HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.1 Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision Implementation General Plan and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Amendments'At
STAFF REPORT
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL
DATE: October 17, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
Agenda Item 6.1
SUBJECT: Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision Implementation General Plan and
Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Amendments
Prepared by: Amy Million, Principal Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider amendments to the General Plan and the Downtown Dublin
Specific Plan to further implement the Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision approved by the
City Council in 2019. The amendments consist of adding Research and Development as a new
land use, increasing the residential allocation by 465 units, decreasing the non-residential
allocation by 300,000 square feet, increasing the height and floor area ratio in "The Core" area
of the Retail District, and changes to setbacks. No specific development is proposed at this
time. An Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared that
concludes that all potential environmental effects were adequately addressed in the original
EIR.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct the public hearing, deliberate, and adopt the Resolution Amending the General Plan
and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan to Further Implement the Downtown Dublin Preferred
Vision.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Costs associated with the proposed amendments were included in the Community
Development Departments Operating Budget. These costs include the hiring of a consultant to
prepare the environmental review and the local transportation analysis for the proposed
project at an estimated cost of $50,125, in addition to staff time associated with the
development of the proposed amendments.
Page 1 of 9
1
DESCRIPTION:
Background
The overarching goal of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP), adopted in 2011, is "to
create a vibrant, dynamic commercial and mixed -use center that provides a wide array of
opportunities for shopping, services, dining, working, living, and entertainment in a
pedestrian -friendly and aesthetically pleasing setting that attracts both local and regional
residents."
The DDSP established three distinct districts, each including its own set of design standards
tailored to the envisioned uses. A map of the DDSP area and districts is provided in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Downtown Dublin Districts
The Transit -Oriented District embraces its
proximity to the West Dublin BART station. The
Retail District includes much of the existing retail
core and aims to stimulate infill development and
redevelopment of aging buildings and large surface
parking areas. The Village Parkway District
embraces the existing successful service and retail
uses along a "Main Street" corridor, and this district
has the most potential to reutilize and re -tenant
existing buildings with more intense uses such as
restaurants, service retail, and other local -serving
businesses.
On November 5, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 115-19 approving the
Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision (Preferred Vision). The Preferred Vision builds upon the
DDSP's vision and includes a new and extensive street grid network, including a main street
experience, a new town square, and a mixture of supportive land uses such as retail, office,
hotel and residential. In 2020, the City Council approved amendments to the DDSP focused on
the initial implementation of the Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision.
Proposal
The City has initiated amendments to the DDSP to further implement the Preferred Vision.
The proposed amendments require amendments to the General Plan for consistency. The
proposed DDSP Amendments and related General Plan Amendments consist of the following
revisions in order to further implement the Preferred Vision:
1. Increasing the residential allocation by 465 units and decreasing the non-residential
allocation by 300,000 square feet.
2. Increasing the height and floor area ratio in "The Core" area of the Retail District.
3. Changes to Design Standards and Allowable Uses.
Page 2 of 9
2
The draft Resolution approving the proposed amendments to the General Plan and Downtown
Dublin Specific Plan included as Attachment 1. The proposed amendments to the DDSP are
provided in a redline format in Attachment 2 where underlined text is proposed to be added
and text with a strikcthrough is proposed to be deleted.
Analysis
Increase Residential Development Potential and Decrease Non -Residential Development
Potential
In order to accommodate the additional residential growth envisioned by the Preferred Vision
without creating new impacts, the proposal is to increase the residential development
potential of the area while reducing the non-residential or commercial development
potential. All other development standards and design guidelines currently in the DDSP that
affect development are proposed to remain unchanged unless specifically noted.
The Initial Study concluded that with the proposed increase of 465 residential units and a
corresponding decrease of 300,000 square feet of non-residential square footage would result
in a net decrease of vehicle trips at project buildout. This reduction is because commercial
development generates a greater number of trips than residential development when
compared on an equivalent square footage basis. As such, impacts to the circulation system
and traffic flow in Downtown (and throughout the City) would be less than what was
anticipated in the DDSP EIR.
The certain amount of non-residential development capacity in the DDSP is held within a
"Development Pool." The DDSP allows a "base" amount of development, or floor area ratio
(FAR) on each parcel by right. If a property owner would like to develop beyond the base
FAR, they may obtain additional square footage from the "Development Pool" up to the
maximum allowed FAR. In order to access the Development Pool, a property owner must
enter into a Community Benefit Agreement (CBA) with the City, which requires them to
provide a community benefit to the City. Since approval of the DDSP, 10,329 square feet of
non-residential uses have been constructed in the Retail District, which totals less than one
percent of the allowed non-residential development.
The proposed amendments would result in corresponding adjustments to the total allowable
development in the Downtown and the amount of development within the
Development Pool as shown in Table 1 below.
Page 3 of 9
3
Table 1. Existing and Proposed Development
Residential Development
Non -Residential Development
Total Allowable Development in the Downtown
Existing
Development Pool
2,500
Development Pool
1,320,220
Affordable Units not
subject to
Development Pool
Total Units
416
2,916
SF not subject to
Development Pool
942,320
Total SF
2,262,5401
Proposed
Units to be Added
+ 465
SF to be Eliminated
Total SF
- 300,000
1,962,540
Total Units
3,381
Development Pool
Existing
Development Pool
2,500
Development Pool
1,320,220
Units Constructed
- 783
SF Constructed
- 10,329
Units Reserved and
Not Yet Constructed
- 921
SF Reserved and Not
Yet Constructed
0
Units Remaining
796
SF Remaining
1,309,891
Proposed
Units to be Added
+ 465
SF to be Eliminated
- 300,000
Total Units
2,965
Total SF
1,020,220
Units Remaining
1,261
SF Remaining
1,009,891
Anticipated Downtown Preferred Vision Development (Hines)
Total Units
1,455
I Total SF
658,000
Increase the height and floor area ratio in "The Core" area of the Retail District
The initial focus of the Preferred Vision was development of first four blocks north of Dublin
Boulevard, which includes the Town Square and is referred to as "The Core" as shown in
Figure 2 below. A primary result of this planning effort was to create an environment where
mixed -use buildings are located around the Town Square and in close proximity to each
other, offer convenience, vibrancy and downtown character. The development standards in
the Retail District encourage a walkable and pedestrian -friendly development throughout the
District. The proposed amendments strengthen the existing requirements by continuing to
focus the denser development in The Core.
Page 4 of 9
4
The proposed changes have The Core mimic the
maximum height and floor area ratio (FAR) of the
Transit -Oriented District which is 8 floors and no
more than 75 feet to the finished floor of the
highest story and a maximum FAR of 2.5.
These changes would not increase the maximum
development allowed in the Retail District, as
previously approved.
Changes to Design Standards and Allowable Uses
The Preferred Vision envisioned a mass and
density to reflect the intended character of
Downtown. The overarching goal of the design
Figure 2. The Core
Mt
A�yrXr YW7 N.O
The Core
standards was to create a pedestrian friendly environment and establish a sense of place. The
blocks were designed to allow for parking structures to be hidden behind the buildings, wide
sidewalks, and pockets of open space.
In collaboration with the property owner of the Dublin Place shopping center, additional
clarification and flexibility in the design standards in the Retail District are needed to support
the envisioned character. This includes clarification on building setbacks at the upper floors
versus the ground floor as well as setbacks for stoops, windows and awnings and parking
dimensions.
The Preferred Vision anticipated a mix of uses, including between 324,000 square feet and
948,000 square feet of office uses. Since development of the Preferred Vision, the need for the
amount and type of office as changed; however, in collaboration with the property owner of
the Dublin Place shopping center it has been determined that offices that support life
sciences, research and development and laboratory uses are desirable. Office is a key
component to creating vibrancy in a downtown. The amendment includes adding Research
and Development as a new land use allowed in the Retail and Transit -Oriented District
defined as follows:
Any establishment which primary use is for research and development purposes
including, but not limited to, science and engineering laboratories (research,
development, and testing), quality assurance work (dimensional analysis), and software
development and engineering. Limited manufacturing uses are allowed as part of the
primary use. Such uses may not generate nuisances related to emissions, noise, odors,
and may not include outdoor storage and operations.
The addition of Research and Development will allow for flexibility in the development of life
sciences and other technology -based office uses to further enhance the mixed -use
environment and create for a more financially feasible development of the area.
Page 5 of 9
5
CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE:
The DDSP is located within the General Plan land use designations of Downtown Dublin -
Village Parkway District, Downtown Dublin - Transit -Oriented District and Downtown Dublin
- Retail District and the Downtown Dublin Zoning District. The amendments remain
consistent with the General Plan designations, as amended, which allow a range of
residential, commercial, and mixed uses consistent with the DDSP. The Downtown Dublin
Zoning District was established to implement the DDSP and ensure that all development in
the DDSP area is reviewed for substantial compliance with the DDSP. The amendments
continue to require compliance with the development standards, land use regulations and
design guidelines in the DDSP.
Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines
The City of Dublin Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines require a local
transportation analysis (LTA) for all General Plan Amendments to evaluate potential impacts
on the circulation network. The analysis primarily focuses on local access and circulation in
proximity to the project area. Per the TIA Guidelines, an LTA was initiated to evaluate the
proposed land use changes and is outside the CEQA review process.
As stated in the General Plan, the City may consider improvements in the DDSP area to
increase the efficiency of the roadway network especially to minimize transit delays and
improve vehicular, bicyclist and pedestrian safety through striping, signalization timing, etc.,
as long as the proposed improvements are consistent with adopted Specific Plan and General
Plan policies. The preliminary recommended improvements include lengthening turn
pockets, adjusting signal timing and cycle lengths and improving bicycle improvements.
These improvements will be further refined and identified in a future amendment to the
Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee program.
As stated in General Plan Policy 5.2.5 B., the City periodically reviews the improvements
identified in the Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee to ensure that the improvements
identified are consistent with General Plan policies, the DDSP, the Dublin Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan, and improve the efficiency of the roadway network, especially for transit
service, and enhance vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian safety.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
In 2010, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared to address potential
environmental impacts of the DDSP. The DDSP EIR (SCH# 2010022005) was prepared in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and was certified by the
City Council on February 1, 2011.
The DDSP was adopted by the Dublin City Council in February 2011 with the intent of
Page 6 of 9
6
encouraging development within the Downtown area that would be more conducive to a
walkable, mixed -use, and vibrant community. The boundaries of the DDSP encompassed
boundaries of five other specific plans that were dissolved when the DDSP was adopted. The
DDSP includes three distinct districts (Retail, Transit Oriented, and Village Parkway Districts),
with separate development standards for each.
After adoption, the DDSP has been amended five times, including the 2020 DDSP
Amendments focused on the initial implementation of the Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision
approved by City Council on November 5, 2019, which included three primary components: 1)
Siting of a Town Square; 2) New Street Grid Network; and 3) Downtown Character.
The proposed amendments further implement the Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision by
increasing the residential development potential by 465 units and decreasing the non-
residential square footage by 300,000 square feet, increasing the height and floor area ratio in
"The Core" area of the Retail District and amendments to the design standards and allowable
uses.
The project was examined to determine if any of the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines
Section 15162(a) requiring preparation of supplemental environmental review would be met.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 identifies the conditions requiring subsequent environmental
review. After a review of these conditions, the City has determined that no subsequent EIR or
Negative Declaration is required for this project. This is based on the following:
a) Are there substantial changes to the Project involving new or more severe significant impacts?
There are no substantial changes to the project involving new or more severe significant
impacts than what was analyzed in the DDSP EIR and subsequent Addendums. The
project is consistent with the land uses for the project area analyzed in the DDSP EIR and
subsequent Addendums. The project does not constitute a substantial change to the DDSP
EIR and subsequent Addendums analyses, will not result in additional significant impacts,
and no additional or different mitigation measures are required.
b) Are there substantial changes in the conditions which the Project is undertaken involving new or
more severe significant impacts?
There are no substantial changes in the circumstances or conditions involving new or
more severe significant impact than was analyzed in the DDSP EIR or subsequent
Addendums. The project will not change the allocation nor amount of development as
previously analyzed in the EIR and subsequent Addendums.
c) Is there new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have
been known at the time of the previous EIR that shows the Project will have a significant effect not
addressed in the previous EIR; or previous effects are more severe; or, previously infeasible
Page 7 of 9
7
mitigation measures are now feasible but the applicant declined to adopt them; or mitigation
measures considerably different from those in the previous EIR would substantially reduce
significant effects but the applicant declines to adopt them?
There is no new information showing a new or more severe significant effect beyond
those identified in the prior CEQA documents. All future development projects would be
required to comply with the design standards of the DDSP and applicable regulatory
requirements. No new or different mitigation measures are required for the project. All
previously adopted mitigations continue to apply to the project. The CEQA documents
adequately describe the impacts and mitigations associated with the proposed
development on portions of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area.
d) If no subsequent EIR-level review is required, should a subsequent negative declaration be
prepared?
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or
substantially more severe significant impacts beyond what has been analyzed in the DDSP
EIR and subsequent Addendums, and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review
are met. Therefore, no further environmental review or documentation is required. No
subsequent Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration is required because
there are no significant impacts of the project beyond those identified in the DDSP EIR and
subsequent Addendums.
The Initial Study and CEQA Addendum are included as Attachment 3.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW:
The Planning Commission considered the proposed project at their regular meeting on
September 12, 2023. There was no public comment provided at the meeting. The Planning
Commission unanimously adopted Resolution No. 23-07 (Attachment 4) recommending
approval of the DDSP Amendments.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
Strategy 1: Downtown Dublin and Economic Development.
Objective A: Continue support of the Downtown Preferred Vision and Downtown Dublin
Specific Plan including improving visual and environmental quality and evaluating specific
business uses.
Objective B: Pursue mixed -use projects to create economic vitality. Implement the City's
adopted Preferred Vision for Downtown Dublin.
Page 8 of 9
8
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
In accordance with State law, a public notice was published in the East Bay Times and posted
at several locations throughout the City. A notice of this hearing was also mailed to all
property owners and tenants in the DDSP area, those within 300 feet of the DDSP boundaries,
and all persons who have expressed an interested in being notified of meetings.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Amending the General Plan and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan to Increase the
Residential Development Potential by 465 Units, Decrease the Non -Residential Square
Footage Permitted by 300,000 Square Feet, Increase the Height and Floor Area Ratio in
"The Core" Area of the Retail District and Amend the Design Standards and Allowable
Uses.
2) DDSP Amendments - Redlined Pages
3) CEQA Addendum
4) Planning Commission Resolution No. 23-07 Recommending that the City Council Amend
the General Plan and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan
Page 9 of 9
9
Attachment I
RESOLUTION NO. xx - 23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN AND DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN TO
FURTHER IMPLEMENT THE DOWNTOWN DUBLIN PREFERRED VISION
PLPA-2023-00001
WHEREAS, the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP) project area is located in the
southwestern portion of the City and is approximately 284 acres in size. The project area is
generally bound by Village Parkway to the east, Interstate 580 to the south, San Ramon Road to
the west, and Amador Valley Boulevard to the north; and
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2011, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 09-11
approving the DDSP and associated implementation actions. At the same time, the City Council
adopted Resolution No. 08-11 certifying the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Environmental Impact
Report (DDSP) (EIR) (SCH# 2010022005, incorporated herein by reference). The DDSP EIR
evaluated the potential impacts associated with intensifying development in the 284-acre
Downtown Dublin area to accommodate additional residential and non-residential uses; and
WHEREAS, Subsequent to adoption, the DDSP has been amended five times, including
the 2020 DDSP Amendments focused on the initial implementation of the Downtown Dublin
Preferred Vision approved by City Council on November 5, 2019, which included three primary
components: 1) Siting of a Town Square; 2) New Street Grid Network; and 3) Downtown
Character; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the General Plan and DDSP further implement
the Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision by increasing the residential development potential by 465
units and decreasing the non-residential square footage by 300,000 square feet, increasing the
height and floor area ratio (FAR) in "The Core" area of the Retail District and amendments to the
design standards and allowable uses, hereafter referred to as the "2023 DDSP Amendment" or
the "Project;" and
WHEREAS, consistent with Section 65352.3 of the California Government Code, the City
obtained a contact list of local Native American tribes from the Native American Heritage
Commission and notified the tribes on the contact list of the opportunity to consult with the City on
the proposed General Plan Amendment. None of the contacted tribes requested a consultation
within the 90-day statutory consultation period and no further action is required under Section
65352.3; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code
Section 21166, et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) require that when an
EIR or negative declaration has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR or negative
declaration shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of
substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that one or more of the following exists:
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 1 of 9
10
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions
of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project
is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due
to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity
of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have
been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified
as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous
EIR or negative declaration;
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
shown in the previous EIR;
c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact
be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the
project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or
d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adoption measures
or alternative; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the Project was examined to
determine if any of the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) requiring
preparation of supplemental environmental review would be met. The analysis, as further detailed
the Staff Report, dated October 17, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference, concluded that
none of the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) requiring preparation of
supplemental environmental review are met; the Project would not result in any new significant
impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in DDSP EIR
and subsequent Addendums; no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met and no
further environmental review is required; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on the
Project, including the proposed General Plan and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Amendments,
on September 12, 2023, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, on September 12, 2023, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
23-07 recommending that the City Council approve the 2023 DDSP Amendment, which
Resolution is incorporated herein by reference; and
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 2 of 9
11
WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated October 17, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference,
described and analyzed the 2023 DDSP Amendment for the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on the 2023 DDSP
Amendment on October 17, 2023, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be
heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the DDSP EIR and CEQA Addendum, all above -
referenced reports, recommendations, and testimony to evaluate the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct
and made a part of this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the General Plan
amendments, as set forth below, are in the public interest and that the General Plan as amended
will remain internally consistent.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the Downtown Dublin Specific
Plan amendments, as set forth below, are in the public interest will promote general health, safety
and welfare, and that the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan as amended will remain internally
consistent.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the following
amendments to the General Plan:
Page 1-9, Section 1.8.1.5 Primary Planning Area revise the Downtown Dublin -Retail
District land use classification to increase the FAR to a maximum of 2.5 and the
Downtown Dublin -Transit Oriented District land use classification to a maximum FAR of
2.5 to be consistent with Table 2.1 as follows:
B. DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
Downtown Dublin — Village Parkway District (Maximum FAR: .35; employee density: 200-
450 square feet per employee)
This designation allows a range of residential, commercial, and mixed uses consistent with
the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan.
Downtown Dublin — Retail District (Maximum FAR: 2.0 - 2.5; employee density: 200-450
square feet per employee)
This designation allows a range of residential, commercial, and mixed uses consistent with
the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan.
Maximum FAR is 2.5 in "The Core." In "The Core", the FAR may be spread through all
developable parcels (this does not include the Town Square). Outside "The Core", the
maximum FAR is 2.0.
Downtown Dublin — Transit -Oriented District (Maximum FAR: 2.5; employee density: 200-
450 square feet per employee)
This designation allows a range of residential, commercial, and mixed uses consistent with
the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan.
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 3 of 9
12
Table 2.1 shall be revised as follows: (Only the section of the table related to the DDSP area
is shown here. All other sections of Table 2.1 remain the same):
Table 2.1 Land Use Develo 3ment Potential: Primary Planning Area
Downtown
Dublin
Specific Plan
Area
Acres
Dwelling
Units/acre
Dwelling Persons/Dwelling
Units Unit
Population
Downtown
Dublin
230.2
6.1-25.1+ 2,500
2.7 6,750
Downtown
Dublin
Specific Plan
Area
Acres
Maximum
Floor Area
Ratio (Gross)
Maximum
Potential
Square Feet'
Square
Feet/employee
Jobs
Village
Parkway
District
Retail District
Transit -
Oriented
District
32.9
.35 .50
113.1 2.5
84.2
g 94,5
2.5 9.24
200-450
200-450
200-450
1,115-2,508
6,139-13,814
8,492-19,108
Total: 230.2
19.6
15,746-35,430
4 This designation allows a range of residential, commercial, and mixed uses consistent with the Downtown
Dublin Specific Plan.
5 Maximum FAR is 2.5 in "The Core". In "The Core", the FAR may be spread through all developable
parcels (this does not include the Town Square). Outside "The Core", the maximum FAR is .60.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the following
amendments to the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan:
Page 43, Table 3-1: Land Uses, shall be amended to add "Research and Development" as
an allowed use in the Retail District and Transit -Oriented District and Prohibited in the
Village Parkway Districts as follows:
Table 3-1: Land Uses
BUILDING USES'
RETAIL
DISTRICT
TRANSIT -
ORIENTED
DISTRICT
VILLAGE
PARKWAY
DISTRICT
Research and Development
Allowed'
Allowed'
Prohibited
Manufacturing uses are limited to less than 10% of the building area. A CUP is required for manufacturing uses
greater than 10% up to maximum of 20% of the building area.
Page 45, add new Section 3.4.16 Research and Development to read as follows:
3.4.16 Research and Development
Any establishment which primary use is for research and development purposes including, but
not limited to, science and engineering laboratories (research, development, and testing), quality
assurance work (dimensional analysis), and software development and engineering. Limited
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 4 of 9
13
manufacturing uses are allowed as part of the primary use. Such uses may not generate
nuisances related to emissions, noise, odors, and may not include outdoor storage and
operations.
Page 47, Table 3-3 shall be amended to read as follows:
Table 3-3: Base and Maximum FAR Per District
DISTRICT
The Core
Transit -
Oriented
Village
Parkway
BASE
FAR
0.35
0.50
0.50
0.35
MAXIMUM
FAR
2.0
2.5
2.5
0.35
Page 47, Fifth Paragraph shall be amended to read as follows:
This Specific Plan allows for a future construction of approximately 2.2 million square feet of non-
residential development and 3,381 residential dwelling units (416 of these units are exempt from
the Community Benefit Program as further described in Section 6.4 Development Pool and
Community Benefit Program).
Page 48, Table 3-4 shall be amended to read as follows:
Table 3-4: Net New Development
DISTRICT
Retail
Transit -
Oriented
Village
Parkway
NON-
RESIDENTIAL
(SF)
1,866,810
(+150 hotel rooms)
20,730
1,962,540
(includes 150 hotel
rooms)
RESIDENTIAL
(DU)
3,381
MINIMUM
RESIDENTIAL
DENSITY
22 units/net acre
30 units/net acres
No minimum
Notes. Includes projects that have been approved, but not yet constructed
Page 53 Section 4.1 Retail District Development Standards, 4 Street Setback from Dublin
Boulevard and San Ramon Road shall be amended to read as follows:
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 5 of 9
14
LOT SIZE AND BUILDING PLACEMENT
Street Setback
from Dublin
4 Boulevard and
San Ramon
Road
10 ft. min at ground level.
The street setback may be improved as an extension of the public
sidewalk if accessible to the public through an established easement.
Along Dublin Boulevard, upper floors above 20 ft. may reduce setback
to 5 ft.
Page 57 Section 4.1 Retail District Development Standards, 1 Floor Area Ratio (FAR), 2
Res and 3 Building Height shall be amended to read as follows:
BUILDING DESIGN
1 Floor Area
Ratio (FAR)
0.35 base outside "The Core" and 0.50 in "The Core."
2.0 max outside "The Core" and 2.5 max in "The Core." In The Core,
the FAR may be spread through all developable parcels (this does not
include the Town Square) (required participation in the development
density pool, an agreement with the City, and provision of a community
benefit in compliance with the Community Benefit Prograrn).1
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 6 of 9
15
2 Residential
Units
3 Building Height
Not permitted west of San Ramon Road.
Allowed at a minimum density of 22 units per net acre.
Permitted within a mixed -use development if designed based on the
following standards:
• The development includes ground floor retail or office space that
equals an FAR of 0.3 min
• Retail or office space is built along at least 80% of the property's
total street frontage and set back no more than 10 ft. from the
building setback requirement
• Common open space for the residential units are provided at a
rate of 15% of the site's total area
• The above standards may be modified through an SDR as part
of a mixed -use development in the Town Core area.
Projects that include residential development within 1,000 ft. of either
Interstate 580 or 680 (or less per Bay Area Air Quality Management
District's current guidelines) shall incorporate the following standards to
minimize potentially adverse air quality affects:
• Configure the proposed buildings so that the bulk of the building
is located farther from the highway.
• Place heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system
intakes as far away from highway as feasible.
• Include high efficiency filters in the HVAC system (rated with a
minimum efficiency rating value [MERV] of at least 13). This
would also include a commitment to regular maintenance and
replacement of filters as needed.
• Provide positive pressure with the HVAC system in all occupied
spaces to prevent the incursion of outside air that bypasses the
HVAC filters.
• To reduce the amount of outside unfiltered air indoors, do not
place operable windows in close proximity to the highway. In
addition, signs should be posted to keep exterior doors closed
when not in use.
8 floors and no more than 75 feet to the finished floor of the highest
story. Maximum building height it 90 ft. (tower elements, architectural
and articulated design features, solar panels, and small-scale wind
turbines may extend 10 ft. max beyond this height). The height may be
increased through an SDR in the Town Core area.
Minimum building height in "The Core" is 40 feet, except for structures
within the Town Square.
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 7 of 9
16
Page 58 Section 4.1 Retail District Development Standards, 2 Stoops, 3 Bay Windows and
6 Storefront Awnings shall be amended to read as follows:
PROJECTIONS AND ENCROACHMENTS INTO SETBACKS
3 Bay Windows
6 Storefront
Awnings
Permitted for residential use only.
5 ft. min usable walkway must be maintained on private streets and 10
ft. on public streets.
2 ft. max into all setbacks.
4 ft. max along Dublin Boulevard.
12 ft. min vertical clearance required over sidewalks, walkways, and
private outdoor spaces.
6 ft. max into all setbacks.
8 ft. max along Dublin Boulevard and Golden Gate Drive.
8 ft. min vertical clearance required over sidewalks, walkways, and
private outdoor spaces.
Page 86 Office/Lodging Fronts, first bullet point shall be amended to read as follows:
At least 20% of the facade's surface area should consist of windows (including glass on
doors). Windows shall be provided on all floors of the building. Exceptions to window
area may be approved for parking structures. See Section 4.4.14 for design guidelines
for Parking Structures.
Page 103 Section 4.4.14 Parking Areas, fourth bullet point shall be amended to be
consistent with graphic on page 104 as follows:
The length of parking spaces may be reduced by up to 2.5 feet if the vehicle will
overhang a landscape planter which has been designed to accommodate the vehicle
overhang plus additional space for planting. The planter shall be protected by a curb or
wheel stop and should include low lying plants where the vehicle will overhang the
planter.
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 8 of 9
17
Table 6-1 shall be revised as follows:
Table 6-1: Development Pool
DISTRICT
Retail
Transit -
Oriented
Village
Parkway
NON-
RESIDENTIAL
SQUARE
FOOTAGE
1,020,220
(+150 hotel
rooms)
0
NUMBER OF
RESIDENTIAL
DWELLINGS
2,965
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 2023 by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 9 of 9
18
Attachment 2
3.4 Land Use Designations
Within each of the Specific Plan districts, there are a variety of land uses
that may be permitted. Table 3-1: Land Uses, identifies the uses that are
allowed, prohibited, and permitted with a use permit within each of the
districts. Descriptions of each land use are described below, and the
Community Development Director can allow similar uses. In addition, the
Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision sites a Town Square within the Retail
District.
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN I 3
Table 3-1: Land Uses
BUILDING USES'
Regional Retail
Community Retail
Outdoor Dining
Dining and/or Entertainment
Office
Lodging
Live -Work 6
Multi -Family Residential 5
Mixed -Use Non -Residential
Mixed -Use Residential S
Indoor Recreation
Auto Service/Sales
Drive -Through and Drive -In Businesses
Civic, Cultural, and Institutional
Town Square
Temporary Uses
Notes
RETAIL
DISTRICT
Allowed
Allowed
Allowed 3
Allowed
TRANSIT -
ORIENTED
DISTRICT
Prohibited 2
Allowed
Allowed
Allowed
VILLAGE
PARKWAY
DISTRICT
Prohibited
Allowed
Allowed 3
Allowed
Allowed Allowed Allowed
Allowed Allowed Prohibited
Allowed 6 Allowed CUP/PC 4
Allowed 6 Allowed Allowed
Allowed
Allowed
Allowed
Allowed 6 Allowed Allowed
ZC or MUP/ZA ZC or MUP/ZA ZC or MUP/ZA
CUP/ZA CUP/PC CUP/ZA
CUP/PC CUP/PC CUP/PC
CUP/PC CUP/PC CUP/PC
Allowed Prohibited Prohibited
Allowed' Allowed? Prohibited
TUP
TUP TUP
1 Additional and similar uses may be permitted by the Community Development Director.
2 Prohibited unless adjacent to Dublin Boulevard.
3 Assuming accessibility (ADA) standards can be met.
4 May be permitted with a CUP/PC in a mixed -use development.
5 Subject to additional development standards if located within 1,000 feet of 1-580 or 1-680.
6 Allowed throughout the Retail District except on those properties west of San Ramon Road
67 Manufacturing uses are limited to less than 10% of the building area. A CUP is reauired for
manufacturing uses greater than 10% uo to maximum of 20% of the building area.
CUP — Conditional Use Permit
TUP —Temporary Use Permit
ZC— Zoning Clearance
PC — Planning Commission
ZA —Zoning Administrator
MUP— Minor Use Permit
DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN 43
19
3.4.13 Civic, Cultural, and Institutional
Any establishment that is open to the general public or a group of
members that involves gathering for religious, social, cultural, or
educational purposes. Such uses include museums, churches, gathering
halls, community centers, post office, and public parking.
3.4.14 Temporary Uses
Any non -permanent use as defined by Chapter 8.108 (Temporary Use
Permit), in the Zoning Ordinance.
3.4.15 Town Square
A one -acre park and plaza that serves as Downtown Dublin's central public
gathering place.
3.4.16 Research and Development
Any establishment which primary use is for research and development
purposes including. but not limited to. science and engineering
laboratories (research. development, and testing). quality assurance work
(dimensional analysis), and software development and engineering.
Limited manufacturing uses are allowed as part of the primary use. Such
uses may not generate nuisances related to emissions. noise, odors. and
may not include outdoor storage and operations.
3.5 Future Development Assumptions
Development activities under this Specific Plan are anticipated to occur
over the next 15 to 20 years. During that time, it is assumed that only a
portion of the existing land uses will include new development and that
many of the existing structures will remain essentially the same in their
size and configuration but perhaps remodeled.
A brief assessment of development conditions since 2000 is described
below, followed by a summary of future market demand. Based on this
information, future development assumptions for each district are
identified, which will be used as the basis for infrastructure improvements
and potential environmental impacts as described in the Downtown Dublin
Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report.
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN I 3
Past Development Activities
Downtown Dublin is largely built -out and there are very few vacant parcels
on which new development could occur. Future development will
therefore occur as properties are modified, in some cases at a higher
density. Due to existing FAR and parking requirements, limited net new
additional density opportunities exist, particularly in the Village Parkway
District.
Based on City estimates and as described in the Downtown Dublin
Opportunities, Issues & Strategies Report (RBF Consulting, 2009),
approximately 258,734 square feet of non-residential development has
occurred since adoption of the West Dublin BART, Downtown Core, and
Village Parkway Specific Plans in December 2000. With the exception of a
senior residential development (Wicklow Square) and senior center
(15,300 square feet), all of this development (243,434 square feet) has
been commercial retail development. There has been no hotel, office or
residential development constructed in the Downtown December 2000
through 2009, despite the fact that the three above mentioned specific
plans collectively allowed for nearly 3.2 million square feet of
retail/office/commercial space, 150 hotel rooms, and 740 residential
dwelling units.
Large format retail has also been changing and now competes directly with
online shopping. A more diverse and mixed development pattern is more
likely to replace large format retail in due time.
Proposed New Development
Several new projects are either under construction or have been entitled in
the Specific Plan Area. The most significant development is the
construction of the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station. The station is
being constructed within the median of Interstate 580 with pedestrian
access north and south over both sections of the freeway. By the year
2013, the project is projected to accommodate 8,600 users per day.
Within the City of Dublin, a 713-space parking garage has been constructed
at the southern terminus of Golden Gate Drive for BART commuters. As
part of the BART project, a 150-room hotel, 7,500 square feet of retail
space have been planned for (Stage I Development Plan), and 309
residential units (Essex) have been entitled west of Golden Gate Drive.
DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN 45
20
Development Plan
This Specific Plan provides a development plan for the next 15 to 20 years.
Each Specific Plan district identifies a broad range of land uses that can be
developed, either outright or through a Conditional Use Permit. These
land uses, which include regional retail, community retail, office,
residential, mixed use and public uses, are described in detail in Section
3.4: Land Use Designations. This approach will allow greater flexibility in
the ultimate development pattern, while still maintaining a common vision
for function and urban character within Downtown Dublin.
For each district, this Specific Plan identifies a specific set of development
standards that will apply to all new buildings and significantly remodeled
buildings. These standards include lot size and building placement, access,
parking, building density or floor area ratio (FAR), and building height and
setbacks.
The actual density of development allowed on a particular parcel will be
regulated by the FAR. This Specific Plan identifies both a base FAR that is
allowed outright and a maximum FAR that can be constructed based on
the use and district. If a property owner would like to develop a project
beyond the base FAR, they may obtain additional square footage up to the
maximum FAR by drawing on the Development Pool that has been
established for specific uses in each district. The density Development
Pool applies to both residential and non-residential development. As
shown below in Table 3-3: Base and Maximum FAR Per District, the
maximum FAR would be greater than the base FAR for the Retail and
Transit -Oriented Districts, but would remain the same in the Village
Parkway District.
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN I 3
Table 3-3: Base and Maximum FAR Per District
DISTRICT
Retail
Transit -Oriented
Village Parkway
BASE FAR
0.35
0.50
MAXIMUM
FAR
2.0
2.5
0.50 2.5
0.35 0.35
Downtown Dublin is largely built out, which means that new development
projects will primarily replace (or expand upon) existing developments and
land uses. Based on discussions with stakeholders, the general public, and
City staff, as well as an assessment of underutilized parcels, a conservative
estimate was made that 50% of the parcels within Downtown Dublin could
be privately developed with new development projects over the next 15+
years.
This Specific Plan allows for a future construction of approximately 2.2
million square feet of non-residential development and 2,916 3.381
residential dwelling units (416 of these units are exempt from the
Community Benefit Program as further described in Section 6.4
Development Pool and Community Benefit Program).
Assuming an average of 1,200 square feet per residential unit (and an
average of 500 square feet per hotel room), this represents 5.83 million
square feet under this Specific Plan.
A breakdown of development potential (including base and maximum FAR)
by district is shown in Table 3-4: Net New Development.
DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN 47
21
3 I LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Table 3-4: Net New Development
DISTRICT
Retail
Transit -
Oriented
Village
Parkway
Total
NON-RESIDENTIAL
(SF)
2,166,8101,866,810
(+150 hotel rooms)
20,730
2,262,5401,962,540
(includes 150
hotel rooms)
RESIDENTIAL
(DU)
2,91G 3,381
279 3,381
MINIMUM
RESIDENTIAL
DENSITY
22 units/net acre
30 units/net acres
No minimum
Notes: Includes projects that have been approved, but not yet constructed.
Includes416 unitswhich are exempt from the Development Pool, as further
discussed in Section 6.4: Development Pool and Community Benefit Program.
While this represents the theoretical buildout of net new development in
Downtown Dublin, the ultimate amount of future development will likely
be less due to non -tangibles such as market demand, ownership patterns,
tenant lease terms, other available vacant land (e.g. East Dublin), etc.
Additionally, Downtown Dublin is largely developed, resulting in significant
physical limitations such as parcel configurations, parking, and circulation.
When a project applicant proposes to develop using a portion of the
density development pool allocation, they will be required to enter into an
agreement with the City and provide a community benefit in accordance
with the Community Benefit Program. The life of the agreement will be
limited to a specific time period so that if a project is not constructed, the
square footage can be returned to the density development pool and
available for use by another development project in the same District. See
Section 6.4 for further discussion on the density development pool and
Community Benefit Program.
48 CITY OF DUBLIN
22
4 I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES
LOT SIZE AND BUILDING PLACEMENT
1 Lot Width'
2 Lot Depth'
3 Lot Size'
Street Setback from
4 Dublin Boulevard and
San Ramon Road
5 Street Setback from
Other Streets
Internal Setback from
6 Property Lines shared
with Residential Uses
7
Internal Setback from
Property Lines shared
with Non -Residential
Uses
8 Freeway/Drainage
Channel Setback
9
Required Frontage
Buildout2
50 ft min
80 ft min
10,000 sf min
10 ft min
The street setback may be improved as an extension of
the publicsidewalk ifaccessible to the public through an
established easement. Along Dublin Boulevard, upper
floors above 20 ft may reduce setback to 5 ft.
5 ft min
The street setback may be improved as an extension of
the public sidewalk if accessible to the public through an
established easement
15 ft min
Per Building Code
10 ft min from property lines adjacent to freeway or
drainage channel
Not required
Notes 1 These standards only apply to new land subdivisions and do not apply to
condominium subdivisions
2 If residential units are provided, see buildoutrequirements in the Building
Design table, below
52 CITY OF DUBLIN
Figure 4-3: Examples of Lot Size and Building Placements in the
Retail District
Residential Property
4
Non -Residential Property
Dublin Boulevard or San Ramon Road
Buildable Area
Required Setbacks
— ' ' — Property Line
Other Streets
23
BUILDING DESIGN
1 Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
2 Residential Units
0.35 base. outside "The Core" and 0.50 in "The Core"
2.0 max outside "The Core" and 2.5 max in "The Core". In
this area. the FAR may be averaged across the parcels
(excluding the Town Sauare) (required participation in the
development density pool, an agreement with the City,
and provision of a community benefit in compliance with
the Community Benefit Program)'
Not permitted west of San Ramon Road.
Allowed at a minimum density of 22 units per net acre.
Permitted within a mixed -use development if designed
based on the following standards:
• The development includes ground floor retail or
office space that equals an FAR of 0.3 min
• Retail or office space is built along at least 80% of
the property's total street frontage and set back no
more than 10 ft from the building setback
requirement
• Common open space for the residential units are
provided at a rate of 15% of the site's total area
• The above standards may be modified through an
SDR as part of a mixed -use development in the
Town Core area.
Projects that include residential development within 1,000
ft. of either Interstate 580 or 680(or less per Bay Area Air
Quality Management District's current guidelines) shall
incorporate the following standards to minimize
potentially adverse air quality affects:
• Configure the proposed buildings so that the bulk of
the building is located farther from the highway.
• Place heating ventilation and air conditioning
(HVAC)system intakes as far away from highway as
feasible.
• Include high efficiency filters in the HVAC system
(rated with a minimum efficiency rating value
[MERV] of at least 13). This would also include a
commitment to regular maintenance and
replacement of filters as needed.
• Provide positive pressure with the HVAC system in
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES I 4
3 Building Height
4 Building Stepbacks
5 Allowed Frontages'
Ground Floor
6. Commercial in "The
Core"
Notes
all occupied spaces to prevent the incursion of
outside air that bypasses the HVAC filters.
• To reduce the amount of outside unfiltered air
indoors, do not place operable windows in close
proximityto the highway. In addition, signs should
be posted to keep exterior doors closed when not in
use.
&8 floors and no morethan 75feet to the finished floorof
the highest story. Maximum max building height is 90feet
(tower elements, architectural and articulated design
features, solar panels, and small-scale wind turbines may
extend 10ft max beyond this height). The height may be
increased through an SDR in the Town Core area.
Minimum building height in "The Core" is40 feet, except
for structures within the Town Sauare
Encouraged on upper floors, but not required
At least one of the following frontages (based on the
ground floor use) shall be provided on all facades that
front a street:
• Anchor Storefronts
• Storefronts
• Office/Lodging Fronts
• Auto Service Fronts
• Public Fronts
Minimum height of ground floorto second flooris 18 feet
Provide a minimum of50feet of depth; 60 feet is preferabl
Space structural columns 30 feet apart
1 Refer to Section 3.5: Future Development Assumptions
2 For frontage standards/guidelines, see Section 4.4: Design Standards and
Guidelines
DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN 57
24
4 I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES
PROJECTIONS AND ENCROACHMENTS INTO SETBACKS
1 Balconies
2 Stoops
3 Bay Windows
4 Window Shades
(Vertical /Horizontal)
5 Trellises
6 Storefront Awnings
7 Roofs
8 Projecting Signs
9 Building Lighting
58 CITY OF DUBLIN
4 ft max into all setbacks
12 ft min vertical clearance required over sidewalks,
walkways, and private outdoor spaces
Permitted for residential use only
5 ft min usable walkway must be maintained on private
streets and 10 ft on public streets
2 ft max into all setbacks
4 ft max alone Dublin Boulevard
12 ft min vertical clearance required over sidewalks,
walkways, and private outdoor spaces
5 ft max into all setbacks
8 ft min vertical clearance required over sidewalks,
walkways, and private outdoor spaces
5 ft max into all setbacks
8 ft min vertical clearance required over sidewalks,
walkways, and private outdoor spaces
6 ft max into all setbacks
8 ft max alone Dublin Boulevard and Golden Gate Drive
8 ft min vertical clearance required over sidewalks,
walkways, and private outdoor spaces
5 ft max into all setbacks
4 ft max into all setbacks
8 ft min vertical clearance required over sidewalks,
walkways, and private outdoor spaces
3 ft max into all setbacks
If extending more than 6 in from the facade, 8 ft min
vertical clearance required over sidewalks, walkways, and
private outdoor spaces
= Property Line
NOTE: Buildings shown builtto setback line
25
4 I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES
Office/Lodging Fronts
The following guidelines apply to facades that are designed with
office/lodging fronts:
• At least 20% of the facade's surface area should consist of
windows (including glass on doors). Windows shall be provided
on all floors of the building. Exceptions to window area may be
approved for parking structures. See Section 4.4.14 for desien
euidelines for Parkine Structures.
■ Both common entrances (to lobbies or interior courtyards) and
private entrances (to individual business suites on the ground
floor) may be provided.
• Primary building entrances should be highlighted and serve as the
prominent building feature with elements such as (but not limited
to) recessed or protruding entries, tower elements, different
materials/colors, decorative or display windows, shade structures
or galleries, and special paving and landscaping.
• Awnings, marquees, window shades and trellises, and second
floor balconies are encouraged to provide shade.
■ Porte-cocheres (covered driveways providing temporary guest
registration parking and valet services) may be provided on
lodging fronts.
■ Fences, walls, and hedges that are located along this frontage
should not exceed a height of 40 inches.
• Raised planters are allowed between the sidewalk and the
building. If a planter is raised, it should be elevated a maximum of
40 inches above the elevation of the adjacent sidewalk. Planters
that are designed to retain and filter stormwater runoff from the
roof are encouraged.
Examples of Office/Lodging Fronts
86 CITY OF DUBLIN
26
4.4.14 Parking Areas
Surface Parking Lots
• Where feasible, views of surface parking areas from sidewalks
should be minimized and parking should be located internally and
to the rear of buildings that front a street. Landscaped buffers
along the perimeter of surface parking areas should include a
variety of trees, shrubs, and groundcovers designed to soften
views of parked vehicles from pedestrians walking along the
sidewalk, walkway, or private outdoor space. These landscaped
buffers may include fences, walls, or hedges.
• Surface parking areas should include measures to reduce
impervious surfaces, including, but not limited to:
• Vegetated swales/planters;
• Green gutters and flow -through planters;
• Landscaped medians/planters; and
• Pervious/porous paving (for parking stalls, walkways, and
driveways).
• Where feasible and appropriate, walkways that connect surface
parking areas to building entrances, sidewalks, private outdoor
spaces, and additional parking areas should be provided.
• The length of parking spaces may be reduced by up to 2-2_5 feet if
the vehicle will overhang a landscape planter which has been
designed to accommodate the vehicle overhang plus additional
space for planting. The planter shall be protected by a curb or
wheel stop and should include low lying plants where the vehicle
will overhang the planter.
• Where feasible, consider innovative measures to manage
stormwater with "leftover" space in front of angled parking stalls.
• Parking spaces with decorative and permeable pavers are strongly
encouraged.
• Evergreen trees are encouraged within parking lots.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES I 4
• Where on -site circulation can be designed to permit it, shared
access to multiple parcels and businesses is strongly encouraged,
• A direct and clearly visible pedestrian connection shall be
provided through the surface parking lot that connects to the
primary building entrance and sidewalk.
• Landscaping and landscape buffers along sidewalks should be
attractive and should encourage and provide interest to
pedestrians. Features such as benches may be incorporated into
these areas.
• Parking lots along sidewalks shall include perimeter shrubs with a
minimum height of 3 feet to screen parked vehicles.
DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN 103
27
Table 6-1: Development Pool
DISTRICT
Retail
Transit -Oriented
Village Parkway
NON-RESIDENTIAL
SQUARE FOOTAGE
1,3201,020,220
(+150 hotel rooms)
0
NUMBER OF
RESIDENTIAL
DWELLINGS
2,500 2,965
The above Development Pool for the Transit -Oriented District includes the
AMB project (150,000 square feet of office and 308 residential dwellings),
the Essex project (309 residential dwellings) and the BART hotel (150 hotel
rooms and 7,500 square feet of commercial). In the event that these
projects are constructed, the corresponding development potential will be
removed from the Development Pool. As these projects were approved
prior to the adoption of this Specific Plan, the developers are not required
to enter into the Community Benefit Program. If these projects are not
constructed, the associated development potential will be made available
to developers in the Transit -Oriented District. If only a portion of one of
these projects is constructed, the remaining development potential will be
returned to the Development Pool for the Transit -Oriented District.
For all three districts, the density obtained from the Development Pool will
be available to the property owner for the period of time specified in a
binding agreement between the City and the developer. At the expiration
of that period, the density will be returned to the Development Pool if the
project has not been constructed.
The City will manage the Development Pool and maintain an inventory of
all projects that are developed above the base FAR to ensure that
development does not exceed the density cap in each district.
Community Benefit Program
A Community Benefit Program will be established to ensure that
developers provide a benefit to the Specific Plan Area in exchange for
receiving a higher density on their property.
IMPLEMENTATION AND ADMINISTRATION I 6
A developer who is taking part in the Community Benefit Program will be
required to enter into a binding agreement with the City that specifies the
community benefit that will be provided in exchange for use of density
from the pool. The City will negotiate the terms of the Agreement
including the period during which the density will be available to the
developer and community benefits that will be provided by the developer.
A developer may be required to provide one or a combination of benefits
in relation to the density they are obtaining from the Pool. Improvements
or fees which are required by the Municipal Code are not considered to be
a community benefit and are regardless of the project status. Examples of
appropriate community benefits that might be provided by the developer
include the following.
■ Public Plaza or gathering space;
• Public Parks or Outdoor Play Areas;
• Measures aimed at reducing Greenhouses Gases and
Transportation trips including charging stations for electric
vehicles, preferred parking for carpool vehicles, site specific
transportation demand management programs, etc.;
■ Sponsorship of a downtown special event (event to be approved
by the City);
■ Public Safety enhancements including substation, vehicles,
defibrillators, fire extinguishers, etc.;
• Enhanced streetscape improvements (e.g. sidewalks, landscaping,
fountains, etc.);
• Pedestrian connections to other sites or facilities (e.g. easement
dedications and pathway improvements). Note: This does not
include pedestrian connections within the project site, which are
required by good site planning principles;
■ Transit improvements (e.g., enhance or construct bus shelters);
■ Payment into a Downtown Fund for future public improvements;
and
DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN 121
28
sus
DUBLIN
CALIFORNIA
Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision, November 2019
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Addendum
August 7, 2023
Planning Application Number: PLPA-2023-00001
>Horn
29
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Addendum I Page 1
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Addendum
August 7, 2023
Project Description
The Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP) was adopted by the Dublin City Council in February
of 2011 with the intent of encouraging development within the downtown area that would be
more conducive to a more walkable, mixed development, and vibrant community. The DDSP
includes three distinct districts (Retail, Transit -Oriented, and Village Parkway Districts), with
separate development standards for each. The DDSP Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH
#2010022005) was certified by the Dublin City Council concurrent with approval of the DDSP in
2011.
The proposed project (the project) will complete an amendment to the DDSP (2023 DDSP
Amendment) which would:
■ Add Research and Development as a new land use allowed in Retail District and Transit -
Oriented District. Uses may include, but are not limited to, science and engineering
laboratories (research, development, and testing), quality assurance work (dimensional
analysis), and software development and engineering. Manufacturing uses are limited to
less than ten percent of the building area. Such uses may not generate nuisances related
to emissions, noise, odors, and may not include outdoor storage and operations.
■ Increase the floor area ratio (FAR) from 2.0 to 2.5 for the defined "The Core" area
located within the Retail District.
■ Decrease the non-residential net new development and allowable allocation
(Development Pool) by 300,000 square feet; Net New Development from 2,166,810 to
1,866,810 and the Development Pool from 1,320,220 to 1,020,220 square feet.
■ Increase the residential allowable allocation (Development Pool) by 465 units; from
2,500 to 2,965 units.
■ Increase the building height in the defined area of "The Core" area of the Retail District
from six to eight floors and no more than 75 feet to the finished floor of the highest
story. This change would be consistent with the Transit -Oriented District standards.
■ Incorporate minor revisions to the development standards and design guidelines (e.g.,
street setbacks, stoops, storefront awnings, etc.) in the Retail District.
The project would increase the number of residential units and correspondingly decrease the
amount of non-residential development in the plan area, thereby maintaining the same
maximum level of development intensity (gross square footage) as analyzed in the DDSP EIR.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
30
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Addendum I Page 2
Prior CEQA Analysis
Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR
The DDSP Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2010022005) was certified by the Dublin
City Council concurrent with approval of the DDSP in 2011 (City Council Resolution Nos 08-11
and 09-11). The EIR analyzed the environmental impacts of potential development associated
with the DDSP in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Subsequent Amendments
Subsequent to adoption, the DDSP has been amended five times, the latest occurring in
November 2022. Two of these amendments included reappropriating the amount of residential
and non-residential development in the Retail and Transit -Oriented Districts.
All amendments were reviewed and recommended by the Planning Commission and approved
by the Dublin City Council. A CEQA Analysis with a supporting Initial Study was prepared as part
of each of these amendments and adopted by the Dublin City Council.
Proposed CEQA Analysis in this Document
The City of Dublin (City) has determined that an Addendum to the DDSP EIR is the appropriate
CEQA review for the project. This Addendum has been prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15164 for the project. The City prepared an Initial Study dated August 7, 2023,
incorporated herein by reference, to assess whether any further environmental review is
required for this Project. Through this Initial Study, the City has determined that no subsequent
EIR or Negative Declaration is required per the following:
No Subsequent Review is Required per CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 identifies the conditions requiring subsequent environmental
review. After a review of these conditions, the City has determined that no subsequent EIR or
Negative Declaration is required for this project. This is based on the following analysis:
a) Are there substantial changes to the Project involving new or more severe significant
impacts?
There are no substantial changes to the project as analyzed in the DDSP EIR. The project is
similar to land uses for the project area analyzed in the DDSP EIR and there is no net
change in overall development intensity, as amended. As demonstrated in the Initial
Study, the project does not constitute a substantial change to the DDSP EIR analysis, will
not result in additional significant impacts, and no additional or different mitigation
measures are required.
b) Are there substantial changes in the conditions which the Project is undertaken involving
new or more severe significant impacts?
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
31
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Addendum I Page 3
There are no substantial changes in the conditions assumed in the DDSP EIR, as amended.
The project will not change the net development intensity in the project area, as
previously analyzed. This is documented in the attached Initial Study.
c) Is there new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known at the time of the previous EIR that shows the Project will have a
significant effect not addressed in the previous EIR; or previous effects are more severe; or,
previously infeasible mitigation measures are now feasible but the applicant declined to
adopt them; or mitigation measures considerably different from those in the previous EIR
would substantially reduce significant effects but the applicant declines to adopt them?
As documented in the attached Initial Study, there is no new information showing a new
or more severe significant effect beyond those identified in the prior CEQA documents.
Similarly, the Initial Study documents that no new or different mitigation measures are
required for the project. All previously adopted mitigations continue to apply to the
project. The CEQA documents adequately describe the impacts and mitigations associated
with the proposed development on portions of the DDSP area.
d) If no subsequent EIR-level review is required, should a subsequent negative declaration be
prepared?
No subsequent Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration is required
because there are no significant impacts of the project beyond those identified in the
DDSP EIR, as documented in the attached Initial Study.
Conclusion
This Addendum is prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 based on the attached
Initial Study. The Addendum and Initial Study review the proposed 2023 Amendments to the
DDSP as discussed above. Through the adoption of this Addendum and related Initial Study, the
City determines that the above minor changes do not require a subsequent or supplemental EIR
or Negative Declaration under CEQA Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and
15163. The City further determines that the DDSP EIR adequately addresses the potential
environmental impacts of the 2023 DDSP Amendment.
There are no project changes, new information or changed circumstances that would result in a
new or substantial increase in severity of a significant impact from those identified in the DDSP
EIR because the proposed 2023 DDSP Amendment would not exceed the maximum allowable
land development limits as defined in the DDSP EIR (as amended). No standards for requiring
supplemental environmental review under CEQA are met.
As provided in Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, this Addendum need not be circulated for
public review, but shall be considered with the prior environmental documents before making a
decision on this project.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
32
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Addendum I Page 4
The Initial Study, the DDSP and EIR, and the previous amendments are incorporated herein by
reference and are available for public review during normal business hours in the Community
Development Department, Dublin City Hall, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, CA.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
33
II
sus
DUBLIN
CAL[FORNIA
Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision, November 2019
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study
August 7, 2023
Planning Application Number: PLPA-2023-00001
Kimley >> Horn
34
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study I Page i
Table of Contents
Introduction 1
Project Background 3
Prior CEQA Analysis 3
Project Description 4
Environmental Checklist 7
Determination 9
Environmental Analysis 10
List of Tables
Table 1: Change in Project Traffic Trips 38
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Location 2
Figure 2: Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Districts 3
Figure 3: Downtown Preferred Vision Town Square, Street Grid, and The Core 5
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
35
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 1
2023 DDSP Amendment
I ntroduction
Project Title
2023 DDSP Amendment
(PLPA-2023-00001)
Lead Agency
City of Dublin
Community Development Department
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Contact
Amy Million
Principal Planner
Phone: 925/833-6610
Amy.Million@dublin.ca.gov
Project Location
The Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP) project area is located in the southwestern portion
of the City of Dublin and is approximately 284 acres in size. The project area is generally bound
by Village Parkway to the east, Interstate 580 to the south, San Ramon Road to the west, and
Amador Valley Boulevard to the north. There are some partial boundary limits that extend
beyond those roadways, most notably portions of San Ramon Road and Amador Valley
Boulevard, and all of the Village Parkway, which are located within the Specific Plan area. See
Figure 1: Project Location.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
36
City of Dublin
Figure 1: Project Location
▪ Uv Limds
▪ PIgn Ar,s
Project Applicant / Sponsor
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
uetI Idi Plalll uesignation
• Downtown Dublin — Village Parkway District
Downtown Dublin — Transit -Oriented District
Downtown Dublin — Retail District
Zonin
DDZD — Downtown Dublin Zoning District
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 2
0 250 500 1000 F 1
LEGEND
Specific Plan Boundary
Ofy Limit Line
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
37
City of Dublin
Project Background
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 3
The Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP) was adopted by the Dublin City Council in February
of 2011 with the intent of encouraging development within the downtown area that would be
more conducive to a more walkable, mixed -use, and vibrant community. The boundaries of the
DDSP encompassed boundaries of five other specific plans that were dissolved when the DDSP
was adopted. The DDSP includes three distinct districts (Retail, Transit -Oriented, and Village
Parkway Districts), with separate development standards for each. See Figure 2: Downtown
Dublin Specific Plan Districts.
Figure 2: Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Districts
DRIVE�
Prior CEQA Analysis
•
0.
i•
I, 2's�-� ,+!`Jf�,/�-C-- LEGEND
= Specific Plan Boundary
AIP
S� InCityLlmit Line
Specific Plan Districts
- Retail District
•, •� r alriPX
- Transit -Oriented District
'% Village Parkway District
41111
; i
N
];0G F
,. atE g9D
City of
Pleasanton
Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR
The DDSP Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2010022005) was certified by the Dublin
City Council concurrent with approval of the DDSP in 2011 (City Council Resolution Nos 08-11
and 09-11). The EIR analyzed the environmental impacts of potential development associated
with the DDSP in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
38
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 4
Subsequent Amendments
Subsequent to adoption, the DDSP has been amended five times, the latest occurring in
November 2022. Two of these amendments included reappropriating the amount of residential
and non-residential development in the Retail and Transit -Oriented Districts.
All amendments were reviewed and recommended by the Planning Commission and approved
by the Dublin City Council. A CEQA Analysis with a supporting Initial Study was prepared as part
of each of these amendments and adopted by the Dublin City Council.
Project Description
The proposed project (the project) is to complete an amendment to the DDSP (2023 DDSP
Amendment) which would:
■ Add Research and Development as a new land use allowed in Retail District and Transit -
Oriented District. Uses may include, but are not limited to, science and engineering
laboratories (research, development, and testing), quality assurance work (dimensiona
analysis), and software development and engineering. Manufacturing uses are limited to
less than ten percent of the building area. Such uses may not generate nuisances related
to emissions, noise, odors, and may not include outdoor storage and operations.
■ Increase the floor area ratio (FAR) from 2.0 to 2.5 for the defined "The Core" area
located within the Retail District (see Figure 3: Downtown Preferred Vision Town
Square, Street Grid, and The Core).
■ Decrease the non-residential net new development and allowable allocation
(Development Pool) by 300,000 square feet; Net New Development from 2,166,810 to
1,866,810 and the Development Pool from 1,320,220 to 1,020,220 square feet.
■ Increase the residential allowable allocation (Development Pool) by 465 units; from
2,500 to 2,965 units.
■ Increase the building height in the defined area of "The Core" area of the Retail District
from six to eight floors and no more than 75 feet to the finished floor of the highest
story. This change would be consistent with the Transit -Oriented District standards.
■ Incorporate minor revisions to the development standards and design guidelines (e.g.,
street setbacks, stoops, storefront awnings, etc.) in the Retail District.
The project would increase the number of residential units and correspondingly decrease the
amount of non-residential development in the plan area, thereby maintaining the same
maximum level of development intensity as analyzed in the DDSP EIR.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
39
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 5
Figure 3: Downtown Preferred Vision Town Square, Street Grid, and The Core
Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required
None.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
40
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 6
Environmental Checklist
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected by the Project
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Biological Resources
Geology/Soils
Hydrology/Water
Quality
Noise
Recreation
Utilities/Service
Systems
Agricultural and Forestry
Resources
Cultural Resources
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Land Use/Planning
Population/Housing
Transportation/Traffic
Wildfire
Air Quality
Energy
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Mineral Resources
Public Services
Tribal Cultural
Resources
Mandatory Findings
of Significance
Instructions
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are
adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the
parentheses following each question (see Source List, attached). A "No Impact"
answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the
impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls
outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is
based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will
not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening
analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well
as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and
construction as well as operational impacts.
3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur,
then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially
significant, less -than -significant with mitigation, or less -than -significant. "Potentially
Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that any effect may
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
41
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 7
be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when
the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: applies
where incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially
Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must
describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to
a less -than -significant level.
5. Earlier Analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other
CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR
or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a discussion should
identify the following on attached sheets:
a. Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available
for review.
b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist
were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document
pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or
refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -
specific conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to
information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances).
Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate,
include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting information sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources
used, or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats;
however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist
that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
o The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question;
and
o The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than
significance.
10. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the
project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code Section
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
42
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 8
21080.3.1? If so, has consultation begun?
Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments,
lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review,
identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and
reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See
Public Resources Code Section 21083.3.2.) Information may also be available from
the California Native American Heritage Commission's Sacred Lands File per Public
Resources Code Section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources Information
System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Public
Resources Code Section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
43
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 9
Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or
agreed to bythe project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the project MAY have a potentially significant or a potentially significant unless
mitigated impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed
in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTREPORTis required, but it must analyze only the effectsthat remain
to be addressed.
I find that although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated X
pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the project, nothing further is required.
CITY OF DUBLIN
71.-,(,(/L
August 7, 2023
Amy Million, Principal Planner Date
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
44
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 10
Environmental Analysis
The discussion below analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the project per the
criteria as described in Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section
15162. For convenience, this analysis uses Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines as a framework
for analysis. As such, the checkboxes in the column labeled "Equal or Less Severe Impact than
Identified in the DDSP EIR" in the tables below indicates that no new environmental review is
required because none of the standards under Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162 are met. There are no project changes, new information or changed
circumstances that would result in a new or substantial increase in severity of a significant
impact from those identified in the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP) EIR because the
proposed 2023 DDSP Amendment would not exceed the maximum allowable land development
limits as defined in the DDSP EIR (as amended). No standards for requiring supplemental
environmental review under CEQA are met.
Aesthetics
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not
limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its surroundings?
(Public views are those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an
urbanized area, would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic
quality
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
45
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 11
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Scenic vistas, views
As described in the DDSP EIR, there are no designated scenic vistas in the vicinity of the project
area and, therefore, there would be no impact.
(b) Scenic resources
Located in an urban setting, the project area is fully developed and there are no natural or built
features that are considered scenic resources.
Portions of the project area are visible from Interstate-680 (an officially designated State Scenic
Highway and a locally designated scenic route), Interstate-580 (a highway eligible for
designation as a State Scenic Highway and locally designated scenic route), and San Ramon
Road (a locally designated scenic route).
As described in the DDSP EIR, all proposed projects visible from Interstate-680 and Interstate-
580 would be subject to design review per polices of the General Plan. Furthermore, specific
projects would be required to comply with the development standards and be consistent with
the design guidelines as identified in the DDSP, as amended.
(c) Conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality
The project area is located in an urban built -out area and is adjacent to two major interstate
freeways.
The DDSP EIR concluded that impacts to the existing visual character would be less than
significant. The project would increase the building height in the defined area of "The Core"
area of the Retail District from six to eight floors and no more than 75 feet to the finished floor
of the highest story. This change would be consistent with the Transit -Oriented District
standards.
All new development projects would be required to comply with the FAR, as amended. Future
projects would also be required to comply with other existing development standards and be
consistent with the design guidelines as identified in the DDSP.
These DDSP changes to the development standards and design guidelines (as amended) would
not conflict with zoning or other regulations governing scenic quality.
(d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare
The project area is located within an urban area that produces considerable light and glare.
Newly proposed development projects would be required to comply with the DDSP which
includes a number of specific design guidelines that address light and glare.
The DDSP EIR concluded that impacts from light and glare would be less than significant. The
project would continue to require that all new development projects comply with the DDSP
design guidelines regarding light and glare.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
46
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 12
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified aesthetic/visual impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to aesthetic resources beyond what has been analyzed in the
DDSP EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
Agricultural and Forestry Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
New of an Impact Equal or Less Severe
Significant Identified in Impact than Identified
Impact the DDSPEIR in the DDSP EIR
2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model
to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion
of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of
forest land to non -forest use?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest
land to non -forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion
❑X
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
47
City of Dublin
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 13
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSPEIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of
forest land to non -forest use?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a-e) Convert farmland or conflict with zoning
The project area is located in an urbanized setting where there are no agricultural or forestry
resources. As described in the DDSP EIR, agricultural and forestry resources were not analyzed
as they were determined to be an "effect found not to be significant" and, therefore, there
would be no impact on agricultural and forest resources and no further environmental review is
required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
Air Quality
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Equal
or Less
Substantial Severe
Increase in Impact
the than
Severity of Identifi
an Impact ed in
New Identified the
Significant in the DDSP
Impact DDSPEIR EIR
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors
adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
❑x
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
48
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 14
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Consistent with air quality plans
As described in the DDSP EIR, short-term air quality impacts associated with construction would
be anticipated with future development projects; however, all development within the project
area would be required to comply with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District
(BAAQMD) control measures identified in the DDSP EIR.
Additionally, the DDSP EIR concluded that the DDSP is consistent with population growth
assumptions in the BAAQMD Clean Air Plan, and it is anticipated to reduce vehicle miles
traveled due to the DDSP guiding principles to create a walkable, transit -oriented, and mixed -
use community. The project does not increase the overall net development intensity in the
DDSP, as amended. As such, the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of
an air quality plan.
(b) Project emissions
Because all future development projects would be required to comply with the design
standards in the DDSP and applicable air quality regulations as identified in the DDSP EIR, the
project would not conflict with or obstruct the air quality plan, violate air quality standards, nor
result in cumulatively considerable net increase in any criteria pollutant.
(c) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations and create odors
As described in the DDSP EIR, because all future development projects that generate toxic air
contaminants are required to comply with BAAQMD rules, regulations, and permitting
requirements, and all projects are required to comply with the California Air Resources Board's
rules and regulations and implement any applicable toxics control measures, the project would
not expose sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations and create odors.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there will be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to exposing sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations beyond what has been analyzed in the DDSP EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met.
(d) Odors
As described in the DDSP EIR, odors anticipated within the project area would result from
construction activities and business operations (e.g., odors from restaurants or waste
receptacles). Construction odors would be temporary and are not generally considered
offensive. Future uses would be required to comply with City regulations as defined in the
Dublin Municipal Code (Chapter 8.24: Commercial Zoning Districts, Chapter 8.64: Home
Occupations Regulations, and Chapter 8.20: Residential Zoning Districts) which minimize
operational odors. Therefore, impacts would remain less than significant.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
49
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 15
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified air quality impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts associated with air quality resources beyond what has been
analyzed in the DDSP EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
Biological Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSPEIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally
protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
❑X
❑X
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
50
City of Dublin
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 16
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSPEIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a-f)
The project area is located in an urbanized setting, is primarily development and has been
disturbed through prior development. As described in the DDSP EIR, biological resources were
not analyzed as they were determined to be an "effect found not to be significant." Therefore,
there will be no impact on biological resources.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
Cultural Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
New of an Impact
Significant Identified in
Impact the DDSPEIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
❑x
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
51
City of Dublin
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 17
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSPEIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of dedicated cemeteries?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a-c)
The project area is located in an urban setting and most of the area has been disturbed through
prior development. As described in the DDSP EIR, cultural resources were not analyzed as they
were determined to be an "effect found not to be significant." Therefore, there would be no
impact on cultural resources.
While the likelihood of finding archaeological resources is extremely low, Chapter 8.48
Archaeological Resources Regulations of the City of Dublin Municipal Code outlines a process to
protect archaeological resources and prehistoric or historic artifacts that are discovered during
any construction or excavation, which will be adhered to.
Additionally, all development projects constructed subsequent to certification of the 2023
DDSP Amendment are required to comply with Section 7050.5 of the California Health a nd
Safety Code in the event of the discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location
other than a dedicated cemetery during future development activities. Section 7050.5 requires
that there is no further excavation or disturbance of the area, or any nearby area reasonably
suspected to overlie adjacent remains. If the human remains are of Native American origin, the
coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24-hours of
identification.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project will not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified cultural resources impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there will be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to cultural resources beyond what has been analyzed in the
DDSP EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
52
City of Dublin
Energy
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 18
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
13. ENERGY. Would the project:
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
New of an Impact
Significant Identified in
Impact the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact
due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption
of energy resources, during project construction or
operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
❑x
❑x
(a-b) Wasteful consumption of energy resources and conflict with local plan for renewable
energy
At the time the DDSP EIR was prepared, the Environmental Checklist Form (Appendix G of the
CEQA Guidelines) did not include energy. Therefore, the DDSP EIR did not specifically analyze
impacts to energy.
Because the DDSP EIR has been certified, the determination of whether energy needs to be
analyzed for this project is governed by the law on supplemental or subsequent EIRs (Public
Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). Energy is not
required to be analyzed under those standards unless it constitutes "new information of
substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time" the
DDSP EIR was certified as complete. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (a)(3).)
Energy impacts were not analyzed in the DDSP EIR; however, this impact is not new information
that was not known or could not have been known at the time the previous EIR was certified.
The issue of energy was widely known prior to the certification of the DDSP EIR, particularly in
context to the environmental effects associated with greenhouse gas emissions.
Under CEQA standards, energy is not new information that requires analysis in a supplemental
EIR or Negative Declaration. No supplemental environmental analysis of the project's impacts
on this issue is required under CEQA.
Additionally, as described in the DDSP EIR, development under the DDSP includes mixed -use,
commercial, and transit -oriented development. The DDSP EIR concluded that construction fuel
consumption associated with the DDSP would not be any more inefficient, wasteful, or
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
53
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 19
unnecessary than other similar development projects. Additionally, the public transit services
and proximity to the West Dublin / Pleasanton BART station would help ensure that
implementation of the DDSP would not result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary
consumption of transportation energy.
Newly proposed development projects in the DDSP would be required to comply with all
Federal, State, and local requirements for energy efficiency, including Title 24 of the California
Code of Regulations regarding building energy efficiency standards. In addition, Chapter 7.94,
Green Building, of the City of Dublin Municipal Code encourages sustainable construction in the
following categories: planning and design, energy efficiency, water efficiency and conservation,
materials conservation and resource efficiency and environmental quality. The type of
development would not change as a result of this project and, therefore, impacts on energy
consumption would remain less than significant.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified energy impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to energy resources beyond what has been analyzed in the
DDSP EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
Geology and Soils
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated
on the most recentAlquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
54
City of Dublin
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 20
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault?
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life
or property?
e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of wastewater?
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
❑X
❑X
❑X
(a, i-iii) Seismic hazards
As described in the DDSP EIR, there are three faults within six miles of the project area and
future development projects may be subject to liquefaction. Mitigation Measure 3.3-1 requires
project applicants to consult with a registered geotechnical engineer to complete a site -specific
geotechnical investigation prior to development of individual projects. The project will comply
with Mitigation Measure 3.3-1 in all respects, including reviewing ground shaking and
liquefaction effects. Recommendations made by the geotechnical engineer will be incorporated
into the project plans. Future development project will also be required to comply with the
latest version of the California Building Code which includes design standards to protect
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
55
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 21
structures from seismic hazards. Therefore, these impacts will be reduced to a less than
significant level.
(a, iv) Landslides
As described in the DDSP EIR, the project area is relatively flat, lacks steep slopes, and is not
within a seismic hazard zone where landslides may occur during a strong earthquake and,
therefore, there would be no impact.
(b) Erosion/topsoil loss
As described in the DDSP EIR, future development could result in soil erosion or loss of topsoil
during construction. Mitigation Measures 3.5-la and 3.5-1b require compliance with the City's
Public Works Department Policy No. 95-11, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit process, and the City's Building Code requirements. Compliance with Mitigation
Measures 3.5-la and 3.5-1b during construction would continue to mitigate impacts to soil loss
and erosion to less than significant levels.
(c-d) Soil stability
As described in the DDSP EIR, the project area does not exhibit characteristics of expansive
soils; however, site -specific soil evaluations and adherence to City and State building codes is
required as part of any proposed development.
(e) Soil capability to support wastewater disposal, including septic
As described in the DDSP EIR, the project area does not exhibit characteristics of expansive soils
and wastewater sewers will be available to all new development projects. Therefore, there will
be no impact.
(f) Paleontological/unique geological resources
As described in the DDSP EIR, the project area is located in an urban setting a nd has been
disturbed through prior development. There are no identified cultural resources within the
project area and, therefore, there will be no impact to paleontological or unique geologic
resources.
While the likelihood of finding unrecorded and unidentified artifacts is extremely low,
regulatory requirements identified within the DDSP EIR with respect to the discovery of
potential cultural resources during construction will continue to apply.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that will require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP EIR
and this environmental analysis, the project will not substantially increase the severity of the
previously identified geology and soils impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
56
City of Dublin
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 22
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements and mitigation measures, there would
be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to the discovery of potential cultural
resources beyond what has been analyzed in the DDSP EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
New of an Impact
Significant Identified in
Impact the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
b) Conflict with applicable plan, policy or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a-b) Generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or conflict with GHG plans or regulations
As described in the DDSP EIR, California is a substantial contributor of global greenhouse gases,
emitting over 400 million tons of CO2 a year and that it is not anticipated that any single
development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change.
Greenhouse gas emissions from the project would include emissions from area sources and
mobile sources associated with new projects. Cumulative GHG emissions could occur as a result
of future development under the DDSP. This development was previously considered, and the
project will not result in a substantial change than what was analyzed in the DDSP EIR.
Additionally, future projects within the project area and the rest of the City would be reviewed
on a project -by -project basis to ensure their compliance with the City's Climate Action Plan
2030 and Beyond to determine if any impacts would occur beyond those already identified in
DDSP EIR. Furthermore, the DDSP includes several measures that would help to reduce GHG
emissions.
The project is consistent with the overall goals of the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission's Plan Bay Area 2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
57
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 23
Strategy in concentrating new development in locations where there is existing infrastructure,
as well the GHG reduction planning efforts and housing performance targets outlined in Plan
Bay Area 2040.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified GHG impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
With adherence to required applicable regulatory requirements and plans, there would be no
new or substantially more severe significant impacts to cumulative GHG emissions beyond what
has been analyzed in the DDSP EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are
met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
City of Dublin Climate Action Plan 2030 and Beyond, 2020
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
New of an Impact
Significant Identified in
Impact the DDSP EIR
8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within
14 mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
❑x
❑x
❑X
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
58
City of Dublin
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 24
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for
people residing or working in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
g)
Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly,
to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving
wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a-b) Transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials
As described in the DDSP EIR, new projects could involve the transport, use, disposal, and
release of hazardous materials during construction and may result in the demolition and
removal of structures which may contain asbestos and/or lead based paints. Mitigation
Measures 3.5-1a, 3.5-1b, and 3.4-1 within the DDSP EIR will continue to apply, requiring
compliance with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and preparation of a
stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP). A SWPPP is designed to reduce the risk of spills
or leaks from reaching the environment. The SWPPP would also include a Spill Response Plan to
address minor spills of hazardous materials. Compliance with SWPPP requirements would
ensure that potential significant hazards associated with routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials during and after construction would be less than significant.
Additionally, prior to demolition of structures constructed prior to 1980 (when asbestos and
lead based paints were commonly used), a qualified environmental specialist shall inspect the
buildings to determine the presence of asbestos and/or lead based paints. If found, subsequent
permits and approvals would be required along with the appropriate disposal of the
contaminated materials. Any hazardous materials stored and used at in the project area as part
of a development project would be required to be managed in accordance with applicable local,
State, and federal hazardous materials regulations that would reduce risks associated with
leakage, explosions, fires, or the escape of harmful gases.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
59
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 25
With incorporation of these mitigation measures and adherence to all regulations, impacts
would remain less than significant.
(c) Emit hazardous materials within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school
As described in the DDSP EIR, Nielsen Elementary School (7500 Amarillo Drive, Dublin) is
located within a quarter mile of the project area and new businesses that are located near
residential areas or schools may expose these sensitive uses to a greater risk of exposure to
hazardous materials, wastes, or emissions. However, all new projects would be required to
comply with regulations established by federal, state and local regulatory agencies. Compliance
with these regulations will ensure that potential impacts to sensitive uses will not result in a
substantially more severe significant impact beyond was previously analyzed in the DDSP EIR.
(d) Listed as a hazardous materials site
As described in the DDSP EIR, the project area is not located on a hazardous material site
pursuant Government Code Section 65962.5, however, there are three Cleanup Program Sites
within the project area that are currently (2023) being monitored by the RWQCB. Two of these
sites are on Dublin Boulevard (Shamrock Ford and Aster Apartments), and one site is on San
Ramon Road (Crow Canyon Cleaners). Mitigation Measure 3.4-2 within the DDSP EIR would
continue to apply to new projects and will require the preparation of a Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment and subsequent testing. Therefore, impacts would remain less than significant.
(e) Proximity to a public airport
As described in the DDSP EIR, the project area is not located within an airport land use plan or
within the vicinity of a private airstrip and, therefore, there would be no impact.
(f) Impair implementation of an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan
The City uses the Tri-Valley Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, which was developed in compliance
with State requirements and also meets the requirements of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA), as its local hazard mitigation plan. The Tri-Valley Local Hazard
Mitigation Plan provides a uniform hazard mitigation strategy for the Tri-Valley area, addressing
a range of hazards including, but not limited to, earthquakes, floods and wildland fire. The City
also has an adopted Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and a Local Hazard
Mitigation Plan to assess hazards and mitigate risks prior to a disaster event.
Finally, as described in the DDSP EIR, future development would not impair implementation of
or physically interfere with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan and,
therefore, there would be no impact.
(g) Expose people or structures to wildland fires
A wildland fire is a fire occurring in a suburban or rural area which contains uncultivated land,
timber, range, brush, or grasslands. Wildland fires are primarily a concern in areas where there
is a mix of developed and undeveloped lands. As described in the DDSP EIR, the project area is
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
60
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 26
located in an urbanized area and the project site is not identified as an area of moderate, high,
or very high fire hazard severity for the Local Responsibility Area. It is identified as an area of
moderate fire hazard severity for the State Responsibility Area, as mapped by the California
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). Further, future development will be
constructed in accordance with the requirements of the CBC, California Fire Code, and the City's
Wildfire Management Plan.
The project is not subject to potential wildfire hazards and, therefore, there would be no
impact.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified hazards and hazardous materials impacts, nor result in new significant
impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements and required mitigation measures and
applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially more severe
significant impacts to hazards and hazardous materials beyond what has been analyzed in the
DDSP EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
Livermore Municipal Airport, Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, 2012.
RWQCB Geotracker (https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/), accessed July 10, 2023.
Hydrology and Water Quality
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface
or groundwater quality?
❑x
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
61
City of Dublin
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 27
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
(i). Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -
site;
(ii). Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface
runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on -
or offsite;
(iii). Create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff; or
(iv). Impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of
pollutants due to project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Violate water quality or waste discharge requirements or degrade surface or groundwater
quality
As described in the DDSP EIR, new project construction would be required to comply with
Mitigation Measures 3.5-la and 3.5-1b, which require compliance with RWQCB water quality
and waste discharge requirements and preparation of a SWPPP. Compliance with these
mitigation measures will ensure that potential water quality impacts associated with project
construction are reduced to a less -than -significant level.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
62
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 28
(b-c) Substantially decrease or interfere with groundwater supplies; Alter existing drainage
patterns re: erosion/siltation, re: flooding, or degrade water quality
As described in the DDSP EIR, the project area is largely developed and served by existing
stormwater facilities that have been designed to accommodate future anticipated
development. Per RWQCB requirements, new projects will include design features to increase
percolation (thereby decreasing stormwater flows, impact to drainage systems, and
groundwater degradation). Therefore, the project will not substantially decrease or interfere
with groundwater supplies.
The project will not alter existing drainage patterns because the project site is already
developed and consists of impervious surface areas in the form of buildings and surface parking
lots. Current regulations are now more stringent and would result in greater on -site retention
than currently exists and thereby improving groundwater supplies.
(d) Flood hazard, seiche, or tsunami
As described in the DDSP EIR, the project area is located well inland from the San Francisco Bay
or other major bodies of water to be impacted by a tsunami or seiche and is not within a
designated dam failure inundation area. Therefore, there would be no impact.
(e) Water Quality
As described in the DDSP EIR, the water source for new projects in the DDSP area would rely on
surface water supplies from the Dublin San Ramon Services District and no local groundwater
supplies. As a result, the project would not conflict with a water quality control or sustainable
groundwater management plan. Therefore, there would be no impact.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified hydrology and water quality impacts, nor result in new significant
impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements and required mitigation measures and
applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially more severe
significant impacts to hydrology and water quality resources beyond what was analyzed in the
DDSP EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
63
City of Dublin
Land Use and Planning
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 29
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a
conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
❑X
❑x
(a) Physically divide an established community
The physical division of an established community typically refers to the construction of a
feature (such as an interstate highway or railroad tracks) or removal of a means of access (such
as a local road or bridge) that would impair mobility within an existing community, or between
a community and outlying areas. For instance, the construction of an interstate highway
through an existing community may constrain travel from one side of the community to
another; similarly, such construction may also impair travel to areas outside of the community.
As described in the DDSP EIR, the DDSP would help ensure greater land use compatibility and
would not physically divide a community. The project would maintain the land use compatibility
principals of the DDSP and, therefore, there would be no impact.
(b) Conflict with land use plan, policy, or regulation
The 2023 DDSP Amendment would re -allocate the maximum allowed development densities
for residential and non-residential uses in the plan area, allow Research and Development as a
permitted use in the "Core" portion of the Retail District, and include other various refinements
to the DDSP development standards and design guidelines. These changes, as amended, would
not conflict with any city land use plan, policy, or regulation.
Therefore, there would be no change to the analysis of consistency with land use plans, policies
and regulations, from that previously analyzed in the DDSP EIR. The project would be consistent
with the DDSP (as amended) as well as the City's General Plan (including the 6th Cycle Housing
Element) and Zoning and, therefore, there would be no impact.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
64
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 30
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified land use and planning impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to land use and planning
beyond what was analyzed in the DDSP EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental
review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
City of Dublin. 2023 — 2031 Housing Element (6th Cycle), 2023.
Mineral Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
❑X
(a-b) Loss of known or identified mineral resource
As described in the DDSP EIR, mineral resources were not analyzed as they were determined to
be an "effect found not to be significant." The project would be consistent with the DDSP (as
amended) and within the scope of what was analyzed in the DDSP EIR. Therefore, there would
be no impact to mineral resources.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
65
City of Dublin
Noise
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 31
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
12. NOISE. Would the project result in:
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
New of an Impact
Significant Identified in
Impact the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the
project in excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards
of other agencies?
b) Generation of excessive ground borne vibration or
ground borne noise levels?
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private
airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
❑X
❑x
❑X
(a-b) Generate noise or vibration exceeding standards
As described in the DDSP EIR, compliance with DDSP design guidelines and development
standards would ensure that new projects do not exceed long-term stationary noise thresholds.
However, new projects could result in short-term construction -related noise and vibrations that
exceed noise standards for nearby sensitive uses and increased long-term mobile noise sources
(vehicular traffic). Mitigation Measures 3.7-la and 3.7-1b described in the DDSP EIR would
continue to apply to new projects including the preparation of construction noise management
plans (when applicable) and noise from transporting construction materials. Additionally, new
projects located adjacent to heavily traveled roadways would be required to prepare acoustical
analyses and incorporate site -specific mitigations to limit construction to the less noise
sensitive periods of the day and ensure that proper operating procedures are followed during
construction so that nearby sensitive receptors are not adversely affected by noise and
vibration. Based on these requirements, impacts would remain less than significant.
Mitigation Measure 3.7-3 described in the DDSP EIR would continue to apply to new
developments located adjacent to Interstate 580, Amador Plaza Road (between Dublin
Boulevard and St. Patrick's Way), and Dublin Boulevard (between the following locations:
Amador Plaza Road and Village Parkway, Regional Street and Golden Gate Drive, and San
Ramon Road and Regional Street) and requires a site -specific acoustical analysis. The mitigation
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
66
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 32
measure requires design features to be incorporated into the future development to reduce
noise impacts to noise sensitive land uses.
(c) Excessive noise level near a public or private airport
The project area is not located within an airport land use plan or within the vicinity of a private
airstrip and, therefore, there would be no impact.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified noise impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements and required mitigation measures and
applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially more severe
significant impacts related to exposure to noise exceeding standards beyond what was analyzed
in the DDSP EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no
further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
Livermore Municipal Airport, Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, 2012.
Population and Housing
New
Significant
Impact
13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an
area, either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
❑x
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
67
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 33
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a, b) Population and Housing
As described in the DDSP EIR, impacts to population and housing was not analyzed as they were
determined to be an "effect found not to be significant." The project would be consistent with
the DDSP (as amended) and within the scope of what was analyzed in the DDSP EIR. Therefore,
there would be no impact.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
Public Services
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities or need for new or physical altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of
the public services:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d)
Parks?
e) Other public facilities?
❑X
❑X
❑x
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Fire
As stated in the DDSP EIR, new projects would be required to comply with applicable building,
safety, and fire codes (e.g., 2022 California Fire Code, Part 9, Title 24 of the California Code of
Regulations and City of Dublin Chapter 5.08 Fire Code). New projects would also be required to
fund on- and off -site improvements and contribute to the City's public facilities fees.
Specifically, the proposed project is required to adhere to the California Fire Code and City of
Dublin codes, ordinance and regulations to minimize fire hazards, including fire prevention and
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
68
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 34
suppression measures; fire hydrants and sprinkler systems; emergency access; and other similar
requirements. Alameda County Fire Department would continue to provide services to the
project site and would not require additional firefighters to serve the proposed project. The
demand for fire protection services resulting from the proposed project would not require the
construction of new or alteration of existing fire protection facilities to maintain an adequate
level of fire protection service. No physical impacts associated with the provision of fire
protection services would occur.
(b) Police
As stated in the DDSP EIR, new projects would be required to comply with applicable City of
Dublin safety requirements. This includes paying City of Dublin public facility impact fees to
assist in funding new police facilities. Additionally, per Dublin Police Services, future projects
will be required to incorporate various safety and security requirements, including but not
limited to adequate locking devices, security lighting, and ensuring adequate surveillance for
structures and parking areas. These incorporations are minor and will not result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities or need for new or physically altered governmental facilities.
(c) Schools and other public facilities
The project would increase the number of residential units and corresponding decrease the
amount of non-residential development in the plan area, thereby maintaining the same
maximum level of development intensity as analyzed in the DDSP EIR. The project would still be
consistent with the DDSP's policies to encourage residential development downtown. Dublin
Unified School District fees, City public facilities fees, and the DDSP provision for community
benefit (e.g., gathering spaces) would continue to apply for new projects.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified public services impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to public services beyond what was analyzed in the DDSP EIR
and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
69
City of Dublin
Recreation
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 35
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
15. RECREATION. Would the project:
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
New of an Impact
Significant Identified in
Impact the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction
or expansion of recreational facilities which might have
an adverse physical effect on the environment?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
❑x
❑x
(a, b) Increase the use of existing recreation facilities causing deterioration or require new
recreation facilities
As described in the DDSP EIR, recreation facilities were not analyzed as they were determined
to be an "effect found not to be significant." The project would be consistent with the DDSP
and within the scope of what was analyzed in the DDSP EIR. Therefore, there would be no
impact.
Furthermore, each new development project would be required to pay public facilities impact
fees that will fund the acquisition of parkland and the development of future park facilities.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified recreation impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to recreation facilities beyond what was analyzed in the DDSP
EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
70
City of Dublin
Transportation
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 36
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
New of an Impact
Significant Identified in
Impact the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design
feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
❑X
❑x
❑X
(a) Conflict with applicable transportation plans standards, including bicycle and pedestrian
facilities
As part of the DDSP, the City amended the City's General Plan related to acceptable Levels of
Service (LOS) standards within the City to require a LOS of D or better for all intersections
except for intersections within the DDSP area. The objective of this amendment was to balance
vehicular and non -vehicular circulation requirements and, thereby, create a more pedestrian -
friendly downtown.
As shown in Table 1: Change in Project Traffic Trips, the project would increase the allowable
allocation of residential units by 465 units and a decrease in the allowable allocation of non-
residential uses by 300,000 square feet. It would result in a net decrease of 11,488 daily trips, a
net decrease of 162 AM peak hour trips, and net decrease of 1,110 PM peak hour trips. This
reduction is because commercial development generates a greater number of trips than
residential development when compared on a similar square footage basis.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
71
City of Dublin
Table 1: Change in Project Traffic Trips
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 37
Proposed ITE Land
or Use
Removed Code
Land Use Size
Multifamily Housing
Proposed 221 465 2,209 149 54
(Mid -Rise)
1
Shopping Center
(>150 KSF)2
Net New Project Trips 1-11,488 1 -162 1 -139
Note: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition (2021) used to develop trip generation rates.
'Average rate used for ITE Land Use Code 221 and also assumed close to transit.
2 Fitted curve used for ITE Land Use Code 820.
Units
AM Peak PM Peak
Daily
Trips Total In Out Total In Out
Removed
820
300
Dwelling
Units
KSF
-13,697
-311
-193
95
-118
135
-1,245
88
-597
47
-648
-23-1,1101 -509 1 -601
Since this proposed change would result in a negative trip generation for all time periods, no
new impacts would be created compared to the previous analysis in the DDSP EIR.
Additionally, Mitigation Measures 3.9-1 and 3.9-4 require support of Alameda County's project
and program aimed at reducing traffic congestion, development of Transportation Demand
Management Programs, implementation of the City's policies to use alternative modes of
transportation and working with Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) to increase
service. These measures would continue to apply to any future development project.
Therefore, impacts would remain less than significant.
(b) Conflict with CEQA Section 15064.3 (b)
Since certification of the DDSP EIR in 2011, the issue of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) has
become a more prominent issue of concern as evidenced by passage of SB 743 in 2013.
Previously, CEQA analysis was conducted using a level of service (LOS) measurement that
evaluated traffic delay. As specified under SB 743 and implemented under Section 15064.3 of
the State CEQA Guidelines (effective December 28, 2018), VMT is the required metric to be
used for identifying CEQA impacts and mitigation. In December 2018, the Office of Planning and
Research (OPR) published a Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts, including
guidance for VMT analysis. The Office of Administrative Law approved the updated CEQA
Guidelines and lead agencies were given until July 1, 2020, to implement the updated
guidelines for VMT analysis.
The topic of the project's contribution to vehicle miles traveled (VMT) was not analyzed in the
DDSP EIR. Because DDSP EIR has been certified, the determination of whether VMT needs to be
analyzed for this project is governed by the law on supplemental or subsequent EIRs (Public
Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). VMT is not
required to be analyzed unless it constitutes new information of substantial importance that
was not known and could not have been known at the time the previous environmental
documents were certified as complete (Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162 and 15163). VMT was known at the time of the certification of the
DDSP EIR (Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
72
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 38
15163). Increased traffic was analyzed using other methods (LOS) at the time of certification of
the DDSP EIR. Under CEQA standards, VMT is not considered new information that requires
analysis in a Supplemental EIR or negative declaration. Therefore, no supplemental
environmental analysis of the project's impacts on this issue is required under CEQA. Therefore,
the City is not required to conduct an analysis of VMT and the 2023 DDSP Amendment would
have no impact.
(c) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
The 2023 DDSP Amendment does not include specific development plans which would
substantially increase hazards, nor does it alter roadway design such that implementation of
the proposed project would create sharp curves or dangerous intersections and, therefore,
there would be no impact.
(d) Result in inadequate emergency access
As described in the DDSP EIR, new projects would be required to comply with applicable
building, safety, and fire codes to ensure proper design and adequacy of emergency access.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified transportation impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to transportation beyond what was analyzed in the DDSP EIR
and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
cource(s1
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
City of Dublin. Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, 2021.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
73
City of Dublin
Tribal Cultural Resources
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 39
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
New of an Impact
Significant Identified in
Impact the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature,
place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of
Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical
resources as defined in Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k), or
b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c)
of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
❑X
❑X
The topic of tribal cultural resources is a relatively new category in the CEQA checklist and was
not analyzed in the DDSP EIR. However, mitigation measures related to potential impacts to
historic and archeological resources on the site are described in the Cultural Resources section,
above.
Because the DDSP EIR has been certified, the determination of whether tribal cultural resources
need to be analyzed for this proposed project is governed by the law on supplemental or
subsequent EIRs (Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15162
and 15163). Tribal cultural resources are not required to be analyzed under those standards
unless it constitutes "new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete" (CEQA
Guidelines Sec. 15162 (a) (3)).
(a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources
The project area is located in an urban setting and has been disturbed through prior
development. There are no identified historic resources within the project area and, therefore,
there would be no impact.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
74
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 40
(b) Significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1
There are no known significant tribal cultural resources within the project area. While the
likelihood of finding archaeological resources is extremely low, Chapter 8.48 Archaeological
Resources Regulations outlines a process to protect archaeological resources and prehistoric or
historic artifacts that are discovered during any construction or excavation.
Furthermore, the 2023 DDSP Amendment would continue to require new projects to comply
with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code in the event of the discovery or
recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery during
future development activities, which would require that there be no further excavation or
disturbance of the area, or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains. If
the human remains are of Native American origin, the coroner must notify the Native American
Heritage Commission within 24-hours of identification.
As required under Senate Bill 18, a letter regarding the project was mailed to eleven tribes on
June 23, 2023, using a mailing list provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. No
request for consultation has been received to date.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified tribal cultural impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or more severe
significant impacts to tribal cultural resources beyond those previously analyzed in the DDSP
EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
75
City of Dublin
Utilities and Service Systems
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 41
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
New of an Impact
Significant Identified in
Impact the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new
or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm
water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project and reasonably foreseeable future development
during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
❑X
❑x
(a and c) Require relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater
treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas or telecommunications
facilities and sufficient wastewater capacity
The project would increase the number of residential units and correspondingly decrease the
amount of non-residential development in the plan area, thereby maintaining the same
maximum level of development intensity as analyzed in the DDSP EIR.
The proposed project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or
expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunication facilities beyond that which was already anticipated in the DDSP EIR.
Additionally, new projects would be required to pay impact fees to fund stormwater
infrastructure.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
76
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 42
The proposed project would be consistent with the type and intensity of development assumed
for the project site in the City's General Plan and accounted for in Dublin San Ramon Services
District 2020 Urban Water Management Plan.
(b) Sufficient water supply
As described in the DDSP EIR, there is adequate capacity to service buildout of the DDSP area.
Because the proposed project would not increase the existing maximum allowable commercial
space nor would there be an increase in the maximum number of residential units beyond what
was previously approved and analyzed in the DDSP EIR, there would be no impacts to water
supply. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(d-e) Adequate landfill and compliance
As described in the DDSP EIR, the project area is served by the Altamont Landfill, which has a
total estimated permitted capacity of 62,000,000 cubic yards and a remaining estimated
capacity of 45,720,000 cubic yards (74 percent remaining capacity). Future development would
occur over an extended period of time and the Altamont Landfill would see an incremental
increase in additional solid waste until ultimate buildout of the project area.
Because the 2023 DDSP Amendment would not increase projected total solid waste generation
because the existing maximum limit of commercial space and residential units would remain as
previously analyzed in the DDSP EIR, there would be no impacts. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
Disposal of solid waste would be required to comply with all federal state, and local statutes
and regulations associated with solid waste. This would include providing receptacles for green
waste, recyclables, and garbage.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified utilities and service system impacts, nor result in new significant
impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or more severe
significant impacts to utilities and service systems beyond those previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR, 2010.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
77
City of Dublin
Wildfire
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 43
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
New of an Impact
Significant Identified in
Impact the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
18. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard
severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including
downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a
result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
❑X
❑x
(a-d) Wildfire and emergency evacuation plans
The topic of wildfire is a new category in the CEQA checklist and was not analyzed in the DDSP
EIR. Since the DDSP EIR has been certified, the determination of whether wildfire and
emergency evacuation plans need to be analyzed for this 2023 DDSP Amendment is governed
by the law on supplemental or subsequent EIRs (Public Resources Code Section 21166 and
CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163).
Wildfire and emergency evacuation plans are not required to be analyzed under the CEQA
standards for supplemental or subsequent EIRs unless it constitutes "new information of
substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete" (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (a)(3)).
The impact of wildfire and emergency evacuation plans was known at the time of the
certification of the DDSP EIR. Under CEQA standards, it is not new information that requires
analysis in a supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration. No supplemental environmental
analysis of the project's impacts on this issue is required under CEQA.
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
78
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 44
Furthermore, the project area is located outside of a very high fire hazard severity zone as
identified by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE). The project
area is in an urbanized area and is not located within an area that would be subject to the
requirements of the City's Wildfire Management Plan (City of Dublin 2010).
In addition, the Alameda County Fire Department, as part of the City's entitlement process, will
review all plans for adequate fire suppression, fire access, and emergency evacuation for all
future new developments.
Conclusion
The project does not propose substantial changes that were not previously analyzed in the
DDSP EIR that would require major changes to the EIR. Based on the information in the DDSP
EIR and this environmental analysis, the project would not substantially increase the severity of
the previously identified wildfire impacts, nor result in new significant impacts.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or more severe
significant impacts to wildfire beyond those previously analyzed in the DDSP EIR and no other
CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review
is required.
Source(s)
CALFIRE FHSZ Viewer. Accessed July 6, 2023.
City of Dublin. Wildfire Management Plan, 2010.
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSP EIR
18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project:
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
79
City of Dublin
2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study' Page 45
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
New
Significant
Impact
Substantial
Increase in
the Severity
of an Impact
Identified in
the DDSP EIR
Equal or Less Severe
Impact than Identified
in the DDSP EIR
b)
Have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of the past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.)
c) Have environmental effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures
(a) Substantially degrade the quality of the environment
No new impact. There are no substantial changes to the project as analyzed in the DDSP EIR.
The project is similar to land uses for the project area analyzed in the DDSP EIR and there is no
change in the maximum amount of commercial square footage or residential units permitted
under the DDSP. As demonstrated in this Initial Study, the project does not constitute a
substantial change to the DDSP EIR analysis, will not result in additional significant impacts, and
no additional or different mitigation measures are required. Therefore, implementation of the
proposed project would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of a previously
identified significant impact as previously analyzed, and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required for this
impact area.
(b) Cumulative impacts
No new impact. The DDSP EIR considered the project's cumulatively considerable impacts
where effects had the potential to degrade the quality of the environment as a result of build -
out of the DDSP. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in any new
cumulative impacts or increase the severity of a previously identified significant cumulative
impact as previously analyzed, and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, there would be no cumulative impacts.
(c) Substantial adverse effects on human beings
No new impact. The proposed project would not create adverse environmental effects that
would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The
proposed project would allow for residential and commercial development in compliance with
the DDSP standards and land uses, as amended. These uses or activities would not result in any
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, as discussed
8/15/23
Kimley>»Horn
80
City of Dublin 2023 DDSP Amendment
CEQA Initial Study I Page 46
throughout this document. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not
result in any new impacts or increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact as
previously analyzed in the DDSP EIR, and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are
met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required for this impact area.
8/15/23
Kimley>>>Horn
81
DocuSign Envelope ID: FAD68031-6512-472E-8158-8773DAAB54C8
Attachment 4
RESOLUTION NO. 23-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN AND
DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN TO INCREASE THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
POTENTIAL BY 465 UNITS, DECREASE THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
PERMITTED BY 300,000 SQUARE FEET, INCREASE THE HEIGHT AND FLOOR AREA
RATIO IN "THE CORE" AREA OF THE RETAIL DISTRICT AND AMEND THE DESIGN
STANDARDS AND ALLOWABLE USES
PLPA-2023-00001
WHEREAS, the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP) project area is located in the
southwestern portion of the City and is approximately 284 acres in size. The project area is
generally bound by Village Parkway to the east, Interstate 580 to the south, San Ramon Road to
the west, and Amador Valley Boulevard to the north; and
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2011, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 09-11
approving the DDSP and associated implementation actions. At the same time, the City Council
adopted Resolution No. 08-11 certifying the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Environmental
Impact Report (DDSP) (EIR) (SCH# 2010022005, incorporated herein by reference). The
DDSP EIR evaluated the potential impacts associated with intensifying development in the 284-
acre Downtown Dublin area to accommodate additional residential and non-residential uses;
and
WHEREAS, Subsequent to adoption, the DDSP has been amended five times, including
the 2020 DDSP Amendments focused on the initial implementation of the Downtown Dublin
Preferred Vision approved by City Council on November 5, 2019, which included three primary
components: 1) Siting of a Town Square; 2) New Street Grid Network; and 3) Downtown
Character; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the General Plan and DDSP further implement
the Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision by increasing the residential development potential by
465 units and decreasing the non-residential square footage by 300,000 square feet, increasing
the height and floor area ratio in "The Core" area of the Retail District and amendments to the
design standards and allowable uses, hereafter referred to as the "2023 DDSP Amendment" or
the "Project;" and
WHEREAS, consistent with Section 65352.3 of the California Government Code, the City
obtained a contact list of local Native American tribes from the Native American Heritage
Commission and notified the tribes on the contact list of the opportunity to consult with the City
on the proposed Specific Plan Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code
Section 21166, et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) require that when an
EIR or negative declaration has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR or negative
Reso. No. 23-07, Item 6.1, Adopted 09/12/2023 Page 1 of 3
82
DocuSign Envelope ID: FAD68031-6512-472E-8158-8773DAAB54C8
declaration shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of
substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that one or more of the following exists:
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions
of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the
project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative
Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous
EIR or negative declaration;
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
shown in the previous EIR;
c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in
fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the
project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or
d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects
on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adoption measures or
alternative; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the Project was examined to
determine if any of the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) requiring
preparation of supplemental environmental review would be met. The analysis, as further
detailed the Staff Report, dated September 12, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference,
concluded that none of the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) requiring
preparation of supplemental environmental review are met; the Project would not result in any
new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified
in DDSP EIR and subsequent Addendums; no other CEQA standards for supplemental review
are met and no further environmental review is required; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated September 12, 2023, and incorporated herein by
reference, described and analyzed the 2023 DDSP Amendment, for the Planning Commission;
and
Reso. No. 23-07, Item 6.1, Adopted 09/12/2023 Page 2 of 3
83
DocuSign Envelope ID: FAD68031-6512-472E-8158-8773DAAB54C8
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on the 2023
DDSP Amendment on September 12, 2023, at which time all interested parties had the
opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all above -referenced reports,
recommendations, and testimony to evaluate the 2023 DDSP Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct
and made a part of this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council approve the amendments to the General Plan and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan, as
described in Exhibit A, based on findings, as set forth in Exhibit A, that the amendments are in
the public interest, promotes general health, safety and welfare, and that the General Plan and
Downtown Specific Plan, as so amended, will remain internally consistent.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of September 2023 by the following
vote:
AYES: Aini, Grier, Ochoa, Thalblum, Wahida
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: ,—DocuSigned by:
---64E9DDAD421F421...
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
r DocuSigned by:
yy'A1E22E565B484A3
LAIn� IJGVGI...Opment Director
Co
5480452.2
Reso. No. 23-07, Item 6.1, Adopted 09/12/2023 Page 3 of 3
84
DOWNTOWN DUBLIN
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS
City Council
October 17,2023
DUBLIN
CALIFORNIA
Downtown Dublin Specific Plan and
Preferred Vision
• Downtown Dublin Specific Plan
• Preferred Vision
— City Council Approved November 2019
— Primary Components:
• Siting of a Town Square
• New Street Grid Network
• Downtown Character
Retail
District
Transit -Oriented
District
Coordination with Property Owner
• Approval of Memorandum of
Understanding between the City and
American Realty Advisors
• Acquisition of 7300Amador Plaza Road
Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision
Implementation 2019
DDSP Amendments
• Increase FAR
• TOD and Retail Districts
• Combine Residential Allocation
• All Districts
• Amend Parking Standards
• TOD and Village Parkway District
• Hotel and Office Uses in TOD
Internal Coordination
• Street Cross Sections
• Determining Right -of -Way Needs
Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision
Implementation 2020
DDSP Amendments
• IncorporateTown Square
• Incorporate Street Grid
• Combine Non -Residential Allocation
• TOD and Retail Districts
• Add Hotel as a Permitted Use
• Retail District
• Update Design Guidelines Standards
Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision
Implementation 2021 to Now
Coordination with Property Owner City Council Discussions
• Amended MOU April 2021
• ROW Acquisition for New Streets and
Continue Street Cross Sections
(202 I )
• Parking Assessment (2022)
• Hines Draft Master Plan (2022)
• Hines North Project (2023)
• Transportation Analysis (2023)
• Coordination with DSRSD (2023)
• Strategic Planning Workshop (Feb. 2022)
• Increase FAR
• Increase Residential Allocation
— Housing Element approx.400 units
Hines approx. 1,500 units
• Increase Height to Match TOD
• Life Sciences — New Land Use
• Private vs. Public Streets
— WDTIF update
• Hines Presents Master Plan (Oct. 2022)
Proposed Amendments to
lenient Preferred Vision
• Increase Residential Allocation
— 465 Units
• Decrease Non-residential Allocation
— 300,000 square feet
• Increase Floor Area Ratio in The Core
— Base FAR .50 / Maximum FAR 2.5
• Design Standards and Allowable Uses
— Projections and setbacks
— Flexibility in The Core
— Research and Development
Residential and Non -Residential
Development Potential
Residential Development
Non -Residential Development
Total Allowable Development in the Downtown
Existing
Development Pool
2,500
Development Pool
1,320,220
Affordable Units not
subject to
Development Pool
416
SF not subject to
Development Pool
942, 320
Total Units
2,916
Total SF
2,262,540
Proposed
Units to be Added
+ 465
SF to be Eliminated
- 300,000
Total Units
3,381
Total SF
1,962,540
Development Pool
Existing
Development Pool
2,500
Development Pool
1,320,220
Units Constructed
- 783
SF Constructed
- 10,329
Units Reserved and
Not Yet Constructed
- 921
SF Reserved and Not
Yet Constructed
0
Units Remaining
796
SF Remaining
1,309,891
Proposed
Units to be Added
+ 465
SF to be Eliminated
- 300,000
Total Units
2,965
Total SF
1,020,220
Units Remaining
1,261
SF Remaining
1,009,891
Anticipated Downtown Preferred Vision Development
(Hines)
Total Units
1,455
I Total SF
658,000
al I
DUBLIN
CALIFORNIA
I
91
Changes to Standards and Uses
• Design Standards
- Setbacks on Upper Floors
- Projections (stoops, windows, awnings)
- Parking Space Length
• Design Standards for The Core
- Maximum Height (Match TOD)
- Floor Area Ratio (Match TOD)
- Location of Residential Units
• New Use
— Research and Development
Environmental Review
• Downtown Dublin Specific Plan EIR (20 I I )
• Prior Amendments (2014-2020)
• Current Project
- No new impacts
- Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Planning Commission Review
• Regular Meeting September 12, 2023
• Resolution No. 23-07 Recommending Approval
Recommendation
Conduct the public hearing, deliberate and adopt the Resolution
Amending the General Plan and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan to
Further Implement the Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision.
October 17, 2023
SB 343
Senate Bill 343 mandates supplemental materials
that have been received by the City Clerk's office that
relate to an agenda item after the agenda packets
have been distributed to the City Council be available
to the public.
The attached documents were received in the City
Clerk's office after distribution of the October 17,
2023, Regular City Council meeting agenda packet.
Item 6.1
96
IP
DUBLIN
CALIFORNIA
THE NEW
AMERICAN
BACKYARD
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 17, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Item 6.1 Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision Implementation General Plan and
Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Amendments
The October 17, 2023, City Council Meeting includes an item adopting the Resolution Amending the
General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan to Further Implement the Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision.
Table 2.1 (page 4) in the Resolution (Attachment 1) has been updated to reflect City Council Resolution
No. 84-23 to correct the total number of dwelling units, persons per dwelling units and population. In
addition, a correction has been made to the footnote for Table 2.1 to state the maximum FAR outside
"The Core" is 2.0.
97
Attachment I
RESOLUTION NO. xx - 23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN AND DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN TO
FURTHER IMPLEMENT THE DOWNTOWN DUBLIN PREFERRED VISION
PLPA-2023-00001
WHEREAS, the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP) project area is located in the
southwestern portion of the City and is approximately 284 acres in size. The project area is
generally bound by Village Parkway to the east, Interstate 580 to the south, San Ramon Road to
the west, and Amador Valley Boulevard to the north; and
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2011, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 09-11
approving the DDSP and associated implementation actions. At the same time, the City Council
adopted Resolution No. 08-11 certifying the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Environmental Impact
Report (DDSP) (EIR) (SCH# 2010022005, incorporated herein by reference). The DDSP EIR
evaluated the potential impacts associated with intensifying development in the 284-acre
Downtown Dublin area to accommodate additional residential and non-residential uses; and
WHEREAS, Subsequent to adoption, the DDSP has been amended five times, including
the 2020 DDSP Amendments focused on the initial implementation of the Downtown Dublin
Preferred Vision approved by City Council on November 5, 2019, which included three primary
components: 1) Siting of a Town Square; 2) New Street Grid Network; and 3) Downtown
Character; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the General Plan and DDSP further implement
the Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision by increasing the residential development potential by 465
units and decreasing the non-residential square footage by 300,000 square feet, increasing the
height and floor area ratio (FAR) in "The Core" area of the Retail District and amendments to the
design standards and allowable uses, hereafter referred to as the "2023 DDSP Amendment" or
the "Project;" and
WHEREAS, consistent with Section 65352.3 of the California Government Code, the City
obtained a contact list of local Native American tribes from the Native American Heritage
Commission and notified the tribes on the contact list of the opportunity to consult with the City on
the proposed General Plan Amendment. None of the contacted tribes requested a consultation
within the 90-day statutory consultation period and no further action is required under Section
65352.3; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code
Section 21166, et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) require that when an
EIR or negative declaration has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR or negative
declaration shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of
substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that one or more of the following exists:
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 1 of 9
98
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions
of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project
is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due
to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity
of previously identified significant effects; or
3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have
been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified
as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous
EIR or negative declaration;
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
shown in the previous EIR;
c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact
be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the
project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or
d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adoption measures
or alternative; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the Project was examined to
determine if any of the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) requiring
preparation of supplemental environmental review would be met. The analysis, as further detailed
the Staff Report, dated October 17, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference, concluded that
none of the standards contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) requiring preparation of
supplemental environmental review are met; the Project would not result in any new significant
impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in DDSP EIR
and subsequent Addendums; no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met and no
further environmental review is required; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on the
Project, including the proposed General Plan and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Amendments,
on September 12, 2023, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, on September 12, 2023, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
23-07 recommending that the City Council approve the 2023 DDSP Amendment, which
Resolution is incorporated herein by reference; and
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 2 of 9
99
WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated October 17, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference,
described and analyzed the 2023 DDSP Amendment for the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on the 2023 DDSP
Amendment on October 17, 2023, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be
heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the DDSP EIR and CEQA Addendum, all above -
referenced reports, recommendations, and testimony to evaluate the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct
and made a part of this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the General Plan
amendments, as set forth below, are in the public interest and that the General Plan as amended
will remain internally consistent.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the Downtown Dublin Specific
Plan amendments, as set forth below, are in the public interest will promote general health, safety
and welfare, and that the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan as amended will remain internally
consistent.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the following
amendments to the General Plan:
Page 1-9, Section 1.8.1.5 Primary Planning Area revise the Downtown Dublin -Retail
District land use classification to increase the FAR to a maximum of 2.5 and the
Downtown Dublin -Transit Oriented District land use classification to a maximum FAR of
2.5 to be consistent with Table 2.1 as follows:
B. DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
Downtown Dublin — Village Parkway District (Maximum FAR: .35; employee density: 200-
450 square feet per employee)
This designation allows a range of residential, commercial, and mixed uses consistent with
the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan.
Downtown Dublin — Retail District (Maximum FAR: 2.0 - 2.5; employee density: 200-450
square feet per employee)
This designation allows a range of residential, commercial, and mixed uses consistent with
the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan.
Maximum FAR is 2.5 in "The Core." In "The Core", the FAR may be spread through all
developable parcels (this does not include the Town Square). Outside "The Core", the
maximum FAR is 2.0.
Downtown Dublin — Transit -Oriented District (Maximum FAR: 2.5; employee density: 200-
450 square feet per employee)
This designation allows a range of residential, commercial, and mixed uses consistent with
the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan.
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 3 of 9
100
Table 2.1 shall be revised as follows: (Only the sections of the table related to the DDSP area
and Grand Total are shown here. All other sections of Table 2.1 remain the same):
Table 2.1 Land Use Development Potential: Primary Planning Area
Downtown
Dublin
Specific Plan
Area
Acres
Dwelling
Units/acre
Dwelling
Units
Persons/Dwelling
Unit
Population
Downtown
Dublin
230.2
6.1-25.1+
3,3815
2.99
10,109
Downtown
Dublin
Specific Plan
Area
Acres
Maximum
Floor Area
Ratio (Gross)
Maximum
Potential
Square Feet'
Square
Feet/employee
Jobs
Village
Parkway 32.9 .35 .50 200-450 1,115-2,508
District
Retail District 113.1 2.56 9.94 200-450 6,139-13,814
Transit -
Oriented 84.2 2.5 9.24 200-450 8,492-19,108
District
Total: 230.2 1 19.6 15,746-35,430
GRAND
TOTAL
ACRES
2,494.48
DWELLING
UNITS
6,770-14,333
POPULATION
20,242-42,854
SQUARE FEET
(MILLIONS)
14.16-16.59
JOBS
28,952-63.175
6 Maximum FAR is 2.5 in "The Core". In "The Core", the FAR may be spread through all developable
parcels (this does not include the Town Square). Outside "The Core", the maximum FAR is 2.0.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the following
amendments to the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan:
Page 43, Table 3-1: Land Uses, shall be amended to add "Research and Development" as
an allowed use in the Retail District and Transit -Oriented District and Prohibited in the
Village Parkway Districts as follows:
Table 3-1: Land Uses
BUILDING USES'
RETAIL
DISTRICT
TRANSIT -
ORIENTED
DISTRICT
VILLAGE
PARKWAY
DISTRICT
Research and Development
Allowed'
Allowed'
Prohibited
Manufacturing uses are limited to less than 10% of the building area. A CUP is required for manufacturing uses
greater than 10% up to maximum of 20% of the building area.
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 4 of 9
101
Page 45, add new Section 3.4.16 Research and Development to read as follows:
3.4.16 Research and Development
Any establishment which primary use is for research and development purposes including, but
not limited to, science and engineering laboratories (research, development, and testing), quality
assurance work (dimensional analysis), and software development and engineering. Limited
manufacturing uses are allowed as part of the primary use. Such uses may not generate
nuisances related to emissions, noise, odors, and may not include outdoor storage and
operations.
Page 47, Table 3-3 shall be amended to read as follows:
Table 3-3: Base and Maximum FAR Per District
DISTRICT
Retail
The Core
Transit -
Oriented
Village
Parkway
BASE
FAR
0.35
0.50
0.50
0.35
MAXIMUM
FAR
2.0
2.5
2.5
0.35
Page 47, Fifth Paragraph shall be amended to read as follows:
This Specific Plan allows for a future construction of approximately 2.2 million square feet of non-
residential development and 3,381 residential dwelling units (416 of these units are exempt from
the Community Benefit Program as further described in Section 6.4 Development Pool and
Community Benefit Program).
Page 48, Table 3-4 shall be amended to read as follows:
Table 3-4: Net New Development
DISTRICT
Retail
Transit -
Oriented
Village
Parkway
NON-
RESIDENTIAL
(SF)
1,866,810
(+150 hotel rooms)
20,730
1,962,540
(includes 150 hotel
rooms)
RESIDENTIAL
(DU)
3,381
MINIMUM
RESIDENTIAL
DENSITY
22 units/net acre
30 units/net acres
No minimum
Notes. Includes projects that have been approved, but not yet constructed
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 5 of 9
102
Page 53 Section 4.1 Retail District Development Standards, 4 Street Setback from Dublin
Boulevard and San Ramon Road shall be amended to read as follows:
LOT SIZE AND BUILDING PLACEMENT
Street Setback
from Dublin
4 Boulevard and
San Ramon
Road
10 ft. min at ground level.
The street setback may be improved as an extension of the public
sidewalk if accessible to the public through an established easement.
Along Dublin Boulevard, upper floors above 20 ft. may reduce setback
to 5 ft.
Page 57 Section 4.1 Retail District Development Standards, 1 Floor Area Ratio (FAR), 2
Res and 3 Building Height shall be amended to read as follows:
BUILDING DESIGN
1 Floor Area
Ratio (FAR)
0.35 base outside "The Core" and 0.50 in "The Core."
2.0 max outside "The Core" and 2.5 max in "The Core." In The Core,
the FAR may be spread through all developable parcels (this does not
include the Town Square) (required participation in the development
density pool, an agreement with the City, and provision of a community
benefit in compliance with the Community Benefit Program).
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 6 of 9
103
2 Residential
Units
3 Building Height
Not permitted west of San Ramon Road.
Allowed at a minimum density of 22 units per net acre.
Permitted within a mixed -use development if designed based on the
following standards:
• The development includes ground floor retail or office space that
equals an FAR of 0.3 min
• Retail or office space is built along at least 80% of the property's
total street frontage and set back no more than 10 ft. from the
building setback requirement
• Common open space for the residential units are provided at a
rate of 15% of the site's total area
• The above standards may be modified through an SDR as part
of a mixed -use development in the Town Core area.
Projects that include residential development within 1,000 ft. of either
Interstate 580 or 680 (or less per Bay Area Air Quality Management
District's current guidelines) shall incorporate the following standards to
minimize potentially adverse air quality affects:
• Configure the proposed buildings so that the bulk of the building
is located farther from the highway.
• Place heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system
intakes as far away from highway as feasible.
• Include high efficiency filters in the HVAC system (rated with a
minimum efficiency rating value [MERV] of at least 13). This
would also include a commitment to regular maintenance and
replacement of filters as needed.
• Provide positive pressure with the HVAC system in all occupied
spaces to prevent the incursion of outside air that bypasses the
HVAC filters.
• To reduce the amount of outside unfiltered air indoors, do not
place operable windows in close proximity to the highway. In
addition, signs should be posted to keep exterior doors closed
when not in use.
8 floors and no more than 75 feet to the finished floor of the highest
story. Maximum building height it 90 ft. (tower elements, architectural
and articulated design features, solar panels, and small-scale wind
turbines may extend 10 ft. max beyond this height). The height may be
increased through an SDR in the Town Core area.
Minimum building height in "The Core" is 40 feet, except for structures
within the Town Square.
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 7 of 9
104
Page 58 Section 4.1 Retail District Development Standards, 2 Stoops, 3 Bay Windows and
6 Storefront Awnings shall be amended to read as follows:
PROJECTIONS AND ENCROACHMENTS INTO SETBACKS
3 Bay Windows
6 Storefront
Awnings
Permitted for residential use only.
5 ft. min usable walkway must be maintained on private streets and 10
ft. on public streets.
2 ft. max into all setbacks.
4 ft. max along Dublin Boulevard.
12 ft. min vertical clearance required over sidewalks, walkways, and
private outdoor spaces.
6 ft. max into all setbacks.
8 ft. max along Dublin Boulevard and Golden Gate Drive.
8 ft. min vertical clearance required over sidewalks, walkways, and
private outdoor spaces.
Page 86 Office/Lodging Fronts, first bullet point shall be amended to read as follows:
At least 20% of the facade's surface area should consist of windows (including glass on
doors). Windows shall be provided on all floors of the building. Exceptions to window
area may be approved for parking structures. See Section 4.4.14 for design guidelines
for Parking Structures.
Page 103 Section 4.4.14 Parking Areas, fourth bullet point shall be amended to be
consistent with graphic on page 104 as follows:
The length of parking spaces may be reduced by up to 2.5 feet if the vehicle will
overhang a landscape planter which has been designed to accommodate the vehicle
overhang plus additional space for planting. The planter shall be protected by a curb or
wheel stop and should include low lying plants where the vehicle will overhang the
planter.
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 8 of 9
105
Table 6-1 shall be revised as follows:
Table 6-1: Development Pool
DISTRICT
Retail
Transit -
Oriented
Village
Parkwa
NON-
RESIDENTIAL
SQUARE
FOOTAGE
1,020,220
(+150 hotel
rooms)
0
NUMBER OF
RESIDENTIAL
DWELLINGS
2,965
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 2023 by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2023 Page 9 of 9
106