HomeMy WebLinkAbout*April 21, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda PacketApril 21, 2020 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 1 of 4
REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, April 21, 2020 DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL
A G E N D A
REGULAR MEETING 7:00 PM
Meeting Procedure During Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak:
In keeping with the guidelines provided by the State of California and Alameda County
Department of Public Health regarding gatherings during the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak,
and recommendations to follow social distancing procedures, the City of Dublin will adopt the
following practices during upcoming City Council meetings:
• The Dublin City Council will hold the meetings remotely via Zoom Video
Communications.
• Per normal practice, the meeting will be livestreamed and available at www.TV30.org for
viewing and also broadcast live on Comcast T.V. channel 28 beginning at 7:00 p.m.
• Online speaker slips will be available at www.dublin.ca.gov, and the public will be able to
call in using a computer/or smart phone via a link which will be provided following
submission of a speaker slip. A telephonic option will also be available.
• Once connected, the public speaker will be placed in an on-line waiting room. While in the
waiting room, the public speaker should watch or listen to the meeting via the outlets above,
as they will not see or hear the meeting while they are connected and waiting to speak.
• When the agenda item upon which the individual would like to comment is addressed, the
speaker will be announced in the meeting when it is his/her time to speak to the City
Council. The speaker will then be moved to the meeting for comment.
REGULAR MEETING
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
3.1. Public Comment
At this time, the public is permitted to address the City Council on non-agendized items. Please step to the podium and
clearly state your name for the record. COMMENTS SHOULD NOT EXCEED THREE (3) MINUTES. In accordance with
State Law, no action or discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. The Council may
respond to statements made or questions asked, or may request Sta ff to report back at a future meeting concerning the
matter. Any member of the public may contact the City Clerk’s Office related to the proper procedure to place an item on a
future City Council agenda. The exceptions under which the City Council MAY discuss and/or take action on items not
appearing on the agenda are contained in Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(1)(2)(3).
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the City Council with
one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the City Council who would like an item removed from the Consent
Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor to remove the item.
4.1. Approval of the April 7, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the April 7, 2020 Regular City
Council meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the minutes of the April 7, 2020 Regular City Council meeting.
April 21, 2020 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 2 of 4
4.2. Consulting Services Agreement with Procure America for Business Intelligence
Services
The City Council will consider approval of a consulting services agreement with Procure
America for business intelligence services. Under the agreement, Procure America will audit
several categories of the City’s business-related expenses to identify potential cost savings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving a Consulting Services Agreement with Procure America
for Business Intelligence Services.
4.3. Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers
The City Council will receive a listing of payments issued from March 1, 2020 - March 31,
2020 totaling $12,027,791.55.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report.
4.4. Approval of California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) Form 130 Designating
Agents Necessary to Provide for All Matters Pertaining to State and Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Reimbursements
The City Council will consider approving the CalOES Form 130, designating the City
Manager, Assistant City Manager, and Director of Administrative Services as agents
necessary to provide for all matters pertaining to State and Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) reimbursements. The Resolution will remain in effect for all open and
future disasters up to three (3) years following the date of approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES)
Form 130, Designating Agents Necessary to Provide for All Matters Pertaining to State and
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Reimbursements.
4.5. Acceptance of Work – Dublin Boulevard Widening Improvements Project and Mape
Memorial Park Playground Replacement Project
The City Council will consider accepting the Dublin Boulevard Widening Improvements
Project and the Mape Memorial Park Playground Replacement Project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Accepting the Dublin Boulevard Widening Improvements Project (CIP
No. ST1012) and adopt the Resolution Accepting the Mape Memorial Park Playground
Replacement Project (CIP No. PK0319).
4.6. Proclamations for the Month of May
The City Council will present the following proclamations for the month of May in the City
of Dublin: Bike Month and Bike to Work Day, and National Day of Prayer.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Present the proclamations.
4.7. First Amendment to the Community Benefit Program Agreement with Crystal Bay
Development LLC (Formerly Bayview Development Group, Inc.)
The City Council will consider approving a First Amendment to the Community Benefit
Program Agreement with Crystal Bay Development LLC (formerly Bayview Development
Group, Inc.) for the St. Patrick Way Residential Project that includes 499 residential units on
a ±8.53-acre property located at 6700 Golden Gate Drive.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving the First Amendment to the Community Benefit Program
Agreement between the City of Dublin and Crystal Bay Development LLC (formerly
Bayview Development Group, Inc.).
April 21, 2020 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 3 of 4
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
5.1. Review of Proposed Terms to Extend the Solid Waste Collection Services Agreement
The City Council will receive an update on the City's negotiations with Amador Valley
Industries, LLC on an extension to the Collection Services Agreement. The finalized
agreement will be brought back to the City Council for approval in June.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report and provide direction, if necessary.
6. PUBLIC HEARING
6.1. Tassajara Road Alignment Project - General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan Amendment, Introduce Ordinance Establishing Precise Alignment of Right-of-
way Lines
The City Council will hold a public hearing to hear comments and to consider approving a
General Plan Amendment and an Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment related to the
Tassajara Road Alignment Project, reducing the number of travel lanes from six lanes to four
lanes and to consider introducing an ordinance to establishing a precise alignment of the
right-of-way lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive to the Alameda-Contra Costa
County Limit Line. The project is proposing to reduce the ultimate right-of-way width of
Tassajara Road between North Dublin Ranch Drive to the Alameda-Contra Costa County
limit line and to revise the alignment of Tassajara Road from Palisades Drive to the
Alameda-Contra Costa County limit line to allow for future construction of Tassajara Road
as a four-lane arterial. The new alignment will improve traffic safety within both the City of
Dublin and in Contra Costa County when future construction is completed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct the public hearing, deliberate and take the following actions: a) Adopt the
Resolution Amending the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan related to the
Tassajara Road Alignment Project; b) Waive the reading and INTRODUCE the Ordinance to
Establish Right-of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive to the Alameda-
Contra Costa County Limit Line.
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS – NONE.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Review
The City Council will consider its options to become an Entitlement City and receive funding
directly from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) starting in
2021. The City currently receives CDBG funding through the Urban County program
administered by Alameda County. The City must notify HUD and the County of its decision
by May 15, 2020 and begin to implement that decision.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Direct Staff to either remain in the Urban County program or seek Entitlement City status
and notify HUD and Alameda County HCD of that decision.
9. OTHER BUSINESS
Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports
and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB1234).
10. ADJOURNMENT
This AGENDA is posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a)
April 21, 2020 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 4 of 4
If requested, pursuant to Government Code Section 54953.2, this agenda shall be made available in appropriate
alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990 (42 U.S.C. Section 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. To make
a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, please contact the City Clerk’s Office (925) 833-
6650 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Mission
The City of Dublin promotes and supports a high quality of life, ensures a safe and secure environment, and fosters
new opportunities.
Page 1 of 1
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 21, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Approval of the April 7, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
Prepared by: Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the April 7, 2020 Regular City
Council meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the minutes of the April 7, 2020 Regular City Council meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the April 7, 2020 Regular City
Council meeting.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Minutes of the April 7, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting
4.1
Packet Pg. 5
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
REGULAR MEETING – APRIL 7, 2020
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 1
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 7, 2020
A Regular Meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, April 7, 2020,
remotely via Zoom Video Communications. The meeting was called to order at 7:00
PM., by Mayor Haubert.
1. Call to Order
Attendee Name Title Status
David Haubert Mayor Present
Arun Goel Vice Mayor Present
Melissa Hernandez Councilmember Present
Jean Josey Councilmember Present
Shawn Kumagai Councilmember Present
2. Pledge of Allegiance - The pledge of allegiance was recited by the City Council and
Staff.
3. Oral Communications
3.1. Public Comment
No public comment provided.
4. Consent Calendar
4.1. Approved the minutes of the March 3, 2020 Regular City Council meeting, the
March 4 and 5, 2020 Special City Council meetings, and the March 18, 2020
Emergency City Council meeting.
4.2. Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 19-20
APPROVING A LIST OF PROJECTS FUNDED IN FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 BY
SENATE BILL 1, THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
4.3. Received the March and April 2020 City proclamations.
4.4. Received the report of City Manager actions taken during delegation of authority.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 6
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 7, 2020
4.5 Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 20 - 20
CONSIDERING AN INITIAL STUDY/CEQA ADDENDUM AND ADOPTING A
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH PRECISE ALIGNMENT FOR THE
FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES FOR TASSAJARA ROAD BETWEEN PALISADES
DRIVE AND ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA COUNY LIMIT LINE
4.6 Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 21 - 20
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX – POLICE SERVICES BUILDING
IMPROVEMENTS, CIP NO. GI0116
RESOLUTION NO. 22 – 20
ACCEPTING THE ALAMO CREEK TRAIL REPAIR AND APPROVING THE FINAL
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER, CIP NO. ST0219
4.7 Received the Annual Fire Inspection Compliance Report for fiscal year 2018-19.
4.8 Received the Annual Progress Report on the status of the Dublin General Plan
and Housing Element for calendar year 2019.
4.9 Waived the reading and adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 03 - 20
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 8.84 (SIGN REGULATIONS) OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE RELATED TO OFF-SITE ADVERTISING SIGNS
PLPA-2020-00001
4.10 Received the Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Fund Transfers for the
month of February 2020.
4.11 Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 23 - 20
ADOPTING A SUPPLEMENTAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
APPROVING A PROJECT FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH THE ALAMEDA COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE IRON HORSE TRAIL BRIDGE AT
DUBLIN BOULEVARD
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 7
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 7, 2020
4.12 Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 24 - 20
AUTHORIZING CITY COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS TO MEET
ELECTRONICALLY DURING CURRENTLY PROCLAIMED EMERGENCY
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVED BY: David Haubert, Mayor
SECOND: Shawn Kumagai, Councilmember
AYES: Josey, Kumagai, Goel, Haubert, Hernandez
5. Written Communication – None.
6. Public Hearing
6.1. Weed and Combustible Refuse Abatement Order
Mayor Haubert opened the public hearing.
Erika Ratto, Dublin resident, wished to provide public comment, but was unable
to connect to the meeting due to technical difficulties. The City Manager later
spoke to Ms. Ratto.
Mayor Haubert closed the public hearing.
On motion of Mayor Haubert, seconded by Councilmember Hernandez, and by
unanimous vote, the City Council directed Staff to continue the weed abatement
process, and made the following motion:
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVED BY: David Haubert, Mayor
SECOND: Melissa Hernandez, Councilmember
AYES: Josey, Kumagai, Goel, Haubert, Hernandez
7. Unfinished Business – None.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 8
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 4
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 7, 2020
8. New Business
8.1. Update from City Manager on Impact of COVID-19 including City Finances
The City Council received the update from the City Manager and Assistant City
Manager on the impact of COVID-19 including City finances and provided their
feedback.
Kunal Khaware, Dublin Resident, provided public comment.
8.2. Short-Term Waiver of Penalties for Late Payment of Transient Occupancy
Taxes
The City Council received the report on the short-term waiver of penalties for late
payment of transient occupancy taxes and provided their feedback.
On motion of Mayor Haubert, seconded by Councilmember Josey, and by
unanimous vote, the City Council adopted:
RESOLUTION NO. 25 - 20
PERMITTING THE TAX ADMINISTRATOR TO WAIVE PENALTIES AND INTEREST
FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE CITY’S
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVED BY: David Haubert, Mayor
SECOND: Jean Josey, Councilmember
AYES: Josey, Kumagai, Goel, Haubert, Hernandez
9. Other Business
Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee
reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expense
(AB1234).
By consensus, the City Council asked Staff to prepare an item for discussion by the
Economic Development Committee with ways the City can assist the City's small
businesses in the City of Dublin; and, to direct any discussion about volunteering to
be brought up with the Dublin Pride Week Committee as they work on a revised set
of activities.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 9
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 7, 2020
10. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 8:34 p.m. in honor of Sean Diamond and all of our
fallen troops.
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 10
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 21, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consulting Services Agreement with Procure America for Business
Intelligence Services
Prepared by: John Stefanski, Assistant to the City Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider approval of a consulting services agreement with Procure
America for business intelligence services. Under the agreement, Procure America will
audit several categories of the City’s business-related expenses to identify potential cost
savings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving a Consulting Services Agreement with Procure
America for Business Intelligence Services.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no net financial impact associated with executing the agreement.
The City will pay Procure America fees at a percentage rate of 30% of cost
savings/refunds actualized, per audit review for 60 consecutive months. In the instance
where no cost savings or refunds are obtained, then Procure America will receive no
compensation for services rendered. This item is being brought to the City Council for
approval in the instance the fees for service surpass the City Manager’s signing
authority of $45,000.
DESCRIPTION:
Procure America provides government agencies with business intelligent services to
identify cost savings in indirect expense categories such as facility utilities, document
management (copier maintenance), telecommunications (voice, data, mobile), treasury
(credit card processing fees), and waste and recycling services. Procure America
achieves savings for agencies by having their teams of subject matter experts review
and analyze the billing rates and contracts for services in these expense catego ries.
Through this process, these teams identify opportunities for savings or alternative
4.2
Packet Pg. 11
Page 2 of 2
arrangements for services.
Under this proposed agreement, Procure America will develop an Enterprise Strategic
Plan regarding the short-, medium-, and long-term goals for each expense category.
The development of this plan will include the review of existing agreements for services,
evaluation of current operations, identification of opportunities to adjust needs and
goals, execution of renegotiated contracts, validation of outcomes, and institutional
change management (as needed).
The proposed agreement utilizes a Regional Cooperative Agreement (RCA) entered
into by the County of Orange and Procure America. Under this arrangement, the City
will receive the negotiated terms and conditions of the original RCA. Procure America
has provided these services to many public agencies in California including Contra
Costa County as well as the Cities of Pico Rivera, Santa Ana, Hayward, and Escondido.
Next Steps
Upon approval of this agreement, Staff will work with Procure America to begin the first
phase of analysis of expense categories, utilities and telecommunications.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving a Consulting Services Agreement with Procure America for
Business Intelligence Services
2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: Agreement with Procure America
4.2
Packet Pg. 12
RESOLUTION NO. XX-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*********
APPROVING A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PROCURE AMERICA
FOR BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin strives to be a good steward of public monies by
operating in an efficient and effective manner; and
WHEREAS, Procure America assists agencies by analyzing existing bills and
contracts to identify potential savings in expense categories for utilities,
telecommunications, document management, waste and recycling, and treasury
services; and
WHEREAS, Procure America will conduct these analyses for free and will only
charge a fee based off of a percentage of the total amount of savings actualized; and
WHEREAS, the City anticipates this work may result in a cost savings to the City
for which the fee to Procure America may exceed the City Manager’s contract signing
authority.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Dublin does hereby approve a Consulting Services Agreement with Procure America for
Business Intelligence Services, as attached hereto as Exhibit A to this Resolution; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute the
Agreement, attached hereto, and may any necessary, non-substantive changes to carry
out the intent of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April 2020, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 13
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
f
o
r
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
I
n
t
e
l
l
i
g
e
n
c
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
City Clerk
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 14
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
f
o
r
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
I
n
t
e
l
l
i
g
e
n
c
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 1 of 13
CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND
PROCURE AMERICA, INC. FOR BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT for consulting services is made by and between the City of Dublin (“City”) and
Procure America, Inc. (“Consultant”) (together sometimes referred to as the “Parties”) as of May 1, 2020
(the “Effective Date”).
Section 1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consultant
shall provide to City the services described in the Scope of Work attached as Exhibit A at the time and
place and in the manner specified therein. In the event of a conflict in or inconsistency between the terms
of this Agreement and Exhibit A, the Agreement shall prevail.
1.1 Term of Services. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and shall
end on April 30, 2025, the date of completion specified in Exhibit A, and Consultant shall
complete the work described in Exhibit A on or before that date, unless the term of the
Agreement is otherwise terminated or extended, as provided for in Section 8. The time
provided to Consultant to complete the services required by this Agreement shall not affect
the City’s right to terminate the Agreement, as referenced in Section 8. Notwithstanding
the foregoing this Agreement may be extended on a month to month basis for up to 6
months upon the written consent of the Consultant and the City Manager, provided that: a)
sufficient funds have been appropriated for such purchase, b) the price charged by the
Consultant for the provision of the serves described in Exhibit A does not increase. None
of the foregoing shall affect the City’s right to terminate the Agreement as provided for in
Section 8.
1.2 Standard of Performance. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this
Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent
practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged.
1.3 Assignment of Personnel. Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform
services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any
time during the term of this Agreement, desires the reassignment of any such persons,
Consultant shall, immediately upon receiving notice from City of such desire of City,
reassign such person or persons.
1.4 Time. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this
Agreement as may be reasonably necessary to meet the standard of performance
provided in Subsection 1.2 above and to satisfy Consultant’s obligations hereunder.
Section 2. COMPENSATION. There will be no up-front fees and Consultant shall only be
compensated as set forth in Exhibit B for work performed in accordance with Exhibit A. City shall have no
obligation to pay any sum in excess of that specified in Exhibit B, unless authorized by amendment in
accordance with Section 1.1 of this Agreement.
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 15
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 2 of 13
In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and Consultant’s proposal, attached as Exhibit A,
regarding the amount of compensation, the Agreement shall prevail. City shall pay Consultant for services
rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth herein. The payments
specified below shall be the only payments from City to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this
Agreement. Consultant shall submit all invoices to City in the manner specified herein. Except as
specifically authorized by City in writing, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services performed by
more than one person.
2.1 Invoices. The Consultant shall submit invoices to City on Consultant’s letterhead. Each
invoice shall have a unique number and shall include, at minimum, the following
information:
a. Consultant’s name and address (as specified in this Agreement)
b. Consultant’s remittance address, if difference from (a.) above
c. Name of City department/contact person
d. Contract or PO number must be reference on all invoices
e. Delivery/Service address
f. Service Date
g. Consultant’s Tax Identification Number (TIN) or Employer’s Identification Number
(EIN)
h. Description of services
i. Total dollar amount of invoice
j. The Consultant’s signature
2.2 Total Payment. City shall pay for the services to be rendered by Consultant pursuant to
this Agreement. City shall not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost whatsoever
incurred by Consultant in rendering services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall make
no payment for any extra, further, or additional service pursuant to this Agreement.
In no event shall Consultant submit any invoice for an amount in excess of the maximum
amount of compensation provided above either for a task or for the entire Agreement,
unless the Agreement is modified prior to the submission of such an invoice by a properly
executed change order or amendment.
2.3 Payment of Taxes. Consultant is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes
incurred under this Agreement and any similar federal or state taxes.
2.4 Payment upon Termination. In the event that the City or Consultant terminates this
Agreement pursuant to Section 8, the City shall compensate the Consultant for all
outstanding costs and reimbursable expenses incurred for work satisfactorily completed as
of the date of written notice of termination. Consultant shall maintain adequate logs and
timesheets to verify costs incurred to that date.
2.5 Authorization to Perform Services. The Consultant is not authorized to perform any
services or incur any costs whatsoever under the terms of this Agreement until receipt of
authorization from the Contract Administrator.
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 16
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 3 of 13
Section 3. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT.Except as set forth herein, Consultant shall, at its sole
cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment that may be necessary to perform the services
required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only the facilities and equipment listed
in this section, and only under the terms and conditions set forth herein.
City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space, as may be
reasonably necessary for Consultant’s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and
the information in possession of the City. The location, quantity, and time of furnishing those facilities shall
be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be obligated to furnish any facility that may involve
incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to computer, long-distance telephone or other
communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities.
Section 4. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Before fully executing this Agreement, Consultant, at its
own cost and expense, unless otherwise specified below, shall procure the types and amounts of insurance
listed below against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in
connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant and its agents, representatives,
employees, and subcontractors. Consistent with the following provisions, Consultant shall provide proof
satisfactory to City of such insurance that meets the requirements of this section and under forms of
insurance satisfactory in all respects, and that such insurance is in effect prior to beginning work.
Consultant shall maintain the insurance policies required by this section throughout the term of this
Agreement. The cost of such insurance shall be included in the Consultant's bid or proposal. Consultant
shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until Consultant has obtained all
insurance required herein for the subcontractor(s) and provided evidence to City that such insurance is in
effect. VERIFICATION OF THE REQUIRED INSURANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND MADE PART OF
THIS AGREEMENT PRIOR TO EXECUTION. Consultant shall maintain all required insurance listed
herein for the duration of this Agreement.
4.1 Workers’ Compensation.
4.1.1 General Requirements. Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain
Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for
any and all persons employed directly or indirectly by Consultant. The Statutory
Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance shall be
provided with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per accident. In the alternative,
Consultant may rely on a self-insurance program to meet these requirements, but
only if the program of self-insurance complies fully with the provisions of the
California Labor Code. Determination of whether a self-insurance program meets
the standards of the California Labor Code shall be solely in the discretion of the
Contract Administrator.
The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation
in favor of the entity for all work performed by the Consultant, its employees,
agents, and subcontractors.
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 17
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 4 of 13
4.1.2 Submittal Requirements. To comply with Subsection 4.1, Consultant shall
submit the following:
a. Certificate of Liability Insurance in the amounts specified in the section;
and
b. Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement as required by the section.
4.2 Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance.
4.2.1 General Requirements. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain
commercial general liability insurance for the term of this Agreement in an amount
not less than $1,000,000 and automobile liability insurance for the term of this
Agreement in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, combined
single limit coverage for risks associated with the work contemplated by this
Agreement. If a Commercial General Liability Insurance or an Automobile Liability
form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this
Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required
occurrence limit. Such coverage shall include but shall not be limited to, protection
against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting
therefrom, and damage to property resulting from activities contemplated under
this Agreement, including the use of owned and non-owned automobiles.
4.2.2 Minimum Scope of Coverage. Commercial general coverage shall be at least as
broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form
CG 0001 (most recent edition) covering comprehensive General Liability on an
“occurrence” basis. Automobile coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance
Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001, Code 1 (any auto). No
endorsement shall be attached limiting the coverage.
4.2.3 Additional Requirements. Each of the following shall be included in the
insurance coverage or added as a certified endorsement to the policy:
a. The Insurance shall cover on an occurrence or an accident basis, and not
on a claims-made basis.
b. City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as
additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of work or operations
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; or automobiles owned,
leased, hired, or borrowed by the Consultant.
c. Consultant hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer or
contractor may require from vendor by virtue of the payment of any loss.
Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsements that may be necessary to
effect this waiver of subrogation.
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 18
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 5 of 13
d. For any claims related to this Agreement or the work hereunder, the
Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects
the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance
or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees,
or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not
contribute with it.
4.2.4 Submittal Requirements. To comply with Subsection 4.2, Consultant shall
submit the following:
a. Certificate of Liability Insurance in the amounts specified in the section;
b. Additional Insured Endorsement as required by the section;
c. Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement as required by the section; and
d. Primary Insurance Endorsement as required by the section.
4.3 Professional Liability Insurance.
4.3.1 General Requirements. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain
for the period covered by this Agreement professional liability insurance for
licensed professionals performing work pursuant to this Agreement in an amount
not less than $2,000,000 covering the licensed professionals’ errors and
omissions. Any deductible or self-insured retention shall not exceed $150,000 per
claim.
4.3.2 Claims-Made Limitations. The following provisions shall apply if the professional
liability coverage is written on a claims-made form:
a. The retroactive date of the policy must be shown and must be before the
date of the Agreement.
b. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be
provided for at least 5 years after completion of the Agreement or the
work, so long as commercially available at reasonable rates.
c. If coverage is canceled or not renewed and it is not replaced with another
claims-made policy form with a retroactive date that precedes the date of
this Agreement, Consultant shall purchase an extended period coverage
for a minimum of 5 years after completion of work under this Agreement.
d. A copy of the claim reporting requirements must be submitted to the City
for review prior to the commencement of any work under this Agreement.
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 19
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 6 of 13
4.3.3 Additional Requirements. A certified endorsement to include contractual liability
shall be included in the policy.
4.3.4 Submittal Requirements. To comply with Subsection 4.3, Consultant shall
submit the Certificate of Liability Insurance in the amounts specified in the section.
4.4 All Policies Requirements.
4.4.1 Acceptability of Insurers. All insurance required by this section is to be placed
with insurers with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII.
4.4.2 Verification of Coverage. Prior to beginning any work under this Agreement,
Consultant shall furnish City with complete copies of all Certificates of Liability
Insurance delivered to Consultant by the insurer, including complete copies of all
endorsements attached to the policies. All copies of Certificates of Liability
Insurance and certified endorsements shall show the signature of a person
authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. If the City does not
receive the required insurance documents prior to the Consultant beginning work,
it shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves
the right to require complete copies of all required insurance policies at any time.
4.4.3 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Consultant shall disclose to and
obtain the written approval of City for the self-insured retentions and deductibles
before beginning any of the services or work called for by any term of this
Agreement. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate
such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers,
employees, and volunteers; or the Consultant shall provide a financial guarantee
satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations,
claim administration and defense expenses.
4.4.4 Wasting Policies. No policy required by this Section 4 shall include a “wasting”
policy limit (i.e. limit that is eroded by the cost of defense).
4.4.5 Endorsement Requirements. Each insurance policy required by Section 4 shall
be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party, except
after 30 days’ prior written notice has been provided to the City.
4.4.6 Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its
policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each
subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the
requirements stated herein.
4.5 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Consultant fails to provide
or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time
herein required, City may, at its sole option exercise any of the following remedies, which
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 20
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 7 of 13
are alternatives to other remedies City may have and are not the exclusive remedy for
Consultant’s breach:
Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such
insurance from any sums due under the Agreement;
Order Consultant to stop work under this Agreement or withhold any payment that
becomes due to Consultant hereunder, or both stop work and withhold any payment,
until Consultant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; and/or
Terminate this Agreement.
Section 5. INDEMNIFICATION AND CONSULTANT’S RESPONSIBILITIES. Refer to the attached
Exhibit C, which is incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement.
Section 6. STATUS OF CONSULTANT.
6.1 Independent Contractor. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the
right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's services rendered
pursuant to this Agreement and assignment of personnel pursuant to Subsection 1.3;
however, otherwise City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant
accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other
City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant
and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing services under this
Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any and
all claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including
but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System
(PERS) as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for
employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.
6.2 Consultant Not an Agent. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no
authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an
agent. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement
to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.
Section 7. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.
7.1 Governing Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement.
7.2 Compliance with Applicable Laws. Consultant and any subcontractors shall comply with
all laws and regulations applicable to the performance of the work hereunder, including but
not limited to, the California Building Code, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and any
copyright, patent or trademark law. Consultant’s failure to comply with any law(s) or
regulation(s) applicable to the performance of the work hereunder shall constitute a breach
of contract.
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 21
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 8 of 13
7.3 Other Governmental Regulations. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by
fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant and any subcontractors
shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of
such fiscal assistance program.
7.4 Licenses and Permits. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and
its employees, agents, and any subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications,
and approvals of whatsoever nature that are legally required to practice their respective
professions. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its
employees, agents, any subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect
at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are
legally required to practice their respective professions. In addition to the foregoing,
Consultant and any subcontractors shall obtain and maintain during the term of this
Agreement valid Business Licenses from City.
7.5 Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity. Consultant shall not discriminate, on the
basis of a person’s race, sex, gender, religion (including religious dress and grooming
practices), national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition
(including cancer and genetic characteristics), marital status, age, sexual orientation, color,
creed, pregnancy, genetic information, gender identity or expression, political affiliation or
belief, military/veteran status, or any other classification protected by applicable local,
state, or federal laws (each a “Protected Characteristic”), against any employee, applicant
for employment, subcontractor, bidder for a subcontract, or participant in, recipient of, or
applicant for any services or programs provided by Consultant under this Agreement.
Consultant shall include the provisions of this Subsection in any subcontract approved by
the Contract Administrator or this Agreement.
Section 8. TERMINATION AND MODIFICATION.
8.1 Termination. City may cancel this Agreement at any time and without cause upon written
notification to Consultant.
Consultant may cancel this Agreement upon 30 days’ written notice to City and shall
include in such notice the reasons for cancellation.
In the event of termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services
performed to the effective date of termination; City, however, may condition payment of
such compensation upon Consultant delivering to City any or all documents, photographs,
computer software, video and audio tapes, and other materials provided to Consultant or
prepared by or for Consultant or the City in connection with this Agreement.
8.2 Extension. City may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, extend the end date of this
Agreement beyond that provided for in Subsection 1.1. Any such extension shall require a
written amendment to this Agreement, as provided for herein. Consultant understands and
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 22
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 9 of 13
agrees that, if City grants such an extension, City shall have no obligation to provide
Consultant with compensation beyond the maximum amount provided for in this
Agreement. Similarly, unless authorized by the Contract Administrator, City shall have no
obligation to reimburse Consultant for any otherwise reimbursable expenses incurred
during the extension period.
8.3 Amendments. The Parties may amend this Agreement only by a writing signed by all the
Parties.
8.4 Assignment and Subcontracting. City and Consultant recognize and agree that this
Agreement contemplates personal performance by Consultant and is based upon a
determination of Consultant’s unique personal competence, experience, and specialized
personal knowledge. Moreover, a substantial inducement to City for entering into this
Agreement was and is the professional reputation and competence of Consultant.
Consultant may not assign this Agreement or any interest therein without the prior written
approval of the Contract Administrator. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the
performance contemplated and provided for herein, other than to the subcontractors noted
in the proposal, without prior written approval of the Contract Administrator.
8.5 Survival. All obligations arising prior to the termination of this Agreement and all
provisions of this Agreement allocating liability between City and Consultant shall survive
the termination of this Agreement.
8.6 Options upon Breach by Consultant. If Consultant materially breaches any of the terms
of this Agreement, City’s remedies shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
8.6.1 Immediately terminate the Agreement;
8.6.2 Retain the plans, specifications, drawings, reports, design documents, and any
other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement;
8.6.3 Retain a different consultant to complete the work described in Exhibit A not
finished by Consultant; or
8.6.4 Charge Consultant the difference between the cost to complete the work
described in Exhibit A that is unfinished at the time of breach and the amount that
City would have paid Consultant pursuant to Section 2 if Consultant had
completed the work.
Section 9. KEEPING AND STATUS OF RECORDS.
9.1 Records Created as Part of Consultant’s Performance. All reports, data, maps,
models, charts, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda, plans, studies, specifications,
records, files, or any other documents or materials, in electronic or any other form, that
Consultant prepares or obtains pursuant to this Agreement and that relate to the matters
covered hereunder shall be the property of the City. Consultant hereby agrees to deliver
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 23
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 10 of 13
those documents to the City upon termination of the Agreement. It is understood and
agreed that the documents and other materials, including but not limited to those described
above, prepared pursuant to this Agreement are prepared specifically for the City and are
not necessarily suitable for any future or other use. City and Consultant agree that, until
final approval by City, all data, plans, specifications, reports and other documents are
confidential and will not be released to third parties without prior written consent of both
Parties.
9.2 Consultant’s Books and Records. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books
of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents
evidencing or relating to charges for services or expenditures and disbursements charged
to the City under this Agreement for a minimum of 3 years, or for any longer period
required by law, from the date of final payment to the Consultant to this Agreement.
9.3 Inspection and Audit of Records. Any records or documents that Subsection 9.2 of this
Agreement requires Consultant to maintain shall be made available for inspection, audit,
and/or copying at any time during regular business hours, upon oral or written request of
the City. Under California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the amount of public funds
expended under this Agreement exceeds $10,000.00, the Agreement shall be subject to
the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit
of the City, for a period of 3 years after final payment under the Agreement.
Section 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
10.1 Attorneys’ Fees. If a party to this Agreement brings any action, including an action for
declaratory relief, to enforce or interpret the provision of this Agreement, the prevailing
party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to any other relief to which
that party may be entitled. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a
separate action brought for that purpose.
10.2 Venue. In the event that either party brings any action against the other under this
Agreement, the Parties agree that trial of such action shall be vested exclusively in the
state courts of California in the County of Alameda or in the United States District Court for
the Northern District of California.
10.3 Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this
Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the provisions of this Agreement not so
adjudged shall remain in full force and effect. The invalidity in whole or in part of any
provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this
Agreement.
10.4 No Implied Waiver of Breach. The waiver of any breach of a specific provision of this
Agreement does not constitute a waiver of any other breach of that term or any other term
of this Agreement.
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 24
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 11 of 13
10.5 Successors and Assigns. The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of
and shall apply to and bind the successors and assigns of the Parties.
10.6 Use of Recycled Products. Consultant shall prepare and submit all reports, written
studies and other printed material on recycled paper to the extent it is available at equal or
less cost than virgin paper.
10.7 Conflict of Interest. Consultant may serve other clients, but none whose activities within
the corporate limits of City or whose business, regardless of location, would place
Consultant in a “conflict of interest,” as that term is defined in the Political Reform Act,
codified at California Government Code Section 81000 et seq.
Consultant shall not employ any City official in the work performed pursuant to this
Agreement. No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest in this
Agreement that would violate California Government Code Section 1090 et seq.
Consultant hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous 12 months,
an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City. If Consultant was an employee,
agent, appointee, or official of the City in the previous 12 months, Consultant warrants that
it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement. Consultant
understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of California Government Code
Section 1090 et seq., the entire Agreement is void and Consultant will not be entitled to
any compensation for services performed pursuant to this Agreement, including
reimbursement of expenses, and Consultant will be required to reimburse the City for any
sums paid to the Consultant. Consultant understands that, in addition to the foregoing, it
may be subject to criminal prosecution for a violation of California Government Code
Section 1090 et seq., and, if applicable, will be disqualified from holding public office in the
State of California.
At City’s sole discretion, Consultant may be required to file with the City a Form 700 to
identify and document Consultant’s economic interests, as defined and regulated by the
California Fair Political Practices Commission. If Consultant is required to file a Form 700,
Consultant is hereby advised to contact the Dublin City Clerk for the Form 700 and
directions on how to prepare it.
10.8 Solicitation. Consultant agrees not to solicit business at any meeting, focus group, or
interview related to this Agreement, either orally or through any written materials.
10.9 Contract Administration. This Agreement shall be administered by the City Manager
("Contract Administrator"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Contract
Administrator or his or her designee.
10.10 Notices. Any written notice to Consultant shall be sent to:
Procure America Inc.
Attn: Fred Armendariz
31103 Rancho Viejo Rd., #D2102
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 25
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 12 of 13
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
Any written notice to City shall be sent to:
City of Dublin
Attn: City Manager
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
10.11 Integration. This Agreement, including the scope of work attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibits A, B, C, and D represents the entire and integrated
agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations,
representations, or agreements, either written or oral.
Exhibit A Scope of Services
Exhibit B Compensation Schedule
Exhibit C Indemnification
Exhibit D Orange County Regional Cooperative Agreement
10.12 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which
shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement.
10.13 Certification per Iran Contracting Act of 2010. In the event that this contract is for
one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) or more, by Consultant’s signature below Consultant
certifies that Consultant, and any parent entities, subsidiaries, successors or subunits of
Consultant are not identified on a list created pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2203 of
the California Public Contract Code as a person engaging in investment activities in Iran as
described in subdivision (a) of Section 2202.5, or as a person described in subdivision (b)
of Section 2202.5 of the California Public Contract Code, as applicable.
SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 26
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and Last revised 04/02/2020
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services Page 13 of 13
The Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. The persons whose signatures appear
below certify that they are authorized to sign on behalf of the respective Party.
CITY OF DUBLIN PROCURE AMERICA INC.
Linda Smith, City Manager Fred Armendariz, CEO
Attest:
Caroline Soto, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
City Attorney
3070368.1
,7190436Ā-6:25782Ā/,)Ā."!$ %+ Ȁ#!&+Ȁ$"..Ȁ('(,Ȁ$&$++#+*'%$(
EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION 4.2.b
Packet Pg. 27
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services
Last revised 04/02/2020
Exhibit A – Page 1 of 4
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Procure America is the Country’s leading business intelligence firm supporting government agencies with
Enterprise Strategic Plans (ESP) specifically designed to deliver expense reduction and operational efficiency.
With over 2 billion dollars of client expenses under management, our expertise and track record are second to
none in this space. Each of the Procure America’s 6 practice groups: Utilities, Waste & Recycling, Document
Management, Telecommunications, Treasury and Risk Management are staffed with highly experienced
professionals who come directly from the industry in which they practice delivering insight, innovation,
intelligence and results.
In 2019, Procure America was awarded a Regional Cooperative Agreement (OC-RCA 017-19010018) by the
County of Orange, for the services under consideration by City of Dublin. The following Scope of Work mirrors
the OC-RCA in project scope, compensation and mission deliverables. A copy of the Regional Cooperative
Agreement can be found in Exhibit D.
OBJECTIVE
Procure America’s mission objective is to deliver the City of Dublin (Client) an Enterprise Strategic Plan (ESP) to
minimize the City’s utility, telecommunications, document management and treasury costs. Our team of
professionals will use their best efforts to obtain cost savings for the City by analyzing the Client’s policies,
procedures, supplier contracts, inventory of meters and services, equipment, past invoices and other pertinent
information as it relates to the expense categories stated in this proposal.
Procure America cost reviews require minimal staff time, with no disruptions to the City’s daily operations. Our
teams are self-contained with analytics, technology and any resources needed to accomplish the assigned
review as outlined in this proposal.
UTILITIES- Tariff Rate Optimization Study – TROS®
This analysis is unique and highly specialized in that our work is primarily a legal review of tariff rates,
transmission fees and surcharge structures. The study also includes: a forensic legal review of the California
Public Utility Commission's (CPUC) rulings; interpretations and regulations as it applies to commercial and
governmental tariff rate assignments; and how the providers are applying said rates structures to the City.
Further, our team has deep experience in municipal tax code applications and apply this expertise to our client's
various North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) designations in search of exemptions and cost
mitigation opportunities through individual meter rate modeling and other measures.
Procure America conducts TROS® reviews using methods, technology, and human capital that are highly
specialized and proprietary. Procure America staff’s qualifications to conduct a TROS® review requires both a
legal background and operational-engineering experience in order to understand, identify and implement the
most “favorable” CPUC adjudicated rate structures available, and to recognize less than apparent tariff rate
designations and tax mitigation that may benefit our clients.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS COST REVIEW
The Telecommunications Cost Review seeks to reduce the City’s landline voice, data and wireless costs while
maintaining or improving service levels. This detailed and specialized review goes far beyond a typical telecom
bill audit which is focused on identifying past carrier billing errors. Bringing decades of industry experience,
Procure America’s team will review every phone line, circuit and wireless device to identify services that are not
on the most appropriate plan offered by the carrier. Legacy services that can be replaced by more efficient
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 28
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services
Last revised 04/02/2020
Exhibit A – Page 2 of 4
technologies will be identified along with specific recommendations to the City. Contract optimization plays a
role in identifying savings opportunities; therefore, we conduct a forensic review of contract terms and compare
to industry best practices, cost model comparisons and governmental program modeling. Our goal is to optimize
the agreement to the Client’s specific goals and needs. Our team has extensive knowledge of public-sector
telecom purchasing contracts and will apply this expertise to identify any contracting vehicles that will benefit the
City of Dublin.
DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT COST REVIEW
While Procure America has experience working with all manufacturers and service providers in the industry
including Xerox, HP, Sharp, Ricoh, Konica and others, we remain completely vendor and hardware neutral. We
have access to databases of vendors, pricing and performance-related metrics providing insight into how
various brands and models perform in different environments. Our process includes establishing the historical
cost and objective assessment of all copier and printer devices, all pages, everywhere throughout the
organization, including scanning and faxing processes. We focus on optimization from the very start of the
assessment through the acquisition, and ultimately the daily management of devices.
In the end, our comprehensive analysis will provide recommendations on print cost reduction and management,
including operation and service enhancements. Procure America will work to develop cost savings strategies to
meet the City's needs, goals, and efficiencies with reduced pricing.
TREASURY COST REVIEW
Procure America specializes in minimizing costs associated with accepting credit cards and other forms of
electronic payment. As vendor neutral experts in the payments industry, we employ a comprehensive strategy
to redirect those fees back to our clients. In contract to belief, pricing is only part of the equation. In order to
minimize the City’s credit card processing costs, Procure America provides very specific pricing and terms to
ensure transactions are clearing at the lowest cost method. Further, our recommendations strive to increase
efficiency and a better, more transparent relationship with your processing vendors. A comprehensive ESP will
be generated with our findings and recommendations will be presented to the City, along with a discussion on
the various options presented to pursue savings. Additionally, we will also advise on methods or emerging
technology that could further reduce costs for the City.
Enterprise Strategic Plan (ESP)
Process:
1. Gathering Historical Data - Procure America will gather and organize historical billing information for all the
City’s utility, telecommunications, document management and treasury (electronic payment processing)
accounts. Where data is not readily available, Procure America will dedicate staff to work with the individual
departments and providers to gather the needed billing information. This process would require limited time from
City staff with the vast majority of the required information available directly to Procure America through online
access with the providers.
2. Tariff Rate Analysis - Procure America analyzes the data accumulated in light of applicable tariffs, statutes,
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) decisions and specific rate structures. All utility accounts are
reviewed to determine whether they are being billed correctly, and whether they have been billed appropriately
in the past. Procure America’s analysis includes but is not limited to the investigation of billing calculations,
inappropriate rate schedules, proper metering of services, optional rates, applicability of taxes and surcharges,
baseline and lifeline allowance calculations, meter multipliers, and rules and regulations affecting billing.
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 29
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services
Last revised 04/02/2020
Exhibit A – Page 3 of 4
Where the TROS® review starts with the historical aspect of the client’s expenses associated to rate structures,
the more significant and long-term value associated to the study stems from the alternative rates available to the
client moving forward. In the rate modeling component of a TROS® review, the analyst mathematically tests
alternate tariff rates the client is entitled to use per CPUC rules and regulations. These alternative tariffs are
based on a myriad of qualifiers including various industry NAICS codes designations, specific usage rates, load
profiles, technology, 15-minute interval data and other influencers, including the new PG&E Time-of-Use
structures (see section 8 for additional detail). The go-forward cost reduction aspect of the rate modeling
element of a TROS® review has an extended shelf life that will continue for many years into the future.
3. Telecommunications Cost Analysis - Procure America utilizes historical billing information and carrier
Customer Service Records to create a complete and current inventory of all landline voice, data and wireless
services by location. Each account is reviewed to determine if services are being billed correctly per the terms of
the contract and whether they have been billed appropriately in the past. Procure America’s analysis includes a
review of monthly recurring costs, usage charges, equipment charges, feature charges and the applicability of
taxes and surcharges.
Opportunities to reduce ongoing costs with improved carrier pricing or by utilizing available purchasing contracts
are identified. Based on line-by-line usage studies, Procure America will recommend the most cost-effective
carrier plans for each phone line, circuit and wireless device. Usage reports, dial studies and data traffic studies
are used to identify phone lines, circuits and wireless devices that appear to be unused and may no longer be
needed.
4. Document Management Cost Analysis – Procure America’s team will gather information from the City and
from the City's vendors including service history information for the past months, purchase and/or lease
information and service contract information. Thereafter, we will assess the current pricing, printing, copying,
scanning and faxing environment to provide recommendations related to the deployment of devices, policies,
and procedures in order to obtain the advantages of a more streamlined and efficient document output fleet for
the City. Procure America will also obtain data from the devices, interview key personnel, conduct a site visit to
couple equipment with location, review service histories and supply pricing to establish cost and service
benchmarking. A complete equipment list of inventory, establishing a baseline in pricing and the detailed print
environment will be complied into a report with recommendations on print cost reduction and management. This
detailed ESP includes an Excel file with a comprehensive cost analysis report at the individual asset level for all
devices including all costs of operation for hardware/software, service, and supplies (ink/toner).
Our analysis may recommend the City conducts a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Managed Print Services. If
so, Procure America will work with the City's staff to develop the RFP specifications and assist writing the RFP,
aligning the overall strategy and goals of the City. Procure America will assist the City evaluating the technical
specifications of various models, advise on the selection of devices and ultimately awarding the contract for
equipment, supplies and services specific to optimize the City’s document management needs.
5. Treasury Cost Analysis – After a preliminary review of 4 months of recent processing statements, we will
request a call with the City’s designated staff member(s) to get a deep understanding of Interchange and
Interchange Compliance, as well as all the alternative models that could work given the City’s needs.
Thereafter, we will do our analysis to
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 30
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services
Last revised 04/02/2020
Exhibit A – Page 4 of 4
deliver a savings strategy by reducing fees associated with accepting credit, debit and other forms of electronic
payment. A comprehensive report will be generated with our findings and recommendations will be presented to
the City of Dublin.
Based on our analysis will work with the City to determine if remaining with the existing processor (our
preference), consolidating to one of the existing processors (if there are multiple providers) or if selecting an
alternative trusted vendor is the best course to achieve cost savings. Thereafter, Procure America can either
negotiate on behalf of the City or advise the City on how to drive price and operations toward the desired
targets.
6. Report Submission - The ESP reports will summarize the results of the Telecommunications, Document
Management, Treasury and TROS® reviews. The reports will contain an explanation of legal grounds for all
refunds and cost reduction opportunities identified for each account, including calculations of the estimated
savings and refunds expected to be achieved.
7. Implementation of Changes/Recovery of Refunds - Procure America takes all necessary steps to
implement the City’s approved recommended changes and collect refunds for past billing errors. This work
includes preparing documentation supporting Procure America’s recommended rate applications and if
necessary, communicating or meeting with provider personnel to discuss each request. No involvement is
required by City staff other than in an advisory capacity and for final approval.
ESP DELIVERABLES
1. Analysis of historical usage data on all reviewed accounts
2. Legal and performance review of Power Purchase Agreements (PPA)
3. Complete inventory of all telecommunications services, hardware and phonelines
4. Complete inventory of all print management devices by location
5. Strategic go-forward findings report with recommendations to reduce costs
6.Implement all City approved recommendations
7. Evaluate any requests denied by utility provider and appeal to CPUC if appropriate and approved by the
Client
8. Direct communication with carriers to confirm proper implementation
9. Work on behalf or advise the City on merchant account recommendations
10. Document and collect refunds for past overcharges
11. Monthly auditing of vendor invoices to verify cost reduction
12. Ongoing cost reduction review
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 31
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services
Last revised 04/02/2020
Exhibit B – Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT B
COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
Procure America’s compensation proposal to the City is 100% contingency based. The ESP report will
document the Established Rates and specific recommendations for cost reduction and outline the methodology
used. If the City elects to proceed with any or all of the recommendations as set forth in the ESP report.
City will pay fees at the following percentage rate of cost savings/refunds, per audit review, after City approves
and receives Consultant recommendations in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
•30% of actual cost recovered for each month in the targeted expense category(s), for sixty (60)
consecutive months.
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 32
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Consulting Services Agreement between City of Dublin and
Procure America Inc. for Business Intelligence Services
Last revised 04/02/2020
Exhibit C – Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT C
INDEMNIFICATION
Consultant shall indemnify, defend with counsel acceptable to City, and hold harmless City and its officers,
elected officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all liability, loss, damage,
claims, expenses, and costs (including without limitation, attorney’s fees and costs and fees of litigation)
(collectively, “Liability”) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Consultant’s performance of the
services called for or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except
such Liability caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City.
Notwithstanding the forgoing, to the extent this Agreement is a “construction contract” as defined by
California Civil Code Section 2782, as may be amended from time to time, such duties of Consultant to
indemnify shall not apply when to do so would be prohibited by California Civil Code Section 2782.
The Consultant’s obligation to defend and indemnify shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s
inability to evaluate Liability or because the Consultant evaluates Liability and determines that the
Consultant is not liable to the claimant. The Consultant must respond within 30 days to the tender of any
claim for defense and indemnity by the City. If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense
and indemnity within 30 days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, so much of the money due
the Consultant under and by virtue of this Agreement as shall reasonably be considered necessary by the
City, may be retained by the City until disposition has been made of the claim or suit for damages, or until
the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense, whichever occurs first.
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 33
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 34
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 35
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 36
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 37
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 38
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 39
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 40
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 41
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 42
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
C<HmQ! ojt)range, Count.p E,xecudve (JjJice CostRecovery and Reduction Services Contr4ct: R,CA.-017�19010018 l]roc1tre'A�efiC111,,Inc.
l 1. Child SupJ)ort i;:ntorCcement ��quircmenti;: Contra9tor certifies n1s in full toinpUartce with allappriqabJe fiederal, � state reporting requlrerneqts regarding its ernployee5and with all lawfully �erred Wage and Earnfogs Assignment Orders and Notices of Assignmerits andwiU continue to be in coropUance thr9ughout 1P� tei;m of.the .OoJltract with the Corutt.y. of,orange .. Failure to comply shall cQnstitute a rnateriaLbr¢ach. of the Contract and failure to cure such breach within 60 calenciar days. ofnotice ,frc>1n th¢County shall constitute grounds fotterininatfo11 ofilie •. Contract.
12.ownership of Oocuments: The. Court� has permaite�t ownership Qf all dltectly coruiected ap(ideri\o'ative materials produced under thisG011tracthy tbe Contract9r .. All d9cu�nents, repgrtsandnther Incidental Qt d�rivatiye work <>r.mat,erials fru11ished t.e.-ew1der sball ge99rne and remafns thesole property Qf the County (1114 m!Iy pe ll§ecl, PY t\l.e C<>unty as it lnay require withoµt ad4itiopal�ost tp the C:0µ11tx. Nolle of tl.1e. qqcu.ments, repqrts ail4 <>ther foci<fer,taJ m-derivative WQrk 9tfuraj$becl. inaterials sh.a! I .. ge • \/-sec!, QY the Contraetor without tbe express written eon;sent of theGPUAl)'i
ll Da,ta - TltJe; To: All Ul{lJed�ls, dOCl!Iil¢ll�S. d.ata or infqrrnadon. Qbtained from the Counw data f'jles Qrany Qpunty me4iurn furpJshed to the Contractodn the performance Cir this contract WiU at :i.ll. times .. 1:en1aiu fu�. prqpe� ()f' lhe . Co\lnty. guch data or .. information n1ay not lie used 6rcqpiedfor dire¢t pr 111d,irect u!e by·. the9mtractor after co111pletion or tert11U1atfo11 of this ?ontraet without the express written consent oflhc. County. All rrtat�rialsrdocurnents, data Qr hiforrttation, including copies, mustbe returned to the County .lit tlie end of this Gontra¢t.
14.Publication: . �ti co�ies of ske!ches, schedu.Ies, \'yritten �ocwnerits! c9fuputer q�sed �ta,phot()gtaphsl niaps or !¥�phs, Juclu�i�ggrap.hic art \\'Ork� resulJin� from. Pefforrn;tqqe or preP.!!tedin porinectio1t W,ith this Co�tract;. are t9. be reiea.scd PY Cpnti:1!,ctor @g/-pr imyoµe aetj11g µnqef th.esqpervjsjcm of Con)taqtor 't(), �lly pi!):!lQO; partµership, epmpiny, c9i:pprati9p, Qf, ,agt1ncy, w1U19µtpriprwniten .!lPPl'.QYal by the ('.!o\lnty, e:-ccept !lS Jlt'!gess�ry for th� pert1;>r(�ance P[ we serviC¢S pfthj.s C,ontrac;t. Ail press coµt11,ct.s, .. inc14dfp.g gnJPhi� !;ti.splatlnfprmali()n tp b.e pqblished innewspapers,.magazines •. etc.�.arn to• be adroip.illtered only afterCQ.ruttY 11,pprov.al.
ts. Ertprs and ()pdsstons: . All. report�; files. and .ot�er.di,eume�ts prepared and $�bll1itted. byContractor shall be �on1Rlete. and . shall . be carefllllY checke(I, by. the prof e�sfonal(s) ide�dfi�d . by CQntJ;actor as Project Mana�ct and key personnel a«ache� l1etcto, prior to submission to the Corutty. Contractbr agrees that County review is discretionai-y and Contractor shall not assume that the CoU11ty ,vin discfrver errors arid/or omissioris. If the Cotuity discovers any errors or Omissiohs priorto approvirig;Coritracfor's repprts, files and other written documents, the .reports. files or docuinerits win be returned to Contractor for correcHon, Shoutd the County or others discqver errors or omissiohs in the repprts, files or pther written do9U([!Cnts sµllmittecl 1:>y the Contractpr .after Cpunty approval th�reof, County approval of Contractor's report;s, files pr docµments sllall not be used as a clefense by Contractor in any action betwe_en the Cowtty and Cont,r11ctor" �d the reports, files Qr documents will be returned to Contractor for correction,
16.News/lQ(Qrmation Release: The Contractor agreestbati� will not issue any news releases ormake any·contactwith the media in COllllCCtion With either the award ofthis Gontract.or.a:nrsub.sequent amendment of; or effo.rt under this·Contract, Contractors n1ust first obtain review andapproval ofsaidnews media contact from the County thfaugh the {;ouno/ DPA. An:y r�qtiestsforinterviews or information received by the media should be ref erred directly to the County.Contractors are n6t authorized fo serve as a 1nedia spokespersoris for County projects without firstobtaining.permission from the CoUnty�
Page /Oof 19
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 43
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 44
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 45
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 46
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 47
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 48
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 49
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 50
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 51
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 52
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 53
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 54
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
:
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
(
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 21, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers
Prepared by: Veronica Briggs, Senior Finance Technician
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will receive a listing of payments issued from March 1, 2020 - March
31, 2020 totaling $12,027,791.55.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUMMARY OF PAYMENTS ISSUED
March 1, 2020 through March 31, 2020
Total Number of Payments: 427
Total Amount of Payments: $12,027,791.55
DESCRIPTION:
The Payment Issuance Report (Attachment 1) provides a listing of all payments for the
period beginning March 1, 2020 through March 31, 2020. This report is provided in
accordance with the policy adopted November 15, 2011 in Resolution No.189 -11. The
listing of payments has been reviewed in accordance with the policies for processing
payments and expenditures.
The City’s practice of reporting payments to the City Council after the payments have
been made is in compliance with California Government Code Sections 37208 (b) and
(c), which allow for an agency to make payments without first being audited by the
legislative body, as long as such payments are: 1) conforming to a budget approved by
ordinance or resolution of the legislative body; and 2) presented to the legislative body
for ratification and approval in the form of an audited comprehensive annual financial
report.
4.3
Packet Pg. 55
Page 2 of 2
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Payment Issuance Report for March 2020
4.3
Packet Pg. 56
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 1 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
03/02/2020 4 PAWS GOOSE CONTROL, INC 1,000.00 GEESE CONTROL SERVICES JAN 2020
03/02/2020 4LEAF INC. 106,770.50 BUILDING INSPECTION/PLAN CHECK SERVICES
03/02/2020 ADVANCED MOBILITY GROUP 4,650.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS MAINT & SUPPORT 11,068.32 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS SUPPORT
Check Total: 15,718.32
03/02/2020 AKHTAR, AHMED 178.00 REC CLASS REFUND
03/02/2020 ALAMEDA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 1,370.00 CORP YARD HAZMAT FILING FEES
03/02/2020 ALAMEDA COUNTY INFO TECH DEPT 2,400.00 GIS IMAGERY FOR FY18-19
03/02/2020 ALPHA OMEGA WIRELESS, INC 2,530.00 ANNUAL WIRELESS SUPPORT TO CORP YARD
03/02/2020 AMP PRINTING, INC. 555.14 BUSINESS CARDS 364.44 SENIOR CENTER PUNCH CARDS PRINTING Check Total: 919.58
03/02/2020 AMY'S ENGRAVED SIGNS & AWARDS 43.70 EMPLOYEE NAMEPLATE - JAMES
03/02/2020 ANASTASIS DBA RADIANCE SCHOOL 200.00 SPLATTER FESTIVAL PERFORMANCE
03/02/2020 APWA-AMERICAN PUBLIC WORK ASSN 2,703.75 PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC AGENCY DUES
03/02/2020 AT&T - CALNET 3 45.29 SERVICE TO 02/06/2020 1,166.53 SERVICE TO 02/12/2020 499.30 SERVICE TO 02/14/2020 Check Total: 1,711.12
03/02/2020 BATCHELDER, PHILIP 200.00 ST. PATRICK’S DAY FESTIVAL ENTERTAINMENT
03/02/2020 BAY ISLAND OFFICIAL ASSOC 6,733.00 SPORTS OFFICIATING SERVICES
03/02/2020 BKF ENGINEERS 6,650.25 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY DUBLIN BLVD
03/02/2020 BMC SOFTWARE, INC. 1,017.58 HELP DESK SOFTWARE ANNUAL SUPPORT
03/02/2020 BOITNOTT, MICHAEL 67.12 REIMB DOUGHERTY RD IMPROV PROJ SUPPLIES
03/02/2020 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 100.00 YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINI GRANT
03/02/2020 BSK ASSOCIATES INC. 3,309.00 CONSTRUCTION INSPECT-IMAGINE PLAYGROUND
03/02/2020 CALATLANTIC GROUP, INC. 1,689,706.00 REFUND DUBLIN CROSSING TRANSPORT FEE PAID
03/02/2020 CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE 29,033.85 RETENTION DEPOSIT-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
03/02/2020 CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRONMENT 192.00 CA WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSN DUES-YOUNG
03/02/2020 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 49,373.22 PSC NETWORK SWITCHES/SONICWALL SECURITY
03/02/2020 CHARGE POINT, INC. 3,992.00 REPLACE EV CHARGING STATIONS
03/02/2020 CITIES GROUP, THE 1,708.33 WORKERS COMP/SAFETY COMPLIANCE ASSESS.
03/02/2020 COMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR 230.85 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT DEC 2019
03/02/2020 CONTRACT SWEEPING SERVICES 20,264.86 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES DEC 2019 17,435.44 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES FEB 2020 Check Total: 37,700.30
03/02/2020 DAHLIN GROUP INC 2,396.00 AQUATIC COMPLEX ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SVC
03/02/2020 D'AMORE'S OF DUBLIN 47,063.00 SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE GRANT REIMB
03/02/2020 DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. 779.42 GREASE TRAP SERVICE-FIRE STATIONS 17 & 18
03/02/2020 DEAM, VALERIE 500.00 ST. PATRICK'S DAY FESTIVAL ENTERTAINMENT
03/02/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 160.00 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES JAN 2020
03/02/2020 DUBLIN HIGH SCHOOL P.A.T.C.H. 340.00 YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINI GRANT
03/02/2020 DUBLIN HIGH SCHOOL PFSO 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/02/2020 DUBLIN INTEGRITY IN ACTION 500.00 EVENT SPONSORSHIP AND TEAM PARTICIPATION
03/02/2020 DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 911.65 STAGER GYM ELECTRIC 12/12/2019 - 1/12/2020 3,326.02 STAGER GYM FLOOR MAINTENANCE 194.15 STAGER GYM WATER USAGE 12/1/2019 – 1/31/2020 Check Total: 4,431.82
03/02/2020 DUDE SOLUTIONS INC. 24,977.40 TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP PROJECT
03/02/2020 EMPOWER MARTIAL ARTS 76.30 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 57
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 2 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
03/02/2020 FEDEX 49.10 EXPRESS SHIPPING
03/02/2020 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 175.00 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 2/14/20
03/02/2020 GARRY, TIMOTHY 2,500.00 ST. PATRICK'S DAY FESTIVAL ENTERTAINMENT
03/02/2020 GATES & ASSOCIATES, INC., DAVID L. 7,275.44 DESIGN SERVICES-DSG ALL ABILITIES PLAYGRND
03/02/2020 GENIUS KIDS DUBLIN ECLIPSE 250.00 LIBRARY RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/02/2020 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS, INC. 7,078.42 GREEN INFRASTRUCT/STRMWTR RESOURCE PLAN
03/02/2020 GIRI, BIMESH 250.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/02/2020 GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SVCS INC 1,638.06 RECORDS MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE
03/02/2020 GOLDEN BOUGH INC 1,500.00 ST. PATRICK'S DAY FESTIVAL ENTERTAINMENT
03/02/2020 GORDON HUETHER + PARTNERS, INC 70,000.00 PUBLIC ART FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
03/02/2020 GROUP 4 ARCHITECTURE, 35,409.54 CULTURAL ARTS CENTER DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION
03/02/2020 HERNANDEZ, MELISSA 210.56 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 2018 222.26 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 2019
Check Total: 432.82
03/02/2020 IRISH HERALD, THE 1,600.00 ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL ADVERTISING
03/02/2020 KIM, SAMMY 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/02/2020 LOEWKE PLANNING ASSOCIATES 3,450.00 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVICES JAN 2020
03/02/2020 LOGOBOSS 725.41 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION EVENT SUPPLIES
03/02/2020 MCE CORPORATION 533,964.83 BUILDING MAINTENANCE JAN 2020
03/02/2020 OFFICE TEAM 2,495.73 TEMPORARY CLERICAL SUPPORT-RECORDS 1,446.80 TEMPORARY OFFICE STAFF-MUTHER Check Total: 3,942.53
03/02/2020 ONE WORKPLACE L. FERRARI LLC 340.99 OFFICE EQUIPMENT-ADMIN SERVICES DEPT
03/02/2020 PACIFIC FITNESS PRODUCTS LLC 57,761.79 GYM EQUIPMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
03/02/2020 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 2,533.00 EASTERN DUBLIN TIF UPDATE DEC 2019 4,125.00 EASTERN DUBLIN TIF UPDATE JAN 2020 1,500.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEC 2019 3,225.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES JAN 2020 1,097.00 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROJ
Check Total: 12,480.00
03/02/2020 PG&E 24,346.20 SERVICE TO 02/05/2020 4,452.38 SERVICE TO 02/06/2020 252.26 SERVICE TO 02/07/2020 101.12 SERVICE TO 02/10/2020 3,608.78 SERVICE TO 02/11/2020 431.38 SERVICE TO 02/12/2020
Check Total: 33,192.12 03/02/2020 PG&E CFM/PPC DEPARTMENT 45,677.43 PG&E CONNECT-DON BIDDLE COMMUNITY PARK
03/02/2020 PIZZA GUYS 152.00 THE WAVE BIRTHDAY PARTY PACKAGE SUPPLIES
03/02/2020 QUARRY LANE-ENVIRONMENTAL CLUB 400.00 YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINI GRANT
03/02/2020 REGISTER, INGRID 500.00 ST. PATRICK'S DAY FESTIVAL ENTERTAINMENT
03/02/2020 REVEL ENVIRONMENTAL MFG INC. 6,384.00 TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE MAINTENANCE SERVICE
03/02/2020 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. 4,253.75 DEVELOPMENT OF CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 2.0
03/02/2020 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 922.36 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DIVISION
03/02/2020 SAUSAL CORPORATION 553,543.14 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION
03/02/2020 SCHOOL OF IMAGINATION 2,308.00 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEE
03/02/2020 SDI PRESENCE, LLC. 1,253.00 ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLNG SELECTION ASSIST
03/02/2020 SELECT IMAGING 1,519.11 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION EVENT PRINTING
03/02/2020 SHUMS CODA ASSOCIATES INC 11,700.00 PLAN CHECK SERVICES JAN 2020
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 58
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 3 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
03/02/2020 SORBYE, LIEF 4,000.00 ST. PATRICK'S DAY FESTIVAL ENTERTAINMENT
03/02/2020 STAGES UNLIMITED 3,090.00 ST. PATRICK’S DAY PARADE BLEACHER RENTAL
03/02/2020 TEENS UNITE FOR EDUCATION 200.00 YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINI GRANT
03/02/2020 TERRYBERRY 292.93 EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS
03/02/2020 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 2,587.04 INTERNET & PHONE SVCS TO 02/08/2020 2,761.38 INTERNET & PHONE SVCS TO 03/08/2020 Check Total: 5,348.42
03/02/2020 TRB AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 4,455.00 PLAN CHECK SERVICES JAN 2020
03/02/2020 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 144,485.11 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/ STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE
03/02/2020 TRI-VALLEY COMMUNITY TV 1,139.16 DVD RECORDER FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS
03/02/2020 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. 1,702.26 EXTRA JANITORIAL SERVICES JAN 2020 20,631.45 JANITORIAL SERVICES FEB 2020 2,195.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 4,060.89 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JAN 2020 Check Total: 28,589.60
03/02/2020 U S BANK ST. PAUL 1,605,542.09 SPECIAL TAX REVENUE COLLECTED CFD 2015-1
03/02/2020 U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION AWG 449.93 WAGE GARNISHMENT: PE 2/14/20
03/02/2020 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 240.00 BUSINESS REPLY MAIL PERMIT
03/02/2020 WANZENRIED, NICKI 25.99 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT JAN 2020
03/02/2020 WC3-WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANT 30,375.00 PLAN CHECK SERVICES JAN 2020
03/02/2020 ZOO STATION ENTERTAINMENT 2,500.00 ST. PATRICK'S DAY FESTIVAL ENTERTAINMENT
Payments Issued 3/2/2020 Total: 5,281,644.48
03/03/2020 AMP PRINTING, INC. 728.86 PRINTING SERVICES-THE WAVE SWIM CARDS
Payments Issued 3/3/2020 Total: 728.86
03/06/2020 CAL PERS 77,993.05 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 2/28/20
03/06/2020 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 18,482.37 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 2/28/20
03/06/2020 I C M A 401 PLAN 2,072.76 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 2/28/20
03/06/2020 I C M A 457 PLAN 23,876.42 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 2/28/20
03/06/2020 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 57,726.39 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 2/28/20
03/06/2020 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM 212.08 2020 CA DISABLED ACCESSIBILITY GUIDEBOOKS 710.96 CA PARKS & REC CONF REG & EXP-ELLIOTT 485.00 CITY CLERKS ASSOC CONFERENCE REG-DIAZ 31.77 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP SUPPLIES 2,138.31 COMPUTER EQUIP, NETWORK CABLES FOR PSC 511.00 EMPLOYMENT ADS AND W-4 WEBINAR-A. SMITH 834.76 ERGONOMIC EQUIPMENT AND OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,594.32 ERGONOMIC EQUIPMENT AND OFFICE SUPPLIES 209.35 GREEN CITIES CA MEETING EXP-PARNES/YOUNG 243.02 HERITAGE CENTER AND MUSEUM SUPPLIES 115.35 INNOV TRI-VALLEY EVENT REG-WETHERFORD 1,411.55 IPMA-HR CONF REG-CLEVENGER, PD SUPPLIES 214.99 MICROSOFT OFFICE LICENSES 665.00 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF REG-GOEL 2,921.81 LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF EXP-JOSEY/KUMAGAI
3,348.62 VOLUNTEER REC EVENT/COMM PROMO SUPPLIES 1,441.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES, PARKS/REC CONF REG-WEBER
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 59
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 4 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
628.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES & CAFR AWARD APPLICATION 105.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES & CITY CLERKS ASN DUES-SOTO 3,100.35 PLNG COMMISSIONERS CONF REG-4 ATTENDEES 203.37 POLICE INVESTIGATIONS SUPPLIES 2,191.45 POLICE PURSUIT PREVENTION DEVICES 632.69 POLICE SUPPLIES 293.07 PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 316.34 PRINTING OF SOCIAL MEDIA & PARKS POSTCARDS 1,027.73 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX SUPPLIES 30.00 PUBLIC WORKS ASSN TRAINING-MC DONALD 1,804.56 PW OFFICERS CONF REG/EXP-RUSSELL/SUCGANG 390.84 RADIO CONVERSION KITS FOR PD VEHICLES 1,256.80 RECREATION SUPPLIES 312.88 SENIOR CENTER SUPPLIES 57.86 SPONSOR RECOGNITION SUPPLIES 12.00 STOPWASTE MEETING EXPENSE-HERNANDEZ 60.00 SUBDIV MAP ACT/PAVEMENTS SEMINAR-SUCGANG 236.95 THE WAVE SUPPLIES 45.00 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MTG EXP-KHAN 1,950.20 U.S. CONF OF MAYORS EXPENSE-HAUBERT
Check Total: 30,664.34
03/06/2020 US BANK - PARS 2,206.42 PARS: PE 2/28/20
03/06/2020 WAGEWORKS, INC. 4,771.73 WAGEWORKS: PE 2/28/20
Payments Issued 3/6/2020 Total: 217,793.48
03/09/2020 CALPERS 31,387.71 CALPERS ARREARS CONTRIBUTIONS
03/09/2020 NEOPOST USA INC 2,000.00 REPLENISH POSTAGE MACHINE
Payments Issued 3/9/2020 Total: 33,387.71
03/11/2020 4LEAF INC. 2,604.00 BUILDING INSPECTIONS SERVICES-CIP
03/11/2020 AIGNER, MOLLY 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIRS FOR ART DISPLAY
03/11/2020 ALAMEDA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 3,564.00 HEALTH PERMITS FOR THE WAVE POOLS
03/11/2020 AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR & 72,593.16 RETENTION RELEASE 2019 SLURRY SEAL PROJ
03/11/2020 APEX GRADING 2,706.00 FALLON VILLAGE GHAD MAINTENANCE
03/11/2020 ARAMARK UNIFORM SVC LOCKBOX 704.08 MAT SERVICE CIVIC CENTER 345.59 MAT SERVICE CORP YARD 377.51 MAT SERVICE SENIOR CENTER 1,605.11 MAT SERVICE SHANNON CENTER 42.91 MAT SERVICES SHANNON CENTER Check Total: 3,075.20
03/11/2020 BALLARD, MITCH 600.00 SOUND SERVICES FOR PSC GRAND OPENING
03/11/2020 BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3,758.54 DESIGN SUPPORT FOR DUBLIN BLVD WIDENING
03/11/2020 BENKO, MICKEY 2,316.20 REKEY EVIDENCE AREA-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 392.07 KEY ROLLING DOORS-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX Check Total: 2,708.27
03/11/2020 BSK ASSOCIATES INC. 300.00 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES-CLOVER PARK
03/11/2020 CAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY INC 235.00 PEER REVIEW/PLAN CHECK-DON BIDDLE PARK
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 60
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 5 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
03/11/2020 COIT SERVICES, INC. 1,083.00 CARPET CLEANING SERVICES-CIVIC CENTER
03/11/2020 COLIN SELIG SCULPTURE LLC. 9,925.00 CLOVER PARK PUBLIC ART PROJECT
03/11/2020 CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING 15,070.13 INSPECTION SERVICES-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
03/11/2020 ECOLAB, INC. 398.98 SENIOR CENTER SUPPLIES
03/11/2020 EMPOWER MARTIAL ARTS 76.30 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/11/2020 EVERPRO KIDS 357.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/11/2020 FASTENAL COMPANY 126.89 HARDWARE FOR TVS-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
03/11/2020 FASTSIGNS 1,603.24 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX DEDICATION PLAQUE 165.69 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX SIGNAGE Check Total: 1,768.93
03/11/2020 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 600.72 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 2/28/20
03/11/2020 GATES & ASSOCIATES, INC., DAVID L. 1,075.00 PLAN REVIEW DON BIDDLE COMMUNITY PARK
03/11/2020 GLUMAC 2,844.25 COMMISSIONING AGENT SERVICES FOR PSC PROJ
03/11/2020 GREENPLAY, LLC. 1,780.10 PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE
03/11/2020 IMAGE SALES, INC. 83.16 TONER FOR ID BADGE MACHINE
03/11/2020 INDIGO/HAMMOND + PLAYLE 16,409.37 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN-POLICE BLDG RENOV
03/11/2020 JAM SERVICES INC 365.99 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
03/11/2020 JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY 426.44 FIRE ALARM MONITORING SVCS-CIVIC CENTER 834.42 FIRE ALARM MONITORING SVCS-PSC Check Total: 1,260.86
03/11/2020 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC. 5,786.70 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE
03/11/2020 LPA, INC. 54,915.46 DESIGN SVCS-CIVIC CNTR HVAC/ROOF RPLCMNT
03/11/2020 MCE CORPORATION 23,457.02 SUNWOOD CONCRETE RESTORATION 35,796.00 VOMAC RD CURB & GUTTER Check Total: 59,253.02
03/11/2020 MEIN, STEPHANIE 29.79 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT JAN 2020
03/11/2020 MEYERS NAVE 369.00 LEGAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 50,068.93 LEGAL SERVICES DEC 2019
Check Total: 50,437.93
03/11/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 366.23 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE MAILING-TASSAJARA
03/11/2020 MODERN DRAPERY GROUP INC. 9,646.00 WINDOW BLINDS AT PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
03/11/2020 NORTON, AMY 49.90 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FEB 2020
03/11/2020 ONE WORKPLACE L. FERRARI LLC 1,195.20 PLANNING & BLDG DIV OFFICE FURNITURE
03/11/2020 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 3,363.00 2019 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT 2,925.00 PEER REVIEW/PLAN CHECK SVC-DON BIDDLE PRK Check Total: 6,288.00
03/11/2020 PURECO, NELSON 18.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FEB 2020
03/11/2020 RASTOGI, SWATI 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/11/2020 REDGWICK CONSTRUCTION CO 127,198.35 ALAMO CREEK TRAIL REPAIRS
03/11/2020 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 217.60 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DIVISION
03/11/2020 SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS 99,530.95 VIDEO WALL FOR EOC AT PUBLIC SAFETY COMP
03/11/2020 SPECIAL EVENTS 562.99 EQUIP RENTAL-PUBLIC SAFETY COMP OPENING
03/11/2020 STEFANSKI, JOHN 204.25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FEB 2020
03/11/2020 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT 3,740.00 CIVIC CENTER HVAC EVALUATION 2,380.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT DUBLIN BLVD WIDENING 9,145.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT/INSPECTION FF&E AT PSC 15,699.00 MANAGE TEMP RELOCATION ALAMEDA CO FIRE Check Total: 30,964.00
03/11/2020 TELLART, LLC. 15,000.00 DOUGHERTY HILLS DOG PARK PUBLIC ART
03/11/2020 TERRYBERRY 395.70 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION GIFT
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 61
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 6 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
03/11/2020 TORRES, TARALYN 13.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT JAN 2020
03/11/2020 TRANSPORT PRODUCTS 13,195.22 CARGO CONTAINERS-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
03/11/2020 TRI VALLEY KOREAN AMERICAN 500.00 SENIOR CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/11/2020 U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION AWG 449.93 WAGE GARNISHMENT: PE 2/28/20
03/11/2020 VALLEY WINDOW CLEANING INC 8,325.00 WINDOW CLEANING-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
03/11/2020 VASUDEVAN, PRIYA 984.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/11/2020 VINLAND GRAFTON INVESTMENT LLC 1,040.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
03/11/2020 WAGEWORKS, INC. 533.00 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT ADMIN FEES
03/11/2020 WEE HOOP, INC. 2,188.80 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/11/2020 WONG, ANNE 40.50 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT
03/11/2020 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP 1,462.00 PROJECT MGMT SVCS-DON BIDDLE COMM PARK
Payments Issued 3/11/2020 Total: 638,162.57
03/16/2020 4LEAF INC. 87,776.00 BUILDING INSPECTION/PLAN CHECK SVCS
03/16/2020 A-1 ENTERPRISES 885.00 PORTABLE RSTRMS-DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS
03/16/2020 ADAMS SAFETY TRAINING 196.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/16/2020 ADVANCED INTEGRATED PEST 2,635.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICES
03/16/2020 AGRAWAL, SHWETA 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 ALAMEDA COUNTY CLERK 50.00 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION CLERK FILING FEE
03/16/2020 ALAMEDA COUNTY CLERK 50.00 TASSAJARA ROAD ALIGNMENT PROJECT
03/16/2020 AMADOR VALLEY INDUSTRIES LLC 3,985.73 COMMERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM REIMB
03/16/2020 AMP PRINTING, INC. 454.25 COUNCIL CHAMBER PODIUM LOGOS 198.50 ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL BART BANNER 171.41 ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL POSTERS 293.13 ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL STREET SIGNS Check Total: 1,117.29
03/16/2020 ARAMARK UNIFORM SVC LOCKBOX 166.59 MAT SERVICE CIVIC CENTER 53.93 MAT SERVICE SENIOR CENTER 69.22 MAT SERVICE SHANNON CENTER Check Total: 289.74
03/16/2020 ARORA, AKSHAY 4,851.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/16/2020 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING 19,456.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - JAN 2020
03/16/2020 AT&T 1,328.66 PSC INTERNET/PHONE SVC - FEB 2020 93.38 SERVICE FOR TOLL FREE NUMBER- FEB 2020 Check Total: 1,422.04
03/16/2020 AT&T - CALNET 3 287.92 SERVICE TO 02/26/2020 124.69 SERVICE TO 02/27/2020
Check Total: 412.61
03/16/2020 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 349.92 PLANNING LEGAL NOTICES FEB 2020
03/16/2020 BKF ENGINEERS 13,740.56 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY DUBLIN BLVD
03/16/2020 BLAISDELL'S BUSINESS PRODUCTS 2,899.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES-FEB 2020
03/16/2020 BLUETOAD, INC. 390.00 DIGITAL 2020 SUMMER CAMPS & ACTIVITY GUIDE
03/16/2020 BOARDMAN, JEANNIE 314.00 RECREATION REFUND
03/16/2020 BOYLE, DUSTIN TRAVIS 500.00 FARMERS' MARKET PERFORMANCE
03/16/2020 BRINKS, INC. 195.23 ARMORED CAR SERVICE MAR 2020
03/16/2020 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 637.08 SOFTWARE LICENSE-ADOBE, MICROSOFT,SOPHOS
03/16/2020 CERRUTI, DAELYN 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 CHAN, ROSA 302.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/16/2020 CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT 12,124.38 INVESTMENT SERVICES FEB 2020
03/16/2020 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC 2,219.00 CIVIC CENTER INTERNET SERVICE MAR 2020
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 62
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 7 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
03/16/2020 COMCAST 2,300.00 CIVIC CENTER/FIRE STATION INTERNET MAR 2020
03/16/2020 COMCAST 1,442.57 INTERNET/CABLE SVCS VARIOUS CITY DEPTS
03/16/2020 CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING 2,691.70 PUBLIC SAFETY PUBLIC ART INSPECTIONS
03/16/2020 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 18.00 ASSESSOR MAP UPDATES - JAN 2020
03/16/2020 DENALECT ALARM COMPANY 336.00 QUARTERLY ALARM CHARGE FIRE STATION 18
03/16/2020 DESAI, CHINAR 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 DIABLO PUBLICATIONS 2,795.00 ADVERTISING FOR ST. PATRICK'S DAY FESTIVAL
03/16/2020 DSRSD 987.09 SERVICE TO 2/29/2020
03/16/2020 DU-ALL SAFETY, LLC 2,247.50 SAFETY CONSULTING & INSPECTION SERVICES
03/16/2020 DUBLIN HIGH SCHOOL BOOK CLUB 160.00 YOUTH MINI GRANT 2020
03/16/2020 DUBLIN LITTLE LEAGUE 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/16/2020 DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,046.64 STAGER GYM ELECTRIC 1/31/2020 - 2/11/2020 588.27 STAGER GYM SPURR GAS 12/4/2019 - 1/31/2020
Check Total: 1,634.91
03/16/2020 EARL ANTHONYS DUBLIN BOWL INC 1,000.00 2020 PRO BOWLERS ASSN TOUR SPONSORSHIP
03/16/2020 EAST BAY POOL SERVICE, INC. 8,620.00 POOL MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE WAVE
03/16/2020 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DIST 36,917.08 MAINT TASSAJARA CREEK/ALAMO CANAL TRAILS
03/16/2020 ECOLAB, INC. 821.82 SENIOR CENTER SUPPLIES
03/16/2020 EDGE GYMNASTICS TRAINING CTR. 277.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/16/2020 EMPOWER MARTIAL ARTS 152.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/16/2020 ENGIE SERVICES U.S. INC. 31,020.00 SOLAR PANEL MAINTENANCE YR 7
03/16/2020 ENVIRONMENTAL LOGISTICS, INC. 1,590.00 ENVIRONMENTAL SPILL RESPONSE SERVICES
03/16/2020 EVERPRO KIDS 153.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/16/2020 EVERYTHING GROWS INTERIOR 198.55 PLANT SERVICE MAR 2020
03/16/2020 GATES & ASSOCIATES, INC., DAVID L. 2,515.87 DESIGN SERVICES-DSG ALL ABILITIES PLAYGR
03/16/2020 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS, INC. 7,023.06 GREEN INFRASTR/STRMWTR RESOURCE PLAN
03/16/2020 GIANATIEMPO, COLLEEN 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 GIANCOLA, ANNE 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 GIANG, MAY YIN 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SVCS INC 1,669.62 RECORDS MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE
03/16/2020 GOLDEN BAY CONSTRUCTION, INC. 13,868.95 PED IMPROV AVB/STAGECOACH/WILDWOOD
03/16/2020 HARRELL HARRIS PHOTOGRAPHY 900.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES PSC GRAND OPENING
03/16/2020 HOLMES, SHEILA M. 301.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/16/2020 HOODYE, KHALIF 206.02 REIMB ADV ROADSIDE IMPAIRMENT TRNG EXP
03/16/2020 IBS USA INC. 84,297.30 REPLACE MAPE MEMORIAL PARK PLAY EQUIP
03/16/2020 JOCHNER, RICH 13.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FEB 2020
03/16/2020 KIER & WRIGHT CIVIL ENGINEERS 2,409.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES JAN 2020
03/16/2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. 7,535.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES JAN 2020
03/16/2020 KINDERMUSIK W/ MS LINDSAY & 1,944.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/16/2020 KLUBER ASSOCIATES, INC 2,151.75 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SVCS
03/16/2020 LALLIAN, SALVIN 300.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/16/2020 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 38.50 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES FEB 2020 350.56 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES JAN 2020 Check Total: 389.06
03/16/2020 LANLOGIC INC. 1,050.00 MALWARE SOFTWARE MONITORING FEB 2020 425.00 NETWORK MONITORING SERVICES FEB 2020 43.50 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING PROJECT FEB 2020 2,453.95 WIRELESS ACCESS POINTS-PSC
Check Total: 3,972.45
03/16/2020 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 100.00 EAST BAY DIVISION MEETING-KUMAGAI/JOSEY
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 63
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 8 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
03/16/2020 LOGOBOSS 420.33 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION PLAQUES
03/16/2020 LONG, LISA 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 LOWDERMILK, VERA GORDEEV 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 MERCADO, JAONY 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/16/2020 MGT OF AMERICA CONSULTING, LLC 1,150.00 SB90 CLAIMS PROCESSING
03/16/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 110.89 LEED POSTER FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
03/16/2020 MONKEY BEAR YOGA, INC. 140.00 PRESCHOOL FIELD TRIP
03/16/2020 MORBO, ANGELA 90.00 REIMBURSE FOR OFFICE SUPPLIES
03/16/2020 MULEY, THERESA 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 NICKLES, BRITTANY 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 NORCAL MUNI HR MGRS GROUP 200.00 NORCAL HR SPRING 2020 CONF REG - CARTER
03/16/2020 OFFICE TEAM 1,446.80 TEMPORARY CLERICAL SUPPORT- MUTHER 3,074.45 TEMPORARY CLERICAL SUPPORT-RECORDS
Check Total: 4,521.25
03/16/2020 OLBERDING ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 2,503.30 GHAD SUPPORT CONSULTING SERVICES JAN 2020
03/16/2020 OSGOOD, JOHN 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 OUTFRONT MEDIA LLC 7,800.00 ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL BART ADVERTISEMENT
03/16/2020 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 900.00 EASTERN DUBLIN TIF UPDATE 2,662.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES - FEB 2020 7,155.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES - JAN 2020 900.00 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROJ
Check Total: 11,618.25
03/16/2020 PG&E 7,582.50 SERVICE TO 01/31/2020 1,115.31 SERVICE TO 02/11/2020 6,684.61 SERVICE TO 02/13/2020 25,301.46 SERVICE TO 02/14/2020 4,789.63 SERVICE TO 02/25/2020 112.53 SERVICE TO 02/26/2020 119.32 SERVICE TO 02/27/2020 53.05 SERVICE TO 02/28/2020 2,475.22 SERVICE TO 03/01/2020 256.00 SERVICE TO 03/02/2020 Check Total: 48,489.63
03/16/2020 PLEASANTON, CITY OF 2,389.06 HUD SECTION 108 LOAN PYMNT-AXIS COMMUNITY
03/16/2020 PSOMAS 115.00 GIS PORTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
03/16/2020 PUBLIC BENEFIT TECHNOLOGY 255.00 CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO SVCS JAN 2020
03/16/2020 QUENCH USA, INC. 513.23 WATER FILTER SYSTEM SERVICES
03/16/2020 REDDELL, DANIEL E. 990.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/16/2020 RIDDLE, ALEXANDRA 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 RIDE ARTS LLC. 4,900.00 SEAN DIAMOND PARK PUBLIC ART
03/16/2020 RIZVI, FIZZA 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/16/2020 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 95.20 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DIVISION
03/16/2020 RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CA CORP 333.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES - DEC 2019 1,498.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES - JAN 2020 2,523.75 PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
Check Total: 4,356.25
03/16/2020 SAN LEANDRO, CITY OF 4,262.00 ALAMEDA CO MAYORS' CONF DUES-HAUBERT
03/16/2020 SELECT IMAGING 47.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES
03/16/2020 SESAC, INC. 932.79 ANNUAL MUSIC LICENSE 2020
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 64
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 9 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
03/16/2020 SHAMROCK OFFICE SOLUTIONS, LLC 1,737.27 COPIER MAINTENANCE & COPIES MAR 2020
03/16/2020 SHUKLA, USHA 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 SIMPLER SYSTEMS, INC 1,500.00 SOFTWARE LICENSING SUPPORT MAR 2020
03/16/2020 SNG & ASSOCIATES INC. 20,575.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEC 2019 26,834.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES JAN 2020 Check Total: 47,410.00
03/16/2020 SOLOMON MOHABBAT 246.75 FALLON SPORTS PARK RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/16/2020 SUNFLOWER HILL 2,024.00 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT NOV 2019-JAN 2020
03/16/2020 SURF TO SNOW ENVIRONMENTAL 68.75 SPILL RESPONSE ASSISTANCE & MRP INSPECTION
03/16/2020 TERRYBERRY 418.07 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION GIFTS
03/16/2020 THE ECOHERO SHOW, LLC. 2,745.00 DUBLIN SCHOOLS RECYCLING EDUC ASSEMBLIES
03/16/2020 THOMAS, VANESSA 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 T-MOBILE USA, INC. 449.55 CELL PHONE SERVICES FEB 2020
03/16/2020 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 9,570.73 FUEL DEC 2019
03/16/2020 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 34,302.09 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/ STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE
03/16/2020 TRI-VALLEY COMMUNITY TV 430.00 PHOTO EDITING FOR ADVERTISING 902.28 RECORD/TELEVISE CITY COUNCIL/ PLNG MTGS Check Total: 1,332.28
03/16/2020 TRI-VALLEY HAVEN, INC 2,449.85 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT JAN 2020
03/16/2020 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. 24,796.13 JANITORIAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES - CAMP PARKS 2,254.30 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FEB 2020
Check Total: 27,050.43
03/16/2020 U S CONF OF MAYORS 3,489.00 U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS MEMBERSHIP 2020
03/16/2020 UNITED KARATE FEDERATION OF CA 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/16/2020 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 665.32 PORTABLE TRAILER DISPOSAL SERVICES
03/16/2020 US FOODS, INC. 2,527.01 THE WAVE CONCESSION SUPPLIES
03/16/2020 VSI RISK MGMT & ERGONOMICS INC 1,910.00 ERGONOMIC EVALUATIONS
03/16/2020 WEISS, ROBIN S. 573.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
03/16/2020 WELLS MIDDLE SCHOOL 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/16/2020 YU, JESSICA 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
03/16/2020 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP 7,482.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - DEC 2019 17,042.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - JAN 2020 473.00 PLAN REVIEW SERVICES-FALLON SPORTS PARK Check Total: 24,997.00
Payments Issued 3/16/2020 Total: 661,873.77
03/17/2020 UNUM LIFE INS CO OF AMERICA 12,096.49 LIFE AND AD&D PREMIUM - MAR 2020
Payments Issued 3/17/2020 Total: 12,096.49
03/20/2020 CAL PERS 78,284.89 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 3/13/20
03/20/2020 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 17,990.05 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 3/13/20
03/20/2020 I C M A 401 PLAN 2,072.76 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 3/13/20
03/20/2020 I C M A 457 PLAN 23,242.62 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 3/13/20
03/20/2020 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 56,574.16 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 3/13/20
03/20/2020 US BANK - PARS 2,502.50 PARS: PE 3/13/20
03/20/2020 WAGEWORKS, INC. 4,174.16 WAGEWORKS: PE 3/13/20
Payments Issued 3/20/2020 Total: 184,841.14
03/24/2020 4LEAF INC. 1,860.00 BUILDING INSPECTIONS SERVICES-CIP
03/24/2020 ADAMS SAFETY TRAINING 98.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 65
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 10 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
03/24/2020 ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCTS 43.04 TACTICAL VEST ACCESSORIES
03/24/2020 AID EAST BAY 905.20 REFUND EMERALD GLEN PARK FIELD RENTAL
03/24/2020 ALAMEDA ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH 25.00 REFUND FOR ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL
03/24/2020 ALAMEDA CO SHERIFF'S OFFICE 96.58 PRINTING SERVICES – POLICE GROUP PHOTOS 221.69 PRINTING SERVICES - GRAND OPENING POSTER 54.41 PRINTING SERVICES - GROUP PHOTO 163.75 PRINTING SERVICES - PSC STATEMENT PRINTING
Check Total: 536.43
03/24/2020 ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM 1,327.00 MEDICAL EXAM
03/24/2020 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SVCS INC 12,966.00 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 1/26/20 TO 2/8/20 10,372.80 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 2/9/20 TO 2/22/20 Check Total: 23,338.80
03/24/2020 AMP PRINTING, INC. 792.06 HERITAGE & MUSEUM EXHIBIT SUPPLIES
03/24/2020 APEX GRADING 4,500.00 FALLON VILLAGE GHAD MAINTENANCE
03/24/2020 AT&T - CALNET 3 117.97 SERVICE TO 03/01/20 45.79 SERVICE TO 03/06/20 1,166.66 SERVICE TO 03/12/20 500.75 SERVICE TO 03/14/20
Check Total: 1,831.17
03/24/2020 BANBAO 900.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/24/2020 BSK ASSOCIATES INC. 2,219.75 CONSTR INSPECTION/TESTING-IMAGINE PLYGRND 1,521.00 GEOTECHNICAL SVCS-FALLON SPORTS PARK PH3 Check Total: 3,740.75
03/24/2020 CAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY INC 822.50 PEER REVIEW/PLN CHECK SVC-DON BIDDLE PARK
03/24/2020 CAL PERS 500.00 CALPERS ARREARS ADMINISTRATION FEE
03/24/2020 CINTAS CORP 42.92 FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES
03/24/2020 CREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING, INC 561.86 CRIME PREVENTION PROMOTIONAL SUPPLIES
03/24/2020 CSI FORENSIC SUPPLY 565.53 EVIDENCE SUPPLIES
03/24/2020 DEAF COUNSELING ADVOCACY 3,558.57 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT OCT 2019-FEB 2020
03/24/2020 DUBLIN CYCLERY 329.72 POLICE BICYCLE MAINTENANCE
03/24/2020 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR 1,714.95 VEHICLE RENTAL-SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT
03/24/2020 FASTENAL COMPANY 22.37 HARDWARE FOR MOUNTING EQUIP AT PSC
03/24/2020 FIELDS, ANNA 28.00 REFUND FOR EGGSTRAVAGANZA
03/24/2020 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 175.00 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 3/13/20
03/24/2020 FUNNEL CAKES AND MORE 650.00 REFUND FOR ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL
03/24/2020 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC 2,676.66 EQUIPMENT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
03/24/2020 GREAT DESTINATIONS 2,000.00 REFUND ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL SPONSORSHIP
03/24/2020 GROUP 4 ARCHITECTURE, 25,356.56 CULTURAL ARTS CENTER DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION
03/24/2020 HAAG, JERRY P 1,000.00 CEQA DOCS TASSAJARA PRECISE PLAN
03/24/2020 HALO BRANDED SOLUTIONS 313.74 CRIME PREVENTION PROMOTIONAL SUPPLIES 197.61 CRIME PREVENTION TABLE COVER Check Total: 511.35
03/24/2020 HEATHER GLEN DESIGNS 550.00 ST. PATRICKS FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/24/2020 HUTSLAR, MIKE 800.00 REFUND FOR ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL
03/24/2020 INDEPENDENT, THE 650.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL NEWSPAPER ADS
03/24/2020 INDIGO/HAMMOND + PLAYLE 13,535.88 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN-POLICE BLDG RENOV
03/24/2020 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 180.92 BUILDING CODE BOOKS & PUBLICATIONS
03/24/2020 IRON MOUNTAIN 360.81 POLICE RECORDS STORAGE - MAR 2020
03/24/2020 KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS 650.00 ST. PATRICKS FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/24/2020 LEE, SOPHIA 1,000.00 PAINTED ADIRONDACK CHAIR FOR ART DISPLAY
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 66
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 11 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
03/24/2020 LIBERTARIAN PARTY ALAMEDA CTY 25.00 REFUND FOR ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL
03/24/2020 LIVERMORE HARLEY DAVIDSON 24,296.52 2020 HARLEY-DAVIDSON POLICE MOTORCYCLE
03/24/2020 MACKAY & SOMPS CIVIL ENGINEERS 15,848.25 CONSULTING SVCS-TASSAJARA RD REALIGNMENT
03/24/2020 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 4,236.63 POLICE MOTORCYCLE HELMETS
03/24/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 65.55 PUBLIC SAFETY OPENING SIGNAGES
03/24/2020 NOLKHA, VIDITA 14.00 REFUND FOR EGGSTRAVAGANZA
03/24/2020 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 750.00 PEER REVIEW/PLAN CHECK-DON BIDDLE PARK
03/24/2020 PELLA DOORS AND WINDOWS 2,000.00 REFUND ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL SPONSORSHIP
03/24/2020 PG&E 12.19 SERVICE TO 03/02/20
03/24/2020 PGADESIGN INC. 353.06 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MAPE PARK
03/24/2020 PHILLIPS, TYLER 26.45 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FEB 2020
03/24/2020 PHOENIX GROUP INFO SYS. 623.25 PARKING CITATION PROCESSING JAN 2020
03/24/2020 PIZZA GUYS 180.00 THE WAVE BIRTHDAY PARTY PACKAGE SUPPLIES
03/24/2020 PLAN JPA 2,379.33 GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS FEB 2020
03/24/2020 POT-O-GOLD KETTLE CORN 200.00 REFUND FOR ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL
03/24/2020 PRESLEY, MARIA 390.00 EMERALD GLEN PARK RENTAL REFUND
03/24/2020 REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LAB. INC. 1,386.00 FORENSIC DRUG & ALCOHOL EXAMS
03/24/2020 RENEWAL BY ANDERSON 2,000.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL SPONSORSHIP REFUND
03/24/2020 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 122.40 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DIVISION
03/24/2020 S & J ADVERTISING INC 549.00 ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL ADVERTISING
03/24/2020 SAM THATTE VISUAL COMMUNICATIO 3,800.00 STATE OF THE CITY PRESENTATION SERVICES
03/24/2020 SAN LEANDRO, CITY OF 4,262.00 ALAMEDA CO MAYORS' CONF DUES 2020-HAUBERT
03/24/2020 SELECT IMAGING 47.09 EMPLOYEE NAME BADGES-FABRIGAS
03/24/2020 SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SVCS INC. 978.96 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT FEB 2020
03/24/2020 ST. RAYMONDS SCHOOL 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
03/24/2020 SUAREZ & MUNOZ CONSTRUCTION 321,684.77 IMAGINE PLAYGROUND CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
03/24/2020 TERRYBERRY 940.38 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION GIFTS 2019
03/24/2020 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 137.66 2020 JUVENILE LAW BOOKS
03/24/2020 TORRES, TARALYN 10.35 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FEB 2020
03/24/2020 TRB AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 15,120.00 PLAN CHECK SERVICES FEB 2020
03/24/2020 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 10,899.52 ANIMAL CONTROL FIELD SERVICES OCT-DEC 2019 3,796,608.55 DUBLIN POLICE SERVICES 10/20/19-12/28/19 44,132.42 EAST CO ANIMAL SHELTER SVCS OCT-DEC 2019 3,385.00 PARKING CITATIONS COLLECTED JAN 2020 Check Total: 3,855,025.49
03/24/2020 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. 2,016.38 EXTRA JANITORIAL SERVICES FEB 2020
03/24/2020 U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION AWG 449.93 WAGE GARNISHMENT: PE 3/13/20
03/24/2020 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 4,633.13 POSTAGE FOR 2020 SUMMER GUIDE
03/24/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS 2,047.25 POLICE CELL PHONE SERVICE TO 03/03/20 1,672.44 POLICE SITCAM SIM CARD SERVICE TO 3/03/20 Check Total: 3,719.69
03/24/2020 VOLCANO SPLASH DRINKS 1,650.00 REFUND FOR ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL
03/24/2020 WC3-WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANT 8,100.00 PLAN CHECK SERVICES FEB 2020
Payments Issued 3/24/2020 Total: 4,376,924.51
03/31/2020 ADVANCED MOBILITY GROUP 1,700.00 CONNECTED AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES TESTING 4,580.26 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS MAINT & SUPPORT Check Total: 6,280.26
03/31/2020 ALL NATURAL STONE 4,000.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL SPONSORSHIP REFUND
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 67
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 12 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
03/31/2020 ARAMARK UNIFORM SVC LOCKBOX 53.93 MAT SERVICE SENIOR CENTER 69.22 MAT SERVICE SHANNON CENTER Check Total: 123.15
03/31/2020 BEWLEY, LISA 500.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/31/2020 BIG O TIRES #7 979.14 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR
03/31/2020 BUZZ KIDDER ORIGINALS 825.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/31/2020 CHENG, NIKKI 176.00 ACTIVITY CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 COIT SERVICES, INC. 250.00 CARPET CLEANING HERITAGE MUSEUM
03/31/2020 COMCAST 1,485.74 INTERNET/CABLE SVCS VARIOUS CITY DEPTS
03/31/2020 CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING 19,577.25 INSPECTION SERVICES-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
03/31/2020 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - SHERIFF 360.00 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ANALYSIS
03/31/2020 CONTRACT SWEEPING SERVICES 17,435.44 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES MAR 2020
03/31/2020 COVANTA ENERGY, LLC 655.03 EVIDENCE DESTRUCTION
03/31/2020 CUTCO 1,000.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL SPONSORSHIP REFUND
03/31/2020 DEGREGORIO, DIANA 40.00 REC CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 DUBLIN IRISH GUARD 25.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL REFUND
03/31/2020 ELLUL, BARBARA 550.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/31/2020 EUGENE O'NEIL FOUNDATION 25.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL REFUND
03/31/2020 FAROOQ, MUHAMMAD 30.00 ACTIVITY CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 GEICO 3,000.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL SPONSORSHIP REFUND
03/31/2020 GENIUS KIDS DUBLIN ECLIPSE 500.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/31/2020 GOLDEN STATE FLEET SVCS INC 250.00 POLICE VEHICLE TOW
03/31/2020 JOB'S DAUGHTERS BETHEL NO. 1 25.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL REFUND
03/31/2020 KIM, YOUNG 1,600.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/31/2020 KULANDAIVELU, PRIYA 74.00 ACTIVITY CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 KUMAGAI, SHAWN 986.39 REIMB NAT'L LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF EXPENSES
03/31/2020 KUSANO, ERI 40.00 REC CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 LEHR AUTO 460.00 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
03/31/2020 LEWIS SOFTWARE ASSOC. LLC 41.75 941 QUARTERLY RETURNS FILING SERVICE
03/31/2020 LI, YANYAN 74.00 ACTIVITY CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 LITCH, TINA 40.00 REC CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 LIU, SONGRUI 70.00 REC CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 LOCKFORD LEMONADE 850.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/31/2020 LUNA, FRANK 157.38 REIMB WAGEWORKS BILL RE-ISSUE PAYMENT
03/31/2020 MCE CORPORATION 433,342.85 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FEB 2020 9,497.42 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DSRSD FEB 2020
Check Total: 442,840.27
03/31/2020 MEHTA, SNEHA 114.00 ACTIVITY CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 MICHAEL BAKER INT'L, INC. 2,047.50 HOUSING CONSULTING SERVICES FEB 2020
03/31/2020 NELSON, NANCY 130.00 REIMB WAGEWORKS BILL RE-ISSUE PAYMENT
03/31/2020 PG&E 993.45 SERVICE TO 03/09/20 3,623.06 SERVICE TO 03/10/20 89.52 SERVICE TO 03/11/20 290.31 SERVICE TO 03/12/20 1,679.54 SERVICE TO 03/13/20 Check Total: 6,675.88
03/31/2020 QUADIENT LEASING USA, INC. 1,066.39 NEOPOST MAIL MACHINE LEASE JAN-MAR 2020
03/31/2020 RUFINO, RAEL 25.00 ACTIVITY CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 SEAN'S CELTIC CREATIONS 275.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 68
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Print Date: 04/06/2020 City of Dublin
Page 13 of 13 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
03/31/2020 SHAMROCK OFFICE SOLUTIONS, LLC 8,248.38 PRINTER REPLACEMENT AT PSC
03/31/2020 SHUMS CODA ASSOCIATES INC 5,280.00 PLAN CHECK SERVICES FEB 2020
03/31/2020 SIDDIREDDY, SINDHURI 84.00 ACTIVITY CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 SIG SOLLAR INSTALLATION GROUP 500.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/31/2020 SINGLETREE INC. 275.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/31/2020 STEWART, TARA 500.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/31/2020 SULLIVAN, LUISSA 84.00 ACTIVITY CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT 2,720.00 CIVIC CENTER HVAC EVALUATION FEB 2020 11,577.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT/INSPECTION FF&E AT PSC 10,650.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT/INSPECTION AT PSC 2,126.00 MANAGE TEMP RELOCATION ALAMEDA CO FIRE Check Total: 27,073.00
03/31/2020 TANNA, DARSHNA 96.00 REC CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 TANTE'S 900.00 ST. PATRICK’S FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/31/2020 THE ORIENT 800.00 ST. PATRICKS’ FESTIVAL VENDOR REFUND
03/31/2020 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 2,887.33 INTERNET & PHONE SVCS TO 04/08/20
03/31/2020 TRAVLN TOYS, INC. 4,999.90 TRAVEL TRAILER FOR POLICE MOTOR UNIT
03/31/2020 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. 22,448.95 JANITORIAL SERVICES MAR 2020 4,450.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 1,251.83 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES POLICE FEB 2020 Check Total: 28,150.78
03/31/2020 VALLEY WINDOW CLEANING INC 450.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES CIVIC CENTER 1,055.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES THE WAVE Check Total: 1,505.00
03/31/2020 VENKATACHALAM, PADMAVATHI 20.00 REC CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 VILLA, LUZ 1,600.00 ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL REFUND
03/31/2020 WANG, CHEN-YU 40.00 REC CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 WANG, YANG 96.00 REC CLASS REFUND
03/31/2020 WEST CORPORATION 625.88 KEY FOBS FOR POLICE SERVICES 300.00 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 425.00 SERVICE CALL-CIVIC CENTER DOORS SOFTWARE
Check Total: 1,350.88
03/31/2020 WESTERN PACIFIC SIGNAL LLC 6,800.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES-CIP
03/31/2020 WHITEWATER WEST INDUSTRIES LTD 13,388.70 THE WAVE WATERSLIDE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
Payments Issued 3/31/2020 Total: 620,338.54
Grand Total for Payments Dated 3/1/2020 through 3/31/2020: 12,027,791.55 Total Number of Payments Issued: 427
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 69
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
2
0
)
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 21, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Approval of California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) Form 130
Designating Agents Necessary to Provide for All Matters Pertaining to
State and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Reimbursements
Prepared by: John Stefanski, Assistant to the City Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider approving the CalOES Form 130, designating the City
Manager, Assistant City Manager, and Director of Administrative Services as agents
necessary to provide for all matters pertaining to State and Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) reimbursements. The Resolution will remain in effect for
all open and future disasters up to three (3) years following the date of approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES)
Form 130, Designating Agents Necessary to Provide for All Matte rs Pertaining to State
and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Reimbursements.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no immediate financial impact associated with approving the Resolution.
However, approval of the CalOES Form 130 is required for the City to obtain certain
disaster cost reimbursements from FEMA and the State relating to the current COVID -
19 emergency as well as any future disasters over the next three years.
DESCRIPTION:
On March 4, 2020, the Governor of California proclaimed a state of eme rgency exists in
California related to the spread of COVID-19.
On March 13, 2020, the President declared the ongoing Coronavirus Disease 2019
(COVID-19) pandemic of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant an emergency
declaration for all states, tribes, territories, and the District of Columbia pursuant to
section 501 (b) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act,
42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 (the “Stafford Act”). This national emergency declaration
4.4
Packet Pg. 70
Page 2 of 2
increases federal support for state and local responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.
On March 16, 2020, the City Manager acting in her capacity as Director of Emergency
Services, proclaimed the existence of a local emergency within the City of Dublin. This
proclamation directed all City officers and employees take all steps required to qualify
the City for reimbursement from the FEMA and for other state and federal relief as may
be available to reimburse the City for the expenses incurred from the emergency. On
March 18, 2020 the City Council ratified the local emergency proclamation.
In order for the City to be eligible for future reimbursement from the federal or state
government, the City Council must approve a CalOES Form 130 -Designation of
Applicant’s Agency Resolution for Non-State Agencies (Form 130). The Form 130
designates the positions the City Council authorizes to apply for public assistance and
recovery funding on behalf of the City, for a three-year period. The proposed action
would designate the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and Director of
Administrative Services as agents who can apply for possible reimbursement.
Next Steps
Shall the City Council approve the Form 130, Staff will submit all necessary documents
to CalOES as required for future reimbursement requests. Over the coming months,
Staff will continue to monitor and apply for any reimbursement funding opportunities to
recover costs incurred throughout the COVID-19 emergency.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving the State of California Governor's Office of Emergency
Services Designation of Applicant's Agent (CALOES FORM 130)
2. Exhibit A to the Resolution
4.4
Packet Pg. 71
RESOLUTION NO. XX-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*********
APPROVING THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY
SERVICES DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT’S AGENT RESOLUTION (CALOES FORM 130)
WHEREAS, On March 13, 2020, the President declared the ongoing Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant an
emergency declaration for all states, tribes, territories, and the District of Columbia pursuant to
section 501 (b) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42
U.S.C. 5121-5207 (the “Stafford Act”); and
WHEREAS, On March 16, 2020, the City Manager acting in her capacity as Director of
Emergency Services, proclaimed the existence of a local emergency within the City of Dublin;
and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2020 the City Council ratified the Local Emergency
Proclamation; and
WHEREAS, in order for the City to be eligible for future reimbursement from the Federal
or State government for costs incurred from the current COVID-19 emergency, the City Council
must approve a CalOES Form 130—Designation of Applicant’s Agency Resolution for Non-
State Agencies (Form 130) authorizing certain positions to apply for public assistance and
recovery funding on behalf of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does
hereby approve the CalOES Form 130—Designation of Applicant’s Agency Resolution for Non-
State Agencies (Form 130), as attached hereto as Exhibit A to this Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City Council designates the City Manager, Assistant
City Manager, and Director of Administrative Services as authorized agents to obtain certain
federal financial assistance under Public Law 93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under
the California Disaster Assistance Act, for a period not to exceed three years.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
4.4.a
Packet Pg. 72
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
S
t
a
t
e
o
f
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
G
o
v
e
r
n
o
r
'
s
O
f
f
i
c
e
o
f
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
'
s
A
g
e
n
t
_________________________________
City Clerk
4.4.a
Packet Pg. 73
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
S
t
a
t
e
o
f
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
G
o
v
e
r
n
o
r
'
s
O
f
f
i
c
e
o
f
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
'
s
A
g
e
n
t
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
Cal OES 130
Cal OES ID No:______________________
DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION
FOR NON-STATE AGENCIES
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE OF THE
(Governing Body)(Name of Applicant)
THAT ,OR
(Title of Authorized Agent)
,OR
(Title of Authorized Agent)
(Title of Authorized Agent)
is hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of the , a public entity
(Name of Applicant)
established under the laws of the State of California, this application and to file it with the California Governor’s Office of Emergency
Services for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance under Public Law 93-288 as amended by the Robert T.Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under the California Disaster Assistance Act.
THAT the ________________________________________________, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California,
(Name of Applicant)
hereby authorizes its agent(s) to provide to the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster
assistance the assurances and agreements required.
Please check the appropriate box below:
This is a universal resolution and is effective for all open and future disasters up to three (3) years following the date of approval below.
This is a disaster specific resolution and is effective for only disaster number(s) ________________________
Passed and approved this day of , 20
(Name and Title of Governing Body Representative)
(Name and Title of Governing Body Representative)
(Name and Title of Governing Body Representative)
CERTIFICATION
I,,duly appointed and of
(Name)(Title)
,do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a
(Name of Applicant)
Resolution passed and approved by the of the
(Governing Body)(Name of Applicant)
on the day of , 20 .
(Title)
Page 1
(Signature)
Cal OES 130 (Rev.9/13)
20
Exhibit A to the Resolution 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 74
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
C
a
l
O
E
S
F
o
r
m
1
3
0
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
Cal OES 130 -Instructions
Cal OES Form 130 Instructions
A Designation of Applicant’s Agent Resolution for Non-State Agencies is required of all Applicants to be eligible to receive funding. A new resolution must be submitted if a previously submitted Resolution is older than three (3) years from the last date of approval, is invalid or has not been submitted.
When completing the Cal OES Form 130,Applicants should fill in the blanks on page 1. The blanks are to be filled in as
follows:
Resolution Section:
Governing Body: This is the group responsible for appointing and approving the Authorized Agents.
Examples include: Board of Directors,City Council,Board of Supervisors,Board of Education, etc.
Name of Applicant:The public entity established under the laws of the State of California. Examples include: School
District, Office of Education, City, County or Non-profit agency that has applied for the grant, such as: City of San Diego,
Sacramento County, Burbank Unified School District, Napa County Office of Education, University Southern California.
Authorized Agent: These are the individuals that are authorized by the Governing Body to engage with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency and the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services regarding grants applied for by the Applicant. There are
two ways of completing this section:
1.Titles Only: If the Governing Body so chooses,the titles of the Authorized Agents would be entered here,not
their names.This allows the document to remain valid (for 3 years)if an Authorized Agent leaves the position
and is replaced by another individual in the same title.If “Titles Only”is the chosen method,this document
must be accompanied by a cover letter naming the Authorized Agents by name and title. This cover letter can
be completed by any authorized person within the agency and does not require the Governing Body’s signature.
2.Names and Titles: If the Governing Body so chooses, the names and titles of the Authorized Agents would be
listed.A new Cal OES Form 130 will be required if any of the Authorized Agents are replaced, leave the position
listed on the document or their title changes.
Governing Body Representative: These are the names and titles of the approving Board Members.
Examples include: Chairman of the Board, Director,Superintendent,etc. The names and titles cannot be one of the
designated Authorized Agents, and a minimum of two or more approving board members need to be listed.
Certification Section:
Name and Title: This is the individual that was in attendance and recorded the Resolution creation and approval.
Examples include:City Clerk, Secretary to the Board of Directors,County Clerk,etc. This person cannot be one of the
designated Authorized Agents or Approving Board Member (if a person holds two positions such as City Manager and
Secretary to the Board and the City Manager is to be listed as an Authorized Agent, then the same person holding the
Secretary position would sign the document as Secretary to the Board (not City Manager) to eliminate “Self
Certification.”
Page 2Cal OES 130 (Rev.9/13)
Exhibit A to the Resolution 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 75
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
C
a
l
O
E
S
F
o
r
m
1
3
0
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
)
Page 1 of 3
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 21, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Work – Dublin Boulevard Widening Improvements Project
and Mape Memorial Park Playground Replacement Project
Prepared by: Michael Boitnott, Capital Improvement Program Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider accepting the Dublin Boulevard Widening Improvements
Project and the Mape Memorial Park Playground Replacement Project .
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Accepting the Dublin Boulevard Widening Improvements Project
(CIP No. ST1012) and adopt the Resolution Accepting the Mape Memorial Park
Playground Replacement Project (CIP No. PK0319).
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The Dublin Boulevard Widening Improvements Project (CIP No. ST1012) is complete
and the project cost was as follows:
Project Funding Sources
State Gas Tax $ 500,000.00
Measure BB Grants $ 3,000,000.00
Road Maintenance & Rehab. Account $ 500,000.00
Street CIP Reimbursement $ 2,684,000.00
Traffic Impact Fee - Category 2 $ 4,376,755.00
Mitigation Contributions $ 680,679.00
Total Funding $ 11,741,434.00
Estimated Expenditures
Construction Contract $ 5,678,454.00
Change Order #1 - 21 $ 993,743.28
Rule 20A Undergrounding “District 2013-1” $ 3,225,000.00
Contract Services, Design, Salary and Testing $ 944,236.72
Total Expenditures $ 10,841,434.00
4.5
Packet Pg. 76
Page 2 of 3
Estimated Project Balance $ 900,000.00
The majority of the remaining balance will be allocated back to the Street CIP
Reimbursement funding source, which is made up of project reimbursements from
PG&E. A small amount of the unused budget will be returned to the Gas Tax fund
balance.
The Mape Memorial Park Playground Replacement Project (CIP No. PK0319) is
complete and the project cost was as follows:
Project Funding Sources
Internal Service Fund - Facilities Replacement $ 320,000.00
Total Funding $ 320,000.00
Estimated Expenditures
Construction Contract $ 130,988.00
Change Order #1 $ 11,370.23
Play Equipment $ 130,725.17
Contract Services, Design, Salary and Testing $ 46,916.60
Total Expenditures $ 320,000.00
Estimated Project Balance $ 0.00
DESCRIPTION:
Dublin Boulevard Widening Improvements
Dublin Boulevard Improvements – Sierra Court to Dublin Court is a two-phase project.
Phase 1 consisted of the undergrounding of overhead utilities within the project limits
utilizing PG&E’s Rule 20A program funds and coordinating with AT&T, Comcast, and
PG&E. The utility undergrounding was necessary in advance of Phase 2, the widening
of Dublin Boulevard from four to six lanes. The utility undergrounding construction was
completed in summer 2018 and City Council accepted the construction on July 18,
2018. The total cost of Phase 1 was $3,225,000.
On July 17, 2018, the City Council awarded the Phase 2 construction contract to
Granite Construction Company to construct the Dublin Boulevard Widening
Improvements (CIP No. ST1012). The City Council awarded the contract for
$5,678,454.00 and approved an original co nstruction contingency amount of
$575,000.00. On April 2, 2019, an additional $500,000.00 contingency amount was
added to repave and install video detection at the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and
Dougherty Road, install street lighting along the Dublin Sports Grounds parking lot, and
perform emergency pavement repairs on Village Parkway.
The project provided for the widening of Dublin Boulevard to six travel lanes between
Sierra Court/Civic Plaza and Dublin Court, the addition of bicycle lanes on both sides of
Dublin Boulevard, intersection improvements at both Sierra and Dublin Courts, new
4.5
Packet Pg. 77
Page 3 of 3
sidewalks on both sides of the street including a pedestrian bridge over a drainage
channel east of Dublin Sports Grounds, landscape improvements including the
replacement of the existing street trees and additional street trees, and bus shelter
relocation.
The project also included the construction of curb ramps to comply with the Americans
with Disabilities Act, modifications to median islands, installation of a traffic signal video
detection system, converting the existing potable landscaping irrigation to recycled
water, installation of a landscaped bioretention treatment area, relocation of existing
water service into the new sidewalk, and the resurfacing of the Dublin Sports Grounds
parking lot to accommodate a new striping layout. Staff has determined that the project
is complete and recommends that the City Council accept the construction project and
begin the warranty period.
Mape Memorial Park Playground Replacement
On November 5, 2019, the City Council awarded a contract to IBS USA, Incorporated
for the Mape Memorial Park Playground Replacement (CIP No. PK0319). The City
Council awarded the contract for $130,988 and approved a construction contingen cy
amount of $17,716.
The project provided for the removal and replacement of two play equipment areas
(ages 2-5 and ages 5-12) and the wood fiber surfacing. Staff has determined that the
project is complete and recommends that the City Council accept the construction
project and begin the warranty period.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
A courtesy copy of this Staff Report was sent to Granite Construction Company, IBS
USA, Incorporated, and to the Alameda County Transportation Commission,
Independent Watch Dog Committee.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Accepting the Dublin Boulevard Widening Improvements Project (CIP No.
ST1012)
2. Resolution Accepting the Mape Memorial Park Playground Replacement Project
(CIP No. PK0319)
4.5
Packet Pg. 78
RESOLUTION NO. - 20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * * * *
ACCEPTING THE DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
(CIP NO. ST1012)
WHEREAS, on July 17, 2018 the City of Dublin entered into a contract with Granite
Construction Company to construct the Dublin Boulevard Widening Improvements Project, CIP No.
ST1012; and
WHEREAS, said improvements have been completed in accordance with plans and
specifications, and any approved modifications thereof, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the
City of Dublin; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of the contract, Granite Construction Company is required to
warranty the improvements for a period of one year following acceptance of the work by the City of
Dublin and maintain a maintenance bond in the amount of 10% of the final contr act value.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does
hereby accept the Dublin Boulevard Widening Improvement Project (CIP No. ST1012) and authorizes
Staff to file a Notice of Completion with Alameda County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize
the City Manager or designee to release the retention, if after 35 days of filing the Notice of
Completion and there are no subcontractor claims.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize
the City Manager or designee to release the maintenance bond at the end of the one-year warranty
period.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April 2020, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
4.5.a
Packet Pg. 79
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
c
e
p
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
W
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
I
P
N
o
.
S
T
1
0
1
2
)
(
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
B
l
v
d
RESOLUTION NO. - 20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * * * *
ACCEPTING THE MAPE MEMORIAL PARK PLAYGROUND REPLACEMENT PROJECT
(CIP NO. PK0319)
WHEREAS, on November 5, 2019 the City of Dublin entered into a contract with IBS USA,
Incorporated to construct the Mape Memorial Park Playground Replacement Project (CIP No. PK0319);
and
WHEREAS, said improvements have been completed in accordance with plans and
specifications, and any approved modifications thereof, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the
City of Dublin; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of the contract, IBS USA, Incorporated, is required to warranty the
improvements for a period of one year following acceptance of the work by the City of Dublin and
maintain a maintenance bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract value .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby
accept the Mape Memorial Park Playground Replacement Project (CIP No. PK0319) and authorizes
Staff to file a Notice of Completion with Alameda County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize
the City Manager or designee to release the retention, if after 35 days of filing the Notice of Completion
there are no subcontractor claims.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize
the City Manager or designee to release the maintenance bond at the end of the one -year warranty
period.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April 2020, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
4.5.b
Packet Pg. 80
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
c
e
p
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
M
a
p
e
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
I
P
N
o
.
P
K
0
3
1
9
)
(
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
B
l
v
d
4.5.b
Packet Pg. 81
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
c
e
p
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
M
a
p
e
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
C
I
P
N
o
.
P
K
0
3
1
9
)
(
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
B
l
v
d
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 21, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Proclamations for the Month of May
Prepared by: Cierra Fabrigas, Executive Aide
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will present the following proclamations for the month of May in the
City of Dublin: Bike Month and Bike to Work Day, and National Day of Prayer.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Present the proclamations.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
The City Council will present the following proclamations for the City of Dublin:
Bike Month – May 2020 and Bike to Work Day – September 24, 2020
The attached proclamation designates the Month of May as Bike Month. The goal of
Bike Month is to encourage the public to use a bicycle for transportation, health, or
enjoyment. Due to the COVID-19 Shelter in Place Order, all Bike Month events will
occur in a virtual environment during the month of May. Staff will promote all virtual
events hosted by partner organizations such as Bike East Bay and The League of
American Bicyclist.
Bike to Work Day is rescheduled to September 24, 2020. Bike to Work Day (BtWD) is a
one-day annual event that encourages the use of alternative modes of transportation
during the commute to work by the Bay Area workforce. Entering its 26th year in
Alameda County, BtWD is organized by Bike East Bay which facilitates “Energizer
Stations” providing giveaways set up in strategic locations throughout the region.
On BtWD, the City of Dublin will help host an “Energizer Station” from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00
a.m. at the East and West Dublin/Pleasanton BART stations. Refreshments, giveaways,
4.6
Packet Pg. 82
Page 2 of 2
and informational brochures will be given to those who commute via bicycle on that day.
A limited number of BtWD tee-shirts will be given out at the “Energizer Stations” on a
first-come, first-serve basis. In addition to BtWD, the City of Dublin also plans to host
several other bicycle-related events in September. All events taking place in Dublin are
free to residents and non-residents.
National Day of Prayer – May 7, 2020
The attached proclamation designates May 7, 2020 as National Day of Prayer. The goal
of National Day of Prayer is to recognize the 32 nd anniversary of the National Day of
Prayer that celebrates the act of prayer and recognizes that calling for prayer in times of
crisis creates a sense of unity in the United States.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Bike Month and Bike to Work Day Proclamation
2. National Day of Prayer Proclamation
4.6
Packet Pg. 83
A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA
“Bike Month and Bike to Work Day”
May 2020
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin acknowledges that bicycling is not only a successful rideshare mode to alleviate traffic congestion, reduce air
pollution, and decrease fuel consumption, but also is an effective way to reduce stress and exercise while practicing social distancing per the
COVID-19 SHELTER IN PLACE ORDER; and
WHEREAS, the League of American Bicyclists has declared the Month of May as National Bike Month but only will host virtual bike
education events continuing to promote the vision of encouraging everyone to think beyond bicycling to work and move towards a holistic
approach to integrate bicycling into as many aspects of lives as possible; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin acknowledges that bike month education and bike-to-work days are effective in converting drivers into
bicyclists, educating citizens about the environmental value of bicycling to work regularly, and promoting the health benefits of bicycling and
intends to promote virtual bike education events in May; and
WHEREAS, Bike East Bay along with other regional and local sponsors are promoting Bike to Work Day on Thursday, September 24th in the
San Francisco Bay Area; and
WHEREAS, on September 24th, the cities of Dublin and Pleasanton, Alameda County Public Works Agency, Dublin Cyclery, Hacienda, and
REI Dublin will host Energizer Stations at both the East and West Dublin/Pleasanton BART stations, to greet and reward bicyclists with
refreshments and sponsored giveaways; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin Public Works Department will host additional bicycling events in September including a community bike ride,
a ride to market day, and a bike film screening.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby proclaim the Month of May as “Bike
Month” and September 24th as “Bike to Work Day” in the City of Dublin and encourages all citizens and civic organizations to consider
bicycling throughout the month, participating in bike events, and visiting the Dublin Energizer Stations on Bike to Work Day.
DATED: April 21, 2020
______________
Mayor David G. Haubert Vice Mayor Arun Goel
Councilmember Melissa Hernandez Councilmember Jean Josey Councilmember Shawn Kumagai
4.6.a
Packet Pg. 84
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
B
i
k
e
M
o
n
t
h
a
n
d
B
i
k
e
t
o
W
o
r
k
D
a
y
P
r
o
c
l
a
m
a
t
i
o
n
(
C
i
t
y
P
r
o
c
l
a
m
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
M
a
y
)
A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA
“National Day of Prayer”
May 7, 2020
Recognizing May 7, 2020 as the 32nd anniversary of the National Day of Prayer established under the Act entitled “An Act to
provide for setting aside the first Thursday in May as the date on which the National Day of Prayer is celebrated”.
WHEREAS, the National Day of Prayer was established in 1952 as a floating holiday and was later established as the First
Thursday in May; and
WHEREAS, May 7, 2020, marks the 32nd anniversary of the National Day of Prayer which has been consistently celebrated
annually by all United States Presidents; and
WHEREAS, the United States has a long history of turning to prayer both in times of crisis and in times of thanksgiving ; and
WHEREAS, the act of prayer is both an expression of religious belief and an act of sp eech that is protected by the First
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
WHEREAS, the National Day of Prayer is consistent with the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of
the United States; belongs to all people in the United States; and
WHEREAS, calling for prayer in times of crisis and thanksgiving creates a sense of unity in the United States .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby proclaim May 7, 2020 as
National Day of Prayer and encourages all people in the City of Dublin to reaffirm the importance prayer has played in the
heritage of the United States.
DATED: April 21, 2020
Mayor David G. Haubert Vice Mayor Arun Goel
Councilmember Melissa Hernandez Councilmember Jean Josey Councilmember Shawn Kumagai
4.6.b
Packet Pg. 85
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
a
y
o
f
P
r
a
y
e
r
P
r
o
c
l
a
m
a
t
i
o
n
(
C
i
t
y
P
r
o
c
l
a
m
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
M
a
y
)
Page 1 of 3
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 21, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
First Amendment to the Community Benefit Program Agreement with
Crystal Bay Development LLC (Formerly Bayview Development Group,
Inc.)
Prepared by: Hazel L. Wetherford, Economic Development Director
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider approving a First Amendment to the Community Benefit
Program Agreement with Crystal Bay Development LLC (formerly Bayview
Development Group, Inc.) for the St. Patrick Way Residential Project that includes 499
residential units on a ±8.53-acre property located at 6700 Golden Gate Drive.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving the First Amendment to the Community Benefit
Program Agreement between the City of Dublin and Crystal Bay Development LLC
(formerly Bayview Development Group, Inc.).
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
On May 1, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 41-18 (Attachment 1)
approving a Community Benefit Agreement between the City of Dublin and Bayview
Development for the St. Patrick Way Residential Project that includes 499 residential
units on a ±8.53-acre property located at 6700 Golden Gate Drive.
The Community Benefit Agreement outlined what the Developer would contribute to the
City in exchange for requesting the residential units from the development pool. As
discussed in the May 1, 2018 Staff Report, those community benefits have been
outlined in the form of off-site dedications, funding, and improvements.
As it relates to the off-site dedication, Developer will dedicate to the City, or as
directed by the City to an affordable housing developer, an adjacent 1.3-acre
parcel located at 6541 Regional Street for a future affordable housing project.
Additionally, Developer will be dedicating approximately .28 acres of a parcel
Page 2 of 3
north of the property to complete the right-of-way improvements for the extension
of St. Patrick Way.
In terms of improvements, the Developer will make $200,000 in enhancements to
St. Patrick Way so that the street can function as a usable event and festival
space for Downtown activation. These streetscape enhancements include seat
walls to the north edge of the sidewalk, bollard sleeves in the street at each end
of the project site, string lighting at each end of the project site and along the
southern and northern edges of the new street, electrical outlet installation in tree
wells, and monumentation at each end of the project site to create defined edges
when used as event space.
The Developer will include 1,500 square feet of commercial space within the
building for use as co-workspace to assist small businesses, telecommuters and
entrepreneurs for a period of at least five years.
Lastly, the Developer will contribute $50,000 in funding towards pedestrian
connections to BART from its project site.
As outlined above, part of the community benefits of the residential project include the
improvement and dedication of St. Patrick Way along the northern boundary of the
property, including on property owned by the adjacent property owner. The Developer,
despite good faith efforts, has had difficulties in acquiring the off-site property
voluntarily, which has delayed the timing of the project. The City has had to step in and
assist with acquiring the off-site property pursuant to its eminent domain power.
Since the improvement and dedication of St. Patrick Way must be completed as a
condition of the residential project, the Developer has requested an extension to the
term of the agreement for an additional year to June 13, 2021. The current Community
Benefit Agreement is set to expire on June 13, 2020.
In addition to the one-year extension, clean up language has also been added as it
relates to the transfer of the adjacent property located at 6541 Regional Street to the
City or to a third party as the City may direct. If the City desires to acquire the adjacent
parcel earlier than the issuance of the first building permit for the 499 residential project
(in order to work with an affordable housing developer and secure bond funds), then the
City has the option of paying the developer $5,000,000 for the 1.3-acre parcel. Once the
first building permit is issued for the 499 residential unit project, the Developer would
pay the City back the $5,000,000 less the nominal price as outlined in Attachment 3.
Lastly, Bayview Development Group desires to assign the Community Benefit Program
Agreement to Crystal Bay Development LLC, a subsidiary to Bayview Development
Group which is allowed as outlined in the Community Benefit Program Agreement.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
A copy of this Staff Report has been sent to Crystal Bay Development LLC.
Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 41-18 Approving the Community Benefit Agreement Between the City of
Dublin and Bayview Development Group
2. Resolution Approving the First Amendment to City of Dublin Community Benefit
Program Agreement
3. Exhibit A to the Resolution – First Amendment to City of Dublin Community Benefit
Program Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 41 — 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING A COMMUNITY BENEFIT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AND BAYVIEW DEVELOPMENT GROUP AND AN ALTERNATE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE
WITH THE INCLUSIONARY ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE
ST. PATRICK WAY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
WHEREAS, Bayview Development Group has proposed the construction of a market rate
apartment project in Downtown Dublin at 6700 Golden Gate Drive; and
WHEREAS, the project consists of 499 apartments, including studios, one and two-bedroom
units, as well as 1,500 square feet of commercial space; and
WHEREAS, Bayview submitted a Site Development Review Permit application to demolish the
existing partially vacant 204,624 square foot warehouse building, construct the ultimate extension of
St. Patrick Way and construct a five story, 499-unit apartment community and related site
improvements. The proposed project also includes a request for a Vesting Tentative Map for
condominium purposes; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 18-07 denying the Site
Development Review Permit and Vesting Tentative Map 10809; and
WHEREAS, Bayview appealed the action of the Planning Commission to City Council in
accordance with Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.136; and
WHEREAS, Bayview is seeking 499 units from the residential development pool and 1,500
square feet from the commercial development pool. In exchange for this allocation, Bayview will
contribute community benefits in the form of off-site dedications, funding, and improvements; and
WHEREAS, Bayview is acquiring and then dedicating to the City a 1.33-acre site at 6541
Regional Street as a community benefit; and
WHEREAS, Bayview will provide street improvements and enhancements (estimated at
200, 000) along the new segment of St. Patrick Way so that the street can function as a usable event
and festival space for Downtown activation as further described in Exhibit B of the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Bayview will dedicate approximately .28 acres of a parcel north of the property to
complete the right of way improvements for the extension of St. Patrick Way; and
WHEREAS, Bayview will include 1,500 square feet of commercial space within the building for
use as co-work space to assist small businesses, telecommuters and entrepreneurs for a period of at
least five years; and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall extend
until the earlier of the following: 1) the Developer has provided the Community Benefit to the City as
provided in Section 3 of this Agreement, 2) any of the Project Approvals expires, or 3) Two years after
the Effective Date plus any extensions granted pursuant Section 4.2 of this Agreement; and
Reso No. 41-18, Adopted 5/1/2018, Item No. 6.1 Page 1 of 2
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 89
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
WHEREAS, Section 8.68.040.E of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance allows the City Council, at its
discretion, to waive, wholly or partially, the requirements of the Inclusionary Zoning Regulations and
approve an alternate method of compliance if the applicant demonstrates, and the City Council finds,
that such alternate methods meet the purposes of the Inclusionary Zoning Chapter; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Inclusionary Zoning Regulations are to enhance the public
welfare and assure that further housing development contributes to the attainment of the City's
housing goals by increasing the production of residential units affordable by households of very-low,
low and moderate-income and assure that the limited remaining developable land in the City's
planning area is utilized in a manner consistent with the City's housing policies and needs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby irrevocably offers
Bayview 31 affordable unit credits that Bayview may use to satisfy a portion of the project's 62
affordable unit obligation under the Inclusionary Zoning Regulations. The offer will expire upon the
expiration of the Site Development Review permit for the project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that Bayview's proposed alternate
method of compliance with the Inclusionary Zoning Regulations for the remainder of the obligation
which is based on the characteristics of the project) meets the purposes of the Inclusionary Zoning
Regulations for the following reasons:
The size, location, and type of the units in the 499-unit market rate project are likely to produce
housing that will be beneficial to many economic segments, both directly, by making a substantial
number of units available at reasonable rents, and indirectly, by substantially increasing the supply of
rental housing available in the community.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby approves the
Community Benefit Agreement between the City of Dublin and Bayview Development Group, as
attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute the
Agreement and gives the City Manager authority to execute any minor amendments to the
Agreement, as needed, to carry out the intent of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of May, 2018, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Goel, Gupta, Hernandez, Thalblum and Mayor Haubert
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:i-004
Mayor
ATTEST:
C,,v„
City Clerk
Reso No. 41-18, Adopted 5/1/2018, Item No. 6.1 Page 2 of 2
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 90
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
1–
CITY OF DUBLIN COMMUNITY BENEFIT PROGRAM AGREEMENT
Bayview Development Group, 6700 Golden Gate Drive Project
This Community Benefit Program Agreement (“Agreement”) is en tered into on
this day _____ of ___________, 2018, by and between the City of Dublin, a municipal
corporation (“City”) and Bayview Development Group, Inc., a California corporation
Developer”). City and Developer are, from time-to-time, individually referred to in this
Agreement as a “Party,” and are collectively referred to as “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. On February 1, 2011, the City adopted Resolution No. 9-11 establishing a
Downtown Dublin Specific Plan,” which sets forth a comprehensive set of guiding
principles, standards, and design guidelines for the implementation of future
development in Downtown Dublin (“the Specific Plan Area”). On May 6, 2014 and
October 7, 2014, the City Council adopted, respectively, Resolution Nos. 49 -14 and
170-14 amending the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan. The Downtown Dublin Specific
Plan, as amended, is herein referred to as “the Specific Plan.”
B. The Specific Plan regulates the density of development allowed in the
Specific Plan Area by establishing a “Base Floor Area Ratio (FAR)” for development in
each of the three districts within the Specific Plan Area.
C. The Specific Plan also establishes a pool of additional development
potential, in the form of 2,262,540 square feet of non-residential development and 2,500
residential dwelling units (collectively “the Excess Capacity”) apportioned between the
three districts in the Specific Plan Area. The pool can be used by developers that (a)
propose to develop projects that exceed the Base FAR up to a defined “Maximum FAR”
and (b) propose to develop residential dwelling units. Developers utilizing Excess
Capacity must participate in the Community Development Program and enter into a
Community Benefit Program Agreement with the City.
D. Developer proposes to develop certain property consisting of
approximately 8.53 acres of land and buildings located in the City of Dublin, County of
Alameda, State of California, which is more particularly described in Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and which real property is hereafter
called the “Property.”
E. In conjunction with development of the Property, Developer proposes to
convey 1.33 acres of land and buildings adjacent to the Property (“the Adjacent
Property”), which property is referred to variously as 6541 and 6543 Regional Street
and Alameda County Assessor’s Parcel No. 941-1500-25.
F. Developer seeks units from the Development Pool in order to construct a
residential project on the Property (“the “Project”).
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 91
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
2–
I Developer has applied for a Site Development Review for the Property,
which approval, if granted, together with any approvals or permits now or hereafter
issued with respect to the Project are referred to as the “Project Approvals.”
J The City and Developer have reached agreement with respect to the
Community Benefit and desire to express herein a Community Benefit Program
Agreement clearly setting forth the Community Benefit to be provided by the Developer,
and the scope and nature of excess development capacity to be granted to Developer in
exchange for said Community Benefit.
K. The Project is subject to and in compliance with the Specific Plan, for
which a Specific Plan a Program EIR was certified by CITY in Resolution No. 08-11,
and updated with the Addendum to Specific Plan EIR as adopted by CITY in Resolution
No. 50-14 (“Specific Plan EIR”) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act,
and the CEQA Guidelines promulgated thereunder (collectively, “CEQA”). Pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines section 15168, this Agreement is within the scope of the project
analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR and no further CEQA review or document is required.
This Agreement does not impede, impair or otherwise seek to truncate or limit the City
discretion in considering any future Project Approvals or conducting any future CEQA
review as required by applicable law.
NOW, THEREFORE, with reference to the foregoing recitals and in consideration
of the mutual promises, obligations and covenants herein contained, City and Developer
agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Relationship of City and Developer.
It is understood that this Agreement is a contract that has been negotiated and
voluntarily entered into by the City and Developer and that the Developer is not an
agent of the City. The City and Developer hereby renounce the existence of any form of
joint venture or partnership between them, and agree that nothing contained herein or in
any document executed in connection herewith shall be construed as making the City
and Developer joint venturers or partners.
2. Effective Date and Term.
2.1 Effective Date.
The effective date of this Agreement (“the Effective Date”) shall be the date upon
which the City Council approves this Agreement.
2.2 Term.
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall
extend until the earlier of the following: 1) the Developer has provided the Community
Benefit to the City as provided in Section 3 of this Agreement, 2) any of the Project
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 92
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
3–
Approvals expires, or 3) 2 years after the Effective Date plus any extensions granted
pursuant Section 4.2 of this Agreement.
3. Community Benefit to Be Provided By Developer.
3.1 Transfer of the Adjacent Property
Developer shall provide the following Community Benefit to the City: the
Developer will, for no more than a “Nominal Price,” transfer ownership of the Adjacent
Property to the City (the “Community Benefit”). The Developer shall provide the
Community Benefit no later than the time of issuance of the first building permit for the
Project. In no event shall the City be required to issue a building permit unless the
Community Benefit has been provided to the City. For the purposes of this Agreement,
a “Nominal Price” shall be any sales price that is one-thousand dollars ($1000) or less
not including, and not limiting, the purchaser’s share of escrow fees, title insurance
costs, transfer taxes, prorated taxes and assessments and other customary closing
costs).
3.2 Community Benefit For Off-Site Dedication and Improvement and
Streetscape Enhancements for St. Patrick Way.
In addition to the Developer dedication of 1.52 acres of land from the Property for
the construction and improvement of St. Patrick Way, Developer shall dedicate 0.28
acres of off-site land for St. Patrick Way. In addition to construction of public
improvements consistent with City standards, Developer shall fund up to $200,000 of
additional streetscape enhancements, including but not limited to, additional street
furniture, street monumentation, decorative street lighting and other improvements as
more fully set forth in Exhibit B. Pursuant to Ordinance No. __________, adopted
concurrently with this Agreement, City has modified the right of way for St. Patrick Way,
as depicted in Exhibit C. City recognizes that Developer’s dedication of 0.28 acres of
land and construction of public improvements and streetscape enhancements qualify as
a “Community Benefit” under the Specific Plan, as it will assist the City in fulfilling its
General Plan, Specific Plan and Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
3.3 Community Benefit for Co-Work/Economic Development Space
within Project (“Co-Work Space”).
Upon occupancy of the Project, Developer shall reserve, construct tenant
improvements for and operate 1,500 square feet of Co -Work Space in the Project. City
recognizes that Developer’s reservation of, tenant improvements to, and operation of
1,500 square feet of Co-Work Space in the Project is a qualifying “Community Benefit”
under the Specific Plan, as it will assist the City in fulfilling its General Plan, Specific
Plan and Economic Development objectives. Developer will provide the Co-Work Space
available to Dublin residents during hours when the leasing office is open for business
for an initial five (5) year period after the certificate of occupancy for the Co -Work
Space, which may be extended for an additional five (5) years upon mutual agreement
between the City and Developer.
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 93
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
4–
3.4 Contribution of $50,000 for the Improvement of Pedestrian Access to
BART.
Developer shall contribute Fifty Thousand Dollars $50,000 to the City for future
improvement projects, determined at City’s discretion, to improve pedestrian access to
BART. City recognizes that Developer’s contribution of up to $50,000 to improve
pedestrian access to BART is a qualifying “Community Benefit” under the Specific Plan,
as it will assist the City in fulfilling its General Plan, Specific Plan and Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan.
4. Excess Capacity, Residential Allocations.
4.1 Grant
As of the Effective Date, as defined in Section 2.1, and for the term specified in
Section 2.2, City shall grant 499 Residential Allocations out of the Residential Allocation
Pool established by the Specific Plan for the proposed development on the Property.
City may make the right to construct residential units under the Project Approvals
conditional upon the transfer of the Adjacent Property in accordance with Section 3.1.
The term “Residential Allocation” as used in the Agreement means an allocation of the
right to construct residential units from the Residential Allocation Pool established by
the Specific Plan.
4.2 Term of Residential Allocations.
Once granted, the “Residential Allocations” provided by the Community Benefit
provisions of this Agreement shall extend until two (2) years from the Effective Date
the Residential Allocation Term”). The City Manager may, for good cause, extend the
Residential Allocation Term twice for periods of six (6) months each, provided the
Developer has at the time of such extension applied for a building permit. It is
acknowledged that Developer shall not have a right to the Residential Allocations until
such time as it has transferred the Adjacent Property in accordance with Section 3.1.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a building permit for any structure has been issued by
City, and if the construction of any structure related to residential uses has been
commenced on the Property within said Residential Allocation Term or any extension
period or periods, then the Residential Allocations for the development on the particular
parcel for which the permit was issued shall be extend for the life of the building permit
and any extensions thereto. This Section 4.2 shall survive termination of the
Agreement.
4.3 Reservation.
During the Residential Allocation Term, and only so long as each of the Project
Approvals remain in effect, City shall reserve 499 units for Developer’s use. If Developer
fails to provide the Community Benefit during the term of this Agreement, or if
Developer provides the Community Benefit but fails to obtain building permits for all or a
portion of the units within the Residential Allocation Term, the Excess Capacity reserved
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 94
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
5–
for Developer shall revert to the pool maintained by the City and will be available to
other developers on a “first come, first served” basis.
4.4 Limitation on City’s Obligation.
This Agreement shall not be construed to require the City to issue any Project
Approval to the Developer. City is solely required to reserve the Excess Capacity
identified in Section 4 of this Agreement. Other than this obligation, nothing in this
Agreement shall prevent the City from denying or conditionally approving any
subsequent land use permit or authorization for the Project. All of City’s applicable
ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations and official policies shall apply to the Project
including, but not limited to, those governing the permitted uses of the Property, design
and construction of the Project, density and intensity of use of the Project, and the
maximum height, bulk and size of proposed buildings within the Project.
4.5 Limitation on Developer Obligations.
This Agreement shall not be construed to require the Developer to provide any
Community Benefits described herein, if City does not grant Project Approvals in
accordance with the Project or Developer does not develop the Project.
5. Amendment or Cancellation.
This Agreement may be amended in writing from time to time by mutual consent
of the parties.
6. Severability.
The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provisions, covenant, condition
or term of this Agreement shall not render the other provisions unenforceable, invalid or
illegal, unless a Party’s consideration materially fails as a result.
7. Attorneys’ Fees and Costs.
If the City or Developer initiates any action at law or in equity to enforce or
interpret the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in addition to any other relief to
which it may otherwise be entitled. If any person or entity not a party to this Agreement
initiates an action at law or in equity to challenge the validity of any provision of this
Agreement, the parties shall cooperate in defending such action. Developer shall bear
its own costs of defense as a real party in interest in any such action, and shall
reimburse the City for all reasonable court costs and attorneys’ fees expended by the
City in defense of any such action or other proceeding.
8. Assignment.
Developer may wish to sell, transfer or assign all or portions of the Property to
other developers (each such other developer is referred to as a “Transferee”). In
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 95
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
6–
connection with any such sale, transfer or assignment to a Transferee, Developer may
sell, transfer or assign to such Transferee some or all of the Excess Capacity reserved
under this Agreement, so long as said transfer would not result in development of the
Property in excess of the Maximum FAR. No such transfer, sale or assignment of
Developer’s rights, interests and obligations hereunder shall occur without prior written
approval by the City. The City Manager shall consider and decide on any transfer, sale
or assignment within ten (10) days after Developer’s notice, provided all necessary
documents, certifications and other information are provided to the City Manager to
enable the City Manager to determine whether the obligations incurred by Developer
pursuant to this Agreement will be fully satisfied.
9. Notices.
All notices required to be given to City under this Agreement shall be in writing
and shall be addressed as follows:
City Manager
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
FAX No. (925) 833-6651
All notices required to be given to Developer under this Agreement shall be in
writing and shall be addressed as follows:
Bayview Development Group, Inc.
60 South Market Street, Suite 450
San Jose, CA 95113
With copies to: Morrison & Foerster, LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94125
Attention: Miles Imwalle
Telephone: 415-268-6523
Email: mimwalle@mofo.com
10. Agreement is Entire Understanding.
This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the
parties.
11. Legal Authority.
Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of Developer hereby
represents and warrants that he or she has full power and authority under the entity’s
governing documents to execute and deliver this Agreement in the name of and on
behalf of the company and to cause the entity to perform its obligations under this
Agreement.
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 96
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
7–
12. Exhibits.
The following documents are referred to in this Agreement and are attached
hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full:
Exhibit A Legal Description and Plat of the Property
Exhibit B Streetscape Improvements Enhancements
Exhibit C Revised St. Patrick Way Right of Way Alignment
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the date and year first above written.
CITY OF DUBLIN
By: __________________________
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
Attest:
Caroline Soto , City Clerk
Approved as to form
John D. Bakker, City Attorney
DEVELOPER
Bayview Development Group, Inc.
By:
Its:
2928458.6
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 97
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 98
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 99
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 100
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
Exhibit B
Streetscape Improvement Enhancements ($200,000 Value)
1. Entry monuments
2. Seat Wall
3. Stamped/Decorative Asphalt Paving and Crosswalks
4. Decorative String Street Poles and String Lights and Bulbs
5. Electrical infrastructure for electrical outlets on street light poles and string light poles and
electrical connection at each street tree for lighting.
6. Drop down, manual bollard sleeves and bollards for street closures
Note: Does not include value of dedication of 0.28 acres of offsite property. See conceptual plan
attached.
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 101
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 102
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
(
C
B
A
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
C
r
y
s
t
a
l
B
a
y
)
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 103
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
(
C
B
A
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
C
r
y
s
t
a
l
B
a
y
)
344
1
350
9
350
3
349
9
351
0
341
3
341.
2
342
7
343.63443
345.
4
346
8
343
6
343
4
343
5
342
5
341
8
345
6
347
6
347.
6
2
344
4
344
2
342
8
350
7
349
3
351
13478
350
5
349.
7
350.
3
350
2
350
5
350
6
346
3
345.
3
9
350
2
350
6
350
5
349
3
351.
3
350
8
350
1
351
8
352
4
351.
2
352.
2
352
3
354
5
354
6
354
9
355
6
356
1
355
7
354
8
355
4
350.
4
351.
0
351
3
351.
7 351
3
351.
4
352
6
353
5
352
3
353
7
354
2
355
3
355
8
338.
3
338
5
338.
6
338
3
353.
5
343
2
339
8
339
1
339
3
340
2
340
6
341
6
339.
8
339
6
340
7
342.
3
339
4
343
1
343.
9
344.
9
340
2
339
8
339
5
342
2
350
345
340
3
4
0
345
350
350
3
5
5
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
TYPEAUNITINTERIORNON-ACCESS
R3NONACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
R3NON-
ACCESS
R3NONACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
TYPEAUNITINTERIORNON-ACCESS
R3NON-
ACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCPUBLIC
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
TYPEAUNITINTERIORNON-ACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
R3NONACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCPUBLIC CBCPUBLIC
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIORTYPEAUNITINTERIORNONACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
R3NONACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
R3NONACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIORCBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR TYPEAUNITINTERIORNON-ACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
R3NONACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIORTYPEAUNITINTERIORNON-
ACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIORTYPEAUNITINTERIORNON-
ACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
R3NON-
ACCESSCBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
TYPEAUNITINTERIORNON-ACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
R3NONACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
R3NON-ACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
R3NON-
ACCESS
R3NONACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
R3NONACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
R3NONACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
R3NONACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
TYPEAUNITINTERIOR
NON-ACCESS
R3NON-
ACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
R3NONACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
TYPEAUNITINTERIORNON-ACCESS
R3
NONACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
TYPEAUNITINTERIORNON-ACCESS
R3NONACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
R3NON-ACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
R3NON-ACCESS
R3NON-ACCESS
R3NON-
ACCESS
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
CBCUNITINTERIOR
RE
G
I
O
N
A
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
ST. PATRICK W A Y
EN
T
R
Y
D
R
I
V
E
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
C
ST. PATRICK WAY
WE
S
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
GO
L
D
E
N
G
A
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
A
B
C
345
4
347
6
2
344
9
34
5
CBCPUBLIC CBCPUBLIC
SECTION C: EXISTINGSECTIONB - 58' ST. PATRICK RIGHT OF WAYWITHPARKINGSECTIONA - 71' ST. PATRICK RIGHT OF WAY WITH PARKING
DATE: MARCH 16, 2018
0'120'40'160'
1" = 40'SCALE:
ST. PATRICK WAY
HOLD NORTH ST. PATRICK FACE OF CURB LINE
PLAN LINE STUDY
CITY OF DUBLIN ALAMEDA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
F:\2763-000\ACAD\EXHIBITS\XB-028_PLAN LINE STUDY.DWG
3/
1
6
2
0
1
8
3
2
0
P
M
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
SAN RAMON, CALIFORNIA
CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS
925) 866 - 0322
www.cbandg.com
916) 375 - 1877
Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc.
LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS
ST. PATRICK & WEST STREET INTERSECTION DETIAL
4.7.a
Packet Pg. 104
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
4
1
-
1
8
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
B
a
y
v
i
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
G
r
o
u
p
(
C
B
A
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
C
r
y
s
t
a
l
B
a
y
)
RESOLUTION NO. XX- 20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*********
APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN COMMUNITY BENEFIT
PROGRAM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND CRYSTAL BAY
DEVELOPMENT LLC
WHEREAS, on May 1, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 41-18 approving a
Community Benefit Agreement between the City of Dublin and Bayview Development Group
and an Alternate Method of Compliance with the Inclusionary Zoning Regulations for the St.
Patrick Way Residential Project; and
WHEREAS, Bayview Development Group has proposed the construction of a market rate
apartment project in Downtown Dublin at 6700 Golden Gate Drive; and
WHEREAS, the project consists of 499 apartments as well as 1,500 square feet of
commercial space; and
WHEREAS, in exchange of pulling 499 units from the residential development pool and
1,500 square feet from the commercial development pool, Bayview w ill contribute community
benefits in the form of off-site dedications, funding and improvements; and
WHEREAS, Bayview has acquired and shall dedicate to the City a 1.3-acre site at 6541
Regional Street as a community benefit; and
WHEREAS, Bayview will provide street improvements and enhancements (estimated at
$200,000) along the new segmen t of St. Patrick Way so that the street can function as a usable
event and festival space for Downtown activation; and
WHEREAS, Bayview will dedicate approximately .28 acres of a parcel north of the
property to complete the right of way improvements for t he extension of St. Patrick Way; and
WHEREAS, Bayview will include 1,500 square feet of commercial space within the
building for use as co-work space to assist small businesses, telecommuters and entrepreneurs
for a period of at least five years; and
WHEREAS, since the improvement and dedication of St. Patrick Way must be completed
as a condition of the residential project, the developer has requested an extension to the term of
the agreement for an additional year to June 13, 2021; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the one-year extension, clean up language has also been
added as it relates to the transfer of the adjacent property located at 6541 Regional Street; and
WHEREAS, Bayview Development Group desires to assign the Community Benefit
Program Agreement to Crystal Bay Development LLC, a subsidiary to Bayview Development
Group.
4.7.b
Packet Pg. 105
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
t
o
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
B
A
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does
hereby approve the First Amendment to City of Dublin Community Benefit Program Agreement
between Crystal Bay Development LLC and the City of Dublin as attached as Exhibit A to this
Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the City Manager to
execute the Agreement and gives the City Manager authority to execute any minor amendm ents
to the Agreement, as needed, to carry out the intent of this Resol ution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April, 2020 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
City Clerk
4.7.b
Packet Pg. 106
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
t
o
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
B
A
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
–1–
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
CITY OF DUBLIN COMMUNITY BENEFIT PROGRAM AGREEMENT
Crystal Bay Development, LLC, 6700 Golden Gate Drive Project
This First Amendment to the Community Benefit Program Agreement
(“Amendment”) is entered into on this day 21st of April, 2020, by and between the City
of Dublin, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Crystal Bay Development LLC, a
California limited liability company (“Developer”). City and Developer are, from time-to-
time, individually referred to in this Agreement as a “Party,” and are collectively referred
to as “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. Developer is pursuing a mixed-use project that includes 499 residential
units (the “Project”) on an 8.53-acre property referred to as 6700 Golden Gate Drive
(the “Property”).
B. Developer and City are parties to that certain Community Benefit Program
Agreement, dated June 13, 2018 (“the Agreement”), in which the City, pursuant to its
Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (“the Specific Plan”), granted Developer (as assignee of
Bayview Development LLC) the right to develop residential units in exchange for
providing the City certain community benefits.
C. The community benefits of the Project include the improvement and
dedication of St. Patrick Way along the northern boundary of the Property, including on
property owned by the adjacent property owner (“the Off-Site Property”).
D. Developer despite diligent efforts was unable to acquire the Off-Site
Property voluntarily, and the City is in the midst of acquiring it pursuant to its eminent
domain power.
E. Since the improvement and dedication of St. Patrick Way must be
completed as a condition of the Project, the parties agree that the period of time
required to acquire the Off-Site Property necessitates an extension in the term of the
Agreement.
F. In addition, the Parties desire to make certain other changes to conform
the Agreement to changes in law.
NOW, THEREFORE, with reference to the foregoing recitals and in consideration
of the mutual promises, obligations and covenants herein contained, City and Developer
agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
Section 1. Amendment to Subsection 2.2, Term. Subsection 2.2 of the
Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
4.7.c
Packet Pg. 107
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
–
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
t
o
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
B
A
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
–2–
“Term.
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and
shall extend until the earlier of the following: 1) the Developer satisfied all of the
obligations set forth in Section 3 of this Agreement, 2) any of the Project
Approvals expires, or 3) 3 years after the Effective Date plus any extensions
granted pursuant Section 4.2 of this Agreement.”
Section 2. Amendment to Subsection 3.1, Transfer of Adjacent Property.
Subsection 3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Transfer of the Adjacent Property
Developer shall provide the following Community Benefit to the City: the
Developer will, for no more than a “Nominal Price,” transfer ownership of the
Adjacent Property to the City or to such third party as the City may direct (the
“Community Benefit”). The Developer shall provide the Community Benefit no
later than the earlier of:
(i) the date of closing (the “Property Transfer Date”) on the transfer
of the Property from Developer to AvalonBay Communities, Inc. or an
entity controlled by it (the “Property Transfer”), in which case, as part of
the same escrow as the Property Transfer on the Property Transfer Date:
(a) Developer shall (1) assign the Agreement to AvalonBay
Communities, Inc. or an entity controlled by it (“Assignee”), which
potential assignment the City hereby prospectively approves
notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 8, and (2)
convey the Adjacent Property to the City or to such third party as
the City may direct; and
(b) The City shall deposit $5,000,000 into the escrow (the
“Escrow Deposit”) pursuant to an escrow agreement that is
reasonably satisfactory to Developer, Assignee, and City, which
shall provide that the Escrow Deposit, less the Nominal Price, shall
be released to the City upon issuance of the first building permit for
the Project; provided that, in the event that this Agreement expires
or is terminated prior to issuance of the first building permit for the
Project, then upon such expiration or termination the Escrow
Deposit shall be released to Developer.
or
(ii) the time of issuance of the first building permit for the Project.
4.7.c
Packet Pg. 108
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
–
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
t
o
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
B
A
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
–3–
In no event shall Developer be obligated to provide the Community Benefit
to the City or to such third party as the City may direct unless the Property
Transfer has occurred, provided that the City shall not be required to issue a
building permit for the Project unless the Community Benefit has been provided
to the City or to such third party as the City may direct. For the purposes of this
Agreement, a “Nominal Price” shall be any sales price that is $1,000 or less (not
including, and not limiting, the purchaser’s share of escrow fees, title insurance
costs, transfer taxes, prorated taxes and assessments and other customary
closing costs).
Section 3. Amendment to Subsection 4.2, Term of Residential Allocations.
Subsection 4.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Term of Residential Allocations.
Once granted, the “Residential Allocations” provided by the Community
Benefit provisions of this Agreement shall extend until three years from the
Effective Date (“the Residential Allocation Term”). The City Manager may, for
good cause, extend the Residential Allocation Term twice for periods of six
months each, provided the Developer has at the time of such extension applied
for a building permit. It is acknowledged that Developer shall not have a right to
the Residential Allocations until such time as it has transferred the Adjacent
Property in accordance with Section 3.1. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a
building permit for any structure has been issued by City, and if the construction
of any structure related to residential uses has been commenced on the Property
within said Residential Allocation Term or any extension period or periods, then
the Residential Allocations for the development on the particular parcel for which
the permit was issued shall be extended for the life of the building permit and any
extensions thereto. This Section 4.2 shall survive termination of the Agreement.”
Section 4. Life of Site Development Review Approval. The Project includes site
development review approval, which the City Council approved by Resolution No. 40–
18 on May 1, 2018. Dublin Municipal Code section 8.96.020.D provides that
construction pursuant to a site development review approval must commence within
one year of approval or the approval becomes null and void. The section further defines
commencement to mean either actual construction or “demonstrating substantial
progress toward commencing such construction. . . .” Under the unique circumstances
here involving the acquisition of the Off-Site Property, the City Council hereby finds that
Developer demonstrated “substantial progress toward commencing” construction of the
Project within one year of the site development approval for the Project and thereafter
has and will continue to do so throughout the term of the Agreement.
Section 5. Full Force and Effect. Except as specifically clarified, confirmed or
modified herein, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect according to its
terms.
4.7.c
Packet Pg. 109
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
–
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
t
o
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
B
A
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
–4–
Section 6. Defined Terms. Defined terms have the same meaning in this
Amendment as in the Agreement unless otherwise specified.
Section 7. Memorandum. At the request of either party to the Agreement, the
parties shall execute and record a memorandum of the Agreement in the public records
of the County where the Property is located. Upon the expiration or earlier termination
of this Agreement, the parties shall execute and record a release of such memorandum.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed as of the date and year first above written.
CITY OF DUBLIN
By: __________________________
Linda Smith, City Manager
Attest:
________________________
Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk
Approved as to form
________________________
John D. Bakker, City Attorney
DEVELOPER
Crystal Bay Development LLC
__________________________
By:
Its:
3455641.6
4.7.c
Packet Pg. 110
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
–
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
t
o
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
B
A
F
i
r
s
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Page 1 of 4
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 21, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Review of Proposed Terms to Extend the Solid Waste Collection Services
Agreement
Prepared by: Jay Baksa, Assistant Administrative Services Director
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will receive an update on the City's negotiations with Amador Valley
Industries, LLC on an extension to the Collection Services Agreement. The finalized
agreement will be brought back to the City Council for approval in June.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report and provide direction, if necessary.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This report is meant as a primer for the extension to the agreement between the City
and Amador Valley Industries, LLC, which will be brought to the City Council in June
2020. Incorporation of the tentative deal terms into the contract extension results in an
estimated rate increase of 18% in the first year. The residential garbage and recycling
services fees are collected on the property tax bill as an annual assessment; all other
customers are billed directly.
DESCRIPTION:
Background
On December 6, 2004, the City Council approved a Collection Services Agreement with
Amador Valley Industries, LLC (AVI) for the collection and disposal of solid waste in the
City of Dublin. The original contract term was seven years, expiring June 30, 2012.
Since then, five amendments to the agreement have been executed to include, among
other things, collection of recyclable materials produced by commercial units, provision
of large item collection services, adjustments to the compensation model and franchise
payments, and collection of an annual community benefit payment for small business
assistance. On June 1, 2010, the City Council extended the term of the agreement for
5.1
Packet Pg. 111
Page 2 of 4
an additional eight years, terminating on June 30, 2020.
At the meeting of August 21, 2018, the City Council discussed a request by AVI to begin
negotiations with the City to extend the agreement again in order to make necessary
investments in new equipment over the next several years. The City Council directed
Staff to bring back a review of the existing contract arrangement, along with a brief
discussion of potential focus areas of contract negotiations. That item was brought back
to the City Council on November 8, 2018, highlighting the main components that would
be included in a contract extension, including capital equipment replacement,
operational cost increases, and incorporation of future local and state requirements. The
City Council then directed Staff to proceed with negotiations on a contract extension.
Goal and Approach
The City’s objective for the contract extension was to continue to keep customer rates
low while engaging in a long-term agreement that considers current and future
challenges facing the refuse and recycling industry, and that adds or enhances
programs to help the City increase diversion rates.
Additionally, it has become clear that the original approach to the contract, w hich
allowed for the establishment of a blended baseline cost with annual adjustments based
on various factors, is no longer a realistic approach in the current waste management
market. While this approach did work for a time, it becomes problematic in th at it
assumes long-term predictability in how a hauler operates and disposes of material. In
fact, the recycling markets have become increasingly volatile and unpredictable, and the
costs to dispose of certain materials have increased. In 2017, local disposal sites
stopped paying for recycling as the commodities market dwindled, leading AVI to
absorb large disposal costs with no offsetting revenue. This subsequently led to their
request for an extraordinary rate adjustment, which was approved by the City Co uncil in
June 2019.
In addition to market volatility, there have been state and local legislative changes in
recent years related to the handing of certain recyclable material and compostable
waste, and programs that support diversion efforts. In short, locking AVI into a 15-year
contract that incorporates assumptions about uncontrollable and volatile factors would
result in a rate increase more than double the amount that Staff and AVI are now
projecting with a new model.
The New Model
The new model is hybrid of annual rate adjustments, component cost separation, and
regular financial reviews. The important distinction with the hybrid model is that the cost
elements in the service agreement are more separated rather than blended, and while
the baseline amounts would continue to be adjusted annually, a third-party administrator
would review costs and revenues every three years to confirm reasonableness and to
ensure that an industry standard level of operating margin is being maintained by AVI.
This type of contact is now the predominate form used in the industry, due to the
previously discussed issues. The method of the financial review would be formalized
once a third-party consultant is chosen and brought under contract.
5.1
Packet Pg. 112
Page 3 of 4
The following is a brief summary of the new, changed, or expanded cost elements and
programs included in the proposed contract extension.
New Cost Components
1. Recycling Disposal and Organics Disposal Elements – These new elements will
be cost neutral, simply shifting costs that would have otherwise been factored
into various other elements. The proposed methodology will protect the Dublin
rate payers should the recycling markets rebound and AVI is able to sell their
goods once again. If this does occur, Dublin customers will receive a credit
toward their rates. In the second year of the agreement City staff and AVI will
reconcile the estimated cost for recycling and organics disposal versus the actual
cost and make an adjustment to be applied during the next rate adjustment.
2. Fleet/Asset Replacement Element – The largest single cost associated with the
contract extension is the replacement of two-thirds of AVI’s fleet in the first year.
These costs will be tracked as a separate element and will not be adjusted
annually. AVI will continue to utilize natural gas vehicles with their upcoming
replacements, but the contract will include language relating to the future
consideration of alternative fuel vehicles.
New Programs
The mandates being implemented by the county and the state include the requirement
to improve the local diversion rate, or the amount of waste that is diverted from garbage
landfills. The proposed agreement extension with AVI will increase the minimum
diversion requirement from the current 50% to 75% within five years. T o help with this
effort, City staff has requested that the following new/expanded programs be included:
1. Expanded Large Item Pick-Up – This will focus on outreach and assistance to
Multi-Family Dwellings that may be underutilizing the service.
2. Quarterly Residential Textile Collection – Under this program, AVI will work with
charities and local companies to recycle and re-use textiles.
3. Enclosure Clean-Up – This will focus on the cleaning of overflowing bins and
working with customers to proactively address the issue.
4. Collection of Illegally Dumped Material in the City Right-A-Way – This will focus
on the prompt identification and removal of material illegally dumped on City
property.
Mandatory Recycling Ordinance (MRO)
On June 19, 2019, the City Council approved opting into Alameda County Waste
Management Authority’s MRO Phase II, which places requirements on businesses and
multi-family property owners regarding the handling of certain recyclable material and
compostable waste. Participation in the MRO gives City staff, Dublin businesses, and
AVI time to expand waste diversion programs before additional state mandates are
enacted. As the program continues to expand, additional AVI resources have become
5.1
Packet Pg. 113
Page 4 of 4
necessary, including another hauler and increased staff time. These costs are now
being incorporated into the agreement extension. The costs associated with the MRO
will be tracked separately and adjusted as necessary every three years.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
5.1
Packet Pg. 114
Page 1 of 7
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 21, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Tassajara Road Alignment Project - General Plan Amendment, Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Introduce Ordinance Establishing
Precise Alignment of Right-of-way Lines
Prepared by: Erwin Ching, Associate Civil Engineer
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will hold a public hearing to hear comments and to consider approving
a General Plan Amendment and an Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment related to
the Tassajara Road Alignment Project, reducing the number of travel lanes from six
lanes to four lanes and to consider introducing an ordinance to establishing a precise
alignment of the right-of-way lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive to the
Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit Line. The project is proposing to reduce the
ultimate right-of-way width of Tassajara Road between North Dublin Ranch Drive to the
Alameda-Contra Costa County limit line and to revise the alignment of Tassajara Road
from Palisades Drive to the Alameda-Contra Costa County limit line to allow for future
construction of Tassajara Road as a four-lane arterial. The new alignment will improve
traffic safety within both the City of Dublin and in Contra Costa County when future
construction is completed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct the public hearing, deliberate and take the following actions: a) Adopt the
Resolution Amending the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan related to
the Tassajara Road Alignment Project; b) Waive the reading and INTRODUCE the
Ordinance to Establish Right-of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive
to the Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit Line.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The Tassajara Road Alignment Project consists of two separate projects in the
approved 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the Tassajara Road
Realignment and Widening Project (ST0116) and Tassajara Road Improvements -
North Dublin Ranch Drive to Quarry Lane School (ST0119).
The Tassajara Road Realignment and Widening Project (ST0116) is part of a larger
6.1
Packet Pg. 115
Page 2 of 7
multijurisdictional Tassajara Road/Camino Tassajara realignment project that extends
from Palisades Drive in the City to Windemere Parkway in Contra Costa County. The
City’s share of the total project’s estimated cost is $12.5 million, which Staff anticipates
being funded by State Gas Tax, Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (SB -1)
funds, and Traffic Impact Fees.
The estimated cost for the Tassajara Road Improvements - North Dublin Ranch Drive to
Quarry Lane School Project (ST0119) is $7.5 million, which Staff anticipates being
funded by State Gas Tax, Traffic Impact Fees, and the Tri -Valley Transportation
Development (TVTD) Fees.
There is no impact to the General Fund.
DESCRIPTION:
Background
The General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan identify Tassajara Road as a
six- to eight-lane arterial roadway linking several developments in Eastern Dublin with
Contra Costa County (County) to the north, where the roadway name changes to
Camino Tassajara, and the I-580 freeway and City of Pleasanton to the south. In 1999
and 2004, the City adopted right-of-way lines for Tassajara Road, between I-580 and
the northern boundary of Dublin Ranch Phase 1 as Ordinance No. 20-99 and between
the northern boundary of Dublin Ranch Phase 1 to Alameda - Contra Costa County limit
line as Ordinance No. 21-04.
In coordination with Contra Costa County, a revised alignment of Tassajara
Road/Camino Tassajara was proposed between Palisades Drive in the City and
Windemere Parkway in the County, to improve the existing horizontal alignment and to
improve traffic safety. A conceptual alignment was included as an alternative within the
Vesting Tentative Tract Map for the Moller Ranch (now Tassajara Hills) development
project, which was approved by the Planning Commission on November 27, 2012, as
Planning Commission Resolution No. 12-45.
On February 16, 2016, the City Council approved the addition of the Tassajara Road
Realignment and Widening Project into the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
and directed Staff to proceed with the preliminary design of a revised alignment of
Tassajara Road, which includes four lanes, instead of six lanes, north of North Dublin
Ranch Drive. The reduction from six lanes to four lanes was supported by a study
initiated by the City and Contra Costa County, “Tassajara Road/Camino Tassajara
Capacity Analysis” (Traffic Analysis), which was based on up-to-date land-use
estimates along with refined street network data anticipated in the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan (EDSP) and in the Eastern Dublin EIR. The Traffic Analysis concluded
that reducing Tassajara Road/Camino Tassajara from six to four lanes (two in each
direction) between North Dublin Ranch Drive in the City and Windemere Parkway in the
County (Figure 1) would result in similar levels-of-service at intersections, minimal traffic
diversion to other roads, and minimal increase in travel times compared to a six -lane
configuration.
6.1
Packet Pg. 116
Page 3 of 7
FIGURE 1
On February 11, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and
adopted Resolution No. 20-03 (Attachment 5) recommending that the City Council
adopt a Resolution amending the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
related to the Tassajara Road Alignment Project. At the same meeting, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 20-04 (Attachment 6) recommending that the City
Council consider an Initial Study/California Environmental Quality Act Addendum
(IS/CEQA Addendum) prepared for the Tassajara Road Alignment Project and adopt a
Resolution of Intention to establish a precise alignment for the future right -of-way lines
for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and the Alameda -Contra Costa County
limit line. Planning Commission meeting minutes are included as Attachment 7.
6.1
Packet Pg. 117
Page 4 of 7
On March 3, 2020, the City Council considered the IS/CEQA Addendum for the
Tassajara Road Alignment Project (Project) and determined that the Project does not
result in any new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any
significant impacts identified in previous CEQA documents. Resolution 17 -20
(Attachment 8) was then adopted, a Resolution of Intention to establish the precise
alignment of future right-of-way lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and
the Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit. The Resolution of Intention set a Public
Hearing for the March 17, 2020 City Council meeting. However, the March 17, 2020
City Council meeting was subsequently cancelled by the proclamation of a local
emergency due to the COVID-19 outbreak.
On April 7, 2020, the City Council once again considered adopting a Resolution of
Intention to establish the precise alignment for the right-of-way lines for Tassajara Road
between Palisades Drive and the Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit and set a public
hearing date to hear protests and objections on April 21, 2020 (Attachment 9). At the
meeting, the City Council will consider introducing an Ordinance to establish the precise
alignment for the right-of-way lines for the segment of Tassajara Road between
Palisades Drive and the Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit and consider amendments
to the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
ANALYSIS:
General Plan / Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments
The Project is not proposing any changes to the land use designations in the General
Plan and EDSP. The only proposed change to the General Plan and EDSP is a
programmatic change in the number of ultimate travel lanes on Tassajara Road
between North Dublin Ranch Drive to the Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit Line
(Figure 1).
Based on the Traffic Analysis and associated environmental review, Staff recommends
reducing the number of lanes from the current six-lane roadway to a four-lane roadway
(two lanes in each direction). In addition to this change Staff is recommending some
minor amendments to address text in the General Plan and EDSP Chapters 5 and 7,
included in the City Council Resolution amending the General Plan and EDSP
(Attachment 1).
The proposed four-lane roadway falls within adopted right-of-way lines as established
by Ordinance No. 20-99 and Ordinance No. 21-04, except for the segment of Tassajara
Road north of Palisades Drive where a revised alignment is being proposed. The
reduction in the number of travel lanes would result in anticipated benefits that include a
lowered cost to acquire land and to construct the roadway, lesser impacts to private
properties from a narrower right-of-way width, and fewer potential impacts to the natural
environment.
Establishment of Right-of-Way Lines
Chapter 7.68 of the Dublin Municipal Code allows for the establishment of right -of-way
lines for purposes of future roadway extension, widening, or creation of space for future
utilities, pedestrian pathways, fire and police emergency access to property, and all
6.1
Packet Pg. 118
Page 5 of 7
public right-of-way. The Municipal Code requires the City Council to conduct a public
hearing to hear public testimony, review the proposed right -of-way lines, deliberate, and
consider establishing the right-of-way lines by ordinance (Attachment 3).
Only one parcel will be affected by the proposed revised alignment and the impact on
this parcel is approximated in Table 1 below. The legal description and plat map of the
required right-of-way acquisition on this parcel is attached as Attachment 4.
TABLE 1
Assessor’s Parcel
Number
Property Owner Right-of-Way Acquisition
in Square Feet (SF)
986-0004-001-00 Singh Family Properties LP 28,696 SF
The roadway alignments in the General Plan and in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
(EDSP) are approximate rather than exact. The proposed right-of-way lines would
create precise alignment for Tassajara Road which is currently depicted in the General
Plan and EDSP, and no change to the land use designations would occ ur. Therefore,
the proposed right-of-way lines for Tassajara Road from Palisades Drive to the northern
City limit would be consistent with the General Plan and EDSP. The preliminary design
of the roadway would also be consistent with the General Plan and E DSP, as amended,
in terms of features such as sidewalks, vehicle travel lanes, and medians. The Project is
also consistent with the City of Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (Master Plan)
in that it would help implement the planned bicycle and pede strian facility improvements
envisioned within the Master Plan and facilitate future bicycle and pedestrian travel.
Proposed Roadway Improvements
Tassajara Road currently has two segments to be improved north of North Dublin
Ranch Drive (Figure 2). The southerly segment, Segment 1, is from a point located
north of North Dublin Ranch Drive to the Quarry Lane School/Rutherford Drive
intersection. The northerly segment, Segment 2, is proposed for a revised alignment
and extends from Palisades Drive to the northern City limit. Both Segment 1 and
Segment 2 consist of a two-lane undivided roadway and will be widened into a four-lane
divided roadway. The future road will include sidewalks, bicycle lanes, traffic signals,
and raised medians. The right-of-way widths will vary between 108 feet and 110 feet.
6.1
Packet Pg. 119
Page 6 of 7
FIGURE 2
The design and construction of the road improvements for both Segment 1 and
Segment 2 have been incorporated into the City’s CIP as separate projects (CIP No.
ST0116 and CIP No. ST0119) (Attachment 11). Final design of Segments 1 and 2 is
anticipated to begin in Spring 2020. Segment 2 is planned as a joint project between the
City and Contra Costa County, as the realigned roadway continues into Contra Costa
County. Adoption of an ordinance to establ ish the proposed right-of-way lines for
Tassajara Road will facilitate the design, right-of-way acquisition, and eventual
construction of roadway improvements for Segment 2.
These projects would be subject to applicable Mitigation Measures from earlier C EQA
documents.
REVIEW BY APPLICABLE DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES:
The Community Development Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Public Works
Department, and Dublin San Ramon Services District reviewed the Project and provided
comments where appropriate to ensure that the Project is established in compliance
with all local Ordinances and Regulations.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
A public notice was mailed to property owners of the project area in Dublin. Public
agencies and interested parties were also notified. The public notice was published in
6.1
Packet Pg. 120
Page 7 of 7
East Bay Times and posted at several locations throughout the City.
As required by the Dublin Municipal Code, Chapter 7.68, the Resolution of Intention to
establish Right-Of Way Lines for the Project was published and posted along the
proposed precise alignment on Tassajara Road to give notice to interested parties of
the proposed Right-Of-Way ordinance.
Consistent with section 65352.3 of the California Government Code, t he City obtained a
contact list of local Native American tribes from the Native American Heritage
Commission and notified the tribes on the contact list of the opportunity to consult with
the City on the proposed General Plan Amendment. On February 14, 2020, one of the
tribes responded to the City with an inquiry related to the Project . Staff has responded
to the inquiry and informed the tribe of the dates and locations of the public hearings
related to the Project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Amending the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Related to
the Tassajara Road Alignment Project
2. Exhibit 1 to Resolution
3. Ordinance to Establish Precise Alignment for Tassajara Road between Palisades
Drive and the Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit Line
4. Exhibit A to Ordinance - Legal Description and Plat Map
5. Project Location
6. Planning Commission Resolution No. 20-03
7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 20-04
8. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - February 11, 2020
9. Resolution No. 17-20 - Resolution of Intention adopted March 3, 2020
10. Resolution No. 20-20 - Resolution of Intention to Establish Right-Of-Way Lines -
adopted April 7, 2020
11. CIP No. ST0116 and CIP No. ST0119 Project Budgets
6.1
Packet Pg. 121
1
RESOLUTION NO. xx-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
_____________________________________________________
AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN
RELATED TO THE TASSAJARA ROAD ALIGNMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin adopted Right-Of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road by
Ordinance No. 20-99 and Ordinance No. 21-04; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 51-93,
certifying an Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment
and Specific Plan (Eastern Dublin Environmental Impact Report, SCH #91103064) (the “1993
EIR”) that analyzed the ultimate development of Tassajara Road at six travel lanes; and
WHEREAS, in 2004, the Dublin City Council adopted an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration for a precise alignment of a future six-lane major roadway within the Eastern Dublin
Planning Area (Tassajara Road/Fallon Road Ultimate Road Right-of-Way Alignment Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, SCH #2004042008) (the “2004 IS/MN”); and
WHEREAS, the existing General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan designate a six-
to eight-lane roadway of Tassajara Road; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 7.68, the City of Dublin has
proposed a revised alignment for portions of Tassajara Road that differs slightly from the
alignment previously approved in May 2004 (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the Project includes a programmatic change in the number of ultimate travel
lanes from six lanes to four lanes for the portion of Tassajara Road as depicted on Exhibit 1,
attached to this Resolution and hereby incorporated by reference; and
WHEREAS, the affected segment of Tassajara Road is between Palisades Drive and
the Alameda-Contra Costa County limit line; and
WHEREAS, to complete the Project, the alignment of right-of-way lines on Tassajara
Road between Palisades Drive and Alameda -Contra Costa County line must be adjusted; and
WHEREAS, the right-of-way lines are appropriate and compatible with the existing and
planned land uses and will not overburden public services; and
WHEREAS, no changes to land use designations and land use provisions of the General
Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) are proposed; and
WHEREAS, the properties through which the proposed right-of-way lines pass are within
the boundary of the EDSP and therefore will be encompassed by, and consistent with, the
General Plan; and
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 122
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
E
a
s
t
e
r
n
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
R
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
2
WHEREAS, precise alignment for the future right-of-way lines will not have a substantial
adverse effect on safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to
property or public improvements; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code
Section 21166, et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 require that when an
EIR or negative declaration has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR or negative
declaration shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis
of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that one or more of the following exists:
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions
of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the
project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative
Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR
was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the
following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the
previous EIR or negative declaration;
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe
than shown in the previous EIR;
c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible
would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation
measure or alternative; or
d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from
those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt
the mitigation measures or alternative; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, Dublin has completed an
Initial Study/CEQA Addendum (the “Addendum”) for the Project as shown in the Addendum for
the Tassajara Road Ultimate Right-Of-Way Alignment Project prepared by Jerry Haag on
January 2020 and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the Addendum concluded that the Project would not result in any new
significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in
1993 EIR or the 2004 IS/MN and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met;
and
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 123
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
E
a
s
t
e
r
n
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
R
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
3
WHEREAS, consistent with section 65352.3 of the California Government Code, the City
obtained a contact list of local Native American tribes from the Native American Heritage
Commission and notified the tribes on the contact list of the opportunity to consult with the City
on the proposed General Plan Amendment. On February 14, 2020, one of the tribes responded
to the City with an inquiry related to the Project. Staff responded to the inquiry; and
WHEREAS, on February 11, 2020, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 20-03
recommending that the City Council approve the proposed General Plan and Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan amendments and the entirety of the Project, which resolution is incorporated
herein by reference and available for review by contacting the Public Works Director; and
WHEREAS, the Dublin Planning Commission considered the Addendum as well as the
1993 EIR and 2004 IS/MN referenced above, before taking action on the Project, and the
Planning Commission did further hear and consider all said reports, recommendations, and
testimony hereinabove as set forth before taking any action; and
WHEREAS, on March 3, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 17-20
considering the Addendum and setting a public hearing on the proposed right-of-way for 7:00
p.m. on March 17, 2020, but the City Council’s regular meeting on March 17, 2020 was
cancelled; and
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2020, in light of the March 17, 2020 meeting cancellation, the
City Council again reviewed and considered the Addendum and adopted Resolution of Intention
20-20, to establish the precise alignment for the right-of-way lines for Tassajara Road between
Palisades Drive and the Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit Line and calling for a public
hearing pursuant to Sections 7.68.080 through 7.68.100 of the Dublin Municipal Code, at 7:00
p.m. on April 21, 2020, in the City of Dublin City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin,
California or at a telephonic or electronic place, if such meeting is held pursuant to the authority
granted by Executive Order N-29-20, to hear protests and objections to the establishment of
the proposed Right-Of-Way lines; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated April 21, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference,
described and analyzed the Project, including the proposed Right-Of-Way Lines, the General
Plan and EDSP Amendments, and the Addendum, for the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on the Project,
including the proposed General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan amendments, on April
21, 2020, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Addendum and all above-referenced
reports, recommendations, and testimony to evaluate the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct
and made a part of this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the General Plan and
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan amendments, as set forth below, are in the public interest, will
promote general health, safety and welfare, and that the General Plan as amended will remain
internally consistent. The proposed project is consistent with the guiding and implementing
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 124
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
E
a
s
t
e
r
n
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
R
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
4
policies of the General Plan in each of the Elements and will allow for the continued
implementation of the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The General Plan
amendments noted below will ensure that the implementation of the proposed project is in
compliance with the General Plan and that each Element within the Gene ral Plan is internally
consistent.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the following
amendments to the General Plan:
Table 5-1 shall be amended to read as follows:
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
Fallon Road Widening Widening of Fallon Road to six lanes from Positano Parkway to Dublin
Boulevard.
Tassajara Road Widening Widening of Tassajara Road to four lanes between the Alameda -Contra
Costa County line to North Dublin Ranch Drive.
Tassajara Road Widening Widening of Tassajara Road to six lanes between North Dublin Ranch Drive
to Dublin Boulevard.
Tassajara Road Widening Widening of Tassajara Road to eight lanes between Dublin Boulevard and
1-580 westbound ramps.
Dublin Blvd Widening Widening of Dublin Boulevard to six lanes from Brannigan Street to
Fallon Road.
Dublin Blvd Extension Dublin Boulevard six lane extension, from Fallon Road to Croak Road.
Dublin Blvd Extension Dublin Boulevard four lane extension, from Croak Road to North
Canyons Parkway
Arnold Road Widening Widening Arnold Road to four lanes from Dublin Blvd to Central
Parkway.
Hacienda Drive Widening Widening Hacienda Drive to six lanes from Dublin Boulevard to Central
Parkway.
Hacienda Drive Widening Widening Hacienda Drive to four lanes from Central Parkway to
Gleason Road.
Scarlett Court Extension Extend/Widen Scarlett Drive to four lanes from Dublin Boulevard to
Dougherty Road.
Grafton Street Completion Completion of Grafton Street between Central Parkway and Dublin
Boulevard.
Fallon Road Widening Widening of Fallon Road to four lanes from Tassajara Road to Silvera
Ranch Drive.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 125
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
E
a
s
t
e
r
n
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
R
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
5
Central Pkwy Extension Central Parkway two lane extension, from Fallon Road to Croak Road.
Dougherty Road Widening Widening Dougherty Road to six lanes from Sierra Court to City limits.
St. Patrick Way Extend St. Patrick Way from Regional Street to connect to its current
terminus west of Golden Gate Drive.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the following
amendments to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan:
Section 5.1.1 – TASSAJARA ROAD shall be amended to read as follows:
Tassajara Road is a major north -south arterial in the City of Dublin. Tassajara Road
is a two-lane undivided arterial between the Alameda - Contra Costa County line to
North Dublin Ranch Drive and from North Dublin Ranch Drive to I -580 it is currently a
four to five lane facility.
Section 5.2.2 NORTH -SOUTH CIRCULATION, fifth Paragraph, shall be amended to
read as follows:
Tassajara Road will be the major north -south road through Tassajara Village Center,
Foothill Residential, Tassajara Gateway and Town Center carrying substantial traffic
from both the planning area and beyond into the retail core. Tassajara Road will
meet the northern portion of Tassajara Road and Fallon Road at an intersection. The
plan concentrates residential and employment users along Tassajara Road to
encourage transit use for local a nd regional travel. The minimum right of way from I -
580 to Dublin Boulevard shall be 152 feet. North of Dublin Boulevard to North Dublin
Ranch Drive the minimum right -of-way shall be 128 feet, and North Dublin Ranch
Drive to the Alameda-Contra Costa County limit line varies between 108 feet to 110
feet. Additional right -of-way will be needed for transitions and additional turn lanes.
Section 5.2.7 ARTERIAL STREETS shall be amended to read as follows:
The arterial streets in East Dublin are designed to carry very high traffic volumes with
a minimum of interference from connecting traffic. The major arterial streets include
Dublin Boulevard, as well as Hacienda Drive, Tassajara Road and Fallon Road. In
general, these streets will provide six through lan es, with up to eight through lanes for
short street sections connecting directly to a freeway interchange. Dublin Boulevard
between Croak Road and North Canyons Parkway in Livermore will be a four -lane
roadway. Tassajara Road between the Alameda -Contra Costa County limit line and
North Dublin Ranch Drive will be a four -lane roadway. Access to arterials will be
permitted only at signalized intersections with arterial or collector streets, or at
selected controlled locations with the approval of the Directo r of Public Works.
Section 7.5.2 STREETS shall be amended to read as follows:
TASSAJARA ROAD
• No on-street parking
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 126
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
E
a
s
t
e
r
n
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
R
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
6
• Signalized intersections based on current and projected traffic flows and
CalTrans Traffic Signal Warrant Standards
FROM SOUTH OF GLEASON ROAD TO I-580
• 14’ median with large canopy tree
• 20’ from curbline to ROW line includes canopy tree and secondary tree, sidewalk
or pedestrian/bike path. Sidewalk may be widened and the secondary tree
eliminated where buildings are built at the 10’ set bac k line. (See Figure 7.40)
FROM GLEASON ROAD TO NORTH DUBLIN RANCH DRIVE
• Six lane arterial street
• 38’ landscaped median with 24’ for future lanes
• 20’ from curbline to ROW line includes large canopy tree and 8 -foot sidewalk or
bike/pedestrian path
• 10’ landscaped setback outside ROW
FROM NORTH DUBLIN RANCH DRIVE TO THE ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
LIMIT LINE
• Four lane arterial street
• 16’ landscaped median
• 10’ landscaped setback outside ROW
• 10’ to 20’ from curbline to ROW line includes canopy tree and secondary
tree and 6' to 10’ sidewalk or bike/pedestrian path. Sidewalk may be
widened and the secondary tree eliminated where buildings are built at the
10’ set back line.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____ day of __________, 2020 by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
City Clerk
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 127
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
E
a
s
t
e
r
n
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
R
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
6.1.b
Packet Pg. 128
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
1
t
o
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
ORDINANCE NO. __-20
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
TO ESTABLISH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES FOR TASSAJARA ROAD BETWEEN
PALISADES DRIVE AND THE ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIMIT LINE
WHEREAS, the City Council Adopted Resolution No. 20-20 on April 7, 2020, calling
for a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Sections 7.68.080 through 7.68.100 of the
Dublin Municipal Code on April 21, 2020, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 100 Civic
Plaza, Dublin, California, or at a telephonic or electronic place, if such meeting is held pursuant
to the authority granted by Executive Order N -29-20, to hear protests and objections to the
establishment of right-of-way lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and the
Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit; and
WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly given; and
WHEREAS, no written objections were received by the City Clerk prior to the public
hearing on April 21, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and pass upon all protests or objections filed,
and denies any and all objections; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1:
Pursuant to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.68, the ultimate right-of-way lines are hereby
established for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and the Alameda-Contra Costa County
Limit Line, according to the Legal Description and Plat Map, attached hereto as Exhibit A, said
Exhibit herein incorporated.
SECTION 2:
The effect of said right-of-way lines shall be governed by the provisions of Dublin Ordinance No.
44-87, as amended.
SECTION 4: Effective Date and Posting of Ordinance
This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and
adoption by the City Council. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be
posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of
the Government Code of the State of California.
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 129
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
P
r
e
c
i
s
e
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
P
a
l
i
s
a
d
e
s
D
r
i
v
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
A
l
a
m
e
d
a
-
C
o
n
t
r
a
C
o
s
t
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin on this 21st day
of April, 2020, by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
City Clerk
3507178.1
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 130
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
P
r
e
c
i
s
e
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
P
a
l
i
s
a
d
e
s
D
r
i
v
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
A
l
a
m
e
d
a
-
C
o
n
t
r
a
C
o
s
t
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 131
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
L
e
g
a
l
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
P
l
a
t
M
a
p
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 132
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
L
e
g
a
l
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
P
l
a
t
M
a
p
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 133
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
-
L
e
g
a
l
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
P
l
a
t
M
a
p
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.e
Packet Pg. 134
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 135
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
3
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 136
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
3
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 137
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
3
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 138
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
3
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 139
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
3
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 140
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
3
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 141
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
3
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 142
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
3
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 143
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
3
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 144
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
3
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 145
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
3
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 146
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
3
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.g
Packet Pg. 147
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
4
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.g
Packet Pg. 148
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
4
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.g
Packet Pg. 149
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
4
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.g
Packet Pg. 150
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
4
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.g
Packet Pg. 151
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
4
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.g
Packet Pg. 152
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
4
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.g
Packet Pg. 153
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
4
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.g
Packet Pg. 154
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
4
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.g
Packet Pg. 155
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
4
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.g
Packet Pg. 156
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
0
4
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.h
Packet Pg. 157
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
8
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
-
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.h
Packet Pg. 158
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
8
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
-
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.h
Packet Pg. 159
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
8
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
-
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
6.1.h
Packet Pg. 160
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
8
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
-
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
RESOLUTION NO. 17-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
CONSIDER AN INITIAL STUDY/CEQA ADDENDUM AND ADOPT A
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH PRECISE ALIGNMENT FOR THE FUTURE
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES FOR TASSAJARA ROAD BETWEEN PALISADES DRIVE AND
ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIMIT LINE
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin adopted Right-Of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road by
Ordinance No. 20-99 and Ordinance No. 21-04; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 51-93,
certifying an Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and
Specific Plan (Eastern Dublin Environmental Impact Report, SCH #91103064) (the "1993 EIR")
that analyzed the ultimate development of Tassajara Road at six travel lanes; and
WHEREAS, in 2004, the Dublin City Council adopted an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration for a precise alignment of a future six-lane major roadway within the Eastern Dublin
Planning Area (Tassajara Road/Fallon Road Ultimate Road Right-of-Way Alignment Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, SCH #2004042008) (the "2004 IS/MN"); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 7.68, the City of Dublin has
proposed a revised alignment for portions of Tassajara Road that differs slightly from the
alignment previously approved in May 2004 (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Project includes a programmatic change in the number of ultimate travel
lanes from six lanes to four lanes for the portion of Tassajara Road as depicted on Exhibit 1,
attached to this Resolution and hereby incorporated by reference; and
WHEREAS, the affected segment of Tassajara Road is between Palisades Drive and the
Alameda-Contra Costa County limit line; and
WHEREAS, to complete the Project, the alignment of Right-Of-Way Lines on Tassajara
Road between Palisades Drive and Alameda-Contra Costa County line must be adjusted; and
WHEREAS, the Right-Of-Way Lines are appropriate and compatible with the existing and
planned land uses and will not overburden public services; and
WHEREAS, the properties through which the proposed Right-Of-Way Lines pass are within
the boundary of Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and therefore will be encompassed by, and
consistent with, the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, precise alignment for the future Right-Of-Way Lines will not have a substantial
adverse effect on safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to
property or public improvements; and
Reso No. 17-20, Item 7.1, Adopted 03/03/20 Page 1 of 3
6.1.i
Packet Pg. 161
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
9
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
1
7
-
2
0
-
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
M
a
r
c
h
3
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code
Section 21166, et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 require that when an EIR
or negative declaration has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR or negative declaration
shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial
evidence in light of the whole record, that one or more of the following exists:
1.Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions
of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects;
2.Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the
project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative
Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3.New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have
been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
a.The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the
previous EIR or negative declaration;
b.Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
shown in the previous EIR;
c.Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would
in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of
the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or
d.Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from
those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt
the mitigation measures or alternative; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, Dublin has completed an Initial
Study/CEQA Addendum (the "Addendum") for the Project as shown in the Initial Study/CEQA
Addendum for the Tassajara Road Ultimate Right-Of-Way Alignment Project prepared by Jerry
Haag on January 2020 is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the Addendum concluded that the Project would not result in any new
significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in
1993 EIR or the 2004 IS/MN and no other CEQA standards for supplemental revisions are met;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after hearing and considering all said reports,
recommendations and testimony at a public hearing on February 11, 2020, adopted Resolution
20-04, recommending that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention.
Reso No. 17-20, Item 7.1, Adopted 03/03/20 Page 2 of 3
6.1.i
Packet Pg. 162
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
9
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
1
7
-
2
0
-
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
M
a
r
c
h
3
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines,
on the basis of substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited to, the 1993
EIR, the 2004 IS/MN, the Addendum, and all related information presented to the City Council,
that the environmental effects of the proposed Project were sufficiently analyzed and that an
Addendum is the appropriate environmental document for the proposed Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Project will not result in any new significant impacts
or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in the previous CEQA
documents and no further environmental review under CEQA is required.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts this Resolution of
Intention and calls for a public hearing pursuant to Sections 7.68.080 through 7.68.100 of the
Dublin Municipal Code, at 7:00 p.m. on March 17, 2020, in the City of Dublin City Council
Chambers, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California, to hear protests and objections to the
establishment of the proposed Right-Of-Way lines as depicted on the legal description and plat
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is directed to post this Resolution of
Intention in accordance with Section 7.68.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code at least 10 days before
the public hearing.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of March 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Goel, Hernandez, Josey, Kumagai and Mayor Haubert
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reso No. 17-20, Item 7.1, Adopted 03/03/20 Page 3 of 3
6.1.i
Packet Pg. 163
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
9
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
1
7
-
2
0
-
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
M
a
r
c
h
3
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
MEDP6 CO 141V
COSH .
0 C%" %
t f
LEGEND:
SEGMENT OF
FUTURE TASSAJARA
RD. THAT WILL BE
REDUCED FROM 6-
TO 4-LANES
w
PROPOSED REVISED
ALIGNMENT OF
TASSAJARA ROAD
PALISADES DR.
IL4,
R4
ANE
TASSAJARA
N. DUBLIN
ROAD
RANCH DR.
S. DUBLIN
RANCH DR.
b LANES
GLEASC N DR.
CENTRAL PKWY.
E
DUBLIN BLVD,
B LAN ES— _-
Source: City of Dublin
it N
I-580 v .
6.1.i
Packet Pg. 164
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
9
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
1
7
-
2
0
-
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
M
a
r
c
h
3
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
19702-020
1/2S/2020
Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION
LANDS OF SINGH FAMILY PROPERTIES LP TO BE
CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN FOR
TASSAJARA ROAD WIDENING
DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA
ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING A PORTION OF THE LANDS OF SINGH FAMILY PROPERTIES LP, AS
DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT SERIES NO. 2006392818, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTH CORNER OF PARCEL B OF THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED "TRACT
NO. 8133" RECORDED IN BOOK 343 OF MAPS AT PAGES I 1 THROUGH 19, ALAMEDA COUNTY
RECORDS, COMMON TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF TASSAJARA ROAD,
SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF SINGH FAMILY PROPERTIES
LP, TFIENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TASSAJARA ROAD, ALONG A NON -TANGENT
CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 833.00 FEET, FROM WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS
NORTH 56053'23" EAST, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18013144" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 265.02
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE THF, FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:
1. ALONG ANON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 833.00 FEET, FROM
WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 75°07'07" EAST, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
20057'08" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 304.62 FEET;
2. NORTH 06004115" EAST, 72.56 FEET TO TFIE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LANDS OF SINGH;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS OF SINGH FAMILY PROPERTIES LP THE
FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:
1, SOUTH 73050'31" WEST, 4.78 FEET;
2. THENCE SOUTH 73 052'02" WEST, 162.51 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE AND ENTERING SAID LANDS OF SINGH FAMILY
PROPERTIES LP THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:
1. SOUTH 25042'31"EAST, 368.54 FEET;
2. NORTH 75007'07" EAST, 16.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 28,696 SQ, FT MORE OR LESS
PORTION OF APN 986-0004-001-00
END OF DESCRIPTION
P:\19702\SRV\Mapping\Desc\19702_ROW DEDICATION-7.doc
6.1.i
Packet Pg. 165
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
9
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
1
7
-
2
0
-
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
M
a
r
c
h
3
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
PREPARED BY:
IAN B CE 1VjAj'DONALD
LICEN EDL44D SURVEYOR NO.8817
STATE CALIFORNIA
Zqy
DATE
9702-020
1/2S/2020
Page 2 of 3
P:\19702\SRV\Mapping\Desc\19702_ROW DEDICATION-7.dac
6.1.i
Packet Pg. 166
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
9
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
1
7
-
2
0
-
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
M
a
r
c
h
3
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
GON P UN Y
P
GO kA
GS
DOF DU9-1N
SINGH FAMILY
PROPERTIES LP
APN 936-0004-001-00
SERIES NO, 2006392313
P.0.8.
P.O.C.
EX
PROP
R/W
SF
R)
AREA TO BE DEDICATED
28,696± SF
PROP R/W
EXHIBIT "A"
PAGE 3 OF 3
ARW
r \
SEE D\TAIL
THIS SKEET
ca
o r' p6
O
1p a
P.O.B
Curve Table
Curve # Radius Delta Les31G13000000, 0015'03"
Line Table
Line # Bearing Length
L1 N6004'15"E 72.56'
L2 N75007'07"E 16.99'
TRACT 8102
d \ 347 M. 50-70
N610
J `
vj90
EX R/W \\rn wocp
Cc>
o,
BOUNDARY OF DESCRIPTION
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY LINE
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
CONTROL LINE
COUNTY LINE
ANGLE POINT
POINT OF BEGINNING
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
EXISTING
PROPOSE
RIGHT OF WAY
SQUARE FEET
RADIAL BEARING
oosLp,
C \ P.O.G.
PARCEL 8
TRA CT 3133
343 Al, I I
6.1.i
Packet Pg. 167
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
9
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
1
7
-
2
0
-
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
M
a
r
c
h
3
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
Reso No. 20-20, Item 4.5, Adopted 04/07/20 Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 20 - 20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * *
CONSIDERING AN INITIAL STUDY/CEQA ADDENDUM AND ADOPTING A RESOLUTION
OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH PRECISE ALIGNMENT FOR THE FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINES FOR TASSAJARA ROAD BETWEEN PALISADES DRIVE AND ALAMEDA-CONTRA
COSTA COUNY LIMIT LINE
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin adopted Right-Of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road by
Ordinance No. 20-99 and Ordinance No. 21-04; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 51 -93,
certifying an Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and
Specific Plan (Eastern Dublin Environmental Impact Report, SCH #91103064) (the “1993 EIR”)
that analyzed the ultimate development of Tassajara Road at six travel lanes; and
WHEREAS, in 2004, the Dublin City Council adopted an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration for a precise alignment of a future six -lane major roadway within the Eastern Dublin
Planning Area (Tassajara Road/Fallon Road Ultimate Road Right-of-Way Alignment Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, SCH #2004042008) (the “2004 IS/MN”); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 7.68, the City of Dublin has
proposed a revised alignment for portions of Tassajara Road that differs slightly from the
alignment previously approved in May 2004 (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the Project includes a programmatic change in the numbe r of ultimate travel
lanes from six lanes to four lanes for the portion of Tassajara Road as depicted on Exhibit 1,
attached to this Resolution and hereby incorporated by reference; and
WHEREAS, the affected segment of Tassajara Road is between Palisades Drive and the
Alameda-Contra Costa County limit line; and
WHEREAS, to complete the Project, the alignment of Right -Of-Way Lines on Tassajara
Road between Palisades Drive and Alameda -Contra Costa County line must be adjusted; and
WHEREAS, the Right-Of-Way Lines are appropriate and compatible with the existing and
planned land uses and will not overburden public services; and
WHEREAS, the properties through which the proposed Right-Of-Way Lines pass are within
the boundary of Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and therefore will be encompassed by, and
consistent with, the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, precise alignment for the future Right-Of-Way Lines will not have a substantial
adverse effect on safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to
property or public improvements; and
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 168
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
2
0
-
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
o
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
R
i
g
h
t
-
O
f
-
W
a
y
L
i
n
e
s
-
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
Reso No. 20-20, Item 4.5, Adopted 04/07/20 Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code
Section 21166, et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 require that when an EIR
or negative declaration has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR or negative declaration
shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial
evidence in light of the whole record, that one or more of the following exists:
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions
of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the
project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative
Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have
been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the
previous EIR or negative declaration;
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
shown in the previous EIR;
c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would
in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of
the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigati on measure or
alternative; or
d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from
those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt
the mitigation measures or alternative; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, Dublin has completed an Initial
Study/CEQA Addendum (the “Addendum”) for the Project as shown in the Initial Study/CEQA
Addendum for the Tassajara Road Ultimate Right-Of-Way Alignment Project prepared by Jerry
Haag on January 2020 is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the Addendum concluded that the Project would not result in any new
significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in
1993 EIR or the 2004 IS/MN and no other CEQA standards for supplemental revisions are met;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after hearing and considering all said reports,
recommendations and testimony at a public hearing on February 11, 2020, adopted Resolution
20-04, recommending that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention; and
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 169
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
2
0
-
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
o
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
R
i
g
h
t
-
O
f
-
W
a
y
L
i
n
e
s
-
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
Reso No. 20-20, Item 4.5, Adopted 04/07/20 Page 3 of 3
WHEREAS, the City Council had previously adopted Resolution No. 17-20 setting a public
hearing for 7:00 p.m. on March 17, 2020, but the City Council’s regular meeting on March 17,
2020 was cancelled. In light of that cancellation, the City is adopting a revised resolution of
intention in order to reschedule the hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines,
on the basis of substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited to, the 1993
EIR, the 2004 IS/MN, the Addendum, and all related information presented to the City Council,
that the environmental effects of the proposed Project were sufficiently analyzed and that an
Addendum is the appropriate environmental document for the proposed Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Project will not result in any new significant impacts
or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in the previous CEQA
documents and no further environmental review under CEQA is required.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts this Resolution of
Intention and calls for a public hearing pursuant to Sections 7.68.080 through 7.6 8.100 of the
Dublin Municipal Code, at 7:00 p.m. on April 21, 2020, in the City of Dublin City Council Chambers,
100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California or at a telephonic or electronic place, if such meeting is held
pursuant to the authority granted by Executive Order N-29-20, to hear protests and objections to
the establishment of the proposed Right -Of-Way lines as depicted on the legal description and
plat attached hereto as Exhibit A.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is directed to post this Resolution of
Intention in accordance with Section 7.68.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code at least 10 days before
the public hearing.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of April 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Goel, Hernandez, Josey, Kumagai and Mayor Haubert
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 170
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
2
0
-
2
0
-
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
o
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
R
i
g
h
t
-
O
f
-
W
a
y
L
i
n
e
s
-
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
7
,
2
0
2
0
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
Number ST0116 Program STREETS
ESTIMATED COSTS
PRIOR
YEARS
2018-2019
BUDGET 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
FUTURE
YEARS
ESTIMATE TOTALS
9100 $11,280 $91,458 $89,360 $108,440 $300,538
9200 $116,096 $1,214,206 $454,110 $145,050 $1,929,462
9300 $1,980,000 $1,980,000
9400 $48,589 $7,751,411 $7,800,000
9500 $490,000 $490,000
$127,376 $1,305,664 $592,059 $10,474,901 $12,500,000
FUNDING SOURCE
PRIOR
YEARS
2018-2019
BUDGET 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
FUTURE
YEARS
ESTIMATE TOTALS
2201 $200,000 $200,000
2220 $15,254 $84,746 $592,059 $692,059
4301 $112,122 $108,638 $220,760
Road Maint. & Rehab.
Account (RMRA)
TASSAJARA ROAD REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING -
FALLON ROAD TO NORTH CITY LIMIT
2018-2023 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Salaries & Benefits
Contract Services
Land/Right of Way
Improvements
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
State Gas Tax
Traffic Impact Fee -
Category 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project provides for the planning and preliminary engineering to define a new roadway alignment, design cross-section,right-of-way, and environmental clearance for
Tassajara Road between North Dublin Ranch Drive and the City and Contra Costa County limit. The project also provides for the design and construction of a realigned
Tassajara Road from Fallon Drive to the northern City limit. The design and construction of the southerly Tassajara Road segment, down to North Dublin Ranch Drive, is
included in another Capital Improvement Program, project, Tassajara Road Improvements - North Dublin Ranch Drive to Quarry Lane School.
The project will improve Tassajara Road to a four-lane arterial standard with bike lanes, sidewalks, landscaped median, stormwater treatment areas, and other associated
street improvements. Portions of the existing roadway have been improved by adjacent development projects and this project will complete the street improvements and
realign a portion of existing roadway to improve safety and achieve good circulation while adhering to the Complete Streets Policy. The roadway segment is a project within
both the Tri-Valley Transportation Council Strategic Expenditure Plan (Project B-8) and the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact (Category 1) Fee Program. Design and
construction of the realigned roadway will be coordinated with Contra Costa County.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT:TBD
MANAGING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
6.1.k
Packet Pg. 171
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
I
P
N
o
.
S
T
0
1
1
6
a
n
d
C
I
P
N
o
.
S
T
0
1
1
9
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
s
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
FUNDING SOURCE
PRIOR
YEARS
2018-2019
BUDGET 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
FUTURE
YEARS
ESTIMATE TOTALS
4303 $409,263 $409,263
4306 $503,017 $2,000,000 $2,503,017
9998 $8,474,901 $8,474,901
$127,376 $1,305,664 $592,059 $10,474,901 $12,500,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT
TOTAL
Traffic Impact Fee -
Category 3
TVTD
Unidentified
6.1.k
Packet Pg. 172
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
I
P
N
o
.
S
T
0
1
1
6
a
n
d
C
I
P
N
o
.
S
T
0
1
1
9
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
s
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
Number ST0119 Program STREETS
PRIOR YEARS
2018-2019
BUDGET 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
FUTURE
YEARS
ESTIMATE TOTALS
9100 $54,120 $81,920 $136,040
9200 $1,065,900 $250,060 $1,315,960
9300 $260,000 $30,000 $290,000
9400 $5,340,000 $5,340,000
9500 $418,000 $418,000
$1,798,020 $5,701,980 $7,500,000
PRIOR YEARS
2018-2019
BUDGET 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
FUTURE
YEARS
ESTIMATE TOTALS
2201 $1,201,980 $1,201,980
4301 $1,798,020 $1,000,000 $2,798,020
FUNDING SOURCE
TASSAJARA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - NORTH DUBLIN RANCH DRIVE TO
QUARRY LANE SCHOOL
2018-2023 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ESTIMATED COSTS
Salaries & Benefits
Contract Services
Land/Right of Way
Improvements
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
State Gas Tax
Traffic Impact Fee -
Category 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project provides for design and construction to complete the street improvements for Tassajara Road, from North Dublin Ranch Drive to Quarry Lane School. The scope
of this project was previously included as part of Fiscal Year 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Program project, ST0116 -Tassajara Road Realignment & Widening, which
included the design and construction of Tassajara Road from North Dublin Ranch Drive to Dublin's northern limit. In Fiscal Year 2018-2019, the scope of ST0116 was revised
to only include the segment of Tassajara Road north of Fallon Road.
The project will improve Tassajara Road to a four-lane arterial standard, with bike lanes, sidewalks, landscaped median, stormwater treatment areas, and other associated street
improvements. Portions of the existing roadway have been improved by adjacent development projects and this project will complete the street improvements to implement the
General Plan and the Complete Streets Policy. The roadway segment is a project within the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact (Category 1) Fee program. Preliminary engineering
and environmental document preparation are being completed as part of ST0116.
Preliminary design of the project will begin in Fiscal Year 2019-2020. Construction is anticipated to start in Fiscal Year 2020-2021, however it is dependent upon utility
relocation, right-of-way acquisition, and permitting by regulatory agencies.
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT:TBD
MANAGING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
6.1.k
Packet Pg. 173
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
I
P
N
o
.
S
T
0
1
1
6
a
n
d
C
I
P
N
o
.
S
T
0
1
1
9
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
s
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
PRIOR YEARS
2018-2019
BUDGET 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
FUTURE
YEARS
ESTIMATE TOTALSFUNDING SOURCE
4306 $3,500,000 $3,500,000
$1,798,020 $5,701,980 $7,500,000
ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT
TOTAL
TVTD
6.1.k
Packet Pg. 174
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
I
P
N
o
.
S
T
0
1
1
6
a
n
d
C
I
P
N
o
.
S
T
0
1
1
9
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
s
(
T
a
s
s
a
j
a
r
a
R
o
a
d
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
Tassajara Road Alignment
Project
City Council Public Hearing
April 21, 2020
Outline
1.Project Overview, Design and Background
2.General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Amendments
3.Process to Establish New Right-Of-Way Lines
4.Public Outreach
5.Recommended Action
Project Overview: Vicinity
Project Overview
Project Design: Road Section
Project Background
•2010 -County proposes a realignment of Tassajara Road to improve traffic safety
•2012 -City approves Moller Ranch development project, which included a concept alternative alignment
•2015 -City/County initiated a Traffic Analysis with up-to-date land use data and street network
•Level of Service (LOS), traffic diversion, and travel times were analyzed for a 4-lane and 6-lane scenario and were found to be similar
Project Background
•2016 –City Council received a presentation on the
needed capacity of Tassajara Road as a four-lane arterial
north of North Dublin Ranch Drive and approved the
addition of Tassajara Road Realignment and Widening
Project into the 5-year Capital Improvement Program
(CIP)
•2020 –City Council reviewed and considered an
IS/Addendum for the Project and adopted the
Resolution of Intention to Establish the Precise
Alignment of Tassajara Road north of Palisades Drive
General Plan and Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan Amendments
•No Change to Land-Uses
•No Change in Intensity of Development
•Change Number of Lanes –From Six Lanes to
Four Lanes from N. Dublin Ranch Drive to the
City Limit
•Minor text updates to the General Plan and
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Process to Establish ROW
•DMC -Section 7.68 outlines the process of establishing ROW lines
•Planning Commission must hold a Public Hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council to consider adopting a Resolution of Intention to establish ROW (February 11, 2020)
•City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention (April 7, 2020)
•City Council Hold a Public Hearing no less than 14 days and no more than 35 days after the adoption of the Resolution of Intention and consider approving a ROW Ordinance
Right-Of-Way
•1999 Precise Alignment Ordinance (Ord. No. 20-99)
–Established ROW Lines from I-580 to the northern boundary
of Dublin Ranch Phase 1, near Shadow Hills Drive
•2004 Precise Alignment Ordinance (Ord. No. 21-04)
–Established ROW Lines from Shadow Hills Drive to the City
Limit Line
•2012 -Approved a conceptual alignment with the Moller Ranch
Project (Tassajara Hills)
•2020 -Proposed 4-lane Tassajara Road falls within the established
ROW adopted in 1999 and 2004 except for the revised alignment
north of Palisades Drive
Public Outreach
•October 2019 -Property owners who will be affected
by the widening project were invited to view the
project’s preliminary improvement plans
–The proposed reduction in the number of lanes
meant that the required right-of-way on private
properties adjacent to Segment 1 would be less.
–However the proposed revised alignment would
impact one parcel just south of the County limit line
on the west side of Tassajara Road.
Recommendation
Conduct the public hearing, deliberate and take the following
actions:
a)Adopt the Resolution Amending the General Plan and the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan related to the Tassajara Road
Alignment Project;
b)Waive the reading and INTRODUCE an Ordinance to
Establish Right-of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road between
Palisades Drive to the Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit
Line.
Page 1 of 6
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: April 21, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Review
Prepared by: Jim Bergdoll, Senior Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider its options to become an Entitlement City and receive
funding directly from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
starting in 2021. The City currently receives CDBG funding through the Urb an County
program administered by Alameda County. The City must notify HUD and the County of
its decision by May 15, 2020 and begin to implement that decision.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Direct Staff to either remain in the Urban County program or seek Entitl ement City
status and notify HUD and Alameda County HCD of that decision.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
If the City remains part of the Urban County program, there would not be a change in
financial impact. Becoming an Entitlement City would cost approximately $30,000 in
consultant time to plan the program in FY 2020-21 and would also include a provision of
staff time. Program administration costs, including staffing, would begin in FY 2021-22
and the cost could be partially offset by the CDBG program which allows 20 percent of
the annual funding allocation to pay for program administration.
DESCRIPTION:
Background
The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program provides annual grants to
states, cities, and counties to develop viable urban communities by provid ing decent
housing and a suitable living environment, and by expanding economic opportunities,
principally for low- and moderate-income persons. The program is authorized under
Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and is administere d by
HUD. CDBG funds are allocated to local jurisdictions by HUD using a calculation based
on relative levels of pre-1940 housing, poverty, overcrowding, population, and regional
8.1
Packet Pg. 175
Page 2 of 6
growth lag.
The City currently receives CDBG funds through the Urban County program
administered by the Alameda County Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD). The Urban County program is a way for cities with a population of
less than 50,000 to receive CDBG funds (cities over 50,000 may also choose to receive
their CDBG allocation through the Urban County program). Dublin participates in the
Urban County program through a Cooperative Agreement with the unincorporated
Alameda County and the cities of Newark, Emeryville, Albany, and Piedmont.
Dublin’s participation provides approximately $244,000 in CDBG funds to the Urban
County program. A portion of those funds are allocated specifically for Public Service
Grants to fund programs in Dublin, a portion is allocated to countywide service
programs, and a portion is placed into a pool of funds for Capital Grants that are
available to the Urban County jurisdictions on a competitive basis to fund capital
improvements.
Alameda County handles most of the required program administration, including
preparation of the Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plan, and Citizen Participation
Plan. The Consolidated Plan must be prepared every five years, and include a needs
assessment, market analysis, anti-poverty strategy, goals, and projections. The Annual
Action Plan is prepared by the County prior to the start of each fiscal year and identifies
the goals, projections, and budget for the year. HUD also requires extensive reporting
and program monitoring which is handled by the County. This includes year end and
quarterly reporting of data on people served, demographics, etc., administration of
financial disbursements to grantees, periodic monitoring of every grantee, and financial
reporting on expenditures and balances.
Alameda County HCD administers certain CDBG-funded programs that benefit all the
Urban County jurisdictions. This includes administering a contract with ECHO Housing
to provide tenant/landlord and fair housing services. The County also funds the Minor
Home Repair Program administered by Healthy Homes, and a Rental Housing
Rehabilitation program that is available to Urban County jurisdictions.
Dublin’s share of discretionary CDBG funds are distributed through Public Service
Grants and Capital Grants. Public Service Grants are awarded through the City’s
Human Services Grants Program to local non-profit organizations serving Dublin in
conformance with program guidelines. These grants are awarded annually by the
Dublin City Council after reviewing recommendations made by the Dublin Human
Services Commission. Public Service Grants are limited to 15 percent of the total
annual CDBG funding allocation. Historically, Dublin has received more than its share of
the 15 percent Public Service Grant allocation by utilizing funds that have gone unused
by the other Urban County jurisdictions. This year, Dublin will award approximately
$85,000 in public services grants.
The Capital Grant program is administered by Alameda County to provide funding for
capital improvements. Organizations apply to the County with the City taking the lead on
8.1
Packet Pg. 176
Page 3 of 6
the application submittal. Approximately $630,000 is available annually to share
amongst the Urban County jurisdictions. This includes a $330,000+/- “capital pool”
which is available for projects through an RFP program, and at least $300,000 in
previously programmed categories like Rental Housing Rehabilitation and Preservation,
and Minor Home Repair. It should be noted that the funds in the “capital pool” are
shared amongst the Urban County jurisdictions and awarded to projects on a
competitive basis. The amount of money available to projects in Dublin can vary from
year to year. Open Heart Kitchen successfully applied for a $330,000 Capital Grant this
fiscal year to build out their new facility in Livermore which will serve the greater Tri -
Valley.
Current Consideration
Every three years, the City has the option to stay in the Urban County program or
become an Entitlement City. The City first became eligible to participate as an
Entitlement City in 2014 when the population reached 50,000. The City Council decided
in 2014 and again in 2017, to remain in the Urban County program. The City must once
again decide whether to remain in the Urban County program and enter into a new
three-year Cooperative Agreement or become an Entitlement City and begin the
process to establish that program. The City must inform HUD and Alameda County
HCD of its decision by May 15, 2020.
ANALYSIS:
The City of Dublin has the option to become an Entitlement City and receive CDBG
funds directly from HUD and take over program administration beginning in 2021 or
remain part of the Urban County program. Table 1 below provides a comparison of the
CDBG components for Dublin under the current Urban County program and as an
Entitlement City. All dollar amounts are provided on an a nnual basis with Urban County
program figures based on the current fiscal year, and Entitlement City figures estimated
based on information provided by HUD.
Table 1. Urban County & Entitlement City Program Matrix
Program Component Urban County Program (FY 2019/20) Entitlement City (Estimated)
CDBG Annual Allocation
(Allocated to programs noted
below)
$244,000 (estimated portion of Urban
County funds attributable to Dublin’s
participation in the program. These
funds are not the exclusive use of
Dublin nor are they a cap on annual
funding available to Dublin based
programs and services)
$250,000 +/- (estimated total amount
that would be available to Dublin in
year 1 of the program)
Public Service Grants (To
non-profit service providers
and limited to 15% max. of
annual allocation)
$36,600 (Note: Can utilize unused
Urban County funds to increase this
amount. For example, Dublin awarded
$85,000 in FY 2019/20 by accessing
unused funds from other Urban County
jurisdictions.
$37,500 (estimated total amount based
on the above number)
Capital Grants (To non-
profit organizations for
capital improvements)
Portion of $630,000 Urban County pool
awarded by County (Recent examples
include: Axis Health $16K loan
$160,000 total to be allocated by
Dublin through RFP (Unused funds
can be carried over into future years
8.1
Packet Pg. 177
Page 4 of 6
Program Component Urban County Program (FY 2019/20) Entitlement City (Estimated)
payments annually, $30K capital
improvements FY16 and $25K FY17;
CRIL roof replacement $5K FY16)
with certain limitations)
Economic Development
(Job creation for small, low
income owned or operated
businesses)
Amount varies per year and
determined by program administration
and funded from the annual CDBG
allocation based on program priorities
Amount varies per year and
determined by program administration
and funded from the annual CDBG
allocation based on program priorities
Tenant-Based Rental
Assistance (Emergency
housing funds available
partly from CDBG program,
and partly HOME)
Not available CDBG can be used for related support
services outside of 15% services cap.
HOME funds are used to provide
financial assistance
HOME Funds (rental
assistance, down payment
assistance, homebuyer
counseling, affordable
housing production)
Share of $585,000 pool awarded on
competitive basis to organizations
serving Urban County jurisdictions
$75,000 (program administered by
City, but funds continue to be
administered by HCD)
HUD 108 Loans (For Capital
Projects or Programs as 20-
year, low interest loan)
Available only in partnership with an
Entitlement City (example: Axis Health)
Up to 5x CDBG allocation (total
cumulative balance of all outstanding
108 loans cannot exceed this amount)
Program Administration
(20% max. of annual
allocation to cover program
administration, and
preparation of Consolidated
Plan, Annual Action Plan,
Citizen Participation Plan)
$6,600 to Dublin; and $42,200 to
Alameda County
$50,000 to Dublin
Consolidated Plan Prepared every 5 years by County with
staff input (costs offset by Program
Administration funds)
Prepared every 5 years by the City
(estimated cost: $30,000)
Annual Action Plan and
Citizen Participation Plan
Prepared annually by County with staff
input (costs offset by Program
Administration funds)
Prepared annually by City (costs offset
by Program Administration funds)
Monitoring and Reporting
to HUD
Prepared annually by the County Prepared annually by the City
Comparable/Nearby Entitlement Cities
Table 2 below provides the CDBG allocation for FY 2020 - 21 for comparable and
nearby Entitlement Cities.
Table 2. Comparable Entitlement City Annual Allocations
City Population
1/1/2019 (DOF)
CDBG Allocation
FY 2020/21*
Santee (San Diego County) 58,408 $276,000
San Clemente (Orange County) 65,405 $356,000
Walnut Creek (Contra Costa County) 70,212 $342,000
Pleasanton (Alameda County) 80,492 $342,000
Livermore (Alameda County) 91,039 $437,000
Dublin (Alameda County) 64,577 $250,000*
*Entitlement City figures for Dublin estimated based on information provided by
HUD.
8.1
Packet Pg. 178
Page 5 of 6
The cities of San Ramon (population 72,073) and Brentwood (population 51,335) are
examples of cities which are similar in size and demographics to Dublin that are not
Entitlement Cities, and do not plan to change that status.
As an example of how CDBG funds can be spent by category, Table 3 below shows
how the cities of Livermore and Pleasanton proposed spending their a nnual CDBG
allocations as Entitlement Cities in FY 2019-20.
Table 3. Livermore and Pleasanton CDBG Allocation by Category FY 2019 -20
Program Component Livermore Pleasanton
Capital Grants
Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation $160,000 --
Tri-Valley REACH Home Maintenance & Repairs $12,000
Community Facilities Rehabilitation -- $183,000
Axis Clinic Loan Repayment -- $23,000
Public Service Grants
Misc. Community Services $72,000 $48,000
Other
Tenant-based Based Rental Assistance/
Emergency Rehousing
$108,000 --
Administration $88,000 $64,000
Total $440,000 $318,000
Urban County Program
Historically, Dublin’s CDBG program efforts have primarily focused on Public Service
Grants. If Dublin were to remain in the Urban County program, there appear to be
opportunities for the City to expand its CDBG program to further utilize available
funding, particularly in the Capital Grant and Economic Development categories. These
efforts would require coordination with Alameda County HCD and allocation of
additional staff resources to the CDBG program. These funds would be drawn from the
Urban County pool of funds ($630,000+/-) for Capital Grants. Potential uses of Capital
funds include:
• Single-Family Home Rehabilitation or Weatherization Grants.
• Incentivize the creation of Junior Accessory Dwelling Units.
• Community Facility Rehabilitation and Preservation - Expand facilities such as
Tri-Valley Haven.
• Assist non-profit organizations to acquire, rehabilitate and/or preserve
apartments for low-income households.
• Land Acquisition for New Affordable Housing.
• Public Works projects that improve ADA accessibility.
8.1
Packet Pg. 179
Page 6 of 6
The City could also potentially utilize CDBG Economic Development funds for job
creation/retention activities including establishment, stabilization and expansion of small
businesses if they are either owned by low income people or employ low income
workers.
If the City Council elects to remain in the Urban County program, but desires to expand
the programs funded through CDBG, they cou ld direct Staff to pursue such
opportunities.
Entitlement City
Becoming an Entitlement City would provide the City with greater control over the
CDBG program administration and certainty regarding annual Capital Grant funding. But
it could also reduce the maximum amount of potential Capital Grant and Public Service
Grant funding available each year because we could no longer utilize unused funds in
the Urban County pool (Please refer to the discussion immediately above for examples
of potential programs that could use capital funds). With that control would also come
additional work to administer the program. In addition to the upfront consultant time and
cost to plan the program, Staff believes additional staff time would be necessary to
manage the CDBG start up and ongoing program. This would either come in the form
of a redeployed staff resource or a staff augmentation through a consultant.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
This information report is not subject to the requirements of the California Environment al
Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 as it does not meet
CEQA’s definition of a project and will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in
the environment.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
8.1
Packet Pg. 180
Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Program Review
City Council Meeting
April 21, 2020
Presentation Overview
•CDBG Program
•Urban County Program
•Current Consideration
•CDBG Program Components
•Urban County vs. Entitlement City Programs
CDBG Program
•Provides annual grants to states, cities and counties
•Purpose: To develop/enhance viable urban
communities, provide decent housing, and expand
economic opportunities for low-income people
•Entitlement Cities receive CDGB funds directly
from HUD
•Urban County Program
–Provides CDBG funds to cities with population <50,000
–Cities >50,000 may remain in program
Urban County Program
•Dublin currently participates in Urban County
Program
–Cooperative Agreement with Urban County jurisdictions
•Program administered by Alameda County HCD
•Dublin’s discretionary funds
–Public Service Grants: Awarded through Dublin’s
Human Service’s Grants Program
–Capital Grants: Awarded by County
Current Consideration
•Stay in Urban County Program or become
Entitlement City beginning in FY 2021-22
•Inform HUD and HCD by May 15, 2020
•Required program preparation and
implementation for Entitlement status would
then begin
Program Components
•Public Service Grants (CDBG)
•Capital Grants (CDBG)
•Economic Development (CDBG)
•Administration (CDBG)
•HOME Funds
•Tenant-Based Rental Assistance
•HUD 108 Loans
Urban County vs. Entitlement City
•Become an Entitlement City
–Upside: Greater control over program
administration and certainty regarding Capital Grant
funding
–Downside: Could reduce Capital and Public Service
Grant funding and increase program administration
•Remain in Urban County Program
–Option: Expand Dublin program to further utilize
funding for Capital Grants and Economic
Development
Questions