HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-06-2007 SCAC MinutesPage 1 of 6
CITY OF DUBLIN
SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 6, 2007
Call to Order
Chairperson Al Edge called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
Roll Call:
Committee Members (CM) Present: Al Edge, Beth Wood, Martin Baron, and Diane Bonetti
Absent: Delilah Vanderpool, and Parks and Community Services Commission Liaison: Rich Guarienti
Staff Present: Paul McCreary, Parks and Community Services Manager, Anna Hudson, Recreation
Coordinator, Diane Guenther, Office Assistant
Oral Communications - None
Approval of the Minutes
Prior to the approval of the June 7, 2007 minutes CM Baron asked if Staff had answered the question
posed by CM Wood of “why numbers could not be generated through the computer registration
program” McCreary stated that training would be provided to show Staff how to access this information.
THE COMMITTEE APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 7, 2007 MEETING. MOTION BY
CM WOOD, SECONDED BY CM BONETTI.
The July 5, 2007 minutes were amended on page 2 of 3, eighth paragraph from, “CM Wood suggested
forming a subcommittee to develop a marketing plan outline” to read, “CM Baron suggested.” THE
COMMITTEE APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 5, 2007 MEETING AS AMENDED.
MOTION BY CM BARON, SECONDED BY CM BONETTI.
The August 2, 2007 minutes were amended on page 2 of 4, eighth paragraph, CM Baron asked that after
“continuity” add “and connectivity”. On page 3 of 4, first paragraph, last sentence, CM Baron
corrected that in regards to the Pareto Principle, the 80/20 rule implies that we focus 80 percent of our
effort on 20 percent of the “services we offer.” instead of “what is really important.” Also third
paragraph, CM Wood asked to drop “of all ages” in the last sentence. Also CM Wood asked that we drop
“of all ages” in the first sentence of the fifth paragraph and replace it with “50 years and above”. In
paragraph seven, take out the second bullet and add, “Bring annual implementation plan for review.”
THE COMMITTEE APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 2, 2007 MEETING AS
AMENDED. MOTION BY CM WOOD, SECONDED BY CM EDGE.
CM Wood expressed concern that the minutes are distributed to the public unapproved and without
corrections. McCreary stated that the corrections are reflected in the following month’s minutes.
Written Communication- None
Unfinished Business-None
New Business
One-Year Agenda Plan
McCreary provided an overview of the one-year agenda plan. Points of note from the August Team
Building Workshop were:
CITY OF DUBLIN SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 6, 2007
PAGE 2 OF 6
• Revisit the Senior Center Strategic Plan in preparation for the annual City Council Goals and
Objectives process.
• Assist with the development and implementation of a Marketing Plan for the Senior Center
that will help determine the best methods for product pricing, promotion, placement and
positioning.
• Assist with the planning and implementation of the new Ambassador Program.
Based upon the above list Staff developed a list of proposed items (attached) to discuss at upcoming
meetings. It was noted the proposed agenda items might change over time, but served as a starting point.
Staff was seeking input from the Committee to make sure their comments were captured.
CM Baron felt the One-Year Proposed Plan was a good start and a good way to keep the Committee
informed. Baron would like to provide input at the strategic level.
CM Edge stated this was a well-thought out document.
CM Wood commented this was a great step forward and helps the Committee understand the cycle. CM
Wood thought November was optimistic for the final review of the Senior Center Marketing Plan and that
the current advertising plan should be addressed in October. CM Wood requested a short presentation in
March/April on the budget prior to being presented to the Commission and City Council. McCreary
stated that budgets proposed by Staff do not go before the public until the City Manager’s approval of the
budget.
There were no additional comments.
Review of Senior Center Mission, Vision and Values
Staff is seeking input from the Committee Members to review the Senior Center Mission, Vision and
Values assembled by the Committee in 2005. Additionally, Staff requested input on what the current
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (S.W.O.T.) existed for the Senior Center.
Core Values
The core values are the qualities and beliefs that form the foundation of the Dublin Senior Center and are
most valued by customers. Core values are the driving force behind the way the City does business, and
guides the day-to-day operations of the Senior Center to ensure the City is successful at achieving its
mission.
CM Baron felt that since core values imply focus, there were too many core values listed. He questioned
if Diversity was core value. He suggested lumping some of the values together and making subsets, such
as education & lifelong learning with availability of information and resources for seniors. The values
could possibly be seen as a profit or benefit to users. CM Baron further asked, “Are the core values a
profit for our users? Is there a relationship between the use of services and the core values? How do you
evaluate if this is a core value?” He suggested prioritizing values into four groups, or driving forces.
CM Edge and CM Bonetti felt the list should stand as it is.
CITY OF DUBLIN SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 6, 2007
PAGE 3 OF 6
CM Wood agreed with CM Baron that there were too many core values and that some items could be
removed. Although the core values are all are important values, CM Wood suggested exploring the
different areas of interest through programming but it was not necessary to reflect them in values. She
suggested grouping the words; for example, use “Wellness” instead of healthy lifestyles, and fitness; and
“personal connection” instead of warm and friendly hangout.
The Committee having no further comments and agreed the Values could stay the same but asked Staff to
see if they could be condensed.
Vision
The Vision Statement describes the preferred future of the Dublin Senior Center. Staff suggested to use
language that conveys a sense of how success would look and feel.
CM Edge queried if the Senior Center activities are for adults 50, or 55 years of age. McCreary indicated
no one is turned away but that statistically the age group in the last two years, the average has been 65
years and older.
CM Baron commented that the current Vision appears to place an emphasis on the facility and questioned
whether “a warm welcoming facility” should be listed in the vision. Is the community going to profit
from the facility? CM Baron wondered if the statement is too narrow referring to recreation facility, or is
it an exploration facility.
CM Wood discussed utilizing a distributed view of needs and services that could be possibly met in
different ways by the City of Dublin and not solely by the Dublin Senior Center.
CM Edge voiced that concentration should be placed on the Senior Center not on what the City has to
offer.
CM Wood felt that the Senior Center should be the hub, but there was also a need for a distributed
program.
CM Wood felt that the Committee could not architect a Vision today but asked Staff to bring back a
couple of suggested Vision Statements. She suggested that the Vision not focus just on facility but
investigate program opportunity that could be offered beyond the walls. Staff should take a broader view
in planning. Staff should not just ask for input from people who are coming to the Center but also people
outside of the Center.
CM Wood asked Staff to develop a couple of prototype statements.
CM Bonetti commented that people do not like to be called senior or elderly because it makes them seem
or look not as useful.
Time was set aside for public comment. George Zika commented that seniors openly realize the benefits
from being a senior, such as receiving senior discounts and collecting Social Security yet do not like to be
considered a senior. He felt that part of successful marketing may be getting seniors to admit they are
seniors and visit the Senior Center. Mr. Zika requested that the Committee send a representative to the
Foundation meetings each month.
CITY OF DUBLIN SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 6, 2007
PAGE 4 OF 6
CM Baron suggested that the core values not be repeated within the mission statement.
There was no further discussion at this time.
S.W.O.T.
Staff requested for input from the Committee Members on the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and
Threats (S.W.O.T.) to the Senior Center. The key trends and other Committee Member input will be
evaluated to identify the market opportunities with the greatest potential for meeting Senior Center’s
vision and mission.
CM Wood stated that bus trips were not strengths but they are a way to make money. She felt that City
funding was not a strength, nor was a large number of programs or breadth of programming. She saw
targeting programming as a strength.
CM Edge commented that Staff is well aware of programming.
CM Wood feels that we need to do a better job to reach more customers, and there is strength in program
variety. Under weaknesses, she asked Staff to clarify funding, and wanted to understand what is possible
based on the budget. CM Wood felt that the Committee needs to understand and digest the budget in
terms of programming and was unclear of available budget. She felt that if they understood what is
possible then the Committee could provide additional comments. Under threats, CM Wood saw the
increased demand for social services as a threat. She shared that she read in a recent study that a third
(1/3) of the baby boomers are providing adult caregiving. As caregivers, boomers may not have the time
to participate in our services.
CM Baron stated a strength is the progressive nature of the City, the eagerness of the City Staff, the
availability of the Committee. Weakness is unfocused marketing efforts. Threats are the coming of age
of the boomers in Dublin and the need for alignment of the Committee. Strategically, we don’t have a
clear plan of marketing and unclear of our customers.
CM Wood noted that under Opportunities that we have the opportunity to plan a wonderful future for
Dublin.
Staff will take comments to develop Mission, Vision and Values taking into account all of the discussion
today.
Marketing Plan Report presented by the Marketing Sub-Committee
During the July Senior Center Advisory Committee meeting, the Committee discussed the value of
marketing and community advertising and formed a Marketing Sub-Committee. At the September
meeting, the Marketing Sub-Committee provided a Marketing Outline and made a presentation on
possible marketing strategies and the next steps towards developing the Marketing Plan.
A short marketing video from a private retirement community was shown to the Committee Members.
CM Edge questioned if the Center wanted to get into this type of aggressive marketing. CM Wood
responded that the marketing plan would address this question and who we will try and attract.
CITY OF DUBLIN SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 6, 2007
PAGE 5 OF 6
CM Baron reviewed the continuity of process and that the feedback mechanism is what is important. The
Sub-Committee was seeking comments on the market plan outline and looking for other ways to grow.
Hudson asked if the Committee would be able to recommend simple inexpensive steps to marketing to
address the immediate needs of the Senior Center. CM Baron stated a truly successful plan takes effort
and resources and how we do that is a measure of how many resources we put into it.
CM Edge asked how much time Staff would realistically be able to dedicate to the Sub-Committee’s
marketing plan. McCreary responded that plans are underway to utilize a consultant Department-wide to
conduct the City needs assessment. Staff will not have a lot of time to utilize the subcommittee marketing
plan. CM Edge stated that events such as the LIFE event are our biggest marketing efforts. Staff could
also publicize the Senior Center activities at the department-wide events.
CM Bonetti expressed that if we use a club-like setting, we will lose people since we have a diverse group
of needs to address, such as cultural, religious, socio economic levels, etc.
CM Baron asked “do the answers to some/any of the questions add value and advance the role of the
Advisory Committee”? He is seeking consensus to answer some of the questions posed in their
Marketing Plan to set goals for the future.
CM Bonetti wondered if the City was responsible for offering activities that everyone can be a part of or
what only a few can pay for. She did not want to see the Center require a membership fee. McCreary
stated there is no membership fee; the Center is a public facility and we need to learn more about our
customers and those people who are not coming to us to determine if fees are one barrier to participation.
CM Edge was in favor of marketing using a softer approach. He felt that if the Center can offer certain
things with a lot of advertising, people will come to the Center.
CM Baron asked, how do we promote programs? He talked about ”positioning” and asked each
Committee Member what business or brand do they think of first, second, third, etc when you mention a
particular product, or service. It is this type of product positioning or image that we want to invoke when
people think of Dublin Senior Center. CM Baron recommended developing a positioning statement by
the October meeting. CM Wood expressed that although this work needs to be done first, the October
time frame is too soon for so much work. CM Baron suggested creating a marketing initiative and that
the positioning statement begs promotional material, a branded image and a viable term.
CM Wood suggested creating a marketing plan that accomplishes two results; things that can be done
immediately as well as work on a five year plan.
McCreary recommended waiting for the data obtained from the Department survey that will be out in
December/January. He suggested that Staff would be able to create a more concise implementation plan
after this time frame.
CM Edge stated the Committee should have a short term focus on advertising current events.
There was discussion about additional Committee Members working on different parts of the marketing
plan.
CITY OF DUBLIN SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 6, 2007
PAGE 6 OF 6
CM Wood made the motion to endorse the marketing plan outline and the proposed next steps as
recommended by the Sub-Committee and add a fourth step as proposed by the Advisory Committee
discussion The motion was seconded by CM Edge and the Committee approved.
The proposed next steps are as follows:
1. Determine how the Marketing Plan will be developed for the future.
2. Provide input on this year’s marketing material updates, such as
a. Improve Newsletter format
b. Target mailings
c. New special events at the Senior Center
3. Prepare survey for current and potential customers to answer key questions, such as
a. What is the description of our current customers?
b. What barriers prevent potential customers from participating in senior activities?
4. Develop a positioning statement.
New Business
CM Baron noted that the San Ramon Senior Center will be closing for a month and suggested inviting the
patrons to our Center. CM Wood felt this was the friendly thing to do and provided an opportunity to
engage. CM Baron also recommended the Committee propose an initiative for a transportation program
similar to the Caltrans Rides program.
CM Bonetti volunteered to attend Foundation meetings. She attended the September Parks and
Community Services Commission meeting. CM Wood said she would attend the October Parks and
Recreation Commission meeting.
Adjournment
There being no further business the Committee adjourned at 12:05 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________________
Diane Guenther
Office Assistant
APPROVED:
___________________________________
Al Edge
Chairperson