HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.3 EDub EIR/PD PrezAGENDA STATEMENT
CITY CLERK
File # 600-00 & 620-20
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE' October 16, 2001
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: PA 00-025 Eastern Dublin Properties
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, Planned Development (PD)
prezone (Stage 1 Development Plan) 2nd Reading, Pre-Annexation
Agreement, and Resolution for Reorganization Application to LAFCO
(Report Prepared by: Andy Byde, Senior Planner)
ATTACHMENTS:
o
o
o
Resolution certifying the Eastern Dublin Properties Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR)
Ordinance adopting a Planned Development (PD) Prezone (with
the following Exhibits attached: Exhibit-A-l: Prezoning; Exhibit
A-2: Stage 1 Development Plan; Exhibit B: CEQA mitigation
findings; Exhibit C: Findings concerning Alternatives; Exhibit D:
Statement of Overriding Considerations; and Exhibit E: Mitigation
Monitoring Program)
Resolution Approving Pre-Annexation Agreement (with Pre-
Annexation Agreement with Braddock and Logan Group attached
as Exhibit 1)
Resolution Authorizing Initiation of Application for
Reorganization with Alameda County Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCo) (with the following Exhibits' attached:
Exhibit A: Annexation to the City of Dublin; Exhibit B:
Annexation to Dublin San Ramon Services District; Exhibit C:
Detachment from Livermore Area Parks and Recreation District)
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR),
including Comments Received on DSEIR and Responses To
'Comments
City Council Staff Report dated October 2, 2001, and Planning
Commission Staff Report dated September 25, 2001, incorporated
herein by reference*
* Not attached, but available at the Planning Department, City Hall
RECOMMENDATION~i'
2.
3.
4.
Hear Staff Presentation
Open Public Hearing
Hear Applicant's Presentation
Question Staff, Applicant and the Public
COPIES TO:
Applicant(s)
Property Owners
PA file
ITEM NO. _~
o
Close' Public Hearing
Deliberate
Adopt a resolution certifying the Eastern Dublin Properties
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report;
Waive the Reading and adopt Ordinance (Attachment 2) approving
a Planned Development (PD) Prezone and Stage 1 Development
Plan (with the following Exhibits attached: Exhibit A-l:
Prezoning; Exhibit A-2: Stage 1 Development Plan; Exhibit B:
CEQA mitigation findings; Exhibit C: Findings concerning
Alternatives; Exhibit D: Statement of Overriding Considerations;
and Exhibit E: Mitigation Monitoring Program)
Adopt a resolution approving the Pre-Annexation Agreement with
Braddock and Logan Group (attached as Exhibit 1)
Adopt resolution authorizing initiation of application for
Reorganization with Alameda County Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCo) (with the following Exhibits attached:
Exhibit A: Annexation to the City of Dublin; Exhibit B:
Annexation to Dublin San Ramon Services District; Exhibit C:
Detachment from Livermore Area Parks and Recreation District)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project area is approximately 1,120 acres in size and is 'located in an unincorporated area of
Alameda County bounded by Interstate 580 (1-580) to the south and Fallon Road to the west. The
Project area abuts the eastern Dublin City limit boundary. Approximately 472 acres of the Project area
are included within the City's Eastern Dublin Specific Plan boundary, while the remainder is within the
1993 Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area. The entire Project area is located within the City's
General Plan Planning Area and Sphere of Influence (SOI). The Project area consists of thirteen (13)
different parcels of land, under eleven (11) separate ownerships (See Aerial Photo under Project
References contained within Exhibit A- 1).
The Eastern Dublin Property Owners (EDPO) are the applicants for this proposed annexation and
prezoning. The EDPO consist of the following property owners: Campbell, Branaugh, Anderson,
Braddock and Logan, Chen, and Fallon Enterprises. The table below includes a list of all of the
properties within the Project area and includes the following information: owners, APN's, acreages,
locations, and if the property owner is consenting to the annexation for locations of APNs.
Assessor Parcel Consent to Address Area Property Owner
No. Annex?
905-0001-004-03 Yes North ofi-580, east 8.8 ac Campbell
of Croak Rd.
905-0001-004-04 Yes North ofi-580, east 39.8 ac Branaugh
of Croak Rd.
905-0001-005-02 Yes North ofi-580, east 48.8 ac Righetti Partners
of Croak Rd.
985-0001-006-03 Yes North ofi-580, east 48.9 ac Anderson Second Family
of Croak Rd. Limited Partnership
905-0002-002 Not at Approx. 1 mile north 164 ac Croak
905-0002-001-01 this time ofi-580, east of
Fallon Rd., north &
2
east of Jordan Ranch
905-0002-003 Yes Approx. 1 mile north 160.9ac Braddock & Logan Group
ofi-580, east of
Jordan Ranch
985-0006-004 Yes North east Quadrant 136 ac Chen
ofi-580 at Fallon
Rd.
985-0006-006-02 Not at North ofi-580, west .8 ac EBJ Partners, L.P.
this time of Croak Rd.
985-0006-006-03 Not at North ofi-580, east .2 ac Pleasanton Ranch Investments
this time of Croak Rd.
985-0006-010 Not at 4233 Fallon Road 189 ac First American Title Guaranty
985-0006-009 this time Co., (Jordan Charitable Trust)
985-0007-002-14 Yes East of Current City 313.8 ac Fallon Enterprises
of Dublin Limits,
North of Jordan
Ranch
The proposed Project includes: prezoning the area to the City of Dublin PD-Planned Development
Zoning District and considering a related Stage 1 Development Plan to guide future development of the
Project Area, annexation of the Project area to the City of Dublin and Dublin San Ramon Services
District (DSRSD), detachment from Livermore Area Recreation and Park District (LARPD), and the
execution of a pre-annexation agreement with the consenting property owners.
Annexation/Reorganization:
The project site is currently within unincorporated portion of Alameda County. In order for the project
to come under the jurisdiction of the City of Dublin, and to receive urban services from the Dublin San
Ramon Services District (DSRSD), annexation of the site to the City and to DSRSD must be approved
by the Alameda County Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCo), which is a State mandated local
agency that oversees boundary changes to cities and special districts, the formation of new agencies
including incorporation of new cities, and the consolidation of existing agencies. LAFCo requires that a
city prezone an area proposed for annexation, and that prezoning must be consistent with the approved
General Plan and Specific Plan uses for the property. The PD Prezoning proposed for adoption would
address this requirement, and would establish the appropriate land uses to be in effect at the time the
project site becomes a part of the city. (See below.)
LAFCo has established spheres of influence for the City and DSRSD. A "Sphere of Influence" is the
probable physical boundary and service area that a local governmental agency is expected to serve in the
future. Establishment of this boundary is necessary to determine which governmental agencies can
provide services in the most efficient way to the people and property in any given area. The entire
Project area is within the sphere of influence (SOI) of Dublin and has been since LAFCo originally
established the eastern SOI boundary for the City in 1983. The project area is also with the SOI for
Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD). The property immediately to the west of the Project
area was annexed into the City in 1995 and is now being developed in phases and urban infrastructure is
being extended to a point immediately adjacent to the Project area by various developers within the
Dublin Ranch Area.
The current action for the City Council is to adopt a resolution that would authorize Staff to initiate an
application to LAFCo for reorganization (a proposal that includes more than one annexation is called a
reorganization). The reorganization proposal includes the annexation of approximately 1,120 acres to
the City of Dublin and Dublin San Ramon Services District. The project also includes detachment from
Livermore Area Recreation and Park District (LARPD), since upon annexation the area would be served
by the City of Dublin Parks and Community Services Department.
The City has received a letter from the LARPD Board of Directors expressing concern regarding the
proposed detachment from LARPD's service area (see Attachment 5, LARPD's Comment Letter dated,
June 26, 2001). However, detaching the area from LARPD's service area is consistent with the Eastern
Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan policies that indicate jurisdictional lines should be
revised so that the City of Dublin Parks and Community Services Department and other City
departments have jurisdiction over all park land within the Dublin SOI, which includes the project site.
In addition} the City has a Park and Recreation Master Plan that addresses park facilities to meet the
demand related to development within the Project Area, including facility financing and operating
methods, for the Project site and the rest of the Eastern Dublin planning area. LARPD's intent of
retaining the area would conflict with the Park and Recreation Master Plan policies and programs related
to park planning, financing and operations. Moreover, during the adjacent 1994 Dublin Ranch
reorganization application, the LARPD Board consented to detachment.
Public services such as water and sewer for this annexation may not be available immediately upon
approval of annexation. Construction of additional water and sewer infrastructure will be required to
service to the annexation area, and the project proponents will likely need to enter into agreements with
DSRSD to fund such infrastructure.
The proposed reorganization is appropriate, as it implements Dublin's extensive planning for the area, is
contiguous with the Dublin City limits, and would provide for the logical and orderly extension of urban
services to the eastern portion of Dublin.
Planned Development Prezoning:
Development under the proposed PD prezoning and Stage 1 Development Plan would reflect the land
uses specified in the current City of Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The uses
would include a mix of residential uses at a variety of densities, employment-generating uses such as
retail, service, office and light industrial, parks, open spaces, community facilities, roadways and similar
land uses. The Stage I Development Plan proposes retail, office and light industrial land uses located
primarily within the southern portion of the Project area along the freeway and major arterials, with
residential uses located in the more northern and eastern portions of the Project area. The Project also
would provide a complement of neighborhood parks, school sites, open space, a portion of a community
park, and a multi-use trail system to link the developed areas with the parks and trails within project
open space.
A Planned Development (PD) Prezoning has been prepared for the subject property to establish regulations
for future use. The proposed land uses are as shown on the Prezoning Exhibit, labeled Exhibit A-1 of
Attachment 2 to the Agenda Statement. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan and General Plan. The PD District provisions (Attachment 1) specify the intent, intensity
of use, and permitted and conditional uses of the land use designations in accordance with the Specific
Plan and General Plan. Any future residential development on this property shall conform to the
policies and intent of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan including the design guidelines. Page 4 of
Attachment 2, shows the potential development of the area. No development may occur until a Stage 2
Development Plan is adopted by the City identifying regulations for the improvement and maintenance
of the property in accordance with Dublin's. Zoning Ordinance..Properties not currently subject to the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan would also need to apply for a Specific Plan prior to or concurrently with
the Stage 2 Development Plan.
4
The Stage 1 Development Plan proposes an "Existing Agricultural and Residential Uses" land use that
would allow the existing residential and agricultural uses approved under the Alameda County's Zoning
Ordinance to remain until such time the landowner of this property applies for a Specific Plan as
applicable, and Stage 2 Development Plan in accordance with Section 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning
Ordinance, to develop the property.
Staff finds the Project to be consistent with the City of Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan land use designations and policies and recommends the City Council find the project consistent
with adopted General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Project includes the same land uses and densities as approved in the 1993 Eastern Dublin General
Plan Amendment and Specific Plan, and as analyzed in the related EIR. The City prepared an Initial
Study for the Project to determine if any subsequent environmental review was required beyond the
1993 EIR. The Initial Study concluded that much of the impact analysis in the 1993 EIR continues to
apply to the Project. However, the Initial Study concluded that additional environmental review was
required under CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 based primarily on newly identified
sensitive biological species, substantially increased regional traffic and related noise and air quality
effects, and on' potential power shortages. A Draft Supplemental EIR was prepared and was circulated
for public review. The comment period was open from July 31, 2001, to September 14, 2001. The City
received 12 comment letters during the public review. Responses have also been prepared to each of the
comments received by the City, during the 45-day review period. All responses that were received past
the public review period were not responded to, (Public Resources Code section 21092.5(c)). Staff
provided responses, on October 5, 2001, to all public agencies that commented on the project during the
public review period, pursuant to Public Resource Code 21092.5(a). The comments and associated
responses together constitute the Final SEIR for the proposed project (the FSEIR is included as
Attachment 5). Staff will be asking the Council to: (1) Certify the SEIR (consisting of the Draft and
Final Supplemental EIR documents), (2) make all the findings to approve the project under CEQA, and
(3) approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project.
The following environmental issues were analyzed in the Supplemental EIR:
Agricultural Resources:
The 1993 EIR analyzed conversion of agricultural lands due to development of the Eastern Dublin area,
including the Project site. The Draft Supplemental EIR examined recent changes in the definition of
"prime" agricultural lands under AB 2838 and determined that the new definition would not result in
conversion of more prime agricultural lands than in the 1993 EIR. The Draft Supplemental EIR also
determined that cancellation rather than non-renewal of Williamson Act contracts on the Project area
was not a new significant impact.
Air Quality:
The 1993 EIR identified cumulative air quality impacts as a significant unavoidable impact of
development in Eastern Dublin. In 1998, the EPA downgraded Bay Area air quality to "non-attainment"
for ozone and new, strict standards have been adopted for "precursor" pollutants, which lead to ozone
formation. Even with mitigation, the Project exceeds those standards, therefore the Draft Supplemental
EIR identifies significant unavoidable air quality impacts.
Biology:
Numerous sensitive habitats and protected species potentially occur on the site, as described in the 1993
EIR, which identified the cumulative loss of sensitive habitat as a significant unavoidable impact of
development in Eastern Dublin. The. Draft Supplemental EIR identified new sensitive species and
5
habitats, which could potentially be affected by development of the Project area. It also analyzed the
effect of recent regulatory changes such as USFWS' designation of critical habitat for the California
Red-Legged Frog. The Draft Supplemental EIR updated previously adopted mitigation measures to
ensure implementation of the most current species survey protocols; however even with mitigation,
cumulative loss of sensitive habitat was identified as a significant unavoidable impact.
Noise:
The 1993 EIR concluded that projected increaSes in noise from development of Eastern Dublin could be
reduced to less than significant through acoustical mitigation, except in the case of existing residences
for which noise impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. The Draft Supplemental EIR
concluded that noise from increased regional traffic beyond the 1993 EIR projections would also be
significant and unavoidable for existing homes. Acoustical mitigation would continue to be required for
furore residences and businesses in the Project area.
Traffic and Circulation:
The Draft Supplemental EIR concluded that increased regional traffic beyond that anticipated in the
1993 EIR would result in potentially significant impacts on several intersections and road segments.
Mitigation measures in the Draft Supplemental EIR proposed improvements to reduce these impacts to
less than significant except at Cumulative Buildout for 2025 for three Dublin Boulevard intersections
and for 1-580 and 1-680 freeway segments.
Utilities and Service Systems:
The Draft Supplemental EIR analyzed whether utility and services impacts have substantially changed
since the 1993 EIR. Substantial changes were identified with respect to water supplies, and electrical
power supply and distribution; mitigation measures were also identified to reduce these impacts to less
than significant.
Environmental Analysis Conclusion:
The project is within the Dublin General Plan's Eastern Extended Planning Area and the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan Area, which was the subject of an Environmental Impact Report, certified by the City of
Dublin in 1993. The General Plan/Specific Plan EIR is a program EIR, which analyzed the
environmental issues related to the land use locations, development plans and policies contained in the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The EIR also anticipated several subsequent actions related to future
development in Eastern Dublin.
The EIR did identify some impacts from implementation of the. General Plan/Specific Plan that were not
able to be mitigated. Upon certification of the EIR, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding
Considerations for several impacts, some of which relate to this project. The City also adopted a
mitigation monitoring program, which included measures intended to reduce impacts from the
development of Eastern Dublin area. These mitigation measures apply to project approvals and actions
at various stages in the development process, and will be applied to thid project as applicable. The
timing of these mitigation measures is indicated in the City's EIR mitigation monitoring matrix (City
Council Resolution # 53-93).
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program:
In addition to the mitigation monitoring program adopted as part of the East Dublin EIR, a new
mitigation monitoring program needs to be adopted to supplement the previous mitigation monitoring
program, This program will be adopted to supplement the previous mitigation monitoring program. This
program is included as Exhibit E to Attachment 2 of the Agenda Statement. The Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program is required by CEQA to identify the timing of mitigation measures and which
agency is responsible for implementing each measure.
The Initial Study and Supplemental EIR thoroughly and comprehensively assessed the potential for the
Project to cause or contribute to significant impacts beyond those identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR.
Where new potentially significant impacts were identified, appropriate mitigation measures were also
proposed to reduce or avoid the impacts. These impacts will be addressed in mitigation findings upon
City Council approval of the Project. Even with mitigation, however, certain new impacts cannot be
reduced to less than significant and will require a Statement: of Overriding Considerations (which is
included in Exhibit D to Attachment 2 of the Agenda Statement).
PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT:
The goals and policies of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan require annexation and new development to
be revenue neutral. Prior to its submittal of an annexation request to LAFCo, the City requires that an
annexation agreement be entered into by the developer, to pay a share of the public services deficit.
Braddock and Logan Group has signed a pre-annexation agreement with the City (Refer to Exhibit 1 of
Attachment 3), which will guarantee that the cost of providing services to the area will not exceed the
revenue received from the area. The agreement will also assure that the financing goals and policies of
the Specific Plan are met. The City Council should authorize the execution of the Pre-Annexation
agreement by adopting Attachment 3.
DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT:
The Dublin General Plan policies state "schools located within the city should be operated by the Dublin
Unified School District". It is the intent of the City that the boundaries of the Dublin School District
should be coterminous with the City limits. The project site is currently located within the Livermore
Valley Joint Unified School District. The detachment of the Project area from the Livermore School
District and annexation to the Dublin School District is not subject to LAFCo approval. The Planned
Development Prezone contains a provision which requires that the applicant cooperate and actively
work with other property owners within the City of Dublin's Sphere of Influence to initiate and
complete the annexation process to the Dublin Unified School District.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed Planned Development Prezone and Annexation request for the Project area is consistent
with the Dublin General Plan, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan-and Dublin Zoning Ordinance. The project
will accommodate the logical extension of public services within Eastern Dublin and will provide for
future land uses anticipated in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and City of Dublin General Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council, open the public hearing, hear Applicant's presentation, question
staff, applicant and the public, close the public hearing, deliberate and take the following actions:
· Adopt a resolution certifying the Eastern Dublin Properties Supplemental Environmental Impact
Report;
· Waive the Reading and adopt Ordinance (Attachment 2) approving a Planned Development (PD)
Prezone Stage 1 Development Plan (with the Prezoning Exhibit attached as Exhibit A-1 and
Stage 1 Development Plan attached as Exhibit A-2; and the required CEQA findings attached as
Exhibits B-E);
· Adopt a resolution approving the Pre-Annexation Agreement (with Pre-Annexation Agreement
with Braddock and Logan Group attached as Exhibit 1); and
· Adopt a resolution authorizing initiation of application for Reorganization with Alameda County
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo).
G:\PA#k2000\00-025\CC Staff Reports and Resos\cc staff report 10-10-01.doc
7
RESOLUTION NO. XX-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
FOR THE EASTERN DUBLIN PROPERTIES ANNEXATION AND PREZONING PROJECT
PA 00-025.
WHEREAS, the Eastern Dublin Property Owners submitted applications for annexation of -
approximately 1,120 acres of land to Dublin, for prezoning to the Planned Development zoning district
including approval of a Stage 1 Development Plan, and related approvals, collectively known as the
"Project"; and
WHEREAS, the Project area is within the Eastern Extended Planning Area of the Dublin General
Plan as amended by the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment, approved in 1993. Portions of the
Project area are also within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area as approved in 1993. The Eastern
Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan are collectively referred to as the GPA/SP Project;
and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the City Council certified a program Environmental Impact
Report ("EIR") for the GPA/SP Project and an addendum thereto, dated May 4, 1993 (SCH 91103064).
On August 22, 1994, the City Council approved another addendum to update plans to provide sewer
service. The May 10, 1993 program EIR, the May 4, 1993 addendum and the August 22, 1994 addendum
are collectively referred to as the Eastern Dublin EIR; and
WHEREAS, upon approval of the GPA/SP Project, the City Council adopted mitigation findings,
a statement of overriding considerations, and a mitigation monitoring program as set forth in Resolution
53-93, included in the Draft Supplemental EIR referenced below; and
WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with the type, location and density of land uses approved
through the GPA/SP Project. All mitigation measures adopted for the GPA/SP Project continue to apply
to implementing projects such as the current annexation and prezoning Project; and all applicable City
development ordinances and standards apply to the Project except as otherwise approved through the
Project prezoning and related Stage 1 Development Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City completed an Initial Study for the Project consistent with CEQA Guidelines
sections 15162 and 15163 and determined that a Supplement to the Eastern Dublin EIR ("Supplemental
EIR") was required in order to analyze substantial changes in circumstances and new information since
certification of the Eastern Dublin EIR. A Notice of Preparation dated May 25,2001 was circulated with
the Initial Study to public agencies and interested parties for consultation on the scope of the
Supplemental EIR; and
WHEREAS, based on the Initial Study and responses to the Notice of Preparation, the City
prepared a Draft Supplemental EIR dated July 2001 and consisting of two bound volumes. Volume 1
contains the Draft Supplemental EIR text; Volume 2 contains appendices, including the Notice of
Preparation and Initial Study. The 2-volume Draft Supplemental EIR (SCH 2001052114) is incorporated
herein by reference; and
Attachment 1
WHEREAS, the Draft Supplemental EIR was circulated for the required 45 day public review
period, from July 31, 2001 through September 14, 2001; and
WHEREAS, a staff report, dated September 25, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference,
described and analyzed the Draft Supplemental EIR and the Project for the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2001, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on
the Project at which time the Commission considered the staff report, the Draft Supplemental EIR, written
comments received during the public comment period, and all other oral and written comments presented
to them, and based on this evidence, recommended certification of the Supplemental EIR and approval of
the Project in Resolutions 01-23 and 01-24 dated September 25, 2001, incorporated herein by reference;
and
WHEREAS, City staff reviewed all comments received on the Draft Supplemental EIR during the
public review period and prepared written responses to all significant environmental issues raised therein.
Through the responses, the City reviewed objections and suggestions from the commentors. Where the
City accepted the suggestions, appropriate revisions to the Draft Supplemental EIR were included in the
responses. Where the City did not accept the Suggestions, the responses explain the City's position in
light of the objections. In all cases, the responses clarify and amplify the information contained in the
Draft Supplemental EIR and provide the City's good faith, reasoned analysis on the environmental issues
raised by the comments. The written responses to comments and revisions to the Draft Supplemental EIR
are contained in a separately bound Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("Final
Supplemental EIR") dated October 2001 and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the City reviewed all written responses to comments and all revisions to the Draft
Supplemental EIR and determined that none of the responses and/or revisions included significant new
information requiring recirculation of the Draft Supplemental EIR; and
WHEREAS, the Supplemental EIR for the East Dublin Property Owners annexation and
prezoning Project consists of the 2-volume Draft Supplemental EIR dated July 2001, and the 1-volUme
Final Supplemental EIR dated October 2001; and
WltEREAS, on October 2, 2001, the City Council held a noticed public hearing, introduced the
prezoning ordinance for first reading, and continued the matter to October 16, 2001 to certify the
Supplemental EIR and for final action on the prezoning and other applications.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and
made a part of this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council certifies as follows:
A. That the Supplemental EIR for the Eastem Dublin Properties annexation and prezOning Project has
been completed in compliance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin'Environmental
Guidelines.
B. That the Supplemental EIR was presented to the City Council who reviewed and considered the
information.contained in the Supplemental EIR prior to approving the Project.
2
C. That the Supplemental EIR reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis on the potential for
environmental effects of the annexation and prezoning Project beyond the effects identified and analyzed
in the Eastern Dublin EIR.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of October, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
A:\cc.certSEIR.draft. oct9.doc
ORDINANCE NO. XX-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO PREZONE PROPERTY AND APPROVE A STAGE 1
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 1,120 ACRES EAST OF FALLON ROAD PA 00-025
WHEREAS, the applicant, Braddock and Logan on behalf of the Eastern Dublin Property Owners
(EDPO), has requested approval of a Planned Development (PD) Prezoning, Stage 1 Development Plan,
and reorganization of an area of approximately 1,120-acres generally located in an unincorporated area of
Alameda County bounded by Interstate 580 (I-580) to the south and Fallon Road to the west, located east
of the current City Limits and within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area (APNs: 985-0007-002-14,
905-0002-003, 985-0006,010, 985-0006~009, 905-0002-002, 905-0002-001-01,985-0006-004, 985-0006-
006-02, 985-0006-006-03, 905-0001-006-03, 905-0001-005-02, 905-0001-004-04, 905-0001-004-03),
which reorganization includes the annexation of the territory to the City of Dublin and the Dublin San
Ramon Services District and the detachment of the territory from the Livermore Area Recreation and
Parks District.; and
WHEREAS, a complete application for the project is available and on file in the Planning
Department; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a Prezoning and a Stage 1 Planned Development
application to the City as required by Section 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Unless otherwise
specified, reference to the Prezoning also inclUde the required the Stage 1 Development Plan; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of this Public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the City Council certified a program Environmental Impact
Report ("EIR") for the Eastern Dublin GPA/SP Project and an addendum thereto, dated May 4, 1993
(SCH 91103064). On August 22, 1994, the City Council approved another addendum to update plans and
provide sewer service. The May 10; 1993 program EIR, the May 4, 1993 addendum and the August 22,
1994 addendum are collectively referred to as the Eastern Dublin EIR; and
WHEREAS, upon approval of the Eastern Dublin GPA/SP Project, the City Council adopted
mitigation findings, a statement of overriding considerations, and a mitigation monitoring program as set
forth in Resolution 53-93, included in the Draft Supplemental EIR referenced below; and
WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with the type, location and density of land uses approved
through the GPA/SP Project. All mitigation measures adopted for the GPA/SP Project continue to apply
to implementing projects such as the current annexation and Prezoning Project; and all applicable City
development ordinances and standards apply to the Project except as otherwise approved through the
Project prezoning and related Stage 1 Development Plan; and
wHEREAS, the City completed an Initial Study for the Project conSistent with CEQA Guidelines
sections 15162 and 15163 and determined that a Supplement to the Eastem Dublin EIR ("Supplemental
EIR") was required in order to analyze substantial changes in circumstances and new information since
certification of the Eastern Dublin EIR. A Notice of Preparation dated May 25, 2001, was circulated with
the Initial Study to public agencies and interested parties for consultation on the scope of the
Supplemental EIR; and
ATTACHMENT 2
WHEREAS, based on the Initial Study and responses to the Notice of Preparation, the C~ty
prepared a Draft Supplemental EIR dated July 2001 and consisting of two bound volumes. Volume 1
contains the Draft Supplemental EIR text; Volume 2 contains appendices, including the Notice of
Preparation and Initial Study. The 2-volume Draft Supplemental .EIR (SCH 2001052114) is incorporated
herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the Draft Supplemental EIR was circulated for the required 45 day public review
period, from July 31,2001 through September 14, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the City received 12 comment letters during the public review period; and
WHEREAS, responses have been prepared to each of the comments received by the City during' '
the public review period, and the comments received and associated responses together constitute the
Final SEIR for the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did considered the SEIR including the comments received during
the comment period and associated responses; and
WHEREAS, the project would have significant effect on the environment most of which can be
substantially and the City Council hereby approves the mitigation findings set forth in Exhibit B attached
hereto; and
WHEREAS, some Of the significant effects cannot be lessened, The City Council hereby
approves the findings regarding alternatives set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and the City Council
hereby approves a statement of overriding considerations for these unavoidable impacts as further set
forth is Exhibit D, attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the CEQA guidelines the City Council hereby approves Exhibit E,
Mitigation Monitoring 'Plan and attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a properly noticed public hearing on said
applications on September 25, 2001, and did adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council
approve a Planned Development Prezoning and Stage 1 Development Plan for PA 00-025; and
WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on October 2, 2001;
and October 16, 2001; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending that the City Council approve the
application; and
WHEREAS, the City Council heard and considered all said reports, recommendations and
testimony hereinabove set forth.
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby make the following findings and determinations
regarding said proposed Planned Development Prezone/Stage 1 Development Plan for PA 00-025:
The proposed Planned Development Prezone/Stage I Development Plan meets the intent
and purpose of Chapter 8.32 of the Zoning Ordinance because it provides a comprehensive
Development Plan which will create a desirable use of land and an environment that will '
be sensitive to surrounding land uses by virtue of the layout and design of the site plan; and
2
o
The Planned Development Prezone will be appropriate for the subject property in terms of
setting forth the purpose, applicable provisions of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance, range of
permitted and conditionally permitted uses and development standards, which will be
compatible with existing and proposed residential and open space uses in the immediate
vicinity and will enhance the development of the area; and
The Planned Development Prezone will provide for the furore development of the property.
The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan specified the Project Area as subareas D, E, G, and H to
be developed with residential, commercial, industrial, and open space uses as well as uses
including public schools and parks; the project is consistent with the general provisions,
intent, and purpose of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and will contribute towards
implementation of said Plan; and
The Planned Development Prezone is consistent with the general provisions, -intent,' and
purpose of the-PD Zoning District of the Zoning Ordinance in that it contains all
information required by Section 8.32 of the Zoning Ordinance and accomplishes the
objectives of Section 8.32.010, A through H,' of the Zoning Ordinance; and
o
The Planned Development Prezone will provide efficient use of land and will preserve an
area of open space and undisturbed hillside along the 'north and primarily the northeast
comer of the property; and will be compatible with and enhance the general development
of the area; and will create an attractive, efficient and safe environment; and
The Planned Development Prezone will not have a substantial adverse effect on health or
safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or
public improvement, as all applicable regulations will be met; and
The Planned DevelOpment Prezone will not overburden public services or facilities as all
agencies must commit to the availability of public services prior to the issuance of any
building permits as required by the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan policies and Mitigation
Measures contained within the Eastern Dublin EIR and the Eastern Dublin Properties
Supplemental EIR; and
The Planned Development Prezone will be consistent with the land use designations and
policies of the Dublin General Plan; and
The Planned Development Prezone will benefit the public necessity, convenience and
general welfare; and
10.
The adopted Eastern Dublin EIR Mitigation Monitoring Program and the additional site
SPecific mitigation measures identified in the Eastern Dublin Properties Supplemental EIR
will apply to the Project, as the reporting and monitoring program required by Public
Resources Code 21081.6 for the Project.
WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and use their independent judgment and considered all said
reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Dublin City Council does ordain as folloWs:
SECTION 1: ~ ~
Pursuant to Chapter 8.32, Title 8 of' the City of Dublin Municipal Code the City of' Dublin Zoning
Map is amended to prezone the following property ("the Property") to a Planned Development Zoning
District:
1,120-acres generally located in an unincorporated area of Alameda County bounded by
Interstate 580 (I-580) to the south and Fallon Road to the west, located east of the current City
Limits and within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area (APNs: 985-0007-002-14, 905-0002-
003, 985-0006-010, 985-0006-009, 905-0002-002, 905-0002-001-01, 985-0006-004, 985-
0006-006-02, 985-0006-006-03, 905-0001-006-03, 905-0001-005-02, 905-0001-004-04, 905-
0001-004-03).
A map of the rezoning area is shown below:
DUBLIN
1-580
PLEASANTON
SECTION 2.
The regulations of' the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the Property are set
forth in the Stage 1 Development Plan for the Project Area (Exhibits A-1 & A-2, hereto) which are hereby
approved. Any amendments to the Stage 1 Development Plan shall be in accordance with section
8.32.080 of the Dublin Municipal Code or its successors.
SECTION 3.
No development shall occur on this property until a Specific Plan, as applicable, and Stage .2
Development P1an have been adopted by the City. Except as provided in the Stage 1 Development Plan,
4
the use, development, improvement and maintenance of the Property shall be governed by the provisions
of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION 4.
The goals and policies of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan require annexation and' new
development to be revenue neutral. Prior to the submittal of the annexation reqUest to LAFCo, all
consenting property owners within the annexation area will be required to enter into a pre-annexation
agreement with the City. The agreement will assure that the financing goals and policies of the Specific
Plan are met.
SECTION 5.
General Plan Policy 4.1 states, "Schools located within the city should be operated by the Dublin
Unified School District". It is the intent of the City that the boundaries of the Dublin School District
should be coterminous with the City limits. The property owners within this annexation area shall
cooperate and actively work with other property owners within the City of Dublin's Sphere of Influence to
initiate and complete the detachment process from the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District and
annexation process to the Dublin Unified School District.
SECTION 6.
This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced upon the effective date of the annexation. The
City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places
in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of .
California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BYthe City Council of the City of Dublin, on this 16~ day of October 2001,
by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
G:\PA#k2000\00-025\CC Staff Repons and Resos\CC 2ndt PD ord.doc
5
STAGE 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN EASTERN DUBLIN PROPERTIES
(PA 00-02S)
This is a Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance for
the Eastern Dublin Properties prOject, bounded by Interstate 580 (I-580) to. the south and
Fallon Road to the west and the City Sphere of Influence line on the east (APNs: 985-0007-002-14,
905-0002-003, 985-0006-010, 985-0006-009, 905-0002-002, 905-0002-00t-01,985-0006-004, 985-0006-006-02,
985-0006-006-03, 905-0001-006-03, 905-0001-005-02, 905-0001-004-04, 905-0001-004-03). This
Development Plan meets all of the requirements for Stage I review of the project.
This Development Plan is also represented by the, Aerial Photo, Stage I Site Plan, Master
Infrastructure Plan, Phasing Plan, Master Neighborhood Landscape
Plan/Pedestrian/Bicycle Circulation' Plan, Maximum Non-Residential Square
Footage/Residential Units Table, and Street Sections sheets dated November 2000 and
Revised July 2001 labeled Exhibit A-1 to the Ordinance approving this Development Plan
(City Council Ordinance No. 01 - ), and on file in the Planning Department. The Planned
Development District allows the flexibility needed to encourage innovative development
while ensuring that the goals, policies, and action prOgrams of the General Plan, Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan, and provisions of Section 8.32 of the Zoning Ordinance are satisfied.
Zoning: This PD Planned Development Zoning District is to provide for and regulate the
development of the Eastern Dublin Properties as shown on Exhibit A-1. (General Plan
land use designations include: General Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial,
Industrial Park, Rural Residential/Agriculture, Single Family Residential, Medium
Density Residential, Medium-High Density Residential, High Density Residential,
Schools, Parks, and Open Space)
2. Permitted Uses: The following are uses permitted for this site:
A) PD General Commercial
Intent: General Commercial land use designations are established to: a)
accommodate a range of regional-serving and community-serving retail
and mixed use projects incorporating retail, service and/or office used with
residential used when location and design ensure compatibility: b) provide
appropriately located areas for retail stores, offices, service establishments,
amusement establishments, and wholesale businesses to concrete for the
convenience for the public and in mutually beneficial relationship to each
other; d) provide space for community facilities and institutions that
appropriately may be located in commercial areas; d) provide adequate
space to meet the needs of modem commercial development, including
off-street parking and track loading areas; and e) minimize traffic
congestion and to avoid overloading of utilities by preventing the
construction 'of buildings of excessive size in relation to thd mount of
land around them.
Exhibit A-2
Intensity of Use: .20 - .60 Floor Area Ratio
Permitted Uses:
Office and service establishments including, but not limited to:
Accounting
Architect
Athletic Club
Cleaner and dryer, not including on-site processing
Communication Technology Development
Employment Agency
Formal wear/rental
Hair/Beauty Salon
Internet Technology Development
Key Shop
Legal
Medical and Dental
Optometris~
Other administrative and professional offices
Real Estate'/title offices
Shoe repair
Software Development
Tailor
Technology access center
Tele-commuting center
Tele-marketing center
Travel Agency
Conditional Uses:
Community, religious and charitable institutional facilities
Drive-through establishments (also drive-in)
Eating and drinking establishments
In-patient and outTpatient facilities as licensed by the State Department of Health
Services
Other conditional permitted uses which meet the intent of the zone shall be
considered by the Planning Commission on an individual case basis
Public facilities and uses
Retail commercial establishments to serve site users
Veterinary office
Accessory Uses:
All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40. of the Dublin
Zoning Ordinance
Temporary Uses:
Temporary Construction Trailer
Outdoor Sale (on-site) by established business
Festival/Street Fair
Office Trailer
Christmas Tree/Pumpkin sales lot
Arts and Crafts Fair
Farmers Market
Newspaper Recycling Bin
B) PD Neighborhood Commercial
Intent: Neighborhood Commercial land use designations are established to: a)
provide for the creation of community-oriented and neighborhood-oriented
commercial centers to serve local retail, service and entertainment needs;
and b) provide for mixed use projects incorporating combinations of
commercial, service, office and/or residential uses.
Intensity of Use: .25 -'.60 Floor Area Ratio
Permitted Uses:
Automobile/Vehicle Brokerage
Banks and Financial Services, including, but not limited to:
Mortgage services
Investment services
Credit unions
Copying (photocopying) and blueprinting
Office:
Administrative
Professional, including, but not limited to:
Medical
Dental
Optometrist
Legal
Counseling
Personal Services, including but not limited to:
Beauty/barber salons
Dry cleaners (no plant on premises)
Florists
Tailor/seamstress
Travel agencies
Repair Shop, including but not limited to:
Jewelry repair
Small appliance repair shops
Shoe
Watch
Retail stores; including but not limited to:
Apparel and shoe stores
Art galleries and art supply stores
Book/video stores
Boutiques/gift shops
Drug stores/pharmacies
Grocery stores/delicatessens
Hardware stores
Home dScor/kitchen supply stores
Office supply/stationery stores
Post office (US or other)
Restaurants (incl. take-out service)
Conditional Uses:
Schools, including but not limited to:
BUsiness
General tutoring
Music or art schools
Trade
Studios, martial arts, dance, general fitness (gymnasiums and health clubs),
etc.
Accessory Uses:
All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40. of the Dublin
Zoning Ordinance
Temporary Uses:
Temporary Construction Trailer
Outdoor Sale (on-site) by established business
Festival/Street Fair
Office Trailer
Christmas Tree/Pumpkin sales lot
Arts and Crafts Fair
Farmers Market
Newspaper Recycling Bin
C) PD Industrial Park
Intent: Accommodates a wide variety of minimum-impact, light industrial uses,
provided these activities do not produce offensive levels of noise, dust,
glare, or odor. Residential uses are not permitted within this designation.
Intensity of Use: Maximum.35 Floor Area Ratio
Permitted Uses:
Ambulance service
Industrial- heavy
Industrial- light including but not limited to:
Laboratory
Office- contractors
Parking lot/garage- commercial
Printing and publishing
Research and development laboratory
Storage of petroleum products for on-site use
Trucking terminal
Warehousing and distribution
Conditional Uses:
Animal sales'and service
Auction yard
Automobile/vehicle rental
Automobile/vehicle repairs and service
Automobile/vehicle sales and service
Automobile/vehicle storage lot
Bed and breakfast Inn
Caretaker residence
Cemeteries, columbariums and mortuaries
Community care facility- large
Community facility
Dance floor
Day care center- 15+ children
Equipment and materials storage yard
Housemovers storage lot
Impound yard
Industrial transfer/storage/treatment facility
Outdoor mobile vendor
Recreational facility- indoor
Recreational facility- outdoor
Recycling facility-commercial
Salvage and wrecking yard
Service station
Small scale transfer and storage facility
Temporary outdoor sale not related to on-site established business
Vehicle storage yard- commercial
Accessory Uses:
All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40. of the Dublin
Zoning Ordinance
Temporary Uses:
Temporary Construction Trailer
Outdoor Sale (on-site) by established business
Festival/Street Fair
Office Trailer
Storage Container
Arts and Crafts Fair
Farmers Market
Newspaper Recycling Bin
D) PD Rural Residential/Agricultural
Intent: Rural residential Agriculture land use designations are established to
accommodate agricultural activities and other open space uses, such as range
and watershed management. They are also established to provide space for
and encourage such uses in places where more intensive development is not
desirable or necessary for the general welfare.-
Intensity of Use: .01 dwelling unit per acre
Permitted Uses:
Agricultural Accessory Use- Office
Animal Keeping- Residential
Community Care Facility- Small
Mobile Home
Single Family Residence
Small Family Day Care Home
Conditional Uses:
Agricultural Housing
Agricultural Processing
Animal Keeping- Agricultural
Animal Keeping- Commercial
Animal Sales and Services
Bed and Breakfast Inn
Bird Keeping- Commercial
Caretaker Residence
Community Facility
Crop Production
Farm Mobile Home
Horse Keeping
Horse Stable/Riding Academy
Home Occupation
Large Family Day Care Home
Plant Nursery
Recreational Facility- Outdoor
Temporary Uses:
Temporary Construction Trailer
Temporary Mobile Home/Manufactured Home
Arts and Crafts 'Fair
Festival Street Fair
Accessory Uses:
All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40. of the Dublin
Zoning Ordinance
E) PD Single Family Residential
Intent:
Single Family land use designations are established to: a) reserve
appropriately located areas for family living at reasonable population
densities consistent with sound standards of public health and safety; b)
ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling; c)
provide space for semi-public facilities needed to complement urban
residential areas and for institutions that require a residential environment;
and d) accommodate single family housing, including a wide range of units
from small-lot and zero-lot line units to large lot estate units.
Intensity of Use: .9 - 6.0 dwelling units per acre
Permitted Uses:
Active adult community
Community care facility/small (permitted if required by law, otherwise as
conditional use)
Home occupation in accordance with Chapter 8.64 of the Dublin Zoning
Ordinance
Private recreation facility (for homeowners' association and/or tenant use
only)
Single family dwelling
Small family day care home
Conditional Uses:
Active Adult/Senior community w/group services (centralized meal service, group
activities, etc.)
Ambulance service
Bed and breakfast inn
Day care center
Large family day care home
Parking lot - residential
Religious facility
Second unit, temporary mobile home or permanent structure
School/private
Second unit in accordance with Dublin Zoning Ordinance
Temporary Uses:
Temporary construction trailer
Tract and sales office/model home complex
Accessory Uses:
All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40. of the Dublin
Zoning Ordinance
F) PD Medium Density Residential
Intent: Medium Density land use designations are established-to: a) reserve
appropriately located areas for family living in a variety of types of
dwellings at a reasonable range of population densities consistent with
sound standards of public health and safety; b) preserve as many as possible
of the desirable characteristics of the one-family residential district while
permitting higher population densities; c) ensure adequate light, air, privacy
and open space for each dwelling unit; d) minimize traffic congestion and
avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings
of excessive size in relation to the land around them; e) provide necessary
space for off-street parking of automobiles .and, where appropriate, for off-
street loading of trucks; and f) protect residential properties from the
hazards, noise and congestion created by commercial and industrial traffic.
Intensity: 6.1 - 14.0 dwelling units per acre
Permitted Uses:
Community care facility/small (permitted if required by law, otherwise as
conditional use)
Home occupations (per Chapter 8.64 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance)
Multi-family dwelling
Private recreation facility (for homeowners' association and/or tenants use
only)
Single family dwelling
Small family day care home
Conditional Uses:
Active Adult/Senior community with group and life care services
Bed and breakfast inn
Boarding house
Day care center
Large family day care home
Parking lot - residential
Religious facility
School/private
Community center
Accessory Uses:
All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8:40. of the Dublin
Zoning Ordinance
Temporary Uses:
Temporary construction trailer
Tract and sales office/model home complex
G) PD Medium-High Density Residential
Intent:
Intensity
Medium High Density land use designations are established to: a) reserve
appropriately located areas for family living in a variety of types of
dwellings at a reasonable range of population densities consistent with
sound standards of public health and safety; b) preserve as many as possible
of the desirable characteristics of the one-family residential district while
permitting higher population densities; c) ensure adequate light, air, privacy
and open space for each dwelling unit; d) minimize traffic congestion and
avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings
of excessive six in relation to the land around them; e) provide necessary
space for off-street parking of automobiles and, where appropriate, for off-
street loading of-trucks; and f) protect residential properties from the
hazards, noise and congestion created by commercial and industrial traffic.
of Use: 14.1 - 25.0 dwelling units per aCre
Permitted Uses:
Community care facility/small (permitted if required by law, otherwise as
conditional use)
Home occupations (per Chapter 8.64)
Multi-family dwelling
Private recreation facility (for homeowners' association and/or tenants use only)
Small family day care home
Conditional Uses:
Active Adult/Senior community with group and life care services
Bed and breakfast inn
Boarding house
Community care facility/large
Day Care center
Large family day care home
Parking lot - residential
Religious facility
School/private
Accessory Uses:
All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40.
Zoning Ordinance
of the
Dublin
Temporary Uses:
Sales office/model home complex
Temporary construction trailer
Arts and Crafts Fair
H)'PD
Intent:
High Density Residential
High Density land use designations are established to: a) reserve
appropriately located areas for family living in a variety of types of
dwellings at a reasonable range of population densities consistent with
sound standards of public health and safety; b) preserve as many as possible
of the desirable characteristics of the one-family residential district while
permitting higher population densities; c) ensure adequate light, air, privacy
and open space for each dwelling unit; d) minimize traffic congestion and
avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing the construction of buildings
of excessive size in relation to the land around them; e) provide necessary
space for off-street parking of automobiles and, where appropriate, for off-
street loading of trucks; and f) protect residential properties from the
hazards, noise and congestion created by commercial and industrial traffic.
Intensity of Use: 25.1+ dwelling units per acre
10
Permitted Uses:
Accessory structures and uses
Community care facility/small (if required by statute, otherwise it should be a
conditional use)
Home occupations (per Chapter 8.64)
Multi-family dwelling
Private recreation facility (for homeowners' association and/or tenants use
only)
Small family day care home
Conditional Uses:
Active Adult/Senior community with group and life care services
Bed and breakfast inn
Boarding house
Community care facility/large
Community center
Day care center
Large family day care home
Hospital/medical center
Parking lot - residential
Religious facility
School/private
I)
Accessory Uses:
All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40. of the Dublin
Zoning Ordinance
Temporary Uses:
Sales office/model home complex/rental office
Temporary construction trailer
Arts and Crafts Fair'
PD Schools
Intent: Provides for
facilities.
the future
development of public or private
educational
Intensity of Use: No Floor Area Ratio Requirements
Permitted Uses:
Middle School
11
Elementary School
Accessory Uses:
All Accessory Uses shall be in accordance with Section 8.40. of the Dublin
Zoning Ordinance
PD Parks
Intent: Provides for the recreation needs of the area.
Intensity of Use: No Floor Area Ratio Requirements
Permitted Uses:
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Square
K) PD Open Space
Intent:
Protects areas with important and/or sensitive resources and areas with
natural hazard from development.
Permitted Uses:
Recreational- passive
Trails
L)
M)
PD Rural Residential/Agriculture - Future Study Area
Permitted Uses:
Future land use designations to be determined at a later date. Until then, land
uses under this zone shall abide by those listed under PD Rural
Residential/Agriculture. Existing land uses may continue and shall be
considered to be legal, non-conforming uses subject to the City of Dublin
zoning ordinance regarding such uses.
Intensity of Use: . 01 dwelling unit per acre
PD General Commercial- Future Study Area
Permitted Uses:
The Rural Residential/Agriculture land use designation is established to
accommodate uses under the Rural Residential/Agriculture and Open Space
land use designations and also Provides for the future study of land use
12
N)
designations to determine the most appropriate use for these lands prior to
future PD rezoning of the property.
Intensity of Use: . O1 dwelling unit per acre
Existing Agricultural and Residential Uses
Intent:
To allow all existing residential and agricultural uses that were in existence
prior to the effective date of annexation. These uses shall be allowed to
continue until such time the landowner of this property applies for a
Specific Plan as applicable, and Stage 2 Development Plan in accordance
with Section 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance, to develop the property.
Any minor expansion of any existing uses shall be subject to review and
approval by the Director of Community Development.
Permitted Uses:
Existing residential and agricultural uses in effect prior to the effective date of
annexation
Similar and related uses (to the existing residential and agricultural uses) shall
be determined by the Director of Community Development
0
Dublin Zoning Ordinance - Applicable Requirements: Except as specifically
modified by the provisions of this PD District Rezone/Development Plan, all applicable
general requirements and procedures of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance shall be applied to
the land uses designated in this PD District Rezone.
Phasing Plan. Refer to Exhibit A-2, East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan,
Phasing Plan.
5. Landscaping Plan. Refer to Exhibit A-2, Master Neighborhood Landscaping Plan.
Maximum Non-Residential Square Footage/Residential Units. Refer to Exhibit A-2
for Table.
7. Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance. Dublin's Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance requires
five-percent of ail housing to be affordable to those of very low, low, and moderate
incomes or pay an in-lieu fee which would allow the City to facilitate construction of
such housing. It is intended that this project will comply with the Inclusionary Zoning
O~dinance .requirements by paying an in-lieu fee, providing land, constructing such
housing, or executing a 'combination of these options. The implementation of this
ordinance will be identified when the Stage 2 Development Plan is prepared and
submitted for each individual property.
G:~A/P~g000\00-025x,PC StaffReports-Resos\developraent planDOC
13
EXHIBIT B
FINDINGS CONCERNING SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION
MEASURES
Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines sections 15091
and 15163(e), the City Council hereby makes the following findings with respect to the
potential for significant supplemental environmental impacts and means for mitigating
those impacts. The impacts identified below are supplemental impacts, that is, significant
or potentially significant impacts based on changed conditions or new information since
the Eastern Dublin EIR that were not addressed in that EIR, pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines section 15162 and 15163, and as further set forth in the Project Initial Study
and Draft Supplemental EIR. Mitigation measures identified' in the Eastern Dublin EIR
and adopted upon approval of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific
Plan in 1993 continue to apply to implementing projects. As such, they are assumed to
be within the annexation and prezoning Project and are not summarized specifically
below. Supplemental mitigations ("SM") identified in the Draft Supplemental EIR are
described below. Many of the supplemental impacts and mitigation measures in the
following findings are summarized rather than set forth in full. The text of the Draft and
Final Supplemental EIRs should be consulted for a complete description of the impacts
and mitigations. Findings pursuant to section 21081(c) relating to Project alternatives are
made in Exhibit C.
Section 3.2 Air Quality
Supplemental Impact AQ 1. Mobile Source Emissions: Reactive Organics,
Nitrogen Oxide, Particulate Matter. Automobile trips generated by the Project will
create emissions that will exceed BAAQMD thresholds for pollutants that are. precursors
to ozone formation, and would result in the form~ttion of substantial quantities of ozone,
which already exceed both state and federal standards. This is also a significant
cumulative impact. DSEIR pp. 3.2-4, -5.
SM-TRAFFIC-6, -8. These supplemental mitigations include City monitoring of peak
hour volumes at key intersections along Dublin Boulevard. They also require
implementation of transportation demand management measures such as ridesharing,
increased transit use, and staggered work hours in future, development projects DSEIR
pp. 3.2-5; 3.6-15, -16, -18, -19.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project.
However, even with these changes, the impact might not be avoided or substantially
lessened. Therefore,-a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon
approval of the Project.
Rationale for Finding. The supplemental mitigation measures will reduce potential
Project emissions by reducing traffic congeStion which is the major source of precursor
pollutants. The supplemental mitigations will not only reduce vehicle trips but also
EXHIBIT B To ATTACHMENT 2
reduce single car occupancy, thereby reducing the number of automobiles on City and
regional roadways.
Section 3.3 Biological Resources
Supplemental Impact BIO 1: Direct and Indirect Habitat Loss. Seasonal wetlands
and intermittent streams are sensitive habitat types identified as likely to occur within the
Project area. New and/or additional sensitive plant and wildlife species have been
identified as occurring or likely to occur in the Project area. These habitats and Species
were not previously identified or analyzed for the Project area. This is also a potentially
significant cumulative impact. DSEIR pp. 3.3-12, - 13.
SM-BIO-1. The Project proponents shall prepare a comprehensive Resource
Management Plan (RMP) for the entire Project area. The RMP shall reflect all City
resource protection programs (e.g., Stream Restoration Program), all apPlicable
mitigation measures from the Eastern Dublin EIR, and all applicable habitat and species
mitigations from the Supplemental EIR, including any offsite mitigation lands. The first
priority of the RMP shall be avoidance of impacts to and preservation of biological
resources in the Project area. The RMP shall be approved, prior to or concurrently with
any subsequent implementing application, such as Stage 2 Development Plans and
tentative maps; and all such implementing applications shall be consistent with the
approved RMP. DSEIRpp. 3.3-13 to-15.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The Eastern Dublin EIR acknowledged that loss of existing
vegetation would reduce the habitat and range for sensitive species; adopted mitigation
measures required the city to implement management programs to protect riparian and
wetland resource areas, plant diversity, native plant recovery and hillside vegetation.
(Impacts 3.7/A, B). These requirements would also apply 'to the newly identified
habitats and species. The RMP refines the adopted mitigations to incorporate all
applicable management programs, as well as previously adopted and currently proposed
habitat and species mitigations, in one resource program. Through this comprehensive
approach, the RMP will minimize direct disturbance of habitat areas and restore disturbed
areas to minimize the amount of habitat lost from future development of the Project area. ,
Supplemental Impact BIO 2. Loss of Special Status Plant Species. No special status
plant species were identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR. At least five special status plants
have since been identified as occurring Or potentially occurring on the Project site. This
is also a potentially significant cumulative impact. DSEIR p. 3.3-15.
SM-BIO-2. Conduct seasonal plant surveys per resource agency protocols and include
results in subsequent development applications. DSEIR p. 3.3-15.
'SM-BIO-3. Areas where special status plant species are identified should be avoided.
DSEIR p. 3.3-15.
2
SM-BIO-4. If special status plant species cannot be avoided, ensure 1:1 replacement by
reserving other on- or off-site acreage that contains the plant or by harvesting and
relocating the plants or seeds from the plants to another suitable area on- or off-site to be
preserved in perpetuity. DSEIR p. 3.3-15, - 16.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The mitigation measures ensure that subsequent development
projects will identify special status plants onsite and incorporate protective measures in
the development application. The measures will further ensure that special status plants
are preserved either on- or off-site thereby.avoiding the loss of the plant' species.
Supplemental Impact BIO 3. Loss or Degradation of Botanically Sensitive Habitats.
The Eastern Dublin EIR identified direct loss and degradation of the area's unique
Arroyo Willow Riparian Woodland and Freshwater Marsh habitats as significant and
unavoidable (Impact 3.7/C). Both of these habitats are present in the Project area. Newly
identified seasonal wetlands and intermittent stream habitats are additional botanically
sensitive habitats that could be affected directly and indirectly by future development of
the Project. This is also a potentially significant cumulative impact. DSEIR p. 3.3-16.
SM-BIO-5. Design and construct future implementing projects to avoid and minimize
impacts on wetlands. Examples of design and construction features include reducing the
size of the Project or implementing projects, establishing wetland or upland vegetated
buffers to protect streams and other open waters, avoiding the Arroyo. Willow Riparian
Woodland and red-legged frog habitat in the Fallon Road drainage to the maximum
extent feasible or limiting impacts in that area to bridge crossings. DSEIR p. 3.3-16.
SM-BIO-6. If avoidance and minimization are not feasible, wetlands impacts shall be
mitigated at a 2:1 ratio onsite through creation, restoration or enhancement of wetlands or
other waters. DSEIR p. 3.3-16.
SM-BIO-7. If mitigation onsite is not feasible, wetlands impacts shall be mitigated at a
2:1 ratio at an offsite location acceptable to the City. DSEIR p. 3.3-17.
SM-BIO-8. Mitigations for botan!cally sensitive habitats shall be included in the RMP
required by SM-BIO-1. DSEIR p. 3.3-17.
Finding. Changes or alteratiOns have been required in, or incorporated into the Project.
These changes will avoid or substantially lessen the Project-related significant effects
identified in the Supplemental EIR. However, these changes will not avoid the
cumulative effects of additional lost or degraded biologically sensitive habitat represented
by the seasonal wetlands and intermittent streams. Therefore, a Statement of Overriding
Considerations must be adopted upon approval of the Project.
Rationale for Finding. The supplemental measures provide a series of mitigations, phased
by preference, i.e., the first preference is for avoidance of sensitive botanical habitat areas
represented by wetlands and other water areas. If avoidance is not feasible, the second
preference is for replacement or enhancement of wetlands at a different location onsite.
If onsite mitigation is not feasible through either of the first two preferences, offsite
mitigation shall be required. Through the RMP, the mitigation for botanically.sensitive
areas, including wetlands, must be established for the entire Project area before any
individual development projects are considered. This provides increased opportunities
for onsite mitigation than would otherwise be possible on individual development sites,
for example, by maintaining stream corridors, which cross several properties. Through
on- or off-site mitigation at the specified ratios, this Project will ensure that the amount of
habitat will remain constant. Even with these protections for biologically sensitive
habitats including the additional wetlands and intermittent streams, the cUmulativeimpact
cannot be fully mitigated.
Supplemental Impact BIO 4: San Joaquin Kit Fox. No new impacts were identified
in the Supplemental EIR; kit fox impacts remain as described in the Eastern Dublin EIR.
However, supplemental mitigation measures update the' previously adopted Eastern
Dublin San Joaquin Kit Fox Protection Plan to reflect updated survey and protection
measures for kit fox and other special status grassland species. DSEIR p. 3.3-17.
BIO-SM-9. Future development of the Project shall comply with the amended Eastern
Dublin San Joaquin Kit Fox Protection Plan contained in Exhibit E of the DSEIR.
DSEIR p. 3.3-17.
BIO-SM-10. San Joaquin kit fox habitat shall be included in the RMP required by SM-
BIO-1. DSEIR p. 3.3-17.
BIO-SM-11. If avoidance is infeasible, offsite mitigation lands at a 1:1 ratio or other
suitable ratio determined by the USFWS shall be set aside if feasible, and in perpetuity.
This mitigation shall be proposed in a mitigation and monitoring plan prior to issuance of
a grading permit. Selection of off-site mitigation lands shall give preference to large
bloclcs of land, linkage to open space or other high-quality habitat, and shall exclude or
limit public uses. FSEIR Response 8.65.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The original kit fox protection plan provided a comprehensive
protection plan addressing a multi-phase approach, from avoidance of potential dens to
maintenance of habitat. The supplemental mitigations ensure that the latest protocols and
standards of the resources agencies are included in the proteCtion plan. The supplemental
mitigations also ensure that off-site mitigation sites will be selected to maximize
protection of kit fox. Through the amended plan, the Project will continue to avoid most
direct and indirect adverse effects on any kit fox that might be present in the Project area.
Supplemental Impact BIO 5: California Red-legged Frog (CRLF). Since the
Eastern Dublin EIR, the USFWS has published a draft Recovery Plan and has adopted
critical habitat for the CRLF. Related studies have shown that upland areas adjacent to
water and riparian features are potential aestivation and dispersal habitat for. CRLF.
Future development of the Project on the newly identified potential upland habitat could
represent a broader impact than previously analyzed. DSEIR'>.3.3-18.
SM-BIO-12. The most recent USFWS survey protocols shall be followed in habitat
suitable for CRLF which has not already been surveyed. DSEIR D- 3.3-18.
SM-BIO-13. CRL'F habitat areas, including the drainage upstream and east of the current
Fallon Road alignment, shall be included in the RMP required by SM-BIO, 1. DSEIR p.
3.3-18.
SM-BIO-14. Future development of the Project area shall make a reasonable attempt to
provide a 300 to 500-foot buffer on either side of any stream that provides CRLF habitat.
Limited minor development, such as a trail, bridge crossing, or grading activities along
the edge of the buffer zone, may occur within the buffer zone so long as it will have only
minor impacts on the habitat. DSEIR p. 3.3-18, -19.
SM-BIO- 15. If avoidance is infeasible, mitigation lands at a 3:1 ratio or other suitable
ratio determined by the USFWS shall be set aside in perpetuity. This mitigation shall be
proposed in a mitigation and monitoring plan prior to submittal of development
applications. Selection of off-site mitigation lands shall give preference to large blocks
of land, linkage to open space or other high-quality habitat, and shall exclude or limit
public uses. If mitigation lands are approved by the City, mitigation guidelines as detailed
in the DSEIR shall be implemented prior to and during construCtion of any development
projects. The guidelines include such requirements'as fencing, wetland areas, controlling
removal of vegetation from the fenced areas, preconstmction surveys, and monitoring by
the Project Biologist. FSEIR Response 8.65.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The supplemental mitigation measures refine previously adopted
mitigation measures for CRLF to provide open space protection, revegetation, restoration
planning, as well as wetland and riparian area protection to minimize impacts to the
riparian habitat necessary for CRLF, in accordance with the most current protocols. The
expanded stream buffer will extend this protection to the newly identified upland habitat
areas. The supplemental mitigations also .ensure that off-site mitigation sites will be
selected to maximize protection of CRLF. Through mitigation at the specified ratios, the
Project will ensure that the amount of habitat will remain constant.
Supplemental Impact BIO 6: Special Status Invertebrates. Future developm6nt of
the Project could disturb potential wetland habitat of two additional special status
invertebrate species not identified in the previous EIR. DSEIR p. 3.3-20.
SM-BIO-16. Special status invertebrate habitat shall be included in the RMP required by
SM-BIO-1. DSEIRp. 3.3-20.
SM-BIO-IT Vernal pool habitat shall be surveyed. If suitable habitat is identified, the
mitigation guidelines as detailed in the DSEIR for preservation or creation of habitat shall
be implemented. These guidelines address details such as habitat preservation ratios,
habitat creation ratios, habitat monitoring and training of construction personnel. DSEIR
p. 3.3-20, -21.
5
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The RMP and detailed mitigation guidelines will ensure that
future development will be planned to avoid wetland and vernal pool habitat for' special
status invertebrates. Through mitigation at the specified ratios, the Project will ensure
that the amount of habitat will remain constant.
Supplemental Impact BIO 7: California Tiger Salamander (CTS). Water
impoundments and stream courses were previously identified as potential habitat for.
CTS. Since the previous EIR, upland areas have been recognized as potential aestivation
habitat. CTS have been confirmed in the southern portion of the Project area and suitable
habitat is present throughout' the Project area. Furore development of the Project could
result in direct and indirect loss of individuals. DSEIR p. 3.3-21, -22.
SM-BIO-18. California Tiger Salamander habitat shall be included in the RMP required
by SM-BIO-1. DSEIR p. 3.3-22.
SM-BIO-19. If avoidance 'of habitat is infeasible, mitigation lands providing aquatic and
upland habitat at a 1:1 ratio or other suitable ratio determined by the CDFG shall be set
aside in perpetuity, and following the guidelines detailed in the DSEIR. This mitigation
shall be proposed in a mitigation and monitoring plan prior to submittal of development
,applications. Selection of off-site mitigation lands shall give preference to large blocks
of land, linkage to open space or other high-quality habitat, and shall exclude or limit
public uses. FSEIR Response 8.65.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The supplemental mitigation measures refine previously adopted
mitigation measures for CTS to provide open space protection, revegetation, and
restoration planning fOr both aquatic and upland habitat. The supplemental mitigations
also ensure that off-site mitigation sites will be selected to maximize protection of CTS.
Through mitigation at the specified ratios, the Project will ensure that the amount of
habitat will remain constant.
Supplemental Impact BIO 8: Nesting Raptors. An additional special status raptor
species, the short-eared owl, has been identified as potentially nesting within the Project
area since the previous EIR. DSEIR p. 3.3-22.
SM-BIO-20. A qualified biologist shall conduct pre-construction surveys for nesting
raptors. If an active nest is found, SM-BIO-21 to -25 shall be implemented. DSEIR p.
3.3 -22
SM-BIO-21. If construction must occur during nesting season, all potential nesting trees
in the development footprint should be removed prior to the nesting season. DSEIR p.
3.3-22
SM-BIO-22. Construction should occur between August 31 and February 1 to avoid
disturbance of owls during the nesting season. DSEIR p. 3.3-22
SM-BIO-23. If removal of nesting trees is infeasible and construction must occur in the
breeding season, a nesting raptor survey shall be performed by a qualified biologist prior
to tree disturbance. DSEIR p. 3.3-22
SM-BIO-24. All active nests shall be identified and a buffer zone established around the
nesting tree ranging from 200 to 500 feet, or to an entire viewshed. DSEIR p. 3.3-22
SM-BIO-25. If construction is scheduled when young birds have not yet fledged, an
exclusion zone around the nest shall be established or construction shall be delayed until
after the young have fledged, typically by August 15 or earlier if determined by a
biologist that fledging has occurred. DSEIR p. 3.3-23
SM-BIO-26. Nesting raptor habitat shall be included in the RMP required by SM-BI0-1.
DSEIR p. 3.3-23
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The mitigation measures ensure that surveys will be conducted to
identify active nests before any construction is undertaken. If active nests are identified,
the mitigation measures ensure that occupied nests will not be disturbed during nesting
season.
Supplemental Impact BIO 9: Golden Eagle - Elimination of Foraging Habitat. The
Eastern Dublin EIR identified impacts from reduction of the mount and quality of
foraging habitat for golden eagles. Since the previous EIR, studies have determined that
a breeding pair of eagles uses the northern portion of the Project area for foraging. This
area is designated for Rural Residential/Agricultural uses. DSEIR p. 3.3-23
SM-BIO-27. The territory of the golden eagle nesting pair shall be included in the RMP
required by SM-BIO-1. Development standards for the Rural Residential/Agricultural
uses in this area, and other portions of the Project area within the viewshed of nest sites
used by the pair, shall include preservation of foraging habitat by locating homesites in
valley bottoms near existing or planned development, by limiting agricultural uses to
grazing, and by prohibiting rodent control. DSEIR p. 3.3-23
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The mitigation measures ensure that the RUral
Residential/Agricultural area and other areas used for foraging will maintain effective
foraging habitat and that the territory of the nesting pair and the integrity of the nesting
site is protected.
Supplemental Impact BIO 10: Burrowing Owl. No new impacts were identified in
the Supplemental EIR; burrowing owl impacts remain as described in the Eastern Dublin
7
EIR. However, supplemental mitigation measures identify new burrowing 0wl
mitigation guidelines from CDFG since the previous EIR. DSEIR p. 3.3-23
SM-BIO-28. If construction is scheduled during the nesting season (February 1 -August
31), pre-construction surveys should be conducted on the entire Project area and within
150 meters (500 feet) of the Project area prior to any ground disturbance. To avoid take
of over-wintering birds, all burrows should be surveyed 30 days prior to ground
disturbance between the months of September 1 and January 31. If ground disturbance is
delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre-construction .survey, the site
should be resurveyed. DSEIR pP. 3.3-23, -24.
SM-BIO-29. If over-wintering birds are present no disturbance should occur within 160
feet of occupied burrows unless agency approval provides a letter giving consent to
relocate wintering birds. If owls must be moved away from the disturbance area, passive
relocation techniques, following CDFG 1995 guidelines, should be used raker than
trapping. If no over-wintering birds are observed, burrows may be removed prior to the
nesting season to reduce impacts from noise, dust, and human disturbance to mated pairs.
DSEIR p. 3.3-24.
SM-BIO-30. Maintain a minimum buffer (at least 250 feet) around active burrowing owl
nesting sites identified by pre-construction surveys during the breeding season to avoid
direct loss of individuals (February 1- September 1). DSEIR p. 3.3-24.
SM-BIO-31. If removal of unoccupied potential nesting burrows prior to the nesting
season is infeasible and construction must occur within the breeding season, a nesting
bUrrowing owl survey shall be performed by a qualified biologist within 30 days prior to
construction. Owls present on site after February 1 wilt be assumed to be nesting on site
or adjacent to the site. All active burrows shall be identified. DSEIR p. 3.3-24.
SM-BIO-32. All active nesting burrows shall have an established 250-foot exclusion
zone around the burrow. DSEIR p. 3.3-24
SM-BIO-33. If construction is scheduled during summer, when young are not yet
fledged, a 250-foot exclusion zone around the nest shall be established or construction
shall be delayed until after the young have fledged, typically by August 31. DSEIR p.
3.3-24
SM-BIO-34. When destruction of occupied burrows is unavoidable, existing unsuitable
burrows should be enhanced (enlarged or cleared of debris) or new burrows created (by
installing artificial burrows) at a 2:1 ratio on protected lands, as provided for below.
DSEIR p. 3.3-24.
SM-BIO-35. A minimum of 6.5 acres of foraging habitat per pair or unpaired resident
bird, shall be acquired and permanently protected: The protected lands shall be adjacent
to occupied burrowing owl habitat and at a location acceptable to CDFG.' DSEIR p. 3.3-
24.
SM-BIO-36. The 15roject proponent shall provide funding for long-term management and
monitoring of the protected lands. The monitoring plan should include success criteria,
remedial measures, and an annual report to CDFG. DSEIR p. 3.3-24.
SM-BIO-37. Burrowing owl habitat shall be included in the RMP as required in
Mitigation Measure SM-BIO-1. DSEIR p. 3.3-24.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The pre-consU'uction surveys and required buffer zone around
known nesting and breeding sites will preserve owl burrows by allowing them to be
avoided during the construction and development process. The measures will. also ensure.
that any unavoidable disturbance will be mitigated in coordination with CDFG.
Supplemental Impact BIO 11: Nesting Passerines. The Project area provides
potentially suitable nesting habitat, including grassland, arroyo willow riparian woodland,
and freshwater marsh habitat, for two additional nesting passerines, the loggerhead shrike
and the California homed lark, which were not identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR.
Future development of the Project could destroy nesting habitats or disturb these species.
DSEIR pp. 3.3-24, -25.
SM-BIO-38 If construction is scheduled to occur during the nesting season (February 1 -
August 15), all potential nesting sites and structures (i.e., shrubs and tules) within the
footprint of development should be removed prior to the beginning of the nesting season.
However, because the removal of grassland habitat is infeasible, mitigation for impacts to
California homed lark are addressed more particularly in Mitigation Measures SM-BIO-
39 to SM-BIO-41, below. DSEIR p. 3.3-25; FSEIR Response 8.68.
SM-BIO-39 If removal of nesting trees and shrubs within the footprint of development
is infeasible and construction must occur within the breeding season, a nesting bird
survey should be performed by a qualified biologist within 30 days prior to construction.
These surveys shall cover grassland habitat for potential nesting California homed lark.
Birds present on site after February 1 will be assumed to be nesting onsite or adjacent to
the site. DSEIR p. 3.3-25.
SM-BIO-40 All active nests shall be identified by flagging and a buffer zone, depending
on the species, shall be established around the nest site. Buffer zones can range between
75 feet to 100 feet. DSEIRp. 3.3-25.
SM-BIO-41 If construction is scheduled during summer, when young have not yet
fledged, an exclusion zone around the nest shall be established or construction shall be
delayed until after the young have fledged, typically by July 15. DSEIR p. 3.3-25.
SM-BIO-42 Habitat for nesting passerines shall be included in the RMP as required in
SM-BIO-1. DSEIR p. 3.3-25.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The pre-construction surveys and required buffer zone around
known nesting sites will preserve passerine nests and protect young birds by allowing the
sites to be avoided during the construction and development process. Including habitat
in the RMP ensures that the integrity of the nesting sites is protected.
Supplemental Impact BIO 12: Bat Species. Future development of the Project could
destroy roosting habitat for special status bat species potentially occurring on the Project
site and identified since the previous EIR. DSEIR p. 3.3-25
SM-BIO-43 A qualified bat biologist shall conduct occupancy surveys of the Project ·
area to determine whether any mature trees, snags or suitable buildings that would be
removed during future project construction provide hibernacula or nursery colony
roosting habitat. DSEIR pp. 3.3-25, -26.
SM-BIO-44 If presence-is observed, removal of roost habitat should be conducted at '
specific times of the year. Winter roosts are generally occupied between October 15
through January 30 and maternity colonies are generally ox:cupied betWeen February 15
and July 30. If bats are using roost sites that need to be removed, the roosting season of
the colony shall be determined and the removal shall be conducted when the colony is
using an alternate roost. DSEIR p. 3.3-26.
SM-BIO-45 Habitat for these bat species shall be included in the RMP required by SM-
BIO-1. DSEIR p. 3.3-26
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rational.e for Finding. The occupancy surveys and limitations on removing roost habitat
or roost sites ensure that occupied bat roosts will be avoided during the construction and
development process.
Section 3.4 Noise
Supplemental Impact NOISE 1: Exposure of proposed and existing housing to noise
levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan. As noted in the DSEIR
traffic analysis, traffic levels on Project area roadways are expected to increase due to
regional increases in traffic along 1-580. This increased traffic could also increase traffic
noise along those roadways, as reflected in revised noise contours for Project buildout.
(DSEIR Figure 3.4-B). Some land uses within the Project area would be exposed to
noise levels that would be considered conditionally acceptable under the City of Dublin's
Noise Element. Residential development along Central Parkway, Fallon Road and
internal loop roads would be exposed to a CNEL of over 65dBA, exceeding the City's
residential noise standard of 60dBA. Existing residences would also be exposed to the
increased traffic noise. DSEIR p. 3.4-3.
Supplemental Mitigation Measures. None. Adopted Mitigation Measures 3.10/1.0 and
2.0 of the Eastern Dublin EIR require acoustical studies for new residential development
t0
within the 60 dBA CNEL noise contour and require mitigation for outdoor living areas of
existing residences. These mitigations will continue to apply within the 60 dBA contour
as adjusted and will reduce increased traffic noise impacts on new housing to less than
significant. No supplemental mitigation measures are recommended. DSEIR p. 3.4-3.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR
with respect to future housing. However, even with these changes, the increased traffic
noise impacts on existing residences will not be avoided or substantially lessened.
Therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon approval of
the Project.
Rationale for Finding. Acoustical mitigation will be identified and incorporated into
future new residential development in the Project area and will ensure that applicable
noise standards are met. Noise barriers or berms may not be feasible for existing
residences due to existing site constraints. The supplemental impact is significant and
unavoidable for existing residences.
Supplemental Impact NOISE 2: Exposure of future commercial, office and
industrial uses to noise levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan.
As reflected in the noise contours for 1-580 and Project area roadways, the general
commercial and industrial commercial land uses proposed between Dublin Boulevard and
Interstate 580 would be exposed to a CNEL of up to 75 dBA, which is considered
conditionally acceptable for these land uses under the guidelines of the Noise Element of
the General Plan. DSEIR p. 3.4-4.
SM-NOISE-1. A noise insulation plan shall be prepared for general commercial
(including any proposed office-type uses) and industrial development projects located
within the future CNEL 70 dBA contour, showing how interior noise levels would be
controlled to acceptable levels through means such as sound-rated windows in windows
closest to the streets and the freeway. DSEIR p. 3.4-4.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The required noise insulation plan allows.the developer and City
to anticipate noise levels and to propose specific measures to address potentially
excessive noise at an early stage in the development process.. The insulation measures
will be included in future development applications, and will allow projects to make use.
of a variety of techniques to reduce noise levels.
Supplemental Impact NOISE 3: Exposure of people to or generation of excessive
ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. Increased traffic on 1-580 and
Project area roadways also could increase ground borne vibrations caused by the passage
of heavy trucks or equipment along nearby streets. The discussion of increased noise
levels in Supplemental Impact Noise 1 above applies generally to ground borne noise,
since both are generated by vehicular traffic, the main source of current and future noise
on and within the Project area. Therefore, no additional supplemental impact or
mitigation measures are required for ground-borne noise. DSEIR p. 3.4-4.
SM-NOISE-2: Except for local deliveries, restrict heavy truck traffic to designated
arterial roadways and truck routes within the Project area and limit the hours of local
deliveries to daytime hours as established by the City. DSEIR p. 3.4-4.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. Restrictions on routes and hours of delivery will ensure that
ground borne vibration impacts are avoided during the quieter times of the day so they
will be less noticeable, especially in residential areas.
Section 3.6 Traffic and Circulation
Supplemental Impact TRAFFIC 1: Unacceptable LOS at Hacienda Drivefl-580
eastbound ramps. The intersection of Hacienda Drive/I-580 eastbound ramps would
operate at unacceptable levels of LOS E in the AM Peak Hour under the Dublin Baseline
Model with or without the Project. DSEIR p. 3.6-13.
SM-TRAFFIC-1: Project developers shall contribute a pro-rata share to the widening of
the 1-580 eastbound off-ramp approach at Hacienda Drive to add a third eastbound left
turn lane. The City of Dublin shall implement this mitigation measure in coordination
with the City of Pleasanton and Caltrans. This improvement shall occur when traffic
impacts from individual projects are determined to trigger the need for this improvement
based on traffic impact studies of the individual projects. DSEIR p. 3.6-13.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. Widening the 1-580 ramp and adding a left-tm lane will provide
sufficient capacity for this intersection to operate at an acceptable level of service.
Supplemental Impact TRAFFIC 2: Unacceptable LOS at Hacienda Drive/I-580
westbound ramps. The intersection of Hacienda Drive/I-580 westbound ramps would
operate at an unacceptable LOS F in the AM Peak Hour under the Dublin Baseline Model
with or without the Project. DSEIR p. 3.6-13
SM-TRAFFIC-2: Project developers shall contribute a pro-rata share to the widening of
the northbound Hacienda Drive overcrossing from 3 lanes to 4 lanes including three
through lanes and one auxiliary lane that leads exclusively to the 1-580 westbound loop
on-ramp. The westbound loop on-ramp shall be modified as necessary to meet Caltrans'
standards and design criteria. Project developers also shall contribute to widening the
westbound off ramp approach to add a third westbound left-mm lane. The City of Dublin
· shall implement this mitigation measure in coordination with the City of Pleasanton and
Caltrans. This improvement shall occur when traffic impacts from individual projects are
determined to trigger the need for this improvement based on traffic impact studies of the
individual projects. FSEIR Response 1.4.
12
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. Widening the overcrossing and modifying the loop on-ramp will
provide sufficient capacity for this intersection to operate at acceptable levels of service.
Supplemental Impact TRAFFIC 3: Unacceptable LOS at Santa Rita Road/l-580
eastbound ramps. The intersection of Santa Rita Roadfl-580 eastbound ramps will
operate at an unacceptabIe LOS E in the AM and PM peak hours. DSEIR Page 3.6-13, -
14
SM-TRAFFIC-3: Project developers shall contribute a pro-rata share to construction,
which converts the eastbound Santa Rim .off-ramp through lane to a shared left
turn/through lane. Proj eot developers also shall contribute to a traffic signal upgrade that
includes a westbound right-tm overlap from Pimlico Drive. The City of Dublin shall
implement this mitigation measure in coordination with the City of Pleasanton and
Caltrans. This improvement shall occur when traffic impacts from individual projects are
determined to trigger the need for this improvement based on traffic impact studies of the
individual projects. DSEIR p. 3.6-14.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. Converting the off-ramp to include a shared left turn lane and
upgrading the traffic signal will improve intersection operation to acceptable levels of
service.
Supplemental Impact TRAFFIC 4: New Project Intersection of Dublin
Boulevard/Street D. The new Dublin Boulevard/Street D intersection would operate at
an unacceptable level of service during the PM peak hour (LOS F) with one-way STOP
sign control under the Dublin Model Baseline and TVTM Model, with Project. DSEIR p.
3.6-14.
SM-TRAFFIC-4: The project developers shall install a traffic signal at the Dublin
Boulevard/Street D intersection at the time development occurs in this area utilizing this
intersection. Project developers shall implement this mitigation measure when the traffic
signal installation at Dublin Boulevard/Street D becomes warranted based on the
estimated additional trips from individual projects, as determined by traffic impact
studies of the individual projects. DSEIR p. 3.6-14.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorpOrated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR
Rationale for Finding. Installing the traffic signal will result in the intersection operating
at an acceptable level of service
Supplemental Impact TRAFFIC 5: New Project Intersection of Fallon
Road/Project Road. The new Fallon Road/Project Road intersection would operate at
13
unacceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours (LOS F) with one-way
STOP sign control. This is a significant impact under'the Dublin Model Baseline and
TVTM Model, with Project. DSEIR p. 3.6-15.
Mitigation Measure SM-TRAFFIC-5: The project developers shall install a traffic signal
at the Fallon Road/Project Road intersection at the time development occurs in this area
utilizing this intersection. Project developers shall implement this mitigation measure
when the traffic signal installation at Fallon Road/Project Road becomes warranted based
on the estimated additional trips from individual projects, as determined by traffic impact
studies of the individual projects. DSEIR p. 3.6-15.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the SEIR.
Rationale for Finding. Installing the traffic signal will result in the intersection operating
at an acceptable level of service.
Supplemental Impact TRAFFIC 6: Year 2025 Cumulative Buildout with Project
Scenario, Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard Intersection. The Dougherty
Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection would operate at LOS E (0.93) in the AM peak hour
and LOS F (1.03) in the PM peak hour. This intersection operates at LOS'E in the AM
and PM peak hours even without the Project and is a significant cumulative impact.
Development of the Project creates only a 0.03 impact at this intersection during the PM
peak hour and improves the intersection very slightly in the AM peak hour. DSEIR p.
3.6-15
SM-TRAFFIC-6: Project developers shall contribute a pro-rata share to configure the
eastbound Dublin Boulevard approach to include 1 left-tm lane, three through lanes and
two right turn lanes. Project developers shall contribute a pro-rata share to configure the
west bound Dublin Boulevard approach to include three left-tm lanes, two through
lanes, and one shared through/fight-turn lane. Project developers shall contribute a
pro-rata share to configure the northbound Dougherty Road approach to include three
left-turn lanes, three through lanes and two right-mm lanes. Project developers shall
contribute a pro-rata share to configure the southbound Dougherty Road approach to
include two left mm lanes, three through lanes, and one shared through/right-turn lane.
The I~580 'westbound diagonal on-ramp from Dougherty Road shall be widened as
necessary to include two single-occupancy vehicle lanes. In addition, the City will
monitor the intersection for peak hour volumes on. a periodic basis, as described below,
and will apply appropriate Project conditions based on the results of such monitoring, as
suggested below. The Project developers shall pay their pro-rata share of the cost to
construct these improvements through payment of the Original Traffic Impact Fee. The
City will implement these improvements.
The City will also periodically monitor peak hour volumes and apply transportation
demand management measures to future development projects as appropriate. Measures
include trip reduction programs such as ride-sharing, transit passes, staggered work
hours, vanpools and other similar measures. DSEIR pp. 3.6-15, -16.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been in, or incorporated into the Project. However,
even with these changes, the impact will not be avoided or substantially lessened.
Therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon approval of
the Project.
Rationale for Finding. Additional improvements to reduce the intersection impacts to an
acceptable LOS would require adding a fourth northbound left turn lane and other
improvements that raise major safety concerns. Nor would these additional
improvements be feasible given the physical constraints at the Dougherty Road/Dublin
Boulevard intersection where adjacent properties to the intersection are already built out.
Monitoring the intersection to obtain updated volume forecasts for future horizon years
(i.e., Year 2025) can more effectively implement transportation measures to improve
levels or.service and reduce single car occupancy through future development projects.
These City and Project efforts will comPlement current and future phases of the 1-580
Smart Corridor Project and would likely relieve some congestion at the Dougherty
Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection through ITS (Intelligent Transportation Systems)
measures to discourage traffic from diverting off the freeway due to congestion or
incidents.
SUpplemental Impact TRAFFIC 7: Year 2025 Cumulative Buildout with Project
scenario, Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard intersection. The Hacienda Drive/Dublin
Boulevard intersection was identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR as exceeding the
applicable LOS under the cumulative buildout with Project analysis (Impact 3.3M).
Mitigation Measure 3.3/13.0 remains applicable. The SEIR analyzed this intersection
and found it still to operate at an unacceptable level in the cumulative analysis. The
Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard intersection would operate at LOS E (1.00) during the
PM peak hour even without the Project. This LOS is a significant cumulative impact.
DSEIR p. 3.6-16, -17.
SM-TRAFFIC-A*. The City will periodically monitor peak hour volumes at this
intersection and apply transportation demand management measures to future
development projects as appropriate. Measures include trip reduction programs such as
ride-sharing, transit passes, staggered work hours, vanpools and other similar measures.
[*Note: This monitoring recommendation is nearly identical to monitoring
recommendations included in SM-TRAFFIC-6 and -8, however, it was not identified as a
separate mitigation measure for this intersection. Among the staff-recommended
revisions to the DSEIR is formally identifying the recommended monitoring as a
mitigation measure for Supplemental Impact TRAFFIC 7. The text of the
recommendation is in the DSEIR at p. 3.6-17.]
Finding. Changes or alterations have been in, or incorporated into the Project. However,
even with these changes, the impact will not be avoided or substantially lessened.
Therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon approval of
the Project.
Rationale for Finding. Given the existing right-of-way and improvements at this
intersection, there is no opportunity to provide additional mitigation beyond the existing
intersection geometries. Additional improvements to reduce the intersection impacts to
an acceptable LOS would require adding a fourth northbound left mm lane and other
improvements that raise major safety concerns. Similar to the Dougherty Road/Dublin
Boulevard intersection the Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard intersection is nearly built
out. Adjacent properties to the east of the intersection are already built out. The
Sybase Headquarters project which is currently under construction will occupy 'the
northwest corner of the intersection. As part of ITS deployment measures along the
1-580 corridor, the City of Dublin will implement advanced traffic signal timing
techniques (e.g., adaptive signal timing) along Dublin Boulevard and Hacienda Drive to
improve the operation of this intersection by utilizing the intersections' throughput
capacity more efficiently.
Supplemental Impact TRAFFIC 8: Year 2025 Cumulative Buildout with Project
Scenario, Fallon Road/Dublin Boulevard Intersection. The Fallon Road/Dublin
Boulevard intersection would operate at LOS F (1.11) in the PM peak hour with some
increases in tumi.'ng movements and traffic volumes at this intersection possibly
attributable to Project and regional traffic utilizing Dublin Boulevard as an "escape" route
from PM peak hour congestion on 1-580. This LOS is a significant cumulative impact.
DSEIR pp. 3.6-17, -18.
SM-TRAFFIC-7: The Project developers shall construct an additional through lane on
northbound Fallon Road (for a total of four through lanes), construct an additional
left-turn lane on westbound Dublin Boulevard (for .a total of three left-tm lanes) and
construct an additional through lane on southbound Fallon Road (for a total of four
through lanes). In addition, the City will monitor the intersection for peak hour volumes
on a periodic basis and will apply appropriate Project conditions based on the results of
such monitoring. Project developers shall implement this mitigation measure when
traffic impacts from individual projects are determined to trigger the need for this
improvement based on traffic impact studies of the individual projects. Construction of
these additional' lanes at the intersection would aid in moving vehicles through the
intersection and will reduce the impacts to the intersection. However this mitigation
cannot reduce the impacts to an acceptable level (LOS D), so this impact remains a
significant cumulative impact. DSEIR p. 3.6-18.
.SM-TRAFFIC-8: In addition to the additional lane configurations in SM-TRAFFIC-7,
the Project developers shall pay for studies to assess the feasibility of locating the Fallon
Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection farther north to allow for a signalized Project
interSection between the 1-580 westbound ramps/Fallon Road intersection and the Fallon
Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection (the "auxiliary intersection") with lane
configurations as detailed in the DSEIR. If the studies show that a new Project auxiliary
intersection in such location is feasible~ the Project developers shall construct such
intersection. Project developers shall implement this mitigation measure when traffic
impacts from individual projects are determined to trigger the need for this improvement
based on traffic impact studies of the individual projects. Construction of this auxiliary
intersection would require modifications to the planned Fallon Road and Dublin
Boulevard alignments to provide the necessary 750 feet distance between intersections.
Land uses and planned building locations on the west side of Fallon Road may have to be
modified to accommodate this new intersection. This new intersection .is anticipated to
function at LOS B in the AM peak hour and LOS C in the PM peak hour. However, even
with this new auxiliary intersection, the Fallon Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection
would operate at LOS E (0.91) in the PM peak hour, just above the acceptable standard of
LOS D (0.90). Therefore, this impact remains a significant cumulative impact,
The City will also periodically monitor peak hour volumes and apply transportation
demand management measures to future development projects as appropriate. Measures
include trip reduction programs such as ride-sharing, transit passes, staggered work
hours, vanpools and other similar measures. DSEIR pp. 3.6-18, -19.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been in, or incorporated into the Project. However,
even with these changes, the impact will not be avoided or substantially lessened.
Therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted.
Rationale for Finding. As with other identified intersections along Dublin Boulevard,
additional improvements to reduce the impacts at the Fallon Road/Dublin Boulevard
intersection to an acceptable LOS would require adding a fourth westbound left turn lane
and would raise the same safety concerns. Monitoring the intersection to obtain updated
volume forecasts for future horizon years (i.e., Year 2025) can more effectively
implement transportation measures to improve levels of service and reduce single car
occupancy through furore development projects. These City and Project efforts will
complement future phases of the 1-580 Smart Corridor project, including advanced traffic
signal timing techniques (e.g., adaptive signal timing) along Dublin Boulevard and Fallon
Road to improve the operation of this intersection by utilizing the intersections'
throughput capacity more efficiently.
Supplemental Impact TRAFFIC 9: Future Base with Project Scenario, Fallon
Road. Based on the Dublin Model, ADTs due to Project traffic over future baseline
traffic will substantially increase along Fallon Road and will overload planned interim
lane configurations. Project traffic volumes would require that certain segments of
Fallon Road be widened to accommodate expected average daily traffic volumes. This
increase in ADT is considered a significant impact. Dublin Boulevard east of Fallon
Road to Street D is expected to reach an ADT of 45,800 vpd and 34,100 vpd west of
Fallon Road, based on the TVTM model with Project traffic. DSEIR pp. 3.6-19, -20.
SM-TRAFFIC-9: The Project developers shall be responsible for widening Fallon Road
between 1-580 and Dublin Road to its ultimate eight lanes and shall be responsible for
widening Fallon Road between Dublin Boulevard and Central Parkway to its ultimate
six-lane width. The Project developers shall be responsible for widening Fallon Road
between Central Parkway and Project Road to four lanes. The Project developers also
shall be responsible for widening the Fallon Road 0vercrossing (between the eastbound
and westbound 1-580 ramps) from four lanes to six' lanes. Project developers shall
implement this mitigation measure when traffic impacts from individual projects are
determined to trigger the need for this improvement based on traffic impact studies of the
individual projects. DSEIR p. 3.6-20
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the SEIR
Rationale for Finding. With the mitigation measures, Fallon Road would be wide enough
to carry the expected traffic volumes at an acceptable level.
Supplemental Impact TRAFFIC 10: Future Base with Project Scenario, Central
Parkway. Based on the Dublin Model, Central Parkway between Fallon Road and
Tassajara Road is expected to carry an increase of 1,300 ADT due to Project traffic over
future baseline traffic, for a total of 16,800 vpd. This increase in ADT is considered a
significant impact. DSEIR p. 3.6-20
SM-TRAFFIC-10: The Project developers shall be responsible for widening Central
Parkway between Tassajara Road and Fallon Road from two lanes to four lanes. Project
developers shall implement this mitigation measure when traffic impacts from individual
projects are determined to trigger the need for this improvement based on traffic impact
studies of the individual projects. DSEIR p. 3.6-20
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR
Rationale for Finding: With the mitigation, Central Parkway would be' wide enough to
carry the expected traffic volumes at an acceptable level
Supplemental Impact TRAFFIC 11: Year 2025 Cumulative Buildout with Project
Scenario, Freeway Segments on 1-580 and 1-680 in the Project Area. With the
proposed Project traffic added to Year 2025 No Project mainline freeway volumes,
projected LOS for eastbound and westbound commute directions on 1-580 would remain
unchanged. However, with a projected LOS F in the AM westbound commute direction
between east of Airway Boulevard and 1-680, the proposed Project trips also would be
adding to a deficient condition between Tassajara Road and east of Airway Boulevard
and between 1-680 and Dougherty Road in the eastbound commute direction.. These
specific segments of 1-580 would not meet the ACCMA standard of LOS E during the
AM or PM peak hour, even without the Project trips. This is considered a significant
cumulative impact.
With the proposed Project traffic added to Year 2025 No Project mainline freeway
volumes, projected LOS for both directions of travel on 1-680 would remain unchanged
during the AM and PM peak hours. With a projected LOS F in the PM peak hour
northbound direction north of 1-580, the proposed Project trips would be adding to an
already deficient condition. However, the 1-680 segment north of 1-580 would not meet
the ACCMA standard of LOS E in the PM peak hour northbound direction, even without
the Project trips. Draft SEIR Page 3.6-21 and 22.
Therefore, the impact on the freeway system of 1-580 and 1-560 in the Project area
-remains a significant cumulative impact. DSEIR pp. 3.6-21, -22.
Mitigation Measure. No supplemental mitigation measures are identified. Freeway
impacts were analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR and Mitigation Measures 3.3/3.0 and
/5.0 were adopted to require coordination between the City of Dublin, Caltrans, the City
of Pleasanton and Eastern Dublin developers to provide auxiliary lanes on 1-580. In
compliance with these mitigations,-the City of Dublin adopted a Tri-Valley
Transportation Development (TVTD) Fee in 1998 for future developments within the
City of Dublin. TVTD Fees paid by Project developers pay for regional improvements to
the freeway system. DSEIR pp. 3.6-21, -22; FSEIR Response 8.39a.
Finding. No supplemental mitigation measures are identified for supplemental freeway
segment cumulative impacts, therefore the impacts remain significant and unavoidable
and a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon Project approval.
Rationale for Finding. Previously identified regional transportation mitigations are being
implemented, e.g., through the TVTD fee. Previously identified improvements together
with implementation of trip reduction Strategies can reduce cumulative impacts through
measures to decrease single occupant vehicle use 'and increase public transit use, but not
enough t° reduce 1-580 and 1-680 segments to acceptable levels of service.
Supplemental Impact UTS 1: Available Water Supplies. DSRSD's required showing
of available water supplies under the Settlement Agreement may exceed the otherwise
required showing under CEQA. Failure to prepare an adequate PWSA pursuant to the
Settlement Agreement would be a potentially significant impact. DSEIR p. 3.7-6.
SM-UTS-l: Prior to approval of future Subdivision Maps or Site Development Review
(SDR) applications (as may be applicable) by the City of Dublin, project developers shall
submit "will serve" letters from DSRSD indicating that adequate water is available to
serve the proposed development project. DSEIR p. 3.7-6.
Finding. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The mitigation measure ensures that there is an available water
supply for the Project prior to any development.
Supplemental Impact UTS 2: Uncertain Energy Supply. California is experiencing
an energy crisis that appears to be caused by a lack of sufficient electricity generation
facilities. In addition, PG&E has declared bankruptcy because of billion of dollars of
debt owed to generators of electricity for power purchased in California's deregulated
markets. Until PG&E emerges from bankruptcy some uncertainty concerning the
provision of gas and electricity services to new and existing PG&E customers exists.
DSEIR p. 3.7-10
Supplemental Impact UTS 3: Local Electrical Distribution Constraints. Local
electrical distribution constraints limit PG&E's ability to serve the Project area. PG&E
has stated that it is able to adequately serve the Tri-Valley with existing facilities until
approximately June 2002. PG&E proposes to increase electric service by adding
substations in Dublin and North Livermore, expanding the Vineyard Substation in
Pleasanton, and installing approximately 23.5 miles of 230 kilovolt (kV) transmission
lines to serve the substations (CPUC, 2000).
Until the Tri-Valley 202 Capacity Increase Project or a functional equivalent alternative
is approved, the impact would be significant: With construction and operation of the
Tri-Valley 2002 Capacity Increase Project or an equivalent alternative and project
phasing as described in the supplemental mitigation below the proposed annexation and
prezoning would result in a less than significant impact.
SM-UTS-2: Require .discretionary .City review prior to the installation and use of
distributed generators, including emergency generators. DSEIR p. 3.7-11
SM-UTS-3: Prior to approval of future subdivision maps or Site Development Review
applications (as may be applicable) by the City of Dublin, project developers shall submit
"will serve" letters from PG&E indicating that adequate electricity and natural gas
services are available to serve the proposed development project. DSEIR p. 3.7-11
Finding. changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project
that avoid or substantially lessen the significant effect identified in Supplemental Impacts
UTS 2 and 3 in the Supplemental EIR.
Rationale for Finding. The mitigation measures will ensure that there is an available
electrical supply for the Project prior to any development.
Location and Custodian of the documents and other materials, which constitute the
record of the proceedings upon which' decisions on the East Dublin Properties
Project .were made:
City of Dublin Community Development Department
Dublin City Offices
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Attn: Andy Byde, Senior Planner
G:\PA#~2000\00-025\CC Staff Re~orts and Resos\mitigation.findings.oct12,doc
2O
EXHIBIT C
FINDINGS CONCERNING ALTERNATIVES
The EaStern Dublin EIR identified four alternatives: No Project, Reduced Planning Area,
Reduced Land Use Intensities and. No Development. The City Council found the No
Project, Reduced Land Use Intensities and No Development alternatives infeasible and
then approved a modification of the Reduced Planning Area alternative. The
Supplemental EIR identified a new alternative, the Mitigated Traffic Alternative. It also
updated the analysis of the No Project and No .Development alternatives that were
analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR. These findings are for the Mitigated Traffic
Alternative and the No Project and No Development alternatives as revised by the
Supplemental EIR.
The City Council hereby finds that the three alternatives identified and described in the
Supplemental EIR were considered and finds them to be infeasible for the specific
economic, soCial, or other considerations set forth below pursuant to CEQA section
210Si(c).
MITIGATED TRAFFIC ALTERNATIVE. DSEIR Pages 4-2 to 4-7.
Finding: Infeasible. This alternative reduces the number of residential units and
commercial floor area by 25% but would occupy the same area and the same
development "footprint'" as the, Project. The Mitigated Traffic alternative is found to be
infeasible for the following reasons:
1. Unavoidable Impacts. Even with the reduced number of units, all of the
unavoidable impacts for the Project would remain except for the unavoidable cumulative
impact at the Fallon Road/DUblin Boulevard intersection. Therefore, there is no
substantial benefit from adopting this alternative given the other benefits from the
Project.
2. Jobs/Housing. This alternative would reduce the ratio of jobs to employed
residents in the City and would provide a smaller share of the City's contribution to
regional housing needs.
3. Fiscal Impacts. This alternative may have potentially significant fiscal
impacts on the City budget's cost/revenue balance by reducing commercial development,
which generally generates 'less service costs and more property tax revenues than
housing.
NO PROJECT (ECAP) ALTERNATIVE. DSEIR Pages 4-7 to 4-13.
Finding: Infeasible. This alternative assumes the Project as proposed would not be built
on the site; instead, any development would be pursuant to the County of Alameda's.
General Plan and East County Area Plan (ECAP). Under this alternative, development of
the portion of the Project Area subject to the East Dublin Specific Plan would be similar
EXHIBIT C to Attachment 2
in terms of land uses'and densities;' but, with greater commercial development and the
non-residential types of uses, it would generate more employment. Development of the
areas within the Sphere of Influence but Outside the Specific Plan area would be reduced
to 6 residential units rather than the 1,286 units pursuant to the Project.
The No Project Alternative is infeasible because the City's General Plan has designated
the entirety of the Project area for planned development as part of its long-range planning
for the Eastern Dublin area. As to the portions of the Project area within Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan, the No Project Alternative would partially fulfill the City's objectives.
However, as to the portions within the Sphere of Influence but outside the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan, those objectives would not be fulfilled. In addition, the No Project
Alternative would exacerbate the City's existing excess of jobs compared to employed
residents. This alternative would not avoid identified significant unavOidable air quality,
biology or traffic impacts, and would generate approximately 80% more traffic than the
Project.
NO DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE. DSEIR Pages 4-13 to 4-15.
Finding: Infeasible. This alternative assumes no development of the Project area
beyond existing conditions and assumes no annexation of the Project 'area. This
alternative would avoid all of the Project's impacts, but is not feasible because the City's
General Plan has designated the Project area for planned development as part of its long-
range planning for the Eastern Dublin area; it therefore would not meet the City's
objectives. In addition, the No Development Alternative fails to provide needed housing
as set forth in the Housing Element of the City's General Plan and other plan documents.
G:\PA#\2000\00-025\CC Staff Reports and Resos\edpo.findings.alternatives.octl 0.doc
2
EXHIBIT D
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
1. General.
Pursuant to .CEQA Guidelines section 15093, the City Council of the City of
Dublin makes the following Statement of Overriding Considerations for those
supplemental impacts identified in the East Dublin Properties Supplemental EIR. The
City Council previously adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the
unmitigated adverse impacts identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR, which remains valid
and applicable to the Project. This Statement of Overriding Considerations addresses the
supplemental unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Supplemental EIR.
The City Council has carefully considered each impact in reaching its decision to
adopt the Project and to allow urbanization of the eastern Dublin Project area. Although
the City Council believes that many of the unavoidable environmental effects identified
in the Supplemental EIR will be substantially lessened by mitigation measures
incorporated into the Project, and future development plans as well as future mitigation
measures implemented w/th future approvals, it recognizes that the implementation of the
Project carries with it unavoidable adverse environmental effects.
The City Council specifically finds that to the extent that the identified adverse or
potentially adverse impacts have not been mitigated to acceptable levels, there are
specific economic, social, environmental, land use, and other considerations that support
approval of the Project.
2. Unavoidable Significant Adverse Impacts.
The following unavoidable significant environmental impacts are associated with
the proposed Project as identified in the Supplemental EIR. The impacts cannot be fully
mitigated by changes or alterations to the Project.
Supplemental Impact AQI: Mobile Source Emissions: Reactive Organics (RO),
Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) and Particulate Matter (PM-10). Even with mitigation, the Project
and cumulative development would result in mobile source emissions that exceed
applicable state and federal standards. No feasible mitigation measures are available to
reduce this impact to a level of insignificance. The only Project alternative that could
reduce this impact to a level of insignificance is the No Development Alternative, which
was found to be infeasible (see Exhibit C). (DSEIR pp. 3.2-1-3.2-10).
Supplemental Impact BIO 3: Loss or Degradation of Botanically Sensitive
Habitats. Even with mitigation, the future development of the Project would result in a
cumulative loss of botanically sensitive habitat. This loss is cumulatively significant,
given the loss of other botanically sensitive habitat in the area. No feasible mitigation
measures are available to reduce this cumulative impact to a level of insignificance. The
only Project alternative that could reduce this impact to a level of insignificance is the No
EXHIBIT D to ATTACHEMENT 2
Development Alternative, which was found to be infeasible (see Exhibit C).
(DSEIR pp. 3.3-11-3.3-17).
Supplemental Impact Noise 1: Exposure of Existing Houses to Noise Levels In
Excess of Standards Established in the General Plan. Even with mitigation, the Eastern
Dublin EIR previously identified traffic noise impacts on existing residences as
unavoidable and concluded there were no feasible mitigation measures that could reduce
this impact to a level of insignificance. To the extent that increased traffic noise not
anticipated in the Eastern Dublin EIR intensifies this impact, there are no feasible
mitigation measures available to reduce this impact to a level of insignificance. The only
Project alternative that could reduce this impact to a level of insignificance is the No
Development Alternative, which was found to be infeasible (see Exhibit C). (DSEIR pp.
3.4-1-3.4-7).
Supplemental Impact Traffic 6: Year 2025 Cumulative Buildout with Prqject
Scenario, Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard Intersection. Even with mitigation, the
Level of Service at this intersection cannot be reduced to minimum acceptable level of
service. No feasible mitigation measures are available to reduce this impact to a level of
insignificance, since the configuration required to add another lane would cause major
safety concerns, and physical constraints prevent the required configuration. The Only
Project alternative that could reduce this impact to a level of insignificance is the No
Development Alternative, which was found to be infeasible (see Exhibit C). (DSEIR pp.
3.6-15-3.6-16).
Supplemental Impact Traffic 7: Year 2025 Cumulative Buildout with Project
Scenario, Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard Intersection. Even with mitigation, the
Level of Service at this intersection cannot be reduced to minimum acceptable level of
service. No feasible mitigation measures are available to reduce this impact to a level of
insignificance given the existing right-of-way and improvements at this intersection. The
only Project alternative that could reduce this impact to a level of insignificance is the No
Development Altemative, which was found to be infeasible (see Exhibit C). (DSEIR pp.
3.6-16-3.6-17).
Supplemental Impact Traffic 8: Year 2025 Cumulative Buildout with Project
Scenario, Fallon Road/Dublin Boulevard Intersection. Even with mitigation, the Level of
Service at this intersection cannot be reduced to minimum acceptable level of service,
No feasible mitigation measures are available to reduce this impact to a level of
insignificance given the existing right-of-way and improvements at this intersection. The
only Project alternatives that could reduce this impact to a level of insignificance are the
No Development and the Mitigated Traffic Alternatives, both of which have been found
to be infeasible [(see Exhibit C). (DSEIR pp. 3.6-17-3.6-19).
Supplemental Impact Traffic 11: Year 2025 Cumulative Buildout with Project
Scenario, Freeway Segments on 1-580 and 1-680 in the Proiect Area. Even with
mitigation, the Level of Service on these freeway segments cannot be reduced to
minimum acceptable level of service. No feasible mitigation measures are available to
reduce this impact to.a level of insignificance. The only Project alternative that could
reduce this impact to a level of insignificance is the No Development Alternative, which
was found to be infeasible (see Exhibit C). (DSEIR pp. 3.6-21-3.6-22).
3..Overriding Considerations
The City Council has balanced the benefits of the East Dublin Properties Project to
the City of Dublin against the significant and potentially significant adverse impacts
identified in the Supplemental EIR that have not been eliminated or mitigated to a level
of 'insignificance. The City Council similarly weighed the benefits of the' Eastern Dublin
GPA/SP Project in 1993 against the unavoidable significant impacts of future
develoPment of Eastern Dublin and determined that the Eastern Dublin project should be
approved. (Resolution 53-93, section 4). To the extent that the Project would result in
unavoidable significant impacts described in the previous statement of overriding
considerations as well as impacts referenced above in the Supplemental EIR, the City
Council hereby determines that such unavoidable impacts are outweighed by the benefits
of Project as further set forth below. The City Council, acting pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15093, hereby determines that unavoidable impacts of the Project are
outweighed by the need for the City to implement and bring to fruition its long-range
planning for the Eastern Dublin area. The City Council has considered the public record
of proceedings on the proposed Project and had determined that approval of the Project
would result in the implementation of the City's long-term programmatic, planning goals,
policies and programs for Eastern Dublin in general and the Project site in particular.
The City of Dublin has carefully and systematically planned for its future, which efforts
are reflected in its General Plan and other actions over the last several years. The City
has planned for, sought and secured the planning and incremental annexation of those
eastern lands within its sphere of influence and the Project completes the City's planning
approach.
Upon consideration of the public record of proceedings on the proposed Project, the City
Council hereby determines that approval and implementation of the Project would result
in the following substantial public benefits.
Economic Considerations. Substantial evidence is included in the record, demonstrating
the economic benefits that the City would derive from implementation of the Project.
Specifically, the Project will result in:
a. Approximately 2,575 new jobs, as well as a substantial number of
construction jobs.
Potential commercial development that will result in increases in sales tax
revenues for the City.
c. Substantial increases in property tax revenues.
Social Considerations. Substantial evidence exists in the record demonstrating the social
benefits that the City would derive from the implementation of the Project. Specifically,
the Project will result in:
Increases in housing opportunities in the City and in a region where housing is
costly and in short supply.
b. Increases in the amount of affordable housing in the community.
An arrangement for the City to contribute its fair share of regional housing .
oppommities.
do
Provision of. diverse types and densities of housing opportunities including
higher density housing, medium density and upper-end executive housing and
rural residential areas.
Other Considerations. Substantial evidence exists in the record demonstrating other
public benefits that the City would derive from implementation of the Project. They
include:
Comprehensive planning incorpOrating innovative and extensive
environmental mitigation for the entire Project site to allow more opportunity
to maintain continuity of onsite resources, including resource and open space
corridors.
bo
Designating substantial areas of land for Open Space and low intensity Rural
Residential uses, while also providing neighborhood and community parks for a
variety of open space and recreation opportunities, for the Project, the City and
the region,
4
G:\PA#\2000\00-025\CC Staff Reports and Resos\edpo.soc.octl2.doc
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation (PA 00-025)
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
October 2001
Mitigation Measure
SM-BIO-l: Project proponent(s) shall
prepare a Resource Management Plan (RMP)
for the entire Project area for the City of
Dublin's review and approval prior to or
concurrent with submittal of any future
development applications within the Project
area submitted to the City for discretionary
review. The RMP shall include all properties
within the Project area and any necessary off-
site mitigation lands and address consistency
with local policies, such as the Stream
Restoration Program and the Grazing
Management Plan and mitigation measureg
contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR and this
SEIR. The RMP shall be a comprehensive
document that includes, at a minimum:
Implementing
Responsibility
Individual
project
developers
Monitoring
Responsibility
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
Prior to or
concurrent with
submittal of the
first Stage 2 PD
Rezoning
application
within the
project area
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 DeVelopment Plan and Am~exation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin z:x~^~x~xt~,-~xcc start ReporLs and Resos\EastOubli~MMP e×hlbit e.d ....
Page 1 ~
Exhibit E to Attachment 2 ~.
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
MOnitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Project overview
Discussion of existing conditions of
soil, geology, adjacent and proposed
land uses, creeks and drainages,
wetlands, vegetation, wildlife, and
special status species
Maps and figures delineating precise
location of species occurrence,
preserved/created habitats, associated
open space and-treatments
Special status species and habitat
addressed in the RMP shall include
but are not limited to:
1. Botanically sensitive
communities: arroyo willow
riparian woodland, seasonal
wetlands, intermittent streams,
freshwater marsh and alkali
grasslands
2. Special Status plant species: San
Joaquin spearscale, Congdon's
tarplant, palmate bird's beak,
caper-fruited tropidocarpum
and Livermore tarplant
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Am~exation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Verification
Page 2
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
3. Special status invertebrates:
conservancy fairy shrimp,
longhorn fairy shrimp, vernal
pool fairy shrimp, and vernal
pool tadpole shrimp.
4. Special status amphibians:
California red-legged frog and
California tiger salamander.
5. Special status raptors and
passerines: golden eagle,
burrowing owl, short-eared
owl, sharp-shinned hawk,
tricolored blackbird,
loggerhead shrike and
California horned lark.
6. Special status mammals: San
Joaquin kit fox, pallid bat,
Townsend's big-eared bat and
Yuma myotis bat.
· Program goals and objectives
· Summaries of important related
project and regional documents
addressing resources and planning
· Consistency and compliance with local
resource protection policies
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Verification
Page 3
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
VerificatiOn
· Regulatory and legal framework for
affected resources including informal
consultation with the regulatory
agencies
· Measures for maintaining on-site
mitigation in perpetuity
· Identification of any proposed off-site
mitigation and measures for
maintaining offsite mitigation in
perpetuity
· Summary of Eastern Dublin EIR and
Supplemental EIR impacts and
mitigation by habitat type
· For each special status species and
sensitive habitat:
1. Description of the resource -
biology, life history and
regional distribution
2. Potential direct, indirect and
cumulative impacts per the
Eastern Dublin EIR and
Supplemental EIR
3. Mitigation ratios for
preservation and creation
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 4
o
o
10.
11.
12.
13.
Mitigation Measure
P'reconstruction and
construction avoidance and
minimization measures
including but not limited to
preconstruction surveys,
contractor-education,
construction scheduling,
restricted activities, fencing,
signage, agency consultation
and reporting
Onsite avoidance and
minimization measures
Onsite mitigation and adaptive
management
Off-site mitigation and
adaptive management
Regulatory permitting
requirements
Monitoring and performance
standards
Long-term monitoring
management and protection
Funding and implementation
Schedule for implementation
and monitoring
Implementation agreement for
City and future development
East Dublin Prola~tlil~61 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
Page 5
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Res .ponsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
14.
Procedures for acconn~todating
changed and unforeseen
circumstances
In preparation of the RMP, the first priority
will be given to avoidance and preservation
of biological resources within the Project
area. Only after opportunities for onsite
avoidance and preservation have been
thoroughly evaluated, will off-site mitigation
be considered, including mitigation banking.
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 6
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
The long-term viability and sustainability of
the natural resources on the preserved and
mitigated lands shall be protected and
managed in perpetuity. This should be a
clearly stated goal of the RMP as it relates to
all of the protected resources. Management
measures shall address all identified
potential direct and indirect impacts from the
Project as identified in the Eastern Dublin
EIR and this supplement. Modifications to
the land plan may be required to implement
the RMP.
Measures to protect these resources from
foreseeable and unforeseeable impacts over
the long-term shall be consistent with the
mitigation measures herein and could
include but are not necessarily limited to:
General Mitigation Measures
1. In-perpetuity conservation
easements
2. In-perpetuity funding
assurances
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Am~exation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 7
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
3. Maintenance of documents
describing resources of the
Project area.
Hydrolo~gy Mitigation Measures
1. Water quality control and
treatment
2. Appropriate management of
the natural hydrologic regime
3. Management. of runoff,
drainage and sediment
4. Appropriate flood control
maintenance
Erosion control and chava~el
stability
Management Measures
Setbacks necessary to protect
the specific resources
2. Buffers and buffer treatments
3. Fencing and signage necessary
to protect the specific resources
4.Public education
5. Managed trails and other
multiple-uses
6. Restricted public access
Multiple-use
1.
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 8
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
7. Management of trash
receptacles to discOurage
predators
8. Appropriate management of
water bodies known to
promote undesired predators of
protected species
9. Restricted activities consistent
with resource protection
Resource Management Measures
1. Vegetation management
2. Fire management appropriate
to management of the
biological resources
3. Control of exotic predators of
protected species
4. Invasive exotic species control
5. Habitat management and
monitoring
6. Management of resources
within their regional context
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 9
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-2: Plant surveys, as outlined in
USFWS and CDFG survey protocols (CDFG
1996), shall be conducted within the Project
area in early spring, late spring, and late
summer to confirm presence or absence of
special-status plant species. Results of these
Surveys §hall be included with subsequent
development applications.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to or
concurrent with
submittal of the
first Stage 2 PD
Rezoning
application
within the
project area
SM-BIO-3: Once presence is determined for
a special status plant species, areas
supporting the species should be avoided.
SM-BIOz4: If a special-status plant species
cannot be avoided, then the area containing
the plant species must be measured and one
of the following steps must be taken to
ensure replacement on a 1:1 ratio (by
acreage):
Individual
project
developers
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
During
construction
Prior to grading
permit or
commence-
ment of any
public
improvement
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 10
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
a. permanently preserve, through use of a
conservation easement or other similar
method, an equal amount of acreage either
within the Project area or off-site that
contains the plant;
b. harvest the plants to be lost, and relocate
them to another suitable and equal sized area
either within the Project area or off-site; such
area shall be preserved and protected in
perpetuity; or
c. harvest seeds from the plants to be lost, or
use seeds from another appropriate source,
and seed an equal amount of area suitable for
growing the plant either within the Project
area or off-site; such area shall be preserved
and protected in perpetuity.
Prior to submittal of a Stage 2 development
plan or tentative map, the developer shall
submit a written report to the City for its
review and approval demonstrating how the
developer will comply with this mitigation
measure,
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 11
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
including the steps it will take to ensure that
transplanting or seeding will be successful.
SM-BIO-5: To the extent feasible,
implementation of the Project shall be
designed and constructed to avoid and
minimize adverse effects to waters of the
United States within the Project area.
Examples of avoidance and minimization
include (1) reducing the size of the Project or
any future individual development projects
within the Project area, (2) design future
development projects within the Project area
so as to avoid and/or minimize impacts to
waters of the United States, and (3) establish
and maintain wetland or upland vegetated
buffers to protect open waters such as
streams.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
During
construction
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 12
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
Also, in order to protect the particularly
sensitive Arroyo willow riparian woodland
and red-legged frog habitat found in the
Fallon Road drainage from Fallon Road
upstream to its terminous, to the maximum
extent feasible, future development projects
within the Project area either shall completely
avoid this drainage or limit impacts to bridge
crossings (as opposed to fill) or other such
minimally impacting features.
SM-BIO-6: To the extent that avoidance and
minimization are not feasible and wetlands
of other"waters, will be filled, such impacts
shall be mitigated at a 2:1 ratio (measured by
acreage) within the Project area, through the
creation, restoration or enhancement of
wetlands or other waters. Prior to submittal
of a Stage 2 development plan or tentative
map, the developer shall submit a written
report to the City for its review and approval
demonstrating how the developer will
comply with this mitigation measure.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
submittal of a
Stage 2 PD
Rezoning or
tentative
subdivision map
application
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 13
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-7: If mitigation within the Project
area is not feasible, then the developer shall
mitigate the fill of wetlands or other waters
at a 2:1 ratio (measured by acreage) at an off-
site location acceptable to the City. Prior to
submittal of a Stage 2 development plan or
tentative map, the developer shall submit a
written report to the City for its review and
approval demonstrating how the developer
will comply with this mitigation measure.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
submittal of a
Stage 2 PD
Rezoning or
tentative
subdivision map
application
SM-BIO-8: Botanically sensitive habitats
shall be included in and shall be protected
and enhanced by implementation of the
Resource Management Plan, as outlined in
Mitigation Measure BIO-SM-I, above.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance
of grading
permits or
commence-ment
of construction
for public works
projects
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 14
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
BIO-SM-9: Future development of the
Project shall comply with the amended
Eastern Dublin San Joaquin Kit Fox
Protection Plan (Appendix E) which reflects
the latest protocols for kit fox habitat
evaluations, presence/absences surveys, pre-
construction survevs and precautionary
construction measures.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance
of grading
permits or
commence-ment
of construction
for public works
projects
BIO-SM-10 San Joaquin kit fox habitat shall
be included in and shall be protected and
enhanced by implementation of the Resource
Management Plan, as outlined in Mitigation
MeaSure BIO-SM-l, above.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance
of grading
permits or
commence-ment
of construction
for public works
projects
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 15
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
BIO-SM-Il: If avoidance is infeasible,
mitigation lands, providing similar or better
habitat for San Joaquin kit fox at a 1:1 ratio or
suitable ratio determined by the USFWS shall
be set aside in perpetuity off-site, if feasible,
providing such land is available. This
mitigation, proposed in a mitigation and
monitoring plan, shall be submitted to the
City for review prior to the issuance of a
grading permit.
The above mitigation measures for San
Joaquin kit fox also are suitable mitigation for
other special status grassland species.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance
of grading
permits or
commence-ment
of construction
for public works
projects
BIO-SM-12: Focused surveys following
USFWS survey protocol shall be conducted in
habitat considered suitable for California red-
legged frog which have not already been
surveyed.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance
of grading
permits or
commence-ment
of construction
for public works
projects
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 16
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
The current protocol (USFWS 1997b) requires
that two daytime and two nighttime surveys
be performed over a suitable four-day
period, or, the most recent USFWS approved
focused survey protocol should be followed.
Results of these surveys shall be sent to the
City for review.
BIO-SM-13: Specific California red-legged
frog habitat areas, including the drainage
upstream and east of the current Fallon Road
alignment, shall be included in and protected
and enhanced by implementatiOn of a
Resource Management Plan, as outlined in
Mitigation Measure BIO-SM-l, above.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance
of grading
permits or
commence-ment
of construction
for public works
projects
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 17
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
BIO-SM-14: To the extent feasible,
development of the Project area shall avoid
all areas of identified suitable California red-
legged frog aquatic and dispersal habitat. A
reasonable attempt shall be made to avoid
such aquatic habitat and to provide a 300 to
500-foot buffer on each side of any stream
which provides red-legged frog habitat.
Limited permanent development may occur
within this buffer zone (such as a trail
through the length of the buffer zone, or a
bridge crossing across the buffer zone), so
long as it will have only minor impacts on
the habitat. Limited temporary development
activity may occur within this buffer zone to
create trails, install bridges, etc., and to allow
for grading activities along the edge of the
buffer zone, so long as such activity will have
only minor impacts on the habitat.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance
of grading
permits or
commence-ment
of construction
for public works
projects
East Dublin Properties stage I Development Plan and Almexation
Page 18
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
BIO-SMd5: If avoidance is infeasible,
mitigation lands, providing similar or better
habitat for California red-legged frog at a 3:1
replacement ratio or suitable ratio
determined by the USFWS, shall be set aside
in perpetuity. This mitigation, proposed in a
mitigation and monitoring plan, shall be
required prior to submittal of Stage 2
Development Plans and tentative maps. If
the identified mitigation lands have been
approved by the City, the following
mitigation guidelines implemented prior to
and during construction would reduce
impacts to this species:
Prior to construction, a map shall be
prepared to delineate upland areas from
preserved wetland areas. Information for
this map shall be based on the verified
wetland delineation.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
submittal of
Stage 2 PD
Rezoning
applications or
tentative maPs
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 19
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
The wetland construction boundary shall be
fenced to prohibit the movement of animals
into the construction area and control
siltation and disturbance to wetland habitat.
Following installation of fencing, its proper
location shall be verified by the Project
Biologist. The Project Biologist shall ensure
that at no time during construction is
vegetation removed inside of the fenced area.
If construction necessitates the removal of
vegetation within the fenced area, additional
mitigation will be required. Additionally,
the Project Biologist shall walk the length of
the fence once a day to ensure that California
red-legged frog are not trapped within the
enclosure. The Project Biologist shall walk
the length of the fence more than once a day
in areas where California red-legged frog are
most abundant. The permitting agencies
shall also be contacted in the event of any
significant deviation from permitting
conditions.
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 20
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
Pre-construction surveys within the
construction zone shall be conducted by a
qualified biologist with appropriate permits
to handle red-legged frogs. If no special-
status animals are detected during these
surveys then construction related activities
may proceed. If special-status animals are
found within the construction disturbance
zone they shall immediately be moved
passively, or captured and moved, in
consultation with the USFWS, to suitable
upstream sites by the Project Biologist.
All construction employees shall participate
in an endangered species/special-status
habitat education program to be presented
by a qualified biologist prior to construction
activities. The program shall cover such
topics as identifying wetland habitat and
areas used by California red-legged frog,
identification of California
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Am~exation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 21
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
red-legged frog photos, the State and federal
Endangered Species Acts, and the
consequences of violating the terms of these
acts.
Ail construction adjacent to wetlands shall be
regularly monitored to ensure that impacts
do not exceed those included within the
protective standards of the mitigations. Work
performed within 500 feet of aquatic habitat
shall be monitored by the Project Biologist,
who shall document pre-project and post-
project conditions to ensure permit
compliance.
During construction, the Project Biologist
shall be on site whenever construction within
any aquatic habitats is to occur. Any
construction activity within ordinary high
water shall be photo-documented by the
Project Biologist. In addition, a biologist with
the appropriate permits to relocate animals
shall be available for consultation as needed.
East. Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Armexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 22
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-16: Special-status invertebrate
habitat shall be included in and shall be
protected and enhanced by implementation
of a Resource Management Plan, as outlined
in Mitigation Measure SM-BIO-1.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance
of grading
permits or
commence-ment
of construction
for public works
projects
SM-BIO-17: The following vernal pool
habitat surveys and mitigation shall be
implemented:
Surveys of potential habitat are required. If
suitable habitat is identified, the following
mitigation is required. If impacts to occupied
and protected vernal pool fairy shrimp
habitat are less than one acre, including
habitat directly destroyed and habitat
indirectly affected (within 250 feet of vernal
pool), the following, based on the
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
submittal of
Stage 2 PD
Rezoning
applications or
tentative maps
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 23
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
February 28, 1996 Biological Opinion
(USFWS 1996), or current protoCol, shall be
adhered to or as otherwise negotiated with
the USFWS. The Biological Opinion
collectively covers all projects with small
effects (less than one acre) on listed vernal
pool crustaceans in the Sacramento Basin (of
which the Project area is considered a part)of
California. For purposes of this consultation
with USFWS, all applicants will have either
surveyed habitat of these species (habitat)
and confirmed the presence of listed species,
or chosen to assume that all potential habitat
contains listed species.
(a) Preservation: For every acre of habitat
directly or indirectly impacted at least two
vernal pool credits shall be dedicated within
a Service-approved ecosystem preservation
bank, or in-accordance with USFWS
evaluation of site-specific conservation
values, three acres of
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page24
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
vernal pool habitat may be preserved within
the Project area or on another non-bank site
as approved by the Service.
(b) Creation: For every acre of habitat
directly impacted, at least one vernal pool
creation credit shall be dedicated within a
Service-approved habitat mitigation bank, or,
in accordance with USFWS evaluation of site-
specific conservation values, two acres of
vernal P0ol habitat will be' created and
monitored within the Project area or on
another non-bank site as approved by the
Service.
Mitigation ratios for non-bank mitigation
may be adjusted to approach those for banks
if the Service considers the conservation
value of the non-bank mitigation area to
approach that of Service-approved mitigation
banks.
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 25
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
Mitigation for direct impacts to vernal pool
habitat shall include either 2:1 preservation
and 1:1 creation on mitigati.on bank lands or
3:1 preservation and 2:1 creation for non-
mitigation bank lands.
Vernal pool habitat and associated
upland areas which are preserved
onsite shall be managed info
perpetuity or until the Corps of
Engineers, the applicant and the
USFWS agree on an exchange of
present habitat for mitigation credits
within a USFWS approved ecosystem
preservation bank.
All avoided habitat (preserved) on site
shall be monitored by a USFWS
approvedbiologist during the time of
construction. The monitoring
biologist shall have authority to stop
all activities that may result in
destruction or take of likted species or
destruction of their habitat.
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 26
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
MOnitoring
Schedule
Verification
Resumption of construction shall
occur after appropriate corrective
measures have been taken. The
biologist shall report any
unauthorized impacts to USFWS and
CDFG.
Fencing shall be placed and
maintained around any and all
preserved vernal pool habitat.
All on-site construction personnel
shall receive instruction regarding the
presence of listed species and their
habitat.
· The proponent shall insure that
activities inconsistent with the
preservation of the vernal pool habitat
and associated upland habitat are
prohibited during the life of the
Project.
· Any project that impacts vernal pool
or seasonal wetland habitat greater
than one acre shall be evaluated by the
USFWS on a case-by-case level using
these basic guidelines.
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting' Program
City of Dublin
Page 27
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-18: California tiger salamander
habitat shall be included in and shall be
protected and enhanced by implementation
of a Resource Management Plan, as outlined
in Mitigation Measure SM-BIO-1.
SM-BIO-19: If avoidance is infeasible,
mitigation lands, providing similar or better
aquatic and upland habitat for California
tiger salamander (CTS) at a 1:1 ratio or
suitable ratio determined by the California
Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), shall
be set aside in perpetuity. Upland habitat
shall be mitigated by preserving additional
upland on-site or, if necessary, by preserving
currently-occupied tiger salamander habitat
off-site. Aquatic habitat shall be mitigated by
creating an equal number (or acreage) of new
aquatic California tiger salamander habitat
within the preserved upland habitat. This
mitigation, included in a mitigation and
monitoring plan, shall be required prior to
submittal of Stage 2 development plans and
tentative maps.
Individual
project
developers
Individual
project.
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
submittal of
Stage 2 PD
Rezoning
applications or
tentative maps
Prior to
submittal of
Stage 2 PD
Rezoning
applications or
tentative maps
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 28
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-20: A qualified biologist shall
conduct pre-construction surveys for nesting
raptors. If an active nest is found the
following mitigation measures shall also be
implemented.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to grading
activities
SM-BIO-21: 'If construction must occur
during the nesting season, all potential
nesting trees within the footprint of
development should be removed prior to the
nesting season to prevent occupied nests
from being present when construction
begins.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to grading
activities
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 29
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-22: Construction should occur
between August 31 and February 1 to avoid
disturbance of owls during the nesting
season. This construction windoTM could be
adjusted if monitoring efforts determine that
the owls do not nest in a given year or that
nesting was completed before August 1.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to grading
activities
SM-BIO-23: If removal of nesting trees is
infeasible and construction must occur within
the breeding season, a nesting raptor survey
shall be performed by a qualified biologist
prior to tree disturbance.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to grading
activities
SM-BIO-24: All active nests shall'be
identified by flagging and a buffer zone,
depending on the species, shall be
established around the nesting tree. Buffer
zones can range between 200 feet to 500 feet
to an entire viewshed.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to grading
activities
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and A~mexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 30
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-25: If construction is scheduled
when young birds have not yet fledged, an
exclusion zone around the nest shall be
established or construction shall be delayed
until after the young have fledged, typically
by August 15 or earlier if determined by a
biologist that fledging has occurred.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
During grading
activities
SM-BIO-26: Nesting raptor habitat shall be
included in and shall be protected and
enhanced by implementation of the Resource
Management Plan as outlined in SM~BIO-1.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to grading
activities
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 31
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-27: The territory of the golden
eagle nesting pair shall be included in and
protected and enhanced by implementation
of a Resource Management Plan, as outlined
in Mitigation Measure SM-BIO-1. The
protected golden eagle foraging territory
affects areas in the northern portion of the
Project area designated for Rural
Residential/Agricultural uses. Development
standards and uses for these areas shall
incorporate the following measures:
Homesites in this portion of the
Project area shall be located in valley
bottoms adjacent to existing or
planned residential development.
· Permitted agricultural uses shall be
limited to grazing to maintain suitable
golden eagle foraging habitat.
· Rodent control in this portion of the
Project area shall be prohibited.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
submittal of
Stage 2 PD
Rezoning
applications or
tentative maps
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 32
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
Any additional portion of the Project area
that is within the viewshed of all nest sites
used by this pair shall also be managed in a
similar manner.
SM-BIO-28: If construction is scheduled
during the nesting season (February i -
August 31), pre-construction surveys should
be conducted on the entire Project area and
within 150 meters (500 feet) of tine Project
area prior to any ground disturbance. To
avoid take of over-wintering birds, all
burrows should be surveyed 30 days prior to
ground disturbance between the months of
September I and January 31. If ground
disturbance is delayed or suspended for
more than 30 days after the pre-construction
survey, the site should be resurveyed.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to grading
activities
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 33
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-29: If over-wintering birds are
present no disturbance should occur within
160 feet of occupied burrows unless agency
approval provides a letter giving consent to
relocate wintering birds. If owls must be
moved away from the disturbance area,
passive relocation techniques, following
CDFG 1995 guidelines, should be used rather
than trapping. If no over-wintering birds are
observed, burrows may be removed prior to
the nesting season to reduce impacts from
noise, dust, and human disturbance to mated
pairs.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to grading
activities
SM-BIO-30: Maintain a minimum buffer (at
least 250 feet) around active burrowing owl
nesting sites identified by pre-construction
surveys during the breeding season to avoid
direct loss of individuals (February 1-
September 1).
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
During
construction
activities
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Am~exation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 34
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-31: If removal of unoccupied
potential nesting burrows prior to the nesting
season is infeasible and construction must
occur within the breeding season, a nesting
burrowing owl survey shall be performed by
a qualified biologist within 30 days prior to
construction. Owls present on site after
February 1 will be assumed to be nesting on
site or adjacent to the site. All active burrows
shall be identified.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to grading
activities
SM-BIO-32: All active nesting burrows shall
have an established 250-foot exclusion zone
around the burrow.
SM-BIO-33: If construction is scheduled
during summer, when young are not yet
fledged, a 250-foot exclusion zone around the
nest shall be established or construction shall
be delayed until after the young have
fledged, typically by August 31.
Individual
project
developers
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
During
construction
activities
Prior to
construction
activities
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 35
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-34: When destruction of occupied
burrows is unavoidable, existing unsuitable
burrows should be enhanced (enlarged or
cleared of debris) or new burrows created (by
installing artificial burrows) at a 2:1 ratio on
protected lands, as provided for below.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
construction
activities
SM-BIO-35: A minimum of 6.5 acres of
foraging habitat per pair or unpaired resident
bird, shall be acquired and permanently
protected. The protected lands shall be
adjacent to occupied burrowing owl habitat
and at a location acceptable to CDFG.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
construction
activities
SM-BIO-36: The project proponent shall
provide funding for long-term management
and monitoring of the protected lands. The
monitoring plan should include success
criteria, remedial measures, and an annual
report to CDFG.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
construction
activities
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 36
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-37: Burrowing owl habitat shall be
included in and shall be protected and
enhanced by implementation of the Resource
Management Plan as outlined in Mitigation
Measure BIO-SMd.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance
of grading
permits or
commence-ment
of construction
for public works
projects
SM-BIO-38: If construction is scheduled to
occur during the nesting season (February 1-
August 15), all potential nesting sites and
structures (i.e., shrubs and tules) within the
footprint of development should be removed
prior to the beginning of the nesting season.
However, because the-removal of grassland
habitat is infeasible, mitigation for impacts to
California horned lark are addressed more
particularly in
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to grading
activities
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 37
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
Mitigation Measures SM-BIO-42 to SM-BIO-
44, below.
SM-BIO-39: If removal of nesting trees and
shrubs within the footprint of development is
infeasible and construction must occur within
the breeding season, a nesting bird survey
should be performed by a qualified biologist
within 30 days prior to construction. These
surveys shall cover grassland habitat for
potential nesting California horned lark.
Birds present on site after February 1 will be
assumed to be nesting onsite or adjacent to
the site.
SM-BIO-40: All active nests shall be
identified by flagging and a buffer zone,
depending on the species, shall be
established around the nest site. Buffer zones
can range between 75 feet to 100 feet.
Individual
project
developers
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to grading
activities
Prior to grading
activities
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 38
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-BIO-41: If'construction is scheduled
during summer, when young have not yet
fledged, an exclusion zone around the nest
shall be established or construction shall be
delayed until after the young have fledged,
typically by July 15.
SM-BIO-42: Habitat for nesting passerines
shall be included in and shall be protected
and enhanced by implementation of the
Resource Management Plan as outlined in
SM-BIO-1.
SM-BIO-43: A qualified bat biologist shall
conduct occupancy surveys of the Project
area to determine whether any mature trees,
snags or suitable buildings
Individual
project
developers
Individual
project
developers
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Dublin
Community
Development
Department'
Prior to grading
activities
Prior to
submittal of
Stage 2 PD
Rezoning
applications or
tentative maps
Prior to grading
activities
that would be removed during future project
construction provide hibernacula or nursery
colony roosting habitat.
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Almexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 39
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM~BIO-44: If presence is observed,
removal of roost habitat should be conducted
at specific times of the year. Winter roosts
are generally occupied between October 15
through January 30 and maternity colonies
are generally occupied between February 15
and July 30. If bats are using roost sites that
need to be removed, the roosting season of
the colony shall be determined and the
removal shall be conducted when the colony
is using an alternate roost.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to grading
activities
SM-BIO-45: Habitat for these bat species
shall be included in and shall be protected
and enhanced by implementation of the
Resource Management Plan as outlined in
Mitigation Measure SM-BIO-1.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
submittal of
Stage 2 PD
Rezoning
applications or
tentative maps
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublh~
Page 40
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-NOISE-l: Require a noise insulation
plan for general commercial (including any
proposed office-type uses) and industrial
land uses to be submitted for all such
development projects located within the
future CNEL 70 dBA contour. The plan shall
show how interior noise levels would be'
controlled to acceptable .levels.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance
of building
permits
The acceptable level will depend on the type
of use as set forth in the noise insulation plan.
Interior noise levels could be controlled
adequately by using sound-rated windows in
windows closest to the streets and the
freeway.
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 41
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-NOISE-2: Except for local deliveries,
restrict heaVy truck traffic to designated
arterial roadways and truck routes within the
Project area and limit the hours of local'
deliveries to d~ytime hours as established by
the City.
Individual
project
developers
Dublin
Cormnunity
Development
Department
During project
operation
SM-TRAFFIC-l: Project developers shall
contribute a pro-rata share to the widening of
the 1-580 eastbound off-ramp approach at
Hacienda Drive to add a third eastbound left
turn lane.
The City of Dublin shall implement this
mitigation measure in coordination with the
City of pleasanton and Caltrans. This
improvement shall occur when traffic
impacts from individual projects are
determined to trigger the need for this
improvement based on traffic impact studies
of the individual projects.
Individual
project
developers
City of DUblin
Public Works
Department;
City of
Pleasanton and
Caltrans
When traffic
impacts from
individual
projects trigger
need for
additional lane
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 42
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
RespOnsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-TRAFFIC-2: Project developers shall
contribute a pro-rata share to the widening of
the northbound Hacienda Drive overcrossing
from 3 lanes to 4 lanes including three
through lanes and one auxiliary lane that
leads exclusively to the 1-580
Individual
project
developers
City of Dublin
Public Works
Department;
City of
Pleasanton and
Caltrans
When traffic
impacts from
individual
projects trigger
need for
additional lane
westbound lo0p on-ramp. The westbound
loop on-ramp shall be modified as necessary.
Project developers also shall contribute to
widening the westbound off ramp approach
to add a third westbound left-turn lane.
The City of Dublin shall implement this
mitigation measure in coordination with the
City of Pleasanton and Caltrans. This
improvement shall occur when traffic
impacts from individual projects are
determined to trigger the need for this
improvement based on traffic impact studies
of the individual projects.
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page43
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-TRAFFIC-3: Project developers shall
contribute a pro-rata share to construction
which converts the eastbound Santa Rita off-
ramp through lane to a shared left
turn/through lane. Project developers also
shall contribute to a traffic signal upgrade
which includes a westbound right-turn
overlap from Pimlico Drive.
Individual
project
developers
City of Dublin
Public Works
Department;
City of
Pleasanton and
Caltrans
When traffic
impacts from
individual
projects trigger
the need for
stated
improvements
The City of Dublin shall implement this
mitigation measure in coordination with the
City of Pleasanton and Caltrans. This
improvement shall occur when traffic
impacl~s from individual projects are
determined to trigger the need for this
improvement based on traffic impact studies
of the individual projects.
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page44
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-TRAFFIC-4: The Project developers
shall install a traffic signal at the Dublin
Boulevard/Street D intersection at the time
development occurs in this area utilizing this
intersection.
Project developers shall implement this
mitigation measure when the traffic signal
installation at Dublin Boulevard/Street D
becomes warranted based on the estimated
additional trips from individual projects, as
determined by 'traffic impact studies of the
individual projects.
Individual
project
developers
City of Dublin
Public Works
Department
When traffic
impacts from
individual
projects trigger
the need for
traffic signal
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and AImexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 45
Mitigation Measure
hnplementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-TRAFFIC-5: The Project developers
shall install a traffic signal at the Fallon
Road/Project Road intersection at the time
development occurs in this area utilizing this
intersection.
Project developers shall implement this
mitigation measure when the traffic signal
installation at Fallon Road/Project Road
becomes warranted based on the estimated
additional trips, from individual projectS, as
determined by traffic impact studies of the
individual projects.
Individual
project
developers
City of Dublin
Public Works
Department
When traffic
impacts from
individual
projects trigger
the need for a
traffic signal
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 46
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification'
SM-TRAFFIC-6: Project developers shall
contribute a pro-rata share to configure the
eastbound Dublin Boulevard approach to
include 1 left-turn lane, three through lanes
and two right turn lanes. Project developers
shall contribute a pro-rata share to configure
the west bound Dublin Boulevard approach
to include three left-turn lanes, two through
lanes, and one shared through/right-turn
lane. Project developers shall contribute a
pro-rata share to configure the northbound
Dougherty Road approach to include three
left-turn lanes, three through lanes and two
right-turn lanes. Project developers shall
contribute a pro-rata share to configure the
southbound Dougherty Road approach to
include two left turn lanes, three through
lanes, and one shared through/right-turn
Individual
project
developers
City of Dublin
Public Works
Depart~nent
When traffic
impacts from
individual
projects trigger
the need
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 47
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
lane. The 1-580 w~estbound diagonal on-ramp
from Dougherty Road shall be widened as
necessary to include two single-occupancy
vehicle lanes. In addition, the City will
monitor the intersection for peak hour
volumes on a periodic basis, as described
below, and will apply appropriate Project :
conditions based on the results of such
monitoring, as suggested below.
The Project developers shall pay their pro-
rata share of the cost to construct these
improvements through payment of the
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee. The City
will implement these improvements.
However, these improvements will not be
able to reduce the intersection impacts to an
acceptable LOS. Additional improvements to
reduce the intersection impacts to an
acceptable LOS would
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 48
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
require adding a foUrth northbound left turn
lane and other improvements. Allowing four
lanes of traffic to perform a left turn
movement simultaneously would raise major
concerns regarding the safety of such an
operation. In addition, these additional
improvements to reduce this impact are not
feasible given the physical constraints at the
Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard
intersection. Adjacent properties to the
intersection are already built out and efforts
are now being made to acquire additional
right-of-way to implement the above
improvements (in Supplemental Mitigation
Traffic 6) in the future. It is recommended
that the City monitor the intersection for
peak hour volumes on a periodic basis and
continue to obtain updated volume forecasts
for future hori2on years (i.e., Year 2025).
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 49
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
Such monitoring will be done to assist the
City and Project developer to comply with
General Plan Policies requiring
implementation of transportation measures
to improve levels of service. Such
transportation measures to be considered at
the Stage 2 Development Plan include
requiring a comprehensive transportation
demand p~ogram; ride sharing; free or
discounted BART or other transit passes for
employees; vanpools; staggered work hours;
and other trip reduction programs as
specified in Chapter 5 (Travel Demand
Management Element) of the ACCMA
Congestion Management Program. In
addition, current and future phases of the 1-
580 Smart Corridor Project (i.e., state-of-the-
art systems deployment for traffic
monitoring, indident management, and
regional traffic coordination among the cities
of
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 50
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
Dublin, Livermore and Pleasanton, Alameda
County, and Caltrans) would likely relieve
some congestion at the Dougherty
Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection through
ITS (Intelligent Transportation Systems)
measures and discourage traffic from
diverting off the freeway due to congestion
or incidents.
SM-TRAFFIC-7: The Project developers
shall construct an additional through lane on
northbound Fallon Road (for a total of four
through lanes), construct an additional left-
turn lane on westbound Dublin Boulevard
(for.a total of three left-turn lanes) and
construct an additional through lane on
southbound Fallon Road (for a total of four
through lanes). In addition, the City will
monitor~
Individual
project
developers
City of Dublin
Public Works
Department
When traffic
impacts from
individual
projects trigger
the need for
stated
improvements
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 51
Mitigation Measure
Implementing Monitoring Monitoring
Responsibility . Responsibility Schedule
Verification
the intersection for peak hour volumes on a
periodic basis, as described below, and will
apply appropriate Project conditions based
on the results of such monitoring, as
suggested below.
Project developers shall implement this
mitigation measure when traffic impacts
from individual projects are determined to
trigger the need for this improvement based
on traffic impact studies of the individual
projects.
SM-TRAFFIC-& In addition to the above.
additional lane co~ffigur_ations (in
Supplemental Mitigation Traffic 7), the
Project developers shall pay for studies to
assess the feasibility of locating the Fallon
Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection farther
north to allow for a signalized Project
intersection bebveen the 1-580 westbound
ramps/Fallon Road intersection and the
Fallon Road/Dublin Boulevard
Individual
project
developers
City of Dublin
Public Works
Department
When traffic
impacts from
individual
projects trigger
the need ·
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporth~g Program
City of Dublin
Page 52
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
intersection (the "auxiliary intersection").
This new Project auxiliary intersection should
consist of seven northbound Fallon Road
lanes (2 left, 4 through, 1 right), seven
southbound Fallon Road lanes (2 left turn, 4
through, 1 right turn), and 4 lanes for the
new Project street; in the westbound
direction three left turn lanes and a shared
through/right turn lane; and in the
eastbound direction, two right-turn lanes,
one through and two left turn lanes. If the
studies show that a new Project auxiliary
intersection in such location is feasible, the
Project developers shall construct such
intersection.
Project developers shall implement this
mitigation measure when traffic impacts
from individual projects are determined to
trigger the need for this improvement based
on traffic impact studies of the individual
projects.
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 53
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-TRAFFIC-9: The Project developers
shall be responsible for widening Fallon
Road between 1-580 and Dublin Road to its
ultimate eight lanes and shall be responsible
for widening Fallon Road between Dublin
Boulevard and Central Parkway to its
ultimate six-lane width. The Project
developers shall be responsible for widening
Fallon Road between Central Parkway and
Project Road to four lanes. The Project
developers also shall be responsible for
widening the Fallon Road overcrossing
(between the eastbound and westbound 1-580
ramps) from four lanes to six lanes.
Project developers shall implement this
mitigation measure when traffic impacts
from individual projects are determined to
trigger the need for this improvement based
on traffic impact studies of the individual
projects.
Individual
project
developers
City of Dublin
Public Works
Department
When traffic
impacts from
individual
projects trigger
the need
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 54
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-TRAFFIC-10: The Project developers
Shall be responsible for widening Central
Parkway between Tassajara Road and Fallon
Road from two lanes to four lanes.
Project developers shall implement this
mitigation measure when traffic impacts
from individual projects are determined to
trigger the need for this improvement based
on traffic impact studies of the individual
projects.
Individual
project
developers
City of Dublin
Public Works
Department
When traffic
impacts from
individual
projects trigger
the need
East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monito. ring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 55
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-TRAFFIC-A: The City shall monitor the
intersection for peak hour volumes on a periodic
basis and continue to obtain updated volume
forecasts for future horizon years (i.e., Year 2025).
Such monitoring will be dor/e to assist the City
and Project developer to comply with General
Plan Policies requiring implementation of
transportation measures to improve levels of
service. Such transportation measures to be
considered as part of the Stage 2 Development
Plan include requiring a comprehensive
transportation demand program; ride sharing; free
or discounted BART or other transit passes for
employees; vanpools; staggered work hours; and
other trip reduction programs as specified in
Chapter 5 (Travel Demand Management Element)
of the ACCMA Congestion Management
Program. In addition, the City shall implement
the 1-580 Smart Corridor Project, which would
likely relieve some congestion at the Hacienda
Drive/Dublin Boulevard intersection through
ITS measures and discourage traffic from
diverting off the freeway due to congestion or
incidents.
City of Dublin/
Individual project
developers
City of Dublin
Public Works
Department
As part of
submittal for
Stage 2 PD
Rezoning/
When traffic
impa.cts from
individual
projects trigger
the need
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
City of Dublin
Page 56
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring -
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-UTS-l: Prior to approval of future
Subdivision Maps or Site Development
Review applications (as may be applicable)
by the City of Dublin, project developers
shall submit "will serve" letters from DSRSD
indicating that adequate water is avaiIable to
serve the proposed development project.
SM-UTS-2: Require discretionary City
review prior to the installation and use of
distributed generators, including emergency
generators.
Individual
project
developers
Individual
project
developers
City of Dublin
Public Works
Department
City Of Dublin
Public Works
Department
Prior to
approval of
future
Subdivision
Maps or Site
Development
Review
applications
Prio~ to
approval o~
future
Subdivision
Maps or Site
Development
Review
applications
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 57
Mitigation Measure
Implementing
Responsibility
Monitoring
Responsibility
Monitoring
Schedule
Verification
SM-UTS-3: Prior to approval of future
subdivision maps or Site Development
Review applications (as may be applicable)
by the City of Dublin, project developers
shall submit "will serve" letters from PG&E
indicating that adequate electricity and
nfitural gas services are available to serve the
proposed development project.
Individual
project
developers
City of Dublin
Public Works
Department
Prior to
approval of
future
Subdivision
Maps or Site
Development
Review
applications
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Dublin
Page 58
RESOLUTION NO. XX-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING THE PREANNEXATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND BRADDOCK AND LOGAN GROUP II, L.P.
WHEREAS, an agreement between the City of Dublin and Braddock and Logan Group II, L.P.
entitled "Preannexation Agreement Between City of Dublin and Braddock and Logan Group II, L.P.", a
copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1.
WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended the approval of said agreement.
WHEREAS, the applicant, Braddock and Logan Group II, L.P., has executed said agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE THAT: said agreement is hereby approved and execution thereof by the Mayor of
Dublin is hereby authorized.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of October 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
G:\PA#\2000\00-025\CC Staff Reports and Resos\CC Reso annex-011.doc
Attachment 3
City of Dublin
When Recorded Mail To:
City Clerk
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Space above this line for Recorder's Use
PREANNEXATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DUBLIN and
BRADDOCK AND LOGAN GROUP !1
THIS AGREEMENT dated for identification this day of ,2001, is entered
into by and between the City of Dublin, a municipal corporation ("the City") and
Braddock and Logan Group II, Limited Partnership ("Developer").
Recitals
1. In 1993, the City Council of the City'adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan
Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ("the Specific Plan").
2. The General Plan and the Specific Plan include goals and policies to prevent
development within the Eastern Extended Planning Area and the Specific Plan Area
(hereinafter collectively "Eastern Dublin")frOm drawing upon and diluting the fiscal base
of the remainder of the City.
3. The fiscal analysis included in the SpeCific Plan anticipates the last new fire
station'in Eastern Dublin will become operational in the year 2010.
4. A condition was imposed on the developer of Dublin Ranch Area A in
Resolution 00-36 of the Dublin Planning Commission to construct or fund construction
of a new fire station in Eastern Dublin. In addition, Condition 109 of said Resolution
obligates the Dublin Ranch Area A developer to fund any deficit between costs
associated with services to properties in Eastern Dublin and revenues from such area,
less amounts which other owners seeking development entitlements should pay for
such deficit. Development of the Annexation Area will benefit from construction of the
neW fire station.
5. Braddock and Logan is the fee title owner of that certain real property within
Eastern Dublin consisting of approximately 159.5 acres identified as Parcel No. 2 on the
map attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Property Map") and described more particularly
in Exhibit B (the "Braddock and Logan Property") and hOlds an option interest to
purchase that certain undeveloped real property consisting of approximately 314.42
Preannexation Agreement Between the City of Dublin
and Braddock and Logan Group II
Page 1 of 10
October 10, 2001
E H. B,!TI To ATTACHMENT
acres identified in the Property Map as Parcel No. 1, which property is owned by Fallon
Enterprises, (collectively described as the "Braddock and Logan Interests").
6. The Developer has filed an application with requesting that the City apply to
the Alameda Local Agency' Formation Commission ("LAFCO") to annex to the City the
Braddock and Logan Interests, the Chen Property, and certain other land ('~[he
Annexation Area")'within the Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment Area (the
"Project") and requesting that the City prezone the Annexation Area. Collectively, the
following properties, along with the Braddock and Logan Interests and the Chen
Property, make up the Annexation Area, ali of which are shown on the PropertY Map
and incorporated herein by reference:
a. Certain real property consisting of approximately 0.8 acres identified in the
Property Map as Parcel No. 12 and owned in fee title by EBJ Partners,
L.P.;
b. Certain real property consisting of approximately 0.2 acres identified in the
Property Map as Parcel No. t3 and owned in fee title by Pleasanton
Ranch Investments;
c. Certain real property consisting of approximately 48.9 acres' identified in
the Property Map as Parcel No, 8 and owned in fee title by Anderson
Second Family Limited Partnership;
d. Certain undeveloped real property consisting of approximately 39.8 acres
identified in the Property Map as Parcel NO. 10 and owned in fee title by
Branaugh;
e. Certain undeveloped real property consisting of approximately 8.8 acres
identified in.the Property Map as Parcel No. 11 and owned in fee title by
Campbell;
f. Certain undeveloped real property consisting of approximately 164 acres
identified in the Property Map as Parcel Nos. 5 and 6 and owned in fee
title by Croak;
g. Certain undeveloped real property consisting of approximately 48.8 acres
identified in the Property Map as Parcel No. 9'and owned in fee title by
.Righetti Partners.
h. Certain undeveloped real property consisting of approXimately 135.6 acres
identified in the Property Map as Parcel No. 7 and owned in fee title by
Robert Chen.
i. Certain undeveloped real property consisting of approximately 189.1 acreS
identified in the Property Map as Parcel Nos. 3 and 4 and owned in fee
title by First American Title Guarantee ("the Jordan Property").
(Properties listed in (a) through (h) are collectively described as "Noncontributing
Properties.")
7. It is currently estimated that the cost of providing public services to the
Eastern Dublin Area at a level consistent with services provided within the City will not
Preannexation Agreement Between the City of Dublin
and BraddOck and Logan Group II
Page 2 of 10
October 10, 2001
exceed revenues generated to the City from property within Eastern Dublin until the new
fire station is operational.
10. If new development occurs within the Eastern Dublin Area as anticipated,
it is eXpected to generate revenues to the City that will reduce and, in the near futurel
eliminate the above-described Potential deficit. However, even With development,
deficits may occur. Consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and
· Specific Plan, Developer will pay to City the Developer's proportionate share of any
such deficits, as provided herein. Developer's proportionate share shall be 34.01%
(thirty-four and one one-hundredths percent), which is the percentage that the
Annexation Area (1,120 acres) is of the lands in Eastern Dublin that had not been
annexed to the City as of July 25, 2000, the date of Resolution 00-36 (1,929.84 acres)
plus the Dublin Ranch Project (1,363.29 acres).
11. Certain improvements to the 1-580/Fallon Road Interchange ("Fallon
Interchange Improvements',) must be constructed in order to facilitate development on
the Annexation Area. City has previously entered into an agreement with the Lin Family
for funding the construction of the Interchange Improvements with developers of
property within the City. The Lin Family has agreed to advance approximately
$8,000,000 to the City for the Fallon Interchange Improvements. The agreement
requires the City to seek reimbursement from non-contributing developers (as defined in
the Lin Family agreement) prior to the issuance of building permits to the non-
contributing developer. Development of the Annexatiori Area will benefit from
construction of the Fallon Interchange Improvements.
12. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan anticipates that Fallon. Road, currently a
two-lane county road along the western edge of the Annexation Area, will eventually be
a six-lane roadway. Fallon Road currently runs along the western boundary of the
Jordan Property and provides access to a residence on the Jordan Property; the
developer of Dublin Ranch Area A is currently improving two-lane Fallon Road in its
current location to provide access to Dublin Ranch Area A. The alignment in the
Specific Plan would relocate FallOn Road further to the east and into the Jordan
Property. The current owners of the Jordan Property do not wish to develop their
property for the immediately foreseeable future and wish to continue residing on the
property. To temporarily allow the current Owners to continue to reside on the Jordan
Property, the City is amenable to temporarily increasing Fallon Road to four lanes in its
current location ("Interim Location"), so long as the expansion to four lanes in the
Interim Location is entirely funded by the Developer.
Preannexation Agreement Between the City 'of Dublin
and Braddock and Logan Group 11
Page 3 of 10
October 10, 2001
AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and conditions
contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:
Section I. General Fund Shortfalls
A. The Developer's Payment Obligations; Definitions. Developer shall
pay the City 34.01% of the deficit, if any, between Public Service Costs and General
Revenues. "Public Service Costs" shall mean the City of Dublin General Fund cost of
providing public services to the Eastern Dublin Area at a level consistent with public
services provided within the incorporated area of the City prior to the annexation.
"General Revenues" shall mean those revenues deposited to the City's general fund
from property and inhabitants within the Eastern Dublin Area. "Eastern Dublin Area"
shall include all lands within the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area (see
map attached as Exhibit C) that are within the City limits of Dublin.
B. Duration of Payment Obligations. The Developer's payment obligation
under this Section I shall begin when a deficit exists and shall terminate when there is
no longer a deficit but in no event shall the obligation extend beyond June 30, 2010
("Deficit Period"). The Developer's payment obligations may be terminated only' by
detachment of the Annexation Area from the City or by separate agreement approved
by the City. Should development on any portion of the Annexation Area fail to occurby
June 30, 2010, and the Annexation Area therefore fails to generate sufficient revenues
to the City to provide City services to the property, Developer agrees not to protest the
detachment of the Annexation Area (or any portion of the Annexation Area) from the
city.
C. Annual Fiscal Analyses. The City shall prepare a fiscal analysis each
year during the Deficit PeriOd to estimate the amount by which the Public Service Costs
will exceed General Revenues. The fiscal analysis will be prepared on a fiscal year
basis (July 1 to June 30) and will calculate the deficit for the preceding fiscal year.
D. Payments to the City. No later than October 1 of each year during the
Deficit Period, Developer shall pay to City 34.01% of the deficit between Public Services
Costs and General Revenues for the preceding fiscal year, based on the fiscal analysis,
plus 34.01% of the cost of the fiscal analysis described in Section. I.C; The payment
obligations under this section shall be proportionately reduced if LAFCO approves an
annexation of less than 1,120 acres.
E. ' Security for Payment, At such time as requested by the City Manager,
Developer will provide the City with security in an amount and form satisfactory to the
City Manager, to become effective once the Annexation Area becomes part of the City,
to secure the payments to the City described in Section I.D above. The security may
consiSt of a letter of credit or similar instrument. Developer agrees that the City shall be
Preannexation Agreement Between the City of Dublin
and Braddock and Logan Group II
Page 4 of 10
October 10, 2001
under no obligation to continue processing any land use entitlement applications for
Developer's property if security has not been provided, when requested.
F. Reimbursement From Noncontributing Properties. The City shall
consider fair and appropriate ways of reimbursing the Developer some. of the amounts
Developer may be required to pay under this Section I from the owners of the
Noncontributing Properties. To the extent permitted by law, the City shall require
owners of the Noncontributing Properties seeking City approval of development
entitlements for such property to pay to the City for payment to Developer a fair and
proportionate share of the amounts that Developer is required to pay pursuant to this
Section I. All such payments received by the City from Noncontributing Properties shall
be paid to the owners or successors in interest of the Braddock and Logan Property.
Section II.
Payment to City for Fallon Interchange Improvements
A. Advance of Monies by Developer. Developer agrees not oppose the
City's imposition of conditions on future land-use approvals that require Developer to
advance, prior to approval of final subdivision maps or, if no subdivision map is required
for the development of a particular property, prior to approval, of stage 2 development
plans, monies for the construction of the Fallon Interchange Improvements. Such
advances are required by the City's agreement with the Lin Family.
B. Use of Monies by City. City will use the monies paid by Developer
pursuant to' Section II of this Agreement, together with any interest earned thereon, for
construction of the Fallon Interchange Improvements or to reimburse the Lin Family for
their contributions. As used herein, "construction" shall include preliminary engineering,
preparation of project study report, project report, plan specifications and estimates,
engineering, environmental documentation and review, right-of-way acquisition (if
necessary), permits, processing, utility relocation, construction, construction inspection,
project management, and inspection.
City shall be under no obligation to use the monies paid by Developer until such
time that City has adequate monies to construct the Interchange Improvements.
C. Credit Against TIF. City will provide a credit to Developer in the amount
of Developer's payment of monies under this Section II, to be used by Developer
against payment of the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee ("TIF"). The use of credits
(including limitations on the use of credits and payment of a portion of the TIF in cash)
and manner of conversion of the credit to a right of reimbursement will be as determined
in the development, agreement between Developer and the City. The following
provisions will be included in the development agreement, at a minimum: (a) the
Developer shall pay an administrative fee of one-half of one percent or $1,000
whichever is greater; (b) the credit shall be granted at the time Developer makes
payments of money pursuant to this agreement; and (c) the credit may be used only
against the Category I TIF.
Preannexation Agreement Between the City of Dublin
and Braddock and Logan Group II
Page 5 of 10
October 10, 2001
D. Reimbursement From Noncontributing Properties. The City shall
consider fair and appropriate ways of reimbursing the Developer some of the amounts
Developer may be required to pay under this Section II from the owners of the
Noncontributing Properties. To the extent permitted by law, the City shall require
owners of the Noncontributing Properties seeking City approval of deVelopment
entitlements for such property to paY to the City for payment to the Developer a fair and
proportionate share of the amounts that Developer is required to pay pursuant to this
Section I1. All such payments received by the City from NOncontributing Properties shall
be paid to the owners or successors in interest of the Braddock and Logan Property.
Section III. Payment of Funds for Construction of Eastern Dublin Fire Station
A. Reimbursement for Construction of Eastern Dublin Fire Station.
Developer agrees not oppose a requirement on future development approvals that
requires the Developer to pay funds, prior to approval of final subdivision maps or, if no
subdivision map is required to facilitate, tJ~e development of a particular property, prior to
approval of stage 2 development plans, in order to allow the City to reimburse the
developer of Dublin Ranch Area A (DP, Acquisitions, L.L.C.).for its advance of costs to
construct and equip the new Eastern Dublin fire station (Fire Station 18). Because
construction has not yet been completed, the cOsts of construction are currently
unknown. The City anticipates that the amount of the payment will be based on the
Developer's proportionate share of the benefits from fire station conStruction. For
instance, the payment may be based on percentageof acreage that a developer's
property bears to the total acreage of the Eastern Dublin area. Thus, for illustrative
purposes, if the Annexation Area were developed as a single project, it would be
required to pay 34.1% of the costs of construction of the new Eastern Dublin fire station.
B. Credit Against Fire Impact Fee. City will provide a credit to Developer in
the amount of Developer's payment of monies under this Section ill, to be used by
Developer against payment of Fire Facilities Fee. The amount of the credit, once
established, shall not be increased for inflation and shall not accrue interest. The
credits may be used by Developer against payment of the Fire Facilities Fee for any
project in Dublin Or, with written notice to City, may be transferred by Developer to
another developer of land in Dublin.
If Developer has not been able to use the credits within ten years of the City's
acceptance of Fire Station 18 ImProvements, the remaining credits will convert to a right
of reimbursement and shall terminate after ten years. Any reimbursement shall be from
Fire Facilities Fees only, if available. Other aspects of the credit and right of
reimbusement shall be consistent with the City's Traffic Impact Fee Guidelines.
C. Effect on Noncontributing Properties. The City anticipates that the
Payment obligations anticipated to be imposed on Developer pursuant to this Section Iil
will be imposed on the developers of the Noncontributing Properties at such time as
they seek discretionary land use approvals from the City.
Preannexation Agreement Between the City of Dublin
and Braddock and Logan Group II
Page 6 of 10
October 10, 2001
Section IV. Funding for Interim Location of'Fallon Road
A. Costs of Interim Location. Developer agrees to fund all costs of
expanding Fallon Road to four lanes in the Interim Location. Developer's obligation
under this Section IV is limited to the segment of Fallon Road from the future
intersection with Dublin Boulevard on the south to the southern boundary of Dublin
Ranch Area A on the north. Such costs shall include, but not be limited to, preliminary
engineering, plan specifications and estimates, engineering, environmental
documentation and review, right-of-way acquisition (if necessary), permits, processing,
utility relocation, construction, construction inspection, project management,, and
inspection. Such costs shall also include, but not be limited to, costs incurred in
demolishing the Interim Location.
B. Security for Payment. At such time as requested by the City Manager,
but no later than the first discretionary land use approval on the Braddock and Logan
Interests, Developer will provide the City with security in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City Manager to secure the payments to the City described in Section
IV.A above, The security may consist of a letter of credit or similar instrument.
Developers each agree that the City shall be under no obligation to continue processing
any land use entitlement applications for Developers' property if security has not been
provided, when requested.
C. Reimbursement From Noncontributing Properties. The City shall
consider fair and appropriate ways of reimbursing the Developer some of the amounts
Developer may be required to pay under this Section IV from the owners of the
Noncontributing Properties. To the extent permitted by law, the City shall require
owners of the Noncontributing Properties seeking City approval of development
entitlements for such property to pay to the City for payment to Developer a fair and
proportionate share of the amounts that Developer is required to pay pursuant to this
Section IV. All such payments received by the City from Noncontributing Properties
shall be paid to the owners or successors in interest of the Braddock and Logan
Property.
Section V. Approval of Annexation
This Agreement shall take effect when the City adopts a resolution of application
to annex the Annexation Area, with or without conditions or, if the Developer files a
petition to annex, upon adoption of an ordinance or resolution rezoning any portion of
the property. Upon such action by the City, the City shall take reasonable steps to
facilitate annexation of the Annexation Area in a timely manner. This Agreement shall
become ineffective, however, if the annexation is not approved by LAFCO or the voters.
or does not become effective for any other 'reason.
Preannexation Agreement Between the City of Dublin
and Braddock and Logan Group II
Page 7 of 10
October 10, 2001
Section VI.
Additional Provisions
A. Correctness of the Recitals. The Recitals set forth in this Agreement
are true and correct and are a part hereof.
B. Further Assurances. The Parties shall execute, acknowledge, and
deliver such additional documents or instruments as may be necessary to carry out the
intent of this Agreement, including but not limited to, those expressly referred to in this
Agreement.
C. Construction by CaliforniaLaw. This.Agreement is entered into in the
State of California and shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with its laws.
D, Representation of Comprehension of Document. In entering into this
Agreement, the Parties represent that they have relied upon the legal advice of their
attorneys who are the attorneys of.their choice. The Parties further represent that the
terms of this Agreement have been completely read by and explained to them by their
attorneysl and that they fully understand and voluntarily accept those terms.
E, Authorship. Each Party and counsel for each Party has reviewed and
revised this Agreement, and accordingly, the normal rule of construction to the effect
that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed
in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendment of it.
F. Authority to Execute. Each of the persons executing this agreement on
behalf of a legal entity represents and warrants that each has full power to enter into
this Agreement on behalf of the entity and that the Agreement. is binding on the entity.
G.' Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement contains the entire
agreement between the Parties with regard to the matters set forth. There are no
additional written or oral agreements or promises between the Parties concerning these
matters which are not expressly set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement may be
amended or modified only by an agreement in writing executed in the same manner as
this Agreement.
H. Attorneys' Fees. In the event a Party to this Agreement is found in a
court of law to have breached this Agreement, said Party shall pay the opposing Party's
reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in litigating the breach of contract action.
I. Approval of Project. By'entering into this Agreement, City makes no
commitment that it will approve the Project.
J. Notices. All notices shall be by certified mail or hand delivered to the
Parties as follows:
Preannexation Agreement Between the City of Dublin
and Braddock and Logan Group. II
Page 8 of 10
October 10, 2001
To the City:
City Manager
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
P. O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
To the Developer:
Braddock and Logan:
Marshall Torre
Braddock and Logan Services, Inc.
4155 Blackhawk Plaza Circle, Suite 201
Danville, CA 94506
K. Recordation. 'This Agreement shall be recorded against the Property
described in Exhibit B (the Braddock and Logan Property).
L. Counterparts, This Agreement may be executed in as many
counterparts as may be deemed necessary and convenient, and by the different parties
hereto on separate counterparts, each of which, when so executed, shall be deemed an
original, but all such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.
M. Exhibits. The following exhibits are appended to this agreement:
1. Exhibit A.
2. Exhibit B.
3. Exhibit C.
Map of Annexation Area
Property Description of Braddock and Logan Property
Map of Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment Area
[SIGNATURE BLOCKS ON NEXT PAGE]
Preannexation Agreement Between the City of Dublin
and Braddock and Logan Group II
Page 9 of 10
October 10, 2001
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement the day and
year first above written.
CITY OF DUBLIN
DEVELOPER
Guy S. HoUston, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Breddp:k and Lo~en Group II, L.p,
ua~ ~o ~a ± te~p ~tncrsn~p
~y: ~ra~ock ~.~o~an §er¥1ces, Inc.
a ua±l~ornla ¢orporaglon
.-----%~G~neral Partner
[Officer]~,~ffrey Lawrence, V±ce Pre$±dene
City Attorney
Attest:
City Clerk
[NOTARIZATIONS ATTACHED]
C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OLK8055\annexation agreement_101001 .doc
Preannexation Agreement.Between the City of Dublin
and Braddock and Logan Group II
Page 10 of 10
October 10, 2001
ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
On 0~.w~O~t- !/ ~00 / before me,
(DATE) J
personally
appeared
ersonally known to me - OR -
SS.
(NOTARY)
SIGNER(S)
[] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory.
evidence to be the person¢:)-whose name(~
is/j~r.e~subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that ho ~h. ~**.~-.
-~, .... , .... j executed
the same in ~;o,~,~ authorized
capacity~), and that by his~
signatures~on the instrument the person~,
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person~ acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
NO SIGNATURE
~ OPTIONAL INFORMATION ~
The information below is not required by law. However, it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this acknowl-
edgement to an unauthorized document.
CAPACITY CI,ADIED BY SIGNER (PRINCIPAL}
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE(S)
'~ PARTNER(S)
[--] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMEt~F
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: RIGHT THUMBPRINT
~O~i~NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITYfIES)t~~ ~- ~)~ ~[ ~~' ,kP OF
. SIGNER
OTHER
.=~
APA 5/99 VALLEY-SIERRA, 800-362-3369
Exhibit A
East Dublin
Annexation Area
2
mACKAY&StoPS
12 }~,/13
1-580
9
6
EXHIBIT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
cD/
REAL PROPERTY in the City of Pleasanton, Township of Murray, County
of Alameda, state of California, described as follows:
The northwest ¼ of Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 1 East, MOunt
Diablo Base and Meridian.
Excepting that portion conveyed to County of Alameda by deed recorded
January 2, 1918. in Book 2630 of Deeds, Page 80, Alameda County Records.
APN: 905-0002-003
EXHIBIT
I
i I
· ~ General Commercial may be permitted by a Planned Development Zoning Process (see text tot complete discussion ]
'~q~ Wa convert to Future Study Al'ea/Agdcull~re where determined inconsistent with APA [see text for complete discussion}
FUTURE STUDY AREA
AGRICULTURE
2743.9 Acres
L
Acres
(Crosby}
General Plan
-Eastern Extended Planning Area
LAND USE MAP
Legend
COMMERCIAL
Neighborhood Commercial
General Commercial
Carn~us Dirge
Industrial Park
RESIDENTIAL
~ High Density 25- du/ac
~ Medium-High Density14-25 du/ac
~ Medium Density 6-14 du/ac
~ LOw Density O-6 d~/ac
~ Rural RealdentiaVAghc~iure 1 di~lO0 ac
PUBLiC/SEMFPUBUC/OPEN
~ '¢~blia/Semi-Pub~ FacatY
B
ementary School
Junior High Schoot
:,~ High School
~ PublicJSemi-Pub~c
p~l~s & Recreation
~) 'City Park
~ Community Park
~ .Neighborhood Park
N¢ighbgrhood Square
Ope~ Space
~?eam Corridor
~--~ ^rtedal Street
.... Cbllect0r Street
......... Tra'~t Sr~s
.... (~eO.~_ral ~arl Amendment Study Area
. . .,~p~?ific Ban S~dy Area
DUBLIN
'~'~' -t~a~Cff.'~b6~l~ ;~ Tqdd Figure 2B
E×H!6ff C__.
RESOLUTION NO. XX-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF APPLICATION FOR REORGANIZATION
FOR PA 00-025, ANNEXATION NO. 13
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the' Cortese-Knox-
Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, commencing with Section 56000 of the
California Govermnent Code, for a reorganization that would concurrently annex territory to the City of
Dublin and the Dublin San Ramon Services District and detach territory from the Livermore Area
Recreation and Park District.
WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has been given, and this
Council has'conducted a public hearing based upon this notification.
WHEREAS, the principal reasons for the proposed reorganization are as follows: to, consistent
with the City of Dublin Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan,
provide the full range of municipal services to the territory.
WHEREAS, the following agencies would be affected by the proposed jurisdictional changes:
Agency
City of Dublin
Dublin San Ramon Services District
Livermore Area Recreation and Park District
Nature of Change
Annexation
Annexation
Detachment
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be reorganized is uninhabited, and a map and a description
of the boundaries of the territory are attached hereto as follows: Exhibit A: Annexation to the City of
Dublin; Exhibit B: Annexation to Dublin San Ramon Services District; Exhibit C: Detachment from
Livermore Area Parks and Recreation District. Exhibits A, B, C are incorporated herein by this reference.
WHEREAS, it is desired that the proposed reorganization be subject to the following renns and
conditions:
a. The effective date of the annexation shall be July 1, 2002.
WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the spheres of influence of the City of Dublin and
DSRSD.
WHEREAS, this proposal is not consistent with the sphere of influence of the Livermore Area
Park and Recreation District, which is coterminous with its boundaries; therefore, it is proposed that its
sphere of influence by concurrently amended.
Attachment 4
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
This resolution of application is hereby adopted and approved and the Local Agency Formation
Commission is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory as authorized
and in the manner provide in the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act
of 2000.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of October 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
G:\PA#k2000\00-025\CC Staff Reports and Resos\CC Reso lafco 9-6-011.doc
UN
g85-0001-002
SERIES No. gg-445131
VICINITY MAP
EXISTING CI1Y OF
DUi~IN 80UNDARY
BOUNOARY UHE OF crrr j % ~PI,r,A~ANTON
~ OF DUBUN ANNEXARON
INTERSTATE 580
11 ~m.Y
']'~,,~ ~ r~LkOa RO~O ROYAL-FORUOSA INC., et al
[ z L_~-:...~ SERIES No. 96-003167 o~
"~A','~JA.n / ,7) ~ ~,--'-'-~ PRO~ON~ATIOff Dm~l I0
985-0006-005 ~ o e:: o
EXISTING ANNEXATION No lO RI N I 4 ~ ~"~
RE: ,,q7§. IM: ~74
ACAOR PAR1NERS fi
rko: DOOLAN WEST ASSOCIATES
985~0007-001
SERIES No. 86-321121
iA CA CIA PAETRERS II
IIka: DOOLAN
I ASSOCIATES
I 9O5-0003-014~03
ISERIES No. 86-321
\
MUEHLHAUSER 'x
ANNEXA'J'IUN lqo.
TO THE CITY OF DUBUN
BY CITY OF DUBLIN RESOLUTION No.
ON
SCALE: 1"=800' DATE: FEBRUARY, 2001
FALLON ENTERPRISES. INC.
985-0007-002-14
RE: 2658, IM: 332
FIRST AMERICAN
TITLE ~ CO.
985-0006-09
SERIFS No. 98~
FIRST AMERICAN
TITLE GUARANIY CO.
985-0006-010
SERIES No. 98-.388140
ROYAL-FORMOSA INC., et ol
985-0006-OO4
SERIES No. 96-003167
INTERSTATE 580 -~,~ ..... ,~**CAMPBEil
CEE ftC'TAll '~'.-~ 905-0001-004-03-
~.~. u~.,n,c, u, SERIES No. 80-092552
9o5 0~o3 o~2 ~. REVISION DATE: OCTOBER 2001
- ' ~. PESTANA '
SERIES No. 98-085650 /
// /)/x SERIES No. 93-239363 III1~1~111 ?~1[ ~illrg
...... / / ~// '(~ FA'mT'ER
~,~w ~ / /~ / / / x,~-~e~ A 905-0003-009-02
905-000,]-011 / / No. ~7-178224 ' '
SERIES No. AW-087~9 /~ 4/
~KINNON "... / /~' /~ ~./ t~"'~'~ SERIES No. 99-246356
905-0005-008 - '~'
SERIES Ho. 80-042265 sY:
]RAODOCK & LOGAN GROUP II, LP.
905-0002-003
SERIES No. 99-065224
I
I
I
I
!
'"'UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT gos-OSO1-002-02
SHEET 1 OF I Ig149-OR
~ PARTNERS I
rko: DO(~J~N EAST ASSOCIATES
905-0002-004
SERIES No, 88-0(:15652
~ 9o5-000,-00,-0~
.//'"'~-SEE DETAIL 'A'
CROAK
905-0002-002
No.
EXHIBIT A To
ATTACHMENT
PAGE 1 OF 4
DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXkTION No. __ (EASTERN DUBLIN)
TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN
19149-0A
10/11/2001
F.C.I.
BEING ALL OF THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS AS CONVEYED IN THE DEEDS TO: "STATE OF CALIFORNIA" [FOR:
CROAK ROAD] AS RECORDED ON THE 7!!! DAY OF JULY, 1967 IN REEL: 1995, IMAGE: 347 [HEREINAFTER CALLED
"STATE DEED 1']; "ROYAL-FORMOSA INC., ETAL" AS RECORDED ON THE 5'm DAY OF JANUARY, 1996 IN SERIES
NO. 96-003167; "FIRST AMERICAN TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY" AS RECORDED ON THE 4!2 DAY OF NOVEMBER,
1998 IN SERIES No. 98-388140; "FALLON ENTERPRISES, INC." AS RECORDED ON THE 21sT DAY OF JULY, 1970 IN
REEL: 2658, IMAGE: 332; "BRADDOCK & LOGAN GROUP II, LP.' AS RECORDED ON THE 1612 DAY OF
FEBRUARY, 1999 IN SERIES No. 99-065224; "FRANCIS P. CROAK" AS RECORDED ON THE 1312 DAY OF
NOVEMBER, 1979 IN SERIES No. 79-229985; "THE ANDERSON SECOND FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP" AS
RECORDED ON THE i412 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1991 IN SERIFS No. 91-305170; "EBJ PARTNERS, LP." AS
RECORDED ON THE 2612 DAY OF IANUARY, 2001 IN SERIES No. 2001029949; "PLEASANTON RANCH
INVESTMENTS." AS RECORDED ON THE 3012 DAY OF JULY, 1973 IN REEL: 3475, IMAGE: 374; "RIGHETTI
PARTNERS, LP." AS RECORDED ON THE 1212 DAY OF MARCH, 1992 IN SERIES No. 92-075343; "JAMES R.
CAMPBELL and DIXIE M. CAMPBELL" AS RECORDED ON THE 2912 DAY OF MAY, 1980 IN SERIES No. 80-092552;
"BRANAUGH ]991 TRUST." AS RECORDED ON THE 23v'v DAY OF OCTOBER, 1996 IN SERIES No. 96-269964; AND
"STATE OF CALIFORNIA" [FOR: COLLIER CANYON ROAD] AS RECORDED ON THE 812 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1968 IN
-REEL: 2122, IMAGE: 473 [HEREINAFTER CALLED "STATE DEED 2"]; ALL AS RECORDED IN ALAMEDA COUNTY
RECORDS, CALIFORNIA; FOR PURPOSES OF ANNEXATION No. __ (EASTERN DUBLIN) TO THE CITY OF
DUBLIN, LYING AND BEING IN THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF "ANNEXATION No. lO (EASTERN DUBLIN) TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN"
AS FILED ON THE 1812 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1995 IN BOOK 204 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 75A AND 75B, ALAMEDA
COUNTY RECORDS, CALIFORNIA, AND SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF
CROAK ROAD, COMMON TO SAID NORTHERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 580, AND SAID POINT
ALSO BEING ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 5°00'05'' EAST [NORTH 5°00'22"
EAST PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. lO'q; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF SAID "ANNEXATION No. 10" THE
FOLLOWING FIFTY (50) COURSES: ALONG THE SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CROAK ROAD IN A
NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION [DESCRIBED IN THE FOLLOWING COURSES (I) THROUGH (5)] (1) ALONG SAID CURVE
[TO THE RIGHT] 797.83 FEET [702.39 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 10"] ALONG THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT
CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1028.11 FEET [1020.00 FEET PER'SAID "ANNEXATION No. ]0"] AND
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°27'44'' [39°27'17" PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. I0"] TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO
TIlE LEFT WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 36°53'29'' WEST [TANGENT REVERSE 'CURVE PER SAID
"ANNEXATION No. 10"]; THENCE (2) 149.05 FEET [241.47 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 10"] ALONG THE ARC OF A
NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 700.07 FEET [700.00 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION No.
JO"] AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°11'56'' [19°45'52" PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. I0"]; THENCE (3)
NORTH 50000'05" EAST, 48.90 FEET [NORTH 50°00'22" EAST 48.92 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 10"]; THENCE (4)
NORTH 39°59'55" WEST, 239.02 FEET [NORTH 39°59'38" WEST 238.99 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 10"] TO A POINT
OF CURVATURE; THENCE (5) 170.92 FEET [170.90 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 10"] ALONG THE ARC OF A
TANGENT CURVE TO TI-IE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 222.02 FEET [222.00 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 10"]
AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°06'26"; THENCE (6) LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
CROAK ROAD ALONG THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY NORTH 84°06'21" WEST, 42.73
FEET [NORTH 84°06'04" WEST 40 FEET MORE OR LESS PER SAID "ANNEV~TIONNo. 10"] TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION
WITH THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF FALLON ROAD; THENCE
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION AND EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF FALLON ROAD
[DESCRIBED IN THE FOLLOWING COURSES (7) THROUGH (10)] (7) NORTH 2°06'49'' EAST, 175.69 FEET [188.00 FEET
MORE OR LESS PER SAID "ANNEXATION No..10"]; THENCE (8) NORTH 87°53'11" WEST, 12.00 PEET; THENCE (9)
NORTH 2°07'21" EAST, 1457,26 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE (10) 205.71' FEET ALONG THE ARC OF
A TANGENT CURVE.TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 429.94 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
27°24'48"; THENCE (11) LEAVING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PALLON ROAD NORTH 88030'52" WEST,
33.93 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CURVING CENTERLINE OF FALLON ROAD AS SHOWN ON TIKE RECORD OF
mAOKAY& SomP$
CIVIl ENGINEERING* LAND PLANNING* LAND suRVEYING
5142 Franklin Drive Sutte B, Pleasanton, CA. 94588-3355
(925) 225-0690
p:\legals\I9149 \Annex-dublin. doc
/ j/~ ~/{/5 19149-0A
PAGE 2 OF 4 10/11/2001
F.C.I.
SURVEY No. 1005, WHICH WAS FILED FEBRUARY h 1993 IN BOOK 16 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, AT PAGE 37
(93,032269), ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS, CALIFORNIA, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 62031'08''
WEST, SAID CENTERLINE ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND SHOWN
ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY
[DESCRIBED IN THE FOLLOWING COURSES (12) THROUGH (50)] (12) 72.58 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON
TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 399.94 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
10°23'54"; THENCE (13) NORTH 37052'46'' WEST, 428.46 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE (14) 308.53
FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 399.94 FEET AND
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°12'02"; THENCE (15) NORTH 6°19'16'' EAST, 1321.37 FEET [1321.27 FEET PER
SAID "ANNEXATION No. 10"] TO A POINT OF CURVATURE, FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 83040'20''
EAST; THENCE (16) 224.14 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 800.55 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°02'30"; THENCE (17) NORTH 22021'46'' EAST,
500.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE (18) 176.40 FEET ALONG TH]E ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE
TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 199.76 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50°35'39"; THENCE
(19) NORTH 28013'53'' WEST, 24.09 FEET; THENCE (20) NORTH 33045'20'' WEST, 128.91 FEET; THENCE (21) NORTH
22056'58'' WEST, 83.13 FEET; THENCE (22) NORTH 10041'42'' WEST, 61.-76 FEET; THENCE (23) NORTH 03°58'13"
WEST, 101.75 FEET; THENCE (24) NORTH 3°49'18'' EAST, 159.00 FEET; THENCE (25) NORTH 30035'37'' WEST, 55.23
FEET; THENCE (26) NORTH 38°49'42" WEST, 90.60 FEET; THENCE (27) NORTH 27021'32'' WEST, 59.83 FEET;
THENCE (28) NORTH 16°43'46'' WEST, 80.16 FEET; THENCE (29) NORTH 4°40'18'' WEST, 58.73 FEET; THENCE (30)
NORTH 82033'39'' WEST, 198.51 FEET; THENCE (3I) NORTH 15045'22'' WEST, 294.24 FEET; THENCE (32) NORTH
13°36'21'' EAST, 453.59 FEET; THENCE (33) SOUTH 89°53'39'' EAST, 470.00 FEET; THENCE (34) NORTH 37°46'21''
EAST 177.15 FEET; TI-IENCE (35) NORTH 27°21'21'' EAST, 182.90 FEET; THENCE (36) NORTH 6°53'39'' WEST, 100.00
FEET; THENCE (37) NORTH 10053'39'' WEST, 130.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE FROM WHICH POINT THE
CENTER BEARS NORTH 22°06'21". EAST; THENCE (38) 153.59 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE
TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 160.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 55°00'00" TO A
POINT OF REVERSE CURVATI/RE; THENCE (39) 26.76 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE
LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET Ab,qD THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15020'00'', TO A POINT OF
REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE (40) 239. i I FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°15'00", TO A POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE: THENCE (41) 102.61 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT C .13RVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 170.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°35'00"; TPIENCE (42) NORTH 28033'39' WEST,
200.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE (43) 164.15 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE
TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 165.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 57°00'00"; THENCE
(44) NORTH 28°26'21" EAST, 217.82 FEET; THENCE (45) NORTH 14°39'29'' WEST, 253.60 FEET TO A POINT OF
CURVATURE FROM WHICH POINT THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 8°35'31" EAST; THENCE (46) 103.66 FEET ALONG
THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 180.00 FEET AND THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°59'45"; THENCE (47) NORTH 22053'39'' WEST, 218.39 FEET; THENCE (48) NORTH 0°06'21"
EAST, 300.00 FEET; THENCE (49) NORTH 48046'28'' EAST, 1910.79 FEET; THENCE (50) NORTH 0°09'11" WEST,
235.96 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWAI ON SAID RECORD OF
SURVEY No. 1005 CONVEYED TO CHANG SU-O-LIN PER BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT MAP APPROVED ON
JANUARY 2, 1992 (BA91-25) ALAMEDA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
OF WHICH WAS FILED NOVEMBER 19, 1992 (SERIES No. 92-376221); THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY
LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005 CONVEYED TO FALLON
ENTERPRISES, INC. (PER SERIES No. 92-376222) PER SAID BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT (BA91-25) SOUTH 89°40'26"
EAST 1485.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FALLON ENTERPRISES TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN
ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID FALLON
ENTERPRISES TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005 SOUTH 0°48'41''' WEST
2642.66 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST ~A OF SECTION 35,
TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 EAST, MO~JiWT DIABLO BASE & MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY
No. 1675 AS FILED ON THE 21~! DAY OF APRIL, 2000 IN BOOK 25 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, AT PAGES 31 AND
32, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS, CALIFORNIA, CONVEYED TO BRADDOCK & LOGAN GROUP 1I, LP. (PER
SERIES No. 99-065224); THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN
lllAI)KAY & $OIlIPS :
' CML ENGINEERINGdLAND PLANNING*LAND SURVEYING
5142 Franklin Drive Suite B, Pleasanton, CA, 94588-3355
(925] 225-0690
p:\legals\lg149\Annex-dublin.do~
j~,,~ (/~/5' 19149-0A ~
PAGE 3 OF 4 10/11/2001
F.C.I.
ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675 CONVEYED TO BRADDOCK & LOGAN GROUP II, L.P. SOUTH 88044'02''
EAST [SOUTH 88043'28'' EAST PER R.O.$. No, 1675] 2640.61 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BRADDOCK
& LOGAN GROUP II, L.P. TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675; TI-IENCE ALONG
THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID BRADDOCK & LOGAN TRACT OF LAND AND CONTINUING ALONG
THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST ~,4 OF SAID SECTION 35 BOTH
AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675 CONVEYED TO CROAK (PER SERIES No. 79-229985) SOUTH
0054'53'' WEST [SOUTH 0055'27'' WEST PER R.O.S. No. 1675] 5288.33 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
CROAK TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675; THENCE ALONG TI-IE SOUTHERLY
PROPERTY LINE OF SAID CROAK TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675 NORTH
89004'24'' WEST [NORTH 89003'50'' WEST PER R.O.S. No. 1675] 274.76 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO BRANA UGH (PER SERIES No. 96-269964); THENCE ALONG TI-IE
EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID BRANAUGH TRACT OF LA_ND AND CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTHERLY
PROLONGATION OF SAID EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE SOUTH 0026'44'' WEST 2858.49 FEET MORE OR LESS TO
THE SOUTI-IEAST CORNER OF SAID "STATE DEED 2"; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF
SAID "STATE DEED 2" NORTH 88°33'16'' WEST 757.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHWF_ST CORNER OF SAID "STATE
DEED 2"; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID "STATE DEED 2" NORTH 0°22'11.' EAST
9.03 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED .TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
("PARCEL SA" PER REEL: 2144, IMAGEi 114) [HEREINAFTER CALLED: "STATE DEED 3"]; THENCE ALONG THE
NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID "STATE DEED $" NORTH 84°41'01'' WEST 74.08 FEET TO AN ANGLE
POINT IN SAID NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY PROPERTY
LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA ("PARCEL I" PER REEL: 2279, IMAGE: 110) II-IEREINAFTER CALLED: "STATE DEED 4"] A.ND COFUi~INUING
ALONG THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE NORTH 88°33'15'' WEST
1544.70 FEET TO A POINT ON TH~ EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THAT. TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO
PLEASANTON RANCH INVESTMENTS (PER REEL: 3475. IMAGE: 374); THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY
LINE OF SAID PLEASANTON RANCH TRACT OF LA_ND SOUTH 0°20'37" WEST 3.79 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID PLEASANTON RANCH TRACT OF LA_ND; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE
OF SAID PLEASANTON RANCH TRACT OF LAND SOUTH 89°59'37'' WEST 221.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID PLEASANTON RANCH TRACT OF LAND; THENCE IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION
PERPENDICULARLY TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CROAK ROAD SOUTH 1°26'50'' WEST' 8.34
FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WA~Y LINE AS MEASURED 56.01 FEET LN A SOUTHERLY
DIRECTION FROM THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID "STATE DEED 1"; THENCE ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AS MEASURED 56.01 FEET pERPENDICULARLY AND CONCENTRIC IN A
SOUTHERLY DIRECTION FROM THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID "STATE DEED I" THE FOLLOWING
THREE (3) COURSES: (51) NORTH 88~33'10'' WEST 316.16 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A TANGENT
CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE (52) ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 5028.49 FEET, A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 3°33'15'', AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 311.93 FEET TO THE BEGINNING POINT OF A TANGENT LINE;
THENCE (53) ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE NORTH"84°59'55" WEST 556.93 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 1,119 ACRES, MORE OR LESS [TOTAL ANNEXATION AREA].
ALL OF: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 905-0001-004-03, 905-0001-004-04,905-0001~005-02, 905-0001-006-03, 905-
0002-001-01,905-0002-002, 905-0002-003, 985-0006-004, 985-0006-006-02, 985-0006-006-03,985-0006-009, 985-0006-010,
985-0007-002-14, UNASSIGNED (SOUTH OF APN #'s 905-0001-004-03 & 905-0001-004-04 - COLLIER CANYON ROAD), AND
UNASSIGNED (SOUTH OF APN # 985-0006-004 - CROAK ROAD),
END OF DESCRIPTION '~
P~ED C. INGALL'g,~'', LICENSED / / DATE ~ ~ 'i
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR No. 5859
OF CALIFORNIA
CML ENGINEERING LAND pLANNING LAND sURVEYING
p:\legat$\ 19149\Annex~ublin.doc
,5142 Franldln Drive Suite B, Plea~anton, CA. 94588-33,55
(92§] 22,5-0690
I
ACACIA PARTNERS I]
UN rko: O00LAN WEST ASSOCIA1ES
985-0001-002 985-0007-001
Sr_RJES No. 99-445131 SERIES No. 86-.121121
_ _
IVICINITY
, ~NSE~S I
I
~ INTg~A~
DBTAIC 'A'
~Jl ~ ~
9~-~6-~5
s~c~~
~A~ 580 ~ ~
9~-~6-~-0~
DETAIL ~B~
RRST AUERiCAN
TIT~ GU~W CO.
985-O006-010
SERIFS No. 98-588140
ROYN_-FORMO,~m. INC., et ol
985-0006~004
SERIES No. 96-003167
INTERSTATE 580
SEE DETAIL 'B
SERIES No. 80-092552
iACACLA PAI~tNERS fl
I rko: O00LAN WEST
ASSOCIAIT5
IdUEHLHAUSER
EXHIBIT {A'
DISTRICT ANNEXATION No.
TO DUBLIN SAN RAMON SF, RVICES DISTRICT
BY DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT
RESOLUTION No .... ON _
SCALE: 1"=800' DATE: FEBRUARY, 2001
REVISION DATE: OCTOBER, 2001
BRADDOCK & LOGAN GROUP II, L,P.
905-00O2-005
SERIES No. 99-065224
905-0005-012 ~ PESTANA
S[RIES No. 98-085650
// /'~SERIES No. 9.1-23936~
S~VA / / /
~ / SE ES NO. 97-17822
~IN~N xx // /( X ~ S~ES No. 99-246356
9~-~3-010-01~ /'~ / ~ )__~'~
SE~ES ~. 99-1729~//
905-~-~
SE~ES No. ~-~2265
9~-~2-004
905-~2-002 ~m ~ ~ ~'
I
905-~1--~1--02 J
I
I
~RU~ V~ ~NT
905-~1-002-02
DETAIL 'A'
EXH,BiT
TO
ATTACHMENT
19149-0A
PAGE 1 OF 4 10/11/200I
F.C.I.
DESCRIPTION OF DUBLIN-SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT ANNEXATION No. __
TO DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT
BEING ALL OF THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS AS CONVEYED IN THE DEEDS TO: "STATE OF CALIFORNIA" [FOR:
CROAK ROAD] AS RECORDED ON THE 7za DAY OF JULY, 1967 IN REEL: 1995, IMAGE: 347 [HEREINAFTER CALLED
"STATE DEED 1 "]; "ROYAL-FORMOSA INC., ETAL" AS RECORDED ON THE 5:m DAY OF JANUARY, 1996 IN SERIES
No. 96-003167; "FIRST AMERICAN TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY" AS RECORDED ON THE 4TM DAY OF NOVEMBER,
1998 IN SERIES No. 98-388140; "FALLON ENTERPRISES, INC." AS RECORDED ON THE 21s'r DAY OF JULY, 1970 IN
REEL: 2658, IMAGE: 332; "BRADDOCK & LOGAN GROUP II, L.P." AS RECORDED ON THE 16'm DAY OF
FEBRUARY, 1999 IN SERIES No. 99-065224; "FRANCIS P. CROAK" AS RECORDED ON THE 13axq DAY OF
NOVEMBER, 1:979 IN SERIES No. 79-229985; "THE ANDERSON SECOND FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP" AS
RECORDED ON THE 14'm DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1991 IN SERIES No. 91-305170; "EBJ PARTNERS, L.P." AS
RECORDED ON THE 26va DAY OF JANUARY, 2001 IN SERIES No. 2001029949; "PLEASANTON RANCH
INVESTMENTS." AS RECORDED ON THE 30~- DAY OF JULY, 1973 IN REEL: 3475, IMAGE: 374; "RIGHETTI
PARTNERS, LP." AS RECORDED ON THE 122!t DAY OF MARCH, 1992 IN SERIES No. 92-075343; "JAMES R.
CAMPBELL and DIXIE M. CAMPBELL" AS RECORDED ON THE 29----- DAY OF MAY, 1980 IN SERIES No. 80-092552;
"BRANAUGH 1991 TRUST." AS RECORDED ON THE 23v'~ DAY OF OCTOBER, 1996 IN SERIES No. 96-269964; AND
"STATE OF CALIFORNIA' [FOR: COLLIER CANYON ROAD] AS RECORDED ON THE 8IJ~! DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1968 IN
REEL: 2122, IMAGE: '473 [I-IEREINAFrER CALLED "STATE DEED 2"]; ALL AS RECORDED IN .ALAMEDA COUNTY
RECORDS, CALIFORNIA; FOR PLrRPOSES OF DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT ANNEXATION No. ,
LYING _~qD BEING IN THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE soUTHEAsT CORNER OF "DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT ANNEXATION No. 94-]"
AS FILED ON THE 18va DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1995 IN BOOK 204 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 76A AND 76B, ALAMEDA
COUNTY RECORDS, CALIFORNIA, AND SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF
CROAK ROAD, COMMON TO SAID NORTHERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 580, AND .SAID POINT
ALSO BEING ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 5°00'05" EAST [NORTH 5°00'22''
EAST PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 94-1"]; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF SAID "ANNEXATION No. 94-]"
THE FOLLOWING FIFTY (50) COURSES: ALONG THE SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CROAK ROAD IN A
NORTHIVESTERLY DIRECTION [DESCRIBED IN THE FOLLOWING COURSES (1) THROUGH (5)1 (1) ALONG SAID CURVE
[TO THE RIGHT] 797.83 FEET [702.39 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 94-1 "] ALONG THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT
CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1028.11 FEET [1020.00 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 94-1"] AND
THROUGH A cENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°27'44" [39°27'17'. PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 94-1 "] TO A POINT ON A CURVE
TO THE LEFT WHosE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 36o53'29" WEST [TANGENT REVERSE CURVE PER SAID
"ANNEXATION No. 94-1"]; THENCE (2) 149.05 FEET [241.47 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 94-I "] ALONG THE ARC OF
A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 700.07 FEET [700.00 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION Nc~.
94-I"] AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°11'56" [19°45'52" PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 94,1"1; THENCE (3)
NORTH 50000'05" EAST, 48.90 FEET [NORTH 50000'22" EAST 48.92 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 94-1 "]; THENCE (4)
NORTH 39°59'55" WEST, 239.02 FEET [NORTH 39059'38" WEST 238.99 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION Nq. 94-1"] TO A
POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE (5) 170.92 FEET [170.90 FEET PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 94-1 "1 ALONG THE ARC
OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 222.02 FEET [222.00 FEET PER SAID' "ANNEXATION No.
94-1 "] AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°06'26"; THENCE (6) LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY OF CROAK ROAD ALONG THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY NORTH 84°06'21"
WEST, 42.73 FEET [NORTH 84°06'04" WEST 40 FEET MORE OR LESS PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 94-]"] TO A POINT OF
INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF FALLON
ROAD;' THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION AND EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF
FALLON ROAD [DESCRIBED IN THE FOLLOWING COURSES (7) THROUGH (10)] (7) NORTH 2006'49" EAST, 175.69 FEET
[188.00 FEET MORE OR LESS PER SAID "ANNEXATION No. 94-1"]; THENCE (8) NORTH 87°53'11, WEST, 12.00 FEET;
THENCE (9) NORTH 2°07'21" EAST, 1457.26 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE (10) 205~71 FEET ALONG
TI-IE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 429.94 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 27°24'48"; TI-IENCE (11) LEAVING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF FALLON ROAD NORTH
88030'52" WEST, 33.93 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CURVING CENTERLINE OF FAI J~ON ROAD AS SHOWN ON THE
IBAOKAY& Somps
CIVIL ENGINEERING' LAND PLANNING' LAND suRVEYING
5.142 Franklin Drive Suite B, Pleasanton, CA, 94588-3355
[925) 225-0690
P:\legals\lg149\Annex-dsr~d.cloc
P^CE2OF4
19149-0A
10/11/2001
F.C.I.
RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005, WHICH WAS FILED FEBRUARY 1, 1993 IN BOOK 16 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, AT
PAGE 37 (93-032269), ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS, CALIFORNIA, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH
62°31'08" WEST, SAID CENTERLINE ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND
SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY
[DESCRIBED IN THE FOLLOWING COURSES (12) THROUGH (50)] (1!) ?2.58 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON
TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 399.94 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
10°23'54"; THENCE (13) NORTH 37°52'46" WEST, 428.46 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE (14) 308.53
FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 399.94 FEET AND
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°12'02"; THENCE (15) NORTH' 6°19'16'' EAST, 1321.37 FEET [1321.27 FEET PER
SAID "ANNEXATION No. 9,4-1 "] TO A POINT OF CURVATURE, FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 83°40'20,'
EAST; THENCE (16) 224.14 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 800.55 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°02'30"; THENCE (17) NORTH 22°21'46" EAST,
500.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE (15) I76.40 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE
TOTHE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 199.76 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50°35'39"; THENCE
(19) NORTH 28°I3'53" WEST, 24.09 FEET; THENCE (20) NORTH 33°45'20" WEST, 128.91 FEET; THENCE (21) NORTH
22°5658" WEST, 83.13 FEET; THENCE (22) NORTH 10°41'42" WEST, 61.76 FEET; THENCE (:13) NORTH 03°58'13"
WEST, 101.75 FEET; THENCE (24) NORTH 3°49'18' EAST, 159.00 FEET; THENCE (15) NORTH 30°35'37" WEST, 55.23
FEET; THENCE (26) NORTH 38°49'42" WEST, 90.60 FEET; THENCE (27) NORTH 27°21'32" WEST, 59.83 FEET;
THENCE (25) NORTH 16°43'46" WEST, 80.16 FEET; THENCE (29) NORTH 4°40'18" WEST, 58.?3 FEET; THI~NCE (30)
NORTH 82°33'39" WEST, t98.51 FEET; THENCE (31) NORTH 15°45'22'' WEST, 294.24 FEET; THENCE (32) NORTH
13°36'21" EAST, 453.59 FEET; THENCE (33) SOUTH 89°53'39'' EAST, 4?0.00 FEET; THENCE (34) NORTH 37°46'2I"
EAST 177.15 FEET; THENCE (35) NORTH 27°21'21'' EAST, 182.90 FEET; THENCE (36) NORTH 6°53'39" WEST, 100.00
FEET; THENCE (3'7) NORTH 10°53'39" WEST, 130.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE FROM WHICH POINT THE
CENTER BEARS NORTH 22°06'21" EAST; THENCE (38) 153.59 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE
TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 160.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 55°00~00" TO A
POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE (39) 26.?6 FEET ALONG. THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE
LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15020'00", TO A POINT OF
REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE (40) 239.11 FEET'ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°15'00", TO A POINT OF REVERSE
CURVATURE; THENCE (41) 102.61 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 170.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°35'00"; THENCE (42) NORTH 28°3~'39' WEST,
200.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE (43) 164.15 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE
TO TIlE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 165.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 57°00'00"; THENCE
(44) NORTH 28°26'21' EAST, 217.82 FEET; THENCE (45) NORTH 14°39'29" WEST, 253.60 FEET TO A POINT OF
CURYATURE FROM WHICH POINT THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 8°35'31" EAST; THENCE (4~ 103.66 FEET ALONG
THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 180.00 FEET AND THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°59'45"; THENCE (47) NORTH 22°53'39" WEST, 218.39 FEET; THENCE (48) NORTH 0°06'21"
EAST, 300.00 FEET; THENCE (49) NORTH 48°46'28'' EAST, 1910.79 FEET; THENCE (~) NORTH 0°09'11" WEST,
235.96 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF
SURVEY No. 1005 CONVEYED TO CHANG SU-O-LIN PER BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT MAP APPROVED ON
JANUARY 2, 1992 (BA91-25) ALAMEDA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
OF WHICH WAS FILED NOVEMBER 19, 1992 (SERIES No. 92-376221); THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY
LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005 CONVEYED TO FALLON
ENTERPRISES, INC. (PER SERIES No. 92-3?6222) PER SAID BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT (BA91-25) SOUTH 89°40'26"
EAST 1485.?? FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FALl,ON ENTERPRISES TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN
ON SAID RECORD OF' SURVEY No. 1005; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE. OF SAID FALLON
£1VT£R?RISE. S TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005 SOUTH 0°48~41'' WEST
2642.66 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND IN THE NORTHSVEST ¼ OF SECTION 35,
TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE & I~VIERIDIAN, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY
No. 1675 AS FILED ON THE 21~ DAY OF APRIL, 2000 IN BOOK 25 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, AT PAGES 31 AND
32, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS, CALIFORNIA, CONVEYED TO BRADDOCK & LOGAN GROUP II, L.P. (PER
SERIES No. 99-065224); THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN
mAeKAY& SomPs
CML ENGINEERING ' LAND PLANNING' LAND sURVEYING
5142 Fran~dln Drive Suite' B, Pleasonton, CA. 94588-3355
(925) 225-0690
p.. \legals \ 19149 \ Annex-dsrsd.doc'
PAGE3OF4 / ~// ~/ /~ 19149-0A
~ 10/11/2001
F.C.I.
ON SAID KECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675 CONVEYED TO BRADDOCK & LOGAN GROUP II, LP. SOUTH 88044'02''
EAST [SOUTH 88043'28'' EAST PER R.O.S. No. 1675] 2640.61 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BRADDOCK
& LOGAN GROUP II, L.P. TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675; THENCE ALONG
THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID BRADDOCK & LOGAN TRACT OF LAND AND CONTINUING ALONG
THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST t,~.OF SAID SECTION 35 BOTH
AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675 CONVEYED TO CROAK (PER SERIES No. 79-229985) SOUTH
0o54'53.' WEST [SOUTH 0°5527'' wEST PER R.O.S. No. 16751 5288.33 FEET TO TIlE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
CROAK TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675; THENCE ALONG TIlE SOUTI-IERLY
PROPERTY LINE OF SAID CROAK TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675 NORTH
89004'24'' WEST [.NORTH 89°03'50" WEST PER R.O.S. No. 1675] 274.76 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO BRANAUGH (PER SERIES No. 96-269964); THENCE ALONG THE
EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID BRANAUGH TRACT OF LAND AND CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTHERLY
PROLONGATION OF SAID EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE SOUTH 0026'44'' WEST 2858.49 FEET MORE OR LESS TO
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID "STATE .DEED 2"; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY L1NE OF
SAID "STATE DEED 2" NORTH 88°33'16'' WEST 757.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID "STATE
DEED 2"; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID '.'STATE DEED 2" NORTH 0°22'11''. EAST
9.03 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
("PARCEL 3A" PER REEL: 2144, IMAGE: 114) [HEREINAFFER CALLED: "STATE .DEED 3"1; THENCE ALONG THE
NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID "STATE DEED 3" NORTH 84°41'01'' WEST 74.08 FEET TO AN ANGLE
POINT IN SAID NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY PROPERTY
LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA ("PARCEL 1" PER REEL: 2279, IMAGE: 110) [HEREINAFTER CALLED: "STATE DEED 4"] AND CONTINUING
~kLONG THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID NORTHERLY 'PROPERTY LINE NORTH 88°33'15'' WEST
1544.70 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO
PLEASANTON RANCH INVESTMENTS (PER REEL: 3475, IMAGE: 374); THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY
LINE OF SAID PLEASANTON RANCH TRACT OF LAND sOUTH 0020'37'' WEST 3.79 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST
~ORNER OF SAID PLEASANTON RANCH TRACT OF LAND; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE
oF SAID PLEASANTON RANCH TRACT OF LAND SOUTH 89°59'37'' WEST 221.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHW]EST
CORNER OF SAID PLEASANTON RANCH TRACT OF LAND; THENCE IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION
PERPENDICULARLY TO THE SOUTHERLy RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CROAK ROAD SOUTH 1°26'50'' WEST 8.34
FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AS MEASURED 56.01 FEET IN A SOUTHERLY
DIRECTION FROM THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID "STATE DEED 1 "; THENCE ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AS MEASURED 56.01 FEET pERPENDICULARLY AND CONCENTRIC IN A
SOUTHERLY DIRECTION FROM THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID "STATE DEED I" THE FOLLOWING
THREE (3) COURSES: (51) NORTH 88°33'10'' WEST 316.16 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A TANGENT
CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE (52)'ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 5028.49 FEET, A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 3°33'15'', AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 311.93 FEET TO THE BEGINNING POINT OF A TANGENT LINE;
THENCE (53) ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE NORTH 84°59'55" WEST 556.93 FEET TO S AID POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING l, 119 ACRES, MORE OR LESS [TOTAL ANNEXATION AREA 1.
ALL OF: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 905-0001-004-03, 905-0001-004-04, 905-0001-005-02, 905-0001-006-03, 905-
0002-001-0 l, 905-0002-002, 905-0002-003, 985-0006-004, 985-0006-006-02, 985-0006-006-03, 985-0006-009, 985-0006-010,
985-0007-002-14, UNASSIGNED (SOUTH OF APN #'s 905-0001-004-03 & 905-0001-004-04 - COLLIER CANYON ROAD), AND
UNASSIGNED (SOUTH OF APN # 985-0006-004 - CROAK ROAD). ~
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR No. 5859 EXPIRES;
1.1t
CIVIl ENGiNEEI~ING'LAND PLANNING e LAND SURVEYING ~
p:\legals\ 19149 \Annex-dsrsd.doc
5142 Franklin Drive Suite B, Pleasonton, CA, 94588-3355
(925) 225-0690
o' 40G' ~ 160G'
VICINITY MAP
N.I.S;
I
LEGEND I
EXISTIN~ UVERUORE AREAl
O STRICT DETACtlUENT
cou~R 1 CAN'~ON RO~
INTgP, SI'ATi~ §BO
DETAIL 'A'
UN
985-0001-002
SEPJES No. gg-445Lll
J4'. {'-~ -,'~ e' '~NJ. ON ~ ROYAL-FORMOSA INC., et
~ m I{~ 985-ooo6-004
I z L.~.._-'. SER~ No. 96-003167 o,-~,~,.-
:,uu,uuuu-uvu }:: '.-.' 0
AREA RECREA110N ARO PARK ~ '~ Roan I '/. I~,~,~.,
)ISU~ICT DETACHMENT_~~~~No. 94-I . ~.:"~ ='~ ~.//I Ir=
INTERSTATE 550 ~ / --
PLEAS~TON IWICH INV~S~ENTS
RE: ~47§. IM: .174
DETAIL
ACACIA PARIN~RS I{
rko: DOOt~ WESI ASSOCIAES
985-0007-001
SERIES No. 86-521121
ACACIA PARTNERS {{
fko: DOOLAR WEST
ASSOCIAT~S
905-0003-014-03
SERIES No. 86-..]21121 t..m
DETACHMki~T No.
FROM UVERMORE AREA RECREATION AND PARK
BY LIVERMORE AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT
' RESOLUTION No ....... ON
x'"470,--~'/.~,.. SCALE: l"=BO0' DATE: FEBRUARY, 2001
~EH~U~ ~ R~SION DATE: OCTOBER, 2001
9~-~3-012 PEST~
~5-0~3-0{ 1 ~ ./ / A~905-~3-~-02
/' / /~ ~ NO. 97-178224
SERI~ NO. AW-~7689// ' / /~/~% ~ C~
FAU.0N ENTERPRIS£S, INC.
985-0007-002-14
RE: 2658, IU: 332
RRST AMERICAN
TITLE GUARANTY CO.
985-0006-09
SERIES No. 98-388140--)
SEA{ES No. 99-1729~4 ~
BRADDOCK & LOGAN GROUP II, LP.
905-0002-005
SERIES No. 99-065224
FIRST AMERICAN
TITLE GUARANTY C0.
985-0006-010
SERIES No. 98-588140
CRON(
905-0002-002
No.
ROYAL-FORMOSA INC., et al
985-0006-004
SERIES No: 96-003167
INTERSTATE 580
SEE DETAIL 'B
MORGAN
905--0005--008
SERIES NO. 80-042265
ACACIA PARTNERS I
rko: DOOUU4 FJLST A~;OC{ATRS
905-0002-64)4
SERIES No. 88-005652
905-0001-001 -O2
SERIES No. 95-274.172
9o5-oem-oo4-o3 %~..//'"'~-SEE UN,nED~R"O~sc. OOL
SERIES No. 80-092552 DETAIL 'A'
gos-I]OO1-002-02
SHEET 1 OF !
OLIIBITC' T° ATTACHUENT:
PAGE1 OF4 /~/~ zX//~5- 19149-0A
-0 - 10/11/2001
F.C.I.
DESCRIPTION OF DETACHMENT No.
FROM LIVERMORE AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT
BEING ALL OF THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS AS CONVEYED IN THE DEEDS TO: "STATE OF CALIFORNIA" [FOR:
CROAK ROAD] AS RECORDED ON THE 7m DAY OF IULY, 1967 IN REEL: 1995, IMAGE: 347 [HEREINAFTER CALLED
"STATE DEED l ']; "ROYAL-FORMOSA INC., ETAL" AS RECORDED ON THE 5~!~'DAY OF JANUARY, 1996 IN SERIES
No. 96-003167; "FIRST AMERICAN TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY" AS RECORDED ON THE 4~m DAY OF NOVEMBER,
1998 IN SERIES No. 98-388140; "FALLON ENTERPRISES, INC." AS RECORDED ON THE 21sr DAY OF JULY, 1970 IN
REEL: 2658, IMAGE: 332; "BRADDOCK & LOGAN GROUP li, L.P." AS RECORDED ON THE 16-~- DAY OF
FEBRUARY, 1999 IN SERIES No. 99-065224; "FRANCIS P. CROAK" AS RECORDED ON THE 13na DAY OF
NOVEMBER, 1979 IN SERIES No. 79-229985; "THE ANDERSON SECOND FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP" AS
RECORDED ON THE 14-~- DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1991 IN SERIES No. 91-305t70; "EBJ PARTNERS, L.P.' AS
RECORDED ON THE 26----- DAY OF JANUARY, 2001 IN SERIES No. 2001029949; "PLEASANTON RANCH
INVESTMENTS." AS RECORDED ON THE 30-m DAY OF JULY, 1973 IN REEL: 3475, IMAGE: 374; "RtGHET-FI
PARTNERS. L.P." AS RECORDED ON THE 12ra DAY OF MARCH, 1992 IN SERIES No. 92-075343; "JAMES R.
CAMPBELL and DIXIE M. CAMPBELL" AS RECORDED ON THE 29TM DAY OF MAY, 1980 IN SERIES No. 80-092552;
"BRANAUGH 1991 TRUST." AS RECORDED ON THE 23m> DAY OF OCTOBER, 1996 IN 'SERIES No. 96-269964; AND
"STATE OF CALIFORNIA" [FOR: COLLIER CANYON ROAD] AS RECORDED ON THE 8TM DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1968 IN
REEL: 2122, IMAGE: 473 [HEREINAFTER CALLED "STATE DEED 2"]; ALL AS RECORDED IN ALAMEDA COUNTY
RECORDS, CALIFORNIA; FOR PURPOSES OF DETACHMENT No. FROM LIVERMORE AREA RECREATION
AND PARK DISTRICT, LYING AND BEING IN THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF "DETACHMENT No. 94-I FROM LIVERMORE AREA RECREATION
AND PARK DISTRICT" AS FILED ON THE 18~m DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1995 IN BOOK 204 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 75
AND 76, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS, CALIFORNIA, AND SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHERN RIGHT OF
WAY LINE OF CROAK ROAD, COMMON TO SAID NORTHERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 580, AND
SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 5°00'05" EAST
[NORTH 5°00'22" EAST PER SAID "DETACHMENT No. 94-I"]; THENCE ALONG TI-lB EASTERN LINE OF SAID
"DETACHMENT No. 94-I' THE FOLLOWING FIFTY (50) COURSES: ALONG THE SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
OF CROAK ROAD IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION [DESCRIBED IN THE FOLLOWING COURSES (1) THROUGH (5)]
(1) ALONG SAID CURVE [TO THE RIGHT] 797.83 FEET [702.39 FEET PER SAID "DETACHMENT No. 94-1 "] ALONG THE
ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1028.1I FEET [1020.00 FEET PER SAID
"DETACHMENT No. 94-1 "] AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°27'44" [39°27't7" PER SAID "DETACHMENT No. 94.
1'] TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 36°53'29" WEST [TANGENT
REVERSE CURVE PER SAID "DETACHMENT No. 94-1 ']; THENCE (2) 149.05 FEET [241.47 FEET PER SAID "DETACHMENT No.
94-1 "] ALONG TI-lB ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 700.07 FEET [700.00
FEET PER SAID "DETACHMENT No. 94-1"] AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°11'56" [19°45'52" PER SAID
"DETACHMENT No. 94-1 "l; THENCE (3) NORTH 50o00'05" EAST, 48.90 FEET [NORTH 50o00'22" EAST 48.92 FEET PER SAID
"DETACHMENT No. 94-1 "]; THENCE (4) NORTH 39059'55" WEST, 239.02 FEET [NORTH 39°59'38" WEST 238.99 FEET PER
SAID "DETACHMENT No. 94-1"] TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE (5) 170.92 FEET [170.90 FEET PER SAID
~'DETACHMENT No. 94-1 "] ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 222.02
FEET [222.00 FEET PER SAID "DETACHMENT No. 94-1"] AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°06'26"; THENCE (6)
LEAVING SAID SOUTI-IERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CROAK ROAD ALONG THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF
SAID RIGHT OF WAY NORTH 84°06'21'. WEST, 42.73 FEET [NORTH 84°06'04" WEST 40 FEET MORE OR LESS PER SAID
"DETACHMENT No. 94-1"] TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE
EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF FALLON ROAD; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY
PROLONGATION AND EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF FALLON ROAD [DESCRIBED IN THE FOLLOWING coURsEs (7)
THROUGH (10)] (7) NORTH 2o06'49" EAST, 175.69 FEET [188.00 FEET MORE ORLESS PER SAID "DETACHMENT No. 94-1 "];
THENCE (8) NORTH 87°53'11" WEST, 12.00 FEET; THENCE (9) NORTH 2°07'21" EAST, 1457.26 FEET TO A POINT' OF
CURVATURE; THENCE (10) 205.71 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 429.94 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°24'48"; THENCE (11) LEAVING SAID
EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF FALLON ROAD NORTH 88030'52" WEST, 33.93 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
P: \ legals\ 19149 \Annex-livlxl.doc
lUAI:'KAY & SOBPS
CIVIL EN~INEERINC-' LAND PLANNIN~ o LAND suRVEYIN~
5142 Franklin Drive Suite B, Pleasanton, CA~ 94588-$355
(92§) 225-0690
19149-0A
.... PAGE 2OF4 j ~/~/ z~ /~/-~ 10/11/2001
F.C.I.'
CURVING CENTERLINE OF FALLON ROAD AS SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005, WHICH WAS
FILED FEBRUARY 1, 1993 IN BOOK 16 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, AT PAGE 37 (93-032269), ALAMEDA COUNTY
RECORDS, CALIFORNIA, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS SOUTH 62°31'08" WEST, SAID CENTER_LINE ALSO
BEING THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No.
1005; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY [DESCRIBED IN THE FOLLOWING COURSES (12)
THROUGH (50)] (12) 72.58 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS
OF 399.94 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°23'54"; THENCE (13) NORTH 37052'46'! WEST, 428.46
FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE (14) 308.53 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE
RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 399.94 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°12'02"; THENCE (15)
NORTH 6°19'16'' EAST, 1321.37 FEET [1321.27 FEET PER SAID "DETACHMENT No. 94-1 "] TO A POINT OF CURVATURE,
FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 83°40'20" EAST; THENCE (16) 224.14 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 800.55 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 16°02'30"; THENCE (17) NORTH 22°21'46'' EAST, 500.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; Tt-IENCE (18) 176.40
FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 199.76 FEET AND
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50°35'39"; THENCE (19) NORTH 28°13'53' WEST, 24.09 FEET; THENCE (20)
NORTH 33°45'20" WEST, t28.9i FEET; THENCE (21) NORTH 22°56'58" WEST, 83.13 FEET; THENCE (22) NORTH
10°41'42" WEST, 61.76 FEET; THENCE (23) NORTH 03°58'13" WEST, I01.75 FEET; THENCE (24) NORTH 3°49'18'.
EAST, 159.00 FEET; THENCE (25) NORTH 30°35'37" WEST, 55.23 FEET; THENCE (26) NORTH 38°49'42" WEST, 90.60
FEET; THENCE (27) NORTH 27°21'32" WEST, 59.83 FEET; THENCE (28) NORTH 16°43'46" WEST, 80.16 FEET:,
THENCE (29) NORTH 4°40'18" WEST, 58.73 FEET; THENCE (30) NORTH 82°33'39" WEST, 198.51 FEET; THENCE (31)
NORTH 15045'22" WEST, 294.24 FEET; THENCE (32) NORTH 13°36'21" EAST, 453.59 FEET; THENCE (33) SOUTH
89°53'39' EAST, 470.00 FEET; THENCE (34) NORTH 37°46'21" EAST 177.15 FEET; THENCE (35) NORTH 27°2121"
EAST, 182.90 FEET; THENCE (36) NORTH 6053'39" WEST,. 100.00 FEET; THENCE (37) NORTH 10°53'39" WEST, 130.00
FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE FROM WHICH POINT THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 22°06'21" EAST; THENCE
(38) 153.59 FEET'ALONG THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS ~OF 160.00
FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 55°00'00'' TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE (39)
26.76 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET AND
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15°20'00", TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE (40) 239.11 FEET
ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET AND THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34o15'00", TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE (41) 102.61 FEET ALONG THE
ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 170.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL
AN~LE OF 34°35'00"; THENCE (42) NORTH 28033'39' WEST, 200.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE
(43) 164.15 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 165.00 FEET
AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 57°00'00"; THENCE (44) NORTH 28°26'21" EAST, 217.82 FEET; THENCE (45)
NORTH 14°39'29" WEST, 253.60 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE FROM WHICH POINT THE CENTER BEARS
SOUTH 8°35'31" EAST; THENCE (46) 103.66 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 180.00 FEET AND THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°59'45"; THENCE (47) NORTH
22°53'39" WEST, 218.39 FEET; THENCE (48) NORTH 0°06'21" EAST, 300.00 FEET; THENCE (49) NORTH 48046'25"
EAST, 1910179 FEET; THENCE (50) NORTH 0°09'11" WEST, 235.96 FEET TO THE Most NORTHEAST CORNER OF
THAT TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005 CONVEYED TO CHANG SU-O-LIN
PER BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT MAP APPROVED ON 3ANUARY 2, '1992 (BA91-25) ALAMEDA COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT, A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE OF WHICH WAS FILED NOVEMBER 19, 1992
(SERIES No. 92-376221); THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS
SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005 CONVEYED TO FALLON ENTERPRISES, INC. (PER SERIES No. 92-
376222) PER SAID BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT (BA91-25) SOUTH 89°40'26" EAST 1485.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID FALLON ENTERPRISES TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005;
THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID FALLON ENTERPRISES TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN
ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1005 SOUTH 0°48'41" WEST 2642.66 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
THAT TRACT OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH,.RANGE 1 EAST, MOUNT
DIABLO BASE & MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675 AS FILED ON THE 21sv DAY OF
APRIL, 2000 IN BOOK 25 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, AT PAGES 31 AND 32, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS,
CALIFORNIA, CONVEYED TO BRADDOCK & LOGAN GROUP II, L.P. (PER SERIES No. 99-065224); THENCE ALONG
mACKAY& SomPs
CIVIL ENGINEERINGe LAND PLANNING' LAND SURVEYING
,5142 Franklin Drive Suite B, Pleasan~on, CA. 94588-3355
(925) 225-0690
p:\legals\ 19149 \ Annex-livpd.doc
19149-0A
F.C.I.
THE NORTHERLy PROPERTY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No.
1675 CONVEYED TO BRADDOCK & LOGAN GROUP II, DP. SOUTH 88o44'02" EAST [SOUTH 88043'28'' EAST PER R.O.S.
No. 1675] 2640.61 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BRADDOCK & LOGAN GROUP II, L.P. TRACT OF
LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF
SAID BRADDOCK & LOGAN'TRACT OF LAND AND CONTINUING ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF
THAT TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST ¼ OF SAID' SECTION 35 BOTH AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF
SURVEY No. 1675 CONVEYED TO CROAK (PER SERIES No. 79-229985) SOUTH 0°54'53" WEST [SOUTH 0055'27'' WEST
PER R.O.S. No. 1675] 5288.33 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAD CROAK TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON
SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAD CROAK
TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY No. 1675 NORTH 89o04'24.. WEST [NORTH 89°0350"
WEST PER R.O.S. No. 1675] 274.76 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND
CONVEYED TO BRANAUGH (PER SERIES No. 96-269964); THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID
BRANAUGH TRACT OF LAND AND CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID
EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE SOUTH 0°26'44" WEST 2858.49 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF SAID "STATE DEED 2"; THENCE. ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAD "STATE DEED 2" NORTH
88°33'16'. WEST 757.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID "STATE DEED 2"; THENCE ALONG THE
WESTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID "STATE DEED 2, NORTH 0°22'11" EAST 9.03 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ("PARCEL 3A" PER REEL: 2144,
IMAGE: 114) [HEREINAFTER CALLED: "STATE DEED 3"]; THENCE ALONG TIKE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF
SAID "STATE DEED 3" NORTH '84°41'01" WEST 74.08 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHERLY
PROPERTY LINE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE AND ALONG THE
NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ("PARCEL
i" PER REEL: 2279, IMAGEi 110) [HEREINAFTER CALLED: "STATE DEED 4"] AND CONTINUING ALONG THE WESTERLY
PROLONGATION OF SAD NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE NORTH 88°33'15" WEST 1544.70 FEET TO A POINT ON
THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO PLEASANTON RANCH INVESTMENTS
(PER REEL: 3475, IMAGE: 374); THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID PLEASANTON RANCH
TRACT OF LAND SOUTH 0o20'37.' WEST 3.79 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PLEASANTON RANCH
TRACT OF LAND; THENCE ALONG TIlE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID PLEASANTON RANCH TRACT OF
LAND sOUTH 89°59'37'' WEST 221.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAD PLEASANTON RANCH TRACT
OF LAND; THENCE IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION PERPENDICULARLY TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF CROAKROAD SOUTH 1°26'50" WEST 8.34 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
AS MEASURED 56.01 FEET IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION FROM THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAD
"STATE DEED 1"; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AS MEASLrRED 56.01 FEET
PERPENDICULARLY AND CONCENTRIC IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION FROM THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY
LINE OF SAID "STATE DEED 1" THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: (51) NORTH 88°33'10" WEST 316.16 FEET
TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE (52) ALONG SAID CURVE
HAVING A RADIUS OF 5028.49 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°33'15'', AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 311.93 FEET TO
THE BEGINNING POINT OF A TANGENT LINE; THENCE (53) ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE NORTH 84059'55"
WEST 556.93 FEET TO SAID'POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 1,119 ACRES, MORE OR LESS [TOTAL DETACHMENT AREA]. .
ALL OF: .ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 905~0001-004-03, 905-0001-004-04, 905-0001-005-02, 905-0001-006-03, 905-
0002-001-01,905-0002-002, 905-0002-003,985-0006-004, 985-0006-006-02, 985-0006-006-03, 985-0006-009, 985-0006-010,
985-0007-002~14, UNASSIGNED (SOUTH OF APN #'s 905-0001-004-03 & 905-0001-004-04 - COLLIER CANYON ROAD), AND
UNASSIGNED (SOUTH OF APN # 985-0006-004 - CROAK ROAD).
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR No. 5859
(EXP. 12/31/2004)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
p:\le§als\lg149X. Annex-livpd.doc
(925) 22,5-0690