HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-24-1987REGULAR MEETING - August 24,. 1987
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin was held on
Monday, August 24, 1987 in the meeting room of the Dublin Library. The
meeting was called to order at 7:32 p.m. by Mayor Linda Jeffery.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Hegarty, Moffatt, Snyder, Vonheeder and Mayor
JefferY.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor led the CounCil, Staff and those present in the pledge of alle-
giance to the flag.
Crosswalk Request
Pam Pendakoff, a resident on Quartz Circle requested that the Council
consider putting in a crosswalk across Stagecoach Road in order for people on
the east side tO get to the park.
City Engineer Lee Thompson indicated that there are no plans at this time due
to safety factors. Often, crosswalks give pedestrians a false sense of
security when crossing the street.
Ms. Pendakoff clarified that she would also like to see stop signs, as there
is no way for them to get across the street at this time.
Mr. Thompson stated he did not feel that this street could meet the necessary
warrants for a stop sign.
Mayor Jeffery questioned if this is one of the speed areas that will be
watched closely. Staff responded yes, this is one of the streets where
~urveillance will be increased.
Beck Development C.9~cerns
Mr. Don Gunner, a Beck property owner questioned why the City sent notices
out one day before the meeting. He stated that along Stagecoach Road, the
City is really going gung ho and questioned if the City was going to help the
people deal with Beck.
City Engineer Thompson responded that the City is currently Working with Beck
to resolve the problems. The City has given them a list of things they must
do.
· .
Mr. Jim Barker questioned what is being done above Agate Way. He understood
that it is going to be hydroseeded again and they have already gone through
@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@
CM-6-266
Regular Meeting August 24, 1987
this. Since we will soon be approaching the rainy season, he questioned if
this had been considered.
City Engineer Thomspon responded that the best time to hydroseed is right
before the rains begin. Beck will be required to maintain this until the
City takes over. The City will be monitoring it Closely.
Mayor Jeffery indicated that the City is doing everything it can to help the
residents in this situation.
CONSENT CALENDAR
On motion of Cm. Vonheeder, seconded by Cm. Moffatt, and by unanimous vote,
(Cm. Hegarty abstained on the vote related to the Minutes only, as he was not
present, at the August 10th meeting) the Council took the following actions:
Approved Minutes of Regular Meeting of August 10, 1987;
Authorized the City Manager's attendance at the ICMA Annual Conference from
October 25-29, 1987, in Montreal, Canada;
With regard to seized motor vehicles, declared 3 vehicles as surplus City
property; authorized Staff to advertise for sealed bids; authorized Staff to
use the public auction method as an alternative means if this method is more
financially advantageous to the City; approved a budget transfer in the
amount of $1,000 to prepare and clean the vehicles for sale;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 65 - 87
AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN
(Public Works Director/City Engineer & Public Works Inspector)
Denied claim submitted by George Filstead on August 11, 1987, and directed
Staff to notify claimant and the City's insurance providers;
Received a report on the Stagecoach Road Landscaping and requested that Staff
follow up on the items-listed;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 66 - 87
APPROVING AGREEMENT REGARDING
EVALUATION OF NONPOINT SOURCE OF WATER POLLUTION
Approved Warrant Register in the amount of $2,051,830.51;
Approved a request from Dublin United Soccer League to utilize the Civic
Center property for parking during the weekend of September 5-7, 1987 and
provide Public Works assistance at no cost to the soccer league.
@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@
CM-6-267
Regular Meeting August 24, 1987
Cm. Snyder requested that the item related to the Dolan Park Improvements bid
be removed from the consent calendar as he has a conflict of interest. On
motion of Cm. Vonheeder, seconded by Cm' Moffatt, and by majority vote, (Cm.
Snyder abstained), the Council awarded bid for Dolan Park Improvements,
Contract No. 87-7 to Valley Crest Landscape ($403,070);
PARK DEDICATION FUNDS
On August 4, 1987, the DSRSD Board of Directors, in response to a written
request from the City of San Ramon, approved the transfer of all park
dedication funds on deposit with the District from the Contra Costa County
portion of the District to the City of San Ramon. The District has indicated
a willingness to consider a similar request from the City of Dublin.
Staff recommended that if this request is made, it be made with the
understanding that the District would only have input on the expenditure of
the funds up to the time that the District transfers the park facilities to
the City.
City Manager Ambrose reported that the Shannon Community Center project is
scheduled to be partially funded and we anticipate utilizing these funds.
DSRSD has indicated that approximately $260,000 is in this fund.
On motion of Cm. Snyder, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder' and by unanimous vote,
the Council authorized Staff to request park dedication funds on deposit with
the District from the Alameda County portion of DSRSD.
PUBLIC HEARING
LOADING ZONE & NO PARKING ZONE, SCARLETT COURT @ CURT!SS DODGE
Mayor Jeffery opened the public hearing.
Major Jeffery reported that the City had received a letter from the owners of
Valley Boat House requesting that this item be postponed until they returned
from a business trip and had a chance to review the proposal.
Staff advised that Curtiss Dodge, 6451 Scarlett Court, has requested that the
City establish a loading zone along the curb in front of their property in
order to provide a place for transport trucks to unload automobiles being
delivered to the dealership. Parking is currently prohibited on both sides
of Scarlett Court from Dougherty Road to a point approximately 60 feet south
of the driveway of the Valley Boat House. On-street parking is allowed for
the approximately 80 feet remaining between this no parking zone and the
driveway of Curtiss Dodge.
Curtiss Dodge has also requested that approximately 30 feet of curb
southeasterly of their driveway be designated a no parking zone because of
sight distance problems for vehicles exiting the driveway.
@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@
CM-6-268
Regular Meeting August 24, 1987
The Traffic Safety Committee reviewed this request and determined that the
loading zone and no parking zone are warranted.
Cm. Hegarty made a motion which was seconded by Cm. Moffatt, to continue this
public hearing to the Council meeting of September 14, 1987. City Attorney
Nave clarified that no vote was required on this motion.
PUBLIC HEARING
UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICTS
Mayor Jeffery opened the public hearing.
Staff advised that this proposed ordinance, which is part of the ongoing
municipal code revision, provides a procedure and means for establishing
underground utility districts within the City. The ordinance delineates the
noticing procedures and requirements for district formation and the respon-
sibilities of the utility companies and property owners. It also provides a
means for the City to underground private service if-the property owner fails
to do so, with the costs to become a lien on the property.
The utility companies have been given an opportunity to review the draft
ordinance. PG&E made 3 minor additions; no comments were received from
Pacific Bell, Viacom or DSRSD.
No members of the public spoke on this item.
Mayor Jeffery closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous vote,
the Council waived the reading and INTRODUCED an ordinance relating to
underground utility districts.
PUBLIC HEARING
3-TON WEIGHT LIMIT ON CITY RESIDENTIAL STREETS
Mayor Jeffery opened the public hearing.
Staff advised that this ordinance would impose a 3-ton weight limit for
commercial vehicles on all City streets in residential districts, as defined
by the California Vehicle Code. The intent of the ordinance is to prevent
excess wear-and-tear on City streets, thus lessening repair costs in the
future and to create a safer environment in residential neighborhoods by
allowing use only to those commercial vehicles over 3 tons which have a
purpose~for using the street.
This ordinance would allow vehicles using the street as the most feasible
route for purposes of pickup or delivery within the residential neighborhood,
as well as passenger buses or school buses, garbage collection vehicles and
utility company vehicles engaged in repair or installation of public
utilities. A recreational vehicle or passenger vehicle used for hire
(vanpool vehicle) is not considered a commercial vehicle by CVC definition.
@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@
CM-6-269
Regular Meeting August 24, 1987
No public comments were made related to this issue.
Mayor Jeffery closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Vonheeder, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by unanimous vote,
the Council waived the reading and adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 40 - 87
PROHIBITING CERTAIN COMMERCIAL ~HICLES
FROM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
( 3-Ton Weight Limit )
PUBLIC HEARING
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT
Mayor Jeffery opened the public hearing.
Staff advised that in May, 1987, the Department of Water Resources advised
the City that changes had been made in some of the rules governing the
National Flood Insurance Program. The City adopted the County of Alameda's
floodplain management ordinance by reference when the City was incorporated
in 1982.
The proposed ordinance sets forth regulations governing use of property and
construction of improvements within flood hazard areas, as they are
determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the National Flood
Insurance Program. The Building Official is designated as Floodplain
Administrator and is appointed by this ordinance to grant or deny development
permits within areas of special flood hazard.
City Engineer Thompson indicated that the Department of Water Resources had
submitted two minor corrections to the proposed ordinance. On Page 5, the
definition of "Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)", Zone AO is deleted. On
Page 8, Item A, 4 is amended to read "The proposed development does not
adversely affect the carrying capacity of areas where base flood elevations
have been determined but a floodway has not been designated", rather than
"... carrying capacity of the floodway". These corrections to the model
ordinance are not particularly specific to the City of Dublin.
Mayor Jeffery questioned who is responsible for notifying potential buyers.
Mr. Thompson indicated it is the responsibility of the seller, through their
real estate company. A buyer would be required to purchase special insurance
if they are in a flood zone.
No comments were made by members of the public.
Mayor Jeffery closed the public hearing.
@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@
CM-6-270
Regular Meeting August 24, 1987
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous vote,
the Council waived the reading and INTRODUCED an ordinance (with changes .as
discussed), relating to floodplain management.
SOUNDWALLS - AMADOR VALLEY BOULEVARD AND SAN RAMON ROAD
The Council approved combining two soundwall projects for the Fiscal Year
1987-88 update to the Capital Improvement Program. These are 1) the
replacement of the deteriorated wooden fences along Amador Valley Boulevard
between Village Parkway and Stagecoach Road for those properties which back
onto Amador Valley Boulevard, and 2) the addition of soundwalls along the
east side of San Ramon Road as a mitigation for noise impacts from the
improvement of San Ramon Road between Silvergate Drive and Alcosta Boulevard.
This project does not include the wood fences on the west side of San Ramon
Road, nor the short sound barrier at the proposed east Shoulder of the
improved San Ramon Road, both of which will be handled separately.
Staff advised that the action being requested at this time is the
establishment of the type of masonry wall and the exterior face design, not
precise determination of the height or location elements. The next step in
the process for the Amador Valley Boulevard wall will be to solicit easements
from those properties which back onto Amador Valley Boulevard between Village
Parkway and Statecoach Road.f Once the Federal Highway Administration
approves the San Ramon Road improvement environmental document, Staff will
request approval from the City Council regarding the location and size of the
walls, and then for authorization to advertise for bids for the combined
projects.
staff advised that it had met with representatives and obtained cost
estimates from three manufacturers, Printex, Sierra Precast and Best
Block/Tomax. The cost estimates were listed in terms of per foot cost for a
six foot wall, and ranged from $50 to $90 per foot.
City Engineer Lee Thompson displayed slides of the various walls being
considered.
Cm. Moffatt questioned the seismic affects on the walls. Mr. Thompson
indicated that the City would use the State specifications and the walls
would be inspected.
Mr. Thompson requested that the Council keep in mind that there will be
considerable plantings along the east side of the wall along San Ramon ROad.
When questioned, Staff advised that the Village Parkway wall, which is 6'
high, cost approximately $42 per foot.
Fred Sorensen questioned how effective one type of wall compared to another
was at blocking sound.
Mr. Thompson advised that they are all about the same.
@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@
CM-6-271
Regular Meeting August 24, 1987
Scott Stoffer questioned who decides the height of the fences.
Mayor Jeffery indicated that the Council will make the decision. Staff will
present a recommendation, and public hearings will be held in the future.
Keith Elder questioned if the walls were impervious to graffiti.
Mr. Thompson indicated that the same question was asked regarding the Village
Parkway wall. The City's maintenance force responds immediately, and actual
reports have been minimal.
Cm. Hegarty reported that the Council has set a policy that anytime graffiti
appears, it is to be cleaned off immediately.
An unidentified member of the audience questioned if the Council was more
concerned with costs or looks.
Mayor Jeffery responded that both areas were under consideration.
Cm. Snyder pointed out that the costs being discussed were engineering
estimates.
Jim Parker questioned if the City expects the bid costs to be higher.
Mayor Jeffery responded that hopefully, the bids will come in lower.
City Manager Ambrose reported that the City Council also has the right to
throw out all bids. It appears that there area limited number of
manufacturers of the type of wall being considered.
When questioned how many feet of wall were being discussed, City Manager
Ambrose responded that the City set aside approximately $250,000 in the CIP,
basing this amount on approximately $70 per foot.
Cm. Hegarty felt emphasis should be placed on what the wall will look like in
5 to 10 years. Why spend a lot of extra money on a wall that will be hidden
with landscaping.
Cm. Vonheeder indicated that in some of the areas, there will be a shorter
fence closer to the road. Consideration should be given to this fence, as it
will be more visible.
City Manager Ambrose indicated that we could cut baCk on some of the
landscaping, but the wall is a one-time expense.
Cm. Snyder felt that the landscaping along the wall on Hopyard Road adds to
the total affect, which is very pleasing.
On motion of Cm. Snyder, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by unanimous vote, the
Council determined that the most desirable wall was the Tomax wall with the
double band then a break then a single band design.
@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@
CM-6-272
Regular Meeting August 24, 1987
OTHER BUSINESS
Tri-Valley Joint CounciI Meeting
ci~ty Manager Ambrose reported that Danville is hosting the next Tri-Valley
Joint Council meeting on September 24th at 6:30 p.m., at the Blackhawk
Country Club. Those Councilmembers who plan to attend should advise Staff in
order for reservations to be made.
League of CA Cities Conference
City Manager Ambrose reminded the council of the upcoming annual conference
being held in San Francisco on October 4-7. Those planning to attend should
advise Staff where and when they desire to stay.
Solid Waste Management Plan
Cm. Snyder reported that the long process regarding the development of a
solid waste management plan is nearing completion. All cities need to take
formal action to adopt the plan.
Staff advised that this will be an agendized item for discussion in the
future.
P_leasanton Heritag_e' D. ays
Cm. Snyder reported that Dublin has been asked to consider challenging the
Valley's other City Councils during the upcoming Heritage Day Games. The
games will be at 4:00 p.m., on Sunday, September 13th. The cost is $100/tea~
and the money must be in by September 2nd. The Council indicated their
willingness to participate in this fundraising event for Valley Memorial
Hospital.
Shamrock Festival
Mayor Jeffery read a letter from the Dublin Soroptimists related to the
success of the Concours d' elegance, and thanking the City for its
participation.
@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@
CM-6-273
Regular Meeting August 24, 1987
U. S. Constitution Bicentennial
Mayor Jeffery reported that she had received a communication from the
Bicentennial Commission requesting that anyone with bells, ring them in the
"Bells Across America" tribute on September 17, 1987 at 1:00 p.m. The
Council requested that Staff send the letter to all the churches in Dublin.
CLOSED SESSION
At 8:35 p.m. the Council recessed to a closed executive session to discuss
pending litigation, City of Dublin vs. Pet Prevent-A-Care and personnel
matters.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was
adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
C i ~Y~! er k .................
@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@+@
CM-6-274
Regular Meeting August 24, 1987