HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 036-86 HatfieldPropTaxExch RESOLUTION NO. 36- 86
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AMENDING DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 8-86,
AGREEING TO AN EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE CONCERNING
PA 85-035 HATFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - INVESTEC, INC.
PREZONING AND ANNEXATION APPLICATION
WHEREAS, Hatfield Development Corporation - Investec, Inc.,
submitted an application requesting that the City prezone to a Planned
Development (PD) District 46~ acres lying outside the western, boundarY of the
City of Dublin with a concurrent request that the City initiate an application
to the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission(LAFCO) for annexation
of the 46~ acres into the City of Dublin.
WHEREAS, Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code (AB 8)
provides, among other things, that no local agency jurisdictional change can
be completed without the agencies affected by such change first having agreed
upon an exchange of property tax revenue between and among the affected
agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors (Resolution No.
186574) have developed a method for equitably distributing the property taxes;
and
WHEREAS, each specific annexation needs a resolution from both the
City and County agreeing to the exchange of property tax revenues for the
annexation to be completed and filed with the State; and
WHEREAS, on January 27, 1968, the Dublin City Council held a
noticed public hearing adopting Resolution No. 8-86 agreeing to the property
tax revenue redistribUtion stated therein and finding that:
A. For the said annexation by the City of Dublin (which will be first
effective for the fiscal year following the filing of the Certificate of
Completion with the State Board of Equalization providing the filing occurs
prior to December 31 of the preceding year), the Auditor-Controller of the
County of Alameda shall be directed to cause an exchange of property tax
revenues pursuant to the following provisions of paragraph numbers 1 and 3 of
Exhibit "A" of the property tax revenues redistribution method developed by
the Alameda County Board of Supervisors.
1) In all annexations involving developed or developing residential
territory, as well as mixed residential/ commercial areas and vacant or
underdeveloped industrially- zoned areas, the City would automatically
be entitled to receive an allocation of the County's general fund
computed property tax revenue from that area, equal to the City/
County's existing allocation percentage ratio within its corporate
limits;
3) In the event that a City assumes full responsibility for a service
or services presently provided by a separate County Taxing agency or
special district within a territory proposed to be annexed, pursuant to
Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99 (b), the County will endeavor to
transfer to the City the entire computed property tax revenue presently
allocated to such County agency or district from said area.
B. The City certifies that there is no significant commercial and/or
industrial development in the proposed annexation.
WHEREAS, on March 4, 1986, Dublin City Staff submitted said
Resolution and requested the item be scheduled for consideration by the Board
of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 1986, the Alameda County Board of
Supervisors adopted Resolution No. R-86-213 approving Dublin City Council
Resolution No. 8'86 regarding Property Tax Exchange; and
WHEREAS, LAFCO Staff determined that three (3) separate annexation
applications are required for the Hatfield/Investec annexation and that
Resolutions relating to said annexation must reference the three (3)
applications;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Dublin City Council does
hereby amend City Council Resolution No. 8-86 to reflect the three (3)
separate annexation appticationsrequired by LAFC0:
Annexation No. 4 consisting of 11~63+ acres
Annexation No. 5 consisting of .02 acres
Annexation No. 6 consisting of 36.35 acres
BE IT FURTHERRESOLVED that the Dublin City CoUncil does hereby
agree to the property tax revenues redistribution method stated herein.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 1986.
AYES:
Councilmembers Hegarty, Jeffery, Moffatt,
Vonheeder and Mayor Snyder
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
-2-