the intended use, the use for the initial fee calculation purposes will be determined by the Community Development Director. Any Fee discrepancy as a result of a different final use of the property will be calculated and reconciled at the time that a building permit is issued for interior tenant improvements. Such reconciliation may result in an additional Fee or a partial refund of previously paid Fee(s). This fee calculation shall be at the rate in effect at the issuance of building permit. Quasi-public uses (churches, non-profit organizations, etc.) shall be subject to the Fees. For these uses, the Community Development Director will determine which of the categories most appropriately reflects the land use and allocate the project to this category. Affordable housing projects developed by government agencies and/or non-profit entities will be subject to the same Fees that are assessed on private residential development. Where the Fee in question is calculated based on trips generated, the Fee Schedule of the applicable Approving Resolution for the Fee will define appropriate trip rates to be used for the calculation of the Fees. If an applicant disagrees with the Fee calculated based on trips generated by the proposed project per respective Fee program, including but not limited to quasi-public uses, applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Director, requesting that the City undertake a specific traffic study for the purpose of determining the estimated trip generation of the proposed development project. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with the study. If the Public Works Director determines that the land use of the proposed development project is not appropriately reflected in the Fee Schedule to the Resolution or that the intensity of the proposed land use is not consistent with the adopted land use categories in the Fee Schedule to the Resolution, the Public Works Director will have the option of requiring a traffic analysis or utilizing an existing relevant study for the purpose of determining the estimated trip generation of the proposed development project. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with the study. 563 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 4 IV. Payment Records The Administrative Services Department will record the payment of the Fees. Records will be maintained to comply with refunding requirements as prescribed by State Law. The Administrative Services Department will obtain a mailing address from each payor, as well as the applicable Assessor’s Parcel Number, and will note the payor as the entity or person whose name appears as the applicant for the building permit. The Administrative Services Department will maintain the records for a period of ten years from their collection, unless a legal mandate exists for a longer retention. V. Other Miscellaneous Administrative Guidelines A. Refunds Refunds of Fees associated with withdrawn applications or projects on which construction has not commenced, will be done in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Dublin Municipal Code Section 7.28.450. If, pursuant to said procedures for paid building permits, a refund is no longer available, and if, within 10 years of the original payment of the Fees, new building permits are issued for a project on the subject property, the developer of the new project shall be required to pay only the difference between the amount of the Fees that were originally paid, and the amount of the Fees in effect at the time of issuance of building permits for the new project. This calculation of the difference in Fee amounts shall be done on a Fee by Fee basis. Thus, if any one Fee is reduced or eliminated between the time of the original payment and the issuance of building permits for the new project, the original payment amount for that reduced or eliminated Fee shall not be included in the calculation of the amount owed for the other Fees. B. Annual Review of Fee Collection The City has existing procedures for complying with State Law in regards to accounting for developer Fees. The Administrative Services Department will maintain records to provide the following items: A brief description of the Fee; An identification of the improvements and the percentage of cost of the improvements which the Fee will be expended upon; and 564 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 5 For improvements which are funded and yet to be completed, an identification of an expected date by which construction of the facilities will commence. C. Funds and Accounting The City will incorporate the following items into its accounting procedures, which are the responsibility of the Administrative Services Department: The City will maintain a separate fund for the collection and expenditure of Fees. The City will allocate interest to Fees collected in the fund based upon month end cash balances. The City will identify, in accordance with State Law, the beginning and ending balance of the funds held for the Fee as of fiscal year end. The City will identify the amount of Fees collected and interest earned in each fiscal year for Fees. The City will provide a description and accounting of any inter-fund transfers made by the Fee Fund. The City will calculate reimbursements annually within 180 days of each fiscal year end. The City will file an annual accounting of all development impact fees with the City Council and for public inspection within 180 days of each fiscal year end. D. Exemptions 1. Total Exemption. The following types of development will be exempt from the collection of Fees: a) Any alteration or addition to a residential structure, except to the extent that a residential unit (e.g., second dwelling unit) is added to a single-family unit, or another unit is added to an existing multi-family building. b) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing single-family residential structure that has been destroyed or demolished. This exception shall not apply to the extent that the replacement or reconstruction includes the addition of a residential unit (e.g., second dwelling unit). c) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing multi-family residential structure without changing the use type as a residential structure that is not part of a mixed used development and that has been destroyed or demolished. This exception shall not apply to the extent that the replacement or reconstruction increases the number of residential units 565 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 6 on the property. d) Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee only. Some of the retail uses within the Eastern Dublin Transit Center and the Fairway Ranch High-Density Residential Development may be considered ancillary to the adjoining residential uses and therefore may not generate outside vehicle trips. The Public Works Director shall provide the final determination of land uses that could be considered ancillary. If a land use is found to be not completely ancillary, an appropriate fee per trip will be charged in accordance with the provisions of these guidelines. e) The City Council, in its sole discretion, may waive the applicability of the Fee to certain development constructed or to be constructed by a public entity on land having an appropriate General Plan land use designation upon findings of the City Council that such a waiver is in the interest of the public health, safety, and/or welfare, for reasons specified in the findings. f) Any alteration or addition to a non-residential building or structure resulting in a net increase of no more than 500 square feet. g) Any Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) that is less than 750 square feet in size per the requirements of Assembly Bill 345. 2. Partial Exemption – Applicable only to Western Dublin and Eastern Dublin TIF A partial exemption may be granted based on prior Fees paid as follows: If after paying the Fees for a specific development project, the project is demolished and replaced by a new type of development, an exemption may be given for up to the amount which was paid by the prior development project. In the event that the replacement project would result in a lower Fee, the new development shall not accrue any unused credit or reimbursement rights. Any change in use outside of the establishment of the Fee program shall be obligated to pay the entire Fee except to the extent that another exemption applies. Any Transportation Impact Fees will be calculated using the procedures outlined in these Guidelines. E. Administrative Fees Developers will pay the City administrative fees, provided the fees are established in the City's Master Fee Schedule, to cover the costs associated with: The establishment of the credit/reimbursement agreement Credit transfers 566 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 7 Annual credit/Right to Reimbursement maintenance and monitoring. VI. Developer Fee Credits This section applies only to the Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, Public Facilities Fee, Fire Facilities Fee, Non-residential Affordable Housing Impact Fee and the definitions contained in the Resolutions establishing and amending said Fees shall apply. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to the "Fee" or "Fees" in this section shall mean only the Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, Public Facilities Fee, Fire Facilities Fee, and Non-residential Affordable Housing Impact Fee. A. General This section establishes the authority for providing credits and/or reimbursement to developers who construct and/or dedicate any of the improvements and facilities for which the Fees are imposed. When such public improvements and facilities are constructed and/or dedicated by a developer, the developer shall be given a credit when appropriate to be applied against the Fees due for the development project. The amount of the credit shall be determined pursuant to these guidelines. If the amount of the credit is greater than the Fees due for the development project, the developer may, subject to the restrictions described herein, use the credit toward the Fees for another development project or transfer the credit to another eligible developer in accordance with these guidelines. If the developer cannot use or transfer the credit within ten years, then the credit will convert to a reimbursement right unless the developer first extends the credits as provided for in Section VI.G of these Guidelines. B. Fee Credit/Reimbursement Agreement Required The allotment of fee credits and/or provision for a reimbursement will only occur in accordance with a written credit/reimbursement agreement between the City and the developer responsible for the construction of the Fee facilities or dedication of land. 1. All fee credits will be granted by use of a standard agreement approved by the City Attorney. 2. This credit/reimbursement agreement will be entered into at the time the improvements are secured and/or the right-of-way is accepted for dedication. The terms of this agreement may, at the City's discretion, be included in the agreement entered into with 567 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 8 the City to secure certain public improvements as contained on a Final Parcel Map or Final Subdivision Map. 3. Any credits, which are unused within ten years following their creation, pursuant to Section VI.G.a of these Guidelines, shall convert to a right to reimbursement, unless the developer first extends the credits as provided for in Section VI.G .b of these Guidelines. 4. Neither a credit nor the right to reimbursement shall either be increased for inflation or accrue interest. The park land right to reimbursement amount shall be based on land value at the time of dedication. 5. Credits are transferable, with the written approval of the City Manager, provided that the administrative fee is paid, as specified in these guidelines. 6. The developer will sign the fee credit/reimbursement agreement attesting that it obtained a copy of these administrative guidelines and they were read, understood, and accepted. 7. Prior to the 2021 Update, the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee distinguished between Section I and Section II improvements and, therefore, credits earned by Section I and Section II improvements could only be used to offset fees for that same category. These distinctions were eliminated in the 2021 Update to the Eastern Dublin Transportation Fee. After the effectiveness of the 2021 Update to the Eastern Dublin Transportation Fee, any previously created credits that were denominated “Section I” or “Section II” credits can be used to satisfy Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee obligations for which credits can be used. 8. With respect to the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, no fee credits shall be established for the " Residential BART Garage Fee" (formerly known as “Section II Residential BART Garage”) component of the Fee. Payments from those monies shall be made in accordance with subsection VI.L below. 9. With respect to the Public Facilities Fee, the City Manager may approve the conversion of credits from one park land category to another park land category based on the land values conversion ratio, or may approve the conversation of credits from one park improvement category to another park improvement category. Park land credits cannot convert to park improvement credits nor can park improvement credits convert to park land credits.Any such conversion shall require an amendment to the credit/reimbursement agreement that documents the existing credits or a new credit/reimbursement agreement, if the credits have not been documented. Requests for conversion under this section must be made in writing and the decision to approve or deny a request is made at the sole discretion of the City Manager. The City Manager shall approve the conversion only if he or she finds that the conversion would not materially change the Public Facilities Fee program's ability to deliver the acreage in each category specified in the program. This provision does not apply to any other category in the 568 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 9 Public Facilities Fee program. C. Calculating the Fee Credits 1.General The fee credit/reimbursement agreement will identify the total credit for Fee improvements/facilities constructed or land dedicated for a particular development project. The contributed land or improvements must be the facilities described in the applicable Fee Resolutions and/or any subsequent replacement resolutions. There must be a minimum value of $50,000 in improvements and/or right of way dedicated before credits will be allotted to a developer. 2.Determination of Value The Public Works Director will determine the value of the contributed improvements/facilities based upon improvement plans submitted by the developer and approved by the City, which plans shall quantify the size of the Fee facilities to be constructed or dedicated. It is recognized that, in some cases, the scope of construction or dedication will not exactly match the Fee facilities shown in the exhibits to the Fee Resolution. The credits will be the lesser of the following: a) the estimated cost of the improvements as noted in the Resolution and/or any subsequent replacement resolution; or b) the pro- rated value of the improvement using the standard cost measurements in the Resolution and/or any subsequent replacement resolution. The Fee credits cannot exceed the cost estimates of the improvements in the most recent Fee study and resolution. In no case shall the fee credits include facility financing costs. See Appendix A for illustrative examples 1 through 6, which pertain to this section. D. Use of Fee Credits 1. Credits expire when used or 10 years from the date of the credit/reimbursement agreement, whichever occurs first. 2. Developer can request that a credit exists in perpetuity, with the exception of the Fire Facilities Fee. To exercise this option, Developer must make a written request to the City Manager or designee, and the credit will not be eligible to convert to a right to reimbursement. 569 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 10 The value of the credits will be listed in the agreement and applied as credits to the Fees as authorized by the developer. The City's Administrative Services Department will keep record of credit utilization and balance. 3. Only the developer who builds or dedicates the Fee facilities will be entitled to the original or initial credits, until such time as they may be transferred in accordance with these guidelines. E. Use of Fee Credits requires Completion of Facility or Performance Bonds Fee credits cannot be used by the developer until the developer has either: 1. Dedicated the land or constructed improvements/facilities representing the credits to the City; or 2. Provided the City with a performance bond and a labor and materials bond or other adequate security to insure that the improvements will be constructed prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy for any building that is part of the project. The performance bond or other security shall be in an amount equal to 100% of the engineer's estimated cost to construct the improvements and the labor and materials bond shall be written by a surety licensed to conduct business in the State of California and approved by the City Manager or designee. See Appendix A for illustrative example 7, which pertains to this section. F. Transferring of Credits 1. The original holder of credits can request a transfer of credits to a person owning an interest in property that is subject to the same category of the Fee in question. Such transactions shall be subject to an administrative fee, which shall cover the City's administrative costs associated with the credit transfer. The administrative fee shall be established in the City's Master Fee Schedule. 2. There is no limit on the number of times that credits can be transferred between developments. 3. In certain circumstances, and as required in the interest of equity, the City Manager may, at his or her sole discretion, authorize the transfer of credits to a person who does not own an interest in property subject to the Fee. G. Options At or Prior to Expiration of Credit Life At or prior to expiration of the credit, the developer has the following options: a) The expired unused fee credit shall automatically convert to a reimbursement right as 570 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 11 provided for under these guidelines, unless Developer submits a written request for extension no more than six months prior and no less than three (3) months prior to the credit expiration date or with City Manager's approval if the request passes the City's required timeframe. The period for right to reimbursement extends ten (10) years from the date of expiration. b) As an alternative, Developer can request that credits, other than credits created under the Fire Facilities Fee, exist in perpetuity and not convert to a right to reimbursement. To exercise this option, Developer must make a request, in writing, no more than six months prior and no less than three (3) months prior to credit expiration, or with City Manager's approval if the request passes the City's required timeframe. Developer must secure a written approval from the City Manager or designee for the request. Credits cannot be re- converted to a right to reimbursement. o Developers that have Fire Facilities Fee credits that would exist in perpetuity may request that the credits be converted to a right to reimbursement with approval, in writing, by the City Manager. H. Reimbursement Rights (Excluding Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Residential BART Garage Fees) Reimbursement rights are created from the conversion of Fee credits, which occurs 10 years after the initial date of the credit/reimbursement agreement, or after credit extension. Right to reimbursement life is 10 years. Reimbursement rights are subject to the following specific guidelines: 1. Reimbursement will only be from funds that were collected in payment of the same Fee as the one for which a developer is seeking reimbursement. 2. The City will determine the amount of funds available for reimbursement on an annual basis based on Fee programs, such as the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee and Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, and the Public Facilities Fee programs. I. Process for Reimbursement of Reimbursement Rights 1.Determination of Funds Available for Reimbursement Within 180 days of the end of each fiscal year, the Administrative Services Department will make an accounting of all Fees collected for the fiscal year that just ended. The Administrative Services Department will also determine, for each of the Fees, the amount of Fee funds that are unspent and unplanned. The remaining funds (the reimbursement 571 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 12 set-aside) will be used to reimburse holders of reimbursement rights for facilities already contributed, if any such reimbursement rights exist. 2.Allocating the Reimbursement Set-Aside to Outstanding Reimbursement Rights In the event that the City designates that a reimbursement set-aside is available, 50% will be used to pay the oldest reimbursement right outstanding. If the oldest right is paid off before this portion of funds is entirely consumed, then the balance of the 50% will go toward the next oldest right. This portion of reimbursement set-aside funds will be allocated according to this method until it is exhausted. The other half of the reimbursement set-aside will be allocated to all remaining reimbursement rights on a pro- rata basis according to their amounts outstanding, including the remaining un-reimbursed portion of the oldest agreement. Unused reimbursement set-aside funds will not be carried over to another fiscal year. See Appendix A for illustrative example 7, which pertains to this section. This guideline does not apply to any Fire Facilities Fee reimbursement that was converted from a credit in perpetuity. Upon such conversion, the City Manager shall have the authority, in writing, to establish the right to reimbursement priorities for rights of reimbursement. J. Procedures for Construction of Designated Facilities by Developers 1. With respect to the Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee and the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, the improvements requested to be constructed or dedicated must be submitted for approval in writing to the Public Works Director no later than 30 calendar days prior to the approval of the Final/Parcel Map on the development project. Absent a Map, a letter must be submitted for approval prior to the approval of the improvement agreement. The submittal of the improvement plans and/or description of area to be dedicated shall be in sufficient detail, as determined by the Public Works Director, for the Public Works Director to make a determination regarding the approval. The developer constructing or dedicating improvements in lieu of paying a portion of the Fee must post a performance bond before the issuance of any grading and/or building permits for the construction of the improvements. 2. With respect to the Public Facilities Fee (PFF), developers may, with City approval, be permitted to design and construct facilities included in the FF program. The design and construction materials/methods must be in accordance with standard City specifications, and City inspectors shall be responsible for construction inspection throughout the 572 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 13 duration of the construction period. The PFF Facilities to be constructed or dedicated by the developer must be submitted for approval in writing to the Public Works Director no later than 30 calendar days prior to the approval of the Final/Parcel Map or improvement program on the development project. The submittal of the improvement plans and/or description of area to be dedicated shall be in sufficient detail, including the layout of timeline/milestones of the construction, as determined by the Public Works Director, for the Public Works Director to make an informed determination regarding the approval. The developer constructing or dedicating PFF Facilities in lieu of paying a portion of the Fee must post a performance bond and a labor and materials bond before the issuance of any grading and/or building permits for the construction of the PFF Facilities. K. Guidelines for Issuing Trip Credits for Transportation Impact Fees 1. Trip credit shall be determined by the City based upon the adopted trip generation rates as specified in the Fee program. See Appendix A for illustrative examples 8 through 11, which pertain to this section. 2. Trip credits shall follow the land use and not the user. For example, assume User X relocates from Space A to Space B, both of which are located within the Western Dublin TIF area. User X shall not receive trip credit for vacating Space A. User X shall be charged the appropriate TIF amount for moving into Space B, subject to receiving trip credit as specified below. Similarly, the appropriate TIF amount shall be charged to the next user of Space A, subject to the appropriate trip credit. 3. Trip credit associated with unoccupied space shall be issued if, and only if, the space has been vacant for three (3) calendar years or less prior to the date when a use permit is issued to the new user. 4. TIF calculations/trip credit for uses, other than Urgent Care Medical Office, located within a general office building that houses multiple tenants (such as professional services, insurance companies, investment brokers, bank or savings and loan institutions, medical offices, restaurant or cafeteria, retail facilities, etc.) shall be based upon a uniform trip generation rate for Standard Commercial Office as specified in the Fee Program. For Urgent Care Medical Office use within a general office building, the trip generation rate for Clinic, as specified in the Fee program, shall be used to calculate the TIF and the trip credit. 5. Trip credit for uses located within a shopping center containing retail stores, as well as non-merchandising facilities (such as office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, post offices, banks, health clubs, recreational facilities, etc.) shall be based upon a uniform trip generation rate for the appropriate type of Shopping Center as specified in the Fee program. 573 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 14 L. Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee- Residential BART Garage 1.Payment to Alameda County Surplus Property Authority (ACSPA) for $6 million of BART Garage Costs (Residential BART Garage, formerly known as Section II Residential BART Garage). With respect to the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, payment of Residential BART Garage Fees, payment shall be made to the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority (ACSPA), which is responsible for the parking garage construction and dedication of the improvement to the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District for public use. Except for interest earned on Residential BART Garage fees prior to distribution, the maximum amount to be paid to ACSPA shall not exceed $6,000,000 (six million dollars). Payment to Alameda County Surplus Property Authority is subject to the following specific guidelines: a) The maximum to be disbursed from fees collected shall be six million dollars ($6,000,000), which amount shall not be increased for any reason including inflation. In addition, any accrued interest pending disbursement shall be disbursed to ACSPA. b) Disbursement will be only from the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Residential BART Garage fee, and will not come from any other source including the City's General Fund. c) The amount disbursed will depend on the payment of fees by development subject to the fee. There is no guarantee that ACSPA will receive a total of $6,000,000. d) The City will determine and report on an annual basis to ACSPA, the amount of funds collected from the Residential BART Garage fee and the amount available for disbursement, including interest accrued prior to disbursement, if any. e) The procedure for distributing the disbursements to ACSPA is described below. 2.Process for Payment to ACSPA - Residential BART Garage Fee Funds a) Initial Distribution of Residential BART Garage Fee Funds i.Once the BART Garage has been accepted by BART and made available for public use, the ACSPA shall provide to the City a written certification of the completion of the BART Garage. ii.Within 45 days of receipt of the certification described above, City shall calculate the balance of funds available in Residential BART Garage fee, as of the first day of the month preceding the date of the notice. City shall also calculate and 574 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 15 account for accrued interest based on the quarterly balance of Residential BART Garage Fees and the earning rate applied to pooled funds managed by the City. City shall remit to ACSPA the funds as calculated along with a report showing the maximum remaining fees that may be paid to ACSPA. iii.Thereafter, funds shall be distributed on an annual basis as described below. b) Annual Determination of Residential BART Garage Fee Funds Available for Payment i.Within 180 days of the end of each fiscal year, the Administrative Services Department will make an accounting of all Residential BART Garage fees collected, and not previously disbursed, for the fiscal year that just ended. This shall include accrued interest. ii.The City shall distribute to ACSPA, Residential BART Garage fees available, to the extent that the total distribution including previous payments, excluding any amounts paid as interest, does not exceed the maximum amount described above. iii.The Administrative Services Department shall annually report to the ACSPA the current balance remaining in Residential BART Garage fees that may be paid. 575 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 16 Appendix A: Illustrative Examples 576 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 17 Illustrative Example 1 (Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee or Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee):Assume that a developer dedicates land for the partial widening of a major street to offset the Fees due from a development project. To qualify for a credit, this roadway widening project must be included in the relevant Transportation Impact Fee program. The land dedication to be applied for a Fee credit shall not include improvements immediately adjacent to the development project, as these improvements are entirely the responsibility of the developer and are not to be funded by the Fee. To qualify for a credit for the improvements immediately adjacent to the development project, these improvements must be included in the relevant fee program. The Resolution used a standard cost measurement on the current value per square foot for right-of-way dedication in calculating the TIF. The Fee credits due to the developer can be calculated by determining the square footage of the land to be dedicated multiplied by the proper square foot cost measurement after automatic annual adjustments based on the change in land acquisition costs. Illustrative Example 2 (Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee):A Developer constructing multi-family homes contributes traffic signal improvements (TIF improvement) valued at $200,000. Assume that the Fee at the time totals $2,497 per dwelling unit. The credit of $200,000 will cover approximately 80.10 dwelling units. When the building permit is issued for the 81st dwelling unit, the developer will have used up the credit and will have to begin paying the Fee. Illustrative Example 3 (Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee):A developer constructing single family homes has a fee credit of $200,000 from previous construction of improvements that were part of the prior Section I EDTIF program. The EDTIF program no longer makes a distinction between Section I and Section II improvements. The fee credits can be used to offset the developer’s future EDTIF obligations. Assume that the EDTIF at the time totals $13,613 per home. The credit of $200,000 can be used against the developer's EDTIF obligation and will cover approximately 14.69 homes. When the building permit is issued for the 15th home, the developer will have used up the credit and will have to begin paying the EDTIF. Illustrative Example 4 (Public Facilities Fee):Assume that a developer improves 10 acres of land for a planned 20-acre community park to offset the Fees due for the Community Parks Improvement fee component. The last adopted fee study used a standard cost estimate of $420,000 per acre for calculating the cost of improved community parkland. The fee credit due to the developer will be calculated using this cost estimate (10 acres, $420,000 per acre = $4,200,000). 577 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 18 Illustrative Example 5 (Public Facilities Fee):A developer constructing single family homes in Dublin contributes neighborhood park improvements valued at $200,000. The Neighborhood Parks Improvements portion of the Fee for a single family home is $2,280 of the total Fee of $32,643. The developer must pay a Fee of $30,363 for each single-family home (total Fee of $32,643 less credit of $2,280) until the $200,000 credit is used up. This credit will cover the Neighborhood Parks, Improvements component of the Fee for the first 87 single-family homes constructed ($200,000/$2,280 = 87.72). When the developer applies for the building permit for the 88th home, he or she will begin paying this component of the Fee with the balance of the Public Facilities Fee due for the project. Illustrative Example 6 (Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee or Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee):A developer is constructing certain street improvements, which will be dedicated to the City to offset a portion of the Fee. The improvements are a project in Fee Program. The developer supplies the City with a right-of-way conveyance, a performance bond and a labor and materials bond for the completion of the street improvements. Fee credits can be used in advance of completing the improvements, since the City is assured that the land will be dedicated and the improvements will be completed. Illustrative Example 7 (Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee):During one fiscal year, the City collects $88,000 in Fees for Eastern Dublin TIF improvements. The total outstanding reimbursements owed for the Eastern Dublin TIF are $100,000 to the following developers: Developer A (the oldest agreement):$50,000 Developer B:$20,000 Developer C:$30,000 For the upcoming fiscal year, the City retains $44,000 for improvements not built by developers and allocates $44,000 as the reimbursement set-aside to reduce current reimbursement obligations. $22,000 (50% of the $44,000) of the reimbursement set-aside is used to pay Developer A, who holds the oldest agreement. Developer A now has $28,000 of outstanding reimbursements (beginning balance of $50,000 less the $22,000 payment). The other half of the reimbursement set-aside ($22,000) is allocated proportionally to all three parties who currently hold reimbursement rights as follows: 578 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 19 Holder of Reimbursement Current Value of Reimbursement Owed Percent of Total Reimbursements Outstanding Amt. of $22,000 Reimbursement Distributed Reimbursement Balance Remaining Developer A $28,000 35.90%$7,898.00 $20,102.00 Developer B $20,000 25.64%$5,640.80 $14,359.20 Developer C $30,000 38.46%$8,461.20 $21,538.80 TOTAL $78,000 $22,000.00 $56,000.00 Illustrative Example 8 (Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee):User X moves his/her fast food restaurant business into an individual (standalone) building located within the Western Dublin TIF area. Previous use of the building consisted of a sit-down restaurant, which was vacated approximately two years prior to User X obtaining his/her use permit. Would User X be entitled to trip credit? Answer:Yes, because the previous use was vacated only two years before he/she would be entitled to trip credit for the previous sit-down restaurant use which generates fewer trips than a fast food restaurant. User X would pay TIF based on the net trips estimated for his/her project. Illustrative Example 9 (Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee):User X (insurance company office) and User Y (dental office) occupy office space in two separate general office buildings (building A and building B, respectively). Both buildings are located within the Western Dublin TIF area. The two users have decided to switch office spaces (e.g., User X would relocate to the space in building B and User Y would relocate to the space in building A). Would either user be required to pay TIF? Answer:No, because as each user moves into the other space, he/she would receive full trip credit for the previous use, based on the uniform trip generation rate for Standard Commercial Office as specified in the Fee program. Note: Although User Y operates a dental office, which generates more trips than an insurance company office (User X), the same trip generation rate (i.e., Standard Commercial Office) is used in both cases to calculate the TIF, as both uses are proposed to take place within a general office building. Illustrative Example 10 (Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee):User X proposes to change the use of his/her individual (standalone) space within the Western Dublin TIF area from Health Club to Bowling Center/Video Arcade. How would the TIF be determined? Answer:The TIF would be determined based on the net change in trips estimated for the proposed project. For example, User X would be charged TIF based on the proposed Bowling 579 City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 20 Center/Video Arcade use, but would receive trip credit for the discontinued Health Club use. Illustrative Example 11 (Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee):User X proposes to establish an Urgent Care Medical Office within a general office building by replacing existing retail/restaurant uses located on the first floor of the building. How would the trip credit be determined? Answer:The trip credit would be determined based on the trip generation rate for Standard Commercial Office. Note: The TIF would be based upon the increase in trips due to the proposed project (e.g., the difference between Clinic trips and Standard Commercial Office trips). 580 December 21, 2021 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update Presentation Overview •Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee (EDTIF) Background –EDTIF area –Background on current fee program •Proposed Fee Updates •Consolidation of Section I and Section II categories •Capital improvement projects •Proposed fee •Recommendation/Q&A EDTIF Area Existing EDTIF Program •First established in 1995 •Updated several times, most recently in 2010 •Funds have been used to construct improvements to several roads, such as Central Parkway, Gleason Drive, Fallon Road, and Dougherty Road •Capital improvement projects divided into categories: Section I projects are inside EDTIF area, Section II projects are just outside EDTIF area Proposed Fee Update •Reflect Eastern Dublin Area Policy Changes •Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and supplemental amendments •Complete Streets Policy 2012 •Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update 2014 •Various Zoning Changes •Eliminate distinction between Section I and Section II projects •Based on PM peak hour trips Projects for EDTIF Eastern Dublin Land Use Growth •Determine amount of new development anticipated in EDTIF area •Based on City’s recently updated citywide travel demand model, with projections to year 2040 •Estimated growth of 20,000 jobs and 1,700 housing units in EDTIF area by 2040 EDTIF Project Responsibility •Use the City’s recently updated travel demand model to estimate the usage of each facility attributed to the land uses in EDTIF area •Percentage of project costs eligible for inclusion in EDTIF is 61%, or about $126 million New EDTIF Calculations New Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Total Eligible Cost of New Projects $126,500,000 Plus Outstanding Fee Credits $54,000,000 Less Current TIF Balance ($13,600,000) Total EDTIF Amount $166,900,000 Divided by New PM Peak Hour Trips 12,136 Maximum Fee per New PM Peak Hour Trip $13,751 Comparison to Existing Fee Category Unit Current EDTIF Proposed EDTIF Fee per Unit Fee per Unit Low Density Residential DU $11,829 $13,613 Medium Density Residential DU $8,285 $7,701 High Density Residential DU $7,098 $6,050 Hotel Room $11,430 $8,251 General Office KSF $22,860 $15,814 Community Shopping Center KSF $52,578 $34,054 Other Fee Components •Two additional fees are charged within the EDTIF area –Freeway Interchange Fee: •reimburse Pleasanton for improvements at Hacienda and Tassajara interchanges; •will continue unchanged under this EDTIF update –BART Garage Fee: •reimburse Alameda County for East Dublin/Pleasanton BART parking garage; •fee has been re-calculated based on current residential growth projections Recommendation Conduct the Public Hearing,Deliberate,and Adopt: Resolution Revising the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee for Future Development within the Eastern Dublin Area,Renaming the Program as the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee,and Updating the Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines Questions