HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.12 WashingtonInfrasDBW� F• CITY CLERK
File # 1:1026msd
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 20, 2001
SUBJECT:
EXHIBITS ATTACHED:
RECOMMENDATION:�i� f `�
w
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement with Washington
Infrastructure Services (formerly MK Centennial) for the Widening
of Dublin Boulevard from Village Parkway to Sierra Court
(Modification to Scope of Work and Additional Compensation)
Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson, Public Works Director
1) Resolution amending agreement
2) Scope of Work/Fee Proposal from Washington
Infrastructure Services (WIS)
3) Amended agreement dated July 18, 2000
4) Budget Change Form
Approve Budget Change in the net amount of $98,475 and Adopt
Resolution Approving Amendment No. 2 to WIS Contract
WIS' current contract with the City for the Dublin Boulevard
Widening project is $411,000. In addition to this amount, $40,689
of Gas Tax funds was included in this year's budget to fund the
anticipated engineering services needed during construction.
Expanding WIS' scope of work (described below and in WIS' letter
dated November 13, 2001) will add $139,164 to WIS contract to
include services during construction as well as additional services
required under the design phase of the project.
Staff is recommending a budget change to increase the amount for
design services to $139,164 using Developers fees to fund the
expanded scope of work. The City has collected an additional
$170,340 in Developers Fees specifically designated for this project
that is not included in current budget. Staff is also recommending
the decrease of $40,689 of Gas Tax funds budgeted for design
services this fiscal year for a net increase of $98,475 (see attached
budget change form).
DESCRIPTION: The plans, specifications and estimates for the Dublin Boulevard
Widening Project between Village Parkway and Sierra Court are nearing completion. During the design
COPIES TO: James H Lundell, WIS � � 4 0 1
ITEM NO.
g: \engr-contract\Wash\AgstW ash2AmendNov20-2001. doc
phase, Staff and the consultant had determined the need to expand the eXisting scope of work to include
several tasks, which are listed as follows:
1. Revised R/W (additional right of way plats and descriptions required) $ 8,810
2. Supplemental surveys (additional field work required to supplement aerial photo) 1,362
3. Utility Design/Coordination (bridge bracket and opening design required by the 11,100
utility companies as part of the Rule 20A project)
4. DSRSD Coordination and Design (incorporation of recycled waterline project 13,479
into plans and specifications and design coordination)
5. Design of Alamo Canal slope protection and outfall structures (in Coordination 15,330
with Zone 7)
6. Additional Specifications work (revise Caltrans standard specifications in 7,156
compliance with latest federal and state requirements)
7. Left-mm pocket Design Alternatives (to minimize traffic impacts to businesses) 8,701
8. Landscaping Alternatives (bridge landscaping alternatives research by consultant) 5,931
9. Additional Landscaping and Irrigation (limits of landscaping expanded) 13,595
10o Civic Center Drive Entrance Modification (needed to accommodate widening) 2,839
11. Stage Construction Plans, Revised Structural Section & Overlay(not included 5,724
in contract)
12. Drainage Field Survey and Research (drawings not available) 5,782
13. Additional Meetings (Utility meetings, Agency meetings & progress meetings) 11,220
14. Signal Interconnect and Dual Meter Service Design (not included in contract) 2,235
15. Bike Path Retaining Wall (not included in contract) 10,800
16. Engineering Services during construction (not included in contract) 11,000
17. Direct Cost 4,100
Total $139,164
The Dublin San Ramon Services District, so as to minimize construction impacts to the community, has
requested inclusion in the City's project of the installation of a six-inch recycled water line and a.four-
inch conduit in the utility joint trench for DSRSD's fiber optic facility. The design and utility
coordination work associated with this request (Item #4) is included in this expanded scope of work and
would be reimbursed by DSRSD. The draft cooperative agreement between Dublin and DSRSD is being
reviewed by Staff and will be presented to the Council at a later date.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached budget change form and adopt the resolution
approving the amendment to the WIS agreement to expand the conSultant's scope of work as described in
the letter dated November 13, 2001.
Page 2.
RESOLUTION NO. - O1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING AMENDED AGREEMENT WITH
WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES (FORMERLY MK CENTENNIAL)
FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE WIDENING OF
DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM VILLAGE PARKWAY TO SIERRA COURT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin approved an agreement for Preliminary
Engineering and Environmental Services with Washington Infrastructure Services (formerly known as
MK Centennial) for the Dublin Boulevard project from Village Parkway to Sierra Court, on November
16, 1999; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin amended the agreement on July 18, 2000, to extend the scope
of services to include the preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the said project with
an additional compensation in the amount of $267,000 for a total aggregate amount of $411,000; and
WHEREAS, the Scope of Work to be performed is proposed to be expanded to include additional
right-of-way survey work, bike path wall and creek slope protection design, additional landscaping and
signal interconnect design, other miscellaneous work, and design services during construction.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CitY Council of the City of Dublin does hereby
approve Amendment No. 2 to the agreement with Washington Infrastructure Services to expand the scope
of work, as described in Exhibit "A", which is attached to this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized to execute the amended agreement.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of November, 2001.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
g.' lengrlmkl OOIResoAmend2Nov20-2001 '
/
EXHIBIT "A" OF RESOLUTION -01 - .
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CITY OF DUBLIN AND WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
(formerly MK Centennial) FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
WI-IEREAS, the City of Dublin (hereinafter referred' to as "CITY") and Washington
Infrastructure Services (formerly MK Centennial) (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"), entered
into an agreement on November 16, 1999 for Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Services for the
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project between Village Parkway and Sierra Court; and
- WHEREAS, the City amended the agreement on July. 18, 2000 to extend the scope of
work to include the preparation of Plans, SpecificatiOns and Estimates; and
WHEREAS, the Scope of Work to be performed is proposed to be extended to include
additional right of way survey work, bike path wall and creek slope protection design, additional
landscaping and signal interconnect design, other miscellaneous work, and design services during
construction;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Scope of Work
The Scope of Work shall be modified as described in Consultant's Amended Scope of Services -
Phase 2 dated November 13, 2001 for the Dublin Boulevard Widening Project between Village Parkway
and Sierra Court (attached).
Extension of Term
The total cost for time-and-materials work under this amendment shall not exceed an additional
$139,164.
CITY OF DUBLIN
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
~ames H. Vice President
Date:
Washington
November 13,2001
File No. 2262.020
Mr. Ferd Del Rosario, Project Manager
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project
Amendment No. 2
Dear Ferd:
Enclosed is amendment number 2 scope and fee. This amendment is based upon
disCussions at the meeting held November 8, 2001 at the City's offices.
If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
~J~es ~:. Lunde
Vice President
Northern California Operations
Enclosures
CCi
Bruce Zaeni, BCI (w/a)
Etty Mercurio, WIS (w/a)
\\CEI PLOWOL 1LADMILq~ROJECTSL226.2\LettersL2262L-036-d¢
-- wasmngton Group International, Inc. 2633 Camino Ramon ,, Suit~
Phone: (925) 244-1500 · Fax: (925) 24
EXHIBIT
A Professional Services Agreement Between
CITY OF DUBLIN
(CITY)
and
WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
(formerly MK Centennial)
(CONSULTANT)
for the
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
AMENDMENT NO. 2
SCOPE OF SERVICES
INDEX DESCRIPTION
PAGE
INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 2
1. Revised R/W ..................................................................................................................................... 2
2. Supplemental Surveys ...................................................................................................................... 2
3. Utility Design and Coordinatiol~ ...................................................................................................... 2
4. Dublin San Ramon Service District (DSRSD) Coordination and DesigIz ....................................... 2
5. Zone 7 Coordination and Design of Erosion Protection and Ouffalls .............................................. 3
6. Specifications Special Provisions with City Boiler Plate ................................................................. 3
7. Left-turn Pocket Alternatives ........................................................................................................... 3
8. Landscape Alternative~ .................................................................................................................... 3
9. Landscaping and Irrigation ............................................................................................................... 3
10. Civic Center Plaza Design ................................................................................................................ 3
11. Stage Construction Plans, Revised Structural Section and Overlay. ................................................ 4
12: Drainage as-built research, design and details ................................................................................. 4
13. Additional Meetings ......................................................................................................................... 4
14. New SIC and dual meter service pedestals. ...................................................................................... 4
15. Bike path retaining wall .................................................................................................................... 4
16. Design Services During Construction (DSDC) ............................................................................... 5
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Amended Scope of Services - Amendment No. 2
November 13, 2001
Page 2
INTRODUCTION
This scope of services covers the out of scope work for the design phase of the project.
An amended schedule that identifies milestones, tasks and sub tasks, review periods, and coordination
activities associated with engineering and design is included as Attachment A, "Design Schedule." It
shows the amended time phased tasks to be performed for the required work.
1. Revised R/W
The original scope was to prepare one set of R/W documents that included appraisal maps, legals
descriptions and plats. The CONSULTANT prepared three sets of R/W documents as follows:
· R/W documents were prepared for the project based on the approved roadway geometries
developed during the environmental clearance phase of the project.
· After the first set of R/W documents were issued, the City requested that the roadway geometries
be modified to eliminate and reduce required R/W acquisition on three parcels at the beginning of
the project. The CONSULTANT modified the roadway geometries and revised and reissued the
R/W appraisal maps to reflect the requested changes.
· After the second set of R/W documents were issued, the City requested that public service
easements be added on four properties for use by the underground utility project work.
2. Supplemental Surveys
The original scope of services had additional surveys to supplement aerial topography. During the course
of design, additional surveys points have been identified to refine and verify design features within to
project such as utilities, bike path, canal and miscellaneous features. Surveys on existing drainage facilities
and other appurtenances will be obtained. Only one additional field day of surveys will be required (with
two days office time for compilation of said surveys).
3. Utility Design and Coordination
Pacific Bell has an existing conduit structure on the south side of the existing bridge. When the bridge is
widened, the conduit structure will be temporary relocated and new structure built with the widened
bridge. The City requested the CONSULTANT coordinate with Pacific Bell for relocation of their conduit
structure. The CONSULTANT coordinated with Pacific Bell to detail a conduit bracket and opening for
the existing facilities and a new bracket and utility opening for the new facilities. The CONSULTANT
will prepare a segregated construction cost for the CITY to bill Pacific Bell for these construction items.
In addition, the City requested the CONSULTANT design utility openings/attachments on the widened
bridge for several utilities from the underground utility district including.
4. Dublin San Ramon Service District (DSRSD) Coordination and Design
The City requested the CONSULTANT incorporate the sign relocation for DSRSD into the contract
documents for the project. In addition, the CONSULTANT will also incorporate the new recycled water
line design for DSRSD into the contract documents. DSRSD will provide the CONSULTANT with their
design plans and specification notes, and the CONSULTANT will attach the plans to the project plans and
special provisions and modify the engineer's estimate and boilerplate accordingly.
The City requested the CONSULTANT prepare an engineer's estimate with segregated costs for the two
additional packages to be added to the project documents for the utility underground district work and
DSRSD reclaimed waterline.
J:L2262~kdmin\Contracts\phase2\amend l\amendment scope.doc
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Scope of Services
November 13, 2001
Page 3
The CONSULTANT will track these design costs separately.
5. Zone 7 Coordination and Design of Erosion Protection and Outfalls
A Zone 7 66-inch RCP within the project limits. The pipe will remain in place during construction under
the new widened bridge. The CONSULTANT will straddle the existing pipe. The outfall structure for the
existing 66-inch RCP will be reconstructed during construction.
The existing Alamo Canal has signs of erosion and scour below the existing bridge structure as well as
subsidence along the banks adjacent the bike trail. The City requested the CONSULTANT include
scour/erosion protection and repair into the project design. The CONSULTANT will prepare plan, cross-
sections and specifications for work in the canal to be submitted to Zone 7 for concurrence, and to Corps
of Engineers and Fish and Game for permit application to construct.
Three existing outfalls within the canal are approximately 300 mm above bottom of the canal that are
aggravating the erosion and scour within the canal. These outfall structures will be evaluated during
construction to determine if replacement is required.
6. Specifications Special Provision with City Boiler Plate
The original scope of services was to provide Caltrans specifications supplemented with Caltrans special
provisions. The City requested the CONSULTANT replace the sections 1 through 9 with the City
boilerplate, and incorporate language for "Buy America" and DBE/WBE goals. In addition, the City
requested that CONSULTANT replace Caltrans landscaping, signal and lighting specifications with
specifications provided by the City.
In addition, the CONSULTANT will add two sections to the SSPs: one for the underground joint trench
and a second for the DSRSD reclaimed waterline (see item 4 above for work associated with DSRSD).
The CITY's consultant for the joint trench will provide special provisions in Microsoft WORD format to
be added as a separate section to the SSPs. These SSPs will be in Imperial units consistent with the joint
trench work whereas the remainder of the contract documents will be in metric units.
7. Left-turn Pocket Alternatives
The City requested the CONSULTANT to evaluate several design alternatives for the left-turn pockets
along Dublin Blvd. The CONSULTANT prepared exhibits for the various alternatives for review and
comment by the City.
8. Landscaping Alternatives
The original scope of services for landscape design was to only landscape the one new median in front of
DSRSD property. The City requested the CONSULTANT to prepare landscaping alternatives to show
three different landscaping alternatives for the entire project including preliminary cost estimates for the
alternatives. The alternatives also included evaluating special architectural features on the widened bridge
and to evaluate whether a planter could be placed on the existing bridge (additional dead load evaluation).
9. Landscaping and Irrigation
Based on the alternatives, the City selected a preferred alternative that requires new landscaping and
irrigation in all medians within the project except for the median on the bridge structure. The
CONSULTANT will prepare complete landscaping and irrigation plans for full landscaping within the
project. The new landscaping will include new interlocking pavers in the median throughout the project.
10. Civic Center Plaza Design
The project will impact the entrance to City Hall that has a special design of interlocking pavers with
J:L2262XAdmin\Contmcts\phase2\amend l\amendment scope.doc
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Amended Scope of Services - Amendment No. 2
November 13, 2001
Page 4
concrete bands. Based on a field review and a future widening project, the CONSULTANT will prepare
construction details for a modification to the entrance of Civic Center Plaza on the west side only that
includes a reconstruction of the median nose, a new concrete band and reconstruction of the existing
interlocking paver pattern. The east side of the entrance will not be disturbed.
11. Stage Construction Plans, Revised Structural Section and Overlay
The original scope of services did not include staging plans and coordination for the utility underground
district work. The City requested the CONSULTANT to prepare construction staging plans that
incorporates the utility underground work. In addition, the City requested the project include a full
overlay. The stage construction plans will need to incorporate stages for temporary stripping for stage 1
through 3 and a final stage for overlay and final stripping.
The City requested the CONSULTANT include plans, details and specifications for a complete overlay of
the project. The CONSULTANT will add construction details and revise the typical sections, stage
construction plans (see above), quantities and specifications.
The City requested the CONSULTANT to revise the plans to show a full depth AC pavement for the
project. The CONSULTANT will revise the typical sections, quantities and specifications.
12. Drainage as-built research, design and details
The original scope of service assumed that existing as-builts and calculations would be available for the
project. The City did not have as-built information for the existing drainage systems within the project. As
a result, the City instructed the CONSULTANT to research as-builts at Alameda County and Zone 7 for
as-built data. No data was found on these systems. Therefore, the CONSULTANT is required to perform a
field survey of the existing system, obtain additional surveys (see supplemental surveys above), and
prepare drainage details for a new drainage system in addition to extending the existing drainage systems.
13. Additional Meetings
The original scope of services only had budget for a total of six meetings. Additional meetings are
required and the estimated number of additional meetings is as follows:
Description No. Meetings
Progress Meetings 4
Agency Meetings 4
Zone 7
DSRSD
Utility Meetings 2
TOTAL 10
14. New SIC and Dual Meter Service Pedestal
The CITY requested the installation of new signal interconnect cable (SIC) from Village Parkway to Clark
Avenue. The project limits and design drawings currently did not originally include Village Parkway to
Clark Avenue. An additional sheet is required to add interconnect plans to show conduit, pull boxes, and
connection point to the traffic controller at Village Parkway.
15. Bike Path Retaining Wall
At a meeting among the CITY, Zone 7, Kleinfelder and WIS, the CITY requested a retaining wall be
added to the scope of services to repair the failing slope along the bike path under Dublin Blvd.
Approximately 40 meters (120 feet) of new wall will be added to the contract documents. The new wall
J:\2262~4.dmin\Contracts\phase2\amend l\amendment scope.doc
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Amended Scope of Services - Amendment No. 2
November 13, 2001
Page 5
height will be approximately 1 to 1.2 meters (3 to 4 feet) of exposed face. Additional geoteclmical analysis
will be required for the pile support and be provided to the designers to complete a retaining wall design.
16. Design Services During Construction (DSDC)
The CONSULTANT will provide design services during construction that include response to bidder's
questions, response to request for information (RFIs), and response to contract change orders (CCOs).
These services will be provided on a time a material basis during construction and are estimated at
$10,000. These services exclude work by any subconsultants and do not include as-builts or a record of
survey.
J:~262~Admin\Contracts\phase2\amend l\amendment scope.doc
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project COST PROPOSAL
AMENDMENT NO. 2
??
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT = i $ 143,722.28 I
........................................................ '~.'i~-i~'~i'b'~ii~ ~i¥'~ b'."Y:-'T ~' ................ '~';~'~3'~'I R~,ioceted
......... " DESIGN AMENDMENT N~'~. = i $ 1391~64.30 ! OriginalBudget OriginalBudget
Total Revised
Budget
$ 550,164.30
Amendment No. 2
WASHINGTON (MK CENTENNIAL)
A, BOR:
Classh~cation Hours Rate 'etal
Proj Mgr 179 $ 50.00 $ 8,950.00
Sr Eng 214 $ 45.00 $ 9,630.00
Engineer 285 $ 32.00 $ 9,120.00
CADD 208 $ 30.00 $ 6,240.00
Clerical 55.75 $ 19.00 $ 1,059.25
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR 941.75 $ 34,999.25
OVERHEAD (~ 1.69293 $ 59,251.28
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD FOR DESIGN $ 94,250.53
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD FOR CONSI~UC'I1ON SUPPORT SERVt CE~ $ t 0,000.00
WIS DIRECT COSTS:
DIRECT COSTS:
Mailing, Telephone, Supplies, Photos .... $ 500.00
Reproduction & Presentation Materials $ 3,600.00
Transportation
SUBTOTAL MKC DIRECT COSTS $ 4,100.00 Original Budget I Reallocated I Total Revised
FEE= $ 10,450.00 Original Budget Budget
SUBTOTAL WIS $ 118,800.53 $ 203,716.53I $ 203,716.53I $ 322,517.06
PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT:
SUBTOTAL LABOR ~' OVERHEAD FOR CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES $
Original Budget Budget
SUBTOTAL PAM $ $ 62,283.74 $ 62,283.74 $ 62,283.74
CHAUDHARY & ASSOCIATES
SUBTOTAL LA~OR + OVERHEAD FOR CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES $
Original Budget Realiocated I Total Revised
Original Budget Budget
SUBTOTALCHAUDHARY $ $ 78,418.08 $ 78,418.08I $ 78,418.08
KLEINFELDER
LABOR:
Hours Rate Total
Prin Eng 0 $ 46.64 $
Proj Mngr 17 $ 33.65 $ 572.05
Sr Staff Prof 0 $ 25.80 $
=roffesional 0 $ 17.88 $
Drafting/Admin 4 $ 15.60 $ 62.40
;)IRECT LABOR 21 $ 634.45
OVERHEAD ~. 1.92 $ 1,218.14
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 1,852.59
SUBTOTAL LABOR .i. OVERHEAD FOR CON$TRUCTI ON SUPPORT SERVICES $
DIRECT COSTS:
Mileage $
Reproduction & Materials $
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ ' Original Budget Realioceted I Total Revised
FEE $ 185.26 Original Budget Budget
SUBTOTALKLEINFELDER $ 2,037.85 $ 17,368.10 $ 17,368.10I $ 19,405.95
FEHR & PEERS
LABOR:
Hours Rate Total
Proj Prin 0 $ 58.65 $
Sr Engineer 8 $ 33.17 $ 265.36
Engineer 20 $ 23.80 $ 476.00
Technician 4 $ 20.67 $ 82.68
DIRECT LABOR 32 $ 824.04
OVERHEAD {~ 1.4653 $ 1,207.47
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 2,031.51
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD FOR CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES $
DIRECT COSTS:
Mileage $
Reproduction & Materials $
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ - Original Budget Reallocatad I Total Revised
FEE $ 203.15 Original Budget Budget
SUBTOTAL FEHR & PEERS $ 2,234.66 $ 28,541.63 $ 28,541.63I $ 30,776.29
Revised 11113/2001 1:09 PM
J:\2262\admin~contracts~phase2\ENGCST2al.XLS Labor + ODCs Page 1 of 6
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project COST PROPOSAL
AMENDMENT NO. 2
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT = ~ $ 143,722.28 ~
........................................................ '~i~'i~'~'b'i~¥'~c~:'7':-'~'~ ~;~'~:~'~ ~ .
" ' DESiGN'~MEN'DMENT N~'~ = ['$ 139,164~30 ~ OngtnalBudget OriginalBudget
.................................... 'f~'f~['~'6'~'~'~E~"~'~'6'O~"~"~"~ ................. ~'~'~;~'~'~'~, ~.,ooo.oo ~ ~.,ooo.oo
Total Rs'vised
Budget
$ 550,164.30
· IAYGOOD & ASSOCIATES
LABOR:
Hours Rate Total
Proj Prin / Proj Mgr 25 $ 45.00 $ 1,125.00
Landscape Assoc 124 $ 26.00 $ 3,224.00
Jr LandscapeArch 0 $ 15.00 $
CADD Tach 0 $ 25.00 $
Field Tech 0 $ 18.75 $
Clerical 0 $ 15.00 $
DIRECT LABOR 149 $ 4,349.00
OVERHEAD ~ 1.4466 $ 6,291.26
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 10,640.26
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD FOR CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES $
~)IRECT COSTS:
Irrigation Subconsultant $ 3,600.00
Reproductions $ 635.00
Delivery Charges $ 36.00
Mileage, tolls, parking $ 115.00
Project Equipment $
I Reallocated Total Revised
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTSFEE $$ 4,386.001,065.00 Original Budget Original Budget Budget
SUBTOTALHAYGOOD $ 16,091.26 $ 20,671.92 $ 20,671.92 $ 36,763.18
Revised 11/13/20{311:09 PM
J:~2262\admin\contracts~phase2~ENOCST2al.XLS Labor + ODCs Page 2 of 6
COST PROPOSAL- LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 11/13/2001 1:09 PM -
LABOR FOR AMENDMENT NO, 2
~;~?,~ ~:~?~'~::;~:, :~ ~ ~ ~:~ WASHINGTON INF~STRUCTURE SERVICES {WiS fo~edy MK Centennial)
~,:: ~ Proj Mgr Sr Eng Engineer CADD Clerical
'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ 30.00 $ ~9.00
~ ...... ~. ..... ~ ........... ~;~:~= ~[~ $ 50.00 $ 45.00 $ 32.00
~;~ ~ '[;;~e~tt~[. :,:~ ~;~c ~ ~.'t~ ~ ~,~ ~ ?~, Houm Cost Hours Cost Houm Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost
I Revised R~ 16 800 40 1,280 32 960 2 38 90 3,078.00
2 Supplemental Su~eys 2 100 ~ 8 256 4 120 14 476.00
3 Ufili~ Design and Coordination 16 800 40 1,800 20 640 20 600 2 38 98 3,878.00
4 DSRSD Coordina~n and Design 8 400 40 1,800 20 640 20 600 2 38 90 3,478.00
5 Zone 7 Coordination and Design of Erosion Pmte~ion 32 1,600 40 1,800 40 ~,280 20 600 4 76 i 136 5,356.00
6 SSPs wi City Boiler Plate 9 450 30 1,350 10 320 20 380 69 2,500.00
7 Left-turn Po~et Alternatives 16 800 40 1,280 32 960 88 3,040.00
8 Lands~ping Altematives 16 800 16 800.00
9 Lands~ping and I~gation 8 400 8 400.00
10 Civic Center Plaza 16 512 16 480; 32 992.00
11 Stage Construction Plans, Revised Structural Se~ion ~ 8 400 8 ~0 20 640 20 600 56 2,000.00
12 Drainage as-built research, design and details 4 200 32 1,024 24 720 4 76 64 2,020.00
13 Additional Meetings (10) 40 2,000 20 900 20 640 20 380 100 3,920.~
14 New SIC and dual meter se~i~ pedestals 0 0.00
15 Bike path retaining wall 4 200 36 1,620 19 608 20 600 1.75 33 80.75 3,~1.25
~;~ ~1 ~ .,.5ol 214 .,~ol 285 9,1201 ~0~ ~,~01 ~.~ ~.o~.1 941.75 34,999.25
v:~ettv\dublin~scoDe~ENGCST2al.XLS Labor
Page 3 of 6
Ravi~ed: 11/1312001 1:09 PM
COST PROPOSAL- LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 11/13/2OOl 1:09 PM
LABOR FOR AMENDMENT NO, 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Revised PJW
Supplemental Surveys
Utility Design and Coordination
DSRSD Coordination and Design
Zone 7 Coordination and Design of Erosion Protection
SSPs w/City Boiler Plate
Left-turn Pocket Alternatives
Landscaping Alternatives
Landscaping and Irrigation
Civic Center Plaza
Stage Construction Plans, Revised Structural Section
Drainage as-built research, design and details
Additional Meetings (10)
New SIC and dual meter service pedestals
Bike path retaining wall
17 572
17 572
4 62
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0,00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0,00
0 0.00
0 0,00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
21 634.45
21 634.45
Page 4 of 6
COST PROPOSAL- LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 11/13/2001 1:09 PM
LABOR FOR AMENDMENT NO, 2
1 Revised RNV
2 Supplemental Surveys
3 Utility Design and Coordination
4 DSRSD Coordination and Design
5 Zone 7 Coordination and Design of Erosion Protection
6 SSPs w/City Boiler Plate
7 Left-turn Pocket Alternatives
8 Landscaping Alternatives
9 Landscaping and irrigation
10 Civic Center Plaza
11 Stage Construction Plans, Revised Structural Section ~
12 Drainage as-built research, design and details
13 Additional Meetings (10)
14 New SIC and dual meter service pedestals
15 Bike path retaining wall
8 265
8 265
20 476
20 476
4 83
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0,00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
32 824.04
0 0.00
32 824.04
y:\etty~dublin~scope~ENGCST2al.XLS Labor
Page 5 of 6
Revised: 11/13/2001 1:09 PM
COST PROPOSAL- LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 11/13/2001 1:09 PM
LABOR FOR AMENDMENT NO, 2
I Revised R/W 0 0.00
2 Supplemental Surveys 0 0.00
3 Utility Design and Coordination 0 0.00
4 DSRSD Coordination and Design 0 0.00
5 Zone 7 Coordination and Design of Erosion Protection 0 0.00
6 SSPs w/City Boiler Plate 0 0.00
7 Left-turn Pocket Alternatives 0 0.00
8 Landscaping Alternatives 8 360 24 624 32 984.00
9 Landscaping and Irrigation 17 765 100 2,600 117 3,365.00
10 Civic Center Plaza 0 0.00
11 Stage Construction Plans, Revised Structural Section ~ 0 0.00
12 Drainage as-built research, design and details 0 0.00
13 Additional Meetings (10) 0 0.00
14 New SIC and dual meter service pedestals 0 0.00
15 Bfke path retaining wall 0 0.00
y:~etty\dublin~scope~E NGCST2a 1.XLS Labor
Page 6 of 6
('~
AlVIE~ED STANDARD
CONSULTING ENGINEE~G,.SERVICES-AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDED AGP. EElvfENT supercedes and replaces in its entirety au existing
agreement, between smd parties, that was made on the 16~ of November 1999. (City Couucil Resolution
THIS ~ED AGKEEIVIENT is made at Dublin, California, as of 3uly 18, 2000, by
and between the C~TY OF DUBLIN, a municipal corporation ("City"), and MK Centennial
("Consultant"), who agree as follows:
1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement,
Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A Phase I and Phase II. Consultant shall
provide said services at the time, place, and in the mauncr specified in Exhibit A Phases I and II.
2. PAYMENT, City shall pay C'qnsuItant for services rendered pursuant to this
A~eement at the time and in the manner set.forth in Exhibit B. The payments spec/fled in Exh/bit B shall
be the only payments fo b'~de to C _~.. sultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
Consultant shall submit all billings for said services to City in the manner specified in Exlfibit B; or,
manner be specified in Exhibit B, then according to the usual and customary procedures and practices
which Consultant uses for billing clients sknilar to City.
3. FACILITIES AND EOUIPMENT. Except as set forth in Exhibit C, Consultant shall, at
its sole cost and expense, famish all facilities and equipment wkich may be required for furnishing
services pursuant to this Agreement. City shall famish to Consultant only the facilities and equipment
Iisted in Exhibit C according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exh/bit C.
4. GENERAL PROVISIONS. The general provisions set forth in Exhibit D are part of
this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and any other temps or
conditions of this Agreement, the other term or condition shall control insofar as it is inconsistent with the
general provisions.
5. EXStlBITS. Alt exhibits referred t6 herein are attached hereto and are by this reference
incorporated herein.
6. SUBCONTRACTING. The Consaltant shall perform the work contempiated w/th
resources avallable within its own organization and no portion offiae work pertinent, to this contract shall
be subcontracted wSthout ~¢itten authorization by the City, except that.which is expressly identified in the
Consultant's proposal.
7. CHANGES. City-may from time to time require changes in the scope of the services by
Consultant to be performed under this Agreement.- Such changes, including any change in the mount of
Consultant's'compensation which are mutually a~eed upon by City and Consultant, shalI be effective as
amendments to this Agreement only when in writing.
Agreement
Page 1 of 2
07/10/00
for the duration of the project. There shall be no change in the Project Manager or members of the project
team without prior written approval by the City. Thc Project Manager for Consultant shall be Etty
Mercurio.
9. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered by LEE S.
THOIv[PSON ("Administrator"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Administrator or
his or designee.
10. NOTICES. Any written notice to Consultant shall be sent to:
Err Koenig, Vice President
1VIK Centennial
5000 Hopyard Road, Suite 100
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Any written notice to City shall be scm to:
Lee S. Thompson
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
P. O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
Executed as of the day first above stated:
CITY OF DUBLIN,
a municipal corporation
'By
"City"
Attest:
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Agreement
Page 2 of 2
07/10/00
City Attorney
ETCmT~IT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCltEDLrLE
PER ADlVfENDED PROPOSAL DATED July 6, 2000 (P_ba.~e I) and Jun~ 2g, 2000 (Phase
FROM MI4 Centennial (ATTACHED)
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 1
07/10/00
A ProfessiOnal Services Agreement Between
CITY OF DUBLIN
(CITY)
and
MK CENTENNIAL
(CONSULTANT)
for the
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PHASE 1
INDEX
DESCR/pTION PAGE
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
200
210
220
230
360
310
320
330
340
400
410
420
430
440
450
500
510
520
54O
6OO
610
62O
GENERAL ........................................................... 3
Location .......... . .... - ................................................ 3
Description ............................................................ 3
Length of Services ...................................................... 3
Project Scheduling ...................................................... 3
Project Progress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting ..................... 4
Design Monitoring and Subconsultant Management ............................ 4
DESIGN REFERENCES ............................................... 4
Caltrans Publications .................................................... 4
AASHTO Publications .................................................. 4
Publications From Other Sources .......................................... 5
DESIGN WORK PERFOR/VIED BY CONSULTANT ........................ 5
Coordination with the CITY and Other: Parties ................................ 5
Data Collection and Field Reviews .................... ' ..................... 5
Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys ................................ 5
Rift-of-way Engineering -
Environmental Document ................................................ 6
Environmental pro.am Management .................................... ~.. 6
Confirm Environmental Review Process ..................................... 6
CEQA Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration .......................... 6
Traffic Data and Safety Analysis .................. ~ ........................ 7
Location Hydraulic Study ................................................ 8
Preliminary Engineering .................................................. 8
Structure General Plan .................................................... 8
Project Submittals ...................................................... 8
Design Reviews ........................................................ 9
MATERIALS FURNISHED BY The CITY ................................ 9
Record Documents ...................................................... 9
Base and Miscellaneous Information ........................................ 9
J:L2262~Admin\Contra¢~skS CO?E~$COPE 1 a. WPD I
(
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING, ,¢OJECT
Scope of Services
July 6, 2000
Page 2
700
710
720
730
740
750
760
770
780
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION ....................................... 9
The CITY ............................................................. 9
CONSULTANT ........................................................ 9
Project Control ........................................................ 10
Subcontract Services ................................................... 10
Quality Control ....................................................... I0
CONSULTANT Personnel .............................................. 10
Acceptability of the Work ............................................... 10
Design Documentation .................................................. 11
J:!.2262~,dmin\Con tr actors (2OPE~ COPE [a. WPD 2
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING('
Scope of Services
)JECT (
July 6, 2000
Page 3
100
111)
120
130
140
GENERAL
Location
The project is located in Dublin, California. The City of Dublin is proposing to widen
Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway and Sierra Lane from a four-lane facility to a
six-lane facility. The existing street has been improved to a six-lane facility from Village
Parkway westerly to San Ramon Road. Current City's Capital Improvement Project will
provide for Dublin Boulevard to be six lanes from Dougherty Road to Tassajara Road by
the end of next year's Construction Season. The proposed project will extend the six-lane
facility to just east of the Sierra Court intersection. The widening of Dublin Boulevard is to
both sides of the street to obtain additional roadway width. This will require both demolition
and reconstruction of existing improvements on both sides of the street including widening
of an existing bridge and repair of the creek slopes below the bridge. During the
reconstruction, existing overhead utilities will be placed .underground.
Description
The CONSULTANT will prepare an Environmental Document, preliminary engineering
plans, surveys and right-of-way engineering maps. The design of the project elements
described herein, will be in accordance with the CITY, and Caltrans Standards in effect at
the time this agreement is executed. The documents will be produced in dual units
(metric/imperial).
The contract work will consist of the following basic features:
· Conduct an environmental field review
· Prepare environmental technical studies
· Prepare an Environmental Document
· Attend project status meetings and City. Council meetings
· Conduct field reviews, research and data collection :.
· Prepare topographic mapping and conduct supplemental surveys
· Prepare preliminary engineering plans in support of the environmental document
· Prepare fight-of-way engineering maps
Len~h of Services
The project will be initiated with a notice to proceed from the CITY. The environmental
and preliminary engineering Work would then proceed without delay for 8 months. A four-
week review period is scheduled for each review of'the draft and final environmental
document packages.
The CITY may wish to amend the scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT.
When this occurs the CITY and the CONSULTANT will agree on a revised scope and any
adjustments to the project schedule and/or compensation due the CONSULTANT.
Project Scheduling
The project schedule will include all project activities and milestones. The schedule will
.identify alt milestones, tasks and sub tasks, review periods, and coordination activities
associated with engineering and design. Attachment A, "Design Schedule," shows the time
phased tasks to be performed for the-required work.
IA2262~.dmin\ContractsB COPEZSCOPE I a. WPD 3
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENINg
Scope of Services
DJECT ( July 6, 2000
Page 4
150
160
200
210
220
Project Progress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting
Monthly progress reports witl be submitted to the CITY with each invoice for payment for
engineering services. The report will indicate the tasks that were completed during the
preceding period, work planned for the next period, identification of design issues or
problems being encountered, and a comparison of planned and actual progress. The updated
schedule will accompany this report. Monthly reports will be submitted throughout the
project duration assumed above. Reports will not be submitted for any period where no work
was performed.
The CONSULTANT Project Manager will meet with the appointed CITY representatives
on a monthly basis to discuss the status of the project design work. These meetings will
focus on resolution of any design issues requiring the CITY involvement, the design
progress, potential problems, and to address any particular detail of the work previously
identified for resolution.
Design Monitoring and Subconsultant Management
The CONSULTANT Project Manager and each subconsultant principal will monitor the"
work Underway to assure it complies with the criteria and standards established for the work,
and to ensure that the design work is being accomplished in the most efficient manner
possible.
The CONSULTANT will establish effective and efficient project procedures to direct and
monitor the subconsultants' work. Regular scheduled reviews of the subconsultant design
will be performed to ensure compliance with the quality standards established, coordination
among team members, and that design operations are being conducted in a timely and
efficient manner.
DESIGN REFERENCES
Caltrans Publications
211 Standard Drawings
Bridge Standard Details (Current Edition - Metric)
Standard Plans (1999 Edition - Metric)
212 Specifications
Standard Specifications (1999 Edition - Metric)
213 Manuals
Highway Design Manual, 4th edition (English)
Bridge Design Specifications (Current Edition - Metric)
Bridge Design Practice (Current Edition)
Bridge Memo to Designers (Current Edition)
Bridge Design Aids (Current Edition)
Bridge Design Details (Current Edition)
A. ASHTO Publications
A Policy on Geometric-Design of Highways and Streets, 1994 ("Green Book")
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, with interim revisions through 1997
Manual on Foundation Investigations, t978
j:~2262La, dmin\ContracxakSCOPE~SCOPE 1 a. WPD 4
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING~
Scope of Services
)JECT { July 6, 2000
~=ege 5
230
300
310
320
330
Guide for Design of Pavemen~tructures,~ 1993
Guide for Specifications and Standards
Standard SPecifications for Structural Supports for H!ghway Signs, Luminaries and Traffic
Signals, Edition of 1985 and Interim Specifications through 1991
Roadside Design Guide, 1996
An Information Guide for Roadway Lighting, 1984
AASHTO Drainage Guidelines, 1992
Publications From Other Sources
City of Dublin Standard Plans
Alameda County-Standards
Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation
Zone 7 Standards & Hydrology & Hydroceed Design Criteria
Dublin San Ramon Service District (DSRSD) Standards
DESIGN WORK PERFORM_ED BY CONSULTANT
Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties
Design team members will attend the scheduled meetings. The coordination will be
conducted during design review submittals, monthly meetings, and at such other times as
specific issues need resolution. It wilt be necessary for the CONSULTANT to meet with
representatives of the local agencies and The CITY for the purpose of discussing design
details. The number of meetings budgeted for this work are as follows:
Description Num ber of Meetings
Monthly progress meetings 4
City Council Public Meetings .2
Zone 7 Meeting 1
Underground Utility 2
Coordination Meeting
(Trench design, by others)
The agency contacts anticipated are with Alameda County FC & WCD, Zone 7 and the
CITY.
Data Collection and Field Reviews
The CONSULTANT will meet with the CITY and the local agencies to collect available
information pertinent to the project. A review of available information and an on-site
investigation will be conducted to further define Site conditions and determine the need for
additional investigation and data. The design team members and representatives of the CITY
along with any interested parties will field review the work site two times.
Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys
The CONSULTANT will prepare topographic base mapping at t :500 with 0.5-meter
continuous intervals based on 1983 NAD (horizontal control) and 1929 NGVD (vertical
control). Mapping standards will be checked by the CONSULTANT and will conform to
j:~.262~S, dmln\Contracts~qCOPE,,$COPF, la. WPD 5
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENINg:*
Scope of Services
.OJECT
July 6, 2000
Page 6
340
400
410
420
430
the CITY's survey/mapping standards, as required for this project. The CONSULTANT will
conduct field surveys. Work will include conform areas, pavement spot elevations, storm
drainage inlets/outlets, selected utilities and potholed Utilities. Potholing is not included in
this scope of services.
Right-of-Way Engineering
The CONSULTANT will order title reports (15 total), prepare right-of-way plats and legal
descriptions, and conduct right-of-way surveys.
Environmental Document
The project wilt require environmental review under both the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), as well as, the National Environmental. Policy Act CNEPA). NEPA
review is required because federal funds will be used to construct the project. When federal
funds from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are used for project construction,
Caltrans acts as the reviewing agency of all environmental documents on behalf of the
FHWA to ensure that the documents and process comply with NEPA. As a result, the
environmental review process outlined below assumes coordination with Caltrans
environmental staff throughout the project.
Environmental Program Management
The CONSULTANT will oversee and coordinate all aspects of the environmental process
as described below:
Technical Studies
Oversee the preparation of ali technical studies
Coordinate with technical subconsultants as required
Coordinate with The CITY during all phases of the environmentaI process
Agency Cooi'dination
Conduct early consultation to explain the project and identify any agency concerns.
Conduct consultation with agencies to facilitate processing of environmental
permits if required.
Coordination with Engineering Effort
Provide input to preliminary engineering based on the technical reports
~ Analyze design alternatives proposed in Terms of environmental constraints and
potentia.1 impacts.
Agencies to be consulted will be the CITY, Alameda Cc~unty FC & WCD, Zone 7, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and/or California Department of
Fish & Game.
Confirm Environmental Review Process
The CONSULTANT will conduct a field review meeting with City Staff and Caltrans
Project Development and Environmental staff to review the-proposed improvements to
Dublin Boulevard, environmental technical studies that will need to be completed, and the
appropriate environmental document(s) for the project.
CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
The CONSULTANT will distribute and notice for a proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration/Initial Study including preparation of a-Notice of Intent, mailing of notices to
local property owners, interested parties and agencies, and delivery of copies of the
Proposed Negative Declaration to the State Clearinghouse.
J:k2262~4,dmln~Contr acts\S C OPE'~;COPE I a. WPD 6
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENIN(~
Scope of Services
~JECT ('
July 6, 2000
Page 7
440
The CONSULTANT wilt attend one Public Information meeting and City Council'he~ring
and meet with City staffas needed throughout the process.
The CONSULTANT will file a Notice of Completion with the Alameda County Clerk, State
Clearinghouse and payment of California Department of Fish and Game Filing Fees.
-.Natural Environment Study
The CONSULTANT will prepare a Natural Environment Study pursuant to Caltrans
Environmental guidelines and comments from Caltrans Office of Local Assistance
environmental staff. It will include a wetland delineation and field verification with the US
Army Corps of Engineers.
Categorical Exclusion under NEpA
This includes submittal of technical information to Caltrans in support of a determination
that the project qualifies for a Categorical Exclusion under NEPA. The following technical
studies will be provided to Caltrans:
N~.tural Environment Study
Location Hydraulic Study
Traffic memorandum
Sonoma State Cultural Resources Literature Search
Area of Potential Effect Map
Coordination with City and Caltrans as needed regarding Caltrans review of the above.
technical information and processing of a Categorical Exclusion through the Federal
Highway Administration.
Traffic Data and Safety Analysis
The CONSULTANT will prepare the transportation element for the environmental
document. The impact analysis will be completed with and without the Dublin Boulevard
Widening project under both construction year ~ind cumulative ye'~ir conditions for each
transportation mode including automobiles, bicycle, and pedestrian travel. The
CONSULTANT will collect 24-hoUr traffic count data on Dublin Boulevard at one location
within the project limits. The CONSUL,,TANT will collect morning and evening peak period
traffic counts at the Dublin Boulevard/Sierra Cour/and Dublin Boulevard/Clark Avenue
intersections. The CONSULTANT will also obtain available accident data from Alameda
County and the City within the project limits. The CONSULTANT will summarize the
setting information including peak hour capacity analyses of the study section of Dublin
Boulevard and the Sierra Court and Clark Avenue intersections.
Available morning and evening peak hoUr traffic forecasts will be obtained for the study
segment of Dublin Boulevard and the Sierra Court and Clark Avenue intersections under
each scenario. Peak hour operations analyses will be conducted for each facility to establish
a baseline of traffic operations for the corridor. Impacts to bicycle and pedestrian travel will
be qualitatively evaluated based on a review of the project's consistency with established
policies and standards of adopted documents (i.e., General Plans, Specific Plans, design
standards, etc.). Mitigation measures will be identified for significant adverse impacts. The
CONSULTANT will prepare the administrative draft transportation section of the
environmental document. The CONSULTANT.has budgeted a total of 8 hours to respond
J:~.?.6~Admln\Co~uacts~SCOPEk$ C OPE 1 a.WPD 7
Scope of Services
.OJECT
July 6, 2000
Page 8
77
450
500
510
520
to comments on the administrative draft and draft sections. The CONSULTANT anticipates
attendance at up to one meeting during this effort.
Location Hydraulic Study
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a location hydraulic study in accordance with Caltrans
procedures. The CONSULTANT will coordinate with Zone 7 to obtain relevant current
hydraulic information for the Alamo Canal. The CONSULTANT will prepare a backwater
analysis to supplement the location hydraulic study and will submit copies to Caltrans, the
City and Zone 7 for review.
Preliminary Engineering
The design objective is to provide plans and construction cost estimates in support of the
environmental document. CADD digital drawings will be prepared in Microstation format
and a format acceptable to the City. The documents will be-produced in metric units and
annotated Imperial units.
Structure General Plan
The CONSULTANT will prepare a structure general pla~ to show structural type and
preliminary cost estimates.
Project Submittals
The design objective is to provide an environmental document and obtain the environmental
clearance for the construction of the project. The following environmental documents, if
required, will be submitted to the CITY:
A maximum of six copies of each Environmental Technical Studies for the CITY
and Caltrans review:
Natural Environment Study
Location Hydraulic Study
Traffic memorandum
Sonoma State Cultural ResOurces Literature Search
Area of Potential Effect Map
A maximum of six copies of each Environmental Technical Studies for the CITY,
Caltrans and FHWA files:
Natural Environment Study
Location Hydraulic Study
Traffic memorandum
Sonoma State Cultural Resources Literature Search
Area of Potential Effect Map
In conjunction with the environmental document, the CONSULTANT will prepare
preliminary engineering documents for the project. CADD digital drawings Will be prepared
in Microstation format, or a format acceptable to the CITY in accordance with the CITY
procedures. Drawings will be in metric, and annotated Imperial units as established by the
CITY. The CONSULTANT will submit a maximum of 10 copies of the preliminary
engineering plans consisting of:
Strip maps with right-of-way and geometries defined
Preliminary Bridge general plan
J:~262~,dml n\C ontracff'~ COPE',.S COPE t a. WPD ~
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENINdl
Scope of Services
JJECT
July 6, 2000
Page 9
540
600
610
620
700
710
720
Design Reviews
At milestone points, the CONSULTANT will submit mater/als to the CITY and
participating local agencies for review and comment. Review periods will be four weeks
for all milestones. Each reviewing agency will submit a single set of. coordinated review
comments to the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will compile review comments
from the reviewing agencies and schedule a meeting with the CITY and the other reviewing
agencies to discuss any conflicting comments and to reach a consensus on resolution of any
conflicts. Minutes of the resolution meeting will be distributed within five working days
of the meeting. The CONSULTANT will incorporate agreed upon resolutions into the
reviewed documents. Should future reviews generate comments which require changes to
previously agreed upon elements of the documents and such changes result in additional
work on the part of the CONSULTANT, such changes will be performed as Additional
Services.
MATERIALS FURNISHED BY The CITY '
Record Documents
- The CITY will provide the following items:
· Current standard Drawings, Manuals, Guides, and Procedures that pertain to the
project
· Available CITY "as-built" plans and specifications of existing conditions including
r0~ldways, utilities, drainage improvements, and structures
· Available CITY right-of-way plans
· Surveying and mapping information including existing monument locations
· Sample plans and reports to be used as guidelines for format, organization and
content
· Access to all records available at the CITY
Base and Miscellaneous Information
· Entry permission on private parcels
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
The CITY
The CITY will:
· Conduct ongoing reviews of the CONSULTANT's progress in performing the work
and furnish technicaI comments in a timely manner on ail submissions
· Review and approve the CONSULTANT's billings in a timely manner
· Review, e~alUate and may approve CONSULTANT's requests for extension oftirne
and amendments to the agreement
· Attend all progress meetings with the CONSULTANT
· Attend meetings with the CONSULTANT and others as requested
· Conduct public outreach and public relations tasks
CONSULTANT
The CONSULTANT will:
· Establish, furnish and maintain suitable office facilities to serve as the project office
for the duration of the project
· Maintain an adequate staff of qualified support personnel to perform the work
J:~262~.Admi n\Contracm'~ COPE",S COPE 1 a. WPD 9
DUBLJN BOULEVARD WIDENINdl
Scope of Services
c
OJECT
July 6, 2000
Page 10
730
740
750
760
770
necessary to complete the project
Establish internal accounting methods and procedures for documenting and
monitoring project costs acceptable to Caltrans Standards
Establish and maintain contract administration procedures which will include
amendments, time extensions and subcontracts
Maintain a project workbook with all the pertinent information relating to the
project to be given to the CITY at the close of the project
Attend meetings with other agencies as requested by the CITY. However, if number
of meetings exceed those indicated in this scope of services, then those meetings
will be performed as Additional Services
The CONSULTANT is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the contract
documents and related design prepared under this project and prior to submittals will check
all material accordingly. The plans will be reviewed by the CITY for conformity with the
CITY.procedures and the terms of the contract.
Project Control
The CONSULTANT will provide and maintain a Management Information System to
monitor costs and manpower and to report progress with the following:
· Identify progress against the schedule for each major work item
· Forecast completion dates from current progress
· Advise the CITY of any work not in this scope or in any area Which is out of the
required sequence
· Provide updated estimates of time, manpower and dollars required for major work
elements
Subcontract Services
Due to the nature and scope of the required services, the CONSULTANT will subcontract
portions of the work. The CONSULTANT will review and coordinate the work of all
subconsultants and they will abide by the terms and conditions of this scope as applicable
to them.
Quality Control
The CONSULTANT and subconsukants have total responsibility, for the accuracy and
completeness of the plans and related design prepared under this project and will check all
such material accordingly. The CONSULTANT will prepare and have a quality control plan
in effect during the entire time work is being performed under this contract. The quality
control plan will establish a process whereby plans, calculations, and documents that the
CONSULTANT submits for review will be clearly marked as fully checked prior to
submittals by a qualified individual other than the originator.
CONSULTANT Personnel
The CONSULTANT's work will be performed and/or directed by the key personnel
identified in the CONSULTANT's proposal. Any changes in the indicated key personnel
will be subject to review and approval by The CITY.
Acceptability of the Work
The plans, designs, calculations, reports and other documents furnished under this scope of
work will conform to the CITY's standard of quality. The criteria for acceptance will be'a
J:~2262~4.d min\Contracts\SCOPEKgCOPE I t W'PD 10
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING(
Scope of Service.~,
flJECT ~
~ July 6, 2000
Page
product of neat appearance, well. organized, accurate and complete, technically and
grammatically correct, checked and dated in accordance with the Quality Control Plan, and
having the originator and checker identified. The minimum standards of appearance,
organization, and content of drawing will are similar to the type produced by the CITY.
780
Design Documentation
The CONSULTANT will submit all design notes, sketches, worksheets and computations
to document the design conclusions. The design notes and computations will be recorded
on 8 ½" x t 1" computation sheets, appropriately titled, numbered, dated, indexed, and
si~ed by the designer and checker. The data will be bound in a hardback folder or a three-
ring binder for submittals to the CITY. Computer output forms and other oversized sheets
will be bound or placed in a binder. Design notes and computations will include, but not
necessarily be limited to, the following data:
· Design criteria used for the project
· Geometric design calculations for horizontal and vertical alignment
· Quantity calculations
· Documentation of decisions reached from meetings, telephone conversations or ~ite
visits
J':~.26?xA drain%Comracr, s~ COPE~COP E 1 a.'C/PD 1 1
MKCENTENNIAL Dublin Boulevard Widening -Village Parkway to Sierra Court
~ Phase 1 and Phase 2
" ' ' 2000 " 2001 12002
ID TaskName Duration Start Finish ~lan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul I^.gls Ploct Ns~lDeclJanlFeblUartAprlUaylJunlJul I^uglSeplOctlNovlDeclJ." FeblUa.
1 NoticeTo Proceed 0 days 219/00 2/9/00 " }* ~ ~ ' ' ' ' ~ ' ~ ' ~ ' .....
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ~ 11..,..~ .............. ~ ............. { ............. [ .............. ~ .......... { ......... ~ .......... } .......... ~ ............. ~ ............ ~ ............. i ............. ~ ............. [ ......................... ~ ............. ~ .............
2 Project Management 258 days 219108 2/2101 ' _ ...... _ ..... [ ~ · ,
....................................................................................................................... ' ~~~ ~~ I ~ , i ~ ~
3 Prolect Schedule, QA Plan, Sub con,acts 51.~ wk~ ...... ~i6~ ................ ~5>~B'~ ......... I ............. [ ............ [ ............ 1 ............ 1 ........... j ............
4 K ckoff Meet ng Phase I 0 days 219100 219100 f ~ I ~ ~ ' -~ .......................................................... ~ ....... - ; ' ' ~ .... .
' ~9 i ~ ~ i ~
5 UIIIi~ Coordination Meetings 51 6 wks ~9/00 212/01 [ ' ~ ..... ~ .................................................. ~ ........................ ~ ............... ~ ...............
7 ~nAoc ~ aeolON 233days 1/1~00 12/1/00 ~ ' i '; IIIr' '" .................... ~ .............. [ ........... ~ ......... , ............. , .................................. l ....................... i ............ i ...................... i ............................ ~ ................... ; ........ ~ ................. 1 .....
.......................................................................................... '' ~ ~ ~ t [ ~ j ~ i i 1
' ~ E.~ro.~,.t~ ........... ~6'~;~- ................ i~i~ .................... ~'i~' ................. ' ........... ~ ............. ~ .......... ' ............. ~ ........ Ti ....................... ~ ............. ~ ..................... [ .......... ~ .......................... ~'"-' ............ ~ ........... ~ ............. ~ ........................... ~ .................................. ~"'""~ ............ 4 '
9 Comp ere PES fo~ and ~nsu t wi Cai rahs 2 wks 1/12/00 1/25/00 ~ { ~ I ~ ~ ~ "~ ................
................................................ ; ................ ~ i ~ ~ ~I ~ t ~ ~
~o co.au~t~e~ ca ~tu~ e~ ................... ~"~E~ .................... ~ ................ ~6~' .............. ~"i ..................................................... h ....... { ..................... ~ .......................... ~ .............. ~ ....... ~ ......................... ~ ............. { ............ ~ ............................... { ......... ~ .............. ~ ...... ~ ......................
11 Prepare ED for Cat Ex · 4 wks ............... ~'~'~' ................ ~)~ .............. ~"{ .............. ~ ......... ~ .............. [ ........... ~1'"'"'"'[ ~ ............ ~ .......... ~ ......................................................
12 · · ' ....................................................................................................................................................... ~ ........... ~ ........... { .............. ~ ............. , ............... ~ ............... ~ ........... ~ ....................... ~ .......... ~ ......... ~ .......... ~ ....... ~ ................ ~ ........ { .....
Pubhc Review Penod 4 wks ~23/00 3/21/00 { ~ ~
.................................................................................. : ............ ~ I ~ ~ I ' ~ ~ .
- 13 Public Healing and CRy adopl on of ED ..... i'"~ ..................... ~ .............. ~'~6 ............... ~ ............. ~ .................... ~ ........ ~ ........... ~ ?'""'"~ ............. ?-"'~: ............ ~ ....................................................................... J ............ 1 ........
' 14 Prepare Final ED ....................................................................................................................................... and submit to Ca trans and C ~ 2 wks 3122/00 4/4/00 ~ ...... ~ .... ~ ..... ~ ............... ~ ............... ~ ........... ~ [ ............... ~ ........... ~ ......... ~ .......... :~ .................... ~ ................. : ~ .......... ~ ............. ~; ......
................................................................................................................................................................................................ ~ { ~ : ; : ; ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ .; : , · .
16 Transmit approved ED Io FHWA for approval 1 wk 4/19/~5 "~'~)00 ...... ' ....... : ....... r.-..~.. .......... ~ ............ j """T .... t ...... ; .......... ,-' ~ ....... ~ .................. ~ ......... ~ ........... ~ · . ' .... I
.......................................... ........ ................... ................ .... ;" : !
................................. . . . . : , . ~ ~ . ~ [ ' .
2o ~o~g~t~ ~34~ ........... ~}76~ ................... ~ .......... ~'"'"'~-"7'~ ............ ! ........... ~F'"'"-* ............ ~' ......................... ! ......... t ............. i ....................... ~ ........... ~ ........... ~ ............ ! ........................ I ........ ~ ......... * ~ ....... ~ ...... t ......
~,-- · .... ~-,.7 · i ~ · . ·
21 S~cture Genera P an 4 wks 2/9/00 5/10/00 ~ .......... ~ ...... ;2 ....................... ~ ' "'"; .... ~ ....................... ~ ............. ~ .......... ~ .............. ; ........... r ............ ~ .................................................. I ...... ~ ........... ; ............ 4 ...........
....................................... · . , ~ i~ ~ If i I ~ ~ ~. ~
22 Prellmlna ~ roadway d~s .......... ,n .................................................. ~'~"~';;;~'; .............. ~,~ .................... ~m,uu;;';';~; ............................. i ~.:~ ....... ............ ~ ........... ...................................... ~ i i-k..---4~ I ~ ........... Ii ............ ii ............ ii ........... ~ ................... i i ii ~['.. il ~" ~ ~ ................... ~ " :' ........... ;~ ........ J ~' '
23 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ~ i i i ~ I J { J ! i ~ I {
Mapp ng Suweys and Rlght-oFWay Eng neering 80 days $1~100 8/24/00 ......... ] ........... ] ............. ~ ............. ! .......... ] ........... r ............................... ~ .................... I ............ J ............
24 Ma pping 4wk~ 515100 6111~ ~ ........... I ............. . ............. ! .......................... i ......... ~ ............. i ............. ~ ............. ~......--:.~ ~ .......... J i .............. I~ ............. ~ ............... ~ ......... ] .................. .
26Ti,e Repods6 wks 6/2/00 ......... ~)li'~5 .................................. ] 't .................................. '~ ~""'"'~ ............. i ............ i ........... ~ .................................. i ........... ~ ............... [ .......... I ........................................................
.......................... ;'x:: .................................................................................................................................................. I ~,~ [ i !
27 ~w buweys 4 wks R/9~n R/9~/n~'": ...................................................................... ~ .......................... ~ ............... [ ........... ~ ............ I ....................................... ~ ............ f ............. i .............. 4 ......................... ~ ............ ~ .......... ~ ........... [ . [ ..... ~ ................. ~ ........
......................................................................................................... I , ~I ,
Plals and legals 6 wks 7/14/00 8/24/00 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ - ' i ............ [ ......................... ] ........... I .................. 'i ............................................
......................................................................................................................................................... i i ~ f ' ~ ~ ~ { :
2~ ~b i~ Outreach ~03 da ys ................................................................................... ~/23/00 1~/1/00 . :'~" ................................. ~~ ~ ~ '~ - ' *~ ......... ~' ................. ~' '~' ............ " ............. ~ ....................... ~ ............ ~ .......... ~ ..................... ~ '~ ....... ~ ' ~ ........ .~ .....
3o M~eU.~;w~';'(;'~;'~;~;~ ................................................................. -~6"~'~; ~ ...................... ~ ............. ~ ................................... i ......
· 2/~/00 12/1/00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' ......... ~ .......... ' "
Project: D~LIN12.MPP '~'~)~ ~$~
Date: 7/6/00 8:12 PM Task , ~.~.. ~ ..~z.~ C~li~l Task [~~] Progress II Mileslone ~ Summa~
File: y:~e~s~pe~D U ~.~ 2.M P P. '., . ~ . .
MK CENTENNIAL
Task Name Duration
PHASE 2 DESIGN 175 days
30% Design 60 days
Draft foundation report 4 wks
30% plans 6 wks
Conslmctton Costs 1 wk
QNQC 1 wk
Submit 30% plans and estimate 0 days
CITY review 4 wks
90% Design
Final foundation reporl
Permit applications 4 wks
90% plans 6 wks
Construction Costs
Specilications
QNQC
Submit 90% PS&E 0 days
CITY review 4 wks
Final Design S0 days
Final plans 4 wks
Specllicationa 1 wk
QA/QC 1 wk
Submit Final PS&E 0 days
CITY review ...........................
4 wks
CONSTRU~i~ ........................................................... 230 days
Advertise and award construclion contract 6 wks
Construction 40 wks
Dublin Boulevard Widening -Village Parkway to Sierra Court · Phase 1 and Phase 2
2000 2OO2
Slad Finish
10/6100 ! ~ i
§/11/00 ] ~ ~ .......... [ "; ............ ~' ................. ', ......... ! ...........
3/11 I00 ! ~ I '
i '
8'25/00 ,, ! i ~ r ' ', ~ I ..... ........... ........... .......... ............ .......... ................ ~ ...................... ;' ~ '"'
,.l ............................................. , .......................... ~ ....................... , ........................ i ....
.~ .............. i ........... t ........... [ .......... ,- ...... ! : ..... J.
././oo ~o/o/0o j
lol9100 115/01 ! i
' '"--'[ ...................... ~ ....... i .............. ! ....... i ....... r'"' :"
, , ............ 4 ............... , ......... f ........... , ......................... ! ........... , .......... i .......... ! : ........ t .... ' ' 'I'
10/9/00 11/3/00 i ! ! i t i ~ ~ , ,- : ' ,.
' i ............. ~ ......... i ............ ~..' ........... I .............. ', ................. ~ '
11/20/00 11/24/00 i i 1 ~ , I ~ u i , ·
111271OO 1211100 i, i ...................................................... i - i I , ~ .......... i" ............................................
~ i ! ' I ' ""~' ......... ~ ......... ~ ................
~1oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ....................................
~ ' ~ ,' ~ i i i ,,~ 128
..... ~ .......... ~ ........... -' .......................... i .............. ~ .............. i ........ ; .............. ,,.., ............ ~ ............... , .... ~
~/0t ! , i } ........ ' ............. i ......... i'i~'"'""!" i ........... : ...............
................... ~ ........... ~ .......................... I ............................. ~ ............ ~ ........... : .............. i ......... t .............. " ............ ~: ........... : ........ ~ ............. : ....... ; ...... ~ .........
2/16101 ! i I ~ ~ I
3116/01 : , i i :! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~! ' + .... : ...............
211102 i i ................................................................ i ........... ! ..................... -'. .............. '
....... ~ ............. ~ ........... i ......... .i ...... ~ . "'"'"'? ........ i ............ [ .............................
~12z/01 ' ~ ' ~ i i i ~! i I ! .... ;' ''
2/1/02 ~ ............. ~ . ......................... ~ ......... ~ ............ i .................................· ..............
i 7117100
1214/00
....... ~J~i'~ .......
12111/00
116101
118/01
2/5/01
2/5/01
2/12/01
2116101
2/19/01
3119101
3/19/01
4/30/01
Projecl: DUBLIN12.MPp I
Date: 716/00 8.'.12 PM
File: y:\etty\scope\DUBLIN 12.MPp
Task
Crilical Task L~.~'~] Progress
Milestone
Summary
)ublin Boulevard Widening Proj(
COST PROPOSAL
??
MK CENTENNIAL
_ABOR:
Classificatior{
~roj Prin
~roj Mgr
Sr Eng
Engineer
CADD
Clerical
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR
MKC DIRECT COSTS:
DIRECT COSTS:
Hours Rate Total
8 $ 54.00 $ 432.00
164 $ 45.00 $ 7.380.00
136 $ 34.00 $ 4,624.00
100 $ 24.00 $ 2,400.00
56 $ 28.00 $ 1,288.00
30 $ 16.00 $ 480.00
494 $ 18,604.00
OVERHEAD ~ 1.69293 $ 28,109.41
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 44,713.41
Mailing, Telephone, Supplies,.Photos ....
Reproduction & Presentation Materials
CADD CompuTer
Transpor[ation
SUBTOTAL MKC DIRECT COSTS
FEE ibased on 10%' profit of labor)
$ 500.00
$ 305.00
$
$
$ 805.00
$ 4,471.34
SUBTOTAL MKC $
48,68~.76
J35%
Page1
y:\etty~ublin~cope\Engcstl.~s Labor+ ODCs Revised:7~/00 8:10 PM
'~ublin Boulevard Widening Proj{
COST PROPOSAL
PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT
L,~,BOR:
Classification Hours
Principal - Env 28
Proj M~r - Env 68
Associate - Env 138
Cledca~ 48
Rate Total
50.16 $ 1,404.48
29.57 $ 2,010.62
18.59 $ 2,564.81
20,38 $ 978.28
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
282
OVERHEAD @ 1.44
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD
6,958.20
t0.019.80
16,978.00
Printing, Mailing, Telephone & Supplies $ 3,000.00
Transportation $ 500.00
Graphic Suppor~ $ I 500.00
Subconsuitants $ $, 000.00
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor)
SUBTOTAL PAM
$ 13, D00.00
$ 1, ~97.80
$ 31 ~$75.80.122%
Page 2
y:\ei;ty'~du~lin~Scope\Engcstl .xls Labor + ODCs Revised: 7/6/00 8:10 PM
ublin Boulevard Widening Proj(
COST PROPOSAL
Chaudhar¥ & Associates
LABOR:
Prin Mngr
Proj Surveyor
Office Surveyor
2-man Field Crew
Eng / CADD
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
Hours Rate Total
20 $ 48.00 $ 960.00
56 $ 37.00 $ 2,072.00
8 $ 28.00 $ 224.00
110 $ 53.97 $ 5,936.70
64 $ 25.00 $ 1"~ 600.00
258 $ 10,792.70
OVERHEAD ~ 1.8612 S 20~087.37
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 30,880.07
Title Reports au cost (assumes 15 total ~ 1000 per title report)
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE (based on 10 ¥o Drofit of labor)
SUBTOTAL CHAUDHARY
Mileage $ 500.00
Reproduction & Materials $ 500.00
.Photogrametdst $ 3,700.00
$ 15,000.00
$ 1@.700.00
$ 3~088.01
$ 53?$68.08 J37%
(assumes 5 field oays)
Page 3
y:~etty\dublin~scope\Engcstl .xls Labor +OOCs Revised: 7/6/00 5:10 PM
f
_~ublin Boulevard Widening Proj~.,
COST PROPOSAL
FEHR & PEERS ASSOCIATES
LABOR;
Proj.Prin
Sr Engineer
Engineer
Technical
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
Hours Rate Total
14 $ 54.81 $
27 $ 28.85 $
52 $ 21.64 $
14 $ 19.00 $
767.34
778.95
1,125.28
268.00
107 $
OVERHEAD ¢_. 1.4437 $
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $
Travel Mileage
Printing, Mailing, Telephone & Supplies
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE {based on 10% profit of labor)
SUBTOTAL FEER & PEERS
2,937.57
4~240.97
7,178.54
$ 250.00
$ 250,00
$ 717.85
$ 8,146,39 [6%
Page 4
y:\ett!Adublin~sccpe\Engcstl ,xls Labor + ODCs Revised: 7f6/00 8:10 PM
COST PROPOSAL - LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening.Project Revised: 1/6/00 8:10 PM
~i;~E~i~iii~=~i~[~i~i~!!i[~!;~[~i~&~!~-~`~:;~ Pro] Prln ProJ Mgr Sr Eng Engine,er CADD Clerical MKC
~;,~',~ N o.~D e sc ~R tlc ~ ~',;~':;~t=~:~'~':~:'~":'~"~;~::::~~:':~:;~t.~;' ~;~[. Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost. Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost
PrHect Management &Adminfstratio~ ' ' ' ' ' "
Admlnis~a~on I Invoices (4) 2 108 12 540 8 128 22 776.00
Monthly Progress Repods / Sd~edule (4) 2 108 16 720 8 128 26 9~.00
Subconsullant Coordinalion 2 108 40 1,800 4 64 46 1,972.~
Kickoff meeting 8 360 8 272 2 32 18 ~4.~
MeeUngs / Agency Coordina~on (4} 2 108 12 540 12 408 12 288 8 t28 ~ 46 1,472.~
SUBTOTAL 8 432 88 3,960 20 680 12 288 0 30 480 158 5,840.~
~nvlronmental
Confi~ Environmental Do,merit 2 90 2 ~.~
TechnI~l Sludies 8 360 24 816 32 1.176.~
CEQA Initial Study I Neg Dec 8 ;,360 24 816 32 1,176.~
SUBTOTAL 0 18 8~0 48 1,632 O O O 66 2,442,~
Right-or-Way Englneedng & Su~eys
~stlng uUli~ plans & ~ordination 8 360 8 272 8 192 8 184 32 1,008.~
Supplemental Su~eys 8 360 8 272 16 632.00
R~ and Mapping Conirol 8 360 8 272 16 632.~
SUBTOTAL~ 0 24 1,080 24. 816 8 192 8 184 0 64 2,272
)rellmlna~ Engineering
Data coltec~on and field reviews 4 · 136 8 . 192 12 328,~
Geometric layout 2 90 20 680 40 ~0 32 736 94 2,4~.00
S~ctum General Plan 8 360 8 272 20 480 16 368 52 1,480.~
Response to ~mments 4 180 4 136 4 96
12 412.~
QNQC 16 720 18 720.~
Estimates
4 t80 8 272 8 192 20 644.~
SUBTOTAL O 34 1,530 44 1,496 80 1,920 48 1.104 O 2~
~;~ ~ ~N D ~~t~ ~i~:~ ~ ~'~ ~ I 136 4,624 100 56 30 480 494 16,604
COST DI?OPOSAL - LADOI~; O~'4LY
~-~.. Dublin Boulevarc~dening Project
Project Management & Admlnls~atlon
Adminis~aflon I Invoices (4)
Monthly Progress RepoAs I Schedule (4)
Subconsultant C~rdinafion
~ff tussling
Mee~ngs I Agen~ Coordinalion (4)
SUBTOTAL
~vlronmental
Confi~ Environmental Document
Te~nl~l Studies
CEQA Initial Slay / Neg Dec
SUBTOTAL
Right-of-Way Engineering & Su~eys
Existing utility plans & coordinalion
Supplemental Su~eys
R~ and Mapping ConEol
SUBTOTAL
Prellmtna~ Engineering
Data ~llec~ a~ field m~ews
Geometric layo~
S~ture General PLan
Response to comments
Q~QC
Es~males
SUBTOTAL
4 201
8 401
16 803
28 1,404
0
4 118
24 710
40 1.183
68 2.011
8 149
40 743
90 1.673
138 2,565
16
16 326 88
32 652 178
48 978 282
0
0
O
0 O
O
0
O
O
O
0 O.OC
0 O.OC
0 O.OC
0 0.00
0 0.00
0.~
4~?.60
2180.43
4310.17
6958.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
O.00
0.O0
0.00
COST PROPOSAL- LABOR ONLY
, Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Re~sed: Z/~/OOS:lOPM
II
· roJect Management & Admlnlslratlo~
Adminis~aaon / Invoices (4)
Monthly Progress Reports I ~edu;e (4)
Subconsultanl Coordina~on
Kick-off mee[ing
Meetings I Agency C~rdinaflon H)
Environmental
Confi~ Environmental Do.merit
Te~nlcal Sludies
CEQA Ini~al Study I Neg Dec
Rlght.o~-Way Englneeflng & Su~eys
E~sflng utility plans & coordination
Supplemenlal Suweys
~ end Mapping Conbo~
Prellmlna~ Engineering
Data collection and ~eld reviews
G~ometdc layout
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
2 98
18 864
20 960
4 148
52 1,924
56 2.072
· ~' 54
224 56
224 110
2.914
3,022
5,937
8 200
50 1,400
64 1,600
0 0,og
0 0.~
0 0.00
0 0.80
0 0.00
0
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 O.0O
0
0 O.00
68 3.358.38
190 7,434.32
258 10.793
0 0.00
0 0.00
Structure Ganeral Plan j I / - { 0 0.00 {
Response lo comments I I I ' ' I o o.oo I
o*,oc ' I ' I - I o o.oo I
~'"'~' ~='.-"¢'~'="$!?"i~ ~' :"~'.~.i.'~Q:!~¢i~;:S~i~:,~,~::.,:::~,-j~i¢~i~ ~ ~"~ ............... -; .... ?: ........ ' - .................. ~ ........................................ ~,~ ...............
COST PROPO~?~AL - LABOR ONLY 'Dublin Bou evar~d~idening Project Revised:, 7_,~o a:m PM
~roJect Management & Administration
AdminlsVafion I Invoi~s (4) 0
Mon~ly Progress Re~s I S~edule (4) 0 0.~
Subconsultant Coordination 0 0.~
Kickoff meeting 3 87 3
Meeangs / Agency Coordina~on (4) 0 0.~
SUBTOTAL 0 3 87 0 0 3 86.55
Environmental
Confi~ Environmental ~manl 0 0.~
Te~nical Studies 7 384 12 346 32 692: 8 152 59 1.574.35
CEQA tnllial Study I Nag De~ 7 384 12 346 20 433
SUBTOTAL 14 767 24 692 52 1.~25 14 266 104 2.851.02
Right.of. Way Engineering & Su~eys
Exls~ng utilily pl~s & ~oo~inallon 0 0.~
Supplemental Su~eys 0 O.~
R~ and Mapping Control 0 0.~
SUBTOTA~ 0 0 - 0 0 0
Prellmlna~ Engineering
Data collec~on and field mvl~,. 0 .0.~
Gaome~c layout 0 0.~
S~clure General Plan -. 0 0.~
Response to comments 0 0.~
Q~C - 0
Estimales 0 0.0o
SUBTOTAL 0 '- - 0 0 - 0 0
Page 8
COST PROPOSAL - LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widenin~ Project Ra,~ssd: 7~6/00 a:m PM
~roJect Management & Administration
' Administrafion I Invoices (4) 22
Mon~ly Progress Reports I S~edule (4) 28 $ 968.00
Subconsultanl Coo~dinaaon 4S $ 1,972.00
Kick-off meefi~g
Meetings I Agency Coordination (4) 46 $ 1,472.00
;~ SUBTOTAL 161 $ 6,927
Environmental
Confirm Environmental Documdnt ~8 $ SST.60
Te~nical Studies ~79 $ 4,930,78
CEQA lniUal Study I Neg Dec 255 $ 6,762.84
SUBTOTAL 4S2 $ 12,2Sl
Eight*of-Way Englneedng & Su~eys
Exisling uBily plans & coordination 32 $ t,008.00
Supplemental Su~eys 84 $ 3,990.38
~ and Mapping Control 206 $ 8,066.32
SUBTOTAL 322 $ ~ 13,064.70
Prellmlna~ Engineering
Data ~fiection and field m~ews 12 $ 328.00
Geome~c layout 94 $ 2,466.00
S~clum Ganeral Plan 52 $ t,480.00
Responseto ~mments 12 $ 4~2.00
Q~C ~6 $ 720.00
EsUmates 20 $
SUBTOTAL 206 $ 6,050
EXHIBIT
A Professional Services Agreement Between
CITY OF DUBLIN
(CITY)
and
MK CENTENNIAL
(CONSULTANT)
for the
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PHASE 2
INDEX DESCRIPTION
PAGE
100
110
120
140
150
160
t70
180
190
GENERAL ..................:: ............................................ .~ ................... . .................................... 3
Location ...................................................................................................... ; ........................ 3
Description .......................................................................................................................... 3
Design Contract ......................................................................................................... i ........ ;3
Construction Cost ................................................................................................................ 4
Length o£ Services ............................................................................................................... 4
Project Scheduling .............................................................................................................. 4
Project'Progress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting ............................................. 4
Design Monitoring and Subconsultant Management .......................................................... 4
200
210
220
240
DESIGN REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 5
Caltrans Publications ........................................................................................................... 5
AASHTO Publications ........................................................................................................ 5
Publications From Other Sources ....................................................................................... 5
300
310
320
330
340
PHASE 1 DESIGN WORK PERFORMt;D BY CONSULTANT ................................ 5
Data Collection and Field Reviews ..................................................................................... 5
Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys .................................................................. 5
Public Outreach ................................................................... -: ............................................... 6
Right-of-Way ...................................................................................................................... 6
400
410
420
430
440
441
442
443
444
445
450
460
470
PHASE 2 DESIGN WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT ................... 6
Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties .................................................................. 6
Permits ........................................... ; ........................................................................... .......... 6
Geotechnical ........................................................................................................................
P. S. & E. Documents .......................................................................................................... 8
Lighting and Signal Design ................................................................................................. 9
Construction Staging .............................................................. ~ ........................ ~ ................... 9
Utility Plans ......................................................................................................................... 9
Drainage .............................................................................................................................. 9
Landscaping and Irrigation ............................................................................................... 10
Project Submittals ............................................................................................................. I 0
Design Reviews ................................................................................................................. 12
Quantities and Cost Estimates ........................................................... . ................................ t2
¥',CE I _P L D. VOL l ~C E I D ATLZ2 6 2kAD M IN~ ONTP,.4.CT SkPHAS F,,2~ CO pE2. WPD
DUBUN BOULEVARD WIDENIN~[,~ .(OJECT
Scope of Services
June 28, 2000
Page 2
5OO
510
520
MATERIALS FURNISFi'ED BY The CITY ................................................................. 12
Recoi'd Documents ............................................................................................................ 12
Miscellaneous Information ............................................................................................... 12
600
610
620
630
640
650
660
670
680
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................... 12
The CITY .......................................................................................................................... 12
CONSULTANT ................................................................................................................ 13
Project Control .................................................................................................................. t 3
Subcontract Services ......................................................................................................... 13
Quality Control .................................................................................................................. 13
CONSULTANT Personnel ................................................................................................ 14
Acceptability of the Work ................................................................................................. 14
Design Documentation ...................................................................................................... 14
B. CEI _P L 1 \VOL I'~C~ELDAT'~2262~,DM TN~CONTR,ACTS~PHA SE2'GCOPE.2 .V/PD 2
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING~
Scope of Services [
OJECT (' June 28, 2000
Page 3
100
110
120
140
GENERAL
Location
The project is located in Dublin, California. The City of Dublin is proposing to widen
Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway and Sierra Court/Civic Plaza from a four-lane
to a six-lane facility. The existing street has been improved to a six-lane facility from
Village Parkway to San Ramon Road. The proposed project will extend the six-lane facility
to just east of the Sierra Court intersection. The widening of Dublin Boulevard is to both
sides of the street to obtain additional roadway width. This will require both demolition and
reconstruction of existing improvements on both sides Of the street including widening of
an existing bridge and repair of the creek slopes below the bridge. During the
reconstruction, existing overhead utilities will be placed underground.
Description
The CONSULTANT will prepare final plans, specification and estimates. The design of the
project elem.ents described herein, will. be in accordance with The CITY, and Caltrans
Standards in effect at the time this agreement is executed. The documents will be produced
in metric units.
The project will consist of the following basic features:
Prepare environmental technical studies and environmental documents required for
environmental clearance
Attend project status meetings and City Council meetings
Prepare contract bid dOCuments (plans, specifications and estimates - PS&E)
Design Contract
The CONSULTANT services will be divided into three phases of work:
Phase 1 was completed under a separate con.~ulting engineering services contract dated
November 16, 1999 with the City of Dublin and included:
· Environmental documents and clearance
· Topographic mapping, title reports, supplemental surveys and right-of-way maps
· Field reviews and data collection
· Prelimin~ry engineering and design criteria
· Right-of-way maps, Plats and legal descriptions including permanent and temporary
construction easements (TCE)
Phase 2 work will include the following scope of services:
Phase 2
Final construction documents: plans, estimate and specifications (one construction
bid document) including landscaping and irrigation plans and traffic handling and
stage construction plans
Assist The CITY with utility relocation and right-of-way coordination
V~CE1-PL I S'VOL 1 '~C EIDA'T~2262~D M [N'~C 0 NTKACT S ~u H'A'S E ~SC OPE2 'WP D ' 3
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENIN¢~~
Scope of Services
DJECT (' June 28, 2000
Page 4
150
160
170
180
190
Phase 2 (Continuation)'
· Assist the CITY with response to bidders' questions as they pertain to design only
· Construction support services during construction will be provided by CITY staff
Construction Cost
The CONSULTANT will prepare cost estimates of the probable construction costs using the
CITY and Cattrans unit prices. The estimate will include construction costs for roadway,
structures and drainage facilities.
Length of Services
The project will be initiated with a notice to proceed from the CITY. The engineering work-
would then proceed without delay for 8 months. Review periods at the milestones will be:
four weeks at the 30% submittal, four weeks at the 90% submittal, and four weeks at the
final submittal. A four-week review period is scheduled for each review of the draft and
final environmental document packages.
The CITY may wish to amend the scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANTi
When this occurs the CITY and the CONSULTANT will agree on a revised scope and any
adjustments to the project schedule and/or compensation due the CONSULTANT.
Project Scheduling
The project schedule will include ail project activities and milestones. The schedule will
identify all milestones, tasks and sub tasks, review periods, and coordination activities
associated with engineering and design. Attachment A, "Design Schedule," shows the time
phased tasks to be performed for the required work.
Project Progress Meetings and Monthly Progress Reporting
Monthly progress reports will be submitted to the CITY with each invoice for payment for
engineering services. The report will indicate the tasks that were completed during the
preceding.-period, work planned for the next period, identification of design issues or
problems being encountered, and a comparison of planned and actual progress. The updated
schedule will accompany this report. Monthly reports will be submitted throughout the
project duration assumed above. Reports will not be submitted for any period where no
work was performed.
The CONSULTANT Project Manager will meet with the appointed CITY representatives
on a monthly basis to discuss the status'of the project design work. These meetings will
focus on resolution of any design issues requiring the CITY involvement, the design
progress, potential problems, and to address any particular detail of the work previously
identified for resolution.
Design Monitoring and Subconsultant Management
The CONSULTANT Project Manager and each subconsultant principal will monitor the
work underway to assure it complies with the criteria and standards established for the work,
and to ensure that the design work is being accomplished in the most efficient manner
possible.
The CONSULTANT will establish effective and efficient project procedures to direct and
monitor the subconsultants' work. Regular scheduled reviews of the subconsultant design
~ICEI_PL I\VOL I \CEIDAT~262~.DMIN~CONTR.ACTS~HASF_.2~SCOPE2. WPD 4
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WlDENIN~,'i"
Scope of Services
OJECT ~ June 28, 2000
Page 5
200
210
22'0
240
300
310
320
will be performed to ensure compliance with the quality standards established, coox:dination
among team members, and that design operations are being conducted in a timely and
efficient manner.
DESIGN REFERENCES
Caltrans Publications
211 Standard Drawings
Bridge Standard Details (Current Edition - Metric)
Standard Plans (1999 Edition - Metric)
212 Specifications
Standard Specifications (1999 Edition - Metric)
213 Manuals
Highway Design Manual, 5th edition (Metric)
Bridge Design Specifications (Current Edition - Metric)
Bridge Design Practice (Current Edition)
Bridge Memo to Designers (Current Edition)
Bridge Design Aids (Current Edition)
Bridge Design Details (Current Edition)
AA. SFITO Publications
A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 1994 ("Green Book")
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, with interim revisions through 1997
Manual on Foundation Investigations, 1978
Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, 1993
Guide for Specifications and Standards
Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaries and Traffic
Signals, Edition of 1985 and Interim Specifications through 1991
Roadside Design Guide, 1996
An Information Guide for Roadway Lighting, 1984
AASHTO Drainage Guidelines, 1992
Publications From Other Sources
City of Dublin Standard Plans
PHASE 1 DESIGN WORK PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
Data Collection and Field Reviews
Under phase 1 contract, the CONSULTANT met with the CITY and the local agencies to
collect available information pertinent to the project. A review of available information and
an on-site investigation was conducted to further define site conditions and determine'the
need for additional investigation and data.
Site Mapping and Supplemental Field Surveys
Under phase 1 contract, the CONSULTANT prepared topo~aphic base mapping at 1:500
with 0.5-meter continuous intervals based on 1983 NAD (horizontal control) and 1929
NGVD (vertical control). Mapping standards will be checked by the CONSULTANT and
\~.CEI_PL I '~VO L P,C EI D AT',2262~,D M IN,CONTRA C'TS~H. ASE2~$CO PE2. V~PD 5
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING~ ~JECT I June.28, 2000
Scope of Services Page 6
330
340
4O0
410
420
will conform to the CITY's survey/mapping standards, as required for this project. The
CONSULTANT will conduct field surveys. Work will include conform areas, pavement
spot elevations, storm drainage inlets/outlets, selected utilities and potholed utilities.
Potholing is not included in this scope of services.
Public Outreach
Public outreach activities are included in phase 1 contract. Public Outreach activities are
assumed to be minimal during the design phase. We have assumed that the City may want
to have one to two follow-up meetings with local business owners to review the project
status. In addition, we have budgeted for mailings for these two meetings and the
preparation and distribution of one (post-card size) project update during the design phase.
If the City wishes to conduct additional outreach activities such as newsletters, or .more
community meetings, they would be billed on a time and materials basis.
Right-of-Way
As part of the phase 1 contract, the CONSULTANT will identify right-of-way necessary for
the project alternatives based on information derived from existing ri*~ht-of-way information
provided by The CITY. The CONSULTANT will prepare right-of-way maps and conduct
right-of-way surveys. The CITY will provide right-of-way costs to the CONSULTANT.
PHASE 2 DESIGN WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
Coordination with the CITY and Other Parties
In phase 2, the Design team members will continue to attend scheduled meetingS. The
coordination wilt be conducted during design review submittals, monthly meetings, and at
such other times as specific issues need resolution. It will be necessary for the
CONSULTANT to meet with representatives of the local agencies and The CITY for the
purpose of discussing design details. The number of meetings budgeted for this work are as
follows:
Description NumBdr of Meetings
Monthly progress 6
meetings and / or utility
coordination meetings
The agency contacts anticipated are with Zone 7 and the CITY.
Permits
In phase 2, the CONSULTANT will oversee the application and approval of regulatory
permits for the project. These will include permits from the US Army Corps of Engineers,
401 Certification from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Streambed Alteration
Agreement from the California Depm~,ment of Fish and Game, and possibly a Section 7
perm'it from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The CONSULTANT will utilize the
assistance of Barry Anderson and Monk & Associates in preparing applications and
consulting with the regu.latory agencies. Coordination with the City and Zone 7 will an
integral part of preparing the applications and consultation With the regulatory agencies
regarding any mitigation requirements'within the Creek Channel.
'~\CEI_PL 1 \ VOL 1 \CE I DAT',2262La. D M lN~CONTRACTSkPHASE33SC 0 PE2..WP D 6
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING("-
Scope of Services
'~JECT ( June 28, 2000
Page 7
Task I Obtaining a Corps Permit We are assuming that the project will be eligible for a
Nationwide Permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. It is likely that two
permits may be required: Nationwide 14 for linear corridors, and Nationwide 33 for
temporary construction impacts. Although these general permits have already been issued
by the Corps, the applicant must provide the Corps with a Preconstruction Notification (also
known as a PCN). We would prepare PCN and submit it to the Corps.
Task 2 Obtaining a 401 Certification or Waiver In California the Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB) in each district administers Section 40t of the Clean Water Act.
We believe the project will receive a Certification waiver. We will prepare the necessary
forms and submit them to the Board for their review. Also, note that as part of the
application package the Board requires adequate California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) documentation which we are assuming the Negative Declaration approved by the
City under the phase 1 contract will be adequate for RWQCB purposes.
Task 3 Obtaining a i 603 Streambed Alteration Agreement The California Department of
Fish and Game (CDFG) issues Strearnbed Alteration Agreements. for projects that affect the
' bed or bank of creeks and streams in Califorrtia. We will prepare the necessary forms and
submit them to the Departmeni for their approval. The applicant or applicants consultant
usually meets with the Department in the field to discuss the project and how impacts can
be eliminated or reduced. The Department has recently revised its policy on Streambed
Alteration Agreements and now requires that the project be in compliance with CEQA. We
are assuming that the Negative Declaration approved by the City will be. adequate for CDFG
purposes.
Task 4 Assisting With'the California Red-legged Frog (CRLF) Permit Monk & Associates
has already prepared a CRLF site assessment and submitted it to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service for their approval. We do not know what type of permit or permit conditions the
Service will require. For small impacts to frog habitat, the Service has a programmatic
Section 7 permit that they append to the Corps 404 permit. Ideally, this is what would
happen here, and this is what we are providing a budget for.
Task 5 Mitigation Plan Because impacts to various resources are small, we are assuming
that th~ mitigation requirements will be to reconstruct the bank to its previous extent and
hydroseeding bare soil. In this task we will discuss mitigation with the regulatory agencies
and prepare a brief(several pages) document describing the methods for restoration.
Assumptions Because we do not know the exact permits or requirements the agencies will
request, I have made some assumptions that limit .what we are prepared to do for the budget
proposed here.
CEQA documentation has been prepared by the City. We assume it will be adequate for
both the Regional Board and the Department offish and Game. Preparation of new CEQA
documents is beyond the scope of this proposal. We assume the project will be eligible for
a Corps Nationwide Permit. Preparing an application for an Individual Corps permit is
beyond the scope of this proposal. The Fish and Wildlife Service may require a full Section
7 consultation and associated mitigation and monitoring requirements. We assume the
proj ect will receive a Programmatic Section 7, and a regular Section 7 (or Section 10) is
beyond the scope of this proposal. Ali permits require some sort of mitigation plan. We
assume that restoration to the original state of the channel will be all that is required, and
preparation of full mitigation and monitoring plans that the agencies could require is beyond
the scope of this proposal. We assume the Engineers will provide the necessary engineering
drawings that will be required for several of the permits described above.
\\CEI_PL BVOL 1 \CE IDA'i'h2 2 6 2 D~D MIN~CO NTKA CTS'~'HAS£2\S COP F._.2.W P D 7
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENIN(~.
Scope of Services
OJECT ( June 28, 2000
Page 8
430
440
Geotechnical
In phase 2; the CONSULTANT will provide pavement section evaluation by first evaluating
the existing pavement conditions Of the street and subgrade soils. We will first perform a
document search, followed by a brief pavement conditions survey of the surface of the
pavement following Pavement Management Standards (PMS). The pavement section will
be based on an R-value of 5 where new pavement section design and reconstruction is
needed. Pavement section options will be provided so that the most economic means of
paving the road may be selected.
To obtain subsurface information for the bridge and abutment design, we will drill a deep
.boring at each end of the 1964 bridge. Samples obtained from the borings will be used to
provide geotechnical parameters for the bridge in accordance with Caltrans design
requirements. The samples will also be used for evaluating the Alamo Creek bank
stabilization recommendations and the repair of the bicycle path under the bridge, .In
addition, these borings will be used for further information in the evaluation of the existing
roadway. We plan to' provide seismic design parameters for use in the upgrade of the
bridge. Our scope of work' includes rasearching available information regarding the
geology, tectonics, and seismicity of the project site, establishing the controlling seismic
source, estimating peak bedrock acceleration using Caltrans Seismic Hazard Map (1996),
and recommending the appropriate acceleration response spectra (ARS) curve from the
Applied TechnoI.ogy Council publication ATC-32 for the design based on the subsurface
soil information from our field investigation.
The CONSULTANT will draw upon our extensive local experience with Alameda County
Zone 7 as well as that of our staff, in .addressing the Alamo Creek..channel stabilization. We
will draw upon Zone 7's Channel Repair Standards as defined by A..lameda County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District's Resolution No. t757. We will also consider the
concerns of the Army Corps of Engineers and the Fish and Game Depmhnent in assessing
stabilization methods. We will include mitigation measures as outlined in the CEQA
Negative Declaration into the plans and specifications.
The CONSULTANT will also drill three to four shallow borings along the alignment of the
proposed joint utility trench. This is so that we can obtain engineering perimeters and
identify the subsurface conditions that will be encountered during excavation and
construction of the utility vaults, conduits., and trench sections and will also be used for
pavement evaluation. Based on our experience the surface soils in the area are generally
very expansive clays wiih deeper soils consisting of alluvial silty clays with some sand
P.S. & E. Documents
The design objective is to provide plans, specifications and construction cost estimates for
the construction of the project. CADD digital drawings will be prepared in Microstation
format. The documents wilt be produced in metric units.
Specifications will be composed of supplements to the Calms Standard Specifications for
Construction, with general conditions and contract format, including special provisions, as
directed by the CITY. These compositions will be carefully coordinated with the work
depictions shown on the plans and the bid items included in the construction cost estimate.
Construction cost estimates will be assimilated using Caltrans bid item designations,
¥,CF2[_PL 1 \VOL I\CEIDA'D,2262~M~CO~~S~COP~.WPD ~
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING~
Scope of Services
flJECT ( June 28, 200O
Page 9
441
442
443
444
estimating a quantity and expanding it to a cost application of the expected unit price. This
estimate will be performed at each to the design submittal stages. The accuracy of the
estimate will increase throughout the design process.
Lighting and Signal Design
In phase 2, plans specifications & estimates (PS&E) documents will be prepared for the
following project elements:
· Traffic sigaaal modifications at the Dublin Boulevard/Sierra Court and Dublin
Boulevard/Clark Avenue intersections;
· Traffic signal interconnection along Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway
and Sierra Court; and
· Street lighting on 'Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway and Sierra Court.
Available record and/or construction drawings will be obtained f6r each project element.
Detailed field verification of as,built existing.conditions will be performed. All work will
be conducted in accordance with the current-applicable City, County, and State standards.
Electrical load calculations will be prepared and submitted to facilitate verification of
service point locations with the utility company. Final design documents will be provided
based on comments. 'An internal quality control review will .be conducted prior to each
submittal. Technical special provisions will be prepared and submitted at the 90% design
stage. A construction cost estimate will be prepared and submitted at the 30%, 90.%, and
final design stages.
Construction Staging
As part of the PS&E package in phase 2, the CONSULTANT will prepare construction
staging and traffic handling plans. The existing traffic capacity will be maintained during
consl:mction. However, temporary lane closures will be required. CONSULTANT will
identify lane closure hour constraints in the specifications.
Utility Plans
In phase 2, the CONSULTANT will prepare utility maps that identify the existing utilities
based on existing as-built data obtained from the CITY and utilities. The CONSULTANT
shall coordinate with the utilities to identify, propose final locations, and prepare plans for
utilities which are affected by the project and not included in the utility underground district
work. Utility owners will desigxa the relocation of their own facilities as identified by the
CONSULTANT. Pot holing is not included in this scope of services. The CITY may wish
to amend the scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT for utility relocation
design. When this occurs The CITY and CONSULTANT will agree on a revised scope and
any adjustments to the project schedule and/or compensation due CONSULTANT.
Drainage
The CONSULTANT will review the affected sub-basin drainage areas for the project and
determine the drainage impacts. The CONSULTANT will then report to the CITY their
findings of the drainage impacts. The CITY will review the CONSULTANT'S finding and
make a determination on how to proceed with the design of the project's drainage system.
The CITY has previously provided the CONSULTANT with record drawings of the exiSting
drainage system for the projects. The CITY has researched their existing files and has
determined that what was previously provided to the CONSULTANT is the best information
· ,,\CEi_PL 1 \VOL Ix, C El DAT!2262XAD M rNXCONTRAC'i'S~HASF-.2~ COPF-2.WPD 9
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENINgl
Scope of Services
· OJECT
June 28, 2000
Page 10
445
450
available.
The CONSULTANT will prepare drainage plans as determined and as directed by the CITY.
It is assumed that no additional drainage design nor changes to the existing main line system
will be required. This does not preclude the necessity of amending the scope of work if this
assumption is found to be in error.
Landscaping and Irrigation
Landscaping and irrigation are included in phase 2 work. The landscape architectural
portion ofthe work involves providing construction documents for planting and irrigation
for street trees within cut-outs in the city sidewalks and trees, shrubs and ground cover in
the new median. The contractor will be instructed to maintain the plants that are to remain
during construction.
For the property frontages that will be disrupted as a result of the road widening, the
contractor will be responsible for repairing and reconnecting existing irrigation systems in
these areas' using new equipment comparable to the existing systems, and installing the
equipment in such a manner as to provide full'irrigation coverage of the planting bead along
the road frontages. In addition to the irrigation along these frontages, the contractor will also
be responsible for installing ground cover to match existing materials (e.g. sod, ivy, mulch,
crushed rock, etc.) to restore the property,to a neat and clean appearance. Any existing trees
and shrubs that are damaged as a result of the construction that are outside of the edge of
pavement and are to remain will be replaced by the contractor with new plants of the same
species. Direction for this work will be covered in the construction documents.
The landscape planning portion of the work will occur concurrently with the public outreach
effort. Concept plans will be prepared for presentation to staff at the 30°/0 level of team
production. Planting plans will be completed by 90% and will be reviewed by city staff.
Upon acceptance of planting plans, irrigation plans will be prepared and submitted at the
100% submittal. The final bid set will incorporate all comments made by the city staff.
Project Submittals
CONSULTANT will prepare PS&E documents for the project. CADD digital drawings will
be prepared in Microstation format in accordance with the CITY procedures. Final plans
will be submitted in an electronic format compatible to the CITY's electronic equipment
which is AUTOCAD version I4. Drawings will be in dual (Metric/Imperial) units' as
established by the CITY. This Scope of Services provides for a design process that will
produce several documents that will serve as a record of the design development. Design
submittals will be made at'the 30% and 90%. Final design documents will be provided
based on comments. An internal quality control review will be conducted prior to each
submittal. Technical special provisions and a construction cost estimate will also be
prepared and submitted at the 90% design stage.
5 copies of each submittal at 30%, 90% and Final
One hard copy to each utility owner and electronic files
One print-ready original PS&E for advertisement
~\CEI_P L I IVOL I~CEIDAT~2262~.M3M~,CO1VTIL~C'TS~PHASE2~SCOP~2.WPD 10
DUBLIN BOULEVARD W1DENIN~'~
Scope of' Services
OJECT
June 28, 2000
Page ll
The following doCUments, will be submitted to the CITY at project milestone points:
30% plans consisting of:
Title Sheet
Typical Cross Sections
Key Map and Line Index
Layout
Utility Plan (existing only)
Signal and Lighting Plans
Define Right-of-Way
Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate
List of permits required and draft permit aPPlications
Draft Foundation Report
Bridge General Plan
90% plans consisting of all ~otan sheets (revised) listed for the 30% submittal and:
Construction Details
Drainage Plans and Details
Utility Plans
Stage Construction and Traffic Handling Plans
Construction Area Signs
Pavement Delineation and Sign Plans.
Signal and Lighting Details
Planting Plan, Details, Plant List
Irrigation Plan and Details
Foundation Report
Construction Cost Estim ate
Permit Applications Exhibits
ConsTruction Schedule
Specifications
Final plans consisting, of all plan sheets (revised). fully cornvleted, listed for the 90%
submittal and:
Construction Cost Estimate
Construction Support Services during construction will be provided by the CITY as stated
in section 140 of this scope
The CITY' will provide the CONSULTANT with a marked up set of plans that reflect
changes that occurred during the construction phase of the project. The CONSULTANT
shall transfer the reflected changes to the original set of plans with appropriated annotation
that clearly indicates what change occurred during construction. The CONSULTANT shall
then label each sheet of the plans as RECORD DRAWINGS. The CONSULTANT shall
provide to the CITY a copy of the RECORD DRAWING plans in an electronic median
acceptable to the CITY, (AutoCADD Release 14).
".\CEI_PL 1 \VOL l \CEIDA'Ix226-'~'~DM IN~COIqTRACT$~HASF-'2~ COPF-2'WPD 1 t
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENIN(~
Scop~ of Services
OJECT (
June 28, 2000
Page 17
460
470
500
510
520
600
610
Design Reviews
At milestone points, the CONSULTANT will submit materials to the CITY' and
participating local agencies for review and comment. Review periods will be four weeksfor
all milestones. Each reviewing agency will submit a single set of coordinated review
comments to the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will compile review comments
from the reviewing agencies and schedule a meeting with The CITY and the other reviewing
agencies to discuss any conflicting comments and to reach a consensus on resolution of any
conflicts. Minutes of the resolution meeting will be distributed within five working days
of the meeting. The CONSULTANT will incorporate agreed upon resolutions into the
reviewed documents. Should future reviews generate comments which require changes to
previously agreed upon elements of the documents and such changes result in additional
work on the part of the CONSULTANT, such changes will be performed as Additional
Services.
Quantities and Cost Estimate
An kern ized cost ~stimate will be prepared based upon the project's required list of Standard
Items of Work. The quantity estimate will address general requirements, retaining wails,
electrical systems, drainage structures, and all construction work items as applicable. A
preliminary' cost estimate will also be prepared that identifies'the various work items,
quantities, unit costs, and the project's cost, including allowances for mobilization and
contingencies. Quantities and estimates will be updated to respond to each respective
submittals's review comments.
MATERIALS FURNISHED BY The CITY
Record Documents
The CITY will provide the following items:
· Current standard Drawings, Manuals, Guides, and Procedures ~hat pertain to the
project
· Available CITY "as-built" plans and specifications of existing conditions including
roadways, utilities, drainage improvements, and structures
· Available CITY right-of-way plans
· Surveying and mapping information including existing monument locations
· Sample plans 'and reports to be used as guidelines for format, organization and
content
· Access to all records available at the CITY
Miscellaneous Information
· Entry permits on private parcels
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
The CITY
The CITY will:
· Conduct ongoing reviews of the CONSULTANT's progress in performing the work
and furnish technical comments in a timely manner on ali submissions
· Review and approve the CONSULTANT's billings in a timely manner
· Review, evaluate and may approve CONSULTANT's requests for extension of time
and amendments to the agreement
~;CEI -PL P'¥O L 1 ~ClEI DA'I'~26L~'ADMII~CONTRACTS~'HA SI~2~ COP~' WP D ] 2
DUBUN BOULEVARD WIDENINg:'
Scope of Services
DJECT (
June 28, 2000
Page 73
620
630
64O
650
Attend all progress meetings With the CONSULTANT
Attend meetings with the CONSULTANT and others as requested
Consultant
CONSULTANT will:
· Establish, furnish and maintain Suitable office facilities to serve as the project office
for the duration of the project
· Maintain an adequate staff of qualified support personnel to perform the work
necessary to complete the project
· Establish internal accounting methods and procedures for documenting and
monitoring project costs consistent with the State auditor's requirements.
· Establish' and maintain contract administration procedures which will include
amendments, time extensions and subcontracts
· Maintain a project workbook with ail the pertinent information relating to the
project to be given to the CITY at the close of the project
· Attehd meetings with other agencies as requested by the CITY. However, if number
of meetings exceed tho~e indicated in this scope of services,.then those meetings
will be performed as Additional Services
The CONSULTANT is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the contract
documents and related design prepared under this project and prior to submittals will check
all material accordingly. The plans will be reviewed by the CITY for conformity with the
CITY procedures and the terms of the contract.
Project Control
The CONSULTANT will provide and maintain a Management Information System to
monitor costs and manpower and to report progress with the following:
· Identify progress against the schedule for each major work item
· Forecast completion dates from current progress
· Advise the CITY of any work not in this scope or in any area which is out of the
required sequence
· Provide updated estimates of time, manpower and dollars required for major work
elements
Subcontract Services
Due to the nature and scope of the required services, the CONSULTANT will subcontract
portions of the .~vork. The subcontract firm will be approved by the. CITY in writing prior
to initiation of any work bY the subconsultant firms. The CONSULTANT will review and
coordinate the work of ail subconsultants and they will abide by the terms and conditions
of'thi's scope as applicable to them.
Quality Control
The CONSULTANT and subconsultants have total responsibility for the accuracy and
completeness of the plans and related design prepared under this project and will check all
such material accordingly. The CONSULTANT will have a quality control plan in effect
during the entire time work .is being performed under this contract. The quality control plan
will establish a process whereby, plans, calculations, and documents that the
CONSULTANT submits for review will be clearly marked as fully checked prior to
submittals by a qualified individual other ~han the originator.
\'~CEI _ pL i ~,VOL 1 '~C EID A'r~2262LM~MIN~C ON~l-g~. GTSk,°HA$ E2~CO PF--2. W P D
I3
DUBLIN BOULEVARD WIDENING(
Scope of Services
28, 2000
Page f4
660
6?0
680
CONSULTANT Personnel
The CONSULTA2qT's Work will be performed and/or directed by. the key personnel
identified in the CONSULTANT's proposal. Any changes in thc indicated key personnel
will be subject to review and approval: by The CITY.
Acceptability of the Work
The plans, designs, calculations, reports and other documents furnished under this scope of
work will conform to the CITY's standard of quality. The criteria for acceptance will be a
product of neat appearance, well organized, accurate and complete, technically and
grammatically correct, checked and dated in accordance with the Quality Control Plan, and
having the originator and checker identified. The minimum standards of appearance,
organization, and content of drawing will are similar to the type produced by the CITY.
Design Documentation
The CONSULTANT will submit all design notes, sketches, reports, worksheets and
computations to document the design conclusions. The design notes and computations will
be recorded on 8 ½ "x 11" computation sheets, appropriately titled, numbered, dated,
indexed, and signed by the designer and checker~ The data'will be bound in a hardback
folder or a three-ring binder for submittals to the CITY. Computer output forms and other
oversized sheets will be bound or placed in a binder.
Design notes and computations will include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following
data:
· Design criteria used for the project
· Geometric design calculations for horizontal'and vertical alignment
· Quantity calculations
· Documentation of decisions reached from meeting, telephone conversations or site
visits
· Bridge structural calculations
[ICEI_PL I~VOL BCEIDAT~262'tA.DMINkCONTR~CTS~PHASE2~COPE2.W PD 1 4
MN CENTENNIAL ' ~'
Dublin 'Boulevard Widening - Village Parkway to Sierra Court
Phase 1 and Phase 2
............. 2000 12001 2002
.l~n Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul ~,~g Sep 0Ct Nov Dec Jan lFeb M;~r'laprlM;,yl'3u. JulI~.ols.pldc~
...................................................................................... : .......... ~ ............. ) ........... I ............. ~ ........... : ........ ~ ............ ~ ............. ~ . .
2 Project ~anagemen[ 258 days ~100 212101 ~ ~ ~ I II I I I ~
3 P~J.d Schaduls, QA Pla., Sub contracls 51.6 wks 2/9/00 ~2/01 i ~ ~~
· : : ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ · { ·
~ ........ ~i'~'6g';~i'~;~;~"A.;'ti.~, ..... s~,~' ' 2~/0o i 2~o~' ...... ~~:~ '
7 PHASE t DES ON 233 days ill2100 12/1/00 ...... l ' I
........................... 6o'~;~; .......... iii'~0~ ...... S~6~ ....... ::: '":'?::::::':";r::"'"'""~ ........... ~ ............. ~ ........... ~ ...... ~ ......... ~ ....... ~ ......... : J ' : ..... :
8 Envlronmen~l ~ . i
................................................................................... ~ ......... ~ ............ ~ ........... ~'-""i ........ ~ .......... ~ .......... ; ..... ~ ................ ~ ......... i ............ ' ..................... ~' ' ; ' ' ; ' · '~ '
....................................................... ~ .......... I .......... ~ ........ ~ ............ ~ ....... ~ .....
10 Conduc[ le~nl~l studies 4 wks 1/26~0 2/22/00 ~ t ~ ~ ~ { { ~ ~ ~ ', ~
~..i .............. i ....................................... i ..................... ~ ....................... { ........ ~ ........... ~ ......... ~ ........... ~ .......... ~ ............ i ........... ~.: ......... , .................... l ........... I ..
11 Prepare ED for Cai Ex 4 wks 1126~0 ~22~0 ~ ~ ~ i j J i i i j i i i J
'" ............................ = ............................................................................................................................... ................................................................. ~ ......... ~ ............ i ....................... i .............. t ........ ! ........... ~ .................... i ................................... i ......... i .......... l ............ J ........... i ......... i- '""' '~ .......... ! ........ ~' · ' ~ ..... : .....
12 Pub c Renew Pegod 4 wks ~23~0 3/21/00 : ~ ~ . . ~ .
~3 ; ................... ~'~"~'H~'~"~az~-~'~a~i'~';i'~6 .......................................... i"~ ............. ~}~"i'~0' .............. ~i&'6' ........................................ ;'"i ................. ' ..... , ...... , ....... ' ............ I ......... ~ ................. ' ........... l ............ i ........... 1 ............. ~ ............. ' ........... · ..... !' ,'"! '"
: ; .......................... ~ .............. ~..;.........~ ........ ~ .......... l ....... I ....... J......:..-.~ ............ J ............ j ............ ~ ......................... ~.......~ ......... ' ........ ~ ............. · ............ ~ ............ I ........... i ..... ~ ...... :. :..
t4 Prepare Fna ED and subm [ lo Ca frans and C ~ 2 wks 3122~0 4/4100 j ~ j J ! ;
....... - j . , I , ~
15 Review ED 2 wks 415/00 4fl 8~ ................. " ........ ' ......................... ~ [ ............ ' ...................... · Ji ............. ~ ............ t ........... J~ .............. ~ .............................. i i J~ ........ ~l ............. ~ .................... i
: ! ............ ~ ............. i ............ i ............. ~ ............. i-I .......... l ........... i ............ F':-'""~ ............. ~ ........... ............ l ........... i ......... ! ............ J ............ J .......... J ............... i ....... j ....... t ......... ! ..... j ...1 ....
16 Tmnsmlt approved ED to FHWA lot approval 1 wk 4119~0 4125100 ~ ~ ~ i j j j . j ~ ~ '
-- · ............... ='="'"": ................... :- = ...................................................... ~'"--'~ ...................................... J ............ i ............. i ............. ~ ............. [ ........... H-'---"! ............ i .............. { ........... {.~ ........... i ............. [ ............. ~ ........... ~ ............. { ........... ~ ............ i ............. ~ ........... J'~ .......... i .......... ~ .......... ~ ....... i .... ~..
.................. ................... , ...... ,''' ................ ?'
................................. ~~
27 .......... ~'S~e~; ............................................................................................. 4 wks 8/2/00 6129~0 ~ ~ , ~' , ....... ~ ..................... : ~l .......... ~ ................. ~' j . .. ~: ;: ....... , : ',
28 Plats and legals · 6 wks 7/14~0 . 8/24/00 ~ i , ~ · .
.................................................................................................. : , . ~ ~ ~ ~1~ ~ ...j I ~ ~ ~ ...' . =
2g Public Outreach 203 days 2/23/00 12/1/00 j ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ; ......
..................'30 Meetings ' .... wl~ ' ................................................................................................................................... stakeholders 40.6 wks ~23~0 ~ ........................................................................ 1~1~0 ~,,~ ~'"~"~" ~~~ ~ ........................................." '~,,' ~ .......... i~ ......... ,!~'~ ............. ~: ~!{ .................. ~ ~' ..... , j~ ..... ~ ~ ~" :~" ' j~ ' .
'.
Date: 7/6/00 8:12 PM '
MKCENTENNIAL Du.biln Boulevard Widening. Village Parkway to Sierra Court
Phase 1 and Phase 2
............. 2ooo " 12001 ' 1~0o2 ......
.... 31 PHASE2 DESIGN ' ' ' ....... '
175 days 711~100 3116/01
.................................................................................................... I . I i ' . ' · · ' [ "' : ................................... ;~": ................. ~ ...................................................... . ~ ....
~33 Geote~ni~l e~lora~on 4wks 7117/00 8/11/00
~ Draft foundaUon repod 4wk~ 7117/~ 8/11/00 ~ ~,, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .{ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ' ,. , ~ .
35 30% plans
. i
~ .'
41 ............ FJ~[~unda~;~ rep~ ........... 2 w~s ' 'lo~J~ 10~2'0~00 I"
'~3 ....................... ~'~i~'~' ................................. : ........................................... ~..~ .............. ~0~ .......... ~'~'- j _j . . ; ~ . i ~ : ~ "~ . ...... ~."
1 wk 11/20/00 11/24/00 j ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ fl i ~ i . "~ ...... ~ .... ~ ......... , ......... ~" ~ ......
1 wk 1~4/00 12/8/00
0 days 1~8/00 12/8/00 , ! j i ~ !~ .... i ~ I t
. , ~ · ~ , ~ I I I , ,
~ ~"~" ~..~, ~ ~ '~~ , .................... ' ......... ~ .......... : ........ ~ ..........~ ~ ......... : ................... ~ ........ ~ ......... ~ .......... ~ .............................. , .... ~- · t
Project: DUBLIN12.MPP
Date: 7/6/00 8:12 PM Crili~l Task [~~ Progress ~ Mileslone ~ Summa~ ~ .~
File: y:~e~pe~DUB~.MPP ~ .~
~--.~blin Boulevard Widening Proj~t
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
MK CENTENNIAL
LABOR:
Classification
Proj Prin
Proj Mgr
Sr Eng
Engineer
CADD
Clerical
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR
MKC DIRECT COSTS:
DIRECT COSTS:
Hours Rate Total
2 $ 54.00 $ 108.00
232 $ 45.00 $ 10,440.00
450 $ 34.00 $ 15,300.00
536 $ 24.00 $ 12,864.00
424 $ 23.00 $ 9,752.00
128 $ 16.00 $ 2~048.00 ..
1772 $ 50,512.00
OVERHEAD @ t.69293 $ 85.513.28
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 136,025.28
Mailing, Telephone. Supplies, Photos ....
Reproduction & Presentation Materials
CADD Computer
Transportation
SUBTOTAL MKC DIRECT COSTS
FEE ~esed on 10% profit of labor)
$ 500.00
$ 3,600.00
4,100.00
13,601.50
SUBTOTAL MKC $
53,726.78
'157%
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~.262~admin~contr~cts~phase2~Engcst2-xls Labor + ODCs Page 1
(~ublin Boulevard Widening Pro~,~ct
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT
LABOR:
Classification Hours Rate
Principal - Env 54 $ 50.15
Principal -. PI 0 $ 44.88
Proj Mgr - Env 0 $ 29.57
Proj Mgr - PI 0 $ 39.07
Associate. Env 72 $ . · 18.59
Associate - Pi 0 $ 23.23
Clerical 30 $ 20.38
Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,210.24
1,335.48
611.40
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
166
OVERHEAD ~ 1.6
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD
Printing, Mailing, Telephone & Supplies
Transportation
Graphic Support
Miscellaneous
Biology' Subconsultant
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE ~ased on 10% profit of labor)
SUBTOTAL PAM
5,1.60.1,2
8,256.1 g
13,416.31
400.00
250.00
200.00
15~000.00
15,850.00
1 r341.63
30t607,94
111%
Revised 8:4.3 PM 8:43 PM
J:~2262~admin~contracts~ohase2~ngcst2..xis Labor + ODCs Page
~'~blin Boulevard Widening Proj~"-t
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
¸?7
FQ.~AL PROJECT C:O. ST $ 267,519:918._i
Chaudhary & Associates
LABOR:-'
Prin Mr~gr
Proj Surveyor
Office Surveyor
2-man Field Crew
Eng/CADD
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
Hours Rate
0 $ 48.00
0 $ 37.00
0 $ 28.00
0 $ 53.97
o $ 25.00
To~I
$
$
$
$
$
22,500~00
0
OVERHEAD @ 1.8612
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD
Mileage
Reproduction & Materials
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE (based on 10% proffi of labor)
SUBTOTAL CHAUDHARY
2r250.00
24~750.00 19%
Revised 8:43 PM: 8:43 PM
J:~2262~admin~cont~acts~phase2~Engcst2~Js Labor + OOCs Page 3
(~ ,blin Boulevard Widening Pro~'"t
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
KLEINFELDER
LABOR:
Pfin Eng
Proj Mng / Eng
Snr StaffProf
.Professional
'Technician
Drafting / Admin
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
Hours Rate Total
8 $ 46.64 $ 373.12
50 $ 33.65 $ 1,682.50
42 $ 25,80 $ 1.083.60
18 $ 17.88 $ 321.84
7 $ 15.60 $. 109.20
18 $ 18.03 $ 324.54
143 $ 3~894.80
OVERHEAD @ 1.92 $ 7r478.02
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD $ 11,372.82
Drilling
Permits & backfill
Laboratory testing
Ana~sis
Data research & materials
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor)
SUBTOTAL KLEINFELDER
$ 2,958.00
$ 1,900.00
4,858.00
1,137.28
$ 17~368.10 I6%
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~262~admin~contracts~phase2~Engcst2.xts Labor + ODCs Page 4
p,,.blin Boulevard Widening ProJ~r~+
COST PROPOSAL
PHASE 2 WORK
FOTAL PROJECT COSY $ 267,519.9~"i
FEHR & PEERS ASSOCIATES
LABOR:
Pmj Prin
Sr Engineer
Engineer
Technical
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
Hours Rate Total
24 $ 58.65 $
61 $ 33.17
80 $ 23.80 $
88 $ 20.67 $
253 $
OVERHEAD @ 1,4553 $
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD
1,407.60
2,023.37
1,904.00
1 ~81.8.96...
Printing, Mailing, Telephone & Supplies
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor)
t SUBTOTAL FEER & PEERS
Travel Mileage
7,153.93
0,452.65
17,636.58
180.00
815.00
995.00
I ~763.66
20T395.24 18%
Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~262'admin~contracts~hase2~Engcst2.xls Labor + ODCs Page 5
{~" ~blin BoulevardCosT PROPOsALWidening P roi~--'-t
PHASE 2 WORK
_~~ PROJECT COST
HAYGOOD & ASSOCIATES
LABOR:
Proj Prin / Proj Mgr
Landscape Assoc
Jr Landscape Arch
CADD Tech
Field Tech
Clerical
DIRECT LABOR
DIRECT COSTS:
Hours Rate Total
27.5 $ ,45.00 $
211 $ 26.00 $
0 $ 15.00 $
0 ' $ 25.00 $
0 $ 17.00 $
0 $ 14.00 $
1 ~37.50
5,486.00
238.5
OVERHEAD (~ 1.4466
SUBTOTAL LABOR + OVERHEAD
Irrigation Subconsultant
Horticulture Subconsultant
Reproductions
Delivery Charges
Film
Mileage, tolls, parking
Per Diem Travel
Project Equipment
SUBTOTAL DIRECT COSTS
FEE (based on 10% profit of labor)
SUBTOTAL HAYGOOD $
6,723.50
9~726.22
18744.9.72
$ 1,700.00
704.88
144.00
28.35
$ 2,577.23
$ 1~644.97
20.671 .g2
j8%
" Revised 8:43 PM 8:43 PM
J:~2262~admin~contracts~phase2~Engcst2.xls Labor + OOCs Page 6
Dublin Bouleva.~_~rd Widening Project Revised: 7/6/00 8:43 PM
;~;;[~i~-E~:-T`:~!~;~!~t~;i~;ai~;~i~;~;~;[:::~:F;~: ProJ Prln ProJ Mgr Sr Eng Engineer CADD Clerical MKC
:~~~..._._. ~i~1~/~5~[~i~;~[~:~,~ = EJ,~2~-.-~ ,~<.-=-~,~ ~-~:~'~ ,~a,~,~ .=~ ................... ~,~ $ 54.00 S. 45.00 $ 34.00 $ 24 00 $ 23.00 $ t6.~
Project Management & Admtnlstrallon '" , ,,
Admlnis~afion I Invoices (8) 32 1,440 24 384 56 · 1,824.~
Mon~ly Progress Repo~s I S~edule (8) 32 1,440
Sub~nsultant Coordination 40 1,8~ 40 1,360 24 384 104 3.544.~
~ffmeeflng (I) . 4. 180 4. 136 4 96 4 ~ 16 476.~
Meea~s I Agen~ Coo~inaEon (4) I 2 ~ 08 20 900 20 480
4
224
I
2.~
SUBTOTAL 2 108 128 5,760 44 1,496 24 578 0 ~ 1,440 2~ 9,3~.~
Pa~lts and Public Outreach
Public OuEea~ ' 0 1,988.~0'~
Pe~b (Co~s, Fish[Game, Wale.r ~al ~, Zone 7) 20 900 32 1,088 52
· SUBTOTAL 0 <~ 20 900 32 1,088 0 0 0 52 1,988.~
~gllty, Right-of-Way Englneeflng & Su~eys
U~lity plans & ~ordlnaaon (assumes P~ecslon
pla~lng pro,des all pe~nent Info~a~on for
reaping) 8 360 20 680 40 ~O 40 g20 1~ 2.g20.~
SUBTOTAL 0 8 3~0 20 680 40 ~O 40 920 O
Engineering 108 2,920
Geote~nlcal exploraaon & analysis & repo~s 8 272 - 8 272.~
Geome~c layout 4 180 24 5~6 24 552 52 1,308.~
Cons~cUon details 2 90 24 816 40 ~O 40 g20
2.7~.~
Bddge 20 9~ 120 4.080 160 3.840 160 3.680 460 12.~.~
Chapel e~osion ~n~ol design and plans 2 90 4 136 40 9~ 32 736 78 1.922.~
Bike pa~ romp design and repair al bridge only 2 90 4 136 40 960 32 736 78 1.922.~
Drainage 2 90 10 340 40 960 24 552 76
~,942.~
J~nt Een~ plans (re~ew only) 2 90 8 272 8 192 2 32 20 588.~
Lands~plng and I~ga~ plans 2 90 8 272 8 192 2 32 20 586.~
Llgh~ and signals 2 90 8 272 8 192 2 32 20
S~ge ~s~on and Eaffic handling 2 90 40 1.360 ~ - 40 920 '
Pavement dellnealt~ 2 90 4 1~ 40 960 32 736 78 1.~2.~
Response to ~mmenls 2 90 24 818 24 576
Q~C 16 ' 720 32 1,o88 4a t.8Oa.~
Spe~aons 8 360 40 t,360 32 512 80 2.232.~
Cons~clion ~st estimates 8 360 20 680 4'0 ~0 68 2,~.~
SUBTOTAL O 76 3.420 354 12.03~ 472 11.328 384 8.832 38
:onstmctlon. Suppod Sewlces 1324 38.224.~
RE file (nol Included In ~ls s~pe of se~ces)
Cons~cflon bidding suppo~ (not Included In ~is s~pe of se~a '* ~ O. · .O.~
Post ~ard asslstan~ (~blin to pro~de ~nslm~0n suppo~ .e~' *
I
' 0 0.~
, . SUBTOTALi 0 0 0 0
[ ~ ~ ~~s~~-. G · e~ :,~ .... '~ ~:~ :~= ~ '"~ ~=~='~==1 2 108 232 o
~;.-=~-.~=~~,~-:..~t~, . ,. 10,~0 450 15,300 ~36 1~,864 424 9,7S2 t20 2,04= 1,772 ~0,~12
Y:%eflytdublinLscope~,Engcst2.xls Labor
Page 7
COST PROPOSAL -LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widenin[I Project Revised: ?/6/00 8;43 PM
PreJect Management & Administration
Administration / Invoices (8)
Monthly Progress Reports I Schedule (8)
SUBTOTAL
Subconsultanl Coordination
Kick.off meeting (t) .
Meetings/Agency Coordination (4)
~ermlts and Public Outreach
Public Oub'each
Permits (Corps, Fish&Game, Water Quaffiy, Zone 7)
SUBTOTAL
Jgl]fy, RlgM-of-Wsy Englnee~ng & Surveye
UUlity plans & coordination (assumes Pracsion
planning provides all parllnent informaUon for
mapping)
SUBTOTAL
Engineering
Geotachnlcal exploration & analysts & reports
Geom8~o layout
Construction details
Bddga
Channel erosion control design and plans
Blke path romp design and repair at bridge only
Drainage
Joint trench plans (review only)
Landscaping and Irrigation plans
Lighting and signals
Stage construction and traffic handling
Pavement dellneaUon
Response to comments
OA/OC :
Sped~caUons
Construction cost asUmates
SUBTOTAl
=onstructlon Support Services
RE tile (not included In this scope of services} .
ConslmcUon bidding support (not Included in this scop
Post award assistance (Dublin to provide conabuction
SUBTOTAL
40 2,006
24 1,204
64 3,210
32
40
72
595
744
1,338 0
0
0
18 367
12 245
30 011
9O
76
t66
0.~
0,~
.Or
2968.12
2192.00
5180.12
0.00
0.00
0.9O
0.00
0.00
0.9O
0.00
O.OC
0.0~
0.0~
0.00
.9O
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
IXgo
0.9O
cost PROPOSAL- ~OOR O~'~L¥ Dublin Boulev~x.d Widening Project " Ra~.'-~.', ~ e:43 PM
Admtnls~flon I Invoi~s [8)
Monthly Progress Repo~s I S~edule (B)
Sub~ns~lant Coo~dina~on
Ki~ meeting (~)
Mee~ngs/Agency Coordination (4)
SUBTOTAL 0 0
and Public Outreach
Pubfio ~ea~
Perils (Co~s, Fish&Game, Water Quality, Zone 7)
SUBTOTAL 0 0
Right.f-Way Englneeflng & Su~eys
Ufilily plans & ~ina~on (assumes ~ecsion
planning provides all pennant in[o~a0on ~or
mapping)
SUBTOTAL 0 0
Engineering
Geotachnicel exploration & analysis & reporls
Geometric layout
Construc§on details
Bridge
Channel erosion control design and ptans
Bike path ramp design and repair at bridge only
Drainage
Joint trench plans (review only)
Landscaping and Irdgatl0n plans
Lighting and signals
Stage construction and traffic handling
Pavement delinealion
Response Io comments
QA/QC
Speclticallons
Conslmction cost estimates =
SUBTOTAL
Constructlon Support ServiCes
RE file {nol included In this scope of services}
Construction bidding support [~ot included In this scop~
Poet award aselslance (Dublin to provide conelruction ~
SUBTOTAL
0 0
0 0.0~
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
o
0
0
0
0
0 0.0~
0 0.00
0 0.00
0
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
o 0.~0
0 0.00
0
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 o.oo
0 0.00
0
0
0 0.00
0 0.00
y:~elty~dublintscopa~EngcsL?..xlS Labor Page 9
COST PROPOSAL- LABOR ONLY Dublin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 7/6t00 8:43 PM
Adminlslration I Invoices {8)
Monthly Progress Reporls /Schedule (8)
Subconsullant Coordination
Kick-off meeting (1)
Meetings I Agency Coordinallon (4)
SUBTOTAl
'ermlts and Public Outreach
Public Outreach
Permils (Corps, Fish&Qame, Water Quality, Zone 7)
SUBTOTAl
[Jtlllty, Right-of-Way Engineering & Surveys
U~itity plans & coordination (assumes Precslon
planning provides all pertinen! intormalion for
mapping)
SUBTOTAL
Engineering
Geotechnicel exploration & analysis & repeals
Geomelric layout
Consl~JCtion delails
Bridge
Channel erosion control design and plans
Bike path ramp design and repair al bridge only
Drainage
Joint Irench plans (review only)
Landscaping and irrlgalion plans ·
Lighting and signals
Stage construction arid traffic: handling
Pavemanl delineation
Response lo comments
QA/QC
Specfticetions
Construction cost estimates
SUt~TOTAL
;onstructlon Support Services
RE file (nol included in this scope of services)
Conslruction bidding support (Rot included In this scop~
Post award assistance (Ddbtin to provide construction:
SUBTOTAL
B 373
0
50
1,683
0
42
1.084
0
18
322
8 373 50 1,683 42 1,084 18 322
0
7 109
0
18
325
18 325
7 109
0 0.~
0 0.~
O 0.~
0 0.~
0 0.~
O
0 0.~
0 0.~
0
O 0.~
143 3,894,80
9 0.~
0 0.~
0 ~
O 0.~
0 0.~
0 0.~
0 0.~
0 0.00
0 0.~
0 0.~
0 0.~
143 3,894.80
0 0.~
O 0.~
0.~
0
0 o 0 0 0 0
C051 PI;.OPOSAL - LABUfil ONLY
Dublin Boul~e~,~d Widening Project
7/8/00 8:43 PM
Project Management & Admlnlst~tlon
AdminisEaaon / In~l~s (8) 7 0 0.~
Men,fy P~mss Repeals/S~edule (8) . 0 0.~
Su~nsuttant CoordinaUon 0 0.~
~ff meeUng (1) 3 t~ , 3 99.51
Mee0ngs/Agency Coordlna~on (4) 6 19g 4 83 10 281.70
SUBTOTAL 0 9 2g9 0 4 83 13
Pe~l~ and Public Outreach
Public Ou~ea~ ~ 0
Perils (Co~s, Fish&Game, Water Quall~, Zone ?) 0 0.~
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 O
U011~, Right.of. Way Eng[neo~ng & Su~eys
UUlJty plans & ~o[dinaUoQ (assumes Precsion
plannlng pm~des all pe~nenl In~o~aOon for
mapHng) . - 0 0.~
SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 O
5nglneedng
Geote~nl~l exploration & analysis & repeals 0 0.~
Geome~c layout 0 0.~
Cons~ion details 0 0.~
B~dge 0 0,~
Channel erosion conbol design and plans 0 0.~
Bike pa~ ramp design and repair at bridge only 0 0.~
~alnage
Joint lre~ plans (re;law only) ' 0 0.~
0 0.~
Lands~plng and IMgatlon plans ' O 0.~
Lighting and signals
938 40 1.327 60 1.428 80 1.654 1~ 5,346.80
Stage ~ns~c~on and baf~c handling 0 0.~
Pavement dalinealio~.
Resp~ae lo ~mmenls 0 0.~
Q~C 0 0.~
Specifi~lions 4 235 8 265 12 286 2 41 2~ 826.~
Cons~ctton cost estimates 4 235 4 133 8 190 2
SUBTOTAL 24 1,408 52 1,725 80 1,904 84 1.736 240 6,~72.72
:onslmcllon $uppo~ So,Ices
RE file (not Included in ~ls scope of $e~s) ' 0 0.~
Cons~c~on bidding suppo~ (not Included tn ~ls scop 0 0.~
Post award ass{slanc9 (Dublin 1o provide ~ns~c~on 0 0.~
, SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0
v:~etlv~dublin~scooe~Enacst2 xl.~ I nher
Page
COST PROPOSAL. LABOR ONLY Dub lin Boulevard Widening Project Revised: 7/6/00 8:43 PM
::;f,..,t~:,~;~'.i,!: r~' ~! =~:-~.~:~;!d~:i:l~,i~;~.~ ~;~:,~ ~ t~i;~i~2=:~,~;4~:~:!¢; HAYGOOD &"ASSOCIATEs
~:[:4.!~:~;::~;?? ~f;22 {:;:~;.~; ;:; ¢~'-:.;: ;;:i ~ :~,~,~:~',:;:..~'.;4::;" "::' ": ~.; ;:;: ;,,'?f:':¥~:.:?~:"::: ,:-'~ ProJ Pfln I ProJ Mgr Landscape Assoc Jr Landscape Arch CADD ~ech Field Tach Clerical HAYGOOD Total
Adminls~on I Involes (8) .
Mon~ty Progress Repods I S~edule (8) O O.~
Su~sullant Coordinaaon O O.~
~ff meeUng (1) 0 O.~
Mee~ngs I Agen~ C~rdlnaaon (4) 0 O.~.
O 0.(
SUBTOTAL O O 0 0 0 O
and ~ubllc Outreach O
Public
Pe~ ts (Co~s, F sh&Game, Waler Quali~, Zone 7) 0 0.~
0 0.~
· · SUBTOTAL O 0 0 O O 0 O
~ght~f-Way Englneeflng &
U~lily plans & ~o~fna~on (assumes Pre,ton
planning pro,des all ps~nenl Info~a~on for
mapping)
- ' O O.~
SUBTOTAL 0 - 0 0 O O 0
Englneedng O
Geote~nl~l explora~on & analysis & repo~
GeomeMc layout 0 0.~
Cons~on details . · ' 0 O.~
Bddge .O
Channel erosion en~l design and plans 0 O.~
Bike pa~ romp design and repair at bddge only . . ' 0 0.~
Drainage O 0.~
J~nl ~en~ plane (re~ew only) O 0.~
Lands~ptng and i~gatlon plans 2T.5 1,238 211 5,486 0 0,~
Ligh~ng and signals 238.5 6,~23,50
Stage ~ns~c~on and kaBc handling . ·
Pavement delinea~on *' 0 O.
Res~se to ~mments 0 0,~
Q~C ' 0 0.~
Spe~fi~gons 0 0.~
Cons~cdon ~sl eslimates 0 0.~
0 0.~
SUBTOTAL~ 27.5 1,238 211 5,486 0 0 0
Construction Suppo~ Se~lces 238.5 6,723.50
RE file (ne[ Included In ~is s~pe cT sewices) ·
Cons~on bidding suppo~ (nol Indud~ In ~ls scop~ . 0 0.~
Post award asslstan~ (Dub n to pro,de ~ns~on. .
O O.~
SUBTOTAL~ 0 0 0 0 O
.............................................................. , ............................... ' ............. ; .... : ......... 7 ..... ~ ' ' - 239 6,724
MKC Job No. 2262
Printed: 7/6/00 8:4~t PM
S,U M MARY
Dublin Boulevard Widening - Phase 1 and Phase 2 Fee Estimates
t Labor 1 ODCs I Fee I TOTAL.
Phase 1 (with adjustments for revised scope)
MKC $ 44,713.41 I $ 805.00 $ 4,471.34 IS 49,989.75
PAM $ 16,978.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 1,697.80J $ 31,675.80
Chaudhary $ 30,880.07 $ 19,700.00 $ 3,088.01 IS 53,668.08
Kleinfelder $ - $ - $ - $
Fehr&Peers $ 7,178.54 $ 250.00 $ 717.85 $ 8,146.39
Haygood $ - $ - $ - $ -
Subtotal Phase 1 $ 99,750.02 $ 33,755.00 $ 9,975.00 $ 143,48,0.02.
Phase 2
MKC I $ 136,025.28 I $ 4,100.00 $ 13,601.50 15 ' 153,726.78
PAMt $ 13,416.31 $ 15,850.00 $ 1,341..6315 .~ 30,607.94
Chaudhary $ 22,500.00 $ - $ 2,250.00 IS ' 24,750.00
Kleinfelder $ 11,372.82 $ 4,858.00 $ 1,137.28 $ . 17,368.10
Fehr&Peers $' 17,'636.58 $ 995100 $ 1,763.66 $'.. 20,395.24
Haygood $ . 16,449.72 $ 2,577.23 $ 1,644.97 $ 20,671.92
Subtotal Phas'~ 2 $ "217,400.71 $ 28,380.23 $ 21,739.04 $ 2'67.,51~.98-
TOTAL= I$ 317,150.73 I $ 62,135.23 I $ 31,714.04 t $ 411,000.00
j:~262~admin\contracts~udget\Total Fixed Fee.xls Sheet1
Dublin Boule_.yv~ard Widening Project R~,~d: l/8~90 8;43 PM
: .
Y:~atty~dublin~scope~Engcst2,xls Labor
Project Management & Admlntslraflon
Adminis~atio~ I Invoices (8) 66 $ 1,824.00
Monlhly Progress Repods I Sd)edule (8} ' 56 $ 1,824.00
Sub~nsultant Coordination 104 $ 3,5~.00
Kl~ff meeling (1} 19
MeeUngs IAgen~ C~rdination (4) 66 $ t,993.7o
SUBTOTAL 301 $ 9,761
>e~lts and Public Outreach
Public Oulma~ 90 $ 2~968.12
Permits (Corps. Fish&Game, Water Quality, Zone 7) 128 $ 4,~80.00
SUBTOTAL 218 $ 7~148
planning provides all pedinent informa~on for
. mapping} ~08 $ 2,920.00
SUBTOTAL ~08 $ 2~920.00
Englneerlng
Geote~ni~l ~ploration & analysis & reports 151 $ 4~66.80
Geometric layout 52 $ ~,308.00
Construction details 106 $ 2,786.00
B~dge 460 $ 12,500.00
Channel erosion ~n~ml design and plans 7B $ 1,922.00
BiNe palh ramp design and repair at b~dga only 7B $ 1,922.00
Drainage 76 $ 1,9~2.00
Joint ~ench plans (re~ew only) 2D . $ 586.00
Lands~plng and I~gat~on plan~ 258.5 $ 7,309.50
Lighting and signals 216 $
Stage const~lion and traffic handling 82 $ 2,370.00
Pavement delineation 78 $ ~,922.00
Response Io~mments 50 $ ~,482.00
O~QC 48 $ 1~808.00:
Spe~catJons 106
Construction ¢osl estimales B6 $ 2,599.02
SUBTOTAL 1945.5 $ 53,615
Construction Support Se~lces
RE He (hal included In this scope of se~ices} 0 $
Cons~cUon bidding suppoM (not In~uded in this s~pe 0 $
Post award assistance (Dublin Io provide cons~o~ s 0
SUBTOTAL~ o $
Paoa 15
EXHIBIT
Thc method of payment for this contract will be based on actual costs plus fixed fee.
Thc City will reimburse the Consultant for actual costs (including labor costs, employee bencfitl,
travel, overhead and other direct costs) incurred by thc Consultant in performance of the work,
exclusive of any fixed fee, not to exceed the mount of THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY NINE
THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE DOLLARS AND NINTY SIX CENTS
($379,285.96). Actual costs shall be based on the estimated wage rates and other estimated costs set
forth in the Consultant's cost proposal unless otherwise authorized by the CiV Council in writing.
In addition to thc actual costs, the City will pay the Consultant a fixed fee as set forth
and attached hereto in Consultant's (MK Centennial) proposal dated ;[uly 6, 2000 in the amount of
THIRTY ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FOUKTEEN AND FOUR ($31,7-14:04). The
fixed fcc is nonadjustable for the term of the conu:act except in thc event of a change in thc scope of
work and such adjustment is made by contrac'~ amendment. Thc fixed fee shall bc billed monthly at
the ration that thc Direct Labor Costs incurred during thc billing period bears to thc maximum total
estimated Direct Labor Cost for this Agreement, with any un-bill ~,d f~cd fee being paid upon the
satisfactory completion of the scope of services hereunder.
The total amount payable by the City, including the fixed fee, shall not exceed
FOUR HUNDRED ELEVEN THOUSAND AND ZEKO CENTS ($411,000.00).
Consultant shall submit invoices on a monthly basis based of the actual cost for
services performed in accordance with the cost e..stimate included in the Consultant's (MK
Centennial) proposal dated July 6, 2000. The m_onthly invoices shall also inc!udc a portion of thc
fixed fcc determined in accordance with thc provisions of thc second paragraph of this Exhibit B.
Thc total amount, actual cost plus fixed fcc stated above, shall be thc total which
City shall pay for the services to be rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. City shall
not pay.any additional sum for any expense or cost whatsoever incurred by Consultant in rendering
services pursuant 'to this Agreement
City shall make.no payment for any extra, further or additional service pursuant t9
this Agreement unless such extra service and' the price therefor is agreed to in writing executcd'$y
the City Manager or other designated official of City authorized to obtigatc City thereto prior to the
time such extra service is rendered and in no event shall such change order exceed twenty-five
percent (25%) of the initial contract price.
Thc services to be provided under this Agreement may be terminated without cause
at any point in time in the sole and exclusive discretion of City. tf the Agreement is terminated by
City, Consultant shall be entitled to r~ceive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory
work completed on such documents and other materials to thc effective date of such termination. In
that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials shall, at thc option of thc City~
become City's sole and exclusive property. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims
for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate
togs and timcsheets in order to verify costs incurred to date.
Exhibit B
Page 1 of 1
07/10/00
EXI-IIBIT C
City shall furnish phySical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference
space, as may be reasonably necessary for Contractor's use while consulting with City employees
and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quantity, and
time of furnishing said physical facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall
City be obligated to furnish any facility which may involve incurring any direct expense,
including, but not limiting the generality of this exclusion, long-distance telephone or other
communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities.
Exhibit C
Page 1 of 1
07/10/00
EXHIBIT D
GENERAL PROVISIONS
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. At all times during the term oftkis Agreement, Consultant
shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right
to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's engineering services rendered
pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which
Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
LICENSES; PERMITS; ETC. Consultant represents and warrants to City that he has all
licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature, which are legally required
for Consultant to practice, his profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that
Consultant shall, at his sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this
Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to
practice his profession.
o
TIME. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this
Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance, of Consultant's
obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise
from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors. The cost of such insurance shall be included in the
Consultant's bid.
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1)
Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering
comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL
0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance
Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG
0001).
(2) -
Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) coVering Automobile
Liability, code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025.
(3)
Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of
California and Employers Liability Insurance.
B. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1)
General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and property damage. If commercial General Liability
Exhibit D
Page 1 of 5
07/10/00
Do
Exhibit D
Page 2 of 5
07/10/00
Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2)
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily
injUry and property damage.
Workers Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers Compensation limits
as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability
limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
Deductibles and Self-Insured-Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must
be declared to and approved by' the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall
reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its
_ officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing
payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
Other Insurance Provisions. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the
following provisions:
(1) General L~ability and Automobile Liability Coverages.
(a)
The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered
as insureds-as respects: liability.arising out of activities performed by or
on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the
Consultant, premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of the protection
afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(b)
The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects
the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance
or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officerS, officials, employees
or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not
-contribute with it.
(c)
An~ failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not
affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials;employees or
volunteers.
(d)
The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of
the insurer's liability.
.(
o
(2) Worker's Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage.
The insurer shall agree to waive all' fights of subrogation against the City, its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by the Consultant for the City.
(3) Professional Liability.
Consultant shall carry professional liability insurmnce in an amount deemed by the
City. to adequately protect the City against liability caused by negligent acts,
errors or omissions on the part of the Consultant in the course of performance of
the services specified in this Agreement.
(4) All Coverages.
Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that
coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either'party, reduced in
coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice, by certified
mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of
no less than A:VIII.
Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates ofinsm:ance and
with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates
and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by
thaf insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be
received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the fight
to require complete, certified copies of all required insuranCe' policies, at any"fime.
The Risk Manager of City may approve a variation of those inSurance requirements upon
a determination that the coverages, scope, limits 'and forms of such insurance are either
not commercially available or that the City's interests are otherwise fully protected.
CONSULTANT NO AGENT. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no
authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent.
Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City
to any obligation whatsoever.
ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITED. No party to this A~eement may assign any right or obligation
pursuant to this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of an), right Or obligation
pursuant to this Agreement shall be void and of no effect.
Exhibit
Page 3 of
07/10/00
o
10.
PERSONrNEL. Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to
this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this
Agreement, desires the removal of any such persons, Consultant shall, immediately upon
receiving notice from City of such desire of City, cause the removal of such person or persons.
STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to
this Agreement in the manner and according to the st.andards observed by a competent
'practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged in the geographical area in which
Consultant practices his profession. All instrUments of service of whatsoever nature which
Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Agreement shall be prepared in a substantial, f~rst
class and wot ..kmanlike manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a
person practicing in Consultant's profession.
HOLD HARMLESS AND RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULTANTS. Consultant shall take ail
responsibility for the work, shall bear all losses and damages directly or indirectly resulting to
him, to any subconsultant, to the City, to City officers and employees, or to parties designated by
the City, on account of the negligent performance, unforeseen difficulties, accidents, occurrences
or other causes predicated on active or passive negligence of the Consultant or of his
subconsultant. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials, directors, employees and agents from and against any or all loss, liability, expense,
claim, costs (including costs of defense), suits, and damages of evew kind, nature and description
directly or indirectly arising from the negligent performance of the work. This paragraph shall
not be construed to exempt the City, its employees and officers from its own fraud, willful injury
or violation of taw whether willful or negligent. For purposes of Section 2782 of the Civil 'Code
the parties hereto recognize and agree that this Agreement is not a construction contract. By
execution of this Agreement Consultant acknowledges and agrees that he has read and
understands the provisions hereof and that this paragraph:is a material element of consideration.
Approval of the insurance contracts does not relieve th~" Consultant or sub-consultants from
liability under this paragraph.
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by
fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant shall comply with all applicable
rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program.
This may included but not limited to:
a) Representatives of the City, State of California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) or the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) shall have access to review
alt:' relative documents to the project, including but not limited to accounting records,
design reports, design calculations, construction documents and other documents as
outlined in paragraph 11 DOCUMENTS.
Exhibit D
Page 4 of 5
07/10/00
11.
b) The Consultant. agrees that the Contract Cos~ Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR,
Federal Acquisition Regulations STstem, Chapter 1, Part 31 et seq., shall be used to
determine the allowability ofindividual items of cost to be paid by City to Consultant.
c) The Consultant also agrees to comply with Federal procedures in accordance with 49
CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative
Agreements to State and Local Governments.
d) Any costs for which payment has been made to consultant that are determined bY
subsequent audit to be unallowable under 48 CFK, Federal Acquisition Kegulations
System, Chapter 1, Pan 31 et seq., or 49 CFR, Part 1.8, uniform Administrative
Requirements for Ch'ants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments
shall be repaidby Consultant to City..
e) For the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code Section 10115,
ct.seq[ and Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21 Section 2500 et seq.,
When applicable, and o~cr matters connected with the performance of the contract
pursuant to Governmental Code Section 8546.7, the Consultant, sub-consultants and the
City shal] maintain all books, document% papers, accoUnting record, and other evidence
pe~aining to the performance of the conir_a.ct, including but' not limited to: thc costs of
administering the contract... Ail par/des shall make such materials available at their'
respective offices ai all reasonable times during the contract period and for three yc~s
from the date of final payment under the contract. Thc City, State, the State Auditor,
FHWA, or any duJy authorized representative of thc Federal government having
jurisdiction under Federal laws or regulation (including the basis of Federal funding in
whole or in pan) shall have access to any books, records, and documents of the
Consultant that arc pertinent to the contract for audits, examinations, excerpts, and
i~ansactions, and copies thereof shall bc furnished if requested.
f) Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract shall contain all of thc
provisions of this article, paragraph 10 GOVEKNMENTAL KEGULATIONS.
DOCUMENTS. All reports, data, maps, models, chans, designs, plans; studies, surveys,
photographs, memoranda or other written documents or materials prepared by Consultant
pUrsuant to' this A~ccment shall become the property of City upon completion of thc work to be
performed hereunder or upon termination of the Agreement. No such materials o[ properties
produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall .be subject to private use, copyrights, or
patent rights by Consultant in thc United States or in any other country without the express
written consent of City, City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (as may be
limited by the provisions of the California Public Kecords Act), distribute, and otherwise use,
copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other
materials or properties produced under this Agreement.
Exhibit D
Page 5 of 5
07/10/00
CITY OF DUBLIN
BUDGET CHANGE FORM
New Appropriations (City Council Approval Required):
X From Unappropriated Reserves
From New Revenues
CHANGE FORM #
Budget Transfers:
From Budgeted Contingent Reserve (1080-799.000)
Within Same Department Activity
Between Departments (City Council Approval Required)
Other
Name: Name: I
Dublin Boulevard Widening Project fi.om Dublin Boulevard Widening Project from
Village Parkway to Sierra Court (Engr- $40,689 Village Parkway to Sierra Court (Engr- $139,164
Design) Design)
Account#: 206-96920-740-078 Adcount#: 300-96920-740-078
Name: Name:
Account #:
City Manager: Date:
Signature
REASON FOR BUDGET CHANGE ENTRY: The budget change is required to amend WashingtOn
Infrastructure Services agreement to expand the scope of work and provide additional compensation. Existing
gas tax funds budgeted for design work will be replaced with Developers Fees specifically designated for this
Project.
Finance Mgr: (-._~.~-r~--~ ~ Date: \\ \ \~6~,
Signature
Mayor: Date:
Signature
Posted By: Date:
Signature
G : engrlhqe~budgch~;,g, doc