Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
*October 17, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting Packet
COUNCILMEMBERS Melissa Hernandez, Mayor Michael McCorriston, Vice Mayor Jean Josey, Councilmember Dr. Sherry Hu, Councilmember Kashef Qaadri, Councilmember �t DUBLIN CALIFORNIA Regular Meeting of the DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL City Council Chamber Dublin Civic Center 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 www.dublin.ca.gov Tuesday, October 17, 2023 Location: City Council Chamber I00 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 PM Additional Meeting Procedures This City Council meeting will be broadcast live on Comcast T.V. channel 28 beginning at 7:00 p.m. This meeting will also be livestreamed at www.tv30.org and on the City's website at: https://dublin.ca.gov/ccmeetings For the convenience of the City and as a courtesy to the public, members of the public who wish to offer comments electronically have the option of giving public comment via Zoom, subject to the following procedures: ❑ Fill out an online speaker slip available at www.dublin.ca.gov. The speaker slip will be made available at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, October 17, 2023. Upon submission, you will receive Zoom link information from the City Clerk. Speakers slips will be accepted until the staff presentation ends, or until the public comment period on non -agenda items is closed. ❑ Once connected to the Zoom platform using the Zoom link information from the City Clerk, the public speaker will be added to the Zoom webinar as an attendee and muted. The speaker will be able to observe the meeting from the Zoom platform. ❑ When the agenda item upon which the individual would like to comment is addressed, the City Clerk will announce the speaker in the meeting when it is their time to give public comment. The speaker will then be unmuted to give public comment via Zoom. ❑ Technical difficulties may occur that make the option unavailable, and, in such event, the meeting will continue despite the inability to provide the option. I. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE October 17, 2023 Dublin City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 1 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 3.1 Certificate of Recognition of Council on American -Islamic Relations (CAIR) — San Francisco Bay Area The City Council will present a certificate of recognition to the Council on American - Islamic Relations (CAIR) - San Francisco Bay Area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Present the certificate. Staff Report Attachment 1- CAIR-SFBA Certificate of Recognition 3.2 Presentation of the World Polio Day Proclamation The City Council will present the World Polio Day proclamation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Present the proclamation. Staff Report Attachment 1- World Polio Day Proclamation 3.3 Public Comment At this time, the public is permitted to address the City Council on non-agendized items. Please step to the podium and clearly state your name for the record. COMMENTS SHOULD NOT EXCEED THREE (3) MINUTES. In accordance with State Law, no action or discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. The Council may respond to statements made or questions asked, or may request Staff to report back at a future meeting concerning the matter. Any member of the public may contact the City Clerk's Office related to the proper procedure to place an item on a future City Council agenda. The exceptions under which the City Council MAY discuss and/or take action on items not appearing on the agenda are contained in Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(1)(2)(3). 4. CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are typically non -controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the City Council with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the City Council who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor to remove the item. 4.1 Approval of the October 3, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the October 3, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the October 3, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting. Staff Report Attachment 1- October 3, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 4.2 Adopt an Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approval of Plans and Specifications, Award of Contract to Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC, Waive a Minor Bid Irregularity, and Approval of a Budget Change for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space - Phase I Project, CIP No. PK0422 The City Council will consider adopting an addendum to the 2013 Mitigated Negative Declaration, approving the plans and specifications, waiving a minor bid irregularity, and October 17, 2023 Dublin City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 2 awarding a construction contract to Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space - Phase 1 Project. The project will construct the first phase of the 12.13-acre Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Park, located adjacent to the existing Iron Horse Regional Trail and Amador Valley Boulevard. The City Council will also consider approving a budget change to shift project funding from Fiscal Year 2024-25 to the current fiscal year. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Take the following actions: 1) Adopt the Resolution Adopting an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project; 2) Adopt the Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications, Waiving a Minor Bid Irregularity, and Awarding a Contract to Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space - Phase 1 Project, CIP No. PK0422; and 3) approve the budget change. Staff Report Attachment 1- Resolution Approving an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Attachment 2 - Exhibit A to the Resolution - Addendum to 2013 Adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Attachment 3 - Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications, Waiving a Minor Bid Irregularity, and Awarding a Contract to Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project - Phase 1, CIP No. PK0422 Attachment 4 - CIP No. PK0422 Attachment 5 - Bid Results Attachment 6 - Resolution No. 166-13 Certifying the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Attachment 7 - Budget Change Form 4.3 Notice of City Engineer's Receipt of Final Maps for Review for Tracts 8647, 8649, and 8650 The City Council will receive a notification of the City Engineer's receipt of the Final Maps for review for Tracts 8647, 8649, and 8650, Francis Ranch Neighborhoods 3, 5, and 6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the notification. Staff Report 4.4 Quarry Lane Performing Arts Center (PLPA-2021-00041) On October 3, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the Quarry Lane School Performing Arts Center project located at 6237 and 6363 Tassajara Road. The project includes the construction of a 13,800-square-foot performing art center and related site, landscape, and parking improvements. The requested approvals include an amendment to the Planned Development Zoning Stage 1 and 2 Development Plans, Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review Permit. The City Council adopted a Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration, approved a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review Permit, and introduced an Ordinance approving amendment to the Planned Development Zoning. The City Council is now being asked to waive the second reading and adopt the Ordinance approving the Planned Development Zoning Amendments. October 17, 2023 Dublin City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading and adopt the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map and Approving an Amended Planned Development Zoning District and Related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plans for the Quarry Lane School. Staff Report Attachment 1- Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map and Approving an Amended Planned Development Zoning District and Related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plans for the Quarry Lane School Attachment 2 - City Council Staff Report dated October 3, 2023, without attachments 4.5 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Grant Application for the Village Parkway Reconstruction and Complete Streets Project, CIP No. ST0323 The City Council will consider authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to file an application for grant funds from the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for the Village Parkway Reconstruction and Complete Streets Project, CIP No. ST0323. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Filing of an Application for Funding Assigned to MTC and Committing Any Necessary Matching Funds and Stating Assurances to Complete the Village Parkway Reconstruction and Complete Streets Project, CIP No. ST0323. Staff Report Attachment 1- Resolution Authorizing the Filing of an Application for Funding Assigned to MTC and Committing Any Necessary Matching Funds and Stating Assurances to Complete the Village Parkway Reconstruction and Complete Streets Project, CIP No. ST0323 Attachment 2 - CIP No. ST0323 4.6 Second Amendment to the Energy Savings Performance Contract with Willdan Energy Solutions for the Citywide Energy Improvements Project, CIP No. G1012I The City Council will consider approving a second amendment to the Energy Savings Performance Contract with Willdan Energy Solutions for the Citywide Energy Improvements Project, CIP No. GI0121. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Approving a Second Amendment to the Energy Savings Performance Contract with Willdan Energy Solutions for the Citywide Energy Improvements Project, CIP No. GI0121. Staff Report Attachment 1- Resolution Approving a Second Amendment to the Energy Savings Performance Contract with Willdan Energy Solutions for the Citywide Energy Improvements Project, CIP No. GI0121 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A to the Resolution - Second Amendment to the Energy Savings Performance Contract with Willdan Energy Solutions Attachment 3 - Energy Savings Performance Contract with Willdan Energy Solutions Attachment 4 - Amendment to the Energy Savings Performance Contract with Willdan Energy Solutions Attachment 5 - CIP No. GI0121 October 17, 2023 Dublin City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 4 4 4.7 Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers The City Council will receive a listing of payments issued from September 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023, totaling $6,125,063.78. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. Staff Report Attachment 1 - Payment Issuance Report for September 2023 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - None. 6. PUBLIC HEARING 6.1 Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision Implementation General Plan and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Amendments The City Council will consider amendments to the General Plan and the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan to further implement the Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision approved by the City Council in 2019. The amendments consist of adding Research and Development as a new land use, increasing the residential allocation by 465 units, decreasing the non-residential allocation by 300,000 square feet, increasing the height and floor area ratio in "The Core" area of the Retail District, and changes to setbacks. No specific development is proposed at this time. An Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared that concludes that all potential environmental effects were adequately addressed in the original EIR. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conduct the public hearing, deliberate, and adopt the Resolution Amending the General Plan and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan to Further Implement the Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision. Staff Report Attachment 1- Resolution Amending the General Plan and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan to Further Implement the Downtown Dublin Preferred Vision Attachment 2 - DDSP Amendments Redlined Pages Attachment 3 - CEQA Addendum Attachment 4 - Planning Commission Resolution No. 23-07 Recommending that the City Council Amend the General Plan and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Item 6.1 PowerPoint Presentation Item 6.1- SB 343 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7.1 Community Facilities District Formation The City Council will consider various actions to initiate proceedings to form a Community Facilities District at the East Ranch project location. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the following: 1) Resolution Declaring Intention to Form a Community Facilities District and Levy Special Taxes in the City of Dublin Community Facilities District No. 2023-1 (East Ranch) to Finance Certain Public Services and the Acquisition and Construction of Certain Public Facilities in and for such Community Facilities District; and 2) Resolution Declaring Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness to Finance the October 17, 2023 Dublin City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 5 Acquisition and Construction of Certain Public Facilities in and for City of Dublin Community Facilities District No. 2023-1 (East Ranch). Staff Report Attachment 1- Resolution Declaring Intention to Form a Community Facilities District and Levy Special Taxes in the City of Dublin Community Facilities District No. 2023-1 (East Ranch) Attachment 2 - Exhibit A to the Resolution - Rate and Method of Apportionment Attachment 3 - Resolution Declaring Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness to Finance the Acquisition and Construction of Certain Public Facilities in and for City of Dublin Community Facilities District No. 2023-1 (East Ranch) Attachment 4 - Public Comment Item 7.1 PowerPoint Presentation 8. NEW BUSINESS 8.1 MCE Corporation Economic Evaluation and Comparative Analysis The City Council will receive a report evaluating the City's costs over a five-year period for maintenance services provided by MCE Corporation. In addition, the report will include a comparative analysis relating to the maintenance services in neighboring jurisdictions of Brentwood, Pleasanton, and San Ramon. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. Staff Report Attachment 1- MCE Maintenance Services and Subcontractors by Task List Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2022-23 Comparative Analysis Item 8.1 PowerPoint Presentation 9. OTHER BUSINESS Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB1234). I0. ADIOURNMENT This AGENDA is posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a) If requested, pursuant to Government Code Section 54953.2, this agenda shall be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Section 12132) (ADA), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. To make a request for disability -related modification or accommodation, please contact the City Clerk's Office (925) 833-6650 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Upon receiving a request, the City will swiftly resolve requests for reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities, consistent with the federal ADA, and resolve any doubt in favor of accessibility. Agenda materials that become available within 72 hours in advance of the meeting, and after publishing of the agenda, will be available at Civic Center, 100 Civic Plaza, and will be posted on the City's website at www.dublin.ca.gov/ccmeetings. October 17, 2023 Dublin City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 6 Mission The City of Dublin promotes and supports a high quality of life, ensures a safe and secure environment, fosters new opportunities, provides equity across all programs, and champions a culture of diversity and inclusion. October 17, 2023 Dublin City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 7 7 Agenda Item 3.1 DUBLIN CALIFORNIA STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: October 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SU B.ECT: Certificate of Recognition - Council on American -Islamic Relations (CAIR) - San Francisco Bay Area Prepared by: Cierra Fabrigas, Executive Aide EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will present a certificate of recognition to the Council on American -Islamic Relations (CAIR) - San Francisco Bay Area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Present the certificate. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. DESCRIPTION: The City Council would like to recognize the Council on American -Islamic Relations (CAIR) - San Francisco Bay Area on their 29th Anniversary, celebrating their ongoing support and advocacy for civil rights, efforts to protect and empower communities, and continued service to the Dublin community. The Council on American -Islamic Relations is America's largest Islamic civil liberties group, with regional offices nationwide. The CAIR-SFBA was founded in 1994 in response to growing anti - Muslim discrimination and Islamophobia across the nation. It has grown to be recognized as a leader and champion of justice for all Americans and serves nearly 250,000 Muslims residing in the nine Bay Area counties. Page 1 of 2 8 STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: The City Council Agenda was posted. ATTACHMENTS: 1) CAIR-SFBA Certificate of Recognition Page 2 of 2 9 Attachment I cyIcYt'flE OF RTCO#jJ\Efl7OJ\f Given to COUNCIL ON AMERICAN IS IC RELATIONS - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA In recognition of the 29th Anniversary of CAIR-SFBA and in celebration of its ongoing support and advocacy for civil rights, efforts to protect and empower communities, and continued service to the Bay Area and Dublin community. Presented by the City Council of the City of Dublin Dated: October 17, 2023 Mayor Melissa Hernan �.'1., 1 A-Ae`-- Councilmember S erry Hu Councilmemean J Vice Mayor Michael McCorriston Councilmfmber Kashef Qaadri 10 r STAFF REPORT DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL CALIFORNIA DATE: October 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SU B.ECT : Presentation of the World Polio Day Proclamation Prepared by: Marissa Clevenger, Administrative Technician EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will present the World Polio Day proclamation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Present the proclamation. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. DESCRIPTION: Agenda Item 3.2 Polio is a highly infectious disease that is spread person to person, typically through contaminated water. It commonly affects children under the age of 5 and can attack the nervous system and lead to paralysis. The eradication of polio is one of Rotary's longest standing and most significant efforts. Those efforts are providing much needed operational support, medical staff, laboratory equipment, and educational materials for health workers and parents. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: The City Council Agenda was posted. Page 1 of 2 11 ATTACHMENTS: 1) World Polio Day Proclamation Page 2 of 2 12 Attachment I A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA "World Polio Day" WHEREAS, Poliomyelitis, also known as poliovirus or polio, is a highly infectious disease that is spread person to person, typically through contaminated water; and WHEREAS, polio commonly affects children under the age of 5 and can attack the nervous system and lead to paralysis; and WHEREAS, there is no cure, but polio is preventable with a vaccine which has been administered to over 2.5 billion children in 122 countries and polio cases have dropped by 99.9% since 1988 when Rotary helped establish the Global Polio Eradication Initiative; and WHEREAS, Rotary is a global network of 1.4 million neighbors, friends, leaders, and problem -solvers who see a world where people unite and take action to create lasting change — across the globe, in our communities, and in ourselves; and WHEREAS, the eradication of polio is one of Rotary's longest standing and most significant efforts; and WHEREAS, these efforts are providing much needed operational support, medical staff, laboratory equipment, and educational materials for health workers and parents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council does hereby proclaim October 24, 2023, as "World Polio Day" in the City of Dublin and encourages all citizens to join the fight for a polio free world. DATED: October 17, 2023 ok Mayor Melissa Hernan ez uncilmember :31rry Hu Vice Mayor Michael McCorriston ouncilmemb an Josj Councilmeinber Kashef Qaadri 13 Agenda Item 4.1 r DUBLIN CALIFORNIA STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: October 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SU B.ECT: Approval of the October 3, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Prepared by: Marsha Moore, MMC, City Clerk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the October 3, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the October 3, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. DESCRIPTION: The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the October 3, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: The City Council Agenda was posted. ATTACHMENTS: 1) October 3, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 1 14 Attachment I DUBLIN CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN Regular Meeting: October 3, 2023 The following are minutes of the actions taken by the City of Dublin City Council. A full video recording of the meeting with the agenda items indexed and time stamped is available on the City's website at: httns://dublin.ca.Eov/ccmeetings REGULAR MEETING 7:00 PM A Regular Meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, October 3, 2023, in the City Council Chamber. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM, by Mayor Hernandez. 1) CALL TO ORDER Attendee Name Status Melissa Hernandez, Mayor Present Michael McCorriston, Vice Mayor Present Jean Josey, Councilmember Present Dr. Sherry Hu, Councilmember Present Kashef Qaadri, Councilmember Present 2) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Hernandez recognized the passing of Senator Dianne Feinstein and asked for a moment of silence. 3) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 3.1) Presentation of the Domestic Violence Awareness and Prevention Month Proclamation The City Council presented the Domestic Violence Awareness and Prevention Month Proclamation to Tri-Valley Haven and Rewire Community. 3.2) Presentation of the Hindu American Awareness and Appreciation Month Proclamation The City Council presented the Hindu American Awareness and Appreciation Month Proclamation. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2023 15 3.3) Employee Introduction New City of Dublin Staff member, Stephanie Tsoi, Senior Accountant in the Finance Department, was introduced. 3.4) Public Comment Marti Sutton provided public comment. Namrata Berry provided public comment. 4) CONSENT CALENDAR 4.1) Approved the September 19, 2023, Regular City Council Meeting Minutes. On a motion by Councilmember Qaadri, seconded by Councilmember Hu, and by unanimous vote, the City Council adopted the Consent Calendar. RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVED BY: Kashef Qaadri, Councilmember SECOND: Dr. Sherry Hu, Councilmember AYES: Hernandez, McCorriston, Josey, Hu, Qaadri 5) WRITTEN COMMUNICATION — None. 6) PUBLIC HEARING 6.1) Quarry Lane School Performing Arts Center (PLPA-2021-00041) The City Council received a presentation regarding an application from Dr. Sabri Arac of Quarry Lane School, which proposed to construct a 13,800- square -foot performing arts center and related site, landscape, and parking improvements for the Quarry Lane School located at 6237 and 6363 Tassajara Road. Mayor Hernandez opened the Public Hearing. Diya Jain provided public comment. Poluk Sharma provided public comment. Jaz Hayer provided public comment. Niket Vakharia provided public comment. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING O CT O BER 3, 2023 16 Mayor Hernandez closed the Public Hearing. On a motion by Councilmember Josey, seconded by Mayor Hernandez, and by unanimous vote, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 105-23 titled, "Adopting a Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for a New Performing Arts Center at the Quarry Lane School;" waived the reading and introduced the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map and Approving an Amended Planned Development Zoning District and Related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plans for the Quarry Lane School; and adopted Resolution No. 106-23 titled, "Approving a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review Permit for a New Performing Arts Center at the Quarry Lane School." RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVED BY: Jean Josey, Councilmember SECOND: Melissa Hernandez, Mayor AYES: Hernandez, McCorriston, Josey, Hu, Qaadri 7) UNFINISHED BUSINESS - N one. 8) NEW BUSINESS 8.1) Dublin Arts Center Operations Overview The City Council received a report on the planned operation of the Dublin Arts Center and asked Staff clarifying questions. 9) OTHER BUSINESS The City Council and Staff provided brief information -only reports, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB1234). By consensus, the City Council directed staff to prepare a Polio Day Proclamation and a Certificate of Commendation for the Council on American -Islamic Relations SF Bay Area (CAIR-SFBA). By consensus, the City Council requested an update on the library improvements project. DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REG U LA R MEET IN G O CT O BER 3, 2023 17 10) ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hernandez adjourned the meeting at 9:06 PM. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING O CT O BER 3, 2023 18 r DUBLIN CALIFORNIA STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: October 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager Agenda Item 4.2 SU B.ECT: Adopt an Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approval of Plans and Specifications, Award of Contract to Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC, Waive a Minor Bid Irregularity, and Approval of a Budget Change for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space - Phase 1 Project, CIP No. PK0422 Prepared by: Laurie Sucgang, City Engineer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider adopting an addendum to the 2013 Mitigated Negative Declaration, approving the plans and specifications, waiving a minor bid irregularity, and awarding a construction contract to Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space - Phase 1 Project. The project will construct the first phase of the 12.13-acre Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Park, located adjacent to the existing Iron Horse Regional Trail and Amador Valley Boulevard. The City Council will also consider approving a budget change to shift project funding from Fiscal Year 2024-25 to the current fiscal year. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Take the following actions: 1) Adopt the Resolution Approving an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project; 2) Adopt the Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications, Waiving a Minor Bid Irregularity, and Awarding a Contract to Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space - Phase 1 Project, CIP No. PK0422; and 3) approve the budget change. FINANCIAL IMPACT: As approved in the 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program Update (CIP), the total project cost for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space project, CIP No. PK0422, is $11,643,500, with available funding of $9,425,000. The base bid for Phase 1 of the project submitted by Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC is $3,324,491, with four add -alternate items totaling $485,300 for future broadband infrastructure (fiber optic communications conduit and pull boxes). Staff does not recommend the inclusion of the add -alternate items. Staff does recommend, however, a 10% construction contingency of $335,000 to facilitate change orders for unforeseen construction Page 1 of 4 19 issues, bringing the total potential construction contract amount to $3,659,491. In addition to the construction contract, the Phase 1 project budget includes expenditures for utility and agency permit fees and soft costs, which include Staff time, consultant costs, and other miscellaneous costs. Staff estimates a total project cost of $5,400,000, which will require a budget change to shift Public Facilities Fee funding from Fiscal Year 2024-25 to the current year in the amount of $489,600. If approved, the budget adjustment will be reflected in the revised CIP worksheet. The proposed funding and costs are as follows: Funding Source Public Facilities Fee $7,081,000 State Park Grant $2,294,000 General Fund (Stagecoach Park shade structure) $50,000 Total Project Funding $9,425,000 Available Project Funding through FY 2023-24 $4,910,400 Project Costs - Phase 1 Base Bid $3,324,491 Construction Contingency $335,000 Utility/Agency Fees (DSRSD, County, KinderMorgan, Zone 7) $78,509 Soft Costs 1,662,000 Total Estimated Expenditures $5,400,000 Proposed Funding Shift to FY 2023-24 $489,600 DESCRIPTION: The 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program Update (CIP) includes the 12.13-acre Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project, CIP No. PK0422, located adjacent to the existing Iron Horse Regional Trail between the northern City limit to just south of Amador Valley Boulevard. The first phase of the project will construct approximately 2,000 linear feet of new trail and will remove contaminated soil and a hazardous wooden trestle (a relic of its former use as a railroad corridor). The project will also construct seating and gathering spaces, a shade structure, a bike rack and repair station, benches, interpretive signage, trail connections to Stagecoach Park and the Iron Horse Regional Trail, landscaping and wetland mitigation, a small arch culvert bridge, and replacement sidewalk along Amador Valley Boulevard at the trail crossing. Future phases of the project are dependent upon additional funding, will improve the balance of the 12.13 acres, and may include expanding the park land area through cooperation with the adjacent property owner, Zone 7 Water Agency. Bid Process and Results The City of Dublin issued the bid package for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project - Phase 1 on July 27, 2023. The bid package was made up of 72 base bid items and four add - Page 2 of 4 20 alternate items. The four add -alternate items included in the bid package were for installation of broadband communications infrastructure (conduit and pull boxes) for potential future fiber optic communications for City use. Six sealed bids were received on September 13, 2023, with base bids ranging from $3,324,491 to $5,459,063 and add -alternate bids ranging from $410,575 to $650,000. A summary of the bids is provided as Attachment 4. The low base bid was submitted by Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC. Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC's bid contained a minor bid irregularity in that one document was submitted, but mistakenly unsigned. Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC has since submitted the document with proper signature. The Public Contract Code and the City's bid documents define this inconsistency as a "minor bid irregularity," and authorize the City to "waive" these irregularities and proceed with the award of the contract. Staff reviewed the bid results, checked references and necessary licenses, and recommends that the City Council waive the minor bid irregularity and award the project construction contract to Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC, as the lowest responsive bidder. Staff is not recommending awarding the add -alternate bid items because Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC's add -alternate bid was 2.7 times the engineer's estimate. Staff is also recommending a budget change to shift $489,600 of Public Facilities Fee funding from Fiscal Year 2024-25 to the current year, Fiscal Year 2023-24, to cover estimated total project costs and to facilitate timely payment to the contractor and project consultants. In order to facilitate the approval of contract change orders and avoid construction delay, it is requested that the City Manager be authorized to approve change orders up to the contingency amount of $335,000. The resolution will authorize this change as it relates to the project. If the construction contract is awarded to Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC, Staff expects work to begin in November 2023, weather dependent. The project is anticipated to be complete in fall/winter 2024. Community Workforce Agreement On January 11, 2022, the City Council approved a Community Workforce Agreement (CWA) with the Building and Construction Trades Council of Alameda County and its Affiliated Local Unions. The CWA is applicable to public works projects valued at over $1,000,000 and ensures that there are no labor issues related to said projects and bolsters local efforts to connect residents with careers in the building and construction trades. The CWA includes a Local Hire Goal where 20% of all hours on a project are worked by Local Residents, who are defined as individuals that reside within Alameda County or within a 15-mile radius of City limits. The CWA also requires contractors to hire one new apprentice for the first $1,000,000 of construction costs, and an additional new apprentice for every $5,000,000 construction costs, based on the engineer's estimate. Apprentices must work a minimum of 10% of the total craft's work hours, but the CWA allows that apprentices may be deployed to another project to ensure the minimum number of hours are met. Staff worked with a consultant, Workforce Integrity and Training Solutions, to prepare bid documents and solicit bids for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project - Phase 1 that Page 3 of 4 21 comply with the provisions of the CWA. The provisions include the requirement that responsive bidders include an Agreement to be Bound to and by the CWA, and that all subcontractors of the successful bidder execute the Agreement to be Bound within 14 days after Notice of Award. California Environmental Oualitv Act (GEOM. On October 1, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 166-13 certifying the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("2013 MND/MMRP," Attachment 5). As a part of the Phase 1 planning and design process for the project, an additional environmental review was conducted to determine if the Phase 1 portion of the project and related impacts have changed substantially from the original CEQA document. The additional environmental review has shown that Phase 1 of the project has not changed substantially from the originally reviewed project and would have no significant impacts beyond those identified in the 2013 MND/MMRP, which is documented in the Addendum to 2013 Approved Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project (Attachment 6). Therefore, no subsequent environmental review of the project is required. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: The City Council Agenda was posted. A courtesy copy of this report was sent to Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution Approving an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project 2) Exhibit A to the Resolution - Addendum to 2013 Adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project 3) Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications, Waiving a Minor Bid Irregularity, and Awarding a Contract to Goodfellow Bros. California, LLC for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project - Phase 1, CIP No. PK0422 4) CIP No. PK0422 5) Bid Results 6) Resolution No. 166-13 Certifying the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 7) Budget Change Form Page 4 of 4 22 Attachment I RESOLUTION NO. XX - 23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT WHEREAS, the first phase of the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space project, CIP No. PK0422, (Project) is located in the Planned Development zone for which the City of Dublin adopted a General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1/2 Development Plan for a future park site on October 1, 2013; and WHEREAS, on October 1, 2013 the City Council also approved the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Master Plan to construct a 12.13-acre nature park and open space adjacent to the existing Iron Horse Regional Trail from the Dublin/San Ramon city limit to the confluence of Alamo and South San Ramon Creeks; and WHEREAS, on October 1, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 166-13 adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for PLPA-2023-00044, consisting of the Initial Study/Negative Declaration, the Response to Environmental Comments, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space project (2013 MND/MMRP); and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2021, the City Council approved the filing of an application for the Local Assistance Specified Grant from the State of California, Natural Resources Agency, Department of Parks and Recreation, and the Office of Grants and Local Services in the amount of $2,294,000, which secured funding for the Project; and WHEREAS, the proposed improvements for the Project will include approximately 2,000 linear feet of new trail and park amenities from Amador Valley Boulevard to Stagecoach Park with spur trails connecting the Project to Stagecoach Park and to the existing Iron Horse Regional Trail; and WHEREAS, the proposed improvements are consistent with the adopted 2022 Parks and Recreation Master Plan for which the City Council adopted Resolution No. 38-22 on April 19, 2022; and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 provides guidance on when a subsequent environmental review document must be prepared; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, when taking subsequent discretionary actions in furtherance of a project for which a MND has been previously approved, the lead agency is required to prepare an addendum if some changes of additions to the MND are necessary but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 have occurred; and Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted 10/17/23 Page 1 of 2 23 WHEREAS, the City conducted an additional environmental review by preparing an addendum to determine if the proposed Project and related impacts have changed substantially from the original 2013 MND/MMRP (Addendum to 2013 Adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration), as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Addendum to 2013 Adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration provides an analysis showing that the proposed Phase 1 has not changed substantially from the originally reviewed Iron Horse Nature Park and Open project and would have no significant impacts beyond those identified in the 2013 MND/MMRP and concludes that preparation of a subsequent MND is not required; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Addendum to 2013 Adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration at its October 17, 2023 regularly scheduled meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby approves the Addendum to 2013 Adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space project, attached hereto as Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of October 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reso. No. XX-23, Item X.X, Adopted 10/17/23 Page 2 of 2 24 Attachment 2 ;INCE NCE Project No. 891.06.55 September 14, 2023 Laurie Sucgang Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence?' RE: Addendum to 2013 Adopted Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project — Phase 1 Project Description and Comparison The Dublin City Council approved the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Master Plan, as well as adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program at its meeting on October 1, 2013. In the MND document, the project was described as follows: "Proposed Park. Although no specific park design has been formally selected by the City of Dublin, the City has been exploring multiple concepts for future uses that could occur in the park and has developed a concept site plan with community participation and support. The City is aware of the close proximity of residential uses along the corridor and the concept site plan has a number of low -intensity uses that include a mix of quieter, passive uses near residential areas with a few nodes of more active uses. A limited number of small structures would be constructed on the park site, and several of the following uses are likely to be included in the future park plan: • Re -aligned Iron Horse Regional Trail • Realigned South San Ramon Creek • Expanded Wetland Areas with Boardwalk Trails and Wildlife Viewing Platforms • Children's play area • Gathering space/ outdoor classroom(s) • A nature interpretative area • Picnic areas • Community garden • Children's garden 1003 West Cutting Boulevard, Suite 110 Pt. Richmond, CA 948904 510-215-3620 Engineering & Environmental Services www.ncenet.com 25 Page 12 Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration • A riparian forest • Protected and/ or preserved wetlands • Public restrooms • Parking area The City is currently undertaking a comprehensive community outreach program to identify park designs and additional uses may ultimately be selected. The proposed park will likely include providing pedestrian and bicycle linkages with surrounding residential areas east and west of the site as well as a connection to Dublin High School and Stagecoach Park, a local City park. The park is also expected to include realignment of the South San Ramon Creek and relocation of the Iron Horse Trail so that the creek and the trail could have a curvilinear route and pathway through the park rather than being linear and adjacent to the park (as currently exists). If the final park plan were to include the realignment of the creek and trail, the parcels that currently comprise the creek channel and regional trail would continue to be owned by the Zone 7, although they would be integrated into the park development and would function as an extension of the space. A small vehicle parking lot is expected to be provided adjacent to Amador Valley Blvd. Potable water and sewer lines would need to be extended to portions of the future park to support public restrooms. Recycled water lines would also be extended into portions of the project site for irrigation of future landscaped areas. The operational hours of the park are expected to be daily, sunrise to sunset." As funding became available and a grant was received, the first phase of the project began and the project had been further designed and refined since the adoption of the 2013 Initial Study (IS)/MND. Project improvements in the first phase will be consistent with the adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan (City of Dublin 2022) and the approved Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Master Plan (City of Dublin 2013). The first phase of the project will include a new 12-foot-wide asphalt concrete (AC) paved trail spanning approximately 2,000 linear feet with two -foot -wide aggregate base (AB) shoulders on either side. Park amenities will include a trail entry plaza just north of the Amador Valley Boulevard intersection; concrete pads to be used as outdoor classrooms and gathering spaces with seating; shade structures; and wayfinding and trail markers strategically located along the trail. Spur pedestrian trails will be constructed near the north end of Phase 1 to connect to the existing Iron Horse Regional Trail to the west and Stagecoach Park to the east. The amenities will conform to the City's park signage standards and the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) design standards. Environmental testing of the railroad embankment has found that the Project contains arsenic contaminates as a result of former railroad activities. The project will remove approximately one to three feet of soil containing arsenic contaminates along the embankment and dispose of the soils off site at an appropriate disposal facility. For the new AC trail alignment, after the arsenic contaminated soil is removed, approximately one additional foot of existing clayey subgrade soil will be removed and replaced with geogrid fabric and approximately one foot of aggregate base material. This will provide a stable base for the new AC Trail. The seating/gathering space concrete pads will also require approximately one foot of over -excavation, installation of geogrid fabric, and stabilization aggregate base material. The shade structures are anticipated to have approximately 30-inch diameter concrete foundation piers excavated up to eight feet deep. Addendum to Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration September 2023 26 Page 13 Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration Near the northern end of the first phase of the project a dilapidated (burnt) railroad trestle bridge associated with the railroad and containing creosote -coated wood will be removed and an arched culvert bridge and embankment will be constructed in its place. CEQA Review Since the adoption of the project's IS/MND, the Tribal Cultural Resources, Energy, Wildfire, and VMT topic areas and other question changes have been added to the CEQA Appendix G checklist. Guidelines section 15162 provides guidance on when a subsequent document should be prepared. Essentially 15162 provides: 1. When an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified or a Negative Declaration (ND) adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR or ND shall be prepared for that project unless: a. Substantial changes are proposed in the project b. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions c. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous document shows: i. The project will have one or more significant impacts not discussed in the previous EIR or ND; ii. Significant impacts previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; iii. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or iv. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. 2. If changes to a project or its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a ND, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise, the lead agency shall determine whether to prepare a subsequent ND, an addendum, or no further documentation. The 2013 IS and MND was prepared prior to the addition of Tribal Cultural Resources, Energy, and Wildfire to the CEQA checklist. Since its adoption, traffic is no longer studied in terms of Level of Service (LOS), but rather as Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT). This addendum will serve as substantial evidence that subsequent CEQA review is or is not warranted. Once finalized, the addendum will be attached to the planning entitlement and staff report for consideration by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. Completion of the addendum may lead to a determination that the project is not consistent with the prior CEQA documents, or that it involves peculiar or special circumstances including, for example, a feature that was not included in or is not fully consistent with the IS/MND. In these instances, the need for, and level of, additional CEQA documentation will be determined through coordination with City staff. Assuming the addendum determines that no subsequent CEQA review is warranted, no public review of this environmental document is required, and it will serve as an addendum to the prior IS/MND and be provided to the decision -makers. Any project entitlements and permitting that go to a City of Dublin public Addendum to Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration September 2023 27 Page 1 4 Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration hearing will be subject to typical public review and comment as per the entitlement process, and the addendum will be provided to decision makers to inform their decision on the entitlement. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The following environmental factors could be potentially affected by the revised project design: • Aesthetics • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards & Hazardous Materials • Hydrology and Water Resources • Noise • Transportation • Utilities Based on the environmental evaluation performed for this addendum, the proposed project would have no additional significant impact after mitigation on any of these subject topics that were not previously addressed in the 2013 IS/MND. Aesthetics None of the proposed improvements or changes from the original park concept would have an aesthetic impact different from or greater than the impacts considered in the prior IS/MND. The proposed park improvements would be consistent with the adopted plan and visual impacts from structures and lighting were adequately considered in the IS/MND. The project's aesthetic impacts are consistent with the prior CEQA analysis, mitigation, and approvals. While the Master Plan includes some new features, the additions are consistent with planned park uses and do not change the overall visual impact of the park. The project will comply with Mitigation Measure (MM) AES-1 related to light and glare. The overall visual impact of shifting from open space to the development of the Master Plan and nighttime lighting was found to be significant and unavoidable, and the statement of overriding considerations applies to the current project as well. Agriculture and Forestry None of the proposed improvements or changes from the original park concept would have an impact on Agriculture and Forestry different from or greater than the impacts considered in the prior IS/MND. The proposed park improvements would be consistent with the adopted plan and have no impact on Agriculture and Forestry. Air Quality None of the proposed improvements or changes from the original park concept would have an air quality impact different from or greater than the impacts considered in the prior IS/MND. The proposed park improvements would be consistent with the adopted Master Plan and air quality impacts were adequately considered in the Addendum to Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration September 2023 28 Page 15 Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration 2013 IS/MND. The new projected air quality impacts are consistent with the prior CEQA analysis, mitigation, and approvals. While the Master Plan includes some new features, the additions are consistent with planned park uses and do not change the overall air quality impact of the project. It is relevant to note the regulatory environment has changed: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has required all new nonroad diesel engines to meet Tier IV standards since 2013. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) requires fleet owners to report their equipment tiers every year. Fleet size is determined by aggregate gross horsepower. CARB has determined that more than 50 percent of diesel equipment is now Tier 4f (Levine, Johanna, CARB, personal communication on December 13, 2022), which means construction emissions will be less than anticipated in the 2013 IS/MND analysis. There are no new impacts related to the project that were not addressed in the 2013 IS/MND, no new circumstances that would result in greater impacts, and there are no significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the 2013 IS/MND. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of the IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to Air Quality. Biological Resources No notable changes have occurred on the site since the IS/MND was adopted. The type, size, and intensity of the development proposed on the project site would be consistent with the adopted Master Plan. While the proposed project is more refined than the general land use identified for the project site in the Master Plan, the proposed development is generally consistent with the IS/MND. Therefore, project -related impacts on Biological Resources would be consistent with and less than those identified in the analysis and conclusions of the IS/MND. The infrastructure proposed as part of the project is consistent with the backbone infrastructure identified in the Master Plan and would not result in adverse environmental impacts related to Biological Resources beyond what was analyzed in the IS/MND. There are no impacts specific to the project that were not addressed in the IS/MND, no new circumstances that would result in greater impacts, and there are no significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the IS/MND. The mitigation measures contained in the IS/MND adequately address potential impacts and reduce the potential impacts to a less than significant level. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of the IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to Biological Resources Cultural Resources None of the proposed improvements or changes from the original park concept would have any impact on Cultural Resources different from or greater than the impacts considered in the 2013 IS/MND. The proposed park improvements would be consistent with the adopted plan and Cultural Resources impacts were adequately considered in the IS/MND. The project's Cultural Resources impacts are consistent with the prior CEQA analysis, mitigation, and approvals. While the Master Plan includes some new features, the additions are consistent with planned park uses and do not change the Cultural Resource impacts of the park. There are no impacts specific to the project that were not addressed in the IS/MND, no new circumstances that would result in greater impacts, and there are no significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the IS/MND. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of Addendum to Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration September 2023 29 Page 16 Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration the IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to Cultural Resources. Energy Energy use and conservation was not studied in the 2013 IS/MND. The proposed park would be open only from sunrise to sunset. Nothing in the park's description has changed the park's energy consumption. There is nothing new that was not known about the energy use of the park at the time of the adoption of the 2013 IS/MND nor is there any change in circumstances. No further review is required. Geology and Soils The type, size, and intensity of the development proposed on the project site would be consistent with the adopted IS/MND. While the proposed project is more refined than the general land use identified for the project site, the proposed development is generally consistent with the IS/MND. Therefore, project -related impacts related to Geology and Soils would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions of the IS/MND. The infrastructure proposed as part of the project is consistent with the backbone infrastructure identified in the Master Plan and would not result in adverse environmental impacts related to Geology and Soils Resources beyond what was analyzed in the IS/MND. There are no impacts specific to the project that were not addressed in the IS/MND, no new circumstances that would result in greater impacts, and there are no significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the IS/MND. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of the IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to Geology and Soils. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The adopted IS/MND determined that the proposed park improvements would have no impact on greenhouse gas emissions. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of the Master Plan IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The type, size, and intensity of the development proposed on the project site would be consistent with the adopted 2013 IS/MND. While the proposed project is more refined than the general land use identified for the project site, the proposed development is generally consistent with the IS/MND. It is relevant to note that environmental testing of the railroad embankment has found that the project contains arsenic contaminates as a result of former railroad activities. The project will remove approximately one to three feet of soil containing arsenic contaminates along the embankment and dispose of the soils off site at an appropriate disposal facility. Additionally, creosote -coated wood from the dilapidated (burnt) railroad trestle will be removed and a new arch culvert bridge and embankment will be constructed in its place. These additions to the project will reduce the impacts related to hazards and hazardous material to no impact. Therefore, project -related impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions of the IS/MND. The infrastructure proposed as part of the project is consistent with the backbone infrastructure identified in the Master Plan and would not result in adverse environmental impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials beyond what was analyzed in the IS/MND. There are no impacts peculiar to the project that were not addressed in the IS/MND, no new circumstances that would result in greater Addendum to Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration September 2023 30 Page 17 Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration impacts, and there are no significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the IS/MND. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of the IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to hazards and hazardous materials. Hydrology and Water Quality The type, size, and intensity of development proposed on the project site would be consistent with the adopted Master Plan. While the proposed project is more refined than the general land use identified for the project site in the Master Plan, the proposed development is generally consistent with the IS/MND. Impacts related to Hydrology and Water Quality would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions of the IS/MND. The infrastructure proposed as part of the project is consistent with the backbone infrastructure identified in the Master Plan and would not result in adverse environmental impacts related to Hydrology and Water Resources beyond what was analyzed in the IS/MND. There are no impacts specific to the project that were not addressed in the IS/MND, no new circumstances that would result in greater impacts, and there are no significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the IS/MND. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of the IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to Hydrology and Water Quality. Land Use and Planning The infrastructure proposed as part of the project is consistent with the backbone infrastructure identified in the Master Plan and would not result in adverse environmental impacts related to Land Use and Planning beyond what was analyzed in the IS/MND. There are no impacts specific to the project that were not addressed in the IS/MND, no new circumstances that would result in greater impacts, and there are no significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the IS/MND. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of the IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to Land Use and Planning. Mineral Resources None of the proposed improvements or changes from the original park concept would have an impact on mineral resources different from or greater than the impacts considered in the prior IS/MND. The proposed park improvements would be consistent with the adopted Master Plan and have no impact on mineral resources. Noise There are no notable changes that have occurred on the site since the 2013 IS/MND was certified. The type, size, and intensity of development proposed on the project site would be consistent with the adopted Master Plan. While the proposed project is more refined than the general land use identified for the project site in the Master Plan, the proposed development is generally consistent with the IS/MND. Therefore, project -related impacts related to Noise would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions of the IS/MND. The infrastructure proposed as part of the project is consistent with the backbone infrastructure identified in the Master Plan and would not result in adverse environmental impacts related to Noise beyond what was analyzed in the IS/MND. Addendum to Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration September 2023 31 Page 18 Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration There are no impacts specific to the project that were not addressed in the IS/MND, no new circumstances that would result in greater impacts, and there are no significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the IS/MND. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of the IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to Noise. Population and Housing There are no notable changes on the site since the 2013 IS/MND was certified. The type, size, and intensity of development proposed on the project site would be consistent with the adopted Master Plan. While the proposed project is more refined than the general land use identified for the project site in the Master Plan, the proposed development is generally consistent with the IS/MND. Therefore, project -related impacts related to Population and Housing would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions of the IS/MND. The infrastructure proposed as part of the project is consistent with the backbone infrastructure identified in the Master Plan and would not result in adverse environmental impacts related to Population and Housing beyond what was analyzed in the IS/MND. There are no impacts specific to the project that were not addressed in the IS/MND, no new circumstances that would result in greater impacts, and there are no significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the IS/MND. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of the IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to Population and Housing. Public Services There are no notable changes on the site since the IS/MND was certified. The type, size, and intensity of development proposed on the project site would be consistent with the adopted Master Plan. While the proposed project is more refined than the general land use identified for the project site in the Master Plan, the proposed development is generally consistent with the IS/MND. Therefore, project -related impacts related to Public Services would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions of the IS/MND. The infrastructure proposed as part of the project is consistent with the backbone infrastructure identified in the Master Plan and would not result in adverse environmental impacts related to Public Services beyond what was analyzed in the IS/MND. There are no impacts specific to the project that were not addressed in the IS/MND, no new circumstances that would result in greater impacts, and there are no significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the IS/MND. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of the IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to Public Services. Recreation None of the proposed improvements or changes from the original park concept would have an impact on Recreational resources different from or greater than the impacts considered in the prior IS/MND. The proposed park improvements would be consistent with the adopted Master Plan and have no impact on existing Recreational resources. Addendum to Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration September 2023 32 Page 19 Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration Transportation No notable changes have occurred on the site since the IS/MND was adopted in 2013. While the proposed project is more refined than the general land use identified for the project site in the Master Plan, the proposed development is generally consistent with the IS/MND. Therefore, project -related impacts related to Transportation would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions of the IS/MND. The infrastructure proposed as part of the project is consistent with the backbone infrastructure identified in the Master Plan and would not result in adverse environmental impacts related to Transportation/Traffic beyond what was analyzed in the IS/MND. Traffic is no longer studied in terms of LOS, but rather as VMT since adoption of the 2013 IS/MND; however, as the project has not changed since the original Master Plan, no additional analysis is required. There are no impacts specific to the project that were not addressed in the IS/MND, no new circumstances that would result in greater impacts, and there are no significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the IS/MND. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of the IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to Transportation. Tribal Cultural Resources The IS/MND analyzed impacts on tribal cultural resources in Section 5 "Cultural Resources." Section 5, b-d identified the project site as having a high potential for encountering "prehistoric, Native American, or similar cultural resources." It adopted MM CULT-2, which is an accidental finds measure. However, there is nothing in the record that shows compliance with AB 52, which establishes a consultation process with tribes. The adoption of AB 52 and the requirement for tribal consultation is considered a significant change in circumstances. Accordingly, a Northwest Information Center (NWIC) search request was submitted, and those tribes identified were sent letters inviting consultation. A Cultural Resource Inventory report has been prepared and is attached hereto. It should be noted that no Tribal Cultural Resources were identified during this process, and as such, the project is not expected to result in new or substantially more severe impacts than those discussed in the 2013 IS/MND, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project. Utilities and Service Systems The project site is essentially undeveloped, and no notable changes have occurred on the site since the IS/MND was certified in 2013. As discussed in the project description, the type, size, and intensity of urban development proposed on the project site would be consistent with the adopted Master Plan. While the proposed project is more refined than the general land use identified for the project site in the Master Plan, the proposed development is generally consistent with the 2013 IS/MND. Therefore, project -related impacts related to Utilities and Service Systems would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions of the IS/MND. The infrastructure proposed as part of the project is consistent with the backbone infrastructure identified in the Master Plan and would not result in adverse environmental impacts related to Utilities and Service Systems beyond what was analyzed in the 2013 IS/MND. There are no impacts specific to the project that were not addressed in the IS/MND, Addendum to Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration September 2023 33 Page 110 Addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration no new circumstances that would result in greater impacts, and there are no significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the IS/MND. Nothing about the proposed site -specific project design would change the conclusions of the IS/MND or result in new or substantially more severe impacts, and no additional environmental review is needed for the project related to Utilities and Service Systems. Wildfire Exposure to fire was analyzed in Section 8h) "exposure of people or structures to significant risk to loss, injury or death involving wildland fires..." There is nothing that has changed from the prior IS/MND. The risk of wildfire was adequately discussed and found to present no impact. No further review is required. Conclusion None of the proposed revisions or changes from the original park concept would have any impacts different from or greater than the impacts considered in the prior 2013 IS/MND. The proposed park improvements would be consistent with the adopted Master Plan and were adequately considered in the 2013 IS/MND. The project's impacts are consistent with the prior CEQA analysis, mitigation, and approvals. While the Master Plan includes some new features, the additions are consistent with planned park uses and do not change the original impacts of the park. Therefore, no subsequent CEQA review is warranted, and no public review of this environmental document is required. This document will serve as an Addendum to the prior IS/MND and be provided to the decision -makers for adoption. Prepared by: 5140?)7 t,\--- Gail Ervin, Ph.D. Principal Carlos Yanez, JD Senior Environmental Planner NCE 1003 West Cutting Boulevard, Suite 110 Richmond, CA 94804 (510)215-3620 Attachments: Addendum to Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration September 2023 34 Attachment A Cultural Resource Inventory Report 35 NCE Collaboration. Commitment. Confidences'" MEMORANDUM Date: March 8, 2023 To: City of Dublin From: NCE Subject: Sensitive Information Distribution The documents delivered herein contain highly sensitive information concerning cultural resources within or adjacent to the project area(s). These are to be considered confidential documents and used by the California Environmental Quality Act lead agency for planning purposes only. As required by NCE's agreement with the California Historical Resources Information System, and following the California Code of Regulations, Section 15120 (d), these documents contain locational information pertaining to archaeological an/or sacred sites and are not to be shared with the public or anyone within the organization other than for planning purposes. If Native American Tribes, identified as part of Assembly Bill 52 for this project, have requested a review of the enclosed document(s), it is acceptable to share with them. Please let us know if you have questions concerning the content of the deliverable. Thank you, NCE Engineering & Environmental Services www.ncenet.com 36 Cultural Resources Inventory Report Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Dublin, Alameda County, California March 2023 4rsic E Richmond, CA 501 Canal Blvd., Suite I Richmond, CA 94804 City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 .:";NCE Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence'" Cultural Resource Inventory Report Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Dublin, Alameda County, California March 2023 Prepared on Behalf of: City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District 1455 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94103 Prepared by: Molly Laitinen, Staff Archaeologist Charles Zeier, Senior Archaeologist Jeremy Hall, Cultural Resources Manager NCE 501 Canal Blvd., Suite I Richmond, CA 94804 NCE Project No. 891.06.55 38 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 39 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY The City of Dublin (City) proposes to construct the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project (Project) located in Dublin, California. The purpose of the Project is to create a nature park and open space with a trail and recreation facilities to meet the current and future needs of Dublin residents. The Project area, or Area of Potential Effect (APE), will extend north from the intersection of Amador Valley Boulevard for approximately 2,000 feet along a former railroad embankment. An existing segment of the Iron Horse Trail is located west of and parallels the Project. Upon completion of all planned improvements, the new trail constructed as part of the Project will replace the paralleling segment of the existing Iron Horse Trail. Project improvements will be consistent with the adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan (City of Dublin 2022) and the adopted Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Master Plan (City of Dublin 2013). NCE was retained by the City to provide regulatory compliance and permitting for the Project. The Project requires compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is the lead federal agency for Section 106 of the NHPA. The City will act as the lead agency for CEQA. This report describes an archaeological inventory and monitoring of environmental boreholes within the APE conducted by NCE as an initial step in state and federal compliance processes. All work was designed to comply with the current state, federal (USACE), and professional standards. An approximately 10.4-acre APE was defined for the Project which includes all areas where surface or sub -surface disturbance may occur. Every reasonable effort was made to identify any surface or buried expression of archaeological resources in the APE. As a result of this archaeological inventory and monitoring effort, no previously recorded or newly recorded archaeological resources were identified in the APE. It is recommended that the Project will not affect archaeological resources based on the following considerations: • No previously recorded or newly identified archaeological resources are present in the APE; • Project -related activities will be limited to areas previously disturbed by the historic railroad, P-01-011774 (e.g., cut and fill embankment soils and ballast), underground utilities, and channelization of creeks and ditches around the railroad embankment. Based on these considerations, it is recommended the Project will not impact archaeological or historical resources listed in or eligible for listing in the California Register (PRC Section 21083, 50201) or the National Register. Also, it is recommended that the Project will have no effect on cultural resources designated as historic properties and will meet the definition of "no historic properties affected," as that term is defined in 36 Code of Federal Regulations Part 800.4(d)(1). It is noted that architectural resources present in the APE are addressed by Yarbrough (2022) in a separate, stand-alone report. This report provides the results of an architectural inventory and evaluation of a former railroad grade and trestle (P-01-011774) that extends through the APE. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 S-1 40 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Description 1 1.2 Definition of Undertaking 2 1.3 Area of Potential Effect 2 2 CONSULTATION COMMUNICATIONS 4 2.1 Native American Coordination 4 2.2 Other Interested Party Coordination 6 3 LITERATURE REVIEW 7 3.1 Previous Inventories 7 3.2 Previously Recorded Resources 9 3.3 Historic Maps and Aerial Images Consulted 10 3.4 Prehistoric Overview 10 3.5 Ethnographic Background 10 3.6 Historic Overview 11 3.7 Environmental Setting 12 3.7.1 Geology 12 3.7.2 Flora Fauna 13 3.7.3 Archaeological Sensitivity 13 4 FIELD METHODOLOGY 14 4.1 Inventory Areas, Monitoring, and Field Methods 14 4.2 Professional Qualifications 15 5 INVENTORY RESULTS 16 6 ELIGIBILITY RECOMMENDATIONS 17 7 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY 18 7.1 Summary 18 7.2 Determination of Effect 18 7.3 Other Considerations 18 8 REFERENCES 20 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Tribal Representatives Identified by the NAHC 4 Table 2. Summary of Tribe Consultation Correspondence 5 Table 3. Previous Inventories within 0.25 Miles of the APE. 7 Table 4. Previously Recorded Resources within 0.25 Miles of the APE 9 CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 i 41 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A - Figures Appendix B - Wilton Rancheria Inadvertent Discovery Mitigation Measure Appendix C - Native American Correspondence Appendix D - Historical Society Correspondence Appendix E - Records Search Results Appendix F - Photos CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 42 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AB Aggregate Base AB-52 Assembly Bill 52 AC Asphalt Concrete APE Area of Potential Effect bgs Below Ground Surface CEQA California Environmental Quality Act City City of Dublin CRF Code of Federal Regulations DG Decomposed Granite EBRPD East Bay Regional Park District GLO General Land Office NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NWIC Northwest Information Center PRC Public Resources Code Project Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project SLF Sacred Lands File SOI Secretary of the Interior USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USGS U.S. Geological Survey YAR Yarbrough Architectural Resources CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 111 43 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT INTRODUCTION DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Dublin (City) proposes to construct the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project (Project) located in Dublin, California (Figures 1 and 2, figures provided in Appendix A). The purpose of the Project is to create a nature park and open space with a trail and recreation facilities to meet the current and future needs of Dublin residents. The Project area, or Area of Potential Effect (APE), will extend north from the intersection of Amador Valley Boulevard for approximately 2,000 feet along a former railroad embankment. An existing segment of the Iron Horse Trail is located west of and paralleling the Project. Upon ultimate completion of all planned improvements, the new trail constructed with the Project will eventually replace the paralleling segment of the existing Iron Horse Trail. Project improvements will be consistent with the adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan (City of Dublin 2022) and the adopted Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Master Plan (City of Dublin 2013). The Project will include a new 12-foot-wide asphalt concrete (AC) paved trail spanning approximately 2,000 linear feet with two -foot -wide aggregate base (AB) or decomposed granite (DG) shoulders on either side. Park amenities will include a trail entry plaza just north of the Amador Valley Boulevard intersection; concrete pads to be used as outdoor classrooms and gathering spaces with seating; shade structures; and wayfinding and trail markers strategically located along the trail. Spur pedestrian trails will be constructed near the north end of the Project to connect to the existing Iron Horse Trail to the west and Stagecoach Park to the east. The amenities will conform to the City's Wayfinding Signage Standards and the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) design standards. Environmental testing of the railroad embankment has found that the Project contains arsenic contaminates as a result of former railroad activities. The Project will remove approximately one to three feet of the existing soil and base rock making up the former railroad alignment containing arsenic contaminates along the embankment and dispose of the soils off site at an appropriate disposal facility. For the new AC trail alignment, after the arsenic contaminated soil is removed, approximately one additional foot of existing clayey subgrade soil will be removed and replaced with geogrid fabric and approximately one foot of crush rock material. This will provide a stable subbase for the new AC trail. The gathering spaces and/or seating area concrete pads will also require approximately one foot of over -excavation, installation of geogrid fabric, and stabilization crush rock material. The shade structures are anticipated to have approximately 30-inch diameter concrete foundation piers excavated up to eight feet deep. Near the northern end of the Project a dilapidated (burnt) railroad trestle associated with the former railroad and containing creosote -coated wood will be removed and a new culvert and embankment will be constructed in its place. In addition, two new spur trails will also be constructed from the railroad embankment, one to the east leading to Stagecoach Park and one west leading to the existing Iron Horse Regional Trail. Both spur trails will include an embankment ramp and culverts to convey existing drainage swales. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 1 44 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT INTRODUCTION DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Trimming of native trees, and removal of some native and non-native trees, shrubs and vegetation will be required to prepare the project site for earth moving activities and installation of park components. New planting and landscaping will also be provided as well as new or modified gates and fencing. 1.2 DEFINITION OF UNDERTAKING The Project requires compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 800) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code [PRC] 21083.2 and 21084.1). NCE has been retained to complete initial compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA and conduct Native American consultation under Assembly Bill 52 (AB-52) (PRC 21080.3.1). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is the lead federal agency for Section 106 of the NHPA and the City will act as the CEQA lead agency. This report describes an archaeological inventory of approximately 10.4 acres conducted by NCE as an initial step in the state and federal compliance process. All work was designed to comply with the current state, federal (USACE), and professional standards. Those standards state that the goals of an intensive archaeological inventory are to: • Establish an APE, • Identify prehistoric and historic period archaeological resources in the APE, • Evaluate identified resources as to their eligibility for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) and the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), and • Provide management recommendations for those properties considered eligible for the California Register and/or the National Register. It is noted that Yarbrough Architectural Resources (YAR) is currently preparing an architectural inventory and evaluation of the former railroad grade and trestle (P-01-011774) that extends through the APE. As a result, this report does not address P-01-011774-related architectural features. In addition, a more extensive historic overview of the APE will be provided in the architectural report. 1.3 AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT An approximately 10.4-acre APE was established for the Project (see Figure 2). The boundaries of the Area of Direct Impact and Area of Indirect Impact are coincident for this Project; therefore, they are referenced herein as the APE. The APE consists of a former railroad embankment and associated trestle between an existing segment of the Iron Horse Trail to the west and an Alameda County road to the east. The APE is bounded on the south by Amador Valley Boulevard. As discussed previously, ground -disturbing activities will include the construction of a new 12-foot-wide paved trail spanning 2,000 linear feet with two -foot -wide shoulders on either side. Before trail construction, up to four feet of soil will be excavated to remove arsenic - contaminated topsoils and provide space for geogrid fabric and stabilization crush rock material. Excavation for the classroom concrete pads will be up to one foot deep. The shade structures are anticipated to have approximately 30-inch diameter concrete foundation piers CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 2 45 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT INTRODUCTION DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA excavated up to eight feet deep. The railroad trestle will be removed, and a new culvert and embankment will be constructed in its place. The new culvert has not been designed yet and the maximum depth of excavation for this improvement is not yet known. However, all excavations will be in previously disturbed soils and will not result in excavation into native soils. Proposed vertical elements consist of shade structures and trail signs. These new elements are considered minor and will not result in visual impacts on the built environment, archaeological resources, or architectural resources. During construction, there will be a temporary increase in construction traffic levels, dust, equipment noise, and vibrations. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 3 46 Name Irenne Zwierlein Tony Cerda Ann Marie Sayers Kanyon Sayers -Roods Charlene Nijmeh Monica Arellano Katherine Perez Timothy Perez Andrew Galvan Jesus Tarango Steven Hutchason Dahlton Brown Kenneth Woodrow Corrina Gould IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT CONSULTATION COMMUNICATIONS DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 2 CONSULTATION COMMUNICATIONS 2.1 NATIVE AMERICAN COORDINATION As the lead federal agency for Section 106 of the NHPA, the USACE will conduct Native American consultation as identified in 33 CFR Part 325 and the USACE Tribal Consultation Policy (USACE 2012, 2013). Following AB-52 as identified in PRC Section 21080.3.1(b)(2) of CEQA, Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), must be invited to consult on projects. Native American correspondence was initiated with a letter to the NAHC. The letter requested a search of their Sacred Lands File (SLF) and a contact list for regional tribes that may know of tribal cultural resources within or immediately adjacent to the APE. A response was received from the NAHC on June 14, 2022, which indicated negative SLF results within the vicinity of the APE. Inquiry letters were mailed on City letterhead to the tribes identified by NAHC (Table 1) on June 20, 2022. Table 1. Tribal Representatives Identified by the NAHC. Title Affiliation Chairperson Chairperson Chairperson Most Likely Descendant (MLD) Contact Chairperson Vice Chairwoman Chairperson Tribe Representative Tribe Representative Chairperson Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) Director of Administration Chairperson Chairperson Amah MutsunTribal Band of Mission San Juan Bautista Costanoan Rumsen Carmel Tribe Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan Muwekma Ohlone Indian Tribe of the SF Bay Area Muwekma Ohlone Indian Tribe of the SF Bay Area North Valley Yokuts Tribe North Valley Yokuts Tribe The Ohlone Indian Tribe Wilton Rancheria Wilton Rancheria Wilton Rancheria Wuksache Indian Tribe/Eshom Valley Band The Confederated Villages of Lisjan Follow-up phone calls were made to all tribes identified by the NAHC on September 7, 2022. To date, two tribes have responded: Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of Mission San Juan Bautista and Wilton Rancheria. Correspondence with the two tribes is detailed below. On September 7, 2022, Irenne Zwierlein, Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of San Juan Bautista Chairperson, responded via phone requesting cultural resources sensitivity training be provided to construction workers prior to any ground disturbing activities occurring for the Project. On July 27, 2022, Venesa Kremer, Wilton Rancheria Cultural Resource Assistant and Lead Monitor, responded via email requesting to consult on the Project. She requested information CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 4 47 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT CONSULTATION COMMUNICATIONS DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA on the design, type of environmental review conducted for the Project, project alternatives, potential significant effect, and recommended mitigation measures for direct, indirect, or cumulative impacts the Project may cause to tribal cultural resources. Ms. Kremer also requested tribe involvement in cultural surveys and access to any existing cultural resources assessments. On January 30, 2023, a request to meet with Wilton Rancheria and copies of the archaeological and architectural assessment reports were sent to Ms. Kremer via email. On February 26, 2023, a virtual meeting occurred with Ms. Kremer, Lou Griffin, Wilton Rancheria Executive Director of Cultural Preservation Department, Laurie Sucgang, City Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer, Andre Jadkowski, NCE Project Manager and Principal Engineer, Molly Laitinen, NCE Staff Archaeologist, and Christina Rathbone, NCE Project Archaeologist. During the meeting, Wilton Rancheria identified major railroad lines as highly archaeologically sensitive with the potential for railroad levees to contain disturbed midden soils as well as known burial sites located in proximity to the Project. The tribe considered providing tribal monitors and/or screening contaminated soil removed from the levee due to its potential to contain sensitive tribal cultural resources. However, considering archaeological review occurred of the soil samples taken for environmental testing and the nature of the contaminated soils, Wilton Rancheria determined the Project could move forward without tribal monitoring or tribal screening of the contaminated soils removed from the railroad levee. Wilton Rancheria provided their mitigation measure language for inadvertent discoveries to be used during Project implementation. The mitigation measure is provided in Appendix B. Wilton Rancheria inquired if interpretive signage was part of the Project to educate the public about the local tribes. The City indicated they and the community want to preserve Dublin's history as much as possible. To achieve this, the shade structure is being designed to replicate the railroad trellis slated for removal and amenity areas will have educational signage discussing the natural environment. The City identified the signs as an opportunity for tribes to propose educational information that could potentially be displayed as well. Wilton Rancheria deferred providing tribal history to the Ohlone Tribe because the Project is located within the primary territory of the Ohlone Tribe. Table 2 below provides a summary of correspondence attempted with all tribes identified by the NAHC. Consultation -related material, including the NAHC letter and response, an example of the tribal consultation letter sent, and email correspondence, is provided in Appendix C. Table 2. Summary of Tribe Consultation Correspondence. Representative Irenne Zwierlein Tony Cerda Ann Marie Sayers Kanyon Sayers -Roods Affiliation Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of Mission San Juan Bautista Costanoan Rumsen Carmel Tribe Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan Letter Result Letter received on 6/23/2022. No written response to date. Letter received on 6/28/2022. No written response to date. Letters received on 6/23/2022. No written response to date. Outreach Result On 9/7/2022, Ms. Zwierlein responded via phone. She requested cultural resources sensitivity training be provided to construction workers prior to any ground disturbing activities occurring for the Project. On 9/7/2022, a call was attempted, but the contact number provided by the NAHC was disconnected. On 9/7/2022, voicemails were left for Ms. Sayers and Ms. Sayers -Roods. No response to date. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 5 48 Charlene Nijmeh Monica Arellano Katherine Perez Timothy Perez Andrew Galvan Jesus Tarango Steven Hutchason Dahlton Brown IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT CONSULTATION COMMUNICATIONS DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Table 2. Summary of Tribe Consultation Correspondence. Representative Affiliation Muwekma Ohlone Indian Tribe of the SF Bay Area North Valley Yokuts Tribe The Ohlone Indian Tribe Wilton Rancheria Wuksache Indian Kenneth Woodrow Tribe/Eshom Valley Band Corrina Gould Letter Result Letter received on 6/23/2022. No written response to date. Letter received on 6/23/2022. No written response to date. Letter received on 6/28/2022. No written response to date. Letter received on 6/23/2022. Email response on 7/27/2022 detailed in next column. Letter received on 6/28/2022. No written response to date. The Confederated Letter returned to Villages of Lisjan sender. 2.2 OTHER INTERESTED PARTY COORDINATION Outreach Result On 9/7/2022, voicemails were left for Ms. Nijmeh and Ms. Arellano. No response to date. On 9/7/2022, voicemails were left for Ms. Perez and Mr. Perez. No response to date. On 9/7/2022, a voicemail was left. No response to date. On 9/7/2022, a voicemail was left for Mr. Hutchason. On 7/27/2022, Venesa Kremer, Wilton Rancheria Cultural Resource Assistant and Lead Monitor, responded via email requesting to consult on the Project. She requested additional Project information (e.g., design and environmental assessments taking place) and to be contacted to discuss further. On 1/30/2023, a request to meet with Wilton Rancheria to discuss the Project was sent via email. The email contained access to the archaeological and architectural assessment reports for the Project. On 2/16/2023, a virtual meeting occurred with representatives from Wilton Rancheria, the City, and NCE. Wilton Rancheria determined the Project can move forward without tribal monitoring or review of removed contaminated soils. The tribe requested their mitigation measure language for inadvertent discoveries be used. Wilton Rancheria hopes interpretive signage is included in the Project. On 9/7/2022, a voicemail was left. No response to date. On 9/7/2022, a voicemail was left for Ms. Gould. No response to date. The Dublin Historical Society was invited via email to provide additional historic resource information or concerns for the Project on June 16, 2022. On June 20, 2022, Historian Steve Minniear responded via email indicating the historical society could provide additional information and also suggested the Museum of the San Ramon Valley and the Boone Farm Museum as additional research locations. Mr. Minniear was connected with YAR for continued consultations regarding historic architectural resources within the Project. Email correspondence is provided in Appendix D. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 6 49 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT LITERATURE REVIEW DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 3 LITERATURE REVIEW The purpose of archival research is to create an understanding of work that has occurred in the area previously and the types of cultural resources present in the area and to build a historic context. Historic contexts are those patterns or trends in history by which a specific occurrence, property, or site is understood and its meaning (and ultimately its significance) within history is made clear. Before the onset of field inventory activities, NCE conducted sufficient archival research to inform expectations in the field and to develop an understanding of the historical context of the region. The archival research included a records search request from the Northwest Information Center (NWIC), and various historic maps (e.g., General Land Office [GLO] plat maps and U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] topographic maps). Emphasis was placed on the identification of previous archaeological inventories and sites within a quarter mile (0.25) of the APE, known as the archival study area. The records search result received from the NWIC (File# 21-1785) is provided in Appendix E. 3.1 PREVIOUS INVENTORIES Archival research indicates 37 inventories have been conducted within the archival study area (Table 3). Twenty-seven of the inventories intersect the APE and are italicized in the table below. The majority of the inventories intersecting the APE are over 20 years old and were conducted as a regional archaeological study with a designated focus (e.g., northwest prehistoric overview or pre -contact ecology). The one inventory fully encompassing the APE was conducted in preparation for a recycled water distribution project (Wills 2011). An inventory following along the historic railroad was conducted for a proposed wastewater pipeline route (Holman and Chavez 1977). Table 3. Previous Inventories within 0.25 Miles of the APE. Report Title Number S-000727 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of Two New Proposed Wastewater Pipeline Routes, Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency, Alameda County, California S-000848 A Summary of Knowledge of the Central and Northern California Coastal Zone and Offshore Areas, Vol. III, Socioeconomic Conditions, Chapter 7: Historical & Archaeological Resources S-000934 Upper Alameda Creek Urban Study: Archaeology, History, Contemporary, Ethnic S-002021 Archaeological field reconnaissance of the proposed 600-acre Kemco development area in the city of Dublin, California (letter report) S-002458 Overview of Prehistoric Archaeology for the Northwest Region, California Archaeological Sites Survey: Del Norte, Humboldt, Mendocino, Lake, Sonoma, Napa, Marin, Contra Costa, Alameda S-002458a Prehistoric Archaeology Overview Northwest Region; California Archaeological Inventory, Volume I: Humboldt and Del Norte Counties S-002458b Archaeological Overview of Mendocino and Lake Counties Author Year Miley Holman and David 1977 Chavez David A. Fredrickson 1976 David A. Fredrickson, 1978 Marc M. Druckman, Rae Eby -Burroughs, Susan McMurray, and John Hayes Miley Paul Holman 1979 Neil Ramiller, Suzanne 1981 Ramiller, Roger Werner, and Suzanne Stewart Suzanne Ramiller Roger H. Werner 1982 1982 CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 7 50 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT LITERATURE REVIEW DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Table 3. Previous Inventories within 0.25 Miles of the APE. Report Title Number S-002458c Prehistoric Archaeology Overview Northwest Region; California Archaeological Inventory, Volume 3: Napa and Sonoma Counties S-002458d Archaeological Overview of Alameda, Contra Costa, and Marin Counties S-002458e Environmental Overview of the Northwest Region S-009462 Identification and Recording of Prehistoric Petroglyphs in Marin and Related Bay Area Counties S-009583 Ecology of the Pre -Spanish San Francisco Bay Area S-009795 Late Prehistoric Obsidian Exchange in Central California S-016660 Prehistoric Rock Art of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California S-017835 Biological Distance of Prehistoric Central California Populations Derived from Non -Metric Traits of the Cranium S-018217 Cultural Resource Evaluations for the Caltrans District 04 Phase 2 Seismic Retrofit Program, Status Report S-020395 PCNs of the Coast Ranges of California: Religious Expression or the Result of Quarrying? S-030204 The Distribution and Antiquity of the California Pecked Curvilinear Nucleated (PCN) Rock Art Tradition. S-032596 The Central California Ethnographic Community Distribution Model, Version 2.0, with Special Attention to the San Francisco Bay Area, Cultural Resources Inventory of Caltrans District 4 Rural Conventional Highways S-033239 Alameda Watershed, Natural and Cultural Resources: San Francisco Watershed Management Plan S-033600 Geoarchaeological Overview of the Nine Bay Area Counties in Caltrans District 4 S-047983 Section 106 Cultural Resources Assessment, DSRSD Central Dublin Recycled Water Distribution and Retrofit Project, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California S-047983a BUR111208A; Section 106 Compliance for the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) Central Dublin Recycled Water Distribution and Retrofit Project in Alameda County, California (Project #09- CCAO-165) S-048567 Zone 7 Water Agency, 2016 Maintenance Projects, Cultural Resources Survey Report S-048927 The Economy and Archaeology of European -made Glass Beads and Manufactured Goods Used in First Contact Situations in Oregon, California, and Washington S-049780 San Francisco Bay -Delta Regional Context and Research Design for Native American Archaeological Resources, Caltrans District 4 S-049780a FHWA_2016_0615 001, Caltrans District 4 Archaeological Context Author Year Suzanne Stewart 1982 Suzanne B. Stewart 1982 Neil Ramilier 1982 Teresa Ann Miller 1977 David W. Mayfield Thomas Lynn Jackson Jeffrey B. Fentress Judy Myers Suchey Glenn Gmoser Donna L. Gillette Donna L. Gillette Randall Milliken, Jerome King, and Patricia Mikkelsen 1978 1986 1992 1975 1996 1998 2003 2006 David Chavez 1994 Jack Meyer and Jeff 2007 Rosenthal Carrie D. Wills 2011 Milford Wayne 2012 Donaldson Heidi Koenig Donald Scott Crull 2016 1997 Brian F. Byrd, Adrian R. 2017 Whitaker, Patricia J. Mikkelsen, and Jeffrey S. Rosenthal Julianne Polanco 2016 CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 8 51 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT LITERATURE REVIEW DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Table 3. Previous Inventories within 0.25 Miles of the APE. Report Title Number S-037500 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit for T-Mobile West Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Candidate BA22803-A (DSA Dublin High School), 8151 Village Parkway, Dublin, Alameda County, California (letter report) S-037985 Archaeological Testing Report for the Arroyo Vista Project, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California S-040758 A Cultural Resources Study for a Proposed Recycled Water Expansion Project, Dublin, Alameda County, California S-040758a A Cultural Resources Study for a Proposed Recycled Water Expansion Project, Dublin, Alameda County, California (revised) S-040758b BUR_2015_0615_001; National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 Consultation for the Western Dublin Recycled Water Expansion Project, Alameda County, California (15-MPRO-110) 3.2 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED RESOURCES Author Carrie D. Wills Year 2010 Paul Farnsworth 2011 Virginia Hagensieker and 2012 Janine M. Loyd Virginia Hagensiker and 2013 Janine M. Loyd Julianne Polanco 2015 Heidi Koenig Heidi Koenig Dana E. Supernowicz Archival research indicates three architectural resources have been formally recorded within the archival study area (Table 4). Resource P-01-011774 represents the remnants of an unnamed railroad grade and associated features located within the APE and the proposed alignment of the new trail. Resources P-01-011775 and P-01-012186 have been previously recorded within 0.25 miles of the APE. P-01-011775 is a segment of the channelized South San Ramon Creek and P-01-012186 consists of the Alamo Canal. No prehistoric or historic archaeological resources have been previously recorded within the archival study area. Table 4. Previously Recorded Resources within 0.25 Miles of the APE. Site Number Age Description P-01-011774 Historic DSRSD 1 Unnamed Railroad Grade P-01-011775 Historic DSRSD 2 S. San Ramon Creek Section P-01-012186 Historic Alamo Canal Last Eligibility Proximity Recorded Status to APE 2010 Not eligible Within 2010 Not eligible Adjacent 2017 Not eligible Outside CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 S-046220 Zone 7 Water Agency, 2015 Maintenance Projects, Cultural 2015 Resources Survey Report S-046220a Archaeological Monitoring Results - Zone 7 Water Agency 2015 2015 Maintenance Projects (ESA #130626.04) (letter report) S-052657 Cultural Resources Study of the Dublin High School Project 2006 Sprint/Nextel Site No. FN99XC072, 8151 Village Parkway, Dublin, Alameda County, California 94568 S-053003 Cultural Resources Survey Report, Zone 7 Water Agency 2018-2019 Katherine Cleveland and 2019 Channel Bank Repair Projects — Phase 2 Heidi Koenig S-053003a COE_2018_1221_001, Section 106 Consultation for the proposed Julianne Polanco 2019 Zone 7 Water Agency Repair of 26 Bank Failures in Dublin and Pleasanton, Alameda County, California (Corps File Number 2018- 00434S). S-053003b Archaeological Monitoring Results for 2018-2019 Channel Bank Heidi Koenig 2019 Repair Projects Phase 2 (ESA #160463.31) (letter report) 9 52 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT LITERATURE REVIEW DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 3.3 HISTORIC MAPS AND AERIAL IMAGES CONSULTED Historic maps and aerial images reviewed as part of the present study included the following: • 1866 GLO plat map for T.2S., R.1W. - depicts a blank portion of the map only labeled as Lot No. 37. Part of Rancho San Ramon (Amadore) • 1906 Pleasanton USGS topographic map (1:62,500) - depicts a dirt road in similar alignment with the present-day Iron Horse Trail • 1941 Pleasanton USGS topographic map (1:62,500) - depicts a straightened alignment of the 1906 dirt road parallel to the unnamed railroad within the APE • 1953 Dublin USGS topographic map (1:24,000) - Depicts the same dirt road alignment as the 1941 map which is most likely the gravel road currently maintained by Alameda County. The map depicts the railroad alignment as "Southern Pacific". 3.4 PREHISTORIC OVERVIEW Prehistory in the San Francisco Bay Area is commonly referenced as three periods: the Early Period, the Middle Period, and the Late Period (Milliken et al. 2007). These three cultural periods are further subdivided based on economic patterns, socio-politics, trade networks, population density, and variations of artifact types. The Early Period (Lower Archaic, 8000-3500 B.C.) is characterized by geographic mobility, millingslabs, handstone, large wide -stemmed projectile points, and leaf -shaped projectile points (Milliken et al. 2007). A beginning shift to sedentism is indicated by the Early Period (Middle Archaic, 3500-500 B.C.) with cut shell beads and mortar and pestles documented in burials. Archaeological findings dating from the Middle Period, which includes the Lower Middle Period (Initial Upper Archaic, 500 B.C.-A.D. 430), and Upper Middle Period (Late Upper Archaic, A.D. 430-1050), indicates limited geographic mobility and longer -term base camps where diverse flora and fauna resources could be exploited. In addition to archaeological sites from this period being located in more diverse environments, milling tools, obsidian, and chert concave -base projectile points suggest a more diverse economic base. Mobility was replaced by the development of numerous small villages in the Upper Middle Period. The archaeological record indicates a dramatic cultural disruption around A.D. 430 evidenced by a sudden collapse of the Olivella saucer bead trade network. The Initial Late Period (Lower Emergent, A.D. 1050-1550) saw the development of large, central villages with specialized activity sites and political leaders. This period is characterized by the bow and arrow, a diversity of beads and ornaments, and small corner -notched projectile points. 3.5 ETHNOGRAPHIC BACKGROUND Milliken (1995) compiled extensive ethnographic, historic, and archaeological data describing the Ohlone people as having occupied the Central Californian coast and general vicinity of the APE. The Ohlone occupied the area between San Francisco Bay in the north to the Big Sur and Salinas Rivers in the south. This anthropological term encompasses many distinct villages containing their variations of culture and ideology (Koenig 2020). The language group spoken by the Ohlone is known as "Costanoan" and was originally derived from a Spanish word describing the coastal peoples of Central California (Levy 1978). Costanoan contains at least eight distinct languages spoken by distinct sociopolitical groups. The Huchiun people who CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 10 53 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT LITERATURE REVIEW DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA spoke the Chochenyo dialect occupied the area of present-day Alameda County and a large part of the East Bay (Levy 1978; Milliken et al. 2009). The Ohlone engaged in hunting and gathering within coastal and open valley environments (Koenig 2020). They subsisted on a wide variety of resources including acorns, bulbs and tubers, grass seeds, antelope, deer, elk, bear, rabbits, and other small mammals, and a variety of bird species. Private ownership of goods and songs was acknowledged by the Ohlone. Village ownership of rights to land and natural resources was enforced through monetary payment in the form of clamshell beads. Ohlone society was severely disrupted by missionization, displacement, and disease after European contact (Koenig 2020). Today, the Ohlone have a strong presence in the San Francisco Bay Area with continued interest and activism for their historic and prehistoric past. Nine culturally affiliated tribes are associated with the area containing and surrounding Dublin. 3.6 HISTORIC OVERVIEW Spanish explorers Pedro Fages and Reverend Juan Crespi were the first Europeans to visit the East Bay area in 1772 (Koenig 2020). Mexico won independence from Spain in 1821, and in 1833 the Mexican government passed the Secularization Act to sell Spanish Mission land holdings to Mexican settlers (City of Dublin 2006). In 1835, Governor Jose Figueroa granted Jose Amador, a previous civilian administrator, 16,000 acres of former Mission San Jose land. Near Alamilla Springs, Amador built a two-story Monterey -style adobe home that would become the first settlement of present-day Dublin. The land was known as Rancho San Ramon and Amador owned as many as 14,000 cattle, 4,000 sheep, and 400 horses in 1837. Approximately 150 local Native Americans and Mexican laborers were employed as herders and makers of tallows, soap, hides, blankets, saddles, and farm equipment. Rancho San Ramon lay at the crossroads of two Indian trails, later Spanish trails, and became a primary stopping point for travelers. In 1846, California became an independent republic ending the Mexican Rancho era of California (City of Dublin 2006). After the Mexican American War, Amador was forced to sell parts of his property to pay for an extensive legal battle over his land titles. Two Irish immigrants, Michael Murray and Jeremiah Fallon purchased 245 acres each from Amador in 1852. Their homes were built in Alamilla Springs near Amador's adobe. In 1853, James Witt Dougherty purchased 10,000 acres of Rancho San Ramon and lived in Amador's adobe with his family. By the late 1850s, the settlement consisted of several homes and a few civic, commercial, and religious buildings and was known as Amador's or Dougherty's Station. The Amador Hotel was built in 1860 and became a major stopping point for stagecoaches traveling between San Jose, Martinez, Stockton, and Oakland. By 1878, the settlement included a church, cemetery, school, general store, harness shop, blacksmith shop, shoe shop, and two hotels. Due to a large number of Irish American immigrants, the settlement was named after Ireland's capital city, Dublin. Dublin continued to be an important crossroads through the 1900s with the increase in automobile use and the construction of two major highways through the town (City of Dublin 2006). The north -south trending CA-21, now San Ramon Road, connected Benicia to San Jose. The east -west trending Lincoln Highway or Route 50, now Dublin Boulevard, connected CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 11 54 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT LITERATURE REVIEW DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA the Bay Area to Sacramento, Tahoe, and continued further east. After World War II, suburban growth spread throughout the East Bay. In the 1960s and 1970s, Interstate 680 and Interstate 580 were constructed, greatly improving transportation routes in the Bay Area and encouraging residential development in the East Bay. By the mid-1970s, many of the historic buildings in Dublin were replaced by modern office buildings, shopping centers, and apartment complexes. Dublin became an incorporated city in 1982 and its population continued to grow through the 1990s. The Bay Area Rapid Transit Extension between Pleasanton and Dublin was completed in 1997. The rail line is yet another connection between Dublin and the rest of the Bay Area making the City an important commuter hub. 3.7 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 3.7.1 Geology The APE is located in the Livermore-Amador Valley in eastern Alameda County. The regional geology of the valley is dominated by the San Andreas Fault System (Sloan 2006). The hills, part of the Diablo Range and larger Coast Ranges Province, of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties, are no more than a few million years old and are rising due to numerous active faults between the Pacific and North American Plates. The Hayward Fault runs north -south to the east of the APE and was initiated approximately 12 million years ago. The western Pacific Plate of the fault moves through the slow fault creep action shifting northwestward past the North American Plate. Much of the Hayward Fault is marked by linear valleys, landslides, offset streams, and springs that attracted the development of current East Bay communities. Beneath the rolling grassland and oak hill landscape of the East Bay is a variety of rock types. The range includes rocks that formed during Mesozoic subduction more than 100 million years ago to younger terrestrial deposits that were uplifted above sea level about 10 million years ago. The East Bay hills stretch from San Jose to San Pablo Bay and are still rising between the Hayward and Calaveras Faults. The hills are composed of marine and terrestrial sedimentary rocks. This composition of rocks includes the 14-million-year-old Claremont Formation and 12-million-year-old Orinda Formation; about two million years of rock are missing between them from fault action. The Claremont Formation is a whitish chert formation. The Orinda Formation is an alluvium deposit layered with sandstone and conglomerates including Franciscan rocks. Knowing the formation materialized through stream deposits into a lowland demonstrates how fault uplift over time reserved the topography in the East Bay (Sloan 2006). The geologic units comprising the APE include Quaternary alluvium, or Livermore Gravel, described as a mixture of loose rocks and loosely consolidated sandstone, shale, and gravel deposits (USGS 2018). According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), the majority of the APE on the north end is comprised of Clear Lake clay and the south end of the APE contains Linne clay loam and Sunnyvale clay loam (NRCS 2022). Clear Lake and Sunnyvale clays are thick alluvium -derived clays typically found on basin and valley floors. Linne clay loam is a thick weathered residuum derived from calcareous shale. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 12 55 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT LITERATURE REVIEW DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 3.7.2 Flora Fauna The majority of the APE consists of California annual grassland habitat (CBI 2022). These grasslands are dominated by non-native grasses and forbs (H.T. Harvey and Associates 2019). Grasses include wild oat (Avena sp.), meadow barley (H. murinum), seaside barley (Hordeum marinum ssp. gussoneanum), Italian ryegrass, and soft chess. Common forbs include wild radish (Raphanus sativus), bristly ox tongue (Helminthotheca echioides), and various species of geranium and filaree (Geranium spp. and Erodium spp.). Common small mammals found in annual grasslands include California ground squirrels, Botta's pocket gophers (Thomomys bottae), deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), and California voles. Larger mammals include Black -tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) and coyotes (Canis latrans). Bird species foraging within grassland areas include the California scrubjay (Aphelocoma californica), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), violet - green swallow, western bluebird (Sialia mexicana), lesser goldfinch (Carduelis psaltria), and house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus). Raptors typically seen in annual grasslands include the red-tailed hawk and white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus). Common reptiles and amphibians residing in this habitat include the western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), northern Pacific rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus), California kingsnake (Lampropeltis californiae), gopher snake (Pituophis catenifer), western toad (Anaxyrus boreas), and Sierran chorus frog. 3.7.3 Archaeological Sensitivity The California coast and San Francisco Bay have undergone significant landscape changes since humans began to inhabit the region more than 10,000 years ago. Such changes included an increase in sedimentation into streams and rivers and rising sea levels (Helley et al. 1979). Well -developed buried soil profiles, or paleosols, often mark the interface between older land surfaces and Holocene -age landforms. These paleosols can preserve the previous landscape and potential archaeological material deposited before subsequent sediment deposition (Meyer and Rosenthal 2007). Prehistoric archaeological sites are predicted to be more frequent in Late Holocene -age paleosols due to the increase in human populations throughout the Holocene. Conversely, older paleosols developed during the early Holocene or Pleistocene were inhabited by lower population levels and are considered less likely to have preserved archaeological material. Archaeological sites are most likely to be located near perennial water sources, on landforms that contain deposits from successive periods, and on flat landforms that prehistorically and historically remained above water sources (Meyer in Ruby 2010:29). Considering the environmental context (i.e., undivided Quaternary alluvium) of the APE and previous disturbance from the construction of the railroad and channelization, the archaeological sensitivity of the APE is considered low. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 13 56 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT FIELD METHODOLOGY DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 4 FIELD METHODOLOGY An intensive archaeological survey, or inventory, was conducted on April 13, 2022. Concurrently, 52 environmental boreholes were conducted and monitored by a qualified archaeologist between April 13 and April 18, 2022 (Figure 3). 4.1 INVENTORY AREAS, MONITORING, AND FIELD METHODS The objective of the field inventory was to locate, describe, and evaluate cultural resources present within the APE. Fieldwork was performed following applicable and accepted Federal and State standards where feasible. An intensive survey was conducted for the approximately 10.4-acre APE. Ground visibility was low across the APE due to vegetation coverage. Emphasis was placed on the examination of the visible bare soil, rodent burrows, and undisturbed or relatively undisturbed ground. Sufficient clear ground was present to ensure survey adequacy. The objective of monitoring the environmental boreholes was to determine the presence or absence of subsurface cultural resources within the APE. The proposed scope of the sampling effort consisted of fifty boreholes located along the APE corridor, as well as two boreholes located at the railroad trestle abutments. All boreholes were hand augered using a standard 3.25-inch bucket. The subsurface samples were collected at intervals from 0- to 0.5-feet, 1.0- 1.5-feet, and 2.5- to 3.0-feet below ground surface (bgs). Near the trestle abutments, samples were collected at 0- to 0.5-feet, 2.0- to 2.5-feet, and 4.5- to 5.0-feet bgs. Careful attention was paid to the soil matrix. The condition, frequency, and class of any cultural materials identified would have been recorded if encountered. The lack of a subsurface deposit, feature, or culturally derived deposit served as an indicator that a site did not extend into the APE. The presence or absence of modern debris, standard stratigraphic indicators, and soil characteristics would have been relied upon to determine whether a subsurface deposit was intact. If a cultural resource had been encountered, field personnel would have more thoroughly examined the immediate area to determine the type and extent of cultural material. Archaeological and architectural components, including diagnostic artifacts, artifact concentrations, and features, would have been described in field notebooks, photographed using 10 megapixels or better cameras, and plotted using a mapping -grade GPS unit. If an archaeological or architectural site had been encountered, sufficient information would have been collected to allow for the completion of Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms. At least two overview photographs would have been taken per site to capture the general surroundings with attention paid to capturing the horizon (if possible) to aid in future relocation. Upon completion of the inventory, field data would have been downloaded from the GPS unit and differentially corrected. Resources, when identified, would have been plotted on both USGS 7.5-minute base maps and aerial imagery for resource form maps. Field personnel would have collected descriptive data useful in the evaluation of a site's eligibility for listing on the National and California Registers. No artifacts would have been collected during the inventory. Survey and monitoring photos are in Appendix F. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 14 57 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT FIELD METHODOLOGY DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 4.2 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Molly Laitinen, NCE Staff Archaeologist, conducted the inventory, monitored environmental boreholes, and prepared the inventory report. This report has been reviewed by Charles Zeier, NCE Senior Archaeologist, and Jeremy Hall, NCE Cultural Resources Manager. Ms. Laitinen, Mr. Zeier, and Mr. Hall meet the Secretary of the Interior (SOI) standards for archaeology (36 CFR Part 61), and they are Registered Professional Archaeologists. Ms. Laitinen has six years of experience, Mr. Zeier has over 45 years of experience, and Mr. Hall has over 20 years of experience in cultural resource management and evaluation as part of State, Federal, and professional standards. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 15 58 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT INVENTORY RESULTS DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 5 INVENTORY RESULTS As a result of the present effort, no previously recorded prehistoric or historic archaeological resources were revisited, and no newly recorded prehistoric or historic archaeological resources were identified within the APE. Project construction within the APE will be within areas previously disturbed during construction of the historic railroad, P-01-011774 (e.g., cut and fill embankment soils and ballast), underground utilities, and channelization of creeks and ditches around the railroad embankment. One road (owned and maintained by Alameda County) within the APE is depicted on historic maps. However, field reconnaissance indicates the road has been extensively and continually modified, repaired, and upgraded. These changes are indicative of a normal progression of road changes based on local needs. Due to the continuous modifications and urbanization, the historic road within the APE no longer resembles its original form. The road was not formally recorded as part of this Project. Modern debris was present throughout the inventoried APE. All such items were "recent" (less than 50 years in age) and none were recorded. As previously mentioned, YAR is currently preparing an architectural inventory and evaluation of the former railroad grade and trestle (P-01-011774) that extends through the APE. Yarbrough's (2022) architectural report provides findings and recommendations for architectural resources within and adjacent to the Project. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 16 59 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT ELIGIBILITY RECOMMENDATIONS DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 6 ELIGIBILITY RECOMMENDATIONS No previously identified, National Register -eligible or California Register -eligible archaeological resources were identified within the APE. Further, neither prehistoric nor historic period archaeological resources were identified within the present APE as a result of the current inventory effort. In the absence of resources, there is no need to assess National, State, or local eligibility. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 17 60 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 7 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY 7.1 SUMMARY The City proposes to construct the Project located in Dublin, California. The purpose of the Project is to create a nature park and open space with a trail and recreation facilities to meet the current and future needs of Dublin residents. Project improvements will be consistent with the adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan (City of Dublin 2022) and the adopted Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Master Plan (City of Dublin 2013). An APE was defined which includes all areas where surface or sub -surface disturbance may occur. The approximately 10.4-acre APE was surveyed and monitored following current state, federal (USACE), and professional standards. Every reasonable effort was made to identify any surface or buried expression of archaeological resources in the APE. As a result of this archaeological inventory and monitoring, no previously recorded or newly recorded archaeological resources were identified in the APE. 7.2 DETERMINATION OF EFFECT It is recommended that the Project will not affect archaeological resources based on the following considerations: • No previously recorded or newly recorded National Register or California Register eligible archaeological resources are present in the APE; • Project -related activities will be limited to areas previously disturbed by the historic railroad, P-01-011774, (e.g., cut and fill embankment soils and ballast) underground utilities, and channelization of creeks and ditches around the railroad embankment. Based on these considerations, it is recommended that the Project will not impact archaeological or historical resources listed in or eligible for listing in the California Register (PRC Section 21083, 50201) or the National Register. Also, it is recommended that the Project will have no effect on cultural resources designated as historic properties and will meet the definition of "no historic properties affected," as that term is defined in 36 Code of Federal Regulations Part 800.4(d)(1). 7.3 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Every reasonable effort was made to identify cultural resources within or adjacent to the APE. It is recommended the City provides a workers environmental awareness program (WEAP) conducted by either an SOI qualified archaeologist or locally affiliated Native American Tribe representative to contractors prior to any ground disturbing activities. If prehistoric or historic period resources are subsequently discovered that could be adversely affected by Project - related activities, all such activities should cease immediately. The City should implement the inadvertent discovery mitigation measure provided by Wilton Rancheria (see Appendix B) and appropriate tribal representatives should be contacted immediately. Prehistoric burials might be found in the APE (none were apparent based on an examination of the ground surface). In the event human remains are discovered, all work shall cease CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 18 61 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA immediately, and all measures shall be made to secure and protect areas in which human remains and funeral objects are discovered. No photographs of human remains, or funeral objects will be permitted by construction workers and/or contract or subcontractors on the job site. Archaeological resources are not to be moved or taken from the project site and work should not resume until authorized. In the event human remains are discovered, the County Coroner and local law enforcement shall be notified within 24 hours of the discovery to conduct proper evaluation and treatment of the remains. The coroner and law enforcement agency with jurisdiction will evaluate the find to determine whether it is a crime scene or a burial. If human remains are determined to be associated with an archaeological site (burial), SHPO will be notified. The City will work with SHPO to determine measures to take. That office will contact the appropriate tribal representatives and consult on the disposition of the remains and any associated artifacts. NCE prepared this report for use by the City as the intended beneficiary of this work. Interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations contained within the report are based in part on the information presented in other reports that are cited in the text and listed in the references. This report is subject to limitations and qualifications inherent to the referenced documents. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 19 62 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT REFERENCES DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 8 REFERENCES City of Dublin 2006 Dublin Village Historic Area Specific Plan. City of Dublin, Dublin, California. 2013 Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Master Plan. Resolution No. 166-13: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Dublin Adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for a General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Rezone with a Related Stage 1/2 Development Plan for The Future Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project, PLPA-2013- 00044. City of Dublin, California. 2022 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Resolution No. 38-22: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Dublin Considering a CEQA Addendum and Adopting the 2022 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. City of Dublin, Dublin, California. Conservation Biology Institute (CBI) 2022 California wildlife habitat relationships (WHR). Electronic document, https://databasin.ora/maps/new/#datasets=b44e9a 19ee954c00b5830836e6b8264c, accessed June 2022. Helley, Edward J., Lajoie, K. R., Spangle, W. E., and Blair, M. L. 1979 Flatland Deposits of the San Francisco Bay Region, California - their geology and engineering properties, and their importance to comprehensive planning, Geological Survey Professional Paper 943. Holman, Miley, and David Chavez 1977 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of Two New Proposed Wastewater Pipeline Routes, Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency, Alameda County, California. Report #S-000727 on file with the Northwest Information Center Rohnert Park, California. H.T. Harvey and Associates 2019 Dublin Boulevard -North Canyons Parkway Extension Project Biological Resources Report. H.T. Harvey and Associates, Los Gatos, California. Koenig, Heidi 2020 Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project, North, Middle, and South Reach, Contra Costa County, Cultural Resources Survey Report. Report prepared on behalf of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for submittal to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District. Levy, Richard 1978 Costanoan. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, edited by Robert Heizer, pp 485-495. U.S. Printing Office, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 20 63 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT REFERENCES DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Meyer, Jack, and Jeffrey Rosenthal 2007 Geoarchaeological Overview of the Nine Bay Area Counties in Caltrans District 4. Prepared for Caltrans District 4. Milliken, Randall T. 1995 A Time of Little Choice, The Disintegration of Tribal Culture in the San Francisco Bay Area 1769-1810. Ballena Press Anthropological Papers No. 43. Milliken, Randall, Laurence H. Shoup, and Beverley R. Ortiz 2009 Ohlone/Costanoan Indians of the San Francisco Peninsula and their Neighbors, Yesterday and Today. Prepared for National Park Service, Golden Gate National Recreation Area. Milliken, Randall, Richard T. Fitzgerald, Mark G. Hylkema, Randy Groaz, Tom Origer, David G. Bieling, Alan Leventhal, Randy S. Wiberg, Andrew Gottsfield, Donna Gillette, Viviana Bellifemine, Eric Strother, Robert Cartier, and David A. Fredrickson 2007 Punctuated Culture Change in the San Francisco Bay Area. In California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, pp. 99-124. AltaMira Press, New York. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) 2022 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey. Electronic document, http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/, accessed June 2022. Ruby, A. 2010 Draft Archaeological Survey Report for the Monterey Peninsula Light Rail Transit Project. Prepared by Far Western Anthropological Group, Inc. Prepared for Parsons Corporation, San Francisco. On file with Environmental Science Associates, San Francisco. Sloan, Doris 2006 Geology of the San Francisco Bay Region. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 2012 Processing of Department of the Army Permits. Electronic document, https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title33-vo13/pdf/CFR-2011-title33-vo13- part325.pdf, accessed October 18, 2018. 2013 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tribal Consultation Policy and Related Documents. Electronic document, https://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Portals/12/documents/tribal_program/USACE%20Nat ive%20American%20Policy%20brochure%202013.pdf, accessed October 18, 2018. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 21 64 IRON HORSE NATURE PARK AND OPEN SPACE PROJECT REFERENCES DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA United States Geological Survey (USGS) 2018 California Geologic Map Data. Electronic document, https://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology/state/map-us.html, accessed June 2022. Wills, Carrie D. 2011 Section 106 Cultural Resources Assessment, DSRSD Central Dublin Recycled Water Distribution and Retrofit Project, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California. Report #S-047983 on file with the Northwest Information Center, Rohnert Park, California. Yarbrough, Edward 2022 Architectural Identification & Evaluation Report: Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California. Yarbrough Architectural Resources, Saint Helena, California. Prepared for NCE on behalf of City of Dublin Parks and Recreation Department. CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY REPORT MARCH 2023 22 65 Appendix A FIGURES 66 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 67 Contra Costa County Alameda County 0 10 20 Legend ElProject Area S A N Satz Raman Village .4 f Of/. ..414, i i VA$M a — 607 II l� IDO!8) , I• 1, Komandorsk 1 Viilagr I t►' s • e▪ s ;!NCE «11 DUBLIN CALIFORNIA SOURCE ESRI USGS Topo Maps Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Project Area Location Map JOB NUMBER 891.06.55 DRAWN mlaitinen 0 tt CAMP' ;. R •C 1111 r . 4-'• ._ •♦ H t.snT;R.4 1111 1 l. I a .• C ro-.3 -i'r:. f .t 1111 11111 -� _ r _ 1 '� + m 11111 1 T 11111 11111r111l1. 11111111111 t • f 1111 1 _ iril Ilir 1111 rI IIII I. :1I` - 1111 • 1111, i- ■ e r r' E: — 1111' 111i m n[,. ill • c~--T-" _. 1I111ll111111.._ i 09 1 Free I \ ,BouNDARr .j BM 325 County: Alameda USGS 7.5' Quad Map: Dublin TRS: T.25., R.1W., Sec. 36 A 1:24,000 0 1,000 2,000 "t. FIGURE 1 DATE REVISED APPROVED 4/21/22 6/16/2022 jhall • 68 Legend El APE "NICE Ars V DUBLIN Qthirtz Curie - Quilt! Lircie Ala. ; ilki• .L- ..k.—.S7 L- /I . e--4_ .ilL. I". .• ,,... • • - l Sta ." 44 A. ,.. • EP , 2 ..... ir . --3 ...„. ,,,, t, z ., el AI Z5. 1 I Me' '."- aecbach ., .... .. • - • • -4._ ,...., r ....,,.... ., - r.... ft., inc. „eV ..'Ali•=.4 A:y.1'4, . i . . • .1. i -* . - -_;I illellir IL.'ft . -ita. 7, Newcastle tni . -i- , Langmuir Ln- ' __W r 4,1. -",.,,,,,— t112.1N. - . P" ' I • • • * ';'N. f - - Torie:Gt€' ' '' I '... 1.3 ' I • JP Ye .. . ... t ,,i, i'."' • 14 • If 8 grtalliaton,Drammr A ' i—FIC eV— • MI. '' NO . g , .10 - •np. - - ' tilijh . R 1 c ' ' 11111! Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Area of Potential Effect Map ':ALIFORNIA SOURCE JOB NUMBER DRAWN Bing Aerial Basemap 891.06.55 mlaitinen 1 in. = 400 ft. 0 200 400 DATE REVISED 4/22/2022 6/16/2022 FIGURE 2 APPROVED jhall 69 Legend ElProject Area Environmental Borehole/ Sample ;NCE s�s DUBLIN C A LI FO RNIA SOURCE Bing Aerial Basemap Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Environmental Borehole and Soil Sample Location Map 1 in. = 200 ft. 0 100 200 ft. FIGURE 3 JOB NUMBER DRAWN DATE REVISED APPROVED 891.06.55 mlaitinen 6/16/2022 6/17/2022 jhall 70 Appendix B WILTON RANCHERIA INADVERTENT DISCOVERY MITIGATION MEASURE 71 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 72 Wilton Rancheria 9728 Kent Street, Elk Grove, CA 95624 Mitigation Measures for Inadvertent Discoveries If potential tribal cultural resources (TCRs), archaeological artifacts, other cultural resources, articulated, or disarticulated human remains are discovered during construction activities, all work will cease within 100 feet of the find (based on the apparent distribution of the resources. Examples of potential cultural materials include but are not limited to midden soils, artifacts, chipped or worked stone, baked clay, shell, or bone.) A Native American Representative from the federally recognized, Wilton Rancheria will assess the significance of the find and make recommendations for further evaluation and treatment if necessary. Culturally appropriate treatment that preserves or restores the cultural qualities and integrity of a Tribal Cultural Resource may be, but is not limited to, processing materials for reburial, minimizing handling of cultural objects, leaving objects in place within the landscape, construction monitoring of any further activities by a tribal representative, and or returning the objects to a location within the project area where they will not be subject to future impacts. Wilton Rancheria does not consider curation of TCRs to be appropriate or respectful and requests that materials not be permanently curated, unless specifically requested by the Tribe. If any human remains are discovered during construction activities, the County Coroner and the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted immediately. Upon determination by the County Coroner that the remains are Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission will assign the Most Likely Descendant(s) (MLD) who will work the project proponents to define proper treatment and disposition. After review of the find and consultation with the MLD, the authority to proceed may be accompanied by the addition of development requirements which provide for protection and preservation of the site and/or additional measures necessary to address the sensitive and unique nature of the site. All treatment recommendations made by the tribe and other cultural resources specialists will be documented in the confidential portion of the project record. Work in the area(s) of the cultural find may only proceed after authorization from the lead agency in coordination with the Tribe. Please reach out to the tribe by using the contact information listed below. We appreciate your compliance and understanding in our endeavors to protect and preserve our tribal cultural resources. Venesa Kremer Cultural Resource Assistant Lead Monitor Wilton Rancheria- Cultural Preservation Department Tel: 916.683.6000 ext. 2023 vkremer@wiltonrancheria-nsn.gov cpd@wiltonrancheria-nsn.gov 73 Appendix C NATIVE AMERICAN CORRESPONDENCE 74 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 75 Collaboration. Commitment. Confidenc& May 17, 2022 Ms. Christina Snider, Executive Secretary California Native American Heritage Commission 1550 Harbor Boulevard, Suite 100 West Sacramento, California 95691 Dear Ms. Snider: The City of Dublin (City) proposes to implement the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project (Project) located at located between Amador Valley Rd. and Alcosta Blvd., Dublin, California. The proposed Project would include the following features: 1. Re -location of the Iron Horse Trail to the east in the location of the historic railroad bed 2. Additional secondary pedestrian trails along the corridor 3. Better access at the northern boundary, along the northeast side and at Stagecoach Park 4. Restoration of the site with native vegetation representing oak woodlands, grasslands, riparian zones and wetlands 5. Trail head facilities 6. Community garden space 7. Picnic and play spaces for children 8. Collaboration with Zone 7 on their re -alignment of San Ramon Creek to improve flood management, water quality and naturalized system providing access to additional parkland for residents. The Project requires compliance with the National Environmental Preservation Act (NEPA), Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). NCE has been retained to complete initial compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA and AB-52 under CEQA. The Project is comprised of approximately 8-acres located within Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Section 36. Two maps are enclosed for your review. Figure 1 is a location map of the project area at a 1:24,000 scale with a USGS 7.5' quadrangle background (Dublin). Figure 2 is a detail map with aerial imagery. Please provide a Native American contact list for within and near the project area. We also request that you conduct a search of your Sacred Lands database for any places of concern that may be located within or adjacent to the proposed project area. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via email at mlaitinen@ncenet.com or by telephone (510-215-3620). I appreciate your assistance and look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, Molly Laitinen NCE I Staff Archaeologist Enclosed: Tribal Consultation List Request Form; Figure 1 - Location Map; Figure 2 - Detail Map Pt. Richmond, CA 501 Canal Blvd., Suite I Pt. Richmond, CA 94804 (510) 215-3620 Engineering & Environmental Services www.ncenet.com 76 Local Government Tribal Consultation List Request Native American Heritage Commission 1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 95691 916-373-3710 916-373-5471 — Fax nahc(&,nahc.ca.gov Type of List Requested ❑ CEQA Tribal Consultation List (AB 52) —Per Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1, subs. (b), (d), (e) and 21080.3.2 ❑ General Plan (SB 18) - Per Government Code § 65352.3. Local Action Type: General Plan General Plan Element General Plan Amendment Specific Plan _ Specific Plan Amendment _ Pre -planning Outreach Activity Required Information Project Title: Local Government/Lead Agency: Contact Person: Street Address: City: Phone: Email: Specific Area Subject to Proposed Action County: Project Description: Fax: Additional Request ❑ Sacred Lands File Search - Required Information: USGS Quadrangle Name(s): Zip: City/Community: Township: Range: Section(s): 77 .73 Contra Costa County Alameda County Legend El Project Area &INCE sor DUBLIN CALIFORNIA SOURCE ESRI USGS Topo Maps San Ramon Village Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Project Area Location Map JOB NUMBER 891.06.55 DRAWN mlaitinen er ... 0 BOUNDARY BM 325 County: Alameda USGS 7.5' Quad Map: Dublin TRS: T.2S., R.1W., Sec. 36 A 1:24,000 0 1,000 2,000 "t. DATE 4/21/22 REVISED FIGURE 1 APPROVED jhall 78 Legend ElProject Area ;NCE ss DUBLIN _A LI FO RNIA pearl P. Qi r t Q • I b aft A. S 1 4?.:gt . L tb"*' 4, � y Co lPq w * i ngt - ,....:* S,agecoach Park Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Project Area Detail Map SOURCE JOB NUMBER DRAWN Bing Aerial Basemap 891.06.55 mlaitinen N A 1 in. = 400 ft. 0 200 400 ft. FIGURE 2 DATE REVISED APPROVED 4/22/2022 79 CHAIRPERSON Laura Miranda Luiseno VICE CHAIRPERSON Reginald Pagaling Chumash PARLIAMENTARIAN Russell Attebery Karuk SECRETARY Sara Dutschke Miwok COMMISSIONER William Mungary Paiute/White Mountain Apache COMMISSIONER Isaac Bojorquez Ohlone-Costanoan COMMISSIONER Buffy McQuillen Yokayo Pomo, Yuki, Nomlaki COMMISSIONER Wayne Nelson Luiseno COMMISSIONER Stanley Rodriguez Kumeyaay EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Raymond C. Hitchcock Miwok/Nisenan NAHC HEADQUARTERS 1550 Harbor Boulevard Suite 100 West Sacramento, California 95691 (916) 373-3710 nahc@nahc.ca.aov NAHC.ca.gov STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION June 14, 2022 Molly Laitinen NCE Via Email to: mlaitinen@ncenet.com Re: Native American Tribal Consultation, Pursuant to the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014), Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 (m), 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2 and 21084.3, Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project, Alameda County Dear Ms. Laitinen: Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (c), attached is a consultation list of tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the above -listed project. Please note that the intent of the AB 52 amendments to CEQA is to avoid and/or mitigate impacts to tribal cultural resources, (Pub. Resources Code §21084.3 (a)) ("Public agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource.") Public Resources Code sections 21080.3.1 and 21084.3(c) require CEQA lead agencies to consult with California Native American tribes that have requested notice from such agencies of proposed projects in the geographic area that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the tribes on projects for which a Notice of Preparation or Notice of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration has been filed on or after July 1, 2015. Specifically, Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (d) provides: Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at (east one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section. The AB 52 amendments to CEQA law does not preclude initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated within your jurisdiction prior to receiving requests for notification of projects in the tribe's areas of traditional and cultural affiliation. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) recommends, but does not require, early consultation as a best practice to ensure that lead agencies receive sufficient information about cultural resources in a project area to avoid damaging effects to tribal cultural resources. The NAHC also recommends, but does not require that agencies should also include with their notification letters, information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the area of potential effect (APE), such as: 1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to: Page 1 of 2 80 • A listing of any and all known cultural resources that have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE, such as known archaeological sites; • Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response; • Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate, or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the APE; and • If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present. 2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including: • Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measures. All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure in accordance with Government Code section 6254.10. 3. The result of any Sacred Lands File (SLF) check conducted through the Native American Heritage Commission was negative. 4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the APE; and 5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the APE. Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS are not exhaustive and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a tribal cultural resource. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource. This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the event that they do, having the information beforehand will help to facilitate the consultation process. If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we can assure that our consultation list remains current. If you have any questions, please contact me at my email address: Codv.Campagne@nahc.ca.gov. Sincerely, cam/reef"- Cody Campagne Cultural Resources Analyst Attachment Page 2 of 2 81 Amah MutsunTribal Band of Mission San Juan Bautista Irene Zwierlein, Chairperson 3030 Soda Bay Road Lakeport, CA, 95453 Phone: (650) 851 - 7489 Fax: (650) 332-1526 amahmutsuntribal@gmail.com Costanoan Rumsen Carmel Tribe Tony Cerda, Chairperson 244 E. 1st Street Pomona, CA, 91766 Phone: (909) 629 - 6081 Fax: (909) 524-8041 rumsen@aol.com Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan Ann Marie Sayers, Chairperson P.O. Box 28 Hollister, CA, 95024 Phone: (831) 637 - 4238 ams@indiancanyons.org Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan Kanyon Sayers -Roods, MLD Contact 1615 Pearson Court San Jose, CA, 95122 Phone: (408) 673 - 0626 kanyon@kanyonkonsulting.com Native American Heritage Commission Tribal Consultation List Alameda County 6/14/2022 Costanoan Costanoan Costanoan Costanoan Muwekma Ohlone Indian Tribe of the SF Bay Area Charlene Nijmeh, Chairperson 20885 Redwood Road, Suite 232 Costanoan Castro Valley, CA, 94546 Phone: (408) 464 - 2892 cnijmeh@muwekma.org Muwekma Ohlone Indian Tribe of the SF Bay Area Monica Arellano, Vice Chairwoman 20885 Redwood Road, Suite 232 Costanoan Castro Valley, CA, 94546 Phone: (408) 205 - 9714 marellano@muwekma.org North Valley Yokuts Tribe Katherine Perez, Chairperson P.O. Box 717 Linden, CA, 95236 Phone: (209) 887 - 3415 canutes@verizon.net North Valley Yokuts Tribe Timothy Perez, P.O. Box 717 Linden, CA, 95236 Phone: (209) 662 - 2788 huskanam@gmail.com The Ohlone Indian Tribe Andrew Galvan, P.O. Box 3388 Fremont, CA, 94539 Phone: (510) 882 - 0527 Fax: (510) 687-9393 chochenyo@AOL.com Wilton Rancheria Jesus Tarango, Chairperson 9728 Kent Street Elk Grove, CA, 95624 Phone: (916) 683 - 6000 Fax: (916) 683-6015 jtarango@wiltonrancheria-nsn.gov Wilton Rancheria Steven Hutchason, THPO 9728 Kent Street Elk Grove, CA, 95624 Phone: (916) 683 - 6000 Fax: (916) 863-6015 shutchason@wiltonrancheria- nsn.gov Wilton Rancheria Dahlton Brown, Director of Administration 9728 Kent Street Elk Grove, CA, 95624 Phone: (916) 683 - 6000 dbrown@wiltonrancheria-nsn.gov Costanoan Northern Valley Yokut Costanoan Northern Valley Yokut Bay Miwok Ohlone Patwin Plains Miwok Miwok Miwok Miwok This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list is only applicable for consultation with Native American tribes under Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 for the proposed Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project, Alameda County. PROJ-2022- 06/14/2022 12:11 PM 1 of 2 003364 82 Native American Heritage Commission Tribal Consultation List Alameda County 6/14/2022 Wuksache Indian Tribe/Eshom Valley Band Kenneth Woodrow, Chairperson 1179 Rock Haven Ct. Foothill Yokut Salinas, CA, 93906 Mono Phone: (831) 443 - 9702 kwood8934@aol.com The Confederated Villages of Lisjan Corrina Gould, Chairperson 10926 Edes Avenue Bay Miwok Oakland, CA, 94603 Ohlone Phone: (510) 575 - 8408 Delta Yokut cvltribe@gmail.com This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list is only applicable for consultation with Native American tribes under Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 for the proposed Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project, Alameda County. PROJ-2022- 06/14/2022 12:11 PM 2 of 2 003364 83 DUBLIN CALIFORNIA THE NEW AMERICAN BACKYARD City Council 925.833.6650 City Manager 925.833.6650 Community Development 925.833.66 r 0 Economic Development 925.833.6650 Finance/1T 925.833.6640 Fire Prevention 925.833.6606 Human Resources 925.833.6605 Parks & Community Services 925.833.6645 Police 925.833.6670 Public Works 925.833.6630 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 P 925.833.6650 F 925.833.6651 www.dublin.ca.gov June 20, 2022 Tony Cerda, Chairperson Costanoan Rumsen Carmel Tribe 244 E. 1st Street Pamona, CA 91766 SUBJECT: Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project, CIP No. PK0422 Dear Tony Cerda: The City of Dublin (City) proposes to construct the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project (Project) located in Duunn, Laic)! ilia. The purpose of the Project is to create a nature park and open space with a trail and recreation facilities to meet the current and future needs of Dublin residents. The Project area will extend north from the intersection of Amador Valley Boulevard for approximately 2,000 feet along a former railroad embankment. An existing segment of the Iron Horse Trail is located west of and paralleling the Project. Upon ultimate completion of all planned improvements, the new trail constructed with the Project will eventually replace the paralleling segment of the existing Iron Horse Trail. Project improvements will be consistent with the adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan and the adopted Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Master Plan. The Project requires compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City will act as the CEQA lead agency. NCE has been retained to conduct Native American consultation under Assembly Bill 52 (AB-52) (PRC 21080.3.1). The Project is comprised of 10.4-acres located within Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Section 36. Two maps are enclosed for your review. Figure 1 is a location map of the project area at a 1:24,000 scale with a USGS 7.5' quadrangle background (Dublin). Figure 2 is a detail map with aerial imagery. A records search of the Project area and a quarter -mile (0.25) buffer was requested from the Northwest Information Center. Record search results indicate one architectural resource (P-01-011774) has been recorded previously within the Project area and two architectural resources (P-01-011775 and P-01-012186) have been recorded previously within 0.25 miles of the Project area. Resource P-01-011774 represents the remnants of an unnamed railroad grade and associated features; P-01- 011775 is a segment of the channelized South San Ramon Creek; and P-01-012186 consists of the Alamo Canal. A search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File was requested for the Project area on May 17, 2022. The results of that search were negative. An intensive archaeological survey and archaeological monitoring of 52 environmental boreholes within the Project area occurred between April 13 and April 18, 2022. No new cultural resources were identified during the inventory or monitoring efforts. 84 Please consider this letter and preliminary Project information as the initiation of AB- 52 consultation under CEQA. Please respond within 30 days of receipt of this letter if you would like to consult on this Project. Please provide a designated lead contact person if you have not provided that information to us already. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Molly Laitinen, the City's consultant with NCE, via e-mail at mlaitinen@ncenet.com or by telephone at (408)-823- 4570. We appreciate your assistance and look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, Laurie L. Sucgang, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer Enclosure: Figure 1— Project Area Location Map Figure 2 — Project Area Detail Map NAHC Results Letter NWIC Results Letter cc: Molly Laitinen, NCE Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project, Dublin, California Page 2 85 Contra Costa County Alameda County 0 10 20 Legend ElProject Area S A N ,•, . Satz Raman Village 4.► VA$M — _�-607 II tiR -L)(AMADQR) , li Komandorsk 1 Viilagr I t►' s �..hl' f 41%. � i ▪ t • ;!NCE DUBLIN CALIFORNIA SOURCE ESRI USGS Topo Maps • Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Project Area Location Map JOB NUMBER 891.06.55 DRAWN mlaitinen 0 tt CAMP' ;. R •C 1111 r . 4-'• ._ •♦ H t.snT;R.4 .T1ls t . I f . CENIT. 111111111 _r 1 , 1,1 + m 11111 1 T 11111 1111 1 r 11111 11111111111 t • f 11111 _ irll Ilir 1111r I IIII I. :1I` - 1111 • 1111, i- ■ e r r' E: — 1111' 111i m n[,. ill • c~--T -" _. 1I111ll111111.-_ i 09 • 1 Free \ 1I \fiUuNDARY BM 325 .j County: Alameda USGS 7.5' Quad Map: Dublin TRS: T.25., R.1W., Sec. 36 A 1:24,000 0 1,000 2,000 "t. FIGURE 1 DATE REVISED APPROVED 4/21/22 6/16/2022 jhall • 86 Legend ElProject Area "NICE Ars V DUBLIN Qthirtz Curie Quilt! Lircie • • EP , . ,-Ifle/ so, Staciecbachl • - fir Kt- ,Tu.,virquals_.......„st._ • - ei• uii — lung illO.eillr IL.'ft . •Ing;:i . 7, I L Newcastle ni . f , Langmuir Ln- ' ' . ...1 ';'• f - - 0-11.--- ei• . Ns 1 I111 . ili4. ' Pi Irv.' ,l't .417 _11 r , P" 10, vr,:-.) 1 • 1.3 ii.. '0 8 grtalliatomDrilkuir' •-•ri ,... , iour— r,„ kiiiiir,r;; .. . i ,g., ... - •np• • •-• - •. 111jP. R ', ' • 10:. Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Project Area Detail Map ':ALIFORNIA SOURCE JOB NUMBER DRAWN Bing Aerial Basemap 891.06.55 mlaitinen 1 in. = 400 ft. 0 200 400 DATE REVISED 4/22/2022 6/16/2022 FIGURE 2 APPROVED jhall 87 CHAIRPERSON Laura Miranda Luiseno VICE CHAIRPERSON Reginald Pagaling Chumash PARLIAMENTARIAN Russell Attebery Karuk SECRETARY Sara Dutschke Miwok COMMISSIONER William Mungary Paiute/White Mountain Apache COMMISSIONER Isaac Bojorquez Ohlone-Costanoan COMMISSIONER Buffy McQuillen Yokayo Pomo, Yuki, Nomlaki COMMISSIONER Wayne Nelson Luiseno COMMISSIONER Stanley Rodriguez Kumeyaay EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Raymond C. Hitchcock Miwok/Nisenan NAHC HEADQUARTERS 1550 Harbor Boulevard Suite 100 West Sacramento, California 95691 (916) 373-3710 nahc@nahc.ca.aov NAHC.ca.gov STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION June 14, 2022 Molly Laitinen NCE Via Email to: mlaitinen@ncenet.com Re: Native American Tribal Consultation, Pursuant to the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014), Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 (m), 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2 and 21084.3, Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project, Alameda County Dear Ms. Laitinen: Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (c), attached is a consultation list of tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the above -listed project. Please note that the intent of the AB 52 amendments to CEQA is to avoid and/or mitigate impacts to tribal cultural resources, (Pub. Resources Code §21084.3 (a)) ("Public agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource.") Public Resources Code sections 21080.3.1 and 21084.3(c) require CEQA lead agencies to consult with California Native American tribes that have requested notice from such agencies of proposed projects in the geographic area that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the tribes on projects for which a Notice of Preparation or Notice of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration has been filed on or after July 1, 2015. Specifically, Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (d) provides: Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at (east one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section. The AB 52 amendments to CEQA law does not preclude initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated within your jurisdiction prior to receiving requests for notification of projects in the tribe's areas of traditional and cultural affiliation. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) recommends, but does not require, early consultation as a best practice to ensure that lead agencies receive sufficient information about cultural resources in a project area to avoid damaging effects to tribal cultural resources. The NAHC also recommends, but does not require that agencies should also include with their notification letters, information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the area of potential effect (APE), such as: 1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to: Page 1 of 2 88 • A listing of any and all known cultural resources that have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE, such as known archaeological sites; • Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response; • Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate, or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the APE; and • If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present. 2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including: • Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measures. All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure in accordance with Government Code section 6254.10. 3. The result of any Sacred Lands File (SLF) check conducted through the Native American Heritage Commission was negative. 4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the APE; and 5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the APE. Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS are not exhaustive and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a tribal cultural resource. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource. This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the event that they do, having the information beforehand will help to facilitate the consultation process. If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we can assure that our consultation list remains current. If you have any questions, please contact me at my email address: Codv.Campagne@nahc.ca.gov. Sincerely, cam/reef"- Cody Campagne Cultural Resources Analyst Attachment Page 2 of 2 89 1 of 3 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM 5/25/2022 Molly Laitinen NCE 501 Canal Blvd. Suite I Richmond, CA 95804 AzuaEnA CO r,5A OCKVIRA COSTA DEL XO IE HL:.11 CILDT "SAN FRANCSCO LAKE u I-59 MARE,: CT AIA NEEND 'c ti-O 53VTA C fL'Z ]SONIEEEY 5OLANO NAPA roMA S2LNI rrD OLO Re: Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project tiatthwest Information Center SSOnaina State LTnivsity 11011 Valley House Driu. Suite 20 Rohnart Park California 9V28-3609 TeL 77,558.E 5 nnvioVsonoma_edu 'Enwi _sonomaQd.tt NWIC File No.: 21-1785 The Northwest Information Center received your record search request for the project area referenced above, located on the Dublin USGS 7.5' quad(s). The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and a 0.25 mi. radius: Resources within project area: Resources within 0.25 mi. radius: Reports within project area: Reports within 0.25 mi. radius: P-01-011774 P-01-011775, P-01-012186 [20] Please see attached list, page 3 S-37500, 37985, 407548, 46220, 52657, 53003 Resource Database Printout (list): Resource Database Printout (details): Resource Digital Database Records: Report Database Printout (list): Report Database Printout (details): Report Digital Database Records: Resource Record Copies: Report Copies: OHP Built Environment Resources Directory: Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility: CA Inventory of Historic Resources (1976): GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: Historical Maps: X❑ enclosed ❑ not requested X❑ enclosed ❑ not requested x❑ enclosed ❑ not requested ® enclosed ❑ not requested ® enclosed ❑ not requested ® enclosed ❑ not requested ❑X enclosed ❑ not requested ❑ enclosed ❑X not requested ® enclosed ❑ not requested ❑ enclosed ❑ not requested ® enclosed ❑ not requested ❑ enclosed ❑X not requested ❑ enclosed © not requested ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed © nothing listed ® nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed 90 2 of 3 Local Inventories: Caltrans Bridge Survey: Ethnographic Information: Historical Literature: Shipwreck Inventory: ❑ enclosed ❑ enclosed ❑X enclosed ❑ enclosed ❑ enclosed ® not requested ® not requested ❑ not requested ❑X not requested ® not requested ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as soon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above. The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of, or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, State Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts. Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the record search number listed above when making inquiries. Requests made after initial invoicing will result in the preparation of a separate invoice. Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS). Sincerely, WwwPi need Researcher 91 m m rr U.S. Postal Service"' CERTIFIED MAIL°RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only ru CI Certified Mail Fee m ED Extra Services & Fees (check box, add fee as appropriate) 0 Return Receipt (hardcopy) $ 0 Return Receipt (electronic) $ 0 Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ D 0 Adult Signature Required $ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $ D Postage ru $ It !Total Postage and Fees ru yJ rq Sent To T ° 1`1 � n� ft rU 1 D Street anc/Ap . No. ISO ox N City, State, Zi, S SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION i,•■ Compete itari ;1;32grdO. ■ Print yoirn&ifie.; rid address on the reverse so that:We caia fe'turn the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed ,Q ato: 11y ERDFA ' 40 RSe Ida r 6CIY� 2 q 9 C IST -sr: <wrx )00 m o nq1 C O- 4 f -7 II I IIIIIi !III III I III I I l l l l l l l l ll l ll l l I I II I II I• � 9590 9402 6910 1104 1928 66 Postmark Here COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY Vignatur X -Agent 0 Addressee 3.eeceived (Print ame) 10. ate of Deli D. Is delivery address different fro m 1? 0 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑..No 3. Service Type ❑ Adult Signature ❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ Certified Mail® ❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑ Collect on Delivery 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) Li Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery 7021 2720 0000 0320 1339 Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811, July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-90p3 ❑ Priority Mail Express@ ❑ Registered MaliTM ❑ Reslstered Mail Restricted Delivery ❑ Signature ConflrmatiortTM ❑ Signature Confirmation Restricted Delivery Domestic Return Receipt 92 USPS.com® - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc... USPS Tracking® Track Another Package + Get the free Infprmed Delivery `s feature to receive automated no'ifications on your packages FAQs > Track Packages Anytime, Anywhere Learn More (https://reg.usps.com /xsell?app=UspsT cols&ref=homepageBanner&appURL=https%3A%2F%2Finformeddelivery.usps.com/box/pages/intro /startaction) Tracking Number: 70212720000003201339 Remove XCD n CT Your item was picked up at the post office at 2:18 pm on June 28, 2022 in POMONA, CA 91768. USPS Tracking Plus° Available u C✓ Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Post Office June 28, 2022 at 2:18 pm POMONA, CA 91768 Get Updates u Text & Email Updates Tracking History June 28, 2022, 2:18 pm 1 of 2 7/ 1 1 /2022, 2:56 1'M93 USPS.com a - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmnction?tRef fullpage&tLc... Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Post Office POMONA, CA 91768 Your item was picked up at the post office at 2:18 pm on June 28, 2022 in POMONA, CA 91768. USPS Tracking Plus® Product Information See Less /\ Can't find what you're looking for? Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. FAQs 0 2 of 2 7/1 1 /2022, 2:56 PN 94 7021 2720 Certified Mali Fee Extra Services & Fees (check box, add tee as appropriate) ❑ Retum Receipt (hardcopy) $ ❑ Retum Receipt (electronic) $ ❑Certified Mali Restricted Delivery $ ❑ Adult Signature Requlred $ ❑AduH Signature Restricted Delivery $ Postage Total Postage and Fees Sent To Street and Apt. o., (Pb¢Box City, State, Z!P+4e SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. • Print your name and address oh the reverse so that we cari return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: (1--2aM ktor3 88rK� FRfmantC6cl"g4s3y IIII��I ICI IIIIINI II II IIII IINIINIIIIII III 9590 9402 6910 1104 1929 27 U.S. Postal Service"' CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only OFFICIAL LUSF f Postmark Here COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A:•+attire/j0r B. ecelved by Name) 0 Agent Addressee Date of Delivery Ble D. Is delivery address different from item 1? J Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: o 3. Service Type ❑ Adult Signature ❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ Certified Mail® ❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑ Collect on Delivery 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 0 Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ail 7021 2720 0000 0320 1124 ail Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811', July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-S053 ❑ Priority Mall Express® ❑ Registered Mail*M ❑ Registered Mall Restricted' Delivery ❑ Signature Conflrmationar ❑ Signature Confirmation Restricted Delivery Domestic Return Receipt ; 95 USPS.com e - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc... USPS Tracking® Track Another Package -I- FAQs > Track Packages Anytime, Anywhere Get the free Infirmed Delivery® feature to receive Learn More automated no' ifications on your packages (https://reg.usps.com /xsell?app=UspsT ,ols&ref=homepageBanner&appURL=https%3A%2F%2Finformeddelivery.usps.com/box/pages/intro /start.action) Tracking Number: 70212720000003201124 Remove Xn Your item was picked up at the post office at 1:31 pm on June 28, 2022 in 0 FREMONT, CA 94539. USPS Tracking Plus° Available u (✓ Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Post Office June 28, 2022 at 1:31 pm FREMONT, CA 94539 Get Updates u Text & Email Updates Tracking History June 28, 2022, 1:31 pm 96 1 of 3 7/ 11 /2022, 2:57 PN USPS.com e - USPS 'tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc... Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Post Office FREMONT, CA 94539 Your item was picked up at the post office at 1:31 pm on June 28, 2022 in FREMONT, CA 94539. June 23, 2022, 9:25 am Available for Pickup FREMONT, CA 94539 June 23, 2022, 9:24 am Arrived at Post Office FREMONT, CA 94539 June 23, 2022, 6:10 am Out for Delivery FREMONT, CA 94538 June 22, 2022, 9:31 pm Departed USPS Regional Facility OAKLAND CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 22, 2022, 11:02 am Arrived at USPS Regional Facility OAKLAND CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 21, 2022, 11:00 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility RENO NV DISTRIBUTION CENTER USPS Tracking Plus® Product Information See Less /\ u u m a CY 0 2 of 3 7/11/2022, 2:57 Pr97 0320 1162 U.S. Postal ServceTM CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only FCAL U Certified Mall Fee Extra Services & Fees (check box, add fee as appropriate) 0 Retum Receipt (hardcopy) Ei Return Receipt (electronic) ci 0 Certified Mall Restricted Delivery •$ 0 Adutt Signature Required • Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $ • IPostage $ r'- !Total Postage and Fees IS rq Sent To ru -gtreet and Apt. No. or P r•- aim tate, ZIP+46 ti 111111'11" 'I OW1111(119 Ifilk QI.441 ox 1760 yr Cove, NV 89448 7021 2720 0000 & Environmental Services Postmark Here kld 95 a .NFE. 1 1-?..7.10410.6/Z.3/•Zi; N.(1.71-; PIN BOX 6334 .1 CONF E DE R ATE D VI L L A S OF THE L S3 AN ••••• AMF CAq 45,01tL" 1 ' " S P 0S740., c.)-• ,y,§; • PITNEY BOWES irit r•ii 0 4 2 1 .1-1141% 9 9 4 2 2 0 2 D 2 2 MAII Er) FRO Zi C 1)F 8 `,::4 4 9 B C : g. 4 S 6 :3_ 7 3 P. 4 3 .4 - I" . ..11..1)....1-1-1,13.1 . :. .. , locr:A.-it -e. . It-SZ' lit '1 r'67.0,117 11,"5,•11-1 I. . i '' i•iVii ' q ' Vi—i—i• ... •-,t;/ ll-- *-1,'",`.li-Vl,14 • • 1,,Ili. , 0,ll: '‘7.,,z/i,rgl;LiS'Al • a Ni ' E. L A f tw-E- 1.5 • ,,,, c: SS 4 4•817•6060 *939S- SS 250-22 -47 (1)-- fillitql.ithiiiiiptift4.41/4 vil .f$ T -15:11.E.6 • IRAS • TO .FORAdA:P.P1 98 USPS.com® - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc... USPS Tracking° Track Another Package + Get the free Inf.rmed Delivery° feature to receive automated no' ifications on your packages FAQs Track Packages Anytime, Anywhere Learn More (https://reg.usps.com /xsell?app=UspsT )ols&ref=homepageBanner&appURL=https%3A%2F%2Finformeddelivery.usps.com/box/pages/intro /start.action) Tracking Number: 70212720000003201162 Your item has been delivered to the original sender at 10:34 am on July 26, 2022 in ZEPHYR COVE, NV 89448. USPS Tracking Plus® Available u G Delivered, To Original Sender July 26, 2022 at 10:34 am ZEPHYR COVE, NV 89448 Get Updates u Text & Email Updates Tracking History July 26, 2022, 10:34 am Remove 1 Q v 1 of 4 99 7/28/2022, 12:19 PM USPS.cont - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpagc&tLc... Delivered, To Original Sender ZEPHYR COVE, NV 89448 Your item has been delivered to the original sender at 10:34 am on July 26, 2022 in ZEPHYR COVE, NV 89448. July 22, 2022, 9:17 am Available for Pickup ZEPHYR COVE, NV 89448 July 22, 2022, 9:17 am Arrived at Post Office ZEPHYR COVE, NV 89448 July 21, 2022, 9:33 pm Departed USPS Regional Facility RENO NV DISTRIBUTION CENTER m co co July 21, 2022, 12:42 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility n RENO NV DISTRIBUTION CENTER July 20, 2022 In Transit to Next Facility July 19, 2022, 7:43 am Arrived at USPS Facility SACRAMENTO, CA 95813 July 14, 2022, 5:56 pm Unclaimed/Being Returned to Sender ALAMEDA, CA 94501 July 2, 2022 Reminder to Schedule Redelivery of your item June 27, 2022, 9:25 am 100 2 of 4 7/28/2022, 12:19 PM USPS.com0 - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc... Available for Pickup ALAMEDA, CA 94501 June 27, 2022, 2:34 am Departed USPS Regional Facility OAKLAND CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 25, 2022, 4:50 am Arrived at USPS Regional Facility OAKLAND CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 23, 2022, 1:36 pm Arrived at USPS Facility SACRAMENTO, CA 95813 June 22, 2022, 11:42 pm Departed USPS Regional Facility OAKLAND CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 22, 2022, 11:02 am Arrived at USPS Regional Facility OAKLAND CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 21, 2022, 10:33 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility RENO NV DISTRIBUTION CENTER USPS Tracking Plus® Product Information See Less /" m a 0 0 3 of 4 101 7/28/2022, 12:19 rivi 0320 1360 7021 2720 000 U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL° RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only ertified Mail Fee 1$ Extra Services & Fees (check box, add fee as appropriate) ❑ Return Receipt (hardcopy) $ ❑ Retum Receipt (electronic) $ ['Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ ['Admit Signature Required $ ['Adult Signature Restricted Delivery. $ Postage Total Postage and Fees $entTo uha r' Ian J�cyF� ._ / m� A Street and Apt. o., or boX Noo �+ " I `i City, State, SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ▪ Complete items 1, 2, and 3: ■ Print.your name andaddress on the reverse so that we can -return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the -back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. ,. ACh�h2�ene Cs2ayl foest- Pars SSSkoft000 (It.Az3z -CA-S�rxo lla I CO qii4G �IIIIIII INI INlitll 1111lllll IIINlnllli hl 9590 9402 6910 1104 1928 97 Postmark Here COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Signatur ..X.. elved by (Printed Name). AgTdressee a e f Query D. Is delivery address different from item 1? C1 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No 3. Service Type Cl Adult Signature la Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ Certified Mait® ❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑ Collect on Delivery 2. Article Number (Transfer from— label) u Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery _ ,[.7. lneurwd.M�t{ 702-1- 2720 0000 0320 1360 �IRestrictedDelivery. PS Form 3811,-July 2020-PSN 7530-02-000-9053 ❑ Priority Mail Express® ❑ Registered MaiiTM ❑ Registered Mall Restricted Delivery ❑ Signature ConfirmationTM ❑ Signature Confirmation Restricted Delivery Domestic Return Receipt 102 USPS.com® - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc... USPS Tracking® Track Another Package + Get the free lnf armed Delivery `s feature to receive automated no'.ifications on your packages FAQs > Track Packages Anytime, Anywhere Learn More (https://reg.usps.com /xsell?app=UspsT, cols&ref=homepageBanner&appURL=https°/u3A%2F%2Finformeddelivery.usps.com/box/pages/intro /start.action) Tracking Number: 70212720000003201360 Remove XCD r, CT Your item was delivered to the front desk, reception area, or mail room at 0 10:16 am on June 23, 2022 in CASTRO VALLEY, CA 94546. USPS Tracking Plus° Available u Qf Delivered, Front Desk/Reception/Mail Room June 23, 2022 at 10:16 am CASTRO VALLEY, CA 94546 Get Updates \/ Text & Email Updates Tracking History June 23, 2022, 10:16 am 1 of 3 103 6/29/2022, 1:55 Fivi USPS.cona - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.corn/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc... Delivered, Front Desk/Reception/Mail Room CASTRO VALLEY, CA 94546 Your item was delivered to the front desk, reception area, or mail room at 10:16 am on June 23, 2022 in CASTRO VALLEY, CA 94546. June 23, 2022, 10:15 am USPS picked up item CASTRO VALLEY, CA 94546 June 23, 2022, 6:10 am Out for Delivery CASTRO VALLEY, CA 94546 June 23, 2022, 5:46 am Arrived at Post Office CASTRO VALLEY, CA 94546 June 22, 2022, 2:20 pm Departed USPS Regional Facility OAKLAND CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 22, 2022, 11:02 am Arrived at USPS Regional Facility OAKLAND CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 21, 2022, 11:01 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility RENO NV DISTRIBUTION CENTER USPS Tracking Plus® Product Information See Less " 2 of 3 6/29/2022, 1:55 104 N U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAIL° RECEIPT. Domestic Mail Only Ji►Snr.cwhiautuin. m:nl.iii i`i7iit.n i�'d�aitotim►aiu�. Jt iti'iigxe ' � Certified Mall Fee Extra Services & Fees (check box, add fee as appropriate) ❑ Return Receipt (herdcopy) $ ❑ Return Receipt (electronic) $ ❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ ❑ Adult Signature Required $ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $ postage D rtl $ r- Total Postage and Fees 1_4 Sent To i(n. C peItZ Street and Apt. 17 )rw�e✓J C19- q City, State, ZIP+ SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Add d t " i< 'P Piz � ;zr�wrse eci r6.67< 7/7 �J L�nd%n L'11 aszab iunmidmidfiiimminiiimm 9590 9402 6910 1104 1929 10 0320 1117 D D D cb bog. Box No.7 Postmark Here COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Signature 'Agent 0 Addressee fntec(NamIC. Date of Delivery { . Is kv'j dtJ s different from item 17 es If YES, enter delivery address below: 3. Service Type ❑ Adult Signature o Adult Signature Restricted Delivery O Certified Mall® ❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑ Collect on Delivery 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) u L.ollect on Delivery Restricted Delivery rl Ineur r1 Mail 7021 2720 0000 0320 1117 ail Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811, July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 0 ❑ Priority Mall Express® ❑ Registered Mal1TM O Registered Mall Restrictedi Delivery O Signature ConfirmationTM O Signature Confirmation iR stricted Delivery Domestic Return Receipt t 105 USPS.com e - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc... USPS Tracking® Track Another Package + Get the free Inf3rmed Delivery° feature to receive automated no' ifications on your packages FAQs > Track Packages Anytime, Anywhere Learn More (https://reg.usps.com /xsell?app=UspsT cols&ref=homepageBannor&appURL=https%3A%2F%2Finformcddolivery.usps.com/box/pages/intro /start.action) Tracking Number: 70212720000003201117 Remove Xn Q Your item was picked up at the post office at 9:56 am on June 23, 2022 in 0 LINDEN, CA 95236. USPS Tracking Plus° Available \/ S./ Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Post Office June 23, 2022 at 9:56 am LINDEN, CA 95236 Get Updates \/ Text & Email Updates Tracking History June 23, 2022, 9:56 am 1 of 3 106 6/28/2022, 9:39 A USPS.com x - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/T'ackConfirmAction?tRcf=fullpagc&t1,c... Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Post Office LINDEN, CA 95236 Your item was picked up at the post office at 9:56 am on June 23, 2022 in LINDEN, CA 95236. June 23, 2022, 7:50 am Available for Pickup LINDEN, CA 95236 June 23, 2022, 7:24 am Arrived at Post Office LINDEN, CA 95236 June 22, 2022, 6:21 pm Departed USPS Regional Facility SACRAMENTO CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 22, 2022, 10:21 am Arrived at USPS Regional Facility SACRAMENTO CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 21, 2022, 11:02 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility RENO NV DISTRIBUTION CENTER USPS Tracking Plus® Product Information See Less /\ Can't find what you're looking for? 2 of 3 U7 6/28/2022, 9:39 A. 0320 1346 U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAIL° RECEIPT Domestic Mail. Only Certified Mail Fee Extra Services & Fees (check box, add fee as appropriate) 0 Return Receipt (hardcopy) $ D 0 Return Receipt (electronic) $ D 0 Ceniiled Mall Restricted Delivery $ D ❑ Adult Signature Required ' D ❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $ D Postage ru $ rti- 'Total Postage and Fees ru $ r_q n Sent To �nyY7. ` r� ns dStreet and Apt. o., r PO EI " (� City, state, 21 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. IN Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card -Ira -you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article eAAddressed dtto: Q �oH Yo rse 1'ar p. b . 69< 28 N-o ) 17si IIIIilIli 1111III1III11111111111II111111IIII III 9590 9402 6910 11041928 73 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7021 2720 0000 0320 1346 PS Form 3811, July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Postmark Here COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Sign D:"lad ed by fiv rintetl a ,tT] Agent 0 Addressee C. Date of Delivery g addr : different from item 1? 0 Yes If Y2u enter delivery address below: oe_No 3. Service Type ❑ Adult Signature ❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery 54Certified Mail® ❑ riffled Mail Restricted Delivery ❑ Collect on Delivery ❑ Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery lilt Restricted Delivery ❑ Priority Mall Express® ❑ Registered MaiiTM ❑ Registered Mail Restricted: Delivery Q Signature ConflrmatlonTM ❑ Signature Confirmation Restricted Delivery Domestic Return Receipt ; 108 USPS.com e - USPS Tracking a Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirinAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc... USPS Tracking® Track Another Package -}- Get the free Infprmed Delivery® feature to receive automated no' ifications on your packages FAQs Track Packages Anytime, Anywhere Learn More (https://reg.usps.com /xsell?app=UspsT 1ols&ref=homepageBanner&appURL=https%3A%2F%2Finformeddelivery.usps.com/box/pages/intro /start.action) Tracking Number: 70212720000003201346 Remove X a 0- Your item was picked up at the post office at 10:55 am on June 23, 2022 in HOLLISTER, CA 95023. USPS Tracking Plus° Available u C✓ Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Post Office June 23, 2022 at 10:55 am HOLLISTER, CA 95023 Get Updates u Text & Email Updates Tracking History June 23, 2022, 10:55 am 1 of 3 1 U9 6/28/2022, 9:37 A USPS.com e - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef fullpage&tLc... Delivered, Individual Picked Up at Post Office HOLLISTER, CA 95023 Your item was picked up at the post office at 10:55 am on June 23, 2022 in HOLLISTER, CA 95023. June 23, 2022, 6:18 am Available for Pickup HOLLISTER, CA 95023 June 23, 2022, 6:16 am Arrived at Post Office HOLLISTER, CA 95023 June 22, 2022, 2:12 pm Departed USPS Regional Facility SAN JOSE CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 22, 2022, 12:00 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility SAN JOSE CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 21, 2022, 11:00 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility RENO NV DISTRIBUTION CENTER USPS Tracking Plus® Product Information See Less /\ Can't find what you're looking for? co m CY 0 2 of 3 11 U 6/28/2022, 9:37 Aivi m m r9 0 ru m $ U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL° RECEIPT Domestic Marl Only Certified Mail Fee D Extra Services & Fees (check box, add lee as appropriate) ['Return Return Receipt (hardcopy) $ ( Return Receipt (electronic) $ C3 0 Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ CI ❑Adutt Stgnature Required o $ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $ im Postage Ill $ tt Total Postage and Fees ff ru $ f ,� Sent To �r y at ru _ 'r ��J 25 c�oc�S Street and t !=-� ____________ ____ __ � P •, or PO BoX - r- 1..� rSrnt •crry state; zit ® ----. _CT v�Tose err 95 2Z SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: ritirrk SrfrfS--Rc o 1Sf eK JLp(� goarsovL �ouK 5 n Th Cr4 gsi2 z 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 9590 9402 6910 11041928 80 2. Article Number (Tansfer from service Zabel) 7021 2720 0000 0320 Postmark Here COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Signature X 04? 1i2((1' D. Is delivery address different from item 1? 0 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ErelNo Agent CI Addressee B; Received by (Printed Name) C D1te oflivery 3. Service Type ❑ Adult Signature ❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery. ❑ Certified Mall® ❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑ Collect on Delivery 0 Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑ Insured Mail 1353 ail Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811, July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 ❑ Priority Mail Express® ❑ Registered MailTM ❑ Registered Mall Restricted Delivery ❑ Signature ConfitmationTM ❑ Signature Confirmation Restricted Delivery PDp%; p tie; Return Receipt 111 USPS.com e - USPS Tracking® Results hops://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef fullpage&tLc... USPS Tracking° Track Another Package + Get the free Infprmed Delivery® feature to receive automated no' ifications on your packages FAQs Track Packages Anytime, Anywhere Learn More (https://reg.usps.com /xsell?app=UspsT ,ols&ref=homepageBanner&appURL=https%3A%2F%2Finformeddelivery.usps.com/box/pages/intro /start.action) Tracking Number: 70212720000003201353 Your item was delivered to an individual at the address at 1:25 pm on June 23, 2022 in SAN JOSE, CA 95122. USPS Tracking Plus° Available u G Delivered, Left with Individual June 23, 2022 at 1:25 pm SAN JOSE, CA 95122 Get Updates u Text & Email Updates Tracking History June 23, 2022, 1:25 pm Remove , 0- 1 of 3 112 6/28/2022, 9:38 , USPS.com0 - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfir unction?tRef=fullpage&tl,c... Delivered, Left with Individual SAN JOSE, CA 95122 Your item was delivered to an individual at the address at 1:25 pm on June 23, 2022 in SAN JOSE, CA 95122. June 23, 2022, 6:10 am Out for Delivery SAN JOSE, CA 95121 June 23, 2022, 4:55 am Arrived at Post Office SAN JOSE, CA 95121 June 22, 2022, 3:41 pm Departed USPS Regional Facility SAN JOSE CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 22, 2022, 12:24 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility SAN JOSE CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 22, 2022, 12:05 am Arrived at USPS Regional Facility RENO NV DISTRIBUTION CENTER USPS Tracking Plus® Product Information See Less /\ Can't find what you're looking for? T1 m m a CT 0 2c 2 of 3 6/28/2022, 9:38113 — U.S. Postal Service"' CERTIFIED MAIL° RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only 'Certified Mail Fee $ Extra Services & Fees (check box, add fee as appropriate) ❑ Return Receipt (hardcopy) $ ❑ Retum Receipt (electronic) $ ❑ Cerirted MWI Restricted Delivery '$ ❑Adult Signature Required $ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery. $ Postage $ 'Total Postage and Fees $ Sent To zrsq S Street and Apt. No. or PO Box No. City, State, ZIP+4 L� 1 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ■ Complete items l; 2; bnd 3. • Print your name and address on the reverse. so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mail 'ece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: �P�,cS��R►9n CvisYN I.oes-e Pa - - 9,2 -t'nt 57: E/X 046 Ile• 9,3z,2y IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII`Ilillllllllllllll 9590 9402 6910 1104 1928 59 Postmark Here COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Si ure, kgent ddressee B. Ralf Alec' by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery •A\k cam a�l es tc/23/21 D. Is delivery address different from item 1? C7 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: o 3. Service Type ❑ Adult Signature ❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ Certified Mail® ❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑ Collect on Delivery 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) ❑ Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery -- - ❑ Insured Mail 7021 2720 0000 0320 1322 I�I Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811, July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 ❑ Priority Mall Express® 0 Registered MaIITM ❑ Registered Mail Restricted Delivery 0 Signature ConflrmationTM ❑ Signature Confirmation Restricted Delivery Domestic Return Receipt 114 USPS.com ii - USPS Tracking ii Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfu•mAction?tRef=-fullpage&tLc... USPS Tracking° Track Another Package -I- Get the free Intprmed Delivery feature to receive automated no' ifications on your packages FAQs > Track Packages Anytime, Anywhere Learn More (https://reg.usps.com /xsell?app=UspsT cols&ref=homepageL3anner&appURL=https%3A%2F%2Finformeddelivery.usps.com/box/pages/intro /start.action) Tracking Number: 70212720000003201322 Remove >ci CD CD Your item was delivered to the front desk, reception area, or mail room at 3:12 pm on June 23, 2022 in ELK GROVE, CA 95624. USPS Tracking Plus® Available u G Delivered, Front Desk/Reception/Mail Room June 23, 2022 at 3:12 pm ELK GROVE, CA 95624 Get Updates \/ Text & Email Updates Tracking History June 23, 2022, 3:12 pm 1 of3 115 6/28/2022, 9:39 USPS.com® - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.ushs.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRcf fullhage&iLc... Delivered, Front Desk/Reception/Mail Room ELK GROVE, CA 95624 Your item was delivered to the front desk, reception area, or mail room at 3:12 pm on June 23, 2022 in ELK GROVE, CA 95624. June 23, 2022, 8:27 am Out for Delivery ELK GROVE, CA 95624 June 23, 2022, 8:16 am Arrived at Post Office ELK GROVE, CA 95624 June 22, 2022, 5:38 pm Departed USPS Regional Facility SACRAMENTO CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 22, 2022, 10:21 am Arrived at USPS Regional Facility SACRAMENTO CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 21, 2022, 11:01 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility RENO NV DISTRIBUTION CENTER USPS Tracking Plus® Product Information See Less /\ Can't find what you're looking for? 2 of 3 116 6/28/2022, 9:39 / U.S. Postal Service' CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only s " I 1 Ct S.n,U'# sniffed Mail Fee Extra Services & Fees (check box, add fee as appropriate) ❑ Return Receipt (hardcopy) ❑ Return Receipt (electronic) $ ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ DAdult Signature Required $ ❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $ [Postage $ (Total Postage and Fees $ Sent To C1S1C Street and Apt. No., oilr Box City, State, ZIP+A®5 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed t : ipco� (kog 1 oRse Qrl' I7q Pock e fPn e: 56-1i ri tb C/9- Tsvb IIIIIIIII(IIIIIIIIIII IIIIi111IIIIiIIII1111IIli 9590 9402.6910 1104 1929 58 Postmark Here t 9390 COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Signature X B. Received by (Printed Name) ❑ Agent C] Addressee C. Date of Delivery s D. Is delivery address different from item 10 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: D No;` 3. Service Type ❑ Adult Signature ❑ Adult Signature Restricted,Delivery ❑ Certified Mail® ❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑ Collect on Delivery 9_ ArticleNumber(Transfer from service label) u collect on Delivery Restricted p'ellve 7021 2720 0000 0320 1155 D) very PS Form 3811, July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 EllnRiirerf.M�1all IAail Restricted Deff '❑ PrioriI ❑ Reglsfe edt ❑ R lstered` ilR atPr j1fl onflrmA ry. ^.. .ge�st461603llve0. ease M e'sfrjcted, DbmbStie ieturn Reoo 117 USPS.cornOO - USPS Tracking It Results https://tools.asps.com/go/TrackConfrmnction?tRef=f iIIpage&tl,c... USPS Tracking® Track Another Package + Get the free Inf )rmed Delivery's feature to receive automated no'ifications on your packages FAQs > Track Packages Anytime, Anywhere Learn More (https://reg.usps.com /xsell?app=UspsT ,ols&ref=homepageBanner&appURL=https%3A%2F%2Finformeddelivery.usps.com/box/pages/intro /start.action) Tracking Number: 70212720000003201155 Remove 0- Your item was delivered to an individual at the address at 4:33 pm on77 June 28, 2022 in SALINAS, CA 93906. USPS Tracking Plus° Available u C✓ Delivered, Left with Individual June 28, 2022 at 4:33 pm SALINAS, CA 93906 Get Updates u Text & Email Updates Tracking History June 28, 2022, 4:33 pm u I oft 7/ I I /2022, 2:55 118 USPS.com s - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction?tRef=fullpage&tLc... Delivered, Left with Individual SALINAS, CA 93906 Your item was delivered to an individual at the address at 4:33 pm on June 28, 2022 in SALINAS, CA 93906. June 27, 2022 In Transit to Next Facility June 26, 2022, 11:54 am Departed USPS Regional Facility SAN JOSE CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 25, 2022, 1:00 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility SAN JOSE CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER USPS Tracking Plus® Product Information See Less " Can't find what you're looking for? u Go to our FAQs section to find answers to your tracking questions. FAQs 2 of 2 7/ 1 1 /2022, 2:55 119 r'- r'- m U.S. Postal Service' CERTIFIED MAIL®.RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only CO Certified Mail Fee ru m $ im Extra Services & Fees (check box, add fee as appropriate) 0 Return Receipt (bardcopy) $ C] 0 Return Receipt (electronic) $ C7 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ C3 ❑Adult Signature Required $ C7 DAduit Signature Restricted Delivery $ Postage C] nt $ r, - !Total Postage and Fees rull$ r 4 Sent To D7 ,§treetarrdApt. N ox.................. r ��City, S79ie; ZIP+4,5(4. ---• - -- t1 - ru - fnnt 2w SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits, 1. Article Addressed to: re r\c'- Zw i-e Ie 3030 Soak 64y d. 0-14 q,57/...sy II1111111I'llI'IIIIII IIIII II1IIIIIiII111IIII 9590 9402 691011041928 42 J► 13... f iue_ yi bye d ed Name) Postmark Here ❑ Agent 'Addressee ear0 D. Is delivery address different from item 1? If YE en rSieli� adss belo 3. Service Type ❑ Adult Signature ❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ Certified Mail® ❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑ Collect on Delivery 2.._Art clelJyr�ber {Transfer from service label) u Collect on Detivery Restricted Delivery n (YICIIIAft.fViall ., 7021 2720 0000 0320 1377 II;FI feted Delivery PS Form 3811, July 2020 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 livery es 0 No ❑ Priority Mail Express@ ❑ Registered Mail", ❑ Registered Mall Restricted' Delivery ❑ Signature Conflrmationml ❑ Signature Confirmation Restricted Delivery Domestic Return Receipt 120 USPS.com e - USPS Tracking® Results https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackCon[irmAction?tRef fullpage&1Lc... USPS Tracking® Track Another Package + Get the free Inf )rmed Delivery® feature to receive automated no' ifications on your packages FAQs > Track Packages Anytime, Anywhere Learn More (https://reg.usps.com /xsell?app=UspsT )ols&ref=homepageBanner&appURL=https%3A%2F°/u2Finformeddelivery.usps.com/box/pages/intro /start.action) Tracking Number: 70212720000003201377 Your item was delivered to an individual at the address at 3:09 pm on June 23, 2022 in LAKEPORT, CA 95453. USPS Tracking Plus® Available u (✓ Delivered, Left with Individual June 23, 2022 at 3:09 pm LAKEPORT, CA 95453 Get Updates u Text & Email Updates Tracking History June 23, 2022, 3:09 pm Remove Xn 1 of3 6/28/2022, 9:38 121 USPS.com a - USPS Tracking® Results helps://lools.usps.corn/go/TrackConfirmAclion?lRef=llillpage&lLc... Delivered, Left with Individual LAKEPORT, CA 95453 Your item was delivered to an individual at the address at 3:09 pm on June 23, 2022 in LAKEPORT, CA 95453. June 23, 2022, 8:33 am Out for Delivery LAKEPORT, CA 95453 June 23, 2022, 8:22 am Arrived at Post Office LAKEPORT, CA 95453 June 23, 2022, 1:08 am Arrived at USPS Regional Facility NORTH BAY CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER m CD June 22, 2022, 1:29 pm a Arrived at USPS Regional Facility 0 SAN FRANCISCO CA DISTRIBUTION CENTER June 21, 2022, 11:01 pm Arrived at USPS Regional Facility RENO NV DISTRIBUTION CENTER USPS Tracking Plus® Product Information See Less " Can't find what you're looking for? 2 of 3 122 6/28/2022, 9:38 A... From: Venesa Kremer To: Christina Rathbone Cc: Laurie.Sucaana(cldublin.ca.aov: Andre Jadkowski; Cord Hute; Molly Laitinen Subject: RE: Dublin Iron Horse Trail Project Tribal Consultation Date: Thursday, February 16, 2023 3:14:09 PM Attachments: imaae001.ioa Mitiaation Measures for Inadvertant Discoveries.odf Thank you all for meeting with us today. After further review and discussion of this project with my Director, Lou Griffin, we are comfortable allowing this project to move into the next phase without tribal monitoring. We do not need to review the contaminated soils once it arrives to the collection site, however we are attaching our basic mitigation preferences for inadvertent discoveries. We would also like a copy of any testing done of the soils for our records. We really like the idea of having an opportunity to educate people through signage and we hope that you move forward with doing such, but, once we talked it over we think it best to leave this area open for the Ohlone tribe to provide information. I do understand that the Ohlone are not consulting on this project but we do not want to put Wilton's name over someone elses primary territory. Thank you for the opportunity and for taking the time to listen to our concerns. We wish you well on your project and we look forward to speaking with you again soon. Thank you From: Christina Rathbone <CRathbone@ncenet.com> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2023 11:22 AM To: Venesa Kremer <vkremer@wiltonrancheria-nsn.gov> Cc: Laurie.Sucgang@dublin.ca.gov; Andre Jadkowski <AJadkowski@ncenet.com>; Cord Hute <CHute@ncenet.com>; Molly Laitinen <MLaitinen@ncenet.com> Subject: Dublin Iron Horse Trail Project Tribal Consultation Hi Venesa, On behalf of the City of Dublin we would like to set up a meeting with you to discuss the Iron Horse Trial Project concerns and questions. Could you please send me a list of available dates and times to which you are available? We can then work out an appropriate plan to fit everyone's timetable. Please find attached the archaeological report, along with a link which contains the Summary of Architectural Resources Inventory and the Cultural Resources Inventory Report. https://nce.sharefile.com/d-s2578f0b3686e4cb69ef943792137d036 If you have any further questions please feel free to reach out. Thank you, Christina Rathbone Archaeologist c (414) 526-3413 123 e crathbone@ncenet.com 1885 S Arlington Ave #111 Reno, NV 89509 www.ncenet.com Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence.sM 124 From: Venesa Kremer To: Molly Laitinen Subject: Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project, CIP No. PK0422 Date: Wednesday, July 27, 2022 3:35:38 PM July 27, 2022 Dublin California The New American Backyard 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Attention: Molly Laitinen, City Consultant Hello - Wilton Rancheria received a letter from Assistant Public Works Director Laurie L. Sucgang, P.E. for Dublin California- The New American Backyard, dated June 20, 2022, formally notifying us of a proposed project, Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project, CIP No.PK0422, and an opportunity to consult under AB 52. This letter is notice that Wilton Rancheria would like to initiate consultation under AB 52. We would like to discuss the topics listed in Cal. Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2(a), including the type of environmental review to be conducted for the project; project alternatives; the project's significant effects; and mitigation measures for any direct, indirect, or cumulative impacts the project may cause to tribal cultural resources. As consultation progresses, we may also wish to discuss design options that would avoid impacts to tribal cultural resources; the scope of any environmental document that is prepared for the project; pre -project surveys; and tribal cultural resource identification, significance evaluations and culturally -appropriate treatment. This letter is also a formal request to allow Wilton Rancheria tribal representatives to observe and participate in all cultural resource surveys, including initial pedestrian surveys for the project. Please send us all existing cultural resource assessments, as well as requests for, and the results of, any records searches that may have been conducted prior to our first consultation meeting. If tribal cultural resources are identified within the project area, it is Wilton Rancheria's policy that tribal monitors must be present for all ground disturbing activities. Finally, please be advised that our preference is to preserve tribal cultural resources in place and avoid them whenever possible. Subsurface testing and data recovery must not occur without first consulting with Wilton Rancheria and receiving Wilton Rancheria 's written consent. In the letter City Consultant Molly Laitinen is identified as the lead contact person for consultation on the proposed project. Venesa Kremer will be Wilton Rancheria's point of contact for this consultation. Please contact Venesa by phone (916) 683-6000 ext. 2023 or email at vkremerl@wiltonrancheria-nsn.eov to begin the consultation process. 125 Thank you for involving Wilton Rancheria in the planning process at an early stage. We ask that you make this letter a part of the project record and we look forward to working with you to ensure that tribal cultural resources are protected. Sincerely, Venesa Kremer- Cultural Resource Assistant Wilton Rancheria CPD 126 Appendix D HISTORICAL SOCIETY CORRESPONDENCE 127 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 128 Molly Laitinen From: EdlArchitectHist <edwardbyarbrough@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 10:48 AM To: Steve Minniear Cc: Molly Laitinen; Steven Minniear Subject: Re: Proposed Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project H i Steve, Sorry for the delayed response! I've been off work the last two days but forgot to set up an auto -reply. I'm very interested in the 1945 Navy aerial image and to speak with you more about the rail line. I haven't been to Dublin for my site visit yet, which will involve photographing the rail line and especially the trestle. Please let me the best way for us to communicate ... in person, via email, or phone. I'm very grateful for your time and guidance. Thank you!! Ed Edward Yarbrough, MSHP, Assoc. AIA I Senior Architectural Historian dba/Yarbrough Architectural Resources 2150 Silverado Trail North, Saint Helena, CA 94574 1131 Central Ave., Ste. 1, San Francisco, CA 94117 Mobile: 415-819-7995 edwardbvarbrough@gmail.com https://www.varchitecturalresources.com/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please do not read, distribute, or take action in reliance upon this message. Instead, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive consultant -client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message. On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 5:04 PM Steve Minniear <minniear@comcast.net> wrote: Molly, Thanks for the update. I'll look forward to hearing from him. I identified an aerial image taken by the Navy from 1945 that shows some structures in the area. Steve On 06/22/2022 4:47 PM Molly Laitinen <mlaitinen@ncenet.com> wrote: 1 129 Hi Steve, Thank you for taking a look through what you have so far. I have forwarded your information to Ed Yarbrough, the architectural historian for the project, as we discussed briefly on the phone on Monday. He should have some better questions to ask you in regards to the railroad. Thank you! Molly Laitinen NCE I Staff Archaeologist Mobile: (408) 823-4570 From: Steven Minniear <dublincahistoricalsociety gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 10:11 AM To: Molly Laitinen <MLaitinen@ncenet.com> Cc: minniear@comcast.net Subject: Re: Proposed Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Molly, Sorry for the delay. We have additional information about the area that may help your work. It is possible the area was once part of a spur track and loading/unloading area for freight. Can you contact me via minniear@comcast.net and/or 925 785-2898 (personal cell) to talk a bit more. In the meantime I'll look through my information to see what I have and what the Dublin Historical Society has access to. There may be additional information available through the Museum of the San Ramon Valley and/or the Boone Farm museum. Can you let me know what your timelines and deadlines are? Thanks. Steve Minniear Historian, City of Dublin 2 130 Dublin Historical Society On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 4:08 PM Molly Laitinen <MLaitinen@ncenet.com> wrote: Greetings: I am a Staff Archaeologist from NCE completing outreach on behalf of the City of Dublin. I would like to inform the Dublin Historical Society of the Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project proposed by the City of Dublin which will follow the adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan (https://dublin.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5063/Park-and-Recreation-Master-Plan- --2022-Update?bidld=). I've included two maps showing the project area. The project area will extend north from the intersection of Amador Valley Boulevard for approximately 2,000 feet along a former railroad embankment. An existing segment of the Iron Horse Trail is located west of and paralleling the Project. The Project is planned to become the future replacement for the paralleling segment of the existing Iron Horse Trail. Park amenities will include a trail entry plaza just north of the Amador Valley Boulevard intersection; concrete pads to be used as outdoor classrooms and gathering spaces with seating; shade structures; and wayfinding and trail markers strategically located along the trail. We would like to know if you have additional information regarding historical features like the historic railroad alignment, historic context or if you have any concerns regarding cultural resources within the project area. Thank you, Molly Laitinen, RPA Staff Archaeologist p (510) 215-3620 f (510) 215-2898 c (408) 823-4570 e mlaitinenancenet.com NCE 501 Canal Blvd., Suite I, Richmond, CA 94804 www.ncenet.com Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence.sM 3 131 Appendix E RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS 132 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 133 1 of 3 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM 5/25/2022 Molly Laitinen NCE 501 Canal Blvd. Suite I Richmond, CA 95804 AzunA CO r,5n C4.\'i7.A COSTA DEL XO IE HL:.11(ILDT 52iti FRANCSCO LAK3 NATEO MARLN. S Ati IA CLAIA NEENDOCLN-O x�NTAC fL'Z Mo\ Y 5OLANO SAN BEtrro OLO Re: Iron Horse Nature Park and Open Space Project Northwest Information Center Samairta State LTnwersity 1400 Valley House Drive, Suite 210 Rohnart Park California 949 3E09 Tel 7{}7.588.S455 nwiogsononaa.edu hitirlinwic_sanomaxclu NWIC File No.: 21-1785 The Northwest Information Center received your record search request for the project area referenced above, located on the Dublin USGS 7.5' quad(s). The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and a 0.25 mi. radius: Resources within project area: Resources within 0.25 mi. radius: Reports within project area: Reports within 0.25 mi. radius: P-01-011774 P-01-011775, P-01-012186 [20] Please see attached list, page 3 S-37500, 37985, 407548, 46220, 52657, 53003 Resource Database Printout (list): Resource Database Printout (details): Resource Digital Database Records: Report Database Printout (list): Report Database Printout (details): Report Digital Database Records: Resource Record Copies: Report Copies: OHP Built Environment Resources Directory: Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility: CA Inventory of Historic Resources (1976): GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: Historical Maps: X❑ enclosed ❑ not requested X❑ enclosed ❑ not requested x❑ enclosed ❑ not requested ® enclosed ❑ not requested ® enclosed ❑ not requested ® enclosed ❑ not requested ❑X enclosed ❑ not requested ❑ enclosed ❑X not requested ® enclosed ❑ not requested ❑ enclosed ❑ not requested ® enclosed ❑ not requested ❑ enclosed ❑X not requested ❑ enclosed © not requested ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed © nothing listed ® nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed 134 2 of 3 Local Inventories: Caltrans Bridge Survey: Ethnographic Information: Historical Literature: Shipwreck Inventory: ❑ enclosed ❑ enclosed ❑X enclosed ❑ enclosed ❑ enclosed ® not requested ® not requested ❑ not requested ❑X not requested ® not requested ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed ❑ nothing listed Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as soon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above. The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of, or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, State Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts. Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the record search number listed above when making inquiries. Requests made after initial invoicing will result in the preparation of a separate invoice. Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS). Sincerely, WwwPi need Researcher 135 3 of 3 DocCo DocNo S- 000727 S- 000848 S- 000934 S- 002021 S- 002458 S- 009462 S- 009583 S- 009795 S- 016660 S- 017835 S- 018217 S- 020395 S- 030204 S- 032596 S- 033239 S- 033600 S- 047983 S- 048567 S- 048927 S- 049780 136 ,Aminnale4aNVk-ofifisWi e4Wit<<DGAZUt 7-!2 CALIFOR_NIA -'r iNVINTORY OF HISTORIC Kr:SOURCES OD . • "or OP' 4° *Alert d...;,1A11011#4. .! • '1.-7.4t:W7L: • E, 4.71AFk • • 1;Irja' Prat i.or • • 0\ • 1• .Z.A March 1 ei 4*0 State of California — The '.esuk:rces Agenc, DEPARTMENT OF PAR & RECREATKiN ,GW_F-4ft.901041V3eMArrdeVarAae-Wri 137 CALIFORNIA INVENTORY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES March 1976 Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor State of California Claire T. Dedrick Secretary for Resources Herbert Rhodes Director Department of Parks and Recreation State of California — The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION P.D. Box 2390 Sacramento 95811 138 $S - %_J% M '3 5.0 Preface California has a rich and diverse heritage. It is a heritage of many different cultures, strongly influenced by natural forces — climate, the coast, vegetation, and land and mineral wealth. It is a heritage of people and how they have settled and developed within these natural circumstances, shaping their man-made environment. They have left us many cultural resources — historic, architectural, and archeological — from which we may be reminded of the conditions and lessons of the past. These resources must be preserved as a part of the overall environmental quality of California. Throughout the last few decades, many examples of our heritage have been demolished to make way for urban redevelopment, suburban sprawl, and the expansion of commercial needs and transportation networks. Californians recognize that the spirit and direction of the state are founded on our history and are reflected in our historic resources. Our historic and cultural foundations should be preserved as living parts of our community life. These resources contribute to an esthetically diversified environment. They offer a physical link to our heritage that we can look at, walk through, and experience. In the last few years concern for our historic environment has spread. Preservation is being recognized as a vital part of comprehensive environmental planning. As the educational, social, and economic benefits of preservation become known, preservation will attract the support of greater numbers of Californians. With widespread public support today, future generations will be assured of an opportunity to appreciate California's historic resources. A broader definition of historic preservation has resulted from a concern for environmental and historical issues. Fundamentally, preservation is the act of retaining the tangible remnants of our heritage. To reach and benefit as many people as possible, preservation now applies to all of the historic resources that contributed to an area's total living environment. Preserved sites will not only include mansions, missions, and house museums emphasizing political, social, and economic elites and events, but also settlers' villages, factories, ships, agricultural developments and sites representing ethnic minorities and others whose historical importance has been overlooked, such as the average citizen of the past. Historically and architecturally important districts and neighborhoods will be conserved as well as individual Sites. Currently, the Office of Historic Preservation of the California Department of Parks and Recreation is engaged in activities on a statewide scale designed to preserve California's historic resources. These activities reflect a commitment to overall environmental quality and the retention and presentation of all aspects of the state's heritage. The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provides federal funding for preservation efforts within each of the fifty-six states and territories. The Act authorizes the governor to appoint a State Historic Preservation Officer to fulfill functions outlined by the Act. The Act provides that each state prepare a long-range historic preservation plan, conduct a statewide survey of historic sites, nominate and oversee the protection of sites eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and administer a matching -grants program for the acquisition, rehabilitation, or restoration of properties on the National Register. The Office of Historic Preservation serves as the State Historic Preservation Officer's staff for California, and by doing so, secures and distributes funds for many state and local projects. The Office of Historic Preservation also serves as staff for the California Historical Resources Commission, which is the state's official review body for the National Register program as well as the California Historical Landmarks and California Points of Historical Interest programs. To further implement the policies of the Act, the Offite of Historic Preservation reviews Environmental Impact Statements to ensure the protection of sites on or eligible for the National Register. This is in compliance with Section 106 of the Act and Executive Order 11593, which require that federal agencies survey and report on any property within a project's potential environmental impact area that is on or eligible for the National Register. if properties of National Register significance are discovered, proper mitigation must be discussed with the State Historic Preservation Officer and the National Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. 139 GOALS Increased public awareness of and support for historic preservation will be achieved by the dissemination of information on preservation planning, funding, and legislation to private individuals and local entities. The Office of Historic Preservation is establishing liaison with the state's colleges and universities and securing the assistance of volunteers from both academic and non-academic sources. The Office of Historic Preservation offers workshops and publishes procedural guides to encourage and assist public participation in the survey, registry, and grants programs. In May 1976, the ❑ffice of Historic Preservation is co -sponsoring with the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the first statewide preservation conference. Historic, cultural, archeological, and architectural resources must be identified and evaluated before they can be protected and preserved. The constant updating and eventual completion of the inventory by the Office of Historic Preservation and volunteers in the field will provide an efficient tool for planning at all levels. Advanced planning based on a systematic inventory and a related data ba ik $41 protect previously unidentified historic sites from misuse, decay, or destruction. Federal and local, as well as state, planners should be made fully aware of the advantages and responsibilities in the area ❑f historic preservation. Cities and counties will be encouraged to include a preservation element in their general plans and to consider the adoption of historic district ordinances, appropriate zoning measures, tax incentives, and ❑ther devices that facilitate the preservation of historic sites and structures. The enactment of preservation legislation is vital to the protection of California's historic environment. As is the case with most other states, California needs additional legislation to provide incentives to preserve and restore historic properties. During the next decade, legislation embracing the following concepts should be encouraged on state and local levels: 1. Inclusion of historic preservation needs in stated land use planning and regulations. 2. Protection ❑f historic properties from the adverse effects of state and local activities — protection that is comparable to that afforded by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 from damage by federally funded activities. 3. Additional tax incentives to private owners encouraging the preservation of historic structures and properties. 4. Establishment of local landmark commissions with authority to designate and protect historic properties within their respective jurisdictions. i 5. Strengthening of local zoning to protect individual landmarks and historic districts. 6, Modification of health and building codes to facilitate preservation ❑f structures of historic and architectural significance. The goals alluded to here are not easy t❑ achieve. The educational, economic, legal, and technical changes necessary before these benefits can be realized are complex. Widespread public involvement is a prerequisite. The State of California is committed to providing leadership in attaining the goals of historic preservation and enhancing the quality of the man-made environment. Iv 140 Contents page PREFACE iii INTRODUCTION ix SITES BY THEME 1 Aboriginal 3 Architecture 13 Arts/Leisure 51 Economic/Industrial 65 Exploration/Settlement 121 Government 167 Military 179 Religion 189 Social/Education 201 APPENDIX — SITES BY COUNTY 219 GLOSSARY 279 MAP OF CALIFORNIA 284 v 141 List of Photographs Sluicing the American River cover California Department of Parks and Recreation Cliff House xii California Room, State Library St. John's Presbyterian Church 1 Department of Architecture, University of Caifarnia Berkeley Kumeyaay rock painting 3 San Diego Museum of Man Petroglyph 6 San Diego Museum of Man Cave art 9 California Department of Parks and Recreation Archeological remains 12 R. Begole Wynyate Mansion 13 Bob's Photographic Center, South Pasadena Banning Mansion 16 California Department of Parks and Recreation Carson House 18 William E. Padgett Fernandez House . 23 Privette Photography, San Francisco Hale House '26 Julius Shulman Jeffers House 27 National Park Service Kearney Mansion 29 William E. Padgett Lovell Beach House _ 32 Marvin Rand Mission Inn 34 Field Studios, Riverside Paramount Theatre _ 37 Cathe Centorbe Scotty's Castle 42 F.R. Holland, Jr. Temple Mansion 46 Marvin Rand Villa Montezuma 47 H.G. Hanekamp San Diego buildings 49 Aaron Gallup School of Design 51 California Room, State Library Cliff House burning 54 California Historical Society School of Design 55 California Room, State Library Granger Halt musicians 56 South Bay Historical Society Hearst Castle, Neptune pool 57 California Department of Parks and Recreation vi 142 Hotel del Coronado 58 California Room, State Library (Randolph Brandt photo) Cecil B. DeMille Studio 60 California Department of Parks and Recreation Columbia Band 63 California Room, State Library Butcher Shop 65 California Department of Parks and Recreation Old Bale Mill b9 Napa County Engineering and Road Department Best tractor 70 California Department of Parks and Recreation Bradbury Building 71 Marvin Rand Bridgeport Covered Bridge 72 George G. Pomeroy City of Paris Building 76 Craig Buchanan Zane's Ranch Bridge 79 Gary Mason Dutton Hotel 80 Monterey County Planning Deportment Jackson Square, 400 block 89 San Francisco Convention and Visitors Bureau Marshall Statue 94 California Department of Parks and Recreation N.C.O. Building 97 Photographer unknown Sacramento River scene 99 California Department of Parks and Recreation Overland Stage 102 California Department of Parks and Recreation Plumas-Eureka Mill 103 California Department of Parks and Recreation Railroad shops 1 12 California Department of Parks and Recreation Empire Block 119 Aaron Gallup Loading potatoes, Sacramento River 120 California Department of Parks and Recreation (Turrill and Miller photo) Mission San Juan Capistrano 121 California Department of Parks and Recreation Country church 123 William E. Padgett Dana Adobe _ , 130 lack T iedmann Mission Dolores 132 San Francisco Convention and Visitors Bureau Johnston House 139 W. Malcolm Watkins Lassen Emigrant Trail 141 California Department of Parks and Recreation Locke Historic District 142 Aaron Gallup Los Angeles Plaza Historic District 143 El Pueblo de Los Angeles SHP Commission American Hotel i48 California Department of Parks and Recreation viJ 143 Mission San Diego de Alcala 154 California Department of Parks and Recreation Mission San Buenaventura 155 Leroy Jones Capitol Building 167 California Room, State Library (D.L. Joslyn photo) Benicia Arsenal Clock Tower 169 Aaron Gallup Mono County Courthouse 173 W. Lee Symmonds Old San Francisco City Hall 175 California Historical Society Old San Francisco Post Office 175 California Historical Society Streetcar Depot 178 Julius Shulman Camp Markham 179 California Room, State Library (Abell and Priest photo) The Peru 183 California Historical Society Fort Rosecrans National Cemetery 184 Veteran's Administration Hospital, San Diego San Francisco Presidio 187 California Room, State Library Catholic -Protestant Chapels 1 89 Julius Shulman Grand Island Shrine 193 Claire Reynolds Mendocino Presbyterian Church .. 194 Bagley Schoolhouse 201 California Department of Parks and Recreation California Quadrangle 205 City of San Diego Douglas Flat School 206 B.M, Staffon Natural History Museum 212 Putnam and Valentine, Los Angeles Fresno City College Old Administration Building . 213 William Lehr Senior Hall (Golden Bear Lodge) U_C. Berkeley 215 Charles Johnson Workman Family Cemetery 219 Marvin Rand This inventory produced by the California Department of Parks and Recreation. Office of Historic Preservation William E. Padgett, Rob Selway, and Robin E. Datel Systems Development Section Arthur A. Kawada and Cynthia G_ Larkin Technical Reports Section — Graphics Mary F. Lowe Word Processing Center viii 144 Introduction The California Inventory of Historic Resources is based on material gathered through surveys of historic buildings, structures, objects, and sites in California. It has been prepared in response to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, which directs each state to identify all properties "possessing historical, architectural, archeological, and cultural value." The material . was brought together in this form to provide a functional collection of information for historic preservation efforts on all levels throughout California. The State Historic Preservation Officer and the Office of Historic Preservation have assumed full responsibility for this continuing project_ The inventory provides the detailed and workable compilation of the state's historic resources that is essential to the interpretation and implementation of the overall statewide Historic Preservation Plan. The current inventory includes only those resources surveyed before September 1, 1975. The items include: 1. Properties already designated National Historic Landmarks, all listings in the National Register of Historic Places, and properties nominated to the National Register by the State Historic Preservation Officer. The National Historic Landmarks Program, begun in 1935, gave preservation a national orientation. Those features of national historic significance were automatically included in the National Register Program which started in 1966. The Register offers a broader framework by including items of state and local significance as well. 2. Properties surveyed and inventoried by the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Office of Historic Preservation. Many city and county inventories have been assembled for inclusion in the Historic Resources Inventory. 3. Registered California Historical Landmarks which are recognized as having statewide significance. Landmark information has been compiled under the auspices of the State Historical Resources Commission, formerly known as the California Historical Landmarks Advisory Committee. Landmarks and many other individual cultural resources located within National Register districts are not listed separately in the published version of the Inventory. 4. Points of Historical interest, compiled by the above Commission acting on the recommendation of county boards of supervisors. This list includes those features with predominantly local significance. 5. Buildings and sites previously inventoried through federal programs such as The National Survey and Historic American Buildings Survey (NABS). Both programs are conducted under the sponsorship of the National Park Service. Resources listed include only those submitted. 6. Historic properties maintained by the California Department of Parks and Recreation_ All of the programs are continuing projects. The current inventory represents a stage in the collection of information; it is neither final nor complete. The present composite inventory lists nearly 3,000 sites in California. The project goal is the identification and description of at least 50,000 historic resources in the state. To facilitate this vast project, the Office of Historic Preservation with the assistance of the Systems Development Section of the Department of Parks and Recreation is scheduling computerization of the survey information and its periodic publication. Computerization will serve as a basis for the expansion of the inventory and a related data retrieval system. Participation on the part of local agencies and private organizations is vital to future plans. The size of California necessitates organized and enthusiastic local support in order to complete the comprehensive inventory. Boards of supervisors of the state's 58 counties have been asked to ix 145 appoint coordinators and establish historical advisory committees made up of individuals with specific expertise in history; architecture, and archeology. Information in this volume is partially a reflection of their efforts. To guide local agencies and volunteers in selecting resources for inclusion in the inventory, the Office of Historic Preservation has developed survey forms and a procedural guide. This office has also conducted over fifty workshops throughout the state to explain the importance of this project and to assist local representatives with the use of these forms and procedures. Statewide use will ultimately establish a comprehensive body of recorded data. Comparison of features based on this data will, in part, determine the policy toward individual resources. Survey and nomination actions are directed toward correcting deficiencies in historical themes, time periods, and areas of the state. The data retrieval system will standardize and expedite these procedures, thus insuring that California's cultural resources are identified, recorded, and supported in a balanced manner. The inventory should be used as a major planning. tool. In addition, it can serve as a source of nominations to the National Register and as an educational aid to students, teachers, and researchers. The inventory is designed to meet a variety of needs. It is organized in two ways, by theme and by county. Historians, archeologists, and other scholars will probably be most interested in the thematically arranged text, which contains descriptive information. Planners may find the county listings in the appendix more valuable for quickly identifying locations of sites within their areas of jurisdiction. In expectation of the inventory's role as a valuable planning and research tool, the format of data for individual resources has been revised in this, the second edition. Site descriptions have been enlarged. These descriptions summarize information on file with the Office of Historic Preservation. Nevertheless, many sites require further research. The presentation of information in the descriptions is uniform. Omissions may occur when specific items of information were unavailable, incomplete, or deliberately deleted to protect a fragile site. The main portion of the inventory is arranged according to primary historic or cultural theme. The thematic listings are alphabetical by site narne. These entries contain the bulk of descriptive material. Resources are also listed under secondary and tertiary themes. These listings direct the reader to their primary theme. The information in this section includes site name, city, county, description and significance, registration information, ownership, and whether the property is administered by the State or the National Park Service. Abbreviations and acronyms have, for the most part, been avoided. The primary exceptions are: NPS for National Park Service, NHL for National Historic Landmark and HAGS for Historic American Building Survey. A glossary has been provided to clarify the architectural and archeological language used in this inventory. Sites are also listed in an appendix arranged by county. Certain archeological teatures considered of major significance that are State Landmarks or on the. National Register are described under the theme "aboriginal." Even in this case, exact location has been avoided. In the appendix, the total number of aboriginal or archeological sites is noted for each county. Individual entries and locations have been deleted. This has been done to preclude the use of this inventory as a handbook for "pot hunters" and similar vandals. Ownership of sites is included with the hope that rights to privacy and trespassing laws will be observed. Ownership information also allows the various levels of government to assess their performance in acquiring, interpreting, and protecting sites in their jurisdiction. The identification of sites which represent an area's essential character is especially important to the inventory_ Historic districts and the environments of historic structures are emphasized, rather than solitary buildings, events, or personages. Historic districts represent a unified historic scene, which encompasses a spatial or temporal development that may be incomplete with an individual structure. Approximately one -fifth of the sites now listed on the National Register of Historic Places are historic districts. California's Tong -range planning supports the concepts of historic districts as a useful preservation tool. Nevertheless, resources of all kinds are included in an effort to maintain the tangible remains of a variety of past ways of life. California's historic resources have- been organized in three main eras of the state's diversified history: the Indian era (to 1 849 ), the Hispanic era (1542-1849), and the American era (1849 to x 146 present). These eras do not represent distinct periods. They are designated for the group or culture that had the greatest influence on the social, political, and economic developments of that era. The Indian era is represented mostly by archeological sites listed under the aboriginal theme. The Hispanic era includes features associated with both the Spanish and Mexican periods. The American era begins with California's annexation and the Gold Rush influx of Anglo-Americans, whose numbers overwhelmed the earlier Indian and Hispariic cultures. The organization of sites by theme insures that all aspects of California's historic eras are well represented in the inventory and in the state's preservation efforts. Nine general themes covering the entire range of California's diverse cultural heritage were selected to provide the inventory framework. Each resource in the inventory was assigned a primary theme, representing the most significant aspect of the site. If more than one theme seemed to apply to a given site, secondary and tertiary themes were assigned. Each site is listed under applicable themes, but complete descriptions are given only under the primary theme. Every effort was made to select themes which would be specific enough to provide a meaningful structure for organizing the data, yet broad enough to include all conceivable types of resources. The following is a list of the themes with an explanation of the types of resources included within each theme. A. Aboriginal: Sites relating to all aspects of Indian culture and occupation. These sites may be prehistoric or historic. B. Architecture; Structures and sites representing California's various architectural periods and styles or those designed by an outstanding architect. C. Arts/Leisure: Sites relating to dance, drama, music, painting, sculpture and literature. Sites include theaters, concert halls, opera houses, art museums, or other structures associated with famous writers, artists, actors, etc.; parks, gardens, sports facilities, mineral springs, spas, and resort hotels. D. Economic/Industrial: Sites relating to mining, lumbering, agriculture, transportation, communications, finance, manufacturing, commerce, and technology, such as mines and mining equipment, quarries, mills, factories, power plants, farm buildings, railroads and trains, ships, bridges, dams, piers, aqueducts, lighthouses, telegraph, radio and TV stations, banks, offices, hotels, inns, stores, shops and laboratories. E. Exploration/Settlement: Sites relating to expeditions, -explorations, immigrations, government surveys and early settlements including early routes and trails, missions, sites and structures related to Spanish and Mexican land grants and grantees, pioneer communities, landmarks and cemeteries, early mining camps and survey markers. F. Government: Sites relating to federal, state and local government such as town halls, city halls, courthouses, civic centers, jails, post offices, firehouses, municipal utilities; sites associated with politicians and governmental leaders. G. Military: Sites relating to military installations and actions including forts, camps, arsenals, barracks, military routes, and battlegrounds. H. Religion: Sites relating to religious institutions and Observances such as missions, asistencias, churches, temples, synagogues and cemeteries. If a religious structure is primarily of architectural significance, it will be listed under the architecture theme. I. Social/Education: Sites relating to particular social and educational organizations and institutions such as fraternal and social halls, libraries, schools, colleges and universities, hospitals, history and natural history museums, as well as sites representative of general social mores and of various ethnic lifestyles. xi 147 The State Historic Preservation Officer and the Office ❑f Historic Preservation would like to thank those people who have contributed to The California Inventory of Historic Resources. The efforts ❑f the California Section of the State Library and the Systems ❑evelopment, Word Processing, Technical Reports Sections and Operations Division of the State Department of Parks and Recreation have been instrumental in producing material used in the published inventory. Individuals, historical societies, museums, county coordinators, historical landmark commissions, planning departments and a variety of other local government agencies have taken part in the survey and inventory activity. We would also like t❑ thank the volunteer interns from the University of California at Davis and the California State University at Sacramento who have participated in the research and description of sites in the following inventory. The third Cliff House, San Francisco, ca. 1900. xii 148 SITES BY THEME SITES BY THEME AND ERA Indian Hispanic American TOTAL Aboriginal 88 3 16 107 Architecture 0 43 434 477 Arts/Leisure 0 0 129 129 Economic/Industrial 2 43 856 901 Exploration/Settlement 7 254 437 698 Government 0 5 105 110 Military 0 28 73 101 Religion 1 18 151 170 Social/Education 0 11 246 257 TOTAL 98 405 2,447 2,950 St. John's Presbyterian Church, Berkeley, 1908. Designed by Julia Morgan, a pioneer woman architect. 2 150 ABORIGINAL ARTS/LEISURE 1 1 r 152 • -twee : r*P— ECONOMIC/ INDUSTRIAL 1 GRAUMAN'S CHINESE THEATRE (SEE ARTS/LEISURE) GRAYSON CITY/GRAYSONVILLE, GRAYSON, STANISLAUSCOUNTY GRAYSON, FOUNDED IN 1850, WAS AT AN IMPORTANT CROSSING OF THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER DURING THE GOLD RUSH ERA. REVIVED AGAIN IN THE LATE 1860'5 AND '70'S WHEN IT SERVED A5 AN IMPORTANT SHIPPING POINT FOR GRAIN RAISED LOCALLY, THE TOWN THRIVED UNTIL THE EARLY 1890'S WHEN, WITH THE COMING OF THE RAILROAD, THE RIVERBOATS DIED OUT- OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. GREATWESTERN QUICKSILVER MINE, LAKE COUNTY. MINE STARTED PRODUCING QUICKSILVER IN 1873, AND WA5 WORKED CONTINUOUSLY UNTIL THE END OF WORLD WAR U. POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST. GREEN GABLES HOUSE, PACIFIC GROVE, MONTEREY COUNTY A VICTORIAN GOTHIC HOME BUILT IN 1888 BY HARRY ASHLAND GREEN, A RETIRED STOCKBROKER FROM 5AN FRANCISCO WHO BECAME VERY ACTIVE IN BUSINESS VENTURES IN THE AREA. GREEN LEAD MINE, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PIONEER GOLD PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE HOLCOMB VALLEY MINING DISTRICT; DATES TO 1876 AND WORKED AS LATE AS THE 1940'S- CREEN OAKS RANCH, SAN MATEO COUNTY. THE AREA WAS ONCE A DAIRY -FARM OWNED BY ISAAC STEELE WHO BUILT THE TYPICALLY EASTERN STYLE WOODEN HOUSE HERE IN 1863. POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST OWNERSHIP: COUNTY. GREEN,(IOHN) HOME, DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY BUILT IN 1864, THIS WAS THE HOME OF JOHN GREEN, A PROMINENT LOCAL CITIZEN. IT I5 THE OLDEST BUSINESS HOME STILL STANDING IN DUBLIN AND IS A TWO-STORY STRUCTURE. GREEN,(JOHN) STORE, DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY. THE JOHN GREEN STORE, BUILT IN 1864, IS THE OLDEST BUSINESS BUILDING STILL STANDING !N DUBLIN. IT IS A TWO-STORY STRUCTURE WFIICH HAS RETAINED ITS ORIGINAL SHAPE- OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. GREEN,(WILLIAM 5.) WATER NOTICE, GLENN COUNTY. WILLIAM SEMPLE GREEN, 1832-1905, ARRIVED, VIA THE PANAMA ROUTE, IN SAN FRANCISCO, OCTOBER 10, 1849. HE ARRIVED IN COLUSA COUNTY, JULY 6, 1850. FERRYBOAT CAPTAIN, MAIL CARRIER, SURVEYOR, EDITOR, WRITER, LEGISLATOR, SURVEYOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, CALIFORNIA STATE TREASURER, IRRIGATIONIST, AND HUMANIST- ON DECEMBER 18, 1883, HE POSTED THE FIRST WATER NOTICE ON AN OAK TREE ON THE WEST BANK OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER FOR THE DIVERSION OF 500,000 MINER'S INCHES OF WATER FOR THE IRRIGATION OF LANDSON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. GREENVILLE (SEE EXPLORATION(SETTLEMENT) GREENVILLE (SEE EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT) GREENWICH SITE, TEHACHAPI, KERN COUNTY GREENWICH, A TOWNSITE IN THE EVOLUTION OF TEHACHAPI HISTORY, WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED TO BE A TOWN ON THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC LINE IN 1876. HOWEVER, THE RAILROAD WAS LOCATED ONE MILE EAST Of THE WOULD BE SITE AND THE PROMISE OF ECONOMIC BOOM NEVER REACHED GREENWICH. TODAY, NOTHING REMAINS OF THE STAGE STOP, LIVERY, AND HOTEL THAT ONCE STOOD THERE. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. GREENWOOD (SEE EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT) GRIFFITH QUARRY, PENRYN, PLACER COUNTY STARTED OCTOBER 12, 1864 BY A WELSH STONE CUTTER, GRIFFITH GRIFFITH. THE GRANITE TAKEN FROM THE QUARRY WAS FOUND TO BE OF A VERY HIGH QUALITY, AND GRIFFITH OBTAINED SEVERAL LARGE GOVERNMENTAL CONTRACTS; HE PROVIDED GRANITE FOR THE STATE CAPITOL BUILDING (1871), THE US. MINT IN SAN FRANCISCO (1870), GOVERNOR STANFORD'S RESIDENCE ON N08 HILL, AND THE STANFORD UNIVERSITY CORNERSTONE (1887), AMONG OTHERS, BY THE MID 1870'S, THE QUARRY EMPLOYED 250 MEN FULL TIME, GRIFFITH ERECTED THE FIRST POLISHING MILL IN THE STA1E. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. GRISTMILL SITE, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SITE OF GRISTMILL UILT BY DARED DIXON (JOAQUIN) SHELDON 1846-47 ON OMOCHUMNES RANCHO, GRANTED TO HIM BY MEXICAN GOVERNMENT 1843. SHELDON, BORN VERMONT JANUARY 8, 1813, CAME TO CALIFORNIA 1832. SHELDON SHOT JULY 11, 1851, BY MINERS IN QUARREL OVER DAM HE BUILT WHICH FLOODED MINERS' CLAIMS. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP. PRIVATE. GROGAN-ATHERTON-LENT BUILDING, SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY CONSTRUCTED IN 1858. IT GOT IT5 NAME FROM THE THREE MEN WHO AT ONE TIME OR ANOTHER HAD THEIR BUSINESSES THERE. THE BUILDING WAS ALSO USED AS A PICKLE FACTORY, A CIGAR FACTORY, A MACARONI FACTORY, A RESTAURANT, AND AN ANTIQUE AND FURNITURE STORE. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. GROOVER'S GULCH SAWMILL SITE, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY. SITE OF THE GROOVER'S GULCH SAWMILL, BURIED BY THE 1906 EARTHQUAKE. GROVELAND SEE EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT) GROVER HOT SPRINGS (SEE ARTS/LEISURE) GUADALUPE AREA, NEW ALMADEN, SANTA CLARA COUNTY. QUICKSILVER MINE AND ABANDONED MINING CAMP. INCLUDES BRICK STORE, WOODEN HOUSES, CHURCH, CEMETERIES, AND FURNACE. GUBSERVILLE (SEE EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT) HALL CITY AND HALL'S GRADE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY MILTON SANDERS HALL STARTED HALL CITY HERE IN 1875 AND GRADED A ROAD TO SERVE HIS SAWMILL AND THE SETTLEMENT. THE SCHEME COLLAPSED AND THE TOWN WAS ABANDONED IN 1876, PARTS OF THE ROAD ARE STILL IN USE OR VISIBLE, POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST. OWNERSHIP: FEDERAL HANGAR NO. 1 BUILDING, LOS ANGELES, L05 ANGELES COUNTY IN OCTOBER OF 1928, THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES LEASED ONE SQUARE MILE OF WHAT WAS THEN KNOWN AS THE MINES FIELD, FOR MUNICIPAL AIRPORT PURPOSES- IN 1929 THEY CONSTRUCTED HANGAR NO, i, THE FIRST STRUCTURE IN THE AIRPORT AREA. IN 1937, THE CITY PURCHASED TITLE TO THE AIRPORT AND OFFICIALLY NAMED IT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ON OCTOBER 11, 1949. OWNERSHIP: CITY- HANSON,(OLE) HOUSE, SAN CLEMENTE, ORANGE COUNTY HOME OF THE FOUNDER OF SAN CLEMENTE. ON DECEMBER 6, 1925, HANSON STARTED SALE OF LOTS. HE WAS THE FORMER MAYOR OF SEATTLE- HARASZTHY,(COL. AGOSTON) CHAMPAGNE CELLARS, SILVER MOUNTAINCITY, ALPINE COUNTY LOCATED ON SILVER -CREEK, THIS TWO-STORY FRAME HOUSE WAS THE RESIDENCE OF 'LORD' CHALMERS, AN ENGLISHMAN WHO CAME TO ALPINE COUNTY IN 1867. THE CHIMNEY OF HIS ORE REDUCTION PLANT STANDS NEARBY_ HARDISON HOME, SANTA PAULA, VENTURA COUNTY BUILT IN 1883, HOME OF W. HARDISON, ONE OF THE FOUNDERS OF THE UNION OIL COMPANY. HARMONY BORAX WORKS, INVO COUNTY 1883. REMAINS OF PLANT COMPLEX INCLUDING ADOBE RUINS, PART OF THE FURNACE AND BOILER, DISSOLVING TANKS, AND WOODEN FRAME SUPPORTS; CLOSED IN 1888, TYPICAL MARSH BORAX OPERATION; TRADITIONALLY ORIGINATED THE 20-MULE TEAM SYMBOL THAT WAS LATER INCORPORATED INTO COMPANY SLOGAN BY STEPHEN T MATHER, WHO LATER BECAME FIRST DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE. NATIONAL REGISTER. OWNERSHIP: FEDERAL. 86 154 EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT J 1 Jar,V�, File4 155 AMADOR,(JIOSE MARIA/ ADOBE SITE, DUBLIN, ALAMEDACOUNTY. THIS ADOBE ON RANCHO SAN RAMON WA5 ORIGINALLY BUILT BY JOSE MARIA AMADOR. LATER IT WAS OCCUPIED BY JAMES WITT DOUGHERTY, A NATIVE OF MISSISSIPPI WHO CAME TO CALIFORNIA IN 1849 AND WHO PURCHASED THE RANCH IN 1852. AMERICAN EXCHANGE HOTEL (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) AMERICAN RIVER GOLD MINING DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO COUNTY THE AMERICAN RIVER PLAYED A VITAL ROLE IN THE COLONIZATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. THERE WERE A GREAT MANY TRAVELERS TO THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY, BUT THE MOST SIGNIFICANT WAS JOHN A. SUTTER, WHO FOUND THE AMERICAN RIVER IN 1839, AND ESTABLISHED A FORT NOT FAR AWAY. A CARPENTER, JAMES MARSHALL, AT A SITE NOW KNOWN AS COLOMA, IN JANUARY 24, 1848, FOUND GOLD. THE NEWS LEAKED OUT ABOUT THE DISCOVERY, AND MANY GOLD CAMPS SPRUNG UP ALONG THE AMERICAN RIVER. AMERIGE BROTHERS LAND OFFICE, FULLERTON, ORANGE COUNTY. AMERIGE BROTHERS LAND OFFICE, IN AMERIGE PARK, I5 AN OLD REAL ESTATE OFFICE BUILDING ERECTED ABOUT 1887 6Y THE FOUNDERS OF FULLERTON WHEN IT WAS A BOOM TOWN, ANAHEIM'S PIONEER HOUSE OF THE MOTHER COLONY, ANAHEIM, ORANGE COUNTY. FIRST HOUSE BUILT IN ANAHEIM, 1857, BY GEORGE HANSON, FOUNDER. 'THE MOTHER COLONY' GROUP SELECTED THE NAME GIVEN TO THIS SETTLEMENT. THIS GERMAN GROUP LEFT SAN FRANCISCO TO FORM GRAPE -GROWING COLONY IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. VINEYARDS BECAME LARGEST IN CALIFORNIA UNTIL DESTROYED, 1885, BY GRAPE DISEASE. COLONY STARTED PRODUCING VALENCIA ORANGES. HERE ONCE RESIDED HELENA MODJESKA AND HENRYK SIENKIEWICZ AUTHOR OF 'QUO VADIS.' CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. ANGELS CAMP, CALAVERAS COUNTY FOUNDED IN 1849 BY GEORGE ANGEL WHO HERE ESTABLISHED A MINING CAMP AND TRADING STORE. A RICH GRAVEL MINING AREA AND ONE OF THE RICHEST QUARTZ MINING SECTIONS OF THE MOTHER LODE. PRODUCTION RECORDS OF OVER 100 MILLION DOLLARS FOR ANGELS CAMP AND VICINITY, PROMINENT IN EARLY -DAY CALIFORNIA HISTORY. TOWNSITE IN 1873. THE LOCALE OF MARK TWAIN'S FAMOUS STORY, THE JUMPING FROG OF CALAVERAS, FREQUENTED BY JOAQUIN MURIETA, BLACK BART, AND OTHER EARLY -DAY BANDITS. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. ANZA EXPEDITION CAMP, SAN MATEO, SAN MATEO COUNTY. HERE ON THE BANKS OF SAN MATEO CREEK CAPTAIN J.B. DE ANZA CAMPED MARCH 29, 1776, AFTER EXPLORING THE PENINSULA AND SELECTING THE SITES FOR THE MISSION AND PRESIDIO OF SAN FRANCISCO. HERE ALSO THE PARTY OF FAMILIES, SOLDIERS, AND PRIESTS, ON THEIR WAY TO ESTABLISH SAN FRANCISCO, CAMPED FOR THREE DAYS, JUNE 24-27, 1776. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. ANZA EXPEDITION CAMP, BURLINGAME, SAN MATEO COUNTY. THE ANZA EXPEDITION OF 1776 ON ITS WAY UP THE PENINSULA TO LOCATE SITES FOR THE PRESIDIO AND MISSION OF SAN FRANCISCO CAMPED HERE ON MARCH 26 AT A DRY WATERCOURSE A SHORT LEAGUE BEYOND ARROYO DE SAN MATEO. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK, OWNERSHIP: STATE. ANZA TRAIL, ONTARIO, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. THE FIRST HISTORIC ROAD THROUGH THE COUNTY TO BE FOLLOWED BY WHITE MEN, THE TRAIL WAS USED BY JUAN BAUTISTA DE ANZA IN 1774-5, AND AGAIN IN 1776. IT WAS ALSO USED BY THE SAN GABRIEL MISSION FATHERS UNTIL 1822. POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST. APPLEGATE-LASSEN INTERSECT, FANDANGO PASS, MODOC COUNTY. THIS SPOT MARKS THE CONVERGENCE OF TWO PIONEER TRAILS WIDELY USED BY EMIGRANTS DURING THE YEARS 1846-1850. THE APPLEGATE TRAIL, ESTABLISHED IN 1846, LED FROM THE HUMBOLDT RIVER IN NEVADA TO THE WILLAMETTE VALLEY IN OREGON. THE LASSEN CUTOFF, ESTABLISHED BY PETER LASSEN IN 1848, TURNED SOUTH AT GOOSE LAKE TO THE NORTHERN MINES AND SETTLEMENTS OF CALIFORNIA. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: FEDERAL. APTOS HACIENDA RANCHO, APro5, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY_ THE RAFAEL CASTRO HOUSE BURNED IN 1915, IT STOOD ON A KNOLL WEST OF THE BRIDGE OVER APTOS CREEK. ARCATA PLAZA (SEE SOCIAL/EDUCATION) ARGUELLO EXPEDITION CAMPSITE, WINTERS YOLO COUNTY. IN 1821, A SPANISH-MEXICAN EXPEDITION LED BY LUIS ANTONIO ARGUELLO MADE THE FIRST EUROPEAN PENETRATION INTO THE PREVIOUSLY ISOLATED SACRAMENTO VALLEY AREA THAT 15 NOW YOLO COUNTY. ARLINGTON FARM (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) ARNAZ RANCHO ADOBE, VENTURA COUNTY. THE ADOBE SECTION OF THE HOUSE WAS THE SANTA ANA RANCHO HOME OF DON JOSE ARNAZ; HE BUILT IT IN 1863 WHEN HE WAS GRANTED HALF OF RANCHO SANTA ANA. ARRELLANES CASA SITE, SANTA BARBARA, SANTA BARBARA COUNTY. THE ARRELLANES ADOBE I5 SAID TO HAVE BEEN ERECTED IN 1795. IT MAYBE THE FIRST NOTEWORTHY HOUSE TO HAVE BEEN BUILT OUTSIDE THE PRESIDIO ENCLOSURE. IT WAS DESTROYED BY EARTHQUAKE IN 1925. ARROWHEAD (SEE ABORIGINAL) ARROYO DE SAN IOSEPH CLIPERTINO, SANTA CLARA COUNTY. THIS ARROYO HONORING SAN JOSEPH, PATRON SAINT OF FLIGHT AND STUDENTS, WAS FIRST DISCOVERED AND TRAVERSED BY SPANISH EXPLORERS IN 1769. ON MARCH 25-26, 1776, COLONEL JUAN BAUTISTA DE ANZA MADE IT HIS ENCAMPMENT NO. 93, AS MAPPED BY HIS CARTOGRAPHER PADRE PEORO FONT, BEFORE CONTINUING ON TO THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, WHERE HE INITIATED STEPS TO FOUND A COLONY, A MISSION, AND A PRESIDIO. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE /CITY /COUNTY. ARROYO SEQUIT (TOPANGA MALIBU SEQUIT), LOS ANGELES COUNTY. 13,350 ACRES LAND GRANT. GRANTED IN 1804. ASISTENCIA FOUNDATION, VENTURA, VENTURA COUNTY DISCOVERED BY AN ARCHEOLOGICAL DIG CONDUCTED PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE OJAI FREEWAY, THE FOUNDATION STONES OF THE ASISTENCIA WERE MOVED TO A SITE OUTSIDE THE PATH OF THE FREEWAY. THE ASISTENCIA, BUILT C. 1809, WAS AN OUTLYING CHAPEL OF MISSION SAN BUENAVENTURA, AND SERVED THE INDIAN WORKERS IN THE AREA UNTIL ABOUT 1840. OWNERSHIP: COUNTY. AVILA,(JUAN) ADOBE, SAN JUANCAPISTRANO, ORANGE COUNTY JUAN AVILA ADOBE, PROBABLY BUILT IN THE EARLY 1800'S, WAS THE MANSION OF DON JUAN AVILA, BUT MUCH OF IT WAS DESTROYED IN 1870 WITH SUBSEQUENT ALTERATIONS. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. BACON,(SAMJ STORE (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) BAGBY RAILROAD STATION SITE (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) BAGDAD (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) BAKER,(COLONEL THOMAS) MEMORIAL, BAKERSFIELD, KERN COUNTY. IN 1863, COLONEL THOMAS BAKER AND HIS FAMILY MOVED INTO A TULE-THATCHED LOG CABIN IN A SWAMPY, FORESTED AREA. SOON HE CONSTRUCTED AN ADOBE HOUSE WHICH BECAME A COMMUNITY CENTER FOR THE INCOMING POPULATION. BAKER RECLAIMED THE LAND AND PLANTED IT TO ALFALFA; THESE SAME FIELDS BECAME THE CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: CITY. BALBOA PAVILION (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) 124 156 BARBARA LAY IN AMBUSH FOR LIEUTENANT COLONEL JOHN C. FREMONT, U.S.A., AND H15 BATTALION. ADVISED OF THE PLOT, FREMONT WAS GUIDED OVER THE SAN MARCOS PASS BY BENJAMIN FOXEN AND HIS SON WILLIAM, AND CAPTURED SANTA BARBARA WITHOUT BLOODSHED. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. GEODES HOUSE, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY. BUILT IN 1870 BY ONE OF EARLY SETTLERS IN AREA, GEORGETOWN, EL DORADO COUNTY. FOUNDED AUGUST 7. 1849, BY GEORGE PHIPPS AND PARTY. NICKNAMED GROWLERSBURG FROM THE HEAVY NUGGETS THAT 'GROWLED' IN THE MINERS' PANS. GEORGETOWN WAS THE HUB OF AN IMMENSELY RICH GOLD AREA. AFTER THE DISASTROUS FIRE OF 1852, THE OLD TOWN WAS MOVED FROM THE CANYON IN LOWER MAIN STREET TO 1T5 PRESENT SITE. UNIQUE IN EARLY -DAY PLANNING, MAIN STREET WAS LAID OUT I00 FEET WIDE AND SIDE STREETS 60 FEET. POPULATION WAS 3,000 IN 1854-56. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: CITY. GIANT POWDER WORK SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) OILMAN RANCH HOUSE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY THE PRESENT STRUCTURE, BUILT IN 1879 BY JAMES M. GILMAN, HAS SERVED AS A STAGE STATION, STORE, POST OFFICE AND RANCH HEADQUARTERS. IT WAS THE SCENE OF A LYNCHING IN 1874 AND STARTING POINT FOR THE PAIUTE WILLY BOYS ENDURANCE TRACK IN 1909, AHEAD OF A POSSE. POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST, GLADYSTA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ONCE LOCATED NORT1-1WEST Of REDLANDS WAS THE SMALL COMMUNITY OF GLADYSTA, NAMED FOR FOUNDER H.L. WILLIAM'S DAUGHTER GLADYS, IT HAD A RAILROAD STATION, A PROMISED HOTEL, AND 'PAPER' BOOM ERA BUILDINGS. CLASS HOUSE CASA MATERNA OF THE VALLEJOS, MONTEREY COUNTY IN THE 1820'S, DON ICNACIO VALLEJO BUILT THE CASA MATERNA ON BOISA DE SAN CAYETANO. DON IGNACI❑ AND DONA MARIA ANTONIO LUGO Y VALLEJO HAD 13 CHILDREN - FIVE SONS AND EIGHT DAUGHTERS, ONE OF WHOM WAS GENERAL MARIANO GUADALUPE VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE, GLENCOE (MOSQUITO GULCH}, CACAVERAS COUNTY GLENCOE WAS FORMERLY CALLED MOSQUITO GULCH. THE BUSINESS PORTION OF THE TOWN WAS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MOSQUITO GULCH, AND NOT ONE OF THE OW BUILDINGS REMAINS, THE MINES WERE FIRST WORKED BY THE MEXICANS IN THE EARLY 1850'S. QUARTZ MINING PREDOMINATED BUT THERE WAS SOME PLACER MINING. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. GLENDENNING HOUSE SITE (SEE ARCHITECTURE) GLENN COUNTY'S FIRST FRAME HOUSE SITE, GLENN COUNTY IN THE 1850'S, MARTIN A_ REAGER BUILT THE FIRST FRAME HOUSE NEAR THE BOUNDARY LINE OF GLENN AND TEHAMA COUNTIES. POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST, GLENWOOD TOWNSITE, GLENWOOD. SANTA CRU,Z COUNTY HISTORIC TOWN FOUNDED BY CHARLES C. MARTIN, WHO CAME AROUND HORN 1847, AND H15 WIFE, HANNAH CARVER MARTIN, WHO CROSSED THE ISTHMUS. FIRST HOMESTEADED AREA IN 1851 AND OPERATED TOLLGATE AND STATION FOR STAGECOACHES CROSSING MOUNTAINS. LATER MARTIN DEVELOPED LUMBER MILL, WINERY, STORE AND GLENWOOD RESORT HOTEL CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK, OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. GODEY,(AtEX15) LAST HOME SITE, BAKERSFIELD. KERN COUNTY NEAR THIS SITE STOOD THE LAST HOME OF ALEXIS GODEY, FRONTIERSMAN AND SCOUT. BORN IN ST. tOUIS, MISSOURI, IN 181B, HE ACTED AS GUIDE FOR JOHN C. FREMONT'S EXPEDITION THROUGH THE KERN AREA IN 1843-44, AND WAS HONORED FOR HIS SERVICES AT THE BATTLE OF SAN PASQUAL IN 1846. MOVING HERE IN 1883, GODEY DIED JANUARY 19, 1889. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK, OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE_ GODEY,(ALEXIS) ADOBE (SEE ARCHITECTURE) GOLD DREDGING CAMP (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) GOLD RUN, PLACER COUNTY FOUNDED IN 1854 BY O.W. HOLLENBECK AND ORIGINALLY CALLED MOUNTAIN SPRINGS. FAMED FOR ITS HYDRAULIC MINES WHICH FROM 1865 TO 1878 SHIPPED $6,125,000 IN GOLD. FIVE WATER DITCHES PASSED THROUGH THE TOWN SERVING THE MINING COMPANIES WHICH HAD TO CEASE OPERATIONS IN 1882 WHEN STATE LAW WAS PASSED PROHIBITING HYDRAULIC MINING. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK, OWNERSHIP; PRIVATE. GOODYEARS BAR HISTORIC DISTRICT, SIERRA COUNTY FOUNDED iN 1849 BY MILES AND ANDREW GOODYEAR, BECAUSE OF ITS GREAT EARLY GROWTH, GOODYEARS BAR ALMOST BECAME THE COUNTY SEAT OF SIERRA COUNTY, DIGGINGS ALONG GOODYEARS CREEK AND IN THE NORTH TUBA AT THE BAR WERE EXCEEDINGLY RICH. SIGNIFICANT SITES: GOODYEAR BAR SCHOOLHOUSE ERECTED IN 1862 FOR CHURCH AND PUBLIC USE UNTIL 1950, KENNEDY RANCH (1850), ST, CHARLES, FLUKE, BACHELS HOTEL (1850), OLD HOME 11864), AND OLD SUNDERHAUS HOME. GORDON,(W1tLIAM) CEMETERY, RANCHO QUESISOSI, MADISON, YOIO COUNTY A PRIVATE CEMETERY ON RANCHO QUESISOSI IS ALL THAT REMAINS OF THE PIONEER SETTLEMENT OF POLO COUNTY'S FIRST PERMANENT NON-INDIAN RESIDENTS. BURIED THERE ARE WILLIAM GORDON, (1801-1876) A NATIVE OF OHIO WHO WAS TRADER IN TAOS, NEW MEXICO, PRIOR TO EMIGRATING TO CALIFORNIA IN 1841. ONE MILE WEST OF THE CEMETERY STOOD GORDON'S ADOBE HOME. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. GORMAN STAGE STATION (SEE ARCHITECTURE) GOSPEL SWAMP, SANTA ANA, ORANGE COUNTY A PART Of THE FORMER SANTA ANA RIVER BED, ACQUIRED THIS NAME BECAUSE OF THE PIETY OF ITS EARLY FARMERS. GRANITE WELLS (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) GRAPEVINE PASS (WHERE DON PEDRO FADES PASSED PASSED IN 1772), LEBEC, KERN COUNTY IN 1772 DON PEDRO FACES, LEAVING THE FIRST WRITTEN RECORD OF EXPLORATION IN THE SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY, PASSED THIS SITE, TRAVELING FROM SAN DIEGO TO SAN LUIS OBISPO VIA CAJON PASS, MOJAVE DESERT, RICHES LAKE, ANTELOPE VALLEY, TEJON PASS, CANADA DE 1.0S UVAS (GRAPEVINE CANYON) AND BUENA VISTA LAKE. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK, OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. GRASS VALLEY HISTORIC DISTRICT, GRASS VALLEY ON STATE HIGHWAY49, NEVADA COUNTY, A COLORFUL, OLD GOLD -MINING TOWN FIRST ESTABLISHED IN 1846 AND NAMED BY A COMPANY OF EMIGRANTS IN 1849, THE ATMOSPHERE OF EARLY MINING DAYS STILL CLINGS TO THE TOWN. SOME SIGNIFICANT SITES ARE: THE STONE HOUSE ON MILL STREET, HOLTBROOKE HOTEL, AND THE GLASSON HOME ON WEST MAIN STREET, OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. GRAVELLY FORD, MADERA COUNTY. THE GRAVELLY FORD RIVER CROSSING WAS USED IN THE LATE 1850'S BY EARLY SPANISH TRAPPERS, CATTLEMEN, AND SETTLERS. THE CROSSING HAS BEEN ALTERED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW GRAVELLY FORD CANAL NEAR THE OLD FORD. GRAYSON CITYIGRAYSONVILLE (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) GREEN LEAD MINE (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) GREEN,IIOHNI HOME (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) 136 157 MOUNTAIN HOUSE, ALAMEDA COUNTY MOUNTAIN HOUSE WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1849 AS A STOPPING POINT FOR TRAVELERS TO MOTHER LODE MINES. IN 1870 A SCHOOL WAS ESTABLISHED TI-HERE. TODAY A SMALL SETTLEMENT STILL EXISTS. HAGS CAL-T 199_ MOUNTAIN SPRINGS STAGE STATION (SEE ECONOMIC/ INDUSTRIAL) MUCK HOME, WHEATLAND, YUBA COUNTY THIS WAS THE FIRST HOUSE CONSTRUCTED IN WHEATLAND, A TOWN LAID OUT IN 1866 BY GEORGE HOLLAND AND C. L. WILSON. POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST. MURPHY'S RANCH, SACRAMENTO COUNTY THIS IS THE SITE OF THE BEGINNING OF THE CONQUEST Of CALIFORNIA BY THE UNITED STATES. ON JUNE 10, 1846, AMERICAN SETTLERS LED 8Y EZEKIAL MERRITT OVERPOWERED SOLDIERS UNDER LIEUTENANT FRANCISCO ARCH AND TOOK THEIR MEXICAN ARMY HORSES FROM THE CORRAL OF THE MURPHY RANCH ON THE NORTH BANK OF THE COSUMNES RIVER. THE 'BEAR FLAG' ACTION IN SONOMA FOLLOWED ON JUNE 14, 1846. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. MURPHY,( MARTIN) HOME AND ESTATE, SUNNYVALE, SANTA CLARA COUNTY: MARTIN MURPHY, JR., ARRIVED 4N CALIFORNIA WITH HIS FAMILY IN 1844 IN THE FIRST WAGON TRAIN TO CROSS THE SIERRA NEVADA. THE FOUNDER OF SUNNYVALE, HE CONSTRUCTED HERE HIS HOUSE OF PREFABRICATED LUMBER, BROUGHT AROUND THE HORN IN 1849. MEMBERS OF THE MURPHY FAMILY LIVED HERE CONTINUOUSLY UNTIL 1953, WHEN THE PROPERTY WAS ACQUIRED BY THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE. (DESTROYED BY FIRE IN 1961.1 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: CITY. MURPHYS, CAI AVERAS COUNTY. ONE OF THE PRINCIPAL MINING COMMUNITIES IN CALAVERAS COUNTY, NAMED FOR THE DISCOVERER OF GOLD ON THE FLAT IN 1849. THE OBJECTIVE OF MANY IMIvI!GRANTS COMING OVER THE SIERRA NEVADA MOUNTAINS BY EBBETTS PASS, MURPHY FLAT AND SURROUNDING MINES PRODUCED 20,000,000 DOLLARS IN GOLD. EARLY REGULATIONS RESTRICTED CLAIMS TO EIGHT FEET SQUARE. SUSPENSION FLUME CONVEYING WATER ACROSS MURPHY'S CREEK AND DRAINAGE RACE DRAINING THE FLAT WERE TWO OUTSTANDING ACCOMPLISHMENTS Of EARLY -DAY MINERS. BUSINESS PORTION OF TOWN DESTROYED BY FIRE AUGUST 20, 1859. JOAQUIN MURIETA, BANDIT, BEGAN HIS MURDEROUS CAREER HERE. CALAVERAS LIGHT GUARDS, RECRUITING FOR CIVIL WAR, ORGANIZED HERE MAY 4, 1861. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. MURRARY,(MICHAEL) HOUSE, DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY. A ONE-STORY HOUSE, BUILT IN THE T850'S WHICH STILL STANDS ABOUT ONE HUNDRED YARDS WEST Of ITS ORIGINAL LOCATION. THE FLOOR AND SIDING WERE OF PINE SHIPPED AROUND THE HORN, WHILE THE REDWOOD JOISTS WERE CUT AT REDWOOD CITY AND SHIPPED FROM THERE. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. NAPA VALLEY RAILROAD DEPOT (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) NATIONAL OLD TRAILS MONUMENT, NEEDLES, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AN OLD INDIAN TRAIL, STILL VISIBLE IN SOME PLACES, RAN ROUGHLY PARALLEL TO THE COLORADO RIVER ON THE CALIFORNIA SIDE. THIS IS THE ROUTE FOLLOWED BY GARCES AND HIS MOJAVE GUIDES IN 1776, AND BY JEDEDIAH SMITH IN 1826. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: CITY. NATIVE SONS BUILDING, LOWER LAKE, LAKE COUNTY. BRICK BUILDING CONSTRUCTED AROUND 1880. NEGRO HILL, EL DORADOCOUNTY NEGRO HILL, FIRST MINED BY MORMONS IN 1848, WAS A THRIVING CAMP WHICH REPEATED THE EXPERIENCE OF NUMEROUS MINING CAMPS THROUGHOUT THE SIERRA NEVADA, ENJOYING A BRIEF HEYDAY OF PROSPERITY AS A CENTER OF TRADE FOR OUTLYING CAMPS. THE TOWN, WITH ITS SEPARATE SETTLEMENTS OF BLACKS AND WHITES, REACHED A POPULATION OF 1,200 BY 1853. SITE INUNDATED BY FOLSOM LAKE. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: STATE. NEVADA CITY HISTORIC DISTRICT, NEVADA CITY NEVADA COUNTY. ESTABLISHED A5 A MINING CAMP IN THE FALL OF 1849 WITH THE DISCOVERY OF GOLD BY A PROSPECTOR NAMED HUNT. WITHIN A YEAR THE POPULATION OF NEVADA CITY REACHED 6,000. SIGNIFICANT SITES INCLUDE THE MINERS' FOUNDRY, 'THE CASTLE' (THE CITY'S FIRST BRICK BUILDING), AND SEARL'S LAW OFFICE_ OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. NEW ALMADEN (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) NEW BRIGHTON BEACH CHINESE FISHING CAMP (SEE SOCIAL/ EDUCATION) NEW HOPE (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTR'IAL1 NEW HOPE LANDING PLACE, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY FIRST KNOWN SAIL LAUNCH TO ASCEND SAN JOAQUIN RIVER FROM SAN FRANCISCO LANDED HERE AUTUMN 1846. CARRIED TWENTY MORMON PIONEERS WHO FOUNDED NEW HOPE AGRICULTURAL PROJECT ON STANISLAUS. YOKE OF OXEN AND SPAN OF MULES DRIVEN FROM MARSH'S LANDING (ANTIOCH) BY TWO MEN WHO FOLLOWED CRUDE MAP DRAWN BY MERRITT' THE TRAPPER. TWO YEARS LATER DOAK AND BONSELL OPERATED HERE THE FIRST FERRY ON SAN JOAQUIN RIVER CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. NEW YORK OF THE PACIFIC 1 BLACK DIAMOND) /SEE ECONOMIC/ INDUSTRIAL) NEWVILLE, GLENN COUNTY. ACTIVE TOWN IN THE 1860'5, NOW A GHOST TOWN. POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST. MANTIC SHIP/HOTEL S1fE (SEE ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL) NIXON HOUSE, ARJAM, HUMBOLDTCOUNTY WOOD, ONE AND A HALF STORIES MID 19TH CENTURY. GOTHIC REVIVAL, OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. NOBLE EMIGRANT TRAIL (RESTSTOP), SUSANVILLE LASSEN COUNTY THIS MEADOW, NOW A CITY PARK, WAS A WELCOME STOPPING PLACE ON THE NOBLE EMIGRANT TRAIL, PIONEERED BY WILLIAM H. NOBLES IN 1851 AND FIRST USED iN 1852_ HERE, EMIGRANTS EN ROUTE TO THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA MINES WERE ABLE TO REST, RECRUIT THEIR STOCK, AND OBTAIN NEEDED PROVISIONS AT ISAAC ROOP'S ESTABLISHMENT, FROM WHICH GREW THE CITY OF SUSANVILLE. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: CITY. NOBLE EMIGRANT TRAIL, LSSSENCOUNTY THIS ROUTE WAS FIRST USED IN 1852 8Y EMIGRANTS TO NORTHERN CALIFORNIA SEEKING TO AVOID THE HARDSHIPS OF THE LASSEN TRAIL. IT CROSSED THE DESERT FROM THE HUMBOLDT RIVER IN NEVADA, PASSED THIS POINT, AND PROCEEDED OVER THE MOUNTAINS TO THE TOWN OF SHASTA. LATER, )8S9-1861, IT WAS KNOWN AS THE FORT KEARNY, SOUTH PASS AND HONEY LAKE WAGON ROAD. FROM THIS POINT PETER LASS£N AND J.G. BRUFF ON OCTOBER 4, 1850, SAW HONEY LAKE WHILE ON AN EXPEDITION HUNTING FOR GOLD LAKE. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP' STATE. NOBLE'S PASS ROUTE, SHASTA COUNTY WILLIAM H. NOBLE, ACCOMPANIED BY A PARTY OF CITIZENS, SHOWED THE ROUTE FOR A WAGON ROAD ACROSS THE SIERRA NEVADA IN MAY 1852. IT WAS FROM THIS POINT THAT EMIGRANTS GOT THEIR FIRST GLIMPSE OF THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP! FEDERAL. ADMINISTRATION: NPS. NOBLE'S RANCH, RIVERSIDE COUNTY. THIS BUILDING OF UNCUT STONE ON THE RANCH OF NEWTON NOBLE, COUNTY SHERIFF AND ROAD OVERSEER, WA5 A STAGE STATION IN THE 1870'S. IT HAS ALSO SERVED AS A SCHOOL AND POST OFFICE. POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST. NOCE,(JOHN) HOUSE (SEE ARCHITECTURE) 146 158 c GOVERNMENT • 091, ww-9 _.L'Jefraa,'i a.,..61 _ 159 REp**"LIGION a yam 1 160 ST. MARY MAGDALEN ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, CAMARILLO VENTURA COUNTY, BUILT BY THE PIONEER CAMARILLO FAMILY IN 1914. THIS WAS, FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS, THEIR PRIVATE CHAPEL. IT IS NOW A PARISH CHURCH. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH, OAKLAND, ALAMEDA COUNTY. ST. MARY'S WAS ESTABLISHED AS A MISSION! IN 1853, AND BECAME A PARISH IN 1858. THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE PRESENT BUILDING WERE LAID 1N 1668, AND IN 1872 IT WAS DEDICATED. THE WOODEN STRUCTURE HAS UNDERGONE MUCH REMODELING THROUGH THE YEARS, OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. ST. MARY'S CEMETERY, RED BLUFF. TFHAMA COUNTY ST. MARY'S CEMETERY, ESTABLISHED BY FATHER QUINN, HAD ITS FIRST BURIAL IN 1888. BEFORE THIS CEMETERY WAS CREATED, CATHOLICS WERE BURIED IN THE OAK HILL CEMETERY_ THE CEMETERY CONTAINS A STATUE OF THE VIRGIN MARY DONATED BY THE BARRY FAMILY OF COTTONWOOD. OWNERSHIP: CITY. ST. MARYS BY THE SEA, PACIFIC GROVE, MONTEREY COUNT .. FIRST CHURCH BUILT IN PACIFIC GROVE, 1887 INCLUDES WINDOWS BY TIFFANY AND A GROUP OF WINDOWS BY BRUCE PORTER. PARISH HOUSE. 1893. OWNERSHIP- PRIVATE. ST. MATTHEW'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH (SEE ARCHITECTURE) ST. PATRICK'S CHURCH, SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY PATRONAI. CHURCH OF THE IRI5H IN SAN FRANCISCO. BUILT IN 1872, THE CHURCH REMAINS A LANDMARK OF AN AREA THAT 15 NOW ENTIRELY CHANGED FROM ITS ORIGINAL RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER. POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. ST. PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH, SONORA, TUOLUMNE COUNTY. THE CATHOLIC CHURCH WAS ESTABLISHED IN SONORA BY 1849 AND SERVED THE MEXICAN MINERS WHO RESIDED THERE. THE ORIGINAL CHURCH WAS OF ADOBE CONSTRUCTION IN THE MISSION STYLE AND SERVICES WERE CONDUCTED IN SPANISH. IN 1862, A NEW BRICK STRUCTURE WAS COMPLETED. IN 1874 THE ROOF OF THE CHURCH WAS DESTROYED BY FIRE, AND THE INTERIOR OF THE CHURCH WAS BADLY DAMAGED. HABS-189. OWNERSHIP PRIVATE_ ST. PAUL'S CATHEDRAL. LOS ANGELES, LO5 ANGELES COUNTY. STARTED IN 1865 AS THE FIRST ENGLISH SPEAKING AND NON - ROMAN CONGREGATION TO BE FORMED IN LOS ANGELES, THE PARISH WAS ORIGINALLY NAMED ST. ATHANASIUS AND WAS HOUSED IN A SMALL BRICK CHURCH ON NEW HIGH STREET. IN THE 1880'S, THE PARISH CHANGED ITS NAME TO ST. PAUL'S CHURCH AND MADE PLANS FOR A LARGER BUILDING. AN ADEQUATE SITE WAS SECURED ON SOUTH OLIVE STREET, FACING WHAT 15 NOW KNOWN AS PERSHING SQUARE. ST. PAUL'S CHURCH, BUILT OF WOOD WITH AN IMPRESSIVE TOWER, WAS ERECTED IN 1883. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. ST. PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH, SOLANO COUNTY DESIGNED IN 1E159 BY LT. IULIAN MCALLISTER AND BUILT BY SHIPWRIGHTS OF THE PACIFIC MAIL AND STEAMSHIP COMPANY, ST, PAUL'S IS AN OUTSTANDING EXAMPLE OF EARLY CALIFORNIA GOTHIC ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE. NOTABLE FOR ITS FINE CRAFTSMANSHIP, THIS BUILDING HAS CONTINUOUSLY SERVED THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH SINCE ITS CONSECRATION BY THE RT. REV. WILLIAM INGRAHAM KIP iN 1860. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. ST. RAYMOND'S CHURCH, DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY. BUILT IN 1859, THIS WAS THE FIRST CHURCH IN THE TOWNSHIP. LAND FOR THE CHURCH AND THE ADJOINING CEMETERY WAS DONATED IN PART BY JEREMIAH FALLON, ONE OF THE RESCUERS OF THE ILL- FATED DONNER PARTY. THE CHURCH 15 THE OLDEST EXTANT CATHOLIC CHURCH BUILDING INTHE DIOCESE, WHICH COMPRISES ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTIES. POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST. ST. SAVIOUR'S CHAPEL, NORTH HOLLYWOOD, 105 ANGELES COUNTY. 5T. SAVIOUR'S CHAPEL WAS DESIGNED BY REGINALD JOHNSON, 50N OF THE FIRST EPISCOPAL BISHOP OF LOS ANGELES, AND PATTERNED AFTER THE CHAPEL AT RUGBY SCHOOL IN ENGLAND. IT WAS NAMED AFTER ST. SAVIOUR'S CATHEDRAL IN SOUTHWARK, ENGLAND, THE CHURCH WHERE JOHN HARVARD, THE FOUNDER OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY WAS BAPTIZED. IN THE WINTER OF 1937, THE CHAPEL WAS CUT INTO SIXTEEN SECTIONS, BROUGHT OVER SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD FROM ITS ORIGINAL SITE AND RE -ERECTED ON THE PRESENT CAMPUS IN NORTH HOLLYWOOD. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. ST. STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH (SEE ARCHITECTURE] ST. TERESA'S CHURCH, BODEGA, SONOMA COUNTY. CONSTRUCTED OF REDWOOD IN 1659 BY NEW ENGLAND SHIP'S CARPENTERS ON SPANISH LAND GRANT PROPERTY DONATED BY JASPER O'FARRELL. ON MARCH 8, 1860, FATHER LOUIS ROSS1 WAS APPOINTED PASTOR. ARCHBISHOP ALEMANY DEDICATED THE CHURCH IN THE TOWN OF BODEGA ON JUNE 2, 1861, AND IT HAS SERVED THIS COASTAL COMMUNITY CONTINUOUSLY FOR OVER A CENTURY. CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARK. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. ST. TURIBIUS 1NDIAN MISSION (SEE EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT} ST. VIBIANA'S CATHEDRAL, LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY A 'TYPICAL 'BASILICA PLAN' OF EXPOSED BRICK CONSTRUCTION (ORIGINAL) BUT 1922 ALTERATIONS CHANGED FRONT PORTION TO CONCRETE FACED WITH INDIANA LIMESTONE AND EXPOSED BRICK WALLS COVERED WITH CEMENT PLASTER.' ONE OF THE EARLIEST CATHOLIC CHURCHES BUILT IN LOS ANGELES, SINCE ITS CONSTRUCTION IN 1876, IT HAS BEEN THE SEAT OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF L05 ANGELES. UNTIL THE LATE 1880'S IT WAS THE LARGEST CHURCH BUILDING IN THE CITY. THE CATHEDRAL HAS BEEN VISITED BY MANY FAMOUS AMERICANS OF NATIONAL AND STATE DISTINCTION AND HAS WITNESSED MANY IMPORTANT EVENTS IN THE HISTORY OF LOS ANGELES_ OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. 5T. VINCENT DE PAUL CHURCH, LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY ORIGINALLY AND PRESENTLY A BUFF -COLORED, REINFORCED -CONCRETE EDIFICE iN THE SPANISH BAROQUE STYLE WITH A TILE -INLAID DOME MADE IN MEXICO AND A TALL BELL TOWER WITH A SPIRE AT THE LEFT FRONT CORNER. DECORATED ON THE OUTSIDE WITH STATUARY AND FRIEZES OF INDIANA LIMESTONE. FINISHED IN 1925, 5T. VINCENT'S WAS BUILT FOR THE MOST PART WITH A DONATION FROM EDWARD L. DOHENY, A WEALTHY OIL MAGNATE AND LEADING CITIZEN IN LOS ANGELES. DOHENY MADE SURE THAT NO OTHER TYPE OF BUILDING WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED BESIDE THE CHURCH BY HAVING ST. VINCENT'S BUILT ON A 45-DEGREE ANGLE FROM THE STREET CORNER AND BUYING UP ALL THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY. THE CHURCH WAS AWARDED THE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT BY THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS IN 1939 FOR ITS UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL QUALITIES. OWNERSHIP• PRIVATE. ST. VINCENT'S PLACE (SEE SOCIAL/EDUCATION) ST. VINCENT'S SCHOOL FOR 80Y5 (SEE SOCIAL/EDUCATION) STOWE MAUSOLEUM, VENTURA COUNTY, BUILT BY MRS. STOWE FOR HER TWO SONS, WHOSE BODIES WERE MOVED INTO IT FROM THE CHAPEL. OWNERSHIP: PRIVATE. STRAWBERRY VALLEY CEMETERY, STRAWBERRY VALLEY, YUBA COUNTY THIS CEMETERY HAS BEEN IN CONTINUOUS USE SINCE ABOUT 1850. GRAVES OF EARLY PIONEERS, MINERS, AND LUMBERMEN WHO SETTLED THIS PART OF THE SIERRA NEVADA CAN BE FOUND IN THIS THREE AND A HALF ACRE CEMETERY. OWNERSHIP: COUNTY, STREETER HOUSE, RIVERSIDE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, THE STREETER HOUSE IS A LARGE, TWO-STORY, LATE 19TH CENTURY FARMHOUSE WITH DETACHED BARN AND GARAGE. HENRY STREETER WAS A 199 161 1 er -Pr4be4 r'�c- SOCIAL/EDUCATION 1 was 1 7 Wiiwoc ! w let SITES BY COUNTY Family cemetery of early California pioneer William Workmen. 163 SITES BY COUNTY AND THEME Arts/ Economic/ Exploration/ I Social/ Aboriginal Architecture Leisure Industrial Settlement Government Military Religion Education TOTAL Alameda 4 66 10 42 38 14 1 14 32 221 Alpine 0 1 1 8 6 3 0 0 2 21 Amador 1 1 0 19 14 0 0 2 6 43 Butte 3 3 0 10 7 2 0 3 3 31 Calaveras 0 5 0 17 24 3 0 2 5 56 Co{usa 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 6 Contra Costa 1 5 3 44 32 2 0 3 18 108 Del Norte 3 0 0 3 3 1 3 0 1 14 El Dorado 0 1 0 23 13 1 0 1 1 40 Fresno 0 3 2 15 8 0 1 0 4 33 Glenn 0 0 0 5 10 2 0 0 0 17 Humboldt 7 3 2 18 13 0 10 0 5 58 Imperial 0 0 0 4 2 0 3 1 1 11 Inyu 1 0 1 13 7 0 4 0 1 27 Kern 5 1 0 35 22 2 1 1 5 72 Kings 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 5 Lake 2 6 9 15 11 5 1 2 6 57 Lassen 1 0 0 1 14 0 1 0 0 17 Los Angeles 2 82 22 47 36 7 8 20 24 248 Madera 0 1 0 3 5 0 0 1 0 10 1 Merin 2 8 1 8 1 3 2 2 3 30 Mariposa 0 0 1 6 4 2 0 1 1 15 Mendocino 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 7 Merced 1 1 0 3 4 3 0 1 0 13 Modoc 6 0 0 2 8 1 4 0 0 21 Mono 0 0 1 10 5 1 0 0 0 17 Monterey 2 6 4 23 21 1 3 3 3 66 Napa 0 7 3 8 9 0 1 1 2 31 Nevada 1 2 5 23 7 1 0 3 4 46 Orange 2 7 3 36 35 5 2 3 7 100 Placer 1 0 1 16 7 0 0 0 2 27 Plumas 1 0 1 5 8 0 0 0 1 16 Riverside 13 20 12 27 22 4 2 9 9 118 Sacramento 4 1 1 14 13 3 1 4 2 43 San Benito 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 6 San Bet nardino 7 10 7 51 55 1 11 6 5 153 San Diego 1 17 2 17 25 2 10 5 10 89 San Francisco 0 42 12 48 5 8 6 6 14 141 San Joaquin 0 1 0 11 9 0 3 2 2 28 San Luis Obispo 2 19 2 13 9 1 0 8 2 55 San Mateo 1 20 2 19 19 2 4 4 4 75 Santa Barbara 4 32 2 12 8 1 3 5 4 71 Santa Clara 2 34 6 41 31 7 1 4 23 149 Santa Cruz 1 21 2 47 11 4 1 12 11 110 Shasta 6 1 0 19 9 0 3 1 2 41 Sierra 4 0 0 28 12 1 0 0 2 47 Siskiyou 3 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 9 Solano 0 6 0 6 3 3 4 3 5 30 Sonoma 4 4 2 7 8 2 1 1 4 33 Stanislaus 1 0 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 12 Sutter 0 12 0 3 2 3 0 1 1 22 Tehama 0 4 0 1 1 2 1 3 1 13 Trinity 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 Tulare 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 3 9 Tuolumne 3 3 5 27 27 2 0 8 4 79 Ventura 1 8 2 19 22 0 0 10 6 68 Volt) 0 4 2 7 15 2 0 4 3 37 Yuba 0 5 0 7 6 0 0 6 1 25 TOTAL 107 477 129 901 698 110 101 170 257 2,950 220 164 APPENDIX ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF HISTORICAL SITES BY COUNTY ALAMEDA COUNTY - 221 SITES (ALSO 344 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES)" ALAMEDA COUNTY'S THIRD SEAT OF GOVERNMENT. 1925 E t4TH ST., ALEMEDA. THEME. GOVERNMENT ALAMEDA COUNTY COURTHOUSE. DAVIS STREET AT CLARKE STREET, SAN LEANDRO. THEME GOVERNMENT ALAMEDA COUNTY GAZETTE NEWSPAPER. NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAVIS AND CLARKE STREETS, SAN LEANDRO. THEME ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL ALAMEDA COUNTY'S FIRST SCHOOL SITE. REDWOOD ROAD BETWEEN JAMES AND ALMA, CASTRO VALLEY. THEME: SOCIAL/ EDUCATION. - - - - ALEMEDA COUNTY (FIRST) COURTHOUSE SITE. ALVARADO. THEME • GOVERNMENT. ALEMEDA TERMINAL OF THE FIRST TRANSCONTINENTAL RAILROAD. FOOT OF PACIFIC AVENUE, ALEMEDA. THEME ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL - ALTAMONT LIBRARY. ALTAMONT PASS RD. 580, ALTAMONT THEME: RELIGION. - ALVARADO BUSINESS BUILDINGS. UNION CITY- THEME• EXPLORATION/SETTL EMEN T ALVARADO CITY/UNION CITY. ALVARADO/UNION CITY. THEME EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT ALVISO,(AUGUSTIN) ADOBE SITE. NEWARK BOULEVARD NEAR JARVIS AVENUE, UNION CITY. THEME- EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT ALVISO,(FRANCISCO SOLANO) ADOBE. MEADOWLARK DAIRY FARM, PLEASANTON VALLEY, THEME EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT AMADOR,(IOSE MARIA) ADOBE SITE. SAN RAMON ROAD AND DUBLIN BOULEVARD, DUJ - THEME: EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT ANNA HEAD SCHOOL. HASTE AND BOWDITCH STREETS, BERKELEY. THEME- ARCHITECTURE - BACON HALL SITE. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY. THEME SOCIAL/EDUCA TION BAY OR LAUREL TREE. 9 LEWELLING BLVD., SAN LORENZO. THEME: . EXPL ORA TION/SETTLEMENT r- -- -T - BELROSE AVENUE RESIDENCE, 2700 BELROSE AVENUE, BERKELEY. THEME' ARCHITECTURE. BENVENUE AVENUE RESIDENCE. 6487 BENVENUE AVENUE, BERKELEY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE BERKELEY CITY HALL. 2134 GROVE ST., BERKELEY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. BERKELEY'S FIRST ADOBE SITE. 1304 ALBINA STREET, BERKELEY._ THEME- EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT. •NATIONAL REGISTER SITE ••LOCATIONS AND MANY DESCRIPTIONS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ARf NQT GIVEN TO PROTECT THESE RESOURCES- COUNTY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE COUNTS BASED ON THE RECORDS ON FILE WITH CULTURAL RESOURCES SECTION OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARRS ANI) RECREATION. BERNAL,1AGUSTIN) ADOBE. FOOTHILL ROAD, LIVERMORE. THEME: EXPLORATION/SET71 EMENT 1 BERNAL,(PABLOI ADOBE SITE. ARROYO VALLE, PLEASANTON. THEME: EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT BEST HOME. 1315 CLARKE STREET, 5AN LEANDRO.THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. BEST TRACTOR COMPANY. 800 DAVIS STREET, SAN LEANDRO_. THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. BLAISDELL,(FORMER GOV. OF NEVADA) HOME. 40572 MISSION BLVD-, FREMONT. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. BORAX WORKS. PACIFIC NEAR THIRD, ALAMEDA, THEME,' ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL BROOKLYN (OLD COURTHOUSE). 1952 EAST FOURTEENTH STREET, OAS _THEME GOVERNMENT. BROWN'S STAGE STATION, PATTERSON PASS ROAD EAST OF LIVERMORE, THEME: GOVERNMENT •%. BUENA VISTA WAY RESIDENCE.2701 BUENA VISTA WAY, BERKELEY THEME .4RCHITECTLIRE. BUENA VISTA WAY RESIDENCE. 2733 BUENA VISTA WAY, BERKELEY. THEME. ARCHITECTURE. - - BUENA VISTA WAY RESIDENCE. 2704 BUENA VISTA WAY, BERKELEY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. BUENA VISTA WAY, RESIDENCE. 2753 BUENA VISTA WAY, B_ER_KELEY, THEME: ARCHITECTURE. BUENA VISTA WAY RESIDENCE. 2798 BUENA VISTA WAY, BERKELEY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. 'CALIFORNIA NURSERY COMPANY GUEST HOUSE (VALLEJO ADOBE). NILES BLVD. AT NURSERY AVE., FREMONJ. THEME. ARCHITECTURE CALVARY CEMETERY. END OF VAN AVENUE, SAN LEANDRO. THEME EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT. •CAMERON-STANFORD HOME_ 1426 LAKESIDE DR., OAKLAND. THEME: ARCHITECTURE- CAMINO OF RANCHO SAN ANTONIO. SAN JO E VIC WITY. THEW; EAPL ORATION/SETTLEMENT CAMPANILE. UNIVERSITY OF CALIF„ _BERKELEY. THEME SOCIAL/ EDUCATION. CASA PERALTA. 384 WEST ESTUDILLO, SAN LEANDRO. THEME, EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT CASTRO PLAZA. MISSION BLVD. BETWEEN C AND D STS., HAYWARD. THEW ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. CASTRO VALLEY EXCHANGE GROVE WAY AND REDWOOD RD., CASTRO VALLEY. THEME- ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. CASTRO VALLEY'S FIRST PUBLIC SCHOOL SITE. REDWOOD ROAD, BETWEEN JAMES AND ALMA, CA�O VAI I FY. THEME.- SOCIAL/ EDUCATION CASTRO,(CUILLERMO) RESIDENCE. 22738 MISSION BLVD., HAYWARD- THEME. EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT 2Z1 165 Alameda County (Continued) CATHOLIC MASS SITE. LAKESHORE AVENUE, OAKLAND. THEME. R£1. 'CION• CENTERVILLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. FREMONT BLVD. AND BONDI WAN', FREMONT. THEME MIGION, CHABOT STREET RESIDENCE. 7133 CHABOT AT ROBLE ROAD, BERKELEY. THEME:: ARCHITECTURE. C1IAD:.OURI4 CARR1AGZ HOUSE. 39169 FREMONT 61VD., FREMONT, THEME: ARCHITECTURE CHASE,IMOSES) HOUSE SITE. 404 EAST EIGHT STREET, OAKLAND. THEME: E.VPIORA TIOv/SETTL EMENT CHURCH OF ST. JAMES THE APOSTLE. 1540 12TH AVE.. OAKLAND. THEME: RELIGION. CITY HALL. BERKELEY. THEME: GOVERNMENT CLAREMONT HOTEL. ASHBY AND CLAREMONT AVENUES, BERKELEY. THEME" ARCHITECTURE COHEN,(A.A.) HOTEL SITE. HIDDEN VALLEY RANCH END OF STANFORD AVENUE, FREMONT, THEME SOCIAL/EDUCATION. •COHEN,(ALFRED H.1 RESIDENCE. 1440 29TH AVE., FRUITVALE, THEME ARCHITECTURE. COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA SITE. 14TH AND FRANKLIN STREETS, OAKLAND, THEME. SOCIAL/EDUCATION. CONCANNON VINEYARD. 2 MILES S.E. OF LIVERMOREj THEME: ECONOMIC//ND US TRIAL. CRESTA BLANCA WINERY. LIVERMORE VALLEY, THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL p .113 - - DANIA HALL FOOTHILL BLVD., HAY/RD— THEME SOCIAL/ EDUCATION. ` DE FREMERY PARK. IBTH AND .ADELINE ST. OAKLAND. THEME. ARCHITECTURE_ DERBY STREET RESIDENCE. 2924 DERBY STREET, BERKELEY. THEME. ARCiITECTURE _ _ DERBY STREET, RESIDENCES. 2814 AND 2816 DERBY STREET, BERKELEY. THEME ARCHITECTURE DIBBLE AND SEMRAU STUDIO. 1772 LEROY AVENUE, BERKELEY. THEME .ARCHITECTURE DRAWBRIDGE (GHOST TOWN). CUSHING RD., FREMONT. TI-IEME- ECONGMIC/INDUSTRIAL. •DUNSMUIR HOUSE. PERALTA OAKS COURT, OAKLAN THEME. ARCHITECTURE. DUSTERBERRY,(H.) HOME. CENTRAL AND GLENMORE, FREMONT— THEME ARCHITECTURE. DWIGHT WAY RESIDENCE, 2727 DWIGHT WAY, BERKELEY. THEME. ARCHITECTURE. DWIGHT WAY RESIDENCE,(KEELER RESIDENCE). 2733 DWIGHT WAY, BERKELEY. THEME. ARCHITECTURE. EDEN APARTMENTS. 1410 B ST., HAYWARD. THEME: ECONOMIC/ INDUSTRIAL. ESSANY STUDIO COMPLEX. NILES DIST., FREMONT. THEME: ARTS/ LEISURE ESTUOILLO HOME, 550 WEST ESTUDILLO AVENUE, SAN LEANDRO. THEME CXPLORATIO.N/SETTLEMENT. ESTUDILLO HOUSE SITE. DAVIS STREET AND WASHINGTON AVENUE, PLEASANTON. THEME: ARTS/LEISURE. ESTUDILLO,(JOAQUIN JOSE) FIRST HOME SITE. SOUTH BANK OF SAN LEANDRO CREEK, NEAR NIMITZ FREEWAY, SAN LEANDRO. THEME EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT - ETNA STREET RESIDENCE. 2515 ETNA STREET, BERKELEY. THEME- ARCHITECTiURE. EUCUD AVENUE RESIDENCES, EUCLID AVENUE AND BUENA VISTA WAY, BERKELEY. THEME- ARCHITECTURE FAGES/CRESPI TRAVEL ROUTE. FOOTHILL ROAD, PLEASANTON_ THEME. EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT_ FALLON HOUSE. FOOTHILL ROAD, PLEASANTON. THEME: EXPLORATION/SE7TL EMEN T FIRST AND LAST CHANCE SALOON(HEINOLD'S). 50 WEBSTER STREET, OAKLAND. THEME: SOCIAL/EDUCATION. FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENCE. 2619 DWIGHT WAY, BERKELEY. THEME ARCHITECTURE. FOUNDERS ROCK. LA LOMA ENTRANCE TO U.0 BERKiLEY, BERKELEY. THEME: SOCIA1/EDUCI TION GALINDO HOTEL SITE, 8TH AND FRANKLIN STREET, OAKLAND. THEME ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. - GALINDO-HICUERA ADOBE. CURTNER RD„ FREMONT. THEME. - ARCHITECTURE GALLEGOS ESTATE. 43182 MISSION BLVD, FREMONT. THEME ARCHITECTURE. GARCIA HOME. CHUMALIA AND HYDE STREETS, SAN LEANDRO. THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. GLEN AVENUE RESIDENCE. 2204 GLEN AVENUE, BERKELEY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE_ GREEK THEATER. GALEY RD., BERKELEY. THEME:: ARTS/LEISURE. GREEN,(IOHN) HOME. SAN RAMON ROAD SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD, DUBLIN THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. GREEN,(jOHN) STORE. SOUTHSIDE OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD WEST OF SAN RAMON ROAD, DUBLIN. THEME: ECONOMIC/1NDUSTRIAC. GREENVILLE. FOUR MILES EAST OF LIVERMORE, HWY. 50, THEME: EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT - GREENWOOD TERRACE, RESIDENCE. 1486 GREENWOOD TERRACE, BERKELEY. THEME ARCHITECTURE. GREENWOOD TERRACE RESIDENCE. 1459 GREENWOOD TERRACE, BERKELEY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. HACIENDA DEL POZO DE VERONA. CASTLEWOOD COUNTRY CLUB, NEAR PLEASANTON. THEME: SOCIAL/EDUCATION. HALL OF RECORDS, TEMPORARY. T417 20TH AVENUE, OAKLAND. THEME • GOVERNMENT. HARRISVILLE. NEAR LIVERMORE, THEME.: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. HARVEY-GRANGER GENERAL STORE. 3940 SMITH ST.. UNION CITY- ALVARADO_ THEME ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. HARVEY,(SYLVESTER P.) HOME. 32958 ALVARADO RD., FREMONT. THEME. ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. HAYWARD CARNEGIE LIBRARY SITE. FOOTHILL BLVD. AND 8 ST., HAYWARD. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. HAYWARD FIRE HOUSE. MISSION BLVD., HAYWARD. THEME:: SOCIAL/EDUCATION HAYWARD GRAMMAR SCHOOL 21651 THIRD ST., HAYWARD. THEME SOCIAL IEDUCA TION. 222 166 Alameda County (Continued) f HAYWARD GRAMMER SCHOOL (EDEN TOWN51-1IP) SITE. 1L4 BLOCK ON B ST., FOOTHILL BLVD AND C ST., HAYWARD, THEME: SOCIAL/EDUCATION HAYWARD HOTEL. A AND MAIN ST., HAYWARD. THEME ARTS/ LEISURE. HAYWARD POST OFFICE. 22701 MAIN ST., HAYWARD. THEME: 6-OVCRNMENT HAYWARD UNION HIGH SCHOOL. 22300 FOOTHILL BLVD., HAYWARD. THEME:: SCCIAL/EDUCATIDN. HAYWARD'S FIRST CITY HALL 22938 MISSION BLVD, HAYWARD. THEME: GOVERNMENT HAYWARD'S FIRST HIGH SCHOOL. 685 A ST., HAYWARD. THEME SOCIALIEDUCATION. IIAYWARD.(WILLIAMI CAMPSITE. PALOMARES CANYON, HAYWARD. THEME: EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT HIGUERA,(ABELAKDO) ADOBE. WARM SPRINGS THEME: ARCHITECTURE HIGUERA,('FULGENCIO) ADOBE SITE, WARM SPRINGS. THEME: SOCIAL/EDUCATION HONCHURENKO,(AGAPIUS) HOMESITE. CA. STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD. THEME: RELIGION. HOUSE OF BRONZE. 1076 S9TH ST., OAKLAND. THEME. ECONOMIC/ INDUSTRIAL. HOWARD,IJOHN GALEN) RESIDENCE. 1401 LEROY AVENUE, BERKELEY. THEME. ARCHITECTURE I.D.E.S. HALL 1105 C ST.-FOOTHILL BLVD., HAYWARD. THEME: SOCIAL/EDUCATION. 1.0.0.F, BUILDING, LIVERMORE (CITY OF). 2160 FIRST ST., LIVERMORE. THEME: SOCIAL/EDUCATION. 1.0.0.F. HALL. 952 B ST., HAYWARD. THEME SOCIAL/EDUCATION JENSEN HOME. G650 JENSEN RD., HAYWARD. THEME ARCHITECTURE JESSENS OR HAYWARDS LANDING. HAYWARD SHORELINE, HAYWARD. THEME ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. JEWISH SYNAGOGUE. 59 CHUMALIA STREET, SAN LEANDRO. , THEME RELIGION: KOTTINGER ALb0BE BARN. 218 RAY ST„ PLEASANTON. THEME GOVERNMENT KROBER HOME, 1325 ARCH, BERKELEY. THEME:: ARCHITECTURE IA LOMA AVENUE RESIDENCE. 1705 LA LOMA AVENUE, BERKELEY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. LA LOMA AVENUE RESIDENCE. 1515 LA LOMA AVENUE, BERKELEY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE LADDSVILLE SITE. NORTH OF THE S.P. TRACKS AND EAST OF JUNCTION AVENUE, LIVERMORE. THEME.' ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. LAKE CHABOT. UPPER LAKE CHABOT ROAD, SAN LEANDRO. THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. 'LAKE MERRITT WILD DUCK REFUGE. LAKESIDE PK., GRAND AVE., OAKLAND. THEME: GOVERNMENT LANDING PLACE OF OAKLAND'S FOUNDERS. FOOT OF BROADWAY, OAKLAND. THEME EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT_ LITTLE BROWN CHURCH. CLARKE STREET NEAR WEST JOAQUIN, SAN LEANDRO. THEME RELIGION, LIVERMORE MEMORIAL MONUMENT. LIVERMORE ROAD, LWiRMORf. THEME: EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT. MASONIC HOME AT DECOTO- MISSION BLVD, UNION CiTY_. THEME SOCIAL/EDUCATION. MASONIC TEMPLE. PARK 5T. AND ALAMEDA AVE., ALAMEDA, THEME SOCIAL/EDUCATION MAY SCHOOL. MAY SCHOOL RD., LIVERMORE. THEME: SOCIAL/ EDUCATION. MCCONAGHY HOUSE. 1E1701 HESPERIAN BOULEVARD, SAN LORENZO. THEME: ARCHITECTURE MEEK MANSION AND CARRIAGE HOUSE. 240 HAMPTON ROAD, HAYWARD. THEME.: ARCHITECTURE. MENDENHALL,IMARTIN) RANCH. 455 OLIVINA AVE., LIVERMORE. THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. METHODIST CHURCH. 1600 BANCROFT AVENUE, SAN LEANDRO. THEME. REL IG1ON. MIDWAY. EAST OF LIVERMORE, THEME. ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. 'MILLER,(JOAQUINI HOUSE (THE ABBEY). JOAQUIN MILLER RD. AND SANBORN DR., OAKLAND. THEME. ARTS/LEISURE. •MILLER,(IOAQUIN) HOUSE - THE ABBEY. 10AQUIN MILLER ROAD AND SANBORN DRIVE,OAKLAND. THEME::ARTS/LEISURE. 'MILLS HALL. MILLS COLLEGE, OAKLAND. THEME ARCHITECTURE MISSION PASS. HWY. 80 AT MISSION BLVD, FREMONT. THEME EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT MISSION PEAK, MILL CREEK RD., FREMONT. THEME. EXPLORATION/ SETTLEMENT MISSION SAN JOSS OLD TOWN COMPLEX. MISSION AT WASHINGTON BLVDS., FREMONT. THEME: EXPLORATION/ SETTLEMENT. MOHR,(CORNELIUS) ESTATE. 24985 HESPERIAN BLVD., HAYWARD. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. MOHR,I HERMAN) HOUSE. 2595 DEPOT RD., HAYWARD. THEME ARCHITECTURE MORTAR ROCK PARK. INDIAN ROCK AVE. AND SAN DIEGO RD., BERKELEY. THEME ABORIGINAL.. MOSS HOME. MACARTHUR AND BROADWAY, OAKLAND. THEME ARCHITECTURE. MOUNTAIN HOUSE. NEAR LIVERMORE, THEME EXPLORATION/ SETTLEMENT MULFORD CLUBHOUSE. 13075 AURORA DRIVE, SAN LEANDRO. THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. MULFORD-VICKS LANDING. NEAR SAN LEANDRO MARINA ON MULFORD CANAL, THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. MURRARY,(MICHAEL) HOUSE. WESTSIDE OF SAN RAMON ROAD JUST SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD, DUBLIN. THEME EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT NATION'S FIRST SUCCESSFUL BEET SUGAR FACTORY SITE. ALVARADO. THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. NEPTUNE BEACH, WEBSTER AT CENTRAL, ALAMEDA, THEME ARTS/ LEISURE NEWARK RAILROAD COMPLEX. RAILROAD IUNCTION/THORTON AND CENTRAL, NEWARK. THEME ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. NILES OLD TOWN COMPLEX. NILES BLVD., FREMONT. THEME.: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. 223 167 Alameda County (Continued) OHLONE INDIAN BURIAL GROUNDS. WASHINGTON BLVD., MISSION SAN JOSE. THEME: ABORIGINAL. OLD HOTEL. HESPERIAN BOULEVARD AND SAN LORENZO CREEK BRIDGE, SAN LORENZO. THEME EKPLORAT7ON/SETTLEMENT, PACHECO,(TOMAS) ADOBE SITE. SOUTH BANK OF ALAMEDA CREEK, WEST SIDE OF DECOTO ROAD, UNION CITY, THEME EXPL OR ,4 7 ION/SETTLEMENT 'PACIFIC PRESS PUBLISHING COMPANY. 1117 CASTRO ST„ OAKLAND. THEME. ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. PALOMARES SCHOOL PALOMARES RD., PALOMARES CANYON. THEME: SOCIAL /EDUCATION. *PARAMOUNT THEATER. 2025 BROADWAY, OAKLAND. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. PATTERSON-ARDENWOOD ESTATE. JARVIS-NEWARK BLVDS., FREMONT. THEME ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. PERALTA HOME. LAFETTE AND LEO AVENUE, SAN LEANDRO. THEME. ARCHITECTURE PERALTA,(ANTONIO) HOUSE. PAXTON AVENUE BETWEEN COOLIDGE AND 34TH AVENUES, OAKLAND. THEME. EXPLORATION/ SETTLEMENT. PERALTA,(HERMANIA) DARGIE HOME. 384 WEST ESTUDILLO AVENUE, SAN LEANDRO. THEME EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT. PERALTA,(V10ENTE} ADOBE SITE. REAR OF 5521 VICENTE STREET, OAKLAND. THEME ARCHITECTURE. POW -WOW TREE. 1399 A ST., HAYWARD. THEME ABORIGINAL PROSPECT AVENUE RESIDENCE.2301 PROSPECT AVENUE, BERKELEY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. RAILROAD DEPOT. 464 7TH AVENUE, OAKLAND. THEME:: ECONOMIC/1 NDUS TRIA L. RANCHO SAN ANTONIO ADOBE. DIAMOND PARK, OAKLAND, THEME_ SOCIAL/EDUCATION. RANCHO SAN ANTONIO ADOBE SITE,(ORIGINAL) 2511 - 34TH AVENUE, OAKLAND. THEME: EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT RAVENSWOOD SITE, 2647 ARROYO ROAD, LIVERMORE. THEME GOVERNMENT RIDGE ROAD AND LEROY AVENUE RESIDENCE. RIDGE ROAD AND LEROY AVENUE, BERKELEY_ THEME ARCHITECTURE RIDGE ROAD HOUSE. RIDGE ROAD, BERKELEY. THEME; ARCHITECTURE ROBERTS HOUSE. 524 EAST LEWELL$NG BOULEVARD, SAN LEANDRO. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. ROBERTS LANDING. GRANT AVENUE, SAN LORENZO, THEME ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. 'ROOM 307, GILMAN HALL. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY CAMPUS, BERKELEY. THEME. SOCIAL/EDUCATION SAN ANTONIO RANCHO (PERALTA GRANT). SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF RANCHO, SAN LEANDRO. THEME EXPLORATION/ SETTLEMENT SAN FRANCISCO WATER TEMPLE. EDGE OF SUNOL, T,HE(►1E.• ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL ytie%p. 1-Pat +*-h 1_15 *SAN JOSE MISSION. M!ISAyrl BLVD. AND WASHINGTON BLVD., FREMONT. THEME RELIGION. SAN LEANDRO BALL PARK. SAN LEANDRO BOULEVARD AND PARROTT STREET, SAN LEANDRO. THEME ARTS/LEISURE SAN LEANDRO OYSTER BEDS. SAN LEANDRO MARINA, SAN LEANDRO. THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. SAN LEANDRO PLAZA. JUNCTION OF EAST 14TH STREET AND WASHINGTON AVENUE, SAN LEANDRO. THEME EXPLORATION/ SETTL EMENT SAN LEANDRO REPORTER. DAVIS STREET, SAN LEANDRO. THEME: ECONOMICIINDUSTRIA L. SAN LEANDRO'S TOWN HALL. 250 DAVIS STREET, SAN LEANDRO, THEME: GOVERNMENT SAN LORENZO CEMETERY, HESPERIAN BOULEVARD NEAR THE NIMITZ FREEWAY. SAN LEANDRO. THEME: EXPLORATION/ SETTLEMENT SANTA BARBARA ROAD RESIDENCE. 830 SANTA BARBARA ROAD, BERKELEY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE SATHER GATE. UNIVERSITY OF CALIF., BERKELEY. THEME: SOCIAL/ EDUCATION. •SENIOR HALL {GOLDEN BEAR LODGE), UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKLEY CAMPUS. BERKELEY. THEME:: SOCIAL/ EDUCATION. SHATTUCIC AVENUE RESIDENCE. 1200 SHATTUCK AVENUE, BERKELEY. THEME- ARCHITECTURE SHELL MOUND SITE. SHELL MOUND STREET, EMERYVILLE. THEME. ABORIGINAL. SHINN HISTORICAL PARK. 1269 PERALTA BLVD, FREMONT. THEME ARCHITECTURE. SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY HOUSE, (FORMER THORSEN RESIDENCE). 2307 PIEDMONT AVENUE, BERKELEY. THEME ARCHITECTURE. SMITH,(HENRY C.) HOUSE SITE. ALVARADO STREET, UNION CITY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE SOUTH BAY SLOUGHS LANDING. EAST BAY AREA. THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. SOUTH HALL. UNIVERSITY OF CA., BERKELEY CAMPUS, BERKELEY. THEME SOCIAL/EDUCA TIQN SOUTHERN PACIFIC FREIGHT STATION. 801 DAVIS STREET, SAN LEANDRO. THEME ECONOMICIINDUSTRIAL. SPANISH CAMP SITE-SAN LORENZO CREEK. MATTOX ROAD ON CREEK, HAYWARD AREA. THEME: EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT SPRUCE STREET RESIDENCE. 1104 SPRUCE STREET, BERKELEY. THEME ARCHITECTURE. ST. JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH, 37156 ST. JAMES WAY, FREMONT. THEME: RELIGION. 'ST. JOHN'S PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. 2640 COLLEGE AVE., BERKELEY. THEME.: RELIGION, ST. JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH. MISSION AND WASHINGTON BLVDS., FREMONT_ THEME:: RELIGION. ST, MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH. 2314 BANCROFT, BERKELEY THEME' ARCHITECTURE ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH. EIGHTH ANO JEFFERSON STREETS, OAKLAND. THEME- RELIGION. ST. MARY'S COLLEGE. BROADWAY AND HAWTHORNE, OAKLAND. THEME: SOCIAL/EDUCATION. ST. RAYMOND'S CHURCH. DUBLIN. THEME: RELIGION. STANDON HALL (CASTLE). 2ND ST. AND WALPERT AVE., HAYWARD. THEME- ARCHITECTURE 224 168 AIsmcd■ County (Continued) STANFORD,(LELAND) WINERY. HOLY NAME ROAD, MISSION SAN JOSE. THEME ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL- STANTON HOUSE. LAKE CHABOT ROAD, CASTRO VALLEY. THEME ARCHITECTURE STRAUSS HOUSE 8 STONEWALL ROAD. BERKELEY. THEME. ARCHITECTURE SUMMIT SCHOOL. ALTAMONT PASS RD., ALTAMONT- T.HEAtE SOCIAL /EDUCATION. SUNOL,(ANTONIOJ ADOBE WE. NEAR WATER TEMPLE, SUNOL. THEME FXPLORATIDN/SE7TLEMENT. SURVEYORS TREE. MEMORIAL PARK, MISSION BLVD-, HAYWARD. THEME: EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT. TEMPLE OF THE WINGS. 28W BUENA VISTA, BERKELEY- THEME: ARTS/LEISURE TESLA SITE. SOUTHEAST OF LIVERMORE, THEME_ ECONOMIC/ INDUSTRIAL. THRASHER PARK. DAVIS STREET NEAR ORCHARD, SAN LEANDRO. T7-IEME. ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. THRASHER,(DR. WILLIAM) HOME. DAVIS STREET AND ORCHARD, SAN LEANDRO. THEME: ARTS/LEISURE. TOWN AND GOWN CLUB, 2401 DWIGHT WAY, BERKELEY. THEME. ARCHITECTURE. TREADWELL HALL 5212 BROADWAY, OAKLAND. T7-IEME. SOCIAL/ EDUCATION. UNITARIAN CHURCH. DANA STREET AND BANCROFT WAY, BERKELEY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. VALLEJO FLOUR MILL. NORTH OF NILES CANYON ROAD, NILES. THEME. ECONOMIC/INQUSTRML_ VALLEJO,(J.1.1 HOME SITE. OLIVE HYDE CENTER. FREMONT.. THEME MILITARY VICTORIAN ROW. 9TH ST. BETWEEN BROADWAY AND WASHINGTON, OAKLAND. THEME: .ARCHITECTURE. WARREN,iEARL) HOME. B8 VERNON STREET, OAKLAND. THEME: GOVERNMENT: WASHINGTON COLLEGE HOUSE. WASHINGTON BLVD. AND DRISCOLL RD., FREMONT. THEME.- SOCIAL/EDUCATION. WILLEY,(SAMUEL) HOUSE SITE. 2709 DWIGHT WAY, BERKELEY. THEME: ARCHITECTURE. ALPINE COUNTY - 21 SITES (ALSO 105 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES)" CARSON,(KIT) TRAIL. STATE HIGHWAY 88 THROUGH ALPINE COUNTY AND CARSONPASS, THEME EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT CENTER VILLE. THEME. ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. EBBETTS PASS ROUTE. EBBETTS PASS, THEME' EXPLORATION/ SETTLEMENT FISK HOTEL (HOT SPRINGS HOTEL). MARKLEEVILLE THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. GROVER HOT SPRINGS. MARKLEEVILLE. THEME: ARTS/LEISURE. HARASITHY,(COL. AGOSTON i CHAMPAGNE CELLARS. SILVER MOUNTAIN CITY. THEME ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL, KENNEDY WHEELS. JACKSON GATE ROAD, JACKSON- THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. KIT CARSON MARKER. 15.1 MILES WEST OF WOODFORDS, THEME: EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT MARKLEE^S CABIN SITE. MARKLEEVILLE. THEME: EXPLORATION/ SETTLEMENT MARKLEEVILLE JAIL. MARKLEEVILLE, THEME: GOVERNMENT. MONITOR (OR LOOPEI. 8 MILES NORTH OF SILVER MT., THEME. ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL _ MOUNT BULLION. JUNCTION OF SILVER MT. AND MONITOR ROADS, THEME.' ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL ODD FELLOWS PIONEER MEMORIAL. 14.8 MILES WEST OF WOODFORDS, THEME SOCIAL/EDUCATION. OLD EMIGRANT ROAD. HWY. 88, NEAR TWIN LAKES, THEME:: FXPL ORATION/SETTL EMENT PONY EXPRESS REMOUNT STATION AT WOODFORDS. HIGHWAY 89, THEME.' GOVERNMENT SILVER MOUNTAIN CITY. EBBETS PASS ROAD, S.W. OF MONITOR PASS ROAD JUNCTION, THEME' ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. SILVER MOUNTAIN CITY OLD JAIL. SILVER MOUNTAIN CITY. THEME' GOVERNMENT. SMELTER. ERBETS PASS ROAD, SILVER MOUNTAIN CITY. THEME. ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIA1. WADE HOUSE. WOODFORD5. THEME: ARCHITECTURE WEBSTER SCHOOL MARKLEEVILLE. THEME: SOCIAL/EDUCATION. WOODFORDS. THEME: EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT AMADOR COUNTY - 43 SITES (ALSO 131 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE51'• AMADOR CITY DISTRICT. HWY. 49, 3 MILES NORTH OF SUTTER CREEK, AMADOR CITY. THEME. EXPLORATION/SETTLEMENT. 'AMADOR COUNTY HOSPITAL BUILDING. 810 COURT STREET, JACKSON. THEME- -ARCHITECTURE. ARGONAUT AND KENNEDY MINES. JACKSON. THEME• ECONOMIC/ INDUSTRIAL. BIGBAR. HIGHWAY 49 AT AMADOR AND CALAVERAS COUNTY LINE, THEME. ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL BUENA VISTA STONE STORE. LANCHA PLANA-IONE AND JACKSON- STOCKTON ROADS, BUENA VISTA- THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL. BUTTE STORE. 3 MILES SOUTH OF JACKSON, THEME- ECONOMIC/ INDUSTRIAL CENTRAL EUREKA MINE. SUTTER CREEK. THEME.- ECONOMIC/ INDUSTRIAL CHICHIZOLA STORE, JACKSON GATE ROAD, JACKSON GATE. THEME. ECOjIQMIC/INDUSTRIAL. CLINTON. 8.6 MILES EAST OF JACKSON. THEME.' EXPLORATION/ SETTLE/kW/VT. COMMUNITY METHODIST CHURCH OF IONE. IONE. THEME: RELIGION. D'AGOSTINI WINERY. 8 MILES N.E. OF PLYMOUTH, THEME: ECONOMIC/INDUSTRIAL 225 169