Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-01-2011 Adopted CC Min~~0~ DU~~~ MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL ~,,` OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN -- ~~$~ REGULAR MEETING - Februarv 1, 2011 ~~;'l~ ~ _t~.. CLOSED SESSION Cm. Swalwell was not in attendance at the beginning of the Closed Session. A closed session was held at 6:30 p.m., regarding: I. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR -(Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Labor Negotiator Joni Pattillo, City Manager- Unrepresented City Employees: Administrative Aide Administrative Analyst I Administrative Analyst II Administrative Services Director/Director of Finance Administrative Technician Assistant Civil Engineer Assistant Director of Parks & Community Services Assistant Planner Assistant to the Ciry Manager Associate Civil Engineer Associate Planner Building Official City Clerk City Engineer Code Enforcement Officer Community Development Director Community Safety Assistant Economic Development Director Environmental Specialist Environmental Technician Finance Manager Finance Technician I Finance Technician II Geographic Information System Coordinator Heritage & Cultural Arts Manager Heritage & Cultural Arts Supervisor Heritage Center Director Housing Specialist Information Systems Manager Information Systems Technician I Information Systems Technician II Nefinrork Systems Coordinator Office Assistant I Office Assistant II Parks & Community Services Director Parks and Community Services Manager Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator Parks & Facilities Development Manager Permit Technician Planning Manager Preschool Instructor Principal Planner Public Works Director/Assistant City Engineer Public Works Inspector Public Works Manager Public Works Technician I Public Works Technician II Recreation Coordinator Recreation Supervisor Recreation Technician Secretary Secretary to the City Manager/Deputy CityClerk Senior Administrative Analyst Senior Building Inspector Senior Civil Engineer Senior Code Enforcement Officer Senior Finance Technician Senior Office Assistant Senior Plan Checker Senior Planner DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 1 VOLUME 30 G~~yOFDpB~~ REGULAR MEETING a,~~~~~ ' FEBRUARY 1, 2011 `~ ~ ~ ~dG11~tpR~~ II. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR -(Government Code Section 54957.6) Agency Labor Negotiator Joni Pattillo, City Manager- Unrepresented City Employees: Assistant City Manager and Human Resources Director III. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) Name of case: Elite Landscaping, Inc. v. City of Dublin, Alameda County Superior Court, RG11555497 Cm. Swalwell joined the Closed Session at 6:45 p.m. ~i A regular meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, February 1, 2011, in the City Council Chambers of the Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m., by Mayor Sbranti. <i ~ ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers Biddle, Hart, Hildenbrand, Swalwell, and Mayor Sbranti ABSENT: ,~; PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance to the flag was recited by the City Council, Staff and those present. ~~ REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTION Mayor Sbranti stated there was no reportable action during Closed Session. ~i ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Recoqnition of Participation in the "Walk `n' Roll to School" Proqram 7:03:35 PM 3.1 (610-50) Administrative Analyst Erin Steffen presented the Staff Report and advised that Murray Elementary School represented the City of Dublin in the October 2010 "Walk `n' Roll to School" program, which encouraged parents and students to walk or bicycle to school instead of using DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2 VOLUME 30 G~~~OFDpB~ REGULAR MEETING ii, FEBRUARY 1, 2011 '`~~~~j~ ~, R~`~ motor vehicles. This item recognized the achievements of the school and its students for involvement in the program as well as the donation of goods by local businesses to the program. Jim Smith, Bay Area Air Quality Management District representative and Carrie Nerheim, Principal at Murray Elementary School, commented on the positive aspects of the program. The City Council recognized Murray Elementary School for its participation and Dublin Cyclery, Earl Anthony's Dublin Bowl, Livermore Cyclery, World of Shoes, and Yogurtland for their donations regarding the "Walk `n' Roll to School" program. ~ Mavor's Appointments to Citv Commission and Committee 7:14 pm 3.2 (110-30) Mayor Sbranti stated that on December 21, 2010, the City Council approved appointments to the City's Commissions and Committees. The City Council would consider the Mayor's recommendations for a remaining vacancy on the Heritage and & Cultural Arts Commission and a subsequent vacancy on the Senior Center Advisory Committee. On motion of Mayor Sbranti, seconded by Cm. Swalwell and by unanimous vote, the City Council confirmed the Mayor's appointment to Morgan King Sr. to fill the 4 year term for the Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission which expires December 2014, and Lee Sandeman to fill the remainder of. the term which expires December 2012 for the Senior Center Advisory Committee. ~~ Presentation by East Bay Regional Park District Status Update on the Alamo Canal Trail I-580 Undercrossinq Proiect 7:16:47 PM 3.3 (930-30) Senior Civil Engineer Ferd Del Rosario presented the Staff Report and advised that East Bay Regional Park District Trails Development Manager Jim Townsend would update the City Council on the status of the Alamo Canal Trail I-580 Undercrossing Project. The presentation would also include discussion of newly acquired National Infrastructure Investments Discretionary Grant Program (TIGER II) funds for the project. Jim Townsend, East Bay Regional Park District, spoke of the funding and schedule for the Undercrossing Project. The City Council received the presentation. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3 VOLUME 30 G~,~o~ ~e~ REGULAR MEETING n, ~ ~~~ FEBRUARY 1, 2011 '~~~~~~~ ~'~GII~R~S Public Comments 7:30:55 PM 3.4 No comments were made by any member of the public at this time. ~ CONSENT CALENDAR 7:30:59 PM Items 4.1 through 4.5 Mayor Sbranti pulled Item 4.2 for further discussion. On motion of Cm. Hildenbrand, seconded by Vm. Hart and by unanimous vote, the City Council took the following actions: . Approved (4.1) Minutes of December 7, 2010 and January 18, 2011; Adopted (4.3 600-30) RESOLUTION NO. 4 -11 APPROVING THE SELECTION OF WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. TO UPDATE EASTERN DUBLIN FISCAL ANALYIS Adopted (4.4 600-60) RESOLUTION NO. 5 -11 APPROVING FINAL MAP AND TRACT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 7943, ARROYO VISTA and RESOLUTION NO. 6 -11 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR LONG TERM ENCROACHMENT FOR LANDSCAPE FEATURES WITH TRACT 7943, ARROYO VISTA and RESOLUTION NO. 7 -11 ACCEPTING PARK LAND DEDICATION IIwLIEU FEES FOR PARK LAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR EDEN PORTION OF TRACT 7943, ARROYO VISTA DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 4 VOLUME 30 `~,~OF D~ REGULAR MEETING n; FEBRUARY 1, 2011 '~~~~~~~ • ~4GIFpR~~ Approved (4.5 300-40) Check Issuance Reports and Electronic Funds Transfers. ~ Mayor Sbranti pulled Item 4.2, City Treasurer's Investment Report for 2nd Quarter 2010-2011 (320-30), and stated the average yield on investment was budgeted at 1.73%. It had come in at 1.48%. What did that mean in actual dollars? Administrative Services Director Paul Rankin stated that, at this time, Staff had not calculated that figure because it was also dependent on the balances. The balances that the City was carrying were higher than what the original budget projected. That would be part of the mid- year review. Vm. Hart asked what the yield was during the second quarter in 2008? Mr. Rankin stated he did not remember. City Manager Pattillo stated she would supply that information to the City Council in a follow-up. She also wanted to call to the City Council's attention that in 2009-2010, the yield to maturity was 2.55%. As recognized by Vm. Hart, it was significantly higher than the 1.78% in the report. On motion of Mayor Sbranti, seconded by Cm. Hildenbrand and by unanimous vote, the City Council received the Quarterly Investment Report. . ~~ WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None ~ PUBLIC HEARINGS Downtown Dublin Specific Plan, Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment, Zoning Ordinance Amendments, Rezoning properties from various Planned Development Zoning Districts to a new Downtown Dublin Zonina District, and Environmental Impact Report, PA 07-036 7:34:40 PM 6.1 (400-20/420-30/450-20) Mayor Sbranti opened the public hearing. Principal Planner Kristi Bascom presented the Staff Report and advised that the City Council would consider the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP) and associated implementation actions. The DDSP consisted of a comprehensive set .of guiding principles, standards, and design guidelines that would implement the vision for future development in Downtown Dublin. In addition to the DDSP, several amendments were proposed to the General Plan and the DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5 VOLUME 30 `~OFDp~ REGULAR MEETING rn ~ a~ FEBRUARY 1, 2011 '\`~~~1% GIGIFOR~~ Dublin Zoning Ordinance to implement the Specific Plan. Upon approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendments, properties in the DDSP project area would be rezoned from various Planned Development Zoning Districts to a new Downtown Dublin Zoning District. Certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was also being considered. Mayor Sbranti asked if there was a development pool for Village Parkway if someone wanted to intensify that particular part of the district. Ms. Bascom stated that many of the properties on Village Parkway were not built up to their base Floor Area Ration (FAR). There was still some room for people to intensify. Village Parkway was always envisioned as a more low-density, main street-type feel. Wth the existing Village Parkway Specific Plan, there was a maximum height limit of 35 feet, two-story which did not allow for a lot of additional development beyond the 0.35 FAR. Through outreach with the property owners and tenants in that area, there did not seem to be a desire for a great intensification on Village Parkway. Mayor Sbranti stated that with the other finro districts, those also increased by right, as did Village Parkway. The average FAR was at 0.23. That increased it by right. But in the other base FAR, it also increased the maximum FAR that they could go up to. There was so much on the west side of Village Parkway. There was a substantial amount of area in the back of the street. What would be the process, at some later date, if someone came forward with a proposal? Would that go through the Planning Commission or the City Council to consider? Or if it went above 0.35 FAR, what would happen? Ms. Bascom stated the maximum FAR was 0.35, so if someone were to propose something different than that, they would be proposing an amendment to the Specific Plan. If it stayed within 0.35 FAR and they wanted to redevelop their site, the DDSP had been set up so that the zoning was all in place, as was the General Plan, and the Specific Plan designation. All they would need to do to move forward was to apply for a site development review application which would go to the Planning Commission. Mayor Sbranti asked if "new auto" was only allowed with a Conditional Use Permit, in all districts. Ms. Bascom stated that was correct. The City Council discussed the west side of Village Parkway and the set.backs of the buildings and the amount of space behind the buildings. Mayor Sbranti stated this space should be monitored. City Manager Pattillo stated that the document would need another environmental review if there were to be changes. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6 VOLUME 30 `~~F~UB~ REGULAR MEETING ni ~ ~~ FEBRUARY 1, 2011 '~~~~~~~ '1L/~R~ Cm. Hildenbrand stated there had been time to identify this as issue and do it then. She did not know why the City Council was discussing it now. City Manager Pattillo stated one of the points she understood from the City Council's discussion in particular, was that there was a pathway, in the future if there was an opportunity, of being able to modify the Downtown Specific Plan. If it were to be modified tonight, it would need to go back out for environmental review. Mayor Sbranti asked Ms. Bascom to elaborate on how this development pool he{ped the pedestrian orientation of the Downtown. Ms. Bascom stated the development pool was the difference between the base FAR and the maximum FAR. To see buildings of this height built in the future, in the Downtown, would be a big change for the community. However, the permitted building heights were taken from the existing Specific Plan. Clearly, there were no eight story buildings near the BART Station or six story buildings in the retail district, but that was technically what was permitted in the existing Specific Plan. The emphasis in allowing the larger development pool in the Transit-Oriented District in particular, was to encourage more residential development in the area immediately adjacent to the BART Station. FAR was defined as the ratio of square footage that was developed on the site to the site size. Most of the development pool was focused in the Transit- Oriented area in order to encourage a greater intensity of development near the BART Station, as well as the Retail District to allow a greater intensity of commercial development. Dublin's Downtown Core commercial district, right now, had a good amount of square footage and parking areas. By allowing a higher FAR, it would hopefully intensify and allow more development to fill the underutilized areas currently in Dublin. Janet Lockhart, Dublin resident, stated the City did not need to re-do the plan for Village Parkway. Things will start to change. As transition came into the area, there could be a parking structure behind the buildings along 680, maybe even residential over business. Mayor Sbranti closed the public hearing. The City Council commented on the opportunity of the Downtown Plan. It was a good blue print and thorough process. It was innovative. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 7 VOLUME 30 G`~oFDOe~ REGULAR MEETING n, FEBRUARY 1, 2011 '`~~~~`~ ~'1GlFOR~l~ On motion of Cm. Hildenbrand, seconded by Cm. Swalwell and by unanimous vote, the City Council adopted ~ RESOLUTION NO. 8 -11 CERTIFYING A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM UNDER CEQA FOR THE DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN PA 07-036 and RESOLUTION NO. 9 -11 ADOPTING THE DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH THE DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN, AND REPEALING THE WEST DUBLIN BART SPECIFIC PLAN, VILLAGE PARKWAY SPECIFIC PLAN, DOWNTOWN CORE SPECIFIC PLAN, DUBLIN DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, AND SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN ,PA 07-036 and introduced an Ordinance Approving Zoning Ordinance Amendments to Create a New Chapter: 8.30 (Downtown Dublin Zoning District), Rezone All Properties within the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Project Area to the Downtown Dublin Zoning District, Amend the Zoning Map to Identify the Location of the New Zoning District, Amend Zoning Ordinance Chapter 8.12 (Zoning Districts and Permitted Uses), and Amend Chapter 8.104 (Site Development Review). ~ UNFINISHED BUSINESS Community and CDBG Grants Committee Recommendations for the Use of Communitv Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 8:06:43 PM 7.1 (480-30) Administrative Analyst Gaylene Burkett presented the Staff Report and advised that on January 12 and 13, 2011, the Community and CDBG Grants Committee (Committee), made up of Councilmembers Hildenbrand and Swalwell, held two public meetings, reviewed information provided by Staff and received agency presentations on CDBG applications for funding. After considerable deliberations on the second evening, the Committee concluded that in light of the unresolved state budget crisis, funding prioritization for food, shelter and medical services would best meet the current needs of the Dublin community. This year, in accordance with the Committee's priorities, certain agencies would receive full funding. In addition, the Committee recommended funding two CDBG eligible programs with $14,000 in Community Support Grant Funding, which would be discussed at the City Council Budget Study Session on March 7, 2011. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8 VOLUME 30 ~,~o~~DO~ REGULAR MEETING ni Yu~ ~~ FEBRUARY 1, 2011 '~`~~~~~ G~,~oR~'~ Vm. Hart asked why the City was considering using CDBG funds for the Concrete Curb Cuts and Sidewalk Ramps. Ms. Burkett stated it was an eligible use of CDBG funding. It was a Capital Improvement Project. City Manager Pattillo stated the City had trouble in the past getting structural projects and this was one of the areas that was most applicable to CDBG funding. Vm. Hart asked if this would be taking funds away from other uses. Ms. Burkett stated there was a balance befinreen the number of Capital Improvement Projects and Service Based organizations that the City could fund. The percentage was 15%. By funding a Capital Improvement Project, it would help the City to not exceed that amount. The County would look at all applications for CDBG from the urban County Cities to see if they exceeded that 15%. The City did not know that yet. Funding a Capital Project would help the City not exceed that percentage. . Cm. Hildenbrand stated she and Cm. Swalwefl, when considering funding, focused on housing, food and basic needs for the community. The Capital Project funding made sense since YMCA was moving here and providing these types of services. Mayor Sbranti asked how long the City would be eligible for these funds. City Manager Pattillo stated when the City signed on with the County for a three year agreement, which would end in 2012, the City did not know where it would be with population projections. There was a subcommittee formed by the City Council as an exploratory component. With the census data now, the City might still look at a cost benefit analysis to see if the County should still oversee the City's program. The funds associated with CDBG have been on the decline. That would be a decision point that would come back to the City Council. There would also be a community component. Mayor Sbranti stated when he was in Washington D.C., there was talk of ending out the CDBG program altogether. The City needed to monitor this and the results of the Needs Assessment. The City might want to consider the Human Services Task Force. On motion of Vm. Swalwell, seconded by Cm. Hildenbrand and by unanimous vote, the City Council approved the Committee's recommendation to fund the following agencies; directed Staff to submit applications to the Alameda County Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for $88,100 in CDBG funding for Fiscal Year 2011-2012; Axis Community Health - Medical Enrollment Assistance, $10,000; Bay Area Community Services - Valley Creative Living Center, $10,000; CRIL - Housing Services, $6,300; Open Heart Kitchen - Lunch and Hot Meals Program, $10,000; Senior Support Program - Case Management, $7,800; Spectrum Community Services - Meals on Wheels, $6,165; YMCA - Curb Cuts and DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 9 VOLUME 30 G`~OF Dpe~ REGULAR MEETING a~ FEBRUARY 1, 2011 '`~~~~~ ~''1G~FOR~~` Sidewalk Ramps, $10,135; Housing Rehabilitation (administered by the County), $15,673; Annual Contribution toward Sojourner House, $5,427; Program Administration, $6,600; TOTAL: $88,100; and should there be an increase in funds, Staff recommended equally funding Senior Support services and CRIL services up to their maximum amounts requested because the other service organizations had already been allocated the amount requested in their application. Any remaining increase could go towards the YMCA curb and sidewalk project. Should there be a decrease; Staff recommended the decrease be evenly distributed befinreen the programs that do not have mandatory set amounts. ~ NEW BUSINESS Grant Aqreement with the YMCA of the East Bav 8:29:17 PM 8.1 (600-30) Economic Development Director Linda Maurer presented the Staff Report and advised that the City Council was being asked to approve a multi-year grant agreement in the total amount of $400,000 for the YMCA of the East Bay to assist in defraying costs associated with the operation and administration of programs and activities at their new Dublin location. Kelly Dulka, Executive Director of the YMCA, stated this space was significantly larger than where they were now. This new space would allow for more programs. The City Council welcomed fhe YMCA to Dublin. On motion of Cm. Hildenbrand, seconded by Cm. Biddle and by unanimous vote, the City Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 10 -11 APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE YMCA OF THE EAST BAY and approved the Budget Change. ~ Jordan Ranch - General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment Studv Initiation Request 8:37:18 PM 8.2 (420-30) Planning Consultant Mike Porto presented the Staff Report and advised that the City Council would consider whether to initiate a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 10 VOLUME 30 `,~oF~,~ REGULAR MEETING rn ~ir~ ~~~ FEBRUARY 1, 2011 '``~~~~~ ~ic~ eN Study to modify the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan by reducing the number of dwelling units from 780 to 751, placing an underlying Land Use Designation on the Elementary School Site of Medium Density Residential, changing a portion of the Open Space Land Use designation to create a 4.3 acre retail commercial site, eliminating the 2.0 acre Semi-Public Site and revising the adjacent 5.2 acre Medium-High Density residential area to all Medium Density Residential, and eliminating the Mixed-use Designation and replacing it with a Medium-High Density Residential Land Use Designation for the site known as Jordan Ranch. . Cm. Hildenbrand asked what would be going into the site to be designated commercial. Kevin Fryer, Mission Valley Properties, stated the concept of commercial was generated by a significant amount of review and study and consideration of the existing plan there, and the mixed-use element of the neighborhood square. They had long been concerned about the viability of the site as a retail site in the future, even at ultimate buildout, because of its isolation from a significant transportation corridor. They were looking for a non-residential retail use because it had good exposure and a decent amount of traffic, especially as things progressed with the Sport Park, the buildout of Positano and the continuous improvement of everything happening in the area. Even with Fallon Gateway project starting, they felt there was still great opportunity here. Cm. Hildenbrand asked what he meant by "neighborhood serving commercial". Mr. Fryer stated that meant anything up to 35,000 to 40,000 square feet of retail. This could be a small grocery, drug store, or food services, what had been envisioned around the neighborhood square previously. But all of the analysis and studies had demonstrated this was a far superior location to support those uses and make it truly economically viable. It would also be respectful of the biological features on the site. Vm. Hart asked how much grading would have to be done at the site. Mr. Fryer stated the site was relatively flat, so grading would not be significant. Vm. Hart asked why the requested change to a particular site from school designation to medium density. Mr. Porto stated the site did not have an underlying land use. Most areas such as school sites generally had an underlying residential land use on it and this one did not have that. This was an underlay designation for the site in case a school was not built on the site. Vm. Hart asked about the area south of the school site. Mr. Porto stated the semi-public was handled in the Development Agreement where the developer was given the option of rezoning the property. At that time, they elected to look at the overall community that they had planned in the area, and they were proposing now to lower the density to medium density and assimilate the property all into one. The developer was also DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 11 VOLUME 30 G`~~~FDUB~y REGULAR MEETING rn ~ir ~~~ FEBRUARY 1, 2011 '~~~~~~~ `1G/FORN asking for an area designated as mixed use, be studied and the elimination of that mixed use area to go to medium high density development, moving the commercial out onto Fallon Road at the commercial site. Vm. Hart asked was would cause the recommendation for the changes. Mr. Porto stated he could not answer that without further analysis. Mr. Fryer stated it was both the developer's internal expertise and the development history at their company as well as consultation with local retail experts on both the development and the brokers side about the viability of the site with a look at traffic counts, roof tops within a certain radii from those locations, and all of those impacts and drivers. All of those recommendations had suggested that if the retail were to stay at the original location, it would be a strip center. They did not believe it was keeping with the vision of the neighborhood square. It would be vacant retail space that would be an eyesore and not get genuine use out of it. Mayor Sbranti asked about the status of the Community Park. Mr. Fryer stated the Community Park was a total of 18 acres between their property and the Chen property to the south. Eleven acres of the site was on the Jordan Ranch property. They were not proposing any change to that site as part of this item. On motion of Cm. Swalwell, seconded by Cm. Biddle and by unanimous vote, the City Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 11 - 11 APPROVING THE INITIATION OF A GENERAL PLAN AND EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT STUDY TO EVALUATE A PROPOSAL TO MODIFY THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND REDUCE THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS ON THE SITE KNOWN AS JORDAN RANCH, (APN 985-0027-007-02) ~ v St. Patrick's Dav Parade 9:02:07 PM 8.3 (950-40) Environmental Specialist Martha Aja presented the Staff Report and advised that the Annual Dublin Lions Club St. Patrick's Day Parade would be held on Saturday, March 12, 2011. Each year, the Dublin City Council participates in the parade. The City Council would consider alternatives for participating in the 2011 St. Patrick's Day parade. By consensus, the City Council directed Staff to seek the use of the Alameda County Fire Department antique fire truck. If it was not available, then the City Manager would work with Police Chief McCarthy to utilize a police vehicle. DUBLIN CITY.COUNCIL MINUTES 12 VOLUME 30 `~OFDp~ REGULAR MEETING n; ~ ~~~ FEBRUARY 1, 2011 '~`~~~~ Gc~t~oR`'`~ ~ Citv Council Disaster Preparedness Traininq 9:15:22 PM 8.4 (520-30) Senior Administrative Analyst Roger Bradley presented the Staff Report and advised that the City Council would consider holding a disaster preparedness training session for City Councilmembers to receive an overview of the City's disaster response process during an emergency. The City Council would also consider providing Staff with a preferred date to hold the session. By consensus, the City Council provided Staff with a date of Tuesday, April 5, 2011, 5:00 to 7:00 p.m., for conducting disaster preparedness training for City Councilmembers. ~~ OTHER BUSINESS Brief /NFORMAT/ON ONLY reports from Council and/or Staff, including Committee Reports and Reports by Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB 1234) 9:19:13 PM City Manager Pattillo stated there would be a Joint Dublin City Council - Dublin Unified School District meeting on February 10, 2011, 6:00 p.m. in the Dublin Library Community Room. Cm. Biddle stated he had attended a Councilmember Conference in Sacramento in January. He was now on the Community Services Committee for the League of California Cities. He attended the Martin Luther King Jr. Breakfast, the Keypoint Credit Union ribbon cutting, and the State of the City Address. He also attended the East Bay Division League of California Cities dinner meeting, a session with Senators Lockyer and Hancock regarding the budget, and the Sustainable Community Strategies session sponsored by Supervisor Haggerty. He also attended the recent bowling event in Dublin. Vm. Hart stated he attended the Employee Recognition Dinner, the State of the City Address, and the Sustainable Community Strategies session. He also attended the recent bowling event in Dublin. Cm. Hildenbrand stated she attended the City's Strategic Planning Session, a LAVTA Finance meeting, Ethics Training, the East Bay Division League of California Cities dinner meeting, the Employee Recognition Dinner, and the Sustainability Community Strategies session. She also mentioned that the Alameda County Tobacco Control sent the City a report card regarding tobacco control and the City received a"C". DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 13 VOLUME 30 G~~OF DpB~ REGULAR MEETING n, FEBRUARY 1, 2011 '~~~~~~ ~'lLIF~pR~~` Cm. Swalwell stated he attended the East Bay Division League of California Cities dinner meeting. Mayor Sbranti stated he attended the Martin Luther King Jr. Breakfast, the Employee Recognition event, the Keypoint Credit Union ribbon cutting, the Sustainability Community Strategies session, and the Ilene Mischeloff Walk. He delivered the State of the City Address. He stated the West Dublin BART Station would open on February 18, 2011. The Sister City Soccer Event would be coming to Dublin. He attended the recent bowling event in Dublin. He stated he also attended the US Conference of Mayors in Washington D.C. ~ ADJOURNMENT 10.1 There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 9:34:00 PM in memory of Staff Sgt. Sean Diamond and our fallen troops. Minutes prepared by Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk. /~~ . ~J Mayor ATTEST: ~c //~~ . City Clerk DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 14 VOLUME 30 G`~yOFDpB~y REGULAR MEETING a~~~,~~~ FEBRUARY 1, 2011 ~~ ~ ~ G~rFOU~`~